Abstract
Essential tremor (ET) has recently been reconceptualized by many as a degenerative disease of the cerebellum. Until now, though, there has been no attempt to frame it within the context of these diseases. Here we compare the clinical and postmortem features of ET to other cerebellar degenerations, thereby placing it within the broader context of these diseases. Action tremor is the hallmark feature of ET. Although often underreported in the spinocerebellar ataxias (SCAs), action tremors occur, and it is noteworthy that in SCA12 and 15, they are highly prevalent, often severe, and can be the earliest disease manifestation, resulting in an initial diagnosis of ET in many cases. Intention tremor, sometimes referred to as “cerebellar tremor”, is a common feature of ET and many SCAs. Other features of cerebellar dysfunction, gait ataxia and eye motion abnormalities, are seen to a mild degree in ET and more markedly in SCAs. Several SCAs (e.g., SCA5, 6, 14, and 15), like ET, follow a milder and more protracted disease course. In ET, numerous postmortem changes have been localized to the cerebellum, and are largely confined to the cerebellar cortex, preserving the cerebellar nuclei. Purkinje cell loss is modest. Similarly, in SCA3, 12 and 15, Purkinje cell loss is limited, and in SCA12 and 15, there is preservation of cerebellar nuclei and relative sparing of other central nervous system regions. Both clinically and pathologically, there are numerous similarities and intersection points between ET and other disorders of cerebellar degeneration.
Keywords: essential tremor, cerebellar degeneration, spinocerebellar ataxia, clinical, neuropathology
Introduction
Essential tremor (ET) is a chronic, progressive neurological disease whose hallmark clinical feature is kinetic tremor of the upper limbs (1, 2). It is among the most prevalent movement disorders and is the most prevalent tremor disorder (3), with an estimated 7 million affected people in the United States (i.e., approximately 2.2% of the entire population of the United States) (4) and high estimates of prevalence (i.e., number of cases per 100,000 population) in numerous countries (3).
Despite being so common, the underlying patho-mechanisms of ET remain surprisingly enigmatic (5–7). Even localizing the site of primary pathology within the brain has been a major challenge. There had been no systematic collection of ET brains until 2003 (8, 9). During the 100-year period from 1903 to 2003, there were only 15 published postmortems (8), mainly comprising isolated case reports with no conclusive findings (10–16). These studies lacked rigor as none used quantitative or immunohistochemical approaches, nor compared ET to control brains (8, 9). The field faced the curious situation in which ET was one of the most prevalent neurological diseases, yet there was nearly no knowledge about its underlying pathobiology (8, 9). A popular disease model, proposed in the 1970s (17), linked ET to an abnormal inferior olivary nucleus; however, empiric support for that model is limited (18–20) and it has recently fallen out of favor (21, 22). More recent research in the field has focused on the cerebellum, where clinical, neuroimaging, and postmortem studies suggest that ET originates within that brain region (23–30). Indeed, there has been a reconceptualization of the disease as one of cerebellar degeneration (7, 23, 31–40).
While the disorders of cerebellar degeneration share numerous clinical and postmortem features (e.g., gait ataxia and Purkinje cell loss), they are not a monolithic unit. Indeed, these many disorders are chacterized by clinical, pathomechanistic, and pathological heterogeneity (41–45). For example, they do no all follow the same natural history – in some life span is quite truncated whereas in others, there is a normal life span (41–51). In some, the main features are cerebellar, and in others there is a range of additional clinical features referable to lesions in the cerebral cortex, brainstem and cranial nerves, and peripheral nervous system (41–45).
Although ET has recently been conceptualized by many as one of the degenerative diseases of the cerebellum (7, 23, 31–40), no one has critically evaluated it within the context of these diseases. How does ET compare to these diseases? Are there other degenerative diseases of the cerebellum that share clinical and pathological features with ET? The goal of this paper is to place the clinical and postmortem features of ET within the context of other forms of cerebellar degeneration; that is, to look for overlapping features and points of clinical and pathological intersection. The paper builds on recent postmortem studies that have begun this comparative process (39).
Selection of Specific Cerebellar Diseases for Comparision to ET
The list of degenerative conditions of the cerebellum is extensive (41–45, 52). For this review, we carefully selected the following 12 diseases, which we compared with ET: spinocerebellar ataxia (sca)1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 12, 14, 15, 17, Friedreich’s ataxia and multiple system atrophy with cerebellar features (MSA-C). Our choice of diseases was based on the following considerations: (1) detailed information has been published on the clinical features of the disorder (41, 43, 45), (2) postmortem features of the disorder have been described in some detail (42, 53, 54), (3) the presence of certain clinical features (e.g., more prominent kinetic and postural tremor in SCA12 and 15, as is seen in ET) (50, 55–59), (4) the presence of natural history features that overlap with what is seen in ET (e.g., SCA5, SCA6, SCA14, SCA15) (51, 55, 60, 61), (5) the presence of certain postmortem features (e.g., relative preservation of the Purkinje cell population in SCA3, thereby mirroring the modest Purkinje cell loss observed in ET) (42, 53), and (6) the relatively high prevalence of the condition (e.g., Friedreich’s ataxia, SCA1, SCA2, SCA3, SCA6 and SCA7) (41, 43, 45, 53). We considered including fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome, in which intention tremor is common, but a detailed clinical characterization of the various types of tremor (e.g., kinetic, postural) has not been undertaken to any large degree in that syndrome (62).
Methods
One of the authors (E.D.L.) conducted a PubMed search on May 5, 2020, searching abstracts of publishing papers, crossing the term “essential tremor” with a series of second terms, which yielded the following numbers of papers: essential tremor + clinical (n = 1,891), essential tremor + pathology (n = 547), and essential tremor + postmortem (n = 89). Similarly, “spinocerebellar ataxia” was crossed with tremor (n = 179), clinical (n = 1,430), pathology (n = 1,304) and postmortem (n = 46); “multiple system atrophy” was crossed with clinical (n = 1,927), tremor (n = 218), pathology (n = 1,752), and postmortem (n = 151); and Friedreich’s ataxia was crossed with clinical (n = 602), tremor (n = 14), pathology (n = 435), and postmortem (n = 17). All of these papers were reviewed for relevant content and cited in this paper if pertinent.
Clinical Features of ET in Comparison with Other Forms of Cerebellar Degeneration
Tremor and Cerebellar Signs
Tremor is likely underreported in most cerebellar degenerative disorders, as the focus in these disorders is often on the multitude of other features of cerebellar degeneration that can be more clinicially obvious or disabling (e.g., gait ataxia, eye movement abnormalities, dysmetric limb movements (Table 1). Furthermore, tremor may be difficult to separate from dysmetria, further complicating and obscuring its evaluation. When tremor is reported in these disorders, much of the attention is on intention tremor (i.e., tremor that worsens when approaching a target), as this is regarded as a form of cerebellar tremor, or rest tremor (i.e., tremor that occurs when a body part is supported against gravity and is inactive), as this can be a feature of the parkinsonism that can accompany some forms of cerebellar degeneration. Hence, kinetic tremor (i.e., tremor occurring during voluntary movements such as writing or eating) and postural tremor (i.e., tremor occurring when a body part is held motionless against the force of gravity) are likely to be relatively underreported forms of tremor.
Table 1:
ET compared with other forms of cerebellar degeneration in terms of motor features
Tremor (type not specified) | Other type of tremor | Kinetic (also action) tremor | Postural tremor | Intention tremor | Rest tremor | EOMA or nystagmus | Gait ataxia | Other cerebellar features (e.g., dysmetria, over-shoot, dysarthria) |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ET | Head tremor (17.9% – 52.0%)(213) Jaw tremor (7.5% – 41.2%)(213) Voice tremor (15.1% – 40.1 %)(213) |
369/369 (100%)(1) |
305/369 (82.7%)(1) |
101/228 (44.3%)(78–81) |
2/105 (1.9%)–77/166 (46.4%) (90) | +(mild and subclinical)( 107–109) |
159/379 (42.0%)(93– 98) |
Not present | |
SCA1 | 0/10 (0.0%)(63) | 3/52 (5.8%)(68), 4/40 (10.0%)(69), | 1/8 (12.5%)(160), 3/16 (18.8%)(83), 2/3 (66.7%)(182) |
0/40 (0.0%) (69) | +(63, 83, 160, 182) | +(63, 160, 182) | +(63, 160, 182) | ||
SCA2 | Lip tremor 2/28 (7.1 %)(69) Head tremor 1/1 (100%)(214) Chin and head tremors 1/1 (100%)(215) |
5/21 (23.8%)(63), 5/21 (23.8%)(64), 1/1 (100%)(214), 1/1 (100%)(216), 1/1 (100%)(215) |
6/28 (21.4%)(69), 5/21 (23.8%)(64), 19/69 (27.5%)(68), 3/4 (75.0%)(73), 1/1 (100%)(214), 1/1 (100%)(216), 1/1 (100%)(215) |
15/21 (71.4%)(64), 4/4 (100%)(194), 1/1 (100%)(215) |
4/28 (14.3%)(69), 4/8 (50.0%)(132), 1/1 (100%)(214), 1/1 (100%)(216), 1/1 (100%)(215) |
+(63, 64, 132, 183, 194, 214, 216, 217) | +(63, 64, 132, 183, 214–217) | +(63, 64, 194, 214–217) | |
SCA3 | Lip tremor 1/17 (5.9%)(69) Truncal tremor 1/1 (100%)(218) |
2/60 (3.3%)(63), 1/1 (100%)(122) | 2/72 (2.8%)(71), 14/126 (11.1 %)(72), 16/129 (12.4%) (68), 3/17 (17.6%)(69), 2/8 (25.0%)(73) |
7/53 (13.2%)(82), 2/9 (22.2%)(194) |
0/17 (0.0%)(69), 5/72 (6.9%)(71), 4/53 (7.6%)(82), 2/4 (50.0%)(219) | +(63, 82, 122, 194, 219–221) | +(63, 72, 82, 122, 194, 218–221) | +(63, 82, 122, 194, 218–220) | |
SCA5 | −(178), 0/6 (0.0%)(179), 0/77 (0.0%)(51), 2/15 (13.3%)(70) |
−(178), 0/6 (0.0%)(179), 0/77 (0.0%)(51), 2/15 (13.3%)(70) |
− (178), 0/6 (0.0%)(179), 0/77 (0.0%)(51), 5/15 (33.3%)(70) |
+(51, 70, 178, 179) | +(51, 70, 178, 179) | +(51, 70, 178, 179) | |||
SCA6 | 12/140 (8.6%)(22 2) |
1/27 (3.7%)(63) | 11/65 (16.9%)(68), 3/7 (42.9%)(223)**, 3/4 (75.0%)(73) |
11/48 (22.9%) (84)*,+(224) | 0/12 (0.0%)(225), 1/17 (5.9%)(91) |
+(63, 91, 193, 220, 222–224, 226, 227) | +(63, 91, 180, 193, 220, 222–224, 226, 227) | +(63, 91, 220, 222–224, 226, 227) | |
SCA7 | 1/26 (3.8%)(228), 2/19 10.5%)(92), 2/16 (12.5%)(186), 3/12 (25.0%)(2 29) |
Head tremor 1/26 (3.9%)(228), 1/19 (5.3%)(92), 1/8 (12.5%)(230) Head, truncal and limb tremors even at rest 1/1 (100%)(231) |
1/50 (2.0%)(86), 1/6 (16.7%)(73) | 1/16 (6.3%)(186), 2/26 (7.7%)(228), 45/50 (90.0%)(86) |
1/19 (5.3%)(92) | +(86, 92, 133, 186, 187, 228, 230–234) | +(86, 92, 133, 186, 187, 228–234) | +(86, 92, 133, 186, 187, 228–234) | |
SCA12 | 2/4 (50%)(235 |
Head temor 13/21 (61.9%) | 19/25 (76.0%)(66), 5/6 |
17/21 (81.0%)(59) | 1/10 (10.0%)(67), |
10/21 (47.6%)(59) |
+(59, 65, 67, 77, 163) | +(59, 65, 67, 77, 163, | +(59, 65, 67, 77, 235) |
), 4/6 (66.7%)(77),1/1 (100%)(163) | (59) Voice tremor 2/21 (9.5%)(59) Orofacial tremor 3/21 (14.3%)(59) |
(83.3%)(65), 10/10 (100%)(67) |
12/21 (57.1 %)(59) |
235) | |||||
SCA14 | Head tremor 2/18 (11.1 %)(164), 1/1 (100%)(236) Truncal tremor on standing 1/6 (16.7%)(48) Head, arm or leg tremor which was not well- characterized and could be myoclonus rather than tremor 5/5 (100%)(165) |
1/3 (33.3%)(123) |
2/7 (28.6%)(76) | +(47–49, 76, 123, 124, 164) | +(47–49, 60, 76, 123, 124, 164, 165, 236, 237) |
+(47–49, 76, 123, 124, 164, 165, 236) | |||
SCA15 | Trunk or neck tremor 6/10 (60.0%)(56) | 4/10 (40.0%)(56), 7/10 (70.0%)(55) |
1/7 (14.3%)(58), 2/10 (20.0%)(57), 3/13 (23.1 %)(50), 4/10 (40.0%)(56), | 10/10 (100%)(55) |
+(50, 55–58, 181, 238) | +(50, 55, 56, 58, 181, 238, 239) |
+(50, 55–58, 181, 238) | ||
7/10 (70.0%)(55) | |||||||||
SCA17 | 1/15 (6.7%) (16 8) |
1/1 (100%)(216) | 1/15 (6.7%)(125), 1/1 (100%)(216) | 1/3 (33.3%)(126), 1/1 (100%)(216) |
+(125, 126, 216) | +(125, 126, 168, 216) | +(125, 126, 216) | ||
Friedreich’s ataxia |
Head tremor 32/103 (31. 1 %) (240), 1/1(100%) (24 1) |
2/2 (100%)(127) | 5/29 (17.2%)(73), 1/2 (50.0%)(127) | 1/1 (100%)(242) | +(240) | +(127, 240–242) | +(127, 240–242) | ||
MSA-C | 12/119 (10.1 %)(74), 2/18 (11.1 %)(75) |
14/119 (11.8%)(74), 4/18 (22.2%)(75) |
49/203 (24.1 %)(85), 6/18 (33.3%)(75), 14/31(45.2%)(24 3) |
3/119 (2.5%)(74), 3/18 (16.7%)(75), 6/24 (25.0%)(244), 8/31 (25.8%)(243), 79/203 (38.9%) (85) |
+(74, 75, 85, 243, 244) | +(74, 75, 85, 244) | +(74, 85, 243, 244) |
EOMA = extraocular motion abnormalities, ET = essential tremor, MSA-C = multiple system atrophy with cerebellar features, SCA = spinocerebellar ataxia
intention tremor in the limbs and/or axial tremor in the head and trunk.
In the neck in one patient and in both the neck and upper limbs in two patients.
feature is present.
Kinetic tremor occurs in 100% of ET patients (Table 1) and as the sine qua non of ET (1). A review of the data on other forms of cerebellar degeneration (Table 1) shows that kinetic tremor is rarely-reported in some forms of SCA (e.g., SCA1 [0.0%] (63), SCA3 [3.3%] (63), SCA6 [3.7%] (63)), is reported in a moderate percentage of patients with several other forms of SCA (e.g., approximately 20 – 25% in SCA2 (63, 64)) and has been reported in a high percentage of patients with two forms of SCA (e.g., SCA15 [40% – 70%] (55, 56) and SCA12 [76% – 100%] (65–67)).
Postural tremor is a feature of a majority although not all ET patients (e.g., 82.7%, Table 1) (1). By comparision, in patients with cerebellar degenerations, postural tremor is reported to occur in a relatively higher percentage of patients than is kinetic tremor, with percentages ranging from those that are low (5% – 15% [SCA1 (68, 69), SCA5 (70)], 3% – 25% [SCA3 (68, 69, 71–73), Friedreich’s ataxia (73), MSA-C (74, 75)], to those that are in the moderate range (20% – 30% [SCA2 (64, 68, 69), SCA14 (76)], 40% [genetically undefined SCA (73)], 14% – 70% [SCA15 (50, 55–58)]) to those that are higher (80% [SCA12 (59)]). As is the case with kinetic tremor, postural tremor seems to be highly prevalent among patients with SCA12 and SCA15 (Table 1) (50, 55–59, 65–67, 77).
Below, more detail is provided on SCA12 and SCA15, as in these forms of SCA, kinetic and postural tremors seem to be a predominating feature (50, 55–59), as they are in ET (1). Action tremor (i.e., postural or kinetic tremors) of the arms or head was present in 10/10 (100%) affected family members in one SCA12 kindred (67). Tremor was the first neurological sign in 8/10 (80.0%) affected family members in this SCA12 kindred (67); tremor also affected the jaw and voice in two patients and in the protruded tongue of one patient (67). The patients in this kindred were often initially diagnosed as ET (67). In another series of seven SCA12 cases in China, six of whom had clinical information, action tremor was present in 5/6 (83.3%) (65); of the three kindreds reported, action tremor was the initial presenting symptom in one, was a subsequently-reported feature in one, and was not seen in the one patient that comprised the third kindred (65). In a study of 25 SCA12 cases in India, 19 (76.0%) presented with upper limb tremor (66); interestingly, the authors reported that all affected individuals had mild or no gait ataxia (66). In a study of six patients in India with SCA12, four (66.7%) presented with tremor in the hand and the two remaining presented with gait ataxia and dysarthria (77). In a study of ten Japanese patients with SCA15, postural and action tremor was noted in the upper limbs in 4/10 (40%) (56). In a study of ten German patients with SCA15, action and postural tremor of the hands was found in 7/10 (70.0%) patients, and the patients perceived tremor as one of the most compromising impairments of activities of daily living (55). In summary, in these two disorders, SCA12 and SCA15, action tremor (i.e., kinetic and postural tremor) is highly prevalent, often severe, and it can be the earliest disease manifestation, resulting in an initial diagnosis of ET (50, 55–59, 65–67, 77).
With respect to intention tremor, this has been reported in approximately one-half (44.3%) (78–81) of ET patients (Table 1). In other forms of cerebellar degeneration, intention tremor occurs in varied proportions of patients - 0.0% in large cohort of 77 patients with SCA5 (51), 13.2% in a cohort of 53 patients with SCA3 (82), 18.8% in a cohort of 16 patients with SCA1 (83), 22.9% in a cohort of 48 patients with SCA6 (84), 24.1% in a large cohort of 203 patients with MSA-C (85), 57.1% in a cohort of 21 patients with SCA12 (59), 71.4% in a cohort of 22 patients with SCA2 (64), 90% in a cohort of 50 patients with SCA7 (86), and 100% in a cohort of 10 patients with SCA15 (55) (Table 1). Thus, with respect to prevalence of intention tremor, ET falls at a midpoint with respect to these other disorders, with some forms of SCA having lower reported prevalences of intention tremor and some having higher reported prevalences. It is difficult to comment on the severity of intention tremor, as this is generally not reported in the SCA literature; in ET, intention tremor can range from mild to severe (2, 87). Furthermore, in ET, intention tremor is not restricted to the upper limbs, but is also observed in the lower limbs (88) and head (89).
In ET, the proportion of patients with rest tremor depends on the characteristics of the sampled cohort and more specifically, the duration of illness, but it ranges from 1.9% – 46.4% in carefully assessed cohorts (Table 1) (90). Similarly, rest tremor has been reported in a number of other cerebellar degenerative disorders, with the prevalence generally being low (e.g., in larger cohorts of patients: 14.3% of SCA2 (69), 7.6% of SCA3 (82), 5.9% of SCA6 (91), 5.3% of SCA7 (92), Table 1), but its prevalence is reported to be particularly high in some forms of SCA in which tremors of different types are generally more common (e.g., 10/21 patients [47.6%] with SCA12 (59), Table 1).
While some signs typical of cerebellar degeneration other than tremor have not been reported in ET, such as dysarthria and dysmetria, a number of other cerebellar signs have been reported. Thus, gait ataxia has been reported in numerous studies of ET (Table 1) (93–98). Although this ataxia is generally mild in ET, it can be more marked (99). When defined as taking 2 or more tandem gait mis-steps, as is common in prior gait and balance studies, ataxia has been reported in 42.0% of patients with ET vs. only 22% of similarly-aged controls (93). As described elsewhere (93), ET results in significant impairments in gait speed, asymmetry, dynamic balance, and variability, and these may lead to functional consequences for ET patients, including reduced balance confidence and increased risk of falls (100, 101). The impairments that are observed in ET are qualitatively similar to those reported in patients with other forms of cerebellar ataxia (102–104). Thus, classic cerebellar ataxic gait is characterized by slow gait speed, short step length, wide base of support, deviations in the walking path, and increased step-to-step variability (93, 102–105). Increased step-to-step variability, in particular, may be the result of poor timing and scaling of joint movement (93, 105, 106). As discussed elsewhere, gait impairments in ET do not include a wide base of support and deviations in the walking path, both considered key characteristics of ataxic gait (93). Therefore, gait impairments in ET share several features with cerebellar ataxia, but it is important to note that not all features are shared, and the presentation in ET is typically not as severe (93).
Another feature of SCAs is eye motion abnormalities; to some extent, these are likely the result of involvement of cerebellar pathways but they may also be the result of involvement of the brainstem and cranial nerve nuclei in these disorders. In several studies, such abnormalities have been reported in ET (e.g., reflexive saccadic dysmetria and slowing of smooth pursuit), but in terms of their severity, they are far milder than seen in many patients with SCA; indeed, in ET they are not readily detectable on a standard neurological examination (107–109). Limited range of eye motion is not a reported feature of ET in clinical settings.
There are other motor abnormalities in ET that point to a more pervasive underlying abnormality of cerebellar function. Several studies have revealed abnormalities in limb motor behavior in ET in studies of eye-hand coordination and repetitive finger tapping movements (110–113).
Dystonia and Other Involuntary Movement Disorders
Although in the past, dystonia was regarded as a disorder of the basal ganglia, recent studies have posited a role of the cerebellum as well (114–120). In this context, it is of interest that dystonia has been reported in numerous cerebellar degenerative disorders (SCA1, SCA2, SCA3, SCA6, SCA7, SCA12, SCA14, SCA17, Fridreich’s ataxia); the extent to which this is the result of cerebellar or extra-cerebellar (e.g., basal ganglia) pathology, as is found in some of these disorders, remains to be determined. When present, the location of this dystonia can be variable from patient to patient, and the prevalence can be high in some studies. In a study of the natural history of 345 SCA patients from 12 centers in the United States, 7/58 (12.1%) SCA1, 13/72 (18.1%) SCA2, 33/134 (24.6%) SCA3 and 6/70 (8.6%) SCA6 patients had dystonia (121). In a study in India, 5/40 (12.5%) SCA1 patients, 5/28 (17.9%) SCA2 patients, and 3/17 (17.6%) SCA3 patients had dystonia; dystonia included generalized dystonia, torticollis, facial dystonia, lingual dystonia and foot dystonia (69). In a series of SCA3 patients in France, 2/6 (33.3%) had dystonia (one facial dystonia and one hand dystonia) (71), and an 11 year old girl with SCA3 was reported to have lingual dystonia (122). In Taiwan, 19/53 (35.8%) SCA3 cases had dystonia (82). In a study of 126 SCA3 patients from two large cohorts, one in China and one in North America, 32/126 (25.4%) had dystonia (72). A study in Japan of 48 individuals with SCA6 reported the presence of dystonia in 7 (15%) (84). In African families with SCA7, individuals with dystonia were noted (92). Focal dystonia was reported in 2/10 (20%) patients with SCA12 (67). Axial dystonia was noted in 2/25 (8.0%) of patients with SCA12 in India (66) and 1/12 (8.3%) patients with SCA12 in another report from India (77). A patient with SCA14 in a Japanese kindred was reported to have cervical dystonia (123). Two of 13 affected family members with SCA14 in a Dutch kindred had focal dystonia (writer’s cramp) (124). In a study of 15 SCA17 patients in Italy, 7 (46.7%) had dystonia (125); the authors of this report noted that the dystonia in SCA17 was diverse - blepharospasm, torticollis, writer’s cramp, foot dystonia (125). Indeed, in a kindred in Germany, all three affecteds had different types of dystonia: foot, writer’s cramp, cervical (126). A patient with Friedreich’s ataxia had writer’s cramp and dystonia in both feet; in the same report, another patient with the same disease had dystonic postures in the left hand (127). Furthermore, 13/29 (44.8%) patients with Friedreich’s ataxia in Spain were reported to have dystonia.
With respect to ET, there is increasing evidence that advanced patients may develop some dystonia (2, 128–130). Thus, patients with bone fide ET, and especially longstanding and severe ET, may develop subtle dystonic postures or dystonic movements (128). It is debated whether these dystonic postures or movements are simply a manifestation of their advanced ET or whether their presence predicates a second diagnosis or a retraction of the longstanding ET diagnosis (128). There is evidence that it is merely a manifestation of their ET, as it involves their cerebellum (128). The recent consensus classification of tremor similarly acknowledged that patients with ET may exhibit some degree of dystonia (131). However, there is uncertainty as to how much dystonia may be present in a patient with ET. It is not apparent how severe the dystonic postures in ET may be, where these may be located (e.g., limb, neck), and whether they should relate to limbs that do or do not have tremor. Beneath all of this uncertainty, however, is the acknowledgment that some degree of dystonia does not necessitate the removal of the ET diagnosis, although some have suggested referring to these patients as having “ET-plus” (128).
We discussed the occurrence of rest tremor in ET and SCAs above; however, a full parkinsonian syndrome occurs in certain forms of SCA, for example, SCA2 (69), and it can be quite common. For example, in a Japanese SCA2 kindred, 7/8 (87.5%) patients had features of parkinsonism (e.g., rest tremor, bradykinesia, masked face) (132). Parkinsonism has been reported, although more rarely, in other forms of SCA. Thus, a patient with SCA7 and parkinsonism was also reported (133). ET is reported to be a risk factor for incident Parkinson’s, such that some patients with ET will eventually develop co-morbid PD (134–138). In this sense, a full parkinsonian syndrome can be an eventual stage in the evolution of the disease (134–138). Whether the presence of Lewy bodies in some ET patients is a pathomechanistic avenue for such an evolution is not clear (139, 140).
Cognition
Although the hallmark clinical feature of ET is kinetic tremor (1), there is growing appreciation that cognitive impairment is a disease-linked feature (32, 141–143). In particular, clinical studies show that ET patients have poorer cognitive performance than age-matched controls (141, 144). While in many patients the problem is mild, in some it reaches more severe proportions (141, 145, 146). Results of clinical research are consistent with epidemiological studies demonstrating that ET patients have a higher prevalence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) than controls, and they are also at increased risk of developing dementia (141, 145–147). Early studies examining cognition in ET, as well as the majority of cognitive studies in ET to date, have primarily highlighted deficits in executive functioning (141). Given the documented role of the cerebellum in supporting executive functioning (141, 148, 149), and the known compromise of the cerebellum in ET (24–27, 39, 141, 150, 151), executive deficits in ET have generally been conceptualized as the result of inefficient or impaired cerebellar-cortical networks, and particularly those projecting to and from the prefrontal cortex (141, 152–157). It should be pointed out, though, that the cognitive deficits in ET are not restricted to executive dysfunction, as other domains of cognition may be affected (141, 143, 158).
The cerebellum is involved in a broad array of cognitive processes (152). As with ET, cognitive impairment is a described feature of a variety of SCAs, and the deficits may be profound (159). For example, 2/8 (25%) SCA1 patients were demented; their ages were 40 and 56 years (160). Five of 21 (23.8%) SCA2 patients in a German kindred were reported to have mild dementia; their ages were 22, 40, 55, 63 and 68 years (64). Dementia was noted in 4/17 (23.5%) SCA2 patients in Germany; their mean age was 52.0 ± 12.2 years (161). Dementia and delirium were reported in 4 patients in Japan with SCA3 (162). Nine of 19 (47.4%) SCA7 patients were reported to have dementia; 7 (77.8%) of the 9 were between the ages of 20 and 36 (92). Two of 6 (33.3%) affecteds in an SCA12 family in India were reported to be demented (163), and cognitive decline was reported in 2/6 (33.3%) SCA12 patients in 3 Chinese kindreds with clinical information (65). Thirteen of 18 (72.2%) SCA14 patients in a kindred of French ancestory had cognitive complaints or abnormal cognition; in several of these, the cognitive complaint preceded motor signs of cerebellar dysfunction (164). Five of these 13 were under the age of 40 years and ten were under the age of 60 years (164). In a cohort of 15 French or German SCA14 patients, 5/15 (33.3%) had cognitive deficits or dementia (165). Two of five (40%) SCA14 patients in Japan had cognitive deficits; their ages were 30 and 49 (123). In twelve SCA15 patients in Italy, 2 (16.7%, ages 50 and 60 years) had cognitive impairment (57). In SCA17, dementia is common (159, 166, 167); 7/15 (46.7%) SCA17 patients were noted to have dementia (125). Eight of 15 (53.3%) SCA17 patients in Italy had cognitive impairment, which was of moderate severity in six; their ages ranged from 25 – 62 years (168).
In summary, although defined as motor disorders, both ET and a range of SCAs are characterized by cognitive impairments that can range from mild to severe. The pathomechanism for some of these deficits may involve inefficient or impaired cerebellar-cortical networks, and particularly those projecting to and from the prefrontal cortex.
Non-cerebellar signs
SCA6 is often viewed as a predominantly cerebellar syndrome, with few non-cerebellar signs (41, 63). However, many of the SCAs are accompanied by neurological signs that are not referable to cerebellum degeneration and which reflect a more widespread involvement of the nervous system. For example, SCA7 is distinguished from other SCAs by the high prevalence of retinal degeneration (41). One of these signs, hearing loss, will be highlighted as it represents an area of overlap with ET. A number of the SCAs have an associated hearing loss. Thus, a study of two SCA14 cases indicated hearing loss in both; in the one who could be tested, the results supported a sensorineural hearing loss suggesting that the inner ear or cochlear nucleus were impaired (169). A study of central auditory processing in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia noted that 12/43 (27.9%) reported hearing loss and 14/43 (32.5%) had abnormal audiological findings, including 4/12 (33.3%) with SCA3, 3/6 (50.0%) with SCA10 and 1/1 with SCA4, 1/1 with SCA6 and 1/1 with SCA7 (170). Hearing loss, in excess of what is observed in age-matched controls, has now been reported in numerous studies of ET as well; the cause is unclear although there is more evidence in favor of cochlear rather than retrocochlear pathology (171–175). It hints at involvement in ET of structures outside of the cerebellum and traditional tremor pathways (e.g., cerebellar-thalamic tract), thus in some ways mirroring the situation that occurs more broadly in the SCAs.
Natural History
While ET is generally a progressive disease, it is slowly progressive, with estimates of progression being less than 5% per year (176). Patients live to advanced ages. In this respect, in the past, ET was often referred to as “benign essential tremor” (177). By contrast, many forms of cerebellar degeneration follow a more rapidly progressive course (41), leaving some to wonder whether a disease that advances as slowly as ET does could really be a form of cerebellar degeneration. However, a number of SCAs are also slowly progressive (51). Thus, SCA5 (70, 178, 179), SCA6 (180), SCA14 (60, 61), and SCA15 (46) generally do not shorten lifespan and follow a relatively mild disease course (51). Several of these will be discussed in more detail below.
In a Japanese SCA14 kindred, all affected individuals, including a woman with a 30-year history, remained ambulatory without assistance (47). In an Australian SCA14 family, the authors noted that progress of the condition had been slow and that some had even been symptomatic for decades (48). Indeed, in an initial report of a four-generation SCA14 family of English and Duch ancestry with fourteen affected members, the authors noted that symptoms were subtle and slowly progressive and that lifespan did not appear to be decreased (49). In a Dutch SCA14 kindred, the authors noted that life-span appeared to be unaffected, as evidenced by the fact that three affected men were 80 years of age or older (124). In a study of fourteen SCA14 patients in the US, the authors similarly reported that there was no evidence of shortened life span (60).
With respect to SCA15, the investigators noted that in a large kindred, the rate of progression was slow, and some family members remained ambulatory without walking aids five decades after onset” (46). In a paper that reported thirteen SCA15 patients of French origins, the progression of the disease was noted to be “particularly slow” and the two patients with disease of more than 40 years duration needed help to walk but were still ambulatory (50). Another sign of benign disease can be late onset. A report of an Italian SCA15 kindred noted that ages of onset were quite late - 60, 66 and 73 years (181). In another two Italian SCA15 kindreds, ages of onset were quite late - 60 or older in 5/12 (41.7%) affecteds and 70 or older in 2/12 (16.7%) affecteds (57).
Summary (Clinical Features)
In summary, our goal in this paper is to examine ET within the context of other disorders of cerebellar degeneration and review the clinical features of ET relative to those in these other disorders. A consideration of the clinical features of ET should be first and foremost centered on tremor. Kinetic tremor occurs in 100% of ET patients (1) and is the sine qua non of ET. Postural tremor is also very common in ET (1). Although tremors are often underreported in the various SCAs, both types of tremor do occur in the SCAs and their prevalence ranges from rare (e.g., <10%), to moderate percentages (e.g., 20% – 70%) to high percentages (>70%). It is highly noteworthy that in two disorders, SCA12 and SCA15, kinetic and postural tremors are highly prevalent, often severe, and they can be the earliest disease manifestation, actually resulting in an initial diagnosis of ET (50, 55–59, 65–67, 77). Aside from kinetic and postural tremor, intention tremor, often referred to as “cerebellar tremor”, has been reported in 44.3% (78–81) of ET patients. With respect to prevalence of intention tremor, ET falls at a midpoint with respect to the SCAs. Other features of cerebellar dysfunction or degeneration are also quite common in ET, with a mild gait ataxia reported in as many as 42% of ET cases (93) and mild eye motion abnormalities in smooth pursuit and saccades in ET as well (107–109). Although the hallmark feature of ET is kinetic tremor (1), there is growing appreciation that cognitive impairment also occurs (32, 141–143). The cerebellum is involved in a broad array of cognitive processes (152), and as with ET, cognitive impairment may be a feature of a variety of SCAs (159). Non-cerebellar signs such as auditory problems occur in ET (171–175) as well several of the SCAs (169, 170), thereby hinting at involvement in ET of structures outside of the cerebellum and traditional tremor pathways (e.g., cerebellar-thalamic tract), thus mirroring the situation that occurs more broadly in the SCAs. Finally, while ET is generally a progressive disease, it is slowly progressive, with estimates of progression being less than 5% per year (176). Patients live to advanced ages and, in the past, ET was referred to as “benign essential tremor” (177). By contrast, many forms of cerebellar degeneration follow a more rapidly progressive course (41), leaving some to wonder whether a disease that advances as slowly as ET could really be a form of cerebellar degeneration. However, a number of SCAs are also slowly progressive (51). Thus, SCA5 (70, 178, 179), SCA6 (180), SCA14 (60, 61), and SCA15 (46) generally do not shorten lifespan and follow a relatively mild disease course. In summary, in multiple regards, the clinical features of ET do overlap with those of the SCAs, with several forms of SCA evidencing tremor-predominant and more benign phenotypes.
Pathological Features of ET in Comparison with Other Forms of Cerebellar Degeneration
Pure Cerebellar Degeneration vs. Widespread Involvement of Extra-Cerebellar Regions
In ET, the main postmortem changes have been observed in the cerebellar cortex (7, 39, 139). Yet in many forms of SCA, involvement of the nervous system is often diffuse, involving numerous extra-cerebellar regions as well as the cerebellum (54, 182–187). This may in part account for the more severe and widespread clinical findings in these disorders, and the involvement of pre-cerebellar and deep cerebellar nuclei, in addition to the cerebellar cortex, could account for the often greater severity of the clinical cerebellar syndrome noted in these disorders relative to that seen in ET (185).
Many of the SCAs are accompanied by diverse extracerebellar neurodegeneration patterns (e.g., cerebral cortex, basal ganglia, thalamus, midbrain, pons, and medulla) (54, 182–187). However, there are differences, and the pathology is not monotonously the same. For example involvement of the basal forebrain is more a feature of SCA1 and SCA2 than SCA3, SCA6, SCA7 and SCA17 (54, 182), and involvement of basal ganglia, thalamic and midbrain structures are similarly differently involved across this set of six disorders, with severe affection of the pallidum and subthalamic nucleus, for example, in SCA3 (54). Pontine atrophy is more marked in SCA2 than in SCA6 (54). The inferior olivary nucleus is reportedly more involved in SCA1 and SCA2 than in SCA3, SCA6, SCA7 and SCA17 (54, 183). It should also be pointed out that these neurodegenerative patterns overlap considerably, particularly as the diseases pass on to advanced stages (54). In ET, studies to date have not shown such a widespread pattern of degeneration.
Several forms of SCA either have clinical features (e.g., type of tremor, natural history) that more resemble ET. Drawing a parallel with ET, several of these will be discussed below with respect to the limited extent of their associated extra-cerebellar pathology.
As noted above, SCA12 patients have prominent kinetic tremor and may initially be diagnosed as ET (65–67). There is limited knowledge of the pathology of SCA12, with only one published postmortem examination; this patient died at age 66 years of age and had presented initially with action tremor of both arms in her 30s and later developed ataxia and dementia (188). Consistent with the more benign ET-like clinical picture of these patients is that the extent of the pathology (188) was less than that seen in many other forms of SCA (e.g., SCA1, 2, 3, 6) (54). The changes were most evident in the cerebral cortex and cerebellum (188). In the cerebral cortex, there was generalized atrophy that was more marked in parietal and posterior frontal regions (188). Numerous other brain regions appeared normal (e.g., thalamus, subthalamic nucleus, cranial nerves) whereas several others showed mild atrophy (i.e., hippocampus, midbrain, pons, medulla) but without microscopic cell loss or changes (188). Mild cerebellar cortical atrophy was noted (188). Purkinje cell loss was moderate in degree and was patchy and segemental with only occasional torpedoes (188). The deep cerebellar nuclei appeared normal in size and cytology (188). Alzheimer-type neuronal plaques and tangles were rare, and thus could not explain the dementia. Neuronal intranuclear ubiquitin-positive inclusions were rarely detected in motor cortex and in Purkinje cells; more abundant inclusions were identified in the substantia nigra, most consistent with Marinesco bodies. The inclusions identified in this brain did not stain for long polyglutamine tracts (1C2 antibody), nor with alpha-synuclein, tau or TDP-43; their significance in disease pathogenesis remains undefined. SCA12 is caused by an expanded noncoding CAG repeat in a functional promoter region of the PPP2R2B gene, and longer repeats increase expression of PPP2R2B splice variants (188). As the CAG repeats appear not to be significantly transcribed, consistent with the absence of 1C2 immunostaining, SCA12 is not a typical polyglutamine disease.
In SCA15, action and postural tremor of the hands is very common and the patients may perceive tremor as one of the most compromising impairments of activities of daily living (55). To our knowledge, however, there are no published postmortem brain examinations of SCA15. MRI studies have shown cerebellar atrophy, either global or predominant in the vermis, with sparing of brainstem structures (50, 55, 57).
SCA14 tends to follow a more benign course than many of the other SCAs and in this sense resembles ET (47–49, 60). Only two reported cases have come to postmortem examination. The first was a 66 year old woman; clinical information was not published, although family members were reported to have “pure ataxia” (49). The postmortem examination revealed a reportedly normal cerebral cortex, basal ganglia and pons (49). On magnetic resonance imaging, the cerebellar cortex had shown midline atrophy; on postmortem examination, the cerebellar cortex showed patchy loss of Purkinje cells with empty baskets that were hypertrophic (49). The medulla showed mild gliosis in the inferior olives without appreciable neuronal loss (49). The second postmortem was a 90-year old man who died of natural causes, from a 4-generation British family having 18 affected family members (189). MRIs of family members demonstrated moderate to severe generalized cerebellar atrophy. Specific clinical features for this patient were not described, although the family was described as having “pure ataxia”. Mild Braak II/III neurofibrillary Alzheimer type pathology was present, but no Lewy body or TDP-43 proteinopathy was identified. P62 sequestosome antibody did not identify any other protein aggregates. There was severe loss of Purkinje cells in all lobules of the neocerebellum (estimated to be 80%), associated with Bergmann gliosis. However, Purkinje cells in the cerebellar tonsils and adjacent flocculonodular lobe were relatively preserved. There was no apparent neuronal loss in cerebellar nuclei, pons or inferior olive. Thus, in both of these postmortem examinations, the neuropathology of SCA14 was predominiated by Purkinje cell loss, consistent with strong protein expression limited to cerebellar Purkinje cells for the disease affected protein kinase C-γ (189).
Extent of Purkinje Cell Loss: Marked vs. Modest
In ET, Purkinje cell loss, when described, has been significant when compared to age-matched controls, but the degree of loss is moderate and patchy (39, 139, 190). There is no reported thinning of the molecular layer in ET. Many SCA subtypes evidence marked cerebellar cortical atrophy, and marked and even subtotal Purkinje cell loss with thinning of the molecular layer (53, 54, 125). Similarly, in MSA, Purkinje cells may be severely depleted (191). However, in some forms of SCA, this is less marked. Examples of the latter will be discussed below, within the context of their clinical similarities to ET.
SCA12 patients have prominent kinetic tremor and may initially be diagnosed as ET (65–67). There is limited knowledge of the pathology of SCA12 as there has been only one published postmortem examination (188). As described above, in this case, there was moderate loss of Purkinje cells in the cerebellar vermis and cerebellar hemispheres, which occurred in patches of up to 10 cells (188). In this sense, the Purkinje cell loss was not total and occurred to a moderate and patchy degree, similar to the segemental loss of Purkinje cells that is observed in the ET brain (190). Of further interest is that the individual had an expansion of 73 repeats, which is at the high end of the pathogenic range and the patient had an unusually severe clinical course (188). As noted by the authors, it is conceivable that the neuropathological changes observed in this individual were more marked than might be observed in a more typical patient with fewer repeats (188). Of additional note is that torpedoes (i.e., swellings of the Purkinje cell axon) were noted to be “occasional” rather than abundant (188). While neuroimaging findings of other individuals with more modest expansions have also demonstrated atrophy predominantly in cerebellum and cerebral cortical regions (54, 192), additional confirmatory postmortem studies are needed.
SCA14 tends to follow a more benign course than many of the other SCAs and in this sense resembles ET (47–49, 60). As described above, two cases have come to postmortem. The first was a 66 year old woman in whom magnetic resonance imaging of the cerebellar cortex had shown midline atrophy; on postmortem, the cerebellar cortex showed patchy loss of Purkinje cells with empty baskets that were hypetrophic (49). The second case (189) was a 90 year old man in whom pathology was also limited to the cerebellum, which showed more severe Purkinje cell loss (estimated at 80% of Purkinje cells) throughout the cerebellum associated with Bergmann gliosis, except for relative Purkinje cell sparing in cerebellar tonsils and adjacent flocculonodular lobe. Torpedoes were not mentioned in either of these case studies.
Aside from SCA12 and SCA14, there are other forms of SCA in which the Purkinje cell layer is relatively preserved. In SCA3, for example, both the Purkinje cells and the inferior olives are relatively preserved (39, 53, 54, 185, 193–195). Similarly, in Friedreich’s ataxia, involvement of the dentate nucleus is more marked and there is relative preservation of the cerebellar cortex (53).
Types of Changes Within the Cerebellum
One differentiating point for these disorders is the manner in which the cerebellum is involved. A point of discussion is the cerebellar nuclei. In the bulk of ET cases, the dentate nucleus appears normal, although in two cases there was degeneration (139, 196). The SCAs themselves do not unformly involve the cerebellar nuclei, with the most marked involvement reported in SCA1 when compared to SCA2, SCA3, SCA6, SCA7 and SCA17 (54, 183, 184). In Friedreich’s ataxia, involvement of the dentate nucleus is also marked (53). Hence, involvement varies across these disorders.
It is also important to consider the range of other changes in the cerebellar cortex across these various disorders and in doing so, compare ET to these disorders. In recent postmortem studies, we and others have identified a growing number of morphological changes in the ET cerebellum, predominantly centered in and around the Purkinje cell population (197–209), distinguishing ET from age-matched control brains. These changes are observed in the Purkinje cell dendritic arbor and Purkinje cell axonal compartment as well as the connections between Purkinje cell and neighboring neuronal populations (i.e., climbing fibers and basket cells); studies have also detected Purkinje cell loss (197–206). More specifically, changes include swelling and thickening of axons; swellings, regressive changes and loss of spines in Purkinje cell dendrites; remodelling of Purkinje cell axons; Purkinje cell death; remodelling of basket cell axons; heterotopic Purkinje cells; reorganization of climbing fibres; and alterations in astroglia (197–206). By contrast, overt changes have not been observed in other brain regions, such as the thalamus, inferior olivary nucleus and red nucleus (210, 211). In a recent study (39), we contextualized the neuropathological changes observed in ET within a broader degenerative disease spectrum, performing a comparative analysis of quantitative morphologic changes in cerebellar cortex in a postmortem study of 156 brains (50 ET, 23 SCA, 15 MSA, 29 Parkinson’s disease, 14 dystonia, 25 controls), with 37 metrics reflecting alterations in the cell body, dendritic and axonal compartments of PCs, basket neuron axons and afferent climbing fiber synaptic inputs. Within the SCAs and MSA, there was a marked spectrum of change, with ET generally at the low end and SCA1, SCA2, SCA6, or MSA at the high end of severity (39). In this sense, the changes observed in ET fell on the mild end of what is observed in cerebellar degenerations (39). Thus, in large part, these comprised differences of degree rather than kind, likely reflecting a stereotypic repertoire of cellular reactions that characterize cerebellar degeneration (39). In addition, features distinctive to specific disorders were also identified, including a unique redistribution of climbing fiber synapses to the outer Purkinje cell dendritic arbor in ET and aggregation of calbindinD28k-positive puncta around the Purkinje cell soma most prominently in SCA1, SCA2 and SCA6 (39). Each of these disorders had a different signature with respect to cerebellar degeneration, as evidenced by our metric “scores” that combine categories of morphologic features and a skyline plot, which showed that different patterns emerged for ET, SCA3, and SCAs 1, 2, and 6, indicating that these disorders of cerebellar degeneration do not form a homogeneous entity (39). In this sense, there were differences not only of degree, but also differences of kind (39).
Summary (Postmortem Features)
In ET, the main observed postmortem changes have been in the cerebellum (7, 39, 139). Yet in many forms of SCA, involvement of the nervous system is often diffuse, besides the cerebellum also involving numerous extra-cerebellar regions (54, 182–187). In the SCAs however, the pathology is not monotonously the same, and a spectrum of changes exists. Most relevant to the current discussion, which attempts to place ET within the context of these disorders, is that one may see similarities between ET and several SCAs. Several of the SCAs (e.g., SCA12 and SCA15) have clinical features (e.g., prominence of tremor, more benign natural history) that resemble ET. Consistent with the more ET-like clinical picture of these patients is the relative sparing of other regions of the central nervous system outside of the cerebellum as well as the sometimes moderate rather than total nature of Purkinje cell loss and the preservation of deep cerebellar nuclei (49, 188).
In ET, Purkinje cell loss, when described, has been significant when compared to age-matched controls, but the degree of loss is moderate and is patchy (39, 139, 190), and this has raised some concerns when considering this disease as degenerative. However, as noted above, Purkinje cell loss is similarly moderate and not subtotal or total in SCA12 and some cases of SCA14 (49, 188, 189) and furthermore, there are other forms of SCA in which the Purkinje cell layer is relatively preserved (e.g., SCA3) (39, 53, 54, 185, 193–195), as is the case in Friedreich’s ataxia (53). In many senses, the changes observed in ET fell on the mild end of what is observed in cerebellar degenerations (39). A recent analysis further explored numerous metrics of cerebellar cortical pathology in ET relative to other disorders of cerebellar degeneration and reported that there was a marked spectrum of change, with ET generally at the low end and SCA1, SCA2, SCA6, or MSA at the high end of severity (39). In addition, each of these disorders had a different signature with respect to cerebellar degeneration, indicating that these disorders of cerebellar degeneration do not form a homogeneous entity; in this sense, there were differences not only of degree, but also differences of kind (39).
Other Intersection Points
In this paper, we review the numerous intersection points between ET and the degenerative diseases of the cerebellum. These do not as yet extend to specific genetic etiologies. Thus, a study of 10 common degenerative ataxia genes in 323 ET cases and 299 controls indicated that pathogenic repeat expansions in SCA loci were not associated with ET (212).
Summary
Although ET has recently been conceptualized as one of the degenerative diseases of the cerebellum (7, 23, 31–40), there has been no attempt to assess it within the context of these diseases. Are there other degenerative diseases of the cerebellum that share clinical and pathological features with ET? The goal of this paper is to place the clinical and postmortem features of ET within the context of other forms of cerebellar degeneration; that is, to look for overlaps and intersections.
We reviewed the clinical features of ET relative to those of these other disorders. A consideration of the clinical features of ET should be first and foremost centered on kinetic and postural tremors. Although often underreported in the various SCAs, both types of tremor do occur in the SCAs and it is noteworthy that in two disorders, SCA12 and SCA15, kinetic and postural tremors are highly prevalent, often severe, and they can be the earliest disease manifestation, actually resulting in an initial diagnosis of ET (50, 55–59, 65–67, 77). Intention tremor, reported in 44.3% (78–81) of ET patients, is also a common features of many of the SCAs. Other features of cerebellar dysfunction or degeneration are also quite common in ET, albeit often mild - gait ataxia (93) and subclinical eye motion abnormalities (107–109). There is also a growing appreciation that cognitive impairment also occurs in ET (32, 141–143). The cerebellum is involved in a broad array of cognitive processes (152), and as with ET, cognitive impairment may be a feature of a variety of SCAs (159). Finally, many forms of cerebellar degeneration follow a more rapidly progressive course (41), leaving some to wonder whether a disease that advances as slowly as ET does could really be a form of cerebellar degeneration. However, a number of SCAs are also slowly progressive (51). Thus, SCA5 (70, 178, 179), SCA6 (180), SCA14 (60, 61), and SCA15 (46) generally do not shorten lifespan and follow a relatively mild disease course. In summary, in multiple regards, the clinical features of ET do overlap with those of the SCAs, with several forms of SCA evidencing tremor-predominant and more benign phenotypes.
In ET, the main observed postmortem changes have been in the cerebellum (7, 39, 139). Yet in many forms of SCA, involvement of the nervous system is often diffuse, besides the cerebellum also involving numerous extra-cerebellar regions (54, 182–187). In the SCAs however, the pathology is not monotonously the same, and a spectrum of changes exists. Most relevant to the current discussion, which attempts to place ET within the context of these disorders, is that one may see similarities between ET and several SCAs. Several of the SCAs (e.g., SCA12, SCA14 and SCA15) have clinical features (e.g., prominence of tremor and/or more benign natural history) that more resemble ET. Consistent with the more ET-like clinical picture of these patients is the relative sparing of other regions of the central nervous system outside of the cerebellum as well as the moderate rather than total nature of Purkinje cell loss and the preservation of deep cerebellar nuclei (49, 188). In ET, Purkinje cell loss, when described, has been significant when compared to age-matched controls, but the degree of loss is moderate and is patchy (39, 139, 190), and this has raised some concerns when considering this disease as degenerative. However, as noted above, Purkinje cell loss is similarly moderate and not subtotal or total in SCA12 and some cases of SCA14 (49, 188, 189) and furthermore, there are other forms of SCA in which the Purkinje cell layer is relatively preserved (e.g., SCA3) (39, 53, 54, 185, 193–195), as is the case in Friedreich’s ataxia (53). In many senses, the changes observed in ET fell on the mild end of what is observed in cerebellar degenerations (39).
In summary, both clinically and pathologically, there are numerous similarities and intersection points between ET and other disorders of cerebellar degeneration.
Funding:
National Institutes of Health R01 NS088257 and R01 NS086736.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This Author Accepted Manuscript is a PDF file of a an unedited peer-reviewed manuscript that has been accepted for publication but has not been copyedited or corrected. The official version of record that is published in the journal is kept up to date and so may therefore differ from this version.
Conflicts of Interest:
None
Ethical Committee Approval:
Not applicable
References
- 1.Louis ED. The primary type of tremor in essential tremor is kinetic rather than postural: cross-sectional observation of tremor phenomenology in 369 cases. Eur J Neurol. 2013;20(4):725–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Louis ED. Essential tremor: a nuanced approach to the clinical features. Pract Neurol. 2019;19(5):389–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Louis ED, Ferreira JJ. How common is the most common adult movement disorder? Update on the worldwide prevalence of essential tremor. Mov Disord. 2010;25(5):534–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Louis ED, Ottman R. How many people in the USA have essential tremor? Deriving a population estimate based on epidemiological data. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) 2014;4:259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Louis ED. Essential tremor: from bedside to bench and back to bedside. Curr Opin Neurol. 2014;27(4):461–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Louis ED. From Neurons to Neuron Neighborhoods: the Rewiring of the Cerebellar Cortex in Essential Tremor. Cerebellum. 2014;13(4):501–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Louis ED, Faust PL. Essential tremor pathology: neurodegeneration and reorganization of neuronal connections. Nat Rev Neurol. 2020;16(2):69–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Louis ED, Vonsattel JP. The emerging neuropathology of essential tremor. Mov Disord. 2007;23(2):174–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Louis ED, Vonsattel JP, Honig LS, Ross GW, Lyons KE, Pahwa R. Neuropathologic findings in essential tremor. Neurology. 2006;66(11):1756–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bergamasco I. Intorno ad un caso di tremore essenziale simulant in parte il quadro della sclerosi multipla. Riv Pat Nerv Ment 1907;115:80–90. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hassler R. Zur pathologischen anatomie des senilen und des parkinsonistischen Tremor. J Psychol Neurol. 1939;49:193–230. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Frankl-Hochwart L. Universitat Wien Neurologisches Institute Arbeiten aus dem Neurologischen Institute Franz Deuticke; Leipzig: 1903. Zur kenntnis der Pseudosklerose (Westphal-Strumpell). 1903:1–47. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mylle G, Van Bogaert, L. Etudes anatomo-cliniques de syndromes hypercinetiques complexes. I. sur le tremblement familial. Mschr Psychiatr Neurol 1940;103:28–43. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mylle G, Van Bogaert, L. Du tremblement essentiel non familial. . Monatsschr Psychiatr Neurol. 1948;115:80–90. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Herskovits E, Blackwood W. Essential (familial, hereditary) tremor: a case report. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1969;32(6):509–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lapresle J, Rondot P, Said G Tremblement idopathique de repos, d’attitude et d’action. Etude anatomo-clinique d’une observation. Rev Neurol. 1974;130:343–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Llinas R, Volkind RA. The olivo-cerebellar system: functional properties as revealed by harmaline-induced tremor. Exp Brain Res. 1973;18(1):69–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Louis ED, Diaz DT, Kuo SH, Gan SR, Cortes EP, Vonsattel JPG, et al. Inferior Olivary nucleus degeneration does not lessen tremor in essential tremor. Cerebellum Ataxias 2018;5:1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Louis ED, Babij R, Cortes E, Vonsattel JP, Faust PL. The inferior olivary nucleus: A postmortem study of essential tremor cases versus controls. Mov Disord. 2013;28(6):779–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Elkouzi A, Kattah JC, Elble RJ. Hypertrophic Olivary Degeneration Does Not Reduce Essential Tremor. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2016;3(2):209–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Louis ED, Lenka A. The Olivary Hypothesis of Essential Tremor: Time to Lay this Model to Rest? Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) 2017;7:473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hopfner F, Haubenberger D, Galpern WR, Gwinn K, Van’t Veer A, White S, et al. Knowledge gaps and research recommendations for essential tremor. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016;33:27–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Grimaldi G, Manto M. Is essential tremor a Purkinjopathy? The role of the cerebellar cortex in its pathogenesis. Mov Disord. 2013;28(13):1759–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Benito-Leon J, Labiano-Fontcuberta A. Linking Essential Tremor to the Cerebellum: Clinical Evidence. Cerebellum 2016;15(3):253–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cerasa A, Quattrone A. Linking Essential Tremor to the Cerebellum-Neuroimaging Evidence. Cerebellum 2016;15(3):263–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Marin-Lahoz J, Gironell A. Linking Essential Tremor to the Cerebellum: Neurochemical Evidence. Cerebellum 2016;15(3):243–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Louis ED. Linking Essential Tremor to the Cerebellum: Neuropathological Evidence. Cerebellum 2016;15(3):235–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Maas R, Helmich RCG, van de Warrenburg BPC. The role of the cerebellum in degenerative ataxias and essential tremor: Insights from noninvasive modulation of cerebellar activity. Mov Disord. 2020;35(2):215–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mavroudis I, Petridis F, Kazis D. Neuroimaging and neuropathological findings in essential tremor. Acta Neurol Scand. 2019;139(6):491–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Louis ED. De Sedibus et Causis Morborum: is Essential Tremor a Primary Disease of the Cerebellum? Cerebellum 2016;15(3):233–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Benito-Leon J. Essential tremor: a neurodegenerative disease? Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) 2014;4:252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bermejo-Pareja F. Essential tremor--a neurodegenerative disorder associated with cognitive defects? Nat Rev Neurol. 2011;7(5):273–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bonuccelli U. Essential tremor is a neurodegenerative disease. J Neural Transm. 2012;119(11):1383–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Louis ED. Essential tremors: a family of neurodegenerative disorders? Arch Neurol. 2009;66(10):1202–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Samson M, Claassen DO. Neurodegeneration and the Cerebellum. Neurodegener Dis 2017;17(4–5):155–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Boutin E, Vaugoyeau M, Eusebio A, Azulay JP, Witjas T. News and controversies regarding essential tremor. Rev Neurol (Paris) 2015;171(5):415–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tak AZA, Sengul Y, Karadag AS. Evaluation of thickness of retinal nerve fiber layer, ganglion cell layer, and choroidal thickness in essential tremor: can eyes be a clue for neurodegeneration? Acta Neurol Belg 2018;118(2):235–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gironell A. The GABA Hypothesis in Essential Tremor: Lights and Shadows. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) 2014;4:254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Louis ED, Kerridge CA, Chatterjee D, Martuscello RT, Diaz DT, Koeppen AH, et al. Contextualizing the pathology in the essential tremor cerebellar cortex: a patholog-omics approach. Acta Neuropathol. 2019;138(5):859–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Louis ED. Re-thinking the biology of essential tremor: from models to morphology. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014;20 Suppl 1:S88–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Paulson HL. The spinocerebellar ataxias. J Neuroophthalmol. 2009;29(3):227–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Koeppen AH. The neuropathology of the adult cerebellum. Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;154:129–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Manto M, Gandini J, Feil K, Strupp M. Cerebellar ataxias: an update. Curr Opin Neurol. 2020;33(1):150–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Meira AT, Arruda WO, Ono SE, Neto AC, Raskin S, Camargo CHF, et al. Neuroradiological Findings in the Spinocerebellar Ataxias. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) 2019;9:10.7916/tohm.v0.682.. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Soong BW, Morrison PJ. Spinocerebellar ataxias. Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;155:143–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Knight MA, Kennerson ML, Anney RJ, Matsuura T, Nicholson GA, Salimi-Tari P, et al. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 15 (sca15) maps to 3p24.2–3pter: exclusion of the ITPR1 gene, the human orthologue of an ataxic mouse mutant. Neurobiol Dis. 2003;13(2):147–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yamashita I, Sasaki H, Yabe I, Fukazawa T, Nogoshi S, Komeichi K, et al. A novel locus for dominant cerebellar ataxia (SCA14) maps to a 10.2-cM interval flanked by D19S206 and D19S605 on chromosome 19q13.4-qter. Ann Neurol. 2000;48(2):156–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Fahey MC, Knight MA, Shaw JH, Gardner RJ, du Sart D, Lockhart PJ, et al. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 14: study of a family with an exon 5 mutation in the PRKCG gene. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76(12):1720–2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Brkanac Z, Bylenok L, Fernandez M, Matsushita M, Lipe H, Wolff J, et al. A new dominant spinocerebellar ataxia linked to chromosome 19q13.4-qter. Arch Neurol. 2002;59(8):1291–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Marelli C, van de Leemput J, Johnson JO, Tison F, Thauvin-Robinet C, Picard F, et al. SCA15 due to large ITPR1 deletions in a cohort of 333 white families with dominant ataxia. Arch Neurol. 2011;68(5):637–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Dick KA, Ikeda Y, Day JW, Ranum LP. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 5. Handb Clin Neurol. 2012;103:451–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Huang M, Verbeek DS. Why do so many genetic insults lead to Purkinje Cell degeneration and spinocerebellar ataxia? Neurosci Lett. 2019;688:49–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Koeppen AH, Ramirez RL, Bjork ST, Bauer P, Feustel PJ. The reciprocal cerebellar circuitry in human hereditary ataxia. Cerebellum 2013;12(4):493–503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Seidel K, Siswanto S, Brunt ER, den Dunnen W, Korf HW, Rub U. Brain pathology of spinocerebellar ataxias. Acta Neuropathol. 2012;124(1):1–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Synofzik M, Beetz C, Bauer C, Bonin M, Sanchez-Ferrero E, Schmitz-Hubsch T, et al. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 15: diagnostic assessment, frequency, and phenotypic features. J Med Genet. 2011;48(6):407–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hara K, Fukushima T, Suzuki T, Shimohata T, Oyake M, Ishiguro H, et al. Japanese SCA families with an unusual phenotype linked to a locus overlapping with SCA15 locus. Neurology. 2004;62(4):648–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Di Gregorio E, Orsi L, Godani M, Vaula G, Jensen S, Salmon E, et al. Two Italian families with ITPR1 gene deletion presenting a broader phenotype of SCA15. Cerebellum 2010;9(1):115–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Storey E, Gardner RJ, Knight MA, Kennerson ML, Tuck RR, Forrest SM, et al. A new autosomal dominant pure cerebellar ataxia. Neurology. 2001;57(10):1913–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Choudhury S, Chatterjee S, Chatterjee K, Banerjee R, Humby J, Mondal B, et al. Clinical Characterization of Genetically Diagnosed Cases of Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 12 from India. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2018;5(1):39–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Chen DH, Brkanac Z, Verlinde CL, Tan XJ, Bylenok L, Nochlin D, et al. Missense mutations in the regulatory domain of PKC gamma: a new mechanism for dominant nonepisodic cerebellar ataxia. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72(4):839–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Chen DH, Raskind WH, Bird TD. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 14. Handb Clin Neurol. 2012;103:555–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Louis ED. Tremor. Continuum (Minneap Minn) 2019;25(4):959–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Schols L, Amoiridis G, Buttner T, Przuntek H, Epplen JT, Riess O. Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia: phenotypic differences in genetically defined subtypes? Ann Neurol. 1997;42(6):924–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Schols L, Gispert S, Vorgerd M, Menezes Vieira-Saecker AM, Blanke P, Auburger G, et al. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 2. Genotype and phenotype in German kindreds. Arch Neurol. 1997;54(9):1073–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Dong Y, Wu JJ, Wu ZY. Identification of 46 CAG repeats within PPP2R2B as probably the shortest pathogenic allele for SCA12. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2015;21(4):398–401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Bahl S, Virdi K, Mittal U, Sachdeva MP, Kalla AK, Holmes SE, et al. Evidence of a common founder for SCA12 in the Indian population. Ann Hum Genet. 2005;69(Pt 5):528–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.O’Hearn E, Holmes SE, Calvert PC, Ross CA, Margolis RL. SCA-12: Tremor with cerebellar and cortical atrophy is associated with a CAG repeat expansion. Neurology. 2001;56(3):299–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Gan SR, Wang J, Figueroa KP, Pulst SM, Tomishon D, Lee D, et al. Postural Tremor and Ataxia Progression in Spinocerebellar Ataxias. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) 2017;7:492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Jhunjhunwala K, Netravathi M, Purushottam M, Jain S, Pal PK. Profile of extrapyramidal manifestations in 85 patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 1, 2 and 3. J Clin Neurosci. 2014;21(6):1002–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Burk K, Zuhlke C, Konig IR, Ziegler A, Schwinger E, Globas C, et al. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 5: clinical and molecular genetic features of a German kindred. Neurology. 2004;62(2):327–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Bonnet C, Apartis E, Anheim M, Legrand AP, Baizabal-Carvallo JF, Bonnet AM, et al. Tremor-spectrum in spinocerebellar ataxia type 3. J Neurol. 2012;259(11):2460–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Gan SR, Figueroa KP, Xu HL, Perlman S, Wilmot G, Gomez CM, et al. The impact of ethnicity on the clinical presentations of spinocerebellar ataxia type 3. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2020;72:37–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Garcia Ruiz PJ, Mayo D, Hernandez J, Cantarero S, Ayuso C. Movement disorders in hereditary ataxias. J Neurol Sci. 2002;202(1–2):59–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Yabe I, Soma H, Takei A, Fujiki N, Yanagihara T, Sasaki H. MSA-C is the predominant clinical phenotype of MSA in Japan: analysis of 142 patients with probable MSA. J Neurol Sci. 2006;249(2):115–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Wenning GK, Ben Shlomo Y, Magalhaes M, Daniel SE, Quinn NP. Clinical features and natural history of multiple system atrophy. An analysis of 100 cases. Brain 1994;117 ( Pt 4):835–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Vlak MH, Sinke RJ, Rabelink GM, Kremer BP, van de Warrenburg BP. Novel PRKCG/SCA14 mutation in a Dutch spinocerebellar ataxia family: expanding the phenotype. Mov Disord. 2006;21(7):1025–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Srivastava AK, Choudhry S, Gopinath MS, Roy S, Tripathi M, Brahmachari SK, et al. Molecular and clinical correlation in five Indian families with spinocerebellar ataxia 12. Ann Neurol. 2001;50(6):796–800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Louis ED, Frucht SJ, Rios E. Intention tremor in essential tremor: Prevalence and association with disease duration. Mov Disord. 2009;24(4):626–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Deuschl G, Wenzelburger R, Loffler K, Raethjen J, Stolze H. Essential tremor and cerebellar dysfunction clinical and kinematic analysis of intention tremor. Brain. 2000;123 ( Pt 8):1568–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Koster B, Deuschl G, Lauk M, Timmer J, Guschlbauer B, Lucking CH. Essential tremor and cerebellar dysfunction: abnormal ballistic movements. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73(4):400–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Bain PG, Findley LJ, Thompson PD, Gresty MA, Rothwell JC, Harding AE, et al. A study of hereditary essential tremor. Brain. 1994;117 ( Pt 4):805–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Lu CS, Chang HC, Kuo PC, Liu YL, Wu WS, Weng YH, et al. The parkinsonian phenotype of spinocerebellar ataxia type 3 in a Taiwanese family. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2004;10(6):369–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Zuhlke C, Dalski A, Hellenbroich Y, Bubel S, Schwinger E, Burk K. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 1 (SCA1): phenotype-genotype correlation studies in intermediate alleles. Eur J Hum Genet. 2002;10(3):204–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Ikeuchi T, Takano H, Koide R, Horikawa Y, Honma Y, Onishi Y, et al. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 6: CAG repeat expansion in alpha1A voltage-dependent calcium channel gene and clinical variations in Japanese population. Ann Neurol. 1997;42(6):879–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Wenning GK, Tison F, Ben Shlomo Y, Daniel SE, Quinn NP. Multiple system atrophy: a review of 203 pathologically proven cases. Mov Disord. 1997;12(2):133–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Velazquez-Perez L, Cerecedo-Zapata CM, Hernandez-Hernandez O, Martinez-Cruz E, Tapia-Guerrero YS, Gonzalez-Pina R, et al. A comprehensive clinical and genetic study of a large Mexican population with spinocerebellar ataxia type 7. Neurogenetics. 2015;16(1):11–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Sternberg EJ, Alcalay RN, Levy OA, Louis ED. Postural and Intention Tremors: A Detailed Clinical Study of Essential Tremor vs. Parkinson’s Disease. Front Neurol. 2013;4:51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Kestenbaum M, Michalec M, Yu Q, Pullman SL, Louis ED. Intention Tremor of the Legs in Essential Tremor: Prevalence and Clinical Correlates. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2015;2(1):24–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Leegwater-Kim J, Louis ED, Pullman SL, Floyd AG, Borden S, Moskowitz CB, et al. Intention tremor of the head in patients with essential tremor. Mov Disord. 2006;21(11):2001–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Louis ED, Asabere N, Agnew A, Moskowitz CB, Lawton A, Cortes E, et al. Rest tremor in advanced essential tremor: a post-mortem study of nine cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011;82(3):261–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Schols L, Kruger R, Amoiridis G, Przuntek H, Epplen JT, Riess O. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 6: genotype and phenotype in German kindreds. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998;64(1):67–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Atadzhanov M, Smith DC, Mwaba MH, Siddiqi OK, Bryer A, Greenberg LJ. Clinical and genetic analysis of spinocerebellar ataxia type 7 (SCA7) in Zambian families. Cerebellum Ataxias 2017;4:17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Rao AK, Louis ED. Ataxic Gait in Essential Tremor: A Disease-Associated Feature? Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) 2019;9:10.7916/d8–28jq-8t52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Hubble JP, Busenbark KL, Pahwa R, Lyons K, Koller WC. Clinical expression of essential tremor: effects of gender and age. Mov Disord. 1997;12(6):969–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Louis ED, Rios E, Rao AK. Tandem gait performance in essential tremor: clinical correlates and association with midline tremors. Mov Disord. 2010;25(11):1633–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Singer C, Sanchez-Ramos J, Weiner WJ. Gait abnormality in essential tremor. Mov Disord. 1994;9(2):193–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Lim ES, Seo MW, Woo SR, Jeong SY, Jeong SK. Relationship between essential tremor and cerebellar dysfunction according to age. J Clin Neurol. 2005;1(1):76–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Louis ED, Rao AK. Tandem gait performance in essential tremor patients correlates with cognitive function. Cerebellum Ataxias 2014;1:19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Louis ED, Galecki M, Rao AK. Four Essential Tremor Cases with Moderately Impaired Gait: How Impaired can Gait be in this Disease? Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) 2013;3:tre-03-200-4597-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Louis ED, Rao AK, Gerbin M. Functional correlates of gait and balance difficulty in essential tremor: balance confidence, near misses and falls. Gait Posture. 2012;35(1):43–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Louis ED, Rao AK. Functional Aspects of Gait in Essential Tremor: A Comparison with Age-Matched Parkinson’s Disease Cases, Dystonia Cases, and Controls. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) 2015;5:tre-5–308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Thach WT, Bastian AJ. Role of the cerebellum in the control and adaptation of gait in health and disease. Prog Brain Res. 2004;143:353–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Palliyath S, Hallett M, Thomas SL, Lebiedowska MK. Gait in patients with cerebellar ataxia. Mov Disord. 1998;13(6):958–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Stolze H, Klebe S, Petersen G, Raethjen J, Wenzelburger R, Witt K, et al. Typical features of cerebellar ataxic gait. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73(3):310–2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Bastian AJ, Martin TA, Keating JG, Thach WT. Cerebellar ataxia: abnormal control of interaction torques across multiple joints. J Neurophysiol. 1996;76(1):492–509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Earhart GM, Bastian AJ. Selection and coordination of human locomotor forms following cerebellar damage. J Neurophysiol. 2001;85(2):759–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Gitchel GT, Wetzel PA, Baron MS. Slowed saccades and increased square wave jerks in essential tremor. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) 2013;3:tre-03-178-4116-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Helmchen C, Hagenow A, Miesner J, Sprenger A, Rambold H, Wenzelburger R, et al. Eye movement abnormalities in essential tremor may indicate cerebellar dysfunction. Brain. 2003;126(Pt 6):1319–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Wojcik-Pedziwiatr M, Plinta K, Krzak-Kubica A, Zajdel K, Falkiewicz M, Dylak J, et al. Eye movement abnormalities in essential tremor. J Hum Kinet. 2016;52:53–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Trillenberg P, Fuhrer J, Sprenger A, Hagenow A, Kompf D, Wenzelburger R, et al. Eye-hand coordination in essential tremor. Mov Disord. 2006;21(3):373–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Avanzino L, Bove M, Tacchino A, Ruggeri P, Giannini A, Trompetto C, et al. Cerebellar involvement in timing accuracy of rhythmic finger movements in essential tremor. Eur J Neurosci. 2009;30(10):1971–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Bares M, Husarova I, Lungu OV. Essential tremor, the cerebellum, and motor timing: towards integrating them into one complex entity. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) 2012;2:tre-02-93-653-1. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Bares M, Apps R, Avanzino L, Breska A, D’Angelo E, Filip P, et al. Consensus paper: Decoding the Contributions of the Cerebellum as a Time Machine. From Neurons to Clinical Applications. Cerebellum 2019;18(2):266–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Bologna M, Berardelli A. The cerebellum and dystonia. Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;155:259–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Kaji R, Bhatia K, Graybiel AM. Pathogenesis of dystonia: is it of cerebellar or basal ganglia origin? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018;89(5):488–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Bares M, Filip P. Cerebellum and dystonia: The story continues. Will the patients benefit from new discoveries? Clin Neurophysiol 2018;129(1):282–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Prudente CN, Pardo CA, Xiao J, Hanfelt J, Hess EJ, Ledoux MS, et al. Neuropathology of cervical dystonia. Exp Neurol. 2013;241:95–104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Shakkottai VG, Batla A, Bhatia K, Dauer WT, Dresel C, Niethammer M, et al. Current Opinions and Areas of Consensus on the Role of the Cerebellum in Dystonia. Cerebellum 2017;16(2):577–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Filip P, Lungu OV, Bares M. Dystonia and the cerebellum: a new field of interest in movement disorders? Clin Neurophysiol 2013;124(7):1269–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Nibbeling EA, Delnooz CC, de Koning TJ, Sinke RJ, Jinnah HA, Tijssen MA, et al. Using the shared genetics of dystonia and ataxia to unravel their pathogenesis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017;75:22–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Kuo PH, Gan SR, Wang J, Lo RY, Figueroa KP, Tomishon D, et al. Dystonia and ataxia progression in spinocerebellar ataxias. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2017;45:75–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Mitchell N, LaTouche GA, Nelson B, Figueroa KP, Walker RH, Sobering AK. Childhood-Onset Spinocerebellar Ataxia 3: Tongue Dystonia as an Early Manifestation. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) 2019;9:10.7916/tohm.v0.704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Miura S, Nakagawara H, Kaida H, Sugita M, Noda K, Motomura K, et al. Expansion of the phenotypic spectrum of SCA14 caused by the Gly128Asp mutation in PRKCG. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2009;111(2):211–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.van de Warrenburg BP, Verbeek DS, Piersma SJ, Hennekam FA, Pearson PL, Knoers NV, et al. Identification of a novel SCA14 mutation in a Dutch autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia family. Neurology. 2003;61(12):1760–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Rolfs A, Koeppen AH, Bauer I, Bauer P, Buhlmann S, Topka H, et al. Clinical features and neuropathology of autosomal dominant spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA17). Ann Neurol. 2003;54(3):367–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Hagenah JM, Zuhlke C, Hellenbroich Y, Heide W, Klein C. Focal dystonia as a presenting sign of spinocerebellar ataxia 17. Mov Disord. 2004;19(2):217–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Hou JG, Jankovic J. Movement disorders in Friedreich’s ataxia. J Neurol Sci. 2003;206(1):59–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Louis ED. The evolving definition of essential tremor: What are we dealing with? Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2018;46 Suppl 1:S87–S91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Louis ED, Hernandez N, Alcalay RN, Tirri DJ, Ottman R, Clark LN. Prevalence and features of unreported dystonia in a family study of “pure” essential tremor. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2013;19(3):359–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Hale EA, Liu G, Kim CY, Louis ED. Under-Recognition of Cervical Dystonia: An Essential Tremor Patient with Numerous Textbook Features of Cervical Dystonia. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) 2019;9:10.7916/tohm.v0.733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Bhatia KP, Bain P, Bajaj N, Elble RJ, Hallett M, Louis ED, et al. Consensus Statement on the classification of tremors. from the task force on tremor of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. Mov Disord. 2018;33(1):75–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Sun H, Satake W, Zhang C, Nagai Y, Tian Y, Fu S, et al. Genetic and clinical analysis in a Chinese parkinsonism-predominant spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 family. J Hum Genet. 2011;56(4):330–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Lee D, Na BS, Hong IK, Ahn TB. Parkinsonism in Spinocerebellar ataxia type 7. J Neurol Sci. 2016;365:151–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Tarakad A, Jankovic J. Essential Tremor and Parkinson’s Disease: Exploring the Relationship. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) 2018;8:589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Thenganatt MA, Jankovic J. The relationship between essential tremor and Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016;22 Suppl 1:S162–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Benito-Leon J, Louis ED, Bermejo-Pareja F. Risk of incident Parkinson’s disease and parkinsonism in essential tremor: a population based study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009;80(4):423–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.LaRoia H, Louis ED. Association between essential tremor and other neurodegenerative diseases: what is the epidemiological evidence? Neuroepidemiology 2011;37(1):1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Louis ED, Ottman R. Is there a one-way street from essential tremor to Parkinson’s disease? Possible biological ramifications. Eur J Neurol. 2013;20(11):1440–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Louis ED, Faust PL, Vonsattel JP, Honig LS, Rajput A, Robinson CA, et al. Neuropathological changes in essential tremor: 33 cases compared with 21 controls. Brain. 2007;130(Pt 12):3297–307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Louis ED, Honig LS, Vonsattel JP, Maraganore DM, Borden S, Moskowitz CB. Essential tremor associated with focal nonnigral Lewy bodies: a clinicopathologic study. Arch Neurol. 2005;62(6):1004–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Louis ED, Joyce JL, Cosentino S. Mind the gaps: What we don’t know about cognitive impairment in essential tremor. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2019;63:10–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Chandran V, Pal PK. Essential tremor: beyond the motor features. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2012;18(5):407–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Janicki SC, Cosentino S, Louis ED. The cognitive side of essential tremor: what are the therapeutic implications? Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2013;6(6):353–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Benito-Leon J, Louis ED, Bermejo-Pareja F. Population-based case-control study of cognitive function in essential tremor. Neurology. 2006;66(1):69–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Thawani SP, Schupf N, Louis ED. Essential tremor is associated with dementia: prospective population-based study in New York. Neurology. 2009;73(8):621–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Bermejo-Pareja F, Louis ED, Benito-Leon J. Risk of incident dementia in essential tremor: A population-based study. Mov Disord. 2007;22(11):1573–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Benito-Leon J, Louis ED, Mitchell AJ, Bermejo-Pareja F. Elderly-onset essential tremor and mild cognitive impairment: a population-based study (NEDICES). J Alzheimers Dis. 23(4):727–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Daum I, Ackermann H. Neuropsychological abnormalities in cerebellar syndromes--fact or fiction? Int Rev Neurobiol. 1997;41:455–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Koziol LF, Budding D, Andreasen N, D’Arrigo S, Bulgheroni S, Imamizu H, et al. Consensus Paper: The Cerebellum’s Role in Movement and Cognition. Cerebellum 2014;13(1):151–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Handforth A. Linking Essential Tremor to the Cerebellum-Animal Model Evidence. Cerebellum 2016;15(3):285–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Filip P, Lungu OV, Manto MU, Bares M. Linking Essential Tremor to the Cerebellum: Physiological Evidence. Cerebellum 2016;15(6):774–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Schmahmann JD, Sherman JC. The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. Brain. 1998;121 ( Pt 4):561–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Akshoomoff NA, Courchesne E, Townsend J. Attention coordination and anticipatory control. Int Rev Neurobiol. 1997;41:575–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Hallett M, Grafman J. Executive function and motor skill learning. Int Rev Neurobiol. 1997;41:297–323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Molinari M, Leggio MG, Solida A, Ciorra R, Misciagna S, Silveri MC, et al. Cerebellum and procedural learning: evidence from focal cerebellar lesions. Brain. 1997;120 (Pt 10):1753–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Desmond JE, Fiez JA. Neuroimaging studies of the cerebellum: language, learning and memory. Trends Cogn Sci 1998;2(9):355–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Rapoport M, van Reekum R, Mayberg H. The role of the cerebellum in cognition and behavior: a selective review. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2000;12(2):193–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Bermejo-Pareja F, Puertas-Martin V. Cognitive features of essential tremor: a review of the clinical aspects and possible mechanistic underpinnings. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). 2012;2:02-74-541-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Teive HAG, Arruda WO. Cognitive dysfunction in spinocerebellar ataxias. Dement Neuropsychol. 2009;3(3):180–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Schols L, Riess O, Schols S, Zeck S, Amoiridis G, Langkafel M, et al. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 1: Clinical and neurophysiological characteristics in German kindreds. Acta Neurol Scand. 1995;92(6):478–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Burk K, Globas C, Bosch S, Graber S, Abele M, Brice A, et al. Cognitive deficits in spinocerebellar ataxia 2. Brain. 1999;122 ( Pt 4):769–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Ishikawa A, Yamada M, Makino K, Aida I, Idezuka J, Ikeuchi T, et al. Dementia and delirium in 4 patients with Machado-Joseph disease. Arch Neurol. 2002;59(11):1804–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Fujigasaki H, Verma IC, Camuzat A, Margolis RL, Zander C, Lebre AS, et al. SCA12 is a rare locus for autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia: a study of an Indian family. Ann Neurol. 2001;49(1):117–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Stevanin G, Hahn V, Lohmann E, Bouslam N, Gouttard M, Soumphonphakdy C, et al. Mutation in the catalytic domain of protein kinase C gamma and extension of the phenotype associated with spinocerebellar ataxia type 14. Arch Neurol. 2004;61(8):1242–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Klebe S, Durr A, Rentschler A, Hahn-Barma V, Abele M, Bouslam N, et al. New mutations in protein kinase Cgamma associated with spinocerebellar ataxia type 14. Ann Neurol. 2005;58(5):720–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Olszewska DA, Fallon EM, Pastores GM, Murphy K, Blanco A, Lynch T, et al. Autosomal Dominant Gene Negative Frontotemporal Dementia-Think of SCA17. Cerebellum 2019;18(3):654–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Nethisinghe S, Lim WN, Ging H, Zeitlberger A, Abeti R, Pemble S, et al. Complexity of the Genetics and Clinical Presentation of Spinocerebellar Ataxia 17. Front Cell Neurosci 2018;12:429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Mariotti C, Alpini D, Fancellu R, Soliveri P, Grisoli M, Ravaglia S, et al. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 17 (SCA17): oculomotor phenotype and clinical characterization of 15 Italian patients. J Neurol. 2007;254(11):1538–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Sugihara K, Maruyama H, Morino H, Miyamoto R, Ueno H, Matsumoto M, et al. The clinical characteristics of spinocerebellar ataxia 36: a study of 2121 Japanese ataxia patients. Mov Disord. 2012;27(9):1158–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Zeigelboim BS, de Carvalho HA, Teive HA, Liberalesso PB, Jurkiewicz AL, da Silva Abdulmassih EM, et al. Central auditory processing in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia. Hear Res. 2015;327:235–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Ondo WG, Sutton L, Dat Vuong K, Lai D, Jankovic J. Hearing impairment in essential tremor. Neurology. 2003;61(8):1093–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Yilmaz NH, Akbostanci MC, Yilmaz N. Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Non-depressed Essential Tremor Cases and Controls: A Clinical and Audiometric Study. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) 2015;5:281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Balaban H, Altuntas EE, Uysal IO, Senturk IA, Topaktas S. Audio-vestibular evaluation in patients with essential tremor. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;269(6):1577–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Benito-Leon JLE, Bermejo-Pareja F. Reported hearing impairment in essential tremor: A population-based case-control study. Neuroepidemiology 2007;29(3–4):213–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Louis ED. Non-motor symptoms in essential tremor: A review of the current data and state of the field. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016;22 Suppl 1:S115–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Louis ED, Agnew A, Gillman A, Gerbin M, Viner AS. Estimating annual rate of decline: prospective, longitudinal data on arm tremor severity in two groups of essential tremor cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011;82(7):761–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Louis ED, Okun MS. It is time to remove the ‘benign’ from the essential tremor label. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2011;17(7):516–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Ranum LP, Schut LJ, Lundgren JK, Orr HT, Livingston DM. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 5 in a family descended from the grandparents of President Lincoln maps to chromosome 11. Nat Genet. 1994;8(3):280–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Stevanin G, Herman A, Brice A, Durr A. Clinical and MRI findings in spinocerebellar ataxia type 5. Neurology. 1999;53(6):1355–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Zhuchenko O, Bailey J, Bonnen P, Ashizawa T, Stockton DW, Amos C, et al. Autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia (SCA6) associated with small polyglutamine expansions in the alpha 1A-voltage-dependent calcium channel. Nat Genet. 1997;15(1):62–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Castrioto A, Prontera P, Di Gregorio E, Rossi V, Parnetti L, Rossi A, et al. A novel spinocerebellar ataxia type 15 family with involuntary movements and cognitive decline. Eur J Neurol. 2011;18(10):1263–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Rub U, Burk K, Timmann D, den Dunnen W, Seidel K, Farrag K, et al. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 1 (SCA1): new pathoanatomical and clinico-pathological insights. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2012;38(7):665–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Ishida C, Komai K, Yonezawa K, Sakajiri K, Nitta E, Kawashima A, et al. An autopsy case of an aged patient with spinocerebellar ataxia type 2. Neuropathology. 2011;31(5):510–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Lastres-Becker I, Rub U, Auburger G. Spinocerebellar ataxia 2 (SCA2). Cerebellum 2008;7(2):115–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Rub U, Gierga K, Brunt ER, de Vos RA, Bauer M, Schols L, et al. Spinocerebellar ataxias types 2 and 3: degeneration of the pre-cerebellar nuclei isolates the three phylogenetically defined regions of the cerebellum. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2005;112(11):1523–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Horton LC, Frosch MP, Vangel MG, Weigel-DiFranco C, Berson EL, Schmahmann JD. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 7: clinical course, phenotype-genotype correlations, and neuropathology. Cerebellum. 2013;12(2):176–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Rub U, Brunt ER, Gierga K, Seidel K, Schultz C, Schols L, et al. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 7 (SCA7): first report of a systematic neuropathological study of the brain of a patient with a very short expanded CAG-repeat. Brain Pathol. 2005;15(4):287–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.O’Hearn EE, Hwang HS, Holmes SE, Rudnicki DD, Chung DW, Seixas AI, et al. Neuropathology and Cellular Pathogenesis of Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 12. Mov Disord. 2015;30(13):1813–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Wong MMK, Hoekstra SD, Vowles J, Watson LM, Fuller G, Nemeth AH, et al. Neurodegeneration in SCA14 is associated with increased PKCgamma kinase activity, mislocalization and aggregation. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2018;6(1):99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Axelrad JE, Louis ED, Honig LS, Flores I, Ross GW, Pahwa R, et al. Reduced purkinje cell number in essential tremor: a postmortem study. Arch Neurol. 2008;65(1):101–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Tsuchiya K, Watabiki S, Sano M, Iobe H, Shiotsu H, Taki K, et al. Distribution of cerebellar cortical lesions in multiple system atrophy: a topographic neuropathological study of three autopsy cases in Japan. J Neurol Sci. 1998;155(1):80–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Li H, Ma J, Zhang X. Diffusion tensor imaging of spinocerebellar ataxia type 12. Med Sci Monit. 2014;20:1783–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Stevanin G, Durr A, David G, Didierjean O, Cancel G, Rivaud S, et al. Clinical and molecular features of spinocerebellar ataxia type 6. Neurology. 1997;49(5):1243–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Scherzed W, Brunt ER, Heinsen H, de Vos RA, Seidel K, Burk K, et al. Pathoanatomy of cerebellar degeneration in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 (SCA2) and type 3 (SCA3). Cerebellum 2012;11(3):749–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Durr A, Stevanin G, Cancel G, Duyckaerts C, Abbas N, Didierjean O, et al. Spinocerebellar ataxia 3 and Machado-Joseph disease: clinical, molecular, and neuropathological features. Ann Neurol. 1996;39(4):490–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Louis ED, Vonsattel JP, Honig LS, Lawton A, Moskowitz C, Ford B, et al. Essential tremor associated with pathologic changes in the cerebellum. Arch Neurol. 2006;63(8):1189–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Babij R, Lee M, Cortes E, Vonsattel JP, Faust PL, Louis ED. Purkinje cell axonal anatomy: quantifying morphometric changes in essential tremor versus control brains. Brain. 2013;136(Pt 10):3051–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Erickson-Davis CR, Faust PL, Vonsattel JP, Gupta S, Honig LS, Louis ED. “Hairy baskets” associated with degenerative Purkinje cell changes in essential tremor. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2010;69(3):262–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Yu M, Ma K, Faust PL, Honig LS, Cortes E, Vonsattel JP, et al. Increased number of Purkinje cell dendritic swellings in essential tremor. Eur J Neurol. 2012;19(4):625–30 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Louis ED, Lee M, Babij R, Ma K, Cortes E, Vonsattel JP, et al. Reduced Purkinje cell dendritic arborization and loss of dendritic spines in essential tremor. Brain. 2014;137(Pt 12):3142–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Lin CY, Louis ED, Faust PL, Koeppen AH, Vonsattel JP, Kuo SH. Abnormal climbing fibre-Purkinje cell synaptic connections in the essential tremor cerebellum. Brain. 2014;137(Pt 12):3149–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Louis ED, Kuo SH, Tate WJ, Kelly GC, Gutierrez J, Cortes EP, et al. Heterotopic Purkinje Cells: a Comparative Postmortem Study of Essential Tremor and Spinocerebellar Ataxias 1, 2, 3, and 6. Cerebellum. 2018;17(2):104–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Louis ED, Faust PL, Vonsattel JP, Honig LS, Rajput A, Rajput A, et al. Torpedoes in Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, essential tremor, and control brains. Mov Disord. 2009;24(11):1600–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Choe M, Cortes E, Vonsattel JP, Kuo SH, Faust PL, Louis ED. Purkinje cell loss in essential tremor: Random sampling quantification and nearest neighbor analysis. Mov Disord. 2016;31(3):393–401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Kuo SH, Tang G, Louis ED, Ma K, Babji R, Balatbat M, et al. Lingo-1 expression is increased in essential tremor cerebellum and is present in the basket cell pinceau. Acta Neuropathol. 2013;125(6):879–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Louis ED, Kuo SH, Vonsattel JP, Faust PL. Torpedo formation and Purkinje cell loss: modeling their relationship in cerebellar disease. Cerebellum. 2014;13(4):433–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Paris-Robidas S, Brochu E, Sintes M, Emond V, Bousquet M, Vandal M, et al. Defective dentate nucleus GABA receptors in essential tremor. Brain. 2012;135(Pt 1):105–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Delay C, Tremblay C, Brochu E, Paris-Robidas S, Emond V, Rajput AH, et al. Increased LINGO1 in the cerebellum of essential tremor patients. Mov Disord. 2014;29(13):1637–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Beliveau E, Tremblay C, Aubry-Lafontaine E, Paris-Robidas S, Delay C, Robinson C, et al. Accumulation of amyloid-beta in the cerebellar cortex of essential tremor patients. Neurobiol Dis. 2015;82:397–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Louis ED, Babij R, Cortes E, Vonsattel JP, Faust PL. The inferior olivary nucleus: a postmortem study of essential tremor cases versus controls. Mov Disord. 2013;28(6):779–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Rajput A, Robinson CA, Rajput AH. Essential tremor course and disability: A clinicopathologic study of 20 cases. Neurology. 2004;62(6):932–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Clark LN, Ye X, Liu X, Mirzozoda K, Louis ED. Genetic analysis of ten common degenerative hereditary ataxia loci in patients with essential tremor. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2015;21(8):943–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Louis ED, Hernandez N, Michalec M. Prevalence and correlates of rest tremor in essential tremor: cross-sectional survey of 831 patients across four distinct cohorts. Eur J Neurol. 2015;22(6):927–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Isobe T, Sato H, Goto T, Yako T, Yoshida K, Hashimoto T. Long-Term Suppression of Disabling Tremor by Thalamic Stimulation in a Patient with Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2019;97(4):241–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Pirker W, Back C, Gerschlager W, Laccone F, Alesch F. Chronic thalamic stimulation in a patient with spinocerebellar ataxia type 2. Mov Disord. 2003;18(2):222–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Oyama G, Thompson A, Foote KD, Limotai N, Abd-El-Barr M, Maling N, et al. Deep brain stimulation for tremor associated with underlying ataxia syndromes: a case series and discussion of issues. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) 2014;4:228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Zarubova K, Ruzicka E. Cervical dystonia in spinocerebellar ataxia type 2. Mov Disord. 2006;21(8):1295–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Miura M, Numasawa Y, Takahisa M, Ozaki K, Irioka T, Nishida Y, et al. Levodopa-responsive truncal tremor in a patient with spinocerebellar ataxia type 3. J Neurol Sci. 2018;392:32–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Bettencourt C, Santos C, Coutinho P, Rizzu P, Vasconcelos J, Kay T, et al. Parkinsonian phenotype in Machado-Joseph disease (MJD/SCA3): a two-case report. BMC Neurol. 2011;11:131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Jiang H, Tang B, Xia K, Zhou Y, Xu B, Zhao G, et al. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 6 in Mainland China: molecular and clinical features in four families. J Neurol Sci. 2005;236(1–2):25–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.Schols L, Amoiridis G, Epplen JT, Langkafel M, Przuntek H, Riess O. Relations between genotype and phenotype in German patients with the Machado-Joseph disease mutation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996;61(5):466–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Takahashi H, Ishikawa K, Tsutsumi T, Fujigasaki H, Kawata A, Okiyama R, et al. A clinical and genetic study in a large cohort of patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 6. J Hum Genet. 2004;49(5):256–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Watanabe H, Tanaka F, Matsumoto M, Doyu M, Ando T, Mitsuma T, et al. Frequency analysis of autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxias in Japanese patients and clinical characterization of spinocerebellar ataxia type 6. Clin Genet. 1998;53(1):13–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Casey HL, Gomez CM. Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 6. In: Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJH, Stephens K, et al. , editors. GeneReviews((R)). Seattle (WA)1993. [Google Scholar]
- 225.Xie T, Appelbaum D, Bernard J, Padmanaban M, Pu Y, Gomez C. Evaluation of parkinsonism and striatal dopamine transporter loss in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 6. J Neurol. 2016;263(11):2302–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Matsumura R, Futamura N, Fujimoto Y, Yanagimoto S, Horikawa H, Suzumura A, et al. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 6. Molecular and clinical features of 35 Japanese patients including one homozygous for the CAG repeat expansion. Neurology. 1997;49(5):1238–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227.Geschwind DH, Perlman S, Figueroa KP, Karrim J, Baloh RW, Pulst SM. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 6. Frequency of the mutation and genotype-phenotype correlations. Neurology. 1997;49(5):1247–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228.Martin J, Van Regemorter N, Del-Favero J, Lofgren A, Van Broeckhoven C. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 7 (SCA7) - correlations between phenotype and genotype in one large Belgian family. J Neurol Sci. 1999;168(1):37–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229.Tercero-Perez K, Cortes H, Torres-Ramos Y, Rodriguez-Labrada R, Cerecedo-Zapata CM, Hernandez-Hernandez O, et al. Effects of Physical Rehabilitation in Patients with Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 7. Cerebellum 2019;18(3):397–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230.Gu W, Wang Y, Liu X, Zhou B, Zhou Y, Wang G. Molecular and clinical study of spinocerebellar ataxia type 7 in Chinese kindreds. Arch Neurol. 2000;57(10):1513–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Wali GM. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 7: Report of an Indian family. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 2013;16(4):708–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Azevedo PB, Rocha AG, Keim LMN, Lavinsky D, Furtado GV, de Mattos EP, et al. Ophthalmological and Neurologic Manifestations in Pre-clinical and Clinical Phases of Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 7. Cerebellum 2019;18(3):388–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.Italiano D, Tarantino P, De Marco EV, Calabro RS, Bramanti P, Quattrone A, et al. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 7: report of a new Italian family. Intern Med. 2012;51(20):2953–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234.Han Y, Yu L, Zheng HM, Guan YT. Clinical and genetic study of spinocerebellar ataxia type 7 in East Asian population. Chin Med J (Engl) 2010;123(16):2274–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235.Brussino A, Graziano C, Giobbe D, Ferrone M, Dragone E, Arduino C, et al. Spinocerebellar ataxia type 12 identified in two Italian families may mimic sporadic ataxia. Mov Disord. 2010;25(9):1269–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236.Dalski A, Mitulla B, Burk K, Schattenfroh C, Schwinger E, Zuhlke C. Mutation of the highly conserved cysteine residue 131 of the SCA14 associated PRKCG gene in a family with slow progressive cerebellar ataxia. J Neurol. 2006;253(8):1111–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237.Asai H, Hirano M, Shimada K, Kiriyama T, Furiya Y, Ikeda M, et al. Protein kinase C gamma, a protein causative for dominant ataxia, negatively regulates nuclear import of recessive-ataxia-related aprataxin. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18(19):3533–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238.Novak MJ, Sweeney MG, Li A, Treacy C, Chandrashekar HS, Giunti P, et al. An ITPR1 gene deletion causes spinocerebellar ataxia 15/16: a genetic, clinical and radiological description. Mov Disord. 2010;25(13):2176–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239.Bradley D, Whelan R, Walsh R, O’Dwyer J, Reilly R, Hutchinson S, et al. Comparing endophenotypes in adult-onset primary torsion dystonia. Mov Disord. 2010;25(1):84–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240.McCabe DJ, Ryan F, Moore DP, McQuaid S, King MD, Kelly A, et al. Typical Friedreich’s ataxia without GAA expansions and GAA expansion without typical Friedreich’s ataxia. J Neurol. 2000;247(5):346–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241.Galimanis A, Glutz L, Burgunder JM, Spiegel R, Kaelin-Lang A. Very-late-onset Friedreich ataxia with disturbing head tremor and without spinal atrophy--a case report. Mov Disord. 2008;23(7):1058–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242.Machida Y, Lijima M, Nakamura K, Ota S, Hattori N, Mizuno Y. [A 60-year-old man with intention tremor as an initial symptom followed by cerebellar ataxia, peripheral neuropathy and dementia]. No To Shinkei. 2005;57(8):710–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243.Tada M, Onodera O, Tada M, Ozawa T, Piao YS, Kakita A, et al. Early development of autonomic dysfunction may predict poor prognosis in patients with multiple system atrophy. Arch Neurol. 2007;64(2):256–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244.Rodriguez ME, Artieda J, Zubieta JL, Obeso JA. Reflex myoclonus in olivopontocerebellar atrophy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994;57(3):316–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]