Abstract
Background:
Due to extensive damage to the skin, burn victims may acquire life-threatening infections. Though the skin primarily protects against microbial invasions, a large number of bacteria, fungi, and viruses can be isolated from burn patients, specifically Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a gram-negative bacterium with both intrinsic and acquired antibiotic resistance (AR) properties. nalB mutations can be found on the mexR in the P. aeruginosa chromosome. This mutation can induce overexpression of the mexAB-oprMoperon, and affect the MexAB-OprM efflux pump, which removes antimicrobial agents from the bacterial cell. Identifying nalB mutants can be useful for monitoring factors affecting AR.
Methods:
In this study, 70 P. aeruginosa isolates identified from burn patients and antibacterial sensitivity was evaluated using the Kirby-Bauer method. We also investigated nalB mutations in samples using molecular methods including Polymerase reaction chain (PCR) and Sequencing.
Results:
We identified nalB mutations in 16 isolates. We also found that the increasing effect of nalB mutants induces hyper production activity of MexAB-OprM resulting in AR. Overall, these findings compliment the findings of previous reports.
Conclusion:
According to the resistance patterns of the samples, both Amikacin and Ciprofloxacin showed the highest resistance (%). Further, the relationship between Ciprofloxacin resistance and nalB mutations was statistically significant (p= 0.016). The results confirm that the increasing effect of nalB mutants on hyper production activity of MexAB-OprM leads to AR.
Key Words: Antibiotic Resistance, Burn Infections, Hospital-Acquired Infections, Nosocomial Infections, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa
Introduction
Severe burns are among the most common types of trauma. Immediate medical attention and care is required to minimize mortality and morbidity of burn patients. In the past decade, however, survivability has improved tremendously due to advances in modern medicine (1). It is a well-known fact that the skin, the largest human organ, is an essential barrier that provides first-line defense, immunity and protection against microbial invasions. Interestingly, infections related to burns correlate to the severity of the burn injury (2). The source of microorganisms which colonize burn wounds can be traced back to gastrointestinal or respiratory flora, the environment (water, air, environmental surfaces), fomites, or even healthcare workers (3). Furthermore, various microorganisms such as fungi, viruses and bacteria have been isolated from burns (4-9). Here, we specifically evaluate a central microbe involved in severe burn infections, more commonly known as Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10-12).
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, gram-negative bacteria, is one of the root causes of nosocomial infections, and plays an essential role in morbidity and mortality amongst burn patients (13). Moreover, antimicrobial resistance caused by P. aeruginosa can complicate the resolution of burn infections (14, 15). Recent studies indicate that wild-type P. aeruginosa expresses low levels of MexAB-OprM, an efflux pump involved in exporting antimicrobials out of the cell, and promotes resistance against broad-spectrum antibiotics such as penicillin, third generation cephalosporines, monobactams, macrolides, tetracyclines and fluoroquinolones (Ciprofloxacin, Levofloxacin and Ofloxacin) (16-18). Located upstream of the mexAB-oprM operon (the operon of MexAB-OprM efflux pump), mexR regulates the expression of the mexAB-oprM operon (19, 20). A mutation in mexR was found to induce overexpression of the mexAB-oprM operon and exhibit the nalB-type profile of antibiotic resistance (AR) (19, 20). Furthermore, a mutation in the nalB locus of mexR in P. aeruginosa manifests a higher level of AR, specifically to fluoroquinolones, when compared to strains lacking the nalB mutant (19). Originally, the nalB mutation was related to nalidixic acid resistant strains and could be located on the P. aeruginosa chromosome. Taken together, the nalB mutant induces overexpression of the mexAB-oprM operon (20).
Previous studies which contains the sequence of mexR obtained from isolated nalB-type P. aeruginosa found that most strains carried the nalB mutation (16, 19). Thus, both the presence of the nalB mutation and the relationship between Ciprofloxacin (fluoroquinolone) resistance was investigated in isolated P. aeruginosa strains from several adult burn patients.
Materials and Methods
Sample collection and study design
This study was conducted at the Microbiology Laboratory of the Department of Microbiology, Shahid Sadooghi University of Medical Science, Yazd, Iran from April 5, 2018 to December 20, 2018 within eight months from sample collection. Samples were collected from burn wounds of patients at the time of admission to Shohada Mehrab Yazd Hospital Burn Ward and prior to starting the treatment courses. Samples collected from burn wounds involved the use of sterile swabs. Swabs were then cultured on blood agar and eosin methylene blue agar (EMB) followed by a 24 h incubation at 37 °C. The strains identified using biochemical testing (Table 1) were stored at -70 °C. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 10 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) and approved by the Ethical Committee of the Sahid Sadooghi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Table 1.
P. aeruginosa identification tests.
| Identification tests | Results |
|---|---|
| TSI medium | alkaline/ alkaline: non fermentative |
| Oxidase | Positive |
| Growth in 42 °C | Positive |
| Citrate | Positive |
| Urease | Negative |
Evaluation of antibiotic resistance
Antimicrobial susceptibility was performed by disc diffusion using the Kirby-Bauer method using Commercially available antibiotics (MAST, UK) (21). The antibiotics used in the study included: Ciprofloxacin (5 µg), Levofloxacin (5 µg), Norfloxacin (10 µg), Ofloxacin (5 µg), Gentamicin (10 µg), Amikacin (30 µg), Ceftazidime (30 µg) and Imipenem (10 µg). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of Ciprofloxacin as a Fluoroquinolone antibiotic (for detection of mexR defective strains (19)), measured by broth microdilution method between concentrations from 512 µg/ml to 0.25 µg/ml. P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 was used for quality control for all antimicrobial susceptibility assays. The results were analyzed according to the CLSI 2018 guidelines (22).
DNA extraction
DNA was extracted from the strains using a boiling method: Colonies grown overnight (48-72h) were suspended in 300 µl of double distilled water (DDW). Suspensions were boiled for ten minutes and centrifuged at 19000 × G for five minutes at room temperature (RT). The supernatant was subsequently transferred to a new microtube and stored at 20 °C (23).
Primer design
The primer3 (http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/) tool was used to design the forward and reverse primers for mexR. The following forward and reverse primer sequences were used in the study: Forward primer: ACATTAGGTTTACTCGGCCAA; Reverse primer: GCCAGTAAGCGGATACCTGA.
Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) cycles
The PCR reaction was carried out in an Applied Biosystems thermocycler. The initial PCR contained 0.6 µM of each forward and reverse primers, 12.5 µl Taq DNA polymerase, 2X Master Mix Red (Amplicon, Denmark) and sterile distilled water to a final volume of 25 µl. The following conditions were used during DNA amplification: 95 °C for five minutes (initial denaturation), 94 °C for 45 S (denaturation), 55 °C for 30 S (annealing) and 72 °C for 45 S (extension) as three steps of 40 PCR cycles and 72 °C for five mins (final extension).
Electrophoresis
PCR amplicons (4 µl per amplicon) were separated by 1% (w/v) agarose gel electrophoresis (80 V, 45 min) and stained with GeleStain (Pishtaz Teb Co.) at a concentration of 20 mg/100 ml in water.
Sequencing
PCR products were sequenced by the Macrogen Company in Korea.
BLAST and detection of nalB mutants
The results were analyzed using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST; https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). To locate mutations, sequences were compared to the mexR gene sequence (Accession number: 877857).
Statistical analysis
The study investigated the relationship between nalB mutations and Ciprofloxacin resistance. Statistical analysis was performed using a chi-square test, where a p-value <0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Identification and evaluation of antibiotic resistance
Seventy strains of P. aeruginosa were identified following conventional biochemical testing in the microbiology laboratories which mentioned in (Table 1). Both antibiotic susceptibility patterns and MIC profiles of the strains are listed in (Table 2). The mean age of the burn patients was 41.1 ± 31.9 yrs. (< 12- 73 yrs.). There were 53 males (75.8 %) and 17 female participants (24.2 %) resulting in a 3.11:1 male to female ratio.
Mutation investigation
Following PCR and gel electrophoresis ( Fig. 1), 70 mexR positive strains were identified. All positive mexR strains were sequenced to confirm the presence of mexR. To investigate the presence of possible mutations, the sequences were compared to mexR in P. aeruginosa PAO1 (reference sequence) using an online software (ClustalW2: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalw2/). In total, 16 samples contained nalB mutations (Table 3).
Fig. 1.

Amplification of mexR gene (545bp). From left to right respectively: Ladder 100 bp; Control Negative; Samples 1-8.
Table 3.
nalB mutations and susceptibility to Ciprofloxacin in 16 isolates of P. aeruginosa.
| Sample | Nucleotide Mutation | Susceptibility to Ciprofloxacin |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Transversion in nucleotide number 377, A → T/ | Resistant |
| 2 | Transition in nucleotide number 264 and 168, T → C and in nucleotide number 327, A → G / | Resistant |
| 3 | Transversion in nucleotide number 370, C → A / | Resistant |
| 4 | Transition in nucleotide number 327, A → G / | Resistant |
| 5 | Transversion in nucleotide number 377, A → T / | Resistant |
| 6 | Transition in nucleotide number 168, T → C / | Resistant |
| 7 | Transition in nucleotide number 168, T → C / | Resistant |
| 8 | Transition in nucleotide number 264 and 168, T → C and in nucleotide number 327, A → G / | Resistant |
| 9 | Transition in nucleotide number 327, A → G / | Susceptible |
| 10 | Transition in nucleotide number 168, T → C / | Resistant |
| 11 | Transition in nucleotide number 327, A → G and Transversion in nucleotide number 377, A → T / | Resistant |
| 12 | Transition in nucleotide number 264 and 168, T → C and in nucleotide number 327, A → G / | Resistant |
| 13 | Transition in nucleotide number 223 T → C and in nucleotide number 327, A → G / | Resistant |
| 14 | Transition in nucleotide number 327, A → G and Transversion in nucleotide number 377, A → T / | Susceptible |
| 15 | Transition in nucleotide number 168, T → C and in nucleotide number 264, T → C and in nucleotide number 329, A → G / | Resistant |
| 16 | Transition in nucleotide number 166 and 262, T → C and in nucleotide number 325, A→ G / | Susceptible |
Table 2.
Antibiotic susceptibility patterns of P. aeruginosa isolates
| Antibiotic susceptibility assay | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Antibiotic | Agar dick diffusion (number and percentage of isolates) | Broth microdilution (number and percentage of isolates) | ||||
| Resistant | Intermediate | Susceptible | Resistant | Intermediate | Susceptible | |
| Ciprofloxacin | 51 (72.9%) | 15 (21.4%) | 4 (5.7%) | 51 (72.9%) | 15 (21.4%) | 4 (5.7%) |
| Levofloxacin | 57 (81.4%) | 7 (10.0%) | 6 (8.6%) | |||
| Norfloxacin | 52 (74.3%) | 4 (5.7%) | 14 (20.0%) | |||
| Ofloxacin | 54 (77.1%) | 7 (10.0%) | 9 (12.9%) | |||
| Amikacin | 61 (87.1%) | 3 (4.3%) | 6 (8.6%) | |||
| Gentamicin | 51 (74.3%) | 8 (12.9%) | 11 (12.9%) | |||
| Ceftazidime | 54 (75.7%) | 7 (11.4%) | 9 (12.9%) | |||
| Imipenem | 60 (85.7%) | 3 (4.3%) | 7 (10.0%) | |||
Discussion
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a central pathogen involved in nosocomial infections, specifically the development of AR in burn patients. Thus, identifying factors affecting AR could play a key role in improving current interventions and infection management (24). P. aeruginosa is resistant to a wide range of antibiotics intrinsically and can transfer resistance genes to other bacteria (24, 25). Importantly, nalB mutations in mexR leads to the overexpression of the mexAB-oprM operon and can result in multidrug resistance (26). Fluoroquinolones, carbapenems and aminoglycosides are among the most critical antibiotics used to combat P. aeruginosa infections (13, 25, 27). This study reveals that the identification of nalB mutants should be considered in order to prevent the development of AR. Similar to previous reports, the relationship between nalB mutants and Ciprofloxacin resistance was found to be significant. Finally, nalB mutants can increase MexAB-OprM hyper production activity, thereby leading to AR, specifically fluoroquinolone resistance (16-19, 25, 28-33).
Seventy P. aeruginosa strains isolated from burn patients showed the highest resistance to Amikacin (87.1%) compared to Ciprofloxacin (72.9%). There were 16 nalB mutants in 70 mexR defective strains and 13 nalB mutants (81.25%)
were found to be resistant to Ciprofloxacin. The relationship between the Ciprofloxacin resistance and nalB mutations were significant (p= 0.016). In conclusion, these findings align with previous observations and emphasize the overall importance of nalB mutants and AR.
The researchers had no pre-existing knowledge of the medical history of burn patients such as the correlation between the duration of hospitalization and antibiotic susceptibility patterns, type of burn, need for ICU or a ventilator and number of surgeries. It is suggested that the association between these factors and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of the strains could be a critical subject for future investigations. Further research is also required to investigate other potential mutations affecting efflux pumps. Lastly, during our relentless fight against antibiotic resistance, this study further highlights the benefits of gaining a deeper understanding of resistance mechanisms caused by nalB mutations.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran. Authors state no conflict of interest. The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
References
- 1.Hranjec T, Turrentine FE, Stukenborg G, Young JS, Sawyer RG, Calland JF. Burn-center quality improvement: are burn outcomes dependent on admitting facilities and is there a volume-outcome “sweet-spot”?. . Am Surg. . 2012;78(5):559–66. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Owlia P, Azimi L, Gholami A, Asghari B, Lari AR. ESBL-and MBL-mediated resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii: a global threat to burn patients. . Infez Med. 2012;20(3):182–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Church D, Elsayed S, Reid O, Winston B, Lindsay R. Burn wound infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006;19(2):403–434. doi: 10.1128/CMR.19.2.403-434.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rosanova MT, Brizuela M, Villasboas M, Guarracino F, Alvarez V, Santos P, et al. Fusarium spp infections in a pediatric burn unit: nine years of experience. Braz J Infect Dis. 2016;20(4):389–92. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2016.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kubota Y, Kosaka K, Hokazono T, Yamaji Y, Tezuka T, Akita S, et al. Disseminated zoster in an adult patient with extensive burns: a case report. Virol J. . 2019;16(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12985-019-1179-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Khan TM, Kok YL, Bukhsh A, Lee LH, Chan KG, Goh BH . Incidence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in burn intensive care unit: a systematic review. Germs. 2018;8(3):113–125. doi: 10.18683/germs.2018.1138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hasan R, Acharjee M, Noor R. Prevalence of vancomycin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) in methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains isolated from burn wound infections. Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016;28(2):49–53. doi: 10.1016/j.tcmj.2016.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sharma S, Kaur N, Malhotra S, Madan P, Hans C. Control of an Outbreak of Acinetobacter baumannii in Burn Unit in a Tertiary Care Hospital of North India. Advances in Public Health. 2014 [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chim H, Tan BH, Song C. Five-year review of infections in a burn intensive care unit: High incidence of Acinetobacter baumannii in a tropical climate. . Burns. 2007;33(8):1008–14. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2007.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Degaim ZD, Al-Malk HK, Nassar AM, Nasir AA. Molecular detection of two virulence factors of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from burn patients. University of Thi-Qar Journal of Science. 2019;7(1):62–5. [Google Scholar]
- 11.de Almeida KCF, Calomino MA, Deutsch G, de Castilho SR, de Paula GR, Esper LMR, et al. Molecular characterization of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated in a burn center. Burns. 2017;43(1):137–143. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Al-Aali KY. Microbial profile of burn wound infections in burn patients, Taif, Saudi Arabia. Arch Clin Microbiol. 2016;7(2):1–9. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Obritsch MD, Fish DN, MacLaren R, Jung R. Nosocomial infections due to multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: epidemiology and treatment options. Pharmacotherapy. 2005;25(10):1353–64. doi: 10.1592/phco.2005.25.10.1353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bielecki P, Glik J, Kawecki M, dos Santos VAM. Towards understanding Pseudomonas aeruginosa burn wound infections by profiling gene expression. Biotechnol Lett. 2008;30(5):777–90. doi: 10.1007/s10529-007-9620-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Moradali MF, Ghods S, Rehm BH. Pseudomonas aeruginosa lifestyle: a paradigm for adaptation, survival, and persistence. . Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:39. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Saito K, Yoneyama H, Nakae T. nalB-type mutations causing the overexpression of the MexAB-OprM efflux pump are located in the mexR gene of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa chromosome. . FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1999;179(1):67–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb08709.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sobel ML, Hocquet D, Plesiat P, Poole K. Mutations in PA3574 (nalD) lead to increased MexAB-OprM expression and multidrug resistance in laboratory and clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. . Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49(5):1782–6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.5.1782-1786.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ferrer-Espada R, Shahrour H, Pitts B, Stewart PS, Sanchez-Gomez S, Martinez-de-Tejada G. A permeability-increasing drug synergizes with bacterial efflux pump inhibitors and restores susceptibility to antibiotics in multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Sci Rep. . 2019;9(1):3452. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39659-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Tian Z-X, Yi X-X, Cho A, O’Gara F, Wang Y-P. CpxR activates MexAB-OprM efflux pump expression and enhances antibiotic resistance in both laboratory and clinical nalB-type isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. . PLoS pathog. 2016;12(10):e1005932. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sánchez P, Linares JF, Ruiz-Díez B, Campanario E, Navas A, Baquero F, et al. Fitness of in vitro selected Pseudomonas aeruginosa nalB and nfxB multidrug resistant mutants. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002;50(5):657–64. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkf185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hudzicki J. Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion susceptibility test protocol. 2009 [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wayne PA. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 28th ed. CLSI supplement M100; 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Clarke L, Millar BC, Moore JE. Extraction of genomic DNA from Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a comparison of three methods. Br J Biomed Sci. 2003;60(1):34–5. doi: 10.1080/09674845.2003.11978040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hancock RE, Speert DP. Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: mechanisms and impact on treatment. . Drug resistance updates. . 2000;3(4):247–55. doi: 10.1054/drup.2000.0152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Lambert PA. Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J R Soc Med. 2002;95 Suppl 41:22–6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Livermore DM. Of Pseudomonas, porins, pumps and carbapenems. . Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2001;47(3):247–50. doi: 10.1093/jac/47.3.247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Schweizer HP. Efflux as a mechanism of resistance to antimicrobials in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and related bacteria: unanswered questions. . Genet Mol Res. 2003;2(1):48–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rocha AJ, Barsottini MRdO, Rocha RR, Laurindo MV, Moraes FLLd, Rocha SLd. Pseudomonas Aeruginosa: Virulence Factors and Antibiotic Resistance Genes. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology. 2019;62(62):19180503. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nakajima A, Sugimoto Y, Yoneyama H, Nakae T. High-level fluoroquinolone resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa due to interplay of the MexAB-OprM efflux pump and the DNA gyrase mutation. Microbiol immunol. 2002;46(6):391–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2002.tb02711.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Llanes C, Hocquet D, Vogne C, Benali-Baitich D, Neuwirth C, Plesiat P. Clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa overproducing MexAB-OprM and MexXY efflux pumps simultaneously. . Antimicrob Agents Chemother. . 2004;48(5):1797–802. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.5.1797-1802.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Klinoski RL. PA3719-mediated regulation of the MexAB-OprM efflux system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. 2007 [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dupont P, Hocquet D, Jeannot K, Chavanet P, Plesiat P. Bacteriostatic and bactericidal activities of eight fluoroquinolones against MexAB-OprM-overproducing clinical strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;55(4):518–22. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Adewoye L, Sutherland A, Srikumar R, Poole K. The mexR repressor of the mexAB-oprM multidrug efflux operon in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: characterization of mutations compromising activity. . J Bacteriol. 2002;184(15):4308–12. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.15.4308-4312.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
