Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2020 Oct 29;9(44):e00770-20. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00770-20

Genome Sequences of Four Strains of Acinetobacter bereziniae Isolated from Human Milk Pumped with a Personal Breast Pump and Hand-Washed Milk Collection Supplies

Sarah M Reyes a,*,, Emilienne Bolettieri b, Dainelle Allen a, Anthony G Hay b
Editor: Irene L G Newtonc
PMCID: PMC7595943  PMID: 33122407

Acinetobacter bereziniae, formerly Acinetobacter genomospecies 10, is an opportunistic pathogen possessing resistance to multiple antibiotics, and it has been reported to be responsible for hospital-associated infections in immunocompromised individuals. We report the draft genome sequences of four Acinetobacter bereziniae strains that were isolated from a single human milk sample collected with a personal breast pump and a hand-washed milk collection kit.

ABSTRACT

Acinetobacter bereziniae, formerly Acinetobacter genomospecies 10, is an opportunistic pathogen possessing resistance to multiple antibiotics, and it has been reported to be responsible for hospital-associated infections in immunocompromised individuals. We report the draft genome sequences of four Acinetobacter bereziniae strains that were isolated from a single human milk sample collected with a personal breast pump and a hand-washed milk collection kit.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Acinetobacter bereziniae, formerly known as Acinetobacter genomospecies 10, is a strictly aerobic, nonfermentative, nonmotile Gram-negative coccobacillus and a member of the class Gammaproteobacteria (1, 2). It is considered an emerging nosocomial pathogen (3), and several isolates of A. bereziniae have been reported to be responsible for health care-associated infections, including sepsis (1, 46). Additionally, isolates of A. bereziniae have been reported to be resistant to multiple antibiotics, including penicillins, carbapenems, and other β-lactams (1, 5, 7). Acinetobacter species are common in the environment (1) and have been detected as contaminants in human and animal milks (812). They are noted for their surface hydrophobicity, which contributes to their adherence to surfaces (13). Other species of Acinetobacter have been linked to nosocomial outbreaks in neonatal intensive care units; the sources of infection in some cases have been breast pumps and milk collection equipment (1416). While Acinetobacter baumannii and Acinetobacter septicus have received significant attention in the literature (1621), A. bereziniae has received little attention.

Four strains of A. bereziniae were isolated from human milk samples collected as part of the Milk in Life Conditions (MiLC) Trial (n = 52) (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT03123874). MiLC was an in-home randomized, controlled, crossover trial to test the effects of women’s own pumping practices on the human milk microbiome. Participants provided written informed consent according to the study protocol approved by the Cornell University institutional review board (protocol 1608006566). These isolates were obtained from a single woman whose milk was pumped with her personal electric breast pump fitted with her own milk collection kit, which was washed by hand in the woman’s home kitchen. The woman’s infant was 4 months old and was reported to be healthy.

Milk samples were plated on Leeds Acinetobacter medium (Hardy Diagnostics, Santa Maria, CA) and were grown aerobically at 37°C for 18 h; colonies were purified by restreaking three times. DNA was isolated via freeze-thawing of cells and then was purified with glass milk (22). Sanger sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene was performed on four pure cultures (Table 1). Although they had 16S genes almost identical to each other (99.9%) and to those of the type strain A. bereziniae LMG1003 (average of 99.3% identity over 970 bp) (2, 23), ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (RISA) demonstrated the presence of two distinct groups of isolates (24). All four were thus selected for whole-genome sequencing so that we could examine differences within and between RISA groups.

TABLE 1.

Summary of whole-genome assemblies for the A. bereziniae strains in this report

Sample Sourcea GenBank accession no. for:
Length (bp)b Read coverage (×)c No. of contigsb N50 (bp) No. of predicted genes GC content (%) Completeness (%) Contamination (%) SRA accession no.
16S rRNA sequence Whole-genome sequence
A005.1 Human milk MT920178 JACDXR000000000 4,888,305 662 174 66,526 2,055 37.91 99 1.77 SRR12713660
A005.2 Human milk MT920179 JABWPZ000000000 4,892,939 604 158 74,182 2,065 37.89 99 1.70 SRR12713659
A005.3 Human milk MT920180 JABWPY000000000 4,902,916 303 187 81,363 2,068 37.89 99 1.72 SRR12713658
A005.4 Human milk MT920181 JACDXQ000000000 4,875,542 353 318 31,353 2,093 38.06 99 1.70 SRR12713657
a

All samples were sourced from a single human milk sample collected from a woman at home using her own personal electric breast pump and milk collection supplies, which were washed by hand in her home kitchen.

b

The data provided for these parameters include all contigs that are greater than 0 bp long.

c

Calculated as the total number of reads per genome length.

For whole-genome sequencing, sequence libraries were prepared using the Nextera XT Flex kit (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA), followed by sequencing on an Illumina NextSeq v2.18 system, resulting in paired-end reads (2 × 150 bp). Raw reads were uploaded to KBase (25), where adaptor sequences were trimmed using Trimmomatic v0.36 (26) and low-quality reads were removed using FastQC v0.11.5img (27). The genomes were assembled de novo with SPAdes v3.13.0 (28) and quality controlled using QUAST (29) and CheckM v1.0.18 (30). The genomes were annotated using RAST (31). Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise stated.

The draft genomes ranged in size from 4,889,305 to 4,902,916 bp (Table 1). The numbers of contigs ranged from 158 to 318, and the N50 values ranged from 31,353 to 81,363 bp, with the total numbers of predicted genes ranging from 2,055 to 2,093. The GC contents were similar among the isolates and ranged from 37.89 to 38.06%.

Little is known about the impact of Acinetobacter bereziniae from human milk on neonates, but the presence of multiple antibiotic resistance determinants and a hemolysin in these strains, along with the status of A. bereziniae as an emerging pathogen (3), suggests that further analysis of this genus beyond strains of the widely characterized species A. baumannii and A. septicus is warranted (1719).

Data availability.

The sequenced genomes have been deposited in NCBI GenBank under BioProject PRJNA639858. The sequences can be accessed with BioSample and SRA accession numbers SAMN15283204 and SRR12713660 (A005.1), SAMN15283205 and SRR12713659 (A005.2), SAMN15283206 and SRR12713658 (A005.3), and SAMN15283207 and SRR12713657 (A005.4), respectively. Accession numbers for 16S rRNA sequences and whole-genome sequences are available in Table 1.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was funded in part by NIH grant T32-DK007158, USDA/Hatch grant NYC-399346, and the McNair Scholars Program at Cornell University. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Choi J-Y, Kim Y, Ko EA, Park YK, Jheong W-H, Ko G, Ko KS. 2012. Acinetobacter species isolates from a range of environments: species survey and observations of antimicrobial resistance. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 74:177–180. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.06.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nemec A, Musílek M, Sedo O, De Baere T, Maixnerová M, van der Reijden TJK, Zdráhal Z, Vaneechoutte M, Dijkshoorn L. 2010. Acinetobacter bereziniae sp. nov. and Acinetobacter guillouiae sp. nov., to accommodate Acinetobacter genomic species 10 and 11, respectively. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 60:896–903. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.013656-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Grosso F, Silva L, Sousa C, Ramos H, Quinteira S, Peixe L. 2015. Extending the reservoir of blaIMP-5: the emerging pathogen Acinetobacter bereziniae. Future Microbiol 10:1609–1613. doi: 10.2217/fmb.15.88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kuo S-C, Fung C-P, Lee Y-T, Chen C-P, Chen T-L. 2010. Bacteremia due to Acinetobacter genomic species 10. J Clin Microbiol 48:586–590. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01857-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bonnin RA, Ocampo-Sosa AA, Poirel L, Guet-Revillet H, Nordmann P. 2012. Biochemical and genetic characterization of carbapenem-hydrolyzing β-lactamase OXA-229 from Acinetobacter bereziniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:3923–3927. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00257-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jones LS, Carvalho MJ, Toleman MA, White PL, Connor TR, Mushtaq A, Weeks JL, Kumarasamy KK, Raven KE, Török ME, Peacock SJ, Howe RA, Walsh TR. 2015. Characterization of plasmids in extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter strains isolated in India and Pakistan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:923–929. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03242-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Park YK, Jung S-I, Park K-H, Kim SH, Ko KS. 2012. Characteristics of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter spp. other than Acinetobacter baumannii in South Korea. Int J Antimicrob Agents 39:81–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cho G-S, Li B, Rostalsky A, Fiedler G, Rösch N, Igbinosa E, Kabisch J, Bockelmann W, Hammer P, Huys G, Franz CMAP. 2018. Diversity and antibiotic susceptibility of Acinetobacter strains from milk powder produced in Germany. Front Microbiol 9:536. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Huang M-S, Cheng C-C, Tseng S-Y, Lin Y-L, Lo H, Chen P-W. 2019. Most commensally bacterial strains in human milk of healthy mothers display multiple antibiotic resistance. MicrobiologyOpen 8:e00618. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gurung M, Nam HM, Tamang MD, Chae MH, Jang GC, Jung SC, Lim SK. 2013. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Acinetobacter from raw bulk tank milk in Korea. J Dairy Sci 96:1997–2002. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cousin MA. 1982. Presence and activity of psychrotrophic microorganisms in milk and dairy products: a review. J Food Prot 45:172–207. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-45.2.172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ramos G, Nascimento J. 2019. Characterization of Acinetobacter spp. from raw goat milk. Cienc Rural 49:e20190404. doi: 10.1590/0103-8478cr20190404. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Doughari HJ, Ndakidemi PA, Human IS, Benade S. 2011. The ecology, biology and pathogenesis of Acinetobacter spp.: an overview. Microbes Environ 26:101–112. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.me10179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Touati A, Achour W, Cherif A, Hmida HB, Afif FB, Jabnoun S, Khrouf N, Hassen AB. 2009. Outbreak of Acinetobacter baumannii in a neonatal intensive care unit: antimicrobial susceptibility and genotyping analysis. Ann Epidemiol 19:372–378. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Engür D, Çakmak BÇ, Türkmen MK, Telli M, Eyigör M, Güzünler M. 2014. A milk pump as a source for spreading Acinetobacter baumannii in a neonatal intensive care unit. Breastfeed Med 9:551–554. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2014.0054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kilic A, Li H, Mellmann A, Basustaoglu AC, Kul M, Senses Z, Aydogan H, Stratton CW, Harmsen D, Tang Y-W. 2008. Acinetobacter septicus sp. nov. association with a nosocomial outbreak of bacteremia in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Clin Microbiol 46:902–908. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01876-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Al Atrouni A, Joly-Guillou M-L, Hamze M, Kempf M. 2016. Reservoirs of non-baumannii Acinetobacter species. Front Microbiol 7:49. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Espinal P, Roca I, Vila J. 2011. Clinical impact and molecular basis of antimicrobial resistance in non-baumannii Acinetobacter. Future Microbiol 6:495–511. doi: 10.2217/fmb.11.30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kouyama Y, Harada S, Ishii Y, Saga T, Yoshizumi A, Tateda K, Yamaguchi K. 2012. Molecular characterization of carbapenem-non-susceptible Acinetobacter spp. in Japan: predominance of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clonal complex 92 and IMP-type metallo-β-lactamase-producing non-baumannii Acinetobacter species. J Infect Chemother 18:522–528. doi: 10.1007/s10156-012-0374-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pandey PK, Verma P, Kumar H, Bavdekar A, Patole MS, Shouche YS. 2012. Comparative analysis of fecal microflora of healthy full-term Indian infants born with different methods of delivery (vaginal vs cesarean): Acinetobacter sp. prevalence in vaginally born infants. J Biosci 37:989–998. doi: 10.1007/s12038-012-9268-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.McGrath EJ, Chopra T, Abdel-Haq N, Preney K, Koo W, Asmar BI, Kaye KS. 2011. An outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infection in a neonatal intensive care unit: investigation and control. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 32:34–41. doi: 10.1086/657669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Vogelstein B, Gillespie D. 1979. Preparative and analytical purification of DNA from agarose. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 76:615–619. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.2.615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.NCBI Resource Coordinators. 2017. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D12–D17. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cardinale M, Brusetti L, Quatrini P, Borin S, Puglia AM, Rizzi A, Zanardini E, Sorlini C, Corselli C, Daffonchio D. 2004. Comparison of different primer sets for use in automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis of complex bacterial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:6147–6156. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.10.6147-6156.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Arkin AP, Cottingham RW, Henry CS, Harris NL, Stevens RL, Maslov S, Dehal P, Ware D, Perez F, Canon S, Sneddon MW, Henderson ML, Riehl WJ, Murphy-Olson D, Chan SY, Kamimura RT, Kumari S, Drake MM, Brettin TS, Glass EM, Chivian D, Gunter D, Weston DJ, Allen BH, Baumohl J, Best AA, Bowen B, Brenner SE, Bun CC, Chandonia J-M, Chia J-M, Colasanti R, Conrad N, Davis JJ, Davison BH, DeJongh M, Devoid S, Dietrich E, Dubchak I, Edirisinghe JN, Fang G, Faria JP, Frybarger PM, Gerlach W, Gerstein M, Greiner A, Gurtowski J, Haun HL, He F, Jain R, Joachimiak MP, Keegan KP, Kondo S, Kumar V, Land ML, Meyer F, Mills M, Novichkov PS, Oh T, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Parrello B, Pasternak S, Pearson E, Poon SS, Price GA, Ramakrishnan S, Ranjan P, Ronald PC, Schatz MC, Seaver SMD, Shukla M, Sutormin RA, Syed MH, Thomason J, Tintle NL, Wang D, Xia F, Yoo H, Yoo S, Yu D. 2018. KBase: The United States Department of Energy Systems Biology Knowledgebase. Nat Biotechnol 36:566–569. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc.
  • 28.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The sequenced genomes have been deposited in NCBI GenBank under BioProject PRJNA639858. The sequences can be accessed with BioSample and SRA accession numbers SAMN15283204 and SRR12713660 (A005.1), SAMN15283205 and SRR12713659 (A005.2), SAMN15283206 and SRR12713658 (A005.3), and SAMN15283207 and SRR12713657 (A005.4), respectively. Accession numbers for 16S rRNA sequences and whole-genome sequences are available in Table 1.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES