Significance
Transcription occurs at chromosomal sites known as active transcription sites (ATS). We report that ATS can exist in two classes when assessed at key regulatory genes in their natural context: these “iATS” and “cATS” possess incomplete and complete nascent transcripts, respectively. Frequencies of the two classes are patterned within the developing tissue in a gene-, developmental stage-, and sex-specific manner, revealing ATS class regulation. Moreover, cATS frequency, not iATS frequency, corresponds to mRNA abundance, indicating that regulation of ATS class impacts gene expression. The iATS signature—presence of a long first intron but lacking exons—suggests slowing or pausing of transcriptional progression midway through the gene. We suggest that ATS class regulation can pattern gene expression during development.
Keywords: active transcription site, germ cell development, ERK/MAPK
Abstract
The expression of genes encoding powerful developmental regulators is exquisitely controlled, often at multiple levels. Here, we investigate developmental expression of three conserved genes, Caenorhabditis elegans mpk-1, lag-1, and lag-3/sel-8, which encode homologs of ERK/MAPK and core components of the Notch-dependent transcription complex, respectively. We use single-molecule FISH (smFISH) and MATLAB to visualize and quantify nuclear nascent transcripts and cytoplasmic mRNAs as a function of position along the germline developmental axis. Using differentially labeled probes, one spanning an exceptionally long first intron and the other spanning exons, we identify two classes of active transcription sites (ATS). The iATS class, for “incomplete” ATS, harbors only partial nascent transcripts; the cATS class, for “complete” ATS, harbors full-length nascent transcripts. Remarkably, the frequencies of iATS and cATS are patterned along the germline axis. For example, most mpk-1 ATS are iATS in hermaphrodite germline stem cells, but most are cATS in differentiating stem cell daughters. Thus, mpk-1 ATS class frequencies switch in a graded manner as stem cell daughters begin differentiation. Importantly, the patterns of ATS class frequency are gene-, stage-, and sex-specific, and cATS frequency strongly correlates with transcriptional output. Although the molecular mechanism underlying ATS classes is not understood, their primary difference is the extent of transcriptional progression. To generate only partial nascent transcripts in iATS, progression must be slowed, paused, or aborted midway through the gene. We propose that regulation of ATS class can be a critical mode of developmental gene regulation.
The control of gene expression is central to animal development and homeostasis. To achieve that control, an increasingly complex choreography of regulatory steps dictates when, where, and how much mRNA is produced. Transcriptional initiation has taken center stage as the key step in regulating gene expression for years (1), but other downstream mechanisms have now joined initiation on that stage. Most relevant to this work is transcriptional progression through the gene, which affects generation of a complete nascent transcript. A classic example of regulation at this step of transcriptional progression occurs in Drosophila embryos, where the cell cycle is too short to complete transcription through unusually long Hox genes before the cell divides (2, 3). A more broadly used case is the regulated release from transcriptional pauses that occur ∼20 to 60 bp after initiation, the promoter-proximal pause (4). Transcriptional progression can be deduced with “-omic” methods, such as PRO-seq or NET-seq (5, 6), or with imaging methods, such as single-molecule fluorescence in situ hybridization (smFISH) or live imaging (7). One advantage of smFISH is that transcription of endogenous genes can be assessed in their native context with single-cell and single-molecule resolution. This work began with an smFISH investigation of active transcription site or sites (ATS) and transcriptional yields at key regulatory genes during development. Our analyses led to discovery of two distinct ATS classes and what we propose is a case of regulated transcriptional progression.
Our studies have been conducted in the adult Caenorhabditis elegans gonad, which is well suited to smFISH (8) and where germ cell development occurs linearly along the distal–proximal axis. Germline stem cells (GSCs) reside within their niche at the distal end, and GSC daughters mature progressively toward gametogenesis as they move from the niche and ultimately reach the other end (Fig. 1A). Previous studies in this tissue revealed a gradient of Notch-dependent transcriptional bursts at the Notch target gene, sygl-1 (8–10). Here, we focus on transcription of three other genes that regulate GSC self-renewal or differentiation (Fig. 1B). The lag-1 and lag-3/sel-8 (henceforth lag-3) genes encode core components of the Notch transcriptional activation complex, which promotes GSC self-renewal in response to signaling from the niche (11–13). The mpk-1 gene encodes ERK/MAP kinase (14, 15), which promotes several aspects of germline differentiation: sperm/oocyte fate specification (16, 17), progression through meiotic prophase, and oogenesis (18–20). We emphasize that our approach queries transcription at endogenous genes in wildtype animals; our results therefore avoid potentially confounding effects of transgenes, inserted tags, and reporter constructs.
Fig. 1.
C. elegans germline anatomy and key regulatory genes. (A, Left) Adult hermaphrodite has two U-shaped gonadal arms (in colors). The distal gonad (red square) houses germ cells that are either dividing (yellow) or in early meiotic prophase (green); proximal germ cells make oocytes (pink). Sperm (blue) were made as larvae. (A, Right) Development in distal gonad. The progenitor zone (PZ) includes germline stem cells (GSCs) within their niche (gray) and stem cell daughters primed to differentiate; upon leaving the PZ, germ cells enter meiotic prophase (green crescents). (B) Key regulators relevant to this work. (C–E) Gene architecture: boxes, exons; lines, introns. Exons include coding regions (gene-specific colors) and untranslated regions (UTRs; gray). Direction of transcription is the same for all genes (arrow in C). Vertical lines indicate sites of individual smFISH probes; probe sets target either the large first intron (green) or all exons (magenta). Red asterisk marks site of 1 bp frame-shifting insertion in mpk-1b first exon, used as control for mpk-1 exon probe specificity. Deletions in mpk-1 and lag-3 long first introns were used as control for intron probe specificity. The lag-1 gene makes four isoforms (lag-1a-d); for simplicity, lag-1a represents lag-1a-c, which differ in size of exons 2 and 3. The lag-3a first intron contains predicted ncRNA C32A3.7.
To obtain a high-resolution and quantitative view of transcription during development, we coupled smFISH with a MATLAB image analysis code to score RNAs with 3D resolution in the germline tissue, as done previously for sygl-1 (8, 10). Using differentially labeled probe sets to either the 5′ half to two thirds of each gene (spanning the long first intron) or the remaining 3′ part (the exons, most of which are 3′ to the intron), we found two distinct ATS classes that differ in transcriptional progression. One class, iATS for “incomplete” ATS, harbors partial nascent transcripts; the other class, cATS for “complete” ATS, harbors full-length nascent transcripts. The iATS do not reflect a promoter-proximal pause, which generates a very short transcript that would not be seen with an intron probe (Discussion). Remarkably, the frequencies of these ATS classes are gene-, position-, and sex-specific, suggesting developmental regulation. Most strikingly, iATS and cATS frequencies are reciprocally graded for two genes in the stem cell region in a manner consistent with the graded expression of those genes. We propose that regulated changes in transcriptional progression, inferred from changes in the frequency of ATS class, drives the developmental expression of these genes.
Results
Experimental Design and a Modified MATLAB Code.
Our experimental design took advantage of the simple architecture of the C. elegans adult germline (Fig. 1A), the ability to visualize transcription at high resolution in this tissue using smFISH (8, 10), and genes with long first introns that encode key regulators of germline development (Fig. 1B). The mpk-1, lag-1, and lag-3 first introns are 8.2 kb, 6 kb, and 8.5 kb, respectively. We used Stellaris Probe Designer to create two probe sets for each gene, spanning either the long first intron and thus covering the 5′ half to two thirds of each gene or all exons and thus covering the remaining 3′ part of the gene (Fig. 1 C–E). Each set included 47 or 48 individual probes (detailed in Dataset S1). The intron and exon probe sets were labeled with different fluorophores to generate distinct signals (Fig. 2 A–C and SI Appendix, Figs. S1A, S2A, and S3A). Probe specificities were confirmed by inhibiting transcription with ⍺-amanitin to ensure detection of RNA rather than DNA (SI Appendix, Figs. S1B, S2B, and S3B), intron-specific deletions to ensure specificity of the intron probe signal (mpk-1 and lag-3 only; an analogous lag-1 deletion could not be isolated; SI Appendix, Figs. S1C and S3C), and a frame-shift mutant (mpk-1) or RNAi (lag-1, lag-3) to ensure specificity of the exon probe signal (SI Appendix, Figs. S1D, S2 C and D, and S3 D and E). The legends of SI Appendix, Fig. S1–S3, provide gene-specific details of these specificity assays.
Fig. 2.
Identification of two classes of active transcription sites (ATS). (A–C) Maximum projections of smFISH images. (Left) Intron probe set signals (green), (Middle) exon probe set signals (magenta), and merge of both signals with DAPI (cyan). (Scale bar, 5 µm.) (D) Two ATS classes: (Left) images and (Right) cartoons. A cATS (complete ATS) is visualized by overlapping intron and exon probe signals; an iATS (incomplete ATS) is visualized by the intron probe signal alone. (E) ATS numbers, regardless of class, detected with either the intron probe set (intron) or exon probe set (exon) for each gene. Overlaps of intron-detected and exon-detected spots were not determined in this analysis. To test if the high number of intron-detected spots reflected fluorophore bias, the fluorophores conjugated to the original mpk-1 intron and exon probes were swapped (*****P < 0.0000001, Student’s t test).
A previously published MATLAB code (used to analyze transcription in the C. elegans progenitor zone) defined ATS as nuclear spots with overlapping exon and intron probe signals (8). However, a preliminary inspection by eye of the smFISH images for mpk-1, lag-1, and lag-3 transcripts revealed two types of nuclear spots, both with morphology and size of an ATS. We categorize these two types as “cATS” and “iATS” (Fig. 2D). cATS are detected with overlapping signals from the exon and intron probe sets, while iATS are detected uniquely with the intron probe set. The finding of these two ATS types caused us to modify the original code. Briefly, the new code detects nuclear signals independently for the exon and intron probe sets, it determines if the two signals are overlapping to assign them as a cATS or iATS, and it identifies cytoplasmic mRNA, all within the 3D gonad (SI Appendix, Fig. S4, and see SI Appendix, Methods). During this code revision, we asked how many nuclear spots were seen with each probe set, without taking into consideration any overlap, and found that the intron probe detected more spots than the exon probe for all three genes (Fig. 2E). To test whether the abundance bias of intron spots might reflect fluorophore differences, we tested mpk-1 probe sets with swapped fluorophores, but the intron spot abundance bias did not change (Fig. 2E). To validate our modified MATLAB code, we tested it by rescoring previously published images of sygl-1 smFISH and obtained results equivalent to a previous report (SI Appendix, Fig. S5) (8). The new code thus scores cATS and iATS with spatial resolution.
Transcriptional Probabilities and Yields in the Progenitor Zone.
We analyzed mpk-1, lag-1, and lag-3 transcription in the adult hermaphrodite Progenitor Zone (PZ), where GSCs reside distally and more proximal GSC daughters become primed for differentiation (21–23). Position within the PZ was scored as the number of germ cell diameters (gcds) or “rows” along the distal–proximal axis from the distal end, by convention. For this study, we focused on the distal-most 12 rows of the PZ, a region with roughly 150 germ cells that divide asynchronously every ∼6 h on average (24) and move proximally at a rate of ∼0.4 to 1 row per hour (22). Importantly, a germ cell’s state—naïve and stem cell-like or triggered to differentiate—corresponds to its position along the axis (Fig. 3A).
Fig. 3.
Expression of mpk-1, lag-1, and lag-3 in the distal Progenitor Zone (PZ). (A) Region scored (dashed red box) extends 12 germ cell diameters (gcds) into the PZ from the niche (gray). Numbers indicate positions as gcds along the distal–proximal axis, starting from the distal end according to convention; MATLAB score position in micrometers from the distal end, with each gcd averaging ∼4.4 µm in this region (8). (B–D and F–K) The x-axis shows position in both gcds (Top) and micrometers (Bottom). Numbers of gonads scored: mpk-1, n = 37; lag-1, n = 36; and lag-3, n = 32. (B) Transcriptional probability measured as percentage of cells with at least one ATS, including both iATS and cATS. Line plots are derived from data in SI Appendix, Fig. S6 A–C. Total numbers of cells scored: mpk-1, n = 6,065; lag-1, n = 5,981; and lag-3, n = 4,472. (C) Transcriptional output measured as total number of nascent transcripts at cATS per cell row. Analysis was limited to cATS as explained in the text and detailed in SI Appendix, Methods. Line plots are derived from data in SI Appendix, Fig. S6 G–I. (D) Transcriptional output measured as total number of cellular mRNAs per cell row; mRNAs in rachis were excluded. Germ cell boundaries were determined from MATLAB-generated Voronoi cells as described in SI Appendix, Methods. Line plots are derived from data in SI Appendix, Fig. S6 J–L. Data for number of mRNAs per cell are in SI Appendix, Fig. S6 M–O. (E) Detection of nascent transcripts at iATS (Top) and cATS (Bottom). iATS are seen uniquely with the intron probe set, whereas cATS are seen with overlapping exon and intron probe sets. The mpk-1 intron probe set spans 77% of the full-length transcript (excluding 3′UTR); by contrast, the exon probe set spans only 23%. (F–H) iATS and cATS frequencies as a function of position. Each bar shows percentage of total ATS that are cATS (darker bars) or iATS (lighter bars). Numbers of total ATS (cATS plus iATS) scored: mpk-1, n = 5,699; lag-1, n = 6,610; and lag-3, n = 4,200. SEs are shown. (I–K) Measures of transcription taken from panels above and combined to highlight patterns of graded increase, decrease, or relative uniformity; individual lines represent quite different measures, and specific values are therefore not comparable. Transcriptional probability (gray line) is from B, cellular mRNA abundance per row (dashed line) is from D, and cATS frequency (dark colored line) and iATS frequency (lighter colored line) are from G–I. The original panels show y-axis value ranges.
We first determined the percentage of germ cells harboring any ATS, cell row by cell row, along the PZ developmental axis. The ATS scored in this initial analysis include both cATS and iATS, and thus reveal genes that have not only initiated transcription but also elongated far enough for detection with smFISH probes. The percentage of cells with any ATS therefore provides a measure of transcriptional probability, as established previously (8, 9, 25). The mpk-1, lag-1, and lag-3 genes were all transcribed actively across the distal PZ, with 60 to 70% of cells possessing either a cATS or iATS (Fig. 3B and SI Appendix, Fig. S6 A–C). For comparison, the Notch-activated sygl-1 gene produces ATS in ∼65% of the distal germ cells within the niche but <5% outside the niche, as previously reported (8). We also scored how many individual ATS were seen in each nucleus as a function of position along the axis. As expected for genes that transcribe in bursts within an actively dividing cell population, the numbers of individual ATS per cell varied between zero and four (SI Appendix, Fig. S6 D–F). The higher percentage in the most distal germ cells for lag-1 ATS and lower percentage in the same region for lag-3 ATS are reproducible but not understood. Most importantly, all three genes are actively engaged in transcription across the distal PZ.
We next scored two measures of transcriptional productivity as a function of position in the PZ: the number of nascent transcripts at cATS (Fig. 3C and SI Appendix, Fig. S6 G–I) and number of mRNAs in the cytoplasm (Fig. 3D and SI Appendix, Fig. S6 J–O). Measurement of nascent transcript abundance was limited to cATS because it could be estimated by comparing intensity values of exon probe spots at cATS in the nucleus and exon probe dots at single mRNAs in the cytoplasm. While this strategy misses nascent transcripts at iATS, the compared values rely on the same probe, same fluorophore, and same image. Both the number of mpk-1 and lag-3 nascent transcripts increased steadily as germ cells moved along the PZ axis, while the number of lag-1 nascent transcripts increased initially and then leveled off (Fig. 3C). Following those trends, mpk-1 and lag-3 mRNA numbers also increased along the axis, while numbers of lag-1 mRNAs were more level (Fig. 3D). The pattern of lag-1 mRNA abundance conforms for the most part with an independent report published recently (26). Most strikingly, the nearly uniform transcriptional probabilities for mpk-1 and lag-3 (Fig. 3B) did not match their gradually increasing transcriptional outputs across the PZ axis (Fig. 3 C and D).
Frequency of One ATS Class, the cATS, Corresponds to mRNA Yield.
Why might transcriptional probability and output have distinct patterns for a given gene? We considered the possibility that the frequency of the two ATS classes, iATS and cATS (Fig. 2), underlie the explanation. iATS are uniquely detected with the first intron probe, so nascent transcripts at iATS have elongated through much of the long intron, but not the downstream exons (Fig. 3 E, Top). By contrast, cATS are detected with both exon and intron probes, so nascent transcripts at cATS must have elongated through both the long intron and the downstream exons (Fig. 3 E, Bottom). Because iATS and cATS reveal transcription sites dominated by different extents of transcriptional progression, cATS would be expected to yield a more robust transcriptional output than iATS. Based on that idea, we determined the frequencies of each ATS class, measured as a percentage of all ATS, and asked if their frequencies change along the PZ developmental axis. One might have thought that iATS and cATS frequencies would simply reflect the extent of sequence covered by each probe set. If that were the case, they would be the same regardless of position. However, iATS and cATS frequencies had gene-specific patterns along the PZ axis (Fig. 3 F–H). For example, mpk-1 cATS frequency increased steadily from ∼30% distally to ∼75% at row 12, and iATS frequency decreased correspondingly (Fig. 3F). A similar trend was found for lag-3 (Fig. 3H), but the lag-1 cATS frequency initially decreased and then leveled off across the PZ (Fig. 3G). These patterns suggest that transcriptional progression is gene-specific and changes as germ cells move through the PZ. A logical extension of that idea is that the pattern of only one class, the cATS with their full- or nearly full-length transcripts, is responsible for the pattern of mRNA production. That prediction was borne out by comparing patterns of ATS, cATS, iATS, and mRNAs in gene-specific graphs (Fig. 3 I and J) and finding positive correlations between cATS frequency and mRNA number and negative correlations between iATS frequency and mRNA number (Table 1). We conclude that cATS frequency, not iATS frequency, drives mRNA output as germ cells mature through the PZ (Discussion).
Table 1.
Pearson’s correlation tests between distinct measures of transcription
| Comparison | Gene | Correlation coefficient (r) | P value |
| % cells with any ATS vs# mRNA in cells | mpk-1 | 0.0157 | 0.7456 |
| lag-1 | 0.0725 | 0.1362 | |
| lag-3 | −0.0594 | 0.0594 | |
| % ATS that are cATS vs# mRNA in cells | mpk-1 | 0.4872 | 7.5725 × 10−28 |
| lag-1 | 0.1272 | 0.0081 | |
| lag-3 | 0.4448 | 4.6640 × 10−20 | |
| % ATS that are iATS vs# mRNA in cells | mpk-1 | −0.4520 | 9.6179 × 10−24 |
| lag-1 | −0.1149 | 0.0169 | |
| lag-3 | −0.3836 | 6.5252 × 10−15 | |
| # cATS nascent transcripts vs# mRNA in cells | mpk-1 | 0.8214 | 1.9340 × 10−106 |
| lag-1 | 0.3807 | 2.3929 × 10−16 | |
| lag-3 | 0.8074 | 3.9855 × 10−86 |
mpk-1, lag-1, and lag-3 Transcription in the Early Pachytene Region.
We next investigated transcription of the same three genes in a different region of the gonad, where germ cells have begun to differentiate. Specifically, we focused on 12 rows of germ cells that begin at the proximal boundary of the Transition Zone (TZ) and extend into the pachytene region (Fig. 4A). Germ cells here have entered the pachytene stage of meiotic prophase and begun oogenesis. For simplicity, we refer to the region as EP for Early Pachytene. Though germ cells are not dividing mitotically, they move proximally through the EP at a rate of ∼1 row per hour (21, 24) and progressively mature as they move along the distal–proximal axis.
Fig. 4.
Transcription of mpk-1, lag-1, and lag-3 in Early Pachytene (EP) region. (A) Region scored (dashed red box) extends 12 gcds from the TZ/EP boundary. Numbers mark gcd positions, starting at TZ/EP boundary; each gcd averages ∼4.4 µm in this region. SI Appendix, Fig. S7, provides smFISH images. (B–J) Quantification of transcripts. Numbers of gonads scored: mpk-1, n = 36; lag-1, n = 36; and lag-3, n = 37. The x-axis shows position as both gcds (Top) and micrometers (Bottom) from TZ/EP boundary. (B) Transcriptional probability measured as percent cells with one or more ATS of either class. Total cell numbers scored: mpk-1, n = 6,249; lag-1, n = 6,064; and lag-3, n = 4,625. Line plots are from data in SI Appendix, Fig. S8 A–C. (C) Transcriptional output measured as total nascent transcripts at cATS per cell row (see text and SI Appendix, Methods). Line plots are from data in SI Appendix, Fig. S8 G–I. (D) Transcriptional output measured as total number of mRNAs in cells per row (cells defined as in Fig. 2D); mRNAs in rachis were excluded. Line plots are from data in SI Appendix, Fig. S8 J–L. Data for mRNA number per cell are shown in SI Appendix, Fig. S8 M–O. (E–G) ATS class frequencies as a function of position. Total number of ATS (either class) scored: mpk-1, n = 5,749; lag-1, n = 10,118; and lag-3, n = 4,730. (H–J) Measures of transcription taken from panels above and combined to highlight patterns; individual lines represent different measures, and specific values are therefore not comparable. Transcriptional probability (gray line) is from B, number of mRNAs in cells (dashed colored line) are from D, and cATS frequency (dark colored line) and iATS frequency (light colored line) are from E–G. The original panels show y-axis value ranges.
Analyses in the EP paralleled those in the distal PZ (SI Appendix, Fig. S7, shows representative smFISH images). The mpk-1, lag-1, and lag-3 genes were actively transcribed across the region: the percentages of cells with any ATS ranged from ∼50% to 80% (Fig. 4B and SI Appendix, Fig. S8 A–C), and ATS numbered zero to four per nucleus as expected (SI Appendix, Fig. S8 D–F). The number of nascent transcripts at cATS was steady across the region for each gene (Fig. 4C and SI Appendix, Fig. S8 G–I), while mRNA numbers were essentially uniform or increased slightly (Fig. 4D and SI Appendix, Fig. S8 J–O). Strikingly and in contrast to the PZ, most ATS were cATS throughout the EP region (Fig. 4 E–G). Display of the various measures of transcription in a single graph highlights their similarity (Fig. 4 H–J). Again, high cATS frequencies match abundance of cytoplasmic mRNAs. Thus, the ATS class frequencies and hence transcriptional progression appear relatively uniform for these genes as they move through early pachytene.
Deletions in the mpk-1 Long First Intron Have Either Minor or No Detectable Germline Defects.
We considered the idea that the size or content of the long first intron of each gene might influence the pattern of cATS frequency in the PZ. Introns can contain regulatory elements that affect numerous aspects of the transcription process, including elongation and splicing (2, 27–32). To address this issue, we focused on mpk-1 for two reasons. First, the mpk-1b isoform is the principal and likely only mpk-1 transcript in the germline (Fig. 1C) (33, 34). As a result, mpk-1 smFISH in the germline scores this isoform specifically. By contrast, tissue specificity is unknown for the isoforms of the other genes (Fig. 1 D and E). Second, a 5.7 kb deletion in the mpk-1 intron (Fig. 1C) is homozygous viable. Therefore, the regulatory effects of potential elements within the mpk-1 long first intron can be investigated with mutants. By contrast, an analogous deletion in lag-3 (Fig. 1D) is embryonic lethal and the analogous lag-1 intron deletion could not be recovered. Briefly, we generated three 1 kb deletions in different areas of the long first intron, but these deletions did not affect the ATS class pattern, frequency, or mpk-1 gene expression (SI Appendix, Figs. S9 andS10). “Analyses of mpk-1 intron deletion mutants” in the SI Appendix provides details of these experiments.
mpk-1 Developmental Pattern of cATS Frequency Is Sex-Specific.
Finally, we asked if the low mpk-1 cATS frequency found in hermaphrodite GSCs reflects a GSC-related developmental control and the high cATS frequency in hermaphrodite EPs reflects a differentiation developmental control. If this were the case, similar frequencies would be expected in male GSCs, which also reside in the distal PZ, and in the male EP (Fig. 5A, red boxes) (10). However, the male pattern of cATS frequency differed dramatically from that in hermaphrodites. The cATS frequency was ∼50% in male GSCs and dropped from ∼80% at the TZ/EP boundary to ∼40% by row 12 in the EP (Fig. 5C). The mpk-1 cATS frequency pattern is therefore sexually dimorphic (Fig. 5 D and E). The male EP decrease in cATS frequency matches well with the previously reported decrease in MPK-1 protein abundance in the same region (16). We suggest that the sexually dimorphic patterns in cATS frequency reflect sex-specific changes in transcriptional progression related to specification of the sperm fate in the male PZ and production of maternal RNAs in the hermaphrodite EP (Discussion).
Fig. 5.
Male mpk-1 ATS pattern. (A) Male gonad architecture with two somatic niche cells (gray), longer Progenitor and Transition Zones than hermaphrodites (66), but similar GSC pool size in the two sexes (10). Red boxes mark regions analyzed: the first 12 cell rows of PZ and first 12 cell rows of Early Pachytene (EP) region. (B and D) PZ data; conventions as in Fig. 3. Number of gonads scored, n = 24. (C and E) EP data; conventions as in Fig. 4. Number of gonads, n = 22. (B and C) iATS and cATS frequencies in the PZ (B) and EP (C). Total number of ATS scored in PZ, n = 2,195; in EP, n = 1,350. (D and E) Male mpk-1 cATS frequency (solid purple) compared to hermaphrodite cATS frequency (dashed purple) in the PZ (D) and EP (E). Hermaphrodite data are taken from Fig. 3J for PZ and Fig. 4H for the EP.
Discussion
This study analyzes expression of three key regulatory genes during C. elegans germline development, using smFISH to visualize nascent transcripts at active transcription sites (ATS) and mRNAs, both with single-cell resolution. Our results lead to three conclusions. First, we identify distinct ATS classes: iATS with partial nascent transcripts and cATS with full-length nascent transcripts. Second, we find that the frequencies of these ATS classes change in gene- and sex-specific fashion along the germline developmental axis, suggesting developmental regulation. Finally, we show that only one ATS class, the cATS, correlates with transcriptional productivity, suggesting an impact of ATS class on gene expression.
Two ATS Classes with Distinct Extents of Transcriptional Progression and Transcriptional Output.
Classically, ATS are thought to harbor multiple transcripts that vary in degree of completeness (35–37). The discovery of iATS and cATS demonstrates that ATS can exist in different states with distinct extents of transcriptional progression through a gene. The iATS are detected with the intron probe set spanning the 5′ half to two thirds of each gene, but they are not detected with the exon probe spanning the 3′ third to half of each gene; therefore, the iATS class makes only partial transcripts. The cATS, by contrast, are detected with both intron and exon probe sets and must make complete or nearly complete transcripts, likely in addition to partial transcripts (Fig. 6A). This interpretation is consistent with previous studies that used smFISH to investigate transcriptional progression (7, 37–39). Moreover, alternative explanations seem unlikely. The lack of an overlapping exon signal at iATS might be explained if the spliced long intron were tethered to the site while full-length transcripts were released rapidly. However, introns are typically degraded quickly (40) or moved to nuclear speckles for degradation (41–43), and a rapid release of full-length transcripts is inconsistent with the negative correlation between iATS frequency and transcriptional output (Table 1). We therefore favor the idea that iATS and cATS differ in their extents of transcriptional progression (Fig. 6A).
Fig. 6.
Models for ATS classes and their regulation in development. (A) Simple molecular models of iATS and cATS. (Left) iATS nascent transcripts are detected with the long first intron probe set and therefore likely consist of the first exon (Ex1) and much of the long first intron, but not more downstream exons (Ex2-7). We show one incomplete nascent transcript during transcriptional elongation by RNA polymerase II (RNAP II) for simplicity, but iATS could result from slowed or paused transcriptional elongation, slowed or paused splicing, or aborted transcription, with each mechanism leading to different partial nascent transcripts (Discussion). (Right) cATS nascent transcripts are detected with both intron and exon probe sets. We show one complete nascent transcript with the first exon, long first intron, and all downstream exons for simplicity, but cATS likely include a spectrum of partial and complete transcripts. (B) Biological models for mpk-1 ATS class frequency having a critical role in developmental gene expression. Developmental stages shown above correspond to patterns of ATS class frequency, transcriptional output, and protein expression shown below (Discussion).
We do not understand the mechanism responsible for formation of these two ATS classes. The simplest explanation is that transcriptional elongation is slowed or paused at iATS, perhaps in the long first intron. That slowing or pausing cannot be the same as promoter-proximal pausing, which occurs ∼20 to 60 bp downstream of transcriptional initiation and would not generate a transcript detectable with the first intron probe (4, 5, 44). If pausing does occur at iATS, it could be coupled to splicing (45–48). However, splicing pauses detected to date in other systems are short, on the order of seconds to minutes (49–51), but could be longer if regulated. Another plausible explanation is that transcription is aborted at iATS. Abortive transcription occurs in Drosophila embryos, where mitosis truncates transcription of very long genes in cells with very short cell cycles (2, 3, 28, 52, 53). However, in the iATS reported in our work, elongation through each gene is predicted to take <15 min, based on rates of 1 to 4 kb/s (37, 49, 50), far less than the ∼6-h cell cycle in the progenitor zone (24); thus, iATS are unlikely to be the result of aborted transcription at mitosis. Differentiating among these various mechanisms is challenging in the C. elegans germline, and iATS per se have not yet been reported in cultured cells. Nonetheless, although speculative, we suggest that iATS result from transcriptional pausing, perhaps during RNAP II elongation or splicing of the long first intron.
Graded cATS Frequency Is Coupled to a Graded Transcriptional Output.
One of our most striking findings is that frequencies of the two ATS classes, iATS and cATS, are patterned in development. Whereas the probability of a nucleus harboring any ATS was essentially the same for all germ cells in the two regions investigated, the frequencies of the two ATS classes changed dramatically and reciprocally as germ cells mature. Indeed, the mpk-1 and lag-3 frequencies were clearly graded in the hermaphrodite progenitor zone. For both genes, iATS frequency started high in GSCs within the niche and dropped as their daughters left the niche and moved through the progenitor zone; conversely, cATS frequency started low and increased across the same region. These reciprocally graded iATS and cATS frequencies likely reflect graded and regulated changes in the ability of an ATS to complete transcription through the gene.
An important corollary of the iATS class, with its partial transcripts, is that the existence of an active transcription site per se does not ensure production of mRNAs. The iATS frequency had a pattern opposite to that of transcriptional yield, measured both as production of full-length nascent transcripts and mature mRNAs, whereas the cATS frequency pattern aligned well with these two measures of transcriptional output. Future smFISH studies must therefore take into account not only the presence of an ATS, but the ATS class and its productivity. This caution may be most important for genes with long introns or perhaps simply long genes. We suspected that some aspect of the long first intron might be critical for producing the two ATS classes but were not able to identify it with designer deletions. Regardless, for the key genes investigated in this work, we suggest that the regulated balance between cATS and iATS classes is an important factor in driving gene expression.
ATS Classes Are Gene-, Stage-, and Sex-Specific during Germline Development.
The three genes investigated in this work—mpk-1, lag-1, and lag-3—encode key regulators of development (Introduction). In the germline tissue, they regulate stem cell maintenance, sex determination, and several steps of differentiation (Fig. 1B); elsewhere, they regulate embryogenesis and postembryonic somatic development (54, 55). Here we consider how the patterns of ATS class frequency relate to germline function. This is most straightforward in the hermaphrodite Early Pachytene region where germ cells act as nurse cells for oocytes (56). All three genes produce maternal mRNAs (57), consistent with their high cATS frequency and abundant transcriptional yield to load maternal mRNAs into the oocyte.
The patterns of cATS frequency are more nuanced in the Progenitor Zone. We first consider lag-1 and lag-3, which encode essential components of the Notch-dependent transcription factor complex and are required for GSC maintenance (8, 11, 13, 58). Consistent with that role, the lag-1 cATS frequency and transcriptional output are higher in GSCs than in the more proximal PZ (this work), and LAG-1 protein is expressed similarly (26). More puzzling is the lag-3 cATS pattern, which is low in GSCs even though LAG-3 protein must function there to maintain GSCs. The explanation may rely on LAG-3 functioning in a nuclear complex with the Notch intracellular domain (NICD) (13), with abundance of nuclear NICD vanishingly low (59, 60). We suspect that LAG-3 abundance must be kept low to work with its low-abundance NICD companion for Notch-dependent transcriptional activation. Indeed, mammalian Mastermind-like (MAML), a LAG-3 ortholog (61–64), is often overexpressed in cancers (62, 65). Perhaps the lag-3 cATS frequency must be kept low to prevent overexpression and tumorigenesis.
The C. elegans ERK/MAPK ortholog, mpk-1, functions at several steps of germline differentiation: sperm fate specification, meiotic progression, and oocyte maturation (16–20). These functions all rely on a single germline-specific isoform, mpk-1b mRNA, which, in hermaphrodites, generates low MPK-1B protein in the PZ and increasing MPK-1B as germ cells progress through differentiation (16, 33). As shown in Fig. 6B, the pattern of mpk-1 cATS frequency and transcriptional output in hermaphrodites conforms to the pattern of MPK-1B protein expression and its established functions in meiotic progression and oocyte maturation. Given its prominent role in germline differentiation, mpk-1 expression might have been kept low in GSCs to maintain stem cells. However, germline sexual identity is established within the PZ (17, 66), and mpk-1 promotes sperm fate (16). Indeed, mpk-1 cATS frequency was sexually dimorphic: 25% in GSCs of oogenic but ∼50% in GSCs of spermatogenic germlines (Fig. 6B). The low cATS frequency seen in hermaphrodite GSCs is therefore not required for stem cell maintenance but instead is consistent with preventing sperm fate specification in oogenic adult hermaphrodites. Although the abundance and activity of MPK-1/ERK are also regulated posttranscriptionally and posttranslationally (33, 67), regulation of ATS class, and hence regulation of transcriptional progression, emerges as its earliest point of developmental control.
Future Directions.
A deeper understanding of ATS classes and their regulation is a challenge for future studies. One key question is whether iATS form at other genes, in other tissues, and in other species. The literature reveals plausible iATS candidates in Drosophila and mouse (3, 27), but those studies used different methods and their iATS equivalence is uncertain. A second key question is the mechanism regulating ATS class. If found in cultured cells, this question can be addressed with powerful biochemical and genomic methods. The C. elegans iATS reported here occur in a minority of cells within the germline tissue, a substantial barrier for -omics methods. However, mechanism can be approached in C. elegans with more refined smFISH analyses to probe the possibility of a transcriptional pause in iATS and live imaging to ask about transcriptional or pause dynamics. Regardless, identification of a graded developmental transition from iATS to cATS opens the possibility of a previously unrecognized mode of transcriptional regulation.
Materials and Methods
Detailed materials and methods are provided in SI Appendix, Methods. Briefly, all strains were maintained at 20 °C (68) unless otherwise indicated. Most experiments were done using wildtype N2 animals, but SI Appendix, Table S1 provides strain names and genotypes. All mutations were made in otherwise wildtype animals using CRISPR (69, 70), with guides listed in SI Appendix, Table S2. Statistical tests were performed in MATLAB: Student’s t test (ttest2 function) and Pearson’s correlation tests (corr function). Significance cutoff of P ≤ 0.01 was used.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank members of the Kimble laboratory, Wickens laboratory, David Brow, Bob Landick, Daniel Panaccione, and Aaron Hoskins for thoughtful discussions. We thank Brian Carrick, Sarah Crittenden, and Tina Lynch for critical manuscript reading; Laura Vanderploeg for help with figures; and ChangHwan Lee for sharing expertise about smFISH, MATLAB, and lag-3 RNAi. S.R.-T. was supported by the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant DGE-1256259 and NIH Predoctoral Training Grant in Genetics 5T32GM007133. J.K. was an HHMI Investigator and is now supported by NIH Grant R01 GM134119. Any opinion, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Footnotes
The authors declare no competing interest.
This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2013163117/-/DCSupplemental.
Data Availability.
MATLAB codes are deposited and publicly avaliable at https://github.com/robinson-thiewes/Robinson-thiewes-PNAS-codes- (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4007918). All study data are included in the article and supporting information. Raw Matlab workspaces are available upon request.
References
- 1.Mannervik M., Nibu Y., Zhang H., Levine M., Transcriptional coregulators in development. Science 284, 606–609 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gubb D., Intron‐delay and the precision of expression of homoeotic gene products in Drosophila. Dev. Genet. 7, 119–131 (1986). [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shermoen A. W., O’Farrell P. H., Progression of the cell cycle through mitosis leads to abortion of nascent transcripts. Cell 67, 303–310 (1991). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Adelman K., Lis J. T., Promoter-proximal pausing of RNA polymerase II: Emerging roles in metazoans. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 720–731 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jonkers I., Lis J. T., Getting up to speed with transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16, 167–177 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Churchman L. S., Weissman J. S., Nascent transcript sequencing visualizes transcription at nucleotide resolution. Nature 469, 368–373 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pichon X., Lagha M., Mueller F., Bertrand E., A growing toolbox to image gene expression in single cells: Sensitive approaches for demanding challenges. Mol. Cell 71, 468–480 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lee C., Sorensen E. B., Lynch T. R., Kimble J., C. elegans GLP-1/Notch activates transcription in a probability gradient across the germline stem cell pool. eLife 5, e18370 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lee C., Shin H., Kimble J., Dynamics of Notch-dependent transcriptional bursting in its native context. Dev. Cell 50, 426–435.e4 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Crittenden S. L.et al., Sexual dimorphism of niche architecture and regulation of the Caenorhabditis elegans germline stem cell pool. Mol. Biol. Cell 30, 1757–1769 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lambie E. J., Kimble J., Two homologous regulatory genes, lin-12 and glp-1, have overlapping functions. Development 112, 231–240 (1991). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Christensen S., Kodoyianni V., Bosenberg M., Friedman L., Kimble J., lag-1, a gene required for lin-12 and glp-1 signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans, is homologous to human CBF1 and Drosophila Su(H). Development 122, 1373–1383 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Petcherski A. G., Kimble J., LAG-3 is a putative transcriptional activator in the C. elegans Notch pathway. Nature 405, 364–368 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lackner M. R., Kornfeld K., Miller L. M., Horvitz H. R., Kim S. K., A MAP kinase homolog, mpk-1, is involved in ras-mediated induction of vulval cell fates in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genes Dev. 8, 160–173 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wu Y., Han M., Suppression of activated Let-60 ras protein defines a role of Caenorhabditis elegans Sur-1 MAP kinase in vulval differentiation. Genes Dev. 8, 147–159 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lee M. H.et al., Multiple functions and dynamic activation of MPK-1 extracellular signal-regulated kinase signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans germline development. Genetics 177, 2039–2062 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Morgan C. T., Noble D., Kimble J., Mitosis-meiosis and sperm-oocyte fate decisions are separable regulatory events. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 3411–3416 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Church D. L., Guan K. L., Lambie E. J., Three genes of the MAP kinase cascade, mek-2, mpk-1/sur-1 and let-60 ras, are required for meiotic cell cycle progression in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development 121, 2525–2535 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lopez A. L. 3rdet al., DAF-2 and ERK couple nutrient availability to meiotic progression during Caenorhabditis elegans oogenesis. Dev. Cell 27, 227–240 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Arur S.et al., MPK-1 ERK controls membrane organization in C. elegans oogenesis via a sex-determination module. Dev. Cell 20, 677–688 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Crittenden S. L., Leonhard K. A., Byrd D. T., Kimble J., Cellular analyses of the mitotic region in the Caenorhabditis elegans adult germ line. Mol. Biol. Cell 17, 3051–3061 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Rosu S., Cohen-Fix O., Live-imaging analysis of germ cell proliferation in the C. elegans adult supports a stochastic model for stem cell proliferation. Dev. Biol. 423, 93–100 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cinquin O., Crittenden S. L., Morgan D. E., Kimble J., Progression from a stem cell-like state to early differentiation in the C. elegans germ line. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 2048–2053 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hubbard E. J. A., Schedl T., Biology of the caenorhabditis elegans germline stem cell system. Genetics 213, 1145–1188 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chubb J. R., Trcek T., Shenoy S. M., Singer R. H., Transcriptional pulsing of a developmental gene. Curr. Biol. 16, 1018–1025 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chen J.et al., GLP-1 Notch-LAG-1 CSL control of the germline stem cell fate is mediated by transcriptional targets lst-1 and sygl-1. PLoS Genet. 16, e1008650 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Takashima Y., Ohtsuka T., González A., Miyachi H., Kageyama R., Intronic delay is essential for oscillatory expression in the segmentation clock. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 3300–3305 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Swinburne I. A., Silver P. A., Intron delays and transcriptional timing during development. Dev. Cell 14, 324–330 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Swinburne I. A., Miguez D. G., Landgraf D., Silver P. A., Intron length increases oscillatory periods of gene expression in animal cells. Genes Dev. 22, 2342–2346 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chorev M., Carmel L., The function of introns. Front. Genet. 3, 55 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rose A. B., Introns as gene regulators: A brick on the accelerator. Front. Genet. 9, 672 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Parenteau J.et al., Introns are mediators of cell response to starvation. Nature 565, 612–617 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lee M. H.et al., Conserved regulation of MAP kinase expression by PUF RNA-binding proteins. PLoS Genet. 3, e233 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Robinson-Thiewes S., Dufour B., Martel P.-O.et al. , Non-autonomous regulation of germline stem cell proliferation by somatic MPK-1/MAPK activity in C. elegans. bioRxiv:2020.08.24.265249 (August 24, 2020) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 35.Mcknight S. L., Miller O. L., Ultrastructural patterns of RNA synthesis during early embryogenesis of Drosophila melanogaster. Cell Mass Inst. Technol. 8, 309–315 (1976). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Femino A. M., Fay F. S., Fogarty K., Singer R. H., Visualization of single RNA transcripts in situ. Science 280, 585–590 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Darzacq X.et al., In vivo dynamics of RNA polymerase II transcription. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 796–806 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Coté A., Coté C., Bayatpour S.et al. , The spatial distributions of pre-mRNAs suggest post-transcriptional splicing of specific introns within endogenous genes. bioRxiv:2020.04.06.028092 (April 7, 2020).
- 39.Bartman C. R.et al., Transcriptional burst initiation and polymerase pause release are key control points of transcriptional regulation. Mol. Cell 73, 519–532.e4 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Clement J. Q., Qian L., Kaplinsky N., Wilkinson M. F., The stability and fate of a spliced intron from vertebrate cells. RNA 5, 206–220 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Daguenet E.et al., Perispeckles are major assembly sites for the exon junction core complex. Mol. Biol. Cell 23, 1765–1782 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Dias A. P., Dufu K., Lei H., Reed R., A role for TREX components in the release of spliced mRNA from nuclear speckle domains. Nat. Commun. 1, 97 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Galganski L., Urbanek M. O., Krzyzosiak W. J., Nuclear speckles: Molecular organization, biological function and role in disease. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 10350–10368 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sheridan R. M., Fong N., D’Alessandro A., Bentley D. L., Widespread backtracking by RNA Pol II is a major effector of gene activation, 5′ pause release, termination, and transcription elongation rate. Mol. Cell 73, 107–118.e4 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Alexander R. D., Innocente S. A., Barrass J. D., Beggs J. D., Splicing-dependent RNA polymerase pausing in yeast. Mol. Cell 40, 582–593 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Mayer A.et al., Native elongating transcript sequencing reveals human transcriptional activity at nucleotide resolution. Cell 161, 541–554 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Nojima T.et al., Mammalian NET-seq reveals genome-wide nascent transcription coupled to RNA processing. Cell 161, 526–540 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Saldi T., Cortazar M. A., Sheridan R. M., Bentley D. L., Coupling of RNA polymerase II transcription elongation with pre-mRNA splicing. J. Mol. Biol. 428, 2623–2635 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Martin R. M., Rino J., Carvalho C., Kirchhausen T., Carmo-Fonseca M., Live-cell visualization of pre-mRNA splicing with single-molecule sensitivity. Cell Rep. 4, 1144–1155 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Singh J., Padgett R. A., Rates of in situ transcription and splicing in large human genes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 1128–1133 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Alpert T., Herzel L., Neugebauer K. M., Perfect timing: Splicing and transcription rates in living cells. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 8, 10.1002/wrna.1401 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Tadros W., Lipshitz H. D., The maternal-to-zygotic transition: A play in two acts. Development 136, 3033–3042 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kwasnieski J. C., Orr-Weaver T. L., Bartel D. P., Early genome activation in Drosophila is extensive with an initial tendency for aborted transcripts and retained introns. Genome Res. 29, 1188–1197 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Priess J. R., “Notch signaling in the C. elegans embryo” in WormBook, ed. The C. elegans Research Community, www.wormbook.org (June 25, 2005), 10.1895/wormbook.1.4.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 55.Sternberg P. W., “Vulval development” in WormBook, ed. The C. elegans Research Community, www.wormbook.org (June 25, 2005), doi/10.1895/wormbook.1.6.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 56.Wolke U., Jezuit E. A., Priess J. R., Actin-dependent cytoplasmic streaming in C. elegans oogenesis. Development 134, 2227–2236 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Stoeckius M.et al., Global characterization of the oocyte-to-embryo transition in Caenorhabditis elegans uncovers a novel mRNA clearance mechanism. EMBO J. 33, 1751–1766 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Kershner A. M., Shin H., Hansen T. J., Kimble J., Discovery of two GLP-1/Notch target genes that account for the role of GLP-1/Notch signaling in stem cell maintenance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 3739–3744 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Crittenden S. L., Troemel E. R., Evans T. C., Kimble J., GLP-1 is localized to the mitotic region of the C. elegans germ line. Development 120, 2901–2911 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Sorensen E. B., Seidel H. S., Crittenden S. L.et al., A toolkit of tagged glp-1 alleles reveals strong glp-1 expression in the germline, embryo, and spermatheca. MicroPubl Biol., 10.17912/micropub.biology.000271 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Zhao Y.et al., The notch regulator MAML1 interacts with p53 and functions as a coactivator. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 11969–11981 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Wu L., Griffin J. D., Modulation of Notch signaling by mastermind-like (MAML) transcriptional co-activators and their involvement in tumorigenesis. Semin. Cancer Biol. 14, 348–356 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.McElhinny A. S., Li J. L., Wu L., Mastermind-like transcriptional co-activators: Emerging roles in regulating cross talk among multiple signaling pathways. Oncogene 27, 5138–5147 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kitagawa M., Notch signalling in the nucleus: Roles of Mastermind-like (MAML) transcriptional coactivators. J. Biochem. 159, 287–294 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Forghanifard M. M.et al., Expression analysis elucidates the roles of MAML1 and Twist1 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma aggressiveness and metastasis. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 19, 743–749 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Morgan D. E., Crittenden S. L., Kimble J., The C. elegans adult male germline: Stem cells and sexual dimorphism. Dev. Biol. 346, 204–214 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Yoon D. S., Alfhili M. A., Friend K., Lee M.-H., MPK-1/ERK regulatory network controls the number of sperm by regulating timing of sperm-oocyte switch in C. elegans germline. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 491, 1077–1082 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Brenner S., The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 77, 71–94 (1974). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Paix A.et al., Scalable and versatile genome editing using linear DNAs with microhomology to Cas9 Sites in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 198, 1347–1356 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Dokshin G. A., Ghanta K. S., Piscopo K. M., Mello C. C., Robust genome editing with short single-stranded and long, partially single-stranded DNA donors in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 210, 781–787 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
MATLAB codes are deposited and publicly avaliable at https://github.com/robinson-thiewes/Robinson-thiewes-PNAS-codes- (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4007918). All study data are included in the article and supporting information. Raw Matlab workspaces are available upon request.






