Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 12.
Published in final edited form as: Astron Astrophys. 2021 Apr 7;648:L3. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140642

TMC-1, the starless core sulfur factory: Discovery of NCS, HCCS, H2CCS, H2CCCS, and C4S and detection of C5S*

J Cernicharo 1, C Cabezas 1, M Agúndez 1, B Tercero 2,3, J R Pardo 1, N Marcelino 1, JD Gallego 3, F Tercero 3, JA López-Pérez 3, P de Vicente 3
PMCID: PMC7610586  EMSID: EMS120891  PMID: 33850333

Abstract

We report the detection of the sulfur-bearing species NCS, HCCS, H2CCS, H2CCCS, and C4S for the first time in space. These molecules were found towards TMC-1 through the observation of several lines for each species. We also report the detection of C5S for the first time in a cold cloud through the observation of five lines in the 31-50 GHz range. The derived column densities are N(NCS) = (7.8±0.6)×1011 cm−2, N(HCCS) = (6.8±0.6)×1011 cm−2, N(H2CCS) = (7.8±0.8)×1011 cm−2, N(H2CCCS) = (3.7±0.4)×1011 cm−2, N(C4S) = (3.8±0.4)×1010 cm−2, and N(C5S) = (5.0±1.0)×1010 cm−2. The observed abundance ratio between C3S and C4S is 340, that is to say a factor of approximately one hundred larger than the corresponding value for CCS and C3S. The observational results are compared with a state-of-the-art chemical model, which is only partially successful in reproducing the observed abundances. These detections underline the need to improve chemical networks dealing with S-bearing species.

Keywords: Astrochemistry, ISM: molecules, ISM: individual (TMC-1), line: identification, molecular data

1. Introduction

The cold dark core TMC-1 presents an interesting carbon-rich chemistry that leads to the formation of long neutral carbon-chain radicals and their anions, as well as cyanopolyynes (see Cernicharo et al. 2020a,b and references therein). The carbon chains CCS and CCCS are particularly abundant in this cloud (Saito et al. 1987; Yamamoto et al. 1987) and also exist in the envelopes of carbon-rich circumstellar envelopes (Cernicharo et al. 1987). TMC-1 is also peculiar due to the presence of protonated species of abundant large carbon chains such as HC3O+ (Cernicharo et al. 2020c), HC5NH+ (Marcelino et al. 2020), HC3S+ (Cernicharo et al. 2021a), and CH3CO+ (Cernicharo et al. 2021b). The number of sulfur-bearing species detected to date in TMC-1 is small compared to oxygen- and nitrogen-bearing species (see, e.g. McGuire et al. 2019). In fact, the chemistry of sulfur-bearing molecules is strongly dependent on the depletion of sulfur (Vidal et al. 2017). Many reactions involving S+ with neutrals as well as radicals with S and CS have to be studied to achieve a better chemical modelling of sulfur-bearing species (Petrie 1996; Bulut et al. 2021). Nevertheless, the main input to understand these chemical processes is to unveil new sulfur-bearing species in the interstellar medium as well as to understand their formation paths and their role in the chemistry of sulfur.

In this letter we report the discovery, for the first time in space, of the following five new sulfur-bearing species: NCS, HCCS, H2CCS, H2CCCS, and C4S. The detection of C5S in a cold dark cloud is also reported for the first time. A detailed observational study of the most relevant S-bearing species in this cloud is accomplished. We discuss these results in the context of state-of-the-art chemical models.

2. Observations

New receivers, built within the Nanocosmos project1, and installed at the Yebes 40m radio telescope were used for the observations of TMC-1. The receivers and the spectrometers have been described by Tercero et al. (2021). The observations needed to complete the Q-band line survey towards TMC-1 (α J2000 = 4h41m41.9s and δ J2000 = +25°41’27.0”) were performed in several sessions during December 2019 and January 2021. All data were analysed using the GILDAS package2. The observing procedure has been previously described (see, e.g. Cernicharo et al. 2021a,b). The IRAM 30m data come from a line survey performed towards TMC-1 and B1 and the observations have been described by Marcelino et al. (2007) and Cernicharo et al. (2013).

The intensity scale, antenna temperature (TA*) was calibrated using two absorbers at different temperatures and an atmospheric transmission model (ATM; Cernicharo 1985; Pardo et al. 2001). Calibration uncertainties have been adopted to be 10 %. The nominal spectral resolution of 38.15 kHz was used for the final spectra.

3. Results and discussion

Line identification in our TMC-1 survey has been performed using the MADEX catalogue (Cernicharo 2012), the Cologne Database of Molecular Spectroscopy catalogue (Müller et al. 2005), and the JPL catalogue (Pickett 1998). A description of the methods used to fit the data and to derive column densities is provided in Appendix A.

3.1. HCCS and NCS

Among the unidentified spectral features, we have found a couple separated by 1 MHz that perfectly match the frequencies of the strongest hyperfine components of the J=7/2-5/2 transition of HCCS (2Π3/2). This species was observed in the laboratory by Kim et al. (2002) and the prediction of its rotational spectrum is available in the CDMS (Müller et al. 2005) and MADEX (Cernicharo 2012) catalogues. Taking into account the perfect match in frequencies, the narrow linewidth of the emission features in this source, and the perfect match in the relative intensities of the two hyperfine components, the possibility of a fortuitous coincidence is very low. Hence, we conclude that these two lines arise from HCCS. The observed lines are shown in Fig. 1 and the derived line parameters are given in Table D.1. The synthetic spectrum on Fig. 1 corresponds to Tr=5 K and N(HCCS) = 6.8×1011 cm−2. We searched for HCCCS but only a 3σ upper limit to its column density of 2.4×1011 cm 2 can be given (see Table 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Observed lines of HCCS (panel a) and NCS (panels b and c) towards TMC-1. The abscissa corresponds to the rest frequency assuming a local standard of rest velocity of the source of 5.83 km s−1 (see text). Blanked channels correspond to negative features produced in the frequency switching data folding. The ordinate is the antenna temperature corrected for atmospheric and telescope losses in milliKelvin. Spectral resolution is 38.15 kHz. The red lines show the synthetic spectrum of HCCS and NCS for a rotational temperature of 5 K, a linewidth of 0.6 km s−1, and a column density of 6.8×1011 cm−2 and 7.8×1011 cm−2, respectively.

Table 1. Column densities of sulfur-bearing species in TMC-1.

Molecule Trot (K) N obs (cm−2) N calc (cm −2) e
CSa * 10.0 (3.50±0.40)×1014 3.1 × 1014
C34S* 10.0 (1.45±0.10)×1013
13C34S* 10.0 (1.45±0.20)×1011
HCS 5.0b (5.50±0.50)×1012 5.1 × 1010
HSC 5.0b (1.30±0.20)×1011
NCS 5.0b (7.80±0.60)×1011 2.5 × 1010
HCCS 5.0b (6.80±0.60)×1011 3.1 × 1010
H2CSc 10.0 (4.70±0.40)×1013 9.5 × 1012
CC34Sc 10.0 (1.80±0.18)×1012
o-H2CCS 7.0±1.0 (6.00±0.60)×1011 }1.8 × 1012
p-H2CCS 7.0±1.0 (1.80±0.20)×1011
0-H2CCCS 10.0±1.0 (3.00±0.30)×1011 }7.8 × 1010
p-H2CCCS 10.0±1.0 (6.50±0.60)×1010
CCS* 5.1±0.2 (5.50±0.65)×1013 3.8 × 1011
CC34S* 3.6±0.4 (5.00±0.50)×1012
CCCS* 5.8±0.2 (1.30±0.13)×1013 1.1 × 1013
CCC34S* 6.7±0.2 (5.30±0.50)×1011
C4S 7.0±1.0 (3.80±0.50)×1010 1.6 × 1010
C5S 7.0±1.0 (5.00±1.00)×1010 1.9 × 1011
HCS+ * 10.0 (1.00±0.10)×1013 1.7 × 1011
HC34s+ * 10.0 (7.10±0.70)×1011
HC3s+ * 10.0±2.0 (4.00±1.50)×1011 2.8 × 1011
HSCN 5.0 (5.80±0.60)×1011 3.7 × 109
HNCS 5.0 (3.80±0.40)×1011 1.2 × 1010
HC3Sd 5.0 ≤2.40×1011 1.5 × 1011
HCNSd 10.0 ≤6.00×1010 3.9 × 106
HSNCd 10.0 ≤2.00×1010
HSCS+d 5.0 ≤4.00×1012
HCCSHd 7.0 ≤3.00×1012
HCCCSHd 7.0 ≤2.40×1011

Notes.Entries in bold face correspond to the molecular species detected for the first time in space, or in TMC-1 (C5S).

(*)

Data from Cernicharo et al. (2021a).

(a)

Derived from C34S and the C3S/C3 34S abundance ratio.

(b)

Rotational temperature assumed identical to that of CCS.

(c)

Column density refers to the ortho or para species. Assuming an ortho/para ratio of 3, the total column density can be estimated by multiplying the para value by a factor of 4.

(d)

Upper limits correspond to 3<values derived assuming the indicated rotational temperature and a linewidth of 0.6 km s−1.

(e)

Maximum fractional abundance calculated in the 105-106 yr range was converted to column density using N(H2) = 1022 cm−2 (Cernicharo & Guélin 1987).

Thiocyanogen, NCS, has been observed in the laboratory (Amamo & Amano 1991; McCarthy et al. 2003; Maeda et al. 2007), but never detected in space. Only one rotational transition lies within the Q-band, the J=5/2-3/2 transition of NCS in its2 Π3/2 ladder. Figure 1 shows the three hyperfine components of this transition observed in TMC-1. The match between observations and the synthetic spectrum, corresponding to Tr=5 K and N(NCS) = 7.8×1011 cm−2, is remarkably good, ensuring the discovery of this sulfur compound in TMC-1. The oxygen analogue of thiocyanogen, the isocyanate radical (NCO), was detected in cold core L483 by Marcelino et al. (2018). Unfortunately, NCO does not have lines in the 31-50 GHz range.

3.2. H2CCS and H2CCCS

Prompted by the detection of HCCS, we searched for other sulfur-bearing species in our survey. McGuire et al. (2019) searched for H2CCS, thioketene, in TMC-1. They obtained an upper limit to its column density of 5.5×1012 cm−2. Unfortunately they used a transition with an upper level energy around 40 K, which is not the best for the physical conditions of TMC- 1. In this work we report the discovery of thioketene in space through observations of transitions with smaller upper level energies.

Spectroscopic laboratory data of thioketene (Georgiou et al. 1979; Winnewiser & Schäfer 1980; McNaughton et al. 1996) and H2CCCS (Brown et al. 1988) were used to predict the frequencies of these species and implement them in the MADEX code. The dipole moments adopted for H2CCS and H2CCCS are 1.02 D (Georgiou et al. 1979) and 2.06 D (Brown et al. 1988), respectively. We detected the four ortho and two para transitions of H2CCS expected in our data, as shown in Fig. 2. For H2CCCS (propadienthione), six ortho and three para transitions are detected (see seven of them in Fig. 3). The derived line parameters for both species are given in Table D.1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Observed transitions of H2CCS towards TMC-1. The abscissa corresponds to the velocity in km s−1 of the source with respect to the local standard of rest. Line parameters are given in Table D.1. The ordinate is the antenna temperature corrected for atmospheric and telescope losses in milliKelvin. Blanked channels correspond to negative features produced by the folding of the frequency switching observations. The vertical blue dashed line indicates the vLSR of the cloud (5.83 kms−1). The red line spectra correspond to the synthetic model spectrum for each line adopting Tr=7 K, N(o-H2CCS) = 6.0×1011 cm−2, and N(p- H2CCS) = 1.8×1011 cm−2 (see text).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Selected transitions of H2CCCS towards TMC-1. The abscissa corresponds to the velocity in km s−1 of the source with respect to the local standard of rest. Line parameters are given in Table D.1. The ordinate is the antenna temperature corrected for atmospheric and telescope losses in milliKelvin. Blanked channels correspond to negative features produced by the folding of the frequency switching observations. The vertical blue dashed line indicates the vLSR of the cloud (5.83 kms−1). The red line spectra correspond to the synthetic model of the emission obtained for Tr =10 K, N(o-H2CCS) = 3.0×1011 cm−2, and N(p-H2CCS) = 6.5×1010 cm−2.

An analysis of the data through a standard rotation diagram provides rotational temperatures of 7±1 K and 10±1 K for H2CCS and H2CCCS, respectively. For H2CCS, we derived N(ortho) = (6.0±0.6)×1011 cm−2 and N(para) = (1.8±0.2)×1011 cm−2. Hence, the ortho/para ratio for this species is 3.3±0.7. For H2CCCS, we derived N(ortho) = (3.0±0.3)×1011 cm−2 and N(para) = (6.5±0.5)×1010 cm−2, respectively. The ortho/para abundance ratio derived for this species is 4.6±0.8. These ortho/para ratios are compatible with the 3/1 value expected from the statitiscal spin degeneracies. They imply that non-significant enrichment of the para species is produced through reactions of H2CCS and H2CCCS with H3+, or other protonated molecular cations. The synthetic spectrum computed with these parameters for both species is shown in red in the different panels of Figures 2 and 3. The derived abundance ratio between H2CCS and H2CCCS is ≃2, which is very different from the H2CCO/H2CCCO abundance ratio of > 130 derived in the same source by Cernicharo et al. (2020c), but very similar to the C2S/C3S abundance ratio of ~3 derived here (see Table 1).

3.3. C4S and C5S

Taking the large column density derived for CCS and C3S into account (Cernicharo et al. 2021a), the next member of this family, C4S, is a potential candidate to be present in TMC-1. The spectroscopic laboratory data used to predict the spectrum of C4S are from Hirahara et al. (1993) and Gordon et al. (2001). A dipole moment of 4.03 D was computed through ab initio calculations by Pascoli & Lavendy (1998) and Lee (1997). Nineteen transitions of this species have frequencies within the range of our line survey. The line by line search through our data provides a clear detection for the Nu=10 up to 13, Ju=Nu+1 transitions (see Fig. B.1). A rotational temperature of 7±1 K was derived from these lines. The model fitting method (see Appendix A) was used to derive a column density of (3.8±0.4)×1010 cm−2. The stacked spectrum obtained for these lines and for the weaker Ju=N and Ju=N-1 transitions are shown in panels (b) and (c) of Fig. B.1, respectively.

The next member of the CnS family, C5S, was tentatively detected towards the carbon-rich star CW Leo by Bell et al. (1993) and confirmed by Agúndez et al. (2014). Laboratory spectroscopy from Gordon et al. (2001) and a dipole moment of 4.65 D (Pascoli & Lavendy 1998) have been adopted. Five lines from Ju=17 up to 21 have been detected (see Fig. B.2). The model fitting provides a rotational temperature of 7±2K and a column density of (5.0±1.0)×1010 cm−2. The abundance ratio between C4S and C5S is of the order of unity, and the abundance ratio C2S/C3S/C4S/C5S is 5500/1300/3.8/5.0. The change in abundance for C4S and C5S relative to C2S is of three orders of magnitude. This result is very different than the one obtained by Agúndez et al. (2014) for the carbon-rich star IRC+10216. In this object, the derived C3S/C5S ratio is ~ 1-10 (depending on the assumed rotational temperature), versus ~260 in TMC-1. However, the C2S/C3S abundance ratio is the same for both sources, that is to say ~3. The radical C4S has not been detected yet in IRC+10216 (Agúndez et al. 2014). S-bearing carbon chains do not follow the smooth decrease in abundance observed in cold dark clouds and circumstellar envelopes for other carbon chains such as cyanopolyynes (HC2n+1N; a factor 3-5 between members of this molecular species).

3.4. Chemical models

The chemistry of sulfur-bearing molecules in cold dark clouds was recently discussed by Vidal et al. (2017), Vastel et al. (2018), and Laas & Caselli (2019), based on new chemical network developments. These studies revealed that the chemistry of sulfur strongly depends on the poorly constrained degree of depletion of this element in cold dense clouds. Chemical networks are relatively incomplete when dealing with S-bearing species. For example, from the six species detected in this work, only C4S is included in the chemical networks RATE12 (UMIST; McElroy et al. 2013) and kida.uva.2014 (KIDA; Wakelam et al. 2015). Vidal et al. (2017) made an effort to expand the number of reactions involving S-bearing species significantly by including several of the molecules reported here. These authors, however, discussed only a small number of sulfur compounds and did not provide calculated abundances for any of the six species reported in this work. We therefore carried out chemical modelling calculations to describe the chemistry of the new sulfur-bearing molecules detected. We used the gas-phase chemical network RATE12 from the UMIST database (McElroy et al. 2013), expanded with the set of gas-phase reactions involving S-bearing species constructed by Vidal et al. (2017). We included additional reactions to describe the chemistry of NCS and C5S, which was not treated by Vidal et al. (2017), assuming a similar chemical kinetics behaviour to NCO and C3S, respectively (see Table E.1). Our main purpose is to see whether state-of-the-art gas-phase chemical networks can explain the abundances of the S-bearing species discovered. We adopted typical parameters of cold dark clouds: a gas kinetic temperature of 10 K, a volume density of H2 of 2 × 104 cm−3, a visual extinction of 30 mag, a cosmic-ray ionisation rate of H2 of 1.3 × 10−17 s−1, and ‘low-metal’ elemental abundances (see, e.g. Agúndez & Wakelam 2013). We therefore adopted a relatively low gas-phase abundance of sulfur, 8 × 10−8 relative to H.

Calculated column densities for S-bearing species are compared with observed values in Table 1. In Fig. 4 we compare the abundances calculated for the six S-bearing species detected in this study with the values derived from the observations. The peak abundances calculated are within one order of magnitude of the observed abundance for H2CCS, H2CCCS, C4S, and C5S. The two species for which the chemical model severely disagrees with observations are NCS and HCCS, in which case calculated abundances are lower than observed by more than one order of magnitude. These two species have low calculated abundances because they are assumed to react quickly with O atoms, with rate coefficients ≳ 10−10 cm3 s−1. This same behaviour has been previously found for other radicals detected in cold dark clouds such as HCCO (Agúndez et al. 2015) and C2S (Cernicharo et al. 2021a; see also Table 1). In these cases, the fast destruction with neutral atoms, including O, resulted in calculated abundances well below the observed values. These facts suggest that either the abundance of O atoms calculated by gas-phase chemical models of cold clouds is too high or O atoms are not as reactive with certain radicals as currently thought. While the low-temperature reactivity of O atoms with closed-shell S-bearing species such as CS has been shown to be low (Bulut et al. 2021), its reactivity with radicals is very poorly known.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Calculated fractional abundances of the six S-bearing species reported in this work as a function of time. Horizontal dotted lines correspond to observed values in TMC-1 adopting a column density of H2 of 1022 cm−2 (Cernicharo & Guélin 1987).

The radical NCS is formed in the chemical model through the reactions CN + SO and N + HCS. The kinetics and product distribution of these reactions is, however, largely unconstrained. This uncertainty also affects the chemical network involving the family of CHNS isomers, for which the chemical model underestimates the column densities (see Table 1). In the chemical models of dark clouds performed by Adande et al. (2010) and Vidal et al. (2017), the main formation pathways to these molecules involve grain surface reactions, which are not included in our chemical network.

The formation of the other five molecules reported in this work, which are S-bearing carbon chains and thus can be represented by the formula HmCnS, occurs through two types of chemical routes. The first one involves neutral-neutral reactions. Along this pathway, HCCS is formed by the reactions C + H2CS and OH + C3S, the reaction S + C2H3 yields H2CCS, while H2CCCS is mostly formed by the reaction S + CH2CCH. On the other hand, the carbon chain C4S is formed through the reactions S + C4H and C + HC3S, while C5S is produced in the reactions C4H + CS and S + C5H. It must be noted that the kinetics and product distribution of these reactions is very poorly known. Most of these reactions are assumed to proceed with capture rate coefficients by Vidal et al. (2017).

The second pathway consists of reactions involving cations, which ultimately lead to the ion HpCn S+, which dissociatively recombines with electrons to yield HmCnS, where typically p = m + 1. In this route, the ions H2CCS+, H3CCS+, H3CCCS+, HC4S+, and HC5S+ are the precursors of HCCS, H2CCS, H2CCCS, C4S, and C5S, respectively. The abovementioned ions are in turn formed through reactions between atomic S with hydrocarbon ions and S+ with neutral hydrocarbons. In the same line of the reactions discussed above, there are large uncertainties regarding these reactions, for which rate coefficients and product distributions are taken from Vidal et al. (2017). The chemical network is probably incomplete in that it misses important reactions involving S and S+. Moreover, reactions on grain surfaces, which are considered by Vidal et al. (2017) but are not taken into account here, could play an important role.

4. Conclusions

In this work, we present the detection of five new sulfur-bearing molecules in TMC-1: NCS, HCCS, H2CCS, H2CCCS, and C4S. In addition, the species C5S previously found only towards carbon-rich circumstellar envelopes is also detected in a cold dark cloud for the first time. Chemical models fail to reproduce the observed column densities which implies that the chemical networks are incomplete and that laboratory and theoretical work has to be performed in order to understand the chemistry of sulfur in cold prestellar cores.

Supplementary Material

Appendix

Acknowledgements

The Spanish authors thank Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación for funding support through projects AYA2016-75066-C2-1-P, PID2019-106235GB-I00 and PID2019-107115GB-C211/AEII/10.13039/501100011033, and grant RyC-2014-16277. We also thank ERC for funding through grant ERC-2013-Syg-610256-NANOCOSMOS.

Footnotes

References

  1. Adande GR, Halfen DT, Ziurys LM, et al. ApJ. 2010;725:561. [Google Scholar]
  2. Agúndez M, Wakelam V. Chem Rev. 2013;113:8710. doi: 10.1021/cr4001176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Agúndez M, Cernicharo J, Guélin M. A&A. 2014;570:A45. [Google Scholar]
  4. Agúndez M, Cernicharo J, Guélin M. A&A. 2015;577:L5. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Agúndez M, Marcelino N, Cernicharo J, Tafalla M. A&A. 2018;611:L1. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Amano Takayosi, Amano Takako. J Chem Phys. 1991;95:2275. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bell MB, Avery LW, Feldman PA. ApJ. 1993;417:L37. [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown RD, Godfrey PD, Champion R, Woodruff M. Aust J Chem. 1982;35:1747. [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown RD, Dyall KG, Elmes PS, et al. J Am Chem Soc. 1988;110:789. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bulut N, Roncero O, Aguado A, et al. A&A. 2021;646:A5. [Google Scholar]
  11. Cabezas C, Endo Y, Roueff E, et al. A&A. 2021;646:L1. [Google Scholar]
  12. Crabtree KN, Martin-Drumel M-A, Brown GG, et al. J Chem Phys. 2016;144:124201. doi: 10.1063/1.4944072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cernicharo J. Internal IRAM report. IRAM; Granada: 1985. [Google Scholar]
  14. Cernicharo J, Guélin M. A&A. 1987;176:299. [Google Scholar]
  15. Cernicharo J, Guélin M, Hein H, Kahane C. A&A. 1987;181:L9. [Google Scholar]
  16. Cernicharo J. In: ECLA 2011: Proc of the European Conference on Laboratory Astrophysics, EAS Publications Series. Stehl C, Joblin C, d’Hendecourt L, editors. Cambridge Univ. Press; Cambridge: 2012. p. 251. 2012 https://nanocosmos.iff.csic.es/?page_id=1619. [Google Scholar]
  17. Cernicharo J, Tercero B, Fuente A, et al. ApJ. 2013;771:L10. [Google Scholar]
  18. Cernicharo J, Cabezas C, Pardo JR, et al. A&A. 2019;630:L2. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Cernicharo J, Marcelino N, Pardo JR, et al. A&A. 2020a;641:L9. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Cernicharo J, Marcelino N, Agúndez M, et al. A&A. 2020b;642:L8. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Cernicharo J, Marcelino N, Agúndez M, et al. A&A. 2020c;642:L17. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Cernicharo J, Cabezas C, Endo Y, et al. A&A. 2021a;646:L3. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202040013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Cernicharo J, Cabezas C, Bailleux S, et al. A&A. 2021b;646:L7. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202040076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Cernicharo J, Cabezas C, Agúndez M, et al. A&A. 2021c in press. [Google Scholar]
  25. Dunning TH. J Chem Phys. 1989;90:1007. [Google Scholar]
  26. Endo Y, Kohguchi H, Ohshima Y. Faraday Discuss. 1994;97:341. [Google Scholar]
  27. Fossé D, Cernicharo J, Gerin M, Cox P. ApJ. 2001;552:168. [Google Scholar]
  28. Frerking MA, Linke RA, Thaddeus P. ApJ. 1979;234:L143. [Google Scholar]
  29. Georgiou K, Kroto HW, Landsberg BM. J Mol Spectrosc. 1979;77:365. [Google Scholar]
  30. Gordon VD, McCarthy MC, Apponi AJ, Thaddeus P. ApJS. 2001;134:311. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kaifu N, Ohishi M, Kawaguchi K, et al. PASJ. 2004;56:69. [Google Scholar]
  32. Halfen DT, Ziurys LM, Brünken S, et al. ApJ. 2009;702:L124. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hirahara Y, Ohshima Y, Endo Y. ApJ. 1993;408:L113. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hirahara Y, Ohshima Y, Endo Y. J Chem Phys. 1994;101:7342. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kim E, Habara H, Yamamoto S. J Mol Spectrosc. 2002;212:83. [Google Scholar]
  36. Laas JC, Caselli P. A&A. 2019;624:A108. [Google Scholar]
  37. Lee S. Chem Phys Lett. 1997;268:69. [Google Scholar]
  38. Lee KL, Martin-Drumel M-A, Lattanzi V, et al. Mol Phys. 2019;117:1381. [Google Scholar]
  39. Lique F, Spielfield A, Dubernet ML, Feautrier N. J Chem Phys. 2005;123:4316. doi: 10.1063/1.2004994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lique F, Cernicharo J, Cox P. ApJ. 2006;653:1342. [Google Scholar]
  41. Loison J-C, Agúndez M, Marcelino N, et al. MNRAS. 2016;456:4101. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Maeda A, Habara H, Amano T. Mol Phys. 2007;105:477. [Google Scholar]
  43. Marcelino N, Cernicharo J, Agúndez M, et al. ApJ. 2007;665:L127. [Google Scholar]
  44. Marcelino N, Agúndez M, Cernicharo J, et al. A&A. 2018;612:L10. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Marcelino N, Agúndez M, Tercero B, et al. A&A. 2020a;643:L6. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. McElroy D, Walsh C, Markwick AJ, et al. A&A. 2013;550:A36. [Google Scholar]
  47. McGuire BA, Martin-Drumel MA, Thorwirth S, et al. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2010;18 22693. [Google Scholar]
  48. McGuire BA, Shingledecker CN, Willis ER, et al. ApJ. 2019;883:201. [Google Scholar]
  49. McCarthy MC, Coosky AL, Mohamed S, et al. ApJS. 2003;144:287. [Google Scholar]
  50. McCarthy MC, Thaddeus P, Wilke J, et al. J Chem Phys. 2009;130 doi: 10.1063/1.3137057. 234304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Müller HSP, Schlöder F, Stutzki J, Winnewisser G. J Mol Struct. 2005;742:215. [Google Scholar]
  52. McNaughton D, Robertson EG, Hathlerly LD. J Mol Spectrosc. 1996;175:377. [Google Scholar]
  53. Pascoli G, Lavendy H. Int Jour Mass Spectr. 1998;181:11. [Google Scholar]
  54. Pardo JR, Cernicharo J, Serabyn E. IEEE Trans Antennas and Propagation. 2001;49:12. [Google Scholar]
  55. Petrie S. MNRAS. 1996;281:666. [Google Scholar]
  56. Pickett HM, Poynter RL, Cohen EA, et al. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer. 1998;60:883. [Google Scholar]
  57. Puzzarini C. Chem Phys. 2008;346:45. [Google Scholar]
  58. Saito S, Kawaguchi K, Yamamoto S, et al. ApJ. 1987;317:L115. [Google Scholar]
  59. Tercero F, López-Pérez JA, Gallego, et al. A&A. 2021;645:A37. [Google Scholar]
  60. Vastel C, Quénard D, Le Gal R, et al. MNRAS. 2018;478:5514. [Google Scholar]
  61. Vidal THG, Loison J-C, Jaziri AY, et al. MNRAS. 2017;469:435. [Google Scholar]
  62. Wakelam V, Loison J-C, Herbst E, et al. ApJS. 2015;217:20. [Google Scholar]
  63. Wierzejewska M, Moc J. J Phys Chem A. 2003;107 11209. [Google Scholar]
  64. Winnewiser M, Schäfer E. Z Naturforsch. 1980;35a:483. [Google Scholar]
  65. Yamamoto S, Saito S, Kawaguchi K, et al. ApJ. 1987;317:L119. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Appendix

RESOURCES