Abstract
Objective
To examine whether parenteral nutrition using a mixed lipid emulsion containing fish oil improves the neurodevelopmental outcome of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants.
Study design
The study is a secondary outcome analysis of a double-blind randomized trial of 230 ELBW infants performed at a single level IV neonatal care unit (Medical University Vienna; 06/2012-06/2015). Participants received either a mixed lipid emulsion composed of soybean oil, medium chain triglycerides, olive oil, and fish oil, or a soybean oil-based lipid emulsion for parenteral nutrition. Neurodevelopment (Bayley-III) of study participants was assessed at 12 and 24 months corrected age (08/2013-10/2017).
Results
206 out of 230 study participants were eligible at discharge. At 12 and 24 months corrected age, 174 out of 206 (85 %) and 164 out of 206 (80 %) infants were analyzed. At 12 months, there was no significant difference (median [interquartile range]) in cognitive (mixed: 95 [85-101], soybean oil: 95 [85-100]; P=.71), language (mixed: 86 [77-94], soybean oil: 89 [79-94]; P=.48) or motor scores (mixed: 88 [76-94], soybean oil: 88 [79-94]; P=.69). At 24 months, there was again no significant difference in cognitive (mixed: 95 [80-105], soybean oil: 95 [90-105]; P=.17), language (mixed: 89 [75-97], soybean oil 89 [77-100]; P=.54) and motor scores (mixed: 94 [82-103], soybean oil: 94 [85-103]; P=.53).
Conclusion
Parenteral nutrition using a mixed lipid emulsion containing fish oil did not improve neurodevelopment of ELBW infants at 12 and 24 months corrected age.
Clinical trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01585935.
Keywords: docosahexaenoic acid, neurodevelopmental outcome, parenteral nutrition, premature infant
Introduction
Infants of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) are at high risk for adverse neurodevelopment due to morbidities directly affecting the developing brain, such as intraventricular hemorrhage or cystic periventricular leucomalacia. 1 Preterm infants have distinct nutritional requirements, 2 and optimal nutrient supply supports a favorable motor and cognitive development. 3
Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) is an ω-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid (LC-PUFA) that is considered crucial for normal brain development. 4 In the last trimester of pregnancy an estimated amount of 40 to 67 mg/kg/d is transferred from the mother to the fetus. 4–7 After preterm birth, placental transfer of DHA is interrupted. Soybean oil-based lipid emulsions that are used for parenteral nutrition are almost devoid of DHA. Thus, enteral nutrition is the main source of DHA for preterm infants, but supply falls short of fetal accretion, and infants of ELBW accumulate large DHA deficits.
A mixed lipid emulsion composed of soybean oil, medium-chain triglycerides, olive oil, and fish oil is licensed for pediatric use in Europe. Fish oil provides DHA and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), which is a precursor of DHA. Parenteral nutrition using the mixed lipid emulsion provides infants of ELBW with amounts of DHA comparable to in utero transfer rates. 8 By attenuating their DHA deficit 6 the neurodevelopment of preterm infants of ELBW might be improved.
In a recent randomized trial, we assigned 230 infants of ELBW to receive either a mixed lipid emulsion or a soybean oil-based lipid emulsion for parenteral nutrition to evaluate its effect on liver injury. 8 Analysis of amplitude-integrated electroencephalography in study participants measured from birth to discharge revealed acceleration of electrophysiological brain maturation using a mixed lipid emulsion. 9 The aim of the present study was to analyze the effect of a mixed lipid emulsion on the neurodevelopmental outcome of study participants at 12 and 24 months corrected age.
Methods
The study is a pre-specified secondary outcome analysis of a double-blind randomized trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01585935) on the preventive effect of a mixed lipid emulsion on parenteral nutrition associated cholestasis. The study was conducted from June 2012 to June 2015 at a level IV neonatal care unit (University Children’s Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Austria). Study design was previously described in detail, 8 the protocol is accessible at ClinicalTrials.gov. Inclusion criteria included birth weight <1000 grams and admission within the first 24 hours of life. Higher order multiples, infants with chromosomal aberrations, and infants with conditions associated with cholestasis were not eligible. Participants were randomized and stratified (sex and birth weight <750 grams) within their first 120 hours of life to receive parenteral nutrition using either a mixed lipid emulsion (SMOFLipid 20%; Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany; composed of 30% soybean oil, 30% medium chain triglycerides, 25% olive oil and 15% fish oil; ω-6:ω -3 ratio 2.5:1) or a soybean oil-based lipid emulsion (Intralipid 20%; Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany; ω-6: ω-3 ratio 8:1). The mixed lipid emulsion contains 2.2% DHA, 2.4% EPA, and 0.4% arachidonic acid (ARA). The soybean oil-based lipid emulsion contains 0.2 % DHA, no EPA, and 0.3 % ARA. 10, 11 Parenteral and enteral nutrition of participants were previously described in more detail. 9, 10 Lipids were dosed up to 3 g/kg/day. Serum triglycerides were measured at least weekly. Full parenteral nutrition was provided until 140-160 ml/kg/day of enteral nutrition. Parenteral vitamins (2 ml/kg Soluvit; 4 ml/kg Vitalipid N Infant; Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany) were provided unless enteral nutrition with own mother’s milk or donor milk was fortified at 100 ml/kg using a fat-free fortifier (Aptamil FMS; Milupa Nutricia GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany). Donor milk was used if mothers’ own milk was unavailable and switched to preterm formula at 32 weeks of postmenstrual age. This follow-up study, investigating neurodevelopment at 12 and 24 months corrected age, was performed at the hospital’s outpatient clinic from August 2013 to October 2017. Infants with congenital cerebral malformations were excluded from this analysis. Patients and observers were blinded, as were the two psychologists performing neurodevelopmental testing.
Baseline characteristics
Demographic parameters at birth are shown in Table 1. A full course of prenatal steroids was defined as two doses of betamethasone. Surfactant (Curosurf; Chiesi, Parma, Italy) was administered prophylactically in infants <28+0 weeks of gestational age 12 or else if deficiency was suspected. Anthropometry Z-scores were calculated using growth curves by Fenton et al. 13 Small for gestational age was defined as birth weight below the 10th percentile.
Table 1. Demographic parameters.
| Parameter | 12 months corrected age | 24 months corrected age | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mixed lipid emulsion (n=86) |
Soybean oil (n=88) |
Mixed lipid emulsion (n=81) |
Soybean oil (n=83) |
|
| Obstetric parameters | ||||
| Multiple pregnancy | 19 (22) | 27 (31) | 19 (24) | 26 (31) |
| Cesarean delivery | 79 (92) | 82 (93) | 75 (93) | 78 (94) |
| Prenatal steroids (full course) | 57 (66) | 52 (59) c | 53 (65) | 50 (60) c |
| Premature rupture of membranes | 32 (37) | 31 (35) | 30 (37) | 31 (37) |
| Preeclampsia | 12 (14) | 16 (18) | 11 (14) | 16 (19) |
| Highest parental education | ||||
| Primary school | 29 (34) d | 28 (32) g | 28 (35) d | 26 (31) g |
| Secondary school | 26 (30) d | 23 (26) g | 26 (30) d | 22 (27) g |
| Postsecondary school | 22 (26) d | 20 (23) g | 21 (26) d | 19 (23) g |
| Age of mother at birth | 31.5 [27-35] a | 31 [27-37] b | 31.5 [27-35] a | 31 [27-37] |
| Married/in partnership | 71 (82.6) d | 74 (84.1) d | 67 (82.7) d | 70 (84.3) d |
| Caucasian | 83 (96.5) | 84 (95.5) | 79 (97.5) | 79 (95.2) |
| Neonatal parameters | ||||
| Umbilical artery pH | 7.31 [7.26 to 7.36] f | 7.3 [7.25 to 7.35] f | 7.31 [7.26 to 7.36] f | 7.31 [7.25 to 7.35] e |
| Apgar - 5 min | 8 [8 to 9] | 8 [8 to 9] a | 8 [8 to 9] | 8 [8 to 9] a |
| Male sex | 51 (59) | 57 (65) | 48 (59) | 56 (68) |
| Surfactant | 77 (90) | 76 (86) | 72 (89) | 72 (87) |
| Gestational age (wk+d) | 25+5 [24+6 to 27+1] | 26+2 [25+0 to 28+0] | 25+6 [24+6 to 27+2] | 26+2 [25+0 to 28+0] |
| Birth weight (g) | 772.5 [650 to 835] | 760 [630 to 895] | 775 [650 to 855] | 780 [630 to 900] |
| Z score | -0.4 [-1.1 to 0.2] | -0.7 [-1.4 to 0.1] | -0.4 [-1.1 to 0.2] | -0.6 [-1.3 to 0.1] |
| Birth length (cm) | 34 [31 to 35] | 33 [31 to 35] b | 34 [31 to 35] | 33 [31 to 35] |
| Z score | -0.2 [-0.9 to 0.7] | -0.2 [-1 to 0.4] b | -0.1 [-1 to 0.9] | -0.2 [-1 to 0.4] |
| Birth head circumference (cm) | 24 [23 to 25] | 24 [23 to 25] | 24 [23 to 25] | 24 [23 to 25] |
| Z score | 0 [-0.7 to 0.6] | -0.2 [-0.8 to 0.3] | -0.1 [-0.7 to 0.6] | -0.2 [-0.7 to 0.4] |
| Small for gestational age | 17 (20) | 27 (31) | 17 (21) | 24 (29) |
Categorical data are presented as numbers with percentages in round parentheses and were tested using the chi2 test. Continuous data are presented as the median and interquartile range in squared parentheses and were tested using the Mann-Whitney U test.
data of 1 patient missing
data of 2 patients missing
data of 3 patients missing
data of 9 patients missing
data of 11 patients missing
data of 12 patients missing
data of 17 patients missing
Neonatal morbidity and nutritional parameters of infants during hospitalization are shown in Table 2. Necrotizing enterocolitis was diagnosed clinically (Bell’s stage ≥ Ila) or after exploratory surgery. Intraventricular hemorrhage and cystic periventricular leucomalacia were diagnosed by cerebral ultrasound, retinopathy of prematurity by direct ophthalmoscopy. Chronic lung disease was defined as supplementary oxygen after 36+0 weeks post menstrual age. Data on parental education were collected at the follow-up visits and divided into three groups according to highest education of either parent (primary education – i.e. compulsory schooling until the age of 15; secondary – i.e. high school and tertiary – i.e. postsecondary education). Low parental education was defined as primary education only.
Table 2. Neonatal outcome.
| Parameter | 12 months corrected age | 24 months corrected age | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mixed lipid emulsion (n=86) |
Soybean oil (n=88) |
P | Mixed lipid emulsion (n=81) |
Soybean oil (n=83) |
P | |
| Hospitalization (d) | 87 [70 to 109] | 83 [69 to 99] | .40 | 86 [70 to 109] | 82 [69 to 99] | .47 |
| Cholestasis | 8 (9.3) | 13 (15) | .27 | 8 (9.9) | 12 (15) | .37 |
| Retinopathy of prematurity (any) | 55 (64) | 50 (57) a | .38 | 50 (62) | 46 (55) | .41 |
| Highest grade (grade 1-5) | 1.5 [0 to 2] a | 1 [0 to 2] | .50 | 1 [0 to 2] | 1 [0 to 2] | .54 |
| Requiring treatment (severe ROP) | 9 (11) | 9 (10) a | .98 | 8 (9.9) | 8 (9.6) | .96 |
| Sepsis, culture proven | 21 (24) | 22 (25) | .93 | 19 (24) | 20 (24) | .92 |
| Intraventricular hemorrhage III/IV | 8 (9.3) | 4 (4.5) | .22 | 8 (9.9) | 4 (4.8) | .21 |
| Cystic periventricular leucomalacia | 3 (3.5) | 2 (3.4) | .98 | 3 (3.7) | 3 (3.6) | .98 |
| Necrotizing enterocolitis (grade ≥IIa) | 3 (3.5) | 5 (5.7) | .49 | 3 (3.7) | 4 (4.8) | .72 |
| Focal intestinal perforation | 2 (2.3) | 3 (3.4) | .70 | 2 (2.5) | 3 (3.6) | .67 |
| Abdominal surgery | 8 (9.3) | 10 (11) | .66 | 8 (9.9) | 10 (12) | .66 |
| Days on mechanical ventilation | 0 [0 to 11] | 1 [0 to 9] | .64 | 0 [0 to 10] | 1 [0 to 9] | .60 |
| Chronic lung disease | 17 (20) | 17 (19) | .94 | 15 (19) | 17 (21) | .75 |
| Steroid treatment | 9 (11) | 14 (16) | .29 | 8 (9.9) | 13 (16) | .27 |
| PDA requiring treatment | 47 (55) | 58 (66) | .13 | 43 (53) | 56 (68) | .06 |
| Number of ibuprofen cycles | 1 [0 to 2] | 1 [0 to 2] | .26 | 1 [0 to 2] | 1 [0 to 2] | .15 |
| Surgical ligation | 4 (4.7) | 6 (6.8) | .54 | 3 (3.7) | 6 (7.2) | .32 |
| Pulmonary hypertension | 17 (20) | 20 (23) | .63 | 16 (20) | 18 (22) | .76 |
| iNO/sildenafil treatment | 14 (16) | 19 (22) | .37 | 13 (16) | 17 (21) | .46 |
| Time to full enteral feeds (d) | 24 [18 to 38] | 24 [18 to 35] | .52 | 24 [18 to 38] | 24 [18 to 35] | .50 |
| Parenteral lipids (d) | 22 [16 to 36] | 21 [17 to 31] | .73 | 23 [16 to 36] | 21 [17 to 31] | .57 |
| Cumulative amount of parenteral lipids (g/kg) | 43 [28 to 70] | 42 [30 to 57] | .44 | 43 [29 to 72] | 42 [30 to 57] | .36 |
| Study lipids (g/kg/d) | 2 [1.6 to 2.2] | 1.9 [1.6 to 2.1] | .28 | 2 [1.6 to 2.2] | 1.9 [1.6 to 2.1] | .29 |
| Docosahexaenoic acid (mg/kg/d) | 43 [35 to 48] | 3.8 [3.2 to 4.2] | <.0001 | 43 [35 to 48] | 3.8 [3.2 to 4.3] | <.0001 |
| Eicosapentaenoic acid (mg/kg/d) | 47 [39 to 53] | 0 [0 to 0] | <.0001 | 47 [39 to 52] | 0 [0 to 0] | <.0001 |
Abbreviations: iNO, inhalative nitric oxide; PDA, persistent ductus arteriosus; ROP, retinopathy of prematurity
Categorical data are presented as numbers with percentages in round parentheses and were tested using the chi2 test. Continuous data are presented as the median and interquartile range in squared parentheses and were tested using the Mann-Whitney U test. P values <.05 were considered statistically significant.
data of 1 patient missing
Follow-up
Study participants were invited to follow-up visits at 12 and 24 months corrected age as part of clinical routine care. Follow-up included anthropometric measurements (with Z scores and body mass index) and assessment of neurodevelopment using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, third edition (Bayley-III; Harcourt Assessment, San Antonio, United States, 2006.). The Bayley-III is an instrument to measure the neurodevelopment of infants aged 16 days to 42 months and consists of five subtests: cognition, receptive, and expressive communication as well as fine and gross motor function. Scaled scores are calculated for each subtest that range from 1 to 19 with a mean of 10 and a standard deviation of 3 using normative data for the infant’s age group. Scores are converted into cognitive, language, and motor composite scores with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. 14 Results were calculated using the US norms. The tests were performed and scored by two certified clinical psychologists.
Infants with a diagnosis of cerebral palsy were additionally classified using the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) at 24 months corrected age. The GMFCS includes five levels based on functional abilities and quality of movement. 15
Statistical analysis
Differences between groups were analyzed by Mann-Whitney-U test for composite scores of cognitive, language, and motor development as well as gross motor function. Subgroup analyses were carried out by sex and increased risk for unfavorable development (birth weight below 750 g and low parental education). Sensitivity analysis was performed using a mixed model linear regression analysis with mother and child as random factor and included the confounders sex, gestational age, intraventricular hemorrhage grade III and IV, and parental education. SPSS statistical software system version 25.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) and R version 3.5.1 (R foundation, Vienna, Austria) were used for calculations. Assessment of neurodevelopmental outcome was a pre-defined secondary outcome of the trial, confounders and subgroup analyses were defined post hoc after analysis of the whole cohort.
Ethics and registration
The study was conducted in conformance with the “Declaration of Helsinki”, “ICH GCP guidelines”, and the respective European Union directives embedded in the Austrian drug act. Written consent from one parent was sufficient due to low risk for participants. Patients were insured as legally required. The study was approved by the institution’s ethics committee (EK 2011/1030) and registered at European Clinical Trial Database (EudraCT 2011-005456-33) and clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01585935).
Results
Screening
In total, 230 infants were randomized (06/2012 to 06/2015, Figure 1, online only) and 223 infants were eligible for analysis of the primary outcome. At discharge, 206 out of 230 study participants were eligible for neurodevelopmental assessment at follow-up, with 174 (85%) infants analyzed at 12 months (loss to follow-up 15%) and 164 (80%) infants at 24 months corrected age (loss to follow-up 20%). Follow-up lasted from 08/2013 to 10/2017. Loss to follow-up did not vary significantly by group (at 12 months: 16% vs. 15%, P=.95; at 24 months: 21 vs. 20 %, P=.94).
Figure 1. Figure 1 shows the patient flow chart with the reasons for study exclusion.
Demographic parameters & neonatal morbidity
Demographic parameters of infants analyzed at 12 and 24 months corrected age are shown in Table 1.
Neonatal morbidities and nutritional parameters did not differ significantly between groups, expect for DHA and EPA, which were significantly higher in infants receiving the mixed lipid emulsion due to the intervention (Table 2). Important characteristics of dropouts (Table 3, online only) did not differ significantly. Neonatal morbidities and nutritional parameters of the subgroup of infants born < 750 g (Table 4, online only) were also not significantly different.
Table 3. online only. Important demographic and outcome parameters of dropouts at 12 and 24 months corrected age.
| Parameter | 12 months corrected age | 24 months corrected age | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mixed lipid emulsion (n=27) |
Soybean oil (n=28) |
P | Mixed lipid emulsion (n=32) |
Soybean oil (n=33) |
P | |
| Male sex | 14 (51.9) | 19 (65.5) | .23 | 17 (53.1) | 20 (58.8) | .54 |
| Gestational age (wk+d) | 26+6 [24+3 to 28+4] | 26+0 [24+3 to 28+0] | .44 | 26+4 [24+3 to 28+2] | 26+0 [24+3 to 28+0] | .72 |
| Birth weight (gram) | 890 [605 to 960] | 737.5 [590 to 843] | .05 | 818.5 [612 to 956.3] | 700 [582.5 to 840.5] | .07 |
| Z score | -0.6 [-1.2 to 0] | -0.45 [-1.98 to -0.1] | .72 | -0.5 [-1.1 to 0] | -0.7 [-1.9 to -0.1] | .33 |
| Intraventricular hemorrhage III/IV | 4 (14.8) | 6 (20.7) | .53 | 4 (12.5) | 6 (17.6) | .53 |
Categorical data are presented as numbers with percentages in round parentheses and were tested using the chi2 test. Continuous data are presented as the median and interquartile range in squared parentheses and were tested using the Mann-Whitney U test. P values <.05 were considered statistically significant.
Table 4. online only. Neonatal outcome in infants born <750g.
| Parameter | 12 months corrected age | 24 months corrected age | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mixed lipid emulsion (n=35) |
Soybean oil (n=40) |
P | Mixed lipid emulsion (n=32) |
Soybean oil (n=36) |
P | |
| Hospitalization (d) | 104 [85 to 115] | 91.5 [82.3 to 113] | .313 | 104 [85.3 to 115.8] | 91.5 [79.8 to 116] | .357 |
| Cholestasis | 3 (8.6) | 10 (25) | .061 | 3 (9.4) | 9 (25) | .092 |
| Retinopathy of prematurity (any) | 30 (85.7) | 28 (70) | .105 | 27 (84.4) | 24 (66.7) | .092 |
| Requiring treatment (severe ROP) | 6 (17.1) | 8 (20) | .751 | 5 (15.6) | 7 (19.4) | .68 |
| Sepsis, culture proven | 10 (28.6) | 15 (37.5) | .413 | 9 (28.1) | 13 (36.1) | .482 |
| Intraventricular hemorrhage III/IV | 5 (14.3) | 3 (7.5) | .342 | 5 (15.6) | 3 (8.3) | .352 |
| Cystic periventricular leukomalacia | 1 (2.9) | 0 (0) | .282 | 1 (3.1) | 0 (0) | .285 |
| Necrotizing enterocolitis (grade ≥IIa) | 1 (2.9) | 4 (10) | .216 | 1 (3.1) | 3 (8.3) | .362 |
| Focal intestinal perforation | 2 (5.7) | 2 (5) | .891 | 2 (6.3) | 2 (5.6) | .903 |
| Abdominal surgery | 6 (17.1) | 7 (17.5) | .967 | 6 (18.8) | 7 (19.4) | .942 |
| Days on mechanical ventilation | 6 [0 to 14] | 4.5 [0 to 16.8] | .934 | 6.5 [0 to 13.5] | 4.5 [0 to 16.8] | .904 |
| Chronic lung disease | 7 (20) | 8 (20) | 1 | 6 (18.8) | 8 (22.2) | .724 |
| Steroid treatment | 6 (17.1) | 10 (25) | .407 | 5 (15.6) | 9 (25) | .34 |
| PDA requiring treatment | 23 (65.7) | 29 (72.5) | .525 | 21 (65.6) | 27 (75) | .397 |
| Surgical ligation | 3 (8.6) | 4 (10) | .832 | 3 (9.4) | 4 (11.1) | .814 |
| Pulmonary hypertension | 10 (28.6) | 13 (32.5) | .713 | 10 (31.3) | 11 (30.6) | .951 |
| iNO/sildenafil treatment | 8 (22.9) | 12 (30) | .485 | 8 (25) | 10 (27.8) | .796 |
| Time to full enteral feeds (d) | 29 [22 to 48] | 28 [20.3 to 39] | .69 | 30 [22 to 46.3] | 28 [20.3 to 39] | .627 |
| Parenteral lipids (d) | 26 [19 to 39] | 25.5 [20 to 38] | .89 | 26 [20.5 to 41.3] | 25.5 [20 to 38] | .676 |
| Cumulative amount of parenteral lipids (g/kg) | 46.5 [30.5 to 73.8] | 46.92 [35.3 to 63.2] | .987 | 48.4 [30.7 to 76.6] | 49 [35.3 to 63.2] | .868 |
| Study lipids (g/kg/d) | 1.8 [1.6 to 2.1] | 1.8 [1.6 to 2.0] | .932 | 1.8 [1.4 to 2.1] | 1.8 [1.6 to 2.0] | .966 |
| Docosahexaenoic acid (mg/kg/d) | 40 [34.2 to 46.3] | 3.9 [3.2 to 4] | <.0001 | 40 [31.8 to 46.1] | 3.9 [3.2 to 4] | <.0001 |
| Eicosapentaenoic acid (mg/kg/d) | 44.2 [37.3 to 50.5] | 0 [0 to 0] | <.0001 | 44.1 [34.7 to 50.2] | 0 [0 to 0] | <.0001 |
Abbreviations: iNO, inhalative nitric oxide; PDA, persistent ductus arteriosus; ROP, retinopathy of prematurity
Categorical data are presented as numbers with percentages in round parentheses and were tested using the chi2 test. Continuous data are presented as the median and interquartile range in squared parentheses and were tested using the Mann-Whitney U test. P values <.05 were considered statistically significant.
data of 1 patient missing
Anthropometry
Data on anthropometry at 12 and 24 months corrected age are shown in Table 5. There were no significant differences between the two groups.
Table 5. Anthropometry at 12 and 24 months corrected age.
| Parameter | 12 months corrected age | 24 months corrected age | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mixed lipid emulsion (n=86) |
Soybean oil (n=88) |
P | Mixed lipid emulsion (n=81) |
Soybean oil (n=83) |
P | |
| Body Weight (kg) | 8.9 [8 to 10] b | 8.95 [8.1 to 9.9] d | .98 | 11.4 [10.2 to 12.9] a | 11.6 [10.2 to 12.9] c | .84 |
| Z score | -0.57 [-1.5 to 0.4] b | -0.44 [-1.39 to 0.41] d | .93 | -0.22 [-1.09 to 0.68] a | -0.2 [-1.21 to 0.57] c | .95 |
| Height (cm) | 74 [72 to 76] a | 74 [71.63 to 76] f | .90 | 85 [82 to 88] a | 85 [83 to 88] c | .83 |
| Z score | -0.59 [-1.25 to 0.38] a | -0.5 [-1.25 to 0.28] f | .94 | -0.59 [-1.4 to 0.23] a | -0.59 [-1.29 to 0.22] c | .95 |
| Body Mass Index | 16.3 [15.1 to 17.9] a | 16.3 [14.9 to 17.2] d | .51 | 15.7 [14.9 to 16.9] a | 15.8 [14.9 to 17.1] c | .99 |
| Head circumference (cm) | 45 [43.9 to 46] c | 45 [43.7 to 46.3] e | .78 | 47 [46 to 48.5] b | 47 [46 to 48] d | .54 |
| Z score | -1.2 [-2.06 to 0.01] c | -1.1 [-2.3 to 0.5] e | .94 | -0.95 [-1.82 to 0.07] b | -0.98 [-2.49 to -0.33] d | .30 |
Continuous data are presented as the median and interquartile range in squared parentheses and were tested using the Mann-Whitney U test. P values <.05 were considered statistically significant.
data of 7 patients missing
data of 8 patients missing
data of 9 patients missing
data of 10 patients missing
data of 11 patients missing
data of 12 patients missing
Neurodevelopmental outcome
Bayley-III – comparison of medians
The results of neurodevelopmental follow-up (Bayley-III) are shown in Table 6. At 12 and 24 months, there was no significant difference in cognitive, language, or motor scores. Analysis of subgroups with particular risk for unfavorable outcome (birth weight <750g, Table 7, online only; low parental education, Table 8, online only) revealed no statistically significant difference between the two groups. No significant sex specific effect of the mixed lipid emulsion on neurodevelopment (Table 9, online only) was found.
Table 6. Bayley-III at 12 and 24 months corrected age.
| Parameter | 12 months corrected age | 24 months corrected age | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mixed lipid emulsion (n=86) |
Soybean oil (n=88) |
P | Mixed lipid emulsion (n=81) |
Soybean oil (n=83) |
P | |
| Cognitive composite score | 95 [85-101] | 95 [85-100] a | .71 | 95 [80-105] a | 95 [90-105] a | .17 |
| Language composite score | 86 [77-94] a | 89 [79-95] b | .48 | 89 [75-97] d | 89 [77-100] c | .54 |
| Motor composite score | 88 [76-94] a | 88 [79-94] a | .69 | 94 [82-103] a | 94 [85-103] b | .53 |
Continuous data are presented as the median and interquartile range in squared parentheses and were tested using the Mann-Whitney U test. P values <.05 were considered statistically significant.
data of 1 patient missing
data of 2 patients missing
data of 3 patients missing
data of 5 patients missing
Table 7. online only. Bayley-III at 12 and 24 months corrected age in patients born <750g.
| Parameter | 12 months corrected age | 24 months corrected age | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mixed lipid emulsion (n=35) |
Soybean oil (n=39) |
P | Mixed lipid emulsion (n=32) |
Soybean oil (n=36) |
P | |
| Cognitive composite score | 90 [80-95] | 90 [80-100] a | .43 | 90 [80-105] a | 93 [86-105] | .20 |
| Language composite score | 86 [77-97] a | 89 [77-94] a | .90 | 89 [77-97] a | 88 [74-100] b | .78 |
| Motor composite score | 82 [76-94] a | 88 [73-94] a | .36 | 91 [82-100] | 94 [85-104] b | .36 |
Continuous data are presented as the median and interquartile range in squared parentheses and were tested using the Mann-Whitney U test. P values <.05 were considered statistically significant.
data of 1 patient missing
data of 2 patients missing
Table 8. online only. Bayley-III at 12 and 24 months corrected age in patients with low parental education.
| Parameter | 12 months corrected age | 24 months corrected age | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mixed lipid emulsion (n=29) |
Soybean oil (n=29) |
P | Mixed lipid emulsion (n= 28) |
Soybean oil (n=26) |
P | |
| Cognitive composite score | 95 [85-100] | 95 [83-104] | .75 | 90 [71-105] | 90 [80-105] | .79 |
| Language composite score | 86 [76-95] | 85 [78-91] | .84 | 88 [63-95] a | 81 [69-96] a | .73 |
| Motor composite score | 88 [77-97] | 88 [77-94] | .89 | 91 [82-100] | 91 [85-102] | .74 |
Continuous data are presented as the median and interquartile range in squared parentheses and were tested using the Mann-Whitney U test. P values <.05 were considered statistically significant.
data of 2 patients missing
Table 9. online only. Bayley-III at 12 and 24 months corrected age in boys & girls.
| Boys | Mixed lipid emulsion (n=51) | Soybean oil (n=57) | P | Mixed lipid emulsion (n=48) | Soybean oil (n=56) | P |
| Cognitive composite score | 90 [80-100] | 90 [85-100] a | .25 | 90 [79-100] | 95 [85-105] a | .16 |
| Language composite score | 81 [74-91] a | 86 [75-94] b | .67 | 83 [68-97] c | 83 [73-98] b | .53 |
| Motor composite score | 86 [73-94] a | 88 [79-97] a | .42 | 91 [82-100] a | 91 [85-103] a | .41 |
| Girls | Mixed lipid emulsion (n=35) | Soybean oil (n=31) | P | Mixed lipid emulsion (n=33) | Soybean oil (n=27) | P |
| Cognitive composite score | 95 [95-105] | 100 [95-105] | .77 | 100 [85-110] a | 100 [90-115] | .42 |
| Language composite score | 89 [79-100] | 94 [86-97] | .35 | 94 [81-108] a | 97 [89-103] a | .62 |
| Motor composite score | 91 [82-97] | 91 [88-94] | .68 | 100 [90-106] | 97 [94-108] a | .52 |
Continuous data are presented as the median and interquartile range in squared parentheses and were tested using the Mann-Whitney U test. P values <.05 were considered statistically significant.
data of 1 patient missing
data of 2 patients missing
data of 4 patients missing
Gross motor function – comparison of medians
At 24 months corrected age, infants with cerebral palsy were classified using the GMFCS. In both groups, 13 infants were diagnosed with cerebral palsy without revealing a difference in severity between soybean oil (GMFCS 1: n=11, GMFCS: 2 n=1, GMFCS 3: n=0, GMFCS 4: n=1) and the mixed lipid emulsion (GMFCS: 1 n=9, GMFCS 2: n=2, GMFCS 3: n=2, GMFCS 4: n=0).
Mixed model linear regression analysis
After exclusion of patients with missing values in covariates, the sample size for the regression analysis was 153 for infants and 139 for mothers. Parenteral nutrition using the mixed lipid emulsion had no significant influence on cognitive, language, or motor scores (Tables 10 and 11, both online only). Parental education was significantly related to the cognitive and language, but not the motor scores. Intraventricular hemorrhage and male sex had a significant negative impact on all three scores. The gestational age of infants did not exert a significant influence.
Discussion
This secondary outcome analysis of a randomized trial of infants with ELBW comparing parenteral nutrition using a mixed lipid emulsion containing fish oil with a soybean oil-based lipid emulsion showed no significant difference of neurodevelopment at 12 and 24 months corrected age. Follow-up studies on neurodevelopment are crucial to demonstrate safety of novel interventions in neonatology. Studies of new lipid emulsions that provide DHA have not reported on neurodevelopmental outcome. 16, 17
Docosahexaenoic acid promotes the development of neurons 18–21 and comprises 30-40% of the brain’s grey matter. 19, 20, 22 In utero supply is regulated by the placenta 22 and peaks in the third trimester. 23 Extremely preterm infants miss out this period of maximum DHA supply and cannot sufficiently convert precursor fatty acids to LC-PUFAs. 4 The hypothesis that additional supply with DHA to preterm infants is beneficial for their neurodevelopment 24 is based on high cerebral DHA levels 19, 20, 22 , the subtle effects of DHA deprivation 25, 26 in animal studies, and more pronounced effects in vitro. 27, 28 Yet, clinical trials in preterm infants that aimed at improving neurodevelopmental outcome by enteral DHA supplementation did not provide clear evidence for a benefit. 29 Whether parenteral DHA supply using lipid emulsions would be more efficient than enteral supply is speculative, but it might be of additional value. Parenteral lipid emulsions can be provided right after birth in adequate concentrations to close the gap in DHA supply until full enteral feeds are established – typically after a few weeks post partum. 30 Studies in piglets demonstrated enrichment of DHA in the brain using a mixed lipid emulsion. 31 In this context, our previous finding of accelerated maturation of amplitude-integrated EEG assessed between birth and hospital discharge 9 may point out to cerebral DHA incorporation using the mixed lipid emulsion in preterm infants. This created considerable expectations for neurodevelopmental follow-up, but we found no measurable impact on the neurodevelopmental outcome at 12 and 24 months corrected age in this study. In vitro studies showed positive effects of DHA on synaptic protein expression 28 but no influence on absolute neurite numbers. 18 It seems possible that changes of synaptic activity caused a transient impact on electrophysiological brain activity using the mixed lipid emulsion in infants of this cohort 9 , without significantly affecting their neurodevelopment - maybe due to a missing effect on total neurite numbers. 29, 32
Besides DHA, ARA is also highly concentrated in the brain 33 and relevant for growth and neurodevelopment. 34 In enteral nutrition, ARA should meet at least DHA levels. 35 Yet, ARA is five times lower than DHA in the mixed lipid emulsion, but still higher compared to a soybean oil-based lipid emulsion. 11 Yet, ARA levels in the blood were shown to decrease in infants receiving the mixed lipid emulsion compared to soybean oil-based lipid emulsions. 16 This could be due to reduced conversion, 36 replacement of ARA by DHA/EPA, or a shift to other tissues. 37, 38 While DHA supply improves, ARA blood levels decline, which may potentially outweigh positive effects of DHA. This raised concerns about long-term clinical safety concerning growth and development. 16 Yet, we did not find a statistically significant effect on neurodevelopment or growth.
Clinical trials on LC-PUFA enriched infant formula for preterm infants only inconsistently demonstrated a benefit for neurodevelopmental outcome. 32, 39–43 Studies that found a significant influence did so only after subgrouping: Fewtrell et al found higher mental developmental indices in boys 40 and Makrides et al reported on a similar benefit for girls. 39 Analysis of infants of this trial showed higher Bayley-III scores in girls, but no sex-specific neurodevelopmental advantage using the mixed lipid emulsion. It is furthermore well established that parental education influences children’s cognitive abilities. 44 Lien et al proposed a benefit of LC-PUFA supplementation for disadvantaged infants with poor education. 23 In our trial, language and cognitive scores of preterm infants were strongly influenced by parental education (Tables 10 and 11, both online only), but there was no significant effect of the mixed lipid emulsion in infants whose parents had a low educational background (Table 8, online only). Another subgroup with a particular risk for unfavorable development that might benefit from DHA supplementation are the smallest infants born <750 gram, but again there was no significant neurodevelopmental advantage of the mixed lipid emulsion (Table 4, online only).
Our study has certain limitations. Neurodevelopment was a secondary outcome and the study was not powered for assessment of neurodevelopment, with rather small numbers leading to wide confidence intervals. On the other hand, the quality of our trial was high with minimal risk for bias 45 , loss to follow-up was low with 20%, and without a statistically significant difference in numbers and important clinical characteristics of dropouts.
The calculated parenteral supply with DHA using the mixed lipid emulsion was 43 mg/kg/d. This is at the lower end of published fetal accretion rates (40 to 67 mg/kg/d). While infants received higher amounts of DHA using the mixed lipid emulsion, even more DHA would be needed to reach in utero supply in all infants. Moreover, DHA in enteral nutrition is still far too low to meet in utero levels after weaning from parenteral nutrition, and deficiency at discharge is likely. As analysis of plasma fatty acids was not part of our study, we cannot report on blood fatty acid levels.
It is also possible that the nutritional DHA deficits were not pronounced enough in our study to exert an effect on neurodevelopment. In this context, infants of ELBW who received parenteral nutrition for more than three weeks were shown to have a poorer neurodevelopment. 30 In our trial, full feeds were already reached after 23 days (interquartile range 17-37) 8 . We thus cannot rule out an effect in infants of ELBW who depend on parenteral nutrition for much longer.
Conclusion
The type of parenteral lipid emulsion did not significantly affect the neurodevelopmental outcome of preterm infants of ELBW at 12 and 24 months corrected age. Further information on neurodevelopmental outcome will be gathered in another follow-up analysis using the “Kaufmann Assessment Battery for Children” at 5.5 years of age. Future trials should aim at investigating the effects of a combined approach of parenteral and enteral DHA supply starting from the first day of life, and should also consider providing ARA in amounts equal to DHA.
Funding Source
The study was funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF, KLI99-B00). Study emulsions were provided free of charge by Herba Chemosan (Graz, Austria). Fresenius Kabi (Graz, Austria) provided funding to employ a clinical research nurse. The companies had no role in the study, in particular concerning the design, analysis, interpretation or reporting of results and preparation of the manuscript.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest: Andreas Repa received a research grant by Fresenius Kabi (Graz, Austria). The company had no role in the study, in particular concerning design, analysis, interpretation or reporting of results and preparation of the manuscript. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose or any financial relationships relevant to the study.
Margarita Thanhaeuser wrote the first draft of the manuscript. No payment was given to anyone to produce the manuscript. All authors have seen and approved the submission of this version of the manuscript and take full responsibility for the manuscript.
Disclosure of prior presentation of study data as an abstract or poster: Poster at the 5th International Conference on Nutrition and Growth, Paris March 2018 and the 7th Congress of the European Academy of Paediatric Societies, Paris, France, October 2018
Data Statement
The dataset generated and/or analyzed during the current study is available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
- [1].Mercier CE, Dunn MS, Ferrelli KR, Howard DB, Soll RF, Vermont Oxford Network EIF-USG Neurodevelopmental outcome of extremely low birth weight infants from the Vermont Oxford network: 1998-2003. Neonatology. 2010;97:329–38. doi: 10.1159/000260136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Joosten K, Embleton N, Yan W, Senterre T. nutrition EEECwgopp. ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR guidelines on pediatric parenteral nutrition: Energy. Clin Nutr. 2018 doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.06.944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Chan SH, Johnson MJ, Leaf AA, Vollmer B. Nutrition and neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants: a systematic review. Acta Paediatr. 2016;105:587–99. doi: 10.1111/apa.13344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Harris WS, Baack ML. Beyond building better brains: bridging the docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) gap of prematurity. J Perinatol. 2015;35:1–7. doi: 10.1038/jp.2014.195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Koletzko B, Agostoni C, Carlson SE, Clandinin T, Hornstra G, Neuringer M, et al. Long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC-PUFA) and perinatal development. Acta Paediatr. 2001;90:460–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Lapillonne A, Jensen CL. Reevaluation of the DHA requirement for the premature infant. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2009;81:143–50. doi: 10.1016/j.plefa.2009.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Smith SL, Rouse CA. Docosahexaenoic acid and the preterm infant. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2017;3:22. doi: 10.1186/s40748-017-0061-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Repa A, Binder C, Thanhaeuser M, Kreissl A, Pablik E, Huber-Dangl M, et al. A Mixed Lipid Emulsion for Prevention of Parenteral Nutrition Associated Cholestasis in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Pediatr. 2018;194:87–93.:e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.11.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Binder C, Giordano V, Thanhaeuser M, Kreissl A, Huber-Dangl M, Longford N, et al. A Mixed Lipid Emulsion Containing Fish Oil and Its Effect on Electrophysiological Brain Maturation in Infants of Extremely Low Birth Weight: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. J Pediatr. 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.03.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Rayyan M, Devlieger H, Jochum F, Allegaert K. Short-term use of parenteral nutrition with a lipid emulsion containing a mixture of soybean oil, olive oil, medium-chain triglycerides, and fish oil: a randomized double-blind study in preterm infants. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2012;36:81S–94S. doi: 10.1177/0148607111424411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].D’Ascenzo R, Savini S, Biagetti C, Bellagamba MP, Marchionni P, Pompilio A, et al. Higher docosahexaenoic acid, lower arachidonic acid and reduced lipid tolerance with high doses of a lipid emulsion containing 15% fish oil: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Nutr. 2014;33:1002–9. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2014.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Klebermass-Schrehof K, Wald M, Schwindt J, Grill A, Prusa AR, Haiden N, et al. Less invasive surfactant administration in extremely preterm infants: impact on mortality and morbidity. Neonatology. 2013;103:252–8. doi: 10.1159/000346521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Fenton TR, Kim JH. A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:59. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Bayley NB. Scales of Infant and Toddler Development - Third Edition. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. 2006;25:180–98. [Google Scholar]
- [15].Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Walter S, Russell D, Wood E, Galuppi B. Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997;39:214–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1997.tb07414.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Zhao Y, Wu Y, Pei J, Chen Z, Wang Q, Xiang B. Safety and efficacy of parenteral fish oilcontaining lipid emulsions in premature neonates. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015;60:708–16. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Anez-Bustillos L, Dao DT, Baker MA, Fell GL, Puder M, Gura KM. Intravenous Fat Emulsion Formulations for the Adult and Pediatric Patient: Understanding the Differences. Nutr Clin Pract. 2016;31:596–609. doi: 10.1177/0884533616662996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Tanaka K, Farooqui AA, Siddiqi NJ, Alhomida AS, Ong WY. Effects of docosahexaenoic Acid on neurotransmission. Biomol Ther (Seoul) 2012;20:152–7. doi: 10.4062/biomolther.2012.20.2.152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Georgieff MK. Nutrition and the developing brain: nutrient priorities and measurement. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85:614S–20S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/85.2.614S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Calderon F, Kim HY. Docosahexaenoic acid promotes neurite growth in hippocampal neurons. J Neurochem. 2004;90:979–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02520.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Dai YJ, Sun LL, Li MY, Ding CL, Su YC, Sun LJ, et al. Comparison of Formulas Based on Lipid Emulsions of Olive Oil, Soybean Oil, or Several Oils for Parenteral Nutrition: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Adv Nutr. 2016;7:279–86. doi: 10.3945/an.114.007427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Kuipers RS, Luxwolda MF, Offringa PJ, Boersma ER, Dijck-Brouwer DA, Muskiet FA. Fetal intrauterine whole body linoleic, arachidonic and docosahexaenoic acid contents and accretion rates. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2012;86:13–20. doi: 10.1016/j.plefa.2011.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Lien EL, Richard C, Hoffman DR. DHA and ARA addition to infant formula: Current status and future research directions. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2018;128:26–40. doi: 10.1016/j.plefa.2017.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Mun JG, Legette LL, Ikonte CJ, Mitmesser SH. Choline and DHA in Maternal and Infant Nutrition: Synergistic Implications in Brain and Eye Health. Nutrients. 2019;11 doi: 10.3390/nu11051125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Janssen CI, Zerbi V, Mutsaers MP, de Jong BS, Wiesmann M, Arnoldussen IA, et al. Impact of dietary n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on cognition, motor skills and hippocampal neurogenesis in developing C57BL/6J mice. J Nutr Biochem. 2015;26:24–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2014.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Kodas E, Galineau L, Bodard S, Vancassel S, Guilloteau D, Besnard JC, et al. Serotoninergic neurotransmission is affected by n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in the rat. J Neurochem. 2004;89:695–702. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02401.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Tam EW, Chau V, Barkovich AJ, Ferriero DM, Miller SP, Rogers EE, et al. Early postnatal docosahexaenoic acid levels and improved preterm brain development. Pediatr Res. 2016;79:723–30. doi: 10.1038/pr.2016.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Cao D, Kevala K, Kim J, Moon HS, Jun SB, Lovinger D, et al. Docosahexaenoic acid promotes hippocampal neuronal development and synaptic function. J Neurochem. 2009;111:510–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06335.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Moon K, Rao SC, Schulzke SM, Patole SK, Simmer K. Longchain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;12:CD000375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000375.pub5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Vohr BR, Wright LL, Dusick AM, Perritt R, Poole WK, Tyson JE, et al. Center differences and outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2004;113:781–9. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.4.781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Molina TL, Stoll B, Mohammad M, Mohila CA, Call L, Cui L, et al. New generation lipid emulsions increase brain DHA and improve body composition, but not short-term neurodevelopment in parenterally-fed preterm piglets. Brain Behav Immun. 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2019.04.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Wang Q, Cui Q, Yan C. The Effect of Supplementation of Long-Chain Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids During Lactation on Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Preterm Infant From Infancy to School Age: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Pediatr Neurol. 2016;59:54–61.:e1. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2016.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Clandinin MT, Chappell JE, Leong S, Heim T, Swyer PR, Chance GW. Intrauterine fatty acid accretion rates in human brain: implications for fatty acid requirements. Early Hum Dev. 1980;4:121–9. doi: 10.1016/0378-3782(80)90015-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Hadley KB, Ryan AS, Forsyth S, Gautier S, Salem N., Jr The Essentiality of Arachidonic Acid in Infant Development. Nutrients. 2016;8:216. doi: 10.3390/nu8040216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Koletzko B, Bergmann K, Brenna JT, Calder PC, Campoy C, Clandinin MT, et al. Should formula for infants provide arachidonic acid along with DHA? A position paper of the European Academy of Paediatrics and the Child Health Foundation. Am J Clin Nutr. 2020;111:10–6. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqz252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Wainwright PE, Xing HC, Mutsaers L, McCutcheon D, Kyle D. Arachidonic acid offsets the effects on mouse brain and behavior of a diet with a low (n-6):(n-3) ratio and very high levels of docosahexaenoic acid. J Nutr. 1997;127:184–93. doi: 10.1093/jn/127.1.184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Calder PC. Mechanisms of action of (n-3) fatty acids. J Nutr. 2012;142:592S–9S. doi: 10.3945/jn.111.155259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Garg ML, Wierzbicki AA, Thomson AB, Clandinin MT. Omega-3 fatty acids increase the arachidonic acid content of liver cholesterol ester and plasma triacylglycerol fractions in the rat. Biochem J. 1989;261:11–5. doi: 10.1042/bj2610011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Makrides M, Gibson RA, McPhee AJ, Collins CT, Davis PG, Doyle LW, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm infants fed high-dose docosahexaenoic acid: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009;301:175–82. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Fewtrell MS, Abbott RA, Kennedy K, Singhal A, Morley R, Caine E, et al. Randomized, double-blind trial of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation with fish oil and borage oil in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2004;144:471–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.01.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Meldrum SJ, D’Vaz N, Simmer K, Dunstan JA, Hird K, Prescott SL. Effects of high-dose fish oil supplementation during early infancy on neurodevelopment and language: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Nutr. 2012;108:1443–54. doi: 10.1017/S0007114511006878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].O’Connor DL, Hall R, Adamkin D, Auestad N, Castillo M, Connor WE, et al. Growth and development in preterm infants fed long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2001;108:359–71. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.2.359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Westerberg AC, Schei R, Henriksen C, Smith L, Veierod MB, Drevon CA, et al. Attention among very low birth weight infants following early supplementation with docosahexaenoic and arachidonic acid. Acta Paediatr. 2011;100:47–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.01946.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Linsell L, Malouf R, Morris J, Kurinczuk JJ, Marlow N. Prognostic Factors for Poor Cognitive Development in Children Born Very Preterm or With Very Low Birth Weight: A Systematic Review. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169:1162–72. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.2175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Kapoor V, Malviya MN, Soll R. Lipid emulsions for parenterally fed preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;6:CD013163. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013163.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The dataset generated and/or analyzed during the current study is available from the corresponding author upon request.

