Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 5.
Published in final edited form as: Mov Disord. 2020 Jul 11;35(10):1834–1842. doi: 10.1002/mds.28188

Synaptic loss in primary tauopathies revealed by [11C]UCB-J positron emission tomography

Negin Holland 1, P Simon Jones 1, George Savulich 2, Julie K Wiggins 1, Young T Hong 1,3, Tim D Fryer 1,3, Roido Manavaki 4, Selena Milicevic Sephton 1,3, Istvan Boros 1,3, Maura Malpetti 1, Frank H Hezemans 1,6, Franklin I Aigbirhio 1, Jonathan P Coles 5,7, John O’Brien 2,7, James B Rowe 1,6,7
PMCID: PMC7611123  EMSID: EMS96050  PMID: 32652635

Abstract

Background

Synaptic loss is a prominent and early feature of many neurodegenerative diseases.

Objectives

We tested the hypothesis that synaptic density is reduced in the primary tauopathies of progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP-Richardson’s syndrome) and amyloid–negative corticobasal syndrome (CBS).

Methods

Forty four participants (15 CBS, 14 PSP, and 15 age-/sex-/education-matched controls) underwent positron emission tomography (PET) with the radioligand [11C]UCB-J, which binds to synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A), a marker of synaptic density; participants also had 3T magnetic resonance imaging and clinical and neuropsychological assessment.

Results

Nine CBS patients had negative amyloid biomarkers determined by [11C]PiB PET and hence were deemed likely to have corticobasal degeneration (CBD). Patients with PSP-Richardson’s syndrome and amyloid-negative CBS were impaired in executive, memory and visuospatial tasks. [11C]UCB-J binding was reduced across frontal, temporal, parietal, and occipital lobes, cingulate, hippocampus, insula, amygdala and subcortical structures in both PSP and CBD patients compared to controls (p<0.01), with median reductions up to 50%, consistent with post mortem data. Reductions of 20-30% were widespread even in the areas of the brain with minimal atrophy. There was a negative correlation between global [11C]UCB-J binding and the PSP and CBD rating scales (R= -0.61 p<0.002, R= -0.72 p<0.001, respectively) and a positive correlation with the revised Addenbrookes Cognitive Examination (R=0.52, p=0.01).

Conclusions

We confirm severe synaptic loss in PSP and CBD in proportion to disease severity, providing critical insight into the pathophysiology of primary degenerative tauopathies. [11C]UCB-J may facilitate treatment strategies for disease-modification, synaptic maintenance or restoration.

Keywords: Synaptic Vesicle Protein 2A, [11C]UCB-J PET, tauopathy, PSP/CBS

Introduction

The primary degenerative tauopathies of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP) and Corticobasal Degeneration (CBD) cause a severe combination of movement and cognitive impairment (14). Pathologically both are associated with a 4-repeat tauopathy (5). We proposed that the neurophysiological and functional impairments in PSP and CBD are at least in part a consequence of synaptic loss. For example, at post mortem there is approximately 50% loss of cortical synapses in PSP and CBD (6,7), and in vivo there is limited evidence of a ~20% loss of post-synaptic GABAA receptors as shown with [11C]flumazenil positron emission tomography (PET) (8,9). Indeed abnormal physiology in pathways involved in presynaptic function have been identified from transcriptomic studies in patients with mutations in the microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) gene (10). Transgenic models of tauopathies (e.g. rTg4510) confirm a synaptotoxic effect of oligomeric tau, before cell death (11,12). Moreover, in other neurodegenerative dementias, such as Alzheimer’s disease, synaptic loss correlates better with cognitive dysfunction than atrophy (13).

We therefore tested the hypothesis that PSP and CBD reduce synaptic density, in proportion to disease severity. We include patients with the classic phenotype of PSP, PSP-Richardson’s syndrome, which has a high clinicopathological correlation (14), and presents with postural instability, supranuclear gaze palsy, axial rigidity and cognitive impairment (15). Other phenotypes of PSP are increasingly recognised (3,16), but excluded here. We include patients with Corticobasal Syndrome (CBS), with combinations of asymmetric rigidity, apraxia, dystonia, alien limb, and cognitive impairment (1,17). In order to identify those with probable underlying CBD, it is necessary to exclude the substantial minority of CBS caused by Alzheimer’s disease pathology (18). We therefore used amyloid imaging to distinguish those with CBS due to CBD, versus Alzheimer’s disease; we refer to this group as the CBD cohort. Both PSP and CBD are associated with cortical and subcortical atrophy on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (19); and changes in neurophysiology and connectivity measured by magnetoencephalography and functional MRI (2023). However, functional changes are also seen in the areas of the brain that are minimally atrophic.

We used PET with the radioligand [11C]UCB-J ((R)-1-((3-(methyl-11C)pyridin-4-yl)methyl)-4-(3,4,5-trifluorophenyl)pyr-rolidin-2-one) (24). This ligand quantifies synaptic density (25,26) based on its affinity for the presynaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A), that is ubiquitously expressed in all brain synapses (27,28). [11C]UCB-J has revealed hippocampal synaptic loss in Alzheimer’s disease, correlating with episodic memory loss and clinical dementia severity (29). We sought correlations between regional [11C]UCB-J binding potentials, a metric of synaptic density, and disease severity, in terms of cognitive decline and global impairment on the PSP and CBD rating scales.

Methods

Participants & Study Design

Fourteen patients with PSP-Richardson’s syndrome and fifteen patients with CBS were recruited from a tertiary specialist clinic for PSP/CBS at the Cambridge University Centre for Parkinson-Plus. Fifteen healthy volunteers were recruited from the UK National Institute for Health Research Join Dementia Research (JDR) register. Patients had either probable PSP–Richardson Syndrome (3), or both probable CBS and probable CBD (1). Healthy controls and patient volunteers were initially screened by telephone; our exclusion criteria were: current or recent history (within the last 5 years) of cancer, concurrent use of the medication levetiracetam, history of ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke evident on MRI available from the clinic, any severe physical illness or co-morbidity that limited ability to fully participate in the study, and any contraindications to performing MRI. Eligible participants were invited for a research visit where they underwent clinical and cognitive assessment including measures of disease severity (Table 1); these included a neurological examination by a clinician including the PSP and CBD rating scales, the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating scale (motor subsection III), the Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living (SEADL) and Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR); cognitive testing included the revised Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination (ACE-R), the Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and the INECO frontal assessment test. Patients’ carers completed the revised Cambridge Behavioural Inventory (CBI).

Table 1.

Demographics and neuropsychological profile for each participant cohort

Control CBD PSP F(p)
M:F 7:8 7:2 7:7 nsa
Age at [11C]UCB-J PET in years 68 (7.45) 70.56 (8.23) 72.79 (7.74) ns
Disease duration in years NA 3.94 (2.2) 4.28 (2.57) nsb
Education in years 13.69 (2.66) 12.78 (3.27) 12.77 (5.43) ns
ACE-R total (max. 100) 96.47 (2.88) 81.56 (10.83) 80.57 (15.02) 9.61 (<.0004)
     Attention_Orientation (max .18) 17.87 (0.35) 16.89 (1.05) 16.43 (2.06) 4.11 (0.02)
     Memory (max .26) 24.53 (1.85) 20.67 (5.66) 21.43 (4.27) 3.50 (0.04)
     Fluency (max .14) 12.80 (1.15) 8.22 (2.86) 6.43 (3.44) 22.81 (<.001)
     Language (max .26) 25.53 (0.92) 22.44 (5.34) 23.43 (5.21) ns
     Visuospatial (max .16) 15.73 (0.59) 13.33 (2.55) 12.86 (3.98) 4.46 (0.02)
MMSE (max. 30) 29.27 (1.33) 26.44 (3.13) 27.00 (2.88) 4.78 (0.01)
UPDRS (max. 132) 0 (0) 38.22 (14.81) 32.36 (16.38) nsb
PSPRS (max. 100) 0.13 (0.52) 26.78 (9.61) 29.21 (10.27) nsb
CBDRS (max. 124) 0.20 (0.77) 29.12 (13.52) 36.80 (20.41) nsb
MoCA (max. 30) 27.80 (1.74) 12.25 (12.96) 22.46 (2.96) 8.39 (<.001)
Ineco (max. 30) 26.00 (1.85) 14.6 0(8.47) 17.70 (4.74) 17.22 (<.001)
CDR sum of boxes (max. 32) 0.07 (0.26) 6.78 (4.71) 7.54 (6.55) 11.28 (<.001)
CBI (max. 180) 2.47 (4.81) 27.44 (13.5) 42.43 (38.13) 9.97 (<.001)
SEADL (max. 1) 0.99 (0.03) 0.56 (0.28) 0.60 (0.22) 10.54 (<.001)

The results are given as mean (standard deviation). CBD here refers to corticobasal syndrome with a negative amyloid biomarker from [11C]PiB PET, and PSP refers to patients with PSP-Richardson’s syndrome. The F-statistic and p-values are derived from ANOVA. ACE-R: revised Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination, MMSE: Mini-mental State Examination, UPDRS: Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale, PSPRS: Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Rating Scale, CBDRS: CBD functional rating scale, MoCA: Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Ineco: frontal assessment tool, CDR: Clinical Dementia Rating Scale, CBI: revised Cambridge Behavioural Inventory, SEADL: Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living Scale. a chi-squared test. b ANOVA with PSP and CBD patients only. ns = non-significant at p<0.05; NA = non-applicable.

All participants underwent simultaneous 3T MRI and [11C]UCB-J PET. Patients with CBS also underwent amyloid PET imaging using Pittsburgh Compound B ([11C]PiB) and cortical standardised uptake value ratio (SUVR; 50-70 minutes post injection; whole cerebellum reference tissue) was determined using the Centiloid Project methodology (30). Only those with a negative amyloid status as characterised by a cortical [11C]PiB SUVR less than 1.21 (obtained by converting the Centiloid cut-off of 19 to SUVR using the Centiloid-to-SUVR transformation) (31), are included in the subsequent analysis, with the aim of excluding patients with CBS due to Alzheimer’s disease. We interpret this amyloid-negative group as having CBD, although acknowledge that other pathologies are possible.

The research protocol was approved by the local Cambridge Research Ethics Committee (REC: 18/EE/0059) and the Administration of Radioactive Substances Advisory Committee. All participants provided written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Neuroimaging

[11C]UCB-J was synthesised at the Radiopharmacy Unit, Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre, Cambridge University, using the methodology previously described (32). Dynamic PET data acquisition was performed on a GE SIGNA PET/MR (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, USA) for 90 minutes starting immediately after [11C]UCB-J injection (median injected activity: 351 ± 107 MBq, injected mass ≤ 10 μg), with attenuation correction including the use of a multi-subject atlas method (33,34) and also improvements to the MRI brain coil component (35). Each emission image series was aligned using SPM12 (www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/software/spm12/) then rigidly registered to a T1-weighted MRI acquired during PET data acquisition (TR = 3.6 msec, TE = 9.2 msec, 192 sagittal slices, in plane resolution 0.55 x 0.55 mm (subsequently interpolated to 1.0 x 1.0 mm); slice thickness 1.0 mm). Using a version of the Hammersmith atlas (http://brain-development.org) with modified posterior fossa regions, combined regions of interest (including aggregated regions for frontal, parietal, occipital, and temporal lobes; cingulate; and cerebellum) were spatially normalized to the T1-weighted MRI of each participant using Advanced Normalisation Tools (ANTs) software (36). Regional time-activity curves were extracted following the application of geometric transfer matrix (GTM) partial volume correction (PVC, (37)) to each of the dynamic PET images. Regions of interest (ROIs) were multiplied by a binary grey matter mask (>50% on the SPM12 grey matter probability map smoothed to PET spatial resolution), with the exception of the pallidum, substantia nigra, pons and medulla because masking eliminated the ROI for some or all of the subjects. Multiple background grey matter, white matter and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) regions were also defined to provide whole brain coverage for GTM PVC. The mean grey matter/(grey matter + white matter) fraction in the masked ROIs was 0.97 ± 0.03, 0.96 ± 0.03 and 0.96 ± 0.03 for the control, CBD and PSP groups, respectively, illustrating the predominance of grey matter in the masked ROIs. To assess the impact of PVC, time-activity curves were also extracted from the same ROIs without the application of GTM PVC.

To quantify SV2A density, [11C]UCB-J non-displaceable binding potential (BPND) was determined, both regionally and at the voxel level, using a basis function implementation of the simplified reference tissue model (38), with the reference tissue defined in the centrum semiovale (39,40). The volume-weighted average of the GTM PVC BPND values in the masked ROIs was used as a global BPND metric. Group average BPND images (illustrated in Figure 1A) were obtained by spatially normalising each individual T1-weighted MRI (and thereby the co-registered BPND map) to MNI space, and then to the group template using ANTs.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(A) Mean [11C]UCB-J BPND maps for control participants (top row), CBD (middle row), and PSP (bottom row); high and low BPND values are shown by red and blue areas, respectively.

(B) Reduction in global [11C]UCB-J BPND across patients compared to controls (P<0.05).

(C) Individual regional GTM PVC [11C]UCB-J BPND values for control, CBD and PSP participants, across major regions of interests. Binding potential values for patients differed significantly from controls in all the regions depicted (P<0.05, FDR corrected).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses used R (version 3.6.2), with analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) to compare regional [11C]UCB-J BPND between the three groups (Control, CBD, PSP), with age as a covariates of no interest. Regions of interest were: frontal, temporal, parietal, occipital lobes; cingulate cortex, hippocampus, insula, amygdala, caudate nucleus, nucleus accumbens, putamen, pallidum, thalamus, cerebellum, substantia nigra, midbrain, pons, and medulla.

The relationships between [11C]UCB-J BPND, disease severity (PSP and CBD Rating Scales) and cognition (revised Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination) were tested through linear models of the patient data, with age as a covariate of no interest.

The primary analyses used BPND determined following GTM PVC, but all analyses were repeated using BPND without PVC.

Results

Of the fifteen patients with CBS, six had a cortical [11C]PiB SUVR more than 1.21 and were therefore excluded from further analysis in this paper. The remaining groups (9 CBD, 14 PSP, 15 controls) were matched in age, sex and education (Table 1). We observed typical cognitive profiles, as summarised in Table 1: patients were impaired on memory, verbal fluency, language and visuospatial domains of the ACE-R, MMSE and MoCA. There were high endorsements on the Cambridge Behavioural Inventory, and the Clinical Dementia Rating scale, with impairment of activities of daily living on the Schwab and England scale. Concurrent medications used by our participants at the time of the [11C]UCB-J PET scan are outlined in Supplementary Table 1. Four of our patients (1 PSP, 3 CBD) were on dopaminergic medication, and 9 on amantadine (3 PSP, 6 CBD).

Compared to controls, in patients there was a significant global reduction in [11C]UCB-J BPND (Figure 1A-C) across all major cortical and subcortical areas (p<0.05 FDR corrected for all regions of interest shown in Figure 1C); regional BPND values for the three groups are reported in Table 2. BPND in PSP and CBD was 20-50% lower than controls (p<0.01), with the most severe median reduction seen in the medulla, substantia nigra, pallidum, midbrain, pons and caudate nucleus in patients with PSP, and in the medulla, hippocampus, amygdala, caudate nucleus, insula and thalamus in patients with CBD. Post-hoc analysis revealed that the significant differences in BPND between patients and controls in the pallidum and substantia nigra were mainly driven by the PSP cohort. Using data without GTM PVC, the pattern of statistically significant differences in BPND for the reported regions in Table 2 remains, p<0.001.

Table 2.

Mean (standard deviation) GTM PVC [11C]UCB-J BPND values per group for cortical and subcortical regions of interest. (surviving false discovery rate correction over 18 regions).

Region Control CBD PSP F (p)
Frontal Lobe 2.96 (0.17) 2.60 (0.29) 2.48 (0.28) 15.05 (<0.0001)
Temporal Lobe 2.68 (0.16) 2.30 (0.23) 2.17 (0.27) 19.34 (<0.0001)
Parietal Lobe 3.11 (0.19) 2.75 (0.32) 2.63 (0.36) 10.10 (<0.0003)
Occipital Lobe 2.98 (0.23) 2.66 (0.29) 2.48 (0.41) 8.80 (0.0008)
Cingulate 3.02 (0.21) 2.56 (0.26) 2.46 (0.28) 20.41 (<0.0001)
Insula 2.76 (0.15) 2.24 (0.26) 2.17 (0.27) 28.55 (<0.0001)
Amygdala 2.71 (0.20) 2.18 (0.34) 2.20 (0.33) 14.67 (<0.0001)
Nucleus Accumbens 4.18 (0.31) 3.85 (0.46) 3.54 (0.33) 11.28 (0.0002)
Hippocampus 2.00 (0.20) 1.57 (0.29) 1.57 (0.30) 12.37 (<0.0001)
Caudate Nucleus 3.12 (0.22) 2.59 (0.41) 2.48 (0.36) 15.59 (<0.0001)
Pallidum 1.90 (0.22) 1.65 (0.24) 1.27 (0.31) 20.69 (<0.0001)a
Putamen 3.99 (0.24) 3.43 (0.32) 3.28 (0.37) 19.94 (<0.0001)
Thalamus 2.86 (0.25) 2.29 (0.45) 2.25 (0.44) 11.23 (<0.0002)
Cerebellum 2.13 (0.22) 1.75 (0.30) 1.69 (0.28) 11.50 (0.0001)
Midbrain 2.61 (0.29) 2.16 (0.38) 1.83 (0.42) 16.61 (<0.0001)
Substantia Nigra 2.13 (0.28) 1.72 (0.34) 1.32 (0.59) 12.79 (<0.0001)a
Pons 0.93 (0.13) 0.75 (0.18) 0.71 (0.18) 7.69 (0.002)
Medulla 0.62 (0.16) 0.37 (0.17) 0.28 (0.24) 12.04 (<0.001)

CBD here refers to corticobasal syndrome with a negative amyloid biomarker from [11C]PiB PET, and PSP refers to patients with PSP-Richardson’s syndrome. F-statistic and p-values derived from an ANCOVA across the three groups, with age as a covariate of no interest. athe significant difference here is driven by the PSP group only.

The reduction in synaptic density was seen even in the areas of the brain that did not show significant grey matter atrophy. Figure 2A shows the group differences in grey matter volume normalized against the mean of the control group; the significant areas of grey matter volume loss were in the caudate nucleus (p=0.01), and thalamus (p=0.04) in the CBD cohort, and in the frontal (p<0.01), temporal (p=0.04), parietal (p<0.01), occipital lobes (p<0.01), caudate nucleus (p<0.001), and the thalamus (p<0.01) in the PSP cohort. The reduction in [11C]UCB-J BPND however, is more extensive and consistently significantly different across all major cortical and subcortical areas as shown in the normalised plot in Figure 2B (binding potentials were normalised against the mean binding potential of the control cohort for each region of interest).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(A) Cortical and subcortical grey matter volumes, normalised against the corresponding volumes in controls, were significantly reduced in the caudate nucleus and thalamus in CBD; and in frontal, temporal, parietal and occipital lobes, as well as in the caudate nucleus, and thalamus in PSP, P<0.05.

(B) Mean-centred [11C]UCB-J BPND across cortical and subcortical regions of interest normalised against the corresponding BPND values in controls, demonstrating a median reduction of 20-50%.

Correlations between [11C]UCB-J BPND and both global cognition and disease severity are given in Figure 3. A significant positive correlation was seen between [11C]UCB-J BPND and the revised Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination total score (R=0.52, p=0.01) (Figure 3A). There was a significant negative correlation between [11C]UCB-J binding and the PSP (R= -0.61, p<0.01), and CBD (R= -0.72, p<0.001) rating scales (Figures 3B and 3C)

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Correlations between global [11C]UCB-J BPND and total ACE-R score (A), total PSP rating scale (B), and total CBD rating scale (C) for the two patient groups.

Discussion

The principal result of this study is a widespread reduction in synaptic density in PSP-Richardson’s syndrome and amyloid-negative Corticobasal Syndrome (CBS) (which we define as Corticobasal Degeneration (CBD). This accords with post mortem estimates of synaptic loss in PSP and CBD, using synaptophysin immunohistochemistry (6), imaging of neurite density in PSP (41) and morphological studies of cortical dendrites in the closely related condition of frontotemporal lobe dementia (42). Indirect evidence of synaptic loss, from consequential reduction in metabolism, comes from [18F]FDG PET changes in frontal, temporal and parietal lobes (4346). However, PET imaging with the ligand [11C]UCB-J provides direct evidence in vivo of severe and extensive loss of cortical and subcortical synapses, including areas of the brain that are minimally atrophic (47).

Progressive supranuclear palsy and corticobasal degeneration are progressive, with an average disease duration of five to eight years from symptom onset (48). In our clinically diagnosed CBD and PSP groups, the mean symptom duration at the time of PET was three and a half years, and our patients were likely to be approximately mid-way through their symptomatic disease course (not including a potentially long pre-symptomatic period). The median reduction of 20% (and maximal 50%) in [11C]UCB-J binding observed in vivo compared to controls, is therefore in keeping with the predictions from post mortem data.

The synaptic loss observed in our study is widespread, extending beyond the regions that are arguably most associated with the diseases. In PSP, from post mortem studies, these include basal ganglia, thalamus, substantia nigra, premotor cortex, as well as the dentate nucleus and cerebellar white matter. In CBD, areas associated with the disease include cortex, thalamus, basal ganglia and brainstem, without cerebellar involvement (4850). However, in our study the loss of synapses in PSP is global across the cortex, and not confined to the premotor and motor areas, and extends beyond the substantia nigra in the brainstem with pontine and medullary involvement. The loss of synapses in the cerebellum in PSP echoes pathological studies of tau distribution in this disease (49). Interestingly, the cerebellum was also markedly abnormal in CBD; although cerebellar atrophy and tau accumulation are not typical associations of CBD (49). Cerebellar synaptic loss in CBD may therefore represent cerebellar diaschisis in response to widespread cortical pathology and loss of cortico-cerebellar projections; a small minority of individuals in an amyloid-negative CBS cohort may have PSP as the underlying cause for their corticobasal syndrome, although this is unlikely to be sufficient to drive the group-wise effect.

Preclinical models of tauopathy suggest early synaptotoxicity with reduced plasticity and density (11), in response to soluble oligomeric tau aggregates (12) and inflammation (51). The toxicity associated with tau pathology leading to synapse loss is complex and involves direct and indirect pathways (reviewed in Spires-Jones et al. 2014 (52)). Naturally occurring tau plays a role in synaptic function through modulating microtubule and axonal stability; disruptions to this machinery leads to prevention of the trafficking of essential components to synapses such as synaptic receptors (53) and mitochondria. Indeed, over-expression of tau interferes with mitochondria transport (54), and contributes to hyperexcitability of neurons and impaired calcium influx in transgenic mouse models (rTg4510) (55). The global nature of synaptic reduction suggests a more widespread pathology in the primary tauopathies of PSP and CBD beyond the areas that are histologically reported as harbouring a high tau burden such as the basal ganglia, thalamus, and brain stem (56). This may in part be explained by the global damage caused by oligomers of tau which are not easily visible on tau PET imaging or histology. In support of this are biochemical studies that report tau accumulation in both grey and white matter by western blot in PSP but not necessarily by immunohistochemistry (57).

We observed a significant correlation between synaptic loss and disease severity in PSP and amyloid-negative CBS. Synaptic loss correlates with cognitive impairment in another clinical tauopathy, Alzheimer’s disease (13,58), and preclinical models of this (59,60). Our in vivo PET results support the potential use of synaptic PET as a marker of disease and progression, but longitudinal data are required. Synaptic PET may support early stage clinical trials in PSP and CBS/CBD; it is encouraging in this latter respect that [11C]UCB-J PET is sensitive to changes in synaptic density, for example in response to treatment with the synaptic modulator Saracatinib (61).

Our study has several limitations. Although the sample size is small, it is adequately powered in view of the large effect sizes predicted. However, subtler relationships with mild disease, progression or individual clinical features, or phenotypic variants of PSP and CBS, require larger studies. We acknowledge the potential for off-target binding, but preclinical data indicate very high correlations between UCB-J and synaptophysin, a marker of pre-synaptic vesicular density (25). Our diagnoses were clinical, without neuropathology, although the clinicopathological correlations of PSP-Richardson syndrome are very high, and in the absence of Alzheimer’s disease, the clinicopathological correlation of CBS with a 4R-tauopathy (CBD or PSP) is also high (18). Binding potentials for SV2A radioligands such as [11C]UCB-J can be confounded by the use of concurrent medication that may bind to SV2A. We did not enrol any individuals taking levetiracetam or any member of this family of drugs that are SV2A-specific ligands (62). Previously reported studies using [11C]UCB-J in disease have usually not commented on medications used by participants, however one study using this ligand in major depressive disorders reports exclusion of participants on psychotropic medications in the 2 months preceding PET scanning (63); whilst many of our PSP and CBD patients are on medications falling under the psychotropic umbrella, to our knowledge, none of these bind to SV2A.

Arterial blood sampling was not carried out in this study; we used reference tissue modelling to reduce the demand on our patient cohort. Reference tissue modelling of [11C]UCB-J with the centrum semiovale as the reference tissue has been verified against arterial input function compartmental modelling in healthy controls (39,40) and in Alzheimer’s disease (64). To assess the validity of the centrum semiovale in our cohort, we determined the mean total distribution volume (VT) for each of our subject groups using standard arterial input function data from the literature (26,65); this approach assumed that the standard input function was equally valid for all groups. This analysis indicated a small positive bias in centrum semiovale VT for CBD (5%) and less so PSP (2%) relative to that in controls, which would lead to a commensurate reduction in BPND under the assumption that the non-displaceable distribution volume (VND) in the target ROIs remains invariant. These biases cannot, however, explain the much greater BPND reductions seen for CBD and PSP, which is especially true for PSP. Indeed, scaling BPND in the CBD and PSP cohorts to account for the above biases in centrum semiovale VT, produced a similar pattern of significant global reduction in BPND for patients compared to controls, except that the significant differences in the midbrain, pons, substantia nigra, pallidum, and occipital lobe were primarily driven by the PSP cohort in the post-hoc analysis.

The therapeutic challenge in tauopathies is partly due to the complex nature of the underlying pathology. Early stage trials will require early accurate diagnosis, although diagnosis is typically made 3 years after symptom onset (66,67). It is unlikely that synaptic PET could provide pre-symptomatic diagnosis in rare conditions, but it is a promising tool to characterise pathogenetic mechanisms, monitor progression and assess response to experimental medicines (68).

Supplementary Material

Supp Tables

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the participants, the staff at the Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre, and the staff at the Cambridge Centre for Parkinson-Plus. We thank the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre for Support.

Funding

The study was funded by the Cambridge University Centre for Parkinson-Plus; the National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (SUAG/004 RG91365 JBR); the Wellcome Trust (103838) and the Association of British Neurologists, Patrick Berthoud Charitable Trust (RG99368). MP is supported by Cambridge Trust Vice-Chancellor's Award & Sidney Sussex College Scholarship. FHH is supported by a Cambridge Trust Vice-Chancellor's Award & Fitzwilliam College scholarship.

Biography

Authors’ Roles

1) Research project: A. Conception, B. Organization, C. Execution;

2) Statistical Analysis: A. Design, B. Execution, C. Review and Critique;

3) Manuscript: A. Writing of the first draft, B. Review and Critique.

Negin Holland (1A-C, 2A-C, 3A-B); P. Simon Jones (2C, 3B); George Savulich (1B-C, 3B); Julie K. Wiggins(1B-C,3B); Young T. Hong (1C, 2C, 3B); Tim D. Fryer (2C, 3B); Roido Manavaki (1C, 2C); Selena Milicevic-Sephton (1C, 3B); Istvan Boros (3C); Maura Malpetti (2C, 3B); Frank H. Hezemans (2B, 3B); Franklin I. Aigbirhio (1A, 3B); Jonathan P. Coles (1A, 3B); John O’Brien (1A, 2C, 3B); James B. Rowe (1A, 2C, 3B).

Footnotes

Financial Disclosures/conflict of interest: The authors do not have any competing interest pertaining to the manuscript.

Financial Disclosures of all authors (for the preceding 12 months)

NH is funded by the Association of British Neurologists - Patrick Berthoud Charitable Trust. PSJ has no financial disclosures to report. GS has no financial disclosures to report. JKW has no financial disclosures to report. YTH has no financial disclosures to report. TDF has no financial disclosures to report. RM has no financial disclosures to report. SMS has no financial disclosures to report. IB has no financial disclosures to report. FIA has no financial disclosures to report. JBR serves as an associate editor to Brain, and is a non-remunerated trustee of the Guarantors of Brain and the PSP Association (UK). He provides consultancy to Asceneuron, Biogen and UCB and has research grants from AZ-Medimmune, Janssen and Lilly as industry partners in the Dementias Platform UK. JOB provides consultancy to Axon, TauRx and Eisai and has research grant support from Alliance Medical and Merck.

References

  • 1.Armstrong MJ, Litvan I, Lang AE, Bak TH, Bhatia KP, Borroni B, et al. Criteria for the diagnosis of corticobasal degeneration. [cited 2019 Jan 23];Neurology. 2013 Jan 29;80(5):496–503. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827f0fd1. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23359374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Burrell JR, Hodges JR, Rowe JB. Cognition in corticobasal syndrome and progressive supranuclear palsy: A review. Mov Disord. 2014;29(5):684–93. doi: 10.1002/mds.25872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Höglinger GU, Respondek G, Stamelou M, Kurz C, Josephs KA, Lang AE, et al. Clinical diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy: The movement disorder society criteria. [cited 2019 Jan 23];Mov Disord. 2017 32(6):853–64. doi: 10.1002/mds.26987. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5516529/pdf/nihms879447.pdf. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Litvan I, Agid Y, Calne D, Campbell G, Dubois B, Duvoisin RC, et al. Clinical research criteria for the diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy (Steele-Richardson-Olszewski syndrome): Report of the NINDS-SPSP International Workshop. Neurology. 1996 doi: 10.1212/wnl.47.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rösler TW, Tayaranian Marvian A, Brendel M, Nykänen N-P, Höllerhage M, Schwarz SC, et al. Four-repeat tauopathies. [cited 2019 Oct 24];Prog Neurobiol. 2019 Sep 1;180 doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2019.101644. [Internet]. 101644. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301008219300863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bigio EH, Vono MB, Satumtira S, Adamson J, Sontag E, Hynan LS, et al. Cortical synapse loss in progressive supranuclear palsy. [cited 2018 Nov 6];J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2001 60(5):403–10. doi: 10.1093/jnen/60.5.403. [Internet]. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jnen/article-abstract/60/5/403/2916215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lipton AM, Munro Cullum C, Satumtira S, Sontag E, Hynan LS, White CL, et al. Contribution of asymmetric synapse loss to lateralizing clinical deficits in frontotemporal dementias. Arch Neurol. 2001;58(8):1233–9. doi: 10.1001/archneur.58.8.1233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Foster NL, Minoshima S, Johanns J, Little R, Heumann ML, Kuhl DE, et al. PET measures of benzodiazepine receptors in progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurology. 2000 May 9;54(9):1768–73. doi: 10.1212/wnl.54.9.1768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Andersson JD, Matuskey D, Finnema SJ. Positron emission tomography imaging of the γ-aminobutyric acid system. Neurosci Lett. 2019 May;691:35–43. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.08.010. [Internet] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jiang S, Wen N, Li Z, Dube U, Del Aguila J, Budde J, et al. Integrative system biology analyses of CRISPR-edited iPSC-derived neurons and human brains reveal deficiencies of presynaptic signaling in FTLD and PSP. Transl Psychiatry. 2018 Dec 1;8(1) doi: 10.1038/s41398-018-0319-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Menkes-Caspi N, Yamin HG, Kellner V, Spires-Jones TL, Cohen D, Stern EA. Pathological tau disrupts ongoing network activity. [cited 2018 Nov 6];Neuron. 2015 85(5):959–66. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.01.025. [Internet] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kaniyappan S, Chandupatla RR, Mandelkow EM, Mandelkow E. Extracellular low-n oligomers of tau cause selective synaptotoxicity without affecting cell viability. [cited 2018 Nov 6];Alzheimer’s Dement. 2017 Nov;13(11):1270–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2017.04.002. [Internet]. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1552526017301838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Terry RD, Masliah E, Salmon DP, Butters N, DeTeresa R, Hill R, et al. Physical basis of cognitive alterations in alzheimer’s disease: Synapse loss is the major correlate of cognitive impairment. [cited 2018 Nov 8];Ann Neurol. 1991 Oct;130(4):572–80. doi: 10.1002/ana.410300410. [Internet] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gazzina S, Respondek G, Compta Y, Allinson KS, Spillantini MG, Molina-Porcel L, et al. Neuropathological validation of the MDS-PSP criteria with PSP and other frontotemporal lobar degeneration. [cited 2019 Feb 28];bioRxiv. 2019 Jan 15; [Internet]. 520510. Available from: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/520510v1.abstract. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Steele JC, Richardson JC, Olszewski J. Progressive Supranuclear Palsy: A Heterogeneous Degeneration Involving the Brain Stem, Basal Ganglia and Cerebellum With Vertical Gaze and Pseudobulbar Palsy, Nuchal Dystonia and Dementia. [cited 2019 Jun 25];Arch Neurol. 1964 Apr 1;10(4):333–59. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1964.00460160003001. [Internet]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Williams DR, Lees AJ. Progressive supranuclear palsy: clinicopathological concepts and diagnostic challenges. [cited 2020 Apr 4];The Lancet Neurology. 2009 8 doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70042-0. [Internet]. Available from: www.thelancet.com/neurology. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Burrell JR, Hodges JR, Rowe JB. Cognition in corticobasal syndrome and progressive supranuclear palsy: a review. Mov Disord. 2014;29(5):684–93. doi: 10.1002/mds.25872. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24757116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Alexander SK, Rittman T, Xuereb JH, Bak TH, Hodges JR, Rowe JB. Validation of the new consensus criteria for the diagnosis of corticobasal degeneration. [cited 2018 Nov 10];J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014 85(8):923–7. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-307035. [Internet]. Available from: http://cran.r-project.org/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jabbari E, Holland N, Chelban V, Jones PS, Lamb R, Rawlinson C, et al. Diagnosis Across the Spectrum of Progressive Supranuclear Palsy and Corticobasal Syndrome. [cited 2019 Dec 23];JAMA Neurol. 2019 Dec 20; doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.4347. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31860007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sami S, Williams N, Hughes LE, Cope TE, Rittman T, Coyle-Gilchrist ITS, et al. Neurophysiological signatures of Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration: Pathology versus phenotype. [cited 2018 Nov 10];Brain. 2018 141(8):2500–10. doi: 10.1093/brain/awy180. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6061803/pdf/awy180.pdf. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cope TE, Rittman T, Borchert RJ, Jones PS, Vatansever D, Allinson K, et al. Tau burden and the functional connectome in Alzheimer’s disease and progressive supranuclear palsy. [cited 2018 Nov 6];Brain. 2018 141(2):550–67. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx347. [Internet]. Available from: https://wiki. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hughes LE, Rowe JB, Ghosh BCP, Carlyon RP, Plack CJ, Gockel HE. The binaural masking level difference: Cortical correlates persist despite severe brain stem atrophy in progressive supranuclear palsy. J Neurophysiol. 2014 Dec 15;112(12):3086–94. doi: 10.1152/jn.00062.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wolpe N, Moore JW, Rae CL, Rittman T, Altena E, Haggard P, et al. The medial frontal-prefrontal network for altered awareness and control of action in corticobasal syndrome. Brain. 2014;137(1):208–20. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Milicevic Sephton S, Miklovicz T, Russell J, Doke A, Li L, Boros I. Automated radiosynthesis of [11C]UCB-J for imaging synaptic density by PET. J Label Compd Radiopharm. 2020 doi: 10.1002/jlcr.3828. In press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Finnema SJ, Nabulsi NB, Eid T, Detyniecki K, Lin SF, Chen MK, et al. Imaging synaptic density in the living human brain. [cited 2018 Nov 10];Sci Transl Med. 2016 8(348) doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf6667. [Internet]. Available from: www.ScienceTranslationalMedicine.org. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Finnema SJ, Nabulsi NB, Mercier J, Lin SF, Chen MK, Matuskey D, et al. Kinetic evaluation and test-retest reproducibility of [11C]UCB-J, a novel radioligand for positron emission tomography imaging of synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A in humans. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 2017 doi: 10.1177/0271678X17724947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bajjalieh SM, Peterson K, Linial M, Scheller RH. Brain contains two forms of synaptic vesicle protein 2. [cited 2019 Jun 26];Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1993 90 doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.6.2150. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC46043/pdf/pnas01465-0061.pdf. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bajjalieh SM, Frantz GD, Weimann JM, McConnell SK, Scheller RH. Differential expression of synaptic vesicle protein 2 (SV2) isoforms. [cited 2019 Jun 26];J Neurosci. 1994 Sep 1;14(9):5223–35. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-09-05223.1994. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8083732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chen MK, Mecca AP, Naganawa M, Finnema SJ, Toyonaga T, Lin SF, et al. Assessing Synaptic Density in Alzheimer Disease with Synaptic Vesicle Glycoprotein 2A Positron Emission Tomographic Imaging. [cited 2018 Sep 28];JAMA Neurol. 2018 Jul 16;75(10):1215–24. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1836. [Internet] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Klunk WE, Koeppe RA, Price JC, Benzinger TL, Devous MD, Jagust WJ, et al. The Centiloid project: Standardizing quantitative amyloid plaque estimation by PET. [cited 2019 Sep 11];Alzheimer’s Dement. 2015 Jan;11(1):1–15.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.07.003. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25443857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jack CR, Wiste HJ, Weigand SD, Therneau TM, Lowe VJ, Knopman DS, et al. Defining imaging biomarker cut points for brain aging and Alzheimer’s disease. [cited 2019 Sep 10];Alzheimer’s Dement. 2017 Mar;13(3):205–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.08.005. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27697430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Milicevic Sephton S, Miklovicz T, Russell JJ, Doke A, Li L, Boros I, et al. Automated radiosynthesis of [11 C]UCB-J for imaging synaptic density by positron emission tomography. [cited 2020 May 9];J Label Compd Radiopharm. 2020 Mar 1;63(3):151–8. doi: 10.1002/jlcr.3828. [Internet] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Burgos N, Cardoso MJ, Thielemans K, Modat M, Pedemonte S, Dickson J, et al. Attenuation correction synthesis for hybrid PET-MR scanners: Application to brain studies. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2014 doi: 10.1109/TMI.2014.2340135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Prados F, Cardoso MJ, Burgos N, Wheeler-Kingshott C, Ourselin S, Angela C, et al. NiftyWeb: web based platform for image processing on the cloud; 24th Scientific Meeting and Exhibition of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM); 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Manavaki R, Hong Y, Fryer TD. Brain MRI coil attenuation map processing for the GE SIGNA PET/MR: Impact on PET image quantification and uniformity; IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Med Imaging Conf Proceedings; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Avants BB, Epstein CL, Grossman M, Gee JC. Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: Evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain. Med Image Anal. 2008;12(1):26–41. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2007.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Rousset OG, Ma Y, Evans AC. Correction for partial volume effects in PET: Principle and validation. J Nucl Med. 1998 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wu Y, Carson RE. Noise reduction in the simplified reference tissue model for neuroreceptor functional imaging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2002 doi: 10.1097/01.WCB.0000033967.83623.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Koole M, van Aalst J, Devrome M, Mertens N, Serdons K, Lacroix B, et al. Quantifying SV2A density and drug occupancy in the human brain using [11 C]UCB-J PET imaging and subcortical white matter as reference tissue. [cited 2018 Sep 28];Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Aug 18;46(2):396–406. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4119-8. [Internet] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Rossano S, Toyonaga T, Finnema SJ, Naganawa M, Lu Y, Nabulsi N, et al. Assessment of a white matter reference region for 11C-UCB-J PET quantification. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2019 doi: 10.1177/0271678X19879230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mitchell T, Archer DB, Chu WT, Coombes SA, Lai S, Wilkes BJ, et al. Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) and free-water imaging in Parkinsonism. Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Dec 1;40(17):5094–107. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ferrer I, Roig C, Espino A, Peiro G, Matias Guiu X, Neuropatologia U, et al. Dementia of frontal lobe type and motor neuron disease. A Golgi study of the frontal cortex. Journal ofNeurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 1991;54 doi: 10.1136/jnnp.54.10.932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Juh R, Kim J, Moon D, Choe B, Suh T. Different metabolic patterns analysis of Parkinsonism on the 18 F-FDG PET. [cited 2019 Dec 26];Eur J Radiol. 2004 51:223–33. doi: 10.1016/S0720-048X(03)00214-6. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.psychology.nottingham.ac.uk. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Blin J, Vidailhet M-J, Pillon B, Dubois B, Feve J-R, Agid Y. Corticobasal degeneration: Decreased and asymmetrical glucose consumption as studied with PET. [cited 2019 Dec 26];Mov Disord. 1992 7(4):348–54. doi: 10.1002/mds.870070409. [Internet] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Eidelberg D, Dhawan V, Moeller JR, Sidtis JJ, Ginos JZ, Strother SC, et al. The metabolic landscape of cortico-basal ganglionic degeneration: regional asymmetries studied with positron emission tomography. [cited 2019 Dec 26];Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry. 1991 54:856–62. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.54.10.856. [Internet]. Available from: http://jnnp.bmj.com/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Foster NL, Gilman S, Berent S, Morin EM, Brown MB, Koeppe RA. Cerebral hypometabolism in progressive supranuclear palsy studied with positron emission tomography. [cited 2019 Dec 26];Ann Neurol. 1988 Sep;24(3):399–406. doi: 10.1002/ana.410240308. [Internet] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Josephs KA, Whitwell JL, Dickson DW, Boeve BF, Knopman DS, Petersen RC, et al. Voxel-based morphometry in autopsy proven PSP and CBD. [cited 2020 Jan 7];Neurobiol Aging. 2008 Feb;29(2):280–9. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.09.019. [Internet]. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0197458006003538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Dickson DW, Bergeron C, Chin SS, Duyckaerts C, Horoupian D, Ikeda K, et al. Office of Rare Diseases Neuropathologic Criteria for Corticobasal Degeneration. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2002 Nov 1;61(11):935–46. doi: 10.1093/jnen/61.11.935. [Internet] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Dickson DW, Kouri N, Murray ME, Josephs KA. Journal of Molecular Neuroscience. NIH Public Access; 2011. Neuropathology of frontotemporal lobar degeneration-Tau (FTLD-Tau) pp. 384–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kovacs GG, Lukic MJ, Irwin DJ, Arzberger T, Respondek G, Lee EB, et al. Distribution patterns of tau pathology in progressive supranuclear palsy. [cited 2020 May 10];Acta Neuropathol. 2020 May 7;:1–21. doi: 10.1007/s00401-020-02158-2. [Internet] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Rajendran L, Paolicelli RC. Microglia-mediated synapse loss in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci. 2018 Mar 21;38(12):2911–9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1136-17.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Spires-Jones TL, Hyman BT. The Intersection of Amyloid Beta and Tau at Synapses in Alzheimer’s Disease. Neuron. 2014;82:756–71. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.05.004. Cell Press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hoover BR, Reed MN, Su J, Penrod RD, Kotilinek LA, Grant MK, et al. Tau Mislocalization to Dendritic Spines Mediates Synaptic Dysfunction Independently of Neurodegeneration. Neuron. 2010 Dec 22;68(6):1067–81. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.11.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Stoothoff W, Jones PB, Spires-Jones TL, Joyner D, Chhabra E, Bercury K, et al. Differential effect of three-repeat and four-repeat tau on mitochondrial axonal transport. J Neurochem. 2009 Oct;111(2):417–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06316.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Rocher AB, Crimins JL, Amatrudo JM, Kinson MS, Todd-Brown MA, Lewis J, et al. Structural and functional changes in tau mutant mice neurons are not linked to the presence of NFTs. [cited 2019 Mar 3];Exp Neurol. 2010 Jun;223(2):385–93. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.07.029. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19665462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Dickson DW, Kouri N, Murray ME, Josephs KA. Journal of Molecular Neuroscience. Springer; 2011. Neuropathology of frontotemporal lobar degeneration-Tau (FTLD-Tau) pp. 384–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zhukareva V, Joyce S, Schuck T, Van Deerlin V, Hurtig H, Albin R, et al. Unexpected abundance of pathological tau in progressive supranuclear palsy white matter. [cited 2020 Mar 30];Ann Neurol. 2006 Sep;60(3):335–45. doi: 10.1002/ana.20916. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16823854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Robinson JL, Molina-Porcel L, Corrada MM, Raible K, Lee EB, Lee VMY, et al. Perforant path synaptic loss correlates with cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease in the oldest-old. Brain. 2014;137(9):2578–87. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kandimalla R, Manczak M, Yin X, Wang R, Reddy PH. Hippocampal phosphorylated tau induced cognitive decline, dendritic spine loss and mitochondrial abnormalities in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2018 Jan 1;27(1):30–40. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddx381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Walsh DM, Klyubin I, Fadeeva JV, Cullen WK, Anwyl R, Wolfe MS, et al. Naturally secreted oligomers of amyloid β protein potently inhibit hippocampal long-term potentiation in vivo. Nature. 2002 Apr 4;416(6880):535–9. doi: 10.1038/416535a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Toyonaga T, Smith LM, Finnema SJ, Gallezot J-D, Naganawa M, Bini J, et al. In vivo synaptic density imaging with 11 C-UCB-J detects treatment effects of saracatinib (AZD0530) in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. [cited 2019 Aug 29];J Nucl Med. 2019 May 17; doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.223867. jnumed.118.223867. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31101744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Löscher W, Gillard M, Sands ZA, Rafal •, Kaminski M, Klitgaard H. Synaptic Vesicle Glycoprotein 2A Ligands in the Treatment of Epilepsy and Beyond. CNS Drugs. 2016;30 doi: 10.1007/s40263-016-0384-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Holmes SE, Scheinost D, Finnema SJ, Naganawa M, Davis MT, DellaGioia N, et al. Lower synaptic density is associated with depression severity and network alterations. [cited 2019 Sep 11];Nat Commun. 2019 10(1) doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09562-7. [Internet] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Chen MK, Mecca AP, Naganawa M, Finnema SJ, Toyonaga T, Lin SF, et al. Assessing Synaptic Density in Alzheimer Disease with Synaptic Vesicle Glycoprotein 2A Positron Emission Tomographic Imaging. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75(10):1215–24. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1836. [Internet] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Mansur A, Rabiner EA, Comley RA, Lewis Y, Middleton LT, Huiban M, et al. Characterization of 3 PET tracers for quantification of mitochondrial and synaptic function in healthy human brain: 18F-BCPP-EF, 11C-SA-4503, and 11C-UCB-J. J Nucl Med. 2020 doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.228080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Mamarabadi M, Razjouyan H, Golbe LI. Is the Latency from Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Onset to Diagnosis Improving? Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2018 Nov 1;5(6):603–6. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Coyle-Gilchrist ITS, Dick KM, Patterson K, Rodríquez PV, Wehmann E, Wilcox A, et al. Prevalence, characteristics, and survival of frontotemporal lobar degeneration syndromes. [cited 2019 Jun 24];Neurology. 2016 86(18):1736–43. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002638. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27037234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Cai Z, Li S, Matuskey D, Nabulsi N, Huang Y. PET imaging of synaptic density: A new tool for investigation of neuropsychiatric diseases. Neurosci Lett. 2019 Apr;691:44–50. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.07.038. [Internet] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supp Tables

RESOURCES