Abstract
The crystal symmetry of a material dictates the type of topological band structures it may host, and therefore symmetry is the guiding principle to find topological materials. Here we introduce an alternative guiding principle, which we call ‘quasi-symmetry’. This is the situation where a Hamiltonian has an exact symmetry at lower-order that is broken by higher-order perturbation terms. This enforces finite but parametrically small gaps at some low-symmetry points in momentum space. Untethered from the restraints of symmetry, quasi-symmetries eliminate the need for fine-tuning as they enforce that sources of large Berry curvature will occur at arbitrary chemical potentials. We demonstrate that a quasi-symmetry in the semi-metal CoSi stabilizes gaps below 2 meV over a large near-degenerate plane that can be measured in the quantum oscillation spectrum. The application of in-plane strain breaks the crystal symmetry and gaps the degenerate point, observable by new magnetic breakdown orbits. The quasi-symmetry, however, does not depend on spatial symmetries and hence transmission remains fully coherent. These results demonstrate a class of topological materials with increased resilience to perturbations such as strain-induced crystalline symmetry breaking, which may lead to robust topological applications as well as unexpected topology beyond the usual space group classifications.
The introduction of concepts of topology in the past years into the field of electronic dispersions has captured the imagination of condensed matter physics and sparked a flurry of new research directions. In topologically non-trivial metals, the wavefunctions are inherently nonlocal, and novel electronic states are expected and observed at the crystal surface terminating them (1–10). Beyond these surface properties, interesting anomalies in the bulk dispersion lead to novel physical phenomena, such as the emergence of quasiparticles mimicking ultra-relativistic Weyl- and Dirac-Fermions in 3D; a solid-state analogon of the Adler-Bell-Jackiw anomaly; a planar Hall effect; topological piezoelectric effect; second harmonic generation in Weyl semimetals; or strong Berry curvature that impacts the semi-classical and quantum dynamics of quasiparticles (11–19).
Given the wealth of new phenomena and potential applications, it is important to identify such “ideal” Weyl-, Dirac- or nodal-line semi-metals in which the a priori unrelated chemical potential and the topological anomaly coincide. That such a coincidence is rather rare can be understood from the Wigner-Von Neumann theorem, which states that a two-level crossing generally requires three tuning parameters (20, 21). To stabilize crossings of more than two bands (nodal points) or achieve higher dimensional degeneracies (nodal lines, planes), additional crystalline symmetries must provide further constraints on the form of the Hamiltonian, such as rotational symmetries for the fourfold Dirac points in the 3D Dirac semi-metals Cd3As2 and Na3Bi (6, 7) or two-fold screw axis for the nodal plane in MnSi (22).
Hence crystalline symmetry and band topology are inseparably intertwined, and it is natural that symmetry should guide our search for materials. Here we refine this picture, and argue for the importance of approximate symmetries as an additional concept (Fig. 1) with clearly observable experimental consequences. A crystalline symmetry operation, M, commutes with the Hamiltonian of the system, [H(k), M] = 0. The well-known representation theory dictates that low-symmetry points usually support only one-dimensional representations, and hence bands anti-cross at these points. It may be possible, however, that at these low symmetry points approximate symmetries emerge. They are not exact symmetries of the crystal yet still commute with a dominant part of the Hamiltonian. Such approximate symmetries would stabilize almost linear band crossings by enforcing finite yet perturbatively small energy gaps. A trivial example is a weak lattice distortion that removes a spatial symmetry that otherwise stabilizes a band crossing. Graphene could be considered as an alternative example in the spin channel, as its Dirac point is weakly gapped when spin-orbit coupling is considered, turning spin-rotation into an approximate symmetry (23, 24). However, as approximate symmetries leave the bounds set by crystalline point-groups, more exciting approximate symmetries may emerge that have no counterpart in the crystal symmetry.
Figure 1.
(a) Illustration of a mirror symmetry operation, which acts at the whole object consistently. (b) In contrast to the mirror symmetry, quasi-symmetry operation acts differently on different parts of the system. (c) If a crystalline symmetry operation commutes with the Hamiltonian system, the band crossing point is therefore symmetry-protected. (d) In this case the Hamiltonian itself does not commute with the symmetry operation yet its first order perturbation does. This lead to the situation where though the band crossing is numerically avoided but the resulted gap size is negligible for the physical properties of the system. This type of symmetry is called quasi-symmetry. (e) If the symmetry operation does not commute with the Hamiltonian to any order of perturbation of the system, the crossing is not protected by any symmetry. This will result in a sizeable gap and lost of topological character.
We adopt the term “quasi-symmetry” to denote a special type of approximate symmetry of electronic band structures, that emerges from the hierarchy of a k · p type of perturbation expansion around a high-symmetry point. Quasi-symmetries are operators Meff that are the exact symmetries of the lower-order expansion but not of higher-order perturbation terms. The main goal of this paper is to show such a quasi-symmetry exists in the semi-metal CoSi as well as a large set of similar materials, and that it enforces a low-symmetry plane of near-degeneracies spanning the Brillouin zone which pin a source of Berry curvature to the Fermi level (Fig. 2). Excitingly, it falls into the latter category of quasi-symmetries that are unrelated to approximate point-group symmetries, but can be treated as a symmetry of internal degrees of freedom, akin to spin in graphene. Unlike graphene, however, the form of quasi-symmetry is non-trivial as the corresponding symmetry operator is generally k-dependent and forms a part of the Hamiltonian. The key distinction is that while a proper crystal symmetry acts on all atomic coordinates uniformly, the quasi-symmetry operation exchanges 3d orbitals on subsets of inequivalent Co-sites selectively. A simplified example may be an incomplete mirror image [Fig. 1(a) and (b)], in which the mirror operation acts only on parts of the object but not the whole consistently.
Figure 2.
(a) Crystal structure of CoSi. Co and Si atoms are presented as red and blue spheres respectively. (b) Ab-initio-calculated band structure of CoSi around R-point. Here 1/2 denotes orbital character while +/- stands for the spin character of the band. (c) 3D view of all Fermi surfaces, which are centered around either R- or Γ- point of the Brilloiun zone. (d) 3D view of Fermi surfaces centered around R-point with a quadrant cut. (e) Quasi-symmetry and crystalline-symmetry protected degenerate planes. (f) The Berry curvature distribution of the 1–-band defined in (b) at different Fermi energy calculated from the model Hamiltonian Eq. (1).
CoSi crystallizes in a chiral cubic structure of space group P213 without an inversion center (Fig. 2). Recent studies revealed the existence of exceptionally long Fermi arcs which connect the sixfold and fourfold band degenerate points (9, 25–27). These two degenerate points correspond to two branches of Fermi surfaces located at at the Γ- and R-point, respectively, yet only the R-point pockets are observed in quantum oscillation experiments. Band structure calculations reveal four split bands due to spin-orbit coupling which correspond to four Fermi surfaces at R, which we label as 1+, 1−, 2+, 2−, representing the orbital and spin degree of freedom respectively. States at the boundary of the Brillouin zone are doubly degenerate due to crystalline symmetry, hence the non-degenerate Fermi surfaces are enforced to touch there (5). The spin-orbit coupling and the orbital gap are both small yet similar in magnitude, which explains how four slightly degenerate, interpenetrating spheroids make up a surprisingly rich internal structure of the Fermi surfaces.
CoSi single crystals resemble octahedra, indicating a dominant growth along the [111] direction (see supplement Sec.I.A. for growth details). These crystals were fabricated into microstructures using focused-ion-beam machining (28) (see supplement Sec.I.B.) to increase the current path homogeneity and signal of Shubnikov-de Haas oscillations. This microfabrication will later be the key to study the effects of unidirectional strain. The resistivity as well as the large residual resistivity ratio in the samples agrees well with previous bulk measurements (29), indicating an unchanged material quality during fabrication (see supplement Fig. S1). Hence not surprisingly, large quantum oscillations of the magnetoresistance are readily observed at low fields (Fig. 3). Subtracting a polynomial background uncovers strong oscillations that resemble a beating pattern of two frequencies around F1 ~ 550 T and F2 ~ 660 T, in good agreement with existing literature (29–32). The temperature dependence of the oscillations follows well the Lifshitz-Kosevich form, leading to a cyclotron effective mass of mc ~ 0.84 me (see supplement Fig. S14).
Figure 3.
(a) Temperature-dependent SdH oscillations with field and current applied along [100] axis. Here ρosc = Δρ/ρBG, with Δρ the oscillatory part of the magnetoresistivity, and ρBG the background obtained from a 3rd-order polynomial fit to the magnetoresistivity. (b) Fast-Fourier-transformation spectrum of the SdH oscillations presented in (a) with the field window of 3 to 14 T. Two main peaks, as well as their higher-harmonic components, can be clearly observed. The suppression of peak amplitude with increasing temperature is due to the thermal damping effect. (c) Fast-fourier-transformation (FFT) spectrum of angle-dependent quantum oscillations measured at T = 2 K. Here the magnetic field is rotated within (100) plane and the angle is defined between the field direction and [001] axis. (d) Summary of angular dependence of oscillation frequencies. Here the fitting is genereated by calculating the orbital area based on band structure calculations with taking extrem magnetic breakdown due to quasi-symmetry into account (see supplement). The near-perfect fitting clearly demonstrates that quasi-symmetry is the only option to explain the experimental results of nearly angle-independent oscillation frequencies.
In light of the complexity of self-intersecting Fermi surfaces it appears at first surprising that the quantum oscillation spectrum is tantalizingly simple, with only two frequences that, most importantly, only weakly depend on the direction of the applied magnetic field (Fig. 3). When magnetic quantum oscillations arise from such highly degenerate Fermi surfaces, the main question is which, if any, possible trajectories become quantum coherent. As the Fermi-surface is centered around the R-point, any orbit necessarily crosses the symmetry-enforced degeneracies at the Brillouin zone boundary multiple times. This has been argued to stabilize band degeneracies pinned to the Fermi level in this crystal structure (22, 32) on the planes of Brilloiun zone boundary [marked purple in Fig. 4(f)].
Figure 4.
(a) Scanning electron microscope image of CoSi microdevice. A long bar roughly along [110] direction with a 2.5 by 2.4 μm2 cross section is fabricated by FIB. (b) Illustration of tensile strain approximately along [110] which breaks the C2 rotational symmetry of the crystal structure. (c) SdH oscillations with both field and current applied along the fabricated bar direction at T = 50 mK. (d) Logarithmic-scaled FFT spectrum of SdH oscillations displayed in (c). The main peaks are always accompanied with satellite peaks up to the third harmonics. (e) Enlarged view of satellite peaks correspond to the 1st to 3rd harmonic oscillations. The red, purple and blue vertical lines correspond to the FFT spectrum produced by the fully symmetric, crystalline-symmetry-preserved and quasi-symmetry-preserved scenarios respectively. (f) Corresponding Landau orbits for three different scenarios. Here the colored area illustrates the orbital area difference compared to the fully-symmetric case, and the black crosses represent the degeneracies that are lifted in different scenarios. Only the quasi-symmetry-preserved scenario reproduces FFT peaks that match perfectly well with the experimental data.
Yet the orbits further intersect at low-symmetry points at which a gap must open [marked blue in Fig. 4(f)]. Neither the frequencies nor their angle dependence obtained from DFT calculations match the data if this gap is considered to separate the orbits via significant avoided-crossing. As the gap is small, the quasiparticle can tunnel across it continuing on the original trajectory, a phenomenon known as magnetic breakdown (33–36). Based on estimations of the gap from DFT and further analytical calculations, vanishingly small breakdown fields fall below 0.11 T for any field orientation, and hence the experimental data is always obtained in an extreme breakdown regime (see supplement Sec. V. for details). Thus the wavefunctions propagate through these points at near-perfect transmission, and indeed an excellent match of frequencies and their angle dispersion between theory and experiment is found (Fig. 3).
These observations raise a key question about the electronic structure, namely why in a metal with eV bandwidth two bands anti-cross with a gap no larger than 2 meV in extended regions of the Brillouin zone. To obtain such a parametrically small gap accidentally, an unreasonable degree of fine-tuning is required that acts simultaneously at many k-points, as well as at a wide range of energies as we will show. Instead, a quasi-symmetry enforces the uniform smallness of this gap, and thus explains why magnetic breakdown at full transparency occurs at any arbitrary angle.
To understand this quasi-symmetry, we next consider an effective model around the R-point. Without spin-orbit coupling (SOC), all the bands are eight-fold degenerate at R due to the combination of two-fold screw axis symmetries along the x and y direction and time reversal symmetry. Including spin doubles the degeneracy and the SOC splits the eight-fold degenerate states into six-fold and two-fold degenerate states at the R-point. An effective model for these eight bands around the R-point can be constructed as
| (1) |
where 𝓗0(k) = C0 + 2A1 (k · L) is the lower-order expansion of the spin-independent Hamiltonian, and three 4-by-4 matrices L form an emergent angular momentum algebra [Li, Lj] = iεijkLk with Levi-Civita symbol εijk and i, j, k = x, y, z. The SOC term is given by 𝓗soc = 2λ0(s · L), where s is the spin operator. 𝓗k2(k) is the higher-order spin-independent term with its form given in the supplement. Here 𝓗0(k) + 𝓗k2 (k) is the SOC-free expanded Hamiltonian to second order. By choosing appropriate parameters such as C0, A1, λ0, the energy dispersion of 𝓗R well reproduces that from the DFT calculations (see supplement Sec. VII.).
A striking feature in the Hamiltonian 𝓗R is that the SOC term 𝓗soc takes a similar form as the linear-momentum term, just by replacing the momentum k by spin s. This is because spin, as a pseudo-vector, behaves exactly the same as a vector due to the lack of inversion, mirror or other roto-inversion symmetries for a chiral crystal. Due to this similarity, up to the first-order perturbation, we find that the spin of the eigen-states is parallel or anti-parallel to the momentum k and thus we can label the spin states of these bands by ± in Fig. 2(b). We derive an effective Hamiltonian for the near degenerate bands. This can be done by first projecting the full Hamiltonian 𝓗R into the 4 closest bands (1± and 2± bands) to get a 4-band model and then constructing a 2-band model for the 1− and 2+ bands, as discussed in supplement. Up to the first-order perturbation, the 2-band Hamiltonian takes the form Heff = ϵ0 + dz(k)σz, where and the form of the function ϵ0 is given in supplement. Here σz is the Pauli matrix on the basis of 1− and 2+ bands, λ0 term comes from the SOC Hamiltonian 𝓗soc and the C̃ term from 𝓗k2(k). It is striking to see that the operator 𝓜eff = σz commutes with Heff and thus serves as an exact symmetry at the first-order expansion. The existence of 𝓜eff forbids any terms that are coupled to σx,y in the effective Hamiltonian, thus reducing the codimension of a two-level crossing from 3 to 1 and stabilizing a nodal plane, which is defined by the equation in this two-band model. A more accurate and complete description around the Fermi energy is the 4-band model, which shares a similar k-dependent hidden quasi-symmetry and is essential in deriving the 2-band model (see supplement Sec. VII.), and the whole perturbation theory reveals a striking hierarchy structure. Higher-order perturbation expansion breaks 𝓜eff through inducing additional terms coupled to σx,y in the effective model and thus leads to a small gap opening of this nodal plane (see supplement). Therefore, 𝓜eff is not a symmetry of the system, but an emergent quasi-symmetry in the sense of low-energy effective theory. Importantly, this curved nodal plane spans low-symmetry regions of the Brillouin zone, in contrast to symmetry-enforced exact degeneracies. It is this combined structure of symmetry and quasi-symmetry induced degeneracies that forms the basis of the complex structure of the Fermi surface centered at R, and reduces the complexity of the quantum orbits in magnetic fields to two, angle-independent frequencies.
Physically, quasi-symmetry is linked to the orbital structure of the wavefunctions, and its operation only interchanges the orbitals at different atomic sites (internal degrees). Thus, unlike crystalline symmetries, they remain robust against symmetry-breaking lattice distortions (Fig. 4). This is probed experimentally by the application of tensile strain to a bar cut approximately along the [110] direction. The low-symmetry distortion removes the critical screw symmetries at the zone boundaries, and gaps the otherwise symmetry protected crossing points. Experimentally, such strain can be easily applied by thinning the transport bar by FIB-milling, thus reducing its effective spring constant and increasing the total distortion under equal force. The microstructures are coupled to a sapphire substrate and their differential thermal contraction generates the desired tensile strain along the bar [see supplement and (37)]. As such strain lifts the screw symmetry protecting the degeneracy, one naturally expects the sample to gradually leave the magnetic breakdown regime as the strain in increased and a zoo of sum frequencies to emerge that correspond to all possible area differences between the orbits (34–36). Indeed, the strained bar exhibits pronounced satellite peaks that are symmetrically offset from the main peaks by ΔF ≈ 32 T for all harmonics. This matches exactly with the calculated area difference between the crystalline symmetry protected points, fully explaining the observed spectrum. However, those areas associated with a quasiparticle tunneling at a quasi-symmetry-protected point are not observed, implying that the magnetic breakdown field associated with that gap remains much smaller than the lowest field at which quantum oscillations are observed. This is a direct experimental proof that the quasi-symmetry protection is insensitive to breaking of crystalline symmetries, a notion that can be well corroborated by calculations (Fig. 4). This resilience clearly distinguishes symmetry and quasi-symmetry enforced topological band anomalies.
Their unique implications in the Berry curvature distribution in momentum space are another key characteristic of the topological character of near-degeneracies enforced by quasi-symmetry, compared to the exact degeneracies due to symmetry [Fig. 2(f)]. The Berry curvature almost vanishes in the vicinity of the exact degenerate plane, yet it is concentrated to a ring on the near nodal plane at any fixed energy. This large Berry curvature around the near nodal lines, which always occurs at the Fermi energy, may strongly affect physical phenomena that are related to local Berry curvature, including intrinsic spin Hall effect (38, 39) and quantum non-linear Hall effect (40).
The quasi-symmetry is the mathematical and physical framework behind the unexpectedly simple and strain-resistant quantum oscillation spectrum of CoSi. It is, however, just one example of a large class of materials in which quasi-symmetries can exist. Clearly, this new class of near degenerate manifolds at low-symmetry k-points is not found by current search programs for topological materials based on crystalline symmetry without further guideline. To search for materials with quasi-symmetries, a systematic expansion of the k · p-type effective Hamiltonian order by order is required for all space groups, which is in principle feasible (41). Typically, lower-order terms with higher symmetries than the crystalline symmetry itself possess larger prefactors than the higher-order terms with lower symmetries (42), and a symmetry hierarchy is expected for the terms of different orders in the k · p-type Hamiltonian. Further interesting flavors of quasi-symmetry may exist which emerge when higher-order terms with additional symmetries become dominant. Experimentally, we propose that quantum oscillations may provide guidance by pointing to materials with similarly extreme magnetic breakdown on extended regions on the Fermi surface, which a quasi-symmetry would naturally explain. While the here described search methods need to be implemented in the future, it is natural to anticipate quasi-symmetries in related compounds crystallizing in the same structure, such as e.g. PtGa, PtAl, RhSi and the magnetic MnSi where the influence of magnetism can be explored. (22, 43–51). Our DFT calculations indeed reveal similar energy dispersions and Fermi surface shapes with quasi-symmetry-induced near degeneracies in PtAl, PtGa and RhSi (see supplement Sec. VI.). The concept of the quasi-symmetry raises the interesting prospect that even those materials in which crystalline symmetries do not allow stable band crossings may still host exotic quasi-particles and strong Berry curvature at the Fermi level. If such features at the Fermi level are desired, the current approach of automated symmetry classifications may not prove to lead to the most practical materials. Without the necessity of a crystalline symmetry protecting higher-order band crossing points, quasi-symmetries hold an advantage for topological applications. The topological anomalies in real materials often are far away from the Fermi level, and in thin-film form they are exposed to mismatch strains inherent to heterostructures. These key bottlenecks of topological materials do not restrict quasi-symmetric materials. A consensus of high-throughput efforts emerges that 20-30% of materials are topological (52–55). Yet it appears that crystal symmetry may not hold up as the strict barrier it was thought to be, and via quasi-symmetries concepts, topology may reach even further than these estimates predict.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge Dr. Joerg Harms for the assistance on graphic design. This work was funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (MiTopMat - grant agreement No. 715730). This project received funding by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grants No. PP00P2_176789). C. X. Liu and L. H. Hu are supported by the Office of Naval Research (Grant No. N00014-18-1-2793) and Kaufman New Initiative research Grant No. KA2018-98553 of the Pittsburgh Foundation. K.M., and C.F. acknowledge the financial support from the European Research Council (ERC) Advanced Grant No. 742068 “TOP-MAT”; European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (Grant Nos. 824123 and 766566)and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) through SFB 1143. Additionally, K. M. acknowledges Max Plank Society for the funding support under Max Plank–India partner group project. B.A.B. thanks funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement no. 101020833). B.A.B. is also supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (Grant No. DE-SC0016239), and partially supported by the National Science Foundation (EAGER Grant No. DMR 1643312), a Simons Investigator grant (No. 404513), the Office of Naval Research (ONR Grant No. N00014-20-1-2303), the Packard Foundation, the Schmidt Fund for Innovative Research, the BSF Israel US foundation (Grant No. 2018226), the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation through Grant No. GBMF8685 towards the Princeton theory program, and a Guggenheim Fellowship from the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation. B.A.B. and C. X. Liu is supported by the NSF-MERSEC (Grant No. MERSEC DMR 2011750). B.A.B. gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Schmidt DataX Fund at Princeton University made possible through a major gift from the Schmidt Futures Foundation. B.A.B. received additional support from the Max Planck Society. Further support was provided by the NSF-MRSEC No. DMR-1420541, BSF Israel US foundation No. 2018226, and the Princeton Global Network Funds.
Footnotes
Author Contributions C.C. and L.H. contributes equally to this work. Crystals were synthesized and characterized by K.M., C.S. and C.F.. The experiment design, FIB microstructuring and the magnetotransport measurements were performed by C.G., C.P., J.D., X.H. and P.J.W.M.. L.H., C.L. and B.A.B. developed and applied the general theoretical framework, and the analysis of experimental results has been done by C.G. C.P. and P.J.W.M.. Band structures were calculated by Y.S. F.F. and C.F.. All authors were involved in writing the paper.
Competing Interests The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.
Methods
Data Availability
Data that support the findings of this study is deposited to Zendo with the access link: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6336000.
Code Availability
Matlab code used for this study is deposited to Zendo with the access link: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6336013.
References
- 1.Armitage NP, Mele EJ, Vishwanath A. Weyl and Dirac semimetals in three-dimensional solids. Rev Mod Phys. 2018;90:015001 [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lv BQ, Qian T, Ding H. Experimental perspective on three-dimensional topological semimetals. Rev Mod Phys. 2021;93:025002 [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wan XG, Turner AM, Vishwanath A, Savrasov SY. Topological semimetal and Fermi-arc surface states in the electronic structure of pyrochlore iridates. Phys Rev B. 2011;83:205101 [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wang Z, Alexandradinata A, Cava RJ, Bernevig BA. Hourglass fermions. Nature. 2016;532:189–194. doi: 10.1038/nature17410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bradlyn B, Cano J, Wang Z, Vergniory MG, Felser C, Cava RJ, Bernevig BA. Beyond Dirac and Weyl fermions: Unconventional quasiparticles in conventional crystals. Science. 2016;353:aaf5037. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf5037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Wang Z, Sun Y, Chen X-Q, Franchini C, Xu G, Weng H, Dai X, Fang Z. Dirac semimetal and topological phase transitions in A3Bi (A=Na, K, Rb) Phys Rev B. 2012;85:195320 [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wang Z, Weng H, Wu Q, Dai X, Fang Z. Three-dimensional Dirac semimetal and quantum transport in Cd3As2. Phys Rev B. 2013;88:125427 [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bian G, Chang T, Zheng H, Velury S, Xu S-Y, Neupert T, et al. Drumhead surface states and topological nodal-line fermions in TlTaSe2. Phys Rev B. 2016;93:121113 [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rao Z, Li H, Zhang T, Tian S, Li C, Fu B, et al. Observation of unconventional chiral fermions with long Fermi arcs in CoSi. Nature. 2019;567:496–499. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1031-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Moll PJW, Nair NL, Helm T, Potter AC, Kimchi I, Vishwanath A, Analytis JG. Transport evidence for Fermi-arc-mediated chirality transfer in the Dirac semimetal Cd3As2. Nature. 2016;535:266–270. doi: 10.1038/nature18276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zyuzin AA, Burkov AA. Topological response in Weyl semimetals and the chiral anomaly. Phys Rev B. 2012;86:115133 [Google Scholar]
- 12.Burkov AA. Chiral anomaly and transport in Weyl metals. J Condens Matter Phys. 2015;27:113201. doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/27/11/113201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Xiong J, Kushwaha SK, Liang T, Krizan JW, Hirschberger M, Wang W, et al. Evidence for the chiral anomaly in the Dirac semimetal Na3Bi. Science. 2015;350:413–416. doi: 10.1126/science.aac6089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Matsushita T, Fujimoto S, Schnyder AP. Topological piezoelectric effect and parity anomaly in nodal line semimetals. Phys Rev Research. 2020;2:043311 [Google Scholar]
- 15.Li Z, Jin Y-Q, Tohyama T, Iitaka T, Zhang J-X, Su H. Second harmonic generation in the Weyl semimetal TaAs from a quantum kinetic equation. Phys Rev B. 2018;97:085201 [Google Scholar]
- 16.Takasan K, Morimoto T, Orenstein J, Moore JE. Current-induced second harmonic generation in inversion-symmetric Dirac and Weyl semimetals. Phys Rev B. 2021;104:L161202 [Google Scholar]
- 17.Burkov AA. Giant planar Hall effect in topological metals. Phys Rev B. 2017;96:041110 [Google Scholar]
- 18.Liu E, Sun Y, Kumar N, Muechler L, Sun A, Jiao L, et al. Giant anomalous Hall effect in a ferromagnetic kagome-lattice semimetal. Nat Phys. 2018;14:1125–1131. doi: 10.1038/s41567-018-0234-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nakatsuji S, Kiyohara N, Higo T. Large anomalous Hall effect in a non-collinear antiferromagnet at room temperature. Nature. 2015;527:212–215. doi: 10.1038/nature15723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.von Neumann VJ, Wigner E. Uber merkwürdige diskrete Eigenwerte. Phys Z. 1929;30:291–293. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Murakami S, Iso S, Avishai Y, Onoda M, Nagaosa N. Tuning phase transition between quantum spin Hall and ordinary insulating phases. Phys Rev B. 2007;76:205304 [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wilde MA, Dodenhöft M, Niedermayr A, Bauer A, Hirschmann MM, Alpin K, et al. Symmetry-enforced topological nodal planes at the Fermi surface of a chiral magnet. Nature. 2021;594:374–379. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03543-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Konschuh S, Gmitra M, Fabian J. Tight-binding theory of the spin-orbit coupling in graphene. Phys Rev B. 2010;82:245412 [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sichau J, Prada M, Anlauf T, Lyon TJ, Bosnjak B, Tiemann L, Blick RH. Resonance Microwave Measurements of an Intrinsic Spin-Orbit Coupling Gap in Graphene: A Possible Indication of a Topological State. Phys Rev Lett. 2019;122:046403. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.046403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yuan QQ, Zhou L, Rao ZC, Tian S, Zhao WM, Xue CL, et al. Quasiparticle interference evidence of the topological Fermi arc states in chiral fermionic semimetal CoSi. Sci Adv. 2019;5:eaaw9485. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaw9485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sanchez DS, Belopolski I, Cochran TA, Xu X, Yin J-X, Chang GQ, et al. Topological chiral crystals with helicoid-arc quantum states. Nature. 2019;567:500–505. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1037-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fang C, Gilbert MJ, Dai X, Bernevig BA. Multi-Weyl topological semimetals stabilized by point group symmetry. Phys Rev Lett. 2012;108:266802. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.266802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Moll PJW. Focused Ion Beam Microstructuring of Quantum Matter. Annu Rev Condens Matter Phys. 2018;9:147–162. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Xu X, Wang X, Cochran TA, Sanchez DS, Chang G, Belopolski I, et al. Crystal growth and quantum oscillations in the topological chiral semimetal CoSi. Phys Rev B. 2019;100:045104 [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wu DS, Mi ZY, Li YJ, Wu W, Li PL, Song YT, et al. Single Crystal Growth and Magnetoresistivity of Topological Semimetal CoSi. Chin Phys Lett. 2019;36:077102 [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wang H, Xu S, Lu XQ, Wang XY, Zeng XY, Lin JF, et al. de Haas−van Alphen quantum oscillations and electronic structure in the large-Chern-number topological chiral semimetal CoSi. Phys Rev B. 2020;102:115129 [Google Scholar]
- 32.Huber N, Alpin K, Causer GL, Worch L, Bauer A, Benka G, et al. Network of topological nodal planes, multifold degeneracies, and Weyl points in CoSi. arXiv: 2107.02820. 2021 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.026401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Blount EI. Bloch Electrons in a Magnetic Field. Phys Rev. 1962;126:1636–1653. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Helm T, Kartsovnik MV, Proust C, Vignolle B, Putzke C, Kampert E, et al. Correlation between Fermi surface transformations and superconductivity in the electron-doped high-Tc superconductor Nd2−xCexCuO4. Phys Rev B. 2015;92:094501 [Google Scholar]
- 35.Honold MM, Harrison N, Nam M-S, Singleton J, Mielke CH, Kurmoo M, Day P. Magnetic breakdown in the high-field phase of the organic conductor α-(BEDT-TTF)2KHg(SCN)4. Synth Met. 1999;103:2093–2094. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Pezzini S, van Delft MR, Schoop LM, Lotsch BV, Carrington A, Katsnelson MI, Hussey NE, Wiedmann S, et al. Unconventional mass enhancement around the Dirac nodal loop in ZrSiS. Nat Phys. 2017;14:178–183. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bachmann MD, Ferguson GM, Theuss F, Meng T, Putzke C, Helm T, et al. Spatial control of heavy-fermion superconductivity in CeIrIn5. Science. 2019;366:221–226. doi: 10.1126/science.aao6640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sun Y, Zhang Y, Liu CX, Felser C, Yan B. Dirac nodal lines and induced spin Hall effect in metallic rutile oxides. Phys Rev B. 2017;95:235104 [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sun Y, Zhang Y, Felser C, Yan B. Strong intrinsic spin Hall effect in the TaAs family of Weyl semimetals. Phys Rev Lett. 2016;117:146403. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.146403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sodemann I, Fu L. Quantum Nonlinear Hall Effect Induced by Berry Curvature Dipole in Time-Reversal Invariant Materials. Phys Rev Lett. 2015;115:216806. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.216806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yu ZM, Zhang ZY, Liu GB, Wu WK, Li XP, Zhang RW, et al. Encyclopedia of emergent particles in three-dimensional crystals. Sci Bull. 2022;67:375–380. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2021.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Winkler R. Spin-Orbit Coupling Effects in Two-Dimensional Electron and Hole Systems. 2021. (Springer Tracts in Modern Physics). [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yao M, Manna K, Yang Q, Fedorov A, Voroshnin V, Schwarze BV, et al. Observation of giant spin-split Fermi-arc with maximal Chern number in the chiral topological semimetal PtGa. Nat Comms. 2020;11:2033. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15865-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ma JZ, Wu QS, Song M, Zhang S-N, Guedes EB, Ekahana SA, et al. Observation of a singular Weyl point surrounded by charged nodal walls in PtGa. Nat Comms. 2021;12:3994. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24289-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Xu S, Zhou L, Wang XY, Wang H, Lin JF, Zeng XY, Cheng P, Weng H, Xia TL. Quantum Oscillations and Electronic Structure in the Large-Chern-Number Topological Chiral Semimetal PtGa. Chin Phys Lett. 2020;37:107504 [Google Scholar]
- 46.Schröter NBM, Pei D, Vergniory MG, Sun Y, Manna K, de Juan F, et al. Chiral topological semimetal with multifold band crossings and long Fermi arcs. Nat Phys. 2019;15:759–765. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Schröter NBM, Stolz S, Manna K, de Juan F, Vergniory MG, Krieger JA, et al. Observation and control of maximal Chern numbers in a chiral topological semimetal. Science. 2020;369:179–183. doi: 10.1126/science.aaz3480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sessi P, Feng-ren F, Küster F, Manna K, Vergniory MG, et al. Handedness-dependent quasiparticle interference in the two enantiomers of the topological chiral semimetal PdGa. Nat Comms. 2020;11:3507. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17261-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Chang G, Xu SY, Wieder BJ, Sanchez DS, Huang SM, Belopolski I, et al. Unconventional chiral fermions and large topological Fermi arcs in RhSi. Phys Rev Lett. 2017;119:206401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.206401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Rees D, Manna K, Lu B, Morimoto T, Borrmann H, Felser C, et al. Helicity-dependent photocurrents in the chiral Weyl semimetal RhSi. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eaba0509. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba0509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Mühlbauer S, Binz B, Jonietz F, Pfleiderer C, Rosch A, Neubauer A, et al. Skyrmion Lattice in a Chiral Magnet. Science. 2009;323:915–919. doi: 10.1126/science.1166767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bradlyn B, Elcoro L, Cano J, Vergniory M, Wang Z, Felser C, Aroyo M, Bernevig BA. Topological quantum chemistry. Nature. 2017;547:298–305. doi: 10.1038/nature23268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zhang T, Jiang Y, Song Z, Huang H, He Y, Fang Z, Weng H, Fang C. Catalogue of topological electronic materials. Nature. 2019;566:475–479. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0944-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Vergniory MG, Elcoro L, Felser C, Bernevig BA, Wang Z. A complete catalogue of high-quality topological materials. Nature. 2019;566:480–485. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0954-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Tang F, Po HC, Vishwanath A, Wan XG. Comprehensive search for topological materials using symmetry indicators. Nature. 2019;566:486–489. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0937-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data that support the findings of this study is deposited to Zendo with the access link: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6336000.
Matlab code used for this study is deposited to Zendo with the access link: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6336013.




