Abstract
Background and Aims
The associations between genetic factors and waist circumference (WC) with stroke risk have been evaluated in Western studies. However, evidence of this association has rarely been reported in the Chinese population. This study aimed to evaluate the association between WC and family history of stroke (FHS) with ischemic stroke (IS) risk among Chinese adults and to further explore the potential interaction of these associations.
Methods and Results
The China Kadoorie Biobank (CKB) study recruited 35,508 participants aged 30–79 years from the Qingdao urban area during 2004–2008. A total of 33,355 participants were included in study. Cox regression analysis was used to estimate the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the independent and interactional associations between FHS and WC and IS risk. Participants with FHS had a 29% (HR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.12–1.50) higher IS risk than those without FHS. Participants with excessive WC (85 cm for males and 80 cm for females) had a 78% (HR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.51–2.10) higher IS risk than those with normal WC. The combined effect of FHS and excessive WC on IS was statistically significant (HR= 2.29, 95% CI: 1.84–2.86). The present study further found statistically significant multiplicative interactions of FHS and WC with IS risk (P interaction < 0.001).
Conclusion
The present study indicated that FHS and WC were significantly associated with an increased risk of IS. The association between FHS and IS was associated with excessive WC.
Keywords: China, Family history, Waist circumference, Ischemic stroke, Prospective study
Introduction
Stroke is a prominent cause of mortality and disability, and an important contributor to the economic burden [1]. From 1990 to 2019, stroke has become the second-leading cause of death worldwide and the third-leading cause of death and disability combined [2]. Ischemic stroke (IS) is the most frequent among incident cases, constituting 87% of all strokes [3]. The incidence rate of IS in China is 36% higher than the global average [4]. As such, IS poses a major public health burden in China.
Epidemiological studies have demonstrated that stroke is a complex, multifactorial disease caused by a combination of vascular, environmental, and hereditary factors [5]. Large meta-analyses have found that family history of stroke (FHS) increases the stroke risk by 30–44% [6]. Family-history studies can be used to investigate the heritability of complex diseases and potential interactions between genetic and environmental factors [7]. Accumulating evidence suggests that, in a shared environment, individuals with FHS have genetic susceptibility to stroke when compared to individuals without FHS [8]. Parental history of stroke and sibling history of stroke may increase the likelihood of having a more severe stroke [8, 9]. The mean waist circumference (WC) and prevalence of abdominal obesity significantly increased among Chinese adults between 1993 and 2015 [10]. WC is a better tool for assessing body composition and visceral adiposity and reflects cardiometabolic profiles [11]. Abdominal obesity assessed by WC is more pathogenic and is thus more closely associated with cardiovascular diseases [12, 13]. However, cohort studies on the relationship between FHS, WC, and IS risk in the Chinese population are limited.
The present study aimed to evaluate the relationship of FHS and WC with IS risk in a large-scale, Chinese population-based cohort study. We further prospectively examined the interaction of FHS and WC with the risk of IS in Chinese males and females.
Methods
Study participants
The participants came from the China Kadoorie Biobank (CKB) study in Qingdao. More detailed information has been described previously [14–16]. In brief, a total of 35,508 urban residents aged 30–79 years were recruited between 2004-2008. All the participants then entered the follow-up period. Participants who self-reported cancer (n=162), coronary heart disease (n=1,827), or stroke (n=238) in the baseline survey were excluded, leaving 33,355 participants for the present study.
The study was approved by the Oxford Tropical Research Ethics Committee, University of Oxford (UK), the ethics review committee of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Beijing, China) and the ethics review committee of the Qingdao Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention (Shandong, China). All the participants provided written informed consent.
Data collection
Baseline survey
A laptop-based questionnaire was administered by professionally trained interviewers as the baseline survey, including socio-demographic characteristics (age, sex, annual household income, education, occupation, and marital status), lifestyle (alcohol consumption, smoking status, diet frequency, physical activity, and menopause status only for women), personal and family medical history. Physical activity was quantified using the metabolic equivalent of tasks (METS) based on self-reported type, duration, intensity of physical activity, and time spent in sedentary activities.
All participants were asked whether their first-degree relatives (biological father, mother, or siblings) had been diagnosed with stroke. The number of siblings with stroke was recorded. We defined participants as “having a family history” when they reported at least one first-degree relative had stroke, and participants as “having parental history” when they reported that either the father, mother, or both had a stroke. Groups were always defined by the different types of familial history (paternal history, maternal history, parental history, siblings’ history).
Physical measurements for all participants were obtained, including height, weight, blood pressure, and WC. Participants wore light clothes and no shoes to measure height and weight, to the nearest 0.1 cm or 0.1 kg. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg) divided by the square of height (m2). Blood pressure was measured twice after the participants had remained at rest in a seated position for at least 5 mins. A third measurement was required if the blood pressure difference was more than 10 mmHg between the first two measurements, and the mean of the last two blood pressure values was used in the analyses.
WC was measured using a soft, non-stretchable tape (accurate to 0.1 cm), at the midpoint between the lowest rib and the iliac crest. We define excessive WC as ≥ 85 cm for males and ≥ 80 cm for females [17].
Spot random plasma glucose (RPG) was tested using the SureStep Plus System (Johnson&Johnson). RPG data were missing for 422 participants.
Follow-up for IS
IS events were ascertained through linkage with established disease surveillance point systems (DSPs) and the national health insurance system [18], using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (I63). Follow-up time was calculated from the date of the baseline survey to the date of IS occurrence, loss to follow-up, or December 31, 2015, whichever occurred first.
Statistical analysis
The baseline characteristics of the participants are presented as mean ± standard deviation or frequency (percentage, %). Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to examine the independent and multiplicative interactions of FHS and WC with IS risk, generating the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and using the likelihood ratio test. The additive interaction effects were evaluated by the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI), attributable proportion due to interaction (AP), and synergy index (SI) [19]. Potential non-linear associations between WC and IS risk were modelled using restricted cubic splines (RCS) modelling with WC as a continuous variable, with four degrees of freedom. For comparison purposes, HRs were extracted in the 5th, 25th, 75th, and 95th percentiles of the WC [20]. Subgroup analysis according to baseline characteristics was conducted to investigate the effects of these characteristics on the association between FHS or WC and IS risk.
Potential confounders were adjusted for using the following models: Model 1 was adjusted for sex (male or female) and age (continuous) at baseline (men and women were adjusted only for age). Model 2 was further adjusted for education (primary and below, junior high school, high school, and above), occupation (workers, administration/professional technology, sales and service staff/private, housework, retired, unemployed/laid off), annual household income (<20000, 20000–35000, ≥35000), marital status (yes or no), smoking status (never, current regular smoking), alcohol consumption (never, current regular drinking), diet frequency (red meat, fresh fruits, vegetables, and dairy products), physical activity (MET-hoday-1), menopausal status (only for women, no, pre-menopause, menopause), and FHS for the different WC groups. Participants who drank alcohol at least once a week or their equivalent for at least one year were defined as current regular drinkers. Participants who reported having smoked at least one cigarette daily or their equivalent for at least six months were defined as current regular smokers. Model 3 was further adjusted for systolic blood pressure (SBP, continuous), diastolic blood pressure (DBP, continuous), RPG (continuous), and BMI (continuous) in the different FHS groups.
If the 95% CI of RERI and AP did not include 0, and the 95% CI of SI did not include 1, the additive interactions were statistically significant. Statistical significance was indicated by a two-tailed P<0.05. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 25.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp), and the R Foundation for Statistical Computing (https://www.R-project.org/.).
Results
Baseline characteristics according to FHS and WC
The mean baseline age was 50.09 ± 9.88 years of 33,355 participants (14,908 for men, 18,447 for women). There were 5,227 (15.67 %) participants that had FHS, and 20,890 (62.63 %) participants that had excessive WC (⩾ 85 cm for males and ⩾ 80 cm for females). Compared to the participants with normal WC, those with excessive WC were more likely to be older, retired, have lower regular fresh fruit and dairy products intake, have lower physical activity, and have higher BMI, SBP, and RPG (P < 0.05) at baseline (Table 1).
Table 1. The baseline characters of 33,355 participants according to family history of stroke and waist circumference.
| Characteristic | All participants | FHS | WC (cm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | ⩾85 (male) | ≥85 (male) | ||
| <80 (female) | ⩾80 (female) | ||||
| Percentage of participants (%) | 100.00 | 84.33 | 15.67 | 37.37 | 62.63 |
| Age (yr) | 50.09±9.88 | 49.81±10.01 | 51.62±8.98 | 46.52±8.52 | 52.22±10.02 |
| Female (%) | 55.31 | 55.07 | 56.59 | 55.49 | 55.20 |
| Education level (%) | |||||
| Primary school and below | 21.68 | 21.65 | 22.04 | 10.65 | 28.26 |
| Junior high school | 41.91 | 41.45 | 44.40 | 45.18 | 39.96 |
| High school and above | 36.41 | 36.94 | 33.56 | 44.17 | 31.78 |
| Occupation (%) | |||||
| Worker | 42.73 | 43.69 | 37.61 | 57.34 | 34.02 |
| Administration/Professional | 9.87 | 10.19 | 8.15 | 12.11 | 8.54 |
| Sales service staff/private | 3.57 | 3.65 | 3.12 | 3.80 | 3.43 |
| Housework | 5.43 | 5.42 | 5.45 | 2.47 | 7.20 |
| Retired, unemployed, laid-off, others | 38.40 | 37.04 | 45.67 | 24.27 | 46.82 |
| Annual Household income (yuan, %) | |||||
| <20000 | 39.17 | 38.56 | 42.45 | 34.61 | 41.89 |
| 20000-35000 | 44.04 | 44.68 | 40.62 | 47.90 | 41.74 |
| ⩾35000 | 16.79 | 16.76 | 16.93 | 17.49 | 16.37 |
| Currently married (%) | 92.92 | 93.02 | 92.37 | 94.19 | 92.15 |
| Currently regular drinker (%) | 64.71 | 64.20 | 67.50 | 71.23 | 60.83 |
| Currently regular smoker (%) | 28.84 | 28.62 | 30.07 | 31.27 | 27.40 |
| Average daily consumption (%) | |||||
| Red meat | 61.89 | 61.36 | 64.74 | 64.37 | 60.41 |
| Fresh vegetable | 98.11 | 97.97 | 98.81 | 98.11 | 98.10 |
| Fresh fruit | 54.19 | 54.30 | 53.61 | 56.05 | 53.08 |
| Dairy products | 33.58 | 32.99 | 36.77 | 37.88 | 31.02 |
| Total physical activity (MET-h/d) | 18.60±11.48 | 18.80±11.54 | 17.49±11.10 | 21.81±11.40 | 16.68±11.09 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.56±3.45 | 25.50±3.45 | 25.91±3.44 | 22.78±2.15 | 27.23±2.97 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 131.35±20.78 | 130.86±20.61 | 133.95±21.51 | 123.64±17.95 | 135.94±21.00 |
| RPG * (mmol/L) | 6.29±2.60 | 6.26±2.55 | 6.43±2.81 | 5.81±1.95 | 6.57±2.88 |
Quantitative Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation or categorical values are presented as %; P-value refers to the comparison between participants with and without FHS, normal WC, and excessive WC. For each quantitative variable, the P-value is obtained by the method of Student’s t-test; for each categorical variable, the P-value is obtained by the Pearson’s x2 test.
Data missing for 422 participants.
FHS, family history of stroke; WC, waist circumference; MET, metabolic equivalent of task; BMI, body-mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; RPG, random plasma glucose.
Associations of FHS and IS risk
Overall, 1,093 participants (3.28 %) were newly diagnosed with IS (530 men, 563 women) during 302,008.88 person-years (PYs) of follow-up. Per 1,000 PYs, the incidence rate of IS was 3.41 for participants without FHS, and 4.70 for participants with FHS (Table 2). Compared to the participants without FHS, those with FHS had a 29% higher risk of IS (HR=1.29, 95% CI: 1.12–1.50, Model 2), and the association remained with further adjustment for SBP, DBP, RPG, and BMI (Model 3). A positive association was observed in men (HR=1.55, 95% CI: 1.27–1.90), but was not observed in women (HR=1.06, 95% CI: 0.86–1.32) (Table 2). Compared to the participants without FHS, the adjusted HRs (95% CIs) were 1.33 (95% CI: 1.10–1.61), 1.28 (95% CI: 1.05–1.56), 1.27 (95% CI: 1.09–1.48), and 1.33 (95% CI: 0.96–1.85) for paternal, maternal, parental, and sibling history, respectively. A positive association was found in men, but not in women (Supplementary Figure 1). According to the number of FHS members with stroke, the adjusted HRs (95% CIs) were 1.23 (1.05–1.44) and 1.73 (1.24–2.40) for participants with FHS involving 1 and ⩾ 2 members, respectively, in comparison with those without FHS (Supplementary Table 1). The HRs increased with an increasing number of first-degree relatives with IS risk, and this trend remained after multivariable adjustment (P trend <0.001) (Supplementary Table 1).
Table 2. Family history of stroke, waist circumference and risk of ischemic stroke.
| FHS | WC (cm) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | <85 (male) | ≥80 (female) | ||
| <80 (female) | ≥85 (male) | ||||
| Overall | |||||
| No.of participants | 28,128 | 5,227 | 12,466 | 20,889 | |
| No.of cases | 866 | 227 | 186 | 907 | |
| PYs | 253,713.83 | 48,295.05 | 116,004.89 | 186,003.99 | |
| Cases/PYs (/1000) | 3.41 | 4.70 | 1.60 | 7.82 | |
| HR (95%CI) | |||||
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 1.28 (1.10,1.48) | 1.00 | 1.82 (1.55,2.14) | |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 1.29 (1.12,1.50) | 1.00 | 1.78 (1.51,2.10) | |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 1.18 (1.02,1.38) | 1.00 | 1.42 (1.20,1.68) | |
| Men | |||||
| No.of participants | 12,639 | 2,269 | 5,549 | 9,359 | |
| No.of cases | 405 | 125 | 118 | 412 | |
| PYs | 115,531.51 | 21,094.02 | 52,232.36 | 84,393.16 | |
| Cases/PYs (/1000) | 3.51 | 5.93 | 2.26 | 4.88 | |
| HR (95%CI) | |||||
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 1.54 (1.26,1.88) | 1.00 | 1.68 (1.36,2.06) | |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 1.55 (1.27,1.90) | 1.00 | 1.72 (1.40,2.12) | |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 1.37 (1.12,1.69) | 1.00 | 1.38 (1.11,1.71) | |
| Women | |||||
| No.of participants | 15,489 | 2,958 | 6,917 | 11,530 | |
| No.of cases | 461 | 102 | 68 | 495 | |
| PYs | 138,182.32 | 27,201.03 | 63,772.52 | 101,610.83 | |
| Cases/PYs (/1000) | 3.34 | 3.75 | 1.07 | 4.87 | |
| HR (95%CI) | |||||
| Model 1 | 1.00 | 1.06 (0.85,1.31) | 1.00 | 2.04 (1.57,2.66) | |
| Model 2 | 1.00 | 1.06 (0.86,1.32) | 1.00 | 1.83 (1.40,2.39) | |
| Model 3 | 1.00 | 1.00 (0.80,1.25) | 1.00 | 1.48 (1.12,1.94) | |
FHS, family history of stroke; WC, waist circumference; PYs, person-years; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Associations of WC and IS risk
The incidence rate of IS was 1.60 for participants with normal WC, and 7.82 for participants with excessive WC per 1,000 PYs (Table 2). Compared to participants with the normal WC, excessive WC had a significant association with the risk of IS (HR=1.78, 95% CI: 1.51–2.10, Model 2). For men and women, the HRs were 1.72 (95% CI: 1.40–2.12) and 1.83 (95% CI: 1.40–2.39), respectively. The association remained after further adjustment for SBP, DBP, and RPG (Model 3) (Table 2). Incrementally higher risks of all four outcomes were observed in higher quartiles of IS risk for WC compared with the lowest quartile (Q1) group in all models (all P trend < 0.001) (Supplementary Table 2). There was a tendency towards an S-shaped curve of WC with IS risk, and the association was significant (P Non-linear = 0.002). The risk of IS increased with increasing WC (Fig. 1). Almost all plots of the IS risk hazard ratio showed wide confidence intervals among participants with FHS, especially for individuals at both ends of the WC measurement. Non-linear associations existed between WC and IS risk for parental history (P=0.0218) (Supplementary Figure 2).
Figure 1. Plots of IS HR with 95% CI (shaded regions) from multivariate adjusted Cox regression analysis with the restricted cubic spline of waist circumference by adjusting of model 2.
I WC, waist circumference; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
Interaction of FHS and WC with IS risk
Multiplicative interactions between FHS and WC were statistically significant (P < 0.001). Compared to the participants with normal WC and without FHS, the adjusted HRs (95% CIs) for those with normal WC but with FHS, those with excessive WC but without FHS, and those with excessive WC and FHS were 1.41 (95% CI: 1.00–2.01), 1.83 (95% CI: 1.52–2.19), and 2.29 (95% CI: 1.84–2.86), respectively (Fig. 2). The multiplicative interaction between FHS and WC with IS risk was significant in men (P < 0.001), but not in women (P = 0.322) (Fig. 2). In the overall population, this study found a significant interaction between other types of family history, except for siblings. (Supplementary Figure 1). Additive interaction analysis after adjusting for relevant confounders showed no interaction between FHS and WC in the development of IS (Supplementary Table 3).
Figure 2. Interaction of family history and waist circumference on the risk of ischemic stroke.
FHS (-), participants without FHS; FHS (+), participants with FHS; WC (-): normal WC; WC (+): excessive WC.
FHS, family history of stroke; WC, waist circumference.
Subgroup analyses
No significant interactions were found across the strata in terms of sex and marital status. However, the strength of the association between FHS and IS was largely consistent across subgroups defined by age, household income, education level, occupation, smoking status, drinking, frequency of fresh fruits, fresh vegetables, red meat, dairy products, physical activity, BMI, SBP, and RPG (P interaction < 0.05) (Fig. 3).
Figure 3. Subgroup analysis of associations between family history of stroke and risk of ischemic stroke according to potential baseline risk factors.
MET, metabolic equivalent of task; BMI, body-mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; RPG, random plasma glucose; WC, waist circumference.
Significant differences in the association of WC and IS risk across age, sex, household income, education level, occupation, marital status, smoking status, drinking, the frequency of fresh fruits, fresh vegetables, red meat, dairy products, physical activity, BMI, SBP, and RPG were also observed in the present study (P interaction < 0.05) (Fig. 4).
Figure 4. Subgroup analysis of associations between waist circumference and risk of ischemic stroke according to potential baseline risk factors.
MET, metabolic equivalent of task; BMI, body-mass index; SBP, systolic blood pressure; RPG, random plasma glucose.
Discussion
In this population-based prospective cohort study of Chinese adults with 9.05 years of follow-up, we found that either FHS or WC was positively associated with IS risk. In further analyses that combined the effects of FHS and WC, we observed that the FHS and abdominal adiposity defined by WC had a significant multiplicative interaction on IS risk, but no additive interaction. Participants who had FHS and excessive WC had a 129 % (164 % among men, 93 % among women) higher risk of IS compared with those without FHS and normal WC, which implied that excessive WC increased the risk of IS among people with FHS. FHS and excessive WC were associated with the greatest risk of IS. Our study revealed that young age was more strongly associated with FHS in comparison with old age. Moreover, FHS and WC interacted with health risk behaviors (smoking status and alcohol consumption), impacting the risk of IS occurrence.
The association of FHS and IS risk
The genetic component of stroke has been carefully studied and is widely accepted [6, 21]. In large meta-analyses, FHS increased the risk of stroke by 30–44% [6]. In the current study, FHS increased the risk of stroke by 29% with further adjustment for Model 2, and by 18% with further adjustment for Model 3. A previous study also found that people with a positive FHS were more likely to have hypertension [22]. Hypertension is the most powerful risk factor for stroke and may thus account for an important component of the heritability of stroke [23, 24]. Both hypertension and stroke co-aggregate in families [25]. Hypertension may be one of the reasons for the hereditary nature of stroke.
The Framingham Study [8] found that parental stroke was associated with a three-fold increased risk of stroke in offspring, which persisted after adjustment for conventional stroke risk factors. However, Brass et al. [26] and Siegerink et al. [27] found that FHS could not predict the future stroke risk. A case-control study in the RATIO [28] showed that FHS was not significantly associated with IS risk. However, the current study found that FHS increases the risk of IS.
Meschia et al. [29], MacClellan et al. [30], and Kondo et al. [25] showed that sibling history was more significantly positively related to stroke risk than parental history. However, Liao et al. [31] did not find the same results. The present study did not find that a sibling history was associated with a significant increase in IS risk. Some researches have shown that maternal history of stroke was far more important than paternal history [32]. There may also be several reasons or underlying mechanisms, such as genomic imprinting and maternal intrauterine environments [33]. However, a meta-analysis [34] reported that the conferred risk of stroke in offspring did not differ substantially between positive paternal and maternal histories of stroke. This finding is similar to that of the present study.
In the subgroup analyses, significant differences in the association between FHS and IS were observed across the strata of smoking status and alcohol consumption. The association between FHS and IS risk was stronger in participants who were current smokers and current drinkers. These results are consistent with previous researches [35]. Stratified by age, the positive association between FHS and IS risk was slightly more pronounced among participants aged 30-60 years than among those aged >60 years (P interaction = 0.004). A possible explanation is that the relative importance of FHS and genetic variables may decrease with increasing age, as other life-related factors take precedence [22].
The association of WC and IS risk
WC is a widely used measurement of abdominal adiposity in epidemiology [36, 37], which might be a better indicator of accumulation of visceral fat and an adverse metabolic profile than BMI and the waist-to-hip ratio [38]. Many studies have found that excessive WC is associated with an increased risk of IS [39]. A previous study found that WC increased the risk of stroke by 28% [40]. The present study found that WC increased the risk of stroke by 78%. Visceral fat is associated with cardiovascular risk factors [41]. In the present study, the association between WC and incident IS was partially explained by this fact, because after adjustment for the BP and RPG in Model 3, the association was attenuated.
Abdominal adiposity is associated with well-established risk factors for stroke in general, including hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes [42]. A Japanese study [43] showed a 22% increased risk of hypertension, 81% increased risk of dyslipidemia and 35% increased risk of diabetes with abdominal obesity. Stratified by age, the positive association between WC and IS risk was more pronounced among participants aged 30-60 years than among those aged ⩾ 60 years (P interaction < 0.001). The additional increase in WC may be an important component of IS risk in younger adults. Stratified by sex, the positive association between WC and IS risk was more pronounced among females than males (P interaction < 0.001). The explanation for sex differences may be found in the dietary, physical activity behavioral, and biological makeup of male and female differences. Females tend to have a higher body fat percentage than males, even in the same WC [44]. Abdominal adiposity is believed to be an important contributor to IS development. This is probably because visceral fat was considered as an endocrine organ with metabolic activity and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines obesity [45].
The interaction of FHS and WC with IS risk
An association of FHS and WC with IS risk is lacking among the Chinese population. The interplay between genetic and environmental factors often makes it difficult to rely on particular genetic identification to determine the genetic risk of an individual’s cardiovascular disease [46]. We found a particularly significant interaction of FHS and WC with IS. The exact mechanism underlying the combined effect of FHS and WC on IS risk is not completely understood.
According to a case-control study of 6,000 participants, correctable risk factors are responsible for 90 % of stroke risk [47]. The effect of FHS on the risk of IS could reflect either genetic predisposition or shared lifestyle, both of which are not easy to modify in a short period. Thus, it is of great importance for individuals with FHS to decrease their WC by changing unhealthy lifestyles to reduce IS risk. Self-reported FHS information can also be used to personalize health messages and may be more effective than standardized health messages in motivating people to adopt and maintain a healthy lifestyle.
Strengths and Limitations
The strengths of our study include the prospective cohort design, the large sample size, well-designed questionnaire, and systematic and uniform data collection and management. Height, weight, and WC were measured by trained and qualified investigators, using a uniform measurement protocol. This cohort had a low loss to follow-up and was a stable population. Data were collected with strict quality control and important covariates were measured and controlled for in the analysis. This study provided more credible evidence than case-control or cross-sectional studies.
However, this study has some limitations. First, the age at onset of first-degree relatives was not obtained from the questionnaire. Second, family history data were obtained based on self-report, which can lead to some degree of misclassification bias and recall biases, affecting the accuracy of the information. However, previous studies have reported that self-reported family history provides reliable stroke data [48]. Third, the study used RPG instead of fasting plasma glucose, which may have resulted in measurement error. However, a previous study on CKB showed that RPG is a good predictor of the risk of cardiovascular disease[36]. Finally, indices of adiposity were measured once at the baseline, therefore, the evaluation of changes in body size was not possible.
Conclusion
In summary, we found that WC accentuated the impact of family history on IS. Our findings emphasize the importance of counselling family members regarding maintaining a recommended WC, collecting family history as a screening tool for individuals with increased disease risk, and considering gene-environment interactions in the prevention of IS.
Acknowledgements
We thank Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Ministry of Health, National Health and Family Planning Commission of China, and provincial Health Administrative Departments. The most important acknowledgment is to the participants in the study and the members of the survey teams in Qingdao, as well as to the project development and management teams based at Beijing and Oxford.
Funding sources
This work was supported by grants (2016YFC0900500, 2016YFC0900501, 2016YFC0900504) from the National Key Research and Development Program of China, grants from the Kadoorie Charitable Foundation in Hong Kong and grants (088158/Z/09/Z, 104085/Z/14/Z) from Wellcome Trust in the UK. The work also supported by Qingdao Outstanding Health Professional Development Fund.
Abbreviations
- CKB
China Kadoorie Biobank
- DSPs
Disease Surveillance Points System
- FHS
family history of stroke
- WC
waist circumference
- IS
ischemic stroke
- SBP
systolic blood pressure
- DBP
diastolic blood pressure
- BMI
body-mass index
- RPG
random plasma glucose
- MET
metabolic equivalent of task
- HR
hazard ratio
- CI
confidence interval
- PYs
person-years
- AP
attributable proportion due to interaction
- RERI
elative excess risk due to interaction
- SI
synergy index
- RCS
restricted cubic splines
- ICD-10
International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision
Footnotes
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare no competing interests
Author contributions
LL, XX and HZ collected and analyzed the data, drafted and edited the manuscript. YG, PP, SW, HD, RG, ZP, ZC, and LL collected the data. XT, YC designed the study and reviewed the manuscript. All authors were involved in writing the paper and had final approval of the submitted and published versions.
Data availability statement
Details of how to access China Kadoorie Biobank data and details of the data release schedule are available from www.ckbiobank.org/site/Data+Access.
References
- [1].Rajsic S, Gothe H, Borba HH, Sroczynski G, Vujicic J, Toell T, et al. Economic burden of stroke: a systematic review on post-stroke care [J] Eur J Health Econ. 2019;20(1):107–34. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-0984-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 [J] Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(10):795–820. doi: 10.1016/s1474-4422(21)00252-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Virani SS, Alonso A, Aparicio HJ, Benjamin EJ, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2021 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association [J] Circulation. 2021;143(8):e254–e743. doi: 10.1161/cir.0000000000000950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Zhao D, Liu J, Wang M, Zhang X, Zhou M. Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in China: current features and implications [J] Nat Rev Cardiol. 2019;16(4):203–12. doi: 10.1038/s41569-018-0119-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Della-Morte D, Guadagni F, Palmirotta R, Testa G, Caso V, Paciaroni M, et al. Genetics of ischemic stroke, stroke-related risk factors, stroke precursors and treatments [J] Pharmacogenomics. 2012;13(5):595–613. doi: 10.2217/pgs.12.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Yu S, Su Z, Miao J, Yu Y, Zhang S, Wu J, et al. Different Types of Family History of Stroke and Stroke Risk: Results Based on 655,552 Individuals [J] J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019;28(3):587–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.10.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Hopper JL, Bishop DT, Easton DF. Population-based family studies in genetic epidemiology [J] Lancet. 2005;366(9494):1397–406. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67570-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Seshadri S, Beiser A, Pikula A, Himali JJ, Kelly-Hayes M, Debette S, et al. Parental occurrence of stroke and risk of stroke in their children: the Framingham study [J] Circulation. 2010;121(11):1304–12. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.109.854240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Choi JC, Lee JS, Kang SY, Kang JH, Bae JM. Family history and risk for ischemic stroke: sibling history is more strongly correlated with the disease than parental history [J] J Neurol Sci. 2009;284(1–2):29–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2009.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Ma S, Xi B, Yang L, Sun J, Zhao M, Bovet P. Trends in the prevalence of overweight, obesity, and abdominal obesity among Chinese adults between 1993 and 2015 [J] Int J Obes (Lond) 2021;45(2):427–37. doi: 10.1038/s41366-020-00698-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Kuk JL, Lee S, Heymsfield SB, Ross R. Waist circumference and abdominal adipose tissue distribution: influence of age and sex [J] Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81(6):1330–4. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/81.6.1330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Sun X, Liu Z, Du T. Secular trends in the prevalence of abdominal obesity among Chinese adults with normal weight, 1993-2015 [J] Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):16404. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95777-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Krakauer NY, Krakauer JC. Anthropometrics, Metabolic Syndrome, and Mortality Hazard [J] J Obes. 2018;2018:9241904. doi: 10.1155/2018/9241904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Chen Z, Chen J, Collins R, Guo Y, Peto R, Wu F, et al. China Kadoorie Biobank of 0.5 million people: survey methods, baseline characteristics and long-term follow-up [J] Int J Epidemiol. 2011;40(6):1652–66. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Chen Z, Lee L, Chen J, Collins R, Wu F, Guo Y, et al. Cohort profile: the Kadoorie Study of Chronic Disease in China (KSCDC) [J] Int J Epidemiol. 2005;34(6):1243–9. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyi174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Chen ZYG, Offer A, et al. The China Kadoorie Biobank: related methodology and baseline characteristics of the participants [J] Int J Epidemiol. 2012;(03):249–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Chen C, Lu FC. The guidelines for prevention and control of overweight and obesity in Chinese adults [J] Biomed Environ Sci. 2004;17:1–36. Suppl. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Yang G, Rao C, Ma J, Wang L, Wan X, Dubrovsky G, et al. Validation of verbal autopsy procedures for adult deaths in China [J] Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35(3):741–8. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyi181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Knol MJ, VanderWeele TJ, Groenwold RH, Klungel OH, Rovers MM, Grobbee DE. Estimating measures of interaction on an additive scale for preventive exposures [J] Eur J Epidemiol. 2011;26(6):433–8. doi: 10.1007/s10654-011-9554-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Desquilbet L, Mariotti F. Dose-response analyses using restricted cubic spline functions in public health research [J] Statistics in medicine. 2010;29(9):1037–57. doi: 10.1002/sim.3841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Meschia JF, Bushnell C, Boden-Albala B, Braun LT, Bravata DM, Chaturvedi S, et al. Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association [J] Stroke. 2014;45(12):3754–832. doi: 10.1161/str.0000000000000046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Kulshreshtha A, Vaccarino V, Goyal A, McClellan W, Nahab F, Howard VJ, et al. Family history of stroke and cardiovascular health in a national cohort [J] J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24(2):447–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.09.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].O'Donnell MJ, Chin SL, Rangarajan S, Xavier D, Liu L, Zhang H, et al. Global and regional effects of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with acute stroke in 32 countries (INTERSTROKE): a case-control study [J] Lancet. 2016;388(10046):761–75. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30506-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Franceschini N, Le TH. Genetics of hypertension: discoveries from the bench to human populations [J] Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2014;306(1):F1–f11. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00334.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Kondo T, Toyoshima H, Tsuzuki Y, Hori Y, Yatsuya H, Tamakoshi K, et al. Familial aggregation and coaggregation of history of hypertension and stroke [J] J Hum Hypertens. 2005;19(2):119–25. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Brass LM, Shaker LA. Family history in patients with transient ischemic attacks [J] Stroke. 1991;22(7):837–41. doi: 10.1161/01.str.22.7.837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Siegerink B, Rosendaal FR, Algra A. Family history differs between young women with myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke: results from the RATIO case-control study [J] Atherosclerosis. 2012;223(1):235–8. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.04.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Zhang X, Shu XO, Gao YT, Yang G, Li H, Zheng W. General and abdominal adiposity and risk of stroke in Chinese women [J] Stroke. 2009;40(4):1098–104. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.108.539692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Meschia JF, Case LD, Worrall BB, Brown RD, Jr, Brott TG, Frankel M, et al. Family history of stroke and severity of neurologic deficit after stroke [J] Neurology. 2006;67(8):1396–402. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000240267.25699.9d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].MacClellan LR, Mitchell BD, Cole JW, Wozniak MA, Stern BJ, Giles WH, et al. Familial aggregation of ischemic stroke in young women: the Stroke Prevention in Young Women Study [J] Genet Epidemiol. 2006;30(7):602–8. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Liao D, Myers R, Hunt S, Shahar E, Paton C, Burke G, et al. Familial history of stroke and stroke risk. The Family Heart Study [J] Stroke. 1997;28(10):1908–12. doi: 10.1161/01.str.28.10.1908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Touzé E, Rothwell PM. Sex differences in heritability of ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J] Stroke. 2008;39(1):16–23. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.107.484618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Kalish JM, Jiang C, Bartolomei MS. Epigenetics and imprinting in human disease [J] Int J Dev Biol. 2014;58(2–4):291–8. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.140077mb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Weijmans M, van der Graaf Y, Reitsma JB, Visseren FL. Paternal or maternal history of cardiovascular disease and the risk of cardiovascular disease in offspring. A systematic review and meta-analysis [J] Int J Cardiol. 2015;179:409–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Jerrard-Dunne P, Cloud G, Hassan A, Markus HS. Evaluating the genetic component of ischemic stroke subtypes: a family history study [J] Stroke. 2003;34(6):1364–9. doi: 10.1161/01.Str.0000069723.17984.Fd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Pang Y, Kartsonaki C, Turnbull I, Guo Y, Clarke R, Chen Y, et al. Diabetes, Plasma Glucose, and Incidence of Fatty Liver, Cirrhosis, and Liver Cancer: A Prospective Study of 0.5 Million People [J] Hepatology. 2018;68(4):1308–18. doi: 10.1002/hep.30083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Klein S, Allison DB, Heymsfield SB, Kelley DE, Leibel RL, Nonas C, et al. Waist circumference and cardiometabolic risk: a consensus statement from Shaping America’s Health: Association for Weight Management and Obesity Prevention; NAASO, The Obesity Society; the American Society for Nutrition; and the American Diabetes Association [J] Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85(5):1197–202. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/85.5.1197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Dhaliwal SS, Welborn TA, Goh LG, Howat PA. Obesity as assessed by body adiposity index and multivariable cardiovascular disease risk [J] PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e94560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Kim DH, Nam GE, Han K, Kim YH, Park KY, Hwang HS, et al. Variabilities in Weight and Waist Circumference and Risk of Myocardial Infarction, Stroke, and Mortality: A Nationwide Cohort Study [J] Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2020;35(4):933–42. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2020.871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Zhong CK, Zhong XY, Xu T, Zhang YH. Measures of Abdominal Adiposity and Risk of Stroke: A Dose-Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies [J] Biomed Environ Sci. 2016;29(1):12–23. doi: 10.3967/bes2016.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Wiklund P, Toss F, Weinehall L, Hallmans G, Franks PW, Nordström A, et al. Abdominal and gynoid fat mass are associated with cardiovascular risk factors in men and women [J] J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(11):4360–6. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-0804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Lu Y, Hajifathalian K, Ezzati M, Woodward M, Rimm EB, Danaei G. Metabolic mediators of the effects of body-mass index, overweight, and obesity on coronary heart disease and stroke: a pooled analysis of 97 prospective cohorts with 1·8 million participants [J] Lancet. 2014;383(9921):970–83. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61836-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Shirasawa T, Ochiai H, Yoshimoto T, Nagahama S, Kobayashi M, Ohtsu I, et al. Associations between normal weight central obesity and cardiovascular disease risk factors in Japanese middle-aged adults: a cross-sectional study [J] J Health Popul Nutr. 2019;38(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s41043-019-0201-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Stevens J, Katz EG, Huxley RR. Associations between gender, age and waist circumference [J] Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010;64(1):6–15. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2009.101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Nakamura K, Fuster JJ, Walsh K. Adipokines: a link between obesity and cardiovascular disease [J] J Cardiol. 2014;63(4):250–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2013.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Schulz UG, Flossmann E, Rothwell PM. Heritability of ischemic stroke in relation to age, vascular risk factors, and subtypes of incident stroke in population-based studies [J] Stroke. 2004;35(4):819–24. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000121646.23955.0f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].O’Donnell MJ, Xavier D, Liu L, Zhang H, Chin SL, Rao-Melacini P, et al. Risk factors for ischaemic and intracerebral haemorrhagic stroke in 22 countries (the INTERSTROKE study): a case-control study [J] Lancet. 2010;376(9735):112–23. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60834-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Okura Y, Urban LH, Mahoney DW, Jacobsen SJ, Rodeheffer RJ. Agreement between self-report questionnaires and medical record data was substantial for diabetes, hypertension, myocardial infarction and stroke but not for heart failure [J] J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57(10):1096–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Details of how to access China Kadoorie Biobank data and details of the data release schedule are available from www.ckbiobank.org/site/Data+Access.




