Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2023 Mar 17;24(6):333. doi: 10.1038/s41583-023-00695-9

(New neurons) singing in the avian brain

M Llorens-Martín 1,2,3,*
PMCID: PMC7614564  EMSID: EMS172733  PMID: 36932211

During the first half of the twentieth century, the scientific community widely rejected the notion of neuronal regeneration in the adult central nervous system. Indeed, the first report of continuous neurogenesis in the mammalian brain by Joseph Altman in 1963 was initially received with skepticism by some coetaneous researchers. However, these discoveries were subsequently supported by numerous studies performed by independent laboratories in which evidence was collected from more than 120 animal species, including humans. Whilst most of these studies were performed in mammals, the discoveries made by Goldman and Nottebohm in 1983 were the first to unveil the continuous addition of new neurons to the adult avian brain.

In 1981, Fernando Nottebohm had described seasonal volume changes in the hyperstriatum ventrale, pars caudale (HVc, a brain nucleus involved in song learning and production) of adult male canaries that co-incided with periods of song production, suggesting that such plasticity events underlie the learning of new song repertoires. His finding also raised the possibility that the incorporation of new neurons into the HVc might underlie the seasonal volume changes, thereby conferring a functional raison d’être for the phenomenon of adult neurogenesis and paving the way for the subsequent investigation of neurogenesis in the brains of adult birds under physiological conditions.

In their 1983 study, Goldman and Nottebohm used tritiated (3H)-thymidine as a marker of DNA synthesis and, inferentially, of cellular replication. To assess the effect of testosterone on the adult female canary brain, they administered intramuscular injections of 3H-thymidine to adult female canaries that had previously received implants filled with either testosterone or cholesterol (as a control). At various time points after the injections, the birds were sacrificed and their brains examined by optical and electron microscopy. The cells that took up 3H-thymidine were identified and, on the basis of morphological criteria, were classified as neurons, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, endothelial cells or ependymal/subependymal cells. These experiments revealed the presence of 3H-thymidine-labeled neurons in the HVc of canaries from all the experimental groups 37 days after receiving the implants (3-5 weeks after they were injected with (3H)-thymidine).

Goldman and Nottebohm’s data demonstrated the persistence of basal levels of adult neurogenesis (namely, the production of new neurons at a daily average rate of 1.46% of the total HVc neuronal pool.) in the brain of female canaries that received cholesterol implants. Further ultrastructural assessment of some of the labeled cells revealed the presence of dendrites and axons, which confirmed their neuronal phenotype. The type of implant received did not affect the number of new neurons but did modify the numbers of new glial and endothelial cells. The discovery of the differential responsiveness of these cell populations to hormonal stimuli anticipated later work revealing the functional complexity of neurogenic niches in the adult vertebrate brain, the elucidation of which is still ongoing. Goldman and Nottebohm found almost no labeled neurons in the HVc of animals sacrificed shortly (≤48 h) after thymidine injections, but abundant positive cells with a variety of morphologies in the wall of the ventricular zone situated above the HVc. These data suggested that new HVc neurons were generated in the ventricular zone and subsequently migrated toward their final destination in the brain.

Goldman and Nottebohm were cautious and humble in their conclusions. Nevertheless, their discovery provided the foundations for our current understanding of the key principles governing the generation of new neurons in the adult vertebrate brain. The work of these two scientists robustly demonstrated ongoing precursor cell proliferation in the avian ventricular zone and the migration of the cells generated to other regions of the brain, where we now know that they achieve terminal maturation and functional synaptic integration. Their data also suggested the presence and lifetime persistence of a population of stem cells in the avian ventricular system.

Goldman and Nottebohm´s seminal discoveries greatly contributed to the growing interest in adult neurogenesis within both the scientific community and the general public in recent decades. Indeed, deciphering the permissive mechanisms that allow the generation of new neurons in certain regions of the brain but (apparently) not in others is still a challenge for the regenerative medicine and neuroscience research fields. In this regard, developing strategies to promote the generation of new functional neurons might have important consequences for our understanding of the global functioning of the adult and aged brain, as well as also profound clinical implications.

References

  • 1.Goldman SA, Nottebohm F. Neuronal production, migration, and differentiation in a vocal control nucleus of the adult female canary brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1983;80:2390–4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.8.2390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nottebohm F. A brain for all seasons: cyclical anatomical changes in song control nuclei of the canary brain. Science. 1981;214:1368–70. doi: 10.1126/science.7313697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES