Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Biodiversity Data Journal logoLink to Biodiversity Data Journal
. 2020 Oct 26;8:e57237. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.8.e57237

Parasitism of Placobdelloides siamensis (Oka, 1917) (Glossiphoniidae: Hirudinea) in Snail-eating Turtles, Malayemys spp., and the effects of host and aquatic environmental factors

Poramad Trivalairat 1, Krittiya Chiangkul 1, Watchariya Purivirojkul 1,✉
PMCID: PMC7606437  PMID: 33192153

Abstract

The Siam Shield Leech, Placobdelloides siamensis, is a common leech found on Malayemys turtles in Thailand. Sixty Snail-eating Turtles (29 Malayemys macrocephala and 31 M. subtrijuga) were caught over twelve months (February 2017 – January 2018) to determine host characteristics (body size, weight and sex), parasitism (prevalence, intensity and density) and seasonal aquatic environmental factors (conductivity, nitrate nitrogen, dissolved oxygen, pH, salinity and total dissolved solids). There was no significant difference of infection rate between species and sex in both turtle species. Leech prevalence indicated that all turtle individuals were infected throughout year, while the infection rate was significantly higher in larger and heavier turtles mainly on the carapace with an average number of leech approximately 474.80 ± 331.38 individuals for individual host infection and 76.53 ± 20.27 individuals for infection per 100 g body weight. The high level of leech parasitism also caused a rot wound and shell hole which caused the host to die. Aquatic environmental factors did not influence the infection of leeches in both turtle species. Therefore, the factors that influenced the infection rate of P. siamensis were based on only host body size and weight without effect from season. In addition, this study also showed two new hosts, including Cyclemys oldhamii and Heosemys grandis and the widespread distribution from northern, north-eastern, western, central and southern Thailand were reported.

Keywords: Rhynchobdellida , Geoemydidae , Malayemys; aquatic environment, distribution, Thailand

Introduction

Leeches are widespread ectoparasites found in various habitats including terrestrial, marine and particularly freshwater environments (Sawyer 1986). Placobdelloides Sawyer, 1986 is a freshwater leech genus distributed globally in various hosts, such as water snails, fishes, amphibians, reptiles and mammals (Sawyer 1986, Tucker et al. 2005, Alam et al. 2008, Schulz et al. 2011, Tubtimon et al. 2014). The leeches in family Glossiphoniidae, including Placobdelloides leeches, exhibit a parental care behaviour, which is a unique behaviour that helps to increase the survival rate of their young (Kutschera 1992, Kutschera and Wirtz 2001, Bolotov et al. 2019). In Thailand, two Placobdelloides species are reported: first is Placobdelloides siamensis (Oka, 1917) from the Black Marsh Turtle (Siebenrockiella crassicollis (Gray, 1831)), Khorat Snail-eating Turtle (M. Khoratensis Ihlow et al., 2016), Malayan Snail-eating Turtle (M. Macrocephala (Gray, 1859)), Mekong Snail-eating Turtle (Malayemys subtrijuga (Schlegel and Müller, 1845)), Southeast Asian Box Turtle (Cuora amboinensis (Daudin, 1802)) and the Yellow-headed Temple Turtle (Heosemys annandalii (Boulenger, 1903)); and the recently-described species is P. sirikanchanae Trivalairat, Chiangkul and Purivirojkul, 2019 from Asian Leaf Turtle (Cyclemys dentata (Gray, 1831)) and the Dark-bellied Leaf Turtle (C. enigmatica Fritz et al., 2008) (Chiangkul et al. 2018, Trivalairat et al. 2019). Many leeches are haematophagous and have anti-coagulants in their saliva, which can cause haemorrhage and sometimes decrease blood volume and nutrients of the hosts (Bragg et al. 1989, Rigbi et al. 1987, Tiberti and Gentilli 2010). Moreover, the blood-feeding leeches can acquire blood-borne parasites and act as a vector to a future host (Kikuchi and Fukatsu 2002, Mihalca et al. 2002). Consequently, the leeches may increase mortality and risk of disease to hosts, especially wetland aquatic biomonitoring vertebrate species.

The Malayan Snail-eating Turtle (Malayemys macrocephala (Gray, 1859)) and Mekong Snail-eating Turtle (M. subtrijuga) are aquatic freshwater turtles distributed mainly in Thailand (Schlegel and Müller 1845, Gray 1859, Das 2010). They live near slow-flowing freshwater or shallow lacustrine freshwater bodies that are covered with dense vegetation, such as swamps, canals, ditches and flood fields (Ernst et al. 1997, Bonin et al. 2006, Satun inland aquaculture research and development center 2009). In addition, these turtles are important for biological control by consuming the invasive Golden Apple Snail (Pomacea canaliculata (Lamarck, 1819)) (Lamarck 1819, Carlsson et al. 2004). In Thailand, people usually release turtles, especially Snail-eating Turtles, into canals or ponds for merit (Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University 2005, Asian Herp Blogs 2011, Chiangkul et al. 2018). However, as found in this study, the Siamese Shield Leech is observed in both species of Snail-eating Turtles. This means that the release of turtles potentially causes an occasional dispersion of the leech into natural habitats, which involves infecting and worsening the health of other hosts.

Material and methods

Specimen Collection and Host Measurements

Five individuals of the Snail-eating Turtles (Malayemys macrocephala or M. subtrijuga) were randomly captured by hand on the same day each month (15th day, during night) for 12 months continuously (February 2017 through to January 2018) from ponds in Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand (13°50’53.6”N 100°33’47.3”E). All of the captured turtles were provided to the laboratory in the Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University to be examined for weight (g), carapace length (cm) and sex. Weight and measurement were recorded using regularly calibrated digital scales (Teneca digital medical scales) and Vernier calliper (nearest 0.1 mm), respectively. Sex identification was identified from tail and cloaca following Keithmaleesatti 2008. Then, the total number of mature leeches (excluding juveniles and eggs) were counted and removed from the host’s outer area using forceps. Leeches were identified following Chiangkul et al. 2018 and stored in 70% alcohol. All turtles were released to their capture site when finished.

In addition, to avoid forcefully removing the leeches and causing damage, each turtle was kept moist, because, in this study, some turtles were left in a tank without water overnight, causing almost all of the leeches on the carapace and plastron to shrink and die, except for the leeches that moved to the head, axillar, groin and caudal regions where there was more moisture than found on the shells. As a result, the turtles were always kept moist by keeping them in a water tank to avoid biasing the leech infection.

Water Analysis

For 12 continuous months (February 2017 through to January 2018), after collecting the turtles, the water at the sites and depths of each turtle capture were measured for environmental factors such as conductivity (µs/cm), nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N) (mg/l), optical dissolved oxygen (ODO) (mg/l), pH, salinity (ppt), temperature (ᴼC) and total dissolved solids (TDS) (mg/l), using a YSI EXO multiparameter instrument (YSI Incorporated, Yellow Springs, Ohio, USA) to investigate the relationship between leech parasitism and any seasonal environmental factors.

Survey Sampling

Geoemydidae turtle species were surveyed and captured by hand from the natural habitats and captive sites (temples), including markets within Thailand during February 2017 through to June 2018 to investigate a host-specific relationship and distribution of P. siamensis. The number of leech and effects from leech infestation on each turtle were immediately recorded in fields and turtles were released back to their capture site when recordings were complete.

Statistical Analysis

Prevalence (the percentage of hosts infected with at least one leech), mean intensity (the average number of leeches per infected host) and mean density (the average number of leeches per 100 g body weight of infected host) were determined throughout the year. Prevalence and mean intensity were performed following Bush et al. 1997, while density was calculated to minimise bias between weight and body size variations.

graphic file with name M1.gif
graphic file with name M2.gif
graphic file with name M3.gif

The IBM SPSS Statistics software package (SPSS Inc.; Chicago, IL, USA) was used to analyse the number of leeches, carapace length and weight with a 5% type I error risk. Leech loads, numbers of leech, intensity and density, were not normally distributed, so non-parametric tests were used to compare leech load amongst population and other variables. The mean intensity (individuals) and mean density (individuals/100g) of P. siamensis from M. macrocephala and M. subtrijuga, including differences between sexes in both species, were analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Spearman's rank correlation was used to examined the relationships between leech loads (number of leech) and host characteristics (weight and carapace length) and mean density during the 12 months (February 2017 – January 2018) and seven variables of water analysis: conductivity (µs/cm), nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N) (mg/l), optical dissolved oxygen (ODO) (mg/l), pH, salinity (ppt), specific conductance (SPC) (µs/cm) and total dissolved solids (TDS) (mg/l). The preference area infection on hosts (carapace, head and axilla, groin and tail and plastron) and mean density in each month were analysed using one-way ANOVA.

Results

Turtle Body Size

Two species of turtle, Malayemys macrocephala and M. subtrijuga, were captured in Kasetsart University. A total of 29 individuals (21 females and 8 males) of M. macrocephala were captured; they had a mean weight of 709.14 ± 462.92 g (min-max: 80-1700 g) (812.38 ± 457.19 g (min-max: 80-1700 g) for females and 438.13 ± 462.92 g (min-max: 150-1300 g) for males) and carapace length of 16.20 ± 4.71 cm (min-max: 7.8-23.0 cm) (17.20 ± 4.38 cm (min-max: 7.8-23.0) for females and 13.60 ± 4.85 cm (min-max: 9.5-21.5 cm) for males). A total of 31 individuals (21 females and 10 males) of M. subtrijuga were captured; they had a mean weight of 572.24 ± 437.04 g (min-max: 19-1500 g) (699.02 ± 470.81 g (min-max: 19-1500 g) for females and 306.00 ± 166.88 g (min-max: 38-779 g) for males) and carapace length of 15.21 ± 4.53 cm (min-max: 4.8-23.0 cm) (16.35 ± 4.83 cm (min-max: 4.8-23.0 cm) for females and 12.82 ± 2.66 cm (min-max: 9.1-18.8 cm) for males). These results indicated that M. macrocephala was larger and heavier than M. subtrijuga and that females of both species were larger and heavier than males.

Preference between Species

The captured turtles were parasitised by a single species of leech, Placobdelloides siamensis, totalling 28,488 individuals from 60 host specimens (Fig. 1). Five mature leech specimens (ZRC.ANN.0435 to 0439) from each turtle in the first month were deposited in the Zoological Reference Collection (ZRC) of the Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum (LKCNHM), National University of Singapore, Singapore and others series of leech collection from each turtle (60 catalogue numbers, ZMKU-ANN-SER-0001 to 0059) were deposited in the Zoological Museum, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand (ZMKU). The leech infection in both turtle species was found to be distributed with the mean number of leech 538.24 ± 356.26 individuals for M. macrocephala (609.43 ± 343.19 individuals for females and 351.38 ± 340.66 individuals for males) and 415.45 ± 299.96 individuals for M. subtrijuga (493.62 ± 326.36 individuals for females and 242.30 ± 143.62 individuals for males) (Table 1). The leech infection in both species and sex increased significantly with increasing weight (r = 0.926, p = 0.000; r = 0.843, p = 0.009 for females and males of M. macrocephala) (r = 0.928, p = 0.000; r = 0.908, p = 0.000 for females and males of M. subtrijuga) and body size (carapace length) (r = 0.830, p = 0.000; r = 0.766, p = 0.027 for females and males of M. macrocephala) (r = 0.925, p = 0.000; r = 0.793, p = 0.006 for females and males of M. subtrijuga) (Table 2) (Fig. 2). Moreover, the turtle weight increased significantly with increasing body size (r = 0.901, p = 0.000 for females of M. macrocephala) (r = 0.960, p = 0.000; r = 0.941, r = 0.000 for females and males of M. subtrijuga), except males M. macrocephala (r = 0.576, p = 0.135) . Hence, the females individuals in both species have a tendency to be infected by leeches more than males from larger carapace lengths and weights.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Placobdelloides siamensis on Malayemys subtrijuga carapaces.

Table 1.

The Mann-Whitney U test of leech intensity and density found on Malayemys macrocephala and M. subtrijuga, and between the sexes of both species.

Variables Intensity Density
Mean u p Mean u p
Malayemys
macrocephala
(n = 29)		 538.24
± 356.26		 369.5 0.119 78.86
± 14.10		 409.0 0.275
subtrijuga
(n = 31) 		415.45
± 299.96		 74.35
± 24.75
M. macrocephala
Female
(n = 21)		 609.43
± 343.19		 115.0 0.070 76.44
± 11.72		 55.5 0.084
Male
(n = 8)		 351.38
± 340.66		 85.21
± 18.43
M. subtrijuga
Female
(n = 21)		 493.62
± 326.36		 144.0 0.053 78.35
± 26.15		 68.0 0.062
Male
(n = 10)		 242.30
± 143.62		 78.35
± 22.27
Total 47480
± 331.38		 76.53
± 20.27
Open in a new tab

Table 2.

Spearman's correlation (r) and p – values (p) of model variables: number of leeches, weight (g) and carapace length (cm) in both female (F) and male (M) of Malayemys macrocephala and M. subtrijuga.

Characteristics M. macrocephala M. subtrijuga
F (n = 21) M (n = 8) F (n = 21) M (n = 10)
r p r p r p r p
Number of leech
Weight 0.926 0.000 0.843 0.009 0.928 0.000 0.908 0.000
Carapace length 0.830 0.000 0.766 0.027 0.925 0.000 0.793 0.006
Carapace length
Weight 0.901 0.000 0.576 0.135 0.960 0.000 0.941 0.000
Open in a new tab

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

Leech infection vs. turtle weight (A) and vs. carapace length scatterplots (B)

Placobdelloides siamensis demonstrated no differences of intensity between M. macrocephala and M. subtrijuga (u = 1.448, p = 0.119), as well as no differences of infection between females and males in M. macrocephala (u = 115.0, p = 0.070) and M. subtrijuga (u = 144.0, p = 0.053) (Table 1).

The mean density in both species indicated approximately 78.86 ± 14.10 individuals/100g for M. macrocephala (76.44 ± 11.72 individuals/100g for females and 85.21 ± 18.43 individuals/100g for males) and 74.35 ± 24.75 individuals/100g for M. subtrijuga (78.35 ± 26.15 individuals/100g for females and 78.35 ± 22.27 individuals/100g for males) (Table 1). These densities also demonstrated no differences between M. macrocephala and M. subtrijuga (u = 409.0, p = 0.275), as well as no differences of infection between females and males in M. macrocephala (u = 55.5, p = 0.084) and M. subtrijuga (u = 68.0, p = 0.062) (Table 1). These results indicated P. siamensis had no host specific preference between these two turtle species and could be treated as similar populations.

Infection Site Preference

The external body surface of both species were infected mostly on the carapace (311.00 ± 208.99 individuals (57.78%) for M. macrocephala) (241.94 ± 181.22 individuals (56.57%) for M. subtrijuga), followed by: head and axilla (93.24 ± 72.62 individuals, 17.32%), groin and caudal (64.11 ± 11.91 individuals, 16.56%) and plastron (34.07 ± 6.33 individuals, 8.33%), respectively, for M. macrocephala; head and axilla (69.65 ± 59.43 individuals, 20.06%), groin and caudal (70.52 ± 58.90 individuals, 16.46%) and plastron (30.45 ± 25.73 individuals, 6.91%), respectively, for M. subtrijuga (Table 3).

Table 3.

One-way ANOVA resulted in the source of leech infected variation on the body surface of Malayemys macrocephala and M. subtrijuga: C = carapace region; HA = Head and axilla; P = plastron; GT = groin and tail.

Variables Number of leech in each site f p
C HA P GT
M. macrocephala
(n = 29)		 311.00
± 208.99		 93.24
± 72.62		 34.07
± 6.33		 64.11
± 11.91		 30.627 0.000
M. subtrijuga
(n = 31)		 241.94
± 181.22		 69.65
± 59.43		 30.45
± 25.73		 70.52
± 58.90		 27.283 0.000
Open in a new tab

Prevalence and Density

A high level of infection was found with 100% of turtles infected (including a hatchling) throughout the year in these populations. The mean density through the year resulted in 76.53 ± 20.27 individuals/100g (Fig. 3). In addition, the mean density demonstrated no difference of infection in each month (f = 1.754, p = 0.90).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

Mean density (individuals/100g) of Placobdelloides siamensis on Malayemys turtles by month in Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand from February 2017 to January 2018.

Environmental Factors

Leech density on both turtle species (M. macrocephara and M. subtrijuga) was not affected by conductivity (r = -0.118, p = 0.370), nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N) (r = 0.017, p = 0.898), optical dissolved oxygen (ODO) (r = -0.173, p = 0.186), pH (r = 0.071, p = 0.591), salinity (r = -0.106, p = 0.422), temperature (r = 0.091, p = 0.488) or total dissolved solid (TDS) (r = -0.117, p = 0.373) throughout the year (February 2017 to January 2018) (Table 4).

Table 4.

Spearman's correlation (r) and p – values (p) of model variables throughout the year (February 2017 to January 2018): leech density on turtles (Malayemys macrocephala and M. subtrijuga), conductivity (µs/cm), nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N) (mg/l), optical dissolved oxygen (ODO) (mg/l), pH, salinity (ppt), Temperature (°C) and total dissolved solid (TDS) (mg/l).

Parameters Mean r p
Mean density
1. Conductivity (µs/cm) 369.12 ± 289.93 -0.118 0.370
2. NO3-N (mg/l) 1.50 ± 1.38 0.017 0.898
3. ODO (mg/l) 3.80 ± 1.52 -0.173 0.186
4. pH 7.38 ± 0.26 0.071 0.591
5. Salinity (ppt) 0.17 ± 0.14 -0.106 0.422
6. Temperature (ᴼC) 28.18 ± 1.96 0.091 0.488
7. TDS (mg/l) 230.17 ± 184.15 -0.117 0.373
Open in a new tab

Distribution

Altogether, eight species of Geoemydidae turtle from 16 provinces in Thailand were found infected by P. siamensis as follows (Figs 4, 5) (Table 5) (Suppl. material 1): Malayemys macrocephala from Ang Thong, Bangkok, Chiangmai, Nakhon Pathom, Nonthaburi, Pathumthani and Suphan Buri; M. subtrijuga from Ang Thong, Bangkok, Nakhon Nayok, Nonthaburi and Suphan Buri; M. khoratensis from Udon Thani; Cuora amboinensis from Bangkok, Chonburi, Kanchanaburi, Ranong and Songkhla; Cyclemys oldhamii (Gray, 1836) from Prachuap Khiri Khan and Tak; Heosemys grandis (Gray, 1860) from Chonburi; Hieremys annandalii from Bangkok, Chonburi, Kanchanaburi, Ranong and Samut Sakhon; Siebenrockiella crassicollis from Bangkok.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Open in a new tab

Distribution of Placobdelloides siamensis in Thailand.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Open in a new tab

Illegal turtle trading for merit releasing in Thailand: (A) Hieremys annandalii with massive parasitism of Placobdelloides siamensis from Soi Thong Temple, Bang Sue, Bangkok; and (B) Malayemys subtrijuga from Warorot Market, Mueang, Chiangmai.

Table 5.

The prevalence (%) and mean intensity (individuals) of Geoemydidae turtles in Thailand.

Species Number (n) Prevalence (%) Mean intensity
(individuals)
Infected Examined
Malayemys macrocephala 55 55 100.0 96.96 ± 118.74
Malayemys subtrijuga 64 71 90.1 98.35 ± 159.05
Malayemys khoratensis 1 1 100.0 29
Cuora amboinensis 10 53 18.9 0.47 ± 1.51
Cyclemys oldhamii 2 2 100.0 14.50 ± 19.09
Heosemys grandis 1 3 33.3 2.33 ± 4.04
Hieremys annandalii 12 22 54.5 425.77 ± 538.46
Siebenrockiella crassicollis 3 3 100.0 8.67 ± 7.64
Trachemys scripta elegans 0 12 0 0
Open in a new tab

The invasive turtle species, Trachemys scripta elegans (Thunberg in Schoepff, 1792), was found from Bangkok and Chonburi without leech infection.

Symptoms of Infection

This is the first record of leech infested turtles from surveying in Thailand. The aggregated infection of P. siamensis could cause peeling shells, shell holes, haemorrhage or lesions on epidermal tissues towards the S. crassicollis from Bangkok from tissue consumption (Fig. 6A). This leech also penetrated under the keratinised scute on the plastron and bone tissue (shell) through the soft tissue to consume the tissue and blood meals of M. subtrijuga from Nonthaburi (Fig. 6B). Additionally, it occasionally deposited and raised its eggs (approximately 200-400 eggs/clutch) on the carapace surface (Fig. 6C).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Open in a new tab

Symptoms of Placobdelloides siamensis infection (white arrows). (A) Epidermal lesion on forelimb and axilla (red circles) of Siebenrockiella crassicollis; (B) Penetration under keratinised scute on plastron (red circles) of Malayemys subtrijuga; (C) Egg deposition on carapace (red arrow) of M. subtrijuga.

Discussion

Host comparisons

Generally, adult Malayemys macrocephala are usually larger than M. subtrijuga and the females in both species are larger than the males (Ernst et al. 1997, Bonin et al. 2006, Satun inland aquaculture research and development center 2009, Das 2010). The findings of this study from Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand, were in agreement with this; M. macrocephala showed a mean weight and carapace length larger than M. subtrijuga and females in both species were found to have approximately 30% larger carapace lengths and twice the weight of males. This sexual dimorphism may be an adaptation that allowed smaller males to be ready for mating, while allowing larger females to gather more nutrients and energy to produce more offspring (Berry and Shine 1980, Shine 1988).

Parasitic-Host Relationship

The populations of M. macrocephala and M. subtrijuga, from Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand, were determined to be the hosts of a single observed leech, Placobdelloides siamensis. P. siamensis was mostly concentrated on the carapace region in both species. The colonisation of leech on the carapace region might be an adaptation to rest after a blood meal, because this region was influenced less from turtle motions, whereas, head, axilla, groin and caudal regions were epidermal tissues from which leeches could have a blood meal and were also susceptible for leech parasitism from benthos (Ernst et al. 1997, Graham et al. 1997, Ryan and Lamber 2005, Bonin et al. 2006, McCoy et al. 2007). However, these regions were frequent locomotion parts that might disturb leech attaching. Including the plastron region, scratching from the ground also disturbed the attachment of leeches. Consequently, the leech infection was discovered to be mostly on carapace areas thus avoiding the disturbances from turtle activities in other regions.

Furthermore, the results demonstrated that every single Malayemys turtle in Kasetsart University was infected by P. siamensis throughout the year (February 2017 through to January 2018) and infection was even found on a young hatchling. The leech infection increased relative to the host body size and weight. As seen in most animals, body size is positively correlated to weight. In addition, this leech is a blood-feeding ectoparasite that attaches, including reproducing, to the outer parts of the hosts longer than the temporary buffalo leeches which leave the host after sufficient infestation has occurred (Southerland 1986a, Southerland 1986b, Goater 2000, McCoy et al. 2007, Readel et al. 2008, Peig and J.Green 2010). Therefore, the increasing host surface also provides more living areas for attachment and a greater blood resource for feeding.

Environmental Effects

The seven analysed water variables (conductivity, nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N), optical dissolved oxygen (ODO), pH, salinity, temperature and total dissolved solid (TDS)) are essential for some aquatic organisms for balance, water balance support, nutrients and respiration (Mann 1962, Davies 1991, Bush et al. 1997, American Public Health Association et al. 1999, Wetzel 2001, Hayashi 2004, Iyasele et al. 2015, Desai and Rao 2016, Mueller and Helsel 2016). However, in this study, the seven variables were not significantly related to leech intensity throughout the survey period. Accordingly, the leech intensity was not related to conductivity, NO3-N, ODO, pH, salinity, temperature and TDS in each season.

Distribution in Thailand

Although Siebenrockiella crassicollis is described as the original host of P. siamensis from Thailand, it is commonly found in M. macrocephala and M. subtrijuga, M. khoratensis, Cuora amboinensis and Hieremys annandalii (Annandale 1925, Sawyer 1986, Chiangkul et al. 2018). However, this study demonstrated the first record of P. siamensis from Cyclemys oldhamii and Heosemys grandis. In addition, this was the first distribution record of P. siamensis from the northern region (Chiangmai), western regions (Kanchanaburi and Tak), central regions (Ang Thong, Nakhon Nayok, Nakhon Pathom, Nonthaburi, Prachuap Khiri Khan, Pathumthani, Samut Sakhon and Suphan Buri) and southern regions (Ranong and Songkhla). Therefore, this leech had been shown to feed mostly on Geoemydidae turtles, as mentioned above and tended to spread throughout the Thailand area following its host distribution.

Effects of Infection

Placobdelloides siamensis is a jawless leech (Rhynchobdellida) which uses a proboscis to obtain a blood meal by penetrating epidermal tissues under scales or bony tissues of turtle shells (Mann 1962, Siddall and Gaffney 2004). The chronic infection by a concentrated leeches colony damaged tissues due to direct penetration and also caused a wound on the epidermal tissues or shell holes. In addition, the higher leech parasitism also harm the turtle health from anaemia and malnutrition, including haemoparasite transmission, which can sometimes kill the turtles (Rigbi et al. 1987, Bragg et al. 1989, Brooks et al. 1990, Kikuchi and Fukatsu 2002, Tiberti and Gentilli 2010, Dvorakova et al. 2014). Occasionally, both the turtle species in the wild take aerial-basks to reduce leech loads by exposing the parasite to desiccation (Ernst 1971, McAuliffe 1977, Koffler et al. 1978). Consequently, the chronic infection of concentrated leech colonies could significantly effect turtle hosts, ultimately causing their death.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary material 1

Recorded Specimen Data

Poramad Trivalairat.

Data type

Specimen collecting data

Brief description

Recorded data of collected Geoemydidae turtles from natural habitats (NH), captive site (CS) and markets (MA) in Thailand during February 2017 through to June 2018. All specimens were collected manually by Poramad Trivalairat, except specimens from markets.

File: oo_458210.docx

bdj-08-e57237-s001.docx (21.3KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Human Resource Development in Science Project (Science Achievement Scholarship of Thailand, SAST) and the Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University.

References

  1. Alam S., Choudhary M. K. D., Islam K. Leech in urinary bladder causing hematuria. Journal of Pediatric Urology. 2008;4:167–169. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2007.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Association American Public Health, Association American Water Works, Federation Water Environment. Baltimore, MD: American Public Health Association; 1999. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (20th ed.) [Google Scholar]
  3. Annandale N. Zoological results of a tour in the Far East. The Journal of Asiatic Society of Bengal. 1925;9:167–169. [Google Scholar]
  4. Blogs Asian Herp. Malayan snail-eating turtle. https://bangkokherps.wordpress.com/2011/10/22/malayan-snail-eating-turtle-2/ [2020-02-19T00:00:00+02:00];
  5. Berry J. F., Shine R. Sexual size dimorphism and sexual selection in turtle (Order Testudines) Oecologia. 1980;44:185–191. doi: 10.1007/BF00572678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bolotov Ivan N., Klass Anna L., Kondakov Alexander V., Vikhrev Ilya V., Bespalaya Yulia V., Gofarov Mikhail Yu, Filippov Boris Yu, Bogan Arthur E., Lopes-Lima Manuel, Lunn Zau, Chan Nyein, Aksenova Olga V., Dvoryankin Gennady A., Chapurina Yulia E., Kim Sang Ki, Kolosova Yulia S., Konopleva Ekaterina S., Lee Jin Hee, Makhrov Alexander A., Palatov Dmitry M., Sayenko Elena M., Spitsyn Vitaly M., Sokolova Svetlana E., Tomilova Alena A., Win Than, Zubrii Natalia A., Vinarski Maxim V., et al. Freshwater mussels house adiverse mussel-associated leech assemblage. Scientific Reports. 2019;9:16449. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52688-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bonin F., Devaux B., Dupré A. A and C Black, London; 2006. Turtles of the World. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bragg R. R., Oosthuizen J. H., Lordan S. M. The leech Batracobdelloides tricarinata (Blanchard, 1897) (Hirudinea: Glossiphoniidae) as a possible reservoir of the rainbow trout pathogenic Streptococcus species. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research. 1989;56:203–204. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Brooks R. J., Galbraith D. A., Layfield J. A. Occurrence of Placobdella parasitica (Hirudinea) on snapping turtles, Chelydra serpentina, in southeastern Ontario. Journal of Parasitology. 1990;76:190–195. doi: 10.2307/3283014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bush O. A., Lafferty K. D., Lotz J. M., Shostak A. W. Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Mergolis et al. revisited. Journal of Parasitology. 1997;83(4):575–583. doi: 10.2307/3284227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Carlsson N., Kestrup A., Martensson M., Nystrom P. Lethal and non-lethal effects of multiple indigenous predators on the invasive golden apple snail (Pomacea canaliculata) Freshwater Biology. 2004;49:1269–1279. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2004.01269.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chiangkul K., Trivalairat P., Purivirojkul W. Redescription of the Siamese shield leech Placobdelloides siamensis with new host species and geographic range. Parasite. 2018 doi: 10.1051/parasite/2018056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  13. Das I. A field guide to the reptiles of Thailand & South-East Asia. New Holland, London; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  14. Davies R. W. Annelida: Leeches, polychaetes and acanthobdellids. In: J. H. Thorp and A. P. Covich. (eds.). Ecology and classification of North American freshwater invertebrates. Academic Press, New York; 1991. [Google Scholar]
  15. Desai M. D., Rao P. N. A critical review of leeches. International Journal Ayurveda Research. 2016;1(2):116–129. [Google Scholar]
  16. Dvorakova N., Kvicerova J., Papousek I., Javanbakht H., Tiar G., Kami H., Siroky P. Haemogregarines from western Palaearctic freshwater turtles (genera Emys, Mauremys) are conspecific with Haemogregarina stepanowi Danilewsky, 1885. Parasitology. 2014;141(4):522–530. doi: 10.1017/S0031182013001820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ernst C. H. Seasonal incidence of leech infestation on the painted turtle, Chrysemys picta. Journal of Parasitology. 1971;57:32. doi: 10.2307/3277749. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ernst C. H., Altenburg R. G. M., Barbour R. W. Turtles of the World. ETI Information Systems Ltd, Netherlands; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  19. Faculty of Veterinary Science Chulalongkorn University. Turtle release merit making and how to make it right. http://www.asianturtlenetwork.org/library/news_archives_articles/2005/turtle_release_merit_making_10_05.htm. [2020-02-19T00:00:00+02:00];
  20. Goater T. M. The leech, Oligobdella biannulata (Glossiphoniidae) on Desmognathine salamanders: Potential for Trypanosome transmission? The American Midland Naturalist Journal. 2000;144(2):434–438. doi: 10.1674/0003-0031(2000)144[0434:TLOBGO]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Graham T. E., Saumure R. A., Ericson B. Map turtle winter leech loads. Journal of Parasitology. 1997;83:1185–1186. doi: 10.2307/3284384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gray J. E. Description of a new species of freshwater tortoise from Siam. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History. 1859;3(5):501–502. [Google Scholar]
  23. Hayashi M. Temperature-electrical conductivity relation of water for environmental monitoring and geophysical data inversion. In Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. Kluwer Academic Publishers; Netherlands: 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Iyasele J. U., David D. J., Idiata J. Investigation of the relationship between electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids for mono-valent, di-valent and tri-valent metal compound. International Journal of Engineering Research and Reviews. 2015;3(1):40–48. [Google Scholar]
  25. Keithmaleesatti S. An assessment of the association of organochlorine pesticides contamination and reproductive effects on the snail-eating turtle (Malayemys macrocephala) in the lower Chao Phraya river basin, Thailand. Chulalongkorn University; 2008. 143 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kikuchi Y., Fukatsu T. Endosymbiotic bacteria in the esophageal organ of glossiphoniid leeches. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2002;68:4637–4641. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.9.4637-4641.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Koffler B. R., Seigel R. A., Mendonca M. T. The seasonal occurrence of leeches on the wood turtle, Clemmys insculpta (Reptilia, Testudines, Emydidae) Journal of Herpetology. 1978;12:571–572. doi: 10.2307/1563364. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kutschera U. Reproductive behavior and parental care of the leech Helobdella triserialis (Hirudinea: Glossiphoniidae) Zoologischer Anzeiger. 1992;228:74–81. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kutschera U., Wirtz P. The evolution of parental care in freshwater leeches. Theory biosci. 2001;120:115–137. doi: 10.1007/s12064-001-0012-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lamarck J. B. Histoire naturelle des Animaux sans. vertèbres. 6(1) Paris; 1819. 543 [Google Scholar]
  31. Mann K. H. Leeches (Hirudinea): Their structure, physiology, ecology and embryology. Macmillan, University of Minnesota; 1962. [Google Scholar]
  32. McAuliffe J. R. A hypothesis explaining variations of Hemogregarine parasitemia in different aquatic turtle species. Journal of Parasitology. 1977;63:580–581. doi: 10.2307/3280024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. McCoy J. C., Failey E. L., Price S. J., Dorcas M. E. An assessment of leech parasitism on semi-aquatic turtles in the western piedmont of North Carolina. Southeastern Naturalist. 2007;6:191–202. doi: 10.1656/1528-7092(2007)6[191:AAOLPO]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Mihalca A., Achelăriłei D., Popescu P. Haemoparasites of the genus Haemogregarina in a population of european pond turtles (Emys orbicularis) from Drăgăsani, Vâlcea county, Romania. Scientia Parasitologica. 2002;2:22–27. [Google Scholar]
  35. Mueller D. K., Helsel D. R. Nutrients in the nation’s water—too much of a good thing? https://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/circ1136/ [2020-02-19T00:00:00+02:00];
  36. Peig J., J.Green A. The paradigm of body condition: A critical reappraisal of current methods based on mass and length. Functional Ecology. 2010;24(6):1323–1332. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01751.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Readel A. M., Philips C. A., Wetzel M. J. Leech parasitism in a turtle assemblage: Effects of host and environmental characteristics. Copeia. 2008;1:227–233. doi: 10.1643/CH-06-212. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Rigbi M., Levy H., Eldor A., Iraqi F., Teitelbaum M., Orevi M., Horovitz A., Galun R. The saliva of the medical leech Hirudo medicinalis – II. Inhibition of platelet aggregation and leukocyte activity and examination of reputed anaesthetic effects. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. 1987;88(1):95–98. doi: 10.1016/0742-8413(87)90052-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ryan J. R., Lamber A. Prevalence and colonization of Placobdella on two species of freshwater turtles (Graptemys geographica and Sternotherus odoratus) Journal of Herpetology. 2005;39:284–287. doi: 10.1670/180-04N. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. center Satun inland aquaculture research and development. Snail-eating turtle. http://www.fisheries.go.th/sf-satun/index.php/2009-08-17-08-32-23/2009-08-18-05-31-25. [2020-02-19T00:00:00+02:00];
  41. Sawyer R. T. Leech biology and behaviour. Vol. II: Feeding biology, ecology and systematics. Oxford University Press, United Kingdom; Oxford: 1986. 741-749 [Google Scholar]
  42. Schlegel H., Müller S. Over de Schildpadden van den Indischen Archipel. In: Temminck, V. (1839–1847) Verhandelingen over de natuurlijke geschiedenis der Nederlandsche overzeesche bezittingen, door de leden der Natuurkundige Commisie in Oost-Indie en andere schrijvers. Leijden folio. Afd. 1 Zoologie in 12 afleveringen, met.; 1845. [Google Scholar]
  43. Schulz C. A., Thomas M. V., Fitzgerald S., Faisal M. Leeches (Annelida: Hirudinida) parasitizing fish of Lake St. Clair, Michigan, U.S.A. Comparative Parasitology. 2011;78(1):73–83. doi: 10.1654/4439.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Shine R. The evolution of large body size in females: A critique of Darwin’s “fecundity advantage” model. The American Naturalist. 1988;131(1):124–131. doi: 10.1086/284778. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Siddall M. E., Gaffney E. S. Observations on the leech Placobdella ornata feeding from bony tissues of turtles. Journal of Parasitology. 2004;90(5):1186–1188. doi: 10.1645/GE-277R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Southerland M. T. Coexistence of three congeneric salamanders: the importance of habitat and body size. Ecology. 1986;67:721–728. doi: 10.2307/1937695. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Southerland M. T. Behavioral interactions among four species of the salamander genus Desmognathus. Ecology. 1986;67:175–181. doi: 10.2307/1938516. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Tiberti R., Gentilli A. First report of freshwater leech Helobdella stagnalis (Rhyncobdellida: Glossiphoniidae) as a parasite of an anuran amphibian. Acta Herpetolologica. 2010;5(2):255–258. [Google Scholar]
  49. Trivalairat Poramad, Chiangkul Krittiya, Purivirojkul Watchariya. Placobdelloides sirikanchanae sp. nov., a new species ofglossiphoniid leech and a parasite of turtles from lower southern Thailand (Hirudinea, Rhynchobdellida) Zookeys. 2019;882:1–24. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.882.35229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Tubtimon J., Jeratthitikul E., Sutcharit C., Kongim B., Panha S. Systematics of the freshwater leech genus Hirudinaria Whitman, 1886 (Arhynchobdellida, Hirudinidae) from northeastern Thailand. Zookeys. 2014;452:15–33. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.452.7528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Tucker A. D., Fitzsimmons N. N., Govedich F. R. Euhirudinea from Australian turtles (Chelodina burrungandijii and Emydura australis) of the Kimberley Plateau, Western Australia, Australia. Comparative Parasitology. 2005;72(2):241–244. doi: 10.1654/4175. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wetzel R. G. Limnology: Lake and river ecosystems (3rd ed.) CA: Academic Press; San Diego: 2001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material 1

Recorded Specimen Data

Poramad Trivalairat.

Data type

Specimen collecting data

Brief description

Recorded data of collected Geoemydidae turtles from natural habitats (NH), captive site (CS) and markets (MA) in Thailand during February 2017 through to June 2018. All specimens were collected manually by Poramad Trivalairat, except specimens from markets.

File: oo_458210.docx

bdj-08-e57237-s001.docx (21.3KB, docx)

Articles from Biodiversity Data Journal are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES