Abstract
CMOS high-density transducer arrays enable fundamentally new neuroscientific insights through, e.g., facilitating investigation of axonal signaling characteristics, with the “axonal” side of neuronal activity being largely inaccessible to established methods. They also enable high-throughput monitoring of potentially all action potentials in a larger neuronal network (> 1000 neurons) over extended time to see developmental effects or effects of disturbances. Applications include research in neural diseases and pharmacology.
Introduction
To understand how functions and characteristics of neuronal networks arise from the concerted interactions of the involved neurons, it is necessary to have methods that allow for interacting with neuronal functional subunits and ensembles - somas, axons, dendrites, single neurons, and entire networks - at high spatiotemporal resolution and in real time (1–3). Extracellular electrical recordings by means of microtransducer arrays complement well-established patch clamp techniques (4, 5) and optical or optogenetic techniques (6–9).
The use of CMOS technology helps to overcome the connectivity problem of how to interface thousands of tightly-spaced electrodes, while, at the same time, it improves signal-to-noise characteristics, as signal conditioning is done on chip next to where the partially very small signals (< 10 μV) are generated (10–12). Here, we demonstrate how CMOS high-density microelectrode arrays (HD-MEAs) featuring several thousands of transducers (> 3’000 transducers per mm2) can be used to record from or stimulate potentially any individual neuron or subcellular compartment on the CMOS chip (10–15).
CMOS HD-MEA Systems
Several different approaches relying on metal electrodes or open-gate field-effect transistors (FETs), as schematically shown in Fig. 1a, have been pursued (10–13). In the case of open-gate FET transducers, additional stimulation spots are needed and distributed between the electrodes. A sensor site and the surrounding stimulation site can be seen in Fig. 1b.
Figure 1. CMOS realization of an open-gate field-effect transistor array.
(a) Schematic cross section of a CMOS chip; the transistor gate is connected via several metal layers and vias to an electrode on top of the chip, which is covered by a dielectric material, such as high-k Ti-Zr oxide. Adapted from (13). (b) Chip surface of a fabricated CMOS-based HD-MEA based on opengate FETs. The much larger stimulation site completely surrounds the sensor site in the center (11).
Besides the comparably large, planar in-vitro systems, which are in the focus of this contribution, there are also CMOSbased needle-type probes for recording and stimulation in vivo that have been pioneered at the University of Michigan (3, 16–20) and adopted by other groups (21, 22). Such electrode arrays are inserted into the living brain and facilitate advances in the understanding of the nervous system. Merged with on-chip circuitry, signal processing, microfluidics, and wireless interfaces, they are forming the basis for a family of neural prostheses for the possible treatment of disorders, such as blindness, deafness, paralysis, severe epilepsy, and Parkinson’s disease (18, 22).
In the case of the transducer arrays for in-vivo or in-vitro applications, there are two conflicting key CMOS system design requirements: (i) high signal-to-noise ratio to detect partially very small signals and, at the same time, (ii) high spatial resolution. High spatial resolution requires small electrodes and small pitch and permits only very few and small circuitry elements to be realized within each electrode pixel (13, 23). Little available space for circuitry, however, translates into higher noise levels, as the noise of transistors usually scales with size, so that the signal quality is compromised by the very circuitry that enables its readout. Therefore, noise or signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio is a pivotal issue for high-density pixel-based approaches. By applying a switch matrix concept, it was possible to devise CMOS microsystems that feature (i) high S/N ratio and (ii) high spatio-temporal resolution (12, 24) at the expense of not being able to read out all electrodes or transducers simultaneously.
As one example, we show here in Fig. 3 a HD-MEA system featuring a sensing area of 3.85 × 2.10 mm2 hosting 26’400 Pt electrodes of 7 μm diameter at a center-to-center pitch of 17.5 μm (12, 14). The switch matrix allows for simultaneously routing user-configurable selections of electrodes to 1024 recording channels with 10-bit 20-kS/s A/D conversion and 32 stimulation units at the array periphery. The readout channels provide programmable bandwidth and gain up to 78.3 dB. The integrated noise voltage of the full readout chain is 2.4 μVrms in the actionpotential (AP) signal band (300 Hz–10 kHz). The switch matrix can be reprogrammed within 1.4 ms to adapt to the morphology of the biological sample. Possible configurations include single electrodes, sets of electrodes at points of interest, or multiple contiguous high-density blocks of up to 23×23 electrodes.
Figure 3.
CMOS-based bidirectional HD-MEA system. 26’400 metal electrodes (Pt) at the center of the chip (3.85 x 2.1 mm2) are surrounded by readout, stimulation, and addressing circuitry units (scale bar: 1 mm) (12).
A disadvantage of CMOS chips is that silicon is not transparent to visible light in contrast to standard cell culture substrates used in biology. Additionally, the chip or its components can corrode upon operation and long-term exposure to liquids (salt water). Therefore, a good packaging solution is needed, on the one hand, to protect the chip against metabolic products and chemicals of the cell culture, and, on the other hand, to prevent the cells from being poisoned or disturbed by toxic materials released by the chip, such as the CMOS metals aluminum or copper that dissolve in saline solution.
Measurement Results
With this system it was possible to record subcellularresolution data in various preparations. Figure 4 shows the electrical signals of 3 neurons, recorded by the HD-MEA at full resolution and superimposed to a fluorescence image of the cell culture (MAP2-staining). The signals of three neurons as obtained from the respective electrode sites (rounded white rectangles) are displayed in green (top left neuron), red (top right) and blue (bottom right). It is evident that many electrodes record from the same neuron and that every electrode simultaneously records activity of several neurons.
Figure 4.
Electrical signals of 3 neurons, recorded by the HD-MEA at full resolution and superimposed to a fluorescence image of the cell culture (MAP2 staining). Spike-triggered signal averages (50 trials) in green (top left neuron), red (top right) and blue (bottom right) for each electrode site (rounded white rectangles). Only signals exceeding 50 μV are displayed for clarity (14).
Figure 5 shows network recordings. 2000 individual single cells were identified through spike sorting of HD-MEA data (25–27), and the color-coding indicates the action potential spike amplitudes. The fluorescence image of transfected cells of the same culture shows clusters of neurons and tracks of neurite bundles.
Figure 5.
Network recordings. Top: 2000 individual single cells identified through spike sorting of HD-MEA data; circles indicate cell footprints that exceed 4.5 standard deviations of the electrode noise; color-coding indicates AP spike amplitudes. Bottom: fluorescence image of transfected cells of the same culture; clearly visible are clusters of neurons and tracks of neurite bundles (14).
It is also possible to detect small signals of action potentials traveling along thin axons (~100 nm diameter) as shown in Figure 6 (14, 28). Axonal signals across a branching point were recorded by simultaneously using 841 electrodes. The action potential waveforms that have been recorded from the electrodes marked in red in Fig. 6 are shown in Fig. 7. Typical axonal signal characteristics are observed: tri-phasic, first-positive signals (14, 28). The grey lines represent individual signal traces, the black line the spike-triggered average signal.
Figure 6.
Axonal signals across a branching point recorded by simultaneously using 841 electrodes. “Electrical image” of the axonal signals of rat cortical neurons at DIV 18 (14).
Figure 7.
Axonal signal traces recorded by simultaneously using 841 electrodes. Waveforms of the action potentials traveling along the axon as recorded from the electrodes marked in red in Figure 6. Typical axonal signal characteristics are observed: tri-phasic, first-positive signals (14, 28). The grey lines represent individual signal traces, the black line the spike-triggered average signal (14).
Additionally, CMOS microtransducer arrays offer the capability to bi-directionally interact, also in closed loop and real time, with potentially every single neuron in a given neuronal network (14, 28, 29). Due to sophisticated postprocessing procedures and packaging strategies, CMOS chips have been proven to be long-term-stable and viable in cell cultures over weeks to months (12, 14).
Figure 2.
Very compact integrated neural recording microsystem frontend on an index finger featuring 64 electrodes: 4 electrodes per shank and 4 chips with 4 shanks each. At the right the cable connection can be seen (16, 17).
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank A. Stettler for post-processing CMOS chips, M. Radivojevi, D. Jäckel for ideas and discussions, and T. Horn and E. Montani for help with microscopy. This work was financially supported by FP7 of the European Union through the ERC Advanced Grant “NeuroCMOS” under contract number AdG 267351, and by the Swiss National Science Foundation through Grant 205321_157092/1 and Sinergia grant CRSII3_141801.
References
- (1).Alivisatos AP, Andrews AM, Boyden ES, Chun M, Church GM, Deisseroth K, et al. Nanotools for neuroscience and brain activity mapping. ACS nano. 2013;7:1850–1866. doi: 10.1021/nn4012847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).Marblestone AH, Zamft BM, Maguire YG, Shapiro MG, Cybulski TR, Glaser JI, et al. Physical principles for scalable neural recording. Frontiers in computational neuroscience. 2013;7 doi: 10.3389/fncom.2013.00137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).Buzsaki G, Stark E, Berenyi A, Khodagholy D, Kipke DR, Yoon E, et al. Tools for Probing Local Circuits: High-Density Silicon Probes Combined with Optogenetics. Neuron. 2015 Apr;86:92–105. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.01.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Neher E, Sakmann B. Single-channel currents recorded from membranes of denervated frog muscle fibres. Nature. 1976 Apr 29;260:799–802. doi: 10.1038/260799a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).Cole KS. Dynamic electrical characteristics of the squid axon membrane. Arch Sci physiol. 1949;3:253–258. [Google Scholar]
- (6).Hochbaum DR, Zhao Y, Farhi SL, Klapoetke N, Werley CA, Kapoor V, et al. All-optical electrophysiology in mammalian neurons using engineered microbial rhodopsins. Nat Methods. 2014 Aug;11:825–33. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).Scanziani M, Häusser M. Electrophysiology in the age of light. Nature. 2009;461:930–9. doi: 10.1038/nature08540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).Peterka DS, Takahashi H, Yuste R. Imaging voltage in neurons. Neuron. 2011 Jan 13;69:9–21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.12.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).Grienberger C, Konnerth A. Imaging calcium in neurons. Neuron. 2012 Mar 8;73:862–85. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Berdondini L, Imfeld K, Maccione A, Tedesco M, Neukom S, Koudelka-Hep M, et al. Active pixel sensor array for high spatiotemporal resolution electrophysiological recordings from single cell to large scale neuronal networks. Lab on a Chip. 2009;9:2644–2651. doi: 10.1039/b907394a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11).Bertotti G, Velychko D, Dodel N, Keil S, Wolansky D, Tillak B, et al. A CMOS-based sensor array for in-vitro neural tissue interfacing with 4225 recording sites and 1024 stimulation sites. Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (Bio CAS), 2014 IEEE; 2014. pp. 304–307. [Google Scholar]
- (12).Ballini M, Müller J, Livi P, Yihui C, Frey U, Stettler A, et al. A 1024-Channel CMOS Microelectrode Array With 26,400 Electrodes for Recording and Stimulation of Electrogenic Cells In Vitro. Solid State Circuits, IEEE Journal of. 2014;49:2705–2719. doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2014.2359219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).Eversmann B, Jenkner M, Hofmann F, Paulus C, Brederlow R, Holzapfl B, et al. A 128 × 128 CMOS biosensor array for extracellular recording of neural activity. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits. 2003;38:2306–2317. [Google Scholar]
- (14).Müller J, Ballini M, Livi P, Chen Y, Radivojevic M, Shadmani A, et al. High-resolution CMOS MEA platform to study neurons at subcellular, cellular, and network levels. Lab Chip. 2015;15:2767–2780. doi: 10.1039/c5lc00133a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).Eversmann B, Lambacher A, Gerling T, Kunze A, Fromherz P, Thewes R. A neural tissue interfacing chip for in-vitro applications with 32k recording/stimulation channels on an active area of 2.6 mm 2. ESSCIRC (ESSCIRC), 2011 Proceedings of the. 2011:211–214. [Google Scholar]
- (16).Perlin GE, Wise KDJPs. Ultra-Compact Integration for Fully-Implantable Neural Microsystems. IEEE 22nd International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, 2009, (IEEE MEMS 2009); Sorrento, Italy. 2009. pp. 228–231. [Google Scholar]
- (17).Sodagar AM, Perlin GE, Yao Y, Wise KD, Najafi K. An implantable microsystem for wireless multi-channel cortical recording. Transducers ’07 & Eurosensors Xxi, Digest of Technical Papers, Vols 1 and 2. 2007:U38–U39. [Google Scholar]
- (18).Wise KD, Sodagar AM, Yao Y, Gulari MN, Perlin GE, Najafi K. Microelectrodes, microelectronics, and implantable neural microsystems. Proceedings of the Ieee. 2008;96:1184–1202. [Google Scholar]
- (19).Wu F, Stark E, Im M, Cho IJ, Yoon ES, Buzsaki G, et al. An implantable neural probe with monolithically integrated dielectric waveguide and recording electrodes for optogenetics applications. Journal of Neural Engineering. 2013 Oct;10 doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/10/5/056012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (20).Borna A, Najafi K. A Low Power Light Weight Wireless Multichannel Microsystem for Reliable Neural Recording. Ieee Journal of Solid-State Circuits. 2014 Feb;49:439–451. [Google Scholar]
- (21).Seidl K, Herwik S, Torfs T, Neves HP, Paul O, Ruther P. CMOS-based high-density silicon microprobe arrays for electronic depth control in intracortical neural recording. Microelectromechanical Systems, Journal of. 2011;20:1439–1448. [Google Scholar]
- (22).Ruther P, Paul O. New approaches for CMOS-based devices for large-scale neural recording. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2015 Jun;32:31–37. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2014.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (23).Lambacher A, Jenkner M, Merz M, Eversmann B, Kaul RA, Hofmann F, et al. Electrical imaging of neuronal activity by multitransistor-array (MTA) recording at 7.8 mu m resolution. Applied Physics A-Materials Science & Processing. 2004;79:1607–1611. [Google Scholar]
- (24).Frey U, Sedivy J, Heer F, Pedron R, Ballini M, Mueller J, et al. Switch-Matrix-Based High-Density Microelectrode Array in CMOS Technology. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits. 2010 Feb;45:467–482. [Google Scholar]
- (25).Franke F, Jäckel D, Dragas J, Muller J, Radivojevic M, Bakkum D, et al. High-density microelectrode array recordings and real-time spike sorting for closed-loop experiments: an emerging technology to study neural plasticity. Front Neural Circuits. 2012;6:105. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2012.00105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (26).Jäckel D, Frey U, Fiscella M, Franke F, Hierlemann A. Applicability of independent component analysis on high-density microelectrode array recordings. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2012 Jul;108:334–348. doi: 10.1152/jn.01106.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (27).Einevoll GT, Franke F, Hagen E, Pouzat C, Harris KD. Towards reliable spike-train recordings from thousands of neurons with multielectrodes. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2012 Feb;22:11–7. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2011.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (28).Bakkum DJ, Frey U, Radivojevic M, Russell TL, Müller J, Fiscella M, et al. Tracking axonal action potential propagation on a high-density microelectrode array across hundreds of sites. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2181. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (29).Müller J, Bakkum DJ, Hierlemann A. Sub-millisecond closed-loop feedback stimulation between arbitrary sets of individual neurons. Front Neural Circuits. 2012;6:121. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2012.00121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]







