Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jul 6.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Chem Neurosci. 2020 Jan 8;11(3):258–267. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.9b00338

Novel HDAC6 inhibitors increase tubulin acetylation and rescue axonal transport of mitochondria in a model of Charcot-Marie-Tooth Type 2F

Robert Adalbert †,“,, Akira Kaieda , Christina Antoniou , Andrea Loreto , Xiuna Yang , Jonathan Gilley , Takashi Hoshino , Keiko Uga ‡,#, Mahindra T Makhija ‡,, Michael P Coleman †,§,
PMCID: PMC7614726  EMSID: EMS177433  PMID: 31845794

Abstract

Disruption of axonal transport causes a number of rare, inherited axonopathies and is heavily implicated in a wide range of more common neurodegenerative disorders, many of them age-related. Acetylation of α-tubulin is one important regulatory mechanism, influencing microtubule stability and motor protein attachment. Of several strategies so far used to enhance axonal transport, increasing microtubule acetylation through inhibition of the deacetylase enzyme HDAC6 has been one of the most effective. Several inhibitors have been developed and tested in animal and cellular models but better drug candidates are still needed. Here we report the development and characterisation of two highly potent HDAC6 inhibitors, which show low toxicity, promising pharmacokinetic properties, and enhance microtubule acetylation in the nanomolar range. We demonstrate their capacity to rescue axonal transport of mitochondria in a primary neuronal culture model of the inherited axonopathy Charcot-Marie-Tooth Type 2F, caused by a dominantly acting mutation in heat shock protein beta 1.

Keywords: HDAC6, CMT, Axonal transport, Mitochondria, Axonopathy, α-tubulin

Introduction

The bidirectional movement of macromolecules and organelles along axons is essential for axon survival and function, and requires a complex machinery involving motor proteins, adapters coupling to specific cargoes, microtubule tracks and regulators of all the above. Not surprisingly, such an essential process involving many components can malfunction in a number of ways and when it does the consequences can be profound. Mutation of genes encoding axonal transport machinery and regulators cause a number of axonopathies, and especially diseases of long axons. For example, mutations in KIF5A encoding a major anterograde motor protein are an established cause of hereditary spastic paraplegia SPG101, and have also been linked to Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease type 2 (CMT2)2, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)3, 4 and neonatal intractable myoclonus5. Mutant dynactin causes motor neuron disease and distal spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy 6, 7 and in mice the mutation of tubulin chaperone protein Tbce causes a severe, early onset loss of motor axons with a major deficiency of microtubules8.

Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease type 2 (CMT2) is an axonal, non-demyelinating peripheral neuropathy characterized by distal muscle weakness and atrophy, mild sensory loss, and normal or near-normal nerve conduction velocities9. The Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease subtype 2F (CMT2F) and distal hereditary motor neuropathy subtype 2B (dHMN2B) are caused by autosomal dominantly inherited mutations in the small heat shock protein B1 (HSPB1) gene10, 11. The gene codes for heat shock protein beta-1 (HSPB1, also known as HSP27), which is a member of the small heat shock protein family comprising a highly conserved α-crystalline domain. HSPB1 acts as a chaperone binding with partially denatured proteins to prevent aggregation12, 13. Up to now, 18 mutations in HSPB1 have been linked to CMT2F and 27 mutations to dHMN 214. The S135F and P182L mutations are among the best characterized mutations so far11, 15, 16. The S135F mutation is the only one that causes both CMT2 and dHMN2B. P182L mutation is associated only with dHMN2B15. The S135F mutation is located in the α-crystallin domain while P182L mutation lies in the short C-terminal tail of the protein15. Interestingly the localization of the mutation was shown to have different effects on the protein function. While the S135F mutation caused the protein to increase its chaperone activity accompanied with an increased in its monomeric state the chaperone activity of HSPB1 was not affected by the P182L mutation17.

Four mutant HSPB1 transgenic mouse models of CMT2F and/or dHMN2B have been developed so far, which partially recapitulate the hallmarks of peripheral neuropathy11, 1820. S135F and P182L transgenic mice generated by d’Ydewalle et al. demonstrated noticeable phenotypes, the latter presents more like dHMN2B than CMT2F with a lack of sensory symptoms11 which recapitulates all key features of CMT2F or distal HMN2B, dependent on the mutation. However, CMT2F mouse models generated by other groups had notable differences. S135F transgenic mice reported by Lee et al. had no sensory phenotype and presented only a strict motor loss, similar to the P182L, but not the S135F mice of d’Ydewalle et al18. In further contrast, the R136W mouse model did not demonstrate any functional or behavioral deficits20. When R127W and P182L mutant proteins were expressed at physiological levels to alleviate concerns of artifacts due to overexpression, no pathology and behavioural deficits were found in mice19. This could be due to insufficient expression of HSPB1 under the ROSA26 locus.

In addition to rare disorders and animal models, axonal transport deficiency is heavily implicated in many more common neurodegenerative and axonal disorders. Several cancer chemotherapeutics that cause peripheral neuropathy as a dose-limiting complication target microtubules21 and disrupt axonal transport 22. In Alzheimer’s disease, aggregation of microtubule associated protein tau, whose normal functions include regulation of microtubule stability and motor protein attachment23, 24 plays a prominent role, exogenously applied Aβ1-42 is able to disrupt axonal transport in a tau-dependent manner25. The two may also interact26 and impairment of axonal transport exacerbates animal models27. There are many indications of a wider role also in ALS28, Huntington’s disease29, Parkinsonism and frontotemporal dementia30, 31, and normal ageing, the biggest risk factor in each of these32,is accompanied by a twofold decline in axonal transport33. Thus, rare but often better-understood inherited disorders involving an axonal transport mechanism are an important starting point to develop therapies that could have far wider application in neurodegenerative disease.

Axonal microtubules exist in a state of dynamic instability34, 35, constantly both growing and severing to maintain them typically between 0.15-20 μm in length36. Acetylation of α-tubulin at Lys40 is reported to increase microtubule stability under mechanical stress37 and to influence severing by katanin38. It also enhances the binding of kinesin-1 and axonal transport39, 40. Beside SIRT241 HDAC6 is the other major deacetylase for α-tubulin and its inhibition increases axonal transport of some cargoes in models of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease types 2F11 and 2D42, ALS43, and Vincristine neuropathy44, also alleviating some symptoms. Beneficial outcomes have also been reported in models of Alzheimer’s disease45 and stroke46. Early studies of HDAC6 inhibition used tubacin, whose high lipophilicity and short in vivo half-life limited its usefulness. This was largely superseded by the development of Tubastatin A47. However, further improvement of potency is possible48, 49 so it is important to develop new compounds targeting HDAC6 with greater potential for clinical application.

The HDAC inhibitors share a well-recognized pharmacophore that consists of three parts: a zinc binding group (ZBG), a linker, and a cap moiety. Classical HDAC inhibitors typically have the hydroxamic acid moiety as ZBG but the hydroxamic acid causes poor pharmacokinetics, low selectivity profiles, and production of active metabolites50. These features of hydroxamic acid are red flags for drug discovery in chronic diseases that are not life threatening. Therefore, we focussed here on the discovery of non-hydroxamic acid derivatives. High throughput screening (HTS) with a Takeda internal library provided several non-hydroxamic acid derivatives as hit compounds against HDAC6. By our medicinal chemistry efforts, we developed two compounds T-3796106 and T-3793168 that are highly selective for HDAC6, show CNS penetration and low toxicity both in vivo and in vitro. We report their dose-response effects for α-tubulin acetylation in primary neuronal cultures and their influence on axonal transport of mitochondria in a primary culture model of CMT2F.

Results

Evaluation of inhibitory potencies (IC50) of T-3796106 and T-3793168

The inhibitory potencies (IC50) of T-3796106 and T-3793168, which were developed through medicinal chemistry campaign from HTS hit compounds, were evaluated in HDAC panel assay (Table 1). T-3796106 showed potent inhibitory activity against HDAC6 with the IC50 value of 12 nM. IC50 values for HDAC3, HDAC8, HDAC5, HDAC7, and HDAC9 were in the range of 1,000-3,000 nM. IC50 values for HDAC1 and HDAC4 were over 6,000 nM. T-3796106 did not show inhibitory activity against HDAC2, HDAC10, and HDAC11 up to 10,000 nM. IC50 values of T-3793168 were 86 nM for HDAC6 and over 2,000 nM against other HDACs.

T-3796106 and T-3793168 do not cause neuronal toxicity even at high concentrations

First, we tested whether T-3796106 or T-3793168 induces any cytotoxicity in murine neuronal explant cultures, using concentrations substantially higher than those we subsequently used for axonal transport studies to indicate a large therapeutic window. We used superior cervical ganglion (SCG) explants because this neuron type is well-suited for genetic manipulation by microinjection and for axonal transport studies 51, 52, and incubated with concentrations from 1 μM to 100 μM for 24 h. No toxicity was observed at any concentration. Neurites remained morphologically similar to vehicle-treated or untreated cultures, even in their distal terminals which are typically the most vulnerable site (Fig 1A, B). Thus, both compounds are safe for neurons up to 100 μM for at least 24 h.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Increased acetylation levels of α-tubulin after T-3796106 and T-3793168 treatment in neurons

We next confirmed that steady state α-tubulin acetylation increases with either T-3796106 or T-3793168 within the above concentration range (data not shown), before titrating down to determine the dose-response curve for α-tubulin acetylation at sub-saturating levels, thereby minimizing the risk of off-target effects. Both compounds showed a clear dose-response effect between 1 nM and 250 nM in a 24 h incubation (Fig 2A), reaching significance at 50 nM for T-3796106 and 250 nM for T-3793168 (Fig 2B). Based on this characterization we used concentrations of 100 nM and 250 nM respectively in our subsequent axonal transport experiments. At these concentrations, there was no effect on histone acetylation which indicates a high selectivity of these compounds towards HDAC6 (Supplementary Figure 1).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Axonal transport of mitochondria in wild type SCG cultures is not altered by T-3796106 or T-3793168

In the absence of a pathogenic mutation, we found no significant change in either the number or the average and maximum velocity of axonally transported mitochondria in dissociated wild-type SCG neurons treated with T-3796106, T-3793168 or Tubastatin A (Fig 3B, C, D, E). Thus, there is no change in basal axonal transport parameters for this cargo.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Mitochondrial transport impairment induced by S135F mutation is rescued by T-3793168

In the presence of the HSPB1S135F mutation, which causes CMT2 and distal HMN in patients15, both the numbers of anterogradely and retrogradely moving mitochondria were significantly decreased relative to wild type neurons 12 h after microinjection (Fig 4A, B), mirroring similar changes reported in sensory neurons11. The transport deficits in both directions were significantly rescued in neurons treated for 24 h with 250 nM T-3793168, while those treated with 100 nM compound T-3796106 showed a trend towards increased mitochondrial transport but the difference was not statistically significant (Fig 4A, B). As previously reported11, we also found a rescue of anterograde axonal transport with 1 μM Tubastatin A, but in the retrograde direction the trend towards a rescue with Tubastatin A was not significant. The average and maximum speed of mitochondria movement was not significantly altered in the neurons with the HSPB1S135F mutation and was unaffected by any of these treatments (Fig 4C, D).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

P182L mutation does not alter mitochondrial transport in SCG neurons

Consistent with previous findings in sensory neurons11, SCG neurons expressing HSPB1P182L showed no significant changes in mitochondrial transport compared to wild type neurons (Fig 5). Treatment of these mutant-expressing neurons with T-3796106, T-3793168 or Tubastatin A also had no effect on mitochondrial movement (Fig 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

T-3796106 and T-3793168 increase α-tubulin acetylation in human whole blood

We finally investigated the effects of T-3796106 and T-3793168 on acetylation of α-tubulin in human cells, using whole blood. For both compounds, clear dose-response effects were observed between 10 nM and 30 μM in a 4 h incubation (Fig 6). Over 100 μM of our compounds and 300 μM of hydroxamic acid-based HDAC6 inhibitor ACY-1215 showed some precipitate when the compounds were added in the culture medium. We also observed the effect of Tubastatin A on acetylated a-tubulin in the human whole blood assay. It showed a similar trend. In brief, the levels of acetylated a-tubulin were almost the same at 10 and 30 μM of Tubastatin A (data not shown) as well as that of ACY-1215.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Discussion

We report the development and characterization of two novel non-hydroxamic acid-based inhibitors with high potency and specificity for HDAC6, low toxicity in murine primary neuronal cultures and a dose-dependent effect on neuronal α-tubulin acetylation between 1250 nM. T-3793168 significantly increases both the anterograde and retrograde flux of mitochondria in axonal transport within 24 h of application to neurons expressing the CMT-2F HSPB1 mutation S135F, and T-3796106 shows a similar, albeit non-significant trend. Neither alters axonal transport in wild-type cells.

For both compounds the changes in acetylated tubulin in whole blood was several orders of magnitude greater than those in mouse primary neuronal cultures. This suggests a tissue-, tubulin isoform-, or species-specific effect on the efficacy of these HDAC6 inhibitors indicating significant scope of lead compound optimization. Further studies to understand the basis of this specificity should help to optimize their efficacies to achieve substantial enhancement of axonal transport in human axonal disorders.

A major advantage over hydroxamic acid-based inhibitors is greater selectivity over other HDAC family members and this is the case for these compounds. For example, hydroxamic acid-based HDAC6 inhibitor ACY-1215 has a high HDAC6 enzyme potency with IC50 value of 4.7 nM but much lower selectivity (12-fold selectivity for HDAC6 and HDAC1 at IC50)53. In contrast, non-hydroxamic acid-based HDAC6 inhibitors T-3796106 and T-3793168 showed excellent selectivity (>25-fold over other HDAC family members; >100-fold selectivity over HDAC1 at IC50).

It will be important now to test the effect of these compounds on axonal transport in other disease models where transport is impaired and the effect on other axonal transport cargoes. For example, axonal transport defects underlie vincristine neuropathy and some forms of hereditary spastic paraplegia and ALS, and have also been implicated in glaucoma, Alzheimer’s disease and multiple sclerosis. Many axonal transport cargoes need to be continuously shuttled back and forth but among some of the most important ones are NMNAT2, whose absence limits the survival of transected axons51 and the retrograde transport of lysosomes to maintain efficient autophagy and mitochondrial quality control54, and neurotrophins.

Finally, it will be important to test the efficacy of HDAC6 inhibition and rescue of axonal transport in vivo using methods for live imaging of transport cargoes in live nerves and CNS tissue33, 55, 56, to assess how HDAC6 inhibition compares to other methods of boosting axonal transport in experimental models57, 58 and to further develop these lead compounds.

Methods

Chemicals

T-3796106 and T-3793168 are novel HDAC6 inhibitors developed by Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited (Patent WO2017014321)59.The purity of T-3796106 and T-3793168 was determined to be ≥ 95% by elemental analysis which was performed by Sumika Chemical Analysis Service, Ltd. experimentally determined hydrogen, carbon, and nitrogen composition by elemental analysis was within ±0.4% of the expected value, implying a purity of ≥95%. ACY-1215 was synthesized and determined to be ≥ 95% purity by elemental analysis by Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.

Enzyme assay

HDAC panel assay was performed by Reaction Biology Corp. (Malvern, PA, USA) according to their validated protocol. To evaluate the potency and selectivity of T-3796106 and T- 3793168, HDAC panel assay was carried out by Reaction Biology Corp. Briefly, the deacetylation reaction was performed in buffer conditions of 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, and 1 mg/mL bovine serum albumin (BSA), and 1%DMSO. The fluorogenic peptide, RHK-K(Ac)-AMC, is used as substrate for Class1 and 2B HDACs, RHK(Ac)K(Ac)-AMC for HDAC8, and Boc-Lys(trifluoroacetyl)-AMC for Class2A HDACs. After the reaction, by Developer with Trichostatin A, a fluorescence signal (Ex. 360 nm/Em. 460 nm) developed.

Animals

C57BL/6JOlaHsd mice were obtained from Harlan UK (Bicester, UK). All animal work was carried out in accordance with the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act, 1986, under Project License 70/7620.

Cell culture

Explant SCG cultures

SCGs were dissected from 0 to 2 days old C57BL/6 (wild-type) mouse pups. Cleaned explants were placed in the centre of 3.5 cm tissue culture dishes pre-coated with poly-L-lysine (20 mg/mL for 1–2 h; Sigma) and laminin (20 mg/mL for 1–2 h; Sigma). Explants were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) with 4,500 mg/L glucose and 110 mg/L sodium pyruvate (Sigma), 2 mM glutamine (Invitrogen), 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen), 100 ng/mL 7S NGF (Invitrogen), and 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma). Four μM aphidicolin (Calbiochem) was used to reduce proliferation and viability of small numbers of non-neuronal cells. Cultures were used after 6 days.

Dissociated SCG cultures

SCG ganglia were dissociated by incubation in 0.025% trypsin (Sigma) in PBS (without CaCl2 and MgCl2) for 30 min followed by 0.2% collagenase type II (Gibco) in PBS for a further 20 min. Ganglia were then gently triturated using a pipette. After a 2 h pre-plating stage to remove non-neuronal cells, 5,000–10,000 dissociated neurons were plated in a 1 cm2 poly-L-lysine and laminin-coated area in the centre of 3.5 cm ibidi μ-dishes (Thistle Scientific, Glasgow, UK) for microinjection experiments or in the centre of 3.5 cm tissue culture dishes for analysis by western blotting. Dissociated cultures were maintained the same as explant cultures.

HDAC6 inhibitors treatment

The SCG explants and dissociated cultures were treated for 24 h at 37°C with compound dosages ranging from 1 μM to 100 μM for toxicity experiments and 1nM to 250 nM for testing the dose-response study of α-tubulin acetylation. For axonal transport rescue experiments, dissociated SCG cultures were treated with either 100 nM T-3796106, 250 nM T-3793168, 1 μM Tubastatin A or an equivalent amount of DMSO.

Plasmid constructs

The S135F and P182L mutations were introduced separately by QuikChange II site-directed mutagenesis (Stratagene) into the complete open reading frame of human HSPB1 isoform cloned into expression vector pCMV-Tag2 (Stratagene). The mito-EGFP construct was kindly provided by Dr Andrea Loreto.

Microinjection

Microinjection was performed using a Zeiss Axiovert 200 microscope with an Eppendorf 5171 transjector and 5246 micromanipulator system and Eppendorf Femtotips. Microinjection mixes of plasmid DNA were prepared in 0.5× PBS(–), passed through a Spin-X filter (Costar, Glasgow, UK) Eppendorf and injected directly into the nuclei of SCG neurons in dissociated cultures. Femtotips were loaded with the microinjection mix and injection was performed using an Eppendorf 5171 transjector and 5246 micromanipulator system on a Zeiss Axiovert 200 microscope. All injections were carried out directly into the nuclei of dissociated SCG neurons. A maximum total DNA concentration of 0.05 μg/μL in the injection mix was used. Forty cells were injected per dish and imaging was performed 12 hours after microinjection.

Western Blotting

Following treatment, ganglia and neurites were collected and washed in PBS with complete, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-free protease inhibitor cocktail tablets (Sigma-Aldrich), and lysed directly into 2x Laemmli sample buffer. A total of 10 μL of each sample were separated on a 12% SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membrane (Millipore) using the Bio-Rad Mini-PROTEAN III wet transfer system. Blots were blocked and incubated with primary antibodies overnight (in 1xTBS pH. 8.3, with 0.05% Tween 20 and 5% milk powder or 5% BSA). The antibodies were directed against α-tubulin (1/5,000; ab 15246, Abcam) and acetylated α-tubulin (1/5,000; T7451, Sigma) and detected with mouse-700 (Life Technologies) and rabbit-800 (LI-COR) secondary antibodies. Blots were then scanned and quantified using the Odyssey imaging system (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, North Carolina).

Live imaging of mitochondrial transport and image analysis

Mitochondria were labelled by microinjection of mito-EGFP and their movement along the neurites was recorded with an inverted spinning-disk confocal microscope Olympus IX70 using a 100x 1.49 NA oil immersion objective (Olympus), and controlled with MetaMorph 7.7 software (Molecular Devices). The environment was controlled with a stage top incubator (model INUBG2E-ZILCS; Tokai Hit), set at 37°C and CO2 set to 5%. Time lapse images of mitochondrial movements were acquired every 1 s for 2 min (120 frames in total). A total of 4-5 movies from different neurons were captured from each culture dish. Individual neurites were straightened using the Straighten plugin in ImageJ software version 1.44 (Rasband, W.S., ImageJ, U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD; http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/, 1997e2012). Transport parameters were determined for individual neurites using the Difference Tracker set of ImageJ plugins 060. The principal output of these plugins is the number of moving particles identified in each frame of the image, normalized to 1000 pixels (Figure 3A).

Human whole blood assay

Study design

In human whole blood assay, whole human blood was collected from healthy volunteers after informed consent at Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. 25 μL of the collected human whole blood was put into each well of a 96-well round-bottom plate. The whole blood was treated with 10 μL of diluted compounds in 10% FBS containing RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco). In the control group, 0.1% DMSO was added as a final concentration. After that, the treated whole blood was incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes at 5% CO2. Next, 65 μL of RPMI 1640 medium was added onto each well, and the samples were incubated at 37°C for 3.5 hours. T-3796106, T-3793168, and ACY-1215 were dissolved in 100% DMSO (to a stock concentration of 10-300 mM for our in vitro studies).

Measurements

For flow cytometry analyses, the compound-treated whole blood samples were transferred to an assay block (Costar). Diluted Lyse/Fix buffer (BD Biosciences) in dH2O was added to each sample with pipetting well. The samples were put at RT for 10 minutes and then centrifuged at 400xg for 5 minutes. After centrifugation, the supernatant was removed by aspiration. 250 μL of Perm/Wash buffer I (BD Biosciences) was added to each well and the samples were transferred into a 96-well V-bottom plate, and they were incubated on ice for 20 minutes. These samples were centrifuged at 400xg for 5 minutes at RT, and the supernatant was removed by aspiration. The cells were stained with Zenon conjugated AF647 acetylated α-tubulin (ab179484, Abcam) or matched isotype control (ab172730, Abcam) for 20-30 minutes on ice. Zenon Rabbit IgG Labeling Kit, AF647 (Molecular Probes) was used according to the provided protocol. The cells were centrifuged at 400xg at 5 minutes, and the supernatant was removed, and then washed with 200 μL of Perm/Wash buffer I. After re-centrifugation and removal of the supernatant, the samples were suspended with 200 μL of FACS stain buffer (1% FBS/PBS). The samples were analyzed using lymphocyte gate by BD Fortessa, and the results were analyzed with FlowJo software. Therefore, only lymphocytes were analyzed neither erythrocytes nor thrombocytes were included in the assay.

Statistical analysis

Statistical tests, as described in the figure legends, were performed using Prism software (GraphPad Software Inc, La Jolla, CA, USA). A p value of >0.05 was considered not significant (ns) and *p < 0.05 was significant.

Supplementary Material

Supporting information

Table 1. HDAC panel assay.

The selectivity of T-3796106 and T-3793168 was analyzed based on HDAC enzyme inhibition. [a] The compound activity against 11 HDACs represented with the IC50 value. The IC50 values shown are the mean values of duplicate measurements; the numbers in parentheses represent each data. [b] No inhibition or compound activity that could not be fit to an IC50 curve.

Target Compounds IC50 (nM)a
T-3796106 T-3793168 Tubastatin A
HDAC1 6200 (5820-6660) b >10000
HDAC2 >10000 b >10000
HDAC3 4000 (3480-4470) b >10000
HDAC8 >1000 5600 (4170-7080) >1000
HDAC4 6200 (5970-6380) >10000 6200 (6030-6330)
HDAC5 1700 (1610-1800) 2300 (1550-3060) 1900 (1580-2310)
HDAC7 1100 (1050-1130) 5800 (4000-7660) 590 (530-641)
HDAC9 2700 (2540-2840) 5000 (4950-4960) 1100 (913-1380)
HDAC6 12 (12.3-12.4) 86 (67.4-104) 15 (14.3-15.2)
HDAC10 >10000 b >10000
HDAC11 >10000 b >10000

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Daniel Curran and Tauhid Ali for their contribution to the discussions; Masashi Toyofuku, Kousuke Hidaka and Fumiaki Kikuchi for the synthesis of T-3796106, T- 3793168 and ACY-1215, Andrea Loreto for mito-EGFP construct and Myra Ng for the development of human whole blood assay..

Funding

Funding for this work was provided by Takeda Development Centre Europe Ltd. M.P.C. is funded by the John and Lucille van Geest Foundation.

Abbreviations

HDAC

histone deacetylase

KIF5A

kinesin heavy chain isoform 5A

1-42

amyloid beta peptide 42

HMN

hereditary motor neuropathy

NMNAT2

nicotinamide mononucleotide adenylyltransferase 2

DMSO

dimethyl sulfoxide

FBS

fetal bovine serum

Footnotes

Authors Contributions

Research design: R.A., M.T. M., and M.P.C. Experimental work: R.A., A.K, A.L., C.A., X.Y., J.G., T.H., and K.U. Data analyses and interpretation: R.A., A.L., C.A., M. T. M, and M.P.C. Writing the manuscript: R.A., M.P.C. and M.T.M.

Notes

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Table of contents was created with BioRender.com.

References

  • 1.Reid E, Kloos M, Ashley-Koch A, Hughes L, Bevan S, Svenson IK, Graham FL, Gaskell PC, Dearlove A, Pericak-Vance MA, Rubinsztein DC, et al. A kinesin heavy chain (KIF5A) mutation in hereditary spastic paraplegia (SPG10) Am J Hum Genet. 2002;71:1189–1194. doi: 10.1086/344210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Crimella C, Baschirotto C, Arnoldi A, Tonelli A, Tenderini E, Airoldi G, Martinuzzi A, Trabacca A, Losito L, Scarlato M, Benedetti S, et al. Mutations in the motor and stalk domains of KIF5A in spastic paraplegia type 10 and in axonal Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 2. Clin Genet. 2012;82:157–164. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01717.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brenner D, Yilmaz R, Muller K, Grehl T, Petri S, Meyer T, Grosskreutz J, Weydt P, Ruf W, Neuwirth C, Weber M, et al. German, A. L. S. n. M. N. D. N. E. T. Hot-spot KIF5A mutations cause familial ALS. Brain. 2018;141:688–697. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nicolas A, Kenna KP, Renton AE, Ticozzi N, Faghri F, Chia R, Dominov JA, Kenna BJ, Nalls MA, Keagle P, Rivera AM, et al. Genome-wide Analyses Identify KIF5A as a Novel ALS Gene. Neuron. 2018;97:1268–1283.:e1266. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.02.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Duis J, Dean S, Applegate C, Harper A, Xiao R, He W, Dollar JD, Sun LR, Waberski MB, Crawford TO, Hamosh A, et al. KIF5A mutations cause an infantile onset phenotype including severe myoclonus with evidence of mitochondrial dysfunction. Ann Neurol. 2016;80:633–637. doi: 10.1002/ana.24744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Puls I, Jonnakuty C, LaMonte BH, Holzbaur EL, Tokito M, Mann E, Floeter MK, Bidus K, Drayna D, Oh SJ, Brown RH, Jr, et al. Mutant dynactin in motor neuron disease. Nat Genet. 2003;33:455–456. doi: 10.1038/ng1123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Puls I, Oh SJ, Sumner CJ, Wallace KE, Floeter MK, Mann EA, Kennedy WR, Wendelschafer-Crabb G, Vortmeyer A, Powers R, Finnegan K, et al. Distal spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy caused by dynactin mutation. Ann Neurol. 2005;57:687–694. doi: 10.1002/ana.20468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Martin N, Jaubert J, Gounon P, Salido E, Haase G, Szatanik M, Guenet JL. A missense mutation in Tbce causes progressive motor neuronopathy in mice. Nat Genet. 2002;32:443–447. doi: 10.1038/ng1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bird TD. In: GeneReviews((R)) Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJH, Stephens K, Amemiya A, editors. Seattle (WA): 1993. Charcot-Marie-Tooth Neuropathy Type 2. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ismailov SM, Fedotov VP, Dadali EL, Polyakov AV, Van Broeckhoven C, Ivanov VI, De Jonghe P, Timmerman V, Evgrafov OV. A new locus for autosomal dominant Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 2 (CMT2F) maps to chromosome 7q11-q21. Eur J Hum Genet. 2001;9:646–650. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.d'Ydewalle C, Krishnan J, Chiheb DM, Van Damme P, Irobi J, Kozikowski AP, Vanden Berghe P, Timmerman V, Robberecht W, Van Den Bosch L. HDAC6 inhibitors reverse axonal loss in a mouse model of mutant HSPB1-induced Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Nat Med. 2011;17:968–U986. doi: 10.1038/nm.2396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bakthisaran R, Tangirala R, Rao Ch M. Small heat shock proteins: Role in cellular functions and pathology. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1854:291–319. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2014.12.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Haslbeck M, Vierling E. A first line of stress defense: small heat shock proteins and their function in protein homeostasis. J Mol Biol. 2015;427:1537–1548. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Schwartz NU. Charcot-Marie-Tooth 2F (Hsp27 mutations): A review. Neurobiol Dis. 2019;130:104505. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2019.104505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Evgrafov OV, Mersiyanova I, Irobi J, Van Den Bosch L, Dierick I, Leung CL, Schagina O, Verpoorten N, Van Impe K, Fedotov V, Dadali E, et al. Mutant small heat-shock protein 27 causes axonal Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and distal hereditary motor neuropathy. Nat Genet. 2004;36:602–606. doi: 10.1038/ng1354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Juneja M, Burns J, Saporta MA, Timmerman V. Challenges in modelling the Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathies for therapy development. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019;90:58–67. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-318834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Almeida-Souza L, Goethals S, de Winter V, Dierick I, Gallardo R, Van Durme J, Irobi J, Gettemans J, Rousseau F, Schymkowitz J, Timmerman V, et al. Increased monomerization of mutant HSPB1 leads to protein hyperactivity in Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:12778–12786. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.082644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lee J, Jung SC, Joo J, Choi YR, Moon HW, Kwak G, Yeo HK, Lee JS, Ahn HJ, Jung N, Hwang S, et al. Overexpression of mutant HSP27 causes axonal neuropathy in mice. J Biomed Sci. 2015;22:43. doi: 10.1186/s12929-015-0154-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bouhy D, Geuens T, De Winter V, Almeida-Souza L, Katona I, Weis J, Hochepied T, Goossens S, Haigh JJ, Janssens S, Timmerman V. Characterization of New Transgenic Mouse Models for Two Charcot-Marie-Tooth-Causing HspB1 Mutations using the Rosa26 Locus. J Neuromuscul Dis. 2016;3:183–200. doi: 10.3233/JND-150144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Srivastava AK, Renusch SR, Naiman NE, Gu S, Sneh A, Arnold WD, Sahenk Z, Kolb SJ. Mutant HSPB1 overexpression in neurons is sufficient to cause age-related motor neuronopathy in mice. Neurobiol Dis. 2012;47:163–173. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2012.03.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hoke A, Ray M. Rodent models of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. ILAR journal. 2014;54:273–281. doi: 10.1093/ilar/ilt053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.LaPointe NE, Morfini G, Brady ST, Feinstein SC, Wilson L, Jordan MA. Effects of eribulin, vincristine, paclitaxel and ixabepilone on fast axonal transport and kinesin-1 driven microtubule gliding: Implications for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Neurotoxicology. 2013;37:231–239. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2013.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Trinczek B, Ebneth A, Mandelkow EM, Mandelkow E. Tau regulates the attachment/detachment but not the speed of motors in microtubule-dependent transport of single vesicles and organelles. J Cell Sci. 1999;112(Pt 14):2355–2367. doi: 10.1242/jcs.112.14.2355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Dixit R, Ross JL, Goldman YE, Holzbaur EL. Differential regulation of dynein and kinesin motor proteins by tau. Science. 2008;319:1086–1089. doi: 10.1126/science.1152993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Vossel KA, Zhang K, Brodbeck J, Daub AC, Sharma P, Finkbeiner S, Cui B, Mucke L. Tau reduction prevents Abeta-induced defects in axonal transport. Science. 2010;330:198. doi: 10.1126/science.1194653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Adalbert R, Milde S, Durrant C, Ando K, Stygelbout V, Yilmaz Z, Gould S, Brion JP, Coleman MP. Interaction between a MAPT variant causing frontotemporal dementia and mutant APP affects axonal transport. Neurobiol Aging. 2018;68:68–75. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.03.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Stokin GB, Lillo C, Falzone TL, Brusch RG, Rockenstein E, Mount SL, Raman R, Davies P, Masliah E, Williams DS, Goldstein LS. Axonopathy and transport deficits early in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Science. 2005;307:1282–1288. doi: 10.1126/science.1105681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.De Vos KJ, Hafezparast M. Neurobiology of axonal transport defects in motor neuron diseases: Opportunities for translational research? Neurobiol Dis. 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2017.02.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Smith AL, Teener JW, Callaghan BC, Harrington J, Uhlmann WR. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in a patient with a family history of huntington disease: genetic counseling challenges. Journal of genetic counseling. 2014;23:725–733. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9715-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ittner LM, Fath T, Ke YD, Bi M, van Eersel J, Li KM, Gunning P, Gotz J. Parkinsonism and impaired axonal transport in a mouse model of frontotemporal dementia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:15997–16002. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808084105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Alami NH, Smith RB, Carrasco MA, Williams LA, Winborn CS, Han SSW, Kiskinis E, Winborn B, Freibaum BD, Kanagaraj A, Clare AJ, et al. Axonal transport of TDP-43 mRNA granules is impaired by ALS-causing mutations. Neuron. 2014;81:536–543. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.12.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Adalbert R, Coleman MP. Review: Axon pathology in age-related neurodegenerative disorders. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2013;39:90–108. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2012.01308.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Milde S, Adalbert R, Elaman MH, Coleman MP. Axonal transport declines with age in two distinct phases separated by a period of relative stability. Neurobiol Aging. 2015;36:971–981. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.09.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Stepanova T, Slemmer J, Hoogenraad CC, Lansbergen G, Dortland B, De Zeeuw CI, Grosveld F, van Cappellen G, Akhmanova A, Galjart N. Visualization of microtubule growth in cultured neurons via the use of EB3-GFP (end-binding protein 3-green fluorescent protein) J Neurosci. 2003;23:2655–2664. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-07-02655.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Baas PW, Qiang L. Neuronal microtubules: when the MAP is the roadblock. Trends Cell Biol. 2005;15:183–187. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2005.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Yu W, Baas PW. Changes in microtubule number and length during axon differentiation. J Neurosci. 1994;14:2818–2829. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-05-02818.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Portran D, Schaedel L, Xu Z, Thery M, Nachury MV. Tubulin acetylation protects long-lived microtubules against mechanical ageing. Nat Cell Biol. 2017;19:391–398. doi: 10.1038/ncb3481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Sudo H, Baas PW. Acetylation of microtubules influences their sensitivity to severing by katanin in neurons and fibroblasts. J Neurosci. 2010;30:7215–7226. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0048-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Reed NA, Cai D, Blasius TL, Jih GT, Meyhofer E, Gaertig J, Verhey KJ. Microtubule acetylation promotes kinesin-1 binding and transport. Curr Biol. 2006;16:2166–2172. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chen S, Owens GC, Makarenkova H, Edelman DB. HDAC6 regulates mitochondrial transport in hippocampal neurons. PloS one. 2010;5:e10848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.North BJ, Marshall BL, Borra MT, Denu JM, Verdin E. The human Sir2 ortholog, SIRT2, is an NAD+-dependent tubulin deacetylase. Mol Cell. 2003;11:437–444. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(03)00038-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Benoy V, Van Helleputte L, Prior R, d’Ydewalle C, Haeck W, Geens N, Scheveneels W, Schevenels B, Cader MZ, Talbot K, Kozikowski AP, et al. HDAC6 is a therapeutic target in mutant GARS-induced Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Brain. 2018;141:673–687. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Guo WT, Naujock M, Fumagalli L, Vandoorne T, Baatsen P, Boon R, Ordovas L, Patel A, Welters M, Vanwelden T, Geens N, et al. HDAC6 inhibition reverses axonal transport defects in motor neurons derived from FUS-ALS patients. Nature communications. 2017;8 doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00911-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Van Helleputte L, Kater M, Cook DP, Eykens C, Rossaert E, Haeck W, Jaspers T, Geens N, Berghe PV, Gysemans C, Mathieu C, et al. Inhibition of histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) protects against vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathies and inhibits tumor growth. Neurobiol Dis. 2018;111:59–69. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2017.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhang L, Liu C, Wu J, Tao JJ, Sui XL, Yao ZG, Xu YF, Huang L, Zhu H, Sheng SL, Qin C. Tubastatin A/ACY-1215 Improves Cognition in Alzheimer’s Disease Transgenic Mice. Journal of Alzheimers Disease. 2014;41:1193–1205. doi: 10.3233/JAD-140066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wang Z, Leng Y, Wang J, Liao HM, Bergman J, Leeds P, Kozikowski A, Chuang DM. Tubastatin A, an HDAC6 inhibitor, alleviates stroke-induced brain infarction and functional deficits: potential roles of alpha-tubulin acetylation and FGF-21 up-regulation. Scientific reports. 2016;6:19626. doi: 10.1038/srep19626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Butler KV, Kalin J, Brochier C, Vistoli G, Langley B, Kozikowski AP. Rational design and simple chemistry yield a superior, neuroprotective HDAC6 inhibitor, tubastatin A. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:10842–10846. doi: 10.1021/ja102758v. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Benoy V, Vanden Berghe P, Jarpe M, Van Damme P, Robberecht W, Van Den Bosch L. Development of Improved HDAC6 Inhibitors as Pharmacological Therapy for Axonal Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease. Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics. 2017;14:417–428. doi: 10.1007/s13311-016-0501-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.He JC, Yao W, Wang JM, Schemmer P, Yang Y, Liu Y, Qian YW, Qi WP, Zhang J, Shen Q, Yang T. TACC3 overexpression in cholangiocarcinoma correlates with poor prognosis and is a potential anti-cancer molecular drug target for HDAC inhibitors. Oncotarget. 2016;7:75441–75456. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.12254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Flipo M, Charton J, Hocine A, Dassonneville S, Deprez B, Deprez-Poulain R. Hydroxamates: relationships between structure and plasma stability. J Med Chem. 2009;52:6790–6802. doi: 10.1021/jm900648x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Gilley J, Coleman MP. Endogenous Nmnat2 is an essential survival factor for maintenance of healthy axons. PLoS Biol. 2010;8:e1000300. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Milde S, Gilley J, Coleman MP. Axonal trafficking of NMNAT2 and its roles in axon growth and survival in vivo. Bioarchitecture. 2013;3:133–140. doi: 10.4161/bioa.27049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Santo L, Hideshima T, Kung AL, Tseng JC, Tamang D, Yang M, Jarpe M, van Duzer JH, Mazitschek R, Ogier WC, Cirstea D, et al. Preclinical activity, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacokinetic properties of a selective HDAC6 inhibitor, ACY-1215, in combination with bortezomib in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2012;119:2579–2589. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-10-387365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Maday S, Wallace KE, Holzbaur EL. Autophagosomes initiate distally and mature during transport toward the cell soma in primary neurons. J Cell Biol. 2012;196:407–417. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201106120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Misgeld T, Kerschensteiner M, Bareyre FM, Burgess RW, Lichtman JW. Imaging axonal transport of mitochondria in vivo. Nat Methods. 2007;4:559–561. doi: 10.1038/nmeth1055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Gibbs KL, Kalmar B, Sleigh JN, Greensmith L, Schiavo G. In vivo imaging of axonal transport in murine motor and sensory neurons. J Neurosci Methods. 2016;257:26–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.09.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zhang B, Maiti A, Shively S, Lakhani F, McDonald-Jones G, Bruce J, Lee EB, Xie SX, Joyce S, Li C, Toleikis PM, et al. Microtubule-binding drugs offset tau sequestration by stabilizing microtubules and reversing fast axonal transport deficits in a tauopathy model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:227–231. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406361102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lin MY, Cheng XT, Tammineni P, Xie Y, Zhou B, Cai Q, Sheng ZH. Releasing Syntaphilin Removes Stressed Mitochondria from Axons Independent of Mitophagy under Pathophysiological Conditions. Neuron. 2017;94:595–610.:e596. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kaieda A, T M, Daini M, Nara H, Yoshikawa M, Ishii N, Hidaka K. Oxadiazole derivatives useful as HDAC inhibitors. Patent WO2017014321. 2017
  • 60.Andrews S, Gilley J, Coleman MP. Difference Tracker: ImageJ plugins for fully automated analysis of multiple axonal transport parameters. J Neurosci Methods. 2010;193:281–287. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting information

RESOURCES