Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Apr 25.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2024 Jan 31;146(6):3825–3835. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c10982

Measuring hydroxyl exchange rates in glycans using a synergistic combination of saturation transfer and relaxation dispersion NMR

Claris Niya Varghese 1,#, Ahallya Jaladeep 1,#, Ashok Sekhar 1,*
PMCID: PMC7615893  EMSID: EMS195572  PMID: 38293947

Abstract

Molecular recognition events mediated by glycans play pivotal roles in controlling the fate of diverse biological processes such as cellular communication and the immune response. The affinity of glycans for their target receptors is governed primarily by the hydrogen bonds formed by hydroxyl groups decorating the glycan surface. Hydroxyl exchange rate constants are therefore vital parameters that report on glycan structure and dynamics. Here we present a strategy for characterizing hydroxyl hydrogen/deuterium (H/D) exchange in glycans that employs a synergistic combination of 13C chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) and Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill relaxation dispersion (CPMG) NMR methods. We show that the combination of CEST and CPMG experiments facilitates the sensitive detection of the small (~ 0.1 ppm) two-bond deuterium isotope shift on a 13C nucleus when the attached hydroxyl group fluctuates between protonated and deuterated states. This shift is leveraged for measuring site-specific kinetic H/D exchange rate constants as well as thermodynamic free energies of isotope fractionation. The CEST and CPMG modules are integrated with a selective J-cross-polarization scheme that provides the flexibility for rapid characterization of H/D exchange at a specific hydroxyl site. Moreover, our approach enables the precise isothermal measurement of hydroxyl exchange rate constants without the need for cumbersome isotope labeling. The H/D exchange rate constants of three different glycans assessed using this method highlight its potential for detecting transient intra and intermolecular hydrogen bonds. In addition, the trends in H/D exchange rate constants establish site-specific steric accessibility as a key determinant of solvent exchange dynamics in glycans.

Keywords: Chemical exchange saturation transfer, Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill relaxation dispersion, glycans, hydroxyl exchange, hydrogen bonds

Introduction

Glycans are the most abundant biomolecules found in living organisms.1 They are present either in isolation or conjugated to proteins and lipids, and perform a variety of structural and modulatory functions.2,3 For example, glucose is the primary source of energy in all life forms, while glycogen and starch serve as storage reserves4 and glycosaminoglycans such as heparin modulate the outcome of diverse pathways such as cell proliferation and angiogenesis5. The information content in glycans is encrypted in both their sequence and structure, and is decoded by carbohydrate-binding proteins known as lectins. The recognition of a glycan by a lectin involves the formation of specific hydrogen bonds between the hydroxyl groups in the glycan with solvent exposed polar and charged amino acids in the lectin.68 In addition, hydroxyl groups also contribute substantially to the tensile strength of structural carbohydrates like cellulose.1 The rates of hydroxyl group solvent exchange are, therefore, key descriptors of glycan structure and dynamics.

Two broad classes of NMR methods have been developed to measure hydroxyl exchange rates in glycans. In the first class of methods, exchange of protons between the glycan and water is directly observed, either by perturbing the water through a radiofrequency field and observing its effect on hydroxyl resonances9,10, or via a 2D 1H-1H magnetization exchange (EXSY) experiment in which cross-peaks between hydroxyl and water protons are quantified11,12. The second class of methods avoids perturbation or detection of the large water magnetization, which is complicated by experimental factors like radiation damping and receiver overflow. These methods exploit the two-bond deuterium isotope shift of the attached 13C nucleus (2Δ13C(D)) when the hydroxyl group exchanges from a protonated to a deuterated state in a mixed H2O/D2O solvent system. Hydroxyl hydrogen/deuterium (H/D) exchange rates are then measured either via 13C-detection and lineshape analysis (LSA)13 or through the 2D INTOXSY approach, where the diagonal and cross-peaks are separated by 2Δ13C(D), and cross-peak build-up is dictated by the H/D exchange rate constant14. Except for LSA, all these methods involve 1H evolution during the exchange period, in which magnetization transfer occurs not only because of chemical exchange, but also because of dipolar cross-relaxation between the network of coupled protons in the glycan. Careful separation of the effects of exchange and cross-relaxation then becomes necessary to reliably quantify exchange rate constants. On the other hand, LSA does not give an isothermal estimate of the H/D exchange rate constant and relies on 13C detection which is insensitive. Moreover, the range of rate constants measurable by all these methods has been limited to < 100 s-1, necessitating the use of mixed solvent systems or supercooled aqueous solutions to slow down H/D exchange.

The recently developed chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST), and Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill (CPMG) and rotating frame (R) relaxation dispersion NMR methods have been very successful in thermodynamic, kinetic and structural characterization of chemical and conformational exchange in proteins and nucleic acids.1517 However, their potential in probing μs-ms timescale dynamics in glycans remains poorly explored.18 Here, we show that a synergistic combination of 13C-CEST and CPMG methods, in conjunction with a selective 1D Hartmann-Hahn excitation scheme, provides reliable estimates of glycan H/D exchange rate constants. The trends in H/D exchange rates in sucrose, maltose and cellobiose reflect the steric accessibility of the hydroxyl group and also serve as markers for the presence of transient intra- and inter-glycan hydrogen bonds.

Results and Discussion

Evaluating the applicability of CEST and CPMG methodology to measure H/D exchange rate constants

H/D exchange (Eq. 1) at hydroxyl groups in glycans results in a two-bond deuterium isotope shift of the attached carbon (2Δ13C(D)).

COH+12D2OkHDkDHCOD+12H2O (1)

Therefore, in samples containing mixtures of H2O and D2O, glycan carbons attached to hydroxyl groups fluctuate between two sites separated in chemical shift by 2Δ13C(D). The relative populations of the two states (pC-OH and pC-OD) are determined predominantly by the fractional amounts of H2O and D2O, while the exchange rate constant kex is given by kex = kHD + kDH, where kHD and kDH are the forward and backward rate constants. The solvent exchange rate of hydroxyl protons in 100 % H2O, kHH, is related to kHD via a kinetic isotope effect.

The magnitude of 2Δ13C(D) in glycans is small (2Δ13C(D) = ϖC-OD - ϖC-OH = 0.11 ppm)14,19, corresponding to ~ 20 Hz on a 16.45 T (700 MHz) spectrometer. Since both CEST and CPMG methods require sizeable chemical shift differences (Δϖ) to characterize μs-ms timescale dynamics, we first used simulations to assess the range of kex values that can be robustly measured for Δϖ = 20 Hz. Initially, CEST profiles simulated at B1 fields of 1, 2, 3 and 5 Hz for kex varying from 50 – 500 s-1 were fit to the Bloch-McConnell equations. The correlation plot in Figure S1A shows that the fit kex values match the inputs only for kex < 300 s-1, while systematic deviations between the two are observed at larger kex. However, the addition of a CPMG dataset at a single static magnetic field strength substantially improves the agreement between input and fit values for kex up to 1000 s-1, extending the applicability of this methodology to H/D exchange rate constants of the order of 50-1000 s-1 expected for glycans in aqueous solution (Fig. S1B).

Exploiting a selective 1D-based strategy for glycan 13C-CEST and CPMG data acquisition

The principal factor modulating site-specific hydroxyl exchange rates in glycans is the presence of transient intra and intermolecular hydrogen bonds that have been detected in crystal structures as well as neutron diffraction and NMR data.1921 An intramolecular hydrogen bond has been observed in the crystal structure of sucrose between the hydroxyl at position 2 of the glucose ring (GOH2) and the hydroxyl at position 1 of the fructose ring (FOH1)22 (Fig. 1A). In order to gauge whether H/D exchange rate constants measured through 13C-CEST and CPMG methods are sensitive to the presence of transient hydrogen bonds, we chose sucrose as the initial model system. Sucrose affords the additional benefit of being a non-reducing sugar that exists as a single configuration in solution, unlike reducing sugars whose NMR spectra contain two sets of peaks because of anomerization.

Figure 1. Methodology to study hydroxyl exchange rate in glycans.

Figure 1

(A) The chemical structure of sucrose. Glucose carbons are numbered in green while fructose carbons are labelled in blue. The hydrogen bond between FOH1 and GOH2 observed in crystal structures of sucrose is shown as a green dashed line. (B) The 1H-13C HSQC spectrum of unlabeled sucrose at pH 5.8 and 278 K. Fructose and glucose resonances are labelled with F and G prefixes, respectively. The anomeric peak of the glucose ring is shown as an inset. (C) The selective 1D pulse sequence for recording 13C-CEST and CPMG of methylene and methine spin systems in glycans. In this pulse sequence, 1H magnetization is selectively transferred from the 1H of interest to the directly bonded 13C by a selective J cross polarization (SCP) module. CEST or CPMG data are acquired on this 13C magnetization. The 13C magnetization at the end of the CEST or CPMG period is then transferred back to 1H for detection by another SCP module. (Bottom left) The pulse sequence for the 13C-CEST module, where 13C z-magnetization is subjected to a weak B1 field during a period Tex. In every slice of the experiment, the 13C offset at which the weak B1 field is applied is varied. (Bottom right) The pulse scheme for 13C-CPMG, where the number of 13C 180° pulses (represented as wide open rectangles) applied for a constant time Tex is varied in every slice of the experiment. Details of the pulse sequence are provided in Supporting Information. (D) Overlay of the aliphatic region of a 1H 1D spectrum of sucrose (red) with a selective 1D spectrum of a methylene system (GC6-H6, green) and a methine system (FC3-H3, blue) acquired using the pulse sequence shown in panel (C).

Figure 1B shows the 1H-13C HSQC spectrum of sucrose acquired on a 100 mM sample at natural 13C abundance at pH 5.8 and 278 K. The peaks in the aliphatic region are sparsely dispersed over > 20 ppm in the 13C dimension, which would necessitate a CEST sweep of ~ 3.5 kHz on a 16.45 T spectrometer in the conventional 2D-based CEST experiment. On the other hand, the chemical shifts of the two states in exchange differ by a mere 20 Hz for all resonances of interest. In addition, since the 13C chemical shift difference between the protonated and deuterated states is small, weak B1 fields between 1-5 Hz are necessary for visualizing the two dips in intensity. Since the offset spacing in CEST experiments is typically of the order of the B1 field, 300-3000 planes are required to cover the entire 13C sweep width in a conventional 2D CEST experiment, leading to unreasonably long measurement times.

We therefore adopted a selective 1D excitation scheme to interrogate peaks one at a time in the context of either a CEST or a CPMG experiment (Fig. 1C, SI Text). In this scheme, selective excitation is achieved through a Hartmann-Hahn J-cross-polarization module,23 which employs weak radiofrequency fields with matching amplitudes on both the 1H and 13C channels applied on-resonance to the respective 1H and 13C chemical shifts of a 1H-13C covalently bonded spin pair.24 When RF field strengths of the order of 1JHC are used (1JHC ~ 145 Hz, B1 ~ 130 Hz for methine carbons and 1JHC ~ 125 Hz, B1 ~ 115 Hz for methylene carbons), magnetization is transferred from the hydrogen of interest to its covalently bonded 13C nucleus, resulting in a single peak in the 13C-edited selective 1D 1H spectrum.2426 Figure 1D shows the 1D 1H spectrum of sucrose in red, overlaid with a selective 1D spectrum exciting either the FC3-H3 methine (Fig. 1D, blue) or the GC6-H6 methylene (Fig. 1D, green) spin systems. A conventional 2D-based CEST experiment on sucrose would take 184 h for acquiring 736 planes (92 planes centred around each of the eight non-overlapping carbons attached to hydroxyls) spaced 2 Hz apart (4 transients per increment) covering the entire 13C sweep width. On the other hand, the selective 1D CEST will only need 45 min per peak (16 transients per increment) for the same chemical shift offset spacing, since only a sweep of 180 Hz is required around the resonance of interest.

The selective 1D scheme is then interfaced with the CEST (Fig. 1C, left) or CPMG (Fig. 1C, right) modules. In the CEST experiment, a weak RF field is applied at offsets sweeping through the chemical shifts of the states in conformational exchange for a duration Tex. 13C magnetization is placed along the z-axis at the start of Tex and the amount left over at the end of Tex is transferred back to 1H for detection.27 In the CPMG experiment, increasing repeats (N) of the τCP-180°-τCP element are applied on in-phase transverse 13C magnetization for the constant exchange period Tex. The residual transverse magnetization at the end of Tex is estimated by transferring back to 1H for detection.28,29 13C-CEST and CPMG profiles of the selectively excited carbons are then obtained by quantifying the peak intensity in the selective 1D spectrum as function of chemical shift offset (CEST) or CPMG pulsing frequency (νCPMG = 1/(4τCP + 2pw180), pw180 being the duration of the 180° CPMG pulse). The covalently attached proton is decoupled during Tex using a DIPSI-230 composite decoupling sequence in the CEST experiment31 and a continuous wave RF field32 in the CPMG experiment. As decoupling is uninterrupted during the exchange period, there is no interconversion between in-phase and anti-phase magnetization due to scalar coupling evolution, eliminating the need for a P-element in the sequence that would otherwise compensate for differential relaxation of the in- and anti-phase components. In addition, the CPMG module used here has been shown to self-compensate for imperfections in the CPMG 180° pulses.32 This extends the range of the CPMG pulse sequence for probing small kex, as both even and odd numbers of echoes (N) can be employed on either side of the 180°ϕ4 13C pulse without introducing artifacts in the CPMG dispersions.32 Since only one 1H-13C spin pair is examined in each selective 1D dataset, the transmitter offsets can be individually tailored to the values for each nucleus. This is an additional advantage in selective 1D-based experiments as it eliminates off-resonance effects during CPMG pulsing and significantly improves the 1H decoupling efficiency in both sequences.

Measuring H/D exchange rate constants in sucrose: the methodology

Figures 2 and S2 shows the CEST (Fig. 2A, Fig. S2A) and CPMG (Fig. 2B, Fig. S2B) profiles of sucrose acquired on a 100 mM unlabeled sample at pH 5.8 and 278 K. The sample was prepared in 50 % (v/v) H2O/D2O, which was identified through simulations to be the optimal pC-OH/pC-OD ratio for clearly distinguishing exchange fingerprints from CEST and CPMG profiles (Fig. S3). Since the 13C-OH and 13C-OD states are separated only by 2Δ13C(D) ~ 20 Hz), both these states are excited by the J-cross-polarization module. Consequently, CEST and CPMG profiles derive from the evolution of both MCOH and MCOD (the magnetization vectors of 13C nuclei bonded to protonated and deuterated hydroxyls respectively) during the exchange period.

Figure 2. Measuring sucrose H/D exchange rate constants in 50 % (v/v) D2O/H2O using selective 1D 13C-CEST and CPMG data.

Figure 2

(A) Selective 13C-CEST and (B) 13C-CPMG profiles of different carbon nuclei in sucrose. CEST data were acquired at 4 B1 field strengths between 1 and 5 Hz. Solid lines are fits of the data (filled circles) to the Bloch-McConnell equations as described in the Main Text. The H/D exchange rate estimated at each site by fitting 13C-CEST and 13C-CPMG profiles together is indicated at the top along with the name of the site.

The fluctuation of each 13C nucleus between -OH and -OD bonded states is apparent in the CEST profiles, either as two distinct dips in intensity (Fig. 2A, FC3 and FC4) or as a broadening of the CEST profile (Fig. 2A, GC3 and GC6). For each 13C site, the width of the intensity dips increases at higher B1 field strengths, and two distinct dips arising from protonated and deuterated hydroxyl groups are visible only at small RF amplitudes given the small chemical shift difference between the exchanging states (2Δ13C(D) ~ 20 Hz). It is therefore important to acquire data at B1 fields ≤ 5 Hz in order to reliably determine the parameters quantifying the exchange event. Figure 2B shows 13C-CPMG profiles acquired on the same sample at a static field strength of 16.45 T. Chemical exchange between the C-OH and C-OD states separated in chemical shift by 2Δ13C(D) results in CPMG dispersions ranging in magnitude (ΔR2eff=R2eff(vCPMG=25Hz)R2eff(vCPMG,max)) from 3.5 – 5 s-1. In contrast, the dispersions for the GC5 of glucose are flat (Fig. S4), confirming that three-bond deuterium isotope shifts are below the detection limit of our method and do not interfere with H/D exchange rate constant measurements.

The 13C nucleus during Tex is an excellent approximation to an isolated spin-1/2 nucleus since covalently bonded 1H are decoupled during Tex. 13C-13C homonuclear scalar and dipolar couplings do not complicate data analysis as natural abundance 13C magnetization is used in these experiments. Moreover, dipolar cross-relaxation rate constants with remote protons are scaled by a factor of (γCγH)2 compared to rate constants at similar internuclear distances in proton-based exchange experiments.33 Therefore, artefactual contributions of cross-relaxation to the exchange rate constant measurements are negligible. Finally, owing to the fact that small B1 fields are employed in the 13C-CEST experiment, B1 fields were calibrated using the CONDENZ method34, as this allows for precise and accurate measurements of small B1 field strengths.

In order to extract sucrose H/D exchange rate constants from selective 1D data, we first fit the site-specific 4 B1 field CEST data to a two-state model of the Bloch-McConnell equations35. Since the thermodynamics and kinetics of H/D exchange is expected to be different at every hydroxyl site, no parameters were shared between sites. Intrinsic longitudinal (R1) and transverse relaxation rate constants (R2) are not expected to differ significantly for the C-OH and C-OD states (SI Text, Fig. S5) (ΔR1, ΔR2~ 0) and were assumed to be the same in the fitting routine. The χred2 surface for kex (Fig. 3A, green), which shows the deterioration in fit quality (estimated by χred2) when kex is fixed to the ‘incorrect value’, has a pronounced minimum for small kex (50-70 s-1, FC3 and FC4), but becomes flat at higher kex values (> 90 s-1). This indicates that large kex values cannot be reliably extracted from CEST data alone, in agreement with simulations (Fig. S1, see above). To determine why χred2 surfaces become flat at high kex, we plotted pC-OD, 2Δ13C(D), R1, CEST and R2, CEST at every kex value for GC6 (Fig. S6A-D, yellow filled circles). While pC-OD and R1, CEST do not vary significantly when kex is altered (Fig. S6A, S6C), we see systematic increases in 2Δ13C(D) (Fig. S6B) and decreases in R2, CEST (Fig. S6D) with increasing kex, which compensate for changes occurring in kex to maintain the same quality of fit.

Figure 3. H/D exchange rate constants can be reliably estimated from a global analysis of 13C-CEST and 13C-CPMG data.

Figure 3

(A) χred2 plots of kex for different carbon nuclei in sucrose showing the increase in χred2 from the best-fit value caused by fixing kex to a particular value during the fit. χred2 curves were generated by fitting 13C-CEST data alone (filled green circles), 13C-CEST data bounding the R2 value (open red circles), or 13C-CEST and 13C-CPMG data together with bounds on R2 (filled blue triangles). The H/D exchange rates estimated by fitting 13C-CEST and 13C-CPMG data together with bounded R2 are indicated at the top of every χred2 surface along with the site name. (B, C) kex distributions obtained by Monte Carlo analysis of 13C-CEST and 13C-CPMG datasets for methine (B) and methylene (C) systems in sucrose.

The correlation between R2 and kex has previously been observed for protein CEST profiles in fast exchange36 and can be rationalized based on the equation for the CEST profile that is approximately given by:37

I/I0=cos2θeR1ρTex (2)

where

R1ρ=R1cos2θ+(R2+Rex)sin2θ (3)

Here, R is the rotating frame relaxation rate constant and tan θ = ω1/Ω, where θ is the angle made by the effective field with the z-axis, ω1 is the RF field in rad/s and Ω is the chemical shift of each state in slow exchange (or the population weighted average chemical shift in fast exchange). When the dips from the two states overlap significantly in the CEST profiles, as for GC3 and GC6, the contributions to transverse relaxation from intrinsic R2, which is encoded in the width of the dip, cannot be clearly distinguished from exchange broadening of each state (Rex). Since Rex depends on the exact value of kex, fixing kex to different values during the fitting procedure results in changes to Rex. These changes are compensated by the intrinsic R2 in order to keep R2+Rex constant and maintain the same fit quality at different kex values. In order to break the correlation between R2 and kex, we measured exchange-free R2s of 13C nuclei (Fig. S7) in sucrose from the time-dependent decay of transverse magnetization in a variable time CPMG experiment at constant νCPMG (1 kHz), where exchange broadening is completely quenched by CPMG pulsing (Fig. 2B). The R2 values deviate from the asymptotes (R2,∞ = R2,effCPMG = 1000Hz)) of the respective CPMG profiles by up to 10 %. Therefore, we used a conservative bound of R2,∞ ± 25% on the CEST-derived R2s and fit the 4 B1 field CEST profiles together. Now, the χred2 surfaces of FC3, FC4 and GC3 (kex ≤ 150 s-1) show steeper minima compared to fitting CEST data without bounded R2s (Fig. 3A, green vs red).

However, the χred2 surface for GC6 remains flat even with bounded R2 (Fig. 3A, red), because of the tight correlation between 2Δ13C(D) and kex (Fig. S6B, cyan). We next tested whether 13C-CPMG profiles could help in breaking the correlation between 2Δ13C(D) and kex, since CPMG data are sensitive to both kex and |2Δ13C(D)|. CPMG profiles simulated (Fig. S8) using three correlated (kex, 2Δ13C(D)) pairs (Fig. S6B, yellow) are significantly different, suggesting that CPMG data may help in resolving the kex-2Δ13C(D) correlation. Indeed, when 4 B1 field CEST profiles are fit globally with a single CPMG dataset at the same B0 field strength with bounded R2, χred2 surfaces for all sites including GC6 show pronounced minima (Fig. 3A, blue and Fig. S9). The variations in 2Δ13C(D) and R2 from CEST profiles are marginal over the tested range, indicating that different exchange parameters do not adjust in concert with kex (Fig. S6B, S6D, pink). Distributions of kex generated from a Monte Carlo analysis are narrow (Figs. 3B, 3C, SI Text) with standard deviations ranging from 0.3 – 2 s-1 (Table S5). Moreover, 2Δ13C(D) of different sites are very similar (Fig. S10), as expected from relative insensitivity of deuterium isotope shifts on the chemical environment.14 Taken together, our analysis establishes that glycan H/D exchange rate constants in the range 50-200 s-1 can be reliably measured from a global modelling of experimental CPMG and CEST profiles.

Measuring H/D exchange rate constants in sucrose: evidence for steric and hydrogen bonding effects

The site-specific H/D exchange rate constants obtained by fitting 13C-CEST and CPMG profiles along with R2 bounds are indicated at the top of Figure 2. The trends in kex values are reflected in the shapes of the CEST profiles, providing confidence in the kex estimates generated by the fitting routine. For example, as kex increases from FC3 through FC4 and GC3 to GC6, kex/2Δ13C(D) also increases (since 2Δ13C(D) is virtually invariant with site) and the exchange process goes from slow (kex/2Δ13C(D) = 0.49 for FC3) to intermediate exchange (kex/2Δ13C(D) = 1.56 for GC6). In parallel, CEST profiles move from slow exchange (FC3 and FC4) where two dips are clearly discernible, through intermediate exchange (GC3), where the two dips coalesce into a single broad dip, to faster exchange, where the single dip begins narrowing (GC6). Similarly, the ΔR2eff for GC6, which is close to intermediate exchange, is 5 s-1, which is larger than the ΔR2eff values for sites in slower exchange (3.5 s-1 for FC3, FC4 and GC3).

Figure 4 shows the H/D exchange rate constants for all hydroxyls in sucrose. CH2OH groups (open bars, kex ≥ 100 s-1) typically undergo faster exchange than CHOH moieties (filled bars, kex ≤ 100 s-1); this is most likely a direct consequence of the higher steric accessibility of CH2OH groups compared to CHOHs. Interestingly, the H/D exchange rate constants in sucrose also appear to reflect the presence of transient hydrogen bonds in solution. The two hydroxyl groups that form an intra-glycan hydrogen bond in the crystal structure of sucrose, FOH1 and GOH2, have ~ 33% slower exchange rate constants than their CH2OH (FOH6, GOH6) and CHOH (GOH3) counterparts respectively. In addition, slower H/D exchange rate constants are observed for FOH3 and GOH4, which form an inter-glycan hydrogen bond seen in NMR spectra and molecular dynamics simulations20. It must be noted that there is no evidence for intra- or inter-glycan hydrogen bonds formed by FOH4, suggesting that there may be other subtle physicochemical factors like site-specific pKas governing the differences in H/D exchange rates.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Hydroxyl H/D exchange rate constants of sucrose at pH 5.8 and 278 K measured using selective 13C-CEST and CPMG experiments. Blue and green bars represent exchange at fructose and glucose hydroxyls respectively. Open bars show exchange rate constants for hydroxyls attached to methylene carbons, while filled bars depict exchange at methine carbons.

Similar trends in hydroxyl H/D exchange rate constants have been observed in literature. Specifically, saturation transfer and 2D 1H-1H EXSY measurements on sucrose and glucose in acetone/water mixtures revealed that CH2OH groups exchange more rapidly with water than CHOHs10,11 (Fig. S11). The saturation transfer-based H/D exchange rate constant for GOH3 in sucrose is also noticeably higher than for other CHOH10, agreeing well with our observations (Fig. S11A). Interestingly, all the CHOHs in the monosaccharide glucose were observed to exchange at comparable rates in 2D EXSY data11, and the uniformity in glucose H/D exchange rate constants supports our observation that the smaller kex seen in FOH3, FOH4, GOH2 and GOH4 of sucrose indeed originate from transient intra- and inter-glycan hydrogen bonds in sucrose (Fig. S11B). However, the sensitivity of our method for larger kex values makes the patterns in H/D exchange rate constants more noticeable, and isothermal rate constant measurements can be made without taking recourse to mixed solvent systems or supercooled water.

The thermodynamics underlying hydrogen exchange can be probed using the fractionation factor (ϕ), which is given by the equation:

ϕ=kHDkDH=pCOD[H2O]pCOH[D2O]

where [H2O] and [D2O] define the solvent composition.14,38,39 The fractionation factor therefore is the relative occupancy of the deuterated (C-OD) over the protonated (C-OH) states when the concentrations of H2O and D2O in the solvent are equal. Fractionation factors are related to the differences between the zero-point energies of a proton and deuteron at a hydroxyl site in the glycan versus in water.39 ϕ values deviate from unity for strongly hydrogen-bonded systems.40,41 The site-specific ϕ values for sucrose can be directly obtained from pC-OD and pC-OH derived from fits of CEST and CPMG data to the Bloch-McConnell equations and are shown in Figure S12. ϕ values for sucrose cluster closely around 1.0, confirming that the hydrogen bonds formed by hydroxyl groups in glycans are very similar in nature to those found in water.

Detecting transient hydrogen bonds in maltose and cellobiose

Since hydroxyl groups of sucrose engaged in transient hydrogen bonds show significantly slower H/D exchange, we sought to verify this trend in other glycans that are known to form intra-glycan hydrogen bonds. Accordingly, we chose maltose and cellobiose as model systems, because they are both disaccharides of glucose that have the same 1-4 regiochemistry at the glycosidic linkage but differ in the stereochemistry (maltose: α(1-4), cellobiose: β(1-4)) (Fig. 5A, 5B). In addition, X-ray and neutron diffraction data have reported the existence of hydrogen bonds in both maltose42,43 and cellobiose44,45. The hydroxyl attached to C3 in the glucose ring at the reducing end (G1) is hydrogen bonded in both glycans, but to G2OH2 in maltose46,47 and to the G2 ring oxygen in cellobiose48. Based on the H/D exchange trends seen in sucrose, we predicted that G1OH3 in both maltose and cellobiose should undergo slower exchange than a reference CHOH group like G1OH2 that is not involved in hydrogen bonds.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

H/D exchange rate constants in cellobiose and maltose indicate the existence of transient hydrogen bonds. Chemical structures of maltose (A) and cellobiose (B). In each structure, the glucose unit at the reducing end is labelled as G1 and the glucose ring at the non-reducing end is labelled as G2. The glycosidic linkage is highlighted in red and the hydrogen bond reported in literature is denoted as a green dashed line. Carbons attached to hydrogen bonded hydroxyls (for which 13C-CEST and 13C-CPMG profiles are shown in panels (E) and (F)) are labelled in green and carbons attached to non-hydrogen bonded hydroxyls (for which 13C-CEST and 13C-CPMG profiles are shown in panels (C) and (D)) are labelled in blue. (C-F) 13C-CEST profiles (left) at four B1 fields and the 13C-CPMG profile (right) for non-hydrogen bonded hydroxyls attached to βG1C2 of maltose (C) and αG1C2 of cellobiose (D), and hydrogen bonded hydroxyls attached to βG1C3 of maltose (E) and αG1C3 of cellobiose (F). Solid lines are global fits of the data (solid circles) to the Bloch-McConnell equations. The H/D exchange rate constant at 278 K and pH 6.2 estimated by fitting 13C-CEST and 13C-CPMG together is indicated at the top of each panel along with the name of the site.

Figures S13 and S14 show the 1H-13C HSQC spectra of maltose and cellobiose, while the 13C-CEST and CPMG profiles of G1C2 and G1C3 of maltose and cellobiose are depicted in Figures 5C-5F and Figure S15. The H/D exchange rate constant for the hydroxyl group G1OH2 which is not hydrogen-bonded in either sugar is 114 s-1 (maltose) or 106 s-1 (cellobiose) (Fig. 5 and S16). These values compare favourably with the free CHOH in sucrose (94 s-1). In contrast, the hydroxyl group G1OH3 which is predicted to be hydrogen bonded in both sugars has much smaller H/D exchange rate constants of 76 s-1 in maltose and 61 s-1 in cellobiose (Fig. 5, S15 and S16), comparable to the hydrogen-bonded hydroxyls like GOH2 in sucrose. It must be emphasized that the difference in kex values between G1OH2 and G1OH3 in maltose cellobiose is not merely an output of the fitting routine, but can be directly visualized from the CEST and CPMG profiles for each site; faster H/D exchange in G1OH2 results in a coalescence of the dips from C-OH and C-OD that can be differentiated in CEST profiles of G1C3, and larger dispersions in CPMG profiles of G1C2 arise from faster H/D exchange in G1OH2 over G1OH3 (Fig. 5). In summary, the data on maltose and cellobiose provide support for the role of intra-glycan hydrogen bonds in slowing down H/D exchange as well as for the ability of a combined 13C-CEST and 13C-CPMG analysis in detecting these transient hydrogen bonds.

Concluding remarks

Our perception of protein molecular dynamics has been considerably enriched by NMR experiments like chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) and Carr–Purcell–Meiboom–Gill (CPMG) relaxation dispersion.17,37,49 These experiments have enabled the structural characterization of ‘invisible’ states50 and the measurement of molecular properties like diffusion coefficients51, paramagnetic relaxation enhancement52 and hydrogen exchange rates53 in these elusive states. Here we demonstrate the potential of a synergistic combination of 13C-CEST and CPMG methods in measuring isothermal H/D exchange rate constants in glycans. Since exchange is studied while magnetization is present on 13C nuclei, rate constants can be quantified robustly without interference from dipolar cross-relaxation. 13C-13C homonuclear scalar couplings also do not complicate the measurement of H/D exchange rates because natural abundance 13C magnetization is leveraged in these experiments. Moreover, the use of unlabeled glycan samples eliminates the need for glycan isotope labelling, which is challenging because glycan synthesis is not templated, unlike the cellular production of proteins and nucleic acids. The selective 1D excitation provides flexibility for probing nuclei of interest one at a time, and high-sensitivity CPMG and CEST profiles for a target nucleus can be collected on glycan samples down to 25 mM concentration within a few hours (Fig. S17). We anticipate that precise estimates of hydroxyl exchange rate constants available from our method will be beneficial for detecting transient hydrogen bonds in glycans, which can be used as structural restraints in defining glycan ensembles and for locating hotspots involved in glycan-protein and glycan-glycan recognition.

Associated content

Supporting Information

Supporting Text including a Materials and Methods section describing sample preparation, details of the pulse sequence, 13C-CEST and CPMG data processing and analysis, quantitative analysis of differential carbon relaxation in two states; Supporting Figures highlighting the results of simulations, additional glycan 13C-CEST and CPMG profiles, χred2 surfaces, variations in fit parameters at different kex values in the χred2 surface of GC6 in sucrose, intrinsic R2 measurements from 13C-CPMG data, site-specific fractionation factors and 2Δ13C(D), results of bootstrap analysis for error estimation, and HSQC spectra of cellobiose and maltose; Supporting Tables of glycan chemical shifts, fit parameters and error analysis from 13C-CEST and CPMG profiles.

Supplementary Material

SI

Acknowledgements

We thank Pramodh Vallurupalli, Alexandar L. Hansen, Siddhartha P. Sarma and Bharathwaj Sathyamoorthy for helpful discussions. This work was supported by grants from the DBT/Wellcome Trust India Alliance Fellowship (grant no.: IA/I/18/1/503614) and a DST/SERB Core Research grant (no. CRG/2019/003457), as well as a start-up grant from IISc awarded to A.S. We acknowledge funding for infrastructural support from the following programs of the Government of India: DST-FIST, UGC-CAS, and the DBT-IISc partnership program. C.N.V. thanks the Ministry of Education, Government of India for fellowship support through the Prime Minister’s Research Fellows scheme. A.J. thanks IISc Bangalore for fellowship support.

Footnotes

Notes:

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Contributor Information

Claris Niya Varghese, Email: clarisv@iisc.ac.in.

Ahallya Jaladeep, Email: ahallyap@iisc.ac.in.

References

  • (1).Varki A, Cummings RD, Esko JD, Stanley P, Hart GW, Aebi M, Mohnen D, Kinoshita T, Packer NH, Prestegard JH, Schnaar RL, et al., editors. Essentials of Glycobiology. 4th ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; Cold Spring Harbor (NY): 2022. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).Varki A. Biological Roles of Glycans. Glycobiology. 2017;27(1):3–49. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cww086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Ardá A, Jiménez-Barbero J. The Recognition of Glycans by Protein Receptors. Insights from NMR Spectroscopy. Chem Commun. 2018;54(38):4761–4769. doi: 10.1039/C8CC01444B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Albuquerque PBS, De Oliveira WF, Dos Santos Silva PM, Dos Santos Correia MT, Kennedy JF, Coelho LCBB. Epiphanies of Well-Known and Newly Discovered Macromolecular Carbohydrates – A Review. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2020;156:51–66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Roth M, Papakonstantinou E, Karakiulakis G. Carbohydrate Chemistry, Biology and Medical Applications. Elsevier; 2008. Biological Function of Glycosaminoglycans; pp. 209–226. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Gabius H-J, André S, Jiménez-Barbero J, Romero A, Solís D. From Lectin Structure to Functional Glycomics: Principles of the Sugar Code. Trends in Biochemical Sciences. 2011;36(6):298–313. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2011.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).McMahon CM, Isabella CR, Windsor IW, Kosma P, Raines RT, Kiessling LL. Stereoelectronic Effects Impact Glycan Recognition. J Am Chem Soc. 2020;142(5):2386–2395. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b11699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Gimeno A, Valverde P, Ardá A, Jiménez-Barbero J. Glycan Structures and Their Interactions with Proteins. A NMR View. Current Opinion in Structural Biology. 2020;62:22–30. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2019.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Adams B, Lerner L. A Simple One-Dimensional Method for Measuring Proton Exchange Rates in Water. Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969) 1992;96(3):604–607. doi: 10.1016/0022-2364(92)90346-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Adams B, Lerner L. Observation of Hydroxyl Protons of Sucrose in Aqueous Solution: No Evidence for Persistent Intramolecular Hydrogen Bonds. J Am Chem Soc. 1992;114(12):4827–4829. doi: 10.1021/ja00038a055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (11).Sandström C, Baumann H, Kenne L. NMR Spectroscopy of Hydroxy Protons of 3,4-Disubstituted Methyl α-D-Galactopyranosides in Aqueous Solution. J Chem Soc, Perkin Trans. 1998;2(4):809–816. doi: 10.1039/a708550h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Beecher CN, Young RP, Langeslay DJ, Mueller LJ, Larive CK. Hydroxyl-Proton Hydrogen Bonding in the Heparin Oligosaccharide Arixtra in Aqueous Solution. J Phys Chem B. 2014;118(2):482–491. doi: 10.1021/jp410540d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Hanashima S, Kato K, Yamaguchi Y. 13C-NMR Quantification of Proton Exchange at LewisX Hydroxyl Groups in Water. Chem Commun. 2011;47(38):10800. doi: 10.1039/c1cc13310a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Battistel MD, Azurmendi HF, Freedberg DI. Glycan OH Exchange Rate Determination in Aqueous Solution: Seeking Evidence for Transient Hydrogen Bonds. J Phys Chem B. 2017;121(4):683–695. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b10594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Palmer AG. Chemical Exchange in Biomacromolecules: Past, Present, and Future. Journal of Magnetic Resonance. 2014;241:3–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2014.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Liu B, Shi H, Al-Hashimi HM. Developments in Solution-State NMR Yield Broader and Deeper Views of the Dynamic Ensembles of Nucleic Acids. Current Opinion in Structural Biology. 2021;70:16–25. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2021.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Sekhar A, Kay LE. An NMR View of Protein Dynamics in Health and Disease. Annual Review of Biophysics. 2019 doi: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-052118-115647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Barb AW, Prestegard JH. NMR Analysis Demonstrates Immunoglobulin G N-Glycans Are Accessible and Dynamic. Nat Chem Biol. 2011;7(3):147–153. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Battistel MD, Azurmendi HF, Freedberg DI. In: NMR in Glycoscience and Glycotechnology. Kato K, Peters T, editors. The Royal Society of Chemistry; 2017. Intramolecular Hydrogen Bonding in Glycans in Aqueous Solution; pp. 1–19. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Battistel MD, Pendrill R, Widmalm G, Freedberg DI. Direct Evidence for Hydrogen Bonding in Glycans: A Combined NMR and Molecular Dynamics Study. J Phys Chem B. 2013;117(17):4860–4869. doi: 10.1021/jp400402b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Jeffrey GA, Saenger W. Hydrogen Bonding in Biological Structures. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; Berlin, Heidelberg: 1994. Hydrogen Bonding in Carbohydrates; pp. 169–219. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Pérez S. In: Sucrose: Properties and Applications. Mathlouthi M, Reiser P, editors. Springer US; Boston, MA: 1995. The Structure of Sucrose in the Crystal and in Solution; pp. 11–32. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (23).Pelupessy P, Chiarparin E. Hartmann–Hahn Polarization Transfer in Liquids: An Ideal Tool for Selective Experiments. Concepts in Magnetic Resonance. 2000;12(3):103–124. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0534(2000)12:3&#x0003c;103::AID-CMR1&#x0003e;3.0.C0;2-#. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Hansen AL, Nikolova EN, Casiano-Negroni A, Al-Hashimi HM. Extending the Range of Microsecond-to-Millisecond Chemical Exchange Detected in Labeled and Unlabeled Nucleic Acids by Selective Carbon R 1ρ NMR Spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc. 2009;131(11):3818–3819. doi: 10.1021/ja8091399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (25).Chandrakumar N, Subramanian S. Modern Techniques in High-Resolution FT-NMR. Springer; New York, NY: 1987. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Korzhnev DM, Yu Orekhov V, Kay LE. Off-Resonance R 1ρ NMR Studies of Exchange Dynamics in Proteins with Low Spin-Lock Fields: An Application to a Fyn SH3 Domain. J Am Chem Soc. 2005;127(2):713–721. doi: 10.1021/ja0446855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (27).Vallurupalli P, Sekhar A, Yuwen T, Kay LE. Probing Conformational Dynamics in Biomolecules via Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer: A Primer. J Biomol NMR. 2017;67(4):243–271. doi: 10.1007/s10858-017-0099-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (28).Loria JP, Rance M, Palmer AG. A Relaxation-Compensated Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill Sequence for Characterizing Chemical Exchange by NMR Spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc. 1999;121(10):2331–2332. doi: 10.1021/ja983961a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (29).Mulder FAA, Skrynnikov NR, Hon B, Dahlquist FW, Kay LE. Measurement of Slow (Ms−ms) Time Scale Dynamics in Protein Side Chains by 15 N Relaxation Dispersion NMR Spectroscopy: Application to Asn and Gln Residues in a Cavity Mutant of T4 Lysozyme. J Am Chem Soc. 2001;123(5):967–975. doi: 10.1021/ja003447g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (30).Shaka AJ, Lee CJ, Pines A. Iterative Schemes for Bilinear Operators; Application to Spin Decoupling. Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969) 1988;77(2):274–293. doi: 10.1016/0022-2364(88)90178-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (31).Yuwen T, Bah A, Brady JP, Ferrage F, Bouvignies G, Kay LE. Measuring Solvent Hydrogen Exchange Rates by Multifrequency Excitation 15N CEST: Application to Protein Phase Separation. J Phys Chem B. 2018;122(49):11206–11217. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.8b06820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (32).Hansen DF, Vallurupalli P, Kay LE. An Improved 15N Relaxation Dispersion Experiment for the Measurement of Millisecond Time-Scale Dynamics in Proteins. J Phys Chem B. 2008;112(19):5898–5904. doi: 10.1021/jp074793o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (33).Cavanagh J, Fairbrother WJ, Palmer AG, Rance M, Skelton NJ. In: Protein NMR Spectroscopy. Second Edition. Cavanagh J, Fairbrother WJ, Palmer AG, Rance M, Skelton NJ, editors. Academic Press; Burlington: 2007. CHAPTER 5 - RELAXATION AND DYNAMIC PROCESSES; pp. 333–404. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (34).Jaladeep A, Varghese CN, Sekhar A. Measuring Radiofrequency Fields in NMR Spectroscopy Using Offset-Dependent Nutation Profiles. Journal of Magnetic Resonance. 2021;330:107032. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2021.107032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (35).McConnell HM. Reaction Rates by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 1958;28(3):430–431. doi: 10.1063/1.1744152. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (36).Khandave NP, Sekhar A, Vallurupalli P. Studying Micro to Millisecond Protein Dynamics Using Simple Amide 15N CEST Experiments Supplemented with Major-State R2 and Visible Peak-Position Constraints. J Biomol NMR. 2023;77(4):165–181. doi: 10.1007/s10858-023-00419-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (37).Palmer AG, Koss H. In: Methods in Enzymology. Wand AJ, editor. Vol. 615. Academic Press; 2019. Chapter Six - Chemical Exchange; pp. 177–236. Biological NMR Part B. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (38).Krantz BA, Moran LB, Kentsis A, Sosnick TR. D/H Amide Kinetic Isotope Effects Reveal When Hydrogen Bonds Form during Protein Folding. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2000;7(1):62–71. doi: 10.1038/71265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (39).Edison AS, Weinhold F, Markley JL. Theoretical Studies of Protium/Deuterium Fractionation Factors and Cooperative Hydrogen Bonding in Peptides. J Am Chem Soc. 1995;117(38):9619–9624. doi: 10.1021/ja00143a001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (40).Mildvan AS, Massiah MA, Harris TK, Marks GT, Harrison DHT, Viragh C, Reddy PM, Kovach IM. Short, Strong Hydrogen Bonds on Enzymes: NMR and Mechanistic Studies. Journal of Molecular Structure. 2002;615(1):163–175. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2860(02)00212-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (41).Viragh C, Harris TK, Reddy PM, Massiah MA, Mildvan AS, Kovach IM. NMR Evidence for a Short, Strong Hydrogen Bond at the Active Site of a Cholinesterase. Biochemistry. 2000;39(51):16200–16205. doi: 10.1021/bi0022644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (42).Quigley GJ, Sarko A, Marchessault RH. Crystal and Molecular Structure of Maltose Monohydrate. J Am Chem Soc. 1970;92(20):5834–5839. doi: 10.1021/ja00723a003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (43).Gres SME, Jeffrey GA. A Neutron Diffraction Refinement of the Crystal Structure of β-Maltose Monohydrate. Acta Cryst B. 1977;33(8):2490–2495. doi: 10.1107/S0567740877008772. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (44).O’Dell WB, Baker DC, McLain SE. Structural Evidence for Inter-Residue Hydrogen Bonding Observed for Cellobiose in Aqueous Solution. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(10):e45311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (45).Chu SSC, Jeffrey GA. The Refinement of the Crystal Structures of β-d-Glucose and Cellobiose. Acta Crystallographica Section B. 1968;24(6):830–838. doi: 10.1107/S0567740868003250. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (46).Brady JW, Schmidt RK. The Role of Hydrogen Bonding in Carbohydrates: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Maltose in Aqueous Solution. J Phys Chem. 1993;97(4):958–966. doi: 10.1021/j100106a024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • (47).Rönnols J, Engström O, Schnupf U, Säwén E, Brady JW, Widmalm G. Inter-residual Hydrogen Bonding in Carbohydrates Unraveled by NMR Spectroscopy and Molecular Dynamics Simulations. ChemBioChem. 2019;20(19):2519–2528. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201900301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (48).Wang D, Ámundadóttir ML, van Gunsteren WF, Hünenberger PH. Intramolecular Hydrogen-Bonding in Aqueous Carbohydrates as a Cause or Consequence of Conformational Preferences: A Molecular Dynamics Study of Cellobiose Stereoisomers. Eur Biophys J. 2013;42(7):521–537. doi: 10.1007/s00249-013-0901-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (49).Jensen MR, Zweckstetter M, Huang J, Blackledge M. Exploring Free-Energy Landscapes of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins at Atomic Resolution Using NMR Spectroscopy. Chem Rev. 2014;114(13):6632–6660. doi: 10.1021/cr400688u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (50).Sekhar A, Kay LE. NMR Paves the Way for Atomic Level Descriptions of Sparsely Populated, Transiently Formed Biomolecular Conformers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013;110(32):12867–12874. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1305688110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (51).Yuwen T, Sekhar A, Baldwin AJ, Vallurupalli P, Kay LE. Measuring Diffusion Constants of Invisible Protein Conformers by Triple-Quantum 1 H CPMG Relaxation Dispersion. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2018;57(51):16777–16780. doi: 10.1002/anie.201810868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (52).Sekhar A, Rosenzweig R, Bouvignies G, Kay LE. Hsp70 Biases the Folding Pathways of Client Proteins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2016;113(20):E2794–E2801. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1601846113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (53).Long D, Bouvignies G, Kay LE. Measuring Hydrogen Exchange Rates in Invisible Protein Excited States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2014;111(24):8820–8825. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405011111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

SI

RESOURCES