Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2020 Oct 29;10:18637. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75608-2

High prevalence of mcr-1-encoded colistin resistance in commensal Escherichia coli from broiler chicken in Bangladesh

Shahana Ahmed 1, Tridip Das 2, Md Zohorul Islam 1,2,3,4, Ana Herrero-Fresno 1, Paritosh Kumar Biswas 2, John Elmerdahl Olsen 1,
PMCID: PMC7596488  PMID: 33122817

Abstract

Colistin is a last-resort antimicrobial used for the treatment of human infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. However, colistin is still widely used in intensive poultry production in Bangladesh. We aimed to investigate the dynamics and genetic diversity of colistin-resistant commensal Escherichia coli from broiler chickens. A total of 1200 E. coli strains were characterized from 20 broiler farms at three-time points along the production period. All strains were screened for mcr-1 to mcr-5 genes by a multiplex PCR, and their genetic diversity was measured by repetitive extragenic palindromic (REP)-PCR fingerprinting. Genomic diversity and characterization were performed by whole genome sequencing (WGS). Twenty-five percent of the commensal E. coli strains harbored mcr-1 genes. Frequency of mcr-1 gene detection correlated positively (odds ratio 1.71; 95% CI 0.96–3.06; p = 0.068) with the use of colistin in poultry flocks. REP-PCR profiles and WGS analysis showed diverse E. coli population carrying multiple antimicrobial resistance genes. Phylogenetic comparison of mcr-1-bearing strains recovered from this study with a global strain collection revealed wide phylogenetic relationship. This study identified a high prevalence of mcr-1 gene among genetically diverse E. coli populations from broiler chickens in Bangladesh suggesting a massive horizontal spread of mcr-1 rather than by clonal expansion.

Subject terms: Antimicrobials, Applied microbiology, Bacteria, Bacteriology, Clinical microbiology, Microbial communities, Infectious-disease diagnostics, Policy and public health in microbiology, Microbial ecology, Computational science, Scientific data, Statistics, Ecology, Microbiology, Molecular biology, Diseases, Risk factors, Evolutionary biology, Functional genomics, Genome, Genomics, Microbial genetics, Mutation, Sequencing

Introduction

The gut of warm-blooded animals is the primary habitat to Escherichia coli, and the type of relationship between E. coli and its host is mainly that of commensalism. The diversity of the commensal E. coli populations is influenced by many factors such as host species, environment, age of the host, type of food and antimicrobial treatment13. There have been many studies on pathogenic E. coli, while little is known about the commensal population. Understanding the genetic background and population structure of commensal E. coli is necessary to explore their potentials as a reservoir of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) determinants and virulence factors4. Use of antimicrobials as therapeutic agents or growth promoters affects the commensal population as it kills or reduces the growth of susceptible strains, giving advantage to strains that have become resistant, e.g. by the acquisition of resistance genes by horizontal gene transfer5,6.

AMR in Enterobacteriaceae has become a global health concern. It is well documented that the use of antimicrobial in food animal production is a possible source of AMR in humans through horizontal transfer of either antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) to human pathogens or through direct transfer of AMR bacteria7,8.

Colistin is one of the most commonly used antimicrobials in livestock, especially in developing countries like Bangladesh9, which typically lack strong regulation for antimicrobial use (AMU). Resistance to colistin is worrisome because the drug is considered a last resort for the treatment of serious infections caused by carbapenem-resistant organisms belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae10. Before 2015, resistance to colistin was only known to be caused by chromosomal mutations. Later, plasmid-mediated colistin-resistance has been reported from many countries, and to date, nine mcr genes (mcr-1 to mcr-9) have been discovered along with some variants1119.

In Bangladesh, small-scale broiler farms are the major source of poultry meat. Colistin sulphate is used massively for the treatment and prevention of diseases in this production system9. Owing to the absence of strict regulation for AMU in Bangladesh, farmers can acquire colistin without prescription from a registered veterinarian9. To date, there is no systematic investigation on the colistin resistance commensal E. coli population in animals in this production system where imprudent use of antimicrobial is very frequent. Moreover, the overall genetic diversity of the commensal E. coli population in broiler chicken over the entire production stage has not been investigated before.

In this study, the genetic diversity of commensal E. coli from broiler chicken in Bangladesh was thoroughly investigated throughout the production period, and the prevalence of plasmid-encoded colistin resistance genes (mcr) was determined. The objectives of the current study were to investigate the genetic diversity of commensal E. coli in poultry, to explore the distribution and genetic background of colistin-resistant strains among the commensal E. coli population, and to characterize the phylogenetic relationship of the colistin-resistant commensal E. coli strains in the global population structure of E. coli.

Results

Farms, sampling and E. coli isolates

A total of 20 commercial broiler chicken farms at Chattogram division in Bangladesh were investigated in this study. Farms were located across two administrative districts of the division with a minimum and maximum distance between farms of 0.5 km and 80 km, respectively. All the birds were raised in small-scale intensive systems of rearing. The farm size varies from 800 to 4000 birds per farm (median size 1060 birds/farm). Most farms used antimicrobials for treatment and prophylaxis purpose. No farms used antimicrobials for the purpose of growth promotor. A detail list of different classes of antimicrobials used during the production is given in Supplementary Table 1.

One pooled faecal sample were collected in each of the three sampling times at day1, day15, and day28 of the production which comprises 60 pooled samples from 20 farms.

Quantification of E. coli from faecal specimens shown that the average count of E. coli was significantly (p < 0.0001) higher at day1 (8.7 ± 0.43 log10 CFU/gm faeces) compared with day15 (7.6 ± 0.74 log10 CFU/gm faeces) and day28 (7.4 ± 0.55 log10 CFU/gm faeces) (Fig. 1a). A total of 20 confirmed E. coli isolates from each faecal sample, comprising an overall total collection of 1200 isolates, were characterized in this study.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Quantitative detection, phenotypic and genotypic confirmation of colistin-resistant strains among the commensal E. coli population. (a) Log10 transformed colony forming units (CFU) of commensal E. coli per gm faeces over the three-sampling time. The Y axis was scaled down to the data point. Each black dot represents one pooled faecal sample and the bars represent mean and standard deviation. The asterisk denotes p-value of unpaired t-test between sampling times, ****p < 0.0001, ns = non-significant. (b) Frequency of mcr-1-bearing strains among the commensal E. coli population. The frequency was calculated by dividing the number of mcr-1-positive E. coli with the total number of E. coli strains. Each black dot represents one pooled faecal sample and the bars represent mean and standard deviation. (c) Heatmap shows the distribution of mcr-1-bearing E. coli across the farms and sampling time. The rows denote farms and the columns denote individual E. coli isolate over three sampling times. (d) Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) distributions of mcr-1-bearing E. coli (N = 305) against colistin sulphate as determined by a broth microdilution technique.

A high prevalence of mcr-1 gene was detected in the commensal E. coli population

We identified 305 (25%, 95% CI, 23–28%) mcr-1-positive E. coli out of the 1200 isolates. No strains were positive for the other genes (mcr-2mcr-5) investigated. The prevalence of the mcr-1 gene in the E. coli population was significantly higher (p < 0.0001) at day15 (45%) compared with day28 (25%) and day1 (6%) in the production (Fig. 1b). The distribution of mcr-1-bearing E. coli isolates across the farms at three sampling times was highly diverse (Fig. 1c). Colistin-resistant E. coli could be detected in all farms at least one sampling time. Seven variables were tested in the univariable analysis (Table 1). Of them, two parameters: “antimicrobial use” and “colistin use” were identified as eligible to be included for the multivariable analysis. In the final model “colistin use” was found to be a potential risk factor (OR 1.71; 95% CI 0.96–3.06; p = 0.068) associated with the occurrence of mcr-1 gene in the commensal E. coli population (Table 1).

Table 1.

Univariable and multivariable analysis for the risk factors associated with the prevalence of mcr-1 gene in commensal E. coli population.

Variable Co-variables mcr-1/total E. coli (%) Univariable Multivariable
Odds ratio (95% CI) P value Odds ratio (95% CI) P value
Antimicrobial usea Yes 244/660 (36.8) 1.77 (0.95–3.29) 0.070 1.19 (0.57–2.49) 0.640
No 61/540 (11.3)
Colistin usea Yes 171/340 (50.3) 1.85 (1.15–2.98) 0.011 1.71 (0.96–3.06) 0.068
No 134/860 (15.6)
Broiler strains Lohmann 26/60 (43.3) 3.63 (0.46–28.91) 0.223
Ross-308 36/120 (30.0) 1.72 (0.38–7.83) 0.483
Cobb500 243/1020 (23.8)
Water source Tube well 214/840 (28.7) 1.02 (0.24–4.26) 0.983
WASA 2/60 (3.3) 0.08 (0.01–1.15) 0.064
Pond 43/120 (35.8) 2.07 (0.32–13.47) 0.446
Mixed source 13/60 (21.7) 0.88 (0.09–8.78) 0.913
Deep water 33/120 (27.5)
Footbath Spray 256/1080 (23.7) 0.32 (0.07–1.41) 0.131
No 49/120 (40.8)
Floor Muddy 160/660 (24.2) 0.90 (0.34–2.36) 0.825
Concrete 145/540 (26.9)
Ventilation Moderate 153/480 (31.9) 2.03 (0.81–5.11) 0.133
Good 152/720 (21.1)

CI confidence interval, WASA Water Supply and Sewerage Authority.

aUse of antimicrobials within 14 days prior to sampling.

MIC shows an extreme level of resistance against colistin in some strains

The MIC values of mcr-1-positive isolates varied from 2 to 128 mg/L. Notably, more than 50% of the isolates had a MIC of ≥ 8 mg/L (Fig. 1d). On the other hand, none of the mcr-1-negative isolates had MIC above the breakpoint.

REP-PCR based genetic diversity

In total, 367 unique REP-types were identified among the 1200 E. coli isolates (Supplementary Table 2). Of them, 89 (24%) types were present both in mcr-positive and mcr-negative E. coli. In total, 50 (14%) and 228 (62%) unique REP-types were found in mcr-positive and mcr-negative E. coli, respectively. High overall diversity was observed as shown by the Shannon diversity index (H') of 5.3. The highest diversity was found in the sample of day28 with an H' of 4.9 followed by day15 (H', 4.2) and day1 (H', 4.1). However, the genetic diversity among the mcr-negative E. coli strains was slightly higher (H', 5.3) compared with the mcr-positive E. coli (H', 4.6).

Genome assembly and annotation

In total, 32 E. coli draft genomes were produced and assembled using a hybrid assembler Unicycler. The median length of the assembly was 5.06 Mbp with an average GC% of 50.62 ± 0.2. The average N50 of the assembled contigs was 56 Kbp. Annotation of the 32 draft E. coli genomes predicted a median number of 4819 coding sequences (CDs) (ranging from 4102 to 5227). The median number of contigs per assembly was 300 with a minimum of 151 and a maximum of 664 (Supplementary Table 3).

Core and pangenome comparison

The degree of genomic flexibility of the 32 mcr-1-positive commensal E. coli strains was assessed by comparing the core and pangenome structure of the isolates. The overall pangenome consisted of 13,132 genes which is four times larger than the core genome of the same strains (2737 genes (20.84%) (Fig. 2a). The accessory gene pool was highly variable among the isolates (N = 10,395). Of the genes identified by Roary, 50.88% (n = 6681), 25.66% (n = 3370), and 2.62% (n = 344) were found in less than 15% of the isolates (referred to as cloud genes), between 15 and 95% of the isolates (referred as shell genes), and between 95 and 99% of the isolates (referred as soft core genes), respectively (Fig. 2a). We compared the genome of mcr-1-positive E. coli isolates based on the presence or absence a gene which is depicted in Fig. 2b). Phylogenetic comparison based on the concatenated core gene alignment also showed large genomic diversity among the mcr-1-positive commensal E. coli isolates (Fig. 2c).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Pangenome comparison of mcr-1-positive commensal E. coli. (a) Distribution of total genes: core genes when found in ≥ 99%, soft-core genes when found between 95 and 99%, shell genes when between 15 and 95% and cloud genes when found in < 15% of the isolates. (b) Gene presence (blue) absence (white) matrix across the genome of the isolates. Top scale shows the comparative genome size. Each row represents the gene content of the respective isolate. Each column represents the possession of homologous gene clusters. A complete list of annotated genes is provided in the Supplementary File 2. The bottom graph shows percent similarity of gene presence-absence between isolates. (c) Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree inferred from 2737 concatenated core gene alignment of 32 commensal E. coli genome. The tree was constructed by RAxML with 1000 bootstrap using GRT + gamma model. The data was visualized using Phandango.

Virulence genes harboured by commensal E. coli

In Total, 13 virulence genes were detected in the genomes of the 32 commensal E. coli (Supplementary Table 4). The most frequent virulence determinants were astA (EAST-1 heat-stable toxin) and iss (Increased Serum Survival) which were found in 50% and 44% of the isolates, respectively. A major proportion of the isolates (53%) harboured multiple virulence genes. Notably, seven of the 32 isolates harboured at least 4–6 virulence determinants, but none of the strains carried combinations of virulence genes known to be characteristic for pathogenic subtypes.

In silico MLSTs, serotypes, and plasmid genotyping

We identified 16 different sequence types (STs) among the 32 E. coli isolates. The most frequent ST was ST43 (n = 6) followed by ST4965 (n = 5). We could not infer the ST types of three isolates (listed as unknown types in Supplementary Table 4). In silico serotyping identified 11 complete serotypes. The most frequent serotype was O13:H30 (n = 6) followed by O6:H10 (n = 4). We could not identify the O antigen specific serotype of 11 of the isolates. However, based on the H type, three isolates were O-:H10 and two were O-:H21 and seven were singletons. We identified 31 plasmid replicons in the 32 isolates. All the isolates harboured multiple plasmid replicons ranging from four to 11. The most abundant replicon type was ColRNAI which was found in 24 isolates followed by IncFIB (AP001918) in 23 isolates. Other dominant plasmid replicon types were IncHI2 (n = 19), IncHI2A (n = 19), IncN (n = 16), IncX1 (n = 15), and IncI2 (n = 13).

High prevalence of antimicrobial resistance determinants

We identified a total of 42 different antimicrobial resistance determinants in the 32 strains (Fig. 3a). The strain selection was based on the presence of mcr-1 and in accordance, this gene was detected in all 32 strains. The most abundant antimicrobial resistance gene was mdf(A) (31/32) followed by tet(A) (23/32) and blaTEM-1B (23/32) which confer resistance to a broad spectrum of antimicrobials, tetracycline, and beta-lactam antibiotics, respectively. All 32 strains carried multiple acquired antimicrobial resistance genes with a minimum of five to a maximum of 20 genes (Fig. 3a). According to the database used, more than 50% of the strains (n = 18) harboured at least 13 resistance genes.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Antimicrobial resistance determinants identified in the genomes of mcr-1-positive commensal E. coli. (a) Heatmap shows the presence or absence of antimicrobial resistance determinants of commensal E. coli. The rows represent isolates and the columns correspond predicted antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs). ARGs are predicted from whole genome sequence data using Resfinder 3.2 tool on CGE webserver. (b) Heatmap represents chromosomal known point mutation in the commensal E. coli genome. Colours indicate amino acid substitution at the corresponding mutation site. Rows and columns represent isolates and mutated genes, respectively. (c) Point mutations in pmrA and pmrB genes of commensal E. coli. Columns and rows represent amino acid substitution position and individual isolates, respectively. Dark and light blocks show the presence and absence of mutation, respectively. (d) Distribution of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against colistin sulphate among E. coli strains. Rows and columns represent strains and MIC, respectively.

Twenty-seven of the isolates exhibited at least one known point mutation and 15 isolates exhibited at least two point mutations in any of the three-resistance determinants (gyrA, parC, and parE) which may confer resistance to nalidixic acid and ciprofloxacin (Fig. 3b). The insertion sequence ISApl1 was found in 30 of the 32 mcr-1-bearing E. coli strains (Supplementary Table 4). The other two had no ISApl1 insertion sequence in their genomes. A total of eight, fifteen, and six of the isolates contained one, two, and three ISApl1 insertion sequences, respectively.

Presence of chromosomal point mutations in genes previously associated with colistin resistance

Since MIC varied considerably between mcr-1-positive isolates, we carried out a search for point mutations known to be associated with elevated MIC towards colistin in E. coli. No known colistin resistance associated point mutations in pmrA and pmrB genes was detected among the 32 mcr-1-carrying isolates. However, 22 out of 32 mcr-1-positive strains showed point mutations in pmrA and pmrB genes (Fig. 3c). A side-by-side comparison with point mutations and the MIC value of these 32 mcr-1-positive strains are shown by a heatmap in Fig. 3d.

Phylogenetic position of mcr-1-positive E. coli at the global population structure

The WGS of mcr-1-positive strains identified in the current study were compared to a global collection originated from Cambodia (6 human isolates), Canada (one human isolate), China (two environment, 16 chicken, 33 human, and 15 pig isolates), Denmark (one human and five chicken isolates), Japan (three cattle isolates), the Netherlands (three chicken isolates), Singapore (five human isolates), Thailand (three isolates from unknown source), the USA (one human isolate), and Vietnam (32 isolates from poultry farms and farmers) (Supplementary File 1). A total of 93,130 core SNPs was detected among the 158 isolates. The pairwise comparison of SNP between isolates varied from 1 to 46,621 SNPs. A total of six and five E. coli isolates from this study, respectively, formed two separate clades. However, most of the strains of this study were spread across the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Maximum-likelihood phylogeny based on concatenated core genome SNPs of 158 mcr-1-bearing E. coli strains. The phylogeny was inferred from a total of 93,130 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), of which 52,636 were parsimony-informative and 40,494 were singletons. Isolates from this study are highlighted with colour shade. E. coli K12-MG1655 was used as a reference strain.

Discussion

Colistin sulphate is widely used for treatment and for the prevention of diseases in poultry in Bangladesh9. Poultry farmers in Bangladesh usually administer colistin or other antimicrobials through the water, and often in the absence of disease symptoms. Once they start using any antimicrobials treatment, they continuously keep it in water for a certain period of time ranging from three to seven days. Little is known on how this imprudent use of antimicrobial over the decades have affected the genetic diversity of commensal gut bacteria in the poultry.

Our study detected a diverse population of commensal E. coli in broiler chicken according to genetic typing. The genetic diversity of E. coli increased with the age of the birds. Previous studies2022 have also shown the association of age of host (e.g., pigs) with the diversity of commensal E. coli. The increased diversity in the older age group of chicken might be due to the establishment and persistence of adapted strains in the gut over time.

Apart from the wide genetic diversity, we detected a high prevalence of the mcr-1 gene (25%) in the commensal E. coli population. Although the study design and the host species were different, a similar alarming high frequency of mcr-1 was detected in E. coli from human and livestock sources in Thailand23 and one study from China24. Overall, the high frequency of mcr-1 gene detected in this study is still the exception, and much higher than previously reported studies from Germany (3.8%)25, China (1% or less) and other countries2628. Also, this study shows high MIC against colistin (≥ 8 mg/L) in more than 50% of the mcr-1 carrying E. coli which is very similar with another study in Bangladesh29, and the overall MIC is higher than other studies in some European countries25,30,31. It suggests that the commensal E. coli population in livestock in countries with a high and unregulated use of colistin constitutes a hotspot for selection for carriage of transferrable resistance. This is worrisome and calls for immediate action to reduce the preventive use of antimicrobials in general and colistin in particular. The study showed that the occurrence of the mcr-1 gene increased significantly as the birds grew older, most likely simply reflecting the selection pressure. In accordance with this, colistin use is positively associated with the isolation frequency of the mcr-1 gene in this study. This association should be cautiously interpreted as the selection and spread of AMR gene is a complex biological process. Although the selection of mcr-1 gene is primarily influenced under the pressure of colistin, other antimicrobials can also co-select mcr-1 gene32. Additionally, many factors, such as habitat, co-selection by metals, and biocides, can influence the selection of antimicrobial resistance genes33. There is no veterinary monitoring of antimicrobial usage for the studied farms, therefore, we mainly relied on the data provided by the farmers which should also be considered during interpreting this association. The presence of mcr-1 gene in the E. coli population in the day-old broiler chicks raises questions about the origin of the colistin resistance strains in such early age of birds. Vertical transmission of colistin resistance E. coli from broiler breeders to their offspring could be one explanation for the presence of mcr-1 gene in the day-old chicks as indicated by previous studies34,35.

The pangenome analysis of 32 mcr-1-bearing commensal E. coli strains showed a highly flexible accessory genome. The E. coli core genome of this study is four times smaller than the pangenome. Previous studies have also shown a smaller size core genome of E. coli3638. However, the core genome size is a comparative measurement because the core would be reduced when more genomes are added to the comparison39.

Almost all the isolates (91%) harboured at least one and several isolates harboured multiple virulence genes. The most frequent virulence gene was EAST-1 heat-stable toxin (astA) and the increased serum survival (iss) was the second most frequent virulence marker among the commensal strains. The astA gene is commonly found in enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC)40. ETEC is one of the leading causes of severe diarrhoea in young children in developing countries like Bangladesh41. Furthermore, increased serum survival gene iss is a well-known virulence marker of extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) in avian species42, however, the presence of this gene was not found in combination with other virulence markers of avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC). Additionally, the dominant ST type among the isolates was ST43 (n = 6). This type is often found in human clinical infections as carbapenemase-producing E. coli43,44. The presence of virulence markers in the commensal E. coli strains isolated from poultry that have genetic similarity with diverse pathogenic clones indicates their potential of transferring virulence genes to pathogenic clones of E. coli in humans and animals.

Our study revealed that all the mcr-1-positive E. coli isolates carry multiple ARGs. The presence of tetracycline resistance genes in more than 70% of the mcr-1-bearing isolates indicated an alarming spread of tetracycline resistance genes among the commensal population. Although tetracycline is less commonly used in broiler production in Bangladesh9, its increased resistance in commensal E. coli could be an indication of resistance selection by a bystander effect of other antimicrobials45. A previous study from Bangladesh has identified tetracycline resistance genes in multidrug resistance E. coli strains isolated from children46. Earlier studies identified a varied prevalence of tetracycline resistance genes in E. coli isolated from both humans and animals47. One of the strains harboured extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing gene blaCTX-M-55. Co-harbouring of mcr-1 and blaCTX-M-55 gene was previously reported in the pyelonephritis case in a three-year child in France, caused by E. coli48. A combination of a mutation in the gyrA gene and the parC gene was detected in several isolates suggesting resistance to fluroquinolones49,50. The presence of single mutations in the gyrA gene altering serine 83 to leucine (S83L) and the double mutations in the gyrA gene altering aspartic acid (D87N) and serine (S83L) is known to confer high resistance capability of E. coli strains to fluroquinolones51.

All the 32 isolates harboured multiple plasmid replicons. The abundant plasmid types such as ColRNAI, IncFIB, IncHI2, and IncI2 were previously shown as mcr-1-carrying plasmid replicon52,53. The mcr-1 gene mobilizing transposon component ISApl1 was detected in all the isolates except two. Evidence shows that ISApl1 plays a pivotal role in the spread of mcr-1 gene54. In some cases, one or both copies of ISApl1 can be lost, however, a single copy of upstream ISApl1 is capable of mobilizing mcr-1 genes55.

Phylogenetic comparison of the strains identified in the present study with an international collection of colistin-resistant E. coli showed that the mcr-1-bearing E. coli strains of this study were highly diverse. Only two small clusters of the isolates from this study were observed; these encompassed strains of ST43 (n = 6) and ST4965 (n = 5), respectively. All other isolates were found to be diffusely distributed across the tree according to the SNP phylogeny. Similarly, a high level of phylogenetic diversity of mcr-1-bearing E. coli was reported previously53. The scattering of mcr-1-bearing E. coli into genetically diverse strains suggests that the transfer of the gene between strains is a frequent event in the gut of broilers in the poultry farms in Bangladesh.

This study has some limitations. First, the study was conducted in a short time frame which did not allow us to observe if there is any seasonal variation on the AMR and genetic diversity of E. coli. Second, the study was conducted in a certain geographical region in Bangladesh. The addition of more farms from different regions of the country would bring a more detailed picture of the E. coli diversity. Third, only broiler chickens were investigated in this study, whereas layer and backyard chickens are also a major part of poultry production in Bangladesh. Finally, although the study identified the mcr-1 gene in E. coli from day-old chicks, however, it was not possible to clarify whether the source of the resistant-strains was a vertical transmission from breeder flocks or not.

In conclusion, this first population level study on commensal E. coli and colistin resistance in broiler chicken encompassing different stages of production has revealed a high genetic diversity of commensal E. coli in broiler chicken in Bangladesh. The study also revealed a high frequency of mcr-1 carriage among the commensal E. coli population and showed that the carriage was positively associated with colistin use in chicken production. The presence of mcr-1 gene in a diverse E. coli population suggests a massive horizontal spread of mcr-1 gene rather than clonal expansion. These results call for immediate action from the policy makers to stop imprudent use or to actively regulate the rational use of colistin along with other critically important antimicrobials in poultry production in Bangladesh.

Materials and methods

Study farms and sampling

A longitudinal study was conducted between August to September 2018. Commercial broiler chicken farms in the Chattogram division of Bangladesh was chosen for this study. Broiler farm owners were invited to participate in the study. Farms were selected based on the starting date of a new flock during the study period, minimum flock size of 500 birds, and geographically well-representing across the division. Pooled faecal samples from each farm were collected longitudinally at three sampling times: at day1, day15, and day28 of the production. The pooled sample consists of five randomly picked fresh faecal droplets collected from four corners and the centre of the flock. A trained veterinarian collected the samples and brought them to the laboratory on the same day with a proper transporting system in a cooling box. A questionnaire survey was also conducted for epidemiological data on each sampling time. The parameters investigated includes strains of birds, use of antimicrobials, sources of food and water, and farm biosecurity practices. All farm owners were agreed to participate in the study and informed consent was taken before sampling from farms and questionnaire survey on farming data. The animal ethical committee of Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (CVASU), Bangladesh approved the study protocol and collection of animal related data by a questionnaire.

Bacterial isolation and identification

E. coli were isolated and quantified from the faecal samples by drop plate method56 on MacConkey agar (MCA) (Oxoid, United Kingdom). Lactose-positive, red, non-mucoid colonies were randomly selected from each sample and sub cultured onto Eosin Methylene Blue agar (EMB) (Scharlau, Spain) for biochemical confirmation. Species identity of E. coli was confirmed by standard biochemical properties followed by species-specific multiplex PCR57. Primers for the uidA gene and flanking region of the uspA gene were used. The amplified PCR products were separated by electrophoresis at 70 V in a 2% agarose gel (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) containing ethidium bromide (AMRESCO, USA) followed by visualizing under UV light. Gene Ruler 100 bp Plus DNA Ladder (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) was used to standardize the PCR band images. Confirmed E. coli isolates were preserved at -80 ˚C after subculture onto the Blood agar plate (BA) (Oxoid, UK).

PCR for mcr genes and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination

All isolates were screened by a multiplex PCR to detect five mcr genes (mcr-1 to mcr-5) as described previously58. E. coli NCTC 13846, E. coli KP3711, E. coli 2013-SQ35258, E. coli DH5α13, and Salmonella 13-SA0171814 were used as the positive controls for mcr-1, mcr-2, mcr-3, mcr-4, and mcr-5, respectively. Gene Ruler 100 bp Plus DNA Ladder (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) was used as an external reference control. All the mcr-positive E. coli strains were subjected to MIC determination. The MIC for colistin was determined by the broth microdilution (BMD) method according to ISO-standard (20776-1)59. Colistin sulphate (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) and cation-adjusted Mueller–Hinton Broth II (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) were used in the BMD test. The quality control of the experiment was monitored by a resistant strain of E. coli NCTC 13846 (mcr-1-positive) and a susceptible strain of E. coli ATCC 25922. To test the colistin susceptibility of the mcr-1-negative isolates, all the isolates were streaked on the MacConkey agar with 2 mg/L colistin sulphate. Growth was scored after overnight incubation of agar plates at 37˚C. The mcr-1-negative isolates which showed growth at this concentration were subjected to MIC determination for colistin as above.

Repetitive extragenic palindromic-PCR (REP-PCR) fingerprinting

The genetic diversity of the E. coli isolates was determined by REP-PCR. The primers used for REP-PCR fingerprinting were Rep1R-I (5′-III ICG ICG ICA TCI GGC-3′) and Rep2-I (5′-ICG ICT TAT CIG GCC TAC-3′). The PCR was performed according to a previously described protocol60. E. coli ATCC 25922 and sterile MilliQ water were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. As an external reference control, GeneRuler 100 bp plus DNA ladder (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) was used to standardize the fingerprint profiles. GelJ, an image analyzing program, was used to analyze REP-PCR DNA fingerprints data61. The normalization of every gel images was done by 100 bp plus DNA ladder (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) as an external reference. Unique REP-type was assigned using the Dice similarity method with more than 90% band similarity and 4% tolerance. The REP-PCR-based genetic diversity of commensal E. coli strains as well as the diversity of colistin resistant E. coli strains were determined by the Shannon diversity index (). The following formula62 was used to calculate the diversity-

H=-i=1spilnpi

S denotes the number of unique genotype and pi is the number of isolates sharing the same genotype [i] over the total number of isolates.

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) and analysis

A total of 32 mcr-1-bearing E. coli isolates among the dominant REP-types (REP-type with at least three isolates) were selected for WGS. The genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The sequencing library was prepared according to the Illumina protocol and paired-end next generation sequencing was performed on the Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, USA).

Quality checking and de-novo assembly of sequencing reads

The quality of the sequencing reads was tested using fastqc (Galaxy Version 0.72 + galaxy1)63 in the Galaxy platform64. We used “Galaxy Europe Instance” for all other downstream analyses related to the Galaxy platform. The raw reads that passed quality control were de-novo assembled into a draft genome using a hybrid assembly pipeline Unicycler (Galaxy Version 0.4.7.0)65. The pipeline uses both Illumina reads and long reads to produce complete and accurate assemblies. We used default assembly parameters. Genome assembly quality was assessed using Quast (Galaxy Version 5.0.2 + galaxy0)66.

Genome annotation and pangenome analysis

The de-novo assembled genomes were annotated using the prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline (PROKKA, Galaxy Version 1.13)67. Core and accessory genome comparison of the 32 isolates isolated from of this current study was performed using the Roary pangenome pipeline (Galaxy Version 3.10.2)68. Roary generates a core gene alignment from gff3 files produced by PROKKA annotation. A 99% identity cut-off was used to define the “core” gene among the isolates. A concatenated core gene alignment of each of the core genes of all the isolates was generated. The combined core gene alignment was used to construct a maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree using RAxML (Galaxy Version 1.0.0)69. We used the default 1000 fast bootstraps on the best likelihood tree constructed with the General Time Reversible (GTR) substitution model and with a Gamma rate of correction heterogeneity. The gene presence/absence file generated by the Roary pangenome annotation pipeline and the core gene phylogenetic tree were visualized using a web based interactive visualization tool Phandango70.

Global phylogeny

For the phylogenetic comparison of our isolates at global context, we included WGS data of 126 mcr-1-bearing E. coli strains listed in a previous study (Supplementary File 1)71. The global isolates those have complete metadata were considered for comparison with the mcr-1-positive isolates obtained in this study. A global scale phylogenetic comparison was conducted with all the 158 isolates71. Galaxy-based Snippy72 tool (Galaxy Version 4.3.6 + galaxy2) was used to detect SNPs between a reference genome (E. coli K12 MG1665, accession NC_000913.3) and the sequencing reads of interest. Multiple Snippy outputs were combined into a “core SNPs” alignment using Snippy Core (Galaxy Version 4.3.6). The “core site” represents a common genomic position present in all the genomes. The “core SNPs” alignment was used to build a high-resolution phylogeny (ignoring possible recombination). We reconstructed a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree using FastTree73 (Galaxy Version 2.1.10) with GTR + CAT Nucleotide evolution model. The phylogenetic tree was visualized using an interactive webtool iTOL74.

In silico typing

Acquired antimicrobial resistance genes and chromosomal mutations were detected using Resfinder version 3.2 on Center for Genomic Epidemiology (CGE) web server75. CGE webserver was used for further molecular typing of the isolates. Multi-locus sequence typing (MLST), serotyping, virulence determination, plasmid replicon identification and typing were performed using MLST version 2.0, SerotypeFinder version 2.0, VirulenceFinder version 2.0, PlasmidFinder version 2.0 and pMLST version 2.0, respectively7679. The presence of the insertion sequence ISApl1 belonged to the IS30 family of transposons was identified using the ISfinder online tool80.

Statistical analysis

Epidemiological data were analyzed in R 3.5.181. Univariable analysis followed by multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify possible risk factors associated with the prevalence of the mcr-1 gene in the E. coli population. First, we used the univariable logistic regression analysis to identify potential risk factors to be included in the multivariable analysis. Variables with a p-value of less than 0.1 in the univariable analysis were selected for multivariable analysis. Due to the hierarchical data structure, we used three level logistic regression model. The individual observation (1200 E. coli isolates) were nested within three sampling times (day1, day15, and day28) at level-2 which were in turn nested within twenty farms at level-3. The R package lme482 was used for logistic regression analysis.

Ethical approval

The study protocol and a questionnaire to collect animal related data were developed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations in Bangladesh which was approved by the animal ethical committee of Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University (CVASU), Bangladesh (Approval No. CVASU/Dir(R&E)EC/-2019/39(2/6)). Informed consent was taken from all participatory farm owners before sampling and data collection from farms. No animals were handled or harmed in this study as only fecal droppings were collected from the farm floor.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Tables. (74KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the support from Professor Himel Barua at the Department of Microbiology and Veterinary Public Health of Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Bangladesh. The authors are grateful to the farmers who contributed to this study. We thank Md. Saddam Hossain, Md. Saidur Rahman, and Md. Jashim Uddin for their support during sample collection from farms.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: SA, PKB, MZI, JEO, AHF; Sample collection: TD; Wet lab experiment: SA, TD, MZI; Data curation: SA, TD, MZI; Bioinformatic and statistical analysis: SA, MZI; First manuscript draft: SA; Manuscript review and edit: SA, TD, MZI, AHF, PKB, JEO.

Data availability

The genome sequencing data were submitted to the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under the project accession number PRJEB34000. All other data generated or analysed in this study are included in the manuscript and in the Supplementary Materials.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-75608-2.

References

  • 1.Tenaillon O, Skurnik D, Picard B, Denamur E. The population genetics of commensal Escherichia coli. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010;8:207–217. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Herrero-Fresno A, Larsen I, Olsen JE. Genetic relatedness of commensal Escherichia coli from nursery pigs in intensive pig production in Denmark and molecular characterization of genetically different strains. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2015;119:342–353. doi: 10.1111/jam.12840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ahmed S, Olsen JE, Herrero-Fresno A. The genetic diversity of commensal Escherichia coli strains isolated from nonantimicrobial treated pigs varies according to age group. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0178623. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Magiorakos A-P, et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012;18:268–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.de Been M, et al. Dissemination of cephalosporin resistance genes between Escherichia coli strains from farm animals and humans by specific plasmid lineages. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Salinas L, et al. Diverse commensal Escherichia coli clones and plasmids disseminate antimicrobial resistance genes in domestic animals and children in a semirural community in Ecuador. mSphere. 2019;4:e00316-19. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00316-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Marshall BM, Levy SB. Food animals and antimicrobials: impacts on human health. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2011;24:718–733. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00002-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hoelzer K, et al. Antimicrobial drug use in food-producing animals and associated human health risks: what, and how strong, is the evidence? BMC Vet. Res. 2017;13:211. doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-1131-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Islam KBMS, Shiraj-Um-Mahmuda S, Md H-B-K. Antibiotic usage patterns in selected broiler farms of Bangladesh and their public health implications. J. Public Heal. Dev. Ctries. 2016;2:276–284. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mendelson M, et al. The One Health stewardship of colistin as an antibiotic of last resort for human health in South Africa. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018;18:e288–e294. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30119-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Xavier BB, et al. Identification of a novel plasmid-mediated colistin-resistance gene, mcr-2, in Escherichia coli, Belgium, June 2016. Eurosurveillance. 2016;21:30280. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.27.30280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yin W, et al. Novel plasmid-mediated colistin resistance gene mcr-3 in Escherichia coli. MBio. 2017;8:e00543-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00543-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Carattoli A, et al. Novel plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mcr-4 gene in Salmonella and Escherichia coli, Italy 2013, Spain and Belgium, 2015 to 2016. Euro Surveill. 2017;22:30589. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2017.22.31.30589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Borowiak M, et al. Identification of a novel transposon-associated phosphoethanolamine transferase gene, mcr-5, conferring colistin resistance in d-tartrate fermenting Salmonella enterica subsp enterica serovar Paratyphi B. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017;72:3317–3324. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.AbuOun M, et al. mcr-1 and mcr-2 variant genes identified in Moraxella species isolated from pigs in Great Britain from 2014 to 2015. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017;72:2745–2749. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yang Y-Q, Li Y-X, Lei C-W, Zhang A-Y, Wang H-N. Novel plasmid-mediated colistin resistance gene mcr-7.1 in Klebsiella pneumoniae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018;73:1791–1795. doi: 10.1093/jac/dky111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wang X, et al. Emergence of a novel mobile colistin resistance gene, mcr-8 NDM-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2018;7:1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41426-018-0124-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Carroll LM, et al. Identification of novel mobilized colistin resistance gene mcr-9 in a multidrug-resistant, colistin-susceptible Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium isolate. MBio. 2019;10:e00853–e919. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00853-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Liu Y-Y, et al. Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2016;16:161–168. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00424-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ahmed S, Olsen JE, Herrero-Fresno A. The genetic diversity of commensal Escherichia coli strains isolated from non-antimicrobial treated pigs varies according to age group. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0178623. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Katouli M, et al. Phenotypic characterization of intestinal Escherichia coli of pigs during suckling, postweaning, and fattening periods. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995;61:778–783. doi: 10.1128/AEM.61.2.778-783.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bok E, Mazurek J, Stosik MP. Age as a factor influencing diversity of commensal E. coli microflora in pigs. Polish J. Microbiol. 2013;62:165–171. doi: 10.33073/pjm-2013-021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Eiamphungporn W, et al. Prevalence of the colistin resistance gene mcr-1 in colistin-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from humans in Thailand. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2018;15:32–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2018.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Li X, et al. The prevalence of mcr-1 and resistance characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates from diseased and healthy pigs. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2018;91:63–65. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Irrgang A, et al. Prevalence of mcr-1 in E. coli from livestock and food in Germany, 2010–2015. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0159863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Quan J, et al. Prevalence of mcr-1 in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae recovered from bloodstream infections in China: a multicentre longitudinal study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017;17:400–410. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30528-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cao L, Li X, Xu Y, Shen J. Prevalence and molecular characteristics of mcr-1 colistin resistance in Escherichia coli: isolates of clinical infection from a Chinese University Hospital. Infect. Drug Resist. 2018;11:1597–1603. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S166726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yi L, Liu Y, Wu R, Liang Z, Liu J-H. Research progress on the plasmid-mediated colistin resistance gene mcr-1. Yi chuan. 2017;39:110–126. doi: 10.16288/j.yczz.16-331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Amin MB, et al. Occurrence and genetic characteristics of mcr-1-positive colistin-resistant E. coli from poultry environments in Bangladesh. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2020;22:546–552. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2020.03.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zając M, et al. Occurrence and characterization of mcr-1-positive Escherichia coli isolated from food-producing animals in Poland, 2011–2016. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:1753. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Maciuca IE, et al. Genetic features of mcr-1 mediated colistin resistance in CMY-2-producing Escherichia coli from Romanian poultry. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:2267. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhang P, et al. Characterization of five Escherichia coli isolates co-expressing ESBL and mcr-1 resistance mechanisms from different origins in China. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:1994. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bengtsson-Palme J, Kristiansson E, Larsson DGJ. Environmental factors influencing the development and spread of antibiotic resistance. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2018;42:68–80. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fux053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Poulsen LL, et al. Longitudinal study of transmission of Escherichia coli from broiler breeders to broilers. Vet. Microbiol. 2017;207:13–18. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.05.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nilsson O, Börjesson S, Landén A, Bengtsson B. Vertical transmission of Escherichia coli carrying plasmid-mediated AmpC (pAmpC) through the broiler production pyramid. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2014;69:1497–1500. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lukjancenko O, Wassenaar TM, Ussery DW. Comparison of 61 sequenced Escherichia coli genomes. Microb. Ecol. 2010;60:708–720. doi: 10.1007/s00248-010-9717-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fukiya S, Mizoguchi H, Tobe T, Mori H. Extensive genomic diversity in pathogenic Escherichia coli and Shigella strains revealed by comparative genomic hybridization microarray. J. Bacteriol. 2004;186:3911–3921. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.12.3911-3921.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Touchon M, et al. Organised genome dynamics in the Escherichia coli species results in highly diverse adaptive paths. PLoS Genet. 2009;5:e1000344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tettelin H, et al. Genome analysis of multiple pathogenic isolates of Streptococcus agalactiae: Implications for the microbial ‘pan-genome’. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2005;102:13950–13955. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506758102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yamamoto T, Echeverria P. Detection of the enteroaggregative Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin 1 gene sequences in enterotoxigenic E. coli strains pathogenic for humans. Infect. Immun. 1996;64:1441–1445. doi: 10.1128/IAI.64.4.1441-1445.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Levine MM. Escherichia coli that cause diarrhea: enterotoxigenic, enteropathogenic, enteroinvasive, enterohemorrhagic, and enteroadherent. J. Infect. Dis. 1987;155:377–389. doi: 10.1093/infdis/155.3.377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Johnson TJ, Wannemuehler YM, Nolan LK. Evolution of the iss gene in Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008;74:2360–2369. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02634-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kocsis E, Lo Cascio G, Piccoli M, Cornaglia G, Mazzariol A. KPC-3 carbapenemase harbored in FIIk plasmid from Klebsiella pneumoniae ST512 and Escherichia coli ST43 in the same patient. Microb. Drug Resist. 2014;20:377–382. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2013.0152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chiluisa-Guacho C, et al. First detection of the CTXM-15 producing Escherichia coli O25-ST131 pandemic clone in Ecuador. Pathogens. 2018;7:42. doi: 10.3390/pathogens7020042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Karami N, Nowrouzian F, Adlerberth I, Wold AE. Tetracycline resistance in Escherichia coli and persistence in the infantile colonic microbiota. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2006;50:156–161. doi: 10.1128/AAC.50.1.156-161.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Monira S, et al. Multi-drug resistant pathogenic bacteria in the gut of young children in Bangladesh. Gut Pathog. 2017;9:19. doi: 10.1186/s13099-017-0170-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bryan A, Shapir N, Sadowsky MJ. Frequency and distribution of tetracycline resistance genes in genetically diverse, nonselected, and nonclinical Escherichia coli strains isolated from diverse human and animal sources. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004;70:2503–2507. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.4.2503-2507.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Birgy A, et al. CTX-M-55-, MCR-1-, and FosA-producing multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli infection in a child in France. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018;62:e00127–e218. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00127-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Nakamura S, Nakamura M, Kojima T, Yoshida H. gyrA and gyrB mutations in quinolone-resistant strains of Escherichia coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1989;33:254–255. doi: 10.1128/AAC.33.2.254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Vila J, Ruiz J, Goñi P, De Anta MT. Detection of mutations in parC in quinolone-resistant clinical isolates of Escherichia coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1996;40:491–493. doi: 10.1128/AAC.40.2.491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Heisig P, Schedletzky H, Falkenstein-Paul H. Mutations in the gyrA gene of a highly fluoroquinolone-resistant clinical isolate of Escherichia coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1993;37:696–701. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.4.696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Esperón F, et al. Detection of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance (mcr-1) in E. coli isolated from pig caecum in Austria. Abstr. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2016;53:4–163. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Matamoros S, et al. Global phylogenetic analysis of Escherichia coli and plasmids carrying the mcr-1 gene indicates bacterial diversity but plasmid restriction. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:15364. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-15539-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Zurfluh K, Klumpp J, Nüesch-Inderbinen M, Stephan R. Full-length nucleotide sequences of mcr-1-harboring plasmids isolated from extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli isolates of different origins. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016;60:5589–5591. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00935-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Snesrud E, et al. A Model for transposition of the colistin resistance gene mcr-1 by ISApl1. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016;60:6973–6976. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01457-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Miles AA, Misra SS, Irwin JO. The estimation of the bactericidal power of the blood. J. Hyg. (Lond) 1938;38:732–749. doi: 10.1017/s002217240001158x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Godambe LP, Bandekar J, Shashidhar R. Species specific PCR based detection of Escherichia coli from Indian foods. 3 Biotech. 2017;7:130. doi: 10.1007/s13205-017-0784-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Rebelo AR, et al. Multiplex PCR for detection of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance determinants, mcr-1, mcr-2, mcr-3, mcr-4 and mcr-5 for surveillance purposes. Eurosurveillance. 2018;23:17-00672. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2018.23.6.17-00672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.International Standards Organisation. Clinical laboratory testing and in vitro diagnostic test systems—Susceptibility testing of infectious agents and evaluation of performance of antimicrobial susceptibility test devices. Part 1: reference method for testing the in vitro activity of antimi. ISO 20776-1 (2006).
  • 60.Mohapatra BR, Broersma K, Mazumder A. Comparison of five rep-PCR genomic fingerprinting methods for differentiation of fecal Escherichia coli from humans, poultry and wild birds. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2007;277:98–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00948.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Heras J, et al. GelJ—a tool for analyzing DNA fingerprint gel images. BMC Bioinformatics. 2015;16:270. doi: 10.1186/s12859-015-0703-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 1948;27:379–423. doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Andrews S. No TitleFastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data. Available online at: https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc (2010).
  • 64.Afgan E, et al. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2016 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W3–W10. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLOS Comput. Biol. 2017;13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Page AJ, et al. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3691–3693. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Hadfield J, et al. Phandango: an interactive viewer for bacterial population genomics. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:292–293. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Wang R, et al. The global distribution and spread of the mobilized colistin resistance gene mcr-1. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:1179. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03205-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Seemann T. snippy: Fast Bacterial Variant Calling from NGS Reads. https://github.com/tseemann/snippy (2015).
  • 73.Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2—approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e9490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3: an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W242–W245. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Zankari E, et al. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2012;67:2640–2644. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Joensen KG, et al. Real-time whole-genome sequencing for routine typing, surveillance, and outbreak detection of verotoxigenic Escherichia coli. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2014;52:1501–1510. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03617-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Larsen MV, et al. Multilocus sequence typing of total-genome-sequenced bacteria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012;50:1355–1361. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06094-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Carattoli A, et al. In Silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014;58:3895–3903. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02412-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Joensen KG, Tetzschner AMM, Iguchi A, Aarestrup FM, Scheutz F. Rapid and easy in silico serotyping of Escherichia coli isolates by use of whole-genome sequencing data. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2015;53:2410–2426. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00008-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Siguier P, Perochon J, Lestrade L, Mahillon J, Chandler M. ISfinder: the reference centre for bacterial insertion sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:D32–D36. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkj014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.RcoreTeam. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: https://www.r-project.org/ (2016).
  • 82.Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 2015;67:1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Tables. (74KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The genome sequencing data were submitted to the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under the project accession number PRJEB34000. All other data generated or analysed in this study are included in the manuscript and in the Supplementary Materials.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES