Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 16.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Endocr Metab Res. 2020 Jul 2;16:10–28. doi: 10.1016/j.coemr.2020.06.007

Calcium-sensing receptor signaling — How human disease informs biology

Caroline M Gorvin 1,2,
PMCID: PMC7611003  EMSID: EMS127175  PMID: 34141952

Abstract

The calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR) is a class C G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that plays a fundamental role in extracellular calcium homeostasis by regulating parathyroid hormone (PTH) release. Although the CaSR was identified over 25 years ago, new mechanistic details of how the CaSR controls PTH secretion have recently been uncovered demonstrating heteromerization and phosphate binding affect CaSR-mediated suppression of PTH release. In addition, understanding of how the CaSR performs diverse functions in different cellular contexts is just beginning to be elucidated, with new evidence of tissue-specific regulation, and endo-somal signaling. Insights into CaSR activation mechanisms and signaling bias have arisen from studies of CaSR mutations, which cause disorders of calcium homeostasis. Functional assessment of these mutations demonstrated the importance of the homodimer interface and transmembrane domain in biased signaling and showed CaSR mutations can facilitate G-protein-independent signaling. Population genetics studies have allowed a greater understanding of the prevalence of calcemic disorders and revealed new pathophysiological roles.

Keywords: Hypercalcemia, Hypocalcemia, Parathyroid hormone, Signaling bias, Sustained signaling

Introduction

The calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR) plays a critical role in extracellular calcium (Ca2+ e) homeostasis by regulating parathyroid hormone (PTH) release and urinary calcium excretion (Figure 1). The CaSR binds Ca2+ within its extracellular venus flytrap (VFT) domain [1,2] to activate signaling pathways via: Gi/o, suppressing cAMP and activating mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK); and Gq/11-phospholipase-C (PLC), mobilizing intracellular calcium (Ca2+i) release and activating MAPK [3,4]. CaSR mutations cause disorders of calcium homeostasis. Inactivating mutations cause familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type-1 (FHH1), characterized by lifelong elevated serum calcium, moderate-to-high PTH concentrations, and low renal calcium excretion; and rarely cause neonatal severe hyperparathyroidism, which can be fatal if untreated [5]. Activating CaSR mutations cause autosomal dominant hypocalcemia type-1 (ADH1), characterized by mild-to-moderate hypocalcemia, with inappropriately low-to-normal serum PTH [5]. In addition, inactivating mutations in the G-protein-a11 (Gα11), by which the CaSR signals and the adaptor protein-2 σ-subunit (AP2σj, which regulates endocytosis, cause FHH2 and FHH3, respectively; whereas activating Gα11 mutations cause ADH2 [68]. This review focusses on studies from the last three years and begins with new insights into CaSR-mediated control of PTH secretion, before discussing how CaSR mutations have provided insights into receptor activation, internalization, and diverse physiological functions.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Relationship between PTH, 1,25(OH)2D, FGF23, and klotho. Reductions in serum calcium stimulate PTH secretion from the parathyroid glands. PTH acts at: bone to enhance resorption leading to increased efflux of calcium and phosphate; and kidney reducing calcium excretion and enhancing 1,25(OH)2D synthesis, which stimulates calcium absorption by intestines. The net effect is to normalize serum calcium levels. Elevations outside the normal range activate the CaSR on the PTG leading to suppression of PTH. In the FGF23-klotho axis (effects shown in green), FGF23 is produced by bone and binds to FGF receptor–klotho, which reduces PTH secretion and plasma membrane expression of sodium–phosphate transporters (NPT) at the renal proximal tubule. Reduction of NPT at plasma membranes reduces phosphate uptake and increases urinary excretion. FGF23 also inhibits 1,25(OH)2D production and may directly target the PTG to reduce PTH secretion. The figure is adapted from Quarles et al., 2008, JCI [58]. 1,25(OH)2D, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D; CaSR, calcium-sensing receptor; FGFR, FGF receptor; NPT, sodium–phosphate transporters; PTG, parathyroid gland; PTH, parathyroid hormone.

Regulation of PTH secretion

PTH acts on bone to enhance resorption and at kidneys to activate calcium reabsorption and stimulate 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D), which mobilizes intestinal calcium absorption (Figure 1). A number of new mechanisms by which the CaSR regulates PTH secretion have recently been uncovered [912].

The transient receptor potential canonical channel-1 (TRPC1) is expressed at plasma membranes and mediates calcium entry in response to PLC –coupled receptor activation or calcium store depletion [13]. TRPC1 has recently been described to facilitate CaSR-mediated suppression of PTH secretion [10,13] (Figure 2A). Trpc1-/- mice have hypercalcemia, inappropriately high PTH, and reduced urinary calcium excretion; their parathyroid glands (PTG) have impaired PTH secretion; and CaSR-mediated signaling is reduced and PTH secretion enhanced in rat parathyroid-like cells (PTH-C1) depleted of Trpc1 [10]. These effects were independent of Ca2+i store depletion but were Gα11-dependent, with co-immunoprecipitation indicating Gα11 may interact with TRPC1 [10]. Whether TRPC1, Gα11, and CaSR form a complex together to potentiate the effects of CaSR on PTH secretion remains to be investigated [10].

Figure 2. New insights into how the CaSR regulates PTH secretion.

Figure 2

(a) Schematic showing the proposed role for TRPC1 in PTH secretion from a parathyroid gland (PTG) cell. Recent studies show that TRPC1 suppresses PTH secretion from PTG downstream of the CaSR in response to high extracellular Ca2+ concentrations. Co-immunoprecipitations indicate that TRPC1 may directly interact with Gα11. (b) Schematic showing the proposed role of CaSR-GABAB1R heteromers in PTG. CaSR homomers couple to Gq and Gi to activate phospholipase-C (PLC) and calcium mobilization and reduce cAMP, respectively. Both signaling pathways reduce PTH secretion. In CaSR-GABAB1R heteromers (illustrated as a 1:1 stoichiometry, although these details are yet to be elucidated), the GABAB1R impairs CaSR signaling by preventing G-protein coupling to the CaSR. GABAB1R is important for tonic PTH secretion. (c) Left: Crystal structure showing how phosphate interacts with the Arg62 residue in the CaSR venus flytrap domain to maintain the inactive state. Right: Close view of Arg62 and phosphate in the active and inactive states. In the active state, Arg62 in the upper lobe forms a salt bridge (black dotted line) with Glu227 on the lower lobe. This is broken in the presence of phosphate (inactive state). Images were adapted from Centano et al. [11], Chang et al. [9], Onopiuket al. [10]. Structures use inactive and active structures from Geng et al. [1] (PDB:5K5T, PDB:5K5S) [1]. CaSR, calcium-sensing receptor; GABAB1R, γ-aminobutyric acid-B1 receptor; PLC, phospholipase-C; PTG, parathyroid gland; PTH, parathyroid hormone; TRPC1, transient receptor potential canonical channel-1.

Heteromer formation between CaSR and γ-amino-butyric acid-B1 receptor (GABAB1R) has recently been shown to regulate tonic PTH secretion [9] (Figure 2B). In the mouse PTG, the GABAB1R agonist baclofen stimulates acute PTH secretion, particularly in low Ca2+ e ranges, whereas a GABAB1R antagonist reduced PTH-max [9]. In contrast, mice with PTG-specific ablation of GABAB1R had reduced serum calcium and PTH, and their PTG had reduced tonic PTH secretion [9]. In PTH-C1 cells, GABAB1R expression decreased the efficacy of high Ca2+ e to activate Gį and Gq, whereas addition of baclofen further exacerbated the effects [9].

Treatment with baclofen alone did not modulate cAMP or IP1, indicating heteromer formation is required for GABAB1R effects. CaSR–GABAB1R heteromers also contribute to pathophysiology: PTGs of patients with primary or secondary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT and SHPT, respectively) had increased heteromer expression, whereas in mice, deletion of the GABAB1R alleviated serum PTH excess and hypercalcemia in mice lacking one CaSR allele and rescued mice from early death in bialleic CaSR knockouts [9]. It is hypothesized that baclofen transmits a conformational change from the GABAB1R to the CaSR to reduce Gq and Gi activation [9]. Further studies are required to understand these activation mechanisms.

Phosphate is known to stimulate PTH secretion, but how cells detect phosphate has only recently been revealed [11]. Based on CaSR crystal structures that harbor putative anion-binding sites, Geng et al. [1] and Centano et al. [11] hypothesized that the CaSR may detect phosphate. Using HEK293 overexpressing the CaSR (HEK-CaSR), pathophysiological concentrations of phosphate, observed in chronic kidney disease (CKD), were shown to significantly reduce CaSR-mediated Ca2+i and pERK signaling [11]. In isolated human parathyroid cells and mouse PTG, PTH secretion was increased by high phosphate and reduced when phosphate was restored to physiological levels. CaSR-null mice had no phosphate-mediated stimulation of PTH secretion [11]. An Arg62 residue is critical for phosphate binding: HEK293 expressing Arg62Ala lost phosphate-mediated inhibition of the CaSR; and Arg62 forms a salt bridge in the CaSR active state between lobes of the VFT domains, which is broken in the presence of phosphate [11] (Figure 2). Thus, phosphate regulates the equilibrium of active–inactive CaSRs. Elevated plasma phosphate shifts the equilibrium towards the inactive conformation, permitting elevated PTH secretion, which may contribute to SHPT and bone loss observed in CKD [1].

In addition to hyperphosphatemia, elevated FGF23 and klotho contribute to SHPT in CKD [14,15]. FGF23 is secreted by bone in response to elevated serum 1,25(OH)2D and phosphate and by PTH in vitamin D-independent mechanisms [1417]. FGF23 binds to FGF-receptor-1 (FGFR1), which with its co-receptor klotho, reduces renal expression of sodium–phosphate cotransporters to increase phosphate excretion [18]. Elevated serum calcium and FGF23 suppress PTH production by negative feedback mechanisms, which are disrupted in CKD, resulting in simultaneous increases in serum PTH and FGF23 [12]. Why these regulatory mechanisms are disrupted is incompletely understood, but recent studies using mice with PTG-specific deletions of CaSR (PTHCre;CaSRfl/fl), klotho (PTHCre;KLPTGfl/fl), or both CaSR and klotho (DKO) has revealed klotho regulates PTH secretion in CaSR-dependent and CaSR-independent mechanisms [12]. Both DKO and PTHCre;CaSRfl/fl mice had reduced body weights, shorter life expectancies, hypercalcemia, and hypophosphatemia [12]. Serum PTH, FGF23, and 1,25(OH)2D were elevated in PTHCre;CaSRfl/fl mice and significantly higher in DKO mice [12]. The PTG of PTHCre;CaSRfl/fl and DKO mice were enlarged and had increased proliferation, which was more severe in DKO mice [12]. These studies indicate klotho is a negative regulator of PTH synthesis in the absence of CaSR [12]. Klotho expression was decreased in CaSR-deleted PTGs, and reciprocally, CaSR expression was reduced in PTHCre;KLfl/fl whereas co-immunoprecipitation experiments indicated klotho and CaSR may interact [12]. This is consistent with previous studies in which PTGs of patients with PHPT, SHPT, and end-stage renal failure have reduced CaSR and klotho expression [19,20]. Further studies are required to understand how CaSR and klotho function together to control PTH.

Tissue-specific bias

The CaSR is widely expressed and has diverse physiological functions indicating tissue- or ligand-specific CaSR signaling may exist. Two recent publications provide possible insights into this phenomenon.

CaSR activation in osteoblasts is essential for differentiation and bone remodeling [21]. Studies indicate CaSR in osteoblasts activates Akt pathways that phosphorylate β-catenin, facilitating nuclear translocation and promoting expression of genes involved in differentiation and growth [22]. Recent studies revealed a role for the scaffold protein Homer1 in CaSR–Akt pathways [23]. Silencing the CaSR or Homer1 in human osteoblasts reduced Ca2+-induced phosphorylation of Akt, Glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3α/β), β-catenin, and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and nuclear translocation of β-catenin [23] and suppressed alkaline phosphatase activity [23]. In HEK-CaSR, Ca2+ e did not phosphorylate Akt, but transfection of Homer1 restored Akt signaling [23], indicating this pathway may only be present in tissues expressing Homer1.

The CaSR is inhibited by protein kinase-C (PKC)-mediated phosphorylation at Thr888. However, cells expressing the ADH1 mutant Thr888Met, which cannot be phosphorylated, had residual signaling, indicating other phosphorylation sites likely exist [24,25]. Ser875 was predicted as another PKC regulatory site, based on phosphorylation sites in related class C G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) [25]. Cells expressing Ser875Ala had increased pERK activity similar to that of Thr888Ala, while cells expressing a double mutant CaSR (S875A/T888A) had increased Ca2+ e sensitivity, indicating an additive effect when both phosphorylation sites are mutated [25]. Distinct tissue- or ligand-specific phosphorylation patterns could be envisaged that activate different signaling pathways as demonstrated for other GPCRs [2527] and remains to be further investigated.

Receptor activation and signaling bias

Studies of >400 germline CaSR mutations has provided insights into CaSR activation mechanisms demonstrating the importance of the homodimer interface and TM3-TM6, similar to other GPCRs [5,28] (Figure 3). FHH1 and ADH1 extracellular domain mutations cluster in the homodimer interface, loop 1 and 2 (which span the interface to stabilize dimerization), and ligandbinding sites [1,2,5]. FHH1 transmembrane domain (TMD) mutations are present in the TM1 –TM2–TM7 interface, consistent with studies showing loss-of-function GPCR mutations concentrate in these regions [5,29]. However, there is a larger cluster of inactivating mutations at TM5. In other class C GPCRs, TM5 is important in dimerization in the inactive state, which then evolves into a TM6–TM6 interface on receptor activation [30,31]. Therefore, these FHH1 mutations may prevent TMD transitions that are important for receptor activation. Consistent with this, ADH1 TMD mutations cluster at the extracellular side of TM6–ECL3–TM7 [1,2,5], indicating TM6 movement is likely important in receptor activation and that ADH1 mutations may favor formation of an active receptor. Residues in which both inactivating and activating mutations occur are also clustered at the dimer interface, TM3 and TM6 [32], and are associated with signaling bias. These residues are hypothesized to act as molecular switches that undergo conformational changes on ligand binding, and their mutation facilitates receptor structures that preferentially signal via Ca2+i or pERK [32].

Figure 3. CaSR mutations provide insights into receptor activation.

Figure 3

(a) Cartoon of the active CaSR homodimer showing locations of calcium-binding sites (CBS1–4) based on crystal structures (PDB:5K5S) [1]. The CaSR comprises a bilobed venus flytrap domain (VFTD) and a cysteine-rich domain (CRD). (b) Structure of the CaSR protomer showing the location of all published FHH1 mutations (blue), ADH1 mutations (red), and sites of both FHH1 and ADH1 mutations (green). Mutations in the extracellular domain (ECD) are concentrated at the homodimer interface and close to calcium-binding sites. (c) The homology model of the CaSR transmembrane region based on the structure of class C GPCR metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) [31]. FHH1 mutations are present in the TM1–TM2–TM7 interface as observed for other inactivating GPCR mutations. However, there is a cluster of mutations in TM5 indicating this region may be important in retaining the receptor in its inactive state. ADH1 mutations cluster in TM6-ECL3-TM7 indicating TM6 movement is likely important in CaSR activation as observed for other GPCRs. (d) The homology model of the CaSR TM3, TM7, and ECL2 region, reproduced from Gorvin et al. 2018 [33]. The homology model is based on the published structure of metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (GluR1) [59]. The Arg680 residue is shown projecting from TM3 and is predicted to form a salt bridge with Glu767 on ECL2. Its disruption is predicted to allow lateral displacement of TM3 away from TM4 and TM5, facilitating β-arrestin binding [33]. ADH1, autosomal dominant hypocalcemia type-1; CaSR, calcium-sensing receptor; CBS, calcium-binding site; CRD, cysteine-rich domain; FFH1, familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type-1; GPCR, G-protein-coupled receptor.

Studies of an ADH1-associated Arg680Gly mutation provide further details regarding CaSR activation. Arg680Gly biases signaling to enhance MAPK pathways via a G-protein–independent β-arrestin–mediated pathway [33]. Homology modeling and mutagenesis studies revealed Arg680 forms a critical salt bridge with Glu767 in extracellular loop-2. Its disruption is predicted to allow lateral displacement of TM3 away from TM4 and TM5, facilitating β-arrestin binding [33,34] (Figure 3). The study of an autoantibody to the CaSR, causing acquired hypocalciuric hypercalcemia, has revealed further insights into biased signaling. This autoantibody targets the VFT and acts as an allosteric modulator that favors activation of Ca2+i and impairs pERK signaling [35]. This autoantibody was hypothesized to act in a similar way to allosteric modulators of the GPCR taste receptors which target the VFT and facilitate conformational changes in which the TM5–TM6 interface evolves into closer interactions between TM6–TM6 [35,36]. Detailed studies of other CaSR mutations, and those in its signaling protein Gα11, are likely to provide further insights into receptor activation and G-protein coupling [5,28].

CaSR internalization

Unlike other GPCRs, the CaSR is constantly exposed to its ligand, and the ability of the receptor to respond to Ca2+ e fluctuations is aided by the existence of large intracellular reserves of mature CaSRs that can rapidly mobilize to cell surfaces by agonist-driven insertional signaling (ADIS) [37]. A lack of consensus regarding CaSR internalization has existed but was understood to be largely constitutive [38,39].

Two recent studies have investigated CaSR endocytosis in detail. Total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy (TIRFm) was used to measure ADIS and CaSR internalization simultaneously [40]. These studies showed internalization of the CaSR by constitutive and agonist-driven mechanisms, which was recently confirmed using diffusion-enhanced resonance energy transfer (DERET) assays [41]. DERET studies also showed the negative allosteric modulator, NPS-2143, and positive allosteric modulator, NPS-R-568, reduce and enhance internalization, respectively [41]. Using G-protein inhibitors and CRISPR/Cas9-edited cells lacking Gq/11 or β-arrestin1/2, CaSR constitutive internalization and agonist-driven internalization were shown to require β-arrestin1/2, but were largely G-protein–in-dependent [41]. In contrast, TIRFm studies using the same knockout cells showed Gq/11 is required for internalization [40]. More detailed studies using both experimental systems are required to investigate the role of G-proteins in CaSR internalization.

TIRFm studies demonstrated AP2σ mutations reduce ADIS and prolong residency time in clathrin structures resulting in impaired CaSR internalization, with a net increase in CaSR surface expression [40]. However, AP2σ mutations reduce CaSR-mediated signaling [7,40]. To explain this paradox, it was proposed that the CaSR may continue signaling from within cells (sustained signaling) [40], which has previously been shown for other GPCRs [4246] (Figure 4). A MAPK sustained signal was demonstrated in CaSR-expressing cells that was sensitive to the dynamin inhibitor Dyngo and dominant-negative Rab5, and was absent in AP2σ mutant cell-lines [40]. Furthermore, although plasma membrane signals required both Gq/11 and Gi/o, sustained signals were mediated by Gq/11 only, indicating spatially-directed G-protein selectivity by the CaSR [40]. Detailed investigation of sustained signaling in different CaSR-expressing tissues is required to determine whether compartmental bias accounts for diverse CaSR functions.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

CaSR signals from the plasma membrane and endosomes. The CaSR exists at plasma membranes as a homodimer. Mature CaSRs are made at the Golgi and exist in large intracellular reserves that can be rapidly mobilized to the cell surface in response to receptor activation in a process known as agonist-driven insertional signaling (ADIS). The CaSR signals from the plasma membrane predominantly via Gq and Gi. CaSR endocytosis is both constitutive and agonist-driven. The AP2σ plays an important role in CaSR internalization and mutations in the protein cause FHH3. The CaSR is also able to activate sustained signals from the endosome that use Gq. Mutations in the AP2σ impair ADIS, CaSR internalization, and sustained signaling. ADIS, agonist-driven insertional signaling; AP2, adapter protein-2; CaSR, calcium-sensing receptor; FHH3, familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type-3; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase.

Pathophysiology using large-scale population genetics

Recent studies of CaSR variants in the DiscovEHR cohort comprising 51 289 individuals showed 60% had at least one common or rare (mean allele frequency <0.01) CaSR variant [47]. Investigation of serum calcium levels of these individuals showed the following: nonsense/frameshift variants were associated with serum calcium concentrations outside the normal range; individuals with missense variants predicted to be benign were normocalcemic; and individuals with variants predicted to be pathogenic and shown to functionally impact CaSR expression and/or signaling had changes in serum calcium [47]. This allowed prediction of prevalence estimates within the population of 74.1 per 100 000 for FHH1, and 3.9 per 100 000 for ADH1, far greater than previous analyses [47,48].

Three common CaSR variants (Ala986Ser, Arg990Gly, Glu1011Gln) have previously been inconsistently associated with pathologies including variations in urinary calcium excretion, serum calcium concentrations, nephrolithiasis, and coronary artery disease [4955]. The DiscovEHR cohort revealed a positive association with serum calcium, hypercalcemia, and hyperparathyroidism for the Ala986Ser variant, whereas the Arg990Gly variant was negatively associated with serum calcium (Smelser et al., bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/644559). A much larger study utilizing data from the UK Biobank and 25 cohorts from the UK, USA, Europe, and China similarly identified associations between Ala986Ser and serum calcium changes. This was not associated with changes in bone mineral density or risk of fracture [56]. Therefore, common CaSR variants may be associated with lifelong elevated serum calcium levels.

Associations with other pathologies were also explored in the DiscovEHR cohort. Consistent with previous studies [54,55,57], individuals with the Ala986Ser variant had increased risk of cardiovascular disease, whereas the Arg990Gly variant was associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular disease (Smelser et al., bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/644559). A PheWAS of rare CaSR variants also identified associations with cardiovascular disease. Other disease associations included a significant increase in type-2 diabetes in individuals homozygous for Ala986Ser and a reduction in CKD in homozygous Arg990Gly individuals; rare CaSR variants were associated with neurological diseases including dementia and depression, as well as fractures. Further studies in diverse tissues are required to determine whether the CaSR has direct effects or whether these disease associations are secondary to changes in serum calcium.

Summary

Recent studies have highlighted new potential targets for the treatment of calcium-sensing disorders. Dual therapies targeting both the CaSR and other proteins involved in PTH secretion can be envisaged, whereas studies of mutant CaSR proteins have provided important insights into receptor activation that can aid drug design. In addition, new understandings regarding tissue-specific and sustained signaling offer new avenues to explore for future therapies.

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges support from an Academy of Medical Sciences Springboard Award (Ref: SBF004|1034), which is supported by the British Heart Foundation, Diabetes UK, the Global Challenges Research Fund, the Government Department of Business Energy and Industrial Strategy and the Wellcome Trust.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest statement

Nothing declared.

References

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

* of special interest

** of outstanding interest

  • 1**.Geng Y, et al. Structural mechanism of ligand activation in human calcium-sensing receptor. Elife. 2016;5 doi: 10.7554/eLife.13662. [Describes a crystal structure of the CaSR extracellular domain. This revealed that there are multiple binding sites for calcium in the active state and phosphate ions in the inactive state, as well as an orthosteric agonist-binding site at the interdomain cleft] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2*.Zhang C, et al. Structural basis for regulation of human calcium-sensing receptor by magnesium ions and an unexpected tryptophan derivative co-agonist. Sci Adv. 2016;2:e1600241. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1600241. [First publication of the crystal structure of the CaSR extracellular domain. This revealed two loops that stretch across the homodimer interface that are important for dimer stabilization, and tryptophan binding sites] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kifor O, et al. Regulation of MAP kinase by calcium-sensing receptor in bovine parathyroid and CaR-transfected HEK293 cells. Am J Physiol Ren Physiol. 2001;280:F291–F302. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.2001.280.2.F291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Thomsen AR, Hvidtfeldt M, Brauner-Osborne H. Biased agonism of the calcium-sensing receptor. Cell Calcium. 2012;51:107–116. doi: 10.1016/.ceca.2011.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5*.Gorvin CM. Molecular and clinical insights from studies of calcium-sensing receptor mutations. J Mol Endocrinol. 2019;63:R1–R16. doi: 10.1530/JME-19-0104. [Recent review of mutations identified in the CaSR that cause hyper/hypocalcemic disorders. This highlights where inactivating and activating mutations are clustered in the receptor] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nesbit MA, et al. Mutations affecting G-protein subunit alpha11 in hypercalcemia and hypocalcemia. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:2476–2486. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1300253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nesbit MA, et al. Mutations in AP2S1 cause familial hypo-calciuric hypercalcemia type 3. Nat Genet. 2013;45:93–97. doi: 10.1038/ng.2492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mannstadt M, et al. Germline mutations affecting Galpha11 in hypoparathyroidism. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:2532–2534. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1300278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9**.Chang W, et al. PTH hypersecretion triggered by a GABAB1 and Ca2+-sensing receptor heterocomplex in hyperparathyroidism. Nat Metabol. 2020;2:243–255. doi: 10.1038/s42255-020-0175-z. [Demonstrates that CaSR and GABAB1R form heteromers in parathyroid glands and that these are important for mediating the tonic secretion of PTH. Increased formation of heteromers was shown in PTGs of patients with primary and secondary hyperparathyroidism] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10*.Onopiuk M, et al. Control of PTH secretion by the TRPC1 ion channel. JCI Insight. 2020;5 doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.132496. [Using mouse models and parathyroid-like cells this study showed that the TRPC1 calcium channel is important for CaSR-mediated PTH secretion] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11**.Centeno PP, et al. Phosphate acts directly on the calcium-sensing receptor to stimulate parathyroid hormone secretion. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4693. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12399-9. [Showed that phosphate binds to the CaSR and that this is important for maintaining the receptors inactive state. The Arg62 residue was important for phosphate binding. Exposure of phosphate to human and mouse PTG elicits a rapid increase in PTH secretion] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12**.Fan Y, et al. Interrelated role of Klotho and calcium-sensing receptor in parathyroid hormone synthesis and parathyroid hyperplasia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:e3749–E3758. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1717754115. [Used PTG-specific models to demonstrate that CaSR and klotho together regulate PTH secretion. Studies show CaSR and klotho may interact and that CaSR and klotho act together to regulate PTG hyperplasia] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Venkatachalam K, Montell C. TRP channels. Annu Rev Biochem. 2007;76:387–417. doi: 10.1146/annuRevbiochem.75.103004.142819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gutierrez O, et al. Fibroblast growth factor-23 mitigates hyperphosphatemia but accentuates calcitriol deficiency in chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:2205–2215. doi: 10.1681/ASN2005010052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Shigematsu T, et al. Possible involvement of circulating fibroblast growth factor 23 in the development of secondary hyperparathyroidism associated with renal insufficiency. Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;44:250–256. doi: 10.1053/Jajkd.2004.04.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fan Y, et al. Parathyroid hormone 1 receptor is essential to induce FGF23 production and maintain systemic mineral ion homeostasis. Faseb J. 2016;30:428–440. doi: 10.1096/fJ15-278184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rhee Y, et al. Parathyroid hormone receptor signaling in osteocytes increases the expression of fibroblast growth factor-23 in vitro and in vivo. Bone. 2011;49:636–643. doi: 10.1016/Jbone.2011.06.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Urakawa I, et al. Klotho converts canonical FGF receptor into a specific receptor for FGF23. Nature. 2006;444:770–774. doi: 10.1038/nature05315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Latus J, et al. Analysis of alpha-klotho, fibroblast growth factor-, vitamin-D and calcium-sensing receptor in 70 patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2013;37:84–94. doi: 10.1159/000343403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Latus J, et al. Involvement of alpha-klotho, fibroblast growth factor-, vitamin-D-and calcium-sensing receptor in 53 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Endocrine. 2013;44:255–263. doi: 10.1007/s12020-013-9881-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dvorak-Ewell MM, et al. Osteoblast extracellular Ca2+-sensing receptor regulates bone development, mineralization, and turnover. J Bone Miner Res. 2011;26:2935–2947. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22*.Rybchyn MS, Slater M, Conigrave AD, Mason RS. An Akt-dependent increase in canonical Wnt signaling and a decrease in sclerostin protein levels are involved in strontium ranelate-induced osteogenic effects in human osteoblasts. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:23771–23779. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.251116. [Demonstrate that the Homer1 scaffold protein is important for Akt-dependent signaling by the CaSR in osteoblasts. In the absence of Homer1, this Akt pathway is not present in HEK293 cells expressing CaSR. This pathway may be specific for b-catenin stabilization and cellular differentiation in osteoblasts] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rybchyn MS, et al. Homer1 mediates CaSR-dependent activation of mTOR complex 2 and initiates a novel pathway for AKT-dependent beta-catenin stabilization in osteoblasts. J Biol Chem. 2019;294:16337–16350. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.006587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lazarus S, et al. A novel mutation of the primary protein kinase C phosphorylation site in the calcium-sensing receptor causes autosomal dominant hypocalcemia. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;164:429–435. doi: 10.1530/EJE-10-0907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25*.Binmahfouz LS, Centeno PP, Conigrave AD, Ward DT. Identification of serine-875 as an inhibitory phosphorylation site in the calcium-sensing receptor. Mol Pharmacol. 2019;96:204–211. doi: 10.1124/Mol119.116178. [This study identified a new residue, Ser875, in CaSR that is phosphorylated by PKC. Phosphorylation of this residue and Thr888 inhibit CaSR-mediated signaling] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Nobles KN, et al. Distinct phosphorylation sites on the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor establish a barcode that encodes differential functions of beta-arrestin. Sci Signal. 2011;4 doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2001707.ra51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Butcher AJ, et al. Differential G-protein-coupled receptor phosphorylation provides evidence for a signaling bar code. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:11506–11518. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.154526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Binet V, et al. Common structural requirements for heptahelical domain function in class A and class C G protein-coupled receptors. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:12154–12163. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M611071200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Stoy H, Gurevich VV. How genetic errors in GPCRs affect their function: possible therapeutic strategies. Genes Dis. 2015;2:108–132. doi: 10.1016/Jgendis.2015.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Park J, et al. Structural architecture of a dimeric class C GPCR based on co-trafficking of sweet taste receptor subunits. J Biol Chem. 2019;294:4759–4774. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.006173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dore AS, et al. Structure of class C GPCR metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 transmembrane domain. Nature. 2014;511:557–562. doi: 10.1038/nature13396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32*.Gorvin CM, et al. Calcium-sensing receptor residues with loss-and gain-of-function mutations are located in regions of conformational change and cause signalling bias. Hum Mol Genet. 2018;27:3720–3733. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddy263. [This study investigated residues in the CaSR that are associated with both inactivating and activating mutations. Functional analysis showed that mutation of these residues is commonly associated with signaling bias. Structural analyses revealed these residues are located at conformationally active regions of the receptor] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33**.Gorvin CM, et al. A calcium-sensing receptor mutation causing hypocalcemia disrupts a transmembrane salt bridge to activate beta-arrestin-biased signaling. Sci Signal. 2018;11 doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aan3714. [Describes an Arg680Gly mutation in the CaSR that is associated with ADH1. Functional analysis of the mutation revealed a gain in activity by the MAPK pathway that was G-protein-independent and involved a β-arrestin-mediated signaling pathway. The mutation disrupts a salt bridge between TM3 and extracellular loop-2] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Shukla AK, et al. Visualization of arrestin recruitment by a G-protein-coupled receptor. Nature. 2014;512:218–222. doi: 10.1038/nature13430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35*.Makita N, et al. Cinacalcet corrects biased allosteric modulation of CaSR by AHH autoantibody. JCI Insight. 2019;4 doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.126449. [Describes a case of acquired hypocalciuric hypercalcemia (AHH) caused by a CaSR autoantibody that binds to the venus flytrap domain to bias signaling. Suggest this may help in design of biased allosteric modulators of GPCRs. The AHH patient was successfully treated with a CaSR positive allosteric modulator] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36*.Kim SK, Chen Y, Abrol R, Goddard WA, 3rd, Guthrie B. Activation mechanism of the G protein-coupled sweet receptor heterodimer with sweeteners and allosteric agonists. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:2568–2573. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1700001114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37*.Grant MP, Stepanchick A, Cavanaugh A, Breitwieser GE. Agonist-driven maturation and plasma membrane insertion of calcium-sensing receptors dynamically control signal amplitude. Sci Signal. 2011;4 doi: 10.1126/scisig-nal.2002208.ra78. [This study showed that CaSR signaling resulted in forward trafficking of the CaSR from intracellular reservoirs of mature receptor. This mechanism was named agonist-driven insertional signaling (ADIS) and explains how CaSR can rapidly respond to alterations in extracellular calcium concentrations, despite chronic exposure to ligand] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Reyes-Ibarra AP, et al. Calcium-sensing receptor endocytosis links extracellular calcium signaling to parathyroid hormone-related peptide secretion via a Rab11a-dependent and AMSH-sensitive mechanism. Mol Endocrinol. 2007;21:1394–1407. doi: 10.1210/me.2006-0523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhuang X, Northup JK, Ray K. Large putative PEST-like sequence motif at the carboxyl tail of human calcium receptor directs lysosomal degradation and regulates cell surface receptor level. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:4165–4176. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.271528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40**.Gorvin CM, et al. AP2sigma mutations impair calcium sensing receptor trafficking and signaling, and show an endosomal pathway to spatially direct G-protein selectivity. Cell Rep. 2018;22:1054–1066. doi: 10.1016/Jcelrep.2017.12.089. [Shows for the first time that CaSR can signal by a sustained endo-somal pathway and that disease-causing AP2σ mutants impair CaSR trafficking and sustained signaling. CaSR plasma membrane signaling utilizes both Gq/11and Gi/owhile endosomal signaling involves Gq/11 ] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41*.Mos I, Jacobsen SE, Foster SR, Brauner-Osborne H. Calcium sensing receptor internalization is beta-arrestin-dependent and modulated by allosteric ligands. Mol Pharmacol. 2019;96:463–474. doi: 10.1124/Mol119.116772. [Describes a high-throughput assay to measure real-time internalization of the CaSR. Using this assay CaSR internalization was shown to be β-arrestin dependent and involved both constitutive and agonist-driven mechanisms. Allosteric ligands were shown to modulate internalization] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Calebiro D, et al. Persistent cAMP-signals triggered by internalized G-protein-coupled receptors. PLoS Biol. 2009;7:e1000172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ferrandon S, et al. Sustained cyclic AMP production by parathyroid hormone receptor endocytosis. Nat Chem Biol. 2009;5:734–742. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kotowski SJ, Hopf FW, Seif T, Bonci A, von Zastrow M. Endo-cytosis promotes rapid dopaminergic signaling. Neuron. 2011;71:278–290. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroN2011.05.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Jean-Alphonse F, et al. Spatially restricted G protein-coupled receptor activity via divergent endocytic compartments. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:3960–3977. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.526350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Irannejad R, et al. Conformational biosensors reveal GPCR signalling from endosomes. Nature. 2013;495:534–538. doi: 10.1038/nature12000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47*.Dershem R, et al. Familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type 1 and autosomal-dominant hypocalcemia type 1: prevalence in a large healthcare population. Am J Hum Genet. 2020 doi: 10.1016/Jajhg.2020.04.006. [Investigated all rare CaSR variants identified by whole-exome sequencing in 51,289 individuals in the DiscovEHR cohort. Prevalence estimates of FHH1 were shown to be similar to that of primary hyperparathyroidism. Rare variants were associated with cardiovascular and neurological disease] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hinnie J, Bell E, McKillop E, Gallacher S. The prevalence of familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia. Calcif Tissue Int. 2001;68:216–218. doi: 10.1007/s002230001201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kapur K, et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis for serum calcium identifies significantly associated SNPs near the calcium-sensing receptor (CASR) gene. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:e1001035. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgeN1001035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Scillitani A, et al. Blood ionized calcium is associated with clustered polymorphisms in the carboxyl-terminal tail of the calcium-sensing receptor. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:5634–5638. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-0129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Vezzoli G, et al. R990G polymorphism of calcium-sensing receptor does produce a gain-of-function and predispose to primary hypercalciuria. Kidney Int. 2007;71:1155–1162. doi: 10.1038/sJki.5002156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Toka HR, Pollak MR. The role of the calcium-sensing receptor in disorders of abnormal calcium handling and cardiovascular disease. CurrOpin Nephrol Hypertens. 2014;23:494–501. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Thiele I, et al. Associations between calcium and vitamin D supplement use as well as their serum concentrations and subclinical cardiovascular disease phenotypes. Atherosclerosis. 2015;241:743–751. doi: 10.1016/Jatherosclerosis.2015.06.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Larsson SC, Burgess S, Michaelsson K. Association of genetic variants related to serum calcium levels with coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction. J Am Med Assoc. 2017;318:371–380. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.8981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Marz W, et al. Alanine to serine polymorphism at position 986 of the calcium-sensing receptor associated with coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, all-cause, and cardiovascular mortality. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:2363–2369. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-0071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56*.Cerani A, et al. Genetic predisposition to increased serum calcium, bone mineral density, and fracture risk in individuals with normal calcium levels: mendelian randomisation study. BMJ. 2019;366:14410. doi: 10.1136/bmJ14410. [Performed a genome-wide associated meta-analysis of serum calcium levels in up to 61,079 individuals. The most strongly associated calcium locus included CaSR. Associations between Ala986Ser and serum calcium changes were identified] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Challoumas D, Cobbold C. Dimitrakakis G: Effects of calcium intake on the cardiovascular system in postmenopausal women. Atherosclerosis. 2013;231:1–7. doi: 10.1016/Jatherosclerosis.2013.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Quarles LD. Endocrine functions of bone in mineral metabolism regulation. J Clin Invest. 2008;118:3820–3828. doi: 10.1172/JCI36479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wu H, et al. Structure of a class C GPCR metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 bound to an allosteric modulator. Science. 2014;344:58–64. doi: 10.1126/science.1249489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES