Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jul 12.
Published in final edited form as: Bone. 2020 Apr 28;137:115372. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115372

Imaging with radiolabelled bisphosphonates

Gary JR Cook 1,*
PMCID: PMC7616182  EMSID: EMS197125  PMID: 32353566

Abstract

Radiolabeled bisphosphonates were developed in the 1970s for scintigraphic functional imaging of the skeleton in benign and malignant disease. Tracers such as 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate, that map focal or global changes in mineralization in the skeleton qualitatively and quantitatively, have been the backbone of nuclear medicine imaging for decades. While competing technologies are evolving, new indications and improvements in scanner hardware, in particular hybrid imaging (e.g. single photon emission computed tomography combined with computed tomography), have allowed improved diagnostic accuracy and a continued role for radiolabeled bisphosphonate imaging in current practice.

Keywords: Bisphosphonates, Diphosphonates, 99m-technetium, Single photon emission computed tomography, Gamma camera, Imaging

1. History and basis of bisphosphonate imaging

A number of radiotracers that act as markers of skeletal mineralization have been described and compared [1]. However, the ability to radiolabel with the commonly available radionuclide 99mTc-technetium (99mTc), that has ideal physical characteristics for gamma camera imaging (half-life 6 h, photon energy 140 keV), is a distinct advantage leading to the ubiquitous use of radiolabeled bisphosphonates for bone scintigraphy.

99mTc-labeled pyrophosphates were initially used with some success in skeletal imaging [2]. However, the replacement of P-O-P in pyrophosphates with P-C-P, results in bisphosphonates (commonly named diphosphonates in nuclear medicine) that act as analogues that are more stable and resist in-vivo metabolism, and therefore more suitable for radiolabeling and intravenous injection, for imaging. Labeling, with the commonly available radionuclide 99mTc, allows gamma camera imaging of focal or global disturbances in skeletal mineralization, for which these compounds act as biomarkers.

In the 1970s, Subramanian et al. [3] developed 99mTc-labeled methylene diphosphonate (MDP) which showed superior imaging characteristics to other 99mTc-labeled bone-seeking tracers, including pyrophosphate, polyphosphate and another diphosphonate (ethane-1-hydroxyl-1, 1-diphosphonate). 99mTc-MDP was associated with more rapid clearance from blood and soft tissues with good image contrast as early as 2 h post injection and with an acceptable radiation dose. Structurally-related hydroxymethylene diphosphonate (HMDP) also shows favourable properties with higher skeletal uptake and comparable image quality [4,5]. Ignac Fogelman [6] and his collaborators and colleagues of the time were instrumental in the early and subsequent development and refinement of nuclear medicine imaging of the skeleton with bisphosphonates in benign and malignant disease [79] and for 50 years 99mTc-MDP, or similar compounds, have been used for scintigraphic imaging of a wide variety of benign and malignant clinical indications worldwide (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Structures of pyrophosphate (top left), methylene diphosphonate (MDP) (top right), ethane-1-hydroxy-1,1-dphosphonate (EHDP) (bottom left), hydro-xymethane diphosphonate (HMDP) bottom right.

2. Mechanisms and quantification of skeletal metabolism with radiolabeled bisphosphonates

After intravenous injection, between 20 and 60% of radiolabeled bisphosphonates are cleared to the skeleton over the following 24 h. There is significant protein binding that increases with time, but the free tracer is excreted through the urinary tract in relation to the glomerular filtration rate [10,11]. The resulting images, which can be acquired with good contrast between bone and soft tissue between 2 and 4 h post injection, are a map of the regional clearance of tracer in the skeleton related to regional blood flow and osteoblastic activity [3,11] (Fig. 2) although work with fluorescent bisphosphonates has also shown labeling at the resorptive surfaces associated with osteoclasts in animal models [12,13]. Indeed, bisphosphonates remain fixed in bone until the bone eventually undergoes resorption [14].

Fig. 2. A planar anterior and posterior 99mTc-MDP bone scan of a male with metastatic prostate cancer.

Fig. 2

Gamma cameras detect the emitted 140 keV photons from the 99mTc-MDP which are collimated before interaction with a scintigraphic crystal such as sodium iodide. The light scintillations are then collected, and the signal is amplified through photomultiplier tubes to produce a digital image representation of the distribution within the body. Multiple overlapping views of the skeleton can be acquired on a single-headed gamma camera or whole-body sweeps, with anterior and posterior whole-body images, can be acquired on dual-headed scanners (Fig. 2). The gamma camera heads, typically around 40 cm in diameter, can rotate around an area of the skeleton to acquire data that can be processed to make tomographic images that can be displayed in any plane, but typically axial, coronal and sagittal (Fig. 3). Tomographic images (single-photon emission computed tomography, SPECT) give a better 3-dimensional representation of the tracer distribution that can improve localization and diagnostic specificity. Although spatial resolution is inferior to non-tomographic planar images (e.g. 0.8–1.2 cm vs 0.5–1.0 cm), the contrast resolution is improved, thereby increasing sensitivity for lesion detection. If knowledge of the vascularity of a lesion is required, then early post injection scans can be acquired, e.g. 0–1 min for blood flow and 3–5 min for blood pool.

Fig. 3. Planar (a) and SPECT (b) 99mTc-MDP bone scan images in a patient with prostate cancer.

Fig. 3

Fig. 3

A focal metastatic lesion in L1 localizes to the vertebral body on the tomographic images.

As well as providing qualitative diagnostic imaging, it is possible to quantify either regional or global parameters of skeletal metabolism with bone-specific tracers such as 99mTc-MDP.

In particular, global disorders of skeletal metabolism may not be visibly abnormal to the eye without more sensitive quantification.

Fogelman pioneered the 24 h whole-body retention test [1520]. By comparing whole-body counts at 24 h to the initial counts at 5 min after injection, the ratio is related to the clearance of tracer to the skeleton compared to the total clearance of tracer by the skeleton and kidneys. It is assumed that any subsequent release of tracer from the bone mineral compartment is negligible at 24 h and that retention in soft tissues at 24 h is low. Measurements can be performed on a gamma camera or a whole-body counter.

Fogelman reported 24 h whole-body retention results in normals related to age [20] and in patients with a variety of metabolic bone diseases, including osteoporosis, hyperparathyroidism, Paget's disease, osteomalacia and renal osteodystrophy [15,19]. At 24 h, retention is < 20% in normals when using 99mTc-HEDP but as high as nearly 90% in those with renal osteodystrophy [15]. Some variation was noted when using different bisphosphonates [4].

In a study of 250 healthy adults, a rise in 24 h whole-body retention was noted at the menopause as a result of increased skeletal turnover [20], a finding confirmed by other investigators [21]. Fogelman also reported 24 h whole-body retention results in women post oophorectomy showing those on estrogen replacement had significantly lower results than those on placebo and that results correlated with dose and bone loss measured by photon absorptiometry [18].

Refinements to the 24 h whole-body retention methodology by Nisbet allowed quantification during routine clinical bone scanning using 51Cr-EDTA as a glomerular filtration co-tracer [22] and a further method that employs deconvolution analysis for quantifying skeletal metabolism, has also been described [23]. More recently, quantitative SPECT gamma camera data has been used for measurement of regional skeletal indices [24]. This method allowed differences between trabecular and cortical sites of the skeleton to be measured and showed higher values in cortical bone in osteoporotic women compared to normal women [25]. The same group observed increased skeletal metabolism, particularly in the femoral shaft, in patients with hyperparathyroidism and thyrotoxicosis [26]. The majority of both groups of patients showed a reduction in bone turnover after 3 months of appropriate treatment.

3. Diagnostic imaging approaches using radiolabeled bisphosphonates

Several metabolic and non-malignant orthopedic conditions are investigated routinely with bone scintigraphy using radiolabeled bisphosphonates such as 99mTc-MDP. These include Paget’s disease for diagnosis and response assessment [27,28], assessment and follow up of fractures, joint prosthesis infection and loosening, amongst others [29]. In addition, 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy has been a routine staging procedure for cancers that are commonly associated with bone metastases, such as breast and prostate cancers [30]. While the latter indication is still common, there are competing technologies such as positron emission tomography (PET) and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging (DW-MRI), that offer better diagnostic accuracy [30,31].

While the standard clinical bone tracers have not changed for several decades, there has been a significant improvement in quality and complexity of scanner hardware. Hybrid imaging, that combines morphological modalities such as CT and MRI with functional imaging, including SPECT and PET, is now routinely used in many hospitals. SPECT/CT and PET/CT are routinely available and PET/MRI scanners are available in some centers. SPECT/CT and PET/CT scans have the 2 modalities acquired consecutively with resultant images being available to view separately or overlaid (Fig. 4). The two components of PET/MRI can be performed simultaneously.

Fig. 4. Planar (a) and SPECT/CT (b) 99mTc-MDP images of a patient with a history of breast cancer with back pain.

Fig. 4

Fig. 4

Planar images show areas of increased activity in the lumbar spine. On SPECT/CT images (top row SPECT, bottom row SPECT/CT) it can clearly be seen that the abnormal activity originates in the facet joints and is therefore likely to represent benign arthrosis rather than metastases.

A weakness of bone scintigraphy is that uptake of 99mTc-MDP is non-specific and can occur in any disease that causes focal or global changes in mineralization. Tomographic SPECT or PET images on their own may complement planar images and increase sensitivity by increasing contrast resolution and increase specificity by allowing better anatomical and morphological analysis. However, with the addition of CT (or MRI) the specificity can be increased further as the morphological features can more readily differentiate benign from malignant causes of tracer uptake in the skeleton (Fig. 4) [32].

Planar bone scintigraphy has been losing favor as it has long been recognized that it has limited specificity in the diagnosis of bone metastases, and more recently sensitivity has been questioned, as modalities that can detect cancer in the marrow space before an osteoblastic bone reaction has occurred (e.g. MRI, PET), have shown superiority. Sensitivity is also poor in diseases that are predominantly osteolytic in nature such as myeloma where osteoblastic activity is suppressed [33]. However, the availability of hybrid SPECT/CT scanners has vastly improved sensitivity and specificity, notwithstanding the poor sensitivity for marrow-based and osteolytic lesions.

Another disadvantage of tracers that rely on osteoblastic activity for uptake is the flare phenomenon during systemic therapy for bone metastases. This phenomenon causes an increase in uptake of previous lesions, or visualization of previously occult lesions, as a result of osteoblastic healing after successful treatment and cannot be readily differentiated from an increase in uptake secondary to progressive, non-responding disease, for several weeks or months. If a flare is recognized, then it is a good prognostic sign [34]. To overcome this limitation the Prostate Cancer Working Group have described criteria that primarily aim to determine disease progression, requiring at least 2 new lesions on the first assessment following a baseline bone scan and then at least a further 2 lesions on a subsequent confirmatory scan before progressive disease is confirmed [35].

The flare phenomenon can be used to increase diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in bone scintigraphy. Patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated with hormones can show an increase in lesion activity or number six weeks after commencing treatment. In a prospective study of 99 patients with new diagnoses of prostate cancer, 41% with unequivocal metastases showed a 6-week flare, 11% with a normal baseline scan became positive and 20% of those with equivocal lesions showed a flare that was specific for metastases on follow up [36].

Another area that may continue to require radiolabeled bisphosphonate imaging is the planning and follow up of targeted radionuclide therapy for bone metastases. The therapeutic agents such as 89Sr-chloride, 153Sm-EDTMP, 186/188Re-HEDP and 223Ra-chloride, have the same or similar mechanisms of accumulation in skeletal metastases and so 99mTc-MDP scintigraphy can be used to confirm targeting prior to treatment and subsequent treatment response [37]. While radiolabeled bisphosphonates have been almost exclusively associated with SPECT radionuclides, there is some interest in the development of PET radiolabeling, allowing higher resolution and quantitative bone imaging with tracers such as 68Ga-pamidronate that is in preclinical development [38].

4. Alternative tracers and methods for functional bone imaging

18F-fluoride was first described as a bone-specific PET tracer over 50 years ago [39] but it was not until the development of modern PET scanners that it was possible to obtain high quality images of the skeleton (Fig. 5). The mechanism of uptake of 18F-Fluoride is similar to bisphosphonates in that it is related to local blood flow and osteoblastic mineralization activity [11]. Advantages over SPECT imaging with radiolabeled bisphosphonates include a more rapid background clearance, allowing imaging at 1 h post injection, higher spatial resolution and inherent quantitative accuracy. The ability to quantify skeletal kinetics in meaningful parameters such as K1 (related to local blood flow) and Ki (local clearance of tracer to the bone mineral compartment) has led to the method being used to evaluate metabolic bone disorders such as Paget's disease, renal osteodystrophy and osteoporosis [4042]. The occasional shortage in availability of 99mTc as a radionuclide has also led to the replacement of 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy with 18F-fluoride PET/CT in some centers with evidence of resultant changes in management in the diagnosis and follow up of skeletal metastases [4345]. 18F-fluoride, as an osteoblastic tracer, still suffers from the flare phenomenon, however [46].

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

18F-Fluoride PET images of a woman with metastatic breast cancer before (left) and 8 weeks after endocrine therapy (right) showing a reduction in activity in keeping with response to treatment (from [46]).

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) is a commonly used PET tracer in oncology that exploits the preferential metabolism of glucose in many cancers. As well as showing high uptake in nodal and visceral cancer, most cancers, with the exception of prostate cancer, show high uptake in skeletal metastases. 18F-FDG PET/CT has been shown as a sensitive method for detecting bone metastases compared to bone scintigraphy [47] and a better method to measure response as the signal relates to tumor cell viability rather than secondary osteoblastic activity and so the flare phenomenon is not seen (Fig. 6) [46,48].

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

18F-FDG PET images of the same patients as Fig. 4 showing a reduction in activity in bone metastases indicating response to treatment (from [46]).

Other SPECT and PET tracers that are tumor-specific rather than bone-specific may also be useful in detecting skeletal metastases, and like 18F-FDG PET, may have a higher sensitivity for detecting disease at the marrow stage before an osteoblastic response has occurred. Examples include 131I-iodine SPECT for thyroid cancer [49], 68Gaprostate-specific membrane antigen for prostate cancer [50] and 68Gadotatate for neuroendocrine tumor imaging [51].

Another tumor-specific imaging method that is showing increasing evidence of efficacy in detection of skeletal metastases and ability to determine treatment response quantitatively is whole-body DW-MRI (Fig. 7) [46,52]. This method uses standard morphological MRI sequences that can detect marrow-based disease with great sensitivity in conjunction with diffusion-weighted imaging that measures the restriction of water molecule motion in highly cellular tissue such as metastases and can be quantified by measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for monitoring treatment response.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

DW-MRI images of the same patients as Figs. 4 and 5 showing a decrease in signal in bone metastases in keeping with response to treatment (from [46]).

A novel aspect of radionuclide imaging with PET and SPECT is to target osteoclasts as these cells are implicated in the pathogenesis of many benign and malignant bone diseases. The integrin αvβ3 allows osteoclast adhesion to the bone matrix before resorption and is expressed in high concentrations on these cells [53]. PET and SPECT tracers that include the Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) motif that binds αvβ3 integrin with high affinity have been developed primarily for imaging tumor-associated neoangiogenesis but have also been investigated as osteoclast biomarkers. Preclinical work has confirmed specific osteoclast-related uptake in bone metastasis models [54,55]. In man, uptake has been seen in prostate cancer skeletal metastases with change in activity predicting treatment response to systemic therapy (Fig. 8) [56].

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

99mTc-maraciclatide SPECT (top row) and SPECT/CT (bottom row) images of a patient with prostate cancer showing αvβ3 expression at sites of metastatic disease.

5. Conclusions

Radiolabeled bisphosphonate imaging has been central to nuclear medicine practice for several decades. While there are now competing technologies for imaging the skeleton, including PET and DW-MRI, new indications and improvements in scanner hardware mean that there is still a place for these compounds in current clinical practice.

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the King’s College London/University College London Comprehensive Cancer Imaging Centres funded by Cancer Research UK and Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council in association with the Medical Research Council and the Department of Health (C1519/A16463), Breast Cancer Now (2012NovPR013), Prostate Cancer UK (PA1-04), the Wellcome Trust EPSRC Centre for Medical Engineering at King’s College London (WT203148/Z/16/Z), the Royal College of Radiologists and the support of the National Institute of Health Research Clinical Research Network (NIHR CRN).

Footnotes

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Gary J.R. Cook:Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing.

References

  • [1].Marty R, Denney JD, McKamey RR, Rowley MJ. Comparison of 85Sr, 87mSr, 18F, and 99mTc-labeled phosphates for bone scanning. CRC Crit Rev Clin Radiol Nucl Med. 1975;3:403–423. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Citrin DL, Greig WR, Calder JF, Bessent RG, Tuohy JB, Blumgart LH. Preliminary experience of bone scanning with 99mTc-labelled polyphosphate in malignant disease. Br J Surg. 1974;61:73–75. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800610117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Subramanian G, McAfee JG, Blair RJ, Kallfelz FA, Thomas FD. Technetium-99m-methylene diphosphonate–a superior agent for skeletal imaging: comparison with other technetium complexes. J Nucl Med. 1975;8:744–755. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Fogelman I, Pearson DW, Bessent RG, Tofe AJ, Francis MD. A comparison of skeletal uptakes of three diphosphonates by whole-body retention: concise communication. J Nucl Med. 1981;22:880–883. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Littlefield JL, Rudd TG. TG, Tc-99m hydroxymethylene diphosphonate and Tc-99m methylene diphosphonate: biological and clinical comparison: concise communication. J Nucl Med. 1983;6:463–466. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Compston J, Boyce B, Russel G. Ignac Fogelman: 1948-2016. J Bone Miner Res. 2016;31:1785–1786. [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Tofe AJ, Francis MD. Optimization of the ratio of stannous tin:ethane-1-hydroxy-1, 1-diphosphonate for bone scanning with 99mTc-pertechnetate. J Nucl Med. 1974;15:69–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Francis MD, Slough CL, Tofe AJ. Factors affecting uptake and retention of technetium-99m-diphosphonate and 99m-pertechnetate in osseous, connective and soft tissues. Calcif Tissue Res. 1976;20:303–311. doi: 10.1007/BF02546417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Bevan JA, Tofe AJ, Benedict JJ, Francis MD, Barnett BL. Tc-99m HMDP (hydroxymethylene diphosphonate): a radiopharmaceutical for skeletal and acute myocardial infarct imaging. I. Synthesis and distribution in animals. J Nucl Med. 1980;21:961–966. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Hyldstrup L, McNair P, Ring P, Henriksen O. Studies on diphosphonate kinetics. Part I: evaluation of plasma elimination curves during 24 h. Eur J Nucl Med. 1987;12:581–584. doi: 10.1007/BF00284529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Blake GM, Park-Holohan SJ, Cook GJ, Fogelman I. Quantitative studies of bone with the use of 18F-fluoride and 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate. Semin Nucl Med. 2001;31:28–49. doi: 10.1053/snuc.2001.18742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Roelofs AJ, Stewart CA, Sun S, Błażewska KM, Kashemirov BA, McKenna CE, Russell RG, Rogers MJ, Lundy MW, Ebetino FH, Coxon FP. FP, influence of bone affinity on the skeletal distribution of fluorescently labeled bisphosphonates in vivo. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27:835–847. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Sato M, Grasser W, Endo N, Akins R, Simmons H, Thompson DD, Golub E, Rodan GA. Bisphosphonate action. Alendronate localization in rat bone and effects on osteoclast ultrastructure. J Clin Invest. 1991;88:2095–2105. doi: 10.1172/JCI115539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Lin JH. Bisphosphonates: a review of their pharmacokinetic properties. Bone. 1996;18:75–85. doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(95)00445-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Fogelman I, Bessent RG, Turner JG, Citrin DL, Boyle IT, Greig WR. The use of whole-body retention of Tc-99m diphosphonate in the diagnosis of metabolic bone disease. J Nucl Med. 1978;19:270–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Fogelman I, Bessent R, Scullion JE, Cuthbert GF. Accuracy of 24-h whole-body (skeletal) retention of diphosphonate measurements. Eur J Nucl Med. 1982;7:359–363. doi: 10.1007/BF00255654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Martin W, Fogelman I, Bessent RG. Measurement of 24-hour whole-body retention of Tc-99m HEDP by a gamma camera. J Nucl Med. 1981;22:542–545. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Fogelman I, Bessent RG, Cohen NH, Hart DM, Lindsay R. Skeletal uptake of disphosphonate. Method for prediction of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Lancet. 1980;2:667–670. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(80)92707-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Fogelman I, Bessent RG, Beastall G, Boyle IT. Estimation of skeletal involvement in primary hyperparathyroidism. Ann Int Med. 1980;92:65–67. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-92-1-65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Fogelman I, Bessent R. Age-related alterations in skeletal metabolism–24-hr whole-body retention of disphosphonate in 250 normal subjects: concise communication. J Nucl Med. 1982;23:296–300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Thomsen K, Johansen J, Nilas L, Christiansen C. Whole body retention of 99mTc-diphosphonate. Relation to biochemical indices of bone turnover and to total body calcium. Eur J Nucl Med. 1987;13:32–35. doi: 10.1007/BF00252643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Nisbet AP, Edwards S, Lazarus CR, Malamitsi J, Maisey MN, Mashiter GD, Winn PJ. Chromium 51 EDTA/technetium 99m MDP plasma ratio to measure total skeletal function. Br J Radiol. 1984;57:677–680. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-57-680-677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Hyldstrup L, McNair P, Ring P, Henriksen O. Studies on diphosphonate kinetics. Part II: whole body bone uptake rate during constant infusion–a refined index of bone metabolism. Eur J Nucl Med. 1987;12:585–588. doi: 10.1007/BF00284530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Front D, Israel O, Jerushalmi J, Frenkel A, Iosilevsky G, Feinsod M, Kolodny GM. Quantitative bone scintigraphy using SPECT. J Nucl Med. 1989;30:240–245. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Israel O, Lubushitzky R, Frenkel A, Iosilevsky G, Bettman L, Gips S, Hardoff R, Baron E, Barzilai D, Kolodny GM. Bone turnover in cortical and trabecular bone in normal women and in women with osteoporosis. J Nucl Med. 1994;35:1155–1158. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Israel O, Front D, Hardoff R, Ish-Shalom S, Jerushalmi J, Kolodny GM. In vivo SPECT quantitation of bone metabolism in hyperparathyroidism and thyrotoxicosis. J Nucl Med. 1991;32:1157–1161. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Ryan PJ, Fogelman I. Bone scintigraphy in metabolic bone disease. Semin Nucl Med. 1997;27:291–305. doi: 10.1016/s0001-2998(97)80030-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Ryan PJ, Gibson T, Fogelman I. Bone scintigraphy following intravenous pamidronate for Paget’s disease of bone. J Nucl Med. 1992;33:1589–1593. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Krumme JW, Lauer MF, Stowell JT, Beteselassie NM, Kotwal SY. Bone scintigraphy: a review of technical aspects and applications in orthopedic surgery. Orthopedics. 2019;42:e14–e24. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20181120-05. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Cook GJ, Goh V. Functional and hybrid imaging of bone metastases. J Bone Miner Res. 2018;33:961–972. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Azad GK, Cook GJ. Multi-technique imaging of bone metastases: spotlight on PET-CT. Clin Radiol. 2016;71:620–631. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.01.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Helyar V, Mohan HK, Barwick T, Livieratos L, Gnanasegaran G, Clarke SE, Fogelman I. The added value of multislice SPECT/CT in patients with equivocal bony metastasis from carcinoma of the prostate. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:706–713. doi: 10.1007/s00259-009-1334-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Ludwig H, Kumpan W, Sinzinger H. Radiography and bone scintigraphy in multiple myeloma: a comparative analysis. Br J Radiol. 1982;55:173–181. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-55-651-173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Coleman RE, Mashiter G, Whitaker KB, Moss DW, Rubens RD, Fogelman I. Bone scan flare predicts successful systemic therapy for bone metastases. J Nucl Med. 1988;29:1354–1359. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Scher HI, Morris MJ, Stadler WM, Higano C, Basch E, Fizazi K, et al. Prostate cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3. Trial design and objectives for castration-resistant prostate cancer: updated recommendations from the Prostate cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:1402–1418. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.2702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Cook GJ, Venkitaraman R, Sohaib AS, Lewington VJ, Chua SC, Huddart RA, Parker CC, Dearnaley DD, Horwich A. The diagnostic utility of the flare phenomenon on bone scintigraphy in staging prostate cancer, Eur. J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38:7–13. doi: 10.1007/s00259-010-1576-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Ahmadzadehfar H, Essler M, Rahbar K, Afshar-Oromieh A. Radionuclide therapy for bone metastases: utility of scintigraphy and PET imaging for treatment planning. PET Clin. 2018;13:491–503. doi: 10.1016/j.cpet.2018.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Keeling GP, San Juan B, Blower PJ, Smith G, Terry SY, de Rosales RTM. Synthesis and Evaluation of [68Ga]Ga-THP-pam: A Bone-seeking PET Agent With Rapid, Facile Radiolabelling. https://eventclass.org/contxt_emim2019/online-program/session?s=PW03 .
  • [39].Blau M, Nagler W, Bender MA. Fluorine-18: a new isotope for bone scanning. J Nucl Med. 1962;3:332–334. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Cook GJ, Blake GM, Marsden PK, Cronin B, Fogelman I. Quantification of skeletal kinetic indices in Paget’s disease using dynamic 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography. J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17:854–859. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.5.854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Messa C, Goodman WG, Hoh CK, Choi Y, Nissenson AR, Salusky IB, Phelps ME, Hawkins RA. Bone metabolic activity measured with positron emission tomography and [18F]fluoride ion in renal osteodystrophy: correlation with bone histomorphometry. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993;77:949–955. doi: 10.1210/jcem.77.4.8408470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Frost ML, Cook GJ, Blake GM, Marsden PK, Fogelman I. The relationship between regional bone turnover measured using 18F-fluoride positron emission tomography and changes in BMD is equivalent to that seen for biochemical markers of bone turnover. J Clin Densitom. 2007;10:46–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2006.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Hillner BE, Siegel BA, Hanna L, Duan F, Shields AF, Quinn B, Coleman RE. Impact of (18)F-fluoride PET on intended management of patients with cancers other than prostate cancer: results from the National Oncologic PET registry. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:1054–1061. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.135475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Hillner BE, Siegel BA, Hanna L, Duan F, Shields AF, Coleman RE. Impact of 18F-fluoride PET in patients with known prostate cancer: initial results from the National Oncologic PET registry. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:574–581. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.130005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Hillner BE, Siegel BA, Hanna L, Duan F, Quinn B, Shields AF. 18F-fluoride PET used for treatment monitoring of systemic cancer therapy: results from the National Oncologic PET registry. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:222–228. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.150391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Azad GK, Taylor BP, Green A, Sandri I, Swampillai A, Harries M, Kristeleit H, Mansi J, Goh V, Cook GJR. Prediction of therapy response in bone-predominant metastatic breast cancer: comparison of [(18)F] fluorodeoxyglucose and [(18)F]-fluoride PET/CT with whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:821–830. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-4223-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Cook GJ, Houston S, Rubens R, Maisey MN, Fogelman I. Detection of bone metastases in breast cancer by 18FDG PET: differing metabolic activity in osteoblastic and osteolytic lesions. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:3375–3379. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.10.3375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Tateishi U, Gamez C, Dawood S, Yeung HW, Cristofanilli M, Macapinlac HA. Bone metastases in patients with metastatic breast cancer: morphologic and metabolic monitoring of response to systemic therapy with integrated PET/CT. Radiology. 2008;247:189–196. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2471070567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].Qiu ZL, Luo QY, Xu YH. Bone metastases from differentiated thyroid cancer: clinical features and radioiodine treatment. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:1566. [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Pyka T, Okamoto S, Dahlbender M, Tauber R, Retz M, Heck M, Tamaki N, Schwaiger M, Maurer T, Eiber M. Comparison of bone scintigraphy and (68)Ga-PSMA PET for skeletal staging in prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:2114–2121. doi: 10.1007/s00259-016-3435-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Castroneves LA, Coura Filho G, de Freitas RMC, Salles R, Moyses RA, Lopez RVM, Pereira MAA, Tavares MR, Jorge AAL, Buchpiguel CA, Hoff AO. Comparison of 68Ga PET/CT to other imaging studies in medullary thyroid Cancer: superiority in detecting bone metastases. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103:3250–3259. doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-00193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].Cook GJ, Azad G, Padhani AR. Bone imaging in prostate cancer: the evolving roles of nuclear medicine and radiology. Clin Transl Imaging. 2016;4:439–447. doi: 10.1007/s40336-016-0196-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Teitelbaum SL. Osteoclasts and integrins. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2006;1068:95–99. doi: 10.1196/annals.1346.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Sprague JE, Kitaura H, Zou W, Ye Y, Achilefu S, Weilbaecher KN, Teitelbaum SL, Anderson CJ. Noninvasive imaging of osteoclasts in parathyroid hormone induced osteolysis using a 64Cu-labeled RGD peptide. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:311–318. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Wadas TJ, Deng H, Sprague JEJE, Zheleznyak A, Weilbaecher KN, Anderson CJ. Targeting the alphavbeta3 integrin for small-animal PET/CT of osteolytic bone metastases. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:1873–1880. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.067140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Cook GJR, Azad GK, Taylor BP, Lee E, Morrison MS, Hughes S, Morris S, Rudman S, Chowdhury S, Goh VV. Imaging α(v)β(3) integrin expression in skeletal metastases with (99m)Tc-maraciclatide single-photon emission computed tomography: detection and therapy response assessment. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:898–903. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3926-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES