Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Dec 6.
Published in final edited form as: Arts Health. 2017 Jul 18;10(2):165–180. doi: 10.1080/17533015.2017.1342269

Combining music and life story to enhance participation in family interaction in semantic dementia: a longitudinal study of one family's experience

Jackie Kindell a, Ray Wilkinson b, Karen Sage c, John Keady d
PMCID: PMC7617030  EMSID: EMS76954  PMID: 39649985

Abstract

Background

Semantic dementia is a rarer dementia, classified as a type of frontotemporal dementia and a variant of primary progressive aphasia. Studies examining conversation in this condition and interventions to enhance participation in family life present as gaps in the research literature.

Methods

Working with one family on a longitudinal basis, this study used conversation analysis and narrative analysis to provide a detailed assessment of communication. This information was used to design an individually tailored life story intervention to facilitate family interaction: a co-produced life story music DVD.

Results

This intervention offered the family a resource that allowed the person with semantic dementia to display areas of retained competence and enhanced participation in interaction in a way that was not typically present in everyday conversation.

Conclusions

It is argued that fostering greater opportunities for such in-the-moment connections is an important goal for intervention, particularly when language may be significantly compromised.

Keywords: semantic dementia, life story, music, interaction, intervention

Background

Dementia is caused by a number of diseases that affect the brain, each giving rise to a range of cognitive and behavioural symptoms. The most common types of dementia include Alzheimer's disease, vascular dementia and Lewy body dementia (Alzheimer's Disease International's, 2009, 2014). Frontotemporal dementia is a less common dementia, thought to account for between 5 and 10% of all cases of dementia, however, it represents a significant cause of younger onset dementia (Alzheimer's Disease International's, 2009). Semantic dementia is one of the subtypes of frontotemporal dementia and presents with progressive communication difficulties arising out of changes to semantic memory (Gorno-Tempini et al., 2011; Neary et al., 1998). As semantic dementia presents with a prominent language disorder the condition may be classified, particularly within the North American and Australian literature, as the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia (Gorno-Tempini et al., 2011). In contrast to Alzheimer's disease, recent memory is initially well preserved in semantic dementia and, although episodic memory does become impaired with time, difficulties are described in retrieving long-term memories (Hodges & Patterson, 2007).

To date, studies examining communication in semantic dementia have largely focused on the language disorder evident during cognitive testing, with expressive speech described as fluent with difficulties in word retrieval (Hodges & Patterson, 2007). A smaller range of studies have examined connected speech and discourse (Garrard & Forsyth, 2010; Sajjadi, Patterson, Tomek, & Nestor, 2012). However, there are very few studies examining the effects of semantic dementia on everyday communication at home (but see Kindell, Sage, Keady, & Wilkinson, 2013; Kindell, Sage, Wilkinson, & Keady, 2014a; Kindell, Burrow, Wilkinson, & Keady, 2014b; Kindell, Sage, & Cruice, 2015; Kindell, Keady, Sage, & Wilkinson, 2016).

The International Classification of Functioning (ICF), Disability and Health (World Health Organization [WHO], 2001) provides a biopsychosocial framework to conceptualise interventions for all conditions targeting different levels: body structures, functions, everyday activities and participation in life situations. For example, semantic dementia damages body structures (ie brain cells) causing difficulties with particular functions (ie cognitive functions, such as language skills). In addition, this gives rise to limitations in executing everyday activities, such as conversation and participation in family life. Currently, medication is not available to treat the underlying disease affecting brain cells in semantic dementia and interventions have most often focused on improving language functions, including practice tasks to enhance word retrieval (Jokel, Graham, Leonard, & Rochon, 2014). Less prevalent is an exploration of those interventions that target everyday activities in semantic dementia including conversation and participation in social life.

Across dementia care a number of activities are used to enhance social interaction including reminiscence, life story work and use of the arts (Beard, 2012; McKeown, Clarke, & Repper, 2006; Westerhof, Bohlmeijer, & Webster, 2010). However, there is a lack of guidance as to how these can be applied to semantic dementia. In particular, the reported difficulties with long memory in semantic dementia may mean that interventions that rely heavily on such memories, including reminiscence and life story work, may not be appropriate or may need to be modified, as in the study that shortly follows, for those living with this condition (Kindell et al., 2014a; Frontotemporal Dementia Toolkit, 2014). This raises the question as to whether approaches that rely less on these particular cognitive processes may be beneficial for some individuals with semantic dementia. For example, the use of musical activities and singing has been explored in dementia in general, with particular positive effects noted on engagement and interaction (Camic, Williams, & Meeten, 2011; Särkämö et al., 2014). Interstingly, an heightened liking for music, described as “musicophilia”, is particularly common in frontotemporal dementia (Fletcher, Downey, Witoonpanich, & Warren, 2013). In some reports excessive listening to music has been displayed as problematic behaviour (Boeve & Geda, 2001). The literature, however, has lacked any detailed exploration about the benefits of music from the perspective of the person with semantic dementia or how this could be used for the purposes of intervention. That said, Ridder and Aldridge (2005), have previously described how Mrs. F, who lived with advanced frontotemporal dementia, enjoyed singing familiar songs over a four-week structured music programme; this activity was noted to reduce her heart rate and prescription of antipsychotic medication.

To help commence a psychosocial evidence base, the following study will outline how a life story music DVD was developed over time by the first author with a family living with semantic dementia in order to enhance participation in interaction at home. The intervention and the associated outcomes are described, including an exploration of the resulting in-the-moment family connections using conversation analysis.

Research approach and methodology

A case study design (Yin, 2009) was used with one family living with semantic dementia utilising a mixed methods approach with both narrative analysis and conversation analysis. The aims were: (i) to gain in-depth insight into the everyday experiences of family members around interaction; (ii) to use this knowledge to plan and deliver an individually tailored intervention to enhance interaction in the home situation; (iii) to explore the effects of the intervention on interaction and participation. The study was approved by a National Health Service UK-Registered Ethics Committee designated to review research involving those who may lack capacity to consent and was also approved by the research governance department at the National Health Service local organisation where the research took place. Names and some contextual/biographical information have been changed in order to maintain confidentiality in the following description of this family.

Sarah and Reg (64 and 66 years old, respectively) were both retired and had been married for 43 years. They had one daughter, Harriet, who lived locally and offered considerable support. Sarah had been diagnosed with semantic dementia four years before this research took place. She was aware that she had “dementia”, making reference to her condition using this word and recognised that there had been changes in her memory and talking. Reg reported that Sarah's personality and behaviour had also changed. One of the problematic issues for them both was that Sarah was experiencing recurring headaches and would ask Reg for pain relief every few minutes, even if she had just taken her analgesic tablets. The family were visited at home by the first author over an 18-month period, with 20 visits made in total.

During early encounters, structured and semi-structured interviews explored participant's lives both before – and now living with – semantic dementia, with 11 h and 7 min of interviews audio-recorded and transcribed in full. This was analysed using thematic narrative analysis (Riessman, 2008). Williams and Keady (2008) advise that at its simplest level “narrative research and analysis is about asking for people's stories, listening and making sense of them and establishing how individual stories are part of a wider 'storied' narrative of people's lives" (p. 331). This approach was used to understand the interrelationship between identity, self and the social world for Sarah, now living with semantic dementia and her family members (Williams & Keady, 2008). This information, for example, helped reveal how life had changed since the onset of semantic dementia but also to understand long-standing aspects of Sarah's interests and identity in order to plan the intervention which is the focus of this paper.

Conversation at home was explored directly through analysis of video data recording everyday conversations and analysed using conversation analysis (Hutchby & Woofitt, 2008). Conversation analysis analyses the part that both parties play within a given communicative context and has been used in a number of studies to explore the natural communicative behaviours of both the person with dementia and their family members (Kindell et al., 2016; Perkins, Whitworth, & Lesser, 1998). The method is data driven and not constrained by prior theory or systems of coding and, therefore, allows anything within the data to be of interest (Hutchby & Woofitt, 2008). Participants were given a small video camera (Cannon Legria FS200) and asked to record conversation at home without researchers present, with Reg taking charge of operating the camera. They were free to choose where and when they recorded and the topic(s) of conversation. The aim was, therefore, to record a sample of everyday interaction at home including the challenges and skills for all participants.

An initial 127 min and 49 s of video were recorded and analysed, with conversations ranging from 6:44 min to 20:07 min and recorded at all times of the day from 11:32 am to 19:11 pm. Analysis followed the approach described by Hutchby and Woofitt (2008) in order to generate an understanding of recurring practices within the conversation data: (i) highlight and make a collections of examples of a particular practice within the data; (ii) analyse and describe one particular practice in detail; (iii) return to the data to see if other instances of the practice can be analysed and described in this way. Therefore, all the video data were watched on two occasions by author (01) with detailed notes made to gain an overall impression and to note any recurring features. This analysis was then discussed with authors (02 and 04) and 41:25 min were identified for further analysis that illustrated these features. This was transcribed in detail by author (01), with both verbal and nonverbal behaviour transcribed using the conventions of conversation analysis for video data (Jefferson, 2005). The transcriptions and the associated video data were then viewed by authors (01, 02 and 04) together to further analyse the data. At a later stage, this method was also used to explore the effects of the intervention on family interactions; this will be described later in this paper.

Pre-intervention assessment

Initial assessment indicated that whilst there were significant challenges in interaction due to Sarah's dementia, Reg had a good understanding of how to manage her communication needs, displaying a remarkable level of patience and a number of strategies to help them cope. Conversation analysis revealed a reduced repertoire of topics of conversation, with the same topics recurring in Sarah's talk, as well as repeated use of certain questions and statements, particularly about the routine of the day. Reg reported that, at times, Sarah lacked appropriate emotional responses in conversation. In addition, a poverty of conversation in the household was an issue because outside of those identified recurring themes, Sarah did not initiate interaction and trying to encourage her to participate in conversation could be difficult. Reg's attempts to engage Sarah in conversation could at times be met with minimal acknowledgements from her, eg “mm” or “oh” as Extract 1 now illustrates.

Extract 1 – Minimal responses

In this extract, Sarah and Reg are waiting for the support worker and Reg is trying to encourage Sarah to participate in the conversation. There are five instances of minimal responses (lines indicated with an arrow) from Sarah, ie monosyllabic responses, low in volume and accompanied by a lack of eye contact. There are only two other responses from Sarah (lines 008 and 021), where she looks to Reg, addresses his question briefly but she does not elaborate further. Sarah's responses convey minimal participation in the interaction. Please see Appendix for transcription symbols.

     001   R    Suzanne will fetch us out take	
     002        us out maybe somewhere for a meal an ride	
     003        round for you you can say you’ve been out	
     004        then (2.0) alright	
→    005   S    mmm °yeah° ((no eye contact))	
     006   R    now you didn’t sleep very well last night did
     007        you	
     008   S    I don’t know ((looks at Reg))	
     009   R    you was up and down all night long saying	
     010        that you couldn’t sleep	
→    011   S    mmm ((no eye contact))	
     012   R    I thought you probably would’ve wanted to	
     013        stop in bed a bit longer this morning	
→    014   S    ⌈mmm⌉ ((no eye contact))	
     015   R    ⌊but⌋ you was up at half past seven and I	
     016        thought you might have wanted to have a	
     017        little sleep but you seemed to be awake again
     018        now	
→    019   S    m ((no eye contact))	
     020   R    do you feel tired	
     021   S    not now ((looks at Reg))	
     022   R    but seeing that you was up and down all	
     023        through the night and you didn’t sleep at all
     024        you said	
→    025   S    mmm ((no eye contact))

Since assessment indicated that Reg had adapted well to the changes in Sarah's conversation abilities, advice about communication techniques was not necessary. However, Sarah's limited involvement in interactions at home was a concern and this raised the question of whether activities such as life story work could provide enhanced opportunities for participation within everyday family life.

The intervention: life story music DVD

Sarah already had a printed life story book and it was reported that the book was useful at an earlier stage to encourage communication. However, it was now limited as an aid to conversation because Sarah had difficulty recognising many of the people and places portrayed in the photographs and remembering the events concerned. This is consistent with reports of associative agnosia affecting understanding of faces and places, along with evidence of long-term memory difficulties in semantic dementia (Hodges & Patterson, 2007).

Narrative interviews with the family identified that Sarah had a long-standing interest in music and singing and that she still retained many of these abilities. This indicated that exploring music within life story work might be more successful and so the decision was made to make a life story music DVD. Together with Sarah, Reg and Harriet the first author compiled a list of songs that were meaningful to Sarah, either in the past or the present. These songs were played to her using either an audio or video clip of the particular artist, thus identifying the songs she particularly liked. Following this, video footage was recorded at home with Sarah singing with her family using these clips. Also recorded was a member of the family introducing each song, eg We've chosen this song because we know you love RED to introduce Chris De Burgh singing “The Lady in Red”. Clips were uploaded into a popular DVD programme maker, including: family members introducing the artists and stating why the song was meaningful, various artists singing and footage of family members singing with Sarah. The videos were then organised appropriately with relevant title lines added on screen, eg the title of the DVD as an introduction (Thank You for the Music), family member's names when they appeared on screen and linking title slides to give flow to the DVD, eg and now for us all singing … (song name). Care was taken to ensure that videos were of a similar volume with fading used to slowly fade in and fade out tracks. Where possible atypical words were spelt with a regular spelling, eg the popular English singer “Cilla” (Black) was spelt Silla on screen, to help Sarah read as her acquired dyslexia meant she had difficulty reading words with irregular spellings. Finally, a credits slide listed the names of those who took part. The video was shown to Sarah on two occasions to pilot and refine the format, once on a laptop computer and once on the screen of her television and alterations were made as appropriate. This included:

  • Ensuring labels of family names appeared on screen throughout (this reduced Sarah saying who's that?).

  • Altering the order of songs – the song “I like a nice cup of tea” was initially first, however, this led to Sarah requesting tea from Reg even if she had just had a cup and this was, therefore, placed at the end.

  • Ensuring all song lyrics appeared on screen too, at the request of the family so they could sing along more easily.

  • A particular song was omitted as this made Sarah's daughter upset as it reminded her of how her mum used to be prior to her dementia.

A final DVD was given with a cover using stills from the recording session and an explanation of life story work on the reverse. The DVD was 40-min long. Copies were given to Sarah and Reg and another to Harriet.

Outcomes of the intervention

In terms of exploring the effects of the intervention, the aim was to understand how the life story process and the music DVD resource contributed to Sarah's participation in social interaction with family members. Video and audio recordings were made of the session making the DVD (recorded in the late afternoon) and the two sessions with Sarah and Reg watching the piloted and final versions (recorded over two mornings) giving 82 min of video data and an additional 40 min of audio data. In these instances, the video camera was operated by the researcher filming in the lounge area. The principles of conversation analysis guided the analysis of the data as described earlier. Firstly, the video and audio were examined in entirety by author (01) on two occasions with salient recurring features noted. Extracts of the data were then viewed and discussed with authors (02, 04). A collection of specific examples of recurring practices within interaction was then made with detailed transcriptions of the data including speaking, singing and non-verbal behaviours. These examples were viewed and discussed by authors (01, 02, 03) and these were subjected to further detailed analysis focusing on how the life story music DVD impacted on Sarah's behaviour and participation in interaction (see below).

This data-driven method was used to analyse recurring interactional behaviours, or moments in the data as required by conversation analysis (Hutchby & Woofitt, 2008). The method used has some overlap with micro-analytical approaches using video to explore the in-the-moment effects of music therapy, where detailed analysis of both verbal and non-verbal behaviour derived from observation in context has been used (Wosch & Wigram, 2007). Application of conversation analysis, however, allowed for a qualitative comparison between the recurring practices during conversation, with those during the intervention, in order to explore in detail how the intervention influenced participation in interaction. Analysis revealed three recurring patterns in the data that could then be broken down further into specific interactional practices:

  • (1)

    Distraction from Distress.

  • (2)

    Facilitating Interaction.

    • (a)

      In response to the lyrics.

    • (b)

      Making up own lyrics.

    • (c)

      Embodied and emotional connections.

  • (3)

    Performance and Identity.

    • (a)

      Embellishments and over-singing.

    • (b)

      Embodied performance.

    • (c)

      Reaction from her audience.

These findings will be presented and extracts from the video data used to further illustrate issues. In the following extracts bold type is used for singing and standard type for talking. Behaviours occurring simultaneously are bracketed, as is standard in conversation analysis. Still photographs taken from the video have been used to illustrate important nonverbal aspects to the data.

Pattern 1 – distraction from distress

Engaging Sarah in song distracted her from her recurring worries about her headaches and requests for pain relief, providing a foundation for enhanced participation in interaction. The effects of this distraction were particularly dramatic during the session making the DVD when Sarah was initially in bed, with her family present in the lounge. Reg asked Sarah to join the family, as he thought it might help her, but she looked in pain and it seemed as though filming might have to be postponed. Video footage, however, revealed the transformative nature of the music within the first minute. At the start of the recording Sarah complains about her headache. There is no eye contact with Harriet who is sitting next to her; Sarah eyes are shut and she is looking ill whilst rubbing her head. However, as the music plays (Lady in Red, Chris de Burgh) she opens her eyes, looks at the artist on the laptop screen and then to the researcher, beginning to attend to the music (18 s). Sarah begins to move to the music and smile (23 s), make eye contact with Harriet (28 s) and start to sing (33 s). At 54 s, she appears happy and engaged in the song as evidenced by her voice, face and body movements. This level of engagement continues throughout this song. During this visit Sarah did not request pain relief while the music was playing but when the music stopped, she started to complain about her head and ask for tablets. At a later visit Sarah was again repeatedly asking for tablets in the first hour (during normal conversation), rarely going more than five minutes between requests. However, whilst watching the 40 min of the DVD she did not request any tablets. The DVD did not eliminate all repetitive behaviours, as Sarah often still asked for food, cups of tea and chewing gum. It would seem, therefore, that music appeared to lift her mood and distract her from her worries about her head, rather than reduce all such behaviours.

Pattern 2 – facilitating interaction

There were a number of ways that the DVD facilitated interaction including: (a) In response to the lyrics; (b) Sarah making up her own lyrics; (c) Giving rise to embodied emotional connections:

(a). In response to the lyrics

The following extract illustrates that Sarah did not just sing the lyrics of the songs, at an automatic or perhaps “over-learnt” manner; she often processed the meaning and used these words as a vehicle to interact with others:

Extract 2 – Interaction arising from lyrics

Here, Harriet and Sarah are singing to a Tina Turner song, “Simply the Best” (M = music).

 001   M    ⌈tear us apart⌉
 002   H    ⌊tear us apart⌋
 003   S     ((looks at H)) no ⌈no no⌉ no chance no chance
 004   H	               ⌊no no⌋
 005   M    baby I would rather bedead⌉
 006   S	                   ⌊dead⌋ no no we don’t
 007        want to die yet do we

Thus, in response to the lyric tear us apart, Sarah looks to Harriet in line 003 and expresses her disagreement with that possibility: no and no chanceand in response to I would rather be dead (005) Sarah says to Harriet we don't want to die yet do we? The result is both affectionate and humorous.

(b). Making up own lyrics

Sarah would sometimes make up her own lyrics, singing in tune and in time to the music, but with her own words. For example, with Tina Turner's “Simply the Best”, at a point where only the music is playing, Sarah sings her own lyrics to Harriet ah ah I love you any time of day I can't stay awake I love you so oh oh oh.

(c). Embodied and emotional connections

Connections between family members were not just verbal but also embodied, evident by the coordinated use of touch, body posture and eye gaze used spontaneously by both participants within the context. The Cilla Black song, “You are my World”, is Sarah and Reg's engagement song. Sarah no longer remembers this association but does still remember many of the lyrics and its distinctive tempo. On the two occasions Sarah is video recorded listening to this song, Sarah is seen to look to Reg and reach for his hand when she sings my arms reach out to you for love. Reg leans towards Sarah, holds her hand and smiles as she sings. This further demonstrates the embodied connection between them, as extracts 3 and 4 illustrate, with the behaviours observed on both videos remarkably similar.

Extract 3 – Embodied connection – engagement song 1

This example is from the session making the DVD.

(c).

Extract 4 – Embodied connection – engagement song 2

This example is from a later session watching the DVD, as before Sarah reaches over to Reg, who is sitting next to her (this time on the other side and further away) taking his hand.

(c).

Sarah also makes embodied and emotional connections with Harriet, for example, she smiles and leans towards Harriet, placing her cheek to Harriet's when singing about dancing “cheek to cheek” and, at the end of this song (Lady in Red), there is a particularly poignant exchange between them both, as illustrated in extract 5:

Extract 5 – Emotional connection

         001   M    my lady inred⌉
         002   S             ↑ ⌊re:⌋ e:ed
         003   H    I love you  ((leans in joint eye contact))
         004   S    I love you  darlin’ I love you so: much

Pattern 3 – performance and identity

It was clear during interviews that being “a singer” was an extremely important and distinct part to Sarah's identity that she still retained, as she explained when watching the DVD: you've not been a singer really have you Reg, I've always been a singer, I remember when I was a child when me mum was here. When watching the DVD Sarah often asked who's put me on telly Reg? with amazement, but was unable to retain any explanation as to why the DVD had been made. It was decided with Reg that saying it was because she had a good voice was the most easily understandable and helpful for her, as it reinforced this positive aspect of her retained identity. The video also illustrates that Sarah does not just sing, she is seen to perform with the following aspects contributing to this sense of performance.

(a). Embellishments and over-singing

There are numerous examples of Sarah creatively embellishing her performance by adding extra notes, pitch rises and falls and singing extra items such as oh yeah as a professional performer might do, as illustrated in extract 6.

Extract 6 – Embellishment

In the following example, Sarah is watching the DVD and singing to Roy Orbison's “Pretty Woman”.

      001   M    I don’t believe you you’re not the truth
      002   S    no ((point - in time)) no ((point - in time))
      003   M    No one could look as goodas you⌉
      004   S                              ⌊as you⌋
      005   S    go
      006   M    mercy
      007   S    yeah

Here, we see Sarah adding in extra embellishments such as two well-timed no's (002) accompanied with emphatic “points”. In line 005, she adds go before Orbison sings his distinctive mercy to which Sarah responds yeah in line 007.

(b). Embodied performance

Across the data Sarah is observed to move along to the music and this seems less about communicating to others but more about her natural and unintended response to the music, as extract 7 demonstrates. When watching the video data her family note the similarity of these behaviours to how Sarah would have performed prior to her dementia.

Extract 7 – Embodied performance

Here, when singing to “Simply the Best” with Harriet, Sarah holds out her hands much as a singer would do when performing (see photo and lines 003–004).

(b).

(c). Reaction from her audience

Sarah's sense of performance is added to by the reaction of those around her. She is centre stage when singing, both when making and watching the DVD. Those present look to Sarah and comment positively about her singing and encourage her to perform as extract 8 shows.

Extract 8 – Audience reaction

At a rather flamboyant end to “the Lady in Red”, Reg comments positively on Sarah's performance (003):

      001   M    my lady inred⌉
      002   S             ↑ ⌊re:e:e: ed
      003   R    well done Sarah beautiful that

In other instances, family members clap her performance. When watching herself on screen Sarah also indicates approval by clapping. In this way, there is evidence of Sarah “reliving the moment” with approval of her own performance abilities.

Summary of outcomes

Initial assessment revealed that Sarah's participation in interactions with her family members during conversation was generally limited. As described earlier, she initiated little, and her responses were often minimal with questions and topics drawn from a limited repertoire. The introduction of the life story music DVD provided Sarah and her family with a resource which distracted her from her worries and complaints about her headaches and facilitated interaction.

Analysis reveals that engaging with familiar and meaningful music had the power to enhance Sarah's participation and involvement with her family both verbally and nonverbally in a way that was not typically present in everyday conversation. For example, in-the-moment analysis of the video data sees Sarah take an active part in both the process of making the DVD and in her reactions when watching it, with playful, humorous and emotional connections with family members displayed. Sarah is thus fully engaged when singing, in contrast to conversation, where she can often take a more passive role. The resource allowed Sarah to use areas of retained competence in singing and embodied performance to display her identity as a singer and this resulted in positive reactions from her family.

Sarah and her family reported that were very happy with the DVD and that it had been shown to others visiting the house including Reg's relatives, their neighbour, the community nurse and their support worker. They had developed a family joke teasing each other about who was the best singer. The process had led to other activities with their son-in-law making Sarah another DVD with another set of favourite songs. Harriet in particular, however, reported that whilst it was lovely to see her mum happy, sometimes when making the DVD, it also made her sad as it reminded her of how her mum used to be in the past and she compared this to how she was now, saying: sometimes happy memories can also make you sad. Reg reported a similar feeling, though perhaps to a lesser extent. A telephone call from Reg, six months after they had received the DVD, revealed that they still enjoyed watching it together, with Reg reporting I'm surprised it's not worn out, the amount of times she's seen it.

Discussion

This study demonstrates that the life story music DVD intervention acted as a vehicle to provide opportunities for positive interaction and participation at home in semantic dementia. Analysis illustrates the effects on interaction in detail and the positive benefit this has to Sarah in deploying retained abilities, displaying competence and showing aspects of her identity, for example, as a singer and also as a loving wife and mother. Moreover, the case demonstrates that music facilitates a different range of interactional skills compared to everyday conversation and evidences the reports in interviews that music has a special effect on Sarah's well-being. For instance, singing allows the playful and creative aspects of Sarah's identity to be displayed and this is in contrast to observations of conversation, both before and after the intervention, where she is often relatively passive. The embellishments and over-singing that Sarah uses intensifies her sense of performance. Musical embellishments were also reported in a case study of a harpsichord player with semantic dementia with the authors arguing that such behaviours indicate that these musical skills are not merely being retrieved whole from long-term memory (Weinstein et al., 2011). This would also appear to be the case for Sarah as demonstrated by her performance skills, creativity with singing and her ability to process the words of the song and use this as a vehicle to interact with those around her.

Hailstone, Omar, and Warren (2009) found that in a woman with semantic dementia, musical knowledge was disproportionately preserved in comparison to other modalities of knowledge, suggesting that this may contribute to musicophilia in people with frontotemporal dementia. Areas of retained skill may have implications for interventions; for example, a study of the practice of speech and language therapists working with people with semantic dementia reported that one of the founding principles of their work was a focus on ability and its promotion, rather than a focus on disability in therapy (Kindell et al., 2015). Sarah's case study illustrates that communication interventions may build on abilities outside of language to provide appropriate opportunities to contribute to interactional and emotional connections with family members. Importantly, in this case study, singing was not just a solitary pleasure for Sarah, but an activity that could engage others.

The data demonstrate not just a range of verbal connections, but embodied and emotional connections including love, joy and humour. Kindell et al. (2014b) argue that professional outcomes from life story work may be very different from the outcomes that family members value. For example, whilst professionals may focus on reducing negative behaviour or fostering certain abilities, simply “having fun together” might be highly valued by family members. This is where appropriately tailored life story work may offer potential as watching the biographically centred DVD allowed Sarah an opportunity to relive-the-moment and interact with her family. Reg later reported that Sarah often enjoyed watching the DVD, even after the intervention had been completed.

The biographical nature of the intervention enabled long-standing aspects of Sarah's identity to be displayed within interaction, including behaviours of a performative nature. Kontos (2005) has outlined a notion of embodied selfhood for dementia care to capture the idea that fundamental aspects of selfhood are manifested in the way the body moves and behaves. The data here are consistent with this notion with Sarah automatically moving her body and performing to the music as she has always done. The intervention, therefore, actively provides an opportunity for Sarah to express her identity with her body. This performance observed in the present, was also often compared with elements of the past. For example, when observing her current behaviour when singing or watching the video data, Sarah's family talked about her long-standing love of singing and recalled stories of her singing abilities from her childhood through to her adult life. However, reminding them of how she used to be presented some challenges for her family, particularly her daughter. As Schechner (2013) notes “performances mark identities, bend time, reshape and adorn the body and tell stories” (p. 28) and Sarah's performance, it could be argued, was in some ways an autobiographical performance in the present but also from the past. Her family, as the audience, were aware this was only a momentary, and not a lasting, performance and this also brought them some sadness.

There is no evidence that the music DVD had wider or longer term effects on Sarah's interaction, or behaviour, when it was not being used. For example, the video data show that once the music had stopped, Sarah returned to complaints about her headache. Similarly, there is no evidence that the conversations between Sarah and her family differed in any ways which could be attributable to the use of the music DVD. However, this lack of generalisation should not detract from the in-the-moment effects on interaction and emotion evident in the data when the life story music DVD was being used. Moreover, the goal of this intervention, following the framework of the ICF (World Health Organization [WHO], 2001), was to enhance participation in interaction and this, therefore, should be the primary focus for examining outcomes. A recent review of music-based therapeutic interventions found a lack of demonstrated long-term effects on behaviour, cognition, quality of life and emotional well-being, with effects on social behaviour particularly difficult to demonstrate (van der Steen et al., 2017). However, commenting on a lack of long-term benefit, McDermott, Crellin, Ridder, and Orrell (2013) have argued for studies to redefine realistic and clinically relevant goals, including temporary effects on quality of life. Similarly, a focus on engagement and in-the-moment effects has been advocated in other studies using the arts (Camic et al., 2011; MacPherson, Bird, Anderson, Davis, & Blair, 2009). Within theatre studies, Thompson (2009) notes that in the search for the “effects” of performance in terms of social utility, applied theatre is in danger of forgetting the “affect” of performance at the time and this is a problem faced too by dementia care. It can be extremely difficult for families to engage individuals with advancing semantic dementia in activity or conversation of any kind. However, the achievement and creativity seen within such in-the-moment exchanges, as discussed here, can be too easily overlooked when a lack of “effect” in the long term is noted. Dementia care would benefit from greater attention to such issues.

Conclusion

This case study moved away from the focus in the literature on improving language function in semantic dementia to an intervention to enhance participation in life situations using a life story music DVD at home. Using the ICF framework (World Health Organization [WHO], 2001), enhanced participation in interaction was the primary goal of the intervention and evaluating this was, therefore, the relevant outcome measure, as demonstrated here through in-the-moment effects within interaction, analysed using conversation analysis. Changes in behaviour and brain functions after the activity has finished, whilst welcome, are not necessary for the goals of the intervention to be achieved. Separating out these aspects is a crucial aspect to delivering person-centred care and interventions in dementia. This encourages practice and care to value such in-the-moment connections and seek to foster greater opportunities for these to occur in the daily lives of those living with semantic dementia and their family members.

Funding

This work was supported by The Dunhill Medical Trust [grant number RTF33/1111].

Appendix. Transcription symbols

Symbols Explanation

A large left-hand bracket links overlapping utterances or non-verbal
actions at the point where the overlap begins.

A large right-hand bracket marks where overlapping
utterances/simultaneous non-verbal actions stop overlapping.
(0.6) Silences are marked in seconds and tenths of seconds, ie (0.6) is six-tenths of a second; (1.2) is one second and two-tenths of a second.
oh: A colon indicates an extension of the sound or syllable it follows (more colons prolong the stretch).
↑ ↓ Marked rising and falling shifts in intonation are indicated by upward and downward pointing arrows immediately prior to the rise or fall.
stress Underlining indicates emphasis.
°no° Degree signs indicate talk which is quieter than surrounding talk.
((nods)) Double brackets represent a gloss or description of some non-verbal aspect of the talk
Bold Bold type in this report indicates singing,

Footnotes

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

  1. Alzheimer's Disease International. World Alzheimer's report: The global prevalence of dementia. London: Author; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alzheimer's Disease International. World Alzheimer's report: Dementia and risk reduction. London: Author; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  3. Beard RL. Art therapies and dementia care: A systematic review. Dementia. 2012;11:633–656. doi: 10.1177/1471301211421090. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boeve BF, Geda YE. Polka music and semantic dementia. Neurology. 2001;57:1485. doi: 10.1212/wnl.57.8.1485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Camic PM, Williams CM, Meeten F. Does a 'singing together group' improve the quality of life of people with a dementia and their carers? A pilot evaluation study. Dementia. 2011;12:157–176. doi: 10.1177/1471301211422761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fletcher PD, Downey LE, Witoonpanich P, Warren JD. The brain basis of musicophilia: Evidence from frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Frontiers in Psychology. 2013;4:1–8. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Frontotemporal Dementia Toolkit. Retrieved from Eastern Cognitive Disorders Clinic. 2014. http://ecdc.org.au/
  8. Garrard P, Forsyth R. Abnormal discourse in semantic dementia: A data-driven approach. Neurocase. 2010;16:520–528. doi: 10.1080/13554791003785901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gorno-Tempini ML, Hillis AE, Weintraub S, Kertesz A, Mendez M, Cappa SF, et al. Grossman M. Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology. 2011;76:1006–1014. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821103e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hailstone JC, Omar R, Warren J. Relatively preserved knowledge of music in semantic dementia. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry. 2009;80:808–809. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2008.153130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hodges JR, Patterson K. Semantic dementia: A unique clinicopathological syndrome. The Lancet Neurology. 2007;6:1004–1014. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70266-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hutchby I, Woofitt R. Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  13. Jefferson G. In: Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation. Lerner G, editor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; 2005. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction; pp. 13–31. [Google Scholar]
  14. Jokel R, Graham N, Leonard C, Rochon E. Word retrieval therapies in primary progressive aphasia. Aphasiology. 2014;28:1038–1068. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2014.899306. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kindell J, Sage K, Keady J, Wilkinson R. Adapting to conversation with semantic dementia: Using enactment as a compensatory strategy in everyday social interaction. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders. 2013;48:497–507. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kindell J, Sage K, Wilkinson R, Keady J. Living with semantic dementia : A case study of one family's experience. Qualitative Health Research. 2014a;24:401–411. doi: 10.1177/1049732314521900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kindell J, Burrow S, Wilkinson R, Keady J. Life story resources in dementia care: A review. Quality in Ageing and Older Adults. 2014b;16:153–164. doi: 10.1108/QAOA-02-2014-0003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kindell J, Sage K, Cruice M. Supporting communication in semantic dementia: Clinical consensus from expert practitioners. Quality in Ageing and Older Adults. 2015;16:153–164. doi: 10.1108/QAOA-08-2014-0016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kindell J, Keady J, Sage K, Wilkinson R. Everyday conversation in dementia: A review of the literature to inform research and practice. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders. 2016 doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12298. Published on-line ahead of print. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Kontos PC. Embodied selfhood in Alzheimer's disease: Rethinking person-centred care. Dementia. 2005;4:553–570. [Google Scholar]
  21. MacPherson S, Bird M, Anderson K, Davis T, Blair A. An art gallery access programme for people with dementia: You do it for the moment. Aging & Mental Health. 2009;13:744–752. doi: 10.1080/13607860902918207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. McDermott O, Crellin N, Ridder HM, Orrell M. Music therapy in dementia: A narrative synthesis systematic review. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 2013;28:781–794. doi: 10.1002/gps.3895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. McKeown J, Clarke A, Repper J. Life story work in health and social care: Systematic literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2006;55:237–247. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03897.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Neary D, Snowden JS, Gustafson L, Passant U, Stuss D, Black S, et al. Benson DF. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: A consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 1998;51:1546–1554. doi: 10.1212/wnl.51.6.1546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Perkins L, Whitworth A, Lesser R. Conversing in dementia: A conversation analytic approach. Journal of Neurolinguistics. 1998;11:33–53. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ridder HM, Aldridge D. Individual music therapy with persons with frontotemporal dementia. Nordic Journal of Music Therapy. 2005;14:91–106. doi: 10.1080/08098130509478132. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Riessman CK. Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  28. Sajjadi SA, Patterson K, Tomek M, Nestor PJ. Abnormalities of connected speech in semantic dementia vs Alzheimer's disease. Aphasiology. 2012;26:847–866. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2012.654933. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Särkämö T, Tervaniemi M, Laitinen S, Numminen A, Kurki M, Johnson JK, Rantanen P. Cognitive, emotional, and social benefits of regular musical activities in early dementia: A randomized controlled study. The Gerontologist. 2014;54:634–650. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Schechner R. Peformance studies: An introduction. London: Routledge; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  31. Thompson J. Performance affects. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  32. van der Steen JT, van Soest-Poortvliet MC, van der Wouden JC, Bruinsma MS, Scholten RJPM, Vink AC. Music-based therapeutic interventions for people with dementia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017;(5) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003477.pub3. Art. No.: CD003477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Weinstein J, Koenig P, Gunawardena D, McMillan C, Bonner M, Grossman M. Preserved musical semantic memory in semantic dementia. Archives of Neurology. 2011;68:248–250. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Westerhof GJ, Bohlmeijer E, Webster JD. Reminiscence and mental health: A review of recent progress in theory, research and interventions. Ageing & Society. 2010;30:697–721. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X09990328. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Williams S, Keady J. In: Nursing research designs and methods. Watson R, McKenna H, Cowman S, Keady J, editors. Philadelphia, PA: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2008. Narrative research and analysis; pp. 331–340. [Google Scholar]
  36. World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: Author; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  37. Wosch T, Wigram T, editors. Microanalysis in music therapy: Methods, techniques and applications for clinicians, researchers, educators and students. London: Jessica Kingsley; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  38. Yin RK. Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2009. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES