Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2020 Oct 22;33:106439. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.106439

Prevalence data of diarrheagenic E. coli in the fecal pellets of wild rodents using culture methods and PCR assay

Md Mafizur Rahman a,d, Sang Jin Lim a, Wook Han Kim b, Jae Youl Cho c,⁎⁎, Yung Chul Park a,⁎
PMCID: PMC7609732  PMID: 33163593

Abstract

Wild animals, such as rodents seem to be competent reservoir of bacteria-borne zoonotic diseases which disseminate in human. We investigated the presence of E. coli, Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC), and Salmonella in the feces of six category wild rodent species (Apodemus agrarius, A. peninsulae, A. sylvaticus, Micromys minutus, Myodes regulus, and R. norvegicus) captured from different agricultural regions in South Korea. Among them, A. agrarius, which account for 65% of total (N = 52) individuals, are most widely distributed and abundant in various agroecosystems in South Korea. The bacterial identification was performed by cultural and molecular methods. In cultural method, the fecal cultures from 26 individuals formed colonies on E. coli-selective EMB agar media. Of them, the fecal cultures from 18 individuals also produced colonies on the Shiga toxin-producing E. coli-selective CT-SMAC agar media as well as the EMB agar media. In molecular method, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out to detect two virulence genes (stx1 and stx2) of isolated E. coli. The amplified dataset of stx1 and stx2 genes of E. coli were sequenced. In this manuscript, E. coli and STEC were detected but there were no Salmonella species. The wild rodents’ data would provide important information on reservoirs of those pathogenic bacteria.

Keywords: Wildlife, Apodemus agrarius, E. coli, Shiga toxin-producing E. coli, Virulence genes

Specifications Table

Subject area Microbiology
Specific subject area Molecular Microbiology, Diarrheagenic E. coli
Type of data Table, Word, and Figure
How data were acquired Culture methods, PCR assay, and Sequencing
Data format Raw and Analyzed
Parameters for data collection Morphological identification, gene specific PCR amplification and screening, sequencing the target isolates, and the sequences were compared with other homologous sequences deposited in GenBank using BLASTN2.2.31+ [1]
Description of data collection We captured wild rodents using Sherman trap in various agricultural and mountainous area in South Korea. The E. coli and Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) bacteria in the fecal samples were detected by culturing them using a method described in a previous study [2]. The universal marker of bacterial 16S rRNA genes was amplified with HVR (V1SF and V3AR) primer set for molecular identification. Only a single pure colony of all 26 positive E. coli samples was used for PCR amplification. Shiga toxin genes with Stx1 and Stx2 primer sets were used for detection of STEC isolates. One or more pure colonies were randomly selected from all of positive individuals.
Data source location Sobaeksan national park (36°56′45.2′' N, 128°27′43.9′'E) in Yeongju, Gyeongsangbuk-do; Gayasan national park (35°48′00.4′' N, 128°08′30.5′'E) in Geochang, Gyeongsangnam-do; Odesun national park (37°47′31.79′' N, 128°32′20.99′'E) in Pyeongchang, Gangwon-do, South Korea.
Data accessibility Data are with this article only.
Repository Name: NCBI
The hypervariable region (HVR) of 16 s RNA gene (V1SF and V3AR) sequences were deposited to under the accession number: KY885178 to KY885185 (direct link from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/KY885178 to https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/KY885185) and the accession number: KY048442 to KY048446 (direct link from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/KY048442 to https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/KY048446).
The Shiga toxin-producing genes (stx1) were deposited to under the accession number: KY964457 to KY964469 (direct link from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/KY964457 to https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/KY964469)
The Shiga toxin-producing genes (stx2) sequences were deposited to under the accession number: MN266867 to MN266871 (direct link from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN266867 to https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN266871)
Anyone can see the supplementary data and sequence fasta file to direct URL: Repository Name: [Mendeley Data]
Data identification number: DOI: 10.17632/9dkfkfnyzs.2
Direct URL to data: http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/9dkfkfnyzs.2
Related research article M.M. Rahman, K.B. Yoon, S.J. Lim, M.G Jeon, H.J. Kim, H.Y. Kim, Y.C. Park, Molecular detection by analysis of the 16S rRNA gene of fecal coliform bacteria from the two Korean Apodemus species (Apodemus agrarius and A. peninsulae). Genet. Mol. Res. 16 (2) (2017), gmr16029510.
https://doi.org/10.4238/gmr16029510.

Value of the Data

  • •

    The data will provide important information on competent reservoir of several bacteria-borne zoonotic diseases in wild rodent species and their fecal might play an important role in the transmission of pathogens, such as diarrheagenic E. coli bacteria.

  • •

    The dataset provides information about prevalence of diarrheagenic E. coli and could be used for better management of microbial contamination control.

  • •

    The data will contribute to understanding the potential factors that lead to increase in food-borne illness of farmers during agricultural production and processing.

1. Data Description

Wild rodents are competent reservoirs of zoonotic diseases that are responsible for significant economic losses and public health problems [3]. The rodents, such as Apodemus agrarius and A. peninsulae, are very common in South Korea and are widely distributed across agricultural farm areas and mountainous forests [4]. They can disseminate zoonotic microorganisms that are a considerable threat to the health of farmers [3,4]. Therefore, they could be important potential factors that lead to increases in food-borne illness during agricultural production and processing. However, wild rodents of A. agrarius, which account for 34 (65%) of the 52 captured individuals, were most commonly captured in the fields (Table 1 and 5). The E. coli and Shiga toxin-producing E. coli, bacteria in the rodent fecal samples were detected by culture and molecular method. For cultural identification, the E. coli or Shiga toxin-producing E. coli colonies were confirmed based on their colony morphology. The E. coli colonies produced metallic sheen color produced on EMB agar media. Sorbitol negative colonies (colorless) were detected onto CT-SMAC agar media (Supplement Fig. S1). We select colorless colony as E. coli O157:H7 positive colonies seem to be STEC-positive on culture media. Moreover, the bacterial colonies on the selective media that had been identified by their morphology were re-identified by PCR using molecular markers. So, a PCR amplification of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was performed to confirm whether the colonies on the EMB media belonged to E. coli. We randomly selected a single colony from each of the 26 positive EMB agar plates (Table 1) and after PCR amplification with the hypervariable region (HVR) of 16S primer set, the target bands for the 16S rRNA gene were found in all 26 single colonies (Supplement Fig. S2). Thirteen PCR bands were then sequenced (Table 2). A PCR amplification of the Shiga toxin genes (stx1 and stx2) was performed to confirm whether the colonies on the CT-SMAC media belonged to Shiga toxin-producing E. coli. The target PCR bands of 21 E. coli with stx1 gene and 5 E. coli with stx2 gene were amplified and sequenced (Supplement Fig. S3 and S4). Of them, 13 Stx1 PCR bands and 5 Stx2 PCR bands were sequenced (Table 3 and 4). The E. coli and Shiga toxin-producing E. coli sequences were compared for similarity with bacteria deposited in GenBank using NCBI BLAST, which is available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/.

Table 1.

Culture and molecular detection E. coli, and Shigh toxin-producing E. coli in the rodent fecal samples collected from different environments.

Culture detection
Molecular detection
E. coli Shiga toxin E. coli E. coli Shiga toxin producing E. coli
Individual No. Species Fecal sample ID Sex Agricultural environment Collection locality EMB CT-SMAC 16S rRNA gene Shiga toxin gene (stx1) Shiga toxin gene (stx2)
1 Apodemus agrarius MuApAg-1 Male Dry area Odaesun × × – – –
2 A.agrarius MuApAg-2 Male Nearby forest Odaesun × × – – –
3 A.agrarius MuApAg-3 Male Nearby forest Odaesun × × – – –
4 A.agrarius MuApAg-4 Female Dry area Odaesun × × – – –
5 A.agrarius MuApAg-5 Male Dry area Odaesun × × – – –
6 A.agrarius MuApAg-6 Female Watery area Odaesun × × – – –
7 A.agrarius MuApAg-7 Male Nearby forest Gayasan o o o × ×
8 A.agrarius MuApAg-8 Male Nearby forest Gayasan × × – – –
9 A.agrarius MuApAg-9 Male Nearby forest Gayasan × × – – –
10 A.agrarius MuApAg-10 Male Dry area Gayasan o × o × ×
11 A.agrarius MuApAg-11 Female Dry area Gayasan o o o × ×
12 A.agrarius MuApAg-12 Male Dry area Gayasan o o o × ×
13 A.agrarius MuApAg-13 Male Watery area Gayasan o o o × o
14 A.agrarius MuApAg-14 Male Nearby forest Bukhansan o o o × ×
15 A.agrarius MuApAg-15 Male Nearby forest Bukhansan o o o × ×
16 A.agrarius MuApAg-16 Male Nearby forest Bukhansan o o o × ×
17 A.agrarius MuApAg-17 Male Nearby forest Bukhansan o o o × ×
18 A.agrarius MuApAg-18 Male Nearby forest Sobaeksan o o o × ×
19 A.agrarius MuApAg-19 Male Nearby forest Sobaeksan o o o × ×
20 A.agrarius MuApAg-20 Male Nearby forest Sobaeksan o × o × ×
21 A.agrarius MuApAg-21 Male Nearby forest Sobaeksan × × – – –
22 A.agrarius MuApAg-22 Male Nearby forest Sobaeksan o × o × ×
23 A.agrarius MuApAg-23 Male Watery area Sobaeksan o o o × ×
24 A.agrarius MuApAg-24 Female Nearby forest Sobaeksan o × o × ×
25 A.agrarius MuApAg-25 Male Nearby forest Sobaeksan o × o × ×
26 A.agrarius MuApAg-26 Male Nearby forest Sobaeksan o × o × ×
27 A.agrarius MuApAg-27 Female Nearby forest Sobaeksan o × o × ×
28 A.agrarius MuApAg-28 Female Nearby forest Sobaeksan o o o × ×
29 A.agrarius MuApAg-29 Male Nearby forest Sobaeksan × × – – –
30 A.agrarius MuApAg-30 Male Nearby forest Sobaeksan × × – – –
31 A.agrarius MuApAg-31 Male Nearby forest Sobaeksan × × – – –
32 A.agrarius MuApAg-32 Female Nearby forest Sobaeksan × × – – –
33 A.agrarius MuApAg-33 Female Nearby forest Sobaeksan × × – – –
34 A.agrarius MuApAg-34 Male Nearby forest Sobaeksan × × – – –
35 A.peninsulae MuApPe-1 Male Nearby forest Odaesan o × o × ×
36 A.peninsulae MuApPe-2 Female Dry area Odaesan × × – – –
37 A.peninsulae MuApPe-3 Male Nearby forest Sobaeksan × × – – –
38 A.peninsulae MuApPe-4 Male Dry area Sobaeksan × × – – –
39 A.peninsulae MuApPe-5 Male Nearby forest Sobaeksan × × – – –
40 A.peninsulae MuApPe-6 Female Watery area Sobaeksan × × – – –
41 A. sylvaticus MuApSy-1 Male Nearby forest Gayasan o o o × ×
42 A. sylvaticus MuApSy-2 Male Dry area Gayasan o o o × ×
43 A. sylvaticus MuApSy-3 Female Watery area Gayasan o o o × o
44 Micromys minutus MuMiMi-1 Male Dry area Gayasan × × – – –
45 M. minutus MuMiMi-2 Male Nearby forest Gayasan × × – – –
46 M. minutus MuMiMi-3 Male Watery area Gayasan × × – – –
47 Myodes regulus CrMyRe-1 Male Nearby forest Bukhansan × × – – –
48 M. regulus CrMyRe-2 Male Nearby forest Bukhansan × × – – –
49 M. regulus CrMyRe-3 Feamle Nearby forest Bukhansan o o o × –
50 Rattus norvegicus MuRaNo-1 Male Watery area Gayasan o o o × ×
51 R. norvegicus MuRaNo-2 Female Nearby forest Gayasan × × – – –
52 R. norvegicus MuRaNo-3 Male Dry area Gayasan o o o × ×
Total individual (N) 26 18 26 0 2

'o'= detected, ' × '= not detected and '-'= not tested.

Table 5.

Prevalence of E. coli and Shiga toxin-producing E. coli in the six rodent species in South Korea.

Culture detection
Molecular detection
% (positive individuals/ tested individuals) with Shiga toxin gene of E. coli
Species No. of individuals % (positive individuals/ tested individuals) with E. coli EMB % (positive individuals/ tested individuals) with Shiga toxin producing E. coli CT-SMAC % (positive individuals/ tested individuals) with E. coli 16S rRNA gene Shiga toxin gene (stx1) Shiga toxin gene (stx2)
Apodemus agrarius 34 55.88 (19/34) 35.29 (12/34) 55.88 (19/34) 0 (0/34) 2.94 (1/34)
A. peninsulae 6 16.66 (1/6) 0 (0/0) 16.66 (1/6) 0 (0/6) 0 (0/0)
A. sylvaticus 3 100 (3/3) 100 (3/3) 100 (3/3) 0 (0/3) 33.33 (1/3)
Micromys minutus 3 0 (0/0) 0 (0/0) 0 (0/0) 0 (0/0) 0 (0/0)
Myodes regulus 3 33.33 (1/3) 33.33 (1/3) 33.33 (1/3) 0 (0/3) 0 (0/0)
R. norvegicus 3 66.66 (2/3) 66.66 (2/3) 66.66 (2/3) 0 (0/3) 0 (0/0)
Total (N) 52 50 (26/52) 34.62 (18/52) 50 (26/52) 0 (0/52) 3.84 (2/52)

Table 2.

Molecular identification of E. coli in the rodent fecal samples using 16 s rRNA gene sequences.

Similarity analysis in GenBank
Species No. of host individuals used for fecal culture No. of host individuals with fecal E. coli-positive colonies on EMB No. of host individuals with E. coli-positive PCR band No. of the sequences obtained from PCR bands No &Host individual ID No& Sequenced colony ID Size (bp) GenBank accession No. Coverage (%) Identity (%) Identification of bacteria by the similarity analysis of 16 s rRNA gene sequences in GenBank Remarks
Apodemus agrarius 34 19 19 7 MuApAg-7 M1–6 539 KY048445 100 100 E. coli MRY15–131 (AP017620.1) General E. coli
MuApAg-18 M_1_Sobeksan-edit 584 KY885178 100 100 E. coli AR_0104 (CP020116.1)
MuApAg-19 M_2_S 569 KY885179 100 100 Escherichia sp. BAB-6436 (KY672923.1)
MuApAg-20 M_3_Sobeksan_edit 604 KY885180 100 100 E. coli AR_0104 (CP020116.1)
MuApAg-22 M_4_S 611 KY885181 100 100 E. coli NGF1(CP016007.1)
MuApAg-23 M_6_S 539 KY048444 100 100 E. coli MRY15–131 (AP017620.1)
MuApAg-27 M_10_s 585 KY885182 100 100 E. coli 20Ec-P-124 (AP017610.1)
A. peninsulae 6 1 1 1 MuApPe-1 M2M-3 579 KY048443 100 99 E. coli NGF1 (CP016007.1)
A. sylvaticus 3 3 3 2 MuApSy-1 MWM-1 454 KY048442 100 100 E. coli BLR(DE3) (NZ_CP020368.1)
MuApSy-2 MWM2-iii 600 KY885185 100 100 E. coli MDR_56 (CP019903.1)
Micromys minutus 3 × – – – – – – – – –
Myodes regulus 3 1 1 1 CrMyRe-3 SFM 565 KY048446 100 99 E. coli BLR (DE3) (NZ_CP020368.1)
R. norvegicus 3 2 2 2 NuRaNo-1 SFM_3_BKNP 571 KY885183 100 100 E. coli 20Ec-P-124 (AP017610.1)
NuRaNo-3 SFM_4_BKNP 498 KY885184 100 99 E. coli sch21(JX294878.1)
Total (N) 52 26 26 13 11 13 – – – – – –

' × '= not detected and '-'= not tested.

Table 3.

Molecular identification of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli in the rodent fecal samples using Shiga toxin gene (stx1) sequences.

Similarity analysis in GenBank
Species No. of the host individuals used for fecal culture No. of host individuals with fecal Shiga toxin E. coli-positive colonies on CT-SMAC No. of host individuals with the colonies with Shiga toxin gene (stx1)-amplified PCR bands No. of the sequences obtained from the Shiga toxin gene (stx1)- amplified PCR bands Host individual ID Sequenced colony ID GenBank accession No. Size (bp) Coverage (%) Identity (%) Identified genes and their products were found in GenBank Identification of bacteria by the similarity analysis of Shiga toxin gene (stx1) sequence in GenBank Remarks
Apodemus agrarius 34 12 12 5 MuApAg-7 SFM1_2 KY964461 570 100 99 pbpc (penicillin-binding protein 1C) E. coli strain AH01 (CP055251.10) Pathogenic E. coli
MuApAg-11 SFMd2–1 KY964458 302 100 100 allE (S)-ureidoglycine aminohydrolase E. coli strain MS6192 (CP054940.1)
MuApAg-12 SFMd3–24 KY964459 342 100 100 pbpc (penicillin-binding protein 1C) E. coli strain MS6192 (CP054940.1)
MuApAg-13 SFMW-16 KY964460 364 100 99 pbpc (penicillin-binding protein 1C) E. coli strain AH01 (CP055251.10
MuApAg-18 M1_S KY964457 267 100 99 pphc gene (protein‑serine/threonine phosphatase PphC E. coli strain 04–00,955 (CP035498.1)
A. peninsulae 6 0 – – – – – – – –
A. sylvaticus 3 3 3 5 MuApSy-1 MWM1_10 KY964462 504 100 99 pbpc (penicillin-binding protein 1C) E. coli strain 88–3510 (CP027675.1)
MuApSy-2 MWM2_4 KY964463 223 100 98 pphc gene (protein‑serine/threonine phosphatase PphC E. coli strain SCU-484(CP051744.1)
MuApSy-3 MWM2_5 KY964464 311 100 99 Regulator gene E. coli strain EcPF7(CP054232.1)
MWM3_7 KY964465 581 100 99 pbpc (penicillin-binding protein 1C) E. coli strain SCU-316 (CP054371.1)
MWM3_9 KY964466 584 100 99 pbpc (penicillin-binding protein 1C) E. coli strain SCU-316(CP054371.1)
Micromys minutus 3 0 – – – – – – – –
Myodes regulus 3 1 1 0 CrMyRe-3 × – – – –
R. norvegicus 3 2 2 3 MuRaNo-1 NRW1–14 KY964467 420 100 99 allE (S)-ureidoglycine aminohydrolase E. coli strain MS6192(CP054940.10
NRW1_LB KY964468 248 100 100 pphc gene (protein‑serine/threonine phosphatase PphC E. coli strain SCU-316 (CP054371.1)
MuRaNo-3 NRW3–15 KY964469 274 99 99 pphc gene (protein‑serine/threonine phosphatase PphC E. coli strain SCU-316(CP054371.1)
Total (N) 52 18 18 13 – – – – – – – –

' × '= not detected and '-'= not tested.

Table 4.

Molecular identification of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli in the rodent fecal samples using Shiga toxin gene (stx2) sequences.

Similarity analysis in GenBank
Species No. of the host individuals used for fecal culture No. of host individuals with fecal Shiga toxin producing E. coli-positive colonies on CT-SMAC No. of host individuals with the colonies with Shiga toxin gene (stx2)- amplified PCR bands No. of the sequences obtained from the Shiga toxin gene(stx2)- amplified PCR bands Host individual ID Sequenced colony ID GenBank accession No. Size (bp) Coverage (%) Identity (%) Identified genes and their products were found in GenBank Identification of bacteria by the similarity analysis of Shiga toxin gene (stx2) sequence in GenBank
Apodemus agrarius 34 12 2 2 MuApAg-11 SFMd2–1 MN266871 219 100 96 helix-turn-helix transcriptional regulator E. coli O145:NM strain FWSEC0002 (CP031919.1) Pathogenic E. coli
MuApAg-13 SFMW-16 MN266867 456 100 100 stxA2 gene (Shiga toxin Stx2 subunit A) E. coli O157:H7 strain ECP17–1298 (CP040570.1)
A. peninsulae 6 0 – – – – – – – – –
A. sylvaticus 3 3 1 1 MuApSy-3 MWM3_9 MN266868 461 100 100 stx2gA (shiga toxin 2 g subunit A) E. coli O157:H7 strain COPRO21317 (CP035706.1)
Micromys minutus 3 0 – – – – – – – – – –
Myodes regulus 3 1 0 0 CrMyRe-3 × – – – – – –
R. norvegicus 3 2 2 2 MuRaNo-1 NRW1–14 MN266869 321 100 95 helix-turn-helix transcriptional regulator E. coli strain 89–3156 (CP027366.1)
MuRaNo-3 NRW3–15 MN266870 327 99 95 helix-turn-helix transcriptional regulator E. coli O145:NM strain FWSEC0002 (CP031919.1)
Total (N) 52 18 5 5 – – – – – – – –

' × '= not detected and '-'= not tested.

2. Experimental Design, Materials, and Methods

2.1. Sample collection

We captured wild rodents using Sherman traps in various agroecosystems across South Korea (Table 1). Each captured wild rodent was placed into a disposable vinyl zipper bag and then released after collecting its feces. The fecal samples were brought to the laboratory in ice boxes and processed within three hours. The sample collections were conducted under the permission and guideline of local governments.

2.2. Detection of diarrheagenic E. coli bacteria

The E. coli and Shiga toxin-producing E. coli, bacteria in the fecal samples were detected by culturing them using the method described in a previous study [2]. The fecal samples (0.1 g to 1 g) were first cultured in 10 mL non-selective buffered peptone water (BPW) at 37 °C overnight and then a 10 µl enrichment broth of containing the samples was streaked with a loop onto the E. coli-selective eosin methylene blue Agar (EMB) media and Shiga toxin-producing E. coli-selective cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar (CT-SMAC) media and incubated at 37 °C for 24-48 hrs. The plates were examined for colony forming units (CFU) and sub-cultivated was conducted on EMB so that pure colonies could be collected. The E. coli or Shiga toxin-producing E. coli colonies were confirmed based on their colony morphology [5]. E. coli (NCPP: 14,034) and E. coli O157:H7 (ATTC-95,150) were used as a positive control. The E. coli colonies produced metallic sheen color produced on EMB agar media. Sorbitol negative colonies (colorless) were detected onto CT-SMAC agar. From each plate, 2 to 3 colonies were picked from CT-SMAC media. We select colorless colony as E. coli O157:H7 positive colonies seem to be STEC-positive on culture media. The STEC colonies have morphological differences in CT-SMAC compared to the general E. coli. Finally, the STEC E. coli was detected based on morphology, PCR band, and sequence analysis.

2.3. Extraction of total genomic DNA and PCR amplification

The bacterial colonies on the selective media or differential media had been identified by their morphology and re-identified by PCR using molecular markers. The colonies were streaked onto nutrient agar media and then a single colony was collected using sterilized toothpicks. The colonies were incubated at 35 °C for 18 hrs in 5 ml lactose broth (LB) solution. Genomic DNA was extracted from 1 ml LB culture fluid using a DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit™ according to the manufacturer's instructions (Valencia, CA, USA).

The PCR amplification was performed using a final 25 μL reaction volume containing 10 mMTris–HCl (pH 8.4), 50 mMKCl, 4 mM MgCl2, 200 mM of each dNTP, 50 pmol of each primer, 2 U ExTaq polymerase, and 1 μL of genomic DNA. The E. coli colonies on the EMB were molecularly identified by PCR amplification of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene which was performed using the HVR primer set [6]. The Shiga toxin-producing E. coli colonies on CT-SMAC were molecularly identified by PCR amplification using the Stx1 and Stx2 primer set [7,8].

The PCR reaction was conducted using the following reaction conditions: an initial denaturation for 5 min at 94 °C, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation for 1 min at 94 °C, an annealing temperature of 55 °C (HVR, Stx1, and Stx2 primers) for 60 sec, extension for 1 min at 72 °C, and then a final extension for 10 min at 72 °C. The PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis in 1.0% agarose gel and purified using a DNA gel extraction kit (Qiagen, Valencia. CA, USA). The purified PCR products were sent to Macrogen (South Korea) for sequencing. The obtained sequences were compared with other homologous sequences deposited in GenBank using BLASTN2.2.31+ [1].

Ethics Statement

The sample collections were conducted under the permission and guideline of local governments.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest or financial relationships which have influenced the work reported in this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by “Cooperative Research Program for Agricultural Science & Technology Development (Project No. PJ0108592016)” Rural Administration, Republic of Korea.

Footnotes

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.dib.2020.106439.

Contributor Information

Jae Youl Cho, Email: jaecho@skku.edu.

Yung Chul Park, Email: parky@kangwon.ac.kr.

Appendix. Supplementary materials

mmc1.docx (1.3MB, docx)

References

  • 1.Zhang Z., Schwartz S., Wagner L., Miller W. A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. J. Comput. Biol. 2000;7:203–214. doi: 10.1089/10665270050081478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kilonzo C., Li X., Vivas E.J., Jay-Russell M.T., Fernandez K.L., Atwill E.R. Fecal shedding of zoonotic food-borne pathogens by wild rodents in a major agricultural region of the central California coast. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013;79:6337–6344. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01503-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Meerburg B.G., Singleton G.R., Kijlstra A. Rodent- borne diseases and their risks for public health Rodent-borne diseases and their risks for public health. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2009;35:221–270. doi: 10.1080/10408410902989837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rahman M.M., Yoon K.B., Lim S.J., Jeon M.G., Kim H.J., Kim H.Y., Park Y.C. Molecular detection by analysis of the 16S rRNA gene of fecal coliform bacteria from the two Korean Apodemus species (Apodemus agrarius and A. peninsulae) Genet. Mol. Res. 2017;16(2) doi: 10.4238/gmr16029510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Feng P., Stephen D.W., Jinneman K. FDA Bacteriological analytical manual chapter 4A diarrheagenic. Escherichia coli. 2018 https://www.fda.gov/food/laboratory-methods-food/bam-chapter-4a-diarrheagenic-escherichia-coli [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lin C.K., Tsen H.Y. Use of two 16S DNA targeted oligonucleotides as PCR primers for the specific detection of Salmonella in foods. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1996;80:659–666. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1996.tb03271.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Olsivik O., Strockbine N.A. PCR detection of heat-stable, heat-labile, and Shiga like toxin genes in Escherichia coli. In: Persing DH, Smith TF, Tenover FC, White TJ, editors. Diagnostic Molecular microbiology: Principles and Applications. American Society for Microbiology; Washington: 1993. pp. 271–276. Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.K.A. Fode-Vaughan, J.S. Maki, J.A. Benson, M.L.P. Collins, Direct PCR detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Appl. Microbiol. 37(2003) pp. 239–243. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1472-765x.2003.01386.x. [DOI] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mmc1.docx (1.3MB, docx)

Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES