Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 May 4;84(2):499–502. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.04.147

Feasibility and implementation of portable confocal microscopy for point-of-care diagnosis of cutaneous lesions in a low-resource setting

Esther E Freeman 1,*, Aggrey Semeere 2,3,*, Miriam Laker-Oketta 2, Priscilla Namaganda 2, Hany Osman 1, Robert Lukande 4, Devon McMahon 1, Divya Seth 1,5, Linda Oyesiku 1, Guillermo J Tearney 1, Salvador Gonzalez 6, Milind Rajadhyaksha 7, R Rox Anderson 1, Jeffrey Martin 3, Dongkyun Kang 8
PMCID: PMC7606307  NIHMSID: NIHMS1592554  PMID: 32376425

In resource limited settings, portable diagnostic devices could potentially reduce the delay in obtaining histopathologic diagnosis.1 Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) can noninvasively visualize dermatologic cellular details at the point of care. Previously, RCM has not been utilized in resource limited settings, in part due to high cost.2 We developed a low-cost smartphone portable confocal microscope for visualizing skin at the point of care. We then investigated the feasibility of using this device at the Infectious Diseases Institute (IDI) in Uganda. We chose to study this device on HIV-infected patients with suspected Kaposi’s Sarcoma (KS), due to high prevalence of KS in East Africa and importance of histopathology for diagnosis,3 and preliminary data suggesting that confocal microscopy could be used to visualize KS-associated cellular features.5

In the portable confocal microscope, we used line-scanning optics with an inexpensive LED for illumination and a smartphone for detection and data management (Figure 1).4 In vivo imaging on intact skin was performed at depths of 25, 75, and 125 μm to evaluate features in the epidermis, dermo-epidermal junction, and dermis. Ex vivo imaging was performed with an excised biopsy placed in 1% acetic acid for 5 minutes to enhance nuclear contrast, which does not alter H&E staining. Ex vivo imaging allowed us to image deeper into the specimen, down to the layer of the subcutaneous fat.

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

(A) Novel hand-held smartphone confocal microscope. (B) Use of the microscope in vivo in Uganda.

We evaluated a total of 363 patients with Fitzpatrick Skin Type 5 or 6. Imaging was performed by a phlebotomist (52% of samples), nurses (14%) or a physician (34%). In vivo imaging was successfully performed on 198 participants prior to biopsy (Figures 2A, B). Cellular features, including keratinocytes and dermal papillae, were appreciable only from 20 participants due to challenges in maintaining water immersion and stable contact between the skin and the objective lens. The cellular imaging was limited to the epidermis and the dermo-epidermal junction caused by light scattering in dark skin and reduced optical sectioning capability due to slit aperture.

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

In Vivo images visualized the (A) keratinocytes (arrows pointing to dark circles) and (B) dermal-epidermal junction with dermal papillae (*). Ex Vivo images visualized the (C) epidermal cell nuclei, (D) adipocytes, (E) fibrous structure of normal dermis, and (F) irregular capillaries (dark areas irregular in size and shape).

In contrast, ex vivo imaging of the 363 patients was less limited by skin tone. In 185 patients, imaging provided sufficient resolution and contrast to visualize cellular features, including nuclei in epidermis, adipocytes, and collagen (Figures 2C, D, E), as well as irregular capillary patterns, which may be indicative of KS (Figure 2F). Ten patients had high quality images of both ex vivo and in vivo confocal microscopy.

Imaging was conducted in under 15 minutes and achieved lateral resolution of 1μm and optical sectioning of 5μm. The device cost $4,200 USD, 10–20 times less than that of a standard confocal microscope. All cadres of health workers found the device feasible to use. However, ease of use was influenced by the type of skin lesion: patches or plaques were easier to image than tumors, nodules, or oral lesions.

In conclusion, we developed a low-cost portable confocal microscope which was feasible to use in the field in Uganda. Ex vivo confocal microscopy shows promise for rapid point-of-care diagnosis. Limitations included light scattering limiting in vivo image quality in dark skin and the need for a confocal reader. Solutions include portable confocal microscopes with longer wavelength to reduce light scattering and improve imaging depth, as well as the design of artificial intelligence algorithms to interpret confocal images. Next steps include evaluation of the efficacy of portable confocal microscopy for point of care diagnosis of KS and other skin malignancies.

Acknowledgements:

This research was supported by National Institute of Health/Fogarty International Center (Grant # R21TW010221). The contributions of co-author MR were partly supported by NCI grant R01CA201399 and by MSKCC’s NCI core center grant P30CA008748. Co-author AS was in part supported for this research by US National Cancer Institute under grant UH2 CA202723. Co-author EF was in part supported for this research by NIAID K23 AI136579.

Funding: National Institute of Health/Fogarty International Center (R21TW010221); National Cancer Institute (P30CA008748); EF’s effort was supported by Dermatology Foundation Career Development Award and NIAID K23 AI136579.

Footnotes

Disclosures: GT and DK are inventors on a US patent (Massachusetts General Hospital, assignee) on the technology presented.

References:

  • 1.Abaza H, Marschollek M, 2017. mHealth Application Areas and Technology Combinations. Methods Inf Med 56, e105–e122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Que SKT, Grant-Kels JM, Longo C, Pellacani G, 2016. Basics of Confocal Microscopy and the Complexity of Diagnosing Skin Tumors: New Imaging Tools in Clinical Practice, Diagnostic Workflows, Cost-Estimate, and New Trends. Dermatol Clin 34, 367–375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Amerson E, Woodruff CM, Forrestel A, et al. Accuracy of Clinical Suspicion and Pathologic Diagnosis of Kaposi Sarcoma in East Africa. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;71(3):295–301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Freeman EE, Semeere A, Osman H, Peterson G, Rajadhyaksha M, González S, Martin JN, Anderson RR, Tearney GJ, Kang D, 2018. Smartphone confocal microscopy for imaging cellular structures in human skin in vivo. Biomed Opt Express 9, 1906–1915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Grazziotin TC, Cota C, Buffon RB, Araújo Pinto L, Latini A, Ardigò M. Preliminary evaluation of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy features of Kaposi’s sarcoma. Dermatology. 2010;220(4):346–54. Epub 2010 May 6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES