Yes-Associated Protein Contributes to Cell Proliferation and Migration of Gastric Cancer via Activation of Gli1

Abstract

Objective

In the present study, we aimed to explore the potential oncogenic property and the internal mechanism of yes-associated protein (YAP) in gastric cancer (GC).

Materials and Methods

YAP protein levels were evaluated in human GC tissues and paired normal tissues using immunohistochemistry (IHC). The role of YAP in regulating GC cell proliferation and migration was verified by genetic manipulation in vitro. Western blot analysis was used to determine the molecular signaling to explain the mechanism of the observed YAP effects in GC.

Results

Nuclear YAP protein expression was upregulated in GC tissues, and high nuclear YAP level was significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis (LNM) and tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage in patients suffered from GC. YAP knockdown inhibited GC cell proliferation, migration and epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) progress in vitro, whereas YAP elevation did the opposite. YAP regulated glioma-associated oncogene-1 (Gli1) expression independent of smoothened homolog (SMO). YAP modulated protein kinase B (AKT)/mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway in GC cells.

Conclusion

YAP enhanced GC cell proliferation and migration potentially via its regulation of Gli1 expression through the non-classical Hedgehog pathway, indicating suppression of YAP/Gli1 signaling axis may highlight a new entry point for combination therapy of GC.

Introduction

Gastric cancer (GC) is the one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality in the world, with high incidence and high-grade malignancy, which imposes a considerable global health burden.^1,2 Most gastric cancers are diagnosed at advanced or metastatic stages, resulting in low 5-year survival rate.² Hence, it is of utmost importance to identify sensitive biomarkers for early diagnosis of GC and to explore effective therapeutic targets to prevent the metastasis of GC.

Yes-associated protein (YAP) is a downstream effector of the Hippo pathway and can interact with the TEAD and other transcriptional factors to promote the transcription of genes mediating organ size and tissue homeostasis.^3,4 In addition, YAP has recently gained much attention in tumor growth and metastasis and is identified as a candidate oncogene.^3–5 YAP protein levels were reported to be frequently overexpressed in multiple types of malignancies including hepatocellular carcinoma,^6,7 esophageal cancer,⁸ breast cancer,⁹ ovarian cancer,¹⁰ prostate cancer,¹¹ colorectal cancer,^12,13 pancreatic cancer¹⁴ and GC.¹⁵ In cancers, overexpression of YAP has been reported to be involved in tumor cell proliferation, metastasis and epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT).^11,12,16 Recent studies showed that YAP was highly expressed in GC and its overexpression exhibits oncogenic property in GC,^16–19 but the precise function and internal mechanisms of YAP in GC remain to be further explored.

The Hedgehog signal pathway is considered to be crucially involved in the development and progression of numerous types of malignant tumors, including GC.^20,21 The canonical Hedgehog pathway involves G-coupled receptor-like signal transducer Smoothened homolog (SMO), suppressor of fused homolog (SUFU) and the zinc-finger transcription factors glioma-associated oncogene (Gli).²² The ligands bind and inactivate the Hedgehog receptor, protein patched homolog 1 (PTCH1), leading to the release of the SMO; Released SMO then activates Gli by blocking their inhibitory partner SUFU.²³ Besides, the Gli transcription factors, mainly Gli1, can also be activated by other molecules and signaling independently of SMO, including AKT, Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and mTOR/Ribosomal protein S6 kinase 1 (S6K1), which is termed non-canonical Hedgehog signaling pathway.^23,24 Although the classical pathway has been well illustrated, how Gli1 is regulated by a SMO-independent way is still equivocal.

Herein, we compared the nuclear YAP expression in GC tissues and non-cancerous tissues and investigated the association between nuclear YAP expression and the clinicopathological features of patients with GC. We then performed in vitro experiments to assess the effects of YAP on GC cell proliferation, migration and EMT progress. Moreover, we determined its effects on regulation of Gli1 and AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. Our present study suggests that YAP-mediated Gli1 activation which may be implicated by AKT/mTOR pathway contributes to GC cell proliferation and migration, with potential usefulness for new strategies to GC therapy.

Materials and Methods

GC Tissues and Cell Lines

From January 2016 to January 2018, 68 pairs of primary GC tumors and surrounding normal tissues were obtained from patients who underwent surgical resection in the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College. The clinicopathological features of these patients are shown in Table 1. All patients underwent radical resection without either chemotherapy or radiotherapy before surgery. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. This study was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College.

Table 1.

Relationships Between YAP Expression and Clinicopathological Features in 68 Patients with GC

Clinical Parameters	Case No.	YAP Expression		χ2	P value
		None or Low	High
Total	68	18 (28.9%)	50 (71.1%)
Age
<65	33	7 (27.8%)	26 (72.2%)	0.911	0.34
≥65	35	11 (30.0%)	24 (70.0%)
Gender
Male	45	11 (28.8%)	34 (71.2%)	0.281	0.596
Female	23	7 (29.6%)	16 (70.4%)
Tumor size
<5cm	34	10 (44.4%)	24 (55.6%)	0.302	0.582
≥5cm	34	8 (30.8%)	26 (69.2%)
Tumor location
U&M	41	10 (26.7%)	31 (73.3%)	0.230	0.632
L	27	8 (32.3%)	19 (67.7%)
Depth of invasion
T1-2	17	6 (31.8%)	11 (68.2%)	0.907	0.341
T3-4	51	12 (34.8%)	39 (65.2%)
Lymph node metastasis
No	22	11 (52.0%)	11 (48.0%)	10.841	0.001**
Yes	46	6 (17.6%)	40 (82.4%)
TNM Stage
I/II	25	11 (46.4%)	14 (53.6%)	6.242	0.012*
III/IV	43	7 (18.8%)	36 (81.2%)

Notes: *P<0.05, **P<0.01.

The human GC cell lines SGC7901, MGC803, MKN45 and AGS were purchased from the Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China. All the cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (P/S; Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). The cells were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO₂.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

IHC for YAP was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions using rabbit anti-human YAP at 1:200 (#14074, Cell Signaling Technology (CST)). The final staining score was determined by color intensity and positive cell rate, ranging 0–12 which was described in our previous study.²⁵ Patients were classified into two groups: scores 0–4 were considered as none or low, while 5–12 were considered as high expression.

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Whole protein extracts were lysed using RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime, Beijing, China) supplemented with protease inhibitors (Roche, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s protocol. The proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto PVDF membranes, which were then blocked with TBS buffer containing 5% skim milk for 1 h at room temperature. After incubation with primary and secondary antibodies, the proteins were visualized by chemiluminescence. Antibodies used in this study are as follows: anti-YAP (dilution 1:1000; #14074, CST), anti-p-AKT (Ser473) (dilution 1:1000; #4058, CST), anti-AKT (dilution 1:1000; #9272, CST), anti-p-mTOR (dilution 1:1000; #9205, CST), anti-mTOR (dilution 1:1000; #2983, CST), anti-E-cadherin (dilution 1:500; #3195, CST), anti-Vimentin (dilution 1:500; #5741, CST), anti-Gli1 (dilution 1:1000; #ab15179, Abcam), anti-SMO (dilution 1:1000; #ab38686, Abcam) and anti-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (dilution 1:5000; GAPDH, #AG019, Beyotime).

Construction of Stable Cell Lines

GC cell lines stably expressing YAP-specific short hairpin RNA (shRNA) and a plasmid encoding human YAP were constructed to silence and upregulate the expression of YAP, respectively, using a lentivirus technique (GenePharma, Shanghai, China). Lentiviral transduction was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The human YAP shRNA target sequences are 5′-GGU CAG AGA UAC UUC UUA AAU-3′.

Transfection of Small Interfering RNA (siRNA)

Transfection of human Gli1-specific siRNA was performed using Lipofectamine^TM RNAiMax (Invitrogen) at a final concentration of 20 nM, as described in our previous study.²⁵ The siRNA against human Gli1 (5ʹ-CUCCACAGGCAUACAGGAU-3ʹ) was synthesized by GenePharma (Shanghai, China). A scrambled siRNA (5ʹ-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3ʹ) was used as a negative control.

Colony Formation Assay and Migration Assay

In total, about 1000 cells were placed in 6-well plates. After incubating for 7–10 days, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Beyotime, Beijing, China), stained with 0.1% crystal violet (Beyotime, Beijing, China), and the images were captured by a digital camera (Nikon Corporation; Tokyo, Japan).

Transwell migration assay was used in this study. Detailed protocol was described in our previous study.²⁵

Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Student’s t-test (paired or unpaired, two-tailed) and chi-square test were used in this study. Results with P < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

Results

Upregulation of Nuclear YAP Protein Expression in Human GC Tissues

Previous studies have described that YAP was highly expressed in GC and its overexpression exhibits oncogenic property in GC.^15–17 To further verify the oncogenic role of YAP in GC, we first conducted IHC analysis to measure the level of YAP protein in 68 pairs of GC tissues and surrounding normal tissues. Since the nuclear localization is critical in determining the function of YAP,⁴ we only scored the nuclear staining of YAP. Results revealed that marked nuclear immunoreactivity was seen in 71.1% (50/68) of the GC tissues, whereas only 36.8% (25/68) of paired normal tissues presented high nuclear staining of YAP (Figure 1A and B). The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001, Figure 1B). Besides, IHC analysis also showed that nuclear YAP expression in GC patients suffered from LNM was further upregulated compared to those without LNM (P < 0.001, Figure 1A and C).

Figure 1.

High YAP protein expression in human GC.

Notes: (A) YAP protein level measured by IHC staining in GC tissues and paired normal tissues. (B) Scatter plot analysis of YAP IHC score in GC tissues (n=68) and paired normal tissues (n=68). (C) Scatter plot analysis of YAP IHC score in GC tissues with (n=46) or without LNM (n=22). Statistical significance was analyzed using a two-tailed, paired or unpaired Student’s t-test. ***P < 0.001.

Abbreviations: YAP, yes-associated protein; GC, gastric cancer; T, tumor tissues; N, paired normal tissues; IHC, immunohistochemistry; LNM, lymph node metastasis.

Next, chi-square test was used to analyze the correlation between nuclear YAP expression and clinicopathological features in 68 patients with GC. Results showed that high nuclear YAP expression was significantly associated with LNM (P = 0.001, Table 1) and TNM stage (P = 0.012, Table 1), but was not associated with age, gender, tumor size, tumor location or depth of invasion (P > 0.05, Table 1).

These above data revealed that nuclear YAP is upregulated in human GC tissues and may function as an oncogene in the development of GC.

YAP Knockdown and Overexpression Efficiency in GC Cells

To investigate the potential oncogenic effects of YAP in GC cells, we first conducted Western blot analysis to detect the level of YAP protein expression in four human GC cell lines (SGC7901, MGC803, MKN45, AGS). Results showed high level of YAP protein expression in MGC803 and AGS cell lines, while there was lower YAP protein expression in SGC7901 cells and nearly no YAP expression in MKN45 cells (Figure 2A).

Figure 2.

YAP protein levels in human GC cell lines.

Notes: (A) YAP protein expression levels in the human GC cell lines SGC7901, MGC803, MKN45 and AGS. (B) YAP protein levels in MGC803 and AGS GC cells stably transfected with control-shRNA (NC) or shRNA against YAP (KD) tested using Western blot analysis. The bands were quantified and showed as the mean ± SEM of triplicate determination from three independent experiments. (C) YAP protein levels in SGC7901 and MKN45 GC cells stably transfected with empty vector (VEC) or plasmid encoding human YAP (OE) determined by Western blotting. The bands were quantified and showed as the mean ± SEM of triplicate determination from three independent experiments. GAPDH as a loading control. Statistical significance was analyzed using a two-tailed, unpaired Student’s t-test. **P < 0.01. ***P < 0.001.

Abbreviations: YAP, yes-associated protein; GC, gastric cancer; NC, control-shRNA; KD, shRNA against YAP; VEC, empty vector; OE, plasmid encoding human YAP; SEM, standard error of the mean; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

We then stably knocked down YAP expression using a lentivirus vector-based shRNA technique in MGC803 and AGS cell lines and the knockdown efficiency was tested by Western blot analysis. Results showed that YAP protein expression was markedly reduced in MGC803 and AGS cells stably transfected with shRNA against YAP (KD) compared to cells transfected with control-shRNA (NC) (P<0.01, Figure 2B). Next, we stably transfected SGC7901 and MKN45 cells with a plasmid encoding human YAP and YAP protein expression was statistically enhanced in cells stably transfected with human YAP (OE) compared with cells transfected with empty vector (VEC) (P<0.001, Figure 2C).

YAP Enhances GC Cell Proliferation and Migration in vitro and Regulates EMT Progress

Since YAP expression is elevated in GC tissues and correlates with disease stages, we speculated that YAP may contribute to the development of GC. As suspected, depletion of YAP weakened the ability of AGS cells to form foci as determined by the colony formation assays (P<0.01, Figure 3A). On the contrary, ectopic expression of YAP promoted the proliferation of MKN45 cells (P<0.01, Figure 3B). In vitro Transwell assays were conducted to assess the effect of YAP on the migration of AGS and MKN45 cells. As shown in Figure 3C, silencing YAP significantly impaired the migration ability of AGS cells (P<0.01). Inversely, YAP overexpression markedly increased the migration ability in MKN45 cells (P<0.01, Figure 3D).

Figure 3.

YAP promotes GC cell proliferation and migration in vitro.

Notes: (A) YAP knockdown inhibited the proliferation of AGS cells by colony formation assays. Quantitative analysis results were presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 3). (B) YAP overexpression promoted the proliferation of MKN45 cells by colony formation assays. Quantitative analysis results were presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 3). (C) YAP knockdown inhibited the migration of AGS cells by transwell migration assays. Quantitative analysis results were presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 3). (D) YAP overexpression promoted the migration of MKN45 cells by transwell migration assays. Quantitative analysis results were presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 3). (E) E-cadherin and Vimentin expression in MGC803 and AGS GC cells stably transfected with control-shRNA (NC) or shRNA against YAP (KD) tested using Western blot analysis. The bands were quantified and showed as the mean ± SEM of triplicate determination from three independent experiments. (F) E-cadherin and Vimentin expression in SGC7901 and MKN45 GC cells stably transfected with empty vector (VEC) or plasmid encoding human YAP (OE) determined by Western blotting. The bands were quantified and showed as the mean ± SEM of triplicate determination from three independent experiments. GAPDH as a loading control. Statistical significance was analyzed by a two-tailed, unpaired Student’s t-test. **P < 0.01.

Abbreviations: GC, gastric cancer; NC, control-shRNA; KD, shRNA against YAP; VEC, empty vector; OE, plasmid encoding human YAP; SEM, standard error of the mean; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

Considering that YAP contributes to GC metastasis and EMT is an early event in the metastasis of cancer,^26,27 we speculated that YAP may be involved in regulating EMT progress in GC. As expected, results of Western blotting showed that silencing YAP significantly enhanced the protein expression of the epithelial marker E-cadherin and decreased Vimentin protein expression, a mesenchymal marker, in both MGC803 and AGS cells (Figure 3E). Conversely, elevation of YAP exerted the opposite effect on EMT markers (Figure 3F).

YAP Regulates GC Cell Proliferation and Migration via SMO-Independent Gli1 Activation

Given the evidence that aberrant Gli1 expression in Hedgehog pathway contributes to the development of GC,^20,21 we asked whether YAP plays a part in modulating Gli1 expression on the development and progression of GC. Results from Western blot assays revealed that YAP knockdown in MGC803 and AGS cells significantly attenuated Gli1 protein level (Figure 4A) while YAP elevation notably enhanced Gli1 protein expression in SGC7901 and MKN45 cells (Figure 4B), indicating that YAP regulates Gli1 expression in GC cells.

Figure 4.

YAP regulates Gli1 expression in a SMO-independent manner.

Notes: (A) Gli1 and SMO expression in MGC803 and AGS GC cells stably transfected with control-shRNA (NC) or shRNA against YAP (KD) tested using Western blot analysis. The bands were quantified and showed as the mean ± SEM of triplicate determination from three independent experiments. (B) Gli1 and SMO expression in SGC7901 and MKN45 GC cells stably transfected with empty vector (VEC) or plasmid encoding human YAP (OE) determined by Western blotting. The bands were quantified and showed as the mean ± SEM of triplicate determination from three independent experiments. (C) Gli1 expression in SGC7901 cells (VEC and YAP OE) with or without Gli1 siRNA treatment determined by Western blotting. (D) Colony formation assays to test proliferation ability of SGC7901 cells (VEC and YAP OE) with or without Gli1 siRNA treatment. (E) Transwell assays to test migration ability of SGC7901 cells (VEC and YAP OE) with or without Gli1 siRNA treatment. GAPDH as a loading control. Statistical significance was analyzed by a two-tailed, unpaired Student’s t-test. N, nonsignificant; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05.

Abbreviations: Gli1, glioma-associated oncogene-1; SMO, smoothened homolog; GC, gastric cancer; NC, control-shRNA; KD, shRNA against YAP; VEC, empty vector; OE, plasmid encoding human YAP; SEM, standard error of the mean; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

In canonical mammalian Hedgehog signaling, SMO is the central signal transducer, which activates Gli1 through blocking its inhibitory partner, SUFU.²³ Surprisingly, the effect of YAP knockdown or overexpression on SMO protein level was minimal in GC cells (Figure 4A and B), suggesting the possible involvement of other molecules or signaling regulated by YAP which is responsible for the activation of Gli1.

To further explore whether Gli1 is implicated in YAP regulation of GC cell proliferation and migration, we used Gli1-specific siRNA (siGli1) to silence Gli1 expression in SGC7901 cells with YAP overexpression. Colony formation assays and migration assays showed that the increased proliferation and migration ability induced by YAP overexpression was partially reversed when cells lacked Gli1 (Figure 4D and E), indicating that YAP regulates GC cell proliferation and migration via regulating Gli1.

YAP Regulates AKT/mTOR Pathway in GC Cells

Considering that YAP modulates AKT/mTOR pathway to regulate cell size and tissue growth in MCF10A cells²⁸ and hepatocellular carcinoma cells,²⁹ and an activated AKT/mTOR pathway directly activates Gli1 independent of SMO,²³ we then asked whether AKT/mTOR pathway is implicated in YAP-mediated Gli1 activation. Results from Western blot analysis showed that YAP depletion in MGC803 and AGS cells significantly reduced phosphorylated AKT (p-AKT) and phosphorylated mTOR (p-mTOR) protein levels, but not their total levels (Figure 5A). In contrast, YAP elevation notably resulted in an activation of AKT accompanied by an increase of mTOR phosphorylation in SGC7901 and MKN45 cells (Figure 5B). Collectively, our results indicated that YAP acts as a regulator on AKT/mTOR pathway in GC cells, which may be responsible for the activation of Gli1.

Figure 5.

YAP modulates AKT/mTOR pathway.

Notes: (A) The indicated proteins in MGC803 and AGS GC cells stably transfected with control-shRNA (NC) or shRNA against YAP (KD) tested using Western blot analysis. The bands were quantified and showed as the mean ± SEM of triplicate determination from three independent experiments. (B) The indicated proteins in SGC7901 and MKN45 GC cells stably transfected with empty vector (VEC) or plasmid encoding human YAP (OE) determined by Western blotting. The bands were quantified and showed as the mean ± SEM of triplicate determination from three independent experiments. GAPDH as a loading control. Statistical significance was analyzed by a two-tailed, unpaired Student’s t-test. **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05.

Abbreviations: AKT, protein kinase B; mTOR, mechanistic target of rapamycin; GC, gastric cancer; NC, control-shRNA; KD, shRNA against YAP; VEC, empty vector; OE, plasmid encoding human YAP; SEM, standard error of the mean; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

Discussion

YAP, as a downstream effector of the Hippo pathway, has recently been proposed as a candidate oncogene.^3–5 Ectopic YAP expression was reported in several types of cancers,^6–15 and its overexpression was implicated in promoting tumor cell proliferation, metastasis and EMT.^11,12,16 In GC, YAP was also showed to be upregulated and involved in the development and progression of GC,^16–19 but the internal mechanism of YAP-mediated regulation of cell proliferation and migration in GC is not well understood and remains to be further explored.

In the present study, we confirmed that nuclear YAP was highly expressed in GC tissues compared to the adjacent normal tissues. We also evidenced that nuclear YAP expression level in GC patients with LNM was higher than those without LNM. Moreover, clinical data analyses revealed that high nuclear YAP expression was significantly correlated with LNM and TNM stage in patients suffered from GC. Our in vitro experiments provided further evidence that silencing YAP significantly weakened the proliferation and migration ability of GC cells, while YAP elevation did the opposite, suggesting the oncogenic property of YAP in GC. In view of the vital role of EMT progress in tumor metastasis,^26,27 we then investigated the effect of YAP on EMT in GC cells. Results from Western blot showed that YAP promoted EMT progress evidenced by the fact that YAP depletion increased E-cadherin and decreased Vimentin protein expression while YAP overexpression had the opposite effect on EMT markers in GC cells.

Gli1, as an important downstream effector of the Hedgehog signal pathway, has been considered to be crucially involved in the development and progression of GC.^20,21 Our results suggest that YAP played a role in modulating Gli1 expression evidenced by several observations. Knockdown of YAP markedly diminished Gli1 protein expression in cultured GC cells. Inversely, YAP elevation notably increased Gli1 protein expression in GC cells. The regulation of Gli1 by YAP is unlikely due to canonical Hedgehog signaling since the central signal transducer SMO, which activates Gli1 through blocking its inhibitory partner SUFU, was not affected by YAP knockdown or overexpression, suggesting the possible involvement of other molecules or signaling which is responsible for the YAP-mediated Gli1 activation.

Given the evidence that YAP modulates AKT/mTOR pathway to regulate cell size and tissue growth in MCF10A cells²⁸ and in hepatocellular carcinoma cells,²⁹ and an activated AKT/mTOR pathway directly activates Gli1 independent of SMO,²³ we speculated that AKT/mTOR pathway may be involved in YAP-mediated Gli1 activation. In accordance with the previous studies,^27,28 we provided first evidence that in GC cells YAP acts as a regulator on AKT/mTOR pathway, which may be responsible for the activation of Gli1.

The crosstalk of Hippo-YAP pathway and Hedgehog pathway has been reported previously. YAP is amplified and up-regulated in hedgehog-associated medulloblastomas and induces expression of Gli2, which translocates to the nucleus and then regulates Gli1 transcription.³⁰ Another study demonstrated that Hedgehog signaling regulates YAP activity and verified YAP as a downstream effector of the Hedgehog pathway in regenerating mouse Liver.³¹ In the present study, we found that YAP regulated Gli1 expression in a SMO-independent manner and AKT/mTOR pathway may be implicated in YAP-mediated Gli1 activation in view of the positive regulation of AKT/mTOR signaling pathway by YAP in GC cells.

Taken together, our in vitro experiments not only indicated that nuclear YAP was highly expressed in GC tissues but also emphasized its role in regulating GC cell proliferation, migration and EMT. Moreover, we revealed a critical mechanism for YAP in regulation of GC cell proliferation and migration via its participation in modulating Gli1 expression through the non-classical Hedgehog signaling pathway. Considering the interreaction between Hippo-YAP pathway and Hedgehog pathway, suppression of YAP/Gli1 signaling axis may highlight a new entry point for combination therapy of GC.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the Nature and Science Fund from Wannan Medical College, CN (Grant Nos. WK2019F07, WK2019F09).

Disclosure

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.