Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 26.
Published in final edited form as: Matters Sel. 2016 Dec 29;2(12):201610000014. doi: 10.19185/matters.201610000014

Enhanced plasticity of mature granule cells reduces survival of newborn neurons in the adult mouse hippocampus

Felix B Kleine Borgmann 1,, Johannes Gräff 2, Isabelle M Mansuy 3, Nicolas Toni 4, Sebastian Jessberger 5,
PMCID: PMC7613637  EMSID: EMS146324  PMID: 36168317

Abstract

Dentate granule cells are born throughout life in the mammalian hippocampus. The integration of newborn neurons into the dentate circuit is activity-dependent, and structural data characterizing synapse formation suggested that the survival of adult-born granule cells is regulated by competition for synaptic partners. Here we tested this hypothesis by using a mouse model with genetically enhanced plasticity of mature granule cells through temporally controlled expression of a nuclear inhibitor of protein phosphatase 1 (NIPP1*). Using thymidine analogues and retrovirus-mediated cell labeling, we show that synaptic integration and subsequent survival of newborn neurons is decreased in NIPP1*-expressing mice, suggesting that newborn neurons compete with preexisting granule cells for stable integration. The data presented here provides experimental evidence for a long-standing hypothesis and suggest cellular competition as a key mechanism regulating the integration and survival of newborn granule cells in the adult mammalian hippocampus.

Keywords: Synaptic Integration, Synapses, Neurogenesis, Hippocampus, Synaptic Transmission

Introduction

Neural stem/progenitor cells (NSPCs) generate the vast majority of neurons in the brain during embryonic development. However, the neurogenic capacity of NSPCs does not end with birth as new neurons are born across the entire life-span in discrete areas of the mammalian brain [1]. One of these regions is the hippocampal dentate gyrus (DG) where NSPCs persist throughout life and continuously generate new granule cells, the principal neuronal subtype of the DG [2] [3]. Newborn neurons are critically involved in a number of hippocampus-dependent cognitive functions including behavioral pattern separation, forgetting, and mood regulation [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]. Moreover, failing or altered neurogenesis has been associated with several diseases such as major depression and epilepsy, suggesting that the addition of new neurons into the DG circuitry has translational relevance [9] [10] [11]. Similar to embryonic development, a surplus of neurons is initially generated in the adult brain. The survival and stable integration of new neurons appears to be regulated in a two-step process: whereas a substantial number of newborn neurons dies within the first days after their birth, there is a second phase of selection that occurs approximately 1-3 weeks after neuronal birth [12] [13] [14] [15]. Selection during this stage depends on N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor-mediated activity as conditional deletion of the GluN1 (NR1) subunit in newborn granule cells substantially decreases the number of surviving neurons [16]. During the phase of integration, newborn granule cells are highly excitable and remain so for approximately 6 weeks. This period of high cellular plasticity has been associated with unique functional properties of new neurons and may help new neurons to successfully integrate into the pre-existing circuit [17] [18] [19] [20] [21]. Indeed, it has been suggested that new neurons compete for synaptic partners allowing for stable integration and subsequent survival [22]. We here tested this hypothesis by examining whether the cell type-selective enhanced plasticity of mature granule cells affects integration and survival of newborn granule cells. Strikingly, we have found that enhancing the plasticity of the mature dentate granule cell circuit leads to decreased survival of newborn granule cells, providing experimental evidence that competition may be a critical component for the survival of newborn granule cells.

Neural stem/progenitor cells (NSPCs) generate the vast majority of neurons in the brain during embryonic development. However, the neurogenic capacity of NSPCs does not end with birth as new neurons are born across the entire life-span in discrete areas of the mammalian brain [1]. One of these regions is the hippocampal dentate gyrus (DG) where NSPCs persist throughout life and continuously generate new granule cells, the principal neuronal subtype of the DG [2] [3]. Newborn neurons are critically involved in a number of hippocampus-dependent cognitive functions including behavioral pattern separation, forgetting, and mood regulation [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]. Moreover, failing or altered neurogenesis has been associated with several diseases such as major depression and epilepsy, suggesting that the addition of new neurons into the DG circuitry has translational relevance [9] [10] [11]. Similar to embryonic development, a surplus of neurons is initially generated in the adult brain. The survival and stable integration of new neurons appears to be regulated in a two-step process: whereas a substantial number of newborn neurons dies within the first days after their birth, there is a second phase of selection that occurs approximately 1-3 weeks after neuronal birth [12] [13] [14] [15]. Selection during this stage depends on N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor-mediated activity as conditional deletion of the GluN1 (NR1) subunit in newborn granule cells substantially decreases the number of surviving neurons [16]. During the phase of integration, newborn granule cells are highly excitable and remain so for approximately 6 weeks. This period of high cellular plasticity has been associated with unique functional properties of new neurons and may help new neurons to successfully integrate into the pre-existing circuit [17] [18] [19] [20] [21]. Indeed, it has been suggested that new neurons compete for synaptic partners allowing for stable integration and subsequent survival [22]. We here tested this hypothesis by examining whether the cell type-selective enhanced plasticity of mature granule cells affects integration and survival of newborn granule cells. Strikingly, we have found that enhancing the plasticity of the mature dentate granule cell circuit leads to decreased survival of newborn granule cells, providing experimental evidence that competition may be a critical component for the survival of newborn granule cells.

Objective

We investigate the survival and morphology of newborn granule cells in the adult dentate gyrus in a model of enhanced plasticity of mature neurons to test the hypothesis that a mechanism of competition governs integration into the neuronal circuits.

Results & Discussion

Expression of a nuclear inhibitor of PP1 (NIPP1*) in mature granule cells

To test for evidence of activity dependent competition for survival between new neurons and pre-existing granule cells, we used a mouse model where the plasticity of mature granule cells is enhanced through transgenic expression of a constitutively active form of the nuclear inhibitor of protein phosphatase 1 (NIPP1*) [23] [24] [25] [26]. NIPP1* expression in mature granule cells has been previously shown to enhance synaptic plasticity of granule cells in the adult DG, leading, for example, to an increased amplitude of long-term potentiation (LTP) [25] [26]. To selectively direct NIPP1* expression to mature granule cells, we used a cell type specific approach where NIPP1* is expressed under the control of the CaMKIIα promoter and the reverse tetracycline (Tet)-controlled trans-activator 2 (CaMKIIα-driven rtTA2 x TetO-NIPP1*/EGFP; hereafter called tg-NIPP1*; Fig. 1A) [27] [25]. We found that the CaMKIIα promoter is not active in newborn granule cells expressing the microtubule-associated protein doublecortin (DCX) that is transiently expressed in newborn neurons but not in mature granule cells [28], and that transgene expression upon Doxycycline (DOX) treatment was highly selective in mature granule cells (NeuN+, DCX-) in the DG as measured by expression of EGFP fused to NIPP1* (Fig. 1A, and data not shown). Thus, transgenic NIPP1* expression within the DG is restricted to mature granule cells past the expression stage of DCX [28] making this model suitable for testing the effects of enhanced mature granule cell plasticity on NSPC proliferation, fate determination, and stable integration of newborn neurons.

Figure 1. (A-C) CaMKII-driven NIPP1* expression in mature granule cells does not affect NSPC proliferation.

Figure 1

(A) Genetic approach for conditional, DOX-regulated expression of NIPP1* in mature granule cells. Note that transgene-expressed nuclear GFP (green) is not expressed in newborn, DCX-expressing cells (red, arrows). Scale bar represents 20 μm. (B) Number of proliferating, BrdU-labeled cells (green) is not changed upon DOX treatment in control mice (upper panel) compared to DOX-tg-NIPP1* mice (lower panel). Graphs show quantification. Scale bar represents 50 μm. (C) NIPP1* expression in mature granule cells does not affect early survival and neuronal fate choice as measured using IdU injections 1 week before analysis (shown is an example of an IdU-labeled (red), Prox1-positive (green) cell) in control compared to DOX-tg-NIPP1* mice. Scale bar represents 5 μm. Graphs show quantification.

(D-E) Enhanced plasticity of the mature granule cell circuit impairs survival of newborn neurons. (D) The number of newborn neurons expressing DCX (red) is reduced in DOX-tg-NIPP1* mice (right panel) compared to control mice (left panel). Graphs show quantification of DCX-labeled cells per DG. Scale bar represents 20 μm. (E) The number of newborn neurons, labeled with CldU (red) and expressing NeuN (green), is also reduced as measured using CldU injections 3 weeks before analyses in DOX-tg-NIPP1* mice (lower panel) compared to control mice (upper panel). Scale bar represents 50 μm. Graphs show quantification of CldU-labeled cells per DG. * p <0.05.

(F-H) NIPP1* expression in mature granule cells impairs integration of new-born neurons. (F) Reduced dendritic complexity of newborn neurons 3 weeks after birth that were labeled by retrovirus-based GFP expression (green) in DOX-tg-NIPP1* mice (right panel) compared to control mice (left panel). Scale bar represents 20 μm. Graphs show quantification of dendritic length (left) and branching points (right). (G) Number of spines as measured per μm dendritic length is not altered in DOX-tg-NIPP1* mice (right panel) compared to the control mice (left panel). Scale bar represents 5 μm. Graphs show quantification. (H) Neurons born in the DOX-tg-NIPP1* mice are capable of forming MSBs as analyzed using FIB-SEM. Upper panels show the 3D view of 3 week old newborn neurons identified by viral labeling. Lower image shows 3D reconstruction of a MSB formed by a newborn neuron (green) and an unlabeled granule cell (red) that form a synapse onto an axon (yellow). Scale bar represents 500 nm. **p <0.01, ***p <0.001.

Tg-NIPP1* expression in mature granule cells does not affect NSPC proliferation

As previous reports suggested that NSPC proliferation is regulated by neuronal activity [29] [30] [31], we first analyzed if NSPC proliferation is affected upon tg-NIPP1* expression. We compared DOX-fed tg-NIPP1* mice with their single transgenic (lacking the TetO-NIPP1*/EGFP transgene) and non-DOX-fed tg-NIPP1* littermates as controls. Non-DOX-fed single as well as double transgenic mice and DOX-fed single and double transgenic mice were analyzed separately to exclude leakiness of the transgene expression and to test for a potential influence of DOX alone. We did not observe significant differences in the rate of proliferation and number of newborn neurons as measured using DCX expression and thymidine analogue labeling (BrdU, CldU, and IdU) between any of the control groups in any experiment (Suppl. Fig. 1A, B). Upon 2 weeks of DOX treatment, NSPC proliferation was analyzed using a single BrdU pulse (Fig. 1B) 14 h prior to killing the animals. Using this approach, we observed no significant difference between DOX-fed tg-NIPP1* and their respective controls (Con: 1332 ± 145; DOX-tg-NIPP1*: 1340 ± 125 BrdU+ cells per DG, n.s). We next analyzed if tg-NIPP1* expression affects early neuronal cell death or fate specification of newborn cells. Using the thymidine analogue IdU, we labeled cells 1 week prior to analyses and found no difference between tg-NIPP1* mice and respective controls (Fig. 1C) (Con: 1184 ± 163; DOX-tg-NIPP1*: 1138 ± 122 IdU+ cells per DG, n.s.). In addition, we found that virtually all IdU-labeled cells expressed the neuronal markers DCX and Prox1 (Fig. 1C, and data not shown), suggesting that fate determination and differentiation of newborn neurons is not affected in DOX-tg-NIPP1* mice.

Enhanced plasticity of the mature granule cell circuit impairs survival of newborn neurons

We then tested if the total number of immature neurons in tg-NIPP1* mice is affected upon DOX treatment. DCX starts to be expressed in late dividing NSPCs and expression lasts for approximately 3 weeks after neuronal birth [32] [28]. Strikingly, the number of DCX-expressing cells was substantially reduced in DOX-tg-NIPP1* mice (Con: 13182 ± 662.2; DOX-tg-NIPP1* 9810 ± 828.8 DCX+ cells per DG, p <0.05), indicating a loss of immature neurons at later stages when activity dependent survival occurs (Fig. 1D) [16]. We used a complementary approach to confirm the loss of new neurons based on DCX analyses and injected the thymidine analogue CldU in DOX-tg-NIPP1* mice and respective controls. Animals were killed 3 weeks later and the number of CldU+ cells analyzed. Corroborating the DCX results, we found a significant drop in CldU-labeled cells in DOX-tg-NIPP1* mice compared to controls (Con: 808 ± 100 control; DOX-tg-NIPP1*: 465 ± 101 CldU+ cells per DG, p <0.05) (Fig. 1E). Interestingly, these results suggest that neuronal loss occurs around the time when newborn neurons start to form dendritic spines and excitatory synapses [33] [22] suggesting that synaptic competition, impaired by enhanced plasticity of the mature granule circuit through NIPP1* expression, may be critical for stable integration into the DG network.

Reduced dendritic complexity in newborn neurons in tg-NIPP1* mice

We next analyzed if the length and branching of newborn neurons are affected in DOX-tg-NIPP1* mice, using these measures as a proxy for neuronal integration [34]. To analyze the morphology of newborn neurons, we injected retroviruses expressing GFP under chicken beta-actin promoter stereotactically into the DG of control and tg-NIPP1* mice and killed the animals 3 weeks later [33]. Using this approach, we found that dendritic length was significantly reduced in DOX-tg-NIPP1* mice compared to controls (Fig. 1F) (Con: 476.8 μm ± 18.5; DOX-tg-NIPP1*: 368.1 μm ± 22.8 average dendritic length, p <0.001). Further, dendrites extending from neurons born in DOX-tg-NIPP1* mice had substantially fewer branches compared to controls (Fig. 1F) (Con: 8.43 ± 0.52; DOX-tg-NIPP1*: 6.14 ± 0.35, branch points per neuron, p <0.01). In contrast, we found that axonal growth into area CA3, which is reached by axons extending from newborn neurons before first spines are formed [33] was not altered in DOX-tg-NIPP1* mice (Suppl. Fig. 2) (Con: 1122.74 ± 91.73 μm; DOX-tg-NIPP1* 1225.73 ± 42.36 μm, n.s.). After finding that dendrites extending from newborn neurons in DOX-tg-NIPP1* were shorter and less complex, we next analyzed the number of dendritic spines, the main place for excitatory synapses of excitatory neurons, in DOX-tg-NIPP1* and control mice (Fig. 1G). On the dendritic segments analyzed, the number of spines per μm dendrite was similar between groups (Con: 0.469 ± 0.04; DOX-tg-NIPP1*: 0.423 ± 0.02 spines/μm, n.s.) (Fig. 1G [22]). Furthermore, the subtype of spines did not differ between DOX-tg-NIPP1* and control mice (Con: 0.761 ± 0.07; DOX-tg-NIPP1*: 0.898 ± 0.07 mushroom spines/μm; Con: 0.136 ± 0.01; DOX-tg-NIPP1*: 0.105 ± 0.09 stubby spines/μm; Con: 0.256 ± 0.03; DOX-tg-NIPP1*: 0.227 ± 0.02 thin spines/μm, n.s.). However, given that dendrites are shorter in DOX-tg-NIPP1* mice, we reasoned that despite similar spine density the total number of excitatory inputs is reduced per newborn neuron in DOX-tg-NIPP1* mice compared to controls. To estimate the number of spines per cell, we multiplied spines per μm with the calculated dendritic length. It has to be considered, however, that spines are not uniformly distributed on the dendrites; so any calculations can only be a rough estimation (e.g., within the granule cell layer (GCL), only few spines are formed). Given that dendrites are substantially longer in controls than in DOX-tg-NIPP1* mice, we estimated a reduction of synaptic input of approximately 50% of newborn neurons in DOX-tg-NIPP1* compared to controls (195.7 in control, 130.6 in DOX-tg-NIPP1* calculated spines per cell). Next, we analyzed synapse formation of new neurons in DOX-tg-NIPP1* on the ultrastructural level [22]. Again, we used retroviruses expressing GFP to label newborn neurons in DOX-tg-NIPP1* mice and controls. Synapse formation was analyzed 3 weeks after stereotactic injection of retroviruses and after immunhistochemical conversion of the GFP signal into osmiophilic DAB precipitate. We then used focused ion beam scanning (FIBS)- electron microscopy (EM) to reconstruct spines and their environment in 3-dimensions (n = 1 mouse per genotype). In total, we analyzed 73.2 μm of 2 dendrites containing 36 synapses in DOX-tg-NIPP1* (n = 1). Using this approach, we found that spines of newborn neurons in DOX-tg-NIPP1* mice formed synapses with visible postsynaptic densities, indicating functional connectivity, and engaged in multiple synapse boutons (MSBs), suggesting that synapse formation is not fundamentally altered in DOX-tg-NIPP1* mice (Fig. 1H) [22].

We used a genetic approach to test if the survival of new neurons in the adult DG is influenced by the plasticity of the mature granule cell circuit. Strikingly, we found that dendritic integration and subsequent survival of newborn granule is impaired with enhanced plasticity of the mature granule cell circuit, suggesting that competition for synaptic integration is critical in regulating the survival of new neurons. New neurons need to receive synaptic input for their survival, and structural data suggested that filopodia extending from dendrites of newborn neurons initially grow towards existing synapses between mature granule cells and presynaptic axons in the perforant path originating from neurons in the entorhinal cortex, leading to the formation of MSBs [16] [22]. With time, MSBs are then presumably exchanged by single synapse boutons (SSBs) suggesting that new neurons that successfully compete for synaptic partners stably integrate [22]. The survival of newborn neurons can be enhanced, for example, by environmental enrichment that appears to enhance excitability in the DG circuit [35] [36]. Similarly, the reduced survival of new neurons lacking the GluN1 subunit of the NMDA receptor can be partially rescued by global blockade of NMDA-dependent activity [16]. However, characterizing a potential competition by manipulating the balance of excitability selectively between new and mature granule cells had not been tested experimentally. We achieved this by cell type-specific expression of NIPP1* in mature granule cells and found that enhancing plasticity of the mature granule cell circuit [24] [25] impairs the survival of newborn granule cells. The growth of dendrites extending from newborn granule cells was substantially impaired in NIPP1*-expressing mice, whereas synapse formation appeared to be unaltered as analyzed using conventional light microscopy and electron microscopy. This led to a strongly reduced number of dendritic spines of newborn neurons, suggesting that their overall excitatory synaptic input is decreased. Since the transgene is expressed in all CaMKII-expressing cells, including those of the entorhinal cortex, we cannot exclude an effect of more globally changed activity of neuronal circuits. Without longitudinal imaging of synapse formation, which is currently technically not feasible at the required resolution, it cannot be proven that new neurons fail to survive due to impaired synaptic competition. However, our data strongly supports the hypothesis that new neurons need to compete for synaptic partners to ensure proper integration and survival [22]. Interestingly, it has been shown that during the first 3−6 weeks after their birth, new granule cells are highly excitable and show a higher degree of plasticity compared to mature granule cells [17] [18] [19] [21]. This unique feature has been attributed to their special functional properties with emerging evidence supporting the idea that adult neurogenesis in the DG is not a process for mere cell replacement but that new neurons exert their function at least partially due to these special properties [37] [38] [39]. However, it is also reasonable to speculate that the phase of heightened excitability may also be important to ensure the integration of new neurons, giving them a competitive advantage to form synapses with axons arising from the entorhinal cortex. Our data supports this idea by showing that the survival of new neurons is impaired with increased plasticity of the mature granule cell circuit, whereas NSPC proliferation and initial steps of fate determination and specification are unaltered. Thus, we here experimentally support a long-standing hypothesis, indicating that synaptic competition represents a key mechanism regulating the integration and survival of newborn granule cells in the adult mammalian hippocampus.

Limitations

We used a single mouse model of enhanced plasticity with wildtype littermate controls. While, we interpret our data as a strong suggestion of a competitive mechanism at work, additional studies using different models and approaches are needed to prove that the effects observed are not specific to the model. In our model, the transgene is expressed under the control of the CaMKIIα promoter, which is active in all forebrain neurons. It is possible that, next to the effect of the immediate environment, other changes inherent to the transgene also affect neuronal integration and morphology. One immediate effect on newborn granule cells may be altered input by medial entorhinal cortex cells, the primary input of the hippocampus.

Supplementary Material

Suppl. Fig.

Acknowledgements

We thank Anne Greet Bittermann for outstanding help with FIBS-EM (ScopeM, ETH Zurich), D. Chichung Lie for critical comments on the manuscript, Thomas R. Simon for programming the tool used for spine analyses, and the ZMB (UZH) and ScopeM for help with imaging.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the EMBO Young Investigator program and the Swiss National Science Foundation (BSCGI0_157859; 31003A_156943) (to SJ).

Footnotes

Ethics Statement

All animal experiments were done according to the guidelines of and approved by the veterinary office of the Canton of Zürich, Switzerland.

Triple Blind Peer Review

The handling editor, the reviewers, and the authors are all blinded during the review process.

Full Open Access

Supported by the Velux Foundation, the University of Zurich, and the EPFL School of Life Sciences.

Contributor Information

Felix B Kleine Borgmann, Laboratory of Neural Plasticity, Brain Research Institute, University of Zurich, Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, University of Luxembourg.

Johannes Gräff, Brain Research Institute, Laboratory of Neuroepigenetics, University of Zurich and Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Department of Fundamental Neuroscience, University of Lausanne.

Isabelle M Mansuy, Laboratory of Neuroepigenetics, Brain Research Institute, University of Zurich and Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich.

Nicolas Toni, Departement des neurosciences fondamentales, Universite de Lausanne.

Sebastian Jessberger, Laboratory of Neural Plasticity, Brain Research Institute, University of Zurich.

Citations

  • [1].Zhao Chunmei, Deng Wei, Gage Fred H. Mechanisms and Functional Implications of Adult Neurogenesis. Cell. 2008 Feb;132(4):645–660. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Kuhn, et al. Neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of the adult rat: age-related decrease of neuronal progenitor proliferation. Journal of Neuroscience. 1996;16(6):2027–2033. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-06-02027.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Spalding Kirsty L, et al. Dynamics of Hippocampal Neurogenesis in Adult Humans. Cell. 2013 June;153(6):1219–1227. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].David Dupret, et al. Spatial Relational Memory Requires Hippocampal Adult Neurogenesis. PLOS ONE. 2008 Apr;3(4):e1959. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Clelland CD, et al. A Functional Role for Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis in Spatial Pattern Separation. Science. 2009 July;325(5937):210–213. doi: 10.1126/science.1173215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Amar Sahay, et al. Increasing adult hippocampal neurogenesis is sufficient to improve pattern separation. Nature. 2011 Apr;472(7344):466–470. doi: 10.1038/nature09817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Snyder Jason S, et al. Adult hippocampal neurogenesis buffers stress responses and depressive behaviour. Nature. 2011 Aug;476(7361):458–461. doi: 10.1038/nature10287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Akers KG, et al. Hippocampal Neurogenesis Regulates Forgetting During Adulthood and Infancy. Science. 2014 May;344(6184):598–602. doi: 10.1126/science.1248903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Parent, et al. Dentate Granule Cell Neurogenesis Is Increased by Seizures and Contributes to Aberrant Network Reorganization in the Adult Rat Hippocampus. Journal ofNeuroscience. 1997;17:3727–3738. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-10-03727.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Santarelli Luca, et al. Requirement of Hippocampal Neurogenesis for the Behavioral Effects of Antidepressants. Science. 2003 Aug;301(5634):805–809. doi: 10.1126/science.1083328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Jessberger Sebastian, Gage Fred H. Adult neurogenesis: bridging the gap between mice and humans. Trends in Cell Biology. 2014 Oct;24(10):558–563. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2014.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Kempermann Gerd, et al. Early determination and long-term persistence of adult-generated new neurons in the hippocampus of mice. Development. 2003 Jan;130(2):391–399. doi: 10.1242/dev.00203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Ayumu Tashiro, Hiroshi Makino, Gage Fred H. Experience-Specific Functional Modification of the Dentate Gyrus through Adult Neurogenesis: A Critical Period during an Immature Stage. Journal of Neuroscience. 2007 Mar;27(12):3252–3259. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.4941-06.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Amanda Sierra, et al. Microglia Shape Adult Hippocampal Neurogenesis through Apoptosis-Coupled Phagocytosis. Cell Stem Cell. 2010 Oct;7(4):483–495. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.08.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Zhenjie Lu, et al. Phagocytic activity of neuronal progenitors regulates adult neurogenesis. Nature Cell Biology. 2011 July;13(9):1076–1083. doi: 10.1038/ncb2299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Ayumu Tashiro, et al. NMDA-receptor-mediated, cell-specific integration of new neurons in adult dentate gyrus. Nature. 2006 Aug;442(7105):929–933. doi: 10.1038/nature05028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Christoph Schmidt-Hieber, Peter Jonas, Josef Bischofberger. Enhanced synaptic plasticity in newly generated granule cells of the adult hippocampus. Nature. 2004 Apr;429(6988):184–187. doi: 10.1038/nature02553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Shaoyu Ge, et al. A Critical Period for Enhanced Synaptic Plasticity in Newly Generated Neurons of the Adult Brain. Neuron. 2007 May;54(4):559–566. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Marin-Burgin A, et al. Unique Processing During a Period of High Excitation/Inhibition Balance in Adult-Born Neurons. Science. 2012 Jan;335(6073):1238–1242. doi: 10.1126/science.1214956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Dieni CV, et al. Distinct Determinants of Sparse Activation during Granule Cell Maturation. Journal of Neuroscience. 2013 Dec;33(49):19131–19142. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.2289-13.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Brunner Janos, et al. Adult-born granule cells mature through two functionally distinct states. eLife. 2014 July;3:e03104. doi: 10.7554/elife.03104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Nicolas Toni, et al. Synapse formation on neurons born in the adult hippocampus. Nature Neuroscience. 2007 May;10(6):727–734. doi: 10.1038/nn1908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Wade Morishita, et al. Regulation of Synaptic Strength by Protein Phosphatase 1. Neuron. 2001 Dec;32(6):1133–1148. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00554-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].David Genoux, et al. Protein phosphatase 1 is a molecular constraint on learning and memory. Nature. 2002 Aug;418(6901):970–975. doi: 10.1038/nature00928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Koshibu K, et al. Protein Phosphatase 1 Regulates the Histone Code for Long-Term Memory. Journal of Neuroscience. 2009 Oct;29(41):13079–13089. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.3610-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Graff J, et al. Protein phosphatase 1-dependent transcriptional programs for long-term memory and plasticity. Learning and Memory. 2010 June;17(7):355–363. doi: 10.1101/lm.1766510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Gossen M, Bujard H. Tight control of gene expression in mammalian cells by tetracycline-responsive promoters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1992 June;89(12):5547–5551. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.12.5547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Plumpe, et al. Variability of doublecortin-associated dendrite maturation in adult hippocampal neurogenesis is independent of the regulation of precursor cell proliferation. BMC Neuroscience. 2006;7:77. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-7-77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Karl Deisseroth, Malenka Robert C. GABA Excitation in the Adult Brain: A Mechanism for Excitation- Neurogenesis Coupling. Neuron. 2005 Sept;47(6):775–777. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.08.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Juan Song, et al. Neuronal circuitry mechanism regulating adult quiescent neural stem-cell fate decision. Nature. 2012 July;489(7414):150–154. doi: 10.1038/nature11306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Song Juan, et al. Parvalbumin interneurons mediate neuronal circuitry-neurogenesis coupling in the adult hippocampus. Nature Neuroscience. 2013 Nov;16(12):1728–1730. doi: 10.1038/nn.3572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Kempermann Gerd, et al. Milestones of neuronal development in the adult hippocampus. Trends in Neurosciences. 2004 Aug;27(8):447–452. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2004.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Chunmei Zhao, et al. Distinct Morphological Stages of Dentate Granule Neuron Maturation in the Adult Mouse Hippocampus. Journal of Neuroscience. 2006 Jan;26(1):3–11. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.3648-05.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Sophie Tronel, et al. Spatial learning sculpts the dendritic arbor of adult-born hippocampal neurons. Proceedings ofthe National Academy of Sciences. 2010 Apr;107(17):7963–7968. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914613107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Kempermann Gerd, Kuhn Georg H, Gage Fred H. More hippocampal neurons in adult mice living in an enriched environment. Nature. 1997 Apr;386(6624):493–495. doi: 10.1038/386493a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Eckert Michael J, Abraham Wickliffe C. Physiological effects of enriched environment exposure and LTP induction in the hippocampus in vivo do not transfer faithfully to in vitro slices. Learning and Memory. 2010 Sept;17(10):480–484. doi: 10.1101/lm.1822610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Aimone James B, Wei Deng, Gage Fred H. Resolving New Memories: A Critical Look at the Dentate Gyrus, Adult Neurogenesis, and Pattern Separation. Neuron. 2011 May;70(4):589–596. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Amar Sahay, Wilson Donald A, Rene Hen. Pattern Separation: A Common Function for New Neurons in Hippocampus and Olfactory Bulb. Neuron. 2011 May;70(4):582–588. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Wei Deng, Mark Mayford, Gage Fred H. Selection of distinct populations of dentate granule cells in response to inputs as a mechanism for pattern separation in mice. eLife. 2013 Mar;2:e00312. doi: 10.7554/elife.00312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Kleine Borgmann FB, Bracko O, Jessberger S. Imaging neurite development of adult-born granule cells. Development. 2013 May;140(13):2823–2827. doi: 10.1242/dev.091249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Vega Christopher J, Peterson Daniel A. Stem cell proliferative history in tissue revealed by temporal halogenated thymidine analog discrimination. Nature Methods. 2005 Feb;2(3):167–169. doi: 10.1038/nmeth741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Meijering, et al. Design and validation of a tool for neurite tracing and analysis in fluorescence microscopy images. Cytometry Part A. 2004;58A(2):167–176. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.20022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Dani Dumitriu, Alfredo Rodriguez, Morrison John H. High-throughput, detailed, cell-specific neuroanatomy of dendritic spines using microinjection and confocal microscopy. Nature Protocols. 2011 Aug;6(9):1391–1411. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2011.389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Johannes Schindelin, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods. 2012 June;9(7):676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Suppl. Fig.

RESOURCES