Skip to main content
Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Wiley - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2021 Feb 11;153(1):176–179. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13588

Clinical presentations, pregnancy complications, and maternal outcomes in pregnant women with COVID‐19 and tuberculosis: A retrospective cohort study

Rahul K Gajbhiye 1, ,, Niraj N Mahajan 2, Neha Kamath 3, , Shubhada Bahirat 2, Gauri Patokar 2, Aishwarya V Bhurke 1, Deepak N Modi 1, Smita D Mahale 1
PMCID: PMC7611277  EMSID: EMS130365  PMID: 33421126

Short abstract

Pregnant women with symptomatic COVID‐19 should also be tested for TB in countries with a high burden of TB. The infrastructure of the TB Program can be utilized for the control of COVID‐19, and vice versa.


To date, a large number of pregnant women have been infected with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona virus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) and these patients are at higher risk of developing certain pregnancy complications. 1 Out of 10 million people infected globally with tuberculosis (TB), a quarter of the disease burden is contributed by India. 2 Pregnant and postpartum women are at increased risk of developing TB, and this is associated with poor outcomes including premature birth, intrauterine growth retardation, and an increase in maternal mortality.

Tuberculosis and coronavirus disease 19 (COVID‐19) primarily involve the lungs, share common risk factors, and present with similar symptoms. Increased susceptibility to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection has been observed in individuals with latent or active TB. 3 However, at present there is a lack of information on TB with concurrent COVID‐19 in pregnant woman. The present study aims to assess the clinical presentations and maternal outcomes in pregnant and/or postpartum women with active pulmonary TB (PTB) and/or previous TB with concurrent COVID‐19.

A total of 879 pregnant and/or postpartum women with COVID‐19 were admitted to BYL Nair Hospital 4 from April to September, 2020. Six pregnant women were diagnosed with concurrent PTB and COVID‐19. Eleven pregnant women and one postpartum woman had previous history of TB, which was subsequently cured. Ethical approval for the present study was granted by the Institutional Ethics Committee of BYL Nair Hospital (ECARP/2020/63 dated May 27, 2020) and ICMR‐NIRRH (D/ICEC/Sci‐53/55/2020 dated June 4, 2020). A waiver of consent was granted as the study involved retrospective data collection from medical case records.

The study demonstrates the adverse impact of TB and COVID‐19 in pregnant women. Of the six women with PTB, three were recently diagnosed with PTB and were on a course of anti‐tubercular treatment, while the other three patients were serendipitously diagnosed with TB while being investigated for COVID‐19‐related symptoms (Table 1). Since TB has an insidious onset, it is likely that TB already existed in these patients and SARS‐CoV‐2 infection subsequently aggravated the condition, thus leading to a severe presentation. The diagnosis of TB could have otherwise been delayed if these women had not been evaluated for COVID‐19. Oxygen saturation at the time of admission in patients with active PTB and COVID‐19 was comparatively lower than patients with previous TB and COVID‐19 (p = 0.04). The clinical presentation was mild in women with past TB and COVID‐19. Of the six women with PTB, there was one case of maternal mortality and one spontaneous abortion (early fetal demise at 11 weeks of gestation) observed. Additionally, 4 (67%) patients with PTB and SARS‐CoV‐2 co‐infection were symptomatic, whereas only 2 (17%) patients with past TB and COVID‐19 were symptomatic. Two women with active PTB and COVID‐19 developed ARDS and required ICU admission (Table S1). One woman with extensively drug‐resistant TB, who underwent treatment therapy for 4 months, developed severe complications including ARDS, preeclampsia, and fetal growth restriction, and she died 18 days after COVID‐19 diagnosis. These results suggest that the combination of PTB and SARS‐CoV‐2 infection would possibly result in severe presentation with adverse outcomes in pregnant women.

TABLE 1.

Details of six pregnant women with COVID‐19 and active PTB

Case no. Age (years) Gravidity/parity Gestational age (week) Clinical presentation CXR changes/USG findings HRCT finding Auscultation results Duration of ATT Pregnancy outcomes Lowest oxygen saturation ARDS Oxygen support Treatment given
1. 26 G3P1 11 Fever, cough

CXR: left lower lobe consolidation

USG: mild right‐sided pleural effusion

ND Left‐sided crepitation Newly started Ongoing pregnancy 94% No No Antibiotics, HCQ
2. 28 G4P2 11 Breathing difficulties Bilateral heterogeneous opacities Bilateral consolidation with cavitation. Features atypical of COVID‐19 pneumonia. More likely superadded infection Bilateral crepitation Newly started Early fetal demise at 11 weeks of gestation 80% Yes HFNO Antibiotics, corticosteroids
3. 29 G1 26 Fever, cough Patchy shadows and pleural effusion. Inhomogeneous shadows and fibro‐calcific densities s/o old infective etiology ND Normal Newly started on AKT‐4 for MDR TB Ongoing pregnancy 98% No No Antibiotics
4. 34 G4P3 33 Cough, breathing difficulties Patchy opacities in both lungs. Consolidation. Bilateral fibrotic strands. s/o old infective etiology. Widening of upper mediastinum (enlarged lymph nodes) ND Bilateral crepitation Started on ATT for XDR TB four months prior to COVID‐19 infection

Maternal death, pre‐eclampsia

FGR and oligohydramnios

60% Yes Mechanical ventilation Antibiotics, low molecular weight heparin, labetalol
5. 24 G1 38 Asymptomatic Normal ND Normal ATT for 4 months Oligohydramnios, emergency LSCS, surgical site infection, prolonged hospital stay 98% No No Antibiotics
6. 24 G4P2 39 Asymptomatic Normal ND Normal ATT for 5 months Vaginal delivery at term, induction of labor 99% No No Antibiotics

Abbreviations: ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; ATT, anti‐TB treatment; COVID‐19, coronavirus disease19; CXR, chest X‐ray; FGR, fetal growth restriction; G, Gravida; HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; HFNO, high frequency nasal oxygen; HRCT, high‐resolution computed tomography; LSCS, lower segment cesarean section; MDR, multi‐drug‐resistant; MTB, mycobacterium TB; ND, not done; P, Parity; PTB, pulmonary tuberculosis; SARS‐CoV‐2, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona virus 2; S/O, suggestive of; TB, Tuberculosis; USG, ultrasonography; XDR, extensively drug‐resistant.

In India, Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) vaccination is part of the country's Universal Immunization Programme, with BCG vaccinations being administered at birth. Although controversial, the BCG vaccine has been proposed as a potential method for protection against SARS‐CoV‐2. However, our series, similar to other epidemiological studies, 5 , 6 does not support this notion as all 18 patients in our study had either active TB or past exposure to TB in spite of receiving the BCG vaccine at birth and were infected with SARS‐CoV‐2. Co‐infections are likely to be a greater challenge in low‐ and middle‐income countries with a high burden of both diseases. A 26% decline in reported cases of TB within the national surveillance system was reported due to the COVID‐19 pandemic, which has adversely affected the National Tuberculosis Elimination Program in India. 2 The present study highlights the opportunities for integration of healthcare services for the treatment of TB and COVID‐19. Therefore, based on the results of our study, we recommend that pregnant women with respiratory symptoms should be tested for both COVID‐19 and TB in countries with a high burden of TB. Additionally, this represents an opportunity to engage the infrastructure and trained manpower of the TB Program for the control of COVID‐19, and vice versa.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

RG and NM were responsible for the study concept and design. SB, GP, NK, and AB contributed to the acquisition of data. All authors contributed to analysis and/or interpretation of data. RG, NM, and NK were responsible for the drafting of the manuscript. RG, NM, SM, DM contributed to critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. RG, NM, and AB were responsible for statistical analysis. SM, RG, and NM were responsible for administrative and technical or material support.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PregCovid study is registered with Clinical Trial Registry of India (Registration no: CTRI/2020/05/025423).

Supporting information

Table S1

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors acknowledge the Director General, ICMR and Network of National Registry of Pregnant Women with COVID‐19 in India (PregCovid Registry, CTRI/2020/05/025423). The Dean, TNMC, faculties, and resident doctors in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Department of Pulmonary Medicine at TNMC, Mumbai, are sincerely acknowledged. RG is an awardee of the DBT Wellcome India Alliance Clinical and Public Health Intermediate Fellowship (Grant no. IA/CPHI/18/1/503933). The study is funded by an intramural grant of ICMR‐NIRRH (ICMR‐NIRRH/RA/993/11‐2020).

REFERENCES

  • 1. Waghmare R, Gajbhiye R, Mahajan N, Modi D, Mukherjee S, Mahale S. Universal screening identifies asymptomatic carriers of SARS‐CoV‐2 among pregnant women in India. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;256:503‐505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. World Health Organization . Global tuberculosis report 2020. WHO; n.d. http://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/en/. Accessed November 27, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Tadolini M, Codecasa LR, García‐García J‐M, et al. Active tuberculosis, sequelae and COVID‐19 co‐infection: first cohort of 49 cases. Eur Respir J. 2020;56:2001398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Mahajan NN, Pednekar R, Patil SR, et al. Preparedness, administrative challenges for establishing obstetric services, and experience of delivering over 400 women at a tertiary care COVID‐19 hospital in India. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2020;151(2):188‐196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Aronson NE, Mathuram S, Comstock GW, et al. Long‐term efcacy of BCG vaccine in American Indians and Alaska Natives: a 60‐year follow‐up study. JAMA. 2004;291(17):2086‐2091. 10.1001/jama.291.17.2086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Hensel J, McAndrews KM, McGrail DJ, et al. Protection against SARS‐CoV‐2 by BCG vaccination is not supported by epidemiological analyses. Sci Rep. 2020;10:18377. 10.1038/s41598-020-75491-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S1


Articles from International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES