Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 27.
Published in final edited form as: Astrophys J. 2021 Jul 8;915(2):76. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac013f

Laboratory Detection of Cyanoacetic Acid: A Jet-Cooled Rotational Study

Miguel Sanz-Novo 1, Iker León 1, Elena R Alonso 2,3, Lucie Kolesniková 4, José L Alonso 1,*
PMCID: PMC7611904  EMSID: EMS131202  PMID: 34711994

Abstract

Herein we present a laboratory rotational study of cyanoacetic acid (CH2(CN)C(O)OH), an organic acid as well as a –CN bearing molecule, that is a candidate molecular system to be detected in the interstellar medium (ISM). Our investigation aims to provide direct experimental frequencies of cyanoacetic acid to guide its eventual astronomical search in low-frequency surveys. Using different jet-cooled rotational spectroscopic techniques in the time domain, we have determined a precise set of the relevant rotational spectroscopic constants, including the 14N nuclear quadrupole coupling constants for the two distinct structures, cis– and gauche– cyanoacetic acid. We believe this work will potentially allow the detection of cyanoacetic acid in the interstellar medium, whose rotational features have remained unknown until now.

Keywords: catalogs, ISM: molecules, molecular data, techniques: spectroscopic

1. Introduction

Laboratory astrophysics plays a crucial role in understanding our molecular universe by supplementing astronomical searches and assisting astrochemists in building up theoretical models (Savin et al., 2012, Tielens 2013). The field of laboratory astrophysics embraces several areas of physics relevant to astronomy and astrophysics. Among them, the symbiotic relationship between radioastronomy and laboratory rotational studies has enabled the detection of many interstellar molecules (Herbst & van Dishoeck 2009). In current astrophysical research, a battery of state-of-the-art rotational spectroscopic techniques in the frequency and time domain has been devoted to investigating elusive solid compounds of astrophysical interest in the isolation conditions of the gas phase. Many organic compounds with relatively high melting points usually exhibit very low vapor pressure, being sometimes out of the scope of conventional gas–phase microwave and millimeter-wave studies. Thus, besides conventional heating methods (Sanz-Novo et al. 2020 (a)), we have coupled laser ablation sources with high-resolution Fourier transform microwave techniques to characterize most of the coded amino acids (Alonso et al. 2015, Alonso et al. 2021). Other species of astrophysical relevance such as hydantoin (Alonso et al. 2017), hydantoic acid (Kolesniková et al. 2019), glycinamide (CH2(NH2)C(O)NH2) (Alonso et al. 2018), and cyanoacetamide (CH2(CN)C(O)NH2) (Sanz-Novo et al. 2020 (b)) have been recently reported.

Organic acids constitute much of the required material a planet needs to support life. These compounds belong to an influential group of molecules entitled interstellar Complex Organic Molecules (iCOMs, Herbst & van Dishoeck 2009, Ceccarelli et al. 2017). These molecules have received increasing attention in the last decade since they are essential to unveil how chemical complexity builds up. The simplest forms of these molecular classifications, formic acid (HC(O)OH) and acetic acid (CH3C(O)OH) are well-known interstellar molecules (Liu et al. 2002; Lefloch et al. 2017; Favre et al. 2018; Remijan et al. 2003 and Jørgensen et al. 2016). Among all iCOMs, cyano-bearing compounds, organic molecules containing a cyano functional group (-CN), are among the most widely distributed and best-known species in the ISM. In the early 40’s, the diatomic cyano radical, CN, was the second molecule to be identified in the ISM (McKellar 1940). CN’s first rotational transition (J = 1 ← 0) was detected 30 years later in the Orion Nebula and W51 (Jefferts et al. 1970). Since then, more than 30 complex cyanide species have been found in diverse types of astronomical environments, including the detection of the branched i-propyl cyanide (i-C3H7CN) (Belloche et al. 2014), glycolonitrile (HO-CH2-CN) (Zeng et al. 2019), benzonitrile (c-C6H5CN), the first benzene-derived aromatic molecule in the ISM (McGuire et al. 2018) and cyanocyclopentadiene, its five-membered ring analog (McCarthy et al. 2021). Also, very recently, several –CN and -NC bearing molecules, highlighting HC4NC, HCCH2CN, HC5NH+, H2CCHC3N, and HCCCHCHCN, have been detected towards the prototypical cold dark molecular cloud TMC-1 (Cernicharo et al. 2020, McGuire et al. 2020, Marcelino et al. 2020 and Lee et al. 2021). However, many simple cyanides have yet to be discovered. Consequently, new experimental studies exploring related species should represent an essential source of reference data in constraining models on the formation of -CN and –C(O)OH bearing molecules in the ISM and predicting which other iCOMs might be lurking in the expanses of space.

Following our previous work, we have performed state-of-the-art experiments to achieve the first rotational characterization of cyanoacetic acid (CH2(CN)C(O)OH), a –CN bearing organic acid as a candidate for interstellar detection. Only IR and FTIR-matrix studies have been reported so far (Binev et al. 1998 and Reva et al. 2003 (a, b)) and, to the best of our knowledge, no rotational spectroscopic data is available for cyanoacetic acid. Our current study aims to provide accurate experimental rotational information, which is the initial and prerequisite step for its radio astronomical search, to correctly reproduce the spectrum and interpret astronomical data in low-frequency regions.

2. Jet-Cooled Rotational Spectrum

Concurrent to the laboratory work and to guide the spectral search, we performed high-level computations on the conformational panorama of cyanoacetic acid complementing those of Reva et al. 2003 (a, b). We employed a double-hybrid density functional (B2PLYPD3), which includes non-local electron correlation effects (Schwabe & Grimme 2007) and the augmented correlation-consistent polarized valence triple-ζ, (aug-cc-pVTZ) basis set (Dunning 1989; Woon & Dunning 1993). Two predominant conformers (labeled as cis and gauche) were found, differing in the values of the CCC=O dihedral angle of the molecule (see Figure 1). We theoretically explored the plausible relaxation pathways from cis- to gauche- cyanoacetic acid and found a barrier of 275 cm-1 (3.3 kJ/mol) at the B2PLYPD3/aug-cc-pVTZ level. The predicted spectroscopic constants are collected in Table 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

a) Structures of the cyanoacetic acid monomers: cis– (left) and gauche-cyanoacetic acid (right) showing the 14N nucleus; b) Structure of the water cluster: w-cis cyanoacetic acid.

Table 1. Theoretical and final set of experimental spectroscopic parameters of cyanoacetic acid.

Parameters Rotamer I Rotamer II cis [a] gauche
A [b] / MHz 10191.2722 (19) 9255.1 (12) 10199.5 9200.8
B / MHz 2267.21502 (58) 2357.7873 (10) 2262.7 2352.4
C / MHz 1877.26749 (44) 1966.7410 (10) 1873.0 1967.6
ΔJ / kHz 0.344 (18) 3.771 (77) 0.434 1.345
ΔJK/ kHz 2.184 (86) 23.9 (13) 2.223 10.59
ΔK/ kHz 9.57 (64) - 7.754 220.6
δJ/ kHz 0.0776 (45) - 0.0867 31.03
P c [c] 1.6435 (10) 5.983 (13) 1.539 6.456
2 |,|μb|,|μcI [d] Yes / Yes / No Yes / No / No 3.9 / 2.9 / 0.0 2.1 / 0.5 / 1.3
14N χaa [e] -3.2108 (32) -2.8203 (46) -3.379 -2.937
14 N χbb - χ cc -0.9058 (76) -0.692 (14) -0.951 -0.637
14 N | Xab| 2.271 (91) - 2.564 2.474
N [f] 90 25 - -
σ [g] 13.0 3.3 - -
ΔE TOTAL [h] - - 0.0 49.3
[a]

Theoretical computations at the B2PLYPD3/aug-cc-pVTZ level.

[b]

A, B, and C are the rotational constants (in MHz);

[c]

Pc is the planar moment of inertia (in uA2), conversion factor: 505379.1 MHz–uÅ2.

[d]

μa, μb, and μc are the electric dipole moment components (in D).

[e]

χ aa, χ bb and χcc represent the diagonal elements of the 14N nuclear quadrupole coupling tensor (in MHz);

[f]

N is the number of measured hyperfine components.

[g]

σ is the root mean square (rms) deviation of the fit (in kHz).

[h]

ΔE TOTAL is the electronic and Gibbs free energies (in cm-1) at 298 K relative to the global minimum calculated at the B2PLYPD3/aug-c-pVTZ level of theory, taking into account the zero-point vibrational energy (ZPE) for the electronic energy (E TOTAL=E +E ZPE) calculated at the same level. [i] Standard error in parentheses in units of the last digit.

Briefly, we have transferred neutral molecules of cyanoacetic acid to the gas phase using a multi-nozzle heated system and probed them with a chirped pulse Fourier transform microwave spectrometer (CP-FTMW) (Mata et al. 2012). In this experiment, cyanoacetic acid was conventionally heated at 70 °C. It was seeded in Helium to minimize plausible interconversion between the gauche– and cis– forms (Ruoff et al. 1990; Godfrey et al. 1996) (backing pressure of 1 bar) and adiabatically expanded into the vacuum chamber of the spectrometer to generate a supersonic-jet. We employed a 300 W microwave excitation pulse to polarize the molecules macroscopically and collected 57,000 individual free induction decay signals (four FIDs per cycle) in the time domain. These were subsequently Fourier-transformed to obtain the broadband spectrum in the frequency domain.

The broadband rotational spectrum measured for cyanoacetic acid from 8 to 18 GHz is presented in Figure 2 (a). Strong water dimer (H2O)2 signals and other lines belonging to decomposition products were quickly spotted and rejected from the analysis in a first step. At first glance, we quickly recognized an intense aR-branch (J +1) o,j +1← J 0,j progression ascribable to a first rotamer, labeled as I. We further extended the initial assignment to b-type rotational transitions (with J ranging from 0 to 5). All transitions were observed split into various hyperfine components due to the 14N nuclear quadrupole coupling interactions. However, the resolution reached with our broadband CP-FTMW technique was not enough to completely resolve the hyperfine patterns (see Figure 2(b)). In a first step, no attempt was performed to analyze the 14N nuclear hyperfine structure, but rather the intensity-weighted mean of the hyperfine line cluster was measured and fitted (Pickett 1991) to a rigid rotor Hamiltonian to give the first set of rotational constants (A = 10191.3, B = 2267.2 and C = 1877.3) (in MHz) for rotamer I. As shown in Table 1, they perfectly match those theoretically predicted for the cis– form.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

a) Jet-cooled broadband rotational spectrum of cyanoacetic acid from 8 to 18 GHz. b) Zoom-in view of the spectrum showing the 20,2 ← 10,1 transition of rotamer II (gauche-cyanoacetic acid) with unresolved 14N hyperfine structure; c) Completely resolved hyperfine pattern of the same transition attained with the cavity-based MB-FTMW technique. The intensity is given in arbitrary units.

Once all the lines corresponding to cis- form were discarded from the analysis, we discovered a new weaker progression of aR-branch transitions, attributed to another rotamer, labeled as II. We further confirmed the assignment by predicting and measuring additional a-type lines. However, b- and c-type lines were predicted but not observed. We obtained an initial set of rotational constants for rotamer II (A = 9278.6, B = 2357.8 and C = 1966.7) (in MHz), which nicely agrees with those calculated for the gauche- form (see Table 1).

Surprisingly, after excluding all the spectral signatures corresponding to both cis- and gauche- conformers, a small number of rotational lines remained unassigned. These lines most probably belong to the cyanoacetic acid monohydrate founded on the observation of strong water dimer (H2O)2 rotational transitions due to residual water. In this context, we managed to recognize a set of a-type R-branch transitions (spaced approximately by B + C) corresponding to a cyanoacetic acid-water rotamer [see Fig. 2 (a)]. We performed detailed searches for b- and c- type transitions, but they were not observed. Rotational constants and planar moments of inertia are collected in Table 2, while the complete list of measured transitions is provided in Table A1 in de Appendix. The structure of the cyanoacetic acid-water cluster is unambiguously confirmed by a comparison of the experimental and B2PLYPD3 predicted rotational parameters (see Table 2), showing that the observed rotational constants are in good agreement with those calculated for the global minimum (w-cis cyanoacetic acid in Figure 1 (b)). Moreover, the value of the planar moment (1.9162 uA2) is very similar to that of the cis- monomer (1.6434 uA2). It further suggests a nearly planar configuration, with the skeleton framework lying on the ab inertial plane, and only the water hydrogen’s out-of-plane contributions corroborate the assignment. Although the monohydrated form itself is not expected to be a candidate for interstellar detection, this precise spectroscopic information should be helpful in future theoretical studies as a reference point in the characterization of plausible gas and gas-grain mechanisms involving cyanoacetic acid and water in the context of the ISM.

Table 2. Predicted and experimental spectroscopic parameters for the cyanoacetic acid-water cluster.

Parameters rotamer w-I w-cis [a]
A [b] / MHz 7074.50 (33) [h] 7116.6
B / MHz 1158.6515 (11) 1169.8
C / MHz 1003.1681 (13) 1012.7
ΔJ / kHz 0.204 (9) -
ΔJK / kHz -4.68 (21) -
Pc [c] 1.9162 (11) 1.997
a |,|μb|,|μC| [d] Yes / No / No 3.5 / 2.4 / 1.0
N [e] 14 -
σ [f] 15.2 -
ΔE TOTAL [g] - 0.0
[a]

Theoretical computations at the B2PLYPD3/aug-cc-pVTZ level of theory.

[b]

A, B, and C represent the rotational constants (in MHz);

[c]

Pc is the planar inertial moment (in uA2), conversion factor: 5 05379.1 MHz-uÅ2.

[d]

μa, μb, and μc are the electric dipole moment components (in D;

[e]

N is the number of measured transitions.

[f]

σ is the root mean square (rms) deviation of the fit (in kHz).

[g]

ΔE TOTAL is the electronic energy (in cm-1) relative to the global minimum calculated at the B2PLYPD3/aug-c-pVTZ level of theory, taking into account the zero-point vibrational energy (ZPE) for the electronic energy 3 14N (E TOTAL= E + E ZPE) calculated at the same level

[h]

HYPERFINE Standard error in parentheses in units of the last NUCLEAR digit.

3. 14N Hyperfine Nuclear Quadrupole Coupling: Narrowband Rotational Spectrum

A more challenging endeavor was the resolution of the nuclear quadrupole hyperfine structure. For observations in cold and quiescent molecular clouds such as TMC-1, the hyperfine structure could be a key issue for decoding the radioastronomical spectra (McCarthy & McGuire 2021). For instance, the interpretation of the hyperfine patterns of several interstellar molecules, such as cyanoallene (Lovas et al. 2006) and benzonitrile (McGuire et al. 2018), was crucial for their conclusive identification in the ISM. Hence, we profit from the subdoppler resolution of our narrowband MB-FTMW spectrometer (Balle & Flygare 1981; Alonso et al. 1997) to resolve the hyperfine structure. The analysis began with measuring five hyperfine components of the 20,2 ←10,1 transition belonging to cis-cyanoacetic acid and was further extended to other a- and b- type R-branch transitions. Once the analysis was completed, new K=1←0 a R-branch transitions attributable to the gauche-form were identified. In this case, the MB-FTMW spectrometer’s resolution was mandatory to unravel the 14N nuclear quadrupole structure (see Figure 2 (c)).

In a further step, we employed our double-resonance configuration (described in Sanz-Novo et al. 2020 (b)), with which hyperfine components can be resolved, seeking an extension of our measurements to higher frequencies. We focused our attention on the most stable form, cis– cyanoacetic acid. We measured a total of 90 hyperfine components (together with the previous CP-FTMW and MB-FTMW measurements correctly weighted). We fitted them (Pickett 1991) using the A-reduction Hamiltonian in the I r representation (HR (A)) (Watson 1977), complemented with an additional term that accounts for the nuclear quadrupole coupling effects (HQ) (Foley 1947; Robinson & Cornwell 1953), (H = HA(A) + HQ). The rotational Hamiltonian was set up in the coupled basis set F = J + I to describe the energy levels of the hyperfine structure in terms of the quantum numbers J, Ka, Kc, and F. We list the final set of spectroscopic parameters for cis- and gauche- cyanoacetic acid in the first and third column of Table 1, respectively. A sample list of the measured transitions for the cis- form is reported in Table 3. All measured lines for both rotamers are provided in Tables A2–A3 in the Appendix. We detected an unusual nonrigid behavior for the gauche- form reflected in large values of the ΔJ and ΔJK centrifugal distortion constants compared to those obtained for the cis-form. This behavior can be ascribed to a large amplitude motion regarding the CCCO bond torsion, resulting in a double minimum potential function with a low-energy barrier at the planar skeleton framework. The potential energy surface scan of the ∠CCCO torsion confirmed the presence of such a double minimum, separated by a barrier of 25 cm-1 (0.3 kJ/mol), which is similar to that observed for glycinamide (Alonso et al. 2018). As shown in Figure 3, two isoenergetic forms are separated by a torsion barrier that is low enough to split the ground state into two close-lying states (0+ and 0-). Only the lowest-lying 0+ state is observed due to vibrational cooling. This fact helps us to rationalize the requirement of rather large centrifugal distortional parameters for low J values and, therefore, explain the conformer’s unexpected nonrigid nature.

Table 3. Sample list of the measured transition frequencies for the ground-state of cyanoacetic acid.

Technique J′ Ka Kc F′ J″ Ka Kc F″ Uobs a(MHz) Ucalc b (MHz) Uobs-Ucalc c (MHz)
 2  1  2  2  1  1  1  1 7898.1967 7898.1967 0.0001
 2  1  2  2  1  1  1  2 7898.5439 7898.5424 0.0015
 2  1  2  3  1  1  1  2 7899.2045 7899.2039 0.0006
MB-FTMW  2  1  2  1  1  1  1  2 7899.5725 7899.5717 0.0007
 2  1  2  1  1  1  1  0 7900.0909 7900.0901 0.0008
 3  1  2  3  2  1  1  2 13009.1663 13009.1648 0.0015
 3  1  2  4  2  1  1  3 13009.4489 13009.4480 0.0009
 3  1  2  2  2  1  1  1 13009.4668 13009.4709 -0.0041
 2  1  2  1  1  0  1  0 15821.9328 15821.9533 -0.0205
 2  1  2  2  1  0  1  2 15822.3606 15822.3688 -0.0081
CP-FTMW  2  1  2  3  1  0  1  2 15823.0169 15823.0303 0.0133
 2  1  2  2  1  0  1  1 15823.3103 15823.3319 -0.0216
 2  1  2  1  1  0  1  1 15824.3454 15824.3613 -0.0159
 5  1  5  5  4  0  4  4 26032.0800 26032.0715 0.0085
 5  1  5  6  4  0  4  5 26032.1200 26032.1139 0.0061
DR-MB-FTMW  2  2  0  1  1  1  1  0 32854.6280 32854.6368 -0.0088
 2  2  0  3  1  1  1  2 32854.6940 32854.6951 0.0011
 2  2  0  2  1  1  1  1 32854.7600 32863.7728 0.0138

Notes. Upper and lower state quantum numbers are indicated by’ and”, respectively.

(a)

Observed frequency.

(b)

Calculated frequency.

(c)

Observed minus calculated frequency.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Relaxed potential energy surface (PES) scan computed at the B2PLYPD3/aug-cc-pVTZ level, choosing the ∠CCCO torsion as the driving coordinate. A torsion barrier of 0.3 kJ/mol (25 cm-1) connects the two isoenergetic gauche– forms.

All in all, the microwave spectrum of cyanoacetic acid has been explored up to 40 GHz to provide precise laboratory reference spectra that are needed to compare directly against low-frequency observational data in different regions of the ISM. With our measurements, cyanoacetic acid’s rotational transitions can be predicted with linewidths (FWHM) of about 0.1 kms-1 up to 40 GHz in equivalent radial velocity. It is more than enough for a radioastronomical search in the dark, cold molecular clouds, where lines with very narrow linewidths are expected (0.3–0.4 kms-1) (McCarthy et al. 2021). In conclusion, this high-resolution spectroscopic information can be confidently used in future searches for cyanoacetic acid in various low-frequency surveys, such as the Green Bank Observatory (GBT) surveys (McCarthy et al. 2021) and the Effelsberg 100-m (Sanz-Novo et al. 2020 (b)) and Yebes 40-m observations (Cernicharo et al. 2021).

Finally, in Table 4 we list the rotational (Qr) and vibrational (Qv) partition functions of cyanoacetic acid. We calculated Qr’s values from first principles across the standard temperatures by SPCAT (Pickett 1991) as implemented in the JPL database (Pickett et al. 1998). We performed double-hybrid calculations at the B2PLYPD3/aug-cc-pVTZ level of theory to obtain the expected normal frequency modes (see Table A3). Afterward, we predicted the vibrational part, Qv, using a harmonic approximation and a simple formula that coincides with Eq. (3.60) of Gordy & Cook (1970). The vibrational contributions were calculated by considering the lowest vibrational modes up to 1000 cm-1. The total partition function, Qtot, is, therefore, the product of Qr and Qv, and does not include the hyperfine structure.

Table 4. Rotational and vibrational partition functions of cis– cyanoacetic acid.

Temperature (K) Qr (a) Qv (b)
3.00 134.3515 1.0001
9.38 737.1679 1.0008
18.37 2081.8097 1.0293
37.50 5884.2420 1.2065
75.00 16640.5107 1.7985
150.00 47079.8270 3.9574
225.00 86551.9930 8.7615
300.00 133184.4558 19.5677

Notes.

(a)

Qr is the rotational partition function. It does not take the hyperfine splitting into account and we took J = 15 0 as the maximum J value.

(b)

Qv is the vibrational partition function. The total partition function of the molecule is Qr × Qv. If the hyperfine structure is taken into account, QTOT should be multiplied by the nuclear spin statics contribution.

4. Conclusions

There is good reason to expect many astronomical discoveries given improvements in laboratory instrumentation and techniques and the construction of radio telescopes with unprecedented sensitivity regimes, remarking those directed towards low-frequency regions. A thoroughly coordinated laboratory, modeling and observational effort will be essential to understand the origin and evolution of more complex –CN and - C(O)OH bearing systems. In this context, we have investigated the rotational spectrum of cyanoacetic acid in the microwave region. The capability of jet-cooled experiments coupled with time-domain Fourier transform microwave spectroscopy has enabled the first high-resolution rotational characterization of this elusive molecule. For both cis- and gauche- forms, precise experimental values of the rotational constants, the 14N nuclear quadrupole coupling constants, and the quartic centrifugal distortion constants are determined to reproduce the spectrum. The 14N hyperfine structure acts as a fingerprint probe in the molecular identification in the low-frequency surveys, increasing the power of these jet-cooled spectroscopic techniques in molecular astrophysics.

Supplementary Material

Appendix

5. Acknowledgments

The authors thank the financial fundings from Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (CTQ2016– 76393–P and PID2019-111396GB-I00), Junta de Castilla y Leon (VA077U16 and VA244P20) and European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013) / ERC-2013-SyG, Grant Agreement n. 610256 NANOCOSMOS, are gratefully acknowledged. E. R. A. thanks Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades for Juan de la Cierva grant (FJC2018-037320-I). M.S.N. acknowledges funding from the Spanish” Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades” under predoctoral FPU Grant (FPU17/02987).

References

  1. Alonso ER, Kolesniková L, Alonso JL. J Chem Phys. 2017;147:124312. doi: 10.1063/1.4994799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alonso ER, Kolesniková L, Białkowska-Jaworska E, et al. ApJ. 2018;861:70. [Google Scholar]
  3. Alonso ER, León I, Alonso JL. Intra- and Intermolecular Interactions between Non-covalently Bonded Species. Elsevier; 2021. pp. 93–141. [Google Scholar]
  4. Alonso JL, Lorenzo FJ, López JC, et al. Chemical Physics. 1997;218:267. [Google Scholar]
  5. Alonso JL, López JC. In Gas-Phase IR Spectroscopy and Structure of Biological Molecules. Springer International Publishing; Cham: 2015. p. 335. [Google Scholar]
  6. Balle TJ, Flygare WH. Review of Scientific Instruments. 1981;52:33. [Google Scholar]
  7. Belloche A, Garrod RT, Müller HSP, et al. Science. 2014;345:1584. doi: 10.1126/science.1256678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Binev IG, Stamboliyska BA, Binev YI. Journal of Molecular Structure. 1997;444:235–245. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ceccarelli C, Caselli P, Fontani F, Neri R, López-Sepulcre A, Codella C, Feng S, Jiménez-Serra I, Lefloch B, Pineda JE, et al. ApJ. 2017;850:176–190. [Google Scholar]
  10. Cernicharo J, Marcelino N, Angúdez M, et al. APJL. 2020;900:L9. [Google Scholar]
  11. Cernicharo J, Cabezas C, Angúdez M, et al. A&A Letters. 2021:arXiv:2103.12431v1. Article ASAP. [Google Scholar]
  12. Dunning TH. J Chem Phys. 1989;90:1007 [Google Scholar]
  13. Favre C, Fedele D, Semenov D, et al. APJL. 2018;862:L2. 6pp. [Google Scholar]
  14. Foley HM. Physical Review. 1947;71:747. [Google Scholar]
  15. Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Li X, et al. Gaussian 16, Revision A.03. Gaussian, Inc; Wallingford CT: 2016. [Google Scholar]
  16. Godfrey PD, Brown RD, Rodgers FM. J Mol Struct. 1996;376:65. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gordy W, Cook RL. Microwave Molecular spectra. Interscience Pub; New York: 1970. [Google Scholar]
  18. Herbst E, van Dishoeck EF. ARA&A. 2009;47:427. [Google Scholar]
  19. Jefferts KB, Penzias AA, Wilson RW. ApJ. 1970;161:L87. [Google Scholar]
  20. Jørgensen JK, Van der Wiel MHD, Coutens A, et al. A&A. 2016;595:A117. [Google Scholar]
  21. Kolesniková L, León I, Alonso ER, et al. JPCL. 2019;10:1325–1330. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b00208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu S, Girart JM, Remijan A, Snyder LE. ApJ. 2002;576:255. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lefloch B, Ceccarelli C, Codella C, et al. MNRAS. 2017;469:L73. [Google Scholar]
  24. Lee KLL, Loomis RA, Burkhardt AM, et al. APJL. 2021;908:L11. [Google Scholar]
  25. Lovas FJ, Remijan AJ, Hollis JM, et al. ApJ. 2006;637:L37. [Google Scholar]
  26. Marcelino N, Angúdez M, Tercero B, et al. A&A. 2020;643:L6. [Google Scholar]
  27. Mata S, Peña I, Cabezas C, J, Alonso JL. Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy. 2012;280:91. [Google Scholar]
  28. McCarthy MC, Kelvin Lee KL, Loomis RA, et al. Nature Astronomy. 2021;5:176–180. [Google Scholar]
  29. McCarthy MC, McGuire BA. J Phys Chem. 2021 doi: 10.1021/acsjpca.1c00129. A Article ASAP. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. McGuire BA, Burkhardt AM, Kalenskii S, et al. Science. 2018;359(6372):202–205. doi: 10.1126/science.aao4890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. McGuire B, Burkhardt A, Loomis R, et al. APJL. 2020;900:L110. [Google Scholar]
  32. McKellar A. PASP. 1940;52:187. [Google Scholar]
  33. Pickett HM. Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy. 1991;148:371. [Google Scholar]
  34. Pickett HM, Poynter RL, Cohen EA, Delitsky ML, Pearson JC, Müller HS. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer. 1998;60:883–890. [Google Scholar]
  35. Remijan A, Snyder LE, Friedel DN, et al. APJ. 2003;590(1):314–332. [Google Scholar]
  36. Reva ID, Stepanian SG, Adamowicz L, Fausto R. Chemical Phys Letters. 2003(a);107:6351–6359. [Google Scholar]
  37. Reva ID, Stepanian SG, Adamowicz L, Fausto R. J Phys Chem A. 2003(b);374:631–638. [Google Scholar]
  38. Robinson GW, Cornwell CD. J Chem Phys. 1953;21:1436 [Google Scholar]
  39. Ruoff RS, Klots TD, Emilson T, Gutowski HS. J Chem Phys. 1990;93:3142 [Google Scholar]
  40. Sanz-Novo M, León I, Alonso JL, Largo A, Barrientos C. A&A. 2020(a);644:A3. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sanz-Novo M, Belloche A, Alonso JL, et al. A&A. 2020(b);639:A135. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Savin DW, Brickhouse NN, Cowan JJ, et al. Rep Prog Phys. 2012;75:036902. doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/75/3/036901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Schwabe T, Grimme S. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (Incorporating Faraday Transactions) 2007;9:3397. doi: 10.1039/b704725h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Tielens AGGM. Rev Mod Phys. 2013;85:3. [Google Scholar]
  45. Watson JKG. Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy. 1977;66:500. [Google Scholar]
  46. Woon DE, Dunning TH. J Chem Phys. 1993;98:1358 [Google Scholar]
  47. Zeng S, Quénard D, Jiménez-Serra I, et al. MNRAS. 2019;484:L43–L48. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Appendix

RESOURCES