Abstract
Two experiments were conducted to examine the effects of conditioning temperature (CT) and the interactive influence of feed acidification (FA) and CT on the performance, coefficient of apparent ileal digestibility (CAID) of nitrogen (N), starch, fat calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P), and AME in broilers. In both experiments, each treatment was randomly allocated to 6 cages (8 birds per cage) and fed from 1 to 21 D posthatch. In experiment 1, the effect of CT was evaluated using a wheat-based diet at 3 CT: unconditioned, conditioned at 60°C or 90°C. All the diets by-passed the pellet press and collected in mash form. Birds fed the diet conditioned at 90°C consumed more (P < 0.05) feed and tended (P = 0.087) to have higher feed per gain (F:G) than those fed the unconditioned diet but similar to those fed the diet conditioned at 60°C. A tendency was noted for CT to affect the CAID of N (P = 0.071) and starch (P = 0.093), with reduced digestibility values in the diet conditioned at 90°C. Conditioning at 90°C resulted in lower (P < 0.05) AME. In experiment 2, three inclusions of an acidifier (0.0, 7.0, and 10 g/kg) and 2 CT of 60°C and 90°C were evaluated in a 3 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments using pelleted diets. Neither the main effects nor the interaction between acidifier addition and CT was significant for weight gain, feed intake, and F:G. The FA increased (P < 0.05) the CAID of N, fat, and P at both inclusion levels and of starch at 10 g/kg. Conditioning at 90°C reduced (P < 0.05) the CAID of starch, fat, and Ca, regardless of FA level. Overall, the present data showed that the application of high CT for broiler feed manufacture can impair nutrient utilization and, consequently the feed efficiency in broilers. Feed acidification imparts some benefits to nutrient digestibility in broilers fed pelleted wheat-based diets.
Key words: acidifier, broiler, conditioning temperature, nutrient digestibility
Introduction
The last century has been marked by a rapid and extensive modernization in poultry feed processing techniques, and modern broiler chickens are fed an agglomerated high nutrient-dense feed in the form of pellets. The advantages of feeding pelleted diets to enhance feed efficiency and economics in the production of broiler chickens is unequivocal and has been the subject of numerous recent reviews (Abdollahi et al., 2013a, 2018, 2019; Goodarzi Boroojeni et al., 2016). However, while the effect of feeding pelleted diets to broilers is clearly advantageous, variability exists in performance or nutrient digestibility responses. Part of this response variation might be associated, inter alia, with application of high-temperature heat treatment during the pelleting process and its opposing effects on nutrient digestibility and physical pellet quality. It is well documented that the use of high conditioning temperature (CT) damages dietary nutrients with a consequential loss in nutrient utilization and bird performance (Kirkpinar and Basmacioglu, 2006; Abdollahi et al., 2010a,b, 2011; Loar II et al., 2014). However, the better physical pellet quality achieved at higher CT might restore the performance of broilers (Abdollahi et al., 2010a,b), depending on the magnitude of the negative effects of CT on nutrient availability.
In the poultry feed industry, high CT are employed to i) create high quality pellets and ii) eliminate feed-borne pathogens such as Salmonella and Campylobacter to meet the hygiene standards. Considering the detrimental impact of high CT on an array of major and expensive nutrients including starch, amino acids, vitamins, and feed additives such as exogenous enzymes and probiotics, strategies other than high CT should be practised to maintain pellet quality and to preserve the nutritional quality of the feed. Several alternative strategies such as prepelleting additions of water or pellet binder (Abdollahi et al., 2012) and longer pellet length and small diameter die hole (Abdollahi et al., 2013b) have been investigated and proven to be effective in creating high physical quality pellets at low CT. However, lowering the CT raises concern over feed sterilization and Salmonella elimination which is thought to require high-temperature heat treatment. While published data on the effects of temperature on feed hygiene are inconsistent (McCapes et al., 1989; Veldman et al., 1995; Jones and Richardson, 2004; van Immerseel et al., 2009; Jones, 2011), it has been suggested that pelleting process offers no protection against re-contamination of feed and that the sterilizing effects of pelleting may be lost after the feed leaves the pellet press (Jones and Richardson, 2004).
The use of organic acids in poultry diets has attracted some attention over the years and their benefits on gut health, nutrient digestibility, and growth performance have been documented (García et al., 2007; Ao et al., 2009; Chowdhury et al., 2009; Adil et al., 2011; Palamidi et al., 2017). The initial motivation of using organic acids in poultry diets has been to protect the feed from microbial contamination and spoilage through acidification (van Immerseel et al., 2006), and theoretically, they should be able to reduce pH in bird's digestive tract. It has been suggested that pH reduction in the digestive tract because of organic acid inclusion may increase mineral absorption and digestibility of protein by enhancing pepsin activity (Lückstädt and Mellor, 2011). Moreover, a recent study by Jendza et al. (2018) revealed that the combination of feed acidification (FA) and low CT (60°C) resulted in no detectable Salmonella, a finding that was comparable to steam-conditioning the same diet without FA at 75°C or 90°C. This finding could indicate that the effect of FA and CT are potentially additive on feed hygiene. While conditioning at 75°C and 90°C were equally effective at increasing the hygiene of broiler feed, it offered only minimal protection against postpelleting recontamination. However, FA was effective against recontamination regardless of CT (Jendza et al., 2018).
To the authors' knowledge, no study has ever investigated the interaction between FA and CT in poultry. The present study was initiated to explore the possibility of applying lower CT in combination with FA as complementary tools for promoting feed physical quality and maximizing its nutritional value. Thus, the objectives of this study were to determine i) the effects of CT per se on nutrient digestibility and performance of broiler chickens using steam-conditioned mash diets and ii) whether there are interactive effects between FA and CT on the nutrient utilization and growth performance of broilers fed pelleted wheat-based diets.
Materials and methods
The experiments were conducted according to the New Zealand Revised Code of Ethical Conduct for the use of live animals for research, testing, and teaching and approved by the Massey University Animal Ethics Committee.
Diets
Feed ingredients were obtained from a commercial supplier. Whole wheat was ground in a hammer mill (Bisley's Farm Machinery, Auckland, New Zealand) to pass through a screen size of 4.0 mm to achieve medium grind. In experiment 1, a wheat–soybean meal–based diet, with no acidifier inclusion, was formulated to meet the Ross 308 strain recommendations for major nutrients for broiler starters (Ross, 2014; Table 1). The formulated diet was mixed and then divided into 3 equal batches. One was offered as unconditioned mash diet, and the other 2 batches were passed through the conditioner chamber and steam-conditioned at either 60°C or 90°C, by-passed the pellet press, and the mash collected at the outlet of the cooling chamber.
Table 1.
Item | Acidifier inclusion rate (g/kg, as-fed basis)1 |
||
---|---|---|---|
0.02 | 7.0 | 10.0 | |
Wheat | 632.9 | 624.3 | 620.6 |
Soybean meal, 480 g/kg | 297.7 | 298.9 | 299.5 |
Soybean oil | 28.14 | 30.19 | 31.0 |
Dicalcium phosphate | 9.84 | 9.89 | 9.91 |
Limestone | 11.93 | 11.91 | 11.89 |
DL-Methionine | 2.87 | 2.89 | 2.90 |
L-Lysine HCl | 3.46 | 3.45 | 3.44 |
L-Threonine | 1.13 | 1.13 | 1.14 |
Sodium chloride | 1.42 | 1.43 | 1.43 |
Sodium bicarbonate | 2.86 | 1.15 | 0.42 |
Trace mineral premix3 | 1.50 | 1.50 | 1.50 |
Vitamin premix3 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.80 |
Choline chloride 60% | 0.25 | 0.26 | 0.27 |
Titanium dioxide (TiO2)4 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Phytase5 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 |
Carbohydrase6 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 |
Acidifier | 0.0 | 7.0 | 10.0 |
Calculated analysis | |||
AME (kcal/kg) | 3,010 | 3,010 | 3,010 |
CP | 219.9 | 219.5 | 219.3 |
Calcium | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 |
Non-phytate phosphorus | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Sodium | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
Chloride | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Potassium | 8.5 | 8.5 | 8.5 |
Digestible lysine | 12.3 | 12.3 | 12.3 |
Digestible methionine + cysteine | 8.74 | 8.74 | 8.74 |
Digestible threonine | 7.80 | 7.80 | 7.80 |
Analyzed values | |||
Dry matter | 876 | 875 | 868 |
Gross energy (kcal/kg) | 3,929 | 3,929 | 3,893 |
CP (Nitrogen × 6.25) | 226.5 | 221.3 | 216.6 |
Starch | 344 | 342 | 332 |
Fat | 38.9 | 42.7 | 40.3 |
Calcium | 8.4 | 9.3 | 8.7 |
Total phosphorus | 5.4 | 5.6 | 5.6 |
Amasil NA, BASF, Germany. Active ingredients: formic acid, 61% and sodium formate, 20.5%. Provided in liquid form with water content of 18 ± 2.0%. Sodium (Na) content of Amasil NA (67 g Na/kg) was accounted for in feed formulation.
The diet with no acidifier inclusion was used in experiments 1 and 2.
Supplied per kg of diet: vitamin A (trans-retinyl acetate), 12,000 IU; vitamin D3 (cholcalciferol), 4,000 IU; vitamin E (DL-α-tocopherol), 80 IU; biotin, 0.25 mg; pantothenic acid (D-Ca pantothenate), 15 mg; vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin), 0.02 mg; folic acid, 3.0 mg; vitamin K3 (menadione nicotinamide bisulphite), 4.0 mg; niacin (nicotinic acid), 60 mg; pyridoxine (pyridoxine. HCl), 10 mg; riboflavin, 9.0 mg; thiamine (thiamine-mononitrate), 3.0 mg; antioxidant (ethoxyquin), 100 mg; choline (choline chloride 60%), 360 mg; Co (cobalt sulfate), 0.15 mg; Cu (copper sulfate), 6.0 mg; organic Cu, 3.0 mg; Fe (iron sulfate), 36 mg; I (calcium iodate), 0.93 mg; Mn (manganese oxide), 60 mg; Mo (sodium molybdate), 0.15 mg; Se (sodium selenite), 0.26 mg; organic Se (enriched yeast), 0.14 mg; Zn (zinc sulfate), 48 mg; organic Zn, 24 mg.
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
BASF Natuphos E 10,000 G (hybrid 6-phytase; 1,000 phytase units [FTU]/kg diet). One unit of phytase activity is defined as the amount of enzyme, which liberates 1.0 μmol of inorganic phosphorus per minute from a solution of 0.0051 mol/L sodium phytate at pH 5.5 and 37°C. Full nutrient matrix values for phytase were used in diet formulation.
BASF Natugrain TS. One thermostable endo-xylanase unit is defined as the amount of enzyme, which liberates 5.0 μmol reducing sugars, measured as xylose equivalents per minute from a buffer solution containing 1.0 g arabinoxylan per 100 mL at pH 3.5 and 40°C. One thermostable endo-glucanase unit is defined as the amount of enzyme, which liberates 1.0 μmol reducing sugars, measured as glucose equivalents per minute from a buffer solution containing 0.714 g beta-glucan per 100 mL at pH 3.5 and 40°C.
In experiment 2, three broiler starter diets based on wheat and soybean meal, with 3 inclusions of acidifier (0.0, 7.0, and 10.0 g/kg), were formulated to meet the Ross 308 strain recommendations for major nutrients for broiler starters (Ross, 2014; Table 1) and to be equivalent in respect of energy and digestible amino acid contents. The basal diet with no acidifier was the same as that used in experiment 1. The acidifier, Amasil NA (BASF, Ludwigshafen, Germany), was in liquid form. The active ingredients of Amasil NA are formic acid (61%) and sodium formate (20.5%), with a water content of 16 to 20%, sodium content of 6 to 8% and pH (100 g/L water) of 2.6 to 3.2. The sodium content of Amasil NA was accounted for when formulating the diets. In the acidifier diets, the acidifier was added manually to the mash diet in a single-screw paddle mixer (Bonser Engineering Co. Pty. Ltd., Merrylands, Australia). After addition, diets were allowed to mix for 7 min, followed by the addition of soybean oil and mixed for another 7 min. The diets contained 5.0 g/kg titanium dioxide (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) as an indigestible marker for the determination of ileal nutrient digestibility. Each mixed diet was then divided into 2 equal batches, and 1 was steam-conditioned at 60°C, and the second batch was steam-conditioned at 90°C to provide a 3 × 2 factorial array of dietary treatments. All diets were pelleted using a pellet mill (Model Orbit 15; Richard Sizer Ltd., Kingston-upon-Hull, UK) capable of manufacturing 180 kg of feed/h and equipped with a die ring with 3.0 mm apertures and a depth of 35 mm. Pellets were of 2.0 mm length, and representative samples were collected, and pellet durability was determined.
In both experiments, steam-conditioning time of the mash was 30 s, and the CT was measured at the outlet (close to the exit point) of the conditioner before the mash feed entered the pellet die. The CT of the mash was measured continuously as a single-point measure during conditioning using a digital thermometer (Dick Smith Electronics, China). The desired CT were achieved by adjusting the steam flow rate. Natuphos E 10,000 G (hybrid 6-phytase) (BASF) at 1,000 FTU/kg feed and Natugrain TS (endo-1,4-beta-xylanase and endo-1,4-beta-glucanase) (BASF) at 100 g/tonne of feed were added across the basal diets in both experiments. Both enzymes are thermostable and were added to the diets in mixer (prepelleting enzyme addition). The activity of phytase in feed samples were measured at Vita Company Limited, Bangkok, Thailand. The phytase recovery was calculated as the percentage of measured phytase activity in the diet to the expected enzyme activity estimated from the minimum activity of phytase and the amount of phytase added to the diets. All diets were manufactured and stored for 2 wk before the start of the trial, and then, before feeding, DM content of all diets were determined to ensure that feed intake (FI) measurements were not biased by differences in moisture content.
Pellet Durability
Pellet durability was determined in a Holmen Pellet Tester (New Holmen NHP100 Portable Pellet Durability Tester, TekPro Ltd., Willow Park, North Walsham, Norfolk, UK) using the method described by Abdollahi et al. (2010b). Clean pellet samples (100 g; 6 replicates per diet), with no fines, were rapidly circulated in an air stream around a perforated test chamber for 30 s. Fines were removed continuously through the perforations during the test cycle. After the test cycle, the subject pellets were ejected and weighed manually. The pellet durability index (PDI) was calculated as the percentage of the pellets not passing through the perforations at the end of the test.
Birds and Housing
In both experiments, day-old male broilers (Ross 308) were obtained from a local hatchery, individually weighed, and allocated to 18 cages in experiment 1 or 36 cages in experiment 2 in electrically heated battery brooders so that the average bird weight per cage was similar. Each of the dietary treatments, in both experiments, was randomly assigned to 6 cages, each housing 8 birds, with total of 144 and 288 birds used in experiments 1 and 2, respectively. On day 12, birds were transferred to grower cages and continued the same diets until day 21. The space allocation per bird in brooder and grower cages was 530 and 640 cm2, respectively. The battery brooders and grower cages, with wired floors, were housed in an environmentally controlled room with 20 h of fluorescent illumination per day. The temperature was maintained at 31°C on day 1 and decreased by 3°C per week to a final temperature of 22°C at 21 D of age. Cages were equipped with feed troughs and nipple drinkers. Diets, in mash form in experiment 1 and pellet form in experiment 2, were offered ad libitum, and water was freely available.
Performance Data
Body weight and FI were recorded on a cage basis at weekly intervals. Mortality was recorded daily. Feed per gain (F:G) values were corrected for the weight of any bird that died during the course of the experiment.
AME Determination
Feed intake and total excreta output for each cage were monitored from day 17 to 20 posthatch. Daily excreta collections from each cage were pooled, mixed in a blender, and subsampled. Subsamples were lyophilized (Model 0610, Cuddon Engineering, Blenheim, New Zealand), ground to pass through a 0.5-mm sieve, and stored in airtight plastic containers at 4°C pending analysis. The diets and excreta samples were analyzed for DM and gross energy (GE).
Determination of the Coefficient of Apparent Ileal Digestibility
On day 21, all birds per cage were euthanized by intravenous injection (1 mL per 2 kg live weight) of sodium pentobarbitone (Provet NZ Pty Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand), and digesta were collected from the lower half of the ileum, as described by Ravindran et al. (2005). The ileum was defined as that portion of the small intestine extending from the Meckel's diverticulum to a point ∼40 mm proximal to the ileo-cecal junction. The ileum was then divided into 2 halves, and the digesta was collected from the lower half toward the ileo-cecal junction. Digesta from birds within a cage were pooled, lyophilized (Model 0610, Cuddon Engineering, Blenheim, New Zealand), ground to pass through a 0.5-mm sieve, and stored at 4°C until laboratory analysis. The diets and digesta samples were analyzed for DM, titanium (Ti), nitrogen (N), starch, fat, calcium (Ca), and phosphorus (P).
Chemical Analysis
Dry matter was determined using standard procedure (Method 930.15; AOAC, 2005). Gross energy was determined by adiabatic bomb calorimetry (Gallenkamp Autobomb, London, UK) standardized with benzoic acid. Samples were assayed for Ti on a UV spectrophotometer following the method of Short et al. (1996). Nitrogen was determined by combustion (Method 968.06; AOAC, 2005) using a carbon nanosphere-200 carbon, N, and sulfur autoanalyzer (LECO Corporation, St. Joseph, MI). Total starch was determined using the assay procedure (Megazyme Total Starch Assay Procedure; Megazyme International Ireland Ltd., Wicklow, Ireland) based on thermostable α-amylase and amyloglucosidase. Fat was determined using the Soxhlet extraction procedure (Method 991.36; AOAC, 2005). Calcium and P were determined by colorimetric methods after ashing the samples at 550°C and acid digestion in 6.0 M HCl using standard procedures (Method 968.08D; AOAC, 2005).
Calculations
All data were expressed on a DM basis, and the AME was calculated using the following formula:
Coefficient of apparent ileal digestibility (CAID) of nutrients was calculated using the following formula:
where (Nutrient/Ti)d = ratio of nutrient to Ti in the diet, and (Nutrient/Ti)i = ratio of nutrient to Ti in the ileal digesta.
Statistical Analysis
Cage mean values were considered as the experimental unit, and the data were analyzed in a completely randomized design using the General Linear Models procedure of the SAS Institute Inc. (version 9.4; 2015). A 1-way ANOVA was used in experiment 1 and a 2-way ANOVA in experiment 2 to determine the main effects (acidifier inclusion and CT) and their interaction. Statements of significance were based on P-value of equal to or <0.05, and a P-value between 0.05 and 0.10 was considered as a trend. The Least Significant Difference test was used to separate significant differences between means.
Results
Experiment 1
The phytase recovery from the nonconditioned diet and diets conditioned at 60°C and 90°C were 137, 131, and 126%, respectively. The mortality was minimal (2.1%) and not related to any specific treatment. Conditioning temperature had no effect (P > 0.05) on the weight gain (Table 2). Birds fed the diet conditioned at 90°C consumed more (P < 0.05) feed than those fed nonconditioned diet but similar (P > 0.05) to the diet conditioned at 60°C. There was a tendency (P = 0.087) for CT to affect F:G. Birds fed the diet conditioned at 90°C tended to have a higher F:G than those fed the nonconditioned diet.
Table 2.
Conditioning temperature,°C | Weight gain | Feed intake | Feed per gain |
---|---|---|---|
No conditioning | 824 | 1098b | 1.334 |
60 | 843 | 1127a,b | 1.346 |
90 | 860 | 1183a | 1.386 |
Probabilities, P ≤ | 0.346 | 0.019 | 0.087 |
Pooled SEM | 16.6 | 19.0 | 0.0163 |
a-bMeans in a column not sharing a common letter are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Each value represents the mean of 6 replicates (8 birds per replicate).
Steam-conditioning either at 60°C or 90°C reduced (P < 0.05) the CAID of DM compared with nonconditioned diet but failed to have any effect on those of fat, Ca, and P (Table 3). A tendency was noted for CT to affect the CAID of N (P = 0.071) and starch (P = 0.093). Compared with the nonconditioned diet, the CAID of N and starch were unaffected (P > 0.05) by CT at 60°C but tended to reduce when the CT increased to 90°C. Conditioning at 90°C resulted in lower (P < 0.05) AME and DM retention compared with nonconditioned diet and the diet conditioned at 60°C.
Table 3.
Conditioning temperature, °C | CAID |
AME | TTR of DM | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DM | N | Starch | Fat | Ca | P | |||
No conditioning | 0.689a | 0.837 | 0.978 | 0.919 | 0.510 | 0.497 | 3389a | 72.4a |
60 | 0.651b | 0.822 | 0.970 | 0.913 | 0.478 | 0.504 | 3351a | 71.1a,b |
90 | 0.654b | 0.809 | 0.966 | 0.897 | 0.476 | 0.474 | 3265b | 70.1b |
Probabilities, P ≤ | 0.043 | 0.071 | 0.093 | 0.298 | 0.594 | 0.577 | 0.006 | 0.039 |
Pooled SEM | 0.0106 | 0.0080 | 0.0036 | 0.0098 | 0.0257 | 0.0208 | 24.1 | 0.566 |
a-cMeans in a column not sharing a common letter are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Each value represents the mean of 6 replicates (8 birds per replicate), measured on day 21.
Each value represents the mean of 6 replicates (8 birds per replicate), measured from day 17 to 21 posthatch.
Experiment 2
The average phytase recovery from the diets conditioned at 60°C and 90°C (regardless of acidifier inclusion) were 101 and 95%, respectively. Influence of FA and CT on the performance parameters of broiler starters fed pelleted diets and PDI is summarized in Table 4. Mortality during the experiment was negligible. Only 6 out of the 288 birds died, and the deaths were not related to any specific treatment. Neither the main effects nor the interaction between acidifier addition and CT was significant (P > 0.05) for weight gain, FI, and F:G. However, there was a tendency (P = 0.066) for the acidifier to increase the FI at 10.0 g/kg inclusion compared with the diets with no acidifier. While FA and increasing CT improved PDI, the CT effect was attenuated in diets containing acidifier, resulting in a significant acidifier × CT interaction (P < 0.001; Table 4).
Table 4.
Item |
Growth performance |
Pellet quality |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Acidifier (g/kg) | CT, °C | Weight gain | Feed intake | Feed per gain | PDI |
0.0 | 60 | 1,022 | 1,351 | 1.333 | 75.7e |
90 | 1,029 | 1,364 | 1.330 | 88.7b | |
7.0 | 60 | 1,061 | 1,389 | 1.310 | 82.7d |
90 | 1,033 | 1,370 | 1.333 | 88.2b | |
10.0 | 60 | 1,049 | 1,394 | 1.337 | 84.2c |
90 | 1,043 | 1,401 | 1.344 | 90.3a | |
Pooled SEM | 13.3 | 16.4 | 0.0111 | 0.36 | |
Main effects | |||||
Acidifier | |||||
0.0 | 1,025 | 1,358 | 1.331 | 82.2 | |
7.0 | 1,047 | 1,380 | 1.321 | 85.4 | |
10.0 | 1,046 | 1,398 | 1.340 | 87.2 | |
CT, °C | |||||
60 | 1,044 | 1,378 | 1.326 | 80.8 | |
90 | 1,035 | 1,378 | 1.336 | 89.1 | |
Probabilities, P ≤ | |||||
Acidifier | 0.207 | 0.066 | 0.246 | 0.001 | |
CT | 0.422 | 0.984 | 0.321 | 0.001 | |
Acidifier x CT | 0.417 | 0.598 | 0.531 | 0.001 |
a-eMeans in a column not sharing a common letter are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Each value represents the mean of 6 replicates (8 birds per replicate).
Each value represents the mean of 6 replicate samples.
Influence of FA and CT on the digestibility of nutrients, AME, and retention of DM in broiler starters is summarized in Table 5. The main effect of acidifier inclusion was significant for the CAID of DM (P < 0.001), N, starch, P (P < 0.05), and fat (P < 0.01), with the acidifier increasing the CAID of DM, N, fat, and P at both inclusion levels and of starch at 10 g/kg inclusion. Conditioning at 90°C reduced (P < 0.05) the CAID of DM, starch, fat, and Ca, regardless of acidifier inclusion, as indicated by the lack of interaction (P > 0.05) between acidifier and CT. Neither the main effects nor the interaction was significant (P > 0.05) for AME and DM retention.
Table 5.
Acidifier (g/kg) | CT, °C | CAID |
AME | TTR of DM | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DM | N | Starch | Fat | Ca | P | ||||
0.0 | 60 | 0.612 | 0.783 | 0.940 | 0.885 | 0.215 | 0.494 | 3,301 | 69.9 |
90 | 0.593 | 0.766 | 0.936 | 0.875 | 0.121 | 0.474 | 3,296 | 70.2 | |
7.0 | 60 | 0.663 | 0.807 | 0.955 | 0.920 | 0.292 | 0.578 | 3,317 | 70.3 |
90 | 0.629 | 0.789 | 0.929 | 0.897 | 0.168 | 0.545 | 3,296 | 69.4 | |
10.0 | 60 | 0.647 | 0.794 | 0.957 | 0.909 | 0.249 | 0.561 | 3,313 | 70.5 |
90 | 0.632 | 0.800 | 0.953 | 0.890 | 0.189 | 0.531 | 3,286 | 70.2 | |
Pooled SEM | 0.0105 | 0.0097 | 0.0061 | 0.0081 | 0.0417 | 0.0265 | 13.1 | 0.34 | |
Main effects | |||||||||
Acidifier | |||||||||
0.0 | 0.603b | 0.774b | 0.938b | 0.880b | 0.168 | 0.484b | 3,298 | 70.1 | |
7.0 | 0.646a | 0.798a | 0.942b | 0.909a | 0.230 | 0.562a | 3,306 | 69.8 | |
10.0 | 0.639a | 0.797a | 0.955a | 0.899a | 0.219 | 0.546a | 3,300 | 70.3 | |
CT, °C | |||||||||
60 | 0.641a | 0.794 | 0.951a | 0.905a | 0.252a | 0.544 | 3,310 | 70.2 | |
90 | 0.618b | 0.785 | 0.939b | 0.888b | 0.160b | 0.517 | 3,293 | 69.9 | |
Probabilities, P ≤ | |||||||||
Acidifier | 0.001 | 0.034 | 0.025 | 0.005 | 0.296 | 0.015 | 0.833 | 0.423 | |
CT | 0.013 | 0.260 | 0.029 | 0.015 | 0.011 | 0.208 | 0.117 | 0.373 | |
Acidifier x CT | 0.641 | 0.373 | 0.131 | 0.729 | 0.744 | 0.968 | 0.653 | 0.242 |
a-bMeans in a column not sharing a common letter are significantly different (P < 0.05).
Each value represents the mean of 6 replicates (8 birds per replicate), measured on day 21.
Each value represents the mean of 6 replicates (8 birds per replicate), measured from day 17 to 21 posthatch.
Discussion
The paramount motive for this study was to investigate whether i) increasing CT per se, in isolation from feed form, have an effect on nutrient utilization and performance of birds (experiment 1) and ii) FA will interact with CT on the nutrient utilization and growth performance of broilers (experiment 2). Predictably, steam-conditioning, either at 60°C or 90°C, reduced the CAID of DM by an average of 5.3% compared with the nonconditioned diet (0.653 vs. 0.689) in experiment 1. Though not significant, birds fed the diet conditioned at 90°C tended to digest N and starch less efficiently by 3.3 and 1.2%, respectively, compared with those fed the nonconditioned diet. Increasing CT to 90°C also lowered AME by 124 kcal/kg and DM retention by 3.2% when compared with the nonconditioned diet. Moreover, conditioning at 90°C increased the FI by 85 g/bird compared with the nonconditioned diet; a finding that can be explained by the AME loss in birds fed the diet conditioned at 90°C. These findings emphasize the fact that high CT impairs nutrient and energy utilization and that feed efficiency is disadvantaged consequently. This is evidenced by deterioration (although only a tendency) of F:G by 5.2 points in birds fed the diet conditioned at 90°C compared with the nonconditioned diet and by 3.0 points compared with the diet conditioned at 60°C in experiment 1. Although similar outcomes for the application of high CT in pelleted diets are not without precedents (Kirkpinar and Basmacioglu, 2006; Abdollahi et al., 2010a,b; Loar II et al., 2014), limited studies to date have investigated the impact of CT in steam-conditioned mash diets. Abdollahi et al. (2011) compared wheat-based mash diets either unconditioned or steam-conditioned at 60°C, 75°C, or 90°C and reported that while introduction of steam at 60°C resulted in slight improvements in N and starch digestibility, increasing CT from 60°C to 75°C and 90°C decreased N digestibility from 0.869 to 0.855 and 0.847 and starch digestibility from 0.977 to 0.940 and 0.913, respectively. In their study, although increasing CT resulted in higher gelatinized starch content (g per kg total starch) from 52.4 in unconditioned mash diet to 82.7 g/kg at 90°C, it also increased resistant starch content by 1.6 g/kg (from 9.5 to 11.1 g per kg total starch); the latter could explain, at least in part, the reduction in starch digestibility of the diets conditioned at higher temperatures. Increasing CT from 60°C to 90°C also reduced the AME of diet by 24 kcal/kg for every 10°C increase in CT (3,317 vs. 3,389). Similar to the current findings, these researchers also reported an increase of 6.6 points in F:G as a result of steam-conditioning at 90°C compared with the unconditioned diet and an increase of 5.5 points compared with the diet conditioned at 60°C.
Despite significant effect of CT on the CAID of some nutrients in experiment 2, it had no impact on growth performance of broilers. It is noteworthy that performance of the birds is not only driven by the digestibility of nutrients. Other factors such as FI and pellet quality, which can influence the energy-sparing effect of pelleted diets, play an important role in determining the growth response and feed efficiency. In the current study, conditioning at 90°C, compared with 60°C, resulted in same FI but supported a higher PDI by 10.3% (89.1 vs. 80.8%), which could have potentially compensated for the deteriorated DM, starch, and fat digestibility in diets conditioned at 90°C. A good pellet quality reduces the heat increment and increases the productive energy of the diet to be used for productive purposes (Latshaw and Moritz, 2009), enabling reduction of dietary energy density with no negative impact on growth performance (McKinney and Teeter, 2004). A contribution of 151 (Skinner-Noble et al., 2005) to 187 (McKinney and Teeter, 2004) kcal MEn/kg diet has been estimated for a diet at 100% pellets compared with the same diet in mash form.
Increasing CT from 60°C to 90°C benefited the PDI, regardless of the acidifier inclusion, but advantage diminished from 17.2% in diets without acidifier (88.7 vs. 75.7%) to 6.6% in diets with 7.0 g/kg acidifier (88.2 vs. 82.7%) and 7.2% in diets with 10 g/kg acidifier (90.3 vs. 84.2%). Comparing only the diets conditioned at 60°C in the current study, the highest PDI was achieved in the diet with 10 g/kg acidifier (84.2%) followed by the diet with 7.0 g/kg acidifier (82.7%), and the diet with no acidifier (75.7%). The acidifier used in the current study was in liquid form with water content of 18 ± 2%. Therefore, the addition of acidifier to the diets at 7.0 and 10 g/kg would have potentially added 1.26 to 1.8 g/kg extra moisture to the diets, respectively. Significant increases in PDI by water addition to corn-based (Moritz et al., 2003), wheat-based (Abdollahi et al., 2012), and barley-based and corn-based diets (Lundblad et al., 2009) have been reported previously. In a conventional pelleting process, the moisture from steam is held largely on the surface of feed particles rather than permeating the starch granules (Smith, 1959). Prepelleting moisture addition probably facilitates moisture permeation to the starch granules, resulting in evenly distributed starch gelatinization throughout the pellet and improves the pellet quality. One implication of this work and previous studies (Abdollahi et al., 2012, 2013b) is that enhancing physical quality of pellets without the application of high CT is a possible strategy.
The current work failed to show any performance benefits with FA, which is in agreement with the results of Gunal et al. (2006), Hernandez et al. (2006), and Houshmand et al. (2012), who did not find any positive effect of FA on growth performance and feed efficiency of broilers. The lack of advantages arising from FA in these studies, and also the present work, could be attributed to the optimal nutrition, hygiene, and management in the experimental condition which did not leave much room for the acidifier to enhance the performance despite improving the digestibility of nutrients (Hernandez et al., 2006; Houshmand et al., 2012).
The present study, however, did confirm the benefits of acidifier in terms of enhanced nutrient digestibility, with FA increasing the CAID of DM, N, starch, fat, and P by an average of 6.6, 3.0, 1.1, 2.7, and 14.5%, respectively. This finding is consistent with study by Palamidi et al. (2017) who reported that dietary acidifier (mixture of formic, propionic, acetic acid, and their salts) supplementation improved the retention of DM, organic matter, and energy by 5.4, 4.8, and 8.8%, respectively. An improved digestibility of DM, protein, and neutral detergent fiber in broilers because of FA by citric acid has also been reported by Ao et al. (2009). Evidence indicates that organic acids induce positive effects on the gut morphology architecture and improve the intestinal absorption capacity (Senkoylu et al., 2007; Adil et al., 2011). According to Lückstädt and Mellor (2011), a lower pH induced by organic acid inclusion might enhance absorption of minerals, which their solubility is pH dependent (Champagne, 1988; Selle et al., 2000) and of proteins through an increase in pepsin activity. However, in a study by Palamidi et al. (2017), gizzard digesta pH was not affected by acidifier addition to a mash diet. Feeding of pelleted diets has been shown to negatively influence the nutrient digestibility (Abdollahi et al., 2013c, 2014), a finding which was partly attributed to an increase in foregut, especially gizzard, pH because of a suboptimal proventriculus and gizzard development induced by feeding texture-less pelleted diets (Frikha et al. 2009; Saldana et al. 2015a,b; Naderinejad et al., 2016). Interestingly, in a recent unpublished study from our laboratory, acidification of a wheat-based diet in mash form with same acidifier as the one used in the current study at 7.0 g/kg failed to improve the digestibility of nutrients, suggesting that the beneficial effects of FA might be more pronounced in pelleted diets than those in mash form. Ajandouz and Puigserver (1999), in a study with mixtures of glucose and individual amino acids (Lys, Met, and Thr), reported that the rate of the Maillard “browning” reaction increased with increasing the pH, particularly in the Lys-containing solution. These researchers reported almost no loss of Lys at pH between 4.0 and 6.0 and suggested that the decrease in pH of amino acid–containing glucose mixtures, especially above neutral pH, can lower the rate of Maillard reactant losses (i.e., sugar and amino acids). This might suggest that the positive effect of FA on digestibility of N and starch in pelleted diets in current study could be due, in part, to the inhibition of Maillard product formation. It is well documented that some of the Maillard specific reactions are irreversible and result in enzymatically undegradable end products, leading to a reduction in availability of nutrients involved in Maillard reaction (Camire et al., 1990).
The lack of significant acidifier × CT interactions observed for the CAID of nutrients in experiment 2 indicated that the effect of CT was similar across both acidifier inclusion rates. However, feeding diets conditioned at 90°C significantly reduced the digestibility of DM by 3.6%, starch by 1.3%, fat by 1.9% and Ca by 36.5%, compared with those conditioned at 60°C. Several studies have shown negative impacts of high CT on nutrient digestibility and bird performance fed pelleted diets (Raastad and Skrede, 2003; Abdollahi et al., 2010a,b, 2011; Loar II et al., 2014). Abdollahi et al. (2011) reported decreases in the CAID of N by 2.2% and starch by 3.9% in a wheat-based diet conditioned at 90°C compared with the diet conditioned at 60°C. Abdollahi et al. (2010a), in a study with wheat-based and corn-based diets, found that increasing the CT from 60°C to 90°C in wheat-based diets deteriorated the CAID of N (0.802 vs. 0.823) and starch (0.898 vs. 0.933), but had no effect in corn-based diets. In a follow-up study (Abdollahi et al., 2010b), conditioning a sorghum-based diet at 90°C impaired N (0.753 vs. 0.776) and starch (0.914 vs. 0.937) digestibility compared with 60°C. However, Loar II et al. (2014), in a study with a corn–soybean meal diet, increased CT from 74°C to 85°C and 96°C and reported a reduction of 3 to 5% in the digestibility of some amino acids which was associated with a loss of feed efficiency by 3 points at 85°C (1.96 vs. 1.99) and by 8 points at 96°C (1.96 vs. 2.04). Several explanations may be provided for the adverse effects of CT on nutrient utilization and bird performance and include i) increased diet/digesta viscosity because of an increase in the solubility of nonstarch polysaccharides (Samarasinghe et al., 2000; Cowieson et al., 2005); ii) inactivation of dietary endogenous and microbial enzymes that contributes to an increase in molecular weight moieties and viscosity (Silversides and Bedford 1999; Cowieson et al., 2005); iii) promotion of excessive and unintentional bacterial growth and toxin production in the small intestine, caused by increased intestinal viscosity, that could potentially compete with the host for nutrients and promote the occurrence of clinical diseases such as necrotic enteritis; iv) retrogradation of starch molecules and formation of resistant starch with negative impact on starch digestibility (Abdollahi et al., 2010b, 2011); v) formation of indigestible linkages such as disulphide bonds in kafirin protein in sorghum (Selle et al., 2010, 2012); and vi) possible degradation of amino acids, especially Cys, Lys, Arg, Thr, and Ser, and reducing their digestibility (Camire et al., 1990; Marsman et al., 1995). While it is tempting to suggest that CT effect on nutrient utilization in poultry diets may vary depending on the type of ingredients used in the diet (Abdollahi et al., 2010a,b), an important implication from the abovementioned studies is that although the conventional CT (generally between 80°C and 90°C) improves the physical pellet quality and feed hygiene, these benefits come at the expense of nutrient digestibility.
Conclusions
In conclusion, FA, through inclusion of organic acids, is shown to be beneficial to nutrient digestibility in broilers fed pelleted diets. The results of this study also confirm the previously reported detrimental effects of application of high CT in poultry feed manufacture. The current findings may suggest that broiler diets can be conditioned at lower temperatures than the current industry practice if combined with FA. However, a holistic framework investigating the effects of FA and CT on feed hygiene, physical pellet quality, growth performance, nutrient utilization, and intestinal health and histology is required. Such a study will help to unravel the possibility to manufacture hygienic pellets of high quality and high digestibility.
Acknowledgments
This work was financially supported by BASF.
Conflict of Interest Statement: The authors did not provide a conflict of interest statement.
References
- Abdollahi M.R., Ravindran V., Wester T.J., Ravindran G., Thomas D.V. Influence of conditioning temperature on the performance, nutrient utilization and digestive tract development of broilers fed on maize- and wheat-based diets. Br. Poult. Sci. 2010;51:648–657. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2010.522557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Abdollahi M.R., Ravindran V., Wester T.J., Ravindran G., Thomas D.V. Influence of conditioning temperature on performance, apparent metabolizable energy, ileal digestibility of starch and nitrogen and the quality of pellets, in broiler starters fed maize- and sorghum-based diets. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2010;162:106–115. [Google Scholar]
- Abdollahi M.R., Ravindran V., Wester T.J., Ravindran G., Thomas D.V. Influence of feed form and conditioning temperature on performance, apparent metabolizable energy and ileal digestibility of starch and nitrogen in broiler starters fed wheat-based diet. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011;168:88–99. [Google Scholar]
- Abdollahi M.R., Ravindran V., Wester T.J., Ravindran G., Thomas D.V. Effect of improved pellet quality from the addition of a pellet binder and/or moisture to a wheat-based diet conditioned at two different temperatures on performance, apparent metabolizable energy and ileal digestibility of starch and nitrogen in broilers. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2012;175:150–157. [Google Scholar]
- Abdollahi M.R., Ravindran V., Svihus B. Pelleting of broiler diets: an overview with emphasis on pellet quality and nutritional value. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2013;179:1–23. [Google Scholar]
- Abdollahi M.R., Ravindran V., Wester T.J., Ravindran G., Thomas D.V. The effect of manipulation of pellet size (diameter and length) on pellet quality and performance, apparent metabolizable energy and ileal nutrient digestibility in broilers fed maize-based diets. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2013;53:114–120. [Google Scholar]
- Abdollahi M.R., Ravindran V., Svihus B. Influence of grain type and feed form on performance, apparent metabolizable energy and ileal digestibility of nitrogen, starch, fat, calcium and phosphorus in broiler starters. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2013;186:193–203. [Google Scholar]
- Abdollahi M.R., Ravindran V., Svihus B. Influence of feed form on growth performance, ileal nutrient digestibility, and energy utilization in broiler starters fed a sorghum-based diet. Livest. Sci. 2014;165:80–86. [Google Scholar]
- Abdollahi M.R., Zaefarian F., Ravindran V. Feed intake response of broilers: impact of feed processing. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2018;237:154–165. [Google Scholar]
- Abdollahi M.R., Zaefarian F., Ravindran V. Maximizing the benefits of pelleting diets for modern broilers. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2019;59:2023–2028. [Google Scholar]
- Adil S., Banday T., Bhat G.A., Salahuddin M., Raquib M., Shanaz S. Response of broiler chicken to dietary supplementation of organic acids. J. Cent. Eur. Agric. 2011;12:498–508. [Google Scholar]
- Ajandouz E.H., Puigserver A. Nonenzymatic browning reaction of essential amino acids: effect of pH on caramelization and Maillard reaction kinetics. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999;47:1786–1793. doi: 10.1021/jf980928z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ao T., Cantor A.H., Pescatore A.J., Ford M.J., Pierce J.L., Dawson K.A. Effect of enzyme supplementation and acidification of diets on nutrient digestibility and growth performance of broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 2009;88:111–117. doi: 10.3382/ps.2008-00191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- AOAC International . 18th ed. AOAC Int.; Washington, DC: 2005. Official Methods of Analysis. [Google Scholar]
- Camire M.E., Camire A., Krumhar K. Chemical and nutritional changes in foods during extrusion. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1990;29:35–57. doi: 10.1080/10408399009527513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Champagne E.T. Effects of pH on mineral-phytate: protein-mineral-phytate and mineral-fiber interactions. Possible consequences of atrophic gastritis on mineral bioavailability from high fiber foods. J. Amer. Coll. Nutr. 1988;7:499–508. doi: 10.1080/07315724.1988.10720266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chowdhury R., Islam K.M.S., Khan M.J., Karim M.R., Haque M.N., Khatun M., Pesti G.M. Effect of citric acid, avilamycin, and their combination on the performance, tibia ash, and immune status of broilers. Poult. Sci. 2009;88:1616–1622. doi: 10.3382/ps.2009-00119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cowieson A.J., Hruby M., Faurschou Isaksen M. The effect of conditioning temperature and exogenous xylanase addition on the viscosity of wheat-based diets and the performance of broiler chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 2005;46:717–724. doi: 10.1080/00071660500392506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frikha M., Safaa H.M., Serrano M.P., Arbe X., Mateos G.G. Influence of the main cereal and feed form of the diet on performance and digestive tract traits of brown-egg laying pullets. Poult. Sci. 2009;88:994–1002. doi: 10.3382/ps.2008-00480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- García V., Catalá-Gregori P., Hernández F., Megías M.D., Madrid J. Effect of formic acid and plant extracts on growth, nutrient digestibility, intestine mucosa morphology, and meat yield of broilers. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2007;16:555–562. [Google Scholar]
- Goodarzi Boroojeni F., Svihus B., Graf von Reichenbach H., Zentek J. The effects of hydrothermal processing on feed hygiene, nutrient availability, intestinal microbiota and morphology in poultry-a review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2016;220:187–215. [Google Scholar]
- Gunal M., Yayli G., Kaya O., Karahan N., Sulak O. The effects of antibiotic growth promoter, probiotic or organic acid supplementation on performance, intestinal microflora and tissue of broilers. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2006;5:149–155. [Google Scholar]
- Hernandez F., Garcia V., Madrid J., Orengo J., Catala P., Megias M.D. Effect of formic acid on performance, digestibility, intestinal histomorphology and plasma metabolite levels of broiler chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 2006;47:50–67. doi: 10.1080/00071660500475574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Houshmand M., Azhar K., Zulkifli I., Bejo M.H., Kamyab A. Effects of non-antibiotic feed additives on performance, immunity and intestinal morphology of broilers fed different levels of protein. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2012;42:22–32. [Google Scholar]
- Jendza J.A., Huss A., Jones C., Abdollahi M.R., Hall L. Effect of feed acidification and conditioning temperature on feed hygiene and Salmonella recovery from mash and pelleted broiler feed. Proc. Aust. Poult. Sci. Symp. 2018;29:97–100. [Google Scholar]
- Jones F.T. A review of practical Salmonella control measures in animal feed. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2011;20:102–113. [Google Scholar]
- Jones F.T., Richardson K.E. Salmonella in commercially manufactured feeds. Poult. Sci. 2004;83:384–391. doi: 10.1093/ps/83.3.384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirkpinar F., Basmacioglu H. Effects of pelleting temperature of phytase supplemented broiler feed on tibia mineralization, calcium and phosphorus content of serum and performance. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2006;51:78–84. [Google Scholar]
- Latshaw J.D., Moritz J.S. The partitioning of metabolizable energy by broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2009;88:98–105. doi: 10.3382/ps.2008-00161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Loar R.E., II, Wamsley K.G.S., Evans A., Moritz J.S., Corzo A. Effects of varying conditioning temperature and mixer-added fat on feed manufacturing efficiency, 28- to 42-day broiler performance, early skeletal effect, and true amino acid digestibility. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2014;23:444–455. [Google Scholar]
- Lückstädt C., Mellor S. The use of organic acids in animal nutrition, with special focus on dietary potassium diformate under European and Austral-Asian conditions. Recent Adv. Anim. Nutr. Aus. 2011;18:123–130. [Google Scholar]
- Lundblad K.K., Hancock J.D., Behnke K.C., Prestløkken E., McKinney L.J., Sørensen M. The effect of adding water into the mixer on pelleting efficiency and pellet quality in diets for finishing pigs without and with use of an expander. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2009;150:295–302. [Google Scholar]
- Marsman G., Gruppen H., Van der Poel A., Resink J., Verstegen M., Voragen A. The effect of shear forces and addition of a mixture of a protease and a hemicellulase on chemical: physical and physiological parameters during extrusion of soybean meal. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1995;56:21–35. [Google Scholar]
- McCapes R.H., Ekperigin H.E., Cameron W.J., Ritchie W.L., Slagter J., Stangeland V., Nagaraja K.V. Effect of a new pelleting process on the level of contamination of poultry mash by Escherichia coli and salmonella. Avian Dis. 1989;33:103–111. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McKinney L.J., Teeter R.G. Predicting effective caloric value of non-nutritive factors: І. Pellet quality and ІІ. Prediction of consequential formulation dead zones. Poult. Sci. 2004;83:1165–1174. doi: 10.1093/ps/83.7.1065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moritz J.S., Cramer K.R., Wilson K.J., Beyer R.S. Feed manufacture and feeding of rations with graded levels of added moisture formulated to different energy densities. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2003;12:371–381. [Google Scholar]
- Naderinejad S., Zaefarian F., Abdollahi M.R., Hassanabadi A., Kermanshahi H., Ravindran V. Influence of feed form and particle size on performance, nutrient utilization, and gastrointestinal tract development and morphometry in broiler starters fed maize-based diets. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2016;215:92–104. [Google Scholar]
- Palamidi I., Paraskeuas V., Theodorou G., Breitsma R., Schatzmayr G., Theodoropoulos G., Fegeros K., Mountzouris K.C. Effects of dietary acidifier supplementation on broiler growth performance, digestive and immune function indices. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2017;57:271–281. [Google Scholar]
- Raastad, N. and A. Skrede. 2003. Feed pelleting temperature influences growth performance of broiler chickens. Pages 115-116 in 14th Eur. Symp. Poult. Nutr. The World’s Poultry Science Association, Lillehammer, Norway.
- Ravindran V., Hew L.I., Ravindran G., Bryden W.L. Apparent ileal digestibility of amino acids in feed ingredients for broiler chickens. Anim. Sci. 2005;81:85–97. [Google Scholar]
- Ross . Ross Breeders Limited; Newbridge, Midlothian, Scotland, UK: 2014. Ross 308 Broiler: Nutrition Specification, June 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Saldana B., Guzman P., Camara L., Garcia J., Mateos G.G. Feed form and energy concentration of the diet affect growth performance and digestive tract traits of brown-egg laying pullets from hatching to 17 weeks of age. Poult. Sci. 2015;94:1879–1893. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saldana B., Guzman P., Safaa H.M., Harzalli R., Mateos G.G. Influence of the main cereal and feed form of the rearing phase diets on performance, digestive tract, and body traits of brown-egg laying pullets from hatch to 17 weeks of age. Poult. Sci. 2015;94:2650–2661. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Samarasinghe K., Messikommer R., Wenk C. Activity of supplemental enzymes and their effect on nutrient utilization and growth performance of growing chickens as affected by pelleting temperature. Arch. Tierernahr. 2000;53:45–58. doi: 10.1080/17450390009381937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SAS Institute . SAS Institute Inc.; Cary, NC: 2015. SAS® Qualification Tools User’s Guide. Version 9.4. [Google Scholar]
- Selle P.H., Cadogan D.J., Li X., Bryden W.L. Implications of sorghum in broiler chicken nutrition. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2010;156:57–74. [Google Scholar]
- Selle P.H., Liu S.Y., Cai J., Cowieson A.J. Steam-pelleting and feed form of broiler diets based on three coarsely ground sorghums influences growth performance, nutrient utilization, starch and nitrogen digestibility. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2012;52:842–852. [Google Scholar]
- Selle P.H., Ravindran V., Caldwell R.A., Bryden W.L. Phytate and phytase: consequences for protein utilization. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2000;13:255–278. doi: 10.1079/095442200108729098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Senkoylu N., Samli H.E., Kanter M., Agma A. Influence of a combination of formic and propionic acids added to wheat-and barley-based diets on the performance and gut histomorphology of broiler chickens. Acta Vet. Hung. 2007;55:479–490. doi: 10.1556/AVet.55.2007.4.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Short F.J., Gorton P., Wiseman J., Boorman K.N. Determination of titanium dioxide added as an inert marker in chicken digestibility studies. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1996;59:215–221. [Google Scholar]
- Silversides F.G., Bedford M.R. Effect of pelleting temperature on the recovery and efficacy of a xylanase enzyme in wheat-based diets. Poult. Sci. 1999;78:1184–1190. doi: 10.1093/ps/78.8.1184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Skinner-Noble D.O., McKinney L.J., Teeter R.G. Predicting effective caloric value of non-nutritive factors: III. Feed form affects broiler performance by modifying behaviour patterns. Poult. Sci. 2005;84:403–411. doi: 10.1093/ps/84.3.403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith O.B. Proc. Feed Production School. 1959. Factors in conditioning pellet mash; pp. 40–50. Kansas City, MO. [Google Scholar]
- van Immerseel F., Russell J.B., Flythe M.D., Gantois I., Timbermont L., Pasmans F., Haesebrouck F., Ducatelle R. The use of organic acids to combat Salmonella in poultry: a mechanistic explanation of the efficacy. Avian Pathol. 2006;35:182–188. doi: 10.1080/03079450600711045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Immerseel F., De Zutter L., Houf K., Pasmans F., Haesebrouck F., Ducatelle R. Strategies to control Salmonella in the broiler production chain. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 2009;65:367–391. [Google Scholar]
- Veldman A., Vahl H.A., Borggreve G.J., Fuller D.C. A survey of the incidence of Salmonella species and Enterobacteriaceae in poultry feeds and feed components. Vet. Rec. 1995;136:169–172. doi: 10.1136/vr.136.7.169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]