Skip to main content
Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. B logoLink to Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. B
. 2020 Feb 20;10(10):2002–2009. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2020.02.001

Impact of molecular weight on the mechanism of cellular uptake of polyethylene glycols (PEGs) with particular reference to P-glycoprotein

Tingting Wang a,c, Yingjie Guo c, Yang He d, Tianming Ren c, Lei Yin a, John Paul Fawcett c, Jingkai Gu b,c,e,, Huimin Sun f,
PMCID: PMC7606107  PMID: 33163350

Abstract

Polyethylene glycols (PEGs) in general use are polydisperse molecules with molecular weight (MW) distributed around an average value applied in their designation e.g., PEG 4000. Previous research has shown that PEGs can act as P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitors with the potential to affect the absorption and efflux of concomitantly administered drugs. However, questions related to the mechanism of cellular uptake of PEGs and the exact role played by P-gp has not been addressed. In this study, we examined the mechanism of uptake of PEGs by MDCK-mock cells, in particular, the effect of MW and interaction with P-gp by MDCK-hMDR1 and A549 cells. The results show that: (a) the uptake of PEGs by MDCK-hMDR1 cells is enhanced by P-gp inhibitors; (b) PEGs stimulate P-gp ATPase activity but to a much lesser extent than verapamil; and (c) uptake of PEGs of low MW (<2000 Da) occurs by passive diffusion whereas uptake of PEGs of high MW (>5000 Da) occurs by a combination of passive diffusion and caveolae-mediated endocytosis. These findings suggest that PEGs can engage in P-gp-based drug interactions which we believe should be taken into account when using PEGs as excipients and in PEGylated drugs and drug delivery systems.

Key words: P-gp, PEGs, P-gp-substrate, Passive diffusion, Endocytosis

Abbreviations: ACN, acetonitrile; AUC, area under the plasma concentration-time curve; CE, collision energy; Cmax, maximum plasma concentration; CsA, cyclosporine A; DBD, drug-binding domain; DDS, drug delivery system; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide; DP, declustering potential; FBS, fetal bovine serum; HBSS, Hanks' balanced salt solution; HEPES, 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid; IS, internal standard; LC−HRMS/MS, liquid chromatography−high resolution tandem mass spectrometry; MW, molecular weight; NBD, nucleotide binding domain; PAC, paclitaxel; PEG, polyethylene glycol; P-gp, P-glycoprotein; VER, verapamil

Graphical abstract

PEGs are taken up by cells and act as P-gp substrates. Low molecular weight (MW) PEGs cross cell membranes by passive diffusion, whereas those high MW PEGs enter cells by a combination of passive diffusion and caveolae-mediated endocytosis.

Image 1

1. Introduction

PEGs in general use are polydisperse molecules applied as excipients to improve solubility and dissolution of pharmaceuticals. They are also used to form conjugates with drug molecules (PEGylation) and to prepare PEGylated drug delivery systems (DDS), such as liposomes and nanoparticles1, 2, 3. When PEGs or PEGylated therapeutics are ingested, recipients are inevitably exposed to free PEG4,5. This is generally considered to have little clinical significance, but there are reports of free PEGs causing adverse effects due to their tendency to accumulate in tissues6 and acting as P-gp inhibitors7, 8, 9. This paper reports the results of a study into the mechanism of cellular uptake of PEGs with different molecular weight (MW) and the role played by P-gp in the process.

P-gp is a membrane protein that acts as an important mediator of drug efflux from cells10 through possession of a drug-binding domain (DBD) and a nucleotide binding domain (NBD)11,12. P-gp substrates first bind to the DBD after ATP hydrolysis at the NBD by ATPase, which provides the energy to bring about efflux13. Some P-gp inhibitors also act in this way but others can act by directly inhibiting ATPase14. Given that a molecule must be hydrophobic in order to enter the binding pocket of the DBD, PEGs are generally considered to be too hydrophilic to act as P-gp substrates and, to date, there is no evidence that they can. In addition, while PEGs can act as P-gp inhibitors, it remains unclear whether this is due to their ability to inhibit ATPase or to an indirect mechanism involving the disruption of the cell membrane in which P-gp is embedded9.

Using two novel bioanalytical method based on liquid chromatography−high resolution tandem mass spectrometry (LC−HRMS/MS) developed in our laboratory15, we investigated the cellular uptake of polydisperse PEGs both as total PEG concentration and as a profile of each individual PEG homolog. This allowed us to determine the effect of MW and illuminate the role of P-gp. We believe the results increase our understanding of the fate and potential toxicity of PEGs when administered as excipients, PEGylated drugs and PEGylated DDS16,17 in the future design and clinical use of PEG therapeutics.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Materials

Materials were supplied as follows: colchicine (purity 98.5%), chlorpromazine (purity > 88%), genistein (purity > 98%), quercetin (purity > 85%) and verapamil (VER, purity > 99 %) (Dalian Meilun Biotechnology Company, Dalian, China); simvastatin (purity >99.8%) for use as internal standard (IS, National Institute for the Control of Pharmaceutical and Biological Products, Beijing, China); cyclosporine A (CsA, purity > 98.5%) and methoxy polyethylene glycol (PEG) 750, 2000, 5000 and 20,000 (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA); MDCK-hMDR1 and MDCK-mock (P-gp knockdown) cells at passage number 5‒15 (Prof. Su Zeng, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China); A549 cells (the American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD, USA); Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM), fetal bovine serum (FBS) and trypsin (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA); Hanks' balanced salt solution (HBSS), 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazine ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) and penicillin-streptomycin solution (Dingguo Changsheng Biotechnology Company, Beijing, China); HPLC grade acetonitrile (ACN, Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA); BCA protein assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA); Pgp-GLO™ Assay System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). All other chemicals were of analytical grade and used as received. Ultrapure water was prepared using the Milli-Q system (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA).

2.2. Cell culture

Cells were grown in DMEM with 10% FBS, 1% nonessential amino acid solution and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution in 75 cm2 plastic culture flasks (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2.

2.3. PEG uptake by MDCK-hMDR1, MDCK-mock and A549 cells

All drugs were dissolved in DMSO and subsequently diluted in transport buffer [HBSS containing 10 mmol/L HEPES (pH 7.4)]. PEGs were dissolved and diluted in transport buffer. Cells were seeded on 6-well plates (6 × 104 cells/cm2). Medium was changed every two days and experiments were conducted after 5 days in culture.

To study the effect of P-gp inhibitors on cell uptake of PEGs, MDCK-hMDR1 cells were preincubated (0.5 h) and incubated (2 h) at 37 °C as follows: (1) preincubation with transport buffer followed by incubation with PEG (25 and 50 μmol/L, control); (2) preincubation with VER (200 μmol/L) followed by incubation with VER (200 μmol/L) and PEG (25 and 50 μmol/L) together; and (3) preincubation with CsA (10 μmol/L) followed by incubation with CsA (10 μmol/L) and PEG (25 and 50 μmol/L) together.

To investigate the MW dependence of PEG uptake into MDCK-mock cells, MDCK-mock cells were incubated with PEG 750 (50, 100, 500 and 1000 μmol/L) or PEGs 2000, 5000 or 20,000 (5, 10, 50 and 100 μmol/L) at 37 °C and 4 °C for 2 h.

To further investigate the mechanism of uptake of low MW PEGs, A549 cells were incubated at 37 °C with PEG 750 or 2000 (50 μmol/L) for various lengths of time up to 24 h. To further investigate the mechanism of uptake of high MW PEGs, MDCK-mock cells were preincubated (0.5 h) and incubated (2 h) as follows: (1) preincubation with transport buffer followed by incubation with PEG 5000 or 20,000 (100 μmol/L) at 37 °C (positive control); (2) preincubation with transport buffer followed by incubation with PEG 5000 or 20,000 (100 μmol/L) at 4 °C (negative control); (3) preincubation with colchicine (40 μg/mL) followed by incubation with colchicine (40 μg/mL) and PEG at 37 °C; (4) preincubation with chlorpromazine (10 μg/mL) followed by incubation with colchicine (10 μg/mL) and PEG at 37 °C; (5) preincubation with genistein (50 μg/mL) followed by incubation with genistein (50 μg/mL) and PEG at 37 °C; (6) preincubation with quercetin (100 μg/mL) followed by incubation with quercetin (100 μg/mL) and PEG at 37 °C18,19.

After incubations, cells were processed as previously reported20. In brief, cells were: (1) rinsed 3 times with ice-cold transport buffer, (2) collected using a cell scraper, (3) ultrasonicated, (4) centrifuged at 9000×g, 4 °C for 30 min (to remove the cell fragment and organelle) and (5) the protein and intracellular PEG concentration determined. Intracellular PEG concentrations are given in ng/μg protein.

2.4. Determination of PEGs in cell lysates

LC was based on our previously reported method15 with modifications to improve peak shape. A 50 μL aliquot of sample was mixed with 20 μL IS solution (1 μg/mL in ACN) and 150 μL cold ACN (−20 °C) after which samples were centrifuged at 15,000 rpm (ThermoPico17-A, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) for 5 min and 50 μL supernatant analyzed. Chromatographic conditions for assay of the different PEGs are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Analytical conditions for analyzing of total PEG concentration and each individual PEG homolog.

Analyte Chromatography column Column temperature (°C) Solvent A Solvent B Gradient program Flow rate (mL/min)
PEG 750 Zorbax 300SB-C18 column (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm, 300 Å, Agilent) 40 0.1% Formic acid in water ACN 0–1 min 10% B 0.6
1–3 min 10%–90% B,
3–5.5 min 90% B,
5.5–5.6 min 90%–10% B
5.6–8 min 10% B
PEG 2000 PEG 5000 Zorbax 300SB-C18 column (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm, 300 Å, Agilent) 40 0.1% Formic acid in water ACN 0–1 min 20% B,
1–5 min 20%–95% B,
5–7.9 min 95% B,
7.9–8 min 95%–20% B,
8–10 min 20% B
PEG 20,000 PLRP-S column (50 mm × 4.6 mm, 8 μm, 1000 Å, Agilent) 55 0.1% Formic acid in water ACN:isopropanol (50:50) 0–1 min 20% B,
1–4.5 min 20%–80% B,
4.5–6.9 min 80% B,
6.9–7 min 80%–20% B,
7–9 min 20% B.
MW profiling Zorbax 300SB-C18 column (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm, 300 Å, Agilent) 30 0.1% Formic acid in water 0.1% Formic acid ACN 0–1 min 17% B; 0.8
1–10 min 17%–30% B;
10–22 min 30%–33% B;
22–24 min 33%–80% B;
24–26 min 80% B;
26–26.1 min 80%–17%B;
26.1–30 min 17% B

HRMS/MS utilized the MSALL technique in which PEG precursor ions are dissociated to fragments in the collision cell. The MS parameters for assay of all PEGs were as follows: declustering potential (DP) and collision energy (CE) were 100 V and 30 eV, respectively; nebulizer, heater and curtain gas flow rates (N2) were 50, 50 and 30 psi, respectively; ionspray needle voltage was 5500 V; heater gas temperature was 500 °C. Quantitation was conducted by extracting the product ions of PEGs and IS in the m/z ranges of 133.06‒133.10 and 225.16‒225.17, respectively. Data acquisition and integration was controlled by Analyst TF version 1.7.1 software. Representative LC−HRMS chromatograms and mass spectra are provided in Supporting Information.

2.5. Effect of PEGs on P-gp ATPase activity

P-gp ATPase activity was estimated using the P-gp-Glo assay system according to the manufacturer's instructions20. Briefly, human P-gp overexpressing membranes were incubated with PEGs (25 and 50 μmol/L), VER (200 μmol/L), Na3VO4 (100 μmol/L) or buffer alone in a 96-well plate for 5 min. Mg-ATP was added to initiate the reaction (40 min). ATP Detection Reagent (Pgp-GLO™ Assay System, Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was added (20 min) to assay the residual ATP content. ATP consumption was detected as a decrease in luminescence, the less ATP remaining, the higher the P-gp ATPase activity was21.

2.6. MW profiling of uptake of PEGs 750 and 2000 by A549 cells

After incubation of A549 cells with PEGs, a 50 μL aliquot of cell lysate was mixed with 200 μL ACN, the mixture centrifuged at 15,000 rpm (ThermoPico17-A, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 5 min and 50 μL supernatant removed for analysis. The chromatographic conditions for this study are listed in Table 1. Detection by Q-Q-TOF MS was as described in Section 2.4. Except that the CE was reduced to 10 eV to ensure all PEG precursor ions entered Q2 intact. Data are presented as peak areas (cps) of individual homologs divided by the protein concentration acting as IS. Standard solutions of PEGs were prepared by spiking control cell lysate. Representative LC−HRMS/MS chromatograms and mass spectra for this study are provided in Supporting Information.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Effect of P-gp inhibitors on PEG uptake by MDCK-hMDR1 cells

Previous studies have shown that free PEGs can act as P-gp inhibitors in vitro8,9,22. In our preliminary study, PEG was shown to affect the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the P-gp substrate, paclitaxel (PAC), in rat in vivo (Supporting Information Table S2 and Fig. S3). The large interindividual variability in plasma concentration-time curves is probably due to variability in the expression of P-gp and CYP3A, and the low oral absorption of PAC23. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration−time curve (AUC) in the PEG pre-treated group is higher than in control. This result is consistent with a previous study showing that PEG 400 can alter the bioavailability of other P-gp substrates24. To date there are no reports relating to whether PEGs can act as P-gp substrates yet.

P-gp substrates are expected to accumulate in P-gp overexpressing cells in the presence of P-gp inhibitors. To investigate whether PEGs are effluxed by P-gp, we incubated the P-gp overexpressing MDCK-hMDR1 cell line with PEGs concentrations of around 40 μmol/L (the reported concentration of PEG 2000 in rats after intravenous injection of PEGylated doxorubicin)5 in the presence of VER and CsA (P-gp substrates and competitive inhibitors). The results shown in Fig. 1 reveal that the uptake of PEGs by MDCK-hMDR1 cells is significantly increased in the presence of VER and to an even greater extent in the presence of CsA. This is consistent with the known greater affinity of CsA for P-gp25. The results clearly indicate that PEGs can be effluxed by P-gp.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Effects of VER and CsA on the uptake of PEGs with different MW by MDCK-hMDR1 cells. Cells were preincubated with transport buffer (1) alone (control) or (2) containing VER (200 μmol/L) or (3) containing CsA (10 μmol/L) for 0.5 h. After removal of medium, cells were incubated with corresponding solutions containing PEGs (25 or 50 μmol/L) for 2 h. Total intracellular PEG concentration (ng/μg protein) was determined by LC–Q-Q-TOF MS using with MSALL technique and are means ± SD of three independent experiments. *P < 0.05 vs. control, **P < 0.01 vs. control.

3.2. Effect of PEGs on P-gp ATPase activity

P-gp-mediated efflux of P-gp substrates leads to activation of P-gp ATPase and increasing consumption of ATP26. To seek further evidence that PEGs are P-gp substrates, we applied the P-gp-Glo assay system to determine the consumption of ATP by P-gp in the presence of PEGs. It was found that VER significantly reduced the content of ATP whereas Na3VO4 (a non-competitive inhibitor of P-gp ATPase) significantly increased it20. This is consistent with the above results showing that VER stimulates P-gp ATPase directly while Na3VO4 inhibits it indirectly by binding to other sites in P-gp such as the ATP binding site. PEGs, like VER, decreased the content of ATP, albeit to a much lesser extent (Fig. 2), indicating that PEGs, like VER, bind to the P-gp DBD and activate P-gp ATPase. The fact that the efflux of PEGs is inhibited by VER and CsA and that PEGs increase the activity of P-gp ATPase are consistent with previous research12 suggesting that PEGs have the same binding site on P-gp (the DBD) as VER and CsA. The weak stimulation of ATPase activity produced by PEG 20,000 is discussed in Section 3.3.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effect of PEGs on P-gp ATPase activity in the P-gp-Glo assay system. Human P-gp overexpressing membranes of the P-gp-Glo™ Assay System were incubated with either PEGs, Na3VO4 (negative control) or VER (positive control). Residual ATP content was detected by luminescence and is expressed relative to the difference between positive control and untreated control set at 100%. Data are means ± SD of 4 independent experiments. *P < 0.05 vs. untreated control; **P < 0.01 vs. untreated control.

3.3. PEG uptake by MDCK-mock cells

Whenever a nanoparticle produced by self-assembly of a PEGylated drug encounters a cell, it is rapidly taken up through endocytosis27. However, given that PEGs alone do not readily form nanoparticles, this pathway of PEG uptake may not or only apply to PEGs with relatively high MW. Since endocytosis and P-gp efflux require energy, they can be eliminated by incubating cells at low temperature (4 °C) unlike passive diffusion which is not affected by temperature28. However, given the possibility that P-gp could influence the comparison of PEG uptake at 4 °C and at 37 °C, we used P-gp knockdown MDCK-mock cells to avoid this potential complication.

The intracellular concentrations of PEG 750 after incubation with 5 or 10 μmol/L were too low to be detected, and therefore required higher concentrations (50, 100, 500 and 1000 μmol/L) than used for PEGs 2000, 5000 and 20,000 (5, 10, 50 and 100 μmol/L). The concentration and temperature dependence of the uptakes of PEGs are shown in Fig. 3 which also shows the proportion of PEGs entering cells by passive diffusion (the ratio of uptake at 4 °C to that at 37 °C). The results show that the uptakes of PEGs 750 and 2000 increase linearly with concentration and are not affected by temperature indicating they occur by passive diffusion28, 29, 30. This result is surprising given that PEGs are amphiphilic polymers that are generally considered to be with limited cellular uptake31. PEGs 5000 and 20,000 behaved similarly at concentrations <10 μmol/L, but, at concentrations >50 μmol/L, uptake was greater at 37 °C than at 4 °C. Furthermore, when the concentration increased from 50 to 100 μmol/L, the proportion of PEGs 5000 and 20,000 entering cells by passive diffusion decreased from 84.6% to 54.0% and 63% to 47%, respectively. This is speculated to arise because PEGs 5000 and 20,000 tend to aggregate at higher concentrations causing a higher proportion of their uptake to occur by endocytosis27,32,33. Aggregation may also explain the weak stimulation of ATPase activity produced by PEG 20,000 which is much weaker at 50 μmol/L than at 25 μmol/L. Because the proportion of PEG 5000 entering cells by passive diffusion at 50 μmol/L is 84.6%, the stimulation of ATPase activity at 50 μmol/L is not significantly less than at 25 μmol/L.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The uptake of PEGs 750, 2000, 5000 and 20,000 by MDCK-mock cells over 2 h as a function of concentration and temperature. Cells were incubated in transport buffer containing PEG 750 (50, 100, 500 or 1000 μmol/L) or PEGs 2000, 5000 or 20,000 (5, 10, 50 or 100 μmol/L) at 37 °C and 4 °C. Total intracellular PEG concentration (ng/mg protein) was determined by LC–Q-Q-TOF MS using the MSALL technique and are the means of three independent experiments. Percentages indicate the proportion of uptake by passive diffusion (uptake at 4 °C:uptake at 37 °C).

3.4. MW profiling of PEG uptake by A549 cells

Because PEGylated drugs are mainly used to treat cancer, we chose A549 non-small cell lung cancer cells to examine the MW profiles of PEG 750 and 2000 uptake as a function of duration of incubation. The results for the different time intervals in Fig. 4 show that PEG 2000 enters cells more slowly than PEG 750 as its homologs are only detected after 1 h. Fig. 4 also shows that uptake of the lower MW homologs in PEG 750 (the PEG with the lower average MW) is more rapid than uptake of the higher MW homologs such that, after 0.25 h, the MW profile is skewed towards lower MW. In contrast, uptake of PEG 2000 is much slower and, even after 1 h, gives a profile that shows no evidence of being skewed to low MW. However, by 24 h, both profiles resemble those of the corresponding standard solutions.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

MW profile of uptake of (A) PEG 750 and (B) PEG 2000 by A549 cells as a function of duration of incubation. Cells were incubated with PEGs 750 or 2000 (50 μmol/L) in transport buffer at 37 °C. Individual PEG homologs in A549 cells were analyzed by LC−Q-Q-TOF MS as parent ions without fragmentation and are presented as peak areas (cps) divided by the protein concentration acting as IS. Standard solutions of PEGs were prepared by spiking control cell lysate and analyzed in the same way. Data are means ± SD of three independent experiments.

3.5. Uptake of high MW PEGs by endocytosis

The results described above reveal that low MW PEGs (750 and 2000) enter cells by passive diffusion with no contribution from endocytosis whereas high MW PEGs enter cells by a combination of passive diffusion and endocytosis. To further investigate the mechanism of uptake of high MW PEGs by endocytosis, MDCK-mock cells were incubated with PEGs 5000 and 20,000 in the presence of the endocytosis inhibitors, colchicine (an inhibitor of micropinocytosis), chlorpromazine (an inhibitor of clathrin-mediated endocytosis), genistein (an inhibitor of caveolae-mediated endocytosis) and quercetin (an inhibitor of caveolae- and clathrin-independent endocytosis). MDCK-mock cells were used because all the inhibitors of endocytosis (colchicine34, chlorpromazine35, genistein36 and quercetin36,37) are also inhibitors of P-gp and therefore avoid this complication in studying the role of endocytosis in the uptake of PEGs. As shown in Fig. 5, the uptakes of PEGs 5000 and 20,000 are significantly lower at 4 °C and in the presence of genistein compared to positive control but are not significantly different in the presence of the other inhibitors. This suggests that PEGs 5000 and 20,000 enter cells mainly through the caveolae-mediated endocytosis pathway.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Effects of colchicine, chlorpromazine, genistein and quercetin on the uptake of PEGs 5000 and 20,000 by MDCK-mock cells. Cells were preincubated in transport buffer (1) alone (positive control) at 37 °C, (2) alone (negative control) at 4 °C, containing (3) colchicine (40 μg/mL), (4) chlorpromazine (10 μg/mL), (5) genistein (50 μg/mL) or (6) quercetin (100 μg/mL) for 0.5 h. After removal of medium, cells were incubated in corresponding solutions containing PEGs (100 μmol/L) for 2 h. Total intracellular PEG concentration (ng/mg protein) was determined by LC−Q-Q-TOF MS using the MSALL technique and expressed relative to the positive control set at 100%. Data are means ± SD of three independent experiments. **P < 0.01 vs. positive control.

4. Conclusions

PEGs are polydisperse polymers widely used as excipients and in PEGylated drug conjugates and DDS. Despite their hydrophilic nature, there is some evidence that PEGs can access cells and interact with P-gp, but how this occurs is unknown. The results of this study show that PEGs are indeed taken up by cells and act as P-gp substrates. PEGs with relatively low MW (average 750 and 2000 Da) cross cell membranes by passive diffusion whereas those with higher MW (average 5000 and 20,000 Da) enter cells by passive diffusion at low concentration and by a combination of passive diffusion and caveolae-mediated endocytosis at higher concentration. In terms of the intracellular MW profile of PEGs entering by passive diffusion, lower MW homologs are taken up more rapidly. We maintain these results have important implications in the pharmaceutical and clinical use of PEGs.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Professor Su Zeng, College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, for kindly providing MDCK-hMDR1 and MDCK-mock cells. This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 81430087, 81673396, 81872831 and 81603182), and the National Science and Technology Major Projects for ‘significant new drugs creation’ of the 13th five-year plan (2017ZX09101001 and 2018ZX09721002007, China).

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of Institute of Chinese Pharmaceutical Association and Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences.

Appendix A

Supporting data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2020.02.001.

Contributor Information

Jingkai Gu, Email: gujk@jlu.edu.cn.

Huimin Sun, Email: sunhm@nifdc.org.cn.

Author contributions

Jingkai Gu and Huimin Sun participated in research design. Tingting Wang, Yingjie Guo, Tianming Ren and Lei Yin conducted experiments. Tingting Wang and Yang He performed date analysis. Tingting Wang and John Paul Fawcett wrote or contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest. This work did not involve studies with human subjects.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following is the Supplementary data to this article:

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.pdf (497.6KB, pdf)

References

  • 1.Herzberger J., Niederer K., Pohlit H., Seiwert J., Worm M., Wurm F.R. Polymerization of ethylene oxide, propylene oxide, and other alkylene oxides: synthesis, novel polymer architectures, and bioconjugation. Chem Rev. 2015;116:2170–2243. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Vllasaliu D., Fowler R., Stolnik S. PEGylated nanomedicines: recent progress and remaining concerns. Expet Opin Drug Deliv. 2014;11:139–154. doi: 10.1517/17425247.2014.866651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Li C., Wang J., Wang Y., Gao H., Wei G., Huang Y. Recent progress in drug delivery. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2019;9:1145–1162. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2019.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lin W., Yin L., Sun T., Wang T., Xie Z., Gu J. The effect of molecular structure on cytotoxicity and antitumor activity of PEGylated nanomedicines. Biomacromolecules. 2018;19:1625–1634. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.8b00083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yin L., Su C., Ren T., Meng X., Shi M., Fawcett J.P. MSAll strategy for comprehensive quantitative analysis of PEGylated-doxorubicin, PEG and doxorubicin by LC-high resolution q-q-TOF mass spectrometry coupled with all window acquisition of all fragment ion spectra. Analyst. 2017;142:4279–4288. doi: 10.1039/c7an00470b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Longley C.B., Zhao H., Lozanguiez Y.L., Conover C.D. Biodistribution and excretion of radiolabeled 40 kda polyethylene glycol following intravenous administration in mice. J Pharm Sci. 2013;102:2362–2370. doi: 10.1002/jps.23506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Johnson B.M., Charman W.N., Porter C.J.H. An in vitro examination of the impact of polyethylene glycol 400, pluronic P85, and vitamin E d-a-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol 1000 succinate on P-glycoprotein efflux and enterocyte-based metabolism in excised rat intestine. AAPS PharmSci. 2002;4:193–205. doi: 10.1208/ps040440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hugger E.D., Novak B.L., Burton P.S., Audus K.L., Borchardt R.T. A comparison of commonly used polyethoxylated pharmaceutical excipients on their ability to inhibit P-glycoprotein activity in vitro. J Pharm Sci. 2002;91:1991–2002. doi: 10.1002/jps.10176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shen Q., Lin Y., Handa T., Doi M., Sugie M., Wakayama K. Modulation of intestinal P-glycoprotein function by polyethylene glycols and their derivatives by in vitro transport and in situ absorption studies. Int J Pharm (Amst) 2006;313:49–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Silva R., Vilas-Boas V., Carmo H., Dinis-Oliveira R.J., Carvalho F., de Lourdes Bastos M. Modulation of P-glycoprotein efflux pump: induction and activation as a therapeutic strategy. Pharmacol Therapeut. 2015;149:1–123. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2014.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhou M., Li L., Li L., Lin X., Wang F., Li Q. Overcoming chemotherapy resistance via simultaneous drug-efflux circumvention and mitochondrial targeting. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2019;9:615–625. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2018.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chufan E.E., Sim H.M., Ambudkar S.V. Molecular basis of the polyspecificity of P-glycoprotein (ABCB1): recent biochemical and structural studies. Adv Cancer Res. 2015;125:71–96. doi: 10.1016/bs.acr.2014.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mollazadeh S., Sahebkar A., Hadizadeh F., Behravan J., Arabzadeh S. Structural and functional aspects of P-glycoprotein and its inhibitors. Life Sci. 2018;214:118–123. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2018.10.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ziyad B., Afsaneh L. P-glycoprotein inhibition as a therapeutic approach for overcoming multidrug resistance in cancer: current status and future perspectives. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2013;13:326–346. doi: 10.2174/15680096113139990076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhou X., Meng X., Cheng L., Su C., Sun Y., Sun L. Development and application of an MSALL-based approach for the quantitative analysis of linear polyethylene glycols in rat plasma by liquid chromatography triple-quadrupole/time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2017;89:5193–5200. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b04058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nieto Montesinos R., Beduneau A., Pellequer Y., Lamprecht A. Delivery of P-glycoprotein substrates using chemosensitizers and nanotechnology for selective and efficient therapeutic outcomes. J Contr Release. 2012;161:50–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.04.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Iyer A.K., Singh A., Ganta S., Amiji M.M. Role of integrated cancer nanomedicine in overcoming drug resistance. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013;65:1784–1802. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2013.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Xu X., Sabanayagam C.R., Harrington D.A., Farach-Carson M.C., Jia X. A hydrogel-based tumor model for the evaluation of nanoparticle-based cancer therapeutics. Biomaterials. 2014;35:3319–3330. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.12.080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Boylan N.J., Kim A.J., Jung Soo S., Pichet A., Simons B.W., Lai S.K. Enhancement of airway gene transfer by DNA nanoparticles using a pH-responsive block copolymer of polyethylene glycol and poly-l-lysine. Biomaterials. 2012;33:2361–2371. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.11.080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang T., Sun Y., Ma W., Yang Z., Yang J., Liu J. Trantinterol, a novel beta2-adrenoceptor agonist, noncompetitively inhibits P-glycoprotein function in vitro and in vivo. Mol Pharm. 2015;12:1–9. doi: 10.1021/mp500239v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ambudkar S.V., Dey S., Hrycyna C.A., Ramachandra M., Pastan I., Gottesman M.M. Biochemical, cellular, and pharmacological aspects of the multidrug transporter. Annu Rev Pharmacol. 1999;39:361–398. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.39.1.361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ashiru-Oredope D.A., Patel N., Forbes B., Patel R., Basit A.W. The effect of polyoxyethylene polymers on the transport of ranitidine in Caco-2 cell monolayers. Int J Pharm (Amst) 2011;409:164–168. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.02.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.de Weger V.A., Beijnen J.H., Schellens J.H.M. Cellular and clinical pharmacology of the taxanes docetaxel and paclitaxel−a review. Anti-cancer Drug. 2014;25:488–494. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mai Y., Afonso-Pereira F., Murdan S., Basit A.W. Excipient-mediated alteration in drug bioavailability in the rat depends on the sex of the animal. Eur J Pharmaceut Sci. 2017;107:249–255. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2017.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hsiao P., Unadkat J.D. Predicting the outer boundaries of P-glycoprotein (P-gp)-based drug interactions at the human blood−brain barrier based on rat studies. Mol Pharm. 2014;11:436–444. doi: 10.1021/mp400396k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Palmeira A., Sousa E., Vasconcelos M.H., Pinto M.M. Three decades of P-gp inhibitors: skimming through several generations and scaffolds. Curr Med Chem. 2012;19:1946–2025. doi: 10.2174/092986712800167392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sun T., Zhang Y.S., Pang B., Hyun D.C., Yang M., Xia Y. Engineered nanoparticles for drug delivery in cancer therapy. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2014;53:12320–12364. doi: 10.1002/anie.201403036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pisani M.J., Fromm P.D., Mulyana Y., Clarke R.J., Körner H., Heimann K. Mechanism of cytotoxicity and cellular uptake of lipophilic inert dinuclear polypyridylruthenium (II) complexes. ChemMedChem. 2011;6:848–858. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.201100053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Novohradsky V., Liu Z., Vojtiskova M., Sadler P.J., Brabec V., Kasparkova J. Mechanism of cellular accumulation of an iridium(iii) pentamethylcyclopentadienyl anticancer complex containing a C, N-chelating ligand. Metall. 2014;6:682–690. doi: 10.1039/c3mt00341h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Price K.A., Crouch P.J., Volitakis I., Paterson B.M., Lim S., Donnelly P.S. Mechanisms controlling the cellular accumulation of copper bis (thiosemicarbazonato) complexes. Inorg Chem. 2011;50:9594–9605. doi: 10.1021/ic201334q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.D’souza A.A., Shegokar R. Polyethylene glycol (PEG): a versatile polymer for pharmaceutical applications. Expet Opin Drug Deliv. 2016;13:1257–1275. doi: 10.1080/17425247.2016.1182485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shang L., Nienhaus K., Nienhaus G.U. Engineered nanoparticles interacting with cells: size matters. J Nanobiotechnol. 2014;12:5. doi: 10.1186/1477-3155-12-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Verma A., Uzun O., Hu Y., Hu Y., Han H.S., Watson N. Surface-structure-regulated cell-membrane penetration by monolayer-protected nanoparticles. Nat Mater. 2008;7:588–595. doi: 10.1038/nmat2202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dahan A., Sabit H., Amidon G.L. Multiple efflux pumps are involved in the transepithelial transport of colchicine: combined effect of p-glycoprotein and multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 leads to decreased intestinal absorption throughout the entire small intestine. Drug Metab Dispos. 2009;37:2028–2036. doi: 10.1124/dmd.109.028282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Brown D., Goosen T.C., Chetty M., Hamman J.H. Effect of oral contraceptives on the transport of chlorpromazine across the Caco-2 intestinal epithelial cell line. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2003;56:159–165. doi: 10.1016/s0939-6411(03)00110-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jaganathan S.K. Can flavonoids from honey alter multidrug resistance?. Med Hypotheses. 2011;76:535–537. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2010.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wang S.Y., Duan K.M., Li Y., Mei Y., Sheng H., Liu H. Effect of quercetin on P-glycoprotein transport ability in Chinese healthy subjects. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013;67:390–394. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2013.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.pdf (497.6KB, pdf)

Articles from Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. B are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES