Significance
The amount of neurotransmitter release triggered by Ca2+ from a presynaptic single vesicle (quantal size, QS) is fundamental and determines the strength of synaptic transmission. The present study provides compelling evidence that the QS of catecholamine is increased by membrane depolarization per se (bypassing Ca2+) via the voltage-sensitive ATP-GPCR/P2Y12 in sympathetic chromaffin cells. D76-P2Y12 and D127-P2Y12 are revealed as the voltage-sensing sites by introducing two GPCR reporting systems. We also establish the physiology relevance of voltage dependence of catecholamine QS, offering a signaling pathway—Vm → P2Y12(D76/D127) → Giβγ → QS → myocyte contractility—for diverse functions in the nervous system and other systems containing GPCRs.
Keywords: membrane potential, GPCR/P2Y12, dense core vesicle, quantal size, chromaffin cell
Abstract
Current models emphasize that membrane voltage (Vm) depolarization-induced Ca2+ influx triggers the fusion of vesicles to the plasma membrane. In sympathetic adrenal chromaffin cells, activation of a variety of G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) can inhibit quantal size (QS) through the direct interaction of G protein Giβγ subunits with exocytosis fusion proteins. Here we report that, independently from Ca2+, Vm (action potential) per se regulates the amount of catecholamine released from each vesicle, the QS. The Vm regulation of QS was through ATP-activated GPCR-P2Y12 receptors. D76 and D127 in P2Y12 were the voltage-sensing sites. Finally, we revealed the relevance of the Vm dependence of QS for tuning autoinhibition and target cell functions. Together, membrane voltage per se increases the quantal size of dense-core vesicle release of catecholamine via Vm → P2Y12(D76/D127) → Giβγ → QS → myocyte contractility, offering a universal Vm-GPCR signaling pathway for its functions in the nervous system and other systems containing GPCRs.
According to the classical Ca2+ hypothesis of presynaptic transmission and neuroendocrine secretion, a presynaptic action potential activates Ca2+ influx which triggers Ca2+-dependent quantal (all or none) vesicular release of neurotransmitter/hormone (1). In 1996, we reported the example of Ca2+-dependent subquantal release, in which only part of the vesicular content of a native transmitter (catecholamine) is released during a transient fusion event (fusion pore flickers, or kiss and run), leading to a smaller quantal size (QS) in sympathetic adrenal chromaffin cells (ACCs) (2). Subquantal kiss-and-run release was subsequently confirmed in ACCs (3, 4), other endocrine cells (5, 6), glia (7, 8), and neurons (9–11). In 2005, the regulator of subquantal kiss-and-run release was found: G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-dependent Giβγ reduces QS (7). In addition, endogenous dynamin-1 limits expansion of the vesicle fusion pore and maintains all Ca2+-induced exocytotic release via the kiss-and-run/subquantal release mode under physiological conditions in ACCs (12). More recently, the mechanism underlying subquantal catecholamine release has been revealed to consist of the joint kiss-and-run fusion pore and matrix binding (13).
The molecular machine that gates the fusion pore is known to involve the SNARE complex and other regulators (14, 15), including synaptotagmin (16), dynamin (12, 17–19), microdomain Ca2+ (7, 11, 20), and GPCR-dependent Giβγ (12, 19, 21–23). Giβγ is downstream of Gi-GPCR activation because only Gi is sufficiently abundant to allow Giβγ to function (24). There are many Gi-GPCRs, including those activated by the native transmitters acetylcholine (25, 26), somatostatin, and ATP (or ADP). ATP inhibition of QS (termed AIQS here) is induced via the GPCR-Gi-βγ pathway in ACCs (19). Its physiological relevance lies in the fact that ATP release (13) evoked from a neighboring cell directly leads to AIQS (19). AIQS is downstream of the ligand-GPCR-Gi-βγ signaling pathway, which is initiated by a native ligand that regulates the GPCR.
ATP is the ligand of two families of purinergic receptors, P2Xs and P2Ys. P2Xs are ion channels and P2Ys are GPCRs, including Gq (P2Y1, 2, 4, 6, 11) and Gi types (P2Y12, 13, 14) (27, 28). Among the P2Ys, P2Y1 exists in most tissues, including epithelial and endothelial cells, platelets, and immune cells (27, 29), and P2Y12 is strongly expressed on platelets, where it plays fundamental roles in their activation and aggregation (28, 30, 31), as well as in microglia (32, 33), smooth muscle cells (34), and chromaffin cells (35, 36). P2Y12 is a major target for drugs against cardiovascular diseases (thrombosis, stroke, and myocardial infarction) and currently, the top-selling drugs targeting P2Y12 (clopidogrel and cangrelor) are used for antithrombotic therapy (37–39). However, the subtype(s) of P2Ys that mediate AIQS remains unknown in ACCs.
To estimate the effects of GPCR-Giβγ on single-vesicle fusion, we used highly sensitive electrochemical microcarbon fiber electrodes (CFEs, 7-µm diameter) to measure the vesicle contents released from single fusion pores in ACCs (2, 12, 13, 19). For real-time imaging of vesicle fusion events, total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscope imaging in neuropeptide Y (NPY)-pHluorin transfected ACCs allows the distinction of kiss-and-run from full-fusion-like single-vesicle fusion modes (12, 13, 40). To determine the sites responsible for specific functions in a GPCR, reconstitution of the GPCR in a reporting system and its functional assay are needed (38, 41–43).
In the present study, by using CFEs to measure QS and/or the fusion mode of single-vesicle release events, TIRF live imaging to confirm single-vesicle fusion modes, and two complementary GPCR reporting systems (a high-throughput assay of Gi-α-IP3-[Ca2+]i for screening sites and a precision assay of Gi-βγ-GIRK current for validation) to determine the voltage-sensing sites in the P2Y-GPCR, we discovered that P2Y12 mediates AIQS, which is disinhibited by depolarization (membrane voltage [Vm]) via two voltage-sensing sites (D76 and D127) in native neuroendocrine chromaffin cells.
Results
Depolarization Per Se Relieves the Intrinsic AIQS.
We have previously demonstrated that subquantal catecholamine release occurs in ACCs (2), and the QS is regulated by GPCR-Gi-βγ following elevation of the intracellular Ca2+ concentration [Ca2+]i by caffeine (20 mM) (19). When caffeine was applied for 10 s, a burst of amperometric spikes—representing quantal catecholamine release from single large dense-core vesicles—was evoked in ACCs (Fig. 1A). Indeed, ATP inhibited the QS (Fig. 1A, see also refs. 13, 19), or the AIQS phenotype was produced by the smaller QS (Fig. 1A, see also ref. 19). Surprisingly, when a cell was depolarized by high KCl (70 mM), the AIQS phenotype was abolished (Fig. 1A). The effect of Vm on GPCR-Gi-βγ-based AIQS was fully reversible (Fig. 1A) and independent of [Ca2+]i (Fig. 1B). The statistics of this Vm-dependent AIQS are shown in Fig. 1 D and E and SI Appendix, Fig. S1. ACCs were bathed in 0 Ca2+ solution containing 1 mM EGTA during caffeine stimulation to ensure no Ca2+ influx during depolarization. [Ca2+]i measurements using Fura-2 showed that the caffeine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation was independent of depolarization (Fig. 1 B and F). The depolarization from −70 mV to −20 mV by 70 mM KCl (but not caffeine or ATP) was confirmed by current-clamp recordings (Fig. 1 C and F). Note that ATP was required for the Vm-dependent AIQS phenotype and in the absence of ATP, depolarization had no effect on the QS (SI Appendix, Figs. S1 and S14). Furthermore, the QS did not change with repetitive caffeine stimulation (SI Appendix, Fig. S2).
Fig. 1.
ATP inhibition of quantal size (AIQS) of vesicular catecholamine release is attenuated by membrane depolarization voltage (Vm). (A) Basic characteristics of voltage-dependent AIQS. (Upper) cartoon of Vm-AIQS with steps 1 through 3. (Lower) ATP (100 µM) inhibits the QS of amperometric spikes induced by caffeine (Caf; 20 mM for 10 s) and this is reversed by 70 mM KCl (70K)-induced depolarization (dashed boxes show averaged quantal events). Each cell was exposed four times to caffeine-containing solutions. The reversible Vm-AIQS contains four steps (1, 2, 3, and 2′): (step 1) Ca2+ is released from the ER store by caffeine and triggers vesicular catecholamine release events recorded as spikes in amperometric current (Iamp) recordings; (step 2) ATP activates P2Y receptors and reduces QS; (step 3) membrane depolarization (by 70K) removes the inhibitory effect of ATP; and finally (step 2′) AIQS recovers after removing depolarization. (B) Intracellular Ca2+ [Ca2+]i (F340/F380) elevation measured by Fura2/AM, corresponding to A. (C) Membrane potential recorded by current clamp, corresponding to A. Caffeine with or without ATP does not change the membrane potential, while 70 mM KCl depolarizes it by ∼50 mV. (D) Cumulative distribution of QS corresponding to the four steps (1, 2, 3, and 2′) of Fig. 1A (198 spikes for group 1, 157 spikes for group 2, 193 spikes for group 3, and 166 spikes for group 2′. The four groups are matched measurements from n = 15 cells. For groups 2 vs. 3, ***P < 0.001, K-S test). (E) Quantitative analysis of single-vesicle release events (quanta) from cells of Fig. 1D. Analyzed spikes meet the 5-SD noise threshold criterion. ATP significantly reduces QS, while depolarization by 70 mM KCl completely removes the inhibitory effect of ATP. When the 70 mM KCl is washed out, QS is inhibited by ATP again (the four groups are matched measures from n = 15 cells, paired Friedman test, post hoc Dunn’s multiple comparisons test). (F, Left) Depolarization does not affect the caffeine-induced [Ca2+]i elevation in Ca2+-free bath (n = 14 cells, Friedman test, post hoc Dunn’s multiple comparisons test). (F, Right) KCl (70 mM) depolarizes Vm by ∼50 mV (from –70 mV to –20 mV, n = 5 cells, paired Student’s t test). (G) Confirmation of voltage-dependent AIQS by another orthogonal assay of TIRFM imaging. Statistics of TIRF imaging data (SI Appendix, Fig. S4) confirm that the probability ratio [FFL ratio = N(FFL)/N(FFL + KAR), where N(FFL) is the number of full-fusion-like (FFL) events and N(FFL + KAR) is the total number of FFL and kiss-and-run (KAR) events]. Similar to the QS index from CFE recordings in E (multiple treatments were applied to the same cells), the corresponding index (FFL ratio) from TIRFM imaging is also increased by depolarization (70K) (n = 9 cells, Friedman test, post hoc Dunn’s multiple comparisons test, further details in SI Appendix, Fig. S4 and Materials and Methods). A–C show different cells with the same time scale. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. (E–G) *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001; NS, not significant.
To ensure that the relief of the inhibitory effect of ATP is due to membrane depolarization per se, we repeated the experiments shown in Fig. 1, but replacing 70 mM KCl depolarization by whole-cell voltage clamp. Similar to 70 mM KCl depolarization (Fig. 1), whole-cell depolarization from −70 mV to 0 mV abolished the AIQS (SI Appendix, Fig. S3). Thus, the AIQS phenotype is produced by membrane depolarization per se.
In addition to CFE recordings, single-vesicle exocytosis can be imaged live by TIRF, which measures the dynamics of single large dense-core vesicle release of pHluorin-tagged NPY in neurons (40, 44) and ACCs (13, 45). The Ca2+-dependent full-fusion-like mode, corresponding to full quantal release, and the kiss-and-run mode, corresponding to subquantal release (13) were identified by TIRF imaging (SI Appendix, Fig. S4 A and B and Movies S1–S4, see also refs. 13, 40, 45). Consistent with the CFE recordings, TIRF imaging revealed that ATP shifted the fusion mode from full-fusion-like to kiss-and-run (full-fusion-like ratio changed from 68 to 33%), while this AIQS-like effect was largely abolished by depolarization (full-fusion-like ratio changed from 33 to 62%, Fig. 1G and SI Appendix, Fig. S4).
P2Y12 Is the ATP Receptor for Voltage-Dependent AIQS.
Since AIQS was present in ACCs (Fig. 1, see also ref. 19), we aimed to identify the associated receptor. Because AIQS is probably produced by an unknown subtype of P2Y receptor coupled to Gi in ACCs (19), we first identified candidates in pharmacological experiments. When ACCs were treated with ATP (100 μM), 70 mM KCl depolarization disinhibited AIQS and increased QS (Fig. 2A). In contrast, suramin (100 μM), a broad-spectrum antagonist of P2 purinoceptors (46, 47), fully removed the effect of depolarization on AIQS (Fig. 2B). However, PPADS (50 μM), a broad-spectrum antagonist of P2X purinoceptors (48, 49), did not block the depolarization effect (Fig. 2C). Thus, depolarization relieves AIQS via Gi-P2Y(s). Strikingly, ARC66096 (10 μM, a specific antagonist of P2Y12) (50, 51) blocked the effect of depolarization on AIQS (Fig. 2D). These pharmacological experiments suggested that P2Y12 is a candidate for the depolarization-induced relief of AIQS.
Fig. 2.
P2Y12 is the ATP receptor for voltage-dependent AIQS—pharmacological evidence. (A) AIQS is regulated by voltage. Statistically, normalized QS (QS normalized by averaged QS in control bath, black) is significantly increased by 70 mM KCl (70K) depolarization (red) in ACCs treated with 100 µM ATP (n = 17 cells, **P < 0.01, paired Student’s t test). Inset, averaged quantal spikes without (black solid line) and with (red dashed line) 70 mM KCl depolarization. (B) Suramin (100 µM, a broad-spectrum P2XR and P2YR blocker) removes the effect of 70 mM KCl depolarization on AIQS (n = 13 cells, P = 0.49, paired Student’s t test). (C) PPADS (50 µM, a P2XR-specific blocker) does not remove the effect of 70 mM KCl depolarization on AIQS (n = 8 cells, *P < 0.05, paired Student’s t test). (D) ARC66096 (10 µM, a P2Y12 blocker) removes the 70 mM KCl-depolarization effect on AIQS (n = 19 cells, P = 0.74, paired Student’s t test). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; NS, not significant.
To confirm the pharmacological findings, we first performed reverse transcriptional PCR (RT-PCR) of rat adrenal medulla and found four Gq-coupled receptors (P2Y1, P2Y2, P2Y4, and P2Y6) and three Gi-coupled receptors (P2Y12, P2Y13, and P2Y14) (SI Appendix, Fig. S5A and Table S2). Second, following the pharmacological results (Fig. 2), we designed and validated two knockdown (KD) shRNAs targeting P2Y12 in rat ACCs (SI Appendix, Fig. S5 C–F) and found that P2Y12 was the major receptor mediating AIQS. Western blot analysis of HEK293A cells and immunofluorescent staining of native chromaffin cells revealed that P2Y12 was knocked down (∼80% reduction) by the shRNAs and could be fully rescued (Fig. 3 A and B). Depolarization disinhibited the AIQS in control scrambled (Fig. 3C and SI Appendix, Fig. S6A), but not P2Y12-KD (shRNA 1 or 2) ACCs (Fig. 3 D and E and SI Appendix, Fig. S6 B and C), while overexpressing shRNA-resistant P2Y12 fully recovered the Vm dependence of AIQS (Fig. 3F and SI Appendix, Fig. S6D). Thus, P2Y12 is essential for voltage-dependent AIQS in rat ACCs. Finally, using P2Y12-knockout (KO) mice (SI Appendix, Fig. S5B), the depolarization-sensitive AIQS was present only in wild-type (WT) but not P2Y12-KO cells (Fig. 3G). Taken together, P2Y12 is not only the ATP receptor for AIQS, but is also responsible for its Vm dependence.
Fig. 3.
P2Y12 is the ATP receptor for voltage-dependent AIQS—genetic evidence. (A) Western blots and statistics of P2Y12 expression in HEK293A cells transfected with scrambled, P2Y12-KD shRNA1, P2Y12-KD shRNA2, and P2Y12-rescue plasmids (five independent experiments, one-way ANOVA, post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparisons test). (B) Immunostaining and statistics of P2Y12 expression (scrambled, 25 cells; shRNA1, 26 cells; shRNA2, 10 cells; rescue, 17 cells, one-way ANOVA, post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparisons test). (Scale bar, 5 μm.) (C, Left) Typical CFE Iamp traces of ATP (100 µM)-induced AIQS from scrambled cells with or without 70 mM KCl (70K) depolarization. (C, Right) Statistics of the effect of depolarization on QS in 26 scrambled cells (**P < 0.01, Wilcoxon test). Inset, averaged quantal spikes without (black solid line) and with (red dashed line) 70 mM KCl depolarization (Vm). (D and E) Statistics of averaged quantal events and AIQS in 21 P2Y12-KD-shRNA1 cells (D, P = 0.64, Wilcoxon-test) and 19 P2Y12-KD shRNA2 cells (E, P = 0.59, Wilcoxon test) with or without 70 mM KCl depolarization (Vm). (F) Statistics of AIQS in 30 P2Y12-rescued cells (**P < 0.01, Wilcoxon test) with or without 70 mM KCl depolarization (Vm). (G, Upper Left) 70 mM KCl depolarization-induced AIQS is intact in a WT cell. (G, Upper Right) Cumulative distribution curve of QS (n = 14 cells, four groups [1, 2, 3, and 2′] of quantal events [167, 141, 140, and 125]). For groups 2 vs. 3, ***P < 0.001, K-S test and statistics of Vm-AIQS in 14 WT cells (Friedman test, post hoc Dunn’s multiple comparisons test). (G, Lower Left) 70 mM KCl depolarization-induced AIQS is eliminated in a P2Y12-KO cell. (G, Lower Right) Cumulative distribution curve of QS (n = 12 cells; groups 1, 2, 3, and 2′ of 136, 120, 118, and 101 events). For groups 2 vs. 3, NS, not significant, K-S test and statistics of Vm-AIQS in 12 P2Y12-KO cells (Friedman test, post hoc Dunn’s multiple comparisons test). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. (C–G) **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001; NS, not significant.
Depolarization Regulates P2Y12-Gi Signals via the Voltage-Sensing Sites D76 and D127 in Reconstituted Systems.
Based on the finding that P2Y12 mediated the Vm dependence of AIQS in ACCs (Figs. 1–3 and SI Appendix, Figs. S1–S6), we proposed that P2Y12 activity is voltage dependent and P2Y12 contains voltage-sensing sites. To test this hypothesis at the molecular level, we designed a P2Y12 reporting system via the P2Y12-Gi-α-IP3-[Ca2+]i signaling pathway (Fig. 4A), which is a high-throughput assay for multiple cells per experiment with [Ca2+]i imaging (Fig. 4B) to assess the voltage-dependence of P2Y12 in reporting cells (Fig. 4C). The Ca2+ indicator GCaMP3, P2Y12, and the Gαi3q chimera were co-overexpressed in HeLa cells and the Gαi3q chimera results in coupling with Gαi-coupled receptors but signaling through the Gαq-mediated PLC-IP3-[Ca2+]i mobilization pathway (42, 52, 53) (Fig. 4 A and B and SI Appendix, Fig. S7 A, B, and E and see also Materials and Methods). Membrane depolarization by 70 mM KCl (SI Appendix, Fig. S7H) inhibited the increased [Ca2+]i induced by 2MesADP (P2Y12 agonist) (27) in the P2Y12-reconstituted reporting cells (Fig. 4 C and E and Movies S5–S7), confirming that Vm modulates P2Y12 function: depolarization decreases P2Y12 activation as measured by the Gαi pathway. Using this high-throughput imaging assay, we screened for voltage-sensing sites in P2Y12 and found two amino acid sites: D76 and D127 (Fig. 4 C–E and SI Appendix, Fig. S10A) (54). Either D76N or D127N mutation abolished the Vm dependence of P2Y12 (Fig. 4E and SI Appendix, Fig. S8), indicating that these are the voltage-sensing sites of P2Y12.
Fig. 4.
Dissecting the voltage-sensing sites of P2Y12 by two reconstituted GPCR-signaling assays. (A) Cartoon of the P2Y12-Gi-α-IP3-[Ca2+]i assay. HeLa cells were transfected with the plasmids P2Y12, GCaMP3 (cytosol), and Gαi3q. The P2Y12-specific agonist 2MesADP (10 µM) activates the P2Y12-Gαi3q-PLC-IP3 pathway to induce Ca2+ release from the ER (SI Appendix, Fig. S7). (B) Confocal image of multiple HeLa cells transfected with P2Y12, Gαi3q, and GCaMP3 plasmids. (C) [Ca2+]i (ΔF/F0) triggered by 2MesADP with or without depolarization. Overlapped gray [Ca2+]i traces from many cells in the same dish; black/red traces show averaged [Ca2+]i. Depolarization (70 mM KCl, 70K) reversibly decreases the averaged amplitude of ΔF/F0 spikes. (D) P2Y12 purinergic receptor model based on the crystal structure (PDB accession no. 4PXZ) (54). Arrows indicate the positions of the two candidate Vm-sensing residues D76 and D127. (E) Statistics of evoked [Ca2+]i signals. Compared with the WT (C), Vm depolarization reduced [Ca2+]i (ΔF/F0) of P2Y12-WT, but not D76N or D127N mutation. For WT, n = 108 cells; for the D76N mutation, n = 45 cells; for the D127N mutation, n = 76 cells (SI Appendix, Fig. S8). Friedman test, post hoc Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. (F) Cartoon of the P2Y12-Gi-βγ-GIRK current assay (SI Appendix, Fig. S9). (G) Whole-cell recordings of GIRK current (IGIRK) induced by 140 mM KCl (140 K) in HEK293A cells coexpressing GIRK1/4 and P2Y12 (∆I10 and ∆I100 were IGIRK induced by 10 and 100 µM ADP). Note that IGIRK is larger at 100 μM than at 10 μM ADP (see also SI Appendix, Fig. S9E). (H) IGIRK evoked by 10 µM or 100 µM ADP measured at Vm = −40 mV (Left) or −100 mV (Right). The IGIRK ratio (∆I10/∆I100) was defined as γ(Vm) = ∆I10/∆I100. Statistics are shown in J (WT). (I) The γ(Vm)-Vm curve showing that γ(Vm) is voltage dependent. (J) Statistics of γ(Vm). For WT-P2Y12, γ(Vm) is potentiated at −100 mV versus −40 mV. At −40 mV, γ(Vm) = 0.55; at −100 mV, γ(Vm) = 0.79, (n = 29 cells, ***P < 0.001, paired Student’s t test). With the D76N or D127N mutation, the Vm-dependence of γ(Vm) is abolished (n = 15 cells for D76N; n = 18 cells for D127N, see also SI Appendix, Fig. S10, paired Student’s t test). (K) Summary of the effects of P2Y12 mutations on the ratio γ(Vm) (SI Appendix, Fig. S10). Data are presented as the median with interquartile range (E) or the mean ± SEM (J). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001; NS, not significant.
Next, to further analyze and quantify the voltage-sensitive sites of P2Y12, we designed another reporting system for P2Y12 activation based on the P2Y12-Gi-βγ-GIRK signaling pathway. In this precision assay, we used patch clamp to evaluate the voltage dependence of P2Y12 (Fig. 4 F–I and SI Appendix, Fig. S9, see also refs. 31, 41, 43). P2Y12 and GIRK1/4 channels together were coexpressed in HEK293A cells. Following ADP stimulation, the activation of P2Y12 was detected by the whole-cell GIRK current IGIRK (Fig. 4 F and G and SI Appendix, Fig. S9). To assess the voltage dependence of P2Y12, we calculated the ratio of IGIRK at the paired ADP doses 10 μM (middle dose) and 100 μM (saturation dose): γ(Vm) = ∆I10/∆I100 = IGIRK (10 μM)/IGIRK (100 μM), where Vm is the holding potential (SI Appendix, Fig. S11B). Importantly, γ(Vm) was larger at −100 mV than at −40 mV, indicating stronger P2Y12 activation and greater ADP-P2Y12 binding affinity with hyperpolarization (Fig. 4 H–J). To determine whether the negatively charged D76 and D127 were critical for the Vm dependence, in addition to D76N and D127N (negative-to-neutral charge), we made D76E and D127E mutations (negative-to-negative charge). In contrast to native P2Y12 (Fig. 4 H–J), the mutation D76N or D127N, but not D76E or D127E, abolished the voltage dependence of γ(Vm) (Fig. 4 J and K and SI Appendix, Fig. S10 B–F). These results from the precision assay confirmed that not only the sites but also the negative charges (either D or E) of both D76 and D127 were essential for the Vm dependence of P2Y12. Taken together, D76 and D127 are the voltage-sensing sites of P2Y12.
Validation of P2Y12 Vm Sensors for AIQS in Chromaffin Cells.
Next, we examined the effects of the mutations D76N and D127N on the Vm dependence of AIQS (Vm-AIQS) in native ACC cells. First, comparing WT and KD cells (P2Y12-shRNA-KD, Fig. 3 A–F), the rescue by shRNA1-resistant WT restored both AIQS and Vm-AIQS in ACCs (Fig. 5A). However, replacing the shRNA1-resistant WT by either shRNA1-resistant P2Y12-D76N or -D127N, the Vm-AIQS effect (but not AIQS itself) was abolished (Fig. 5 B–D). Thus, both D76 and D127 are voltage-sensing sites of P2Y12 responsible for the Vm-AIQS effect (Fig. 5E).
Fig. 5.
The P2Y12-D76 and -D127 sites are voltage sensors in chromaffin cells. (A, Left) The depolarization dependence of AIQS is rescued by P2Y12*, which is a functional P2Y12 resistant to shRNA1. (A, Right) Statistics of QS (n = 11 cells, Friedman test, post hoc Dunn’s multiple comparisons test). Dashed boxes show averaged quantal events. (B and C, Left) The Vm dependence of AIQS cannot be rescued by either D76N-P2Y12 (B) or D127N-P2Y12 (C). (B and C, Right) Statistics of QS (B, n = 17 cells, one-way ANOVA, post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparisons test; C, n = 7 cells, Friedman test, post hoc Dunn’s multiple comparisons test). (D) Summary of the P2Y12 Vm dependence of AIQS. (E) Model of voltage-sensitive P2Y12 regulation of quantal release in native ACCs. ATP is released from chromaffin vesicles and activates autoinhibitory P2Y12, which inhibits quantal catecholamine release. Meanwhile, depolarization deactivates P2Y12 via the D76 and D127 sites, and thus relieves the inhibitory effect of ATP. Data are the mean ± SEM. (A–C) *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01; NS, not significant.
Physiological Relevance of the Vm Dependence of AIQS.
Next, we investigated whether the Vm dependence of AIQS exists in adrenal slice ACCs (Fig. 6A). CFEs were used to record the amperometric current (Iamp) representing catecholamine overflow from all nearby quantal release from slice ACCs bathed in Ca2+-free solution containing 10 mM EGTA after stimulation (Fig. 6 A and B). ATP reversibly inhibited the caffeine-induced Iamp (Fig. 6B). Importantly, corresponding to the Vm-AIQS in cultured ACCs (Fig. 1A), the Vm dependence of the ATP-inhibited Iamp induced by caffeine was preserved in adrenal slices, as 70 mM KCl depolarization disinhibited this Iamp (Fig. 6B). That this voltage-dependent phenomenon is independent of Ca2+ channels was demonstrated by using the Ca2+ channel blocker CdCl2 (SI Appendix, Fig. S12).. Similar to the Vm-dependent AIQS in cultured ACCs (Fig. 3G), the Vm dependence of ATP-inhibited Iamp in adrenal slices (Vm-AIQS in situ) was also abolished by P2Y12-KO (Fig. 6C). Although depolarization in these slice experiments was by 70 mM KCl, the Vm-AIQS in situ likely remains with physiological stimulation because, when depolarization by 70 mM KCl (Figs. 1–3) was replaced by whole-cell depolarization with either action potentials (SI Appendix, Fig. S13) at physiological frequencies (55, 56) or Vm pulses (SI Appendix, Fig. S3), the Vm dependence of AIQS remained in cultured ACCs.
Fig. 6.
Potential relevance of voltage-dependent GPCR-P2Y12 mediation of catecholamine release. (A) Image of a freshly prepared mouse adrenal slice 150 µm thick. (A, Inset) Enlargement showing a recording CFE (Φ 7 µm) in the slice with visible individual ACCs. (B, Left) In an adrenal slice bathed in 0 Ca2+ (containing 10 mM EGTA) and ATP (100 µM), the ATP-inhibited catecholamine overflow (Iamp, amperometric current) evoked by caffeine (20 mM for 40 s) is fully removed by 70 mM KCl (70K) depolarization in WT ACCs. (B, Right) Statistics of WT (n = 9 slices from four mice, Friedman test, post hoc Dunn’s multiple comparisons test). (C) As in B, except the Vm dependence of Iamp is abolished by P2Y12-KO. (C, Right) Statistics of KO (n = 9 slices from four mice, one-way ANOVA, post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparisons test). (D, Upper) Cartoon of the protocol for the catecholamine fluid collection from adrenal slices treated with 0 Ca + ATP + caffeine (control fluid) or 0Ca + 70K + ATP + caffeine (70K fluid). The fluids were puffed onto myocytes through the patch pipette (10 to 12 µm in diameter) to test their effects. (D, Lower) Setup to record excitation–contraction coupling in a myocyte. (E) Diagram of how catecholamine fluid was used to potentiate myocyte contractility (see F for details). (F) Quantification of ΔL2/ΔL1, where ΔL1 and ΔL2 represent the contraction length of myocytes before and after application of depolarization fluid (0Ca + 70K + ATP + caffeine) versus control fluid (0Ca + ATP + caffeine) (n = 20 myocytes for control fluid, and n = 22 myocytes for depolarization fluid, unpaired Student’s t test). (G) Model of the Vm-AIQS signal pathway to a target cell. The Vm dependence of QS implies a broad physiological relevance by providing the entire Vm-P2Y12 pathway in vivo. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. (B, C, and F) *P < 0.05; NS, not significant.
To provide proof of concept for the physiological impact of the Vm-AIQS effect via catecholamine release from adrenal slices, we determined whether the caffeine-induced release could affect cardiac myocytes, the major peripheral targets of sympathetic ACCs (57, 58). We collected the fluid (30 µL/gland) from adrenal slices (two slices per gland) incubated in either control (0 mM Ca2+ + 100 µM ATP + 20 mM caffeine) or depolarization (control + 70 mM KCl) solution. Compared to the control solution, the depolarization solution should contain more catecholamine produced by the Vm-AIQS effect. These stock solutions were diluted 10 times into working solutions (2 mM Ca2+ and 2 mM caffeine) and applied to beating myocytes (Fig. 6D). In contrast to the control solution, the depolarization solution increased the contractility of myocytes (Fig. 6 D–F), implying potential regulation of cardiac excitation–contraction coupling by Vm-AIQS.
Finally, in addition to the ligand-GPCR pair of ATP-P2Y12, somatostatin-GPCR is also known to inhibit QS in ACCs (13, 19). We found that, like ATP-P2Y12, somatostatin-SSTR (somatostatin receptor) (59) had a similar phenotype of Vm dependence (Figs. 1–6 and SI Appendix, Fig. S15), indicating that the Vm dependence of GPCR-Gi signaling is likely a general phenomenon in native mammalian cells. In principle, the presence of two types of Gi-GPCRs (P2Y12 and SSTR) allows the cell to be regulated by both neurotransmitters (ATP and somatostatin) arising from other vesicles or cells. On the other hand, a single depolarization can shut down the Vm-dependent autoinhibition of both Gi-GPCRs.
Discussion
Neurotransmitter release from presynaptic cells induced by action potentials is fundamental, and neurotransmission depends on QS. In the present work we found that, after Ca2+ as the coregulator to trigger vesicle fusion, depolarization—in addition to activating voltage-gated channels—per se acts as coregulator of GPCR to determine the QS. The P2Y12-mediated Vm dependence of QS has broad physiological relevance, providing the entire pathway [Vm → P2Y12 (D76/D127) → Giβγ → QS → secretion] the ability to modulate the hormone level in circulating plasma for targeted cells throughout the body (including cardiac myocytes, Fig. 6G).
The major finding of the present work was that Vm depolarization relieved AIQS (ATP inhibition of QS) via ATP-dependent GPCR (P2Y)-Giβγ in rodent ACCs. This was supported by the findings that in cultured ACCs: 1) depolarization per se relieved the AIQS, and increased the QS of caffeine-induced secretion by ∼200% (Fig. 1 A–F and SI Appendix, Figs. S1–S3), a characteristic termed Vm-AIQS. 2) TIRF imaging confirmed that depolarization shifted the vesicle fusion mode from kiss-and-run to full fusion and increased the proportion of full-fusion events from 33 to 62% (Fig. 1G and SI Appendix, Fig. S4 and Movies S1–S4), which confirmed Vm-AIQS. 3) Vm-AIQS also persisted in the more physiological adrenal slice (Fig. 6A–C). 4) Like ATP-P2Y, another native ligand-GPCR pair, somatostatin and its GPCR, possessed a Vm-AIQS-like phenotype with somatostatin replacing ATP (SI Appendix, Fig. S15), indicating that Vm-GPCR-QS signaling extends beyond GPCR-P2Y12, and could be a modulatory mechanism shared by many GPCRs and cell types.
Regarding the molecular identity and mechanisms of Vm-AIQS, we found that P2Y12 and its voltage-sensing sites are responsible because RT-PCR showed that P2Y12 was present in rat and mouse ACCs (SI Appendix, Fig. S5 A and B); using pharmacological methods, Vm-AIQS was blocked by suramin (an antagonist of P2Ys and P2Xs) and ARC66096 (an antagonist of P2Y12) (Fig. 2 B and D), but not by PPADS (an antagonist of P2Xs) (Fig. 2C); using genetic approaches, the phenotype was largely blocked either by P2Y12-KO (Fig. 3G) or KD by two P2Y12-shRNAs (Fig. 3 A–E), and was rescued by the corresponding shRNA-resistant P2Y12 (Fig. 3F and SI Appendix, Fig. S6); using assays of P2Y12 function in two complementary reconstitution systems (Fig. 4 and SI Appendix, Figs. S7 and S9), P2Y12-D76 and -D127 were identified as the Vm-sensing sites, because mutagenesis of either D76N or D127N abolished the Vm dependence of P2Y12 while their basic P2Y12-Gi signals remained (Fig. 4 and SI Appendix, Figs. S8 and S10); and overexpressing either D76N or D127N in ACCs silenced by P2Y12-shRNA#1 abolished the Vm dependence, while the control WT-P2Y12 did not (Fig. 5). Taken together, D76 and D127 are the Vm-sensing sites in P2Y12 responsible for Vm-AIQS.
Regarding physiological relevance, the Vm-AIQS occurred in the quantal release evoked by increasing cytosolic Ca2+ through either the caffeine-sensitive endoplasmic reticulum (ER) store (Fig. 1A) or by whole-cell dialysis with high Ca2+ (SI Appendix, Fig. S13). In principle, the quantal release evoked by Ca2+ influx through ion channels (19) or other internal Ca2+ stores (60, 61) would also be regulated by the Vm-dependent GPCRs. The Vm-AIQS was present not only in cultured ACCs (Figs. 1–3, and 5 and SI Appendix, Figs. S1, S3, S4, S6, and S13), but also in fresh adrenal slices (Fig. 6 A–C). In WT but not P2Y12-KO slices, AIQS was preserved as ATP-inhibited Iamp (the sum of release from all nearby cells), which is proportional to the total catecholamine release from the adrenal medulla into the blood. Thus, the Vm dependence of AI-QS (or AI-Iamp) could substantially regulate the catecholamine level in the circulation and thus all of its peripheral targets (57, 58), including myocyte contractility (Fig. 6 D–F). Excitation–contraction coupling was enhanced by the fluid from adrenal slices exposed to 70 mM KCl, which depolarizes ACCs, disinhibits P2Y12, and increases the catecholamine level in solution. This provides proof of concept, that the effect of Vm-AIQS can impact the heart and other peripheral functions through regulating the blood catecholamine level.
The discovery of the Vm sensors D76 and D127 was made possible by using two complementary GPCR reporting systems: a high-throughput [Ca2+]i-imaging assay (Gαi3q) and a high-precision patch-clamp assay (Gβγ-GIRK) (Fig. 4 and SI Appendix, Figs. S7–S11). Our GPCR-Gαi3q-[Ca2+]i assay used HeLa cells coexpressing P2Y12, the Gαi3q chimera, and GCaMP3, which reported the function of P2Y12 by cytosolic [Ca2+]i using fluorescence imaging for screening Vm-P2Y12 sites (Fig. 4 A–E and SI Appendix, Figs. S7 and S8). This assay is superior to previous assays (42, 52, 53) for its higher throughput using real-time imaging. Our high-precision patch-clamp assay consisted of HEK293A cells coexpressing P2Y12 and GIRK1/4 ion channels, which reported P2Y12 function as GIRK currents for Vm-GPCR analysis (Fig. 4 F–K and SI Appendix, Figs. S9–S11, see also refs. 41, 43). In principle, these two complementary assays can be used to study the Vm dependence and/or other functions of P2Y12 (and other GPCRs, with slight modifications).
In contrast to the present findings of Vm-dependent QS in rodent neuroendocrine chromaffin cells, previously Parnas and Parnas have found the Vm-sensing sites responsible for M2-mediated GIRK currents in oocytes and provided pharmacological evidence supporting a Vm-dependent M2 effect on peripheral excitatory postsynaptic currents (26). Mahaut-Smith and colleagues found that Vm-dependent binding between ADP and P2Y1 modulates [Ca2+]i in nonexcitable blood megakaryocytes, with pharmacological evidence supporting Vm-dependent P2Y1 (62). These earlier reports, however, lacked crucial evidence of the Vm dependence of GPCRs (M2 or P2Y1) by genetic knockdown and rescue in native cells. In the present study, we demonstrated not only the phenotypes of the Vm dependence of catecholamine release via P2Y12-AIQS (Figs. 1–3) and the molecular mechanisms (Fig. 4), but also crucial validation using genetic KO, KD, and rescue (Figs. 3 and 5). Particularly, we not only identified the Vm-sensing sites of P2Y12 but also confirmed them in native ACCs (Figs. 2–5). These provide an example of physiological Vm per se having a direct physiological impact on quantal vesicle release in both cultured (Figs. 1–3 and 5 and SI Appendix, Figs. S1, S3, S4, S6, and S13) and slice ACCs (Fig. 6 A–C). The sodium ion (Na+) is known to allosterically modulate GPCR activation by binding the highly conserved TM2 aspartate residue in family A GPCRs (63–65). The present work demonstrated that the aspartate residues of TM2 (D76) and TM3 (D127) are the voltage sensors of P2Y12 and regulate exocytosis in native cells and slices (Figs. 4–6), establishing the essential physiological relevance of GPCR voltage dependence, probably by influencing the interaction between the Na+ pocket of D76 and the DRY motif of D127 (66).
Since the structure and function of GPCRs are well conserved in all tissues, in addition to P2Y12 regulating catecholamine release, future work is needed to determine: 1) the Vm dependence of other phenotypes (i.e., event number) by P2Y12, or other GPCRs and physiological functions, including released vesicle cargos of synaptic neurotransmitters, neurotrophins (nerve growth factor, insulin), inflammatory factors (NF-κB, substance P), and other hormones (5-HT, dopamine); and 2) whether Vm-GPCR-QS also exists in the central nervous system, other nonneuronal systems, and other animals including humans.
The present work establishes a signal pathway linking excitation-quantal size (QS), Vm → GPCR-P2Y12 → Giβγ → fusion pore → QS (Fig. 6G), which coexists with the canonical pathway linking excitation-quantal release, Vm → Ca2+ influx → quantal release in sympathetic chromaffin cells. As Vm and GPCRs are present in all neuronal and nonneuronal cells, the regulation of GPCR and its downstream signals (i.e., vesicle release) by Vm could affect physiological/pathological functions beyond adrenal chromaffin cells and sympathetic nervous system.
Materials and Methods
Animals and Chemicals.
The P2Y12-KO mice on a C57BL/6 background were gifts from Junling Liu, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China, and maintained in the Animal Center of Peking University. Sprague-Dawley rats (adult, 150 g) were from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd. All procedures and animal care were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Peking University (Beijing, China) and the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care. Adult mice (C57BL/6 strain, 1 to 4 mo old, both sexes) were used for all experiments. Mice and rats were housed under a 12-h light/dark cycle with food and water. The details of all animals and chemicals are in SI Appendix, Table S1.
Plasmids.
The full-length rat P2Y12 receptor (P2Y12, NM_022800) was subcloned into pIRES2-EGFP (Clontech) or p3XFLAG-CMV (Sigma). The P2Y12 site mutations D76N, D127N, D76E, and D127E were produced by PCR using a QuikChange II Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Agilent Technologies). The nucleotide target sequences GCA GTA AAT CGA ACT TCA TCA (P2Y12-shRNA1) and GCT TCG TTC CCT TCC ACT TTG (P2Y12-shRNA2) were chosen to silence the expression of P2Y12. A random sequence (TTC TCC GAA CGT GTC ACG T) that was predicted to target no genes in human, rat, and mouse cells served as a negative control (scrambled) (Guangzhou RiboBio Co., Ltd). Annealed double-stranded oligonucleotides encoding the target sequences were inserted into the vector pRNAT-H1.1-RFP/GFP to generate plasmids expressing shRNAs against P2Y12. An RNAi (P2Y12-shRNA1)-resistant form of rat P2Y12 for the rescue experiments was generated by introducing the following silent mutations: GTA GCA AGT CAA ATT TTA. All constructs were verified by DNA sequencing. The bidirectional expression vector pBI-CMV1 (a kind gift from D. E. Logothetis, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA) was used to simultaneously and constitutively express GIRK1 and GIRK4. The Gαi3q was a kind gift from Xiao Yu, Shandong University, Shandong, China. The GCaMP3 was from Addgene Co. The NPY-pHluorin plasmid was constructed from NPY-Venus (a kind gift from Nikita Gamper, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK).
Cell Culture and Transfection.
Rat adrenal chromaffin cells (ACCs) were prepared as described previously (19, 67) and mouse ACCs were prepared similarly with minor modifications. Briefly, the adrenal glands were isolated from anesthetized animals (10% chloral hydrate), cut into pieces and, after removing the cortex, incubated in papain solution for 40 min at 37 °C. The pieces were then triturated gently through a 200-μL pipette tip. After centrifugation, cells were quickly plated on coverslips precoated with 0.1% poly-l-lysine, incubated at 37 °C under 5% CO2, and used within 24 to 96 h. ACCs were transfected for genetic manipulations using a 10-μL Neon electroporation system (Invitrogen, MPK1096) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (68).
HEK293A cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and transfected with VigoFect (Vigorous Biotechnology Beijing Co.) using the following plasmids (per 3.5-cm diameter dish): For gene-silencing experiments, shRNAs (2 μg) and their target P2Y12 (1 μg) were delivered into cells and Western blotting analysis was performed 4 d later. To measure GIRK currents, rat P2Y12 (1 μg) and a bicistronic plasmid expressing the GIRK1 and GIRK4 subunits (1 μg) were transfected and after 24 h of expression, the HEK293A cells were placed on sterile, poly-l-lysine–coated glass coverslips and the GIRK current was recorded.
HeLa cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and transfected with P2Y12, Gαi3q, and GCaMP3 (1 μg each) for 36 h using Lipo2000 (Invitrogen) before Ca2+-imaging experiments. The coexpression rate of the three plasmids in cells was ∼85%.
Adrenal Slice Preparation.
Adrenal slices were prepared as described previously (13, 69). Briefly, adrenal glands were removed from adult mice (2 to 4 mo old) and immediately placed in ice-cold cutting solution containing (in mM): 125 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 26 NaHCO3, and 10 glucose (pH 7.4, saturated with 95% O2 and 5% CO2). Then, a single gland without fat was glued with 3% agarose to the stage of a vibratome (Leica VT 1200S) and cut into 150-µm slices. The slices were incubated for at least 30 min at 37 °C in cutting solution and then kept at room temperature before recordings. Slices were used within 12 h after cutting.
Electrophysiology.
An EPC10/2 amplifier with Patchmaster software (HEKA Elektronik) was used to obtain whole-cell patch-clamp recordings as described previously (40). The normal extracellular buffer was composed of (in mM): 145 NaCl, 2 CaCl2, 2.8 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 10 Hepes (pH 7.4). For the Ca2+-free solution (0Ca), 2 mM Ca2+ was replaced by 1 mM EGTA for cultured chromaffin cells or 10 mM EGTA for adrenal slices. Patch pipettes were filled with intracellular solution containing (in mM): 100 K+-aspartate, 40 KCl, 5 NaCl, 7 MgCl2, 10 EGTA, 0.025 GTP, 5 Na+-ATP, 20 Hepes (pH 7.2). For GIRK current recordings, a high-K+ buffer was used as the extracellular solution (as above, but containing 140 mM K+ and 2.4 mM Na+) (43). GIRK currents were measured in the whole-cell configuration as inward currents (holding potential: −40 mV, −70 mV, or –100 mV) (43). For pure Ca2+ current recording, 2 mM CaCl2 was increased to 10 mM CaCl2 and 1 μM tetrodotoxin was added to the extracellular solution. The intracellular pipette solution contained (in mM) 153 CsCl, 1 MgCl2, 10 H-Hepes, and 4 Mg-ATP, pH 7.2. During experiments, patched cells were continuously superfused with extracellular buffer or agonist-containing solution. Igor software (WaveMetrics) was used for all offline data analyses. All experiments were performed at room temperature unless otherwise indicated.
Electrochemistry.
Highly sensitive, low-noise, 7-μm carbon fiber electrodes (ProCFE, Dagan) were used for the electrochemical monitoring of quantal release of catecholamines from single ACCs as described previously (2, 19). Quantal events were analyzed as described previously (2, 19). Stimulation solutions (caffeine or other drugs) were delivered by a perfusion system (Yibo) with a fast exchange time (<100 ms).
TIRF Imaging.
TIRF images were captured on an inverted microscope with a 100× TIRF objective lens (numerical aperture, 1.45; Olympus IX-81) at an exposure time of 50 ms using an Andor electron-multiplying charge-coupled device with Andor iQ software. The temperature was kept at ∼35 °C throughout all TIRF experiments using a laboratory-made heater. Kiss-and-run and full-fusion-like events were defined as follows: in kiss-and-run events, the fluorescence signal was restricted to the center of the release site; in full-fusion-like events, the fluorescence signal diffused to the surroundings of the release site (SI Appendix, Fig. S4B and see also refs. 8, 13, 40). Exocytotic events were stimulated by puffing 20 mM caffeine and analyzed using ImageJ (NIH) as described previously (13).
Ca2+ Imaging.
For Ca2+ imaging using Fura-2, isolated chromaffin cells were incubated in a bath solution containing 5 μM Fura-2/AM (Molecular Probes) for 15 min at 37 °C. The [Ca2+]i was measured by dual-wavelength ratiometric fluorometry. The Fura-2 was excited by light alternating between 340 nm and 380 nm using a monochromatic system (TILL Photonics), and the emission fluorescence was measured using a cooled charge-coupled device. The [Ca2+]i was calculated from the ratio of F340 to F380, and the sampling frequency was 1 Hz, triggered by the HEKA amplifier. The Ca2+ fluorescence signals were analyzed using Igor software (Wavemetrix) (19).
For Ca2+-imaging using GCaMP3, HeLa cells (4th to 12th generation after recovery from freezing) were transfected with three plasmids: P2Y12, Gαi3q, and GCaMP3 (1 μg each) for ∼36 h using Lipo2000. The P2Y12-specific agonist 2MesADP (10 µM) was puffed onto the cells to trigger [Ca2+]i oscillations (typically one to three spikes, SI Appendix, Fig. S7E). All of the cells were from three to six batches; 10 to 20 cells per batch for each condition (control or mutations) were imaged for statistics. Considering that the peak of the [Ca2+]i oscillation represents the strength of P2Y12-Gαi3q signaling, the amplitude of [Ca2+]i in a cell was defined as the maximum peak during the 90-s stimulation (SI Appendix, Fig. S7E). [Ca2+]i was measured by ΔF/F0, where F0 is basal fluorescence before 2MesADP stimulation and ΔF is the fluorescence change during a [Ca2+]i spike. The [Ca2+]i signals were captured on an inverted confocal microscope (Zeiss 710) using a 488-nm laser and the light emitted from GCaMP3 was recorded at 500 to 540 nm. Time series videos (512 × 512 pixels) were acquired at 1 Hz under a 40× oil objective lens (Zeiss). Data were analyzed with ImageJ.
Excitation–Contraction Coupling in Myocytes.
Myocytes were isolated from adult C57 mice (1.5 to 2 mo old, weight ∼25 g) (70–72). A bipolar electrode (laboratory made) was used to evoke contractions; a brief, 50-V, 5-ms pulse (Nihon Kohden, Electronic Stimulator SEN-3201, Isolator SS-102J) was applied for pacemaking. The contractions evoked before and after drug treatments were imaged under an inverted IX-81 Olympus microscope, and analyzed with ImageJ.
Western Blot.
Samples were lysed with lysate buffer containing 20 mM Hepes at pH 7.4, 100 mM KCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, and 2% proteinase inhibitor (539134, Calbiochem). The homogenate was centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 30 min and the supernatant was collected and boiled in sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis buffer. Proteins were electrophoresed and transferred to nitrocellulose filter membranes. Each membrane was blocked by incubation for 1 h with PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20 (vol/vol), and 5% nonfat dried milk (wt/vol). After washing with 0.1% Tween-20 containing PBS (PBST), the blots were incubated with primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight in PBST containing 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA). Secondary antibodies were then applied at room temperature and left for 1 h. Blots were scanned with an Odyssey infrared imaging system (LI-COR Biosciences) and quantified with ImageJ. The primary antibodies were as follows: rabbit anti-P2Y12 (Anaspec, AS-55043A), mouse anti-flag (F1804, Sigma), and mouse anti–β-actin (A5316, Sigma); the secondary antibodies were IRDye 800CW goat anti-rabbit IgG (LIC-926-32211, LI-COR Biosciences), and IRDye 680CW goat anti-mouse IgG (LIC-926-32220, LI-COR Biosciences).
Immunofluorescence.
Cells were prefixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, washed three times with PBS, then permeabilized with 0.3% Triton in PBS for 3 min. After the cells were incubated with 2% BSA for 1 h, they were incubated with the primary antibody rabbit anti-P2Y12 (Anaspec, AS-55043A) overnight at 4 °C. Then they were washed with 2% BSA in PBS, and incubated with the secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor 594 goat anti-rabbit IgG, A11037, Invitrogen). After that, the cells were mounted on coverslips immersed in 50% glycerol. Fluorescence images were acquired on a confocal microscope (Zeiss 710) and analyzed with ImageJ.
Reverse Transcription PCR.
Total RNA was extracted using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and mRNA was reverse transcribed with the Transgen kit (AU311). The forward and reverse oligonucleotide primers we have used are listed in SI Appendix, Table S2.
Statistics.
All experiments were replicated at least three times. Data are shown as the mean ± SEM or the median with interquartile range. “n” represents the number of independent experiments as reported in the figure legends. All data were tested for normality prior to choosing a proper statistical test. If the data passed the normality test, the paired Student’s t test was applied for comparison between two matched groups and one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was applied when multiple groups were compared with one variable. If the data did not pass normality, the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test (Wilcoxon test) was applied for comparison between two matched groups and the Friedman test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test was used for multiple matched groups. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K-S) test was applied for cumulative distribution comparison between two groups. All tests were conducted using Prism V7.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc.) and SPSS 20.0 (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences). Statistical tests were two-tailed and the level of significance was set at P < 0.05 (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001).
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Drs. Junling Liu (Shanghai Jiaotong University) for the P2Y12-KO mice, Shiqiang Wang and Peace Cheng (Peking University) for providing myocytes, Xiao Yu (Shandong University) for Gαi3q, Diomedes E. Logothetis (Northeastern University) and Hailin Zhang (Hebei Medical University) for GIRK, and Xiaoke Chen (Stanford University) and Iain C. Bruce (Peking University) for reading the manuscript. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31930061, 31761133016, 21790394, 31171026, 31330024, 31327901, 31521062, and 21790390), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFA0500401), and the National Basic Research Program of China (2012CB518006).
Footnotes
The authors declare no competing interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at https://www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.2005274117/-/DCSupplemental.
Data Availability.
All study data are included in the article and supporting information.
References
- 1.Del Castillo J., Katz B., Quantal components of the end-plate potential. J. Physiol. 124, 560–573 (1954). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Zhou Z., Misler S., Chow R. H., Rapid fluctuations in transmitter release from single vesicles in bovine adrenal chromaffin cells. Biophys. J. 70, 1543–1552 (1996). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Albillos A.et al., The exocytotic event in chromaffin cells revealed by patch amperometry. Nature 389, 509–512 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ales E.et al., High calcium concentrations shift the mode of exocytosis to the kiss-and-run mechanism. Nat. Cell Biol. 1, 40–44 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Braun M.et al., Corelease and differential exit via the fusion pore of GABA, serotonin, and ATP from LDCV in rat pancreatic beta cells. J. Gen. Physiol. 129, 221–231 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Takahashi N., Kishimoto T., Nemoto T., Kadowaki T., Kasai H., Fusion pore dynamics and insulin granule exocytosis in the pancreatic islet. Science 297, 1349–1352 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chen X., Wang L., Zhou Y., Zheng L. H., Zhou Z., “Kiss-and-run” glutamate secretion in cultured and freshly isolated rat hippocampal astrocytes. J. Neurosci. 25, 9236–9243 (2005). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bowser D. N., Khakh B. S., Two forms of single-vesicle astrocyte exocytosis imaged with total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 4212–4217 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhang Q., Li Y., Tsien R. W., The dynamic control of kiss-and-run and vesicular reuse probed with single nanoparticles. Science 323, 1448–1453 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.He L., Wu X. S., Mohan R., Wu L. G., Two modes of fusion pore opening revealed by cell-attached recordings at a synapse. Nature 444, 102–105 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang Y.et al., Ligand- and voltage-gated Ca2+ channels differentially regulate the mode of vesicular neuropeptide release in mammalian sensory neurons. Sci. Signal. 10, eaal1683 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wu Q.et al., Dynamin 1 restrains vesicular release to a subquantal mode in mammalian adrenal chromaffin cells. J. Neurosci. 39, 199–211 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhang Q., et al., Differential co-release of two neurotransmitters from a vesicle fusion pore in mammalian adrenal chromaffin cells. Neuron 102, 173−183.e4 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sudhof T. C., Rothman J. E., Membrane fusion: Grappling with SNARE and SM proteins. Science 323, 474–477 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rettig J., Neher E., Emerging roles of presynaptic proteins in Ca++-triggered exocytosis. Science 298, 781–785 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Segovia M.et al., Push-and-pull regulation of the fusion pore by synaptotagmin-7. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 19032–19037 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Samasilp P., Chan S. A., Smith C., Activity-dependent fusion pore expansion regulated by a calcineurin-dependent dynamin-syndapin pathway in mouse adrenal chromaffin cells. J. Neurosci. 32, 10438–10447 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Anantharam A.et al., A new role for the dynamin GTPase in the regulation of fusion pore expansion. Mol. Biol. Cell 22, 1907–1918 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chen X. K.et al., Activation of GPCRs modulates quantal size in chromaffin cells through G(betagamma) and PKC. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1160–1168 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chow R. H., Klingauf J., Heinemann C., Zucker R. S., Neher E., Mechanisms determining the time course of secretion in neuroendocrine cells. Neuron 16, 369–376 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zurawski Z.et al., Gbetagamma directly modulates vesicle fusion by competing with synaptotagmin for binding to neuronal SNARE proteins embedded in membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 12165–12177 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Blackmer T.et al., G protein betagamma directly regulates SNARE protein fusion machinery for secretory granule exocytosis. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 421–425 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Betke K. M., Wells C. A., Hamm H. E., GPCR mediated regulation of synaptic transmission. Prog. Neurobiol. 96, 304–321 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kadamur G., Ross E. M., Mammalian phospholipase C. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 75, 127–154 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhou Z., Misler S., Action potential-induced quantal secretion of catecholamines from rat adrenal chromaffin cells. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 3498–3505 (1995). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Parnas I., Parnas H., Control of neurotransmitter release: From Ca2+ to voltage dependent G-protein coupled receptors. Pflugers Arch. 460, 975–990 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Abbracchio M. P.et al., International union of pharmacology LVIII: Update on the P2Y G protein-coupled nucleotide receptors: From molecular mechanisms and pathophysiology to therapy. Pharmacol. Rev. 58, 281–341 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Idzko M., Ferrari D., Eltzschig H. K., Nucleotide signalling during inflammation. Nature 509, 310–317 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Burnstock G., Purine and pyrimidine receptors. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 64, 1471–1483 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cattaneo M.et al., Molecular bases of defective signal transduction in the platelet P2Y12 receptor of a patient with congenital bleeding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 1978–1983 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Hollopeter G.et al., Identification of the platelet ADP receptor targeted by antithrombotic drugs. Nature 409, 202–207 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Haynes S. E.et al., The P2Y12 receptor regulates microglial activation by extracellular nucleotides. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 1512–1519 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tozaki-Saitoh H.et al., P2Y12 receptors in spinal microglia are required for neuropathic pain after peripheral nerve injury. J. Neurosci. 28, 4949–4956 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wihlborg A. K.et al., ADP receptor P2Y12 is expressed in vascular smooth muscle cells and stimulates contraction in human blood vessels. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 24, 1810–1815 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Burnstock G., Knight G. E., Cellular distribution and functions of P2 receptor subtypes in different systems. Int. Rev. Cytol. 240, 31–304 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ennion S. J., Powell A. D., Seward E. P., Identification of the P2Y(12) receptor in nucleotide inhibition of exocytosis from bovine chromaffin cells. Mol. Pharmacol. 66, 601–611 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Eltzschig H. K., Sitkovsky M. V., Robson S. C., Purinergic signaling during inflammation. N. Engl. J. Med. 367, 2322–2333 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zhang K.et al., Structure of the human P2Y12 receptor in complex with an antithrombotic drug. Nature 509, 115–118 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.von Kugelgen I., Hoffmann K., Pharmacology and structure of P2Y receptors. Neuropharmacology 104, 50–61 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chai Z.et al., Ca V 2.2 gates calcium-independent but voltage-dependent secretion in mammalian sensory neurons. Neuron 96, 1317–1326.e4 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ben-Chaim Y., Tour O., Dascal N., Parnas I., Parnas H., The M-2 muscarinic G-protein-coupled receptor is voltage-sensitive. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 22482–22491 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Conklin B. R., Farfel Z., Lustig K. D., Julius D., Bourne H. R., Substitution of three amino acids switches receptor specificity of Gq alpha to that of Gi alpha. Nature 363, 274–276 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Rinne A., Birk A., Buenemann M., Voltage regulates adrenergic receptor function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 1536–1541 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Matsuda N.et al., Differential activity-dependent secretion of brain-derived neurotrophic factor from axon and dendrite. J. Neurosci. 29, 14185–14198 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Perrais D., Kleppe I. C., Taraska J. W., Almers W., Recapture after exocytosis causes differential retention of protein in granules of bovine chromaffin cells. J. Physiol. 560, 413–428 (2004). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Dunn P. M., Blakeley A. G., Suramin: A reversible P2-purinoceptor antagonist in the mouse vas deferens. Br. J. Pharmacol. 93, 243–245 (1988). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hoyle C. H., Knight G. E., Burnstock G., Suramin antagonizes responses to P2-purinoceptor agonists and purinergic nerve stimulation in the Guinea-pig urinary bladder and taenia coli. Br. J. Pharmacol. 99, 617–621 (1990). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Ziganshin A. U.et al., Selective antagonism by PPADS at P2X-purinoceptors in rabbit isolated blood vessels. Br. J. Pharmacol. 111, 923–929 (1994). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.McLaren G. J.et al., Investigation of the actions of PPADS, a novel P2x-purinoceptor antagonist, in the Guinea-pig isolated vas deferens. Br. J. Pharmacol. 111, 913–917 (1994). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Humphries R. G., Tomlinson W., Ingall A. H., Cage P. A., Leff P., FPL 66096: A novel, highly potent and selective antagonist at human platelet P2T-purinoceptors. Br. J. Pharmacol. 113, 1057–1063 (1994). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Simon J.et al., Activity of adenosine diphosphates and triphosphates on a P2Y(T) -type receptor in brain capillary endothelial cells. Br. J. Pharmacol. 132, 173–182 (2001). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bohnekamp J., Schoneberg T., Cell adhesion receptor GPR133 couples to Gs protein. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 41912–41916 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hu Q. X.et al., Constitutive Galphai coupling activity of very large G protein-coupled receptor 1 (VLGR1) and its regulation by PDZD7 protein. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 24215–24225 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zhang J.et al., Agonist-bound structure of the human P2Y12 receptor. Nature 509, 119–122 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.de Diego A. M., Gandia L., Garcia A. G., A physiological view of the central and peripheral mechanisms that regulate the release of catecholamines at the adrenal medulla. Acta Physiol. (Oxf.) 192, 287–301 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Holman M. E., Coleman H. A., Tonta M. A., Parkington H. C., Synaptic transmission from splanchnic nerves to the adrenal medulla of Guinea-pigs. J. Physiol. 478, 115–124 (1994). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Yang H. Q.et al., beta2-adrenergic stimulation compartmentalizes beta1 signaling into nanoscale local domains by targeting the C-terminus of beta1-adrenoceptors. Circ. Res. 124, 1350–1359 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Huang R.et al., Ca(2+)-independent but voltage-dependent quantal catecholamine secretion (CiVDS) in the mammalian sympathetic nervous system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 20201–20209 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kailey B.et al., SSTR2 is the functionally dominant somatostatin receptor in human pancreatic beta- and alpha-cells. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 303, E1107–E1116 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Mundorf M. L., Troyer K. P., Hochstetler S. E., Near J. A., Wightman R. M., Vesicular Ca(2+) participates in the catalysis of exocytosis. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 9136–9142 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Haynes C. L., Buhler L. A., Wightman R. M., Vesicular Ca2+-induced secretion promoted by intracellular pH-gradient disruption. Biophys. Chem. 123, 20–24 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Gurung I. S., Martinez-Pinna J., Mahaut-Smith M. P., Novel consequences of voltage-dependence to G-protein-coupled P2Y(1) receptors. Br. J. Pharmacol. 154, 882–889 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Katritch V.et al., Allosteric sodium in class A GPCR signaling. Trends Biochem. Sci. 39, 233–244 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Zhang C.et al., High-resolution crystal structure of human protease-activated receptor 1. Nature 492, 387–392 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Liu W.et al., Structural basis for allosteric regulation of GPCRs by sodium ions. Science 337, 232–236 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Venkatakrishnan A. J.et al., Molecular signatures of G-protein-coupled receptors. Nature 494, 185–194 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Duan K., Yu X., Zhang C., Zhou Z., Control of secretion by temporal patterns of action potentials in adrenal chromaffin cells. J. Neurosci. 23, 11235–11243 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Wang C.et al., Synaptotagmin-11 inhibits clathrin-mediated and bulk endocytosis. EMBO Rep. 17, 47–63 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Chen X. W.et al., DTNBP1, a schizophrenia susceptibility gene, affects kinetics of transmitter release. J. Cell Biol. 181, 791–801 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Shang W.et al., Cyclophilin D regulates mitochondrial flashes and metabolism in cardiac myocytes. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 91, 63–71 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Xu M.et al., Intermolecular failure of L-type Ca2+ channel and ryanodine receptor signaling in hypertrophy. PLoS Biol. 5, e21 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Zhou Z., Bers D. M., Ca2+ influx via the L-type Ca2+ channel during tail current and above current reversal potential in ferret ventricular myocytes. J. Physiol. 523, 57–66 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All study data are included in the article and supporting information.






