Abstract
A high fat Western-style diet leads to hepatic steatosis that can progress to steatohepatitis and ultimately cirrhosis or liver cancer. The mechanism that leads to the development of steatosis upon nutritional overload is complex and only partially understood. Using click chemistry-based metabolic tracing and microscopy, we study the interaction between Kupffer cells and hepatocytes ex vivo. In the early phase of steatosis, hepatocytes alone do not display significant deviations in fatty acid metabolism. However, in co-cultures or supernatant transfer experiments, we show that tumor necrosis factor (TNF) secretion by Kupffer cells is necessary and sufficient to induce steatosis in hepatocytes, independent of the challenge of hepatocytes with elevated fatty acid levels. We further show that free fatty acid (FFA) or lipopolysaccharide are both able to trigger release of TNF from Kupffer cells. We conclude that Kupffer cells act as the primary sensor for both FFA overload and bacterial lipopolysaccharide, integrate these signals and transmit the information to the hepatocyte via TNF secretion. Hepatocytes react by alteration in lipid metabolism prominently leading to the accumulation of triacylglycerols (TAGs) in lipid droplets, a hallmark of steatosis.
Keywords: non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, nutrition/lipids, metabolic disease, lipids/chemistry
1. Introduction
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common liver disease in industrialized countries [1,2,3] presenting with a wide range of pathologies. This includes steatosis, which manifests in an excessive accumulation of lipid droplets (LDs) in hepatocytes, steatohepatitis, which is a combination of steatosis and liver inflammation, and liver cirrhosis, i.e., excessive fibrosis with loss of hepatocytes and liver function.
The “two-hit model“ was postulated many years ago to describe NAFLD pathogenesis [4]. The “first hit” is characterized by a reversible steatosis, thought to originate from excess amounts of free fatty acid (FFA), which are esterified to triacylglycerol (TAG). This links NAFLD to obesity, in which FFA are strongly elevated [5,6]. In the “second hit”, steatosis can progress into non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, which additionally includes inflammation, scar formation, oxidative stress and hepatic injury, ultimately leading to cirrhosis and liver cancer [4,7,8]. The “second hit” involves the activation of immune cells, in particular liver macrophages, which consist of blood-derived monocytes and liver-resident Kupffer cells [9,10]. The latter respond to extrahepatic inflammation or metabolic stress by coordinating a local immune response via the secretion of various soluble factors, most notably tumor necrosis factor (TNF) [11]. Contradicting the two-hit model, it was recently shown that interleukin(IL)-6 or TNF, originating from adipose tissue, can trigger liver inflammation in parallel with or even before hepatic steatosis [12].
A potent inducer of inflammation is lipopolysaccharide (LPS)—a main component of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria [13,14]. Excess consumption of fat and sugars leads to increased levels of gut-derived LPS in the circulation of obese and NAFLD patients [15].
There are three known causes for elevated serum LPS levels originating from the gut microbiota: Firstly, a Western style diet stimulates bacterial overgrowth and alters the microbiome in the gut. Secondly, sugars such as fructose trigger a disruption of the tight junctions in the gut, which leads to an increased intestinal permeability (“leaky gut”). Thirdly, LPS is absorbed during fat digestion alongside chylomicrons, subsequently reaches the bloodstream [16], enters the liver and activates Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signaling in Kupffer cells [10,17]. In turn, this activation results in the generation of cytotoxic factors such as reactive oxygen species, various inflammatory cytokines and chemokines that induce acute inflammation in the liver [18,19].
Recent studies reported that a selective depletion of Kupffer cells reduces the incidence of steatosis, liver injury, monocyte infiltration and even insulin resistance [11,20,21]. In particular, Tosello-Trampont et al. observed an important role for TNF in generating steatohepatitis in mice on a methionine/choline-deficient diet [11]. Furthermore, Jia et al. were able to show that mice deficient in hepatocyte TLR4 are protected from high-fat diet (HFD)-induced inflammation and insulin resistance [22].
In this paper, we aim to elucidate the individual contributions and the cellular interactions between hepatocytes and Kupffer cells driving the early steatotic phenotype. For this purpose, we use two different but related strategies. The first strategy is a mild chronic steatosis developed in mice after 10 weeks of HFD, the second one is the acute steatosis after in vivo LPS injection. In order to discriminate between the contributions of the individual cell types, we use freshly isolated hepatocytes or Kupffer cells, or co-cultures of both cell types, and supernatant transfer experiments between Kupffer cells and hepatocytes.
The data demonstrate that Kupffer cell activation by excess free fatty acids or LPS is necessary and sufficient to induce hepatocellular steatosis by TNF signaling.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Mouse Experiments In Vivo
Male wild-type C57BL/6NCrl mice were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (Charles River, Erkrath, Germany), maintained under pathogen-free conditions in the animal facility of the LIMES Institute and fed with a breeding and maintenance diet (LASQCdiet® Rod16, LASvendi, Soest, Germany) ad libitum. Animals were used for experiments at the age of 8 weeks. For feeding experiments, 6-week-old mice were fed a controlled normal diet (C1090-10, 10 kcal% fat, ND) for 2 weeks and either a ND or high-fat diet (C1090-60, 60 kcal% fat, HFD, both Altromin, Lage, Germany) for the subsequent 10 weeks ad libitum. Food intake was measured by determining the weight of the remaining food pellets after one week of feeding and kcal were calculated using the respective values of energy density. Animal experiments were performed in conformity with PHS policy and in accordance with the national laws. All protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Permission LANUV NRW, 84-02.04.2015.A381. The date of approval is 17 March 2016.).
2.1.1. Glucose Tolerance Tests
For glucose tolerance tests, ND and HFD mice were fasted overnight for 12 h. Mice were injected intraperitoneally with 2 mg glucose per g body weight. Tail blood was collected and glucose levels measured using a glucometer (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany).
2.1.2. LPS and TNF In Vivo
Mice were injected intraperitoneally with 15 mg/kg Escherichia coli LPS serotype 011-B4 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) 1.5 h before liver perfusion.
2.1.3. Isolation and Culture of Hepatocytes and Kupffer Cells
Hepatocytes and Kupffer cells were isolated by a two-step collagenase liver perfusion as described [23,24] with minor modifications. Briefly, after injecting heparin-sodium (30 Units/g body weight, Ratiopharm, Ulm, Germany), mice were anesthetized with ketamin/xylazin. A butterfly cannula (0.3 mm × 13 mm) was pricked into the portal vein and perfusion was started by pumping Hank’s balanced salt solution with 5 mM EGTA, pH 7.4 and 1 µL/mL heparin-sodium for 5 min at 4 mL/min using a peristaltic pump, followed by perfusion with collagenase buffer (William’s Medium E, 0.125 mM CaCl2, 0.5 mg/mL collagenase NB46, Serva Electrophoresis, Heidelberg, Germany, cat no. 17465) for 10 min. Afterwards, cells were released into 50 mL suspension medium (William’s Medium E supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum, 2 mM L-Glutamine, 100 Units/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin). The cell suspension was centrifuged at 14× g for 5 min. The pellet, containing the hepatocytes, was re-suspended in fresh suspension buffer and the suspension was filtered through a 100-µm Nylon cell strainer (Becton Dickinson, New Jersey, USA). The supernatant of the first centrifugation, containing the Kupffer cells, was re-centrifuged at 600× g for 10 min. The resulting pellet was re-suspended in Tris-buffered ammonium chloride lysis buffer (17 mM Tris, 160 mM NH4Cl, pH 7.2, for erythrocyte lysis) and incubated at room temperature for 5 min prior to the addition of 10 mL PBS and subsequent centrifugation at 600× g for 10 min. CD11b MicroBeads (Miltenyi Biotech, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany, order no.: 130-049601) were added to the pellet and Kupffer cells were purified according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Viability of hepatocytes and Kupffer cells was around 80–90% as assessed by trypan blue dye exclusion. Kupffer cells and hepatocytes were plated on collagen-coated dishes, maintained in suspension medium and kept at 37 °C and 5% (v/v) CO2. Two hours after plating, media of both cell types were renewed to discard non-adherent cells. Purity of hepatocytes and Kupffer cells was checked by flow cytometry (Supplementary Figure S1A,B) (FACS Canto II, Becton Dickinson, New Jersey, USA).
2.1.4. Serum Parameters
After intraperitoneal injection of heparin-sodium, mouse blood was collected by cardiac puncture under anesthesia as previously described [25]. Serum cholesterol, alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels were measured using the Reflotron® Plus System (Roche Diagnostics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland). Measurement of serum FFA was performed using the FFA quantitation kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA).
2.1.5. Determination of Total Hepatic Lipid Content
Livers were immediately homogenized in 4 mL methanol/chloroform (5:1, v/v) and phase separation was induced by addition of 3.2 mL water and 0.8 mL chloroform. The chloroform phase was collected and dried in a vacuum centrifuge. The weight of the resulting lipid pellet was determined.
2.2. In Vitro Experiments
2.2.1. LPS and TNF In Vitro
Primary hepatocytes and/or Kupffer cells were incubated in the presence or absence of 100 ng/mL LPS, or 10–50 ng/mL recombinant murine TNF (ImmunoTools, Friesoythe, Germany) and/or 100 ng/mL recombinant rabbit anti-murine TNF antibody (Cat.#500-P64, PeproTech, Hamburg, Germany) at 37 °C for 16 h.
2.2.2. Hepatocyte/Kupffer Cell Co-Culture and Supernatant Transfer Experiments
For co-culture, 2.5 × 105 hepatocytes were cultured with 7 × 104 Kupffer cells in 6-well plates as described [26,27] with minor modifications. For supernatant transfer experiments, a different ratio of cell numbers was used, as described previously [28]. A total of 1 × 106 Kupffer cells per well were cultured in 6-well plates for 16 h. The Kupffer cell supernatant was harvested and, after pelleting remnant cells at 600× g for 5 min, transferred to hepatocytes (2.5 × 105) in 6-well plates and incubated at 37 °C for 16 h.
2.2.3. Flow Cytometry
Hepatocytes were seeded in 6-cm dishes at a density of 3.5 × 105 cells/well. After incubation at 37 °C for 12 h, the cells were detached by scraping and pelleted by centrifugation at 11× g for 5 min. Kupffer cells were seeded in 12-well plates at a density of 3.5 × 105 cells/well. After incubation at 37 °C for 12 h, the cells were detached by scraping and pelleted by centrifugation at 600× g for 10 min. Cells were re-suspended in 200 µL PBS. Anti-mouse CD45RB-PE (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, USA) and CD95-APC antibodies or CD11b-PE and F4/80-APC (Ebioscience, San Diego, USA) were added according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After incubation at 4 °C for 20 min, cell fluorescence was evaluated by flow cytometry using FACS Canto II (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, USA).
2.2.4. Pulse-Chase Experiments with Alkyne Lipids
Hepatocytes (3.5 × 105) were cultured in 6-cm dishes for 2 h and pulse-labeled for 2 min using 66 µM alkyne-oleate and 33 µM alkyne-palmitate [29] in William’s Medium E containing 2 mM L-Glutamine, 100 Units/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin and 1% delipidated BSA. Pulse media were removed, cells were washed with PBS + 1% delipidated BSA and chased in chase medium (66 µM oleate, 33 µM palmitate in William’s Medium E containing 2 mM L-Glutamine, 100 Units/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin, 1% fatty acid-free BSA) for different periods as indicated. Chase media were removed and cells were washed twice with PBS. Lipids were extracted, subjected to fluorogenic click reaction according to the standard procedure [29]. Briefly, the dry lipid pellet was redissolved in 7 µL chloroform, followed by addition of 30 µL click reaction mixture (5 µL of 44.5 mM 3-azido-7-hydroxycoumarin, 500 µL of 10 mM [acetonitrile]4CuBF4 in acetonitrile, 2 mL ethanol). The tube was incubated at 42 °C for 3 h and the reaction mix applied onto a 20 × 20 cm silica thin layer chromatography (TLC) plate (no UV-indicator, Merck No. 1.05721.0001). The plate was developed in CHCl3/MeOH/water/acetic acid 65/25/4/1 for 10 cm, dried for 2 min in a warm stream of air, and developed again for 18 cm in hexane/ethyl acetate 1/1. The plate was briefly dried in a stream of warm air and soaked for 5 sec in 4% (v/v) N,N-diisopropylethylamine in hexane. The plate was placed in a hood for 1 min to evaporate excess solvent, followed by fluorescent imaging (exc. 420 nm, em. 482–502 nm. Bands were identified by co-migrating synthetic standards. VLDL secretion was determined by analyzing 120 min chase media for alkyne-labeled TG. For determination of fatty acid uptake, pulse times were extended to 10 min.
2.2.5. ELISA
In vivo (1.5 h) or in vitro (16 h) LPS-treated Kupffer cells (7 × 104) were cultured in 96-well plates for 16 h and the supernatants examined for cytokine secretion using commercial enzyme immunoassay kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA).
2.2.6. Fluorescence Microscopy
Hepatocytes (2.5 × 105 per well of a 6-well dish) were plated with or without 7 × 104 Kupffer cells, on collagen-coated glass coverslips. Cells were fixed in 4% PFA in PBS for 1 h, followed by staining with 0.1 µg/mL LD540 [30] and 1 µg/mL 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Coverslips were rinsed in water and mounted in fluorescent mounting medium (Dako, Hamburg, Germany). Epifluorescence images were acquired on an Axio Observer Z1 (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) in Apotome mode with a 63×, NA 1.4 Plan-Apochromat objective and a Hamamatsu Orca flash 2.0 camera. Quantification of lipid droplet size, number and total LD540 fluorescent area was performed using Fiji [31]. If indicated, data were normalized to total number of cells using equal threshold settings for all images in one figure.
2.3. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism software (version 5.0) (GraphPad, La Jolla, USA). All data are presented as mean values with SEM. Significance was analyzed with a two-tailed Student’s t-test. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: ns, not significant, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
3. Results
3.1. High-Fat Diet (HFD) Mice Show Mild Steatotic Characteristics
In our HFD model, mice were fed a 60% high-fat diet for 10 weeks. During the experiment, the mice consumed normal amounts of food with elevated caloric density (Supplementary Figure S2A). This resulted in a moderate weight gain of about 6 g (Supplementary Figure S2B) along with a rather mild steatosis, characterized by unchanged liver weight (HFD: 1.65 ± 0.09 g vs. normal diet (ND): 1.50 ± 0.04 g n = 4), normal liver appearance (Supplementary Figure S2C) and a 1.8-fold increase in hepatic lipid content (Figure 1A). Serum FFA and cholesterol were elevated (Figure 1B), intraperitoneal glucose tolerance was decreased (Figure 1C). There was a significant increase in alanine aminotransferase and a slight increase in aspartate aminotransferase (Figure 1D). Upon isolation of hepatic cells, numbers of both hepatocytes and CD11b-positive Kupffer cells were unchanged (Figure 1E). When stained with the LD-specific dye LD540, isolated hepatocytes of HFD animals showed lipid droplets (LDs) with increased size and total area (Figure 1F).
In order to characterize the fatty acid metabolism on a cellular scale, we performed a pulse-chase experiment of fatty acid incorporation into the major lipid classes along the phospholipid and TAG biosynthetic pathway, using alkyne-labeled fatty acids and fluorescent detection technology [29] (Figure 2A). For labeling, a 1/2 mixture of alkyne-palmitate and alkyne oleate was used, which ensures with their typical preferences for sn-1 and sn-2 positions [29], respectively, an efficient labeling of most phospholipids. Labeling in TAG is expected to distribute over all three hydroxyl groups. Under the conditions of a short labeling pulse, multiple labeling in one molecule was not observed. Note that the labeling pattern indicates the relative flow of label into the target molecules. For determination of absolute lipid synthesis rates, additional information regarding total lipid synthesis rate would be required. Hepatocytes of ND mice showed a rapid initial incorporation of labeled fatty acids mostly into diacylglycerol (DAG), phosphatidylcholine (PC) and TAG. Upon a chase, the labeled DAG was converted mainly to PC and TAG, which are the major final products of exogenous fatty acids. Hepatocytes of HFD mice showed similar results. However, notable differences were found in DAG metabolism: the initial amount of labeling in DAG was smaller (Figure 2B) and the ratio of 1,3-DAG to 1,2-DAG was larger in HFD hepatocytes than in control hepatocytes (Figure 2A). While 1,2-DAG is an anabolic biosynthetic DAG derived from phosphatidic acid (PA) by dephosphorylation, 1,3-DAG is likely a product of catabolic action of the adipose TAG lipase on TAG [32] (Figure 2C). Therefore, the changed ratio of these DAGs indicates an increased TAG turnover in HFD hepatocytes. Metabolism of phosphatidic acid and phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), as well as final amounts of labeled PC and TAG were very similar under the different diets (Figure 2B). Overall, the pulse chase experiment with isolated hepatocytes failed to explain the steatotic phenotype of HFD mice.
3.2. TNF Is a Major Player in Generating a Steatotic Phenotype in ND Hepatocytes
A possible explanation for this failure is a major contribution of other cell types in the liver, notably Kupffer cells, which communicate with hepatocytes via secreted factors. Therefore, we cultivated ex vivo Kupffer cells from ND and HFD mice and analyzed factors secreted into the culture medium. There were no differences in the secretion of IL-6, IL-10 and IL-1β, but an elevated secretion of TNF by HFD Kupffer cells compared to Kupffer cells from ND animals was found (Figure 3A). To determine whether this release of TNF was sufficient to explain the steatosis observed in HFD hepatocytes, we incubated hepatocytes from ND mice with culture supernatants of Kupffer cells either from ND or HFD mice (Figure 3B). Only the HFD Kupffer cell supernatant induced an increase in LD size and total area per cell (Figure 3B, frame 3), which was reverted upon co-addition of a neutralizing anti-TNF antibody (frame 4). Image quantification confirmed these observations regarding total LD area, LD diameter and LD number (Figure 3C). We conclude that Kupffer cell-derived TNF is necessary to mediate steatosis in hepatocytes that have not been challenged with a HFD.
To determine whether TNF alone is sufficient to induce steatosis in hepatocytes from ND mice, we treated isolated hepatocytes with various concentrations of TNF, resulting in a dose-dependent increase in LD size and area (Figure 4A,B). This finding indicates that Kupffer cell-derived TNF, rather than a metabolic overload of the hepatocytes, is the key factor in the development of steatosis. This raises the question of how fatty acid overload is able to activate Kupffer cells leading to increased TNF. Treatment of isolated Kupffer cells with 0.5 mM of a 2/1 mixture of oleic and palmitic acid, resembling plasma concentrations under HFD (Figure 1B), resulted in a significant increase in released TNF (Figure 4C), indicating that Kupffer cells act as hepatic fatty acid sensors.
3.3. Short Term LPS Stimulation In Vivo Alters the Hepatic Lipid Metabolism
Besides HFD, also inflammatory stimuli including bacterial surface antigens such as LPS can lead to TNF secretion in the liver. LPS release into the portal vein blood is frequently discussed as a factor contributing to steatohepatitis caused by metabolic overload [33,34]. Therefore, we injected ND and HFD mice with 15 mg/kg LPS and analyzed total hepatic lipid weight and serum parameters (Figure 1A,B,D). Both ND and HFD animals showed an increase in liver total lipids and serum FFA, unchanged serum cholesterol and increased markers of liver damage upon LPS treatment. To compare these phenomena with the findings on ND vs. HFD mice described above, we studied isolated hepatocytes and Kupffer cells of untreated (control) vs. LPS-injected mice. LPS injection led to a significant increase in stored TAG (Figure 5A–C). It should be noted that the absolute values are not identical to those in Figure 1A, because animals used in Figure 5 had not been treated with ND for an additional 10 weeks as in Figure 1. These younger animals had less basal liver TAG (see also Supplementary Figure S3). Thus, lipid accumulation is age-dependent, as was previously observed [35,36].
By metabolic tracing of alkyne-labeled FFA, we observed an increased fatty acid incorporation (Figure 5D) and a significantly decreased TAG secretion (Figure 5E) in LPS-treated animals, consistent with a net increase in stored TAG. Detailed pulse-chase analysis of fatty acid metabolism in these hepatocytes revealed a marked increase in TAG synthesis and corresponding decrease in PC synthesis after in vivo LPS treatment (Figure 6A,B compare control vs. in vivo LPS). However, in vitro LPS stimulation of isolated hepatocytes by adding LPS into the culture medium for 1.5 h was not able to reproduce these observations and resulted in a normal fatty acid metabolism (Figure 6, in vitro LPS) and a lack of steatosis upon microscopic analysis of TAG storage in LDs (Figure 7A,B, frame 1+2). In contrast, upon LPS treatment of co-cultures of hepatocytes with Kupffer cells, we observed increased TAG storage in LDs (Figure 7A, frame 3+4), due to an increased size of droplets (Figure 7B, middle panel), and marginally increased LD number (right panel).
Kupffer cell culture supernatants isolated from LPS-treated mice (Figure 3A) showed significantly elevated levels of TNF accompanied by slightly elevated IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-10 levels. Likewise, supernatants of in vitro LPS-treated Kupffer cells (Figure 7C) showed significantly elevated levels of TNF and elevated amounts of IL-10 and IL-1β. We repeated the experiment shown in Figure 3B, this time using LPS-stimulation instead of HFD treatment (Supplementary Figure S4). Supernatant of LPS-stimulated Kupffer cells induced LD accumulation in hepatocytes of untreated mice, which was prevented by co-addition of a neutralizing TNF antibody.
4. Discussion
The present study aimed at defining the factors that trigger the development of initial pathological signs in the liver during metabolic overload. During HFD treatment, and along with the initiation of macroscopic obesity, mice showed hepatic symptoms of a steatosis without major signs of inflammatory steatohepatitis. We observed marginally elevated serum transaminases, macroscopically normal size and appearance of the organ, combined with slightly increased total liver lipids and with a clearly elevated number of cytoplasmic LDs in hepatocytes. In contrast to our expectations, detailed biochemical experiments in hepatocytes of these organs showed a quantitatively and qualitatively normal fatty acid metabolism. Increased secretion of TNF by Kupffer cells was the only marker that pointed to an inflammatory component of the pathology at this early stage. Strikingly, Kupffer cell culture supernatant was sufficient to mirror the HFD phenotype in healthy hepatocytes and TNF was identified as the crucial component to mediate this effect.
A major advantage of cultivated primary cells is to discriminate between hepatocellular metabolic overload stress and Kupffer cell-derived signals as causative agents for hepatocyte steatosis. The results clearly indicate that at least in this early phase of obesity, the contribution of Kupffer cells is more important than the hepatocyte overload stress. Our data do not exclude steatotic contributions of cells outside the liver, in particular factors released from adipose tissue, however, it appears very likely that Kupffer cells are the major origin of signals that promote hepatic steatosis upon a high-fat diet, consistent with in vivo studies on development of steatohepatitis upon choline/methionine-free diet [11].
In vivo LPS treatment leads to hepatic steatosis that is phenotypically similar to the one observed after 10 weeks of HFD. Kupffer cells are essential for the development of steatosis, since LPS did not lead to steatosis when applied to pure hepatocytes. However, the profile of cytokines released by Kupffer cells shows a broader activation of the inflammatory response, and serum transaminases are more strongly elevated than upon HFD treatment. On the biochemical level, the LPS-induced steatosis is reflected by an altered fatty acid pulse-chase profile, which was not observed in HFD hepatocytes. Despite these differences, our data indicate that the LPS-induced steatosis also depends on Kupffer cell-derived TNF. The comparison between HFD and LPS treatment suggests that TNF, regardless of the cause of its release, is the major mediator of hepatic steatosis.
In this context, it is intriguing that fasting mice develop an intermittent steatosis with increased FFA [37] and have strongly elevated serum TNF concentrations [38]. As shown in Figure 4C, treatment of isolated Kupffer cells with 0.5 mM FFA, a concentration found in serum upon challenge with HFD or LPS or both (Figure 1B), or in starving mice [37] resulted in increased secretion of TNF. This is consistent with previous experiments on induction of TNF mRNA expression in Kupffer cells by FFA [39]. Furthermore, FFAs were shown to induce TLR4 signaling in RAW264.7 cells [40] and the expression of TLR4 in Kupffer cells [39]. In addition, HFD-fed mice are more susceptible to a sustained low-dose LPS-induced increase in TNF [41], which appears to be mediated by leptin-induced expression of CD14, a co-receptor of TLR4. Conclusively, elevated FFA, originating from nutritional overload or released from adipose tissue during fasting, would be the primary cause of TNF release from Kupffer cells that leads to hepatocyte steatosis. TLR4 is a likely candidate as an FFA receptor on Kupffer cells to sense fatty acid abundance and overload in the liver. As illustrated in Figure 8, Kupffer cells appear to act as hepatic FFA sensory cells that monitor the fatty acid load and trigger hepatocyte response.
Acknowledgments
We want to thank Bettina Jux for support with serum glucose measurements. We also gratefully thank Marianne Janas and the Knolle laboratory for support with Reflotron measurements.
Supplementary Materials
The following figures are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/9/10/2258/s1, Figure S1: Purity of isolated hepatocytes and Kupffer cells. Figure S2: Characterization of ND and HFD mice. Figure S3: Age-dependent lipid droplet accumulation in hepatocytes. Figure S4: TNF secreted by LPS-stimulated Kupffer cells induces steatotic lipid droplet phenotype in untreated hepatocytes.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, I.F., H.W., L.K., C.T.; methodology, K.L.D., C.T., J.V.; investigation, K.L.D., J.V., K.H., P.M., I.U.; writing—original draft preparation, K.L.D., C.T.; writing—review and editing, all authors; visualization, K.L.D.; supervision, I.F., H.W., L.K., C.T.; project administration, C.T.; funding acquisition, I.F., H.W., L.K., C.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was financially supported by the German Federal Ministry for Science and Education (The Virtual Liver Network to K.L.D. and C.T.), and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB704 to J.V., H.W. and I.F., Transregio TRR83 to K.H., L.K. and C.T.). I.F. and C.T. received funding from the DFG under Germany’s Excellence Strategy—EXC2151—390873048.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Marchesini G., Brizi M., Bianchi G., Tomassetti S., Bugianesi E., Lenzi M., McCullough A.J., Natale S., Forlani G., Melchionda N. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A feature of the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes. 2001;50:1844–1850. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.50.8.1844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Clark J.M., Brancati F.L., Diehl A.M. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2002;122:1649–1657. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.33573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Meli R., Mattace Raso G., Calignano A. Role of innate immune response in non-alcoholic Fatty liver disease: Metabolic complications and therapeutic tools. Front. Immunol. 2014;5:177. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Day C.P., James O.F. Steatohepatitis: A tale of two “hits”? Gastroenterology. 1998;114:842–845. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(98)70599-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Arner P. Insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes: Role of fatty acids. Diabetes. Metab. Res. Rev. 2002;18(Suppl. 2):S5–S9. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Boden G. Obesity and free fatty acids. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am. 2008;37:635–646. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2008.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jansen P.L.M. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2004;16:1079–1085. doi: 10.1097/00042737-200411000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cohen J.C., Horton J.D., Hobbs H.H. Human fatty liver disease: Old questions and new insights. Science. 2011;332:1519–1523. doi: 10.1126/science.1204265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Baffy G. Kupffer cells in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: The emerging view. J. Hepatol. 2009;51:212–223. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhan Y.-T., An W. Roles of liver innate immune cells in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 2010;16:4652–4660. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i37.4652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tosello-Trampont A.-C., Landes S.G., Nguyen V., Novobrantseva T.I., Hahn Y.S. Kuppfer cells trigger nonalcoholic steatohepatitis development in diet-induced mouse model through tumor necrosis factor-α production. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:40161–40172. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.417014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tilg H., Moschen A.R. Evolution of inflammation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: The multiple parallel hits hypothesis. Hepatology. 2010;52:1836–1846. doi: 10.1002/hep.24001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jack R.S., Fan X., Bernheiden M., Rune G., Ehlers M., Weber A., Kirsch G., Mentel R., Fürll B., Freudenberg M., et al. Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein is required to combat a murine gram-negative bacterial infection. Nature. 1997;389:742–745. doi: 10.1038/39622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Heumann D., Roger T. Initial responses to endotoxins and Gram-negative bacteria. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2002;323:59–72. doi: 10.1016/S0009-8981(02)00180-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Harte A.L., da Silva N.F., Creely S.J., McGee K.C., Billyard T., Youssef-Elabd E.M., Tripathi G., Ashour E., Abdalla M.S., Sharada H.M., et al. Elevated endotoxin levels in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Inflamm. (Lond) 2010;7:15. doi: 10.1186/1476-9255-7-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Harris K., Kassis A., Major G., Chou C.J. Is the gut microbiota a new factor contributing to obesity and its metabolic disorders? J. Obes. 2012;2012:879151. doi: 10.1155/2012/879151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Soares J.-B., Pimentel-Nunes P., Roncon-Albuquerque R., Leite-Moreira A. The role of lipopolysaccharide/toll-like receptor 4 signaling in chronic liver diseases. Hepatol. Int. 2010;4:659–672. doi: 10.1007/s12072-010-9219-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kolios G., Valatas V., Kouroumalis E. Role of Kupffer cells in the pathogenesis of liver disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 2006;12:7413–7420. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i46.7413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Duarte N., Coelho I.C., Patarrão R.S., Almeida J.I., Penha-Gonçalves C., Macedo M.P. How Inflammation Impinges on NAFLD: A Role for Kupffer Cells. BioMed Res. Int. 2015;2015:984578. doi: 10.1155/2015/984578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Stienstra R., Saudale F., Duval C., Keshtkar S., Groener J.E.M., van Rooijen N., Staels B., Kersten S., Müller M. Kupffer cells promote hepatic steatosis via interleukin-1beta-dependent suppression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha activity. Hepatology. 2010;51:511–522. doi: 10.1002/hep.23337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Huang W., Metlakunta A., Dedousis N., Zhang P., Sipula I., Dube J.J., Scott D.K., O’Doherty R.M. Depletion of liver Kupffer cells prevents the development of diet-induced hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance. Diabetes. 2010;59:347–357. doi: 10.2337/db09-0016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jia L., Vianna C.R., Fukuda M., Berglund E.D., Liu C., Tao C., Sun K., Liu T., Harper M.J., Lee C.E., et al. Hepatocyte Toll-like receptor 4 regulates obesity-induced inflammation and insulin resistance. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:3878. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Severgnini M., Sherman J., Sehgal A., Jayaprakash N.K., Aubin J., Wang G., Zhang L., Peng C.G., Yucius K., Butler J., et al. A rapid two-step method for isolation of functional primary mouse hepatocytes: Cell characterization and asialoglycoprotein receptor based assay development. Cytotechnology. 2012;64:187–195. doi: 10.1007/s10616-011-9407-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Li P.-z., Li J.-z., Li M., Gong J.-p., He K. An efficient method to isolate and culture mouse Kupffer cells. Immunol. Lett. 2014;158:52–56. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2013.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Parasuraman S., Raveendran R., Kesavan R. Blood sample collection in small laboratory animals. J. Pharmacol. Pharmacother. 2010;1:87–93. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.72350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lopez B.G., Tsai M.S., Baratta J.L., Longmuir K.J., Robertson R.T. Characterization of Kupffer cells in livers of developing mice. Comp. Hepatol. 2011;10:2. doi: 10.1186/1476-5926-10-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sunman J.A., Hawke R.L., LeCluyse E.L., Kashuba A.D.M. Kupffer cell-mediated IL-2 suppression of CYP3A activity in human hepatocytes. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2004;32:359–363. doi: 10.1124/dmd.32.3.359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yerkovich S.T., Rigby P.J., Fournier P.A., Olynyk J.K., Yeoh G.C.T. Kupffer cell cytokines interleukin-1beta and interleukin-10 combine to inhibit phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase and gluconeogenesis in cultured hepatocytes. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2004;36:1462–1472. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2003.10.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Thiele C., Papan C., Hoelper D., Kusserow K., Gaebler A., Schoene M., Piotrowitz K., Lohmann D., Spandl J., Stevanovic A., et al. Tracing fatty acid metabolism by click chemistry. ACS Chem. Biol. 2012;7:2004–2011. doi: 10.1021/cb300414v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Spandl J., White D.J., Peychl J., Thiele C. Live cell multicolor imaging of lipid droplets with a new dye, LD540. Traffic. 2009;10:1579–1584. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2009.00980.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Schindelin J., Arganda-Carreras I., Frise E., Kaynig V., Longair M., Pietzsch T., Preibisch S., Rueden C., Saalfeld S., Schmid B., et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Eichmann T.O., Kumari M., Haas J.T., Farese R.V., Zimmermann R., Lass A., Zechner R. Studies on the substrate and stereo/regioselectivity of adipose triglyceride lipase, hormone-sensitive lipase, and diacylglycerol-O-acyltransferases. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:41446–41457. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.400416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wigg A.J., Roberts-Thomson I.C., Dymock R.B., McCarthy P.J., Grose R.H., Cummins A.G. The role of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, intestinal permeability, endotoxaemia, and tumour necrosis factor alpha in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Gut. 2001;48:206–211. doi: 10.1136/gut.48.2.206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Roh Y.S., Seki E. Toll-like receptors in alcoholic liver disease, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and carcinogenesis. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013;28(Suppl. 1):38–42. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Petersen K.F., Befroy D., Dufour S., Dziura J., Ariyan C., Rothman D.L., DiPietro L., Cline G.W., Shulman G.I. Mitochondrial dysfunction in the elderly: Possible role in insulin resistance. Science. 2003;300:1140–1142. doi: 10.1126/science.1082889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ibdah J.A., Perlegas P., Zhao Y., Angdisen J., Borgerink H., Shadoan M.K., Wagner J.D., Matern D., Rinaldo P., Cline J.M. Mice heterozygous for a defect in mitochondrial trifunctional protein develop hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:1381–1390. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Baker N., Hill V., Ookhtens M. Regulation of plasma-free fatty acid mobilization by dietary glucose in Ehrlich ascites tumor-bearing mice. Cancer Res. 1978;38:2372–2377. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Faggioni R., Moser A., Feingold K.R., Grunfeld C. Reduced leptin levels in starvation increase susceptibility to endotoxic shock. Am. J. Pathol. 2000;156:1781–1787. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65049-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Tang T., Sui Y., Lian M., Li Z., Hua J. Pro-inflammatory activated Kupffer cells by lipids induce hepatic NKT cells deficiency through activation-induced cell death. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e81949. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Shi H., Kokoeva M.V., Inouye K., Tzameli I., Yin H., Flier J.S. TLR4 links innate immunity and fatty acid-induced insulin resistance. J. Clin. Investig. 2006;116:3015–3025. doi: 10.1172/JCI28898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Imajo K., Fujita K., Yoneda M., Nozaki Y., Ogawa Y., Shinohara Y., Kato S., Mawatari H., Shibata W., Kitani H., et al. Hyperresponsivity to low-dose endotoxin during progression to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is regulated by leptin-mediated signaling. Cell Metab. 2012;16:44–54. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.