Abstract
The varying rates at which mRNAs decay are tightly coordinated with transcriptional changes to shape gene expression during development and disease. But currently available RNA sequencing approaches lack the temporal information to determine the relative contribution of RNA biogenesis, processing and turnover to the establishment of steady-state gene expression profiles.
Here, we describe a protocol that combines metabolic RNA labeling with chemical nucleoside conversion by thiol-linked alkylation of 4-thiouridine to determine RNA stability in cultured cells (SLAMseq). When coupled to cost-effective mRNA 3' end sequencing approaches, SLAMseq determines the half-life of polyadenylated transcripts in a global and transcript-specific manner using untargeted or targeted cDNA library preparation protocols.
We provide a step-by-step instruction for time-resolved mRNA 3' end sequencing, which augments traditional RNA-seq approaches to acquire the temporal resolution necessary to study the molecular principles that control gene expression.
Keywords: RNA stability, metabolic RNA sequencing, 4-thiouridine, gene expression kinetics, SLAMseq, mouse embryonic stem cells
1. Introduction
Gene expression comprises a series of tightly controlled molecular events that involve the biogenesis, processing and turnover of RNA molecules. Among these, the regulated decay of messenger RNA (mRNA) acts as a key step to control the quality and quantity of cellular transcripts, which in turn ensures faithful protein expression [1]. To this end, a multitude of cis- and trans-acting factors adjust the life-span of mRNAs according to its encoded function [2], and in response to environmental conditions, including stress [3], metabolic adjustments [4], or developmental cues [5]. Therefore, robust transcriptomics approaches that measure gene expression kinetics in an accessible, cost-effective, and scalable manner are key to systematically dissect the biological processes that modulate RNA decay. Early attempts to measure transcript stabilities mostly employed highly invasive and cytotoxic approaches that globally interfere with RNA synthesis using transcriptional inhibitors or conditional mutants [6, 7]. But such measurements remain imprecise and frequently induce cellular stress responses that may activate alternative routes for transcript-specific decay or interfere with the intrinsic coupling of transcription and decay [8]. In contrast, metabolic labeling of RNA in intact cells represents an attractive alternative to follow the fate of transcripts under unperturbed cellular conditions. This was initially achieved by low-throughput protocols that utilized radiolabeled nucleotides and probe-based filter-binding [9]. Later refinements to this approach included biologically inert ribonucleotide analogs, such as 4-thiouridine (s4U), which exhibit unique physicochemical properties that enabled the reversible conjugation of labeled transcripts, for example to mercury agarose [10]. Numerous updates to this protocol meanwhile combine different nucleotide analogs (e.g. 4-thiouridine, 5-ethyniluridine, or 5'-bromouridine) with diverse biochemical enrichment methods (e.g. reversible biotinylation or classical immunoprecipitation) and gene expression profiling approaches (e.g. qRT-PCR, microarray, or RNAseq) to assess transcript-specific and global RNA stabilities [11]. However, such approaches face significant technical challenges, including the labor-intensive and semi-quantitative nature of biochemical enrichment techniques, the need for ample starting material, and the complex and laborious kinetic modeling steps that integrate sub-fraction-derived datasets (i.e. input, bound, and supernatant) into gene expression dynamics. Many of these limitations were recently overcome by simple chemical conversion of s4U into cytosine analogs [12–14]. Here, total RNA prepared from cells after s4U metabolic labeling is subjected to chemical treatment that changes the base-pairing capacity of s4U top prompt specific T to C conversions in metabolically labeled transcripts upon cDNA library preparation. By detecting metabolically labeled transcripts in the context of total RNA, time-resolved RNA sequencing provides insights into gene expression dynamics at unprecedented accessibility, efficiency and scalability. Among the available conversion chemistries, SLAMseq employs a rapid (<15 minutes reaction time) and efficient (>94% reaction efficiency) nucleophilic substitution reaction that transfers a carboxyamidomethyl-group from iodoacetamide to the thiol group of 4-thiouridine, which causes the mis-incorporation of guanine across alkylated 4-thiouridine during reverse-transcription (Figure 1). When coupled to metabolic RNA labeling protocols, SLAMseq revealed RNA decay rates for thousands of transcripts in mouse embryonic stem cells, and reliably portrayed the regulatory effects of cellular microRNAs and post-transcriptional RNA modifications, such as N6-methyladenosine [13]. Beyond the quantitation of RNA decay, SLAMseq has also been successfully applied to measure (1) rapid changes in transcription for the delineation of primary target genes of transcription factors [15], (2) tissue- and cell-type-specific gene expression profiling in mammals [16], and (3) RNA transport between tissues in vivo in mammals [17].
Figure 1.
Schematic overview of thiol(SH)-linked alkylation for the metabolic sequencing of RNA (SLAMseq). Cultured cells are subjected to metabolic RNA labeling by the addition of 4-thiouridine (s4U) to the culture medium. Following total RNA extraction at several time-points after uridine chase, treatment with iodoacetamide results in thiol-specific alkylation, which modulates the base-pairing capacity of s4U, prompting the site-specific mis-incorporation of guanine across chemically modified s4U during cDNA synthesis by reverse transcription. As a consequence, SLAMseq specifically identifies s4U incorporations at single-nucleotide resolution by sequencing and enables to quantify transcript decay kinetics in a global and transcript-specific manner by standard high-throughput sequencing.
Here, we describe a step-by-step protocol for the global and transcript-specific determination of mRNA half-lives using SLAMseq. While this metabolic RNA sequencing is in principle compatible with any standard RNA sequencing approach that involves the preparation of cDNA libraries, we describe a cost-effective way to assess the stability of polyadenylated RNA polymerase II transcripts from low input material by employing mRNA 3'end sequencing. This sequencing approach enables to independently address mRNA 3' end variants, which frequently modulate the fate and function of transcripts [18]. Finally, we report a simple targeted version of this sequencing protocol that enables to address the decay kinetics even of poorly expressed transcripts, which frequently fail to report robust conversion data in untargeted library preparation protocols.
2. Material
All reagents and labware must be free of nucleases and nucleic acid contamination. Precautions need to be taken at all times during the protocol to ensure nuclease-free conditions. Solutions and reagents should be stored at room temperature unless otherwise specified by the manufacturer.
2.1. General Equipment
-
-
Humidified CO2-controlled tissue culture incubator
-
-
Laminar flow hood
-
-
Benchtop refrigerated centrifuge (up to 20,000 × g)
-
-
Microvolume Spectrophotometer (e.g. Nanodrop)
-
-
Heat block
-
-
Benchtop thermal cycler
-
-
Real-Time PCR detection system
-
-
Magnetic Stand for PCR tubes
-
-
pH meter
-
-
Capillary electrophoresis instrument (e.g. AATI Fragment Analyzer)
-
-
Illumina high-throughput sequencing machine (e.g. Illumina HiSeq 2500)
-
-
Luminescence Plate Reader (e.g. Synergy, BioTek)
-
-
Orbital shaker
-
-
Water bath (set to 37°C)
-
-
Sterile tissue culture plasticware
-
-
500 ml Nalgene® Rapid-Flow™ Filter Units and Bottle Top Filters (0.2 μm)
-
-
Volumetric pipettes (5, 10, 25 mL)
-
-
Filter tips (1-1000 μL)
-
-
Safe-lock 1.5 mL tubes
-
-
15mL and 50 mL Falcon tubes
-
-
0.2 mL 8-tube PCR strips and ultraclear flat cap strips
-
-
Plate-reader compatible 96-well plates (e.g. Cell culture microplate, 96 well, PS, F-bottom, white, cellstar® TC, Greiner Bio-One)
2.2. Reagents and Buffers
-
-
DMEM High Glucose medium
-
-
certified (ES cell pre-tested) FBS (Gibco)
-
-
100 x penicillin- streptomycin solution (100 U/ml penicillin, 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin)
-
-
200 mM L-glutamine
-
-
100 x MEM Non-essential amino acid solution (Sigma or other)
-
-
100 mM sodium pyruvate
-
-
50 mM 2-Mercaptoethanol
-
-
2 mg/ml LIF
-
-
0.5 % Trypsin-EDTA (10x)
-
-
1× sterile Phosphate buffered saline (PBS)
-
-
4-Thiouridine (Sigma-Aldrich)
-
-
Uridine (Sigma-Aldrich)
-
-
Cell viability assay, e.g. CellTiterGlo® Luminescent Cell Viability assay (Promega)
-
-
TRIzol™ Reagent (Ambion, Life Technologies)
-
-
Chloroform:Isoamyl Alcohol 24:1
-
-
3 M NaOAc (pH 5.2)
-
-
2-Propanol
-
-
Ethanol absolute
-
-
Glycogen (20 mg/ml)
-
-
OmniPur® DTT (Merck)
-
-
Nuclease-free water
-
-
Iodoacetamide (Sigma-Aldrich)
-
-
DMSO
-
-
NaH2PO4 (monobasic, Sigma Aldrich)
-
-
Na2HPO4 (dibasic, Merck)
-
-
DNF-471 Standard Sensitivity RNA Analysis Kit (AATI)
-
-
TURBO DNA-free™ Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientifi cor other)
-
-
QuantSeq 3' mRNA-Seq Library Kit for Illumina (Lexogen) (optional)
-
-
QuantSeq-Flex Targeted RNA-Seq Library Prep Kit for Illumina (Lexogen) (optional)
-
-
PCR Add-on Kit for Illumina (Lexogen)
-
-
RNaseOUT™ Recombinant Ribonuclease Inhibitor (Thermo Fisher Scientific)
-
-
SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific)
-
-
10 mM dNTPs
-
-
RNase H (New England Biolabs)
-
-
2× Taq Master Mix, e.g. 2x GoTaq® Green Master Mix (Promega)
-
-
AMPure XP Beads (Beckman Coulter)
-
-
KAPA Real-time Library Amplification kit (Kapa Biosystems)
-
-
DNF-474 High Sensitivity NGS Fragment Analysis Kit (1 bp - 6,000 bp) (AATI)
2.3. Cell lines
Mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) (e.g. clone AN3-12, obtained from IMBA Haplobank [19])
3. Methods
General Considerations:
Time-resolved RNA sequencing is based on metabolic RNA labeling that can be applied in principle to any cultured metazoan cell type. To this, thiol(SH)-linked alkylation for the metabolic sequencing of RNA (SLAMseq) employs the nucleotide analog 4-thiouridine (s4U), which is biologically inert when applied at appropriate doses. When added as a supplement to cell culture medium, metazoan cells readily take up s4U via nucleoside equilibrate transporters and incorporate it into newly synthesized RNA. Notably, the efficiency of s4U incorporation into nascent RNA depends on cell type-specific variables, such as cellular uptake kinetics and overall transcriptional activity. Thus, assessing the sensitivity to s4U and the efficiency of s4U incorporation into RNA prior to a SLAMseq experiment is key to obtain meaningful results and experimental parameters, such as s4U concentration, s4U labeling time or cDNA library sequencing depth, need to be adjusted accordingly. Here, we describe how optimal s4U labeling conditions can be achieved in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs). Cell-type-specific adjustments that enable to apply the protocol to different cell types of various organismal origin will be discussed in the notes section.
3.1. Mouse embryonic stem cell (mESC) culture procedures
General maintenance: Operate under sterile conditions. Maintain mESCs (clone AN3-12) as described previously [19]. Keep cells in a humidified cell culture incubator at 37°C with 5% CO2. Passage cells 1:10 every second day using Trypsin-EDTA for a maximum number of 10-15 passages.
- Mix the following reagents to prepare mESC culturing media:
- 450 ml DMEM High Glucose medium
- 75 ml FBS
- 5 ml Penicillin-streptomycin solution (100x)
- 5 ml L-glutamine (200 mM)
- 5 ml MEM Non-essential amino acid solution (100x)
- 5 ml Sodium pyruvate (100 mM)
- 550 μl 2-Mercaptoethanol (50 mM)
- 5 μl LIF (2 mg/ml)
Sterile filtrate mESC media using a 500 ml 0.2 μm bottle top filter and store media at 4°C for a maximum of 2 months.
3.2. Determining optimal s4U concentration for metabolic RNA labeling
In order to achieve optimal metabolic RNA labeling in the absence of cytotoxic side-effects, the concentration of s4U needs to be carefully adjusted for any given cell type.
Testing s4U-induced cytotoxicity:
Here, we describe how to use CellTiterGlo® to assess cell viability after s4U-labeling of mESCs. Alternatively, other assays can be used to assess cell viability (e.g. viability dyes for flow cytometry).
Prepare a 0.5 M stock solution of s4U in H2O, aliquot the stock solution and store the aliquots at -20°C for several weeks. Avoid exposure to unnecessary long exposures to UV light throughout the experiment (Note 1).
Seed 5000 mESCs per well on a 96-well plate in a volume of 200 μl mESC culturing medium the day before the labeling experiment. Assess the cell viability by Tryptan blue staining in the process of cell counting. To guarantee reproducible results, ensure that the cell viability exceeds 90% prior to seeding
Incubate cells at 37°C overnight.
Prepare serial dilutions of s4U in mESC culturing medium in a concentration range of 0 – 1 mM.
Remove old media from the cells and add 150 μl of s4U-containing media per well (Note 2). Use each s4U-concentration in triplicates and include three wells of ‘no s4U’ control. Additionally, prepare three wells without cells to measure the background luminescence of the culturing media.
Replace media every three hours with fresh media containing the respective s4U concentration (Note 3).
Prepare CellTiterGlo® reagent by equilibrating the CellTiter-Glo® Buffer and lyophilized CellTiter-Glo® Substrate to room temperature. Transfer the appropriate volume of CellTiter-Glo® Buffer to lyophilized CellTiter-Glo® Substrate to form the CellTiterGlo® reagent and mix gently by vortexing.
After 12 h or 24 h of s4U labeling, add 150 μl CellTiterGlo® reagent per well and mix the contents for two minutes on an orbital shaker. Protect the plate from light.
Incubate the plate at room temperature for 10 min.
Transfer the lysate to a luminescent reader compatible 96-well plate.
Measure luminescence, e.g. on Synergy (BioTek) using Gen5 Software.
Assess cellular viability under different s4U-labeling conditions: Subtract the background luminescence signal of wells without cells, normalize luminescence to fit a sigmoidal dose response curve and calculate the EC50.
For pulse-chase experiments, use a s4U concentration that maintains a cell viability > 90% after 12h or 24h of s4U labeling. For mESCs, we use a s4U concentration of 100 μM for metabolic labeling up to 24h with a s4U-containing media exchange every 3 hours (Note 4).
3.3. Measuring global and specific mRNA stability in mESCs
The following set-up describes a pulse-chase experiment to measure mRNA stabilities in mESCs. The experimental set-up is designed for technical triplicate measurements over 7 time-points after a 24h pulse labeling (0h, 0.5h, 1h, 3h, 6h, 12h, 24h chase) and ‘no labeling’ controls. The pulse labeling is performed in a 6-well format and includes media exchange every three hours during 24 hours of the s4U pulse. In order to adjust RNA yields to downstream applications, scale the experiment accordingly.
3.3.1. Pulse-chase labeling experiment
Seed 2 x105 cells on 24 wells of 6-well plates the day before the labeling experiment (Note 5, Note 6). Assess the cell viability by Tryptan blue staining in the process of cell counting. To guarantee reproducible results, ensure that the cell viability exceeds 90% prior to seeding.
Incubate cells at 37°C overnight.
On the following day, prepare 350 ml mESC culturing medium supplemented with 100 μM s4U (Note 7). Aliquot the s4U-containing media into seven 50 ml flasks for media exchanges and store at 4°C protected from light (Note 8).
Prepare 50 ml mESC culturing medium containing 10mM of uridine and store at 4°C (Note 9).
Equilibrate the first aliquot of s4U-medium to 37°C.
Remove the media from the cells. Add 2 ml culturing media without s4U to three wells (‘unlabeled’). To all other wells, add 2 ml s4U-containing media to start the pulse labeling.
Exchange the s4U containing media with fresh s4U-containing media every three hours. Always equilibrate 50 mL medium aliquots to 37°C prior to media exchange.
After 24h, remove s4U-containing media from the cells. Add 500 μl of TRIzol® to the three wells without s4U (‘unlabeled’) and to three wells with s4U (‘0h chase’) and transfer the lysate to 1.5 ml tubes (Note 10). Freeze these samples at -80°C. For all the other wells, wash cells twice with 2 ml 1× PBS. Start the chase by the addition of 2 ml uridine-containing mESC culturing medium per well (Note 11).
Collect time-points in triplicates at 0.5h, 1h, 3h, 6h, 12h and 24h after chase onset by lysing the cells in 500 μL TRIzol® (Note 12). Transfer lysate to 1.5 ml tubes and freeze samples at -80°C.
Store samples at -80°C or directly proceed to RNA isolation (3.3.2.).
3.3.2. RNA isolation
Protect s4U-labeled RNA from light. Work under fume-hood at least until the EtOH washing step.
Thaw TRIzol® lysate and incubate 5 min at room temperature.
In the meantime, prepare 0.2 mM DTT in 2-propanol (14 μl 0.1M DTT in 7 mL 2-propanol) and 0.1 mM DTT in 75% EtOH (13 μl 0.1 M DTT in 13 mL 75% EtOH) (Note 13).
Add 100 μl Chloroform:Isoamyl Alcohol 24:1 per 0.5 ml of TRIzol®.
Vortex tube for 15 sec.
Incubate at room temperature for 2-3 min.
Spin down at 16,000 x g for 15 min at 4°C.
Carefully transfer aqueous phase (~ 200 μL) to a new tube. Do not disturb the interphase.
Add 200 μl DTT-containing 2-propanol (0.1 mM final concentration) and 1 μl glycogen (20 mg/ml) (optional) and vortex well.
Incubate 10 min at room temperature.
Spin down at 16,000 x g for 20 min at 4°C.
Carefully take off the supernatant with a pipette and discard.
Add 500 μl DTT-containing 75% EtOH (0.1 mM final concentration) and vortex well.
Spin down at 7,500 x g for 5 min at room temperature.
Completely remove supernatant with a pipette and let the pellet dry for 5-10 min. Do not overdry as it might become difficult to resuspend the RNA pellet.
Resuspend in 20-30 μL of 1 mM DTT.
Incubate for 10 min at 55°C to completely dissolve the RNA pellet.
Measure concentration by Nanodrop. Typically, we obtain from one well of cultured mESCs 10-15 μg of total RNA. Store RNA at -80°C (Note 14) or proceed to s4U alkylation.
Control the quality of the RNA, e.g. on a capillary electrophoresis system like Fragment Analyzer (AATI, kit DNF-471). See Figure 2 (top) for typical results.
Figure 2. Electropherograms of total RNA prepared from mouse embryonic stem cells before (left panels) and after metabolic RNA labeling for 12 h (right panels) obtained on a Fragment Analyzer.
Treatment of total RNA with iodoacetamide for s4U-alkylation (bottom panels) as part of the SLAMseq protocol does not influence total RNA quality or integrity when compared to untreated conditions (top panels), as judged by comparing RNA quality value (RQN). Blue and red peaks correspond to the 28S and 18S region, respectively. Fragment size is indicated in nucleotides (nt). RFU, relative fluorescence unit; LM, lower marker.
3.3.3. s4U-Alkylation (Iodoacetamide treatment)
Prepare the Sodium Phosphate buffer (500 mM NaPO4, pH 8) as following: Make 1 M stocks solutions of monobasic NaH2PO4 (138 g in 1 L H2O) and dibasic Na2HPO4 (142 g in 1L H2O). To prepare 200 ml of 0.5 M sodium phosphate buffer, mix 93.2 mL of 1 M Na2HPO4 and 6.8 ml of 1 M NaH2PO4 and add 100 ml of H2O. Adjust to pH 8 after buffer preparation using a pH meter.
Freshly prepare a 100 mM IAA stock in EtOH 100%. Keep iodoacetamide protected from light.
Dilute 2 μg of total RNA in 15 μL nuclease-free water (Note 15). Keep RNA on ice.
- Prepare the following mastermix (Note 16):
Volume Final concentration IAA (100 mM) in EtOH 100% 5 μl 10 mM NaPO4, pH 8 (500 mM) 5 μl 50 mM DMSO 25 μl 50% (v/v) Final volume 35 μl Add 35 μl of the mastermix to 15 μl RNA, mix well.
Incubate the reaction at 50°C for 15 min.
Transfer samples on ice and immediately quench the reaction by adding 1 μl 1M DTT (Note 17). Vortex briefly.
Precipitate RNA by adding 1 μl glycogen (20 mg/ml), 5 μl NaOAc (3M, pH 5.2) and 125 μl EtOH 100%. Vortex briefly and incubate for 30 min at -80°C or for several hours at -20°C.
Spin down at 16,000 x g for 30 min at 4°C.
Remove supernatant with a pipette and add 1 ml 75% EtOH, vortex.
Spin down at 16,000 x g for 10 min at 4°C.
Completely remove supernatant with a pipette and let the pellet dry for 5-10 min. Do not overdry as it might become difficult to resuspend the RNA pellet.
Resuspend RNA pellet in 10 μl H2O.
Measure RNA concentration on Nanodrop.
Assess RNA quality e.g. on a capillary electrophoresis system like Fragment Analyzer (AATI, kit DNF-471). Note, that the conditions of the s4U alkylation reaction do not interfere with RNA integrity (see Figure 2, bottom).
3.3.4. Targeted and untargeted mRNA 3' end cDNA library preparation
SLAMseq is in principle compatible with any RNA sequencing library preparation protocol that converts RNA into cDNA. To determine global and transcript-specific stability of poly-adenylated RNA polymerase II transcripts, we commonly employ mRNA 3' end sequencing approaches (e.g. Lexogen’s QuantSeq 3' mRNA-Seq Library Prep Kit for Illumina), as previously described [13]. Using this approach, an average sequencing depth of 10-20 mio reads per time-point provides robust insights into the stability of thousands of transcripts [13].
To further reduce bioinformatic workload and/or sequencing costs, or to increase the sensitivity towards lowly-expressed transcripts, we recommend a targeted mRNA 3' end sequencing approach (Figure 3). To this end, a set of gene-specific forward primers for second strand synthesis is designed taking the following considerations into account (for general considerations follow the manufacturer’s instructions of Lexogen’s QuantSeq-Flex Targeted RNA-Seq Library Prep Kit):
Define the primer binding site of your custom primers within 150-400 bp upstream of the 3' end of the transcripts of interest. Avoid amplicon regions with low T-content in order to be able to robustly evaluate T>C conversions across multiple T positions within the sequenced region.
Blast primer binding sites against the genome to avoid off-target priming.
If possible, check cell line-specific genomic DNA sequencing data for potential SNPs in the primer binding region.
Design DNA oligonucleotides that contain the following sequence information in 5 ’-to-3' direction: 5' - adapter sequence (CACGACGCTCTTCCGATCT); [optional: include random hexamer (NNNNNN) as unique molecular identifier]; specific transcript-binding region - 3' (for a list of example custom primers targeting a set of transcripts in mESC see Table 1).
Prepare 10x Custom Targeted Primer Mix solution by mixing 2 μl of each gene-specific forward primer (100μM stock). For second strand synthesis dilute the 10x Custom Targeted Primer Mix solution 1:10 to a final working concentration of 10 μM
Figure 3. Schematic overview of cDNA library preparation protocol for targeted (right) or untargeted (left) mRNA 3' end sequencing on Illumina platforms.
See text (section 3.3.4) for details.
Table 1. Gene-specific forward primer sequences for the targeted amplification of mRNAs after oligo(dT)-primed reverse transcription.
| Gene | Ensembl ID | Primer sequence (DNA, 5'-3') |
|---|---|---|
| ActB | ENSMUSG00000029580 | CACGACGCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNNCCCACTCCTAA GAGGAGGATG |
| GusB | ENSMUSG00000025534 | CACGACGCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNNGTGAGAGGCT GGAGTGAAGG |
| Hspa1b | ENSMUSG00000090877 | CACGACGCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNNCAAACGTCTTG GCACTGTGT |
| Nat10 | ENSMUSG00000027185 | CACGACGCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNNCTCTCCTGCTC CTCCCTTCT |
| Sox2 | ENSMUSG00000074637 | CACGACGCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNNTGCAGGTTGAT ATCGTTGGT |
| Tnrc6b | ENSMUSG00000047888 | CACGACGCTCTTCCGATCTNNNNNNTGAAGGGTGG TGTTTTCTCA |
Targeted mRNA 3’ end libraries are prepared according to the following protocol (as a commercially available alternative use ‘QuantSeq-Flex Targeted RNA-Seq Library Prep Kit’ from Lexogen) :
-
6.
Prior to reverse transcription, remove possible gDNA contaminants by DNase digest, e.g. using TURBO DNA-free™ Kit according to manufacturer’s instructions. Ensure that the RNA is free of divalent cations and compatible with downstream RT-PCR, otherwise perform an additional clean-up step before setting up the reverse transcription reaction.
-
7.Prepare the reverse transcription reaction:
- 5μl RNA (500 ng)
- 4μl 5x First-Strand buffer (part of SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase kit)
- 0.5 μl 10 μM oligo(dT) primer (final concentration 0.25 μM)
- 0.5 μl RNase OUT
-
8.
Incubate for 5 min at 65°C and quickly cool samples on ice.
-
9.To each reaction add:
- 1 μl 0.1M DTT
- 1.25 μl dNTPs (10 mM)
- 0.5 μl SuperScript III
- 7.25 μl H2O.
-
8.
Incubate the RT-reaction in a thermal cycler for 10 min at 25°C, 50 min at 50°C and 15 min at 70°C.
-
9.
Perform an RNase H digest according to manufacturer’s instructions.
- 10.
-
11.Perform the PCR reaction with the following cycling conditions (note: cycle numbers may need to be optimized depending on transcript expression levels):
95°C 2:00 min 12 cycles of: 95°C 0:30 min 58 °C 0:30 min 72°C 0:30 min 72°C 5:00 min 4°C Hold -
12.
Remove DNA fragments below 200 bp from the cDNA by purifying with AMPure XP beads according to manufacturer’s instructions. Elute cDNA in 20μL H2O.
-
13.Prepare the following library amplification reaction in single ultraclear flat cap PCR tubes (primer sequences see Table 2):
- 10 μl cDNA
- 2.5 25 μl KAPA HiFi HotStart Real-time PCR Master Mix (2x)
- 2.5 μl Illum. FWD primer (10 μM)
- 2.5 μl Illum. REV index primer (10 μM)*
- 10 μl H2O
-
50 μl final volume* Use a different Illum. REV index primer for each sample to uniquely barcode each library.
-
14.
Thaw the KAPA Fluorescence Standards 3 and 4 for at least 15 min at room temperature, mix well by pipetting and transfer 50 μl per Standard into a ultraclear flat cap PCR tube.
-
15.Place the Fluorescence Standards and the library samples into a real-time PCR machine and amplify the libraries using the following cycling conditions:
98°C 0:45 min 98°C 0:15 min 65 °C 0:30 min (annealing) cycling* 72°C 0:20 min (extension 1) Signal detection 72°C 0:15 min (extension 2) *Monitor the PCR amplification curves in real-time. Interrupt the cycling during extension 2 as soon as the amplification curve of a sample has reached the exponential phase in a signal range between KAPA Fluorescence Standard 3 and 4, roughly corresponding to 3500 - 4500 RFU (Note 18). Take out the sample and transfer the tube to ice, then continue with the cycling program and repeat this step for the remaining samples. -
16.
Remove DNA fragments below 200 bp from the cDNA library by purifying with AMPure XP beads according to manufacturer’s instructions. Elute cDNA in 17μL H2O.
-
17.
Assess the library quality, e.g. on a capillary electrophoresis system like Fragment Analyzer (AATI, kit DNF-474).
Table 2. Primer sequences for the targeted mRNA 3' end library preparation.
| Primer | Primer sequence (DNA, 5'-3') |
|---|---|
| oligo(dT) | GTTCAGACGTGTGCTCTTCCGATCT-(T)n-V |
| Illum. FWD | AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACGACGC TCTTCCGATCT |
| Illum. REV index | CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGATNNNNNNGTGACTGGAGTTCAGA CGTGTGCTCTTCCGATCT |
3.3.5. High-throughput sequencing
As a standard approach for SLAMseq datasets generated via mRNA 3' end sequencing, we typically recommend 10-20 million reads per QuantSeq library for an efficient quantification of s4U-containing transcripts of the whole transcriptome (>5000 transcripts). We recommend sequencing with single read 100 (SR 100) mode, which typically enables to recover the vast majority of labeled transcripts (>70% in mESC at a labeling efficiency of ~2.3 %)[13]. For targeted libraries, sequencing depth can be scaled down substantially depending on the number of transcripts amplified and the read mode depends on the T content downstream of the custom primer-binding site.
3.3.6. Data analysis
To pre-process the raw sequencing reads, demultiplex and adaptor trim (e.g. using Cutadapt) the reads. In addition, we recommend trimming the first 12 nt from the 5 ’ end of each read in QuantSeq and target mRNA 3' end sequencing datasets.
To align SLAMseq data generated by QuantSeq or targeted mRNA 3' end libraries, and to quantify T>C conversions in these data sets, we recommend using SLAMDUNK after pre-processing of the sequencing data. SLAMDUNK is a fully automated analysis pipeline based on the NGM mapper algorithm but is adapted to robustly quantify nucleotide-conversion-containing high-throughput datasets (Neumann et al., submitted, http://t-neumann.github.io/slamdunk/) [21]. Briefly, SLAMDUNK includes an alignment scoring scheme that does not penalize T>C conversions during the alignment step. In addition, SLAMDUNK is optimized to process 3' end sequencing data sets as it includes an optional multimapper reassignment strategy, which is specifically optimized for low-complexity regions such as the 3' UTRs of genes.
We recommend aligning the trimmed reads with SLAMDUNK using local alignment scoring and retaining alignments with a minimum identity of 95% and a minimum of 50% of the read bases mapped during the filtering step. To align QuantSeq libraries, a multimapping reassignment strategy can be applied to recover multimapping reads that map simultaneously to other low-complexity non-UTR regions in the genome [13]. SNPs can be filtered from the sequencing reads using a coverage cutoff of 10x and a variant fraction of 0.8 for sequencing data from haploid mouse embryonic stem cells. Adjust the variant fraction according to the ploidy of your cell line of interest. To call non-SNP overlapping T>C conversions with high confidence, apply a base quality threshold of Phred score > 26. SLAMDUNK determines the T>C conversion rate for each position along the custom defined amplicon intervals by normalizing to genomic T content and coverage of each position and averaged per position. For targeted RNAseq approaches, custom defined amplicon intervals can be defined by extracting the expected amplicon regions from the genome.
For QuantSeq data sets, tissue-specific 3' end annotations can be obtained by specifically extracting sequencing reads at the 3' end extending into the polyA tail and thereby assessing the polyadenylation sites (https://github.com/AmeresLab/UTRannotation) [13]. From these 3' end annotations, amplicon intervals extending 250 nt upstream from the custom-defined or annotation-based 3' end can be used to analyze T>C conversions in a mRNA 3' end-specific manner, as described previously [13].
To assess mRNA half-lives from T>C conversions, first subtract the background T>C conversions observed in the ‘unlabeled’ sample. Next, normalize the measured T>C conversion rate at a given time to the T>C conversion rate measured in the ‘0h chase’ sample. A single exponential decay model can be used to fit the normalized T>C conversions over time in order to obtain half-life information for each transcript. For representative examples of a SLAMseq mRNA half-life measurement in mESC using targeted or untargeted mRNA 3' end sequencing strategies, as described in this protocol, see Figure 4.
Figure 4. Transcript stability for the indicated genes in mESCs as determined by SLAMseq in untargeted (left, black) or targeted (right, red) mRNA 3' end cDNA libraries.
T>C conversion rates ± standard deviation of experimental duplicates were determined for each time-point of a s4U-pulse/chase experiment and fit to a single-exponential decay model to derive half-life (t½) in hours (h). Comparisons include each two examples for highly (>100 counts per million, cpm), medium (>10 cpm) or lowly (<10 cpm) expressed genes with each one stable (left) and one unstable (right) transcript. Sequencing data for untargeted (GSE99978) [13] and targeted (GSE118121) mRNA 3' end sequencing for the indicated genes is available at GEO.
Acknowledgements
We thank Brian Reichholf (IMBA, Vienna Biocenter, Austria) and Tobias Neumann (IMP, Vienna Biocenter, Austria) for bioinformatics support. HTP sequencing was performed at the VBCF NGS Unit (www.vbcf.ac.at). This work was supported in part by the European Research Council grants ERC-StG-338252 and ERC-PoC-825710 to S.L.A.
4 Notes
Note, that s4U is highly sensitive to UV-light exposure. Protect the cells from light during labeling by working in the hood without additional light and avoiding unnecessary openings and closing of the incubator during labeling time. Shield s4U-containing samples from light during storage, incubation times and whenever possible during handling of samples.
Prepare a separate 96-well plate containing all s4U-dilutions in the final layout and use a multichannel pipette to transfer s4U-containing media to the cells seeded on the previous day.
Regular media exchange might not be necessary for a cell type other than mESC. Determine conditions for successful s4U-incorporation by HPLC or a small-scale high-throughput experiment (as described in Note 4) and adjust the protocol to assess s4U-toxicity, accordingly. For suspension cells, make sure to replace the entire media volume during media exchange. Partial media exchange might lead to fluctuating s4U incorporation.
To test if non-toxic s4U metabolic RNA labeling conditions (as determined in section 0) lead to detectable incorporation into RNA, we typically perform HPLC analysis of single nucleoside digested total RNA as previously described [20]. Alternatively, SLAMseq libraries can be prepared and sequenced at low depth via cost-effective spike-in as described below (see section 3.3). Note, that HPLC analysis performed on single nucleoside digested RNA will assess the s4U incorporation mostly of rRNA and other stable noncoding RNAs, which might not yet have reached steady-state labeling conditions even after 24h s4U labeling time. Thus, the incorporation rate into mRNAs (as it can be assessed in a polyadenylated RNA sequencing experiment) is considerably higher than for total RNA. After 24h of labeling with 100 μM s4U in mESCs, we typically observe 1.5 % s4U-incorporation assessed by HPLC analysis of total RNA and 2.3 % of T>C conversion in high-throughput sequencing. The s4U-incorporation efficiency will vary depending on the cell type, the time period of labeling and the s4U-concentration used.
Seeding conditions for s4U-labeling should be optimized in order to allow exponential growth throughout the whole experiment by considering the growth rate of the cell type and the duration of the pulse-chase experiment.
To minimize disturbances of the cells during s4U labeling and to avoid toxic effects of TRIzol® vapor arising from neighboring wells while harvesting, seed the cells only in three wells per 6-well plate, corresponding to one harvesting time point in triplicate.
As the sensitivity to s4U varies between different cell types, a viability assay (see section 3.2) is essential to determine the range of non-toxic s4U concentration for the cell type in use.
To ensure light protection of s4U-containing media, wrap the media bottle in aluminum foil and store it in the dark.
The uridine concentration may need to be adjusted to equal 100 x of the s4U concentration used for labeling.
Note, that the addition of TRIzol® to the cells is the defining step for sample timing. Make sure to distribute TRIzol® equally across the well, incubate for 1-2 min and then lyse the cells completely by pipetting up and down several times until TRIzol® becomes less viscous.
The replacement of medium for a large number of samples can take several minutes, causing a timing off-set between the samples. To ensure that the time-points are taken as exactly as possible, we recommend using the earliest time-point as a reference for time measurement (e.g. by performing medium replacement from the latest to the earliest time-point and starting the timing right after adding medium to the last sample). If the time-points are in the minutes range (e.g. 5 min, 10 min, 15 min, etc.), treat each time-point separately.
Shorter pulse labeling periods (e.g. 12 hours) might be suitable depending on the transcripts of interests. After s4U labeling, samples are harvested at multiple time-points after chasing with uridine (0h, 0.5h, 1h, 3h, 6h, 12h and 24h after chase onset) and total RNA is prepared. Note, that depending on the expected half-lives of the transcripts of interest a reduced number of time-points are sufficient to estimate mRNA stability. For precise description of RNA stabilities, consider earlier and/or more refined chase time-point(s) if addressing unstable RNAs (i.e. those encoding regulatory function) or later time-point(s) if focusing on stable transcripts (i.e. those encoding housekeeping function).
To assure the reduced state of the thiol group, low DTT concentrations are added during the RNA extraction protocol.
Before long-term storage of the RNA samples, we recommend the alkylation of s4U-residues by treating the RNA with iodoacetamide (see 3.3.3.).
The alkylation reaction may be performed using < 2μg or up to 5μg total RNA, depending on the availability of input material and on the downstream application of the iodoacetamide treated RNA.
As NaPO4 can form a salt aggregate in DMSO, always prepare > 10 % additional master-mix.
As the addition of DTT determines the end of the thiol reaction, the timing should be as exactly as possible. For a large number of samples, we recommend processing samples in batches.
The number of PCR cycles required for library amplification depends on the amount of input RNA/cDNA and the abundance of the targeted transcript(s). Using a set of 45 gene specific primers, covering comparable numbers of highly, medium and lowly expressed genes, we typically amplified the libraries within 15 to 18 PCR cycles. The cycle number might be considerably lower or higher in case of only highly or lowly abundant transcripts of interest, respectively.
References
- 1.Ghosh S, Jacobson A. RNA decay modulates gene expression and controls its fidelity. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2010;1:351–361. doi: 10.1002/wrna.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Schwanhäusser B, Busse D, Li N, Dittmar G, Schuchhardt J, Wolf J, Chen W, Selbach M. Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control. Nature. 2011;473:337–342. doi: 10.1038/nature10098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Russo J, Olivas WM. Conditional regulation of Puf1p, Puf4p, and Puf5p activity alters YHB1 mRNA stability for a rapid response to toxic nitric oxide stress in yeast. Mol Biol Cell. 2015;26:1015–1029. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E14-10-1452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Slavov N, Botstein D. Decoupling nutrient signaling from growth rate causes aerobic glycolysis and deregulation of cell size and gene expression. Mol Biol Cell. 2013;24:157–168. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E12-09-0670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Asaoka-Taguchi M, Yamada M, Nakamura A, Hanyu K, Kobayashi S. Maternal Pumilio acts together with Nanos in germline development in Drosophila embryos. Nature Cell Biology. 1999;1:431–437. doi: 10.1038/15666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Singer RH, Penman S. Stability of HeLa cell mRNA in actinomycin. Nature. 1972;240:100–102. doi: 10.1038/240100a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wang Y, Liu CL, Storey JD, Tibshirani RJ, Herschlag D, Brown PO. Precision and functional specificity in mRNA decay. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:5860–5865. doi: 10.1073/pnas.092538799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Haimovich G, Medina DA, Causse SZ, Garber M, Millán-Zambrano G, Barkai O, Chávez S, Pérez-Ortín JE, Darzacq X, Choder M. Gene Expression Is Circular: Factors for mRNA Degradation Also Foster mRNA Synthesis. Cell. 2013;153:1000–1011. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ross J. mRNA stability in mammalian cells. Microbiol Rev. 1995;59:423–450. doi: 10.1128/mr.59.3.423-450.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Johnson TR, Rudin SD, Blossey BK, Ilan J. Newly synthesized RNA: simultaneous measurement in intact cells of transcription rates and RNA stability of insulin-like growth factor I actin, and albumin in growth hormone-stimulated hepatocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:5287–5291. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.12.5287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tani H, Akimitsu N. Genome-wide technology for determining RNA stability in mammalian cells: historical perspective and recent advantages based on modified nucleotide labeling. RNA Biol. 2012;9:1233–1238. doi: 10.4161/rna.22036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Riml C, Amort T, Rieder D, Gasser C, Lusser A, Micura R. Osmium-Mediated Transformation of 4-Thiouridine to Cytidine as Key To Study RNA Dynamics by Sequencing. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2017;56:13479–13483. doi: 10.1002/anie.201707465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Herzog VA, Reichholf B, Neumann T, Rescheneder P, Bhat P, Burkard TR, Wlotzka W, Haeseler von A, Zuber J, Ameres SL. Thiol-linked alkylation of RNA to assess expression dynamics. Nat Methods. 2017;14:1198–1204. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Schofield JA, Duffy EE, Kiefer L, Sullivan MC, Simon MD. TimeLapse-seq: adding a temporal dimension to RNA sequencing through nucleoside recoding. Nat Methods. 2018;15:221–225. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Muhar M, Ebert A, Neumann T, Umkehrer C, Jude J, Wieshofer C, Rescheneder P, Lipp JJ, Herzog VA, Reichholf B, Cisneros DA, et al. SLAM-seq defines direct gene-regulatory functions of the BRD4-MYC axis. Science. 2018:eaao2793–10. doi: 10.1126/science.aao2793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Matsushima W, Herzog VA, Neumann T, Gapp K, Zuber J, Ameres SL, Miska EA. SLAM-ITseq: sequencing cell type-specific transcriptomes without cell sorting. Development. 2018;145:dev164640. doi: 10.1242/dev.164640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sharma U, Sun F, Conine CC, Reichholf B, Kukreja S, Herzog VA, Ameres SL, Rando OJ. Small RNAs Are Trafficked from the Epididymis to Developing Mammalian Sperm. Developmental Cell. 2018:1–21. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.06.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mayr C, Bartel DP. Widespread shortening of 3'UTRs by alternative cleavage and polyadenylation activates oncogenes in cancer cells. Cell. 2009;138:673–684. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Elling U, Wimmer RA, Leibbrandt A, Burkard T, Michlits G, Leopoldi A, Micheler T, Abdeen D, Zhuk S, Aspalter IM, Handl C, et al. A reversible haploid mouse embryonic stem cell biobank resource for functional genomics. Nature. 2017;550:114–118. doi: 10.1038/nature24027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Spitzer J, Hafner M, Landthaler M, Ascano M, Farazi T, Wardle G, Nusbaum J, Khorshid M, Burger L, Zavolan M, Tuschl T. PAR-CLIP (Photoactivatable Ribonucleoside-Enhanced Crosslinking and Immunoprecipitation): a step-by-step protocol to the transcriptome-wide identification of binding sites of RNA-binding proteins. Meth Enzymol. 2014;539:113–161. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-420120-0.00008-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sedlazeck FJ, Rescheneder P, Haeseler von A. NextGenMap: fast and accurate read mapping in highly polymorphic genomes. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:2790–2791. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]




