Skip to main content
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics logoLink to Indian Journal of Orthopaedics
letter
. 2020 Aug 29;54(Suppl 2):421–422. doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00246-9

An Approach to Floating Knee Injury in Indian Population: An Analysis of 52 Patients

Subodh Kumar Pathak 1,✉, Rakesh Kumar Gautam 1, Jasneet Chawla 1, Ramesh Chand Jindal 1
PMCID: PMC7609744  PMID: 33194114

Sir,

We read the article titled, “An approach to floating knee injury in Indian Population: An analysis of 52 patients” published in Indian Journal of Orthopedics [1] with keen interest. The author needs compliments for sharing their cases of 52 floating knee injuries and considering cross-legged sitting and squatting as functional outcome modality which is indeed an essential part of daily routine activities in Indian scenario. The contribution of the authors to literature is noteworthy, and we would like to make a few comments about the article.

(1) The incidence of knee pain has been reported as 50% by the authors; however, the authors did not comment on knee injuries and neither on use of any diagnostic modalities such as MRI, intraoperative ligament test or diagnostic arthroscopy, as missed knee ligamentous injury can lead to subsequent knee instability and pain, as this would eventually affect the knee motion and final functional outcome. Paul et al. [2] reported 21 patients with fractures of the ipsilateral femur and tibia, and over 50% of patients suffered from concomitant ipsilateral knee injuries. Szalay et al. [3] compared knee laxity following isolated femur and floating knee injuries. While the incidence was 27% in isolated femur fractures, this almost doubled to 53% in floating knee injuries. Ya Liu et al. [4] in 37 floating knee cases found ligament injuries in 70.3% of patients.

(2) The authors should have mentioned knee pain in 50% patients; however, no further analysis has been done. It would have been more conclusive if authors would have provided group-specific data as per Fraser classification. Literature has shown that type II (a, b, c) fractures are more common to develop knee instability and stiffness and these patients might benefit from MRI prior to surgery which can help to indicate the need for arthroscopy or direct open exploration and repair [5].

(3) The authors have not mentioned the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and no mention has been made on prophylaxis used in the study.

(4) The authors in the study [1] have mentioned opposite lower limb injuries in 7.6% (4 patients) and ipsilateral neck femur fracture in 1.9%(one patient) as depicted in Fig. 4 of Ref. [1], whereas in the discussion sections, the authors have contradicted their own values and mentioned 13.4% (seven patients) with contralateral limb injuries and have mentioned one patient with intertrochanteric fracture instead of neck femur.

Funding

Nil.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical standard statement

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by the any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, informed consent is not required.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Subodh Kumar Pathak, Email: drsubodh08@gmail.com.

Rakesh Kumar Gautam, Email: ortho1415@gmail.com.

Jasneet Chawla, Email: jasneetchawla@ymail.com.

Ramesh Chand Jindal, Email: rcjindal19@gmail.com.

References

  • 1.Chavda AG, Lil NA, Patel PR. An approach to floating knee injury in Indian population: an analysis of 52 patients. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. 2018;52(6):631. doi: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_31_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Paul GR, Sawka MW, Whitelaw GP. Fractures of the ipsilateral femur and tibia: emphasis on intra-articular and soft tissue injury. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 1990;4(3):309–314. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199004030-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Szalay MJ, Hosking OR, Annear P. Injury of knee ligament associated with ipsilateral femoral shaft fractures and with ipsilateral femoral and tibial shaft fractures. Injury. 1990;21(6):398–400. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(90)90129-I. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Liu Y, Zhang J, Zhang S, Li R, Yue X. Concomitant ligamentous and meniscal injuries in floating knee. International Journal of Clinical Experimental Medicine. 2015;8(1):1168. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Muñoz Vives J, Bel JC, Capel Agundez A, Chana Rodríguez F, Palomo Traver J, Schultz-Larsen M, Tosounidis T. The floating knee: a review on ipsilateral femoral and tibial fractures. EFORT Open Reviews. 2016;1(11):375–382. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.000042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Indian Journal of Orthopaedics are provided here courtesy of Indian Orthopaedic Association

RESOURCES