Abstract
Heterologous BCG prime-boost regimens represent a promising strategy for an urgently required improved tuberculosis vaccine. Identifying the mechanisms which underpin the enhanced protection induced by such strategies is one key aim which would significantly accelerate rational vaccine development. Experimentally, airway vaccination induces greater efficacy than parenteral delivery; in both conventional vaccination and heterologous boosting of parenteral BCG immunisation. However, the effect of delivering both the component prime and boost immunisations via the airway is not well known. Here we investigate delivery of both the BCG prime and adenovirus boost vaccination via the airway in a murine model, and demonstrate this approach may be able to improve the protective outcome over parenteral prime/airway boost. Intravascular staining of T cells in the lung revealed that the airway prime regimen induced more antigen-specific multifunctional CD4 and CD8 T cells to the lung parenchyma prior to challenge and indicated the route of both prime and boost to be critical to the location of induced resident T cells in the lung. Further, in the absence of a defined phenotype of vaccine-induced protection to tuberculosis; the magnitude and phenotype of vaccine-specific T cells in the parenchyma of the lung may provide insights into potential correlates of immunity.
Subject terms: Immunology, Diseases, Medical research
Introduction
Tuberculosis (TB) currently claims an estimated 1.5 million lives each year and is the leading cause of mortality by an infectious disease, overtaking HIV in 20151. Mycobacterium bovis bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) remains the only available vaccine against TB and whilst it provides valuable protection against severe childhood forms of TB2,3; meta-analyses of multiple clinical trials indicate widely variable efficacy ranging from 0 to 80%4. These data and the continued high burden of TB leads to inevitable questioning of its use, despite being the most widely used human vaccine globally. Consequently, there is a substantial ongoing research effort to identify improved TB vaccines. Nonetheless, due to these aforementioned benefits and recent evidence there may be non-specific protection against other infections5; it is unlikely to be withdrawn in the near future, and an improved TB vaccine strategy will likely include BCG6. However, after a century of use, we still understand little of the mechanisms which underpin BCG-induced protective immunity. Such knowledge could identify a robust correlate of immunity against TB, still urgently required to help facilitate the rational design of an improved vaccine.
Promising strategies for improved vaccines utilising BCG include boosting immunity with heterologous vaccines, with viral vectors used in several leading approaches7–11. Delivery of viral-vectored boosts to the airway mucosa, to align with the natural route of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection, induces superior protective efficacy compared to parenteral delivery in many reports9,11,12. Numerous studies demonstrate that airway delivery of BCG improves protective efficacy over standard parenteral injection13–19, but surprisingly, administration of both prime and heterologous boost by the airway has been much less investigated. To date, this approach has only been reported in promising data from a single study using a BCG-Modified Vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) prime-boost vaccination12.
Intravascular staining (IVS) to discriminate vascular associated cells in live animals has brought a new dimension to cellular immune analyses, allowing concurrent identification of cell phenotype and function together with location within an organ. This technique has identified lymphocyte populations in numerous non-lymphoid tissues including the lung, and facilitated the discovery of tissue-resident memory T cells20; implicated in immunity to infectious diseases at both barrier and non-barrier tissues21,22.
IVS has shown CD4 T cells induced by Mtb infection within the lung parenchyma provide optimal protection compared to CD4 T cells in lung vasculature23,24. Tissue-resident T cells in the lung induced by TB vaccines are not yet well described25–27. We have shown that intradermal BCG vaccination induces antigen-specific CD4 T cells in the lung28, but few reside in the lung parenchyma29.
We hypothesised that delivering the BCG prime immunisation via an airway route, rather than parenterally, could further enhance the protective capacity induced by an airway delivered viral vectored boost. Using a murine model, combining a BCG prime-adenovirus boost vaccine30 with IVS, we sought to determine whether direct immunisation of the lung mucosa, enhanced tissue-resident immunity within the lung and thus protective immunity to TB challenge.
Here, we demonstrate that compared to parenteral priming, airway delivered BCG induced higher frequencies of antigen-specific multifunctional CD4 and CD8 T cells residing in the lung parenchyma. These observations provide insights into potential correlates of immunity.
Results
Airway BCG priming enhances lung parenchymal CD4 T cell responses to boost vaccination
To assess the impact of varying the route of the BCG prime delivery in a BCG prime/boost regimen, (schedule shown in Fig. 1), mice were vaccinated with BCG, by the intradermal or airway (intranasal) route. Six weeks later, they received a single adenovirus boost via the airway. Four weeks after the boost, CD45+ vascular cells were stained in vivo; and after isolation and stimulation, antigen-specific vascular and parenchymal spleen and lung cells measured using flow cytometry (gating strategy illustrated in Supplementary Fig. S1 online). Antigen-specific cells (termed cytokine+) were identified producing any combination of IFN-γ, IL-2, TNF-α and IL-17.
In the spleen (Fig. 2A), intradermal BCG alone induced a significant frequency of cytokine+ antigen-specific CD4 T cells (0.6%, p < 0.001 vs. Control). Regardless of the priming route, in animals receiving prime/boost vaccinations these responses were ~ 50% lower (both 0.3%, p < 0.05) compared to BCG only.
In the whole lung (Fig. 2B), intradermal BCG prime administration of the prime/boost vaccination did not enhance cytokine+ CD4 T cell responses over BCG alone (1.3% vs 1%, p < 0.05 vs. Control). In contrast, when the BCG prime immunisation was delivered by airway administration, whole lung cytokine+ responses were increased twofold (2.5%; p < 0.01 vs. intradermal BCG/Ad).
IVS allowed clear discrimination of vascular/parenchymal lung T cells; vascular-associated cells staining positive for CD45, whilst tissue-resident parenchymal cells remaining unstained20 (representative sample Fig. 2C).
Analysis of cytokine+ CD4 T cells derived from these compartments of the lung revealed distinct response patterns to varying the route of BCG prime vaccinations (Fig. 2D). Lung vascular cell responses resembled the spleen; intradermal BCG alone induced greater cytokine+ cell frequencies than prime/boost (1.3%, p < 0.01 vs. Control). In contrast, cells derived from the lung parenchyma displayed a different response pattern; intradermal BCG alone induced negligible cytokine+ frequencies (0.04%), increasing tenfold when boosted (0.5%). Most strikingly, varying the BCG prime route to the airway increased the immunogenicity of the boost vaccine 35-fold with parenchymal cytokine+ responses representing 1.4% of total CD4 T cells within the lung (p < 0.0001 vs. all groups). To confirm these cell frequencies represented real changes in cell populations within the lung, actual cell numbers were calculated, confirming the same response pattern (Fig. 2E).
Comprehensive analysis stratified the individual subsets of cytokine+ CD4 T cells producing the different simultaneous combinations of IFN-γ, IL-2 and TNF-α (see Supplementary Fig. S2 online). Although analysed, no significant IL-17+ cell population was detected (data not shown). These data, summarised in Fig. 3A, indicate significantly predominant multifunctional CD4 T cells of: IFN-γ+IL-2+TNF-α+, IFN-γ+TNF-α+ or IL-2+TNF-α+ functional phenotypes. Individual functional subsets did not associate with specific tissue compartments, or immunisation regimens.
Airway BCG priming enhances both systemic and lung parenchymal CD8 T cell responses to boost vaccination
Immunisation with intradermal BCG alone failed to induce significant systemic (spleen) antigen-specific cytokine+ CD8 T cells, with responses remaining at background levels (0.09% total spleen CD8, Fig. 4A). In contrast, boosting intradermal BCG enhanced systemic CD8 T cell responses 30 fold (2.7% total spleen CD8). However, delivering the BCG prime immunisation by airway; this response was further increased to almost 100 fold (93 fold, 8.4% total spleen CD8, p < 0.01).
When viewed as a whole organ, antigen-specific CD8 T cells derived from the lung (Fig. 4B) mirrored that of the spleen. Responses to intradermal BCG alone were minimal (0.18% of lung CD8 T cells), but enhanced tenfold by boosting (2.1% of lung CD8 T cells) and with an order of magnitude increase (72 fold) when BCG prime was delivered via the airway (13% of lung CD8 T cells, p < 0.01).
Compartmentalising lung CD8 T cells by IVS staining revealed the background level response induced by BCG alone was lung vasculature derived (0.17% of total lung CD8 T cells; Fig. 4D). In contrast to the spleen, lung vascular cytokine+ CD8 T cell responses were only significantly boosted (~ sixfold) when the BCG prime was delivered via the airway (1.7%, p < 0.05, Fig. 4D). Analyses of the lung parenchyma-derived cells revealed, that whilst BCG alone failed to induce significant responses (0.01% total lung CD8 T cells), the pattern of responses to both boosting BCG and varying the route of BCG in the prime/boost reflected the response pattern observed in the whole lung. Intradermal BCG prime of the boost induced a 20 fold increase in the parenchymal responses (2% total lung CD8 T cells), while varying the BCG prime route to airway, significantly increased this response 120 fold (12% total lung CD8 T cells, p < 0.05). These frequency changes were confirmed by cell numbers (Fig. 4E).
CD8 T cell functional subset stratification (Fig. 3B and Supplementary Fig. S3 online) indicate CD8 T cell responses differed from CD4 T cells with significant populations of bifunctional IFN-γ+TNF-α+ cells predominating. Functional subsets were not specific to the tissue location, and while only the BCG prime/boost vaccination regimens induced multifunctional CD8 T cells, the route of BCG priming did not affect this stratification.
Airway BCG priming confers a more sustained protective capacity to the boost vaccination
In order to assess the influence of administering the BCG prime via the airway on protective efficacy, one month after the last vaccination equivalent groups of mice were also challenged with ~ 200 CFU of M. bovis by the intranasal route. Bacterial burden in the spleen and lungs was then assessed both at 4 and 8 weeks later. The result for the lungs is illustrated in Fig. 5 and those for the spleen in Supplementary Fig. S4 online.
At 4 weeks post-challenge the M. bovis burden in control mice was 6.3 Log10 CFU in the lungs and 3.8 Log10 CFU in the spleen. Intradermal BCG alone induced protection of 2.1 Log10 CFU in the lungs (p < 0.0001 vs. Control) and 1.5 Log10 CFU in the spleen (p < 0.05 vs. Control). Intradermal BCG prime administration of the prime/boost vaccination led to an increase in this protection by a further 1.6 Log10 in the lungs (p < 0.001 vs. intradermal BCG) and 0.8 Log10 CFU in spleen (not statistically significant vs. intradermal BCG). When the BCG prime immunisation was delivered by airway administration it conveyed equivalent increases in protection over intradermal BCG alone: 1.1 Log10 CFU in the lungs (p < 0.01 vs. Intradermal BCG) and 1.1 Log10 CFU in spleen (p < 0.05 vs. Intradermal BCG). Of note, the group which received a Control/Ad did exhibit a protective effect approaching that of Intradermal BCG alone: of 1.6 Log10 CFU in the lungs (p < 0.001 vs. Control) and 0.6 Log10 CFU in spleen (not statistically significant vs. Control).
At 8 weeks post-challenge, the bacterial burden in control mice remained at 6.3 Log10 CFU in the lungs, but had increased to 5.4 Log10 CFU in the spleen. The protection afforded by intradermal BCG alone had decreased to 0.9 Log10 CFU in the lungs (p < 0.05 vs. Control) and had remained at 1.5 Log10 CFU in the spleen (p < 0.001 vs. Control). The added protection afforded by both the prime/boost vaccinations had increased to 1.5 Log10 CFU in the spleen (p < 0.01 vs. Intradermal BCG). However, in the lungs, intradermal administration of the BCG prime no longer offered a protective advantage over intradermal BCG alone (0.2 Log10 CFU, p = 0.9 vs. intradermal BCG), whilst in contrast using airway administration there remained a discernible reduction in bacterial burden, (0.7 Log10 CFU, p = 0.0517 vs. intradermal BCG).
Airway BCG priming of the boost vaccination displays an increased inflammatory reaction to challenge
In addition to the assessment of bacterial burden, samples of lung tissue from the same animals were also taken for histopathological analysis to assess the tissue pathology induced by the challenge. Lung tissue sections were assessed for granulomatous inflammation visualised with Haematoxylin and Eosin (H & E) staining. Quantitative analysis of the mean score of the percentage area exhibiting this inflammation revealed no differences between vaccine regimen groups at 4 weeks post-challenge (data not shown). Differences were apparent at 8 weeks post-challenge (Fig. 6), although not statistically significant. The mean pathology score in the lung sections from mice in the Control (1.6) and Control/Ad (1.5) regimens were greater compared to those which received intradermal BCG alone (0.3). Mice which received intradermal BCG prime administration of the boost vaccination had similarly deceased pathology score (0.1), but interestingly, those which were primed by airway administration displayed a mean pathology score closer to that observed in the two control regimens (1.1). In nearly all animals, granulomatous inflammation was accompanied by the presence of mycobacteria observed as acid-fast bacilli (data not shown).
Increased PD-1 expression associates with cytokine+ T cells from the lung parenchyma
Defined predictors of protection are not available for TB vaccines, but lung tissue-resident cells may play a role. These responses are not yet well understood, model studies of Mtb infection31 propose a role for the inhibitory receptor, programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) in protective responses against TB within the lung. To investigate this in the context of enhanced protection and further characterise the antigen-specific parenchymal T cells associated with that protection, expression of PD-1 was examined on the cytokine+ CD4 and CD8 T cells derived from the two lung compartments. This was carried out prior to challenge, concurrently with the analysis described for Figs. 2 and 4. There was no detectable association of the level of PD-1 expression by cytokine+ cells between the different vaccine regimens and expression of PD-1 was not unique to any specific cytokine producing cell subset (data not shown). Figure 7A illustrates the differential expression of PD-1 by compartmentalised lung cytokine+ CD4 T cells derived from mice which received the airway BCG prime. Comparison of the PD-1 staining intensity on these cells subdivided by the two compartments (Fig. 7B,C) revealed that for both cytokine+ CD4 and CD8 T cells the median fluorescence intensity (MFI) of PD-1 was on average 1.6 fold (p < 0.0001) and 1.7 fold (p < 0.001) greater, respectively, on those derived from the lung parenchyma compared to the vasculature, supporting its association with tissue-resident cells.
Discussion
The need for a new TB vaccine is urgent and leading strategies proceeding into clinical trials are BCG prime—heterologous boost regimens. In experimental studies, mucosal delivery via the airway has demonstrated greater efficacy than parenteral delivery. This is the case when BCG13–19 or viral vectors32–34 are used alone and also when viral vectors are used to boost a parenteral BCG immunisation9,11,12. Here, we investigated the effect of delivering both the BCG prime, and adenoviral boost vaccination via the airway in a murine model of M. bovis challenge. Delivery of prime via the airway (intranasal) induced greater migration of antigen-specific multifunctional CD4 and CD8 T cells into the lung parenchyma than the parenteral (intradermal) route, and displayed an indication that it could convey an improved protective outcome.
Despite sustained research in this area, the protective immune response against TB is still not well understood. It is clear that the primary protective immune response requires antigen-specific CD4 T cells producing IFN-γ (reviewed in35). This may support a CD8 T cell response, which is required for optimal protection36, however, the exact role of CD8 T cells is not well established. Studies of vaccination-induced CD8 T cells report that superior protection using viral vectored boosting associates with CD8 T cell responses11,30,37. Therefore, higher frequencies of both antigen-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells appear to associate with better protection. Multifunctional antigen-specific T cells are also potential correlates of vaccine mediated protection38 and our previous work using M. bovis challenge models support this28,39. However, such generalised measurements do not offer a robust correlate of protection40 and require increased granularity.
We have previously shown parenteral (intradermal) BCG immunisation induces a persistent population of antigen-specific CD4 T cells in the lungs of mice28 and others provide evidence that these cells associated with protection41. This has also been shown for CD8 T cells resident in the lung induced by adenoviral vaccination, which appear to proliferate in situ42. The location of antigen-specific T cells at the site of the challenge infection has been proposed as a key element in vaccine induced protection against TB, by accelerating initial responses to infection43. Horvath et al. report that BCG-induced lung tissue-resident (likely predominantly vascular) CD4 T cells exhibit delayed proliferation, which can be ameliorated by prior residence in the airways, improving protective outcome44. This infers that primed antigen-specific T cells located as close as possible to the lung airway may be able to offer an increased protective capacity.
The development of IVS allowed discrimination of tissue-resident cells into those which associate with the vasculature and the parenchyma20. Antigen-specific lung parenchymal CD4 T cells are more protective than lung vascular cells in both Mtb23,24 and respiratory virus infection models45. This supports the hypothesis that vaccination which can induce antigen-specific T cells in the lung parenchyma may be more protective to respiratory infection. Protection by a parenteral subunit TB vaccination has associated with parenchymal multifunctional CD4 T cells induced post-challenge25,26. Few studies have localised T cells by IVS in the context of TB vaccination prior to challenge. The majority of antigen-specific T cells isolated from whole lung are typically resident in the lung vasculature rather than the parenchyma46, as was confirmed for parenteral BCG vaccinates in the current study and a recent publication29. This more systemically distributed response, as observed in the spleen, was driven to the lung parenchyma with our adenoviral boost and amplified by airway priming.
Polarisation of antigen-specific responses toward CD8 T cells is a hallmark of virally vectored vaccines. Those induced in the lung lumen by an airway, but not parenteral, adenoviral TB vaccine is associated with its superior protective effect34,42. As the frequency of these cells correlates with those in the lung parenchyma27, the compartments are likely closely associated. This is supported by the ability of airway delivered BCG to induce antigen-specific CD4 T cells in both the lung tissue parenchyma and the airway lumen19.
In the current study, at 4 week post-challenge airway prime/boost did not increase protection over that provided by parenteral prime/boost, although both approaches were significantly better than BCG alone. Evaluation at 8 weeks post-challenge expands the window in which enhanced protection can be observed, as the level of protection induced by parenteral BCG wanes from 4 to 8 weeks post-challenge, as previously reported in Mtb47,48 and M. bovis49 challenge models. We observed that a reduction in bacterial burden (better than BCG alone) was more evident in the airway primed group, than the parenteral primed group. Although this was not quite statistically significant (p = 0.0517), we believe these data are compelling when viewed alongside the immunological parameters measured. To further support this finding, further experimentation employing more prolonged challenge or survival experiments could provide valuable insight. The equivalent level of protection for both boost regimens in the spleen at 8 weeks post-challenge may indicate parenteral BCG priming protects against bacterial dissemination to a degree which cannot be improved upon by airway BCG priming, observed within the parameters of our model. In previous work, we have observed airway BCG alone is no better than parenteral BCG in the spleen at 4 weeks post-challenge19.
In our model we employ challenge infection with M. bovis. With its high degree of genetic homology to Mtb50, a broader host range and greater virulence51,52 (and unpublished data), it could provide a useful surrogate for laboratory strains of Mtb in murine models. To clarify this, it would be highly informative to directly compare the vaccine-induced protection provided by low dose aerosol challenge of mice with these two mycobacterial species.
Lung histopathology indicated that at 8 weeks post-challenge there was an increased trend for granulomatous inflammation in groups primed via the airway compared to the parenteral route. Although airway delivery of BCG alone is able to directly cause a measurable degree of such lung pathology53,54, that observed in this study appeared to be associated only in response to challenge as was not present at 4 weeks post-challenge, when BCG presence in the lung would be expected to be higher. This may indicate enhanced immune responses, or more probable, a localised inflammatory environment induced by BCG bacilli. Further experimentation may clarify if pathology is maintained below that of unprotected control animals. In agreement, others have observed post-Mtb challenge, animals receiving airway delivered BCG, displayed increased lung pathology compared to parenteral BCG54, highlighting the importance of evaluating vaccine safety in addition to efficacy and immunogenicity.
ICS staining and analyses reveal distinct functional phenotypes for cells which associate with enhanced protection, although it must be stressed, not a direct correlate. Our data demonstrate, BCG vaccination by any route induces antigen-specific multifunctional CD4 T cell (IFN-γ+IL-2+TNF-α+, IFN-γ+TNF-α+ or IL-2+TNF-α+) effector/effector memory phenotypes as described previously28,39. Antigen-specific CD8 T cells were only induced by regimens including adenovirus vaccination; and were less multifunctional (IFN-γ+TNF-α+, IFN-γ+ and TNF-α+), similar to that observed in our previous work30, although at a much higher frequency.
We observed no correlation between specific lung location and T cell functional phenotype in any vaccine regimen. In contrast, Mtb infection induces specific CD4 T cell populations in the lung parenchyma with fewer IFN-γ producing cells23. In contrast to our use of in vitro antigen stimulation, this study utilised MHC Class II tetramers to identify antigen-specific cells which requires the use of direct ex vivo ICS staining and data cannot be directly compared.
We were unable to undertake more comprehensive cell surface phenotyping in combination with ICS and IVS, but did measure expression of the immune checkpoint molecule PD-1 on tissue-resident antigen-specific T cells. Expression of PD-1 was enhanced on lung parenchyma resident cytokine+ CD4 and CD8 T cells, compared to vascular associated cells, in agreement with other reports23,24,31. PD-1 expression on tissue-resident cells during Mtb infection may regulate proliferative ability55, and by downregulating IFN-γ induced pathology, protect from lethal disease24,31, although its role in vaccination-induced protection in not yet established. The observed lower magnitude in changes to PD-1 expression, as reported elsewhere56, may represent differences between infection and vaccination. In an effort to discover both the mechanisms and predictors of vaccine mediated protection, further concurrent analyses of other markers associated with parenchymal T cells, such as CXCR323,27, would also be informative.
The antigen-specific lung parenchymal T cells in our study are likely to represent both effector and/or effector memory T cells29, but based solely upon location in the lung parenchyma, we are as yet unable to confirm whether they represent canonical tissue-resident memory T cells (TRM)21 and merits further investigation in TB vaccine models.
Live BCG bacilli are able to persist in vaccinated mice for at least 18 months in the secondary lymphoid organs with little lung involvement after parenteral BCG immunisation28. It is therefore possible BCG administered by the airway may cause similar persistence in the lung tissue53,54 and thus influence antigen-specific T cells in the lung parenchyma via localised inflammatory environments54. Whether this impacts immune protection merits further investigation in vaccine studies using BCG. It is formally possible that such BCG bacilli within the lungs could lead to underestimation of protective efficacy by adding to the mycobacterial burden. To rule this out, such techniques as genetic sequence analysis of recovered bacilli or use of selective culture media would be worthwhile in future studies.
Adenoviral vaccination alone did provide significant protection at 4 weeks post-challenge, although not to the extent described by others11,47,57. There are several potential reasons for this: differences in antigens (Ag85a vs. TB10.4); vaccine preparation; or the challenge (M. bovis vs. Mtb). This protection was not associated with substantial antigen-specific T cell responses, however the small frequency of CD4 T cells in the lung parenchyma and CD8 T cells in the spleen may play a role.
It should be noted, our study was not designed to identify superior vaccine candidates, but to evaluate the potential of an airway prime—airway boost vaccination regimen and investigate immune mechanisms in a ‘better than BCG’ scenario. Our data demonstrate that this approach could offer an advantage over parenteral BCG prime due to the induction of increased frequencies of antigen-specific CD4/8 T cells located specifically in the lung parenchyma, as such cells have been identified to have an increased protective capacity against Mtb and could play a significant role. Therefore, identifying lung compartment location of highly focussed T cell responses (e.g. multifunctional CD4/8 T cells with downregulated inhibitory functions) is a promising approach. It identifies a strategy whereby combining: the specific location of vaccination-induced T cells; surface and functional phenotype mapping; and ‘better than BCG alone’ vaccination regimens which increase the frequency of such cells in the lung parenchyma, may identify key responses to further improve rational vaccine design against TB.
Materials and methods
Ethics
All animal work was carried out in accordance with the UK Animal (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986; under appropriate licences. The study protocol was approved by the APHA Animal Use Ethics Committee (UK PCD number 70/6905).
Animals
Female BALB/c mice were obtained from SPF facilities at Charles River UK Ltd. and used at 8 weeks of age. All animals were housed in appropriate Advisory Committee on Dangerous Pathogens (ACDP) Containment Level 3 (equivalent to BSL3) facilities at APHA, according to the Code of Practice for the Housing and Care of Animals Bred, Supplied or Used for Scientific Purposes58. All animals were randomly assigned to treatment groups in appropriate numbers and housed and cared for, including during the challenge period, as previously described30.
Mycobacteria, mycobacterial enumeration, viral vectors and antigens
The vaccination strain was the human vaccine M. bovis BCG Danish 1331, reconstituted as per manufacturer’s instructions (SSI, Copenhagen, Denmark) in Sauton diluent (SSI) supplied with the original vaccine. Expression of TB10.4 protein in a type 5 Ad was undertaken as previously described30 and prepared for immunisation in PBS.
M. bovis strain AF2122/97 was used for all challenge experiments as described previously39.
Two immunodominant peptides (Pepscan, Lelystad, The Netherlands), [SSTHEANTMAMMARDT] and [AGYAGTLQSLGAEIAV] of the TB10.4 protein were used for in vitro antigen stimulations as these were previously found to contain the only CD4 and CD8 epitopes induced in this model, respectively30.
Mycobacteria were enumerated in aseptically removed spleen and lungs from animals after euthanasia. Organs were homogenised, serially diluted and plated out onto modified Middlebrook 7H11 agar medium as previously described59, except that homogenisation was carried out in 1 ml volumes utilising a Precellys 24 and CK28-R tubes (Bertin Instruments, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France). Bacterial colonies were enumerated 4 weeks later following incubation at 37 °C.
Immunisation and challenge
There were five separate treatment groups of mice: Control (placebo); Intradermal BCG; Intradermal BCG/Ad; Airway BCG/Ad; and Control/Ad. Groups of mice were immunised with a single injection (50 µl) containing 2 × 105 CFU of Intradermal BCG in the base of the tail, or the same dose of BCG (or diluent only placebo) in 25 µl intranasally (i.n.). We refer to this i.n. delivery as airway, as our previous data demonstrated that 75% of inoculum delivered to the nares entered the lungs49. Six weeks later corresponding groups of Control (placebo) or BCG immunised mice were boosted once, with 5 × 107 PFU (25 µl) of Ad-TB10.4 delivered i.n.. Four weeks later, six mice per group were euthanised for immunological analyses, and all remaining mice were challenged with ~ 200 CFU M. bovis i.n. as previously described49. At both 4 and 8 weeks post-challenge, the bacterial loads in the spleen and lungs of equivalent groups of mice were enumerated as previously described above. The right lung post-caval lobe was first separated for histopathological analysis. All i.n. inoculations were conducted under brief general anaesthesia with Isofluorane.
Cell isolation and stimulation
Immediately prior to euthanisation by cervical dislocation, 0.075 µg of anti-CD45 – PE (clone: 30-F11, BioLegend, London, UK) was delivered intravenously (i.v.) in 100 µl for exclusive in vivo staining of intravascular cells. Following euthanasia, spleens and lungs were aseptically removed and cells prepared as previously described39, except in order to prevent ex vivo staining, the lungs were immediately homogenised with a GentleMACS dissociator (Miltenyi Biotec, Bisley, UK) and the homogenate diluted to 20 ml. Following washing (300 g/8min), all cells were re-suspended at 1 × 107/ml for assays. Cells were cultured with a pool of both TB10.4 peptide antigens (see above) each at a final concentration of 2 µg/ml for all assays in addition to 1ug/ml anti-CD28 (clone: 37.51, BD Biosciences, Oxford, UK).
Flow cytometry
For intracellular staining (ICS), cells were cultured with the above antigen stimulation as previously described39. Subsequently, they were surface stained with pre-titrated antibodies: CD4-APC-H7 (clone: GK1.5, BD Biosciences); CD90.2—efluor450 (clone: 53-2.1) ; CD19—Biotin (clone: eBio1D3); CD16/32—Biotin (clone: 93, Life Technologies, Paisley, UK); PD-1—FITC (clone: 29F.1A12) ; CD8—Alexa Fluor 700 (clone: 53-6.7), CD44—Brilliant Violet (BV) 785 (clone: IM7) and Zombie Aqua Fixable Viability Dye (‘Zaqua’); followed by Streptavidin—BD Horizon BV711 (BD Biosciences). Subsequently, cells were washed, fixed/permeabilised and stained by ICS with IFN-γ—PE-Cy7 (clone: XMG1.2); IL-2—APC (clone: JES6-5H4); IL-17a—BV605 (clone: TC11-18H10.1); and TNF-α—PerCP-Cy5.5 (clone: MP6-XT22, BD Biosciences) as previously described39. All antibody conjugates/dyes were purchased from Biolegend except where stated.
Cells were analysed immediately after final staining. Data were acquired using a SORP LSR Fortessa (BD Bioscience) (utilizing a 532 nm laser for PE and PE-Cy7) and analyzed on Flowjo v.10.1 (BD Bioscience) software. All analyses were gated on a minimum of 100,000 live lymphocytes. Compensation was performed using UltraComp eBeads (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Fluorescence minus one (FMO) controls were used to set gates for cytokine analyses.
Histopathological analysis
Lung tissue samples were fixed in 4% buffered formalin solution, routinely processed and embedded in paraffin wax for histopathological studies. Paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were sectioned at 4 μm thickness and stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H & E). A blind histopathologic evaluation was carried out on H & E stained sections by a qualified pathologist. Manual scoring based on the approximate percentage of lung area affected by granulomatous inflammation was carried out as follows: 0% (0); < 5% (1); 5–20% (2); 21–40% (3); 41–60% (4); 61–80% (5); > 80% (6). Serial sections were also stained by the conventional Ziehl–Neelsen staining method in order to confirm the presence of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) in the pulmonary granulomatous lesions.
Statistical analysis
Bacterial burden data were analysed by 1-way ANOVA and ICS by 2-way ANOVA, all with Tukey’s post-hoc test. Prior to analysis, mycobacterial counts were log10 transformed (Y = log[Y]) and expressed as log10/organ. PD-1 expression was analysed using a two-tailed paired t-test. Histopathological data were analysed by Kruskal–Wallis test. Statistical analyses were carried out using GraphPad Prism 7 software (GraphPad, USA). Differences with a p < 0.05 were considered significant and denoted with *, p < 0.01 with **, p < 0.001 with *** and p < 0.0001 with ****.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We are especially grateful for the excellent services provided by the APHA Animal Services Unit. This work was funded by the bovine TB research budget held and administered centrally by Defra on behalf of England, Scotland and Wales (www.defra.gov.uk).
Author contributions
P.J.H. conceived and designed the research. D.A.K., M.C.G.P. and N.C.B. performed the mouse model and immunology experiments. D.A.K., M.C.G.P. and P.J.H. performed the challenge and bacteriology experiments. J.S. and P.J.S.C. designed, performed and analysed the histopathology experiments. D.A.K. analysed the flow cytometry and bacteriology data and prepared the figures. D.A.K. and P.J.H. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript and provided feedback.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-75734-x.
References
- 1.W.H.O. World Health Organization Global Tuberculosis Reporthttps://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/en/ (2019).
- 2.Trunz BB, Fine P, Dye C. Effect of BCG vaccination on childhood tuberculous meningitis and miliary tuberculosis worldwide: a meta-analysis and assessment of cost-effectiveness. Lancet. 2006;367:1173–1180. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68507-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Roy A, et al. Effect of BCG vaccination against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in children: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ (Clin. Res. Ed.) 2014;349:g4643. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fine PE. Variation in protection by BCG: implications of and for heterologous immunity. Lancet. 1995;346:1339–1345. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)92348-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jensen KJ, et al. Heterologous immunological effects of early BCG vaccination in low-birth-weight infants in Guinea-Bissau: a randomized-controlled trial. J Infect Dis. 2015;211:956–967. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.McShane H, et al. BCG: myths, realities, and the need for alternative vaccine strategies. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2012;92:283–288. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2011.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chen Z, et al. Efficacy of parainfluenza virus 5 (PIV5)-based tuberculosis vaccines in mice. Vaccine. 2015;33:7217–7224. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.10.124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hu Z, et al. Sendai virus mucosal vaccination establishes lung-resident memory CD8 T cell immunity and boosts BCG-primed protection against TB in mice. Mol. Ther. 2017;25:1222–1233. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.02.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Forbes EK, et al. Multifunctional, high-level cytokine-producing Th1 cells in the lung, but not spleen, correlate with protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis aerosol challenge in mice. J. Immunol. 2008;181:4955–4964. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.7.4955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Stylianou E, et al. Improvement of BCG protective efficacy with a novel chimpanzee adenovirus and a modified vaccinia Ankara virus both expressing Ag85A. Vaccine. 2015;33:6800–6808. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.10.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Santosuosso M, McCormick S, Zhang X, Zganiacz A, Xing Z. Intranasal boosting with an adenovirus-vectored vaccine markedly enhances protection by parenteral Mycobacterium bovis BCG immunization against pulmonary tuberculosis. Infect. Immun. 2006;74:4634–4643. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00517-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Goonetilleke NP, et al. Enhanced immunogenicity and protective efficacy against Mycobacterium tuberculosis of bacille Calmette-Guerin vaccine using mucosal administration and boosting with a recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara. J. Immunol. 2003;171:1602–1609. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.3.1602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Derrick SC, Kolibab K, Yang A, Morris SL. Intranasal administration of Mycobacterium bovis BCG induces superior protection against aerosol infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis in mice. Clin. Vac. Immunol. 2014;21:1443–1451. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00394-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Perdomo C, et al. Mucosal BCG vaccination induces protective lung-resident memory T cell populations against tuberculosis. mBio. 2016 doi: 10.1128/mBio.01686-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Giri PK, Verma I, Khuller GK. Protective efficacy of intranasal vaccination with Mycobacterium bovis BCG against airway Mycobacterium tuberculosis challenge in mice. J. Infect. 2006;53:350–356. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2005.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Aguilo N, et al. Pulmonary but not subcutaneous delivery of BCG vaccine confers protection to tuberculosis-susceptible mice by an interleukin 17-dependent mechanism. J. Infect. Dis. 2016;213:831–839. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiv503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Aguilo N, et al. Pulmonary Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccination confers dose-dependent superior protection compared to that of subcutaneous vaccination. Clin. Vac. Immunol. 2014;21:594–597. doi: 10.1128/cvi.00700-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chen L, Wang J, Zganiacz A, Xing Z. Single intranasal mucosal Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccination confers improved protection compared to subcutaneous vaccination against pulmonary tuberculosis. Infect. Immun. 2004;72:238–246. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.1.238-246.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bull NC, et al. Enhanced protection conferred by mucosal BCG vaccination associates with presence of antigen-specific lung tissue-resident PD-1(+) KLRG1(-) CD4(+) T cells. Mucosal. Immunol. 2019;12:555–564. doi: 10.1038/s41385-018-0109-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Anderson KG, et al. Intravascular staining for discrimination of vascular and tissue leukocytes. Nat. Protoc. 2014;9:209–222. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mueller SN, Mackay LK. Tissue-resident memory T cells: local specialists in immune defence. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2016;16:79–89. doi: 10.1038/nri.2015.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Takamura S. Niches for the Long-Term Maintenance of Tissue-Resident Memory T Cells. Frontiers in immunology. 2018;9:1214. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sakai S, et al. Cutting edge: control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection by a subset of lung parenchyma-homing CD4 T cells. J. Immunol. 2014;192:2965–2969. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1400019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Moguche AO, et al. ICOS and Bcl6-dependent pathways maintain a CD4 T cell population with memory-like properties during tuberculosis. J. Exp. Med. 2015;212:715–728. doi: 10.1084/jem.20141518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Woodworth JS, et al. Subunit vaccine H56/CAF01 induces a population of circulating CD4 T cells that traffic into the Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected lung. Mucosal. Immunol. 2017;10:555–564. doi: 10.1038/mi.2016.70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lindenstrom T, et al. T cells primed by live mycobacteria versus a tuberculosis subunit vaccine exhibit distinct functional properties. EBioMedicine. 2018;27:27–39. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jeyanathan M, et al. CXCR3 signaling is required for restricted homing of parenteral tuberculosis vaccine-induced T cells to both the lung parenchyma and airway. J. Immunol. 2017;199:2555–2569. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1700382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kaveh DA, Garcia-Pelayo MC, Hogarth PJ. Persistent BCG bacilli perpetuate CD4 T effector memory and optimal protection against tuberculosis. Vaccine. 2014;32:6911–6918. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.10.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bull NC, et al. Induction and maintenance of a phenotypically heterogeneous lung tissue-resident CD4(+) T cell population following BCG immunisation. Vaccine. 2018;36:5625–5635. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.07.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kaveh DA, et al. Parenteral adenoviral boost enhances BCG induced protection, but not long term survival in a murine model of bovine TB. Vaccine. 2016;34:4003–4011. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.06.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sakai S, et al. CD4 T cell-derived IFN-gamma plays a minimal role in control of pulmonary Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and must be actively repressed by PD-1 to prevent lethal disease. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12:e1005667. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wang J, et al. Single mucosal, but not parenteral, immunization with recombinant adenoviral-based vaccine provides potent protection from pulmonary tuberculosis. J. Immunol. 2004;173:6357–6365. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.10.6357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Beverley P, et al. Environmental effects on protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis after immunization with Ad85A. Vaccine. 2013;31:1086–1093. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.12.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Santosuosso M, et al. Mechanisms of mucosal and parenteral tuberculosis vaccinations: adenoviral-based mucosal immunization preferentially elicits sustained accumulation of immune protective CD4 and CD8 T cells within the airway lumen. J. Immunol. 2005;174:7986–7994. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.12.7986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sia JK, Rengarajan J. Immunology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infections. Microbiol. Spectrum. 2019 doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0022-2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bold TD, Ernst JD. CD4+ T cell-dependent IFN-gamma production by CD8+ effector T cells in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. J Immunol. 2012;189:2530–2536. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1200994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Elvang T, et al. CD4 and CD8 T cell responses to the M. tuberculosis Ag85B-TB10.4 promoted by adjuvanted subunit, adenovector or heterologous prime boost vaccination. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e5139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Seder RA, Darrah PA, Roederer M. T-cell quality in memory and protection: implications for vaccine design. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2008;8:247–258. doi: 10.1038/nri2274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kaveh DA, Bachy VS, Hewinson RG, Hogarth PJ. Systemic BCG immunization induces persistent lung mucosal multifunctional CD4 T(EM) cells which expand following virulent mycobacterial challenge. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e21566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Abebe F. Is interferon-gamma the right marker for bacille Calmette-Guerin-induced immune protection? The missing link in our understanding of tuberculosis immunology. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2012;169:213–219. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2012.04614.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Connor LM, et al. A key role for lung-resident memory lymphocytes in protective immune responses after BCG vaccination. Eur. J. Immunol. 2010;40:2482–2492. doi: 10.1002/eji.200940279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Jeyanathan M, et al. Murine airway luminal antituberculosis memory CD8 T cells by mucosal immunization are maintained via antigen-driven in situ proliferation, independent of peripheral T cell recruitment. Am. J. Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;181:862–872. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200910-1583OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Cooper AM. Cell-mediated immune responses in tuberculosis. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2009;27:393–422. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Horvath CN, Shaler CR, Jeyanathan M, Zganiacz A, Xing Z. Mechanisms of delayed anti-tuberculosis protection in the lung of parenteral BCG-vaccinated hosts: a critical role of airway luminal T cells. Mucosal. Immunol. 2012;5:420–431. doi: 10.1038/mi.2012.19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Gilchuk P, et al. A distinct lung-interstitium-resident memory CD8(+) T cell subset confers enhanced protection to lower respiratory tract infection. Cell Rep. 2016;16:1800–1809. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.07.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Anderson KG, et al. Cutting edge: intravascular staining redefines lung CD8 T cell responses. J. Immunol. 2012;189:2702–2706. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mu J, et al. Immunization with a bivalent adenovirus-vectored tuberculosis vaccine provides markedly improved protection over its monovalent counterpart against pulmonary tuberculosis. Mol. Ther. 2009;17:1093–1100. doi: 10.1038/mt.2009.60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Jeon BY, et al. Mycobacterium bovis BCG immunization induces protective immunity against nine different Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains in mice. Infect. Immun. 2008;76:5173–5180. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00019-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Logan KE, Gavier-Widen D, Hewinson RG, Hogarth PJ. Development of a Mycobacterium bovis intranasal challenge model in mice. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2008;88:437–443. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2008.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Smith NH, Hewinson RG, Kremer K, Brosch R, Gordon SV. Myths and misconceptions: the origin and evolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009;7:537–544. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Whelan AO, et al. Revisiting host preference in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex: experimental infection shows M. tuberculosis H37Rv to be avirulent in cattle. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e8527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.North RJ, Ryan L, LaCource R, Mogues T, Goodrich ME. Growth rate of mycobacteria in mice as an unreliable indicator of mycobacterial virulence. Infect. Immun. 1999;67:5483–5485. doi: 10.1128/IAI.67.10.5483-5485.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Tree JA, et al. Intranasal bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine dosage needs balancing between protection and lung pathology. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2004;138:405–409. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2004.02648.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Muruganandah V, et al. A systematic approach to simultaneously evaluate safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of novel tuberculosis vaccination strategies. Sci. Adv. 2020;6:eaaz767. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz1767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Reiley WW, et al. Distinct functions of antigen-specific CD4 T cells during murine Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:19408–19413. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006298107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Prota G, Christensen D, Andersen P, Medaglini D, Ciabattini A. Peptide-specific T helper cells identified by MHC class II tetramers differentiate into several subtypes upon immunization with CAF01 adjuvanted H56 tuberculosis vaccine formulation. Vaccine. 2015;33:6823–6830. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.09.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ronan EO, Lee LN, Beverley PC, Tchilian EZ. Immunization of mice with a recombinant adenovirus vaccine inhibits the early growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis after infection. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e8235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Anonymous. Code of Practice for the Housing and Care of Animals Bred, Supplied or Used for Scientific Purposes. (2014). https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/code-of-practice-for-the-housing-and-care-of-animals-bred-supplied-or-used-for-scientific-purposes.
- 59.Gallagher J, Horwill DM. A selective oleic acid albumin agar medium for the cultivation of Mycobacterium bovis. J. Hyg. (Lond.) 1977;79:155–160. doi: 10.1017/S0022172400052943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.