Abstract
The attachment of the sugar D-N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) with to specific serine and threonine residues on proteins is referred to as protein O-GlcNAcylation. O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT) is the enzyme responsible for carrying out the modification while O-GlcNAcase (OGA) reverses it. Protein O-GlcNAcylation has been implicated in a wide range of cellular processes including transcription, proteostasis and stress response. Dysregulation of O-GlcNAc has been linked to diabetes, cancer, neurodegenerative and cardiovascular disease. OGA has been proposed to be a drug target for the treatment of Alzheimer’s and cardiovascular disease given that increased O-GlcNAc levels appear to exert a protective effect. The search for specific, potent and drug-like OGA inhibitors with bioavailability in the brain is therefore a field of active research, requiring orthogonal high-throughput assay platforms. Here we describe the synthesis of a novel probe for use in a fluorescence polarization based assay for the discovery of inhibitors of OGA. We show that the probe is suitable for use with both human OGA, as well as the orthologous bacterial counterpart from Clostridium perfringens, CpOGA, and the lysosomal hexosaminidases HexA/B. We structurally characterize CpOGA in complex with a ligand identified from a fragment library screen using this assay. The versatile synthesis procedure could be adapted for making fluorescent probes for the assay of other glycoside hydrolases.
Introduction
Protein O-GlcNAcylation is the dynamic and reversible modification of specific serine and threonine side chains on multitude of nucleocytoplasmic and mitochondrial proteins with a single β-N-acetylglucosamine residue1. The attachment of the sugar is catalyzed by the enzyme O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT) and its removal by O-GlcNAcase (OGA). Both OGT and OGA are essential enzymes in mice, with their loss resulting in lethality2–4. Protein O-GlcNAcylation is involved in various cellular processes including transcription5–8, protein stability/degradation9, and stress response10–12; in most these processes, however, the exact role of O-GlcNAcylation is yet to be deciphered. Dysregulation of O-GlcNAc cycling, associated with malfunctions in the production and activity of the processing enzymes, is a feature of pathological conditions such as diabetes, cancer, Alzheimer’s disease and cardiovascular disease1, 9, 13–15.
The structural characterization of bacterial OGAs and more recently human OGA gave insights into the binding mode of O-GlcNAc proteins16–20. Schimpl et al. showed that glycosylated substrate peptides bind in a conserved groove in a similar conformation and orientation, adopting a “V”-shaped conformation with the residue side chains pointing away from the active site, explaining how a single enzyme can recognize > 1000 different substrates16. Inspection of the structures revealed that the peptide backbone forms interactions with OGA, in the -4 through the +3 position surrounding the O-GlcNAc site16. Additional hydrophobic interactions are formed by residues in the -1 and -2 position and a surface exposed Tyr189 in CpOGA, which is conserved in the human OGA (Tyr69)16, 17. Studies revealed that mutation of Tyr69 in human OGA leads to a significant reduction in catalytic activity on 17 the substrate analogue 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-D-N-acetylglucosaminide (4MU-GlcNAc).
Structural studies of human OGT21, 23 and bacterial orthologues of OGA24, 25 have allowed the development of inhibitors26–33 to study the function of these enzymes at the molecular and cellular level. In the case of OGA, potent, cell penetrant inhibitors exist29–33, and have been used for the identification of OGA as a potential drug target for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and cardiovascular disease34–36. Hyperphosphorylation of the protein tau resulting in the formation of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) in AD leading to neuronal loss can be slowed by increasing O-GlcNAcylation, which stabilizes tau, preventing its aggregation34. This study was performed using mice fed with the OGA inhibitor Thiamet G30. A chemically related molecule NButGT29 was shown to prevent the accumulation of the protein amyloid β, neuroinflammation and memory loss in another mouse model of AD35. With respect to cardiovascular disease, inhibition of OGA using NAG thiazolines and NButGT was shown to be protective and attenuate tissue necrosis after ischaemia/reperfusion injury36, 37. Furthermore, genetic studies have suggested that deletion of oga is perinatally lethal although it is not yet clear whether this essentiality is limited to early development 3, 4. While potent and selective, the existing inhibitors of OGA possess a carbohydrate scaffold, which has poor drug-like properties with respect to Lipinski’s rules. Achieving therapeutic concentrations of these molecules in vivo requires the administration of large quantities of the drugs. Molecules with improved stability, pharmacology and penetrability of the blood-brain barrier are desired and the search for these is the subject of ongoing research, exemplified by recent studies describing the use of click chemistry for the rapid generation of potential OGA inhibitor libraries38 and the use of existing chemical libraries for the discovery of new drug-like inhibitor scaffolds39.
Fluorescence polarization (FP) is one of many techniques used for the analysis of ligand-protein interactions. The FP technique offers advantages over methods such as surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and biolayer interferometry (BLI) for the measurement of binding affinities of proteins to ligands40. It is robust, the quantities of protein/ligands required for an FP assay are comparatively low and neither proteins nor ligands require to be immobilized to a surface. This makes the FP assay completely solution-based and minimizes skewing of binding equilibrium, which could occur by immobilizing a protein, as this may impose constraints on structural changes that could occur upon ligand binding40, 41. Also, as a solution based technique, an FP assay is more amenable to high throughput formats. While the OGA activity assay based on the hydrolysis of the fluorescent substrate 4MU-GlcNAc provides a method for the discovery of OGA inhibitors24, 42, the measurement of inhibition constants for potent inhibitors requires long incubations periods (e.g. ~7 h for CpOGA and GIcNAcstatin C)32. An advantage of an FP based OGA assay is direct measurement of binding rather than loss of activity, reducing assay length. The main limiting factor in the development of an FP assay is the requirement for a tailor-made fluorescent ligand with high affinity to the protein/receptor under study, which is what we report here.
Results and Discussion
Previously, we established a robust synthetic approach to a family of highly potent and selective OGA inhibitors, built on 8-alkylamido 2-phenethyl substituted bicyclic sugar-imidazole scaffold (GlcNAcstatins) 43. Here we disclose the synthesis of a fluorescently tagged derivative of the potent OGA inhibitor GlcNAcstatin B 1 created by the replacement of the 2-phenethyl group of the parent molecule with aminopropyl spacer labeled with FITC (hereafter referred to as GlcNAcstatin BF 2 (Fig. 1)).
Figure 1. Structures of GlcNAcstatin B (1) and GlcNAcstatin BF (2).
We also report a novel FP displacement assay using GlcNAcstatin BF as a fluorescent tracer to measure the binding affinities of existing inhibitors to the bacterial OGA from Clostridium perfringens, CpOGA, as well as human OGA (hOGA).
We initially devised a concise synthetic scheme to access GlcNAcstatin BF 2 (Scheme 1). We scheduled the chemoselective installation of a fluorescent tag onto the derivative 3 bearing the requisite aminopropyl handle that supports the final steps in synthesis of the target compound. To reach 3 we devised a novel synthetic approach for the construction of the 8-alkylamido 2-substituted sugar-imidazole 4 by reversing the order in which the corresponding substituents would be introduced into the target molecule as compared to the published approach43.
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic analysis of GIcNAcstatin BF.
Accordingly, we planned to transform the known key 2-iodo-mannose-imidazole 6 into GlcNAc-imidazole derivative 5, which in turn was to be coupled with N-Boc propargyl amine in a Sonogashira reaction giving the intermediate 4. Although this previously unexplored reverse sequence lacks the flexibility of the previously published approach43, it sufficed for the case where synthesis of the sole N-acetyl derivative was required.
Previously, the intermediate 6 was prepared by regioselective mono-deiodination of the diiododerivative 6a, which in turn was the product of a challenging bis-iodination (8 eq of NIS, 85 °C, 36 h) of the bicyclic sugar-imidazole 6b. The latter process was found to be unsuitable for upscaling, resulting in formation of varying amounts of the triply iodinated (ortho position in the p-methoxybenzyl (PMB) group) product, depending on the quality of NIS used. As an alternative route to intermediate 6, we decided to reinvestigate the cyclization of the linear 4,5-diiodoimidazole 7, which was previously found to be inert in a triflic anhydride mediated process 43 (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2.
a Reagents and conditions: (a) Tf2O, C2H4Cl2, 65 °C; (b) PPh3, DIAD, THF, 65 °C, 1h, 85%; (c) EtMgBr, THF, 0 °C, 1 h, 89%; (d) TFA-H2O 1:9, DCM, 1h, RT, 85%; (e) DPPA, DBU, Tol, 90 °C, 1h, 95%; (f) PPh3, THF-H2O, 65 °C, 3 h, then Ac2O, DIPEA, 16 RT, 85%; (g) HCCCH2NHBoc; Pd(PPh3)4, Cui, Et3N, DMF, 85 °C, 16 h, 53%; (h) H2, Pd/C, MeOH, 2 h, RT; (i) HCl:TFE 1:50, 50 °C, 2 h followed by FITC, DIPEA, DMF, RT, 1 h, 65% over two steps.
We assumed that the decreased pKa of the imidazole moiety in 7 would facilitate intramolecular reactivity under Mitsunobu N-alkylation conditions, giving the bicyclic sugar imidazole 6a directly. The intermolecular Mitsunobu N-alkylation reaction of imidazoles bearing electron-withdrawing substituents with different alcohols, including secondary, has several precedents in the literature44, 45. Furthermore, Mitsunobu type cyclization of structurally similar sugar-derived 1,4-diols was consistently used for the synthesis of C-nucleosides including C2-imidazole and benzimidazole derivatives46, 47. In our hands, reaction of the linear precursor 7 under standard Mitsunobu conditions (PPh3, DIAD, 65 °C) resulted in formation of the expected known bicyclic product 6a in excellent yield (Scheme 2). The reaction was shown to be equally applicable to multi-gram scale preparations. Taken together, the novel intramolecular Mitsunobu N-alkylation of 7 in conjunction with the proven highly efficient regioselective mono-deiodination of 6a represents a streamlined (and more economic) access to the key 2-iodoimidazole 6 that supersedes the triflic anhydride mediated cyclization/bis-iodination sequence of the former approach43.
We have previously documented the hydrolytic stability of the BDA group in the GlcNAc-imidazoles 43. Now we reveal that this phenomenon also works for neutral glycoimidazoles to introduce useful orthogonality towards acidolysis between PMB and BDA groups. Indeed, using the standard conditions for the deprotection of the PMB group (aqueous 90% TFA in DCM48) we were able to selectively remove the 8-O PMB group in 6 without affecting the DBA49 and (less surprisingly) the TIPS groups to obtain the monohydroxylic compound 8 in 85 % yield (Scheme 2). This counterintuitive deprotection protocol offers a simplified alternative to the DDQ-mediated PMB removal of the original approach43.
Using 8 as the substrate, the stereoselective azide introduction with inversion of configuration proceeded smoothly according to the established protocol to give gluco-imidazole 9 in a nearly quantitative yield. Next, a one-pot stepwise Staudinger reduction/acetylation sequence applied to 9 gave the crucial 2-iodo-GlcNAc-imidazole 5 in high yield. The Sonogashira coupling of derivative 5 with N-Boc propargyl amine resulted in a fair yield (53%) of the desired advanced intermediate 4. Overall, we have successfully implemented a novel synthetic approach for the construction of 8-alkylamido-2 substituted sugar-imidazoles. This approach produces comparable efficiency to the original one on all the separate steps but Sonogashira coupling, where somewhat diminished yield was recorded.
The concluding transformation of 4 into the targeted fluorescent tracer 2 was initiated with hydrogenation of the triple bond to give the C-2 aminopropyl equipped derivative 10. The pivotal one-pot global removal of the protecting groups in 10 was efficiently achieved with 12 M HCl in trifluoroethanol (1:50) at 55 °C for 2 h to give the fully deprotected compound 3 50, 51 which was (without purification) treated with a slight excess of FITC in DMF to furnish the fluorescently tagged product 2 (Scheme 2). The reaction mixture was directly purified by reverse phase flash chromatography on a C18 column and the product was re-purified to homogeneity by HPLC to afford the desired GlcNAcstatin BF in 65% yield over the three-step sequence.
We next wanted to assess the use of GlcNAcstatin BF with CpOGA and hOGA in an FP assay. GlcNAcstatin BF bound to CpOGA with a K d of 0.5 ± 0.2 nM (Fig. 2a) and to hOGA with a K d of 143 ± 29 nM (Fig. 2b). We then used GlcNAcstatin BF in displacement assays to measure the K d of the inhibitors GlcNAcstatin B and GlcNAcstatin G. Consistent with previous reports 32, 33, GlcNAcstatin B was a better binder of CpOGA with a K i of 6.6 nM versus 16.3 nM for GlcNAcstatin G (Fig. 2c). For hOGA, however, the K i obtained for GlcNAcstatin B was 23.2 nM and for GlcNAcstatin G, it was 21.4 nM (Fig. 2d). The absolute K i values obtained for these inhibitors are not consistent with previously reported K i values obtained using the 4MU-NAG based activity assay32, 33. In addition to the variability expected from using different methods, this could be due to the differences in the assay buffer and pH used or the different N-terminal truncation of the construct used in this study. Dorfmueller et al., used the McIlvaine buffer system at pH 5.7/7.3 32, 33, while here we use Tris buffered saline (TBS) at pH 7.5. The K i values obtained with the FP assay for the binding of CpOGA to GlcNAcstatin G and another potent OGA inhibitor Thiamet G30 are consistent with those obtained using surface plasmon resonance (SPR) performed using the same assay buffer (Supplementary Fig. S1); the binding affinity of hOGA for Thiamet G using the FP assay is shown in Supplementary Fig. S2. These proof-of-concept experiments establish the fluorescence polarization displacement assay using GlcNAcstatin BF as a convenient method for evaluating affinity of OGA inhibitors.
Figure 2. Binding affinity of GIcNAcstatin BF and two inhibitors of the GIcNAcstatin family to CpOGA and hOGA.
FP assay showing the binding of GlcNAcstatin BF to a) CpOGA and b) hOGA. Binding was measured by incubating for 10 min (CpOGA) and 180 min (hOGA) at a fixed concentration of labeled probe ([GBFCpOGA] = 0.5 nM, [GBFhOGA] = 50 nM) with varying concentrations of enzyme. Data points were fitted to a one-site specific-binding equation using Prism (GraphPad). Experiments were performed in triplicate and error bars represent standard error of the mean. Doseresponse curves from the fluorescence polarization assay showing the displacement from c) CpOGA or d) hOGA of a fixed concentration of fluorescent probe by increasing concentrations of GlcNAcstatin B or GlcNAcstatin G. Highest amount of probe bound to enzymes in the absence of inhibitors was set as 100%. Data points were fitted to a four-parameter equation for dose-dependent inhibition using Prism (GraphPad). Experiments were performed in triplicate and error bars represent standard error of the mean. A summary including Hill Slopes can be found in Supplementary Material Table 1.
To expand the applicability of the suggested assay system for the high-throughput screening of custom compound libraries, we decided to evaluate the Maybridge Ro3 1000 fragment library towards CpOGA as a target. This library consists of fragments that adhere to the ‘rule of three’ (Ro3) (molecular weight ≤ 300 Da, no more than 3 hydrogen bond donors/acceptors, cLogP ≤ 3). The screen was performed under experimental conditions matching those used in the displacement of GBF by Thiamet G and GlcNAcstatin G (Supplementary material Fig. S3).
The quality of both screens was estimated by calculating Z’ value across the controls on a given 1plate ‘, which is a measure of the statistical effect size and therefore the suitability of a high-throughput assay system. In our hands, we consistently saw Z’ values for each plate between 0.73 - 0.84 with respect to the standard readings, with a Z’ value of 0.66 for readings across all four plates. We chose to identify compounds as hits if they reduced the maximum polarization by ≥ 40%, resulting in a list of 15 initial hits. Subsequently, the initial hits were advanced into the second round of testing, in which we determined the K i values by measuring the displacement of GlcNAcstatin BF in a dose-dependent manner. Out of the 15 initial hits (F1-F15, Supplementary Material Fig. 3, Supplementary Material Table 2), 8 were confirmed as binders of CpOGA with apparent Ki values between 9 - 150 μM.
Binding of a fragment hit to Tyr189 and Asp401 blocks GlcNAcstatin BF and substrate binding
To further validate the fragments identified as binders in the HTS screen, we performed macromolecular x-ray crystallography to identify the binding mode of a subset of these hits. We managed to solve the structure of CpOGA in complex with 5-(trifluoromethyl)-2,3-dihydro-1H-1,4-diazepine (Fragment F8 hereafter referred to as 5TFD, apparent K i = 146 μM, Fig. 3A). We collected synchrotron diffraction data to 2.6 Å (Supplementary material Table 3) allowing structure solution by molecular replacement and subsequent refinement (final Rwork/Rfree = 0.17/0.22). There was continuous |Fo|-|Fc| electron density for the fragment (Fig. 3B). 5TFD binds proximal to the active site 189 pocket, forming hydrophobic stacking interactions with Tyr189 (Fig 3B). Additionally, the secondary 401 189amine of 5TFD forms a hydrogen bond with the backbone carbonyl oxygen of Asp401 (Fig. 3B). Tyr189 has been previously identified to be important for substrate binding, forming hydrophobic interactions with the substrate peptide backbones 16. When compared to a structure of CpOGA in complex with GlcNAcstatin F (Fig. 3 C, PDBID: 2XPK 52), a nM inhibitor of CpOGA designed to mimic the reaction intermediate, 5TFD forms different interactions. However, taking into account the longer linker and presence of the fluorescein group present in GlcNAcstatin BF it is possible for 5TFD to form a steric barrier for proper GBF binding. Thus, the 5TFD fragment bound to Tyr189 and Asp401, is able to block binding of GlcNAcstatin BF and glycopeptide substrates.
Figure 3. Binding affinity of 5FTD and binding mode of 5FTD and GlcNAcstatin C to CpOGA.
a) Dose-response curves from the fluorescence polarization assay showing the displacement from CpOGA of a fixed concentration of fluorescent probe by increasing concentrations of 5FTD. Highest amount of probe bound to enzymes in the absence of inhibitors was set as 100% and a fictive concentration of 10 M set as 0%. Data points were fitted to a four-parameter equation for dose-dependent inhibition using Prism (GraphPad). Experiments were performed in triplicate and error bars represent standard error of the mean. A summary including Hill Slopes can be found in Supplementary Material Table 2. Structure of CpOGA in complex with b) 5FTD and c) GlcNAcstatin F (PDBID 2XPK 52). The protein is shown as grey cartoon with active site residues shown as sticks. Ligands are shown as green sticks. Hydrogen bonds between ligands and active site residues are shown as dashed black lines. The unbiased |Fo|-|Fc| electron density map for 5FTD is shown as blue mesh contoured at 2 σ.
GlcNAcstatin BF may not only be useful to measure the binding of ligands to OGA, but also to enzymes of related glycoside hydrolase families such as GH20, to which human HexA/B belong. This is because GlcNAcstatin B itself, while potent, is not a selective inhibitor of OGA32 and also targets HexA/HexB. We were able to determine an apparent K d of ~ 4 μM (Supplementary Material Figure 4) for GlcNAcstatin BF to HexA/B isolated from bovine kidneys. HexA/HexB have recently been explored as targets for enzyme enhancement therapy to treat the lysosomal storage diseases Tay-Sachs and Sandhoff disease53 and an FP based assay offers an alternative to activity assays for the screening of fragments/compounds that bind to these proteins.
Here we have reported the design and synthesis of the novel fluorescent probe GlcNAcstatin BF to support miniaturized OGA high-throughput assays. To synthesize the target compound we established a novel synthetic approach for the construction of the 8-N alkylamide 2-substiuted sugarimidazoles by reversing the order of the introduction of the respective substituents into the key intermediate as compared to the original approach. As part of the study, we also developed a novel method for the synthesis of bicyclic sugar-imidazoles via intramolecular Mitsunobu N-alkylation of 4,5-diiodoimidazoles to supersede the challenging sequence of the former approach. We successfully applied a simplified counterintuitive acid hydrolysis procedure for the removal of the PMB protection in the presence of cyclic BDA, the product of the unique substrate-induced orthogonality between PMB and DBA groups. Notably, we established a fast and high yielding procedure for the global deprotection of the penultimate synthetic intermediate including removal of the notoriously stable BDA group that constitutes an expedient alternative to the TFA based method previously used for the GlcNAcstatin synthesis. We have shown that GlcNAcstatin BF is suitable for use in fluorescence polarization assays to measure the binding affinity of OGA inhibitors and identify novel binders from a high-throughput screen of a 1000-member fragment library. Finally, we solved the structure of CpOGA in complex with a binder identified in the screen and were able to show that it binds to Tyr189, an important residue for substrate binding.
Materials and Methods
Crystallography and structure solution
CpOGA was concentrated to 40 mg mL-1 in 25 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 20 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM TCEP. Sitting-drop vapor diffusion crystallization experiments were performed by mixing drops in a 1:1 ratio of CpOGA and 0.175 M CdSO4, 0.1 M sodium acetate pH 7.5 and needle shaped crystals appeared after 3-4 days. A 5FTD fragment complex was achieved by transferring crystals into a drop containing 10 mM 5FTD in 0.175 M CdSO4, 0.1 M sodium acetate pH 7.5, 1% DMSO for 4 h prior to cryoprotection with 20% glycerol in mother liquor saturated with 5TFD. Diffraction data was collected at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) on beamline ID30A-3, were processed with XDS54 and scaled to 2.6 Å using aimless55. 5% of total reflections were set aside as an Rfree test set. Crystals belonged to space group P61 with one molecule per asymmetric unit, a solvent content of 72% and a Matthews coefficient of 4.5. The structures were solved with MOLREP56, using chain A of PDB 2YDS16 as a search model. The structure was fully refined using iterative cycles of Refmac557 and COOT58. Ligand topology was generated using PRODRG59. X-ray diffraction data collection and structure refinement statistics can be found in the supplementary material (Supplementary Material Table 3).
Fluorescence Polarization
Experiments were performed in PerkinElmer, black, 384-well plates and millipolarization units measured using a Pherastar FS plate reader (BMG LABTECH) at excitation and emission wavelengths of 485 nm and 520 nm, respectively. For determination of the equilibrium dissociation constant (K d) of CpOGA and hOGA for GlcNAcstatin BF, 0.5 nM/50 nM of the probe was incubated with a range of concentrations of protein in 25 μL/ 30μL total reaction volume containing 1 x TBS (25 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5) buffer and a final concentration of 1-2% DMSO. Reactions were allowed to stand at room temperature for 10 min for CpOGA and 3 h for hOGA, after which polarization was measured (equilibrium was reached within these time points). Readings were corrected for background emissions from reactions without enzyme and the K d was determined by fitting a non-linear regression curve with Prism (GraphPad). To avoid receptor depletion, reaction mixtures for competition binding experiments contained 1 nM fluorescent probe for CpOGA and 50 nM for hOGA, 7 nM of CpOGA/250 nM hOGA (receptor) and a range of concentrations of inhibitors in the aforementioned reaction conditions. The largest amount of fluorescent probe bound to the receptors in the absence of competing ligands was set as 100%. IC50 values were determined by fitting dose-response curves with Prism (GraphPad) and converted to K d as outlined elsewhere60. All experiments were performed in triplicate.
High-throughput screen of the Maybridge Ro3 1000 fragment library
The Maybridge Ro3 1000 fragment library (Maybridge) screen was performed in black, 384-well plates (PerkinElemer). Displacement of GlcNAcstatin BF was measured by adding 25 μL of 7 nM CpOGA and 1 nM GlcNAcstatin BF in assay buffer (0.1 M Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% DMSO) to assay plates containing 50 nL of a 0.1 M fragment solutions in DMSO, resulting in a final assay concentration of 200 μM. The plates were allowed to stand for 10 minutes in the dark before reading polarization on a Pherastar FS plate reader (BMG Labtech) at excitation and emission wavelengths of 485 nm and 520 nm, respectively. Readings were corrected for background polarization from reactions containing only 1 nM GlcNAcstatin BF in assay buffer and normalised to readings containing 1% DMSO. Fragments displacing GlcNAcstatin BF by ≥ 40% were classified as hits and were advanced for K i value determination. Competition binding experiments were conducted under the same assay conditions in 0.1 M Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 2% DMSO and varying concentrations of fragments. K i values were calculated as described above.
Supplementary Material
The Supporting Information, including synthetic procedures and spectral data for all new compounds, methods, figures and tables as well as the compound characterization checklist and the validation report of the deposited structure are available free of charge via the Internet.
Acknowledgements
We thank the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF) for beam time on ID30A-3 and assistance. This work was funded by a Wellcome Trust Senior Research Fellowship (WT087590MA) to DMFvA. We would like to hank Dr. M. Schimpl for purifying hOGA.
Footnotes
Author Contributions
The study was conceived by VSB, NS and DMFvA. Synthesis was performed by VSB; protein purification, protein biotinylation and FP assays were performed by NS; KR performed HTS, FP and hit-validation assays and structural biology; cloning was performed by ATF and SPR was performed by TA and IHN. Data were analysed by all authors. The manuscript was written by VSB, NS, KR and DMFvA.
Accession codes
The atomic coordinates and structure factors have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank61 under the accession code 5OXD.
References
- [1].Hart GW, Slawson C, Ramirez-Correa G, Lagerlof O. Cross talk between O-GlcNAcylation and phosphorylation: roles in signaling, transcription, and chronic disease. Annu Rev Biochem. 2011;80:825–858. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060608-102511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Shafi R, Iyer SP, Ellies LG, O’Donnell N, Marek KW, Chui D, Hart GW, Marth JD. The O-GlcNAc transferase gene resides on the X chromosome and is essential for embryonic stem cell viability and mouse ontogeny. Proc Natl Acad Sci u s A. 2000;97:5735–5739. doi: 10.1073/pnas.100471497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Yang YR, Song M, Lee H, Jeon Y, Choi EJ, Jang HJ, Moon HY, Byun HY, Kim EK, Kim DH, Lee MN, et al. O-GlcNAcase is essential for embryonic development and maintenance of genomic stability. Aging Cell. 2012;11:439–448. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2012.00801.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Hanover J, Keembiyehetty C, Wang P, Comly M, Dwyer N, Krause M, Love D. Mouse O-Glcnacase Knockout Reveals Roles for O-Glcnac Cycling in Development, Metabolism and Epigenetics. Glycobiology. 2010;20:1453–1453. [Google Scholar]
- [5].Ranuncolo SM, Ghosh S, Hanover JA, Hart GW, Lewis BA. Evidence of the involvement of O-GlcNAc-modified human RNA polymerase II CTD in transcription in vitro and in vivo. J Biol Chem. 2012 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.330910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Fujiki R, Hashiba W, Sekine H, Yokoyama A, Chikanishi T, Ito S, Imai Y, Kim J, He HH, Igarashi K, Kanno J, et al. GlcNAcylation of histone H2B facilitates its monoubiquitination. Nature. 2011;480:557-U188. doi: 10.1038/nature10656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Chen Q, Chen Y, Bian C, Fujiki R, Yu X. TET2 promotes histone O-GlcNAcylation during gene transcription. Nature. 2013;493:561–564. doi: 10.1038/nature11742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Deplus R, Delatte B, Schwinn MK, Defrance M, Mendez J, Murphy N, Dawson MA, Volkmar M, Putmans P, Calonne E, Shih AH, et al. TET2 and TET3 regulate GlcNAcylation and H3K4 methylation through OGT and SET1/COMPASS. EMBO J. 2013;32:645–655. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2012.357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Yang WH, Park SY, Nam HW, Kim do H, Kang JG, Kang ES, Kim YS, Lee HC, Kim KS, Cho JW. NFkappaB activation is associated with its O-GlcNAcylation state under hyperglycemic conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci u s A. 2008;105:17345–17350. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806198105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Zachara NE, Hart GW. O-GlcNAc a sensor of cellular state: the role of nucleocytoplasmic glycosylation in modulating cellular function in response to nutrition and stress. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2004;1673:13–28. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2004.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Zachara NE, O’Donnell N, Cheung WD, Mercer JJ, Marth JD, Hart GW. Dynamic O-GlcNAc modification of nucleocytoplasmic proteins in response to stress - A survival response of mammalian cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2004;279:30133–30142. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M403773200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Liu J, Pang Y, Chang T, Bounelis P, Chatham JC, Marchase RB. Increased hexosamine biosynthesis and protein O-GlcNAc levels associated with myocardial protection against calcium paradox and ischemia. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology. 2006;40:303–312. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2005.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Erickson JR, Pereira L, Wang L, Han G, Ferguson A, Dao K, Copeland RJ, Despa F, Hart GW, Ripplinger CM, Bers DM. Diabetic hyperglycaemia activates CaMKII and arrhythmias by O-linked glycosylation. Nature. 2013;502:372–376. doi: 10.1038/nature12537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Marsh SA, Powell PC, Dell’Italia LJ, Chatham JC. Cardiac O-GlcNAcylation blunts autophagic signaling in the diabetic heart. Life Sciences. 2013;92:648–656. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2012.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Yu Y, Zhang L, Li X, Run X, Liang Z, Li Y, Liu Y, Lee MH, Grundke-Iqbal I, Iqbal K, Vocadlo DJ, et al. Differential effects of an O-GlcNAcase inhibitor on tau phosphorylation. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e35277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Schimpl M, Borodkin VS, Gray LJ, van Aalten DM. Synergy of peptide and sugar in O-GlcNAcase substrate recognition. Chem Biol. 2012;19:173–178. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.01.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Schimpl M, Schuttelkopf AW, Borodkin VS, van Aalten DM. Human OGA binds substrates in a conserved peptide recognition groove. Biochem J. 2010;432:1–7. doi: 10.1042/BJ20101338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Li B, Li H, Lu L, Jiang J. Structures of human O-GlcNAcase and its complexes reveal a new substrate recognition mode. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2017;24:362–369. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Roth C, Chan S, Offen WA, Hemsworth GR, Willems LI, King DT, Varghese V, Britton R, Vocadlo DJ, Davies GJ. Structural and functional insight into human O-GlcNAcase. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Elsen NL, Patel SB, Ford RE, Hall DL, Hess F, Kandula H, Kornienko M, Reid J, Selnick H, Shipman JM, Sharma S, et al. Insights into activity and inhibition from the crystal structure of human O-GlcNAcase. Nat Chem Biol. 2017 doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Lazarus MB, Nam Y, Jiang J, Sliz P, Walker S. Structure of human O-GlcNAc transferase and its complex with a peptide substrate. Nature. 2011;469:564–567. doi: 10.1038/nature09638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Lazarus MB, Jiang J, Gloster TM, Zandberg WF, Whitworth GE, Vocadlo DJ, Walker S. Structural snapshots of the reaction coordinate for O-GlcNAc transferase. Nat Chem Biol. 2012;8:966–968. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Schimpl M, Zheng X, Borodkin VS, Blair DE, Ferenbach AT, Schuttelkopf AW, Navratilova I, Aristotelous T, Albarbarawi O, Robinson DA, Macnaughtan MA, et al. O-GlcNAc transferase invokes nucleotide sugar pyrophosphate participation in catalysis. Nat Chem Biol. 2012;8:969–974. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Rao FV, Dorfmueller HC, Villa F, Allwood M, Eggleston IM, van Aalten DM. Structural insights into the mechanism and inhibition of eukaryotic O-GlcNAc hydrolysis. EMBO J. 2006;25:1569–1578. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Dennis RJ, Taylor EJ, Macauley MS, Stubbs KA, Turkenburg JP, Hart SJ, Black GN, Vocadlo DJ, Davies GJ. Structure and mechanism of a bacterial beta-glucosaminidase having O-GlcNAcase activity. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology. 2006;13:365–371. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Gross BJ, Kraybill BC, Walker S. Discovery of O-GlcNAc transferase inhibitors. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127:14588–14589. doi: 10.1021/ja0555217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Gloster TM, Zandberg WF, Heinonen JE, Shen DL, Deng L, Vocadlo DJ. Hijacking a biosynthetic pathway yields a glycosyltransferase inhibitor within cells. Nat Chem Biol. 2011;7:174–181. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Borodkin VS, Schimpl M, Gundogdu M, Rafie K, Dorfmueller HC, Robinson DA, van Aalten DM. Bisubstrate UDP-peptide conjugates as human O-GlcNAc transferase inhibitors. Biochem J. 2014;457:497–502. doi: 10.1042/BJ20131272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Macauley MS, Whitworth GE, Debowski AW, Chin D, Vocadlo DJ. O-GlcNAcase uses substrate-assisted catalysis: kinetic analysis and development of highly selective mechanism-inspired inhibitors. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:25313–25322. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M413819200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Macauley MS, Shan X, Yuzwa SA, Gloster TM, Vocadlo DJ. Elevation of Global O-GlcNAc in Rodents Using a Selective O-GlcNAcase Inhibitor Does Not Cause Insulin Resistance or Perturb Glucohomeostasis (vol 17, pg 949, 2010) Chem Biol. 2010;17:1161–1161. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Dorfmueller HC, Borodkin VS, Schimpl M, Shepherd SM, Shpiro NA, van Aalten DMF. GlcNAcstatin: A picomolar, selective O-GlcNAcase inhibitor that modulates intracellular O-GlcNAcylation levels. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:16484–16485. doi: 10.1021/ja066743n. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Dorfmueller HC, Borodkin VS, Schimpl M, van Aalten DM. GlcNAcstatins are nanomolar inhibitors of human O-GlcNAcase inducing cellular hyper-O-GlcNAcylation. Biochem J. 2009;420:221–227. doi: 10.1042/BJ20090110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Dorfmueller HC, Borodkin VS, Schimpl M, Zheng X, Kime R, Read KD, van Aalten DM. Cell-penetrant, nanomolar O-GlcNAcase inhibitors selective against lysosomal hexosaminidases. Chem Biol. 2010;17:1250–1255. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Yuzwa SA, Shan X, Macauley MS, Clark T, Skorobogatko Y, Vosseller K, Vocadlo DJ. Increasing O-GlcNAc slows neurodegeneration and stabilizes tau against aggregation. Nat Chem Biol. 2012;8:393–399. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Kim C, Nam DW, Park SY, Song H, Hong HS, Boo JH, Jung ES, Kim Y, Baek JY, Kim KS, Cho JW, et al. O-linked beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase inhibitor attenuates beta-amyloid plaque and rescues memory impairment. Neurobiol Aging. 2013;34:275–285. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Laczy B, Marsh SA, Brocks CA, Wittmann I, Chatham JC. Inhibition of O-GlcNAcase in perfused rat hearts by NAG-thiazolines at the time of reperfusion is cardioprotective in an O-GlcNAc-dependent manner. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2010;299:H1715–1727. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00337.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Champattanachai V, Marchase RB, Chatham JC. Glucosamine protects neonatal cardiomyocytes from ischemia-reperfusion injury via increased protein O-GlcNAc and increased mitochondrial Bcl-2. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2008;294:C1509–1520. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.00456.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Li T, Guo L, Zhang Y, Wang J, Li Z, Lin L, Zhang Z, Li L, Lin J, Zhao W, Li J, et al. Design and synthesis of O-GlcNAcase inhibitors via ‘click chemistry’ and biological evaluations. CarbohydR Res. 2011;346:1083–1092. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2011.03.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Dorfmueller HC, van Aalten DMF. Screening-based discovery of drug-like O-GlcNAcase inhibitor scaffolds. Febs Letters. 2010;584:694–700. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2009.12.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Rossi AM, Taylor CW. Analysis of protein-ligand interactions by fluorescence polarization. Nat Protocols. 2011;6:365–387. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2011.305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Peterson KJ, Sadowsky JD, Scheef EA, Pal S, Kourentzi KD, Willson RC, Bresnick EH, Sheibani N, Gellman SH. A fluorescence polarization assay for identifying ligands that bind to vascular endothelial growth factor. Analytical Biochemistry. 2008;378:8–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2008.03.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Isolation and further characterization of bovine brain hexosaminidase C. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Enzymology. 1981;659:255–266. doi: 10.1016/0005-2744(81)90052-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Borodkin VS, van Aalten DMF. An efficient and versatile synthesis of GlcNAcstatins-potent and selective O-GlcNAcase inhibitors built on the tetrahydroimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine scaffold. Tetrahedron. 2010;66:7838–7849. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2010.07.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Zolle IM, Berger ML, Hammerschmidt F, Hahner S, Schirbel A, Peric-Simov B. New selective inhibitors of steroid 11 beta-hydroxylation in the adrenal cortex. Synthesis and structure-activity relationship of potent Etomidate analogues. J Med Chem. 2008;51:2244–2253. doi: 10.1021/jm800012w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Laha JK, Cuny GD. Synthesis of Fused Imidazoles, Pyrroles, and Indoles with a Defined Stereocenter alpha to Nitrogen Utilizing Mitsunobu Alkylation Followed by Palladium-Catalyzed Cyclization. J Org Chem. 2011;76:8477–8482. doi: 10.1021/jo201237h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Guianvarc’h d, Fourrey JL, Dau M, Guerineau V, Benhida R. Stereocontrolled synthesis of heterocyclic C-nuclcosides Protecting group effect and molecular modeling studies. J Org Chem. 2002;67:3724–3732. doi: 10.1021/jo016345x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Yokoyama M, Tanabe T, Toyoshima A, Togo H. SYNTHESIS OF C-NUCLEOSIDES HAVING TYPICAL AROMATIC HETEROCYCLES AS THE BASE MOIETY. Synthesis-Stuttgart. 1993:517–520. [Google Scholar]
- [48].Yan L, Kahne D. P-Methoxybenzyl Ethers as Acid-Labile Protecting Groups in Oligosaccharide Synthesis. Synlett. 1995:523–524. [Google Scholar]
- [49].Hense A, Ley SV, Osborn HMI, Owen DR, Poisson JF, Warriner SL, Wesson KE. Direct preparation of diacetals from 1,2-diketones and their use as 1,2-diol protecting groups. J Chem Soc Perk T. 1997;1:2023–2031. [Google Scholar]
- [50].Corey EJ, Li WD, Reichard GA. A new magnesium-catalyzed doubly diastereoselective anti-aldol reaction leads to a highly efficient process for the total synthesis of lactacystin in quantity. J Am Chem Soc. 1998;120:2330–2336. [Google Scholar]
- [51].Palladino P, Stetsenko DA. New TFA-Free Cleavage and Final Deprotection in Fmoc Solid-Phase Peptide Synthesis: Dilute HCl in Fluoro Alcohol. Org Lett. 2012;14:6346–6349. doi: 10.1021/ol303124r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Dorfmueller HC, Borodkin VS, Schimpl M, Zheng X, Kime R, Read KD, van Aalten DM. Cell-penetrant, nanomolar O-GlcNAcase inhibitors selective against lysosomal hexosaminidases. Chem Biol. 2010;17:1250–1255. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2010.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Tropak MB, Blanchard JE, Withers SG, Brown ED, Mahuran D. High-throughput screening for human lysosomal beta-N-acetyl hexosaminidase inhibitors acting as pharmacological chaperones. Chem Biol. 2007;14:153–164. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2006.12.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Kabsch W. Xds. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2010;66:125–132. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909047337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Winn MD, Ballard CC, Cowtan KD, Dodson EJ, Emsley P, Evans PR, Keegan RM, Krissinel EB, Leslie AG, McCoy A, McNicholas SJ, et al. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2011;67:235–242. doi: 10.1107/S0907444910045749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Vagin A, Teplyakov A. Molecular replacement with MOLREP. Acta Crystallographica Section D. 2010;66:22–25. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909042589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Murshudov, Vagin, Dodson Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum likelihood method. 1997 doi: 10.1107/S0907444996012255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2010;66:486–501. doi: 10.1107/S0907444910007493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Schuttelkopf AW, van Aalten DMF. PRODRG: a tool for high-throughput crystallography of protein-ligand complexes. Acta Crystallographica Section D. 2004;60:1355–1363. doi: 10.1107/S0907444904011679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Nikolovska-Coleska Z, Wang R, Fang X, Pan H, Tomita Y, Li P, Roller PP, Krajewski K, Saito NG, Stuckey JA, Wang S. Development and optimization of a binding assay for the XIAP BIR3 domain using fluorescence polarization. Anal Biochem. 2004;332:261–273. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2004.05.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Berman HMa, W Ja, F Za, G Ga, B TNa, W Ha, S INa, B PE. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Research. 2000;28:235–242. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






