Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 28;12(10):2964. doi: 10.3390/nu12102964

Table 4.

Cognitive and mood outcomes for all participants and by diet quality group.

All Optimal Sub-Optimal
n Mean SE n Mean SE n Mean SE p 1
Stroop Processing 139 0.05 0.07 72 0.19 0.10 67 −0.10 0.09 0.013 *
Reaction and Decision Speed 140 0.02 0.07 74 0.06 0.11 66 −0.02 0.10 0.337
Visual Processing 140 0.00 0.07 73 0.02 0.11 67 −0.02 0.10 0.586
Spatial Working Memory 141 0.00 0.08 74 −0.11 0.12 67 0.12 0.12 0.342
Perceived Stress 2 141 11.00 (7.00–15.00) 74 10.00 (6.00–15.00) 67 12.00 (8.00–16.00) 0.527
Total Mood Disturbance 2 141 −1.00 (−9.00–14.00) 74 −3.00 (−11.00–9.00) 67 2.00 (−4.00–20.00) 0.177

1 ANCOVA models controlled for age, gender, years of education and BMI. 2 median and interquartile range presented. SE; standard error. * p < 0.05. Z scores are presented for each of the cognitive domains with higher scores indicative of better performance. “Stroop Processing” is the difference between Incongruent and Congruent Stroop performance; “Reaction & Decision Speed” is derived from the average performance for Simple Reaction Time and Choice Reaction Time tasks; “Visual Processing” is derived from the average performance for Immediate Recognition, Delayed Recognition and Contextual Memory tasks, and “Spatial Working Memory” is derived from the average performance for Spatial Working Memory task. For mood outcomes (Perceived Stress, Total Mood Disturbance), lower scores indicate better mood.