Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Tob Control. 2021 Nov 17;32(e1):e121–e124. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-057005

The profile of menthol cigarette smokers in the months following the removal of these products from the market: a cross-sectional population survey in England

Loren Kock 1,2,, Lion Shahab 1,2, Ilze Bogdanovica 2,3, Jamie Brown 1,2
PMCID: PMC7614336  EMSID: EMS140494  PMID: 34789541

Abstract

Introduction

In May 2020 the EU Tobacco Products Directive ban on the sale of menthol cigarettes was implemented in England. This study examined the prevalence of menthol cigarette smoking after the ban, according to sociodemographic and smoking characteristics.

Methods

Cross-sectional data came from a representative survey of current smokers (18+) in England (unweighted n=2,681) between July/2020 and June/2021. The weighted prevalence of menthol cigarette smoking as a proportion of total cigarette smoking was calculated, log-binomial regression explored trends over time, and chi-squared statistics assessed the relationship between menthol smoking, sociodemographic and smoking characteristics. Sources of purchase of menthol cigarettes were explored.

Results

Between July 2020 and June 2021, 15.7% (95%CI 14.5-17.1) of smokers reported smoking menthol cigarettes. The fitted non-linear trend supported no initial change followed by a possible reduction across April-June 2021 and fit the data better than linear and null (no change) models (χ2(2)=2519.7, P=0.06; χ2(3)=2519.7, P=0.006). Menthol cigarette smoking was more common among younger groups (16-24=25.2%; 25-34=19.9%) and women (19.4%). Menthol cigarette smokers showed lower cigarette dependence compared with other smokers. Past six-month purchases of menthol cigarettes from any illicit or cross-border source declined from 30.1% in the last 6 months of 2020 to 17.5% in the first 6 months of 2021.

Conclusions

A substantial minority of current smokers in England reported menthol cigarette smoking between July/2020 and June/2021, despite the ban, possibly reflecting mitigation of restrictions by a variety of licit means, such as legal menthol accessories. The reduction in menthol smoking across April-June 2021 warrants further monitoring.

Keywords: Tobacco, smoking, menthol, flavours, ban

Introduction

In May 2016 the European Union Tobacco Products Directive (TPD) ban on sales of cigarettes with a characterising flavour (smell or taste other than of tobacco), including menthol, was written into UK law. Following a transitional period to allow manufacturers to prepare for this ban, it was implemented in May 2020 (1). The legislation applies specifically to cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco. Menthol accessories that are sold in separate packaging to tobacco or cigarettes are exempt, as are cigars, cigarillos, pipe tobacco and cigarettes not labelled as menthol, but which contain menthol at low levels to reduce the negative sensory effects of smoking (2).

In Europe, pre-ban data on adult smokers from eight countries indicated that compared with other groups, menthol cigarette smoking prevalence was higher among younger people, women and more socio-economically advantaged (3). The country with the highest prevalence of menthol smokers was England, where 12.4% of adult smokers in 2016 were reported to smoke menthol cigarettes (3). Apart from England and Poland (10.2%), menthol smoking was comparably low in other surveyed countries such as Spain (0.4%), Germany (2.1%) and the Netherlands (6.5%).

Mentholated cigarettes are associated with increased dependence and progression to regular cigarette smoking, and lower likelihood of smoking cessation (4,5). By restricting their availability, it is hoped that the menthol ban will reduce smoking initiation (6) and increase the overall population smoking cessation rate (7). However, tobacco companies have exploited exemptions from the legislation by developing menthol filter tips for roll-your-own tobacco, flavour cards that can be inserted into packs of factory-made cigarettes or roll-your-own tobacco(1), and low-level menthol cigarettes (8).

Using data collected following implementation of the cigarette flavour ban in England, this study addressed the following research questions among current smokers:

  • 1)

    What was the proportion of menthol cigarette use between July 2020-June 2021, and did it vary over the time-period?

  • 2)

    What were the sociodemographic and smoking and quitting characteristics (dependence and motivation to stop smoking) of menthol cigarette smokers?

  • 3)

    What were the sources of purchase of menthol cigarettes and did this change over the time-period?

Methods

Study design and participants

Data come from adults (≥18 years) in the Smoking Toolkit Study (STS), collected between July 2020 (the first month in which questions on menthol cigarettes were added to the STS following the TPD ban) and June 2021. The STS is a monthly repeated cross-sectional survey of a representative sample of ~1,700 adults in England. The use of monthly data allowed us to be sensitivity to short term changes in the pattern and trend of menthol smoking in the short-term period following the ban. Further details on the STS, including sampling and weighting techniques are described elsewhere (9).

Measures

Menthol cigarette smoking

Current smokers (including hand-rolled – see supplementary materials) were asked:

“Cigarettes can be sold in different flavours. They can also be flavoured by capsules, filter tips, cards inserted into a packet or flavoured rolling papers. How would you describe the flavour of the cigarettes you usually smoke?”

  • 1)

    Just tobacco

  • 2)

    Tobacco and menthol

  • 3)

    Tobacco and some other flavour

  • 4)

    Refused

  • 5)

    Don’t know

Respondents who answered with option 1 above were categorised as just tobacco smokers. Those who answered with option 2 were categorised as menthol smokers. Answers of 3 were categorised as other flavour smokers. Those responding with 4 or 5 were excluded (1.3%).

Smoking characteristics

Motivation to stop smoking was assessed using the Motivation To Stop Scale (10) and cigarette dependence questions from the Heaviness of Smoking Index (11) (see supplementary material).

Socio-demographic covariates

The sociodemographic characteristics age, gender, occupational social grade and ethnicity were included (see supplementary materials).

Source of purchase

Data on the source of purchase of menthol cigarettes in the past six months were also collected (see supplementary materials).

Analysis

The weighted proportion of menthol cigarette use was calculated each month according to smoking and socio-demographic characteristics. Chi-squared statistics were used to describe the strength of the relationship between menthol cigarette smoking status and the specified variables. Cramer’s V was used as an effect size. To explore potential trends a weighted univariate log-binomial model was fitted for the proportion of smokers who smoke menthol cigarettes as a function of time (months). To allow for non-linear trends, time was modelled using a natural cubic spline with 2 internal knots, each placed at the 33rd and 66th quantiles of the data (12). The fit of this non-linear model was compared with linear and null (no change) models, respectively.

The prevalence of each source of purchase of menthol cigarettes was summarised for July-December 2020 and January-June 2021. These months were collapsed because source of purchase data reflects self-reported purchase in the past six months, with January 2021 onwards therefore representing a retrospective period after the ban was implemented.

Missing data on variables are reported in Table S2. The STROBE reporting guideline were used in the design and reporting of this study (13).

Sensitivity analysis

To explore changes in illicit or cross-border sources of purchase of menthol cigarettes, a sensitivity analysis compared illicit or cross-border sources of purchase (in the past six months) during July-December 2020 and January-June 2021 (see supplementary materials).

All analyses were carried out in R version 4.0.3.

Results

A weighted total of 2,908 smokers (mean (SE) age = 42.1 (0.34); 47% women) completed the survey between July 2020-June 2021. Overall monthly cigarette smoking prevalence across the sampled period remained relatively stable at around 14-15% (Table S1). Of current smokers, 15.7% (95% CI 14.5%-17.1%) smoked menthol cigarettes between July 2020 to June 2021 (Figure 1A). The fitted non-linear trend supported no change followed by a possible reduction across April-June 2021 and fit the data better than linear and null (no change) models (Figure 1B).

Figure 1. A) Proportion of smokers who smoke just tobacco, tobacco and menthol or tobacco and other flavour cigarettes and B) fitted non-linear and linear trends in the proportion of menthol cigarette smokers between July 2020 and June 2021.

Figure 1

Data from the Smoking Toolkit Study, University College London. Unweighted n=2,681. Shaded bands represent 95% CIs; A) Data are weighted to match the socio-demographic profile of adults in England; B) Fitted log-binomial regression of weighted proportion of smokers who smoke menthol cigarettes as a function of survey wave. To allow for non-linear trends, year was modelled using a natural cubic spline with 2 knots, each placed at equally-spaced quantiles of the data(12). Results of likelihood ratio test indicated the spline model was a better fit of the data than linear (χ2(2)=2519.7, P=0.06) and null (intercept only) models (χ2(3)=2519.7, P=0.006) respectively. Points on graph indicate weighted proportion of smokers who use menthol cigarettes.

The profile of menthol cigarette smokers

Among all smokers, 25.2% of 16–24-year-olds and 19.4% women smoked menthol cigarettes. Compared with other smokers, menthol cigarette smoking was more common among younger people, women and those with professional/managerial occupations (Table S2). Menthol smokers appeared less dependent by time to first cigarette and cigarettes per day, with no difference in motivation to stop.

Source of purchase

The most popular sources of menthol cigarette purchases (not mutually exclusive) in the past six months were newsagent/off license/corner shops, supermarkets and petrol garage shops (Table S3). Sources of purchase appeared similar between July-December 2020 and January-June 2021, with the exception of declines in buying abroad (14.2% vs 10.4%; χ2(1)=6.67, P=0.01) and buying from friends (12.3% vs 4.2%; χ2(1)=8.73, P=0.005) (Table S3).

The reports of illicit or cross-border purchase of menthol cigarettes in the past six months declined from 30.1% between July-December 2020 to 17.5% between January-June 2021 (χ2(1)=9.12, P=0.006) (Table S4).

Discussion

The EU TPD ban on the sale of menthol cigarettes was implemented in May 2020. Between July 2020 and June 2021 a substantial minority of smokers continued to report currently smoking menthol flavoured cigarettes, with an observed reduction between April-June 2021. Further monitoring of the decline will inform whether it reflects a secular trend or natural variation.

One possible reason for this pattern in England is that smokers were buying menthol cigarettes from illicit or cross-border sources. However, reported retrospective purchase from any illicit or cross border source was less common in the first 6 months of 2021 than the final months of 2020. This may reflect the impact of UK government COVID-19 related restrictions targeting travel, access to hospitality venues and social gatherings (often sources of illicit tobacco) which were generally more restrictive in late 2020 and early 2021 compared with the summer and autumn months of 2020. Moreover, the observed prevalence is not consistent with stockpiling behaviour, which would be expected to drop as personal stocks dwindle. A more likely explanation is that the survey measure assessing flavoured cigarette smoking covers tobacco accessories, including menthol flavoured capsules, filter tips, cards or flavoured rolling papers that are sold separately from cigarette packs and potentially low-menthol cigarettes. These accessories are exempt from the ban and were introduced and promoted to retailers in the months before implementation (14). It is likely that many smokers shifted to using these compliant products (1), which is supported by leaked industry figures that in the 12 months following the ban, Japan Tobacco International sold over 2 billion ban-compliant low-level menthol ‘replacement’ cigarettes in the UK (8), and by the fact that legal sources of purchase were reported at similar levels across the study period. However, without data on the prevalence of only menthol flavour accessory use before the ban, we cannot infer whether a transition occurred or if this was a continuation of increases in the UK market share of capsule cigarettes leading up to the ban (1). Further monitoring should examine changes in the proportion of cigarettes bought by type (factory-made vs roll-your-own tobacco) and whether substitution occurred with other products such as heated-tobacco and ‘cigarette-like’ menthol cigarillos (15).

Regarding the sociodemographic profile of menthol smokers, our findings support evidence on the popularity of menthol cigarettes among younger age groups (16) and women (17). This pattern among women likely reflects established preferences for menthol during smoking initiation (18) and the misconception that menthol cigarettes are safer than non-menthol tobacco cigarettes (19). There is also some evidence for a genetic component influencing taste preference of menthol cigarettes among women (20).

Contrary to US evidence indicating higher dependence potential of menthol cigarettes(4)(21), our results suggest that menthol smokers were less dependent than tobacco smokers. However, given that cigarette dependence develops for several years, the lower dependence in our sample may reflect the younger age profile of menthol compared with just tobacco smoking (22). The divergence may also reflect different regulatory and tobacco industry contexts; e.g., targeting of more disadvantaged and dependent smokers by menthol advertising campaigns in the US (22). Given the apparent inverse association between nicotine dependence and motivation to stop smoking (10,23,24), and in the context of the menthol ban, examining whether motivation to stop smoking is moderated by nicotine dependence among menthol smokers should be researched in future.

Inferences from our data are limited by an absence of measures on menthol smoking before the ban was implemented. Moreover, apparent changes in the proportion of menthol cigarette smokers may reflect natural variation/seasonality. Further limitations relate to the self-reported menthol smoking and past six-month source of purchase, which may lack accuracy due to recall bias. Although not categorised as strictly illicit for our analyses, it is likely that some purchases from the internet were from illicit sources.

The EU TPD ban on menthol cigarettes has not led to a precipitous short-term decline in menthol smoking in England. In Canada, menthol cigarette sales are now banned nationally, with some differences as to whether menthol is banned as a characterising flavour or as an ingredient in cigarettes. Evidence covering multiple provinces indicates that the bans have been significantly associated with higher rates of quit attempts and success among menthol smokers compared with non-menthol smokers (25,26). Further research in England is needed to examine the longer-term trends in use and the potential impact the ban has had on smoking cessation among menthol cigarette smokers.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary file

What this paper adds.

What is already known on this subject?

  • The European Union Tobacco Products Directive (TPD) ban on the sale of cigarettes with a characterising flavour was implemented in England in May 2020.

  • By restricting the availability of menthol cigarettes it is hoped that the ban will reduce smoking initiation among young people and increase the overall rate of smoking cessation in the population.

  • However, menthol accessories that are sold in separate packaging to tobacco or cigarettes are exempt, as are cigars, cigarillos and pipe tobacco.

What important gaps in knowledge exist on this topic?

  • This is the first study to present the profile of menthol cigarette smoking in England in a period following the EU TPD ban.

What this study adds.

  • A substantial proportion of current smokers in England reported menthol cigarette smoking between July/2020 and June/2021, despite the ban.

  • Menthol cigarette smokers were more likely to be younger, women and have a lower nicotine dependence profile than other smokers.

Role of funding sources

Data collection for the Smoking and Alcohol Toolkit Studies is supported by Cancer Research UK (C1417/A22962). Authors are supported by the UK Prevention Research Partnership (MR/S037519/1), an initiative funded by UK Research and Innovation Councils, the Department of Health and Social Care (England), and the UK devolved administrations and leading health research charities. No funders had any involvement in the design of the study, the analysis or interpretation of the data, the writing of the report or the decision to submit the paper for publication.

Footnotes

Contributors

LK, JB and LS conceived of the study. All authors contributed to the study analysis plan. LK conducted the analysis and write up. All authors contributed to the final manuscript. LK is the guarantor of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Conflict of interest

Authors are members of the UK Prevention Research Partnership, an initiative funded by UK Research and Innovation Councils, the Department of Health and Social Care (England), and the UK devolved administrations and leading health research charities. JB reports receiving grants from Cancer Research UK during the conduct of the study and receiving unrestricted research funding from pharmaceutical companies who manufacture smoking cessation medications to study smoking cessation outside the submitted work. LS reports receiving honoraria for talks, receiving an unrestricted research grant and travel expenses to attend meetings and workshops by pharmaceutical companies that make smoking cessation products (Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson), and acting as a paid reviewer for grant-awarding bodies and as a paid consultant for health care companies. LK and IB have no competing interests to declare.

References

  • 1.Hiscock R, Silver K, Zatoński M, Gilmore AB. Tobacco industry tactics to circumvent and undermine the menthol cigarette ban in the UK. [cited 2020 Dec 11];Tob Control. 2020 Dec 1;29(e1):138–42. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-055769. Available from: http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/ [Internet] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ai J, Taylor KM, Lisko JG, Tran H, Watson CH, Holman MR. Menthol levels in cigarettes from eight manufacturers. Tob Control. 2018;27(3):335–6. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zatoński M, Herbeć A, Zatoński W, Przewoźniak K, Janik-Koncewicz K, Mons U, et al. Tobacco Induced Diseases. Vol. 16. International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases; 2018. [cited 2020 Dec 18]. Characterising smokers of menthol and flavoured cigarettes, their attitudes towards tobacco regulation, and the anticipated impact of the Tobacco Products Directive on their smoking and quitting behaviours: The EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe Surveys; p. 20. [Internet] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mills SD, Hao Y, Ribisl KM, Wiesen CA, Hassmiller Lich K. The Relationship between Menthol Cigarette Use, Smoking Cessation and Relapse: Findings from Waves 1 to 4 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. [cited 2021 Jan 14];Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Oct 16; doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa212/5924832. [Internet] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.US Food and Drug Administration. Preliminary Scientific Evaluation of the Possible Public Health Effects of Menthol Versus Nonmenthol Cigarettes. 2013 [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cadham CJ, Sanchez-Romero LM, Fleischer NL, Mistry R, Hirschtick JL, Meza R, et al. BMC Public Health. Vol. 20. BioMed Central; 2020. [cited 2020 Dec 18]. The actual and anticipated effects of a menthol cigarette ban: A scoping review; 1055. [Internet] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Levy DT, Meza R, Yuan Z, Li Y, Cadham C, Sanchez-Romero LM, et al. Public health impact of a US ban on menthol in cigarettes and cigars: a simulation study. Tob Control. 2021 doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Daily Express. Menthol cigarette ban “worthless” as £1bn worth sold in year via loophole. 2021. [cited 2021 Aug 20]. Available from: https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1460053/menthol-cigarette-ban-New-Superking-Green-Sterling-New-Dual [Internet]
  • 9.Fidler JA, Shahab L, West O, Jarvis MJ, McEwen A, Stapleton JA, et al. “The smoking toolkit study”: a national study of smoking and smoking cessation in England. [cited 2017 Oct 25];BMC Public Health. 2011 Jun 18;11:479. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-479. [Internet] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kotz D, Brown J, West R. Predictive validity of the Motivation To Stop Scale (MTSS): a single-item measure of motivation to stop smoking. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013;128(1–2):15–9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Rickert W, Robinson J. Measuring the Heaviness of Smoking: using self-reported time to the first cigarette of the day and number of cigarettes smoked per day. [cited 2018 Nov 15];Addiction. 1989 Jul 1;84(7):791–800. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1989.tb03059.x. [Internet] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Harrell FE. Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic and ordinal regression, and survival analysis. Vol. 3. Springer; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Knottnerus A, Tugwell P. STROBE--a checklist to Strengthen the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):323. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dance S, Evans-Reeves K. Menthol: Tobacco Companies are exploiting loopholes in the UK’s characterising flavours ban. Tob Control. 2021 [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Branston JR, Hiscock R, Silver K, Arnott D, Gilmore AB. Cigarette-like cigarillo introduced to bypass taxation, standardised packaging, minimum pack sizes, and menthol ban in the UK. Tob Control. 2020 doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-055700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cohn AM, Rose SW, D’Silva J, Villanti AC. Menthol smoking patterns and smoking perceptions among youth: findings from the population assessment of tobacco and health study. Am J Prev Med. 2019;56(4):e107–16. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.11.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Smith PH, Akpara E, Haq R, El-Miniawi M, Thompson AB. Current Addiction Reports. Vol. 4. Springer; 2017. [cited 2021 Feb 19]. Gender and Menthol Cigarette Use in the USA: A Systematic Review of the Recent Literature (2011-May 2017) pp. 431–8. [Internet] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kasza KA, Hyland AJ, Bansal-Travers M, Vogl LM, Chen J, Evans SE, et al. Switching between menthol and nonmenthol cigarettes: findings from the US Cohort of the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey. nicotine Tob Res. 2014;16(9):1255–65. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Moodie C, Ford A, Mackintosh A, Purves R. Are all cigarettes just the same? Female’s perceptions of slim, coloured, aromatized and capsule cigarettes. Health Educ Res. 2015;30(1):1–12. doi: 10.1093/her/cyu063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Oncken C, Feinn R, Covault J, Duffy V, Dornelas E, Kranzler HR, et al. Genetic vulnerability to menthol cigarette preference in women. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;17(12):1416–20. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Benowitz NL, Herrera B, Jacob P. Mentholated cigarette smoking inhibits nicotine metabolism. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2004;310(3):1208–15. doi: 10.1124/jpet.104.066902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Villanti AC, Collins LK, Niaura RS, Gagosian SY, Abrams DB. Menthol cigarettes and the public health standard: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):1–13. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4987-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Marques-Vidal P, Melich-Cerveira J, Paccaud F, Waeber G, Vollenweider P, Cornuz J. Prevalence and factors associated with difficulty and intention to quit smoking in Switzerland. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kotz D, Fidler J, West R. Very low rate and light smokers: smoking patterns and cessation-related behaviour in England, 2006-11. Addiction. 2012;107(5):995–1002. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03739.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chung-Hall J, Fong GT, Meng G, Cummings KM, Hyland A, >O’Connor RJ, et al. Evaluating the impact of menthol cigarette bans on cessation and smoking behaviours in Canada: longitudinal findings from the Canadian arm of the 2016-2018 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Surveys. Tob Control. 2021 doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chaiton M, Schwartz R, Cohen JE, Soule E, Zhang B, Eissenberg T. Prior daily menthol smokers more likely to quit two years after a menthol ban than non-menthol smokers: a population cohort study. Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary file

RESOURCES