Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Sep 5.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Microbiol. 2024 Jun 1;26(6):e16671. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.16671

Isolation and characterization of a phage collection against Pseudomonas putida

Age Brauer 1,#, Sirli Rosendahl 2,#, Anu Kängsep 2, Alicja Cecylia Lewańczyk 2, Roger Rikberg 2, Rita Hõrak 2,, Hedvig Tamman 2,
PMCID: PMC7616413  EMSID: EMS198350  PMID: 38863081

Abstract

The environmental bacterium, Pseudomonas putida, possesses a broad spectrum of metabolic pathways. This makes it highly promising for use in biotechnological production as a cell factory, as well as in bioremediation strategies to degrade various aromatic pollutants. For P. putida to flourish in its environment, it must withstand the continuous threats posed by bacteriophages. Interestingly, until now, only a handful of phages have been isolated for the commonly used laboratory strain, P. putida KT2440, and no phage defence mechanisms have been characterized. In this study, we present a new Collection of Environmental P. putida Phages from Estonia, or CEPEST. This collection comprises 67 double-stranded DNA phages, which belong to 22 phage species and 9 phage genera. Our findings reveal that most phages in the CEPEST collection are more infectious at lower temperatures, have a narrow host range, and require an intact lipopolysaccharide for P. putida infection. Furthermore, we show that cryptic prophages present in the P. putida chromosome provide strong protection against the infection of many phages. However, the chromosomal toxin–antitoxin systems do not play a role in the phage defence of P. putida. This research provides valuable insights into the interactions between P. putida and bacteriophages, which could have significant implications for biotechnological and environmental applications.

Introduction

Pseudomonas putida, especially the strain KT2440 and its isogenic PaW85, has long served as a model species of environmental bacteria. Its main features include high stress tolerance and a wide variety of different metabolic pathways (Dos Santos et al., 2004; Nikel et al., 2016; Reva et al., 2006). The versatile metabolism of P. putida has increased the interest of the scientific and biotechnology communities in utilizing this microbe in bioproduction and biodegradation applications. To engineer a robust microbial cell factory from this laboratory workhorse, the genome of P. putida has been significantly edited and reduced (Aparicio et al., 2019; Martínez-García et al., 2014; Martínez-García & De Lorenzo, 2024). Notably, while P. putida is considered to have high potential for bio-industry, it is curious that there is no knowledge regarding how this bacterium protects itself from bacteriophages.

Phages are abundant in the environment with the number of phage virions on Earth estimated to reach up to 1031 (Comeau et al., 2008). The variety of phages is vast and includes DNA and RNA viruses with double-or single-stranded genomes that can be segmented or unsegmented (Dion et al., 2020). Temperate phages can undergo a lysogenic cycle, enter bacterial genomes as prophages, reproduce at the rate of cell division, and, in certain circumstances, exit the genome and enter the lytic cycle. Lytic phages are unable to enter the bacterial genome. Instead, after their genome is inserted into the bacterium, they reprogram the cell metabolism to produce viruses and finally lyse the exhausted host bacterium to release the new progeny of bacteriophages. Phages pose a constant threat to both basic microbiology studies as well as bacteria-based bio-industrial applications (Bogosian, 2005; Los, 2012). Yet, despite their wide range and variety, only a few phages able to infect the biotechnologically relevant P. putida KT2440 or PaW85 strain have been isolated recently (Jaryenneh et al., 2023; Ngiam et al., 2022).

Bacteria are endowed with different mechanisms that protect them against viruses. A vast number of phage defence systems operating in various ways have been revealed to the scientific community in recent years (Doron et al., 2018; Georjon & Bernheim, 2023; Millman et al., 2022; Vassallo et al., 2022). These systems are often encoded outside the core genomes of bacteria and tend to cluster in the so-called defence islands of mobile DNA regions (Makarova et al., 2011). For example, many phage defence systems can be found in prophages, that is, in genomes of temperate phages that have been integrated into the bacterial chromosome (Bondy-Denomy et al., 2016; Patel & Maxwell, 2023). Among the widespread anti-phage mechanisms are restriction-modification systems (Tock & Dryden, 2005), CRISPR-Cas modules (Horvath & Barrangou, 2010), and various types of abortive infection systems (Abi systems) (Lopatina et al., 2020). Some Abi systems have been shown to act through a toxin–antitoxin (TA) mechanism (Bouchard et al., 2002; Dy et al., 2014; Fineran et al., 2009).

TA systems are widespread bacterial genetic elements that code for a potentially harmful toxin protein and an antidote, an RNA or a protein, able to inhibit the toxicity of its partner efficiently. TA systems are known to stabilize plasmids and other mobile elements (Fraikin & Van Melderen, 2024; Ogura & Hiraga, 1983; Wozniak & Waldor, 2009), but besides that, they have also been reported as defence systems against phages (Kelly et al., 2023; LeRoux & Laub, 2022). Phage infection has been shown to activate toxins. This, in turn, triggers the cell death or severe growth inhibition of phage-infected bacteria (Dy et al., 2014; Fineran et al., 2009; Hazan & Engelberg-Kulka, 2004; LeRoux et al., 2022), which limits the phage propagation within the bacterial population. Upon activation, some toxins may even preferentially target phage products or processes (Guegler & Laub, 2021). Toxins can be activated either by phage-caused overall shutoff of host transcription, followed by destabilization of the RNA-protein TA complex (Guegler & Laub, 2021; Short et al., 2018) or by direct binding of a phage structural protein resulting in toxin liberation (Zhang et al., 2022). Still, despite accumulating evidence of TA systems acting as anti-phage elements, in most cases, the participation of TA systems in phage defence has not been confirmed. Moreover, the activation mechanism of the toxin is often unidentified.

P. putida PaW85, as well as its isogenic KT2440 strain, harbours numerous chromosomal TA systems. Deletion of as many as 13 TA systems from the P. putida PaW85 genome (strain Δ13TA) revealed that multiple TA loci confer no clear fitness benefits but rather impose slight fitness costs to the bacterium, given that the presence of TA loci decreased the competitive fitness of wild-type P. putida (Rosendahl et al., 2020). Yet, so far, we have tested the effects of the lack of chromosomal TA loci on stress tolerance, persistence, biofilm formation, and competitive fitness (Rosendahl et al., 2020), but we have not yet analysed whether the TA systems can protect P. putida from invading phages. As phage defence has been considered to be an important function of TA systems (Kelly et al., 2023; LeRoux & Laub, 2022; Song & Wood, 2020), it is reasonable to test the possibility that TA loci, despite their cost, are maintained in the P. putida PaW85 chromosome due to their importance in phage attacks.

Here, we present a collection of environmental bacteriophages isolated with a P. putida PaW85 derivative lacking 13 chromosomal TA loci and 4 cryptic prophages. Twenty-two phage species from nine genera were characterised by their genome sequences, taxonomy, morphology, temperature requirements, and host and receptor specificities. This first library of P. putida phages allowed us to test whether TA systems or prophages could be involved in the phage defence of P. putida. The collection opens up many research directions to follow, as the need to catch up on phage defence research of this bacterium is of crucial importance to the scientific and bio-industry communities.

Experimental Procedures

Bacterial strains, media, and growth conditions

The bacterial strains and plasmids used are listed in Table S1 (Supplementary File 1). All strains constructed in this study are derivatives of P. putida PaW85 (Bayley et al., 1977), which is isogenic to well-studied KT2440 (Regenhardt et al., 2002). Bacteria were grown in lysogeny broth (LB). If selection was necessary, the growth medium was supplemented with kanamycin (50 μg ml−1) for Escherichia coli and benzylpenicillin (1500 μg ml−1), kanamycin (50 μg ml−1) or streptomycin (200 μg ml−1) for P. putida. E. coli was incubated at 37°C and P. putida at 30°C, except for phage infection experiments that mainly were conducted at 20°C. Bacteria were electrotransformed according to the protocol of Sharma and Schimke (1996).

Construction of strains

P. putida Δ4φ and Δ13TAΔ4φ strains were constructed by sequential deletion of four prophages from P. putida wild-type PaW85 and its Δ13TA derivative. The pEMG- and pSNW2-based plasmids were used for strain construction according to a well-described protocol (Martínez-García & de Lorenzo, 2011). Plasmids are listed in Table S1 (Supplementary File 1), and oligonucleotides used in PCR amplifications are listed in Table S2 (Supplementary File 1). Notably, first, the ΔP1 and the Δ13TAΔP1 strains devoid of prophage P1 were obtained by prophage spontaneous deletion when we aimed to delete the P1-encoded hicAB2 (PP_3900-3899) TA system by using plasmid pEMG-ΔhicAB2. However, instead of the hicAB2 locus deletion, the whole P1 excised from the P. putida genome. The prophage P1 genome is surrounded by 67-bp-long direct repeats attL (genomic location 4371608-4371674) and attR (4427499-4427565) at each end, and sequencing of ΔP1 and the Δ13TAΔP1 strains revealed that recombination between attL and attR had created a clean P1 deletion leaving one att site. P. putida ΔP1 and Δ13TAΔP1 strains were used to delete other prophage genomes in the order P4, P3, and P2. The pEMG-based plasmids containing prophage deletion loci that were employed for strain generation were a generous gift from Martínez-García et al. (2015). For the deletion of wbpL (PP_1804) gene, the upstream and downstream regions of wbpL were amplified separately with primer pairs del1804Eco/del1804 and del1804-pikk/del1804Bam, respectively. Two PCR products were joined into an approximately 1-kb fragment by overlap extension PCR using primer pair del1804Eco/del1804Bam, and inserted into EcoRI-BamHI opened plasmid pSNW2 (Volke et al., 2020), a gfp-containing derivative of pEMG.

Isolation of bacteriophages

The enrichment method was used to isolate phages from various soil and water samples. The sampling date and exact source for each phage are indicated in Table S3 (Supplementary File 2). P. putida PaW85 Δ13TAΔ4φ strain was used as the host bacterium in the isolation process. To enrich the environmental samples with phages, 5 ml of 10x LB medium, 2 ml of exponential phase (OD580~1) Δ13TAΔ4φ culture, CaCl2 (final concentration 10 mM), and ciprofloxacin (final concentration 0.01 μg/ml) were added to the 100 ml of environmental samples. Samples were incubated in flasks overnight at 70 rpm at 20°C. The next day, to get rid of the bacteria and soil sediments, samples were centrifuged for 30 min at 2400 g, and the supernatant was filtrated (0.22 μm filter). To see if the phage isolation was successful, 1 ml of the filtrate was mixed with 200 μl of exponentially growing Δ13TAΔ4φ culture, and 5 ml of 0.3% (w/v) melted LB agar (42°C) containing 10 mM of CaCl2 and overlaid on LB plates supplemented with ciprofloxacin (0.03 μg/ml). Plates were incubated overnight at 20°C. If plaques had formed, single plaques were isolated and purified. To do that, a single plaque was picked and suspended in 100 μl of SM buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 8 mM MgSO4, 0.01% (w/v) gelatin). Then, 5 μl of chloroform was added to lyse the bacteria. Ten-fold dilutions of the phage suspension were made, and 2 μl drops were spotted on bacterial lawn plates. Plates were incubated overnight at 20°C. Next, a new single plaque was picked, and the purification step was repeated three times in total. Purified phages were stored in phage storage buffer (SM buffer) both at 4 and –80°C.

Phage DNA purification

For phage DNA extraction, 1–2 ml of phage solution with a titre ranging from 108 to 1010 PFU/ml was treated with 2 units/ml of DNase and 100 μg/ml RNase (Thermo Scientific), followed by the phage DNA extraction with Phage DNA Isolation Kit (Norgen Biotek) according to the protocol supplied by the manufacturer.

In some cases, the DNA yield from the kit was extremely low, and other measures had to be taken. For the jumbo phages of cluster G3, GeneJET Genomic DNA Purification Kit columns (Thermo Scientific) proved more efficient. The protocol of the phage DNA purification (Norgen Biotek) kit was followed until DNA binding when columns from the genome extraction kit (Thermo Scientific) were used instead of the phage kit columns for binding and elution of the DNA. In some other cases when the DNA yield was low (e.g., phages from genus clusters G6, G7, and G9), the phages were first precipitated from phage lysate with 80 mM ZnCl2 for 5 min at 37°C, pelleted by centrifugation at 10,000 g for 1 min and then resuspended in 400 μl of TES buffer (0.1 M Tris pH 8.2, 0.1 M EDTA, 0.3% [w/v] SDS). Phage capsids were digested by adding 4 μl of proteinase K (Thermo Scientific) and incubating for 1 h at 60°C, after which the proteins were precipitated with 40 μl 3 M K-acetate (pH 4.8) on ice for 15 min. The pelleted proteins were removed by centrifugation (1 min, 10,000 g at 4°C) and DNA in the supernatant was pelleted by adding a 1:1 volume of isopropanol to the liquid fraction and incubated on ice for 5 min. The pellet of DNA was centrifuged down (10,000 g for 10 min), washed twice with 75% (v/v) ethanol, and resuspended in 60–70 μl of water. To purify the precipitated DNA sample, it was cleaned with a DNA Clean-up and Concentration kit (Zymo Research) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and eluted with 35 μl of water. Regardless of the method used, all the purified phage DNA samples were sequenced.

Sequencing and assembly

Whole genome sequencing was done with Illumina MiSeq PE 2 × 175 bp or PE 2 × 151 bp setup. The average sequencing depth was 120×. Sequencing reads were filtered with fastp v.0.21.0 (Chen et al., 2018) and assembled with SPAdes v.3.15.4 using isolate mode (Prjibelski et al., 2020). Genome completeness was confirmed by checking the existence of technical repeats in both contig ends with an exact length of the largest k-mer used during the assembly process by SPAdes and one repeat copy was removed.

Genome annotation and characterization

tRNA and protein-coding genes were annotated using Prokka v.1.14.6 (Seemann, 2014) together with PHROGs (Terzian et al., 2021). Overlaps between ORFs and tRNAs were allowed. Average GC% and coding potential were calculated for each genome. Assembled contigs were reordered for easier visualization of genomic comparisons. Phages with a close relative already available in the databases were reordered similarly to the published genome. For new species and genera, we used PhageTerm v.1.0.12 (Garneau et al., 2017) to predict packaging strategy and termini. If sequencing depth and library method allowed reliable PhageTerm prediction, the same predicted termini were used for other same species phages (identity >95%) as well. Genomes without reliable PhageTerm prediction in any of the close relatives were reordered by setting a large terminase subunit as the first gene if there was no overlap with the preceding ORF. In case of overlaps, arbitrary non-intragenic start was chosen but a similar start was ensured in the isolates belonging to the same species or in the same genus if possible.

Phage lifestyle prediction was carried out with Pha-BOX software (Shang et al., 2023) and additional independent recombinase and integrase prediction using HMMER (http://hmmer.org/) and Pfam models PF00589, PF00665, PF07508, PF13009, and PF16795. Possible homology to P. putida genes including prophage regions was checked with phages’ protein and gene sequences as well as whole genomes using BLAST (Altschul, 1997; Altschul et al., 1990; Zhang et al., 2000).

Genomes were submitted to GenBank under Bio-Project PRJNA1067406, the accession numbers are shown in Table S3 (Supplementary File 2).

Taxonomical clustering analyses

For the comparison to available published phage genomes, we used the monthly updated INPHARED database (Cook et al., 2021) (version date 1 February 2024) including ~27,000 complete or near complete phage genomes available in GenBank. To limit the number of genomes for further similarity analysis, vCONTACT was used (Bin Jang et al., 2019) to select all possible close relatives from Inphared that cluster together with P. putida phages in the sequenced library. vCONTACT was run with settings —rel-mode ‘Diamond’ —pcs-mode MCL —vcs-mode ClusterONE on a dataset consisting of all the protein sequences from Inphared and 67 library phages. vCONTACT picked out 102 phages from Inphared that were grouped with one or more library phages. The genome sequences of all 102 phages were then added to 67 library phages for VIRIDIC analysis to find genome-wide similarities and determine more specific species and genera classification as much as possible (based on agreed thresholds of genome sequence identity over 95 and 70% correspondingly; Turner et al., 2021). In the case of borderline species identity (close to 95%), further detailed comparisons regarding the gene content and locations were made using Mauve (Darling et al., 2004) to align and visualize the annotated genomes. Whole genome coding sequence comparisons were visualized with clinker (Gilchrist & Chooi, 2021).

Phylogenetic tree

Phylogenetic trees were based on the muscle (Edgar, 2004) alignment of four concatenated protein (22 representative species) or gene sequences (all 67 phages): major head protein, DNA primase, spanin, and terminase large subunit. Trees were calculated with iqtree v.1.6.12 (Nguyen et al., 2015) using Model-Finder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al., 2017) and 1000 boot-strap replicates and visualized in iTOL web application (Letunic & Bork, 2021).

Transmission electron microscopy

For morphology analysis by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), the phage samples were concentrated by polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation. For that, 1 ml of phage filtrate (~109 PFU/ml) was treated with 5.3% (w/v) PEG 8000 and 0.33 M NaCl. After 1.5 h incubation at 4°C, the phage particles were pelleted at 8000 g for 10 min at 4°C. The phage precipitate was allowed to resuspend slowly in 20 μl SM buffer overnight at 4°C. Then, 10 μl of high-titre phage suspension (~1011 PFU/ml) was incubated for 5 min on a formvar/carbon-coated grid. After the excess liquid was removed with filter paper, negative staining of phage samples was performed for 2-3 min with an aqueous solution of 2% (w/v) phosphotungstic acid or 2% (w/v) uranyl acetate. Excess liquid was removed, and the grids were rinsed in demineralized water and air-dried. The TEM images were taken using a Tecnai G2 Spirit BioTwin TEM at a 120 kV accelerating voltage, and images were captured using an Orius SC1000 camera.

Plaque assays

Bacteria were grown in LB medium overnight at 20°C. The bacterial cultures were diluted 15-fold into fresh LB medium and grown until OD580~1 at 20°C. Next, 200 μl of the bacterial culture was mixed with 5 ml of melted 0.3% (w/v) LB agar medium (42°C) containing 10 mM CaCl2 and overlaid on 1.5% (w/v) LB agar plates containing 0.03 μg/ml or 0.01 μg/ml ciprofloxacin to create a bacterial lawn. For qualitative phage resistance assay, 1.5 μl drops of phage lysates with the maximum titre were spotted on the bacterial lawn plates. Plates were incubated overnight at 20°C. The formation of plaques was assessed.

To quantify the infectivity of phages, phage lysates were standardized to a titre of 107–108 PFU/ml. Then, 1.5 μl drops of ten-fold dilutions of phage lysates were spotted on the bacterial lawns. Plates were incubated overnight at 20°C (if not mentioned otherwise). The number of plaques formed was counted to calculate the efficiency of plating in plaque-forming units per millilitre.

Results

Phage isolation and genome sequencing

To address the question of the importance of chromosomal TA systems in P. putida PaW85 phage defence, we started with isolating phages from different environmental samples, mainly muddy water and different types of soil. To rule out the possibility of TA systems protecting the cells from phage infection and thus inhibiting phage isolation, we decided to use the P. putida PaW85 strain lacking 13 genomic TA systems (Rosendahl et al., 2020). Also, to isolate a diverse phage collection of P. putida phages, we needed as sensitive a P. putida derivative as possible. While nothing was previously known about the phage resistance of P. putida PaW85, it is commonly well-established that genomic prophages often carry phage-defence elements (Bondy-Denomy et al., 2016; Dedrick et al., 2017; Patel & Maxwell, 2023). P. putida PaW85 genome harbours four cryptic prophages (Martínez-García et al., 2015), and presuming that they may contribute to phage resistance, we deleted all these prophages from the strain that already lacked 13 TA systems. Thus, as a host for phage isolation, we used P. putida strain Δ13TAΔ4φ (Figure 1A).

Figure 1. Phage isolation process by using Pseudomonas putida devoid of 13 TA systems and four prophages.

Figure 1

(A) Schematic representation of P. putida PaW85 genome. The location of 13 TA systems and 4 prophages that are deleted from the phage isolation strain P. putida Δ13TAΔ4φ are indicated. The figure was made with SnapGene software (www.snapgene.com). (B) A scheme of phage isolation process: environmental samples were incubated with the host P. putida Δ13TAΔ4φ overnight at 20°C. The culture was then cleared and overlay agar plates poured to visualize phage plaques. Individual plaques were purified three times before making a final phage monoculture stock.

Our first isolation attempts at the optimal growth temperature for P. putida of 30°C were unsuccessful. Thus, we optimized the phage isolation protocol by lowering the incubation temperature. This was motivated by the fact that P. putida is an environmental bacterium that usually lives in the soil and water at much lower temperatures than 30°C. As expected, reducing the temperature of the phage isolation procedure to 20°C was fruitful and allowed us to collect 67 phages from different environmental samples (Table S3, Supplementary File 2; see Figure 1B for a scheme of phage isolation process). The phage collection was named CEPEST from the Collection of Environmental P. putida Phages from Estonia.

All isolated phages were sequenced, successfully assembled into complete genome sequences, and annotated. VIRIDIC (Moraru et al., 2020) clustering analysis based on sequence similarity of assembled genomes demonstrated that 67 isolated phages belong to nine different genus clusters G1–G9 (Figure 2A; Figure S1, Supplementary File 3). Most sequenced genomes were 39–42 kb long, which is the most common length range among published phages (Figure S2, Supplementary File 3), and contained 45–52 open reading frames and no tRNA genes. Two genus clusters differed regarding the genome size. Cluster G1 phages with genome sizes 95–97 kb belonged to the size class that has so far been poorly represented among sequenced phages (Figure S2, Supplementary File 3). G1 genomes contained 169–176 protein-coding sequences and 16–17 tRNAs. Cluster G3 included eight phages with a genome length over 200 kb and were thus defined as jumbo phages.

Figure 2. The phylogenetic and morphological analysis of phages in CEPEST collection.

Figure 2

(A) Midpoint-rooted phylogenetic tree of 22 representative phage species from 9 clusters (G1–G9). The tree is based on multiple alignment of four concatenated protein sequences (major head protein, DNA primase, spanin, and terminase large subunit), calculated with IQ-TREE using ModelFinder and visualized using iTOL online tool. Bootstrap values >70 are shown. Dark colours mark different VIRIDIC genus clusters, and lighter tones of each colour show species belonging to the corresponding clusters. (B) Morphology of phages in CEPEST collection. A negative staining TEM image of a representative phage from each genus cluster in the CEPEST collection (G1—NoPa, G2—Vasula, G3—Amme-1, G4—Emajogi, G5—Laguja-2, G6—Luke-3, G7—Kompost-2, G8—Kurepalu-1 and G9—Kurepalu-2).

All 67 phages appeared to have a lytic lifestyle as no recombinase or integrase sequences were detected in their genomes. Only cluster G3 phages contain UvsX-like recombinase. UvsX orthologs have been previously reported to be present in phages with large genomes that have strictly virulent lifestyles (Lopes et al., 2010).

Genomic GC content varied from 47.2 to 61.5%, being the lowest in G1 phages and highest in a G8 phage. All informative statistics for each sequenced genome are presented in Table S3 (Supplementary File 2).

Phage phylogeny, taxonomy, and diversity

We compared all 67 sequenced genomes to complete phage genomes in GenBank provided in the Inphared collection (Cook et al., 2021) as of 1 February 2024, to determine taxonomical affiliation and distribution. We clustered proteins in CEPEST phages with all the proteins in Inphared collection phages using the vCONTACT taxonomic clustering tool to detect possible close relatives among already published complete phage genomes. Inphared phages that grouped with at least one of the CEPEST phages were included in the following inter-genomic similarity analysis using VIRI-DIC. Based on the agreed 70% genus level identity threshold in phage taxonomy (Turner et al., 2021), the sequenced library revealed nine separate genus clusters. Most of the published phages that were included appeared to have a genomic similarity of less than 70% to library phages. However, six of the nine clusters contained one or more genomes from Inphared that exceeded either genus or even species-level similarity threshold. This enabled us to classify phages in cluster G2 as members of the genus Pifdecavirus; phages in G4, G7, and G9 as members of the genus Ghunavirus; and phages in G6 belonged to the genus Pollyceevirus (Tables S7, S10, and S12, Supplementary File 2). A phage belonging to cluster G8 had a low genus level similarity (~72%) to two P. putida phages LNA8 and LNA10 which are currently taxonomically unclassified (Ngiam et al., 2022) (Table S11, Supplementary File 2). Phages in three genus clusters (G1, G3, and G5) did not reach genus-level similarity (70%) to any of the available phage genomes, suggesting three new genera of phages (Tables S4–S6 and S8, Supplementary File 2).

Only two phages belonging to cluster G4 (Ghuna-virus) had species-level relatives among the Inphared collection. Phage Emajogi showed >95% similarity to Pseudomonas phages CHF7 (MN729596), phiPSA2 (KJ507099), and phiPsa17 (KR091952). Phage Luke-2 had >96% similarity to Pseudomonas phage Pst_GIL1 (OK523999) and >95% similarity to Pseudomonas phage KNP (KY798121) (Figure S3A, Supplementary File 3; Table S7, Supplementary File 2).

Jumbo phage cluster G3 contained one phage named Aura with a genome size just below the jumbo phage length threshold (199,504 bp) but showed high similarity on genome sequence level and was therefore assigned to species cluster 3A together with Illi-2 and SKa-4 jumbo phages (Table S6, Supplementary File 2).

Genus clusters G2 and G5 were the most abundantly represented in our collection (Figure S1, Supplementary File 3). The majority of the isolates in both of those clusters were assigned to one species based on a comparison of genome sequences, but the third new genus cluster, G5, needed additional analysis to decide the species assignment. There seemed to be three separate species in G5, but the final division remained ambiguous for two phages—SKa-3 and Kompost-1. VIRIDIC automatic clustering grouped these phages with phage BotAed (species cluster 5C). However, the similarity matrix showed SKa-3 and Kompost-1 being more closely related to phages in species cluster 5B (Table S8, Supplementary File 2). In addition, BotAed contains a gene for cysteine dioxygenase, which is not present in other G5 phages, including SKa-3 and Kompost-1 (Figure S3B, Supplementary File 3). Therefore, SKa-3 and Kompost-1 were marked as species 5B* (Table S8, Supplementary File 2).

Gene content analysis was also made for phage Vanda in G5. Although Vanda had genomic similarity reaching over 95% species level threshold with some 5B phages (Table S8, Supplementary File 2), we still marked Vanda as a 5A species phage. Namely, Vanda lacked a protein kinase coding gene similar to 5A phages ErraM (Figure S3B, Supplementary File 3) and ErraS in contrast to 5B or 5C phages. Vanda belonging to 5A was also supported by VIRIDIC automatic species clustering.

In conclusion, VIRIDIC clustering, sequence similarity matrix, gene content, and organization comparison resulted in 22 representative species among 9 identified genus clusters (Figure 2A). Twenty of those were new species without close and characterized relatives among publicly available bacteriophage genomes. Therefore, to know more about those phages, we set out to determine the morphology of the isolated phages with TEM. At least one representative species from each of the nine phage genera was analysed. TEM results demonstrated that most of the phages in our collection had podovirus morphology, and only phages from genus clusters G1 and G3 represented myo-viruses (Figure 2B; Table S3, Supplementary File 2). All the phages with podovirus virions share a similar genome and capsid size, around 40 kbp and 50–60 nm in diameter, respectively. Myoviruses from genus clusters G1 and G3 that have significantly larger genomes (almost 100 kbp for G1 and over 200 kbp for G3) than podoviruses also have larger capsids (Figure 2B). For instance, the jumbo phages from genus cluster G3 have the largest virions of the collection with a head diameter of almost 100 nm. Thus, the morphological studies demonstrate that the genome sizes correlate with the morphology of the phages, with the two myo-virus genera having larger genomes and larger virions than the podovirus phages in our collection.

Temperature-sensitivity of P. putida phages

Given that our first attempts for phage sampling at 30°C were unsuccessful and that the phage library was collected at 20°C, we hypothesised that the infection of P. putida phages might depend on the temperature. To determine the temperature range and sensitivity of the phages, we measured their infection ability at various temperatures, ranging from 15 to 37°C. The results showed that at 30 and 37°C most of the isolated phages were unable to infect the used P. putida host Δ13TAΔ4φ (Figure 3). Moreover, the infection efficiency of most phages was already strongly reduced at 25°C, with the phages from genera G6 and G7 and the species 9B losing their infection ability already at 22°C. However, all phages retained the ability to infect the P. putida cells at 15°C, and, except for most genera G1 and G8 species, even presented the strongest infection phenotype at this low temperature (LT; Figure 3). The most insensitive to changes in infection temperature were the phages from the genus cluster G1, as they (except for 1C phage NoPa) were infectious at all tested temperatures. Remarkably, the temperature sensitivity of phages can vary between species in one genus, for example, phage 1C and most strongly 9B losing the ability to infect cells at clearly lower temperatures than other members of the corresponding genera (Figure 3; Figure S4, Supplementary File 3). Taken together, most P. putida phages in our collection are temperature-sensitive and lose their infection efficiency at higher than 20–25°C.

Figure 3. Temperature sensitivity of CEPEST phages.

Figure 3

The infection efficiency of each phage species representative was tested at temperatures from 15 to 37°C. A: Qualitative infectivity of phages from genus clusters G6, G7, G8, and G9. (B) Heatmap of infection of EOP of each phage at a certain temperature. Zero level shows the most efficient infection, and numbers (and decreasing intensity of grey colour) represent a 10-time decrease in EOP. DL (white) is the detection limit of the experiment, no infection could be detected.

Prophages, but not chromosomal TA systems, increase the resistance of P. putida against several phages

To address our starting goal of studying the importance of 13 chromosomal TA systems in the phage defence of P. putida PaW85, we compared the phage resistance of the P. putida wild-type strain PaW85 and its Δ13TA derivative. Analysis of the infection of the 22 phages representing each species showed that the absence of TA systems did not affect the infection efficiency of phages (Figure 4A,B). Given that several phage species in our collection contain multiple phage isolates with slightly varying genome identities (Tables S3–S12, Supplementary File 2), we also compared the phage resistance of wild type and Δ13TA with other 45 phages in our collection. Similar to the data obtained with 22 representatives of each species (Figure 4A,B), we recorded no difference between the phage sensitivity of the P. putida wild-type and Δ13TA strains (data not shown). Thus, the 13 chromosomal TA systems of P. putida do not function as phage defence modules against any of the phages in our collection.

Figure 4. Pseudomonas putida PaW85 prophages provide protection against several CEPEST collection phages.

Figure 4

Quantitative EOP measurement of phage infection on bacterial lawns of (A) P. putida PaW85 (wt), (B) P. putida PaW85 lacking 13 TA systems (Δ13TA), (C) P. putida PaW85 lacking four prophages (Δ4φ), (D) P. putida PaW85 lacking 13 TA systems and four prophages (Δ13TAΔ4φ). Then, 1.5 μl drops of 10-fold serial dilutions of phages were spotted on the strain to be tested, and plates were incubated overnight at 20°C. EOP was counted from the plaques in dilution spots.

Interestingly, several phages, particularly jumbo phages from genus G3, showed very poor infection efficiency against both the wild-type and the Δ13TA strain (Figure 4A,B). This indicated that prophages that were present in wild type and Δ13TA but were deleted from the phage isolation strain Δ13TAΔ4φ contribute to the phage resistance of P. putida. To test this, we compared the wild-type and the prophage-deficient Δ4φ strains and indeed observed that the latter was more sensitive to many phages (Figure 4A,C). The most prominent protective effect of prophages was observed against the G3 jumbo and 7B phages, as the wild-type strain demonstrated more than 1000-fold higher resistance than the Δ4φ strain (Figure 4A,C). Prophages also provided clear protection against the phage species 5C, 6A, 8A (about 10-fold), and 9A (about 100-fold). At the same time, infection of phages from genera G1, G2, G4, and the species 5A, 5B, and 9B was very little or not at all affected by the presence of prophages (Figure 4A,C). Also, the comparison of the phage resistance of Δ4φ and Δ13TAΔ4φ demonstrated similar phage sensitivity of the two strains (Figure 4C,D), which further confirms that 13 TA systems do not contribute to the phage resistance of P. putida. Overall, these results show that while several of the phages are insensitive to the presence of the four cryptic prophages in PaW85, the prophages provide a variable level of defence against about half of the phage species in the CEPEST collection. This protection seems not to rely on the inhibition of superinfection of related phages, as bioinformatic analysis detected no significant sequence-based homology between any of the phage genes and P. putida PaW85 prophages or other parts of the bacterial genome.

P. putida phages in the CEPEST collection have a narrow host range

To study the host range of the isolated P. putida phages, we tested whether they can infect other bacteria from the genus Pseudomonas. To this end, we selected 11 different P. putida strains, 8 strains of P. syringae, and 2 each of P. fluorescens, P. aeruginosa, and P. stutzeri (Table S1, Supplementary File 1) from the CELMS microbe collection of our institute (http://eemb.ut.ee/celms/main_list.php). As the closest relative to the P. putida wild-type strain PaW85, we also included its ancestor strain PaW1 (mt-2) that harbours the TOL plasmid pWW0 (Worsey & Williams, 1975). For the phage susceptibility testing of these 27 Pseudomonas strains, we used the highest phage concentrations of all 22 species in our collection (Figure 5A). The experiment was carried out at 20°C, where all tested bacterial strains could grow. The results show that the phages in the CEPEST collection are highly host-specific, with phages from genera G1, G5, and G8 being unable to infect any other strains apart from P. putida PaW85 and its ancestor mt-2 (Figure 5A,D). Only eight phage species out of 22 could infect some P. putida (strains CRTN6, PC13, and T9) and P. syringae (P82, DC3000, and B782a) strains at 20°C. No phage was able to infect any of the tested P. fluorescens, P. aeruginosa, or P. stutzeri strains (Figure 5A,D).

Figure 5. Host specificity of CEPEST phages.

Figure 5

(A) Qualitative assay of infection of all 22 phage species representatives (indicated in the colour matrix) on different Pseudomonas hosts. (B) Quantitative EOP measurement of phage infection on their Pseudomonas hosts. Then, 1.5 μL drops of 10-fold serial dilutions of phages were spotted on the strain to be tested, and EOP was counted from the plaques. (C) EOP of G5 phages on P. putida PaW85, its ancestral strain mt-2 containing the pWW0 plasmid, and P. putida PaW85 with the pWW0 plasmid. (D) A heatmap of host specificity of phages. Zero level shows the infection of PaW85 reference strain, and numbers (and decreasing or increasing intensity of grey colour) represent 10-fold changes in EOP. DL (white) is the detection limit of the experiment, no infection could be detected. Plates were incubated for 24 h at 20°C.

Out of the eight species of phages that can infect more strains than just the PaW background, the phages of G2 seem to have the widest host range, followed by 9A species. These phages infect not only five of the tested P. putida strains but also three (phages from genus G2) or two (phage 9A) P. syringae strains. The host range of phage species 3D, 4B, 6A, 7A, and 9B is narrower, but it is interesting to note that the same particular P. putida or P. syringae strains that were infected by G2 and 9A phages were also susceptible to some of these phages (Figure 5A,D).

To quantify the infection efficiency of eight phages that could infect different Pseudomonas hosts, the phage resistance assay was carried out using serial dilutions of phages (Figure 5B). Results show that phages differ strongly in their ability to infect the tested hosts. Some phages, including 2A, 2B, 4B, 7A, or 9B, lyse some strains equally to P. putida PaW85, while they are less efficient against other susceptible hosts (Figure 5B,D). Surprisingly, 3D, 6A, and 9A phages could infect some P. putida or P. syringae strains even better than the P. putida PaW85 reference strain.

The phage sensitivity of P. putida PaW85 and its ancestor strain mt-2 seemed highly similar when the strains were infected with high phage titres (Figure 5A). However, infection efficiency quantification experiments revealed that the mt-2 strain was significantly more resistant to genus G5 phages than P. putida PaW85 (Figure 5C). The main difference between the two strains is that mt-2 contains the 117 kbp TOL plasmid pWW0. As plasmids have been shown to affect phage infection efficiency (Ngiam et al., 2022), we hypothesised that the TOL plasmid could be behind the protection against G5 phages. We tested a P. putida PaW85 that harbours the pWW0 plasmid (lab collection) and, indeed, all of the G5 phages infected this strain 102–104 times less efficiently (Figure 5C), showing that the plasmid pWW0 was causing the reduced infection efficiency of these phages. However, no other phage was affected by the presence of the TOL plasmid.

Interestingly, our results clearly show how two phage species from one genus can have completely different host specificity. Besides having variable infection efficiency towards the same strains, even the strain specificity may differ. For instance, the 4B and 7A species showed wider specificity: 4B could additionally infect P. putida strain CRTN6 and P. syringae P82, and 7A could infect P. putida PC13. At the same time, the other species in those genera, 4A and 7B, could not infect any cells except the PaW background (Figure 5A). Even more remarkably, phage 9A lysed the P. syringae strain DC3000 100 times more efficiently than the reference strain P. putida PaW85, while phage 9B could not infect that P. syringae strain at all (Figure 5A,B,D). Taken together, 14 out of the 22 species of phages tested can only infect the P. putida PaW85 (and its predecessor and derivative strains), showing a very narrow host range for these phages.

Most CEPEST collection phages need intact lipopolysaccharide for P. putida infection

As many podo- and myoviruses of Gram-negative bacteria have been shown to use polysaccharide sugar moieties for adsorption (Bertozzi Silva et al., 2016), we set out to test whether the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of P. putida could be the receptor for phage adsorption of P. putida phages from our collection. As many phages recognize the outermost O-antigen part of LPS (Lindberg, 1973; Nobrega et al., 2018), we deleted the wbpL glycosyltransferase gene that is required for O-antigen synthesis (Rocchetta et al., 1998) from P. putida PaW85 wild-type and also from its Δ13TAΔ4φ derivative. The latter strain was constructed to test the receptor dependence of the G3 jumbo phages that infect the wild-type bacteria very poorly. We also picked a P. putida transposon mutant from our lab strain collection with a disrupted wbpM gene. Similarly to WbpL, WbpM is also involved at the beginning of the LPS O-antigen synthesis pathway (Creuzenet & Lam, 2001), and its disruption results in LPS molecules deprived of O-antigen moieties (Bélanger et al., 1999). Analysis of these strains showed that out of the 22 phages, 18 could not infect the strains with either the wbpL deletion or wbpM truncation (Figure 6A). The only phages that retained the ability to infect LPS-deficient P. putida derivatives were two species from genus G2 and phages 4A and 7B. These four phages were further analysed to quantify their infection efficiency against O-antigen-deficient strains. Surprisingly, the deficient LPS synthesis significantly increased the infection efficiency of 7B phage Kompost-2, where the ΔwbpL strain was about 1000-fold more sensitive than the wild-type strain (Figure 6B). For the other three phages (2A, 2B, and 4A), the infection efficiency against the LPS mutants remained unchanged (Figure 6B). These results confirm that the LPS, particularly its outermost O-antigen moiety, is the main receptor for most of the 22 species of phages in our CEPEST collection.

Figure 6. Most CEPEST phages require intact LPS for infection.

Figure 6

(A) A qualitative assay of phage infection of all 22 phage species representatives on P. putida PaW85 wild type (wt) and its wbpL or wbpM deficient strains and wbpL deletion derivative in the Δ13TAΔ4φ background. (B) EOP of phages that can infect mutants with deficient LPS. Plates were incubated for 24 h at 20°C before recording the result.

Discussion

The CEPEST collection of bacteriophages isolated during this work represents the first broad selection of P. putida environmental phages. Genome homology analysis allocated the CEPEST collection phages into nine genus clusters with 22 species. As only 13 complete P. putida phage genome sequences are available to date (February 2024, NCBI database), it is not surprising that many of the phages are entirely new and even constitute several new genus clusters. From that, it seems that extensive studies are still needed to understand the bacteriophage diversity and any new host bacterium used in isolation could result in identifying many new genera of phages.

The number of phage species is variable in the genus clusters of the CEPEST collection

The composition of the CEPEST collection indicates that it has a high representation of some phage species (e.g., 2A and 5B) but is underrepresented in others (e.g., species in genus clusters G6–G9, see Table S3, Supplementary File 2). Currently, the collection contains phages from only nine genus clusters, and the species abundance in different clusters is highly variable. While the genus cluster G8 is represented by only one species, there are also clusters having over ten isolates defined as the same phage species (identity >95%). For instance, 2A and 5B species clusters are the most overrepresented, containing 17 and 21 phage isolates, respectively. Repeated isolation of 2A phages is not so surprising as G2 phages produce big plaques (Table S3, Supplementary File 2). As plaque sizes positively correlate with lysis rates (Ameh et al., 2020), the propagation of these phages could be favoured during the isolation process that involved an enrichment step. However, G4 phages that also form big plaques were isolated from fewer environmental samples. Therefore, phages of cluster G2 are probably more widespread in the different sampling environments than G4 ones. The repeated isolation of genus cluster G5 phages with average-size plaques is more surprising. As our isolation experiments show the greatest abundance of these phages, they seem to be the most frequent culturable P. putida phages in environmental samples. Still, to rule out that the enrichment phase of the isolation method was the cause of the recurrent appearance of certain phages, we also carried out phage isolation without the enrichment step by directly plating phages precipitated from environmental samples. The G5 phages were still the most frequently detected in the samples, as was determined by G5-specific PCR analysis (data not shown). From that, we conclude that the G5 is indeed a prevalent cluster of P. putida phages in the environment. Interestingly, the G5 phages represent an entirely new genus cluster (Figure 2A). We hypothesize that the reasons for them not having been isolated previously are their very narrow host range (Figure 5A,D) and a temperature-sensitive infection efficiency (Figure 3B, Figure S4, Supplementary File 3), which means that they would have been missed when using different Pseudomonas hosts or higher than 25°C growth temperature for the isolation.

All phages in the current CEPEST collection are tailed double-stranded DNA phages from the order Caudovirales. Over three-quarters of all the 67 phages have podovirus morphology, and two genus clusters (G1 and G3) are myoviruses. Surprisingly, we did not isolate any siphoviruses, although the morphology is common for Escherichia coli phages (Korf et al., 2019; Maffei et al., 2021; Nicolas et al., 2023; Olsen et al., 2020). Moreover, the representation of morphotypes of P. putida phages in the current collection remarkably differs from that in several coliphage collections: around 70% of lytic coliphages are myoviruses, 22–25% siphoviruses and less than 10% podoviruses (Korf et al., 2019; Olsen et al., 2020). Interestingly, if we surveyed the distribution of virion morphotypes of previously isolated P. putida phages, only myo- and podo-viruses were found in accordance with our results. Out of 13 sequenced phages that have been isolated with different P. putida strains, 4 had no morphology data, but 6 were podoviruses (Glukhov et al., 2012; Lee & Boezi, 1966; Ngiam et al., 2022), and 3 myoviruses (Jaryenneh et al., 2023; Magill et al., 2017). Thus, it seems that P. putida phages inherently differ from the phages infecting E. coli with podovirus morphotype being much more prevalent.

The CEPEST collection phages are highly dependent on infection temperature

Most CEPEST collection phages seem to be adapted to LTs, as their optimum infection temperature was 15–20°C, and many failed to lyse P. putida at higher temperatures (Figure 3). This is not surprising, given that P. putida is an environmental bacterium that usually meets its natural phage enemies in soil and water at much lower temperatures than 30°C that is routinely used in the laboratory for growing P. putida. Previous studies have shown that temperature may drastically influence the efficiency of phage infection (Seeley & Primrose, 1980). For instance, coliphages have been divided into three groups according to their temperature sensitivity: high-temperature (HT) phages that lose infectivity at or below 25°C, LT phages that lose infectivity at or above 30°C and mid-temperature (MT) phages that are infectious in the range 15–42°C (Seeley & Primrose, 1980). It has been shown that the temperature profile of phages depends on their origin: phages originating from warm-blooded animals tend to be MT or HT type, while LT-type phages can be found in aquatic habitats (Lee & Boezi, 1966). As our environmental samples originate from the temperate climate of Estonia, it is not surprising that many CEPEST phages displayed an even higher infection efficiency at 15°C compared to the isolation temperature of 20°C (Figure 3).

Many phages showed highly pronounced changes in the infection efficiency upon slight temperature changes (e.g., the 9B phages infecting very efficiently at 20°C, but unable to infect at 22°C, Figure 3). The strong effects of phage infection often result from the phage’s inability to enter the bacterial cells. As the surface layers and features of P. putida are suggested to alter drastically upon prolonged growth at LTs, for example, the expression of different porins, transporters, and proteins increases (Fonseca et al., 2011), it is possible that these changes may accordingly allow (at LTs) or impede (at higher temperatures) phage adsorption or genome injection. The evident LT requirement of many P. putida phages is very encouraging when considering P. putida as a promising microbial cell factory for biocatalysis. It seems that besides its versatile metabolism and high-stress tolerance that make P. putida a valuable candidate for bioproduction, its increased phage resistance at higher temperatures when metabolic reactions are more efficient adds value to its use in bio-industrial applications.

The host and receptor specificity of the CEPEST collection phages

The majority of the CEPEST collection phages display a narrow host range and could not infect other Pseudomonas species or other P. putida strains, except for the P. putida PaW85 ancestor strain mt-2 (Figure 5). Still, some phages, particularly those from Pifdecavirus (G2) and Ghunavirus (G4, G7, G9) genus clusters, had a broader host range, as they could lyse several other P. putida and even P. syringae strains. Given that the host specificity is very often determined by the level of receptor recognition, it is interesting to note that the only phages able to infect the rough cells of the ΔwbpL strain were from the genus clusters with a broader host range. Phages from genus cluster G2 had a wide host range and could also infect the O-antigen deficient strain ΔwbpL (Figures 5 and 6). However, opposite to G2 cluster, the phages from genus clusters G4 and G7 that could infect the O-antigen deficient strain, that is, Emajogi (4A) and Kompost-2 (7B), had a narrow host range, whereas the other species in these clusters, Luke-2 (4B) and Kallioja (7A) with a wider host range, were unable to infect the ΔwbpL strain (Figures 5 and 6). The infection pattern of Ghunavirus Kompost-2 is unique in the collection, as the infection is more efficient when the O-antigen is missing. This suggests that the O-antigen probably masks the main receptor of the phage on the wild-type cells, and the receptor is more accessible upon O-antigen deletion. This all suggests that the receptors of the phages able to infect the ΔwbpL cells are different. For tailed phages, receptor recognition is usually determined by the C-terminal parts of tail fibre proteins, and it is quite common for these areas of the proteins to undergo shuffling as one of the processes that diversify the host range of the phages (Smug et al., 2023). This can lead to otherwise similar phages having diverse receptors or varied host ranges. The Ghunavirus cluster G4 of the CEPEST collection illustrates this well, as both the host range and the receptor specificity differ between species 4A and 4B (Figures 5 and 6), although their full genome sequences are almost 93% identical (Table S7, Supplementary File 2).

P. putida genomic prophages and plasmid pWW0 confer defence against certain CEPEST collection phages

The CEPEST collection contains only phages that can overcome the putative antiphage systems of P. putida. The only exceptions are the potential defence provided by the TA systems and cryptic prophages that were deleted from the genome of the isolation host strain (Figure 1). Our previous efforts have not detected any importance of P. putida chromosomal TA systems for bacterial physiology (Rosendahl et al., 2020). However, due to the lack of P. putida phages, we could not previously test the possible effect of TA systems in phage defence. Here, we compared the phage resistance of wild-type P. putida PaW85 and its 13 TA system deletion derivative but did not detect any differences in the phage defence of the two strains (Figure 4A,B). Our previous data have revealed that several TA systems encode for nontoxic proteins (Rosendahl et al., 2020), which indicates that these toxins have probably lost their function even if they once would have participated in phage defence. Nevertheless, 8 out of the 13 toxins deleted from P. putida were moderately toxic or lethal proteins (Rosendahl et al., 2020) and still did not affect the phage resistance of the bacterium. This means that none of the phages in the current CEPEST collection can activate any of the 13 TA systems in P. putida. However, the 22 species and 67 isolates of phages represent a very small sample size of all possible phages. Thus, from these results, we cannot rule out the possibility that some P. putida TA systems could be active against yet unknown phages. As the collection is upgraded, the TA systems’ involvement in phage infection will be kept under consideration. Yet, current results demonstrate that the 13 chromosomal TA systems provide no general phage defence and neither act as specific phage defence systems against the 67 tested bacteriophage isolates of the CEPEST collection.

Differently from TA systems, however, the four cryptic prophages can protect P. putida at variable strength against about half of the 22 species of phages. Our future work will determine whether this protection is provided by a single prophage or several prophages together. It is known that prophages may inhibit the expression of lytic genes from related phages (Susskind et al., 1974). As prophages keep their genes for lytic development repressed, the infection of phages that share similar repressors is also inhibited (Bondy-Denomy et al., 2016). Yet, as our analysis of the prophage regulator or any other prophage genes revealed no homology among any of the phages in the CEPEST collection (data not shown), this type of defence does not seem to be the mechanism of protection by these prophages. Aside from suppressing the lytic development of related phages, prophages can carry various defence genes that protect the host from attacks by other phages. For example, the superinfection exclusion systems either inhibit the adsorption of new phages (Bondy-Denomy et al., 2016) or prevent their genome injection (Cumby et al., 2012; Hofer et al., 1995; Susskind et al., 1974). Prophages can also encode TA gene(s) or other Abi systems (Owen et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2022) that prevent the spread of the exogenous phages in bacterial populations by inducing the death of the first infected cell. Our next efforts will be directed towards identifying these systems to pinpoint the mechanisms of the prophage-provided defence.

The studies of host specificity of the CEPEST collection phages led to the discovery of the protective effect of the TOL plasmid pWW0 (Assinder & Williams, 1990; Greated et al., 2002; Ramos et al., 1997; Worsey & Williams, 1975) against the phages from genus cluster G5 (Figure 5C). It has been shown that plasmids may influence the efficiency of phage infection by either plasmid-encoded factors that are required for phage entry (Haase et al., 1995; Olsen et al., 1974) or, on the contrary, strongly decreasing the infection efficiency by plasmid-coded defence systems (Emond et al., 1998). The pWW0 plasmid-encoded pili have been shown to support the infection of plasmid-dependent phages PR4 and PRD1 (Bradley & Williams, 1982), but to our knowledge, the pWW0 plasmid has never been associated with phage defence. According to the NCBI database (Sayers et al., 2022), two genes on the TOL plasmid (NC_003350) are annotated as TA genes: HXE35_RS00070 as type II TA system RelE/ParE family toxin and HXE35_RS00065 as addiction module antidote protein (annotation as on 3 May 2024). This system will be tested for involvement in the TOL-provided phage defence. As another option, the presence of the TOL plasmid in the cell could somehow change the phage resistance indirectly. The exact mechanisms for the protection provided by the TOL plasmid are subjects of further research using the diverse and well-represented genus cluster G5 (Table S3, Supplementary File 2) of the CEPEST collection.

Conclusion

Here, we present the first broad collection of phages infecting the environmental bacterium and model organism P. putida PaW85. The collection is built up of phages isolated against a host whose phage resistance is completely unknown. The results obtained on the phage defence during the screening stages will be followed up with research behind the mechanisms of the observed biological effects. Thus, the CEPEST collection allows the phage resistance research of this widely used model bacterium. As knowledge of the phage defence of P. putida broadens, more phages will be isolated using weakened P. putida strains as hosts to increase the diversity of the CEPEST collection and improve the understanding of the interactions between P. putida PaW85 and its phages.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary File 1
Supplementary File 2
Supplementary File 3

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Esteban Martínez-García for kindly providing plasmids for prophage deletion. The authors are also thankful to Kaida Koppel and Raivo Raid for providing the TEM service, Sander Blei and Anita Lipu for help in phage sampling, and Tanel Ilmjärv and Ingrem Popazova for providing the strain P. putida PaW85 (pWW0). The authors thank Andres Ainelo for critically reading the manuscript and scientific illustrator Ali Haririan for input to the graphical abstract. The authors acknowledge the CELMS collection of the Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu for the environmental bacterial strains. This work was funded by the Estonian Research Council (grant PRG1431 to RH and grants MOBTP1017 and together with EMBO the EMBO IG-5323-2023 to HT) and by the European Union (ERC-StG, PhaBacArms, grant No. 101116205 to HT: Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or European Research Council Executive Agency. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them).

Funding information

Eesti Teadusagentuur, Grant/Award Numbers: MOBTP1017, PRG1431; Eesti Teadusagentuur and European Molecular Biology Organization, Grant/Award Number: IG-5323-2023; European Research Council, Grant/Award Number: 101116205

Footnotes

Author contributions

Age Brauer: Writing – original draft; writing – review and editing; data curation; formal analysis; visualization; methodology; investigation; validation; software. Sirli Rosendahl: Investigation; writing – original draft; methodology; validation; visualization; writing – review and editing; formal analysis; supervision; data curation. Anu Kängsep: Investigation; validation. Alicja Cecylia Lewańczyk: Investigation; validation. Roger Rikberg: Investigation; validation. Rita Hõrak: Conceptualization; funding acquisition; writing – original draft; investigation; methodology; validation; writing – review and editing; formal analysis; project administration; supervision; resources. Hedvig Tamman: Conceptualization; investigation; funding acquisition; writing – original draft; methodology; validation; visualization; writing – review and editing; formal analysis; project administration; supervision; resources.

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Data Availability Statement

Genomes are openly available in GenBank under Bio-Project PRJNA1067406: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1067406.

References

  1. Altschul S. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Research. 1997;25(17):3389–3402. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Altschul SF, et al. Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of Molecular Biology. 1990;215(3):403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ameh EM, et al. Lysis Performance of Bacteriophages with Different Plaque Sizes and Comparison of Lysis Kinetics After Simultaneous and Sequential Phage Addition. PHAGE. 2020;1(3):149–157. doi: 10.1089/phage.2020.0005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Aparicio T, De Lorenzo V, Martínez-García E. Improved thermotolerance of genome-reduced Pseudomonas putida EM42 enables effective functioning of the PL/cI857 system. Biotechnology Journal. 2019;14(1):1800483. doi: 10.1002/biot.201800483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Assinder SJ, Williams PA. Advances in microbial physiology. Elsevier; London: 1990. The TOL plasmids: determinants of the catabolism of toluene and the xylenes’; pp. 1–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bayley SA, et al. Two modes of loss of the tol function from Pseudomonas putida mt-2. Molecular and General Genetics. 1977;154(2):203–204. doi: 10.1007/BF00330838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bélanger M, Burrows LL, Lam JS. Functional analysis of genes responsible for the synthesis of the B-band O antigen of Pseudomonas aeruginosa serotype O6 lipopolysaccharide The GenBank accession number for the sequence reported in this paper is AF035937. Microbiology. 1999;145(12):3505–3521. doi: 10.1099/00221287-145-12-3505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bertozzi Silva J, Storms Z, Sauvageau D. Host receptors for bacteriophage adsorption. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2016;363(4):fnw002. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnw002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bin Jang H, et al. Taxonomic assignment of uncultivated prokaryotic virus genomes is enabled by gene-sharing networks. Nature Biotechnology. 2019;37(6):632–639. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0100-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bogosian G. In: The bacteriophages. Calendar R, Abedon ST, editors. Oxford University Press; New York, NY: 2005. Control of bacteriophage in commercial microbiology and fermentation facilities; pp. 667–673. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bondy-Denomy J, et al. Prophages mediate defense against phage infection through diverse mechanisms. The ISME Journal. 2016;10(12):2854–2866. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bouchard JD, et al. Characterization of the two-component abortive phage infection mechanism AbiT from Lactococcus lactis. Journal of Bacteriology. 2002;184(22):6325–6332. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.22.6325-6332.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bradley DE, Williams PA. The TOL plasmid is naturally derepressed for transfer. Microbiology. 1982;128(12):3019–3024. doi: 10.1099/00221287-128-12-3019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen S, et al. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(17):i884–i890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Comeau AM, et al. Exploring the prokaryotic virosphere. Research in Microbiology. 2008;159(5):306–313. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2008.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cook R, et al. INfrastructure for a PHAge REference database: identification of large-scale biases in the current collection of cultured phage genomes. PHAGE. 2021;2(4):214–223. doi: 10.1089/phage.2021.0007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Creuzenet C, Lam JS. Topological and functional characterization of WbpM, an inner membrane UDP-GlcNAc C 6 dehydratase essential for lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Molecular Microbiology. 2001;41(6):1295–1310. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02589.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cumby N, et al. The bacteriophage HK97 gp15 moron element encodes a novel superinfection exclusion protein. Journal of Bacteriology. 2012;194(18):5012–5019. doi: 10.1128/JB.00843-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Darling ACE, et al. Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Research. 2004;14(7):1394–1403. doi: 10.1101/gr.2289704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dedrick RM, et al. Prophage-mediated defence against viral attack and viral counter-defence. Nature Microbiology. 2017;2(3):16251. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dion MB, Oechslin F, Moineau S. Phage diversity, genomics and phylogeny. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2020;18(3):125–138. doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0311-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Doron S, et al. Systematic discovery of antiphage defense systems in the microbial pangenome. Science. 2018;359(6379):eaar4120. doi: 10.1126/science.aar4120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Dos Santos VAPM, et al. Insights into the genomic basis of niche specificity of Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Environmental Microbiology. 2004;6(12):1264–1286. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2004.00734.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Dy RL, et al. A widespread bacteriophage abortive infection system functions through a type IV toxin–antitoxin mechanism. Nucleic Acids Research. 2014;42(7):4590–4605. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research. 2004;32(5):1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Emond E, et al. AbiQ, an abortive infection mechanism from Lactococcus lactis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1998;64(12):4748–4756. doi: 10.1128/AEM.64.12.4748-4756.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Fineran PC, et al. The phage abortive infection system, ToxIN, functions as a protein–RNA toxin–antitoxin pair. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009;106(3):894–899. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808832106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Fonseca P, Moreno R, Rojo F. Growth of Pseudomonas putida at low temperature: global transcriptomic and proteomic analyses. Environmental Microbiology Reports. 2011;3(3):329–339. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2010.00229.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Fraikin N, Van Melderen L. Single-cell evidence for plasmid addiction mediated by toxin–antitoxin systems. Nucleic Acids Research. 2024;52(4):1847–1859. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Garneau JR, et al. PhageTerm: a tool for fast and accurate determination of phage termini and packaging mechanism using next-generation sequencing data. Scientific Reports. 2017;7(1):8292. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07910-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Georjon H, Bernheim A. The highly diverse antiphage defence systems of bacteria. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2023;21(10):686–700. doi: 10.1038/s41579-023-00934-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Gilchrist CLM, Chooi Y-H. clinker & clustermap.js: automatic generation of gene cluster comparison figures’. Bioinformatics. 2021;37(16):2473–2475. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Glukhov AS, et al. Genomic analysis of Pseudomonas putida phage tf with localized single-strand DNA interruptions. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Greated A, et al. Complete sequence of the IncP-9 TOL plasmid pWW0 from Pseudomonas putida. Environmental Microbiology. 2002;4(12):856–871. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2002.00305.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Guegler CK, Laub MT. Shutoff of host transcription triggers a toxin-antitoxin system to cleave phage RNA and abort infection. Molecular Cell. 2021;81(11):2361–2373.:e9. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.03.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Haase J, et al. Bacterial conjugation mediated by plasmid RP4: RSF1010 mobilization, donor-specific phage propagation, and pilus production require the same Tra2 core components of a proposed DNA transport complex. Journal of Bacteriology. 1995;177(16):4779–4791. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.16.4779-4791.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Hazan R, Engelberg-Kulka H. Escherichia coli mazEF-mediated cell death as a defense mechanism that inhibits the spread of phage P1. Molecular Genetics and Genomics. 2004;272(2):227–234. doi: 10.1007/s00438-004-1048-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Hofer B, Ruge M, Dreiseikelmann B. The superinfection exclusion gene (sieA) of bacteriophage P22: identification and overexpression of the gene and localization of the gene product. Journal of Bacteriology. 1995;177(11):3080–3086. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.11.3080-3086.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Horvath P, Barrangou R. CRISPR/Cas, the immune system of bacteria and archaea. Science. 2010;327(5962):167–170. doi: 10.1126/science.1179555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Jaryenneh J, Schoeniger JS, Mageeney CM. Genome sequence and characterization of a novel Pseudomonas putida phage, MiCath. Scientific Reports. 2023;13(1):21834. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48634-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kalyaanamoorthy S, et al. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods. 2017;14(6):587–589. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kelly A, et al. Toxin–antitoxin systems as mediators of phage defence and the implications for abortive infection. Current Opinion in Microbiology. 2023;73:102293. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2023.102293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Korf IHE, et al. Still something to discover: novel insights into Escherichia coli phage diversity and taxonomy. Viruses. 2019;11(5):454. doi: 10.3390/v11050454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lee LF, Boezi JA. Characterization of bacteriophage gh-1 for Pseudomonas putida. Journal of Bacteriology. 1966;92(6):1821–1827. doi: 10.1128/jb.92.6.1821-1827.1966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. LeRoux M, Laub MT. Toxin-antitoxin systems as phage defense elements. Annual Review of Microbiology. 2022;76(1):21–43. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-020722-013730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. LeRoux M, et al. The DarTG toxin-antitoxin system provides phage defence by ADP-ribosylating viral DNA. Nature Microbiology. 2022;7(7):1028–1040. doi: 10.1038/s41564-022-01153-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Research. 2021;49(W1):W293–W296. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Lindberg AA. Bacteriophage receptors. Annual Review of Microbiology. 1973;27(1):205–241. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.27.100173.001225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Lopatina A, Tal N, Sorek R. Abortive infection: bacterial suicide as an antiviral immune strategy. Annual Review of Virology. 2020;7(1):371–384. doi: 10.1146/annurev-virology-011620-040628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Lopes A, et al. Detection of novel recombinases in bacteriophage genomes unveils Rad52, Rad51 and Gp2.5 remote homologs. Nucleic Acids Research. 2010;38(12):3952–3962. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Los M. In: Microbial metabolic engineering. Cheng Q, editor. Springer; New York, NY: 2012. Minimization and prevention of phage infections in bio-processes; pp. 305–315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Maffei E, et al. Systematic exploration of Escherichia coli phage–host interactions with the BASEL phage collection. PLoS Biology. 2021;19(11):e3001424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Magill DJ, et al. Pf16 and phiPMW: expanding the realm of Pseudomonas putida bacteriophages. PLoS One. 2017;12(9):e0184307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Makarova KS, et al. Defense islands in bacterial and archaeal genomes and prediction of novel defense systems. Journal of Bacteriology. 2011;193(21):6039–6056. doi: 10.1128/JB.05535-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Martínez-García E, de Lorenzo V. Engineering multiple genomic deletions in Gram-negative bacteria: analysis of the multi-resistant antibiotic profile of Pseudomonas putida KT2440: Tools for editing Gram-negative genomes. Environmental Microbiology. 2011;13(10):2702–2716. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02538.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Martínez-García E, De Lorenzo V. Pseudomonas putida as a synthetic biology chassis and a metabolic engineering platform. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 2024;85:103025. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2023.103025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Martínez-García E, et al. Pseudomonas 2.0: genetic upgrading of P. putida KT2440 as an enhanced host for heterologous gene expression. Microbial Cell Factories. 2014;13(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12934-014-0159-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Martínez-García E, et al. Freeing Pseudomonas putida KT2440 of its proviral load strengthens endurance to environmental stresses: the prophages of P. putida KT2440. Environmental Microbiology. 2015;17(1):76–90. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Millman A, et al. An expanded arsenal of immune systems that protect bacteria from phages. Cell Host & Microbe. 2022;30(11):1556–1569.:e5. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2022.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Moraru C, Varsani A, Kropinski AM. VIRIDIC—a novel tool to calculate the intergenomic similarities of prokaryote-infecting viruses. Viruses. 2020;12(11):1268. doi: 10.3390/v12111268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Ngiam L, Weynberg KD, Guo J. The presence of plasmids in bacterial hosts alters phage isolation and infectivity. ISME Communications. 2022;2(1):75. doi: 10.1038/s43705-022-00158-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Nguyen L-T, et al. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2015;32(1):268–274. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Nicolas M, et al. Isolation and characterization of a novel phage collection against avian-pathogenic Escherichia coli. Microbiology Spectrum. 2023;11(3):e04296-22. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.04296-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Nikel PI, et al. From dirt to industrial applications: Pseudomonas putida as a synthetic biology chassis for hosting harsh biochemical reactions. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology. 2016;34:20–29. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2016.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Nobrega FL, et al. Targeting mechanisms of tailed bacteriophages. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2018;16(12):760–773. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0070-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Ogura T, Hiraga S. Mini-F plasmid genes that couple host cell division to plasmid proliferation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1983;80(15):4784–4788. doi: 10.1073/pnas.80.15.4784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Olsen NS, et al. Exploring the remarkable diversity of culturable escherichia coli phages in the Danish wastewater environment. Viruses. 2020;12(9):986. doi: 10.3390/v12090986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Olsen RH, Siak J-S, Gray RH. Characteristics of PRD1, a plasmid-dependent broad host range DNA bacteriophage. Journal of Virology. 1974;14(3):689–699. doi: 10.1128/jvi.14.3.689-699.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Owen SV, et al. Prophages encode phage-defense systems with cognate self-immunity. Cell Host & Microbe. 2021;29(11):1620–1633.:e8. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2021.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Patel PH, Maxwell KL. Prophages provide a rich source of antiphage defense systems. Current Opinion in Microbiology. 2023;73:102321. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2023.102321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Prjibelski A, et al. Using SPAdes de novo assembler. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics. 2020;70(1):e102. doi: 10.1002/cpbi.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Ramos JL, Marqués S, Timmis KN. Transcriptional control of the Pseudomonas TOL plasmid catabolic operons is achieved through an interplay of host factors and plasmid-encoded regulators. Annual Review of Microbiology. 1997;51(1):341–373. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.51.1.341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Regenhardt D, et al. Pedigree and taxonomic credentials of Pseudomonas putida strain KT2440. Environmental Microbiology. 2002;4(12):912–915. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2002.00368.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Reva ON, et al. Functional Genomics of Stress Response in Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Journal of Bacteriology. 2006;188(11):4079–4092. doi: 10.1128/JB.00101-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Rocchetta HL, et al. Three rhamnosyltransferases responsible for assembly of the A-band D-rhamnan polysaccharide in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a fourth transferase, WbpL, is required for the initiation of both A-band and B-band lipopolysaccharide synthesis. Molecular Microbiology. 1998;28(6):1103–1119. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00871.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Rosendahl S, et al. Chromosomal toxin-antitoxin systems in Pseudomonas putida are rather selfish than beneficial. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(1):9230. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65504-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Sayers EW, et al. Database resources of the national center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Research. 2022;50(D1):D20–D26. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Seeley ND, Primrose SB. The effect of temperature on the ecology of aquatic bacteriophages. Journal of General Virology. 1980;46(1):87–95. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-46-1-87. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  79. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(14):2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Shang J, et al. PhaBOX: a web server for identifying and characterizing phage contigs in metagenomic data. Bioinformatics Advances. 2023;3(1):vbad101. doi: 10.1093/bioadv/vbad101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Sharma RC, Schimke RT. Preparation of electro-competent E. coli using salt-free growth medium. BioTechniques. 1996;20(1):42–44. doi: 10.2144/96201bm08. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Short FL, et al. The bacterial type III toxin-antitoxin system, ToxIN, is a dynamic protein-RNA complex with stability-dependent antiviral abortive infection activity. Scientific Reports. 2018;8(1):1013. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18696-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Smug BJ, et al. Ongoing shuffling of protein fragments diversifies core viral functions linked to interactions with bacterial hosts. Nature Communications. 2023;14(1):7460. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43236-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Song S, Wood TK. A primary physiological role of toxin/antitoxin systems is phage inhibition. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2020;11:1895. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Susskind MM, Wright A, Botstein D. Superinfection exclusion by P22 prophage in lysogens of Salmonella typhimurium. Virology. 1974;62(2):367–384. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(74)90399-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Terzian P, et al. PHROG: families of prokaryotic virus proteins clustered using remote homology. NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics. 2021;3(3):lqab067. doi: 10.1093/nargab/lqab067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Tock MR, Dryden DT. The biology of restriction and anti-restriction. Current Opinion in Microbiology. 2005;8(4):466–472. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2005.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Turner D, Kropinski AM, Adriaenssens EM. A roadmap for genome-based phage taxonomy. Viruses. 2021;13(3):506. doi: 10.3390/v13030506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Vassallo CN, et al. A functional selection reveals previously undetected anti-phage defence systems in the E. coli pangenome. Nature Microbiology. 2022;7(10):1568–1579. doi: 10.1038/s41564-022-01219-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Volke DC, et al. ‘Synthetic control of plasmid replication enables target- and self-curing of vectors and expedites genome engineering of Pseudomonas putida. Metabolic Engineering Communications. 2020;10:e00126. doi: 10.1016/j.mec.2020.e00126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Worsey MJ, Williams PA. ‘Metabolism of toluene and xylenes by Pseudomonas putida (arvilla)’ mt-2: evidence for a new function of the TOL plasmid. Journal of Bacteriology. 1975;124(1):7–13. doi: 10.1128/jb.124.1.7-13.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Wozniak RAF, Waldor MK. A toxin–antitoxin system promotes the maintenance of an integrative conjugative element. PLoS Genetics. 2009;5(3):e1000439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Zhang T, et al. Direct activation of a bacterial innate immune system by a viral capsid protein. Nature. 2022;612:132–140. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05444-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Zhang Z, et al. A greedy algorithm for aligning DNA sequences. Journal of Computational Biology. 2000;7(1–2):203–214. doi: 10.1089/10665270050081478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary File 1
Supplementary File 2
Supplementary File 3

Data Availability Statement

Genomes are openly available in GenBank under Bio-Project PRJNA1067406: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA1067406.

RESOURCES