Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 7.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Chem Biol. 2020 Aug 3;16(11):1227–1236. doi: 10.1038/s41589-020-0598-6

Structural basis for RING-Cys-Relay E3 Ligase Activity and its Role in Axon Integrity

Peter D Mabbitt 1, Andrea Loreto 2, Marc-André Déry 1, Adam J Fletcher 1, Mathew Stanley 3, Kuan-Chuan Pao 1, Nicola T Wood 1, Michael P Coleman 2,4, Satpal Virdee 1,*
PMCID: PMC7610530  EMSID: EMS118349  PMID: 32747811

Abstract

MYCBP2 is a ubiquitin (Ub) E3 ligase (E3) that is essential for neurodevelopment and regulates axon maintenance. MYCBP2 transfers Ub to non-lysine substrates via a newly discovered RING-Cys-Relay (RCR) mechanism where Ub is relayed from an upstream cysteine to a downstream substrate esterification site. The molecular bases for E2-E3 Ub transfer and Ub relay are unknown. Whether these activities are linked to the neural phenotypes is also unclear. We describe the crystal structure of a covalently trapped E2-Ub:MYCBP2 transfer intermediate revealing key structural rearrangements upon E2-E3 Ub transfer and Ub relay. Our data suggest that transfer to the dynamic upstream cysteine, whilst mitigating lysine activity, requires a closed-like E2-Ub conjugate with tempered reactivity, and Ub relay is facilitated by a helix-coil transition. Furthermore, neurodevelopmental defects and delayed injury-induced degeneration in RCR-defective knock-in mice suggest its requirement, and that of substrate esterification activity, for normal neural development and programmed axon degeneration.


Ubiquitination is a post-translational modification that regulates all aspects of eukaryotic biology1. Ubiquitin (Ub) transfer is initiated by an ATP-dependent Ub-activating enzyme (E1). Ub is transferred from E1 to the catalytic cysteine of a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2) via a chemical reaction known as transthiolation. The thioester-linked intermediate (E2~Ub) is recruited by one of hundreds of ubiquitin E3 ligases (E3s), which mediate discharge of Ub to specific substrates2. Four distinct classes of E3 have been identified but as our current understanding of E3 mechanism is based on a small subset of members, their true diversity is likely to be unappreciated. The largest classification corresponds to RING/U-Box E3s (referred to hereafter as RING E3s)3. RING E3s use an adaptor-like mechanism to recruit the conformationally malleable E2~Ub conjugate4. RING E3s induce a folded back or “closed” E2~Ub conformation which immobilizes the thioester, allosterically configures the E2 active site for catalysis, and is a requisite for efficient aminolysis of a lysine acceptor59. Maintenance of the closed conformation involves a network of interactions between E2 and Ub. Activated RING E3 binding stabilizes these interactions thereby catalyzing substrate ubiquitination79. In contrast, HECT and RBR E3 classes, that possess an essential catalytic cysteine, undergo transthiolation with E2~Ub forming a covalent intermediate10,11. Consistent with the increased nucleophilicity of cysteine relative to lysine, HECT/RBR E3s engage E2~Ub in a non-activating, “open” conformation9,1216. E3s that undergo transthiolation must prevent inadvertent aminolysis activity and current experimental evidence supports the notion that HECT/RBR E3s achieve this by enforcing the open conformation12,15,16. These observations imply that induction of the closed E2~Ub conformation is a specialised catalytic feature reserved for adaptor-like E3 transfer to lysine acceptors and open conformations are specialised, and sufficient, for transthiolation with cysteine.

MYCBP2 (also known as Phr1 (PAM-Highwire-Rpm-1)) is a conserved 0.5 MDa E3 with important roles in synaptogenesis and axon termination1722. MYCBP2 has also been shown to ubiquitinate Fbxw7 and ULK1 kinase thereby promoting chemotherapy resistance and inhibiting neuronal autophagy, respectively23,24. MYCBP2 was found to possess a novel class of cysteine-dependent E3 machinery we termed RING-Cys-Relay (RCR)25. Constitutive Phr1-/- mice (murine ortholog of MYCBP2) present with compromised axon development and the phrenic nerve fails to fully innervate the diaphragm leading to perinatal respiratory failure26. However, conditional silencing of Phr1 in adult mice is tolerated and confers potent axon protection in vivo and in in vitro primary neuron culture models of axon degeneration after physical injury (Wallerian degeneration), or administration of the chemotherapeutic agent vincristine27. Thus, MYCBP2 is likely to have distinct roles in neural development and axon maintenance. Due to its latter role it has become a potential therapeutic target for a range of neurological conditions and neurodegenerative diseases28.

The MYCBP2 RCR machinery utilises a RING domain that is presumed to bind E225,29. However, the RING domain is linked to a Tandem Cysteine (TC) domain containing two catalytic cysteine residues25. The upstream cysteine undergoes transthiolation with E2~Ub and a subsequent step, termed Ub relay, shuttles Ub to the downstream cysteine by means of intramolecular transthiolation. The downstream site has esterification activity with selectivity for threonine25. A crystal structure of the RCR machinery has revealed the general architecture of the TC domain and the basis for threonine-esterification activity25. However, neither an E2~Ub:RCR transfer complex nor the upstream catalytic site (referred to as the mediator loop) have been structurally resolved. Thus, the molecular bases for E2~Ub recruitment, E2-E3 transthiolation and Ub relay are unknown. Furthermore, it remains unknown if loss of MYCBP2’s unusual RING-linked RCR mechanism (i.e. E2-E3 transthiolation followed by Ub relay, and substrate esterification), is central to the neurodevelopmental and axon protective phenotypes.

Here we use a chemically engineered E2~Ub conjugate as a suicide substrate25,30, which permits chemical stabilization of the dynamic mediator loop and the otherwise transient tetrahedral E2~Ub:RCR transfer intermediate. We solve the crystal structure of this transfer complex which reveals that MYCBP2 seemingly employs a distinct form of the closed E2~Ub conjugate associated with an attenuated state of thioester activation. Our data suggest this compensates for the dynamic nature of the upstream MYCBP2 catalytic cysteine whilst mitigating lysine activity. The structure also reveals novel RING-E2 recognition elements and insights into the unexpected incompatibility with a cysteine-reactive E2. We find the mediator loop region, disordered in the apo structure, adopts a short α-helix upon E2-E3 transthiolation. Surprisingly, mutational analysis of the mediator loop reveals that both E2-E3 transthiolation and Ub relay are highly robust processes. However, whilst helix disrupting proline mutations in general do not affect E2-E3 transthiolation, they impair Ub relay. This suggests that transient helix formation is requisite for Ub relay, which we propose is mediated by an entropically-driven helix-coil transition. To assess whether loss of RCR E3 activity is linked to the neural phenotypes we generate upstream cysteine mutant (Phr1C4629A/C4629A) mice where E2-E3 transthiolation, subsequent relay, and substrate esterification activity are abolished. Remarkably, we find that the neurodevelopmental and axon protective phenotypes presented in null animals are recapitulated in Phr1C4629A/C4629A mouse neurons indicating that loss of MYCBP2 RCR activity is central to these phenotypes.

Results

Structure determination of the E2-E3 transfer intermediate

Although chemical engineering approaches have been instrumental for the stabilization and structural resolution of the conformationally dynamic transfer intermediates associated with Ub conjugation3133, structural resolution of a tetrahedral, enzymatic ubiquitin-acyl donor intermediate has not been reported for any E3 classification. A previously described activity-based probe (ABP) based on a chemically engineered E2~Ub conjugate, functions as a suicide substrate for E3 transthiolation25,30 (Fig. 1a, b). We used this ABP to covalently modify the RCR, enabling stabilization of the dynamic mediator loop and the transient E2-E3 Ub transfer complex (Fig. 1b). Importantly, ABP E3 catalytic cysteine labelling forms a tetrahedral bisthioether that locally recapitulates the geometry of the anticipated tetrahedral Ub transthiolation intermediate (Fig. 1b). Diffracting crystals of the engineered covalent E2~Ub:RCR complex were obtained and a structural model was refined to 2.58 Å (Fig. 1c, d, e, Extended Data Fig. 1-3, Extended Data Table 1).

Fig. 1. Stabilization strategy and structure determination of the tetrahedral E2~Ub-MYCBP2 transfer intermediate.

Fig. 1

a, Native mechanism for Ub transfer to the upstream RCR C4520 residue by means of transthiolation with E2~Ub. A transient tetrahedral intermediate is formed prior to intramolecular relay to a downstream cysteine (C4572). b, A chemically engineered E2~Ub conjugate acts as an activity-based probe (ABP) and chemically traps the otherwise transient tetrahedral transfer intermediate. ABP design surrogates the final three Ub residues with an ethyl linker, a triazole (Trz) group, and a cysteine-reactive activated vinylsulfide (AVS) warhead. c, Domain architecture of the catalytic RCR ligase machinery. d, The asymmetric unit consists of a single ternary complex. The RCR machinery in surface representation; RING domain (blue), linker helix (purple), helix-turn-helix (green), TC domain (orange). The trapped tetrahedral Ub transfer intermediate and Trz moiety are depicted in ball and stick. The E2~Ub conjugate is in cartoon representation. The E2 is colored mauve and Ub is gray. e, Closeup view of Ub transfer from E2~Ub to the upstream RCR 4520 residue. Upon Ub transfer the otherwise disordered mediator loop adopts an α-helix.

The RCR E3 engages a closed-like E2~Ub conformation

Our structure accurately recapitulates a transition state intermediate for Ub transfer from E2 to the upstream Cys4520 residue within the E3 mediator loop. The mediator loop is now found to be structured and forms a short α-helix (Fig. 1d, e). Mediator loop residues do not appear to catalytically participate in the transfer process. Rather, transfer to the upstream cysteine residue is facilitated by the RCR binding E2~Ub in a closed conformation, which is entirely distinct from reported catalytic-cysteine dependent E3s12,13,15,16. However, a ~30° rotation of the Ub molecule, centering on Ub Ile44, alters the closed E2~Ub conformation (Fig. 2a). Rotation maintains the highly conserved Ub Ile44 interaction with E2 crossover helix residue Leu1045,6, which is dispensable for HECT/RBR activity9. Other interactions with the globular Ub fold, previously identified as essential for canonical ‘closed’ E2~Ub activation to lysine acceptors, are also largely maintained in the RCR:E2~Ub complex (Fig. 2b, 2c, Extended Data Fig. 4-5). There are two notable exceptions. Firstly, an interaction between Ub Ile36 and the RING domain is lost (Extended Data Fig. 3b). Typically, alanine mutation at this site abolishes canonical activity7,8. Consistent with this interaction being dispensable for activity, a Ub I36A mutant only decreases RCR activity by ~50 % (Fig. 2c). Partial dependence might be reconciled by an intramolecular Ile36 side chain interaction with Leu71 in the Ub tail (Extended Data Fig. 5a). Secondly, the RCR complex lacks the so-called “linchpin” interactions between a conserved arginine/lysine residue within the RING domain (Extended Data Fig. 4b)9. Prototypical RING/E2~Ub complexes have this residue forming bivalent hydrogen-bonds between E2 Gln92, Ub Gln40 and Ub Arg72 (Extended Data Fig. 3b)79. These interactions contribute to anchoring the carboxy terminus of Ub into the E2 active site groove and are considered important for optimum thioester immobilization and E2 active site configuration as their disruption leads to undetectable/negligible activity79. In the RCR complex the Ub rotation shifts Ub Arg72 ~12 Å away from linchpin Lys4441, abolishing its interaction with the E2 Gln92 backbone and Ub Gln40 (Extended Data Fig. 4b). Consistent with a relaxed role, activity of an RCR Lys4441Ala mutant was reduced only by 40 % and a Ub Gln40Ala mutant was unaffected (Fig. 2c)7. A presumed consequence of the lack of these two key canonical interactions would be an intermediate state of thioester activation relative to previously reported RING exemplars.

Fig. 2. The RCR engages a closed-like E2~Ub conformation to facilitate exclusive transthiolation to cysteine within a transient helix.

Fig. 2

a, E2 superposition of canonical RNF4:E2~Ub complex (PDB 4AP4) with MYCBP2:E2~Ub complex (TC domain has been omitted). The RNF4 RING is light blue and its bound E2 and Ub components are wheat and light pink7, respectively. For the E2~Ub:RCR complex, the tetrahedral crosslink and Trz moiety are depicted in ball and stick. Inset is depicted the crystallographically observed rotation of the Ub molecule. This represents an altered closed-like conformation. b, Close up of the interface between the rotated Ub molecule and the E2. c, To validate the structure we designed a single turnover E2-E3 isopeptide assay based on a C4520K E3 mutant (Extended Data Fig. 4). Quantification of E2-E3 isopeptide assays (n = 3 independent experiments performed with identical purified proteins). Ub Gln40 is proximal to the helix-turn-helix motif but does not form a discernible interaction. Consistent with this, the Gln40Ala mutation has no effect. For representative gel data see Extended Data Fig. 3 c, d. d, Close-up view of the engineered, tetrahedral E2~Ub-RCR transthiolation intermediate. The oxyanion, (a proton in our engineered intermediate), has been schematically added to the structure.

Ubiquitin transfer to the RCR requires E2~Ub activation

As our structure geometrically recapitulates a covalently trapped E2~Ub acyl donor intermediate, allowing the orientation of active site residues during catalysis can be inferred (Fig. 2d, Extended Data Fig. 4b). We find that as previously proposed for closed E2~Ub activation, catalysis hinges on E2 Asn77. Canonical closed E2~Ub activation leads to an active site configuration that brings the essential Asn77 residue into proximity of the thioester carbonyl oxygen atom in E2~Ub7,11,34,35. Here, Asn77 might catalytically activate E2~Ub to lysine nucleophilic attack by stabilizing the transient negative charge that forms on the thioester-derived oxygen atom in the tetrahedral transfer intermediate. Alternately, Asn77 may act indirectly by hydrogen bonding to the backbone of Asn114 and stabilize the E2 active-site loop containing Asp117 (Fig. 2d)36,37. A role in thioester immobilization has also been proposed38. As Asn77 is dispensable for HECT/RBR activity it is thought these requirements are a hallmark of a closed E2~Ub activation mechanism for lysine acceptors11,13.

Consistent with our complex, the dependence on Asn77 for RCR activity underscores the unexpected requirement for closed-like E2~Ub activation for transthiolation with MYCBP2 (Fig. 2c). In our transthiolation complex, Asn77 is geometrically compatible with stabilizing the transient negative charge on the thioester-derived oxygen atom and we also observe the interaction between Asn77 and the backbone of Asn114 (Fig. 2d, Extended Data Fig. 4-5). Hence, to elucidate if Asn77 has a particular role in E2-MYCBP2 Ub transfer we determined observed rate constants for Asn77Ser, Asn114Ala, Asp117Ala, and a Asn114Ala Asp117Ala double mutant (Extended Data Fig. 4e-i). In addition to kinetically quantifying the mutants in single turnover C4520K isopeptide assays, we also assessed native cysteine transthiolation activity, thereby allowing potential acceptor-specific roles to be uncovered (Extended Data Fig. 4i, 5e-i)). Strikingly, the observed rates for native transthiolation for Asp117Ala and the Asn114Ala Asp117Ala double mutant were indistinguishable from WT E2, indicative of the described structural role of Asn77 being dispensable. However, the Asn77Ser mutant had no detectable activity (Extended Data Fig. 4i, 5i). This suggests that Asn77’s role in MYCBP2 transthiolation is tetrahedral intermediate stabilization and/or thioester immobilization; both of which are consistent with our structure (Fig. 2d). In contrast, in the isopeptide assay lysine aminolysis was undetectable upon mutation of Asp117, demonstrating that its role is likely to be specific for lysine acceptors where it has been shown to position the lysine ε-amino group and/or suppress its pKa 35,37,38. Consistent with interactions towards the Asn114 backbone being key7,36, Asn114Ala rates were comparable to WT. However, our data cannot exclude the possibility that alternative structural roles mediated by Asn77 may facilitate lysine aminolysis36.

Independent of Asn77, E2 Asp87 augments the canonical linchpin interaction by further anchoring the Ub C-terminus by interaction with Ub Arg74. This interaction was thought to only be required for lysine acceptors7,8,11. We find this interaction also remains critical further underscoring the unusual closed-like requirement for MYCBP2 transthiolation with E2 (Fig. 2c, d, Extended Data Fig. 4d).

E2~Ub activation compensates for mediator loop entropy

An explanation for why transfer to cysteine in the context of the RCR requires E2~Ub activation whereas HECT/RBR E3s do not is that whilst the dynamic nature of the upstream cysteine will not affect intrinsic sulfhydryl reactivity, it might compromise its ability to serve as an effective nucleophile39. The lack of the linchpin and Ub Ile36 interactions would be expected to compromise the stability of the closed conformation that catalytically configures the active site. In turn, this would attenuate thioester reactivity. However, as MYCBP2 is a non-lysine E3 ligase25, aminolysis activity must be mitigated. Thus, employment of a tempered form of the E2~Ub conjugate could satisfy the requirements for elevated reactivity to mediate transthiolation with the mobile upstream cysteine whilst remaining below the threshold for lysine aminolysis activity. To test if the rotated form of the E2~Ub intermediate engaged by the RCR had attenuated reactivity we turned to a version of the RCR where Cys4520 is mutated to alanine. This abolishes competition with native E2-E3 transthiolation allowing assessment of enhanced rate of Ub discharge to free lysine11 (Extended Data Fig. 5i). We found that RCR Cys4520Ala did not enhance lysine discharge activity, supportive of the E2~Ub conformation engaged by MYCBP2 having attenuated reactivity relative to model, dimeric RING E3 systems (Extended Data Fig. 5j)79. Although the crystallographic Ub rotation could account for the attenuated E2~Ub reactivity we observe, we cannot formally exclude the former is imparted by crystal packing and activity attenuation is achieved by an alternative mechanism (Extended Data Fig. 6).

MYCBP2 RING–E2 interface

It was previously assumed that the RCR RING domain binds E2 and the structure reveals that a canonical interface is largely adopted albeit with distinct molecular contacts (Fig. 3a, 3c, Extended Data Fig. 6). Consistent with a closed-like E2~Ub conformation, there is no RING insertion to prevent the formation of a closed-like conformation15,16 (Extended Data Fig. 7). In fact, the contrary appears to be the case as the helix-turn-helix motif renders the RCR incompatible with an open conformation (Extended Data Fig. 8a) Hence, a role for the helix-turn-helix motif might be to prevent engagement of an open E2~Ub conjugate, which based on our observations would be catalytically unproductive.

Fig. 3. MYCBP2 RING-E2 interface involves a novel RING extension and specificity determinants.

Fig. 3

a, Canonical RING-E2 interface involving E2 Pro95 engagement with the core of the RING domain. b, The canonical interface is supplemented by interactions with the characteristic MYCBP2 RING extension which contacts an E2 region not previously implicated with E2 recognition. This is exemplified by the E2 R90 interaction with MYCBP2 L4426. c, Native single turnover E2~Ub discharge assay. Here, E2 is loaded with Ub and reloading is prevented by addition of E1 inhibitor. Discharge of Ub from E2~Ub mediated by addition of MYCBP2 RCR and threonine (50 mM) is monitored. Image is representative replicate with quantification below (n = 3 independent experiments performed with identical purified proteins). d, E2 sequence alignment highlights difference between MYCBP2 compatible E2s and UBE2L3. Superposition of UBE2L3 (pink; PDB 4Q5E) with UBE2D3 (mauve) from the RCR E2~Ub complex. In the superposition UBE2L3 Ser91 cannot interact with the RCR RING extension and UBE2L3 Lys96 is sterically incompatible when introduced into UBE2D3 (Fig. 2c).

Interactions between the MYCBP2 RING domain and E2 shared with canonical RING-E2 interactions include the E2 loop 2 residue Pro95 engaging the core of the RING (Ile4392, Phe4394, Val4420, and Pro4438) (Fig. 3a, Extended Data Fig. 9) and alanine mutation of Ile4392 or F4394 reduces RCR isopeptide formation by ~30 % (Fig. 2c). A difference associated with the loop 1 interaction is that between E2 Phe62 and the RCR RING (Fig. 3a). Typically the Phe side chain docks into a shallow hydrophobic pocket within the RING domain and Phe mutation impairs or even abolishes canonical RING activity7,40. In the case of the RCR RING, the Phe62 pocket is deeper and highly basic and complementarity toward Phe62 is now achieved via a cation-pi interaction with RING Arg4419 (Fig. 3a).

A striking feature of the RCR RING is its pronounced loop extension25. The complexed structure reveals that this serves as an extended docking site for E2 where it complements an E2 region not previously implicated with RING binding (Fig. 3b). In this context, E2 Arg90 H-bonds to Leu4426 within the RING extension. To probe this interaction, we mutated E2 Arg90 to Ala and made a charge-swapped Arg90Glu mutant. Its significance is supported as activity drops by 40 % and 70 %, respectively (Fig. 2c). However, E2-RING recognition is cumulative as even a double Ile4392Ala Leu4426Ala mutant that disrupts both the RING extension and the canonical interface retained 20 % activity (Fig. 3c).

An anomalous characteristic of the RCR is that despite being an E3 that undergoes transthiolation, it is not functional with the E2 UBE2L325, which was understood to support E3 transthiolation activity with most, if not all, catalytic cysteine-dependent E3s11. Our structural insights reveal that incompatibility with UBE2L3 can be primarily ascribed to the presence of Lys96 (homologous to Ser94 in UBE2D3) which would clash with the MYCBP2 RING domain (Fig. 3d). However, we could not impart UBE2L3 compatibility by mutation of the offending Lys96 to serine suggesting that inactivity might be multifactorial (Extended Data Fig. 9b).

Ubiquitin relay is mediated by a helix-coil transition

Strikingly, our structure reveals that during E2-E3 Ub transfer the disordered mediator loop transiently adopts an ordered helical conformation (Fig. 4a). This implies that once MYCBP2 Cys4520 has been thioesterified with Ub, subsequent relay to the downstream Cys4572 residue would require a distance of ~21 Å to be traversed to facilitate intramolecular transthiolation (Fig. 4a). Analogous intramolecular peptide acyl transfer reactions have been observed in simple organisms41, where the tertiary structure of the enzyme brings acyl donor and nucleophilic acceptor in close proximity42. However, in the case of RCR Ub relay, substantial remodelling of the mediator “loop’s” pre-helical state would be required25. We tested the side chain properties of selected mediator loop residues for a potential role in Ub relay using an alanine scan. To deconvolute defects in E2-E3 transthiolation from Ub relay, which are concerted, we initially assessed Cys4520~Ub thioester formation independently (Fig. 4b), prior to assessment of Ub relay to a dead-end product (Fig. 4c). With the exception of the C4520A mutant, which abolishes thioester formation as expected, all alanine mutants retain WT levels of E2-E3 transthiolation activity (Fig. 4d). Strikingly, Ub relay was also found to be extremely robust and unperturbed by any of the side chain mutations (Fig. 4e). Ablation of E2-E3 transthiolation and Ub relay required an amino acid deletion (ΔA4518) upstream of Cys4520 (Fig. 4a, Extended Data Fig. 7c-d).

Fig. 4. Alanine and proline scanning of the mediator loop.

Fig. 4

a, Structural rearrangement of the evolutionarily-conserved mediator loop would be required to relay Ub between C4520 and C4572. b, Mutation of the downstream cysteine to alanine allows direct assessment of native E2-E3 transthiolation activity. c, Mutation of the downstream cysteine to serine restricts RCR activity to the formation of a dead-end ester-linked Ub adduct. For mutants that had negligible effect on E2-E3 transthiolation, reductions in activity can be directly ascribed to Ub relay. d, Assessment of alanine scan on E2-E3 transthiolation. e, Assessment of alanine scan on Ub relay. f, Assessment of proline scan on E2-E3 transthiolation. g, Assessment of proline scan on Ub relay. All SDS-PAGE gel images are representative replicates with quantification below (n = 3 independent experiments performed with identical purified proteins).

The permissive nature of the mediator loop led us to consider backbone perturbation using a proline scan where mutation would render helix formation less thermodynamically favourable43. Whereas this largely does not perturb E2-E3 transthiolation (Fig. 4f), all proline substitutions impair Ub relay (Fig. 4g). The most severe substitutions tend to be at sites immediately proximal of Cys4520 where Ala4518Pro and Asp4521Pro reduce relay by 80 % and 70 %, respectively. These observations suggest that whilst helix formation is not necessary for E2-E3 transthiolation, it is required for efficient Ub relay. As the mediator loop was found to be fully disordered in the apo structure25, and has elevated B-factors in our transfer complex (Extended data Fig. 2e), we propose Ub relay is facilitated by the mediator loop undergoing an entropically-driven helix-coil transition. Helix-coil transitions have been studied extensively in model peptides44,45, but to our knowledge, have not been directly implicated with catalysis.

RCR is central to neurodevelopment and axon protection

Loss of MYCBP2 E3 ligase activity is likely to be central to the axon protective phenotype as RING mutants in Drosophila cells stabilize the axon survival factor NMNAT229. However, it is unclear whether loss of E2-E3 transthiolation, intramolecular Ub relay, and substrate esterification are linked to the neural phenotypes. We generated homozygous knock-in mice that express an orthologous upstream cysteine to alanine mutant rendering all aspects of RCR activity defective (Phr1C4629A/C4629A). Expression levels of Phr1 were consistent across genotypes (Extended Data Fig. 10a), Activity-based proteomics and gel shift analysis of mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) confirmed RCR E3 activity was abolished in homozygous samples (Fig. 5a, Extended Data Fig. 10b, c). Furthermore, expression levels of the Phr1 substrate NMNAT2 when transiently expressed in MEFs were elevated in homozygous samples (Extended Data Fig. 10d). To assess whether loss of RCR activity specifically is likely to recapitulate perinatal lethality observed with null mice, we imaged innervation of the diaphragm by the phrenic nerve in embryonic day 18 (E18.5) mice (Fig. 5b)19,21,22,26. Consistent with previous studies with null mice we found defective innervation of the diaphragm in Phr1C4629A/C4629A relative to Phr1C4629A/+, as shown by the marked reduction of secondary branches of the phrenic nerve (Fig. 5b, Extended Data Fig. 10e). Stunting of neurite outgrowth was also observed in primary superior cervical ganglion (SCG) neurons from E18.5 Phr1C4629A/C4629A mice relative to wild-type and heterozygous littermates (Fig. 5c, d).

Fig. 5. Neurodevelopmental defects and delayed axotomy-induced axon degeneration in Phr1C4629A/C4629A SCG neurons.

Fig. 5

a, Transthiolation activity-based proteomics of E1s and RCR/RBR/HECT E3s in extracted proteomes from MEFs. Signals were normalised to UBA1 (n=2 biological replicates). ABP was withheld in the control experiment allowing assessment of non-specific resin binding. b, βIII-tubulin (Tuj1) immunostaining of the right phrenic nerve terminal branches reveals defective diaphragm innervation in E18.5 Phr1C4629A/C4629A embryos. Boxed regions are magnified (right). Acetylcholine receptor (AChR) clusters are labeled by counter-staining with bungarotoxin-TRITC. Representative images from 4 HOM and 9 HET animals. c, Representative images of neurite outgrowth at DIV7 in Phr1C4629A/+ and Phr1C4629A/C4629A SCG explant cultures. d, Quantification of neurite outgrowth at DIV7; n numbers per genotype are indicated in the figure (mean ±SEM; mixed-effects model followed by Tukey post-hoc test). e, Representative phase contrast images of neurites from Phr1+/+, Phr1C4629A/+ and Phr1C4629A/C4629A SCG explant cultures at the indicated time points after axotomy. f, Quantification of the degeneration index in experiments described in (e) from 3 fields per sample; n numbers per genotype are indicated in the figure. Change in degeneration index is also shown (mean ±SEM; two-way RM ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc test). Asterisks indicate: * P ≤ 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01, *** P ≤ 0.001, **** P ≤ 0.0001, or NS P > 0.05).

Next, we tested the stunted neurites for axon protection in transection assays. Remarkably, despite starting from a higher base, absolute degeneration index measurements are significantly lower at 8 hours post injury indicating neurite protection (P ≤ 0.0001) (Fig. 5e, f). To normalise for reduced neurite growth and health in Phr1C4629A/C4629A mice relative to Phr1+/+and Phr1C4629A/+ (resulting in a higher absolute degeneration index at time 0 h), we also measured change in degeneration index46 (Fig. 5f). In these cultures it is impossible to separate the effects of the developmental phenotype from axon protection, but the stunted growth of the Phr1C4629A/C4629A appears more likely to partially mask the protective effect than to contribute to it. These results indicate that loss of the novel RCR mechanism, followed by substrate esterification, is responsible for the neurodevelopmental defects and axon protection in adult mice (Fig. 6). Thus, inhibition of the RCR mechanism in adult animals could be a valuable strategy for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases and neurologic disorders linked to axonal degeneration.

Fig. 6. Model for the central role of MYCBP2 RING-Cys-Relay activity in neural development and axon maintenance.

Fig. 6

The E2~Ub conjugate samples multiple conformations in solution and the mediator loop is unstructured. The RCR machinery in MYCBP2 engages an activated conformation of the E2~Ub conjugate and the mediator loop adopts a transient α-helix whilst undergoing transthiolation. The RING domain serves as an E2 docking site and the TC (tandem cysteine) domain contains both upstream and downstream catalytic cysteines. Upon E2 dissociation, Ub relay to the downstream cysteine is mediated by an entropically driven helix-coil transition. The downstream site is endowed with esterification activity rather than conventional aminolysis activity. Modification of a threonine (Thr) residue in a polypeptide substrate occurs in vitro but this remains to be confirmed in vivo. Substrate modification is required for normal neural development and programmed axon degeneration in response to injury.

Discussion

The discovery that MYCBP2 RCR uses catalytic features hitherto considered the reserve of canonical RING E3s demonstrates the unappreciated diversity of E3 ligases. Our study demonstrates that RING domains can stabilize closed E2~Ub conformations to facilitate Ub transfer to not only lysine, but also cysteine. The extent of E2~Ub activation can be modulated by the E3 depending on the context of the acceptor site. We anticipate that this mechanism is adopted more widely by the hundreds of RING E3s for substrate ubiquitination. Highly templated and sterically unhindered sites may also be ubiquitinated by a similarly intermediate state of RING-mediated E2~Ub activation, whereas robust stabilization of the closed, activated state might be reserved for more dynamically and sterically challenging sites. Indeed, it has been shown that RING E3s can demonstrate attenuated activity as a means of tuning substrate specificity47. The engineered suicide substrate approach enabled structural elucidation of a highly transient rate-limiting helical intermediate and granted insights into the Ub relay process. Our proposal that Ub relay is mediated by a helix-coil transition provides a framework for how intrinsic disorder might directly facilitate ubiquitin transfer and enzyme catalysis more generally.

We establish that the mechanistically non-homologous Ub relay and non-lysine esterification activities demonstrated by MYCBP2 are likely to be central to the axon protective phenotypes. Our latter inference is based on the observation that MYCBP2 has no lysine activity and will in fact inhibit intrinsic E2 lysine activity through non-productive E2-E3 transthiolation25. The most likely target of MYCBP2 non-lysine E3 activity is NMNAT227,29, either through direct or indirect ubiquitination and destabilization. This presents an exciting therapeutic opportunity for pharmacologically inhibiting Wallerian-like axon degeneration which has been implicated with a number of neurological conditions such as neuropathies and neurodegenerative diseases28. Indeed, one protein downstream of MYCBP2 is SARM1, which is another positive regulator of the Wallerian process48. The discovery of SARM1 having enzymatic activity has led to it becoming an attractive therapeutic target49,50. The structural and biochemical insights obtained herein pertaining to MYCBP2 could similarly inform and accelerate the development of therapeutics.

Online Methods

General materials

All DNA constructs generated for this study were verified by DNA sequencing and are available on request through the Medical Research Council Protein Phosphorylation and Ubiquitylation Unit, University of Dundee, reagents website (https://mrcppureagents.dundee.ac.uk/). Chemical probes and mouse line described in this study are available upon request under a material transfer agreement.

Purification and crystallisation of a covalent RCR-UBE2D3-Ub complex

MYCBP2 residues 4385-4640 were expressed as a GST fusion. Residue numbering for the Uniprot entry for human MYCBP2 (075592) differs as its reannotation has added 38 residues to the protein N-terminus. Following cleavage of the GST tag, MYCBP2 was exchanged by size exclusion chromatography (SEC, Superdex-75) into 20 mM Na2HPO4 pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM TCEP. Ubiquitin (residues 1-73) activity based probe (ABP), containing a thioacrylamide warhead and a UBE2D3 (C21S, S22R, C107S, C111S) recognition element, was prepared as previously described30. ABP (200 μM) and MYCBP2 (50 μM) were exchanged into 20 mM Na2HPO4 pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl and incubated for 4 hr at 30 °C to generate a ternary MYCBP2-UBE2D3-Ub complex. Probe-labelled MYCBP2 was exchanged into 20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM TCEP by SEC. Fractions containing probe-labelled MYCBP2 were pooled and concentrated to 5 mg/mL for crystallisation. Crystals were obtained by vapour-diffusion in 0.85 M sodium citrate, 100 mM sodium chloride, 100 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0. Single crystals were soaked in mother liquor supplemented with 35% glycerol and vitriolized in liquid nitrogen. Data were collected at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility at Beamline ID29 (λ = 1.2737 Å). A total of 360° of data were collected with an oscillation range of Ω= 0.1°. Diffraction data were integrated using XDS51 and scaled using Aimless52 (version 0.7.3) from the CCCP4 package (version 7.0). Phases were obtained by molecular replacement in Phaser53 (version 2.8.2) using apo-MYCBP2 (PDB 5O6C), UBE2D3 (5EGG), and Ub (PDB 1UBQ) as the search models. Manual model building was carried out with Coot54 (version 0.8) and refinement with REFMAC555 (version 5.8.0238). Ramachandran statistics were, favoured: 92.04%, allowed: 6.45%, outliers: 1.51%. Clear electron density for the engineered bisthioether linkage between UBE2D3 Cys85 and MYCBP2 Cys4520 was visible. To model the linkage a ligand was parameterised using the electronic Ligand Builder and Optimization Workbench (eLBOW) module of the PHENIX suite56 (version 1.14). The ligand excluded the ethyl group between Leu73 and the triazole (Trz) as Leu73 was disordered in the structure. The sulphur atoms of Cys85 and Cys4520 were included as part of the ligand. Simulated annealing 2|mFo|-|dFc| composite omit maps were generated using the module within the PHENIX suite57(version 1.14).

Single-turnover E2 discharge by in-gel fluorescence

Cy3B-labeled ubiquitin was prepared as described previously25. Assays were carried out in Assay Buffer: 20 mM sodium phosphate pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM ATP. E2 (10 μM) was charged by E1 (~ 600 nM) with Cy3B-labelled ubiquitin (12.5 μM) at 37 °C for 30 min then cooled at 23 °C for 3 min. E2 recharging was then blocked by the addition of an E1 inhibitor (MLN4924 derivative, compound 158, (25 μM)), and further incubated for 10 min. The mixture was then mixed with an equal volume of cleaved MYCBP2 (residues 4378-4640) (5 μM) and threonine (100 mM) and incubated at 23°C for the specified time. For MYCBP2 C4520A and RNF4 (residues 1-194)7 the final E3 concentrations were 5 μM and 0.5 μM, respectively, and lysine concentrations were 0-200 mM. Although efficient lysine discharge was observed with the RCR C4520K mutant, the structural context of this acceptor lysine templates the reaction which can increase the reaction rate by multiple orders of magnitude, thereby reconciling the lack of activity towards free lysine which would be diffusion-limited39,59. For MYCBP2 C4520K mutants, threonine was omitted from the buffer. The reactions were terminated by the addition of 4X LDS loading buffer Thermo Fisher Scientific) with or without 2-mercaptoethanol. SDS-PAGE gels were scanned with a ChemiDoc MP Gel Imaging System with Image Lab software version 6.0.1 (Bio-Rad Laboratories) and Cy3B fluorescence intensity was quantified using ImageJ version 1.51. Single-turnover Ub-discharge kinetic data were fitted with a one-phase exponential association curve using Prism 7 (Graphpad Software, Inc).

Multiple turnover E2-discharge panel

Indicated E2s (1 μM) were incubated in Assay Buffer with MYCBP2 C4520K (5 μM), Ub (20 μM), E1 (250 nM), 5 mM ATP.

Mediator loop alanine/proline scanning

Mediator loop mutations were introduced into the C4572A or C4572S backgrounds of MYCBP2. E2 charging with Cy3B ubiquitin was carried out as described for single-turnover E2 discharge by in-gel fluorescence, except E1 was not inhibited. The reactions were terminated by the addition of 4X LDS loading buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) (either non-reducing or reducing). For MYCBP2 C4572S ester bond cleavage, 0.14 N NaOH was added and samples were further incubated at 23 °C for 20 min.

Generation of Phr1C4629A/C4629A knock-in mice

A C4629A knock-in mutation was created in the MYCBP2 gene (NCBI transcript NM_207215.2) encoding mouse MYCBP2/Phr1 using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene-editing technology (performed by Taconic Biosciences GmbH, Koöln, Germany), C57BL/6NTac-Mycbp2em5686(C4626A)Tac. In summary, a guide RNA corresponding to the sequence TGAGGCTCGCTGTGATGCTG was used to target exon 83 of the Phr1 gene on chromosome 14. This replaced the native cysteine codon (TGT) at position 4629 for an alanine codon. The guide also introduced a single silent mutation immediately upstream thereby introducing an XhoI restriction site for analytical purposes (TGAGGCTCGAGCAGATGCTG). This reduces the codon usage probability for amino acid R4628 from 9.4 % to 6.6 %. Potential F0 founder animals were screened by PCR using extracted biopsies and XhoI positive products were sequenced. Prediction of potential off target sites, revealed that the two closest genes had 3 mismatches. These, together with the next 6 closest matches and two ubiquitin system targets with 4 mismatches (USP37 and WWP2), were PCR screened revealing none were disrupted. Founder mice were backcrossed, and transmission of the MYCBP2 C4629A was confirmed by direct sequencing of PCR products. Frozen sperm from G1 MYCBP2 C4629A heterozygous mice was received by the University of Dundee animal facility and used for in vitro fertilization of C57BL/6J oocytes, collected from superovulated females. The same 10 potential off-target sites were screened with various primer pairs, and were confirmed to be non-mutated by sequencing. Genotyping of the knock-in allele was routinely performed by PCR using the forward 5’-CACACTTGGAAACCCATGC-3’ and reverse 5’-ATGACTAGCTTCATGTGTACCCC-3’ followed by digestion of the PCR product with XhoI. For a wild type allele, this results in a band of 590 bp while a targeted allele gives a band of 421 bp.

Mice were backcrossed on a C57BL/6J (Charles River UK) background for two generations and provided with free access to food (R&M3 pelleted irradiated diet) and water. Animals were kept in individually ventilated cages at 21 °C, 45-65 % relative humidity and a 12 h/12 h light/dark cycle under specific-pathogen–free conditions in accordance with UK and European Union regulations. Experiments on mice were approved by the University of Dundee ethical review board under a UK Home Office project license.

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated MYCBP2 knock-out of SH-SY5Y cells

The MYCBP2 KO SH-SY5Y line was generated using a lentiviral vector, lentiCRISPRv2 (Addgene plasmid # 52961), encoding a single guide RNA scaffold targeting the first exon of MYCBP2 (spacer sequence: GCCTCCGGTAGCGGTCGGCCA). After transduction, cells were initially selected with puromycin, and later subjected to limiting dilution to obtain a homogenous MYCBP2 KO cell population.

Primary neuronal cultures

SCG explants were dissected from Phr1+/+, Phr1C4629A/+ and Phr1C4629A/C4629A littermate E18.5 mouse embryos. Explants were cultured in 35 mm tissue culture dishes pre-coated with poly-L-lysine (20 μg/ml for 1 hr; Sigma) and laminin (20 μg/ml for 1 hr; Sigma) in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM, Gibco) with 1 % penicillin/streptomycin, 50 ng/ml 2.5S NGF (Invitrogen) and 2 % B27 (Gibco). 4 μM aphidicolin (Merck) was used to reduce proliferation and viability of small numbers of non-neuronal cells. Culture media was replenished every 3 days. Neurites were allowed to extend for 7 days before performing the experiments.

Acquisition of phase contrast images, neurite outgrowth and axon degeneration assays

Phase contrast images were acquired on a DMi8 upright fluorescence microscope controlled with LAS X software (Leica Microsystems) coupled to a monochrome digital camera (Hammamatsu C4742-95). The objectives used were NPLAN 5X/0.12 for neurite outgrowth assays and HCXPL 20X/0.40 CORR for axon degeneration assays. SCG explants and their extending neurites were captured at low magnification at DIV7. Radial outgrowth was determined by taking the average of two measurements of representative neurite outgrowth for each explant. Measurements were made from overlapping images of the total neurite outgrowth. Axon degeneration assays were performed in the same SCG cultures used for the assessment of neurite outgrowth. Neurites were cut with a scalpel and axon degeneration index60, was determined using an ImageJ plugin (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/download.html) which calculates the ratio of fragmented axon area over total axon area after binarization of the pictures and subtraction of the background.

Whole-mount immunostaining of diaphragms

E18.5 mouse embryos were fixed by immersion in 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde for 24 hours at 4°C. Diaphragms were dissected and washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) before incubation with 10 μg/ml tetramethylrhodamine (TRITC)-conjugated α-bungarotoxin (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 20 mins at room temperature. Samples were then permeabilized/blocked in PTX (PBS, 0.5% Triton-X100) with 4% BSA (Sigma) for 2 hours at room temperature and incubated overnight at 4 °C with an anti-βIII-tubulin (Tuj1) antibody (Sigma, T2200) in blocking solution (1:500 dilution). Following multiple washes in PTX, diaphragms were incubated with an AlexaFluor488-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific A11008) (1:200 dilution) in blocking solution for 5 hours at room temperature and again extensively washed in PTX. Diaphragms were finally mounted in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories) and images were acquired on a DMi8 upright fluorescence microscope (Leica Microsystems) coupled to a monochrome digital camera (Hammamatsu C4742-95), using a NPLAN 5X/0.12 objective.

Mouse Embryonic Fibroblast (MEF) isolation

E12.5 embryos were decapitated, minced, incubated in trypsin-EDTA (Gibco), and pelleted by centrifugation. Cells were resuspended in high glucose DMEM (Gibco) supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum (Sigma), 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Gibco), non-essential amino acids (Gibco), 100 U/mL penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco), 2 mM L-glutamine (Gibco). Cells were then plated in 100 mm dishes, and maintained at 37 °C in 5% CO2. For proteomics experiments, MEFs were rinsed, scraped manually in Dulbecco’s Phosphate-Buffered Saline (DPBS, Gibco), and pelleted by centrifugation. Cells were resuspended in DPBS and pelleted by centrifugation. Cell pellets were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -20°C.

NMNAT2-HA expression in mouse embryonic fibroblasts

Mouse embryonic fibroblasts were plated in a 6-well plate at a density of 2 x 106 cells per well. The following day, 1 μg of C-terminal HA-tagged human NMNAT2-coding plasmid, or empty vector, were transiently transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) at a Lipofectamine:DNA ratio of 5:1 in Opti-MEM (Gibco). After 24 h, cells were harvested, lysed, and both soluble protein and insoluble proteins were subjected to Western blot analysis. The insoluble fraction was dissolved in 2 % (w/v) SDS prior to addition of 4X LDS sample buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

MYCBP2 probe-labelling for immunoblot analysis

An ABP, containing maltose binding protein (MBP) fused to the N-terminus of a UBE2D3 (C21S, C107S, C111S) and Ub residues 1-73, was prepared as previously described30. To assess MYCBP2 probe labelling, MEF or SH-SY5Y lysates (100 μg) were incubated in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM glycerophosphate, 50 mM sodium fluoride, 5 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mM sodium vanadate, 0.27 M sucrose, 1% NP-40, 0.2 mM PMSF, 1 mM benzamidine, (complete EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche)) with 12 μM MBP-ABP for 4 h at 30 °C. Reactions were terminated by the addition of 4X LDS loading buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) containing 2-mercaptoethanol prior to immunoblot analysis.

Immunoblot analysis

Harvested cells were resuspended in lysis buffer with complete EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche). Protein concentration in clarified lysates was assessed using the Bradford method. Samples were prepared in 4xLDS sample buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) containing 2-mercaptoethanol. Electrophoresis was performed at 150 V in a NuPAGE 3-8% Tris-Acetate gel (Invitrogen) when blotting for MYCBP2 or a NuPAGE 4-12% Bis-Tris gel (Invitrogen) for NMNAT2-HA. Following electrophoresis proteins were transferred to PVDF membrane. Membranes were blocked in TBS-T (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween-20) containing 5% (w/v) non-fat dried skimmed milk powder for 1 h before incubation with commercially available primary antibody (MYCBP2 Abcam Ab86078 1:10,000 dilution, HA tag 3F10 Sigma 27573500 1:2500 dilution, Vinculin Abcam Ab129002 1:2500 dilution, Tubulin ProteinTech 66031 1:10,000 dilution) or a previously described antibody raised against the RCR domain (anti-MYCBP2 SA357 aa4378-464025 1:1200 dilution). After washing in TBST-T, membranes were incubated for 45 min in secondary HRP-coupled antibody (anti-Rabbit Cell Signaling Technology 7074S 1:5000 dilution, anti-Rat Cell Signaling Technology 7077S 1:5000 dilution, anti-Sheep Invitrogen 31480 1:5000, or anti-Mouse Cell Signaling Technology 7076S, 1:5000 dilution). Membranes were then washed before adding the chemiluminescent substrate (ECL Prime Sigma, for ABP-labelling experiment and NMNAT2-HA; ECL Thermo Fisher Scientific, for MYCBP2 and Tubulin), and exposing to radiographic film.

Activity-based proteomics

MEFs from WT and homozygote genotypes were rinsed and collected with ice-cold PBS, and extracted with ice-cold lysis buffer 2 (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 10 mM sodium 2-glycerophosphate, 50 mM sodium fluoride, 5.0 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 1.0 mM sodium orthovanadate, 0.27 M sucrose, 50 mM NaCl, 0.2 mM (PMSF), 1.0 mM benzamidine, 10 μM TCEP, 1% NP-40) on ice for 20 min. Protein concentration in clarified lysates was determined by Bradford assay and concentrations normalised across genotypes. Biotin-labelled E3 activity-based probe with a UBE2D3 recognition element and Ub residues 1-7325 was added to lysates at 10 μM and incubated at 30°C for 4 hr. Biotin enrichment was then carried out against streptavidin resin followed by on-resin tryptic digestion and LC-MS/MS analysis25. Data were processed using LFQ quantification with MaxQuant (http://www.maxquant.org). To facilitate graphical depiction, the vast dynamic range of LFQ intensities were normalised to the mean UBA1 signal in ABP-treated wild-type MEFs. UBA1 is the predominant ubiquitin E1 and yields a relatively high ABP signal and it was assumed that levels were similar across all genotypes.

Extended Data

Extended Data Fig. 1. Structure determination and representative views of the E2~Ub-MYCBP2 transfer intermediate.

Extended Data Fig. 1

a, A crosslinked transfer complex was prepared by incubating ABP (200 μM) and E3 (MYCBP2 RCR) (50 μM) for 4 h at 30 °C. Complex formation was assessed by SDS-PAGE (left). The stabilized transfer complex was purified by size-exclusion chromatography (right).

b, Domain architecture of MYCBP2 including the catalytic RCR machinery. c, The RCR machinery is in stick representation; RING domain (blue), linker helix (purple), helix-turn-helix (green), TC domain (orange), mediator loop (brown), E2 (mauve) and Ub (gray). The mesh represents a simulated annealing composite omit 2|mFo|-|dFc| electron density map contoured at 1.0 σ.

d, As above except the mesh represents the experimental 2|Fo|−|Fc| electron density map contoured at 1.0 σ. e, Close-up view of the three-way crosslink between E2 C85, RCR C4520 and the Ub carboxy terminus. The mesh represents a simulated annealing composite omit 2|mFo|-|dFc| electron density map contoured at 1.0 σ carved around the mediator loop G4515 – D4529, E2 residues C85, and the crosslink. f, As e except the mesh represents the experimental 2|Fo|−|Fc| electron density map contoured at 1.0 σ. g, Close-up view of the Ub-esterification site, in the apo-structure the esterification site is occupied by a Thr residue due to crystal packing. The mesh represents a simulated annealing composite omit 2|mFo|-|dFc| electron density map contoured at 1.0 σ carved around E4534, F4570 – F4573, H4583, F4586 and an ordered water molecule. h, As g except the mesh represents the experimental 2|Fo|−|Fc| electron density map contoured at 1.0 σ.

Extended Data Fig. 2. Superposition of apo-MYCBP2 (PDB 5O6C), E2~Ub bound-MYCBP2 and protein crystal stability.

Extended Data Fig. 2

a, Apo-MYCBP2 residues Asn4379-His4638 were aligned with bound-MYCBP2 residues Asp4387-Asn4636. The RCR, E2 and Ub are in cartoon representation: Coloring (apo-MYCBP2/bound-MYCBP2) zinc ions (light gray/gray), RING domain (light blue/blue), linker helix (pink/purple), helix-turn-helix (light green/green) and tandem cysteine domain (yellow/orange). In the apo structure, 8 residues from the mediator loop are disordered and are represented by a black dashed line. The E2 is colored mauve and Ub is gray. MYCBP2 Residues Ala4518, Gly4527, Cys4520 and Cys4572 are in ball and stick representation. In the bound-MYCBP2 structure E2 residue C85 and the engineered crosslinker are in ball and stick representation. b, Closeup of TC domains, in the E2~Ub bound structure the eight mediator loop residues, that were disordered in the apo structure, adopt a helical conformation in the E2~Ub:RCR transfer complex. c, Closeup of RING domains, in the E2~Ub bound structure the RING domain has twisted towards the linker-helix this results in a 3.0 and 4.1 Å shift of Zn2+ 1 and Zn2+ 2, respectively. d, Representative view of the E2~Ub-MYCBP2 transfer intermediate. e, Representative view of the E2~Ub-MYCBP2 transfer intermediate colored by B-factors (blue thin-cartoon lowest B-factors to red thick-cartoon highest B-factors) indicates that ubiquitin and the mediator loop are the most disordered components of the complex. f, SDS-PAGE gel of purified ABP-MYCBP2 complex and ABP-MYCBP2 complex recovered from a crystal drop containing the productive conditions (0.85 M sodium citrate, 100 mM sodium chloride, 100 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0). The ABP-labelled transfer complex is stable during crystallization. Experiment was repeated twice with similar results.

Extended Data Fig. 3. Data collection and refinement statistics.

Extended Data Fig. 3

Extended Data Fig. 4. Mutational analysis of E2-E3 Ub transfer was determined by single-turnover isopeptide formation in the context of an RCR C4520K mutant.

Extended Data Fig. 4

To decouple E2-E3 Ub transfer (what our structure is reflective of) from subsequent relay and substrate esterification, we devised a robust assay that results in transfer of Ub from E2 to a dead-end product. To achieve this, we mutated the upstream Cys4520 residue to a lysine (Cys4520Lys). We found Ub was transferred to the lysine forming a stable isopeptide adduct. a, Activity was efficient and only E2’s previously shown to support MYCBP2 E3 activity supported isopeptide bond formation25. Experiment was repeated twice with similar results. b, A subset of hallmark interactions involved in closed E2~Ub stabilization are maintained (coloring as Fig. 2a). c, Representative replicate from single-turnover E2~Ub isopeptide assay used for quantification presented in Fig. 2c (also see methods). (d) The majority of mutants were also tested with wild type MYCBP2 in multiple turnover threonine-discharge assays (Extended Data Fig. 5), which yielded similar activity profiles. However, one exception was with E2 mutation D117A. Whereas D117A was fully active with MYCBP2 WT, it was completely inactive in C4520K isopeptide formation. This is reflective of this residue having a lysine-specific role that is redundant with native MYCBP2 E2-E3 transthiolation. e-h, Kinetic analysis for E2 active site residues (n = 3 independent experiments performed with identical purified proteins). Blue squares and black circles correspond to experiments where E3 was added or withheld, respectively. E2 reloading was blocked by addition of E1 inhibitor and depletion of the E2~Ub species was quantified. i, Observed rates of single-turnover Ub discharge (kobs) from experiments e-h. Observed rate constants were obtained from the one-phase exponential association equation using the routine within Graphpad Prism. Assays were carried out in triplicate using identical purified proteins. The 95 % confidence intervals for kobs are presented. ND* indicates that rates of Ub discharge in the presence of E3 were indistinguishable from background E2~Ub hydrolysis. Observed rates for native transthiolation activity determined from experiments presented in Extended Data Fig. 5 are also tabulated.

Extended Data Figure 5. Mutational assessment of native MYCBP2 E2-E3 transthiolation activity and demonstration of attenuated E2~Ub reactivity.

Extended Data Figure 5

a, Proposed intramolecular role for Ub I36 in maintaining a closed-like E2~Ub conformation. The interaction between Ub I36 and L71 is maintained in the “closed-like” E2~Ub conformation. Superposition of the RCR E2~Ub and RNF4 E2~Ub (PDB 4AP4) complexes. The gap between Ub I36 and L71 has decreased by 0.7 Å in the RCR complex. The RCR, E2 and Ub are in cartoon representation with select residues in ball and stick representation: Ub I36, L71, R72 and the engineered linker (gray), E2 C85 (mauve), RCR K4441 (blue) and C4520 (orange). The RNF4 E2~Ub complex is in cartoon representation with select residues in stick representation: Ub I36, L71, R72 (pink), R181 (purple). b, For the selected mutants, MYCBP2 activity was assessed using single turnover E2~Ub discharge assays mediated by the presence of wild type MYCBP2 and threonine (50 mM). c, Single turnover E2~Ub discharge assay mediated by the presence of wild type MYCBP2 and threonine (50 mM) for E2 Asn114Ala and Asn114Gln mutants. Experiment repeated twice with similar results. d, Quantification for selected mutants, (n = 3-4 independent experiments performed with identical purified proteins). e-i native single-turnover WT MYCBP2 and threonine dependent E2~Ub discharge assay. Observed rate constants tabulated in Extended Data Fig. 4 were obtained from the one-phase exponential association equation using the routine within Graphpad Prism. Blue squares and black circles correspond to experiments where E3 was added or withheld, respectively. (n = 3 independent experiments performed with identical purified proteins) j, Quantification of lysine discharge assay in the presence of a transthiolation-defective RCR A4520 mutant or the canonical RING E3 RNF4 (n = 3 independent experiments performed with identical purified proteins). Although efficient lysine discharge was observed with the RCR C4520K mutant, the structural context of this acceptor lysine templates the reaction which can increase the reaction rate by multiple orders of magnitude, thereby reconciling the lack of activity towards free lysine which would be diffusion-limited39,60.

Extended Data Figure 6. Consideration of crystal packing effects on adoption of the closed like E2~Ub conformation and assessment of their significance in solution.

Extended Data Figure 6

a, Interface between Ub (gray), E2 (mauve) RCR (TC domain, orange; linker helix, purple; helix-turn-helix, green; RING, blue) and two symmetry-related RCR molecules (cyan and light-blue). The side chain of Ub E18 and the first 7 residues of the RCR construct are disordered. b, Closeup of the interface between Ub, E2 and symmetry related E3. Ub K48 and R54 are in close proximity to symmetry related MYCBP2 H4599. c, Superposition of the RCR E2~Ub and RNF4 E2~Ub (PDB 4AP4) complexes highlighting the position of Ub Lys48. The altered Ub packing in the RCR complex (E2, mauve: Ub, gray) results in Ub Lys48 shifting away from E2 D42, relative to the RNF4 complex (E2 wheat; Ub, pink). d, Single-turnover E2~Ub discharge and single-turnover isopeptide formation for the indicated Ub variants. The Ub E18R, A46D, R54E, and N60A mutants were discharged similarly to WT Ub, suggesting that the interface with a second copy of MYCBP2 does not exist in solution or is not required for activity. The Ub K48A and K48E mutants reduced activity, which would not be expected if the interaction with H4599 residue within the symmetry related MYCBP2 contributed to prevention of a canonical closed-conformation in solution. As K48 is proximal to the E2 it seems more likely that it intrinsically contributes to closed and closed-like activation. e, Quantification of single-turnover E2~Ub discharge (n=5 independent experiments performed with identical purified proteins) and single-turnover isopeptide formation (n=3 independent experiments performed with identical purified proteins).

Extended Data Figure 7. Representative electron density centered on key E2~Ub-RING interfaces and comparison with E2~Ub-RING1 interfaces.

Extended Data Figure 7

a, The E2-Ub interface is centred on E2 L104, Ub L8, I44, H68, and V70. E2 (mauve) and Ub (gray) are shown as sticks, the RCR RING domain (blue) is shown as a cartoon. For clarity RCR regions C-terminal of the RING are not shown. The mesh represents a simulated annealing composite omit 2|mFo|-|dFc| electron density map contoured at 1.0 σ. b, As a except the mesh represents the experimental 2|Fo|−|Fc| electron density map contoured at 1.0 σ. c, View of the RING-E2 interface, RCR RING (blue), E2 (mauve) and Ub (gray) are shown as sticks. The RCR equivalent to the ‘linchpin’ residue (K4441) and the functionally important RING extension residue (L4426) are labelled. The mesh represents a simulated annealing composite omit 2|mFo|-|dFc| electron density map contoured at 1.0 σ. d, As c except the mesh represents the experimental 2|Fo|−|Fc| electron density map contoured at 1.0 σ. e, View of the RING-E2 interface focused on RCR residues L4392, F4394 and the interaction between E2 S94 and RING P4438. The mesh represents a simulated annealing composite omit 2|mFo|-|dFc| electron density map contoured at 1.0 σ. f, As e except the mesh represents the experimental 2|Fo|−|Fc| electron density map contoured at 1.0 σ. g, Superposition of MYCBP2 E2~Ub and HOIP E2~Ub complexes (PDB 5EDV) highlighting the shift in E2 binding site for HOIP RING1 (E2s were superposed). MYCBP2 complex RING (blue), E2 (mauve), zinc ions (gray); HOIP complex RING1 (cyan), E2 (wheat), zinc (light gray). h, Superposition of MYCBP2 E2~Ub and HHARI E2~Ub complexes (PDB 5UDH) highlighting a loop insertion in HHARI RING1 that prevents the closed E2~Ub conformation. HHARI His234 would sterically clash with Ub in the “closed” E2~Ub, and similarly, His234 is incompatible with the “closed-like” E2~Ub adopted in the RCR complex. MYCBP2 complex RING (blue), E2 (mauve), Ub (gray), zinc (gray); HHARI complex RING1 (light blue), E2 (wheat) and zinc (light gray).

Extended Data Figure 8. The RCR-helix-turn-helix motif prevents binding of an open E2~Ub conjugate, UBE2L3 activity cannot be imparted by Lys96Ser mutation, and further mediator loop analysis.

Extended Data Figure 8

a, Superposition of ‘open’ conformation E2~Ub from a HECT E2~Ub complex (PDB 3JVZ) with the RCR E2~Ub complex. The open conformation in the HECT E2~Ub complex is incompatible with the observed RCR conformation as Ub is sterically blocked by the helix-turn-helix motif. HECT E2 (pink) and Ub (light gray) are displayed in cartoon representation. b, Despite introduction of the corresponding lysine residue into UBE2D3 abolishing its activity, we could not impart UBE2L3 activity by substitution of Lys96 to Ser, as found in UBE2D3. Blue squares and black circles correspond to experiments where E3 was added or withheld, respectively (n =3 independent experiments performed with identical purified proteins). c, The mediator loop has high sequence conservation across orthologues. The deletions in Drosophila and C. elegans relative to human MYCBP2 imply the Ub relay process is highly plastic. d, Deletion of mediator loop residue A4518 substantially impairs E2-E3 transthiolation and Ub relay. Experiment was repeated twice with similar results.

Extended Data Figure 9. Relaxation of the E2 Ser94-RING Pro4438 interaction is crystallographically observed for RING-linked E3s (RBRs and RCR) relative to canonical RINGs.

Extended Data Figure 9

Interestingly, the Ser94-Pro4438 H-bond is highly conserved in solved E2-RING structures but for canonical RING E3s an idealised geometry is observed (2.3-3.0 Å). For RBR E3s that undergo transthiolation, this H-bond distance is comparable to that observed for the RCR being ~0.4 Å longer. Thus it would appear that relaxation of this H-bond may be a hallmark of RING-linked E3s but the mechanistic basis for this is not clear. a, Distances between E2 Ser94 (gamma oxygen) and E3 Pro (carbonyl oxygen) for MYCBP2 relative to canonical RING E3s. b, Alignment of the C-terminal portion of the RING including the 7th and 8th zinc coordinating residues. The conserved proline that interacts with E2 serine 94 is shown in blue. Zinc coordinating residues are shown in red. The linchpin residue location is indicated with an asterisk. c, Distances between E2 Ser94 (gamma oxygen), or E2 Lys96 (epsilon amino nitrogen), and E3 Pro (carbonyl oxygen) for MYCBP2 relative to RBR E3s. d, Alignment of the c-terminal portion of the RING including the 7th and 8th zinc coordinating residues. The conserved proline that interacts with E2 serine 94 in MYCBP2 shown in blue. Zinc coordinating residues are shown in red.

Extended Data Figure 10. Further characterization of Phr1C4629A/C4629A mouse line.

Extended Data Figure 10

a, Expression levels of Phr1/MYCBP2 in Phr1+/+ (WT), Phr1C4629A/+ (HET) and Phr1C4629A/C4629A (HOM) mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) and neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells (CRISPR KO and WT) (left). An alternative in-house antibody25 was also used to assess Phr1 expression levels across genotypes (right). b, Experimental work-flow used to generate activity-based proteomic data presented in Figure 5b. c, Extracted proteomes from MEF with indicated genotypes were treated with a maltose-binding protein (MBP)-tagged activity-based probe. MBP tagging was necessary to discern a gel shift upon MYCBP2/Phr1 (0.5 MDa) labelling. ABP labelling was selectively abolished in Phr1C4629A/C4629A MEFs consistent with the E3 ligase activity being disrupted. This experiment was carried out twice with similar results. d, NMNAT2 with a C-terminal HA-tag was transiently transfected into MEFs representing all three genotypes. This experiment was carried out once. e, The number of secondary branches (gray) between the primary branches (black) crossing the red dotted line were counted. Quantification of secondary axonal branches of the right phrenic nerve; n number per genotype are indicated in the figure (mean ±SEM; Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test). Asterisks indicate: * P ≤ 0.05.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary_Table1
Source Data for Fig3
Source Data for Extended Data Fig4
Source Data for Fig4
Source Data for Extended Data Fig5
Source Data for Extended Data Fig6
Source Data for Extended Data Fig8
Source Data for Extended Data Fig10

Acknowledgments

We thank Jin-Feng Zhao, Gail Gilmour, Mehreen Mohammad, Joby Varghese, and Axel Knebel of the MRC Protein Phosphorylation and Ubiquitylation Unit. We thank the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF). This work was funded by UK Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12016/8) and Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/P003982/1). A.L. was funded by a Sir Henry Wellcome Postdoctoral Fellowship from the Wellcome Trust (210904/Z/18/Z). We also acknowledge pharmaceutical companies supporting the Division of Signal Transduction Therapy (Boehringer-Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline and Merck KGaA).

Footnotes

Authors contributions

S.V conceived research. P.D.M. designed and carried out experiments. M.C. and A.L. designed diaphragm imaging and neuron explant experiments that were carried out by A.L. M-A.D. coordinated animal breeding and obtained and characterised MEF samples by immunoblot and ABP gel-shift analysis. A.J.F. Prepared MBP-tagged probe and carried out activity-based proteomics and data processing. M.S., K-C.P. synthesized reagents. N.T.W. designed and made cDNA constructs. S.V. and P.D.M. wrote the manuscript with input from other authors.

Competing interest

S.V., K.-C.P. and M.S. are authors on patents relating to work presented in this article.

Data availability

Protein Data Bank coordinates and structure factors for RCR-E2-Ub have been deposited with accession code 6T7F. All DNA constructs were verified by DNA sequencing and are available through the Medical Research Council Protein Phosphorylation and Ubiquitylation Unit, University of Dundee, reagents website (https://mrcppureagents.dundee.ac.uk/). The data that supports these findings, including raw mass spectrometry and microscopy data, are available from the corresponding author upon request s.s.virdee@dundee.ac.uk.

References

  • 1.Komander D, Rape M. The ubiquitin code. Annu Rev Biochem. 2012;81:203–229. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060310-170328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Oh E, Akopian D, Rape M. Principles of Ubiquitin-Dependent Signaling. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2018;34:137–162. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100617-062802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Deshaies RJ, Joazeiro CA. RING domain E3 ubiquitin ligases. Annu Rev Biochem. 2009;78:399–434. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.101807.093809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pruneda JN, Stoll KE, Bolton LJ, Brzovic PS, Klevit RE. Ubiquitin in motion: structural studies of the ubiquitin conjugating enzyme~ubiquitin conjugate. Biochemistry. 2011;50:1624–1633. doi: 10.1021/bi101913m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Saha A, Lewis S, Kleiger G, Kuhlman B, Deshaies RJ. Essential role for ubiquitin-ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme interaction in ubiquitin discharge from Cdc34 to substrate. Mol Cell. 2011;42:75–83. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.03.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wickliffe KE, Lorenz S, Wemmer DE, Kuriyan J, Rape M. The mechanism of linkage-specific ubiquitin chain elongation by a single-subunit E2. Cell. 2011;144:769–781. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.01.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Plechanovova A, Jaffray EG, Tatham MH, Naismith JH, Hay RT. Structure of a RING E3 ligase and ubiquitin-loaded E2 primed for catalysis. Nature. 2012;489:115–120. doi: 10.1038/nature11376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dou H, Buetow L, Sibbet GJ, Cameron K, Huang DT. BIRC7-E2 ubiquitin conjugate structure reveals the mechanism of ubiquitin transfer by a RING dimer. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2012;19:876–883. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pruneda JN, et al. Structure of an E3:E2~Ub Complex Reveals an Allosteric Mechanism Shared among RING/U-box Ligases. Mol Cell. 2012;47:933–942. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.07.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Scheffner M, Nuber U, Huibregtse JM. Protein ubiquitination involving an E1-E2-E3 enzyme ubiquitin thioester cascade. Nature. 1995;373:81–83. doi: 10.1038/373081a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wenzel DM, Lissounov A, Brzovic PS, Klevit RE. UBCH7 reactivity profile reveals parkin and HHARI to be RING/HECT hybrids. Nature. 2011;474:105–108. doi: 10.1038/nature09966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kamadurai HB, et al. Insights into ubiquitin transfer cascades from a structure of a UbcH5B~ubiquitin-HECT(NEDD4L) complex. Mol Cell. 2009;36:1095–1102. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.11.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lechtenberg BC, et al. Structure of a HOIP/E2~ubiquitin complex reveals RBR E3 ligase mechanism and regulation. Nature. 2016;529:546–550. doi: 10.1038/nature16511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dove KK, Stieglitz B, Duncan ED, Rittinger K, Klevit RE. Molecular insights into RBR E3 ligase ubiquitin transfer mechanisms. Embo Rep. 2016;17:1221–1235. doi: 10.15252/embr.201642641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dove KK, et al. Structural Studies of HHARI/UbcH7~Ub Reveal Unique E2~Ub Conformational Restriction by RBR RING1. Structure. 2017;25:890–900. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2017.04.013. e895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yuan L, Lv Z, Atkison JH, Olsen SK. Structural insights into the mechanism and E2 specificity of the RBR E3 ubiquitin ligase HHARI. Nat Commun. 2017;8:211. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00272-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wan HI, et al. Highwire regulates synaptic growth in Drosophila. Neuron. 2000;26:313–329. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)81166-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhen M, Huang X, Bamber B, Jin Y. Regulation of presynaptic terminal organization by C. elegans RPM-1, a putative guanine nucleotide exchanger with a RING-H2 finger domain. Neuron. 2000;26:331–343. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)81167-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Schaefer AM, Hadwiger GD, Nonet ML. rpm-1, a conserved neuronal gene that regulates targeting and synaptogenesis in C. elegans. Neuron. 2000;26:345–356. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)81168-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.D’Souza J, et al. Formation of the retinotectal projection requires Esrom, an ortholog of PAM (protein associated with Myc) Development. 2005;132:247–256. doi: 10.1242/dev.01578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bloom AJ, Miller BR, Sanes JR, DiAntonio A. The requirement for Phr1 in CNS axon tract formation reveals the corticostriatal boundary as a choice point for cortical axons. Genes Dev. 2007;21:2593–2606. doi: 10.1101/gad.1592107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lewcock JW, Genoud N, Lettieri K, Pfaff SL. The ubiquitin ligase Phr1 regulates axon outgrowth through modulation of microtubule dynamics. Neuron. 2007;56:604–620. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Richter KT, Kschonsak YT, Vodicska B, Hoffmann I. FBXO45-MYCBP2 regulates mitotic cell fate by targeting FBXW7 for degradation. Cell Death Differ. 2019 doi: 10.1038/s41418-019-0385-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Crawley O, et al. Autophagy is inhibited by ubiquitin ligase activity in the nervous system. Nat Commun. 2019;10:5017. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12804-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Pao KC, et al. Activity-based E3 ligase profiling uncovers an E3 ligase with esterification activity. Nature. 2018;556:381–385. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0026-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Burgess RW, et al. Evidence for a conserved function in synapse formation reveals Phr1 as a candidate gene for respiratory failure in newborn mice. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:1096–1105. doi: 10.1128/mcb.24.3.1096-1105.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Babetto E, Beirowski B, Russler EV, Milbrandt J, DiAntonio A. The Phr1 Ubiquitin Ligase Promotes Injury-Induced Axon Self-Destruction. Cell Rep. 2013;3:1422–1429. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.04.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Coleman MP, Hoke A. Programmed axon degeneration: from mouse to mechanism to medicine. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2020;21:183–196. doi: 10.1038/s41583-020-0269-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Xiong X, et al. The Highwire ubiquitin ligase promotes axonal degeneration by tuning levels of Nmnat protein. PLoS Biol. 2012;10 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001440. e1001440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pao KC, et al. Probes of ubiquitin E3 ligases enable systematic dissection of parkin activation. Nat Chem Biol. 2016;12:324–331. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Olsen SK, Capili AD, Lu X, Tan DS, Lima CD. Active site remodelling accompanies thioester bond formation in the SUMO E1. Nature. 2010;463:906–912. doi: 10.1038/nature08765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kamadurai HB, et al. Mechanism of ubiquitin ligation and lysine prioritization by a HECT E3. Elife. 2013;2 doi: 10.7554/eLife.00828. e00828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Streich FC, Jr, Lima CD. Capturing a substrate in an activated RING E3/E2-SUMO complex. Nature. 2016;536:304–308. doi: 10.1038/nature19071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wu PY, et al. A conserved catalytic residue in the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme family. EMBO J. 2003;22:5241–5250. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yunus AA, Lima CD. Lysine activation and functional analysis of E2-mediated conjugation in the SUMO pathway. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology. 2006;13:491–499. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Berndsen CE, Wiener R, Yu IW, Ringel AE, Wolberger C. A conserved asparagine has a structural role in ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes. Nat Chem Biol. 2013;9:154–156. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wilson RH, Zamfir S, Sumner I. Molecular dynamics simulations reveal a new role for a conserved active site asparagine in a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme. J Mol Graph Model. 2017;76:403–411. doi: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2017.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jones WM, Davis AG, Wilson RH, Elliott KL, Sumner I. A conserved asparagine in a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme positions the substrate for nucleophilic attack. J Comput Chem. 2019;40:1969–1977. doi: 10.1002/jcc.25852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bruice TC, Pandit UK. Intramolecular Models Depicting the Kinetic Importance of “Fit” in Enzymatic Catalysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1960;46:402–404. doi: 10.1073/pnas.46.4.402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zheng N, Wang P, Jeffrey PD, Pavletich NP. Structure of a c-Cbl-UbcH7 complex: RING domain function in ubiquitin-protein ligases. Cell. 2000;102:533–539. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00057-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mills KV, Johnson MA, Perler FB. Protein splicing: how inteins escape from precursor proteins. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:14498–14505. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R113.540310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Klabunde T, Sharma S, Telenti A, Jacobs WR, Jr, Sacchettini JC. Crystal structure of GyrA intein from Mycobacterium xenopi reveals structural basis of protein splicing. Nat Struct Biol. 1998;5:31–36. doi: 10.1038/nsb0198-31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Oneil KT, Degrado WF. A Thermodynamic Scale for the Helix-Forming Tendencies of the Commonly Occurring Amino-Acids. Science. 1990;250:646–651. doi: 10.1126/science.2237415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Schellman JA. The Factors Affecting the Stability of Hydrogen-Bonded Polypeptide Structures in Solution. J Phys Chem-Us. 1959;62:1485–1494. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zimm BH, Bragg JK. Theory of the Phase Transition between Helix and Random Coil in Polypeptide Chains. J Chem Phys. 1959;31:526–535. doi: 10.1063/1.1730390. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Gilley J, Mayer PR, Yu G, Coleman MP. Low levels of NMNAT2 compromise axon development and survival. Hum Mol Genet. 2019;28:448–458. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddy356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Stewart MD, et al. Tuning BRCA1 and BARD1 activity to investigate RING ubiquitin ligase mechanisms. Protein Sci. 2017;26:475–483. doi: 10.1002/pro.3091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Osterloh JM, et al. dSarm/Sarm1 is required for activation of an injury-induced axon death pathway. Science. 2012;337:481–484. doi: 10.1126/science.1223899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Essuman K, et al. The SARM1 Toll/Interleukin-1 Receptor Domain Possesses Intrinsic NAD(+) Cleavage Activity that Promotes Pathological Axonal Degeneration. Neuron. 2017;93:1334–1343. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.02.022. e1335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Loring HS, Thompson PR. Emergence of SARM1 as a Potential Therapeutic Target for Wallerian-type Diseases. Cell Chem Biol. 2020;27:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2019.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kabsch W., Xds Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2010;66:125–132. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909047337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Evans PR, Murshudov GN. How good are my data and what is the resolution? Acta Crystallogr D. 2013;69:1204–1214. doi: 10.1107/S0907444913000061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.McCoy AJ, et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J Appl Crystallogr. 2007;40:658–674. doi: 10.1107/S0021889807021206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2010;66:486–501. doi: 10.1107/S0907444910007493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Murshudov GN, et al. REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2011;67:355–367. doi: 10.1107/S0907444911001314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Moriarty NW, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Adams PD. electronic Ligand Builder and Optimization Workbench (eLBOW): a tool for ligand coordinate and restraint generation. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2009;65:1074–1080. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909029436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Afonine PV, et al. FEM: feature-enhanced map. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2015;71:646–666. doi: 10.1107/S1399004714028132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Brownell JE, et al. Substrate-assisted inhibition of ubiquitin-like protein-activating enzymes: the NEDD8 E1 inhibitor MLN4924 forms a NEDD8-AMP mimetic in situ. Mol Cell. 2010;37:102–111. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.12.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Stanley M, et al. Orthogonal thiol functionalization at a single atomic center for profiling transthiolation activity of E1 activating enzymes. ACS Chem Biol. 2015;10:1542–1554. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.5b00118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Sasaki Y, Vohra BP, Lund FE, Milbrandt J. Nicotinamide mononucleotide adenylyl transferase-mediated axonal protection requires enzymatic activity but not increased levels of neuronal nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide. J Neurosci. 2009;29:5525–5535. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5469-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary_Table1
Source Data for Fig3
Source Data for Extended Data Fig4
Source Data for Fig4
Source Data for Extended Data Fig5
Source Data for Extended Data Fig6
Source Data for Extended Data Fig8
Source Data for Extended Data Fig10

Data Availability Statement

Protein Data Bank coordinates and structure factors for RCR-E2-Ub have been deposited with accession code 6T7F. All DNA constructs were verified by DNA sequencing and are available through the Medical Research Council Protein Phosphorylation and Ubiquitylation Unit, University of Dundee, reagents website (https://mrcppureagents.dundee.ac.uk/). The data that supports these findings, including raw mass spectrometry and microscopy data, are available from the corresponding author upon request s.s.virdee@dundee.ac.uk.

RESOURCES