Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 3.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Phys. 2021 Jun 3;17(8):968–973. doi: 10.1038/s41567-021-01253-9

Spatio-temporal characterization of attosecond pulses from plasma mirrors

Ludovic Chopineau 1, Adrien Denoeud 1, Adrien Leblanc 2, Elkana Porat 3,4, Philippe Martin 1, Henri Vincenti 1,*, Fabien Quéré 1,*
PMCID: PMC7611525  EMSID: EMS123297  PMID: 34413892

Abstract

Reaching light intensities above 1025 W/cm2 and up to the Schwinger limit of the order of 1029 W/cm2 would enable testing fundamental predictions of quantum electrodynamics. A promising — yet challenging — approach to achieve such extreme fields consists in reflecting a high-power femtosecond laser pulse off a curved relativistic mirror. This enhances the intensity of the reflected beam by simultaneously compressing it in time down to the attosecond range, and focusing it to sub-micrometre focal spots. Here we show that such curved relativistic mirrors can be produced when an ultra-intense laser pulse ionizes a solid target and creates a dense plasma that specularly reflects the incident light. This is evidenced by measuring the temporal and spatial effects induced on the reflected beam by this so-called ʼplasma mirrorʼ. The all-optical measurement technique demonstrated here will be instrumental for the use of relativistic plasma mirrors with the upcoming generation of Petawatt lasers that recently reached intensities of 5 × 1022 W/cm2, and therefore constitutes a viable experimental path to the Schwinger limit.


Quantum field theory predicts that even the most perfect vacuum has a complex structure, characterized by a jostling of so-called virtual particles. Probing the non-linear optical properties of vacuum, resulting from the coupling of light with these virtual particles, would enable unprecedented tests of these predictions (13). The typical amplitude of the electromagnetic fields required to do so corresponds to the onset of the Sauter-Schwinger effect (46), where charged particle-antiparticle pairs are predicted to spontaneously appear from a vacuum in which a sufficiently strong electric field is applied. For electron–positron pairs, this is expected for field amplitudes exceeding Es=me2c3/eħ=1.32×1018V/m, corresponding to electromagnetic waves with an intensity Iscϵ0Es2/24.7×1029W/cm2 Due to these considerable values, this so-called Schwinger limit has never been reached or even approached in experiments (7).

The concentration of light energy allowed by ultrashort lasers (8, 9) has raised the hope of approaching such intensities by focusing near-visible laser light (10). The critical value Is however still far exceeds the present record of laser intensity of ≃ 5.1022 W/cm2, recently achieved with a tightly-focused Petawatt (1 PW=1015 W) femtosecond (1 fs=10-15 s) laser (11). Further increasing the laser pulse energy appears as a technologically hopeless path to close this gap of about seven orders of magnitude. A more realistic approach would consist in considerably increasing the concentration of this light energy. This requires a conversion to electromagnetic waves of shorter wavelengths, which can be more tightly focused in space and compressed in time.

A promising path to implement such a frequency conversion for high-power laser pulses is the concept of curved relativistic mirror (12,13). Upon reflection on a mirror moving at vc, an ultraintense laser pulse gets compressed in time and down-converted in wavelength by a factor 4γ2 (with γ=1/1v2/c2the mirror’s Lorentz factor) due to the Doppler effect. For large γ, the reflected pulse can be compressed down to the attosecond (1 as=10¯18 s) time range, and can now converge to a sub-micron focal spot, thus boosting the intensity of the initial laser by orders of magnitude. Although appealing, the major and so-far unsolved challenge of this approach is the experimental generation of such curved relativistic mirrors.

Different implementations have been proposed (1316) and debated (17) to achieve this goal. Experimentally, significant advances have already been made in the last 15 years, using so-called plasma mirrors: these are dense plasmas produced at the surface of initially-solid targets, ionized by intense fs laser pulses (18,19). They have the ability to specularly reflect high-power ultrashort laser pulses, just like ordinary mirrors do for ordinary light. At intensities exceeding 1018 W/cm2, the laser‐driven oscillation of the plasma surface becomes relativistic, and thus induces a periodic Doppler effect on the reflected beam (15,2023). This results in the generation of a train of attosecond light pulses -with one pulse every laser period-associated in the frequency domain to a comb of harmonics of the laser frequency. In addition to these temporal effects, the surface of plasma mirrors can get strongly curved under the effect of the radiation pressure exerted by the incident laser field, which can provide a way to focus these attosecond pulses right after their generation. Implemented with the emerging generation of PW lasers, this scheme appears as one of the few viable paths towards the Schwinger limit (16).

Pursuing this path requires the accurate measurement of the spatio-temporal properties of the reflected beam, down to the attosecond scale in time and nanometric scale in space, to be able to both assess and optimize the properties of the relativistic mirror. Despite the development of attosecond metrology in the last 20 years (2426), attosecond pulses generated from plasma mirrors have never been accurately characterized in time, due to the challenge of implementing such advanced techniques in the extremely harsh conditions of laser-plasma experiments (27, 28). In this article, we report the spatio-temporal characterization of attosecond pulses generated from relativistic plasma mirrors with a 100 TW-class fs laser, using an all-optical technique. We thus get direct evidence for the effects that compress the light energy of the reflected beam in time and space. The measurement method that we demonstrate can be realistically scaled to the most powerful fs laser systems available to date, and thus constitutes a milestone in the quest for the Schwinger limit.

Principle of dynamical ptychography

The measurement method implemented in our experiment is an extension of a powerful lensless imaging technique known as ptychography (29). This technique consists in illuminating a microscopic object, described by a transmission or reflection function O(xx 0), with a focused beam of coherent light of wavevector k0, described by a field E(x). The angular diffraction pattern S(θ,x0)|dxO(xx0)E(x)eisinθk0x|2 produced as the beam diverges away from the object is measured as a function of the position x 0 of the object with respect to the beam. As an example, we consider the simple case of a sinusoidual surface as an object Fig.1a. This object is illuminated by a probe beam whose size at focus is smaller than the surface oscillation period D. The resulting ptychographic trace S(θ,x0) is displayed in Fig.1b. As the position x 0 is scanned, the peaks and dips of the surface are alternatively probed, and both the angular width and direction of the diffracted beam oscillate. The power of ptychography lies in the fact that iterative phase retrieval algorithms can be applied to such a trace, to reconstruct the spatial structures O(x) of the object and E(x) of the illuminating beam, in amplitude and phase. Pty-chography is thus an advanced spatial measurement method for both microscopic objects and coherent beams of light or particles (30).

Figure 1. Principle of dynamical ptychography.

Figure 1

This figure presents an example of dynamical ptychography, in a case where the diffracting object (grey area in a and c) is a sinusoidal reflective surface with a spatial period D. The ptychographic measurement consists in measuring the diffraction pattern of the illuminating beam (Gaussian profiles in a and c) as a function of the propagation angle θ (upper insets in a and c) while scanning the position offset x0 of this oscillating surface with respect to the beam position (from left to right in panels a-c). In dynamical ptychography, the probe results from the superposition of multiple frequencies ω represented by the different colored Gaussian profiles. Ptychographic traces S(θ,x 0,ω) are measured for several of these frequencies, and such traces are displayed in panels b and d for two of these frequencies ω1 and ω2. In this example, the object is assumed to drift with time t at constant velocity v. The temporal information on the probe pulse is encoded in the frequency dependence of the phase of the oscillating ptychographic traces, as illustrated here for the case of an optimally-compressed probe (panels a-b) and a chirped probe (panels c-d). The black dashed lines in b-d are guides for the eye.

We now consider an illuminating probe consisting of an ultrashort pulse of light, and aim at adding temporal resolution to ptychography, in order to obtain both spatial and temporal information on this beam. We show that this is possible by using an object O(x,t) which evolves in time in a known manner. The measurement then consists in spectrally-resolving the diffraction pattern of the probe beam on this evolving object as the offset position x0 is scanned. This provides a 3D dataset S(θ, x 0, ω), where ω is frequency within the spectral width of the probe pulse. To illustrate this measurement scheme, we now assume that the object of Fig.1 drifts in time with a known and constant velocity v (Fig.1).

An ultrashort pulse of light is formed by the superposition of multiple frequencies. For a given spectrum, the shortest pulse is formed if all frequencies are all perfectly synchronized in time (i.e., group delay is constant). In such a case, all these frequencies will probe the evolving object at the same instant (Fig.1a). The multiple ptychographic traces measured at different frequencies ω would then be observed to oscillate in phase (Fig.1b).

We now consider a probe pulse with the same spectrum, but with the frequencies arriving at different times 1. This corresponds to a chirped pulse whose duration is longer than the minimum allowed by the pulse spectral bandwidth. Different frequencies ω within the pulsed beam will now probe the object at different instants of its motion, and will get diffracted differently (Fig.1c). The oscillations of the multiple ptychographic traces measured at different frequencies would then be observed to be dephased (Fig.1d), i.e. to present a maximal deflection for different values x m(ω) of x0. If the object velocity v is known, this dephasing directly encodes the chirp of the probe pulse, through the following straightforward relationship:

τ(ω)=xm(ω)/v (1)

where τ(ω) is the group delay of frequency ω within the probe spectrum. Combined with the spatial information provided by each ptychographic trace, we can thus get access to the complete spatio‐temporal structure of the illuminating beam.

This measurement scheme, which we call dynamical ptychography, is very general and can in principle be applied to very different types of objects and probes, over a broad range of time scales, to determine the temporal properties of the probe if the evolution of the object is known, or vice versa.

Application to attosecond pulses from plasma mirrors

Here we apply this general measurement scheme to determine the spatio-temporal structure of attosecond pulses generated from plasma mirrors. This calls for a diffracting object evolving very quickly in time, i.e. typically moving by a fraction of its spatial period on an attosecond time scale. We fulfill this condition by using a transient optical grating as the diffracting structure: this consists in an evolving spatial interference pattern, applied on the ultraintense laser beam that drives the interaction with the plasma mirror and generates the attosecond pulses. The spatio-temporal structure of this driving field is imprinted on the dynamics of the plasma mirror and hence on the generated attosecond pulses. This acts as the evolving diffracting object for the dynamical ptychographic measurement of this light source (see Supplementary Information section 2).

Such a fast transient optical grating can be generated by perturbing the main driving laser field, of frequency ωL, with a much weaker secondary beam of frequency 2ω L, arriving at a small angle θp with the main beam (Fig.2a). At any given time t, the crossing of these two fields generates a sinusoidal spatial interference pattern -exactly as the object of Fig.1. Since the two waves have different frequencies, the relative phase of the two beams changes as time evolves, and the resulting interference pattern therefore drifts spatially along the plasma mirror surface - again, like in the example of Fig.1. The spatio-temporal structure of this transient optical grating can be easily calculated analytically (see Supplementary Information section 2), and is displayed in the inset of Fig.2a. Its temporal period is that of the main driving field (T L = 2.7 fs): the methods of attosecond metrology developed in the last 20 years have shown that such a modulation at Petahertz frequency indeed enables temporal measurements with attosecond resolution (24,25).

Figure 2. Applications of dynamical ptychography to attosecond pulses generated on plasma mirrors.

Figure 2

Panel a presents the principle of the experiment, where attosecond pulses (purple cone) are generated on a plasma mirror by a spatio-temporally shaped laser field resulting from the superposition of a main beam at frequency ωL (red cone) and a perturbation beam at frequency L (blue cone), crossing at an angle θp on the target. The delay δt between the two beams is controlled on the attosecond time scale. The inset sketches the transient optical grating resulting from the superposition of the two beams at focus, as a function of time t and position x along the modulation direction of the object in the surface plane of the plasma mirror, for θp = 35 mrad (see Supplementary Information section 2). This is the ‘object’ used for the dynamical ptychography measurement, which here has a velocity v = c/(2sin θp) = 14.3c (c vacuum velocity of light) along x. By scanning δt = x 0/v, frequency-resolved ptychographic traces S(θ, x 0) are measured in the far-field using an XUV spectrometer that resolves the beam in frequency ω and angle θ. Two such traces are displayed in the lower row, measured in the CWE (panel b) and ROM (panel d) regimes, for harmonic 9 of the fundamental beam. The reconstructions provided by the iterative phase-retrieval algorithm are displayed below the measured traces. In both cases, the reconstruction error is of the order of 12 %. The retrieved spatial amplitude and phase (φ 9, axis indicated by black horizontal arrows) profiles of harmonic 9 in the surface plane of the plasma mirror are displayed in the central graphs (panels c and e, amplitude profile in full line, phase profile in dashed line, prediction of theoretical models (41) as black dotted line). To determine error bars on the final reconstruction, the reconstruction algorithm was applied several times to the same trace, starting each time from a different initial random guess. In panels c and e, the shaded color curves display the results obtained after different applications of the algorithm, and the dark color ones are the average over all reconstructions.

A ptychographic measurement requires scanning the position x 0 of the diffracting structure with respect to that of the harmonic source -imposed by the spatial profile of the main driving beam. This can be achieved with high accuracy by changing the relative delay δt between the two beams, by small fractions of the laser optical period. At any given time t, this shifts the spatial interference pattern formed by their superposition, while the position of the harmonic source remains fixed. To ensure the required interferometric delay stability, we generate the perturbing 2ωL beam from a fraction of the main beam, thanks to an all-solid in-line optical setup (see Supplementary Information section 1), and vary its delay with attosecond accuracy by tiny rotations of a glass plate used in transmission. Using an angularly-resolved spectrometer (Fig.2a), we then measure in a single delay scan the ptychographic trace of each individual harmonic in the spectrum of the attosecond pulse train.

We have performed such dynamical ptychographic measurements in different interaction regimes (see Supplementary Information section 1) (19, 31), from laser intensities exceeding 1019 W/cm2, where the Doppler effect described in the introduction is the main source of harmonic generation (Relativistic Oscillating Mirror regime - ROM), down to much lower intensities of ≈ 1017 W/cm2, where attosecond pulses are produced by collective plasma oscillations, periodically triggered into the dense plasma by fast electron bunches (Coherent Wake Emission regime -CWE) (32). The comparison of the results obtained in these two regimes will provide stringent tests of the measurement method, as explained below.

We note that different measurement schemes based on the perturbation of a laser field by its second harmonic have been demonstrated in the last decade (3335), for the characterization of attosecond pulses generated in gases or solids at laser intensities of ∼ 1014 W/cm2. In particular, the method implemented in (34) for the spatio-temporal characterization of isolated attosecond pulses from gases is similar to the one used here. The justification of these schemes was so far based on a quantum picture. The present work provides a different perspective, which suggests that dynamical ptychography can equally apply to some other systems where quantum effects do not play a role, such as plasmas exposed to laser intensities 105 times higher than in all previous attosecond measurement.

Spatio-temporal field reconstructions

Figure 2b-d displays two experimental ptychographic traces obtained for harmonic 9, in the CWE and ROM interaction regimes. These traces are then processed by a ptychographic phase retrieval algorithm (see Supplementary Information section 3), which converges to the reconstructions displayed below the measured data.

The first information obtained from the reconstruction of a single ptychographic trace is the spatial structure of the harmonic beam in the plane of the plasma mirror -along one spatial axis only, although an extension of the method to the two transverse spatial dimensions is in principle possible. The amplitude and phase profiles of harmonic 9 retrieved in the two interaction regimes are displayed in Fig.2 c-e. These spatial properties, and more particularly the phase profile, carry rich information on the physics of the harmonic generation process (36, 37), and are consistent with analytical models (38,39) (black dotted lines in Fig.2 c-e) as well as previous spatial-only measurements (40,41).

In both cases, the observed curvature of the spatial wavefront is due to the spatial variation of the laser intensity across focus. In the CWE regime, the intensity dependence of the electron dynamics at the plasma surface results in a diverging beam (21, 36). The opposite curvature observed in the ROM regime is that of a converging harmonic beam, and has a very different physical origin. At the ultrahigh laser intensities involved in this regime, the radiation pressure exerted by the incident field on the plasma mirror surface reaches the Gigabar range, and leads to a recession of this surface typically by a few tens of nanometers (37, 38). Due to the varying laser intensity, this recession is stronger at the center of the focal spot than on the edges, and the plasma mirror surface thus gets dented, acquiring a parabolic shape: this is precisely the type of curved relativistic mirror that is needed to boost the reflected light intensity.

The intensity boost that will be achieved at the plasma mirror focus is not only determined by the spatial properties of individual harmonics, obtained in Fig.2: it critically depends on the attosecond temporal compression of the reflected field. This is precisely the second type of information provided by dynamical ptychography. For each individual harmonic of frequency ωn = L, the ptychographic algorithm provides a reconstruction of the diffracting object. According to the previous sections, the emission time τ(ωn) of this harmonic is encoded in the measured position offset of this object, following Eq.(1). We now experimentally validate this key feature of the measurement method.

The optical gratings retrieved from the two ptychographic traces of Fig.2 are displayed in Fig.3a. While these two measurements have been performed in different laser-plasma interaction conditions, the moving grating used for dynamical ptychography remained the same in the two cases (see Supplementary Information section 1). As expected, it is sinusoidal in space, with a spatial period D = 11.5 μm determined by the angle between the main and perturbing beams. More importantly, we observe that the overall position of the object retrieved for the 9th harmonic differs by △x0 = 7.5 μm in the two regimes. This position shift should be related to different times of emission (within the laser optical cycle) of the attosecond pulses produced in these two measurements carried out in different regimes. Converted in time using Eq.(1) with v = 14.3c, this corresponds to a delay △t 0 = 1.8 fs between these attosecond pulses (Fig.3c).

Figure 3. Temporal reconstruction of attosecond pulses from plasma mirrors.

Figure 3

Panel a displays the reconstruction of the spatial phase ϕo(9)(x) of the transient optical grating obtained from the two ptychographic traces of Fig.2 for harmonic 9. The position of this grating encodes the emission time (group delay τ) of the harmonic, according to Eq.(1). By measuring the position of this grating as a function of frequency, we determine the group delay of the harmonics making up the attosecond pulses generated in the CWE (upper row) and ROM (lower row) regimes, for harmonic orders 9 to 14 (panel b - ωL is the laser angular frequency - black dotted lines are guides for the eye - the error bars are standard deviations that result from the procedure described in part 3.2 of the Supplementary Information). Knowing the spectral intensity (provided by the XUV spectrometer, see shaded plots in panel b), we can then reconstruct the temporal intensity profile I (t) of these attosecond pulses (panel c) by a Fourier transformation (noted as between b and c). The deduced full-width at halfmaximum durations of the CWE and ROM attosecond pulses are respectively 560 and 450as. The temporal resolution of the technique is validated by the measurement of the difference in emission times, within the laser optical period, of the CWE and ROM attosecond pulses (panel c), which amounts to 1.8 fs. This measured difference matches the value of 1.75fs determined from PIC simulations, shown in panel d that illustrates the plasma dynamics leading to attosecond pulse emission (electron density as grey color map, intensity of attosecond pulses as purple color map, z is the spatial coordinate along the target normal, shown in units of the laser wavelength λL). Experimentally, this time difference is encoded in the spatial shift △x 0 between the two gratings reconstructed from the ptychographic traces measured in the CWE and ROM regime. (see vertical lines in panel a).

Such a difference is indeed what is expected physically (32): in the ROM regime, attosecond pulses are emitted in the part of the optical cycle where plasma surface electrons are pulled outward by the incident laser field (Fig.3d, lower panel). Later in the laser optical cycle, these surface electrons are pushed back into the plasma, where they trigger the emission of CWE attosecond pulses (Fig.3d, upper panel). The measured delay quantitatively matches the one observed in Particle-In-Cell (PIC) simulations of the laser-plasma interaction (△t 0 = 1.75 fs, Fig.3d): this provides a striking validation of the temporal sensitivity of the measurement method.

We can now use the position offset xm(ωn) of the multiple objects retrieved from the ptychographic traces measured for different harmonics, to determine the group delay τ(ω n) of the associated attosecond pulses (see Supplementary Information section 3.2). These results are plotted in Fig.3b, for both the CWE and ROM regimes. In the CWE regime, we observe that the harmonics are emitted at different times, with a total delay of ≃ 150 as between the emission of harmonics 9 and 14, leading to pulses slightly longer than the Fourier-transform limited duration (Fig.3c, upper panel). This varying group delay results from the fact that higher harmonics are emitted from denser parts of the plasma, which are located deeper into the target (32): they are therefore emitted later in the laser optical cycle. In contrast, all harmonics are found to be synchronized in the ROM regime, leading to attosecond pulses with the minimum duration allowed by the spectral bandwidth of the beam (Fig.3c, lower panel). This is because all harmonics are emitted at the same time, when the plasma mirror moves outward at relativistic velocity (Fig.3d, lower panel). These results constitute an accurate temporal measurements of attosecond pulses generated from plasma mirrors. Although we do not access the group delay for all harmonic orders generated in this experiment, the measured range is sufficient to validate a key prediction of simulations, i.e. the fact that harmonics should be in phase in the relativistic regime.

Combining the spatial and temporal information obtained from our ptychographic measurements, we can reconstruct the spatio-temporal field of the attosecond pulses formed by the superposition of harmonics 9 to 14. This field is displayed in Fig.4a for the ROM regime. Due to the spatial curvature of the wavefronts imprinted by the curved plasma mirror surface, this optimally-compressed attosecond pulse will get focused ≃ 150 μm away from this surface. The combination of these temporal and spatial compressions leads to an intensity gain compared to the incident laser field. Determining the effective gain requires considering the field produced by the entire harmonic spectrum, and knowing the conversion efficiency of the laser energy to these harmonics. To this end, we use PIC simulations validated by our experimental results (Fig.4a, side and bottom panels), and estimate that the intensity gain induced by the plasma mirror can reach a value of up to 8 in the physical conditions of our experiments.

Figure 4. Spatio-temporal field of an attosecond pulse produced by a relativistic plasma mirror.

Figure 4

Panel a displays the experimental spatio-temporal reconstruction of the E-field E(x, t) of an attosecond pulse generated in the ROM regime, resulting from the superposition of harmonics 9 to 14, in the plane of the plasma mirror surface. Panel b displays the E-field E(x,t) now obtained from a PIC simulation where the laser intensity on target is 1022 W/cm 2 -nowadays achievable with a PW laser. In this second case, the displayed attosecond pulse is produced by the superposition of all generated harmonics (orders n ≥ 2). The color lines in the bottom and side panels respectively show lineouts of the temporal profile of the field amplitude |E(x, t)|, and projections of the spatial profile in the two cases (with w 0 the laser beam waist on target, and λL the laser wavelength). In case a, the dotted black lines in these panels show results from PIC simulations carried out in the physical conditions of the experiment (see Supplementary Information section 4). The dashed black lines in the main panels a and b are guides for the eye.

A path to the Schwinger limit

The excellent spatio-temporal compression measured in our experiment suggests that considerably higher gains should be possible using incident laser fields with peak intensities of the order of 1022 W/cm2, now available from the emerging generation of PW lasers. As these much higher intensities, the involved physical processes -temporal compression and tight focusing-qualitatively remain the same as the ones observed in our experiment, but their effect can be made much stronger (16). As illustrated by the simulations results of Fig.4b, shorter attosecond pulses (≃ 100 as), associated to broader harmonic spectra, are generated with much higher conversion efficiencies, reaching 40 % for the cumulation of all harmonic orders ⩾ 2 in the physical conditions of Fig.4b. Due to a larger size of the harmonic source, converging harmonic beams with larger numerical apertures are produced, which thus get focused to tighter focal spots. In the case of Fig.4b, a 300 nm focal spot is produced 60 μm away from the plasma mirror surface, resulting in a total intensity gain of 103 that brings the light intensity in the 1025 W/cm 2 range. Different approaches can be used to further enhance the focusing by these highly-controllable plasmas (4248) and thus make the Schwinger limit within reach (49) -such as creating the plasma mirror on a micro-fabricated curved target, using optically-shaped plasmas (44, 45), or tailoring the laser wavefronts to control the harmonic beam divergence (38, 50).

In all of these cases, the advanced measurement method described here will equally apply, enabling the accurate characterization and optimization of the spatio-temporal effects induced by relativistic plasma mirrors on the reflected field. All key experimental concepts and tools are available to pursue this challenging yet realistic path to the Schwinger limit based on plasma mirrors, which our results set as a new type of attosecond light source (24, 51) of high spatiotemporal quality. These results are also highly relevant for the field of ultrafast science, by confirming experimentally that plasma mirrors can provide attosecond pulses for time-resolved experiments on electronic dynamics in matter.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary material

Acknowledgements

We thank F. Reau, C. Pothier, and D. Garzella for operating the UHI100 laser. The research received financial support from the European Research Council (ERC Grant Agreement No. 694596), from LASERLAB-EUROPE and CREMLINplus (Grant Agreements No. 871124 and No. 871072, European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme), from Investissements d’ Avenir LabEx PALM (ANR-10-LABX-0039-PALM) and from Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-18-ERC2-0002). An award of computer time was provided by the INCITE program (project ‘PlasmInSilico’). This research used resources of the Argonne Leadership Computing Facility, which is a DOE Office of Science User Facility supported under Contract DE-AC02-06CH11357. We also acknowledge the financial support of the CrossDisciplinary Program on Numerical Simulation of CEA, the French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission.

Footnotes

The arrival time of frequency ω here refers to the group delay at this frequency, i.e. it corresponds to the temporal position of the pulse formed by the superposition of frequencies within a small interval centered at ω.

Contributions

F.Q. conceived the experiment, and F.Q. and A.D. conceived the experimental set-up. A.D., L.C. performed the experiment with the help of E.P. The data analysis was carried out by L.C. with the help of A.L. H.V. performed all numerical simulations. F.Q. was in charge of the manuscript, to which all authors contributed.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • 1.Marklund M, Shukla PK. Nonlinear collective effects in photon-photon and photon-plasma interactions. Reviews of Modern Physics. 2006;78:591–640. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Di Piazza A, Müller C, Hatsagortsyan K, Keitel CH. Extremely high-intensity laser interactions with fundamental quantum systems. Reviews of Modern Physics. 2012;84:1177–1228. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mourou GA, Tajima T, Bulanov SV. Optics in the relativistic regime. Reviews of Modern Physics. 2006;78:309–371. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sauter F. Über das Verhalten eines Elektrons im homogenen elektrischen Feld nach der relativistischen Theorie Diracs. Zeitschrift für Physik. 1931;69:742–764. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Heisenberg W, Euler H. Folgerungen aus der Diracschen Theorie des Positrons. Zeitschrift für Physik. 1936;98:714–732. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Schwinger J. On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization. Physical Review. 1951;82:664–679. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ringwald A. Pair production from vacuum at the focus of an x-ray free electron laser. Physics Letters B. 2001;510:107–116. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Strickland D, Mourou G. Compression of amplified chirped optical pulses. Optics Communications. 1985;55:447–449. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bahk S-W, et al. Generation and characterization of the highest laser intensities (1022 W/cm2 . Optics Letters. 2004;29:2837–2839. doi: 10.1364/ol.29.002837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gerstner E. Extreme light. Nature. 2007;446:16–18. doi: 10.1038/446016a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yoon JW, et al. Achieving the laser intensity of 5.5 × 1022 W/cm 2 with a wavefront-corrected multi-pw laser. Optics Express. 2019;27:20412–20420. doi: 10.1364/OE.27.020412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Landecker K. Possibility of frequency multiplication and wave amplification by means of some relativistic effects. Physical Review. 1952;86:852–855. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bulanov SV, Esirkepov T, Tajima T. Light intensification towards the schwinger limit. Physical Review Letters. 2003;91:085001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.085001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gordienko S, Pukhov A, Shorokhov O, Baeva T. Coherent focusing of high harmonics: A new way towards the extreme intensities. Physical Review Letters. 2005;94:103903. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.103903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gonoskov AA, Korzhimanov AV, Kim AV, Marklund M, Sergeev AM. Ultra-relativistic nanoplasmonics as a route towards extreme-intensity attosecond pulses. Physical Review E. 2011;84:046403. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.84.046403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vincenti H. Achieving extreme light intensities using optically curved relativistic plasma mirrors. Physical Review Letters. 2019;123:105001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.105001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Solodov A, Malkin V, Fisch N. Limits for light intensification by reflection from relativistic plasma mirrors. Physics of Plasmas. 2006;13:093102 [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kapteyn HC, Murnane MM, Szoke A, Falcone RW. Prepulse energy suppression for high-energy ultrashort pulses using self-induced plasma shuttering. Optics Letters. 1991;16:490–492. doi: 10.1364/ol.16.000490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Thaury C, et al. Plasma mirrors for ultrahigh-intensity optics. Nature Physics. 2007;3:424–429. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lichters R, Meyer-ter Vehn J, Pukhov A. Short-pulse laser harmonics from oscillating plasma surfaces driven at relativistic intensity. Physics of Plasmas. 1996;3:3425–3437. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Thaury C, Quéré F. High-order harmonic and attosecond pulse generation on plasma mirrors: basic mechanisms. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics. 2010;43:213001 [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Baeva T, Gordienko S, Pukhov A. Theory of high-order harmonic generation in relativistic laser interaction with overdense plasma. Physical Review E. 2006;74:046404. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.046404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dromey B, et al. High harmonic generation in the relativistic limit. Nature Physics. 2006;2:456–459. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Krausz F, Ivanov M. Attosecond physics. Reviews of Modern Physics. 2009;81:163–234. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Quéré F, Mairesse Y, Itatani J. Temporal characterization of attosecond xuv fields. Journal of Modern Optics. 2005;52:339–360. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Orfanos I, et al. Attosecond pulse metrology. APL Photonics. 2019;4:080901 [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nomura Y, et al. Attosecond phase locking of harmonics emitted from laser-produced plasmas. Nature Physics. 2009;5:124–128. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Quéré F. Attosecond plasma optics. Nature Physics. 2009;5:93–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rodenburg JM. Ptychography and related diffractive imaging methods. Advances in imaging and electron physics. 2008;150:87–184. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Thibault P, et al. High-resolution scanning x-ray diffraction microscopy. Science. 2008;321:379–382. doi: 10.1126/science.1158573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kahaly S, et al. Direct observation of density-gradient effects in harmonic generation from plasma mirrors. Physical Review Letters. 2013;110:175001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.175001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Quéré F, et al. Coherent wake emission of high-order harmonics from overdense plasmas. Physical Review Letters. 2006;96:125004. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.125004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Dudovich N, et al. Measuring and controlling the birth of attosecond xuv pulses. Nature Physics. 2006;2:781–786. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kim KT, et al. Manipulation of quantum paths for space–time characterization of attosecond pulses. Nature Physics. 2013;9:159–163. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Vampa G, et al. Linking high harmonics from gases and solids. Nature. 2015;522:462–464. doi: 10.1038/nature14517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Quéré F, et al. Phase properties of laser high-order harmonics generated on plasma mirrors. Physical Review Letters. 2008;100:095004. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.095004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dromey B, et al. Diffraction-limited performance and focusing of high harmonics from 1 relativistic plasmas. Nature Physics. 2009;5:146–152. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Vincenti H, et al. Optical properties of relativistic plasma mirrors. Nature Communications. 2014;5:3403. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Malvache A, Borot A, Quéré F, Lopez-Martens R. Coherent wake emission spectroscopy as a probe of steep plasma density profiles. Physical Review E. 2013;87:035101 [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Leblanc A, Monchocé S, Bourassin-Bouchet C, Kahaly S, Quéré F. Ptychographic measurements of ultrahigh-intensity laser–plasma interactions. Nature Physics. 2016;12:301–305. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Leblanc A, et al. Spatial properties of high-order harmonic beams from plasma mirrors: a ptychographic study. Physical Review Letters. 2017;119:155001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.155001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Thaury C, et al. Coherent dynamics of plasma mirrors. Nature Physics. 2008;4:631–634. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wheeler JA, et al. Attosecond lighthouses from plasma mirrors. Nature Photonics. 2012;6:829–833. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Monchocé S, et al. Optically controlled solid-density transient plasma gratings. Physical Review Letters. 2014;112:145008 [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Leblanc A, et al. Plasma holograms for ultrahigh-intensity optics. Nature Physics. 2017;13:440–443. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Denoeud A, Chopineau L, Leblanc A, Quéré F. Interaction of ultraintense laser vortices with plasma mirrors. Physical Review Letters. 2017;118:033902. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.033902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Yeung M, et al. Experimental observation of attosecond control over relativistic electron bunches with two-colour fields. Nature Photonics. 2017;11:32–35. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gao J, et al. Divergence control of relativistic harmonics by an optically shaped plasma surface. Physical Review E. 2020;101:033202. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.101.033202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Quéré F, Vincenti H. Reflecting petawatt lasers off relativistic plasma mirrors: a realistic path to the schwinger limit. High Power Laser Science and Engineering. 2021;9:e6 [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Quintard L, et al. Optics-less focusing of xuv high-order harmonics. Science Advances. 2019;5:eaau7175. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau7175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Maroju PK, et al. Attosecond pulse shaping using a seeded free-electron laser. Nature. 2020;578:386–391. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2005-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

RESOURCES