Abstract
Mosquitoes inject saliva into the host skin to facilitate blood meal acquisition through active compounds that prevent hemostasis. D7 proteins are among the most abundant components of the mosquito saliva and act as scavengers of biogenic amines and eicosanoids. Several members of the D7 family have been characterized at the biochemical level; however, none have been studied thus far in Aedes albopictus, a permissive vector for several arboviruses that causes extensive human morbidity and mortality. Here, we report the binding capabilities of a D7 long form protein from Ae. albopictus (AlboD7L1) by isothermal titration calorimetry and compared its model structure with previously solved D7 structures. The physiological function of AlboD7L1 was demonstrated by ex vivo platelet aggregation and in vivo leukocyte recruitment experiments. AlboD7L1 binds host hemostasis agonists, including biogenic amines, leukotrienes, and the thromboxane A2 analog U-46619. AlboD7L1 protein model predicts binding of biolipids through its N-terminal domain, while the C-terminal domain binds biogenic amines. We demonstrated the biological function of AlboD7L1 as an inhibitor of both platelet aggregation and cell recruitment of neutrophils and eosinophils. Altogether, this study reinforces the physiological relevance of the D7 salivary proteins as anti-hemostatic and anti-inflammatory molecules that help blood feeding in mosquitoes.
Keywords: mosquito, D7 proteins, arthropods, salivary glands, saliva, isothermal titration calorimetry, platelet aggregation, leukocyte recruitment, leukotrienes, blood feeding
1. Introduction
The Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae), has undergone a dramatic global expansion starting from Southeast Asia to the Americas, Europe, Africa, and the Middle East [1,2]. Aedes albopictus is a highly invasive species due to its ability to withstand long periods of desiccation and persist in colder climates [3]. Moreover, climate change and globalization have contributed to the spread of this mosquito species [4]. Aedes albopictus mosquitoes have an aggressive daytime human-biting behavior, and it is able to transmit several arboviruses, including dengue, Zika, Chikungunya, West Nile, or Mayaro viruses [5,6,7].
Female Ae. albopictus mosquitoes require vertebrate blood for egg development. This mosquito species is an opportunistic feeder which takes blood meals primarily from mammals, but preferentially feeds on humans [8,9]. Aedes albopictus mosquitoes have been reported to feed on domestic and wildlife animals and might serve as bridge vectors by supporting the potential transfer of an acquired pathogen from an infected wild animal to a human host during a subsequent blood-meal [5].
During blood feeding, female mosquitoes insert their mouthparts into the host skin and ingest blood, either directly from a capillary or from the hemorrhagic pool created by the blood leakage [10,11]. This injury triggers activation of host hemostasis, a physiological response to blood loss, and ignites a local inflammatory response. Early local vascular contraction reduces blood flow to the injury site and platelet aggregation forms a soft plug [12,13]. Blood clotting, the secondary step of hemostasis, tightly secures the platelet plug with covalently linked fibrin fibers, thereby providing strength and leading to the formation of a stable clot [14]. Additionally, the host immune system also reacts to the blood vessel and skin injury, resulting in itching and inflammation, characterized by swelling, pain, and redness [15].
Blood-feeding arthropods, by an evolutionary process, have developed an important diversity of pharmacological compounds in their saliva that prevent hemostasis and immune responses in order to counteract these physiological responses from the host [16,17]. Salivary proteins are secreted into the skin during mosquito probing and act as vasodilators, platelet aggregation inhibitors, anticoagulants, and anti-inflammatory molecules [15]. Salivary proteins from Ae. albopictus are highly immunogenic and can trigger the generation of IgE and IgG antibodies. Aedes albopictus may induce intense local cutaneous reactions and has been reported as the most common species associated with severe systemic allergic reaction to mosquito bites, associated with IgE antibodies [18,19]. Antibodies against Ae. albopictus salivary proteins are currently being used as markers to monitor host exposure to specific mosquito bites [20,21,22]. However, only a few studies have been done to identify and characterize the Ae. albopictus salivary proteins and much remains unknown.
A transcriptomic analysis of Ae. albopictus salivary glands, carried out by Sanger sequencing of a cDNA library, revealed the presence of 69 cDNA’s encoding putative salivary-secreted proteins [23]. This transcriptome consists of the main salivary protein families found in other mosquito species, with high similarities to the Aedes aegypti transcriptome [24]. Only a few salivary proteins from Ae. albopictus have been biochemically characterized; including an apyrase, as a potent platelet aggregation inhibitor [25,26]; an alpha-glucosidase, present in both male and female salivary glands [25]; a C-type lectin that binds mannose residues [27]; and Alboserpin, a factor Xa inhibitor that serves as a potent anticoagulant [28]. However, to this date, the D7 long forms, one of most studied proteins in salivary glands from insects, have not been biochemically characterized in Ae. albopictus.
D7 proteins are distantly related to the odorant-binding family and are among the most abundant components in the salivary glands of several blood feeding arthropods [29,30,31,32,33]. These salivary kratagonists bind and sequester host physiological effectors, inhibiting their hemostatic activities at the bite site [34]. The D7 proteins belong to a multi-gene family that has undergone gene duplication and functional divergence, resulting in binding specialization with different affinities for host biogenic amines [32,35,36], eicosanoids [35,37,38], or nucleosides and nucleotides in the case of a Culex quinquefasciatus D7 protein [33]. Both D7 short forms containing a single-domain and D7 long forms containing two-domains are present in the saliva of mosquitoes [34]. In Aedes spp. and Culex spp., ligand binding properties appear to be restricted to the D7 long forms. A multifunctional mechanism of ligand binding has been described for two-domain D7 proteins in Ae. aegypti and Cx. quinquefasciatus: The N-terminal domain binds cysteinyl leukotrienes, while the C-terminal domain shows high affinity to biogenic amines such as norepinephrine, serotonin, and histamine [33,35,39].
Although not structurally related, both biogenic amines and eicosanoids act as hemostasis agonists. Among biogenic amines, the catecholamines norepinephrine, epinephrine, and tryptamine stimulate vasoconstriction [15]. Serotonin and histamine induce pain and itch and increase vascular permeability [40]. In addition, serotonin is a weak platelet aggregation agonist. The eicosanoid leukotriene B4 (LTB4) acts as a potent chemotactic agent of polymorphonuclear cells and cysteinyl leukotrienes C4 (LTC4), D4 (LTD4), and E4 (LTE4), are involved in inflammatory reactions. They also activate vasoconstriction, edema formation, and capillary leakage [41]. Here, we report the characterization of a D7 long form protein from Ae. albopictus saliva: AlboD7L1. We have cloned, expressed, and purified AlboD7L1 recombinant protein and show its binding affinities for biogenic amines and eicosanoids. We also demonstrate the functional consequence of scavenging these hemostasis and inflammatory agonists: Biogenic amine binding results in platelet aggregation inhibition whereas leukotriene binding prevents leukocyte recruitment in vivo. This work highlights the role of AlboD7L1 in blood feeding by scavenging pro-hemostatic and immune mediators at the bite site. Future perspectives will focus on investigating the role of this protein in blood feeding and pathogen transmission in vivo through the creation of AlboD7L1 knockout mosquito lines generated by CRISPR/Cas9.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sequence Alignment
Nucleotide and amino acid sequences of D7 protein genes from the Ae. albopictus mosquitoes sialotranscriptome and Ae. aegypti genome (AaegL5) were retrieved from the NCBI databases. Multiple alignments were obtained by Clustal Omega [42], using as input the amino acids without signal peptide predicted by SignalP program [43]. Alignment results were refined using BoxShade server [44] and converted to rich text files for figure annotation.
2.2. Cloning, Expression, and Purification of AlboDL71
Synthetic AlboD7L1 gene was subcloned into pET-17b (Bio Basic Inc., Markham, ON, Canada) for expression in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) pLysS cells (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA, USA). Protein expression was carried out as previously described [33]. Inclusion bodies were refolded using 300 mM arginine, 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0. AlboD7L1 recombinant protein was purified, first by size exclusion chromatography on a HiPrep 16/60, followed by cation exchange chromatography using Mono S 5/50 GL column (GE Healthcare Life Science, Piscataway, NJ, USA). A final analytical size exclusion chromatography was performed using a Superdex 200 10/300 GL column (GE Healthcare Life Science, Piscataway, NJ, USA). AlboD7L1 purified protein was separated in NuPAGE 4–12% Bis-Tris Protein Gels (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and visualized by Coomassie stain. Protein identity was confirmed by Edman degradation at the Research Technologies Branch, NIAID, NIH.
2.3. Isothermal Titration Calorimetry
To identify the potential biological function of AlboD7L1, isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) was used to determine its binding affinities to putative ligands that are known to affect inflammation and hemostasis (biogenic amines, leukotrienes, and thromboxane A2) [15,40,41]. Measurements were performed on a MicroCal VP-ITC (Malvern Panalytical, Westborough, MA, USA) at 30 °C and stir speed at 286 rpm. Possible candidate ligands used were six biogenic amines (dopamine, norepinephrine, epinephrine, histamine, tryptamine, and serotonin), five eicosanoid bioactive lipids (LTB4, LTC4, LTD4, LTE4, and the thromboxane A2 analog U-46619). Protein and ligands were diluted in Tris-buffered saline (TBS-20 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) and degassed under vacuum for 5 min using a MicroCal ThermoVac (Malvern Panalytical, Westborough, MA, USA). The AlboD7L1 concentrations were 2 μM, 3 μM, or 5 μM, and ligand concentrations were prepared at 10-fold the protein concentration (20 μM, 30 μM, or 50 μM), depending on protein/ligand combination for optimal ITC performance. For eicosanoid ligands, the solvent was first evaporated under a stream of nitrogen gas prior to dissolving in TBS, vortexed, and sonicated for 10 min (Branson 1510, Branson Ultrasonics, Danbury, CT, USA) to ensure dissolution. The protein sample volume in the cell was 1.4 mL, and ligand injections were delivered in 10 μL volume in a total of 31 injections. The data was analyzed using the MicroCal PEAQ-ITC analysis software v 1.21 (Malvern Panalytical, Westborough, MA, USA) by fitting to a single-site binding model to obtain the stoichiometry (N), the dissociation constant (KD), the enthalpy of binding (ΔH), and the entropy change (ΔS°) at a constant temperature (T). Because N values were close to 1, as previously described for other salivary D7 proteins [32,33,35,37,38], and as predicted by the structure model, the ITC data were refitted with a fixed N = 1 value.
2.4. AlboD7L1 Structure Modell Prediction
A model of the AlboD7L1 structure was generated with I-TASSER software (version 5.1 Zhang Lab, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) [45] using the mature amino acid sequence as a query. This software predicts the secondary and tertiary structures based on the similarity of other proteins whose structure has been solved. Structural figures and hydrophobicity surface analysis were done using UCSF Chimera (Resource for Biocomputing, Visualization, and Informatics at the University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA) [46].
2.5. Ex Vivo Platelet Aggregation Assays
Platelet rich plasma was obtained from normal healthy donors on the NCI IRB approved NIH protocol 99-CC-0168, “Collection and Distribution of Blood Components from Healthy Donors for In Vitro Research Use.” Blood donors provided written informed consent, and platelets were de-identified prior to distribution. Platelet aggregation was measured using a light transmission aggregometer (Chrono-Log Corporation, Havertown, PA, USA). Briefly, 300 μL of platelet rich plasma, diluted to approximately 2.5 × 105 platelets/μL in HEPES-Tyrode’s buffer (137 mM NaCl, 27 mM KCl, 12 mM NaHCO3, 0.34 mM sodium phosphate monobasic, 1 mM MgCl2, 2.9 mM KCl, 5 mM HEPES, 5 mM glucose, 1% BSA, 0.03 mM EDTA, pH 7.4) were pre-stirred in the aggregometer for 1 min to monitor pre-aggregation effects. Recombinant AlboD7L1 or Tyrode’s buffer as negative control were added to the platelet rich plasma before adding the agonists. Aggregation agonists used in our studies included serotonin, epinephrine, collagen type I fibrils from equine tendons, U-46619, ADP or combination of agonists. Their concentrations are specified in the figure or figure captions. Technical duplicates were performed. For experiments shown in Figure 6 a Chrono-Log aggregometer model 500-CA was used while experiments shown in Supplementary Figure S3 were done in a Chrono-Log model 700.
2.6. Animals and In Vivo Leukocyte Recruitment Experiment
Female C3H/HeJ mice, 6–10 weeks old, were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Germantown, MD, USA) and maintained at the animal facility at the Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research (Rockville, MD, USA). All procedures were performed in accordance with the animal study protocol approved by the NIAID Animal Care and Use Committee (ASP#: LMVR3). Mice received an i.v. inoculation of 200 μL of PBS or AlboD7L1 (100 μg/kg), and 10 min later each mouse was i.p. injected with 200 μg of β-glucan from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Calbiochem-EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The control group consisted of mice receiving the same volume of PBS through the same routes. After 24 h, mice were euthanized, and the cells from the peritoneal cavity were harvested by injection of 3 mL of PBS containing 0.38% sodium citrate. Cells recruited to the peritoneal cavity were concentrated using a cyto centrifuge (StatSpin Cytofuge 2, Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, IN, USA) and sample preparations were stained with a three-Step Stain kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Total cells recruited to the peritoneal cavity were determined in a Neubauer chamber. Differential counts were performed under light microscopy in cytocentrifuge preparations (StatSpin Cytofuge 2, Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, IN, USA) stained with a three-Step Stain kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). Briefly, two-hundred cells were counted and the percentage of neutrophils, eosinophils, mast cells, and mononuclear cells present on each sample was visually evaluated in a blinded fashion (the operator did not know the group each sample came from) and the number of each cell type was calculated as previously described [47]. The experiment was performed twice (n = 3 mice/group) with similar results and data. Results are shown as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of one experiment. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by Bonferroni post hoc test, was used to compare the groups. A p-value of 0.05 or less was considered statistically significant.
3. Results
3.1. Initial Characterization of AlboD7L1
Sequence comparisons between salivary D7 long form proteins from Ae. albopictus and Ae. aegypti suggest that many of the residues involved in the binding of ligands are conserved. Like Ae. aegypti, Ae. albopictus has two D7 long forms in its saliva (AlboD7L1 and AlboD7L2). Interestingly, AlboD7L1 sequence is very similar to AeD7L2 with 66.47% identity (BLASTp e-value: 7 × 10−171); whereas AlboD7L2 shares 69.57% identity (BLASTp e-value: 2 × 10−167) with AeD7L1 (Figure 1).
For binding assays, recombinant AlboD7L1 was expressed in E. coli and purified by ion-exchange and size-exclusion chromatography as described in Materials and Methods (Figure 2A,B). The identity of purified recombinant protein was confirmed by N-terminal sequencing and visualized as a single band by Coomassie-staining gel electrophoresis (Figure 2C).
3.2. Binding Properties of AlboD7L1
In order to assess the binding affinities of the selected ligands to AlboD7L1, ITC experiments were performed to determine the dissociation constant (KD) of each protein ligand combination. As shown in Table 1, Figure 3 and Figure 4 and Supplementary Figure S1, AlboD7L1 was able to bind all ligands tested (dopamine, serotonin, histamine, tryptamine, epinephrine, norepinephrine, leukotrienes B4, C4, D4, E4, and U-46619). AlboD7L1 also binds a single molecule of each ligand at varying affinities (stoichiometry of 1). It had a high affinity to dopamine (KD = 11.0 ± 2.19 nM). Overall, the binding affinities were highest to the biogenic amines (Figure 3), in particular norepinephrine (KD = 3.67 ± 0.994 nM) and serotonin (KD = 4.51 ± 2.66 nM). AlboD7L1 had lower binding to histamine (KD = 278 ± 66.2 nM) and tryptamine (KD = 570 ± 97.7 nM), similar to AeD7L2 affinities for these ligands. A lower affinity to epinephrine (KD = 4110 ± 3330 nM) was calculated. AlboD7L1 was also able to bind the thromboxane A2 analog U-46619 (KD = 946 ± 269 nM, Figure 4), for which AeD7L1 showed no binding. AlboD7L1 showed a similar binding profile for leukotrienes, as previously reported for AeD7L1. As shown in Figure 4, the highest binding affinity of AlboD7L1 was to LTC4 (KD = 67.7 ± 22.4 nM), with lowest binding affinities to LTB4 (KD = 342 ± 65.0 nM), LTD4 (KD = 332 ± 48.3 nM), and LTE4 (KD = 567 ± 115 nM).
Table 1.
Ligand | KD (nM) ± SE | ΔH (kcal/mol) ± SE | −TΔS (kcal/mol) |
---|---|---|---|
Dopamine † | 11.0 ± 2.19 | −12.3 ± 0.197 | 1.23 |
Norepinephrine † | 3.67 ± 0.994 | −11.6 ± 0.186 | −0.116 |
Epinephrine † | 4110 ± 3330 | −6.83 ± 0.809 | −0.637 |
Histamine † | 278 ± 66.2 | −7.47 ± 0.378 | −1.63 |
Tryptamine † | 570 ± 97.7 | −6.43 ± 0.223 | −2.23 |
Serotonin ‡ | 4.51 ± 2.66 | −13.7 ± 0.445 | 2.13 |
LTB4 § | 342 ± 65.0 | −2.74 ± 0.085 | −6.23 |
LTC4 † | 67.7 ± 22.4 | −7.90 ± 0.350 | −2.05 |
LTD4 † | 332 ± 48.3 | −5.00 ± 0.139 | −3.98 |
LTE4 § | 567 ± 115 | −3.98 ± 0.180 | −4.69 |
U-46619 ‡ | 946 ± 269 | −8.54 ± 0.785 | 0.189 |
† Protein concentration in the cell = 2 μM, ligand concentration in the syringe = 20 μM; ‡ Protein concentration in the cell = 3 μM, ligand concentration in the syringe = 30 μM; § Protein concentration in the cell = 5 μM, ligand concentration in the syringe = 50 μM.
3.3. AlboD7L1 Structure Modeling
In silico analysis using the I-TASSER software identified AeD7L1 (PDB ID: 3DXL) as the most similar protein to AlboD7L1 among those proteins whose crystal structures have been solved and are available in the PDB database [48]. AlboD7L1 is predicted to contain 15 alpha helixes (Figure 5A,B), similarly to other D7 proteins, including AeD7L1 and Anst-D7L1 (PDB ID: 3NGV). Although AlboD7L1 and AeD7L1 share 35% identity at the amino acid level (BLASTp e-value: 1 × 10−55, Figure 1), superposition of the AlboD7L1 model with AeD7L1 solved structure showed that both proteins are structurally similar (Figure 5C) and show a similar hydrophobicity patterns (Figure 5D,E). The protein model predicts that AlboD7L1 might bind biolipids through its N-terminal domain and biogenic amines through its C-terminal domain (Supplementary Figure S2), as shown in AeD7L1 and CxD7L2 [33,35].
3.4. AlboD7L1 Inhibits Platelet Aggregation
AlboD7L1 binds platelet agonists such as serotonin, epinephrine and U-46619. Therefore, we hypothesize whether AlboD7L1 functions as a potential platelet aggregation inhibitor. Serotonin acts as a potentiator of platelet agonists such as ADP or collagen. Alone, serotonin can induce platelet shape change; however, in the absence of a more potent agonist, the platelets eventually disaggregate (Figure 6A). AlboD7L1 tightly binds to serotonin as shown in Figure 3. Therefore, the initiation of aggregation produced by serotonin was completely abolished in the presence of AlboD7L1 (Figure 6A). Co-administration of serotonin and low dose of collagen (0.75 μg/mL) as platelet agonists produced a full aggregation response. When platelets were incubated with AlboD7L1, the synergistic effect of serotonin and collagen in platelet aggregation was abolished. Epinephrine also potentiated aggregation initiated by low doses of collagen (Figure 6B). However, AlboD7L1 did not prevent epinephrine and collagen’s synergistic effect as platelet aggregation agonists (Figure 6B).
When platelet aggregation was initiated with high doses of the thromboxane A2 analog U-46619, AlboD7L1 did not have any effect in inhibiting aggregation. However, when lower U-46619 doses were used, platelets started to aggregate and as the agonist was being sequestered by AlboD7L1 platelets disaggregated (Supplementary Figure S3A). Exposure of circulating platelets to collagen from the subendothelial matrix or thrombin leads to the formation of a platelet monolayer that supports subsequent adhesion of activated platelets to one another. At low concentrations of collagen (2 μg/mL), TxA2 plays an important role in the extension and amplification step of the platelet plug formation. Our experiments strongly indicate that the potent inhibitory effect on platelet aggregation observed for AlboD7L1 is due to its binding to U-46619 and presumably TxA2 (Supplementary Figure S3B). AlboD7L1 did not interfere with platelet aggregation induced by high doses of collagen (10 μg/mL) which results in full platelet aggregation independently of secondary mediators (Supplementary Figure S3B). AlboD7L1 neither prevented aggregation initiated by ADP (Supplementary Figure S3C).
3.5. AlboD7L1 Prevents Leukocyte Recruitment In Vivo
To evaluate the in vivo effect of biolipid binding by AlboD7L1, a model of leukotriene-dependent peritonitis induced by β-glucan from Saccharomyces cerevisiae was employed in C3H/HeJ mice. The influx of mononuclear cells, neutrophils, and eosinophils into the peritoneal cavity was evaluated in mice pretreated with PBS or AlboD7L1 and then inoculated with β-glucan. As expected, the injection of β-glucan induced a robust cell influx to the peritoneal cavity, notably of neutrophils and eosinophils, as compared to the control group (p ≤ 0.0001). Pretreatment of mice with AlboD7L1 prevented the inflammation due to β-glucan in this body compartment (Figure 7A, p ≤ 0.0001). The neutrophil and eosinophil inflammation triggered by this stimulus is known to be dependent of leukotrienes [49]. Specifically, migration of neutrophils and eosinophils due to β-glucan was significantly inhibited in the AlboD7L1 pre-treated group (Figure 7B, p ≤ 0.0001 and Figure 7C, p ≤ 0.05, respectively). On the other hand, mononuclear cell numbers were not significantly altered by β-glucan stimulus and AlboD7L1 did not change this phenotype (Figure 7D).
4. Discussion
Salivary proteins are injected into the bite site to assist mosquito blood feed. These bioactive components counteract host hemostatic and immune response mediators. Here, we characterized AlboD7L1, one of the most abundant proteins of the salivary glands of the Asian tiger mosquito, Ae. albopictus. The biochemical and functional activities of this protein indicate that AlboD7L1 plays an important role in mosquito blood feeding.
Vertebrate hosts respond to an arthropod bite through several mechanisms. Mast cells, platelets and peripheral nerve tissues around the bite site produce biogenic amines and eicosanoids to induce coagulation, platelet aggregation, vasoconstriction, and cause pain and itch responses. These response mechanisms to prevent blood loss and alert the host of the presence of the feeder can be detrimental in obtaining a successful blood meal. In this study, we tested several mediators of host hemostasis and found that AlboD7L1 is capable of binding to all of them at varying affinities. Similar to AeD7L1, AlboD7L1 had the highest affinity to biogenic amine (serotonin and norepinephrine). Serotonin, norepinephrine, epinephrine, and tryptamine stimulate vasoconstriction and reduce the blood flow to the injury site [15,50]. We detected binding to tryptamine, a natural vasoconstrictor similar to serotonin [50]. This is the first time tryptamine binding is tested with a D7 protein. Further studies are needed to understand the role of tryptamine binding in host hemostasis prevention. AlboD7L1 also had high affinity towards dopamine. Although the exact role of dopamine in the vertebrate host skin is still largely unknown, some evidence suggests that it is involved in modulating wound healing [51]. The fact that AlboD7L1 binds both histamine and serotonin suggests that this salivary protein might reduce the itching, swelling, and pain felt at the bite site, as a result of increased vascular permeability and infiltration of monocytes induced by these mediators [40,52]. Given the KD values between histamine and its physiological receptors are in the nM range [53], AlboD7L1 would be a good competitor for scavenging histamine.
Overall, the binding affinities to the eicosanoids were lower than biogenic amines. Of the leukotrienes, AlboD7L1 had the highest affinity to LTC4. Leukotrienes are released by mast cells and act quickly to induce pain, swelling, itching, and erythema [54,55]. The thromboxane A2 (TXA2) analog, U-46619, is a potent vasoconstrictor, similar to serotonin and epinephrine. Much like epinephrine, AlboD7L1 had a significantly reduced binding affinity to U-46619. There is a great deal of redundancy in the vertebrate host response to skin injury, and this perhaps explains the coevolution of D7 proteins to bind so many diverse molecules. Aedes albopictus expresses six D7 proteins, two long form and four short form [23].
Sequence comparisons between AlboD7L1 and Ae. aegypti D7 long form proteins showed that most of the residues involved in ligand binding are conserved. AlboD7L1 has the highest similarity to AeD7L2, which corresponds well with the positive binding to U-46619 [39]. Anopheles stephensi AnSt-D7L1 also binds U-46619; the solved crystal structure of the protein with the bound ligand demonstrated that U-46619 is stabilized by hydrogen bonding interactions of the omega-5 hydroxyl group with the phenolic hydroxyl group of Tyr-52 [37]. Tyr-52 is present in both AlboD7L1 and AeD7L2; however, it is absent in AeD7L1, which does not bind U-46619 [35]. The structural model of AlboD7L1 predicts a similar structure and hydrophobicity pattern to AeD7L1, the only salivary D7 protein from Ae. aegypti that has been solved so far [35]. AlboD7L1 might bind biolipids through its N-terminal domain and biogenic amines through its C-terminal domain, in a similar manner of AeD7L1 and CxD7L2 [33,35].
AlboD7L1 tightly binds serotonin, which is released from platelet dense bodies upon activation. Besides inducing constriction of injured blood vessels, serotonin and epinephrine enhance platelet aggregation to minimize blood loss [40]. Platelets play a pivotal role in primary hemostasis. Exposure of circulating platelets to collagen from the subendothelial matrix or thrombin leads to the formation of a platelet monolayer that supports subsequent adhesion of activated platelets to one another [15,56]. Serotonin and epinephrine act as weak platelet agonists alone, but more importantly, they reduce the threshold concentrations of other agonists, including collagen, for platelet aggregation. AlboD7L1 scavenges serotonin and prevents its potentiating effect to collagen, resulting in an inhibition of platelet aggregation, as previously observed for Cx. quinquefasciatus D7L2 and the biogenic amine-binding protein from the triatomine Rhodnius prolixus [33,57]. However, we did not observe any loss of the potentiation effect of platelet aggregation induced by the combination of collagen and epinephrine in the presence of AlboD7L1. This lack of inhibition might be a result of a lower binding affinity of AlboD7L1 to epinephrine. When platelets are activated, TXA2 is synthesized from arachidonic acid released from platelet membrane phospholipids. TXA2 is an unstable compound and cannot be evaluated directly as a platelet aggregation agonist ex vivo. We used U-46619, the stable analog of TXA2 and widely accepted for platelet aggregation studies. AeD7L1 inhibits platelet aggregation induced by low doses of U-46619 most probably due to the AlboD7L1′s low binding affinity to this agonist. TxA2 and ADP play an important role on the extension and amplification step of the platelet plug formation. AlboD7L1 did not prevent platelet aggregation initiated by ADP, as most probably this protein does not bind this mediator. ADP binding has been demonstrated only for Cx. quinquefasciatus D7L1 [33]. Besides, the residues of CxD7L1 involved in ADP-binding are not conserved in AlboD7L1. Or results show that AlboD7L1 prevents aggregation mediated by low doses of collagen (2 μg/mL) without having any effect on aggregation initiated by high doses of collagen (10 μg/mL). At high concentrations, collagen acts as a strong agonist of the GPVI receptor on platelet surface, which induces platelet aggregation in an independent manner of ADP or TXA2 [56]. At low concentrations of collagen, ADP and TXA2 play an important role on the extension and amplification step of the platelet plug formation. Upon platelet activation, mediators secreted by platelets bind to G protein-coupled receptors in platelet membranes, rapidly amplifying the aggregation signal in a positive feedback response [58].
The mouse model of β-glucan induced peritonitis allowed us to study the effect of AlboD7L1 in preventing cell recruitment mediated by leukotrienes. Many immune cells express receptors capable of recognizing β-glucan in its various forms. For example, the binding of β-glucan with integrins CD11b/CD18 (Mac-1), present on neutrophils and mononuclear cell surface, induces the activation of the enzyme 5-lipoxygenase and the concomitant release of LTB4 contributing to the amplification of the inflammatory response [59,60]. In fact, β-glucan of Histoplasma capsulatum is involved in leukocyte recruitment to the site of inoculation, and the leukotrienes are the main chemoattractant involved in early neutrophil and eosinophil migration (6 to 24 h), and late mononuclear cell migration (48 to 72 h) in this model [47,49]. AlboD7L1 pretreatment significantly reduced cell infiltration into the peritoneal cavity of mice when compared to control animals. These results suggest that the effect of AlboD7L1 on the recruitment of neutrophils and eosinophils induced by the β-glucan from S. cerevisiae, is due to its inhibitory effect on leukotrienes, especially LTB4 which is a potent stimulant of leukocyte functions including the chemotaxis, chemokinesis, and aggregation of polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Moreover, LTB4, LTD4, LTC4, and LTE4 are chemoattractant for eosinophils [49]. Here, we have shown that leukotriene binding, a shared feature between AlboD7L1 and Ae. aegypti D7 proteins [35,39], leads to the inhibition of leukocyte recruitment, an ability that might be beneficial for mosquito blood feeding. Both neutrophils and eosinophils secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines and hemostasis mediators including cysLTs, prostaglandins, and platelet activation factor [61,62]. Neutrophils are the first leukocytes to be recruited to an inflammatory site such as those caused by blood feeding arthropods. Recent research has linked hemostasis with inflammation based on the effects of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) on platelets and coagulation [63]. NETs promote platelet aggregation, secretion of ATP and ADP, and increased expression of CD62L and phosphatidylserine (PS) on the surface of the platelets [64]. Besides, NETs can initiate coagulation via thrombin activation [63]. In our experiments, we did not observe an effect of AlboD7L1 on mononuclear cell recruitment. It is possible that it is not the salivary protein that has no effect on mononuclear cells, but rather the beta-glucan that did not increase the recruitment of these cells. At least, no significant increases were seen relatively to control, after beta-glucan administration. Our results agree with previous studies that used this peritonitis model [47].
We demonstrated that the binding of AlboD7L1 to hemostatic mediators results in inhibition of platelet aggregation in ex vivo experiments. Previous work on D7 proteins from Cx. quinquefasciatus has correlated the platelet aggregation inhibition activity observed ex vivo with an anti-hemostatic biological activity in vivo in a mouse model of tail bleeding [33]. We also show that AlboD7L1 binds other well-known mediators of itch, pain, and vasoconstriction. In previous work, we and others have shown that salivary proteins binding to these mediators induce a strong vasodilation in ex vivo experiments using contractility assays [39] and reviewed in [16,65]. Thus, we hypothesize that AlboD7L1 might prevent hemostasis in vivo to facilitate blood feeding. However, a more in-depth study will be necessary to experimentally demonstrate the in vivo activity of AlboD7L1.
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, we characterized a novel D7 long form protein from Ae. albopictus saliva at the biochemical and functional level. We determined the binding capabilities of AlboD7L1 which were similar to the Ae. aegypti D7 salivary proteins. Our structural predicted model suggests that AlboD7L1 binds biogenic amines and biolipids independently through the C-terminal and N-terminal domain, respectively. Moreover, we demonstrated the AlboD7L1 role in inhibiting both platelet aggregation and cell recruitment of polymorphonuclear cells. These anti-hemostatic and anti-inflammatory properties might help blood feeding in mosquitoes. Importantly, this work reinforces the relevance of the D7 family of salivary proteins, which are among the most abundant proteins in mosquito saliva. Future work will investigate the role of this protein in blood feeding and pathogen transmission in vivo through the creation of AlboD7L1 knockout mosquito lines generated by CRISPR/Cas9.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Brian Brown, NIH Library Writing Center, for manuscript editing assistance. This research was supported by the Division of Intramural Research Program of the NIH/NIAID (AI001246-01).
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2218-273X/10/10/1372/s1, Figure S1: Comparison of binding affinities of several mosquito D7 salivary proteins to biogenic amines and biolipids involved in hemostasis. Figure S2: Binding pockets prediction of AlboD7L1 for eicosanoids and biogenic amines. Figure S3. AlboD7L1 inhibits pro-aggregatory effects of the thromboxane A2 analog U-46619, low doses of collagen but not ADP.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, E.C., A.C.C. and A.S.-N.; methodology, E.C., A.C.C. and A.S.-N.; formal analysis, E.C., I.M.-M., L.B.S., A.S.-N., G.S. and P.C.V.-L.; investigation, E.C., A.C.C., A.S.-N. and I.M.-M.; writing—original draft preparation, I.M.-M., L.B.S., G.S. and P.C.V.-L.; writing—review and editing, E.C., I.M.-M., L.B.S., G.S. and P.C.V.-L.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was supported by the Division of Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIH/NIAID) (AI001246-01).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Kraemer M.U.G., Reiner R.C., Jr., Brady O.J., Messina J.P., Gilbert M., Pigott D.M., Yi D., Johnson K., Earl L., Marczak L.B., et al. Past and future spread of the arbovirus vectors Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. Nat. Microbiol. 2019;4:854–863. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0376-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Benedict M.Q., Levine R.S., Hawley W.A., Lounibos L.P. Spread of the tiger: Global risk of invasion by the mosquito Aedes albopictus. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2007;7:76–85. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2006.0562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nawrocki S.J., Hawley W.A. Estimation of the northern limits of distribution of Aedes albopictus in North America. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 1987;3:314–317. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bonizzoni M., Gasperi G., Chen X., James A.A. The invasive mosquito species Aedes albopictus: Current knowledge and future perspectives. Trends Parasitol. 2013;29:460–468. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2013.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pereira-dos-Santos T., Roiz D., Lourenco-de-Oliveira R., Paupy C. A Systematic Review: Is Aedes albopictus an Efficient Bridge Vector for Zoonotic Arboviruses? Pathogens. 2020;9:266. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9040266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kauffman E.B., Kramer L.D. Zika Virus Mosquito Vectors: Competence, Biology, and Vector Control. J. Inf. Dis. 2017;216:976–990. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pereira T.N., Carvalho F.D., De Mendonca S.F., Rocha M.N., Moreira L.A. Vector competence of Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus, and Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes for Mayaro virus. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2020;14:e0007518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Savage H.M., Niebylski M.L., Smith G.C., Mitchell C.J., Craig G.B., Jr. Host-feeding patterns of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) at a temperate North American site. J. Med. Entomol. 1993;30:27–34. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/30.1.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Niebylski M.L., Savage H.M., Nasci R.S., Craig G.B., Jr. Blood hosts of Aedes albopictus in the United States. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 1994;10:447–450. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lavoipierre M.M. Feeding mechanism of blood-sucking arthropods. Nature. 1965;208:302–303. doi: 10.1038/208302a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Choumet V., Attout T., Chartier L., Khun H., Sautereau J., Robbe-Vincent A., Brey P., Huerre M., Bain O. Visualizing Non Infectious and Infectious Anopheles gambiae Blood Feedings in Naive and Saliva-Immunized Mice. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e50464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Batty P., Smith J.G. Haemostasis. Surgery (Oxf.) 2010;28:530–535. doi: 10.1016/j.mpsur.2010.08.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Clemetson K.J. Platelets and primary haemostasis. Thromb. Res. 2012;129:220–224. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2011.11.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sira J., Eyre L. Physiology of haemostasis. Anaesth. Intensive Care Med. 2016;17:79–82. doi: 10.1016/j.mpaic.2015.11.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ribeiro J.M.C., Arca B. From Sialomes to the Sialoverse: An Insight into Salivary Potion of Blood-Feeding Insects. Adv. Insect Phys. 2009;37:59–118. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Arca B., Ribeiro J.M. Saliva of hematophagous insects: A multifaceted toolkit. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2018;29:102–109. doi: 10.1016/j.cois.2018.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mans B.J. Evolution of vertebrate hemostatic and inflammatory control mechanisms in blood-feeding arthropods. J. Innate. Immun. 2011;3:41–51. doi: 10.1159/000321599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Peng Z., Beckett A.N., Engler R.J., Hoffman D.R., Ott N.L., Simons F.E. Immune responses to mosquito saliva in 14 individuals with acute systemic allergic reactions to mosquito bites. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2004;114:1189–1194. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Peng Z., Simons F.E. Mosquito allergy: Immune mechanisms and recombinant salivary allergens. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2004;133:198–209. doi: 10.1159/000076787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Buezo Montero S., Gabrieli P., Severini F., Picci L., Di Luca M., Forneris F., Facchinelli L., Ponzi M., Lombardo F., Arca B. Analysis in a murine model points to IgG responses against the 34kD salivary proteins from Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti as novel promising candidate markers of host exposure to Aedes mosquitoes. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019;13:e0007806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Doucoure S., Cornelie S., Patramool S., Mouchet F., Demettre E., Seveno M., Dehecq J.S., Rutee H., Herve J.P., Favier F., et al. First screening of Aedes albopictus immunogenic salivary proteins. Insect Mol. Biol. 2013;22:411–423. doi: 10.1111/imb.12032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Poinsignon A., Boulanger D., Binetruy F., Elguero E., Darriet F., Gallian P., De Lamballerie X., Charrel R.N., Remoue F. Risk factors of exposure to Aedes albopictus bites in mainland France using an immunological biomarker. Epidemiol. Infect. 2019;147:238. doi: 10.1017/S0950268819001286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Arca B., Lombardo F., Francischetti I.M., Pham V.M., Mestres-Simon M., Andersen J.F., Ribeiro J.M. An insight into the sialome of the adult female mosquito Aedes albopictus. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2007;37:107–127. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2006.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ribeiro J.M., Martin-Martin I., Arca B., Calvo E. A Deep Insight into the Sialome of Male and Female Aedes aegypti Mosquitoes. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0151400. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Marinotti O., de Brito M., Moreira C.K. Apyrase and α-glucosidase in the salivary glands of Aedes albopictus. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1996;113:675–679. doi: 10.1016/0305-0491(95)02035-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dong F., Fu Y., Li X., Jiang J., Sun J., Cheng X. Cloning, expression, and characterization of salivary apyrase from Aedes albopictus. Parasitol. Res. 2012;110:931–937. doi: 10.1007/s00436-011-2579-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cheng J., Wang Y., Li F., Liu J., Sun Y., Wu J. Cloning and characterization of a mannose binding C-type lectin gene from salivary gland of Aedes albopictus. Parasit. Vectors. 2014;7:337. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Calvo E., Mizurini D.M., Sa-Nunes A., Ribeiro J.M., Andersen J.F., Mans B.J., Monteiro R.Q., Kotsyfakis M., Francischetti I.M. Alboserpin, a factor Xa inhibitor from the mosquito vector of yellow fever, binds heparin and membrane phospholipids and exhibits antithrombotic activity. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:27998–28010. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.247924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ribeiro J.M., Charlab R., Pham V.M., Garfield M., Valenzuela J.G. An insight into the salivary transcriptome and proteome of the adult female mosquito Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2004;34:543–563. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2004.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Valenzuela J.G., Charlab R., Gonzalez E.C., de Miranda-Santos I.K., Marinotti O., Francischetti I.M., Ribeiro J.M. The D7 family of salivary proteins in blood sucking diptera. Insect Mol. Biol. 2002;11:149–155. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2002.00319.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ribeiro J.M.C., Martin-Martin I., Moreira F.R., Bernard K.A., Calvo E. A deep insight into the male and female sialotranscriptome of adult Culex tarsalis mosquitoes. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2018;95:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2018.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Calvo E., Mans B.J., Andersen J.F., Ribeiro J.M. Function and evolution of a mosquito salivary protein family. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:1935–1942. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M510359200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Martin-Martin I., Paige A., Valenzuela Leon P.C., Gittis A.G., Kern O., Bonilla B., Chagas A.C., Ganesan S., Smith L.B., Garboczi D.N., et al. ADP binding by the Culex quinquefasciatus mosquito D7 salivary protein enhances blood feeding on mammals. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:2911. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16665-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Andersen J.F., Ribeiro J.M.C. Chapter 4-Salivary Kratagonists: Scavengers of Host Physiological Effectors During Blood Feeding. In: Wikel S.K., Aksoy S., Dimopoulos G., editors. Arthropod Vector: Controller of Disease Transmission, Volume 2. Academic Press; Cambridge, MA, USA: 2017. pp. 51–63. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Calvo E., Mans B.J., Ribeiro J.M., Andersen J.F. Multifunctionality and mechanism of ligand binding in a mosquito antiinflammatory protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:3728–3733. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813190106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mans B.J., Calvo E., Ribeiro J.M., Andersen J.F. The crystal structure of D7r4, a salivary biogenic amine-binding protein from the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:36626–36633. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M706410200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Alvarenga P.H., Francischetti I.M., Calvo E., Sa-Nunes A., Ribeiro J.M., Andersen J.F. The function and three-dimensional structure of a thromboxane A2/cysteinyl leukotriene-binding protein from the saliva of a mosquito vector of the malaria parasite. PLoS Biol. 2010;8:e1000547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Jablonka W., Kim I.H., Alvarenga P.H., Valenzuela J.G., Ribeiro J.M.C., Andersen J.F. Functional and structural similarities of D7 proteins in the independently-evolved salivary secretions of sand flies and mosquitoes. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:5340. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41848-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Martin-Martin I., Kern O., Brooks S., Smith L.B., Valenzuela‐Leon P.C., Bonilla B., Ackerman H., Calvo E. Biochemical characterization of AeD7L2 and its physiological relevance in blood feeding in the dengue mosquito vector, Aedes aegypti. FEBS J. 2020 doi: 10.1111/febs.15524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Van Nueten J.M., Janssens W.J., Vanhoutte P.M. Serotonin and vascular reactivity. Pharmacol. Res. Commun. 1985;17:585–608. doi: 10.1016/0031-6989(85)90067-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Piper P.J. Formation and actions of leukotrienes. Physiol. Rev. 1984;64:744–761. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1984.64.2.744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sievers F., Wilm A., Dineen D., Gibson T.J., Karplus K., Li W., Lopez R., McWilliam H., Remmert M., Söding J., et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011;7:539. doi: 10.1038/msb.2011.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Nielsen H., Engelbrecht J., Brunak S., von Heijne G. Identification of prokaryotic and eukaryotic signal peptides and prediction of their cleavage sites. Protein Eng. 1997;10:1–6. doi: 10.1093/protein/10.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.ExPASy Bioinformatic Resource Portal. [(accessed on 10 June 2020)]; Available online: https://embnet.vital-it.ch/software/BOX_form.html.
- 45.Yang J., Yan R., Roy A., Xu D., Poisson J., Zhang Y. The I-TASSER Suite: Protein structure and function prediction. Nat. Methods. 2015;12:7–8. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Pettersen E.F., Goddard T.D., Huang C.C., Couch G.S., Greenblatt D.M., Meng E.C., Ferrin T.E. UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 2004;25:1605–1612. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sá-Nunes A., Medeiros A.I., Faccioli L.H. Interleukin-5 mediates peritoneal eosinophilia induced by the F1 cell wall fraction of Histoplasma capsulatum. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2004;37:343–346. doi: 10.1590/S0100-879X2004000300009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.PDB Databse. [(accessed on 1 July 2020)]; Available online: https://www.rcsb.org/
- 49.Medeiros A.I., Silva C.L., Malheiro A., Maffei C.M., Faccioli L.H. Leukotrienes are involved in leukocyte recruitment induced by live Histoplasma capsulatum or by the beta-glucan present in their cell wall. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1999;128:1529–1537. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0702912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kousar S., Anjuma S., Jaleel F., Khana J., Naseema S. Biomedical Significance of Tryptamine: A Review. J. Pharmacovig. 2017;5:1–6. doi: 10.4172/2329-6887.1000239. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Vaughn A.R., Davis M.J., Sivamani R.K., Isseroff R.R. A Concise Review of the Conflicting Roles of Dopamine-1 versus Dopamine-2 Receptors in Wound Healing. Molecules. 2017;23:50. doi: 10.3390/molecules23010050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Jutel M., Blaser K., Akdis C.A. Histamine in allergic inflammation and immune modulation. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2005;137:82–92. doi: 10.1159/000085108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sahid M., Tripathi T., Sobia F., Moin S., Siddiqui M., Khan R.A. Histamine, Histamine Receptors, and their Role in Immunomodulation: An Updated Systematic Review. Open Immunol. J. 2009;2:9–41. doi: 10.2174/1874226200902010009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Boyce J.A. Eicosanoid mediators of mast cells: Receptors, regulation of synthesis, and pathobiologic implications. Chem. Immunol. Allergy. 2005;87:59–79. doi: 10.1159/000087571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Soter N.A., Lewis R.A., Corey E.J., Austen K.F. Local effects of synthetic leukotrienes (LTC4, LTD4, LTE4, and LTB4) in human skin. J. Investig. Dermatol. 1983;80:115–119. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12531738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Andrews R.K., Berndt M.C. Platelet physiology and thrombosis. Thromb. Res. 2004;114:447–453. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2004.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Andersen J.F., Francischetti I.M., Valenzuela J.G., Schuck P., Ribeiro J.M. Inhibition of hemostasis by a high affinity biogenic amine-binding protein from the saliva of a blood-feeding insect. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:4611–4617. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M211438200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Brass L. Understanding and evaluating platelet function. Hematol. Am. Soc. Hematol. Educ. Program. 2010;1:387–396. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2010.1.387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Petersen M.M., Steadman R., Williams J.D. Human neutrophils are selectively activated by independent ligation of the subunits of the CD11b/CD18 integrin. J. Leukoc. Biol. 1994;56:708–713. doi: 10.1002/jlb.56.6.708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Steadman R., Petersen M.M., Williams J.D. CD11b/CD18-dependent stimulation of leukotriene B4 synthesis by human neutrophils (PMN) is synergistically enhanced by tumour necrosis factor alpha and low dose diacylglycerol. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 1996;28:771–776. doi: 10.1016/1357-2725(96)00015-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Weissmann G. Leukocytes as Secretory Organs of Inflammation. Hosp. Pract. 1978;13:53–62. doi: 10.1080/21548331.1978.11707397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Zarbock A., Polanowska-Grabowska R.K., Ley K. Platelet-neutrophil-interactions: Linking hemostasis and inflammation. Blood Rev. 2007;21:99–111. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2006.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Zucoloto A.Z., Jenne C.N. Platelet-Neutrophil Interplay: Insights Into Neutrophil Extracellular Trap (NET)-Driven Coagulation in Infection. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2019;6:85. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2019.00085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Elaskalani O., Abdol Razak N.B., Metharom P. Neutrophil extracellular traps induce aggregation of washed human platelets independently of extracellular DNA and histones. Cell Commun. Sig. 2018;16:24. doi: 10.1186/s12964-018-0235-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Mans B. Glandular Matrices and Secretions: Blood-Feeding Arthropods. In: Cohen E., Moussian B., editors. Extracellular Composite Matrices in Arthropods. Springer International Publishing; Cham, Switzerland: 2016. pp. 625–688. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.