Skip to main content
ACS Central Science logoLink to ACS Central Science
. 2020 Sep 9;6(10):1698–1712. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.0c00813

Elevated Vacuolar Uptake of Fluorescently Labeled Antifungal Drug Caspofungin Predicts Echinocandin Resistance in Pathogenic Yeast

Qais Z Jaber , Maayan Bibi , Ewa Ksiezopolska §,, Toni Gabaldon §,∥,, Judith Berman ‡,*, Micha Fridman †,*
PMCID: PMC7596861  PMID: 33145409

Abstract

graphic file with name oc0c00813_0011.jpg

Echinocandins are the newest class of antifungal drugs in clinical use. These agents inhibit β-glucan synthase, which catalyzes the synthesis of β-glucan, an essential component of the fungal cell wall, and have a high clinical efficacy and low toxicity. Echinocandin resistance is largely due to mutations in the gene encoding β-glucan synthase, but the mode of action is not fully understood. We developed fluorescent probes based on caspofungin, the first clinically approved echinocandin, and studied their cellular biology in Candida species, the most common cause of human fungal infections worldwide. Fluorescently labeled caspofungin probes, like the unlabeled drug, were most effective against metabolically active cells. The probes rapidly accumulated in Candida vacuoles, as shown by colocalization with vacuolar proteins and vacuole-specific stains. The uptake of fluorescent caspofungin is facilitated by endocytosis: The labeled drug formed vesicles similar to fluorescently labeled endocytic vesicles, the vacuolar accumulation of fluorescent caspofungin was energy-dependent, and inhibitors of endocytosis reduced its uptake. In a panel comprised of isogenic Candida strains carrying different β-glucan synthase mutations as well as clinical isolates, resistance correlated with increased fluorescent drug uptake into vacuoles. Fluorescent drug uptake also associated with elevated levels of chitin, a sugar polymer that increases cell-wall rigidity. Monitoring the intracellular uptake of fluorescent caspofungin provides a rapid and simple assay that can enable the prediction of echinocandin resistance, which is useful for research applications as well as for selecting the appropriate drugs for treatments of invasive fungal infections.

Short abstract

Monitoring elevated vacuolar uptake of fluorescent probes of the echinocandin drug caspofungin in drug-resistant Candida is useful for predicting drug resistance and for selecting effective antifungal drug treatments.

Introduction

Echinocandins are the most recently approved class of antifungal drugs used for treatment of invasive fungal infections.1,2 These semisynthetic drugs, developed from fermentation metabolites, are composed of different hexapeptide scaffolds attached to an N-linked lipid chain that have been modified chemically to optimize pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties.36 The three echinocandins approved for clinical use by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), namely, caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin (approved in 2001, 2005, and 2006, respectively), are considered among the most effective and best-tolerated antifungals in clinical use against Candida species,7,8 the most frequently encountered fungal pathogens of humans in Western hospitals.9,10 Rezafungin (CD101), a newly developed echinocandin currently undergoing advanced clinical trials, has an extended half-life enabling a single weekly dose.11,12

Echinocandins are currently the only class of clinically approved antifungal drugs that act by inhibiting β-(1 → 3)-glucan synthase (GS), a membrane-bound protein complex essential for fungal cell-wall biosynthesis.13,14 Importantly, GS is present in fungi but not in animals, which may explain the exceptional safety profile of echinocandins.3 GS has been implicated as a target for echinocandins by cell-free GS assays showing echinocandin-mediated inhibition of fungal glucan polymer formation from UDP-[14C]-d-glucose.15,16 Genetic experiments also support this conclusion: Several point-mutation hotspot regions of genes encoding the GS complex subunits are associated with reduced echinocandin susceptibility.14,17

Fks1p, an essential component of the GS complex, is an ∼200 kDa protein composed of 16 membrane-spanning domains and encoded by the FKS1 gene.18,19 Fks1p is the catalytic subunit that forms the glycosidic linkage in the β-(1 → 3)-d-glucan polymer as was shown by photoaffinity experiments with UDP-d-glucose.20 Resistance to echinocandins has been associated with point mutation hotspots, and most of these hotspot mutations confer resistance to all three echinocandins in clinical use.19,2123 The Fks1 hotspot regions reside in predicted extracellular domains of the protein that are thought to bind directly to echinocandins, which act as noncompetitive inhibitors of the GS complex.4,14

The sites of mutations that confer resistance to echinocandins, the large size of these drugs (molecular weight (MW) > 1 kDa), and a membrane anchoring lipid segment suggest that echinocandins should localize mainly to the cell surface. Furthermore, the extracellular orientation of the binding site on Fks1p obviates the need for the drug to enter cells to be efficacious.24,25 However, 3H-labeled-caspofungin accumulates in the cytoplasm of C. albicans cells, a process thought to occur via a high-affinity transporter when the concentrations of a drug exceed 1 μg/mL and also through nonselective diffusion across the plasma membrane at higher drug concentrations.26 A study providing low-resolution images of a Boron-dipyrrmethene (BODIPY)-labeled caspofungin probe suggested that it localized to germ tubes along with possible vesicle involvement in C. albicans.27 This probe was later used in an investigation of the reason for the inherent resistance of the fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans to caspofungin.28 It was demonstrated that the BODIPY-labeled caspofungin probe nonspecifically stained cells of a C. neoformans mutant with a damaged plasma membrane while it was barely detectable in the wild-type parent.

Although echinocandins are becoming the drugs of choice for antifungal treatments, they are not always effective.2932 This may be due their hydrophobicity and differences in the distribution of these drugs at different infection sites.33,34 Other possible explanations for efficacy limitations and the continued appearance of echinocandin-tolerant and resistant isolates have not been ruled out. Here, we investigated the mechanisms and dynamics with which echinocandins enter the yeast cells of Candida and the relationship between drug uptake and antifungal activity. Fluorescent microscopy techniques are widely applied tools for studying biological processes in living cells and for studying the effects of antifungal drugs against cells of pathogenic fungi.3540 Using newly developed fluorescent caspofungin probes, we monitored the subcellular distribution of the drug in live pathogenic yeast cells and the relationship between the degree of intracellular drug internalization and the level of caspofungin resistance in laboratory strains and in clinical isolates.

Results and Discussion

Design and Synthesis of Fluorescent Caspofungin Probes

The design of fluorescently labeled caspofungin probes developed for this study was based on the specific functionalization of the phenol of 3S,4S-dihydroxy-l-homotyrosine of the cyclic hexapeptide of caspofungin with a propargyl group to facilitate click reaction-based conjugation of fluorophores. The phenol group was chosen for functionalization, rather than one of the three amines of the cyclic peptide, to avoid a decrease in the overall positive charge of the resultant caspofungin probes under physiological conditions.

The synthesis of propargyl-functionalized caspofungin intermediate 1a was accomplished in three steps with an overall isolated yield of 45% (Scheme 1A). Briefly, the three amine residues of caspofungin were protected with tert-butyloxycarbonyl (BOC) carbamates followed by selective etherification of the phenol with propargyl bromide under basic conditions. Notably, an attempt to remove the BOC carbamates in neat trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) resulted in a mixture of products with the molecular weight of the desired product (1131.38 g/mol), presumably due to isomerization of chiral centers under these acidic conditions. Rapid removal of the BOC groups using hydrogen chloride in aqueous isopropyl alcohol afforded 1a as a single product in 90% isolated yield (Scheme 1A). The structure of 1a was confirmed by nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy (NOESY) NMR experiments, which showed strong correlations between the aromatic hydrogens of the 3S,4S-dihydroxy-l-homotyrosine and the protons of the propargyl ether (Figure S3). Finally, azide-functionalized tetramethylrhodamine (TMR) and nitrobenzoxadiazole (NBD) dyes (Scheme S1) were coupled with 1a under the click reaction conditions to produce fluorescent caspofungin probes 1 (61% isolated yield, absorption 550 nm, and emission 585 nm) and 2 (68% isolated yield, absorption 470 nm, and emission 540 nm), respectively. The four-step synthetic sequences yielded fluorescent caspofungin probes 1 and 2 in ∼27% and ∼30% isolated yields, respectively. The propargyl-functionalized caspofungin 1a, which was generated in three steps from the parent drug, is a useful intermediate that can be further modified to generate a large diversity of novel caspofungin derivatives.

Scheme 1. Fluorescent Derivatives of Caspofungin.

Scheme 1

(A) Synthesis of fluorescent caspofungin probes 1 and 2: (a) Boc2O, dioxane/H2O, ambient temperature, 48 h, 83%; (b) propargyl bromide in toluene, Cs2CO3, DMF, ambient temperature, 14 h, 60%; (c) 37% HCl in H2O/isopropyl alcohol (1:3, v/v), 2 h, ambient temperature, 90%; (d) azide-functionalized fluorescent dye, CuSO4·5H2O, sodium ascorbate, DMF, ambient temperature; 4 h, 61% for compound 1 and 3 h, 68% for compound 2. The modified phenol group of 3S,4S-dihydroxy-l-homotyrosine amino acid is indicated in blue. (B) Structure of BODIPY-labeled caspofungin (CSF-BOD).

BODIPY-labeled caspofungin probe (CSF-BOD, Scheme 1B) was synthesized according to the previously reported general procedure.27 This fluorescent probe was generated by a site-selective attachment of the BODIPY dye (Scheme S2) to the primary amine of the ethylenediamine functionality of the drug via an amide bond. Detailed synthetic and purification procedures as well as characterization and purity analysis of CSF-BOD are provided in the Supporting Information. Importantly, of the three fluorescent dyes used for the preparation of the caspofungin probes, NBD fluorescence is pH and environment sensitive,41 whereas TMR and BODIPY are largely unaffected by pH.42,43 However, the photostability of the TMR proved to be much higher than that of BODIPY. TMR-labeled caspofungin probe 1 was therefore used as the main probe in this study.

Fluorescent Caspofungin Probes 1 and 2 Retain the Same Spectrum of Antifungal Activity as the Parent Drug

The antifungal activities of the caspofungin derivatives with the modified phenol 1a, 1, and 2 were compared to that of caspofungin and CSF-BOD using a panel of 49 C. albicans and C. glabrata strains (Table S1). The panel included American-type culture collection (ATCC) strains and clinical isolates as well a collection of caspofungin-susceptible strains and their corresponding isogenic caspofungin-resistant derivatives. The caspofungin-resistant derivatives were constructed by introducing point mutations within and near the defined hotspots in the FKS1 and/or FKS2 genes of the GS complex. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for all strains were determined using the broth double-dilution method and are summarized in Figure 1 and Table S2.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Antifungal activities (MICs) of caspofungin, CSF-BOD, and the derivatives 1a, 1, and 2. (blue ■) C. albicans strains. (red ●) C. glabrata strains. The clinical breakpoints for caspofungin resistance in C. albicans and C. glabrata are 1 and 0.5 μg/mL, respectively.8,44

The MIC values of 1a and the TMR-labeled caspofungin probe 1 and those of the NBD-labeled probe 2 were 1–8, 4–16, and 16–64-fold higher than those of the parent caspofungin, respectively (Figure 1, Table S2). The MIC values of CSF-BOD were 8–32-fold higher than those of caspofungin against the susceptible strains from the tested panel. Given that the molecular weight and size of the TMR dye is over twofold higher than that of NBD, it was surprising that the MIC values of the NBD-labeled probe 2 were higher than those of the TMR-labeled probe 1. This difference was more pronounced for C. albicans strains than for the C. glabrata strains (Figure 1). NBD is a noncharged fluorescent dye, but TMR is zwitterionic. This feature can modulate the binding interactions between the fluorescent probe and its target site in the GS complex and may account for the antifungal efficacy differences between probes 1 and 2. Importantly, the antifungal activity spectrum of the three fluorescent caspofungin probes was identical to that of caspofungin: Caspofungin-resistant strains were also resistant to CSF-BOD and to 1 and 2, and caspofungin susceptible strains were also susceptible to the probes. This supports that caspofungin and the fluorescent probes share the same mode of action.

Fluorescent Caspofungin Probes Accumulate in the Vacuole of Yeast Cells Via Endocytosis

The subcellular distribution of the fluorescent caspofungin probes was determined for four C. albicans and two C. glabrata strains using live-cell fluorescence microscopy. Within 15 min, probe 1 localized to vacuoles, as indicated by its colocalization with the vacuole-specific fluorescent dye CellTracker Blue 7-amino-4-chloromethylcoumarin (CMAC)45,46 (Figures 2 and S16). To evaluate how the fluorescent drug transited into vacuoles, we performed a time-lapse analysis that revealed fluorescently labeled vesicular structures, reminiscent of endosomes, within 1 min after the addition of probe 1 (1 μM) (Figure 2, 1 min). These vesicles first accumulated in close proximity to, and then within, the vacuoles (Figure 2, 5 min), ultimately labeling entire vacuoles within 15 min (Figure 2, 15 min). The probe remained concentrated in vacuoles for the remaining duration of the experiments (Figure 2, 60 min). Importantly, the same localization patterns were evident for TMR-based probe 1, NBD-based probe 2, and for CSF-BOD (Figures S16–S19). No such staining was observed in the yeast cells treated with the azide-functionalized TMR or NBD dyes used for the preparation of probes 1 and 2, respectively (Figure S20). This supports the idea that the caspofungin scaffold, and not the fluorescent dye segments, drove the subcellular distribution of the fluorescent probes to endocytic vesicles that subsequently fused with vacuoles.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Fluorescent caspofungin probe 1 labels endocytic vesicles and localizes to vacuoles in yeast cells. Representative DIC and fluorescent images of C. albicans SC5314 yeast cells incubated with probe 1 for 1, 5, 15, and 60 min. Cells were incubated with probe 1 (1 μM, red) and with the vacuole-specific fluorescent dye CellTracker Blue CMAC (10 μM, blue) in PBS. Scale bars, 5 μm.

If the caspofungin probes were internalized via endocytosis and accumulated in the vacuole, then in C.albicans, the probes should be surrounded by Ypt72, a vacuolar Rab small monomeric GTPase, which localizes primarily to the vacuolar membrane.47 Additionally, vesicles directed to the vacuole should form a fluorescent pattern of endocytic vesicles similar to that observed in yeast stained with FM4–64, a fluorescent dye that localizes to endocytic vesicles and the vacuolar membrane.48 Indeed, in C. albicans cells that express Ypt72-GFP47 (strain 7, Table S1), the Ypt72-GFP-labeled vacuolar membrane surrounded probe 1 (Figure 3A and Figure S17), indicating that the probe localizes to the vacuole. A similar pattern was seen with probe 2 relative to FM4–64(Figure 3B), further supporting the idea that the internalization of either of the fluorescent caspofungin probes occurs via endocytosis in C. albicans. Incubation with probe 1 for a short period of time (Figure 2, 1–5 min) gave a similar endosomal pattern to that observed in cells stained with FM4–64 (Figure S21, 1–5 min), further supporting the idea that internalization of either of the fluorescent caspofungin probes into Candida cells occurs via endocytosis. Endocytosis is an energy-dependent process.48,49 To ask if the intracellular uptake of fluorescent caspofungin is energy-dependent, we evaluated the effect of glucose on the uptake of probe 1. Cells from common C. albicans yeast laboratory strains (SC5314 and SN152, Table S1) were suspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with or without 2% glucose. After 4 h of incubation, probe 1 was added to a final concentration of 1 μM, and its cellular uptake was measured by flow cytometry every 15 min for 1 h (Figure 4A). The differences in the uptake of probe 1 in the glucose-rich PBS solution, relative to the glucose-free PBS, during the 60 min duration of the experiment were not significant (t-test: P-value > 0.05) (Figure 4A), suggesting that the uptake of 1 might not be energy-dependent.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Fluorescent caspofungin probes 1 and 2 localize to vacuoles in yeast cells. (A) DIC and fluorescent images of C. albicans CG72 cells expressing Ypt72-GFP (green) incubated with probe 1 (1 μM, red) for 60 min in PBS. (B) DIC and fluorescent images of C. albicans SC5314 cells incubated with probe 2 (1 μM, green) and with FM4–64 (1 μg/mL, red) for 60 min in PBS. Scale bars, 5 μm.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Vacuolar uptake of fluorescent caspofungin probe 1 requires energy. Probe 1 (1 μM in PBS) was added to C. albicans SC5314 and SN152 cells maintained with 2% glucose (+ Glucose) or cells starved on PBS without glucose for 4 h (− Glucose). (A) Flow cytometry analysis of the uptake of probe 1 over time (in arbitrary units, A.U.). Data are presented as means ± SD (error bars). Significance was determined by an unpaired t-test (ns indicates not significant with P > 0.05). (B) Microscopy images of C. albicans SC5314 cells treated with probe 1 (red) for 15 min. The DIC images were processed with a Frangi vesselness filter using ImageJ to show the cell borders (left images), merged images of the fluorescent and the DIC channels (right images). Scale bars, 5 μm. (C) Quantification of the fluorescence intensity of probe 1 in cells analyzed by microscopy (as in (B)), with or without 2% glucose. The integrated densities (in relative fluorescent units, RFU) per cell were determined from microscopic images with ImageJ. Data are presented as means ± SD (∼3000 cells).

However, analysis by microscopy provided a different perspective (Figure 4B). In the presence of glucose, probe 1 accumulated in the vacuole (Figure 4B), while in the absence of glucose it accumulated primarily at the cell envelope (Figure 4B). These results support the idea that intracellular uptake of echinocandins is dependent upon endocytosis, which is an energy-dependent process. Furthermore, the fluorescence microscopy results can explain the apparent paradox between the flow cytometry results, which measured fluorescence per cell, irrespective of the probe localization within the cell, and the microscopy results, which noted the differences in intracellular localization: The degree of probe 1 fluorescence at the cell surface in the absence of glucose and within the vacuole in the presence of glucose were of the same magnitude (t-test: P-value > 0.05) (Figure 4C). These results suggest that echinocandins associate with the cell surface in an energy-independent manner and that their uptake into vacuole-directed vesicles requires energy.

If echinocandin uptake occurs via endocytosis, then inhibitors of endocytosis should inhibit the uptake of fluorescently labeled caspofungin. The accumulation of probe 1 in C. albicans SC5314 and SN152 cells was measured by flow cytometry in the absence and presence of endocytosis inhibitors trifluoperazine (TFP) or pyrroloquinoxaline derivative CGS 12066B (Figure 5A). TFP is a dopamine receptor antagonist,50 and CGS 12066B is a serotonin-1B receptor agonist,51 both of which also inhibit endocytosis in C. albicans.52 Both inhibitors modestly reduced growth at the concentration used (8 μg/mL): They primarily slowed the emergence from lag phase (Figure S23).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Uptake of fluorescent caspofungin probe 1 is decreased by endocytosis inhibitors and caspofungin addition. (A) Probe 1 (1 μM in PBS) was added to C. albicans SC5314 and SN152 cells with or without preincubation with 8 μg/mL of the endocytosis inhibitors TFP or CGS 12066B for 2 h. (B) Probe 1 (1 μM in PBS) was added to C. albicans SC5314 and SN152 cells with or without addition of caspofungin (1 μM, 10 μM) or fluconazole (FLC) (10 μM). Data are presented as means ± SD (error bars). Significance was determined by an unpaired t-test (* P ≤ 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01, *** P ≤ 0.001; ns indicates not significant with P > 0.05).

Notably, both endocytosis inhibitors significantly decreased the uptake of probe 1 relative to the uptake levels in yeast cells not treated with an endocytosis inhibitor, with the effect of CGS 12066B more pronounced than that of TFP (Figure 5A). For example, after 30 min, TFP inhibited the uptake of probe 1 by ∼30%, and CGS 12066B inhibited its uptake by ∼60% in both C. albicans SC5314 and SN152. These results, together with live cell imaging and glucose starvation data, strongly support the idea that the intracellular uptake of fluorescent caspofungin probe 1 occurs within minutes, largely via endocytic vesicles that drive vacuolar accumulation.

To determine if caspofungin competes for cellular uptake with fluorescent probe 1, both the drug and the probe were added simultaneously to cultures of strains SC5314 and SN152. The uptake of probe 1 was measured by flow cytometry every 15 min for 1 h (Figure 5B). Addition of caspofungin reduced the uptake of probe 1 in a dose-dependent manner. No effect on the uptake of probe 1 was detected in cells co-treated with the antifungal azole drug fluconazole, which inhibits the biosynthesis of the fungal membrane sterol, ergosterol. These results suggest that the endocytic internalization of echinocandins into yeast cells is mediated by the binding of the drug to a membrane protein target, possibly the GS complex. Notably, in the important fungal pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus, caspofungin induces dynamic changes in the localization of Fks1p from the membrane to the vacuole.53 This suggests that endocytic migration of Fks1p from the plasma membrane to the vacuole may be involved, at least in part, in vacuolar accumulation of echinocandins.

Echinocandins Are More Effective against Dividing Yeast Cells than against Quiescent Cells

The localization of probe 1 was very different in Candida cells incubated for 2 h in nutrient-rich medium, yeast extract peptone dextrose medium plus adenine (YPAD), than in nutrient-free PBS. In cells maintained in PBS, the probe remained concentrated in vacuoles over the 2 h duration of the experiment (Figure 6A). By contrast, in cells maintained in YPAD, the vacuolar pattern of probe 1 had dispersed after 2 h, and the entire cytoplasm was brightly stained (Figure 6A). Differential interference contrast (DIC) images of cells grown in YPAD and treated with probe 1 revealed larger, more misshapen cells that often appeared to be collapsed, characteristic of dead yeast cells. Thus, the caspofungin probe was relocalized from the vacuole in cells incubated in nutrient-rich growth medium, while cells in PBS retained probe 1 in the vacuole and did not appear to be undergoing cell damage.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Caspofungin causes plasma membrane permeabilization and the death of dividing cells. (A) DIC and fluorescent images of C. albicans SC5314 cells treated with probe 1 (1 μM, red) in PBS or YPAD and untreated cells (no probe 1). (B) DIC and fluorescent images of cells maintained in PBS or YPAD, treated or not with caspofungin (1 μM) and stained with PI (20 μM, red). Scale bars, 5 μm.

To ask if the caspofungin relocalization and apparent cell damage and death is a feature of caspofungin and not only of the fluorescently labeled caspofungin probe 1, we followed cell viability by staining with propidium iodide (PI), a dye excluded from viable cells. We compared cell viability in the presence and absence of 1 μM unlabeled caspofungin in cells incubated either in PBS or in YPAD. Cells incubated in PBS excluded the PI stain (Figure 6B), indicating that the plasma membrane remained intact and the cells were viable. By contrast, in YPAD medium, cells were viable after 15 min but stained brightly with PI after 2 h. Thus, cells exposed to caspofungin in nutrient-rich conditions become permeable to PI, indicative of cell death. This explains the nonspecific distribution of probe 1 in the cytoplasm after prolonged incubation (Figure 6A). It is also consistent with the idea that plasma membrane permeabilization and cell death are likely accompanied by the loss of structural integrity of organelles, including the vacuoles detected here. YPAD contains nutrients that promote cell growth, whereas PBS only maintains cells in a quiescent state. Cell growth is dependent upon cell-wall expansion, which in turn requires β-glucan production catalyzed by GS. We hypothesize that growing cells are more sensitive to caspofungin, because, when cell-wall integrity is compromised due to loss of GS activity, growth leads to cell deformation, membrane rupture, and cell death. By contrast, when cells are quiescent, the drug remained in vacuoles, and, despite the lack of β-glucan synthesis, the cells remain viable.

Uptake of Fluorescent Probe 1 into Caspofungin-Resistant Candida Strains Is Enhanced

We next exploited a number of pairs of isogenic strains in which the parental strains are echinocandin-sensitive and the progeny strains are echinocandin-resistant due to point mutations in the FKS genes. This included four C. albicans strains (Strains 1–4, Table S1)54 and a collection of 23 C. glabrata strains in six different genetic backgrounds (Strains 16–38, Table S1).55,56 We first determined the subcellular localization of caspofungin probe 1 in four echinocandin-resistant progeny strains from the panel by microscopy (Figure S22) and found that the probe localized to the vacuole as it did in echinocandin-susceptible strains. We then quantified the dynamics of cellular association with probe 1 by flow cytometry at 15 min intervals for 1 h (Figure 7 and Figure S24). Interestingly, after 15 min, a statistically significant increase in probe 1 uptake was observed in 80% of the resistant strains relative to the corresponding parental strains (Figure 7). Since all of the resistant strains in the panel are mutants in one of the two FKS genes that encode GS (Table S1), these results suggest a possible connection between FKS mutations and the uptake of probe 1.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Comparison of caspofungin probe 1 uptake by parental and mutant C. albicans (Strains 1–4, Table S1) and C. glabrata (Strains 16–38, Table S1) strains carrying FKS mutations. Intracellular fluorescence of parental strains (dark colors) and their corresponding mutant strains (light colors) were analyzed by flow cytometry after 15 min of incubation with probe 1 (1 μM). Data are presented as means ± SD (error bars). Significance was determined by an unpaired t-test (* P ≤ 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01, *** P ≤ 0.001; ns indicates not significant with P > 0.05).

To investigate if increased uptake of probe 1 by echinocandin-resistant strains is a more general phenomenon that spans most genetic backgrounds in addition to those in Figure 7, we scanned a set of C. albicans clinical isolates with a broad range of echnocandin susceptibility/resistance (Strains 5–15, Table S1), as well as a set of C. glabrata clinical isolates (Strains 39–49, Table S1). Probe 1 uptake for resistant strains was significantly higher than for susceptible strains (t-test: P-value < 0.05 and <0.0001 for C. albicans and C. glabrata, respectively) (Figure 8). The susceptible C. albicans and C. glabrata strains had average levels of fluorescence of 6.3 ± 0.5 and 3.9 ± 0.2, respectively, and the resistant strains were 10.8 ± 1.4 and 6.5 ± 0.5, respectively.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Caspofungin resistance is associated with probe 1 uptake. The uptake of probe 1 was measured after 15 min of incubation with caspofungin-susceptible strains (green, C. albicans and C. glabrata MIC ≤ 0.25 and 0.12 μg/mL, respectively) and caspofungin-resistant strains (red, C. albicans and C. glabrata MIC ≥ 1 and 0.5 μg/mL, respectively). Horizontal dashed lines indicate cutoff values defined based upon receiver operating characteristics (ROC). Significance of the difference between the uptake of probe 1 by the group of resistant strains and the group of susceptible strains was determined by an unpaired t-test (* P ≤ 0.05, **** P ≤ 0.0001).

Cutoff values defined for probe 1 (1 μM) uptake based upon ROC curves using SPSS software distinguished between caspofungin-sensitive and caspofungin-resistant strains. Importantly, 71% of the C. albicans and 77% of the C. glabrata echinocandin-resistant strains tested resistant using the calculated cutoff lines (Figure 8). Notably, all of the strains with uptake values above the cutoff lines were confirmed as resistant. Thus, on average, the increased uptake of fluorescent caspofungin probe 1 appears to be associated with echinocandin resistance. The NBD- and BODIPY-labeled caspofungin probes behaved similarly to the TMR-based probe (Figures S25 and S26) in resistant strains relative to the corresponding parental strains. This further supports our hypothesis that the caspofungin scaffold, and not the fluorescent dye or the labeling position on the drug, is responsible for the observed enhanced uptake of the fluorescent probes in echinocandin-resistant strains. Given that the detection process requires less than 30 min to complete, an assay that monitors fluorescent caspofungin derivative uptake could be used to identify echinocandin-resistant isolates of pathogenic yeast.

Elevated Cell-Wall Chitin Is Associated with Enhanced Fluorescent Caspofungin Probe 1 Uptake into the Vacuoles of Echinocandin-Resistant Candida

The fungal cell wall is a dynamic matrix, and a decrease in one of its components is usually compensated by an increase in others.57,58 It is well-established that caspofungin-mediated inhibition of GS results in increased cell-wall chitin content in Candida.5961 Elevated cell-wall chitin levels were also detected in FKS mutants of C. albicans that confer echinocandin resistance.54,62 Thus, we investigated if elevated levels of probe 1 uptake are associated with elevated levels of cell-wall chitin in echinocandin-resistant Candida.

We first measured chitin levels in echinocandin-susceptible C. albicans SC5314 and three of its resistant progeny strains (Strains 1–4, Table S1), as well as in echinocandin-susceptible C. glabrata CST109 and two of its resistant progeny strains (Strains 18–20, Table S1). Chitin levels were measured by flow cytometry as the fluorescent signal in cell samples that were stained with the chitin-specific dye calcofluor white (CFW).63 Elevated chitin levels were observed in the cells of the echinocandin-resistant C. albicans progeny strains relative to their susceptible parents, with the exception of strain 2 (Figure 9A). Similarly, a significant increase in chitin was detected in the C. glabrata progeny strain 20 but not of progeny strain 19 (Figure 9A). Importantly, the chitin levels in the strains could be associated with their uptake of fluorescent caspofungin probe 1. Indeed, the two strains (2 and 19) that did not show elevated chitin staining (Figure 9A) also showed very little difference in their uptake of probe 1 relative to their parent strains (Figure 7).

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Endocytic vacuolar uptake of fluorescent caspofungin probe 1 is elevated in yeast strains that have high levels of chitin. (A) Comparison of the level of chitin in parental and mutant C. albicans (Strains 1–4, Table S1) and C. glabrata (Strains 18–20, Table S1). Chitin levels of parental strains (dark colors) and their corresponding mutant strains (light colors) were analyzed by flow cytometry after 30 min of incubation with CFW (25 μg/mL). (B) Comparison of chitin levels (CFW staining) in C. albicans SC5314 and C. albicans SN152 cells maintained without or with 0.1 M Ca2+. (C) Comparison of probe 1 uptake into C. albicans SC5314 and C. albicans SN152 cells maintained without or with 0.1 M Ca2+. Data are presented as means ± SD (error bar). Significance was determined by an unpaired t-test (* P ≤ 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01, **** P ≤ 0.0001, and ns indicates not significant with P > 0.05).

Calcium enhances the chitin content in C. albicans cell walls and reduces caspofungin susceptibility.64,65 To further establish the relationship between caspofungin susceptibility, chitin production, and the uptake of fluorescent caspofungin probe 1, caspofungin-susceptible C. albicans cells (SC5314 and SN152) were preincubated in YPAD containing 0.1 M Ca2+ for 18 h, to stimulate the elevation of chitin content in the cell wall, and then were stained with CFW or with probe 1 and analyzed by flow cytometry. We detected an approximately twofold elevation in chitin levels (Figure 9B), along with an approximately twofold elevation in the uptake of probe 1 (Figure 9C), when the medium was supplemented with Ca2+ relative to yeast cells maintained in the absence of added Ca2+. Of note, in C. albicans similar fluorescent signal intensities were measured in cells stained with CFW or with probe 1. In C. glabrata, however, the signal intensity of CFW was significantly lower than that of probe 1. Thus, in C. glabrata, CFW appears to be a less-sensitive indicator of caspofungin resistance than probe 1 uptake (compare strains 18–20 in Figure 9 and Figure 7). The percentage of chitin in the cell wall of C. glabrata is significantly lower than that in C. albicans.66 This likely explains the observation that, in C. glabrata, the chitin stain CFW is a less-sensitive indicator of caspofungin resistance.

These results suggest that increasing chitin levels in the cell wall results in the increased uptake of echinocandins into vacuoles via endocytosis. Chitin enhances cell-wall rigidity and the ability of the cell wall to counter intracellular turgor pressure, which can affect the equilibrium between endocytic and exocytic processes.67 This may offer a plausible explanation for the observed elevation in the endocytic vacuolar uptake of fluorescent caspofungin probe 1 in echinocandin-resistant yeast that have higher levels of cell-wall chitin.

Conclusion

Through a facile four-step synthesis, we developed fluorescently labeled probes of caspofungin, a member of the echinocandin class of antifungal drugs, and validated their antifungal activity. These probes enable live-cell imaging by microscopy and flow cytometry and were used to characterize the organellar sites of drug localization and drug uptake into Candida isolates. We found that the fluorescent drug accumulates in vacuoles within minutes. Cellular uptake occurs via endocytosis, as uptake of the fluorescent drug was energy-dependent and reduced by endocytosis inhibitors. The uptake of fluorescently labeled caspofungin was reduced in the presence of the parent drug, suggesting that endocytic internalization of echinocandins is mediated via a membrane protein, possibly the GS complex. Notably, time-dependent subcellular distribution of the fluorescent drug indicated that echinocandins cause more cell death under conditions that promote rapid yeast cell growth; when cells were maintained in glucose-free buffer, the drug accumulated and remained in vacuoles. This important observation illustrates that echinocandins are effective against metabolically active and dividing yeast and that their maintenance within the vacuole does not kill slowly dividing and/or dormant cells. It remains unclear whether the presence of drug in the vacuole contributes to cell death. It is possible that vacuolar trafficking of echinocandins is simply a byproduct of membrane turnover via endocytosis, which may be accelerated in cells with elevated levels of cell-wall chitin. Given that a minority of the echinocandin-resistant isolates do not have abnormally high chitin levels or increased probe 1 uptake, we think that vacuolar localization is likely due to membrane turnover.

We discovered that the level of fluorescent caspofungin uptake into yeast cells was significantly higher in most echinocandin-resistant strains compared to parental echinocandin-susceptible Candida strains. This phenomenon is associated with the level of chitin in the Candida cell wall. The uptake of the fluorescent drug was significantly higher in 75% of the echinocandin-resistant strain relative to the susceptible strains among the tested panel of 49 Candida strains. Furthermore, we found that calcium-mediated stimulation of chitin production also increased fluorescent probe 1 uptake.

Echinocandin resistance has emerged over the recent years in most clinically relevant Candida species, and it is particularly common in C. glabrata clinical isolates. Of clinical relevance, the quantification of probe 1 uptake can identify isolates that are echinocandin-resistant and provide an assay that is rapid and more sensitive than assays based on CFW staining of chitin in C. glabrata. This further enhances the usefulness of fluorescent caspofungin probes for identifying echinocandin resistance in these important pathogenic yeasts.

To conclude, the fluorescently labeled caspofungin probes reported herein offer a new and useful research tool for the study of the biological activity of members of the echinocandin class of antifungal drugs. These drugs are critical for treating invasive, life-threatening fungal infections. Enhanced vacuolar uptake of the fluorescent caspofungin probes by echinocandin-resistant pathogenic yeast can be harnessed to facilitate rapid prediction of drug resistance and assist in devising optimal drug treatments for invasive fungal infections.

Materials and Methods

General Chemistry Methods and Instrumentation

1H NMR spectra (including one-dimensional total correlation spectroscopy (1D-TOCSY) and two-dimensional (2D) NOESY) were recorded on BrukerAvance 400 or 500 MHz spectrometers. 13C NMR spectra were recorded on BrukerAvance 400 or 500 MHz spectrometers at 100 or 125 MHz. Chemical shifts (reported in ppm) were calibrated to CD3OD (1H: δ = 3.31, 13C: δ = 49.0). Multiplicities are reported using the following abbreviations: b = broad, s = singlet, d = doublet, t = triplet, dd = doublet of doublets, ddd = doublet of doublet of doublets, td = triplet of doublets, m = multiplet. Coupling constants (J) are given in hertz. High-resolution electrospray ionization (HRESI) mass spectra were measured on a Waters Synapt instrument. Low-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectra (ESI-MS) were measured on a Waters 3100 mass detector. Chemical reactions were monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) (Merck, Silica gel 60 F254). Visualization was achieved using a cerium molybdate stain (5 g of (NH4)2Ce(NO3)6, 120 g of (NH4)6Mo7O24·4H2O, 80 mL of H2SO4, 720 mL of H2O) or with a UV lamp. All chemicals, unless otherwise stated, were obtained from commercial sources. Compounds were purified using Geduran Si 60 chromatography (Merck). The preparative reverse-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) system used was an ECOM system equipped with a 5 μm, C-18 Phenomenex Luna Axia column (250 mm × 21.2 mm). Analytical RP-HPLC was performed on a VWR Hitachi instrument equipped with a diode array detector and an Alltech Apollo C18 reversed-phase column (5 m, 4.6 × 250 mm). The flow rate was 1 mL/min. Solvent A was 0.1% TFA in water, solvent B was acetonitrile. The SpectraMax i3x Platform spectrophotometer from Molecular Devices was used for fluorescence measurements.

Compound 1

Compound 1a (25 mg, 0.02 mmol) was dissolved in dimethylformamide (DMF) (2 mL) and treated with azide-functionalized TMR68 (20.5 mg, 0.04 mmol, 2 equiv). A catalytic amount of CuSO4·5H2O and sodium ascorbate were added to the solution. The solution was stirred at ambient temperature for 4 h. Reaction progress was monitored by ESI-MS following the disappearance of the starting material (1a: [M-H], m/z 1129.46) and the formation of 1 ([M-H], m/z 1642.59). Upon completion, the solvent was removed under vacuum. The residue was purified by preparative RP-HPLC (mobile phase: acetonitrile in H2O (containing 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid), gradient from 10% to 90%; flow rate: 15 mL/min) to afford the hydrochloride salt of compound 1 (21 mg, 61%) as a red powder. HRESI-MS m/z calculated for C83H119N16O19, 1643.8837; found [M]+, 1643.8831. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ 8.78 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1H, TMR), 8.26 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.8 Hz, 1H, TMR), 8.16 (s, 1H, H-4), 7.54 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H, TMR), 7.24 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, H-1), 7.16 (dd, J = 9.5, 1.1 Hz, 2H, TMR), 7.07 (ddd, J = 9.6, 2.4, 0.8 Hz, 2H, TMR), 6.98–7.03 (m, 4H, H-2, TMR), 5.18 (s, 2H, H-3), 5.02 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H), 4.95 (m, 2H), 4.54–4.69 (m, 5H), 4.51 (dd, J = 12.9, 4.5 Hz, 1H), 4.32–4.40 (m, 2H), 4.31 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 4.21–4.28 (m, 2H), 4.14–4.21 (m, 1H), 4.04–4.11 (m, 1H), 4.01 (dd, J = 11.0, 2.9 Hz, 1H), 3.77–3.91 (m, 3H), 3.55 (td, J = 6.5, 1.4 Hz, 2H), 3.00–3.22 (m, 6H), 2.40–2.49 (m, 1H), 2.24–2.37 (m, 5H), 1.96–2.17 (m, 5H), 1.80–1.92 (m, 1H), 1.57–1.67 (m, 2H), 1.24–1.53 (m, 15H), 1.19 (d, J = 6.1 Hz, 3H), 1.03–1.15 (m, 2H), 0.83–0.98 (m, 10H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CD3OD) δ 176.7, 174.3, 173.8, 173.4, 172.8, 172.7, 168.9, 168.3, 167.5, 160.7, 159.6, 159.0, 158.9, 145.0, 138.1, 137.4, 135.0, 133.0, 132.3, 131.9, 131.3, 129.6, 125.6, 115.9, 115.6, 114.7, 97.5, 77.4, 75.4, 75.0, 72.3, 71.3, 68.9, 68.6, 68.3, 65.0, 62.8, 62.5, 58.3, 57.1, 56.1, 56.0, 50.7, 47.1, 45.9, 43.1, 40.9, 39.0, 38.5, 38.4, 38.1, 36.9, 35.6, 34.6, 32.9, 31.2, 31.1, 30.9, 30.8, 30.5, 30.3, 28.0, 27.1, 20.7, 20.2, 19.9, 11.5.

Compound 2

Compound 1a (25 mg, 0.02 mmol), dissolved in DMF (2 mL) and treated with azide-functionalized NBD69 (10.5 mg, 0.04 mmol, 2 equiv). Catalytic amounts of CuSO4·5H2O and sodium ascorbate were added to the solution. The solution was stirred at ambient temperature for 3 h. The reaction progress was monitored by ESI-MS following the disappearance of the starting material (1a: [M-H], m/z 1129.46) and the formation of 2 ([M-H], m/z 1392.52). Upon completion, the solvent was removed under vacuum. The residue was purified by preparative RP-HPLC (mobile phase: acetonitrile in H2O (containing 0.1% TFA), gradient from 10% to 90%; flow rate: 15 mL/min) to afford the hydrochloride salt of compound 2 (20 mg, 68%) as a yellow powder. HRESI-MS m/z calculated for C64H100N17O18, 1394.7432; found [M + H]+ 1394.7423. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3OD) δ 8.51 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H, NBD), 8.09 (s, 1H, H-4), 7.24 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, H-1), 6.99 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H, H-2), 6.26 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H, NBD), 5.17 (s, 2H, H-3), 5.09 (bs, 1H), 5.02 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1H), 4.93 (s, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H), 4.54–4.69 (m, 5H), 4.51 (dd, J = 12.8, 4.6 Hz, 1H), 4.32–4.39 (m, 2H), 4.30 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H), 4.27 (d, J = 5.1 Hz, 1H), 4.20–4.26 (m, 2H), 4.04–4.11 (m, 1H), 4.01 (dd, J = 11.0, 2.9 Hz, 1H), 3.78–3.90 (m, 3H), 3.60 (bs, 2H), 3.28–3.02 (m, 6H), 2.36–2.50 (m, 3H), 2.23–2.35 (m, 3H), 1.97–2.20 (m, 5H), 1.81–191 (m, 1H), 1.55–1.67 (m, 2H), 1.23–1.50 (m, 15H), 1.19 (d, J = 6.1 Hz, 3H), 1.05–1.16 (m, 2H), 0.84–0.98 (m, 10H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CD3OD) δ 176.7, 174.4, 173.7, 173.4, 172.8, 172.7, 168.9, 159.6, 145.9, 145.5, 145.2, 138.4, 135.0, 129.6, 125.6, 116.0, 99.9, 77.4, 75.4, 75.0, 72.4, 71.3, 68.8, 68.3, 65.2, 62.8, 62.4, 58.3, 57.1, 56.1, 56.0, 50.7, 47.1, 45.9, 43.1, 39.1, 38.5, 38.2, 38.1, 36.9, 35.7, 34.6, 32.9, 31.2, 31.1, 30.8, 30.6, 30.3, 29.7, 28.0, 27.1, 20.7, 20.2, 19.9, 11.6.

Preparation of Stock Solutions of the Tested Compounds

The antifungal drug caspofungin, purchased from S.L. Moran Ltd., and compounds 1a, 1, 2, and CSF-BOD were dissolved in anhydrous ethanol to 5 mg/mL or 1 mM. CellTracker Blue CMAC, FM4–64, and PI were purchased from Thermo Fisher and dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (10 mM), ddH2O (5 μg/mL), and ddH2O (20 mg/mL), respectively. CFW (1 mg/mL) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. TFP and CGS 12066B were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and dissolved in DMSO (5 mg/mL).

Candida Strains

The laboratory and clinical isolates and ATCC strains used in this study are listed in Table S1. Three FKS mutants derived from C. albicans SC531454 and a collection of 17 FKS mutants derived from six different genetic backgrounds of C. glabrata strains55,56 were used in this study. Resistant progenies of C. glabrata strains were obtained by in vitro evolution. Susceptible strains belonging to different C. glabrata clades were serially transferred in liquid medium (YPD) every 3 d for 18 passages and were exposed to increasing concentrations of anidulafungin every two passages (increments: 0, 0.016, 0.032, 0.064, 0.128, 0.256, 0.512, 1.024, 2.048, and 4.096 μg/mL). Single-colony isolates selected at the last drug concentration were used in this project.

Minimal Inhibitory Concentration Broth Double-Dilution Assay

Candida strains were streaked from glycerol stock onto YPAD agar plates and grown for 24 h at 30 °C. Colonies were suspended in 1 mL of PBS and diluted to 2 × 10–4 optical density (OD600) in flat-bottom 96-well microplates (Corning) with YPAD broth containing a gradient of twofold dilutions per tested compound with concentrations ranging from 64 to 0.03 μg/mL (5 mg/mL stock solution). Control wells with no drug and blank wells without yeast cells containing YPAD were prepared. MIC values (Table S2) were determined after 48 h at 30 °C by measuring the OD600 using a plate reader (Infinite M200 PRO, Tecan). MIC values were defined as the point at which the OD600 was reduced by at least 80% compared to the no-drug control wells. Each concentration was tested in triplicate, and the results were confirmed by two independent sets of experiments.

Effect of Endocytosis Inhibitors on Candida Growth

To evaluate the effect of TFP and CGS 12066B on the Candida growth, 96-well microplates were prepared using the same protocol as described for MIC determination. Plates were incubated for 24 h at 30 °C with shaking in a plate reader (Infinite M200 PRO, Tecan), and the optical density (OD600) was recorded every 40 min.

Live Cell Imaging

Candida strains were streaked from glycerol stocks onto YPAD agar plates and grown for 24 h at 30 °C. Colonies were grown in 3 mL of YPAD broth for 24 h at 30 °C with shaking in tubes. Cultures were diluted 1:100 and incubated in YPAD broth for 2 h at 30 °C with shaking until log-phase growth was observed. Cultures were then centrifuged, washed with PBS buffer, and resuspended in PBS buffer. For experiments in YPAD, the cells were stained directly from the log phase. The cells were incubated with probe 1 or 2 or CSF-BOD at a final concentration of 1 μM and stained with CellTracker Blue CMAC (10 μM) or FM4–64 (1 μg/mL) at 30 °C with shaking in dark over a 2 h time course. For experiments with PI, the cells were incubated with caspofungin (1 μM) and stained with PI (20 μM). A 2 μL aliquot of a Candida cell sample washed with PBS was placed on a glass slide and covered with a glass coverslip. Cells were imaged on a Nikon Ti microscope equipped with a Plan Apo VC 100× Oil objective and a Zyla 5.5 sCMOS camera (Andor) using NIS elements Ar software. The bandpass filter sets used to image probe 1, TMR-azide, FM4–64, and PI had an excitation wavelength of 560/20 nm and an emission wavelength of 629.5/37.5 nm. To image probe 2, NBD-azide, CSF-BOD, BODIPY methyl ester, and Ypt72-GFP, the excitation wavelength was 470/20 nm, and the emission wavelength was 525/25 nm. For CellTracker Blue CMAC, an excitation wavelength of 350/25 nm and an emission wavelength of 460/25 nm were used. Images were processed using ImageJ.

Flow Cytometry Analysis

Candida strains were streaked from glycerol stock onto YPAD agar plates and grown for 24 h at 30 °C. Colonies were grown in 3 mL of YPAD broth for 24 h at 30 °C with shaking. Cultures were diluted 1:100 and incubated in YPAD broth for 2 h at 30 °C with shaking. For experiments with endocytosis inhibitors, the cells were incubated during this 2 h period in the absence or the presence of 8 μg/mL endocytosis inhibitors TFP or CGS 12066B. After the incubation, the cultures were centrifuged, washed with PBS buffer, and resuspended in PBS buffer. For the starvation experiments, the cells were suspended in PBS buffer with or without 2% glucose and incubated for 4 h. Probe 1 was added to a final concentration of 1 μM, and samples were incubated at 30 °C with shaking in dark. Next, 20 μL from each the culture was added to 180 μL of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 50 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) in round-bottom 96-well microplates. Samples were analyzed every 15 min for 1 h by flow cytometry. For CFW staining, we added CFW to a final concentration of 25 μg/mL. Flow cytometry data were collected from 25 000 to 35 000 cells per time point using Y1 laser excitation (excitation at 561 nm and emission at 585/15 nm) for probe 1, B1 laser excitation (excitation at 488 nm and emission at 525/25 nm) for probe 2 and CSF-BOD, and V1 laser excitation (excitation at 405 nm and emission at 450/50 nm) for CFW on an MACSQuant flow cytometer. Analysis was performed using FlowJo 8.7 software. Results were confirmed by three independent sets of experiments.

Calcium-Based Induction of Cell-Wall Chitin Content

We used Ca2+ to increase the chitin content in C. albicans as described previously.64,65C. albicans strains SC5314 and SN152 were streaked from glycerol stock onto YPAD agar plates and grown for 24 h at 30 °C. Colonies were grown in YPAD broth with and without 0.1 M CaCl2 for 18 h at 30 °C with shaking in tubes. Cultures were diluted 1:100 and incubated in YPAD broth with and without 0.1 M CaCl2 for 4 h at 30 °C with shaking. Samples were then centrifuged, washed with PBS buffer, and resuspended in PBS buffer. Test compound (probe 1 or CFW) was added to the desired final concentration, and the experiments were continued as described in the flow cytometry section.

Statistical Analyses

Data are presented as means (two or more replicates) ± standard deviation (SD) (error bars). The significance was determined by an unpaired two-tailed t-test using Microsoft Excel 2016. The significance was assigned with P > 0.05 not significant. Specificities and sensitivities were calculated based on ROC curves using SPSS software.

Acknowledgments

We thank D. Perlin, D. Sanglard, R. Ben-Ami, C. Fairhead, B. Vincent, J. Usher, D. Soll, and S. Lindquist for providing the Candida strains. This work was supported by the Israel Science Foundation, Grant Nos. 179/19 (to M.F.) and 997/18 (to J.B.).

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acscentsci.0c00813.

  • Detailed synthetic schemes and procedures; 1H and 13C NMR assignments and high-resolution MS data for intermediate compounds; 1H and 13C NMR and 2D NOESY spectra; analytic HPLC chromatograms; absorption and emission spectra; yeast strains information; MIC values; live cell imaging data; growth curves; and flow cytometry analysis data (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

oc0c00813_si_001.pdf (2.1MB, pdf)

References

  1. Perfect J. R. The Antifungal Pipeline: A Reality Check. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2017, 16, 603–616. 10.1038/nrd.2017.46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Letscher-Bru V.; Herbrecht R. Caspofungin: The First Representative of a New Antifungal Class. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2003, 51, 513–521. 10.1093/jac/dkg117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Patil A.; Majumdar S. Echinocandins in Antifungal Pharmacotherapy. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2017, 69, 1635–1660. 10.1111/jphp.12780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lee Y.; Puumala E.; Robbins N.; Cowen L. E.. Antifungal Drug Resistance: Molecular Mechanisms in Candida albicans and Beyond. Chem. Rev. 2020. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jiang W.; Cacho R. A.; Chiou G.; Garg N. K.; Tang Y.; Walsh C. T. EcdGHK Are Three Tailoring Iron Oxygenases for Amino Acid Building Blocks of the Echinocandin Scaffold. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135 (11), 4457–4466. 10.1021/ja312572v. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cacho R. A.; Jiang W.; Chooi Y. H.; Walsh C. T.; Tang Y. Identification and Characterization of the Echinocandin b Biosynthetic Gene Cluster from Emericella Rugulosa NRRL 11440. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134 (40), 16781–16790. 10.1021/ja307220z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eschenauer G.; Depestel D. D.; Carver P. L. Comparison of Echinocandin Antifungals. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2007, 3 (1), 71–97. 10.2147/tcrm.2007.3.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pappas P. G.; Kauffman C. A.; Andes D. R.; Clancy C. J.; Marr K. A.; Ostrosky-Zeichner L.; Reboli A. C.; Schuster M. G.; Vazquez J. A.; Walsh T. J.; Zaoutis T. E.; Sobel J. D. Executive Summary: Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 62 (4), 409–417. 10.1093/cid/civ1194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown G. D.; Denning D. W.; Gow N. A. R.; Levitz S. M.; Netea M. G.; White T. C. Hidden Killers: Human Fungal Infections. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012, 4, 165rv13 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Park B. J.; Wannemuehler K. A.; Marston B. J.; Govender N.; Pappas P. G.; Chiller T. M. Estimation of the Current Global Burden of Cryptococcal Meningitis among Persons Living with HIV/AIDS. AIDS 2009, 23 (4), 525–530. 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328322ffac. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lepak A. J.; Zhao M.; VanScoy B.; Ambrose P. G.; Andes D. R.. Pharmacodynamics of a Long-Acting Echinocandin, CD101, in a Neutropenic Invasive-Candidiasis Murine Model Using an Extended-Interval Dosing Design. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62 ( (2), ). 10.1128/AAC.02154-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sofjan A. K.; Mitchell A.; Shah D. N.; Nguyen T.; Sim M.; Trojcak A.; Beyda N. D.; Garey K. W. Rezafungin (CD101), a next-Generation Echinocandin: A Systematic Literature Review and Assessment of Possible Place in Therapy. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2018, 14, 58–64. 10.1016/j.jgar.2018.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Aimanianda V.; Latgé J.-P. Problems and Hopes in the Development of Drugs Targeting the Fungal Cell Wall. Expert Rev. Anti-Infect. Ther. 2010, 8 (4), 359–364. 10.1586/eri.10.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Douglas C. M.; D’Ippolito J. A.; Shei G. J.; Meinz M.; Onishi J.; Marrinan J. A.; Li W.; Abruzzo G. K.; Flattery A.; Bartizal K.; Mitchell A.; Kurtz M. B. Identification of the FKS1 Gene of Candida albicans as the Essential Target of 1,3-β-D-Glucan Synthase Inhibitors. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1997, 41 (11), 2471–2479. 10.1128/AAC.41.11.2471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Douglas C. M. Fungal β(1,3)-D-Glucan Synthesis. Med. Mycol. 2001, 39, 55–66. 10.1080/mmy.39.1.55.66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chhetri A.; Loksztejn A.; Nguyen H.; Pianalto K. M.; Kim M. J.; Hong J.; Alspaugh J. A.; Yokoyama K. Length Specificity and Polymerization Mechanism of (1,3)-β- d -Glucan Synthase in Fungal Cell Wall Biosynthesis. Biochemistry 2020, 59 (5), 682–693. 10.1021/acs.biochem.9b00896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Douglas C. M.; Marrinan J. A.; Li W.; Kurtz M. B. A Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mutant with Echinocandin-Resistant 1,3-β-D- Glucan Synthase. J. Bacteriol. 1994, 176 (18), 5686–5696. 10.1128/JB.176.18.5686-5696.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Qadota H.; Python C. P.; Inoue S. B.; Arisawa M.; Anraku Y.; Zheng Y.; Watanabe T.; Levin D. E.; Ohya Y. Identification of Yeast Rho1 p GTPase as a Regulatory Subunit of 1,3-β-Glucan Synthase. Science 1996, 272 (5259), 279–281. 10.1126/science.272.5259.279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Douglas C. M.; Foor F.; Marrinan J. A.; Morin N.; Nielsen J. B.; Dahl A. M.; Mazur P.; Baginsky W.; Li W.; El-Sherbeini M. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae FKSI (ETGJ) Gene Encodes an Integral Membrane Protein Which Is a Subunit of 1,3-,8-D-Glucan Synthase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994, 91, 12907–12911. 10.1073/pnas.91.26.12907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Okada H.; Abe M.; Asakawa-Minemura M.; Hirata A.; Qadota H.; Morishita K.; Ohnuki S.; Nogami S.; Ohya Y. Multiple Functional Domains of the Yeast l,3-β-Glucan Synthase Subunit Fks1p Revealed by Quantitative Phenotypic Analysis of Temperature-Sensitive Mutants. Genetics 2010, 184 (4), 1013–1024. 10.1534/genetics.109.109892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Johnson M. E.; Katiyar S. K.; Edlind T. D. New Fks Hot Spot for Acquired Echinocandin Resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Its Contribution to Intrinsic Resistance of Scedosporium Species. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55 (8), 3774–3781. 10.1128/AAC.01811-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Park S.; Kelly R.; Kahn J. N.; Robles J.; Hsu M. J.; Register E.; Li W.; Vyas V.; Fan H.; Abruzzo G.; Flattery A.; Gill C.; Chrebet G.; Parent S. A.; Kurtz M.; Teppler H.; Douglas C. M.; Perlin D. S. Specific Substitutions in the Echinocandin Target Fks1p Account for Reduced Susceptibility of Rare Laboratory and Clinical Candida Sp. Isolates. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2005, 49 (8), 3264–3273. 10.1128/AAC.49.8.3264-3273.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Berman J.; Krysan D. J. Drug Resistance and Tolerance in Fungi. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 18 (6), 319–331. 10.1038/s41579-019-0322-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Johnson M. E.; Edlind T. D. Topological and Mutational Analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Fks1. Eukaryotic Cell 2012, 11 (7), 952–960. 10.1128/EC.00082-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Healey K. R.; Katiyar S. K.; Raj S.; Edlind T. D. CRS-MIS in Candida glabrata: Sphingolipids Modulate Echinocandin-Fks Interaction. Mol. Microbiol. 2012, 86 (2), 303–313. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08194.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Paderu P.; Park S.; Perlin D. S. Caspofungin Uptake Is Mediated by a High-Affinity Transporter in Candida albicans. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48 (10), 3845–3849. 10.1128/AAC.48.10.3845-3849.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pratt A.; Garcia-Effron G.; Zhao Y.; Park S.; Mustaev A.; Pillai S.; Perlin D. S. Evaluation of Fungal-Specific Fluorescent Labeled Echinocandin Probes as Diagnostic Adjuncts. Med. Mycol. 2013, 51 (1), 103–107. 10.3109/13693786.2012.685767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Huang W.; Liao G.; Baker G. M.; Wang Y.; Lau R.; Paderu P.; Perlin D. S.; Xue C.. Lipid Flippase Subunit Cdc50 Mediates Drug Resistance and Virulence in Cryptococcus neoformans. mBio 2016, 7 ( (3), ). 10.1128/mBio.00478-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Pfaller M.; Boyken L.; Hollis R.; Kroeger J.; Messer S.; Tendolkar S.; Diekema D. Use of Epidemiological Cutoff Values to Examine 9-Year Trends in Susceptibility of Candida Species to Anidulafungin, Caspofungin, and Micafungin. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2011, 49 (2), 624–629. 10.1128/JCM.02120-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Beyda N. D.; Lewis R. E.; Garey K. W. Echinocandin Resistance in Candida Species: Mechanisms of Reduced Susceptibility and Therapeutic Approaches. Ann. Pharmacother. 2012, 46 (7–8), 1086–1096. 10.1345/aph.1R020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Dannaoui E.; Desnos-Ollivier M.; Garcia-Hermoso D.; Grenouillet F.; Cassaing S.; Baixench M. T.; Bretagne S.; Dromer F.; Lortholary O. Candida Spp. with Acquired Echinocandin Resistance, France, 2004–2010. Emerging Infect. Dis. 2012, 18 (1), 86–90. 10.3201/eid1801.110556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Maubon D.; Garnaud C.; Calandra T.; Sanglard D.; Cornet M. Resistance of Candida Spp. to Antifungal Drugs in the ICU: Where Are We Now?. Intensive Care Med. 2014, 40, 1241–1255. 10.1007/s00134-014-3404-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Felton T.; Troke P. F.; Hope W. W. Tissue Penetration of Antifungal Agents. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2014, 27 (1), 68–88. 10.1128/CMR.00046-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhao Y.; Prideaux B.; Nagasaki Y.; Lee M. H.; Chen P. Y.; Blanc L.; Ho H.; Clancy C. J.; Nguyen M. H.; Dartois V.; Perlin D. S.. Unraveling Drug Penetration of Echinocandin Antifungals at the Site of Infection in an Intra-Abdominal Abscess Model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61 ( (10), ). 10.1128/AAC.01009-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Stephens D. J.; Allan V. J. Light Microscopy Techniques for Live Cell Imaging. Science 2003, 300, 82–86. 10.1126/science.1082160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhang J.; Campbell R. E.; Ting A. Y.; Tsien R. Y. Creating New Fluorescent Probes for Cell Biology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002, 3, 906–918. 10.1038/nrm976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Jaber Q. Z.; Benhamou R. I.; Herzog I. M.; Ben Baruch B.; Fridman M. Cationic Amphiphiles Induce Macromolecule Denaturation and Organelle Decomposition in Pathogenic Yeast. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2018, 57 (50), 16391–16395. 10.1002/anie.201809410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Benhamou R. I.; Jaber Q. Z.; Herzog I. M.; Roichman Y.; Fridman M. Fluorescent Tracking of the Endoplasmic Reticulum in Live Pathogenic Fungal Cells. ACS Chem. Biol. 2018, 13 (12), 3325–3332. 10.1021/acschembio.8b00782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Louzoun-Zada S.; Jaber Q. Z.; Fridman M. Guiding Drugs to Target-Harboring Organelles: Stretching Drug-Delivery to a Higher Level of Resolution. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 15584–15594. 10.1002/anie.201906284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Benhamou R. I.; Bibi M.; Steinbuch K. B.; Engel H.; Levin M.; Roichman Y.; Berman J.; Fridman M. Real-Time Imaging of the Azole Class of Antifungal Drugs in Live Candida Cells. ACS Chem. Biol. 2017, 12 (7), 1769–1777. 10.1021/acschembio.7b00339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Fery-Forgues S.; Fayet J. P.; Lopez A. Drastic Changes in the Fluorescence Properties of NBD Probes with the Polarity of the Medium: Involvement of a TICT State?. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 1993, 70 (3), 229–243. 10.1016/1010-6030(93)85048-D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Geisow M. J. Fluorescein Conjugates as Indicators of Subcellular PH. A Critical Evaluation. Exp. Cell Res. 1984, 150 (1), 29–35. 10.1016/0014-4827(84)90698-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Yang L.; Simionescu R.; Lough A.; Yan H. Some Observations Relating to the Stability of the BODIPY Fluorophore under Acidic and Basic Conditions. Dyes Pigm. 2011, 91 (2), 264–267. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2011.03.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Pfaller M. A.; Diekema D. J.; Ostrosky-Zeichner L.; Rex J. H.; Alexander B. D.; Andes D.; Brown S. D.; Chaturvedi V.; Ghannoum M. A.; Knapp C. C.; Sheehan D. J.; Walsh T. J. Correlation of MIC with Outcome for Candida Species Tested against Caspofungin, Anidulafungin, and Micafungin: Analysis and Proposal for Interpretive MIC Breakpoints. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008, 46 (8), 2620–2629. 10.1128/JCM.00566-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Richards A.; Gow N. A. R.; Veses V. Identification of Vacuole Defects in Fungi. J. Microbiol. Methods 2012, 91 (1), 155–163. 10.1016/j.mimet.2012.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Stefan C. J.; Blumer K. J. A Syntaxin Homolog Encoded by VAM3Mediates Down-Regulation of a Yeast G Protein-Coupled Receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274 (3), 1835–1841. 10.1074/jbc.274.3.1835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Johnston D. A.; Eberle K. E.; Sturtevant J. E.; Palmer G. E. Role for Endosomal and Vacuolar GTPases in Candida albicans Pathogenesis. Infect. Immun. 2009, 77 (6), 2343–2355. 10.1128/IAI.01458-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Vida T. A.; Emr S. D. A New Vital Stain for Visualizing Vacuolar Membrane Dynamics and Endocytosis in Yeast. J. Cell Biol. 1995, 128 (5), 779–792. 10.1083/jcb.128.5.779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Schmid S. L.; Carter L. L. ATP Is Required for Receptor-Mediated Endocytosis in Intact Cells. J. Cell Biol. 1990, 111, 2307–2318. 10.1083/jcb.111.6.2307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Feinberg A. P.; Snyder S. H. Phenothiazine Drugs: Structure Activity Relationships Explained by a Conformation That Mimics Dopamine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1975, 72 (5), 1899–1903. 10.1073/pnas.72.5.1899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Neale R. F.; Fallon S. L.; Boyar W. C.; Wasley J. W. F.; Martin L. L.; Stone G. A.; Glaeser B. S.; Sinton C. M.; Williams M. Biochemical and Pharmacological Characterization of CGS 12066B, a Selective Serotonin-1B Agonist. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1987, 136 (1), 1–9. 10.1016/0014-2999(87)90772-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Bar-Yosef H.; Vivanco Gonzalez N.; Ben-Aroya S.; Kron S. J.; Kornitzer D. Chemical Inhibitors of Candida albicans Hyphal Morphogenesis Target Endocytosis. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7 (1), 1–12. 10.1038/s41598-017-05741-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Moreno-Velásquez S. D.; Seidel C.; Juvvadi P. R.; Steinbach W. J.; Read N. D. Caspofungin-Mediated Growth Inhibition and Paradoxical Growth in Aspergillus fumigatus Involve Fungicidal Hyphal Tip Lysis Coupled with Regenerative Intrahyphal Growth and Dynamic Changes in β-1,3-Glucan Synthase Localization. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61 (10), e00710 10.1128/AAC.00710-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ben-Ami R.; Garcia-Effron G.; Lewis R. E.; Gamarra S.; Leventakos K.; Perlin D. S.; Kontoyiannis D. P. Fitness and Virulence Costs of Candida albicans FKS1 Hot Spot Mutations Associated with Echinocandin Resistance. J. Infect. Dis. 2011, 204 (4), 626–635. 10.1093/infdis/jir351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Garcia-Effron G.; Lee S.; Park S.; Cleary J. D.; Perlin D. S. Effect of Candida glabrata FKS1 and FKS2 Mutations on Echinocandin Sensitivity and Kinetics of 1,3-β-D-Glucan Synthase: Implication for the Existing Susceptibility Breakpoint. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53 (9), 3690–3699. 10.1128/AAC.00443-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Carreté L.; Ksiezopolska E.; Pegueroles C.; Gómez-Molero E.; Saus E.; Iraola-Guzmán S.; Loska D.; Bader O.; Fairhead C.; Gabaldón T. Patterns of Genomic Variation in the Opportunistic Pathogen Candida glabrata Suggest the Existence of Mating and a Secondary Association with Humans. Curr. Biol. 2018, 28 (1), 15. 10.1016/j.cub.2017.11.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Ene I. V.; Walker L. A.; Schiavone M.; Lee K. K.; Martin-Yken H.; Dague E.; Gow N. A. R.; Munro C. A.; Brown A. J. P.. Cell Wall Remodeling Enzymes Modulate Fungal Cell Wall Elasticity and Osmotic Stress Resistance. mBio 2015, 6 ( (4), ). 10.1128/mBio.00986-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Schwarzmüller T.; Ma B.; Hiller E.; Istel F.; Tscherner M.; Brunke S.; Ames L.; Firon A.; Green B.; Cabral V.; Marcet-Houben M.; Jacobsen I. D.; Quintin J.; Seider K.; Frohner I.; Glaser W.; Jungwirth H.; Bachellier-Bassi S.; Chauvel M.; Zeidler U.; Ferrandon D.; Gabaldón T.; Hube B.; d’Enfert C.; Rupp S.; Cormack B.; Haynes K.; Kuchler K. Systematic Phenotyping of a Large-Scale Candida glabrata Deletion Collection Reveals Novel Antifungal Tolerance Genes. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10 (6), e1004211 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Walker L. A.; Gow N. A. R.; Munro C. A. Fungal Echinocandin Resistance. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2010, 47 (2), 117–126. 10.1016/j.fgb.2009.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Stevens D. A.; Espiritu M.; Parmar R. Paradoxical Effect of Caspofungin: Reduced Activity against Candida albicans at High Drug Concentrations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48 (9), 3407–3411. 10.1128/AAC.48.9.3407-3411.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Cota J. M.; Grabinski J. L.; Talbert R. L.; Burgess D. S.; Rogers P. D.; Edlind T. D.; Wiederhold N. P. Increases in SLT2 Expression and Chitin Content Are Associated with Incomplete Killing of Candida glabrata by Caspofungin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008, 52 (3), 1144–1146. 10.1128/AAC.01542-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Imtiaz T.; Lee K. K.; Munro C. A.; MacCallum D. M.; Shankland G. S.; Johnson E. M.; MacGregor M. S.; Bal A. M. Echinocandin Resistance Due to Simultaneous FKS Mutation and Increased Cell Wall Chitin in a Candida albicans Bloodstream Isolate Following Brief Exposure to Caspofungin. J. Med. Microbiol. 2012, 61 (9), 1330–1334. 10.1099/jmm.0.045047-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Hoch H. C.; Galvani C. D.; Szarowski D. H.; Turner J. N. Two New Fluorescent Dyes Applicable for Visualization of Fungal Cell Walls. Mycologia 2005, 97 (3), 580–588. 10.3852/mycologia.97.3.580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Lee K. K.; MacCallum D. M.; Jacobsen M. D.; Walker L. A.; Odds F. C.; Gow N. A. R.; Munro C. A. Elevated Cell Wall Chitin in Candida albicans Confers Echinocandin Resistance in Vivo. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56 (1), 208–217. 10.1128/AAC.00683-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Walker L. A.; Gow N. A. R.; Munro C. A. Elevated Chitin Content Reduces the Susceptibility of Candida Species to Caspofungin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57 (1), 146–154. 10.1128/AAC.01486-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. De Groot P. W. J.; Kraneveld E. A.; Yin Q. Y.; Dekker H. L.; Groß U.; Crielaard W.; De Koster C. G.; Bader O.; Klis F. M.; Weig M. The Cell Wall of the Human Pathogen Candida glabrata: Differential Incorporation of Novel Adhesin-like Wall Proteins. Eukaryotic Cell 2008, 7 (11), 1951–1964. 10.1128/EC.00284-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Proctor S. A.; Minc N.; Boudaoud A.; Chang F. Contributions of Turgor Pressure, the Contractile Ring, and Septum Assembly to Forces in Cytokinesis in Fission Yeast. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22 (17), 1601–1608. 10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Speers A. E.; Cravatt B. F. Profiling Enzyme Activities in Vivo Using Click Chemistry Methods. Chem. Biol. 2004, 11 (4), 535–546. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2004.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Lampkins A. J.; O’Neil E. J.; Smith B. D. Bio-Orthogonal Phosphatidylserine Conjugates for Delivery and Imaging Applications. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73 (16), 6053–6058. 10.1021/jo8011336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

oc0c00813_si_001.pdf (2.1MB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Central Science are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES