Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with an estimated 750,000 deaths in 2022. Recent emergence of molecular targeted agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors and their combination therapies have been transforming HCC care, but their prognostic impact in advanced-stage disease remains unsatisfactory. In addition, their application to early-stage disease is still an unmet need. Omics profiling studies have elucidated recurrent and heterogeneously present molecular aberrations involved in pro-cancer tumor (immune) microenvironment that may guide therapeutic strategies. Recurrent aberrations such somatic mutations in TERT promoter and TP53 have been regarded undruggable, but recent studies have suggested that these may serve as new classes of therapeutic targets. HCC markers such as alpha-fetoprotein, glypican-3, and epithelial cell adhesion molecule have also been explored as therapeutic targets. These molecular features may be utilized as biomarkers to guide the application of new approaches as companion biomarkers to maximize therapeutic benefits in patients who are likely to benefit from the therapies, while minimizing unnecessary harm in patients who will not respond. The explosive number of new agents in the pipelines have posed challenges in their clinical testing. Novel clinical trial designs guided by predictive biomarkers have been proposed to enable their efficient and cost-effective evaluation. These new developments collectively facilitate clinical translation of personalized molecular-targeted therapies in HCC and substantially improve prognosis of HCC patients.
Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma, Molecular targeted therapy, Clinical trial design, Predictive biomarker
INTRODUCTION
Globally, liver cancer, predominantly hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), ranks as the third most common cause of cancer-related mortality. In 2022, it was responsible for approximately 750,000 fatalities worldwide.1,2 The emergence of technologies based on next-generation sequencing has significantly enhanced our comprehension of the molecular and immunological characteristics of HCC.3 In addition, the treatment landscape for advanced-stage HCC has undergone drastic changes due to the approval of molecular targeted agents (MTAs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the past 5 years.4 Although the introduction of these new therapeutic options is promising, their impact on survival rates in advanced-stage HCC remains modest, with median survival still falling short of 2 years. Experimental studies and genomic data are anticipated to provide molecular insights that will soon influence the clinical management of patients with HCC. However, the optimal sequencing of these novel therapies remains uncertain. Recent pre-clinical and clinical investigations have indicated that the response to these molecularly targeted treatments may be affected by clinical factors, such as the etiology of liver disease. Therefore, an in-depth understanding the molecular pathogenesis of HCC in specific clinical scenarios is essential to optimize the application of novel therapies for maximum effectiveness. This review serves as a roadmap for clinical trials and the implementation of new therapeutic approaches by offering a comprehensive overview of the molecular and immunological landscape of HCC.
EMERGING MOLECULAR AND IMMUNE TARGETS IN HCC
Extensive multicenter studies have performed in-depth genomic phenotyping of human HCC tumors and the tumor microenvironment (TME)/tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), identifying key molecular characteristics driving/supporting cancer initiation/progression (Fig. 1A).5 A thorough grasp of the intricacies and diversity within the molecular and immune landscape of HCC and its TME/TIME will offer insights for personalized treatment approaches. The variations within and between tumors arise not only from inherent epi/genetic abnormalities in cancer cells but also from shifts in the makeup and stromal components within the TME/TIME. Comprehensive multi-omic examination of whole tissue, individual cells/nuclei, and spatially mapped tissue has uncovered a wide range of molecular aberrations in HCC tumors and their microenvironment.6-16 Some molecular pathways/hallmarks can be targeted using approved or tested clinical agents, while others, previously considered untreatable, are now being explored as novel therapeutic targets (Fig. 1B). These include frequently mutated regions (e.g., TERT promoter [TERTp], TP53, CTNNB1). In this context, we discuss current and reported molecular and immune mechanisms that could serve as potential therapeutic strategies.6-11,17
Figure 1.
Therapeutic strategies according to molecular and immune landscape of HCC. (A) Molecular subtypes of HCC tumors and associated histological and molecular features. (B) Molecular and cellular targets for approved drugs and therapeutic strategies in development in HCC. CAR-T cells, chimeric antigen receptor T cells; GPC3, glypican-3; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; EpCAM, epithelial cell adhesion molecule; neoAg, neo antigen; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; PDGFβ, platelet-derived growth factor beta; EGF, epidermal growth factor; HGF, hepatocyte growth factor; APC, antigen presenting cell; CTLA-4, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4; VEGFR, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor; FGFR, fibroblast growth factor receptor; PDGFR, platelet-derived growth factor receptor; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; MET, MET proto-oncogene (hepatocyte growth factor receptor); PD-L1, programmed cell death ligand 1; mTOR, mechanistic target of rapamycin; JAK/STAT, Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; PI3K/Akt, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B; PD-1, programmed cell death protein 1; CDK, cyclin-dependent kinase; DKK1, dickkopf-1; Rb, retinoblastoma; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; TGFβ, transforming growth factor beta; TGFβR, transforming growth factor beta receptor; TERT, telomerase reverse transcriptase.
Telomere maintenance mechanisms (TMM)
The disruption of TMM, including the reactivation of telomerase, is a crucial aspect in achieving replicative immortality, which is considered one of the fundamental characteristics in multiple cancer types including HCC.18,19 Somatic alterations in the TERTp are the most common structural changes found in human HCC, occurring in 40-60% of cases, thus, these modifications can take the form of nucleotide substitutions, insertions or deletions, and the integration of viral DN.6-11,17,20,21 The occurrence of somatic TERTp mutations in early-stage HCC, dysplastic nodules of varying grades, and cell-free DNA from cirrhosis patients without clinically detectable HCC indicates their role in the initial stages of HCC formation. This finding also suggests that detecting TERTp mutations could be valuable for assessing risk and/or identifying HCC in its early phases.22-27 The reactivation of telomerase was linked to worse recurrence-free survival, indicating its role in disease advancement.28-30 Conversely, a recent case-control investigation discovered a novel single nucleotide polymorphism in the TERT gene (rs2242652) that appeared to protect against HCC in patients with alcohol-induced cirrhosis.31 This suggests that telomere length may be a factor in the molecular heterogeneity of HCC tumors.32 The precise mechanistic involvement of these mutations in HCC initiation and progression remains unclear. Nevertheless, due to the high frequency of TERTp mutations in HCC and other cancers, TMM has emerged as a potential therapeutic target.33 For example, pre-clinical HCC models have shown promising anti-HCC effects using antisense oligonucleotides that target TERT transcripts.32 Additionally, a nucleoside analog called 6-thio-dG (THIO) has been found to cause telomeric DNA damage in telomerase-activated HCC cells, stimulate innate and adaptive anti-tumor immunity, and improve the response to ICIs in mice.34 These TMM-directed therapeutic approaches, along with others, may prove valuable in the clinical management of individuals at risk for HCC.
Wnt/beta-catenin
The Wnt signaling is an essential pathway in liver development and homeostasis, regulated by a key transcriptional mediator, beta-catenin encoded by the CTNNB1 gene. CTNNB1 is among the most frequently mutated genes in approximately 20-40% of HCC tumors.35 In contrast to other cancer types where CTNNB1 mutations are associated with induction of oncogenic canonical Wnt signaling, these mutations are accompanied with induction of glutamate-ammonia ligase (also known as glutamine synthase) encoded by GLUL gene, more differentiated histology, immune exclusion, and better prognosis in HCC.35-37 Of note, canonical Wnt signaling can be induced in HCC tumors without CTNNB1 mutations.35,38 Wnt/beta-catenin pathway is now actively explored as a therapeutic target in multiple cancer types and non-cancer conditions by utilizing various strategies.39-41 An ongoing phase I/II trial is evaluating a dickkopf-1 (DKK1) inhibitor in patients whose tumors display positive glutamine synthase immunostaining as a surrogate marker of CTNNB1 mutations (NCT03645980).
TP53
TP53 gene, which encodes the p53 tumor protein, is frequently mutated in advanced-stage HCC and is linked to aflatoxin B1 food contamination.11,42-48 Loss-of-function mutations in this tumor suppressor gene and its related genes (TP73L, TP63, CDKN2A, MDM2/MDM4) are associated with aggressive cancer characteristics, including stemness features and resistance to therapy.49-53 A study using a rodent model suggested that p53 function may be compromised in early HCC development through CD44/STAT3 signaling, independent of somatic mutations.54 Another rodent model demonstrated that TP53 loss works in conjunction with c-MET to promote liver cancer development.55 Researchers are actively investigating therapeutic approaches to restore p53 function in pre-clinical studies and early-phase clinical trials. These methods include refolding mutant p53 and inhibiting MDM2, which may soon be applicable to HCC cases with TP53 mutations.56,57 Additionally, adenoviral delivery of the p53 tumor suppressor protein has been evaluated in solid tumors without dominant-negative TP53 mutations (NCT03544723).
Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)
While the limited positivity of AFP (around 30%) restricts its use as a tumor detection biomarker, it may still prove valuable as an indicator of specific biological/clinical characteristics and treatment responses. Research has demonstrated a connection between high AFP levels and tumor progression, resistance to cell death, and blood vessel formation. These effects might be countered by medications targeting relevant molecular pathways, although the precise mechanisms of therapeutic response, such as in the case of ramucirumab, are not always well understood. Recent investigations have also indicated that AFP might aid in tumor immune evasion by suppressing dendritic cells, natural killer (NK) cells, and T-cells.58 While AFP itself has weak immunogenicity, AFP-targeted immune engineering strategies, including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy and specific peptide enhanced affinity receptor (SPEAR) T cell therapy, have undergone phase I/II clinical trials.59 Peptide vaccines targeting have been developed AFP and other cancer-related proteins and neoantigens, including WT-I, ROBO1, FOXM1, HER3, and mutant TP53.60
Glypican-3 (GPC3)
GPC3, a heparan sulfate proteoglycan on cell surfaces, serves as an immunohistochemical indicator for HCC.61 Epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), a marker for hepatic stem/progenitor cells on cell surfaces, is highly expressed in various gastrointestinal cancers, including HCC.62,63 GPC3 (and EpCAM), like AFP, is expressed in a subset of HCC tumors exhibiting stemness characteristics, poor outcomes, and a strong association with the Hoshida S2 subtype (Fig. 1A).38,63,64 GPC3 is also an ideal target for immune-engineered approaches, such as CAR T-cell therapy, currently evaluated in multiple ongoing phase I/II trials (Table 1).64 Codrituzumab (GC33), a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting human GPC3, did not demonstrate anti-tumor effects in a phase II trial. However, it may be useful as a molecular imaging probe when combined with the positron emission tomography radiotracer, I-124.65,66 ERY974, a bispecific antibody designed to redirect T cells to GPC3-positive tumor cells by targeting GPC3/CD3, showed general tolerability in patients with advanced solid tumors during a phase I trial.67
Table 1.
Ongoing biomarker-guided therapeutic trials in HCC
| Clinical context | Phase | Trial type | Agent | Class of agent | Biomarker-based eligibility | NCT number | Last updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neo-adjuvant theapy | II | Biomarker enrichment trial | Lenvatinib | Multi-kinase inhibitor | AFP>100 ng/mL, infiltrative/ macrotrabecular pattern | NCT05113186 | 2024 |
| Adjuvant therapy | I | Biomarker enrichment trial | GPC3 CAR-T cells | Engineered T cells | GPC3 IHC-positive | NCT06560827 | 2024 |
| II | Biomarker enrichment trial | Sintilimab +/- lenvatinib | Anti-PD-1 +/- multi-kinase inhibitor | VETC positive | NCT06461936 | 2024 | |
| IV | Biomarker enrichment trial | Anti-PD-1 +/- lenvatinib | Anti-PD-1 +/- multi-kinase inhibitor | VETC positive | NCT06311929 | 2024 | |
| First-line systemic therapy | I | Basket/bucket trial | TSR-022 | Anti-TIM-3 | TIM-3-positive | NCT02817633 | 2024 |
| I/II | Biomarker enrichment trial | DKN-01 | DKK1 inhibitor | Glutamine synthetase IHC-positive | NCT03645980 | 2020 | |
| First or second-line systemic therapy | I | Biomarker enrichment trial | AFPc332 T cells | Engineered T cells | AFP≥100 ng/mL | NCT03132792 | 2024 |
| I | Biomarker enrichment trial | CT0180 cells | Engineered T cells | GPC3 IHC-positive | NCT04756648 | 2023 | |
| I | Basket/bucket trial | BOXR1030 T cells | Engineered T cells | GPC3 IHC-positive | NCT05120271 | 2024 | |
| I/II | Basket/bucket trial | CAR-T/TCR-T cells | Engineered T cells | DR5 or EGFRvIII IHC-positive | NCT03941626 | 2021 | |
| II | Basket/bucket trial | 32 molecular-targeted agents | Molecular-targeted agents | Positive targets by tumor DNA-seq, IHC | NCT02465060 | 2024 | |
| II | Basket/bucket trial | Spartalizumab | Anti-PD-1 | PD-1 mRNA, high expression | NCT04802876 | 2023 | |
| II | Basket/bucket trial | Ad-p53 + approved ICI | Viral gene therapy + ICI | p53 wild type or IHC-negative | NCT03544723 | 2020 | |
| Second-line systemic therapy | I | Biomarker enrichment trial | C-TCR055 | Engineered T cells | AFP IHC-positive | NCT04368182 | 2020 |
| I | Biomarker enrichment trial | TC-CAR031 | Engineered T cells | GPC3 IHC-positive | NCT05155189 | 2024 | |
| I | Basket/bucket trial | EpCAM CAR-T cells | Engineered T cells | EpCAM-positive | NCT05028933 | 2024 | |
| I | Basket/bucket trial | AFP CAR-T cells | Engineered T cells | AFP IHC-positive or AFP≥400 ng/mL | NCT06515314 | 2024 | |
| I | Basket/bucket trial | p53 MVA vaccine + pembrolizumab | MVA vaccine + anti-PD-1 | p53 IHC-positive or gene mutation | NCT02432963 | 2024 | |
| I | Basket/bucket trial | HER2 CAR-macrophages | Engineered macrophages | HER2-positive | NCT04660929 | 2024 | |
| I | Biomarker enrichment trial | GPC3 CAR-T cells | Engineered T cells | GPC3 IHC-positive | NCT05003895 | 2024 | |
| I | Biomarker enrichment trial | GPC3 CAR-T cells + fludarabine + cytoxan | Engineered T cells + STAT1 inhibitor + alkylating agent | GPC3 IHC-positive | NCT05103631 | 2023 | |
| I | Biomarker enrichment trial | GPC3 CAR-T cells | Engineered T cells | GPC3 IHC-positive | NCT06461624 | 2024 | |
| I | Biomarker enrichment trial | GPC3 CAR-T cells | Engineered T cells | GPC3 IHC-positive | NCT06144385 | 2024 | |
| I | Biomarker enrichment trial | GPC3 CAR-T cells | Engineered T cells | GPC3 IHC-positive | NCT05620706 | 2022 | |
| I | Biomarker enrichment trial | GPC3 CAR-T cells | Engineered T cells | GPC3 IHC-positive | NCT05926726 | 2023 | |
| I | Biomarker enrichment trial | GPC3 CAR-T cells | Engineered T cells | GPC3 IHC-positive | NCT05344664 | 2022 | |
| I | Biomarker enrichment trial | GPC3 CAR-T cells | Engineered T cells | GPC3 IHC-positive | NCT05783570 | 2024 | |
| I | Biomarker enrichment trial | GPC3 CAR-NK cells | Engineered NK cells | GPC3-positive | NCT05845502 | 2024 | |
| I/II | Biomarker enrichment trial | GPC3 CAR-T cells | Engineered T cells | GPC3 IHC-positive | NCT06084884 | 2024 | |
| I/II | Biomarker enrichment trial | B7H3 CAR-T cells | Engineered T cells | B7H3-positive | NCT05323201 | 2024 | |
| I/II | Biomarker enrichment trial | ECT204 T cells | Engineered T cells | GPC3 IHC-positive | NCT04864054 | 2024 | |
| I/II | Biomarker enrichment trial | HBV-TCR T cells (LioCyx-M) +/- lenvatinib | Engineered T cells +/- multi-kinase inhibitor | HLA class I profile matching | NCT05195294 | 2022 | |
| II | Biomarker enrichment trial | PD-0332991 | CDK4/6 inhibitor | RB-positive | NCT01356628 | 2023 | |
| II | Biomarker enrichment trial | Futibatinib + pembrolizumab | FGFR inhibitor + anti-PD-1 | FGF19 mRNA or IHC-positive | NCT04828486 | 2024 | |
| Third-line systemic therapy | I/II | Biomarker enrichment trial | GPC3 CAR-T cells | Engineered T cells | GPC3 IHC-positive | NCT06590246 | 2024 |
| Not defined | I | Basket/bucket trial | IL-15 and IL-21 armored GPC3 CAR-T cells | Engineered T cells | GPC3 IHC-positive | NCT06198296 | 2024 |
| I | Biomarker enrichment trial | GPC3/TGF-β CAR-T cells | Engineered T cells | GPC3 WB or IHC-positive | NCT03198546 | 2024 | |
| I | Biomarker enrichment trial | GPC3 CAR-T cells | Engineered T cells | GPC3 IHC-positive | NCT05070156 | 2023 | |
| I | Biomarker enrichment trial | GPC3 CAR-T cells | Engineered T cells | GPC3 IHC-positive | NCT06478693 | 2024 | |
| I/II | Basket/bucket trial | HMBD-001 | Anti-HER3 | HER3-positive | NCT05057013 | 2023 | |
| I/II | Biomarker enrichment trial | GPC3 CAR-T cells | Engineered T cells | GPC3 IHC-positive | NCT05652920 | 2024 | |
| I/II | Biomarker enrichment trial | RZ-001 + valganciclovir | Trans-splicing ribozyme + antiviral | hTERT-positive | NCT05595473 | 2022 |
ClinicalTrials.gov accessed in October 2024.
HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; NCT, National Clinical Trial; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; GPC3, glypican-3; CAR, chimeric antigen receptor; IHC, immunohistochemistry; PD-1, programmed death-1; VETC, vessels encapsulating tumor clusters; TIM-3, T cell immunoglobulin and mucin containing protein-3; DKK1, dickkopf-1; TCR, T cell receptor; DR5, death receptor 5; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; DNA-seq, DNA sequencing; Ad, adenoviral; C-TCR, AFP specific T cell receptor transduced T cells; ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitor; EpCAM, epithelial cell adhesion molecule; MVA, modified vaccinia virus ankara; HER, human epidermal growth factor receptor; STAT1, signal transducer and activator of transcription 1; NK, natural killer; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; CDK, cyclin-dependent kinase; RB, retinoblastoma; FGFR, fibroblast growth factor receptor; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; IL, interleukin; TGF-β, transforming growth factor beta; WB, western blotting; hTERT, human telomerase reverse transcriptase.
Suppressive immune checkpoints
ICIs, including those targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) pathways, have become crucial elements in the systemic treatment of cancer, including HCC. These agents work by modulating the interactions between tumor and immune cells and are often used in combination with MTAs or other ICIs. There is still no approved companion biomarker for ICI-based therapy specifically for HCC, but several immune-related features such as PD-L1 expression, tumor mutation burden (TMB), and DNA repair defects (e.g., deficient mismatch repair and high microsatellite instability) have been approved for patient selection in several solid cancers such as non-small cell lung cancer.68 In ongoing clinical trials for HCC patients, several molecular features, pembrolizumab (anti-PD-1) plus futibatinib (fibroblast growth factor receptor [FGFR]1-4 inhibitor) have been tested in fibroblast growth factor [FGF]19-positive HCC tumors in phase II trials (NCT04828486). However, despite their importance, reliable biomarkers for predicting patient response to these therapies have not yet been identified.69-71 Currently, a clinical trial (NCT04802876) is evaluating spartalizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in patients exhibiting elevated PDCD1 mRNA expression (encoding PD-1). Recent clinical studies have also focused on targeting established molecular characteristics of HCC, recruiting patients whose tumors display specific molecular alterations. PD-0332991, an inhibitor of CDK4/6 cell cycle regulators, has been studied in HCC patients with intact retinoblastoma (RB) protein (NCT01356628). In HCC patients treated with atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) and bevacizumab (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor [VEFG]), an increase in Ki-67/PD-1/CD8-positive T cells and TIGIT-positive T cells at 3 weeks after initiation of the therapy was associated with superior progression-free and overall survival, suggesting their role as non-invasive predictive biomarkers of response.72
Vessels that encapsulate tumor clusters (VETC)
VETC pattern is a pathological finding observed in a certain percentage of HCCs and has been demonstrated to correlate with poor patient prognosis.73 VETC-positive HCCs have also been reported to develop under the influence of angiopoietin 2, and the potential efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors has been investigated.74 A study showed that unresectable VETC-positive HCC may benefit from treatment with sorafenib.75 A clinical trial is currently in progress to evaluate the treatment of VETC-high expressing HCC with a combination of an ICI and a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (NCT06461936, NCT06311929).
The positive outcomes of these trials could potentially pave the way for the clinical application of personalized, biomarker-guided treatments for HCC across various therapeutic approaches. This advancement may enable a more scientifically rational and effective tumor management strategy while reducing the risk of unnecessary adverse effects in patients who unlikely benefit from these therapies.
ONGOING BIOMARKER-GUIDED THERAPEUTIC CLINICAL TRIALS
Although ongoing and planned clinical trials still tend to enroll all-comer patients, biomarker-driven trials have increased in recent years, coinciding with the active development of MTAs.76 Predictive biomarkers, which indicate therapeutic response, play a crucial role in innovative clinical trial methodologies like adaptive designs, facilitating the translation of novel therapeutic agents and strategies into clinical practice.35,77
Biomarker enrichment trials seek to enhance the detection of therapeutic benefits by focusing on a subset of clinically eligible patients who test positive for a biologically rational target biomarker (Fig. 2). In these trials, only biomarker-positive patients are randomly assigned to either the study drug or placebo arm. These trials aim to demonstrate the superiority of the biomarker enrichment approach over the traditional allcomer strategy. The efficacy of experimental therapies and strategies is evaluated using endpoints relevant to specific clinical contexts, such as anti-tumor response, disease control, survival advantage, and cost-effectiveness of interventions. To efficiently assess the growing number of new MTAs across multiple cancer types and histologies, master protocol designs have been developed.78 One such design is the basket/bucket trial, which recruits patients with the same molecular target, regardless of tissue type or histology, potentially including HCC alongside other cancer types. Umbrella trials assess various molecularly targeted therapies based on the presence of corresponding biomarkers. Platform trials employ multi-arm/stage designs with an open-ended timeline to evaluate multiple experimental treatments against a shared control group (Fig. 2).
Figure 2.
Study designs for biomarker-guided therapeutic clinical trial in HCC. HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma.
CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVE
HCC remains the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality, and there are large racial, ethnic, and interindividual disparities in HCC risk and survival.1,2 Our knowledge of whether molecular and genetic factors contribute to these observed differences is limited by a lack of biological samples. Biospecimen collection is the process of collecting, processing, and storing tissue, blood (e.g., ctDNA), or urine samples for research purposes; biospecimens collected through this process are utilized to elucidate the genetic and molecular factors contributing to HCC and to develop novel biomarker assays of significant importance.79,80 These studies facilitate the development of companion biomarkers based on test results that examine the expression of target molecules, the presence of genetic mutations, and genetic polymorphisms of drug-metabolizing enzymes to predict the efficacy and safety of specific drugs. Furthermore, this research will lead to the development of innovative biomarker-focused trial designs, which will result in improved patient selection, optimizing the application of novel therapies and maximizing their efficacy.
Footnotes
Acknowledgement
The figures were created using BioRender.com.
Conflicts of Interest
Yujin Hoshida is shareholder for Alentis Therapeutics and Espervita Therapeutics, advises Helio Genomics, Espertiva Therapeutics, Roche Diagnostics, and Elevar Therapeutics.
Ethics Statement
This review article is fully based on articles which have already been published and did not involve additional patient participants. Therefore, IRB approval is not necessary.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by US National Institutes of Health (CA233794, CA255621, CA282178, CA288375, CA283935), European Commission (ERC-AdG-2020-101021417), Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RR180016, RP200554), Uehara Memorial Foundation. The funders had no role in this article.
Data Availability
Not applicable.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: HS, SM, SP, and YH
Data curation: HS, SM, SP, and YH
Funding acquisition: HS, SM, SP, and YH
Methodology: HS, SM, SP, and YH
Project administration: HS, SM, SP, and YH
Resources: HS, SM, SP, and YH
Supervision: HS, SM, SP, and YH
Visualization: HS, SM, SP, and YH
Writing - original draft: HS, SM, SP, and YH
Writing - review & editing: HS, SM, SP, and YH
References
- 1.Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74:229–263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rumgay H, Arnold M, Ferlay J, Lesi O, Cabasag CJ, Vignat J, et al. Global burden of primary liver cancer in 2020 and predictions to 2040. J Hepatol. 2022;77:1598–1606. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.08.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Suzuki H, Fujiwara N, Singal AG, Baumert TF, Chung RT, Kawaguchi T, et al. Prevention of liver cancer in the era of next-generation antivirals and obesity epidemic. Hepatology. 2025 Jan 14; doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000001227. doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000001227. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Reig M, Forner A, Rimola J, Ferrer-Fàbrega J, Burrel M, Garcia-Criado Á, et al. BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendation: the 2022 update. J Hepatol. 2022;76:681–693. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.11.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Donne R, Lujambio A. The liver cancer immune microenvironment: therapeutic implications for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2023;77:1773–1796. doi: 10.1002/hep.32740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network Comprehensive and integrative genomic characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell. 2017;169:1327–1341.e23. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fujimoto A, Furuta M, Totoki Y, Tsunoda T, Kato M, Shiraishi Y, et al. Whole-genome mutational landscape and characterization of noncoding and structural mutations in liver cancer. Nat Genet. 2016;48:500–509. doi: 10.1038/ng.3547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Schulze K, Imbeaud S, Letouzé E, Alexandrov LB, Calderaro J, Rebouissou S, et al. Exome sequencing of hepatocellular carcinomas identifies new mutational signatures and potential therapeutic targets. Nat Genet. 2015;47:505–511. doi: 10.1038/ng.3252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Totoki Y, Tatsuno K, Covington KR, Ueda H, Creighton CJ, Kato M, et al. Trans-ancestry mutational landscape of hepatocellular carcinoma genomes. Nat Genet. 2014;46:1267–1273. doi: 10.1038/ng.3126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Huang J, Deng Q, Wang Q, Li KY, Dai JH, Li N, et al. Exome sequencing of hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Genet. 2012;44:1117–1121. doi: 10.1038/ng.2391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nault JC, Martin Y, Caruso S, Hirsch TZ, Bayard Q, Calderaro J, et al. Clinical impact of genomic diversity from early to advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2020;71:164–182. doi: 10.1002/hep.30811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhang Q, He Y, Luo N, Patel SJ, Han Y, Gao R, et al. Landscape and dynamics of single immune cells in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell. 2019;179:829–845.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lu Y, Yang A, Quan C, Pan Y, Zhang H, Li Y, et al. A single-cell atlas of the multicellular ecosystem of primary and metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Commun. 2022;13:4594. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32283-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sharma A. A single-cell atlas of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Glob Oncol. 2019;Suppl 5:46. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sun Y, Wu L, Zhong Y, Zhou K, Hou Y, Wang Z, et al. Single-cell landscape of the ecosystem in early-relapse hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell. 2021;184:404–421.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Yao F, Zhan Y, Li C, Lu Y, Chen J, Deng J, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals the role of phosphorylation-related genes in hepatocellular carcinoma stem cells. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;9:734287. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.734287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jhunjhunwala S, Jiang Z, Stawiski EW, Gnad F, Liu J, Mayba O, et al. Diverse modes of genomic alteration in hepatocellular carcinoma. Genome Biol. 2014;15:436. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0436-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hanahan D. Hallmarks of cancer: new dimensions. Cancer Discov. 2022;12:31–46. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-1059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sieverling L, Hong C, Koser SD, Ginsbach P, Kleinheinz K, Hutter B, et al. Genomic footprints of activated telomere maintenance mechanisms in cancer. Nat Commun. 2020;11:733. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13824-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sze KM, Ho DW, Chiu YT, Tsui YM, Chan LK, Lee JM, et al. Hepatitis B virus-telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter integration harnesses host ELF4, resulting in telomerase reverse transcriptase gene transcription in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2021;73:23–40. doi: 10.1002/hep.31231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Li CL, Hsu CL, Lin YY, Ho MC, Hu RH, Chen CL, et al. HBV DNA integration into telomerase or MLL4 genes and TERT promoter point mutation as three independent signatures in subgrouping HBV-related HCC with distinct features. Liver Cancer. 2023;13:41–55. doi: 10.1159/000530699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Torrecilla S, Sia D, Harrington AN, Zhang Z, Cabellos L, Cornella H, et al. Trunk mutational events present minimal intra- and inter-tumoral heterogeneity in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2017;67:1222–1231. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nault JC, Mallet M, Pilati C, Calderaro J, Bioulac-Sage P, Laurent C, et al. High frequency of telomerase reverse-transcriptase promoter somatic mutations in hepatocellular carcinoma and preneoplastic lesions. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2218. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Trung NT, Hoan NX, Trung PQ, Binh MT, Van Tong H, Toan NL, et al. Clinical significance of combined circulating TERT promoter mutations and miR-122 expression for screening HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Sci Rep. 2020;10:8181. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65213-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jiao J, Watt GP, Stevenson HL, Calderone TL, Fisher-Hoch SP, Ye Y, et al. Telomerase reverse transcriptase mutations in plasma DNA in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or cirrhosis: Prevalence and risk factors. Hepatol Commun. 2018;2:718–731. doi: 10.1002/hep4.1187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lee YT, Fujiwara N, Yang JD, Hoshida Y. Risk stratification and early detection biomarkers for precision HCC screening. Hepatology. 2023;78:319–362. doi: 10.1002/hep.32779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mishima M, Takai A, Takeda H, Iguchi E, Nakano S, Fujii Y, et al. TERT upregulation promotes cell proliferation via degradation of p21 and increases carcinogenic potential. J Pathol. 2024;264:318–331. doi: 10.1002/path.6351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yu JI, Choi C, Ha SY, Park CK, Kang SY, Joh JW, et al. Clinical importance of TERT overexpression in hepatocellular carcinoma treated with curative surgical resection in HBV endemic area. Sci Rep. 2017;7:12258. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12469-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cheng Y, Huang M, Xie W, Gao C, Cai S, Ji J, et al. Chromosome 8q24 amplification predicts prognosis for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) J Clin Oncol. 2019;37 Suppl 15:e15654. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Li X, Xu W, Kang W, Wong SH, Wang M, Zhou Y, et al. Genomic analysis of liver cancer unveils novel driver genes and distinct prognostic features. Theranostics. 2018;8:1740–1751. doi: 10.7150/thno.22010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Buch S, Innes H, Lutz PL, Nischalke HD, Marquardt JU, Fischer J, et al. Genetic variation in TERT modifies the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in alcohol-related cirrhosis: results from a genome-wide case-control study. Gut. 2023;72:381–391. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ningarhari M, Caruso S, Hirsch TZ, Bayard Q, Franconi A, Védie AL, et al. Telomere length is key to hepatocellular carcinoma diversity and telomerase addiction is an actionable therapeutic target. J Hepatol. 2021;74:1155–1166. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.11.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gao J, Pickett HA. Targeting telomeres: advances in telomere maintenance mechanism-specific cancer therapies. Nat Rev Cancer. 2022;22:515–532. doi: 10.1038/s41568-022-00490-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mender I, Siteni S, Barron S, Flusche AM, Kubota N, Yu C, et al. Activating an adaptive immune response with a telomerase-mediated telomere targeting therapeutic in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Cancer Ther. 2023;22:737–750. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-23-0039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Dhanasekaran R, Suzuki H, Lemaitre L, Kubota N, Hoshida Y. Molecular and immune landscape of hepatocellular carcinoma to guide therapeutic decision-making. Hepatology. 2025;81:1038–1057. doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Xu C, Xu Z, Zhang Y, Evert M, Calvisi DF, Chen X. β-catenin signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Invest. 2022;132:e154515. doi: 10.1172/JCI154515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tan PS, Nakagawa S, Goossens N, Venkatesh A, Huang T, Ward SC, et al. Clinicopathological indices to predict hepatocellular carcinoma molecular classification. Liver Int. 2016;36:108–118. doi: 10.1111/liv.12889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hoshida Y, Nijman SM, Kobayashi M, Chan JA, Brunet JP, Chiang DY, et al. Integrative transcriptome analysis reveals common molecular subclasses of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2009;69:7385–7392. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Song P, Gao Z, Bao Y, Chen L, Huang Y, Liu Y, et al. Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in carcinogenesis and cancer therapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2024;17:46. doi: 10.1186/s13045-024-01563-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Selvaggi F, Catalano T, Cotellese R, Aceto GM. Targeting Wnt/β-catenin pathways in primary liver tumours: from microenvironment signaling to therapeutic agents. Cancers (Basel) 2022;14:1912. doi: 10.3390/cancers14081912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Duspara K, Bojanic K, Pejic JI, Kuna L, Kolaric TO, Nincevic V, et al. Targeting the Wnt signaling pathway in liver fibrosis for drug options: an update. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2021;9:960–971. doi: 10.14218/JCTH.2021.00065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bouaoun L, Sonkin D, Ardin M, Hollstein M, Byrnes G, Zavadil J, et al. TP53 variations in human cancers: new lessons from the IARC TP53 database and genomics data. Hum Mutat. 2016;37:865–876. doi: 10.1002/humu.23035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Teramoto T, Satonaka K, Kitazawa S, Fujimori T, Hayashi K, Maeda S. p53 gene abnormalities are closely related to hepatoviral infections and occur at a late stage of hepatocarcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 1994;54:231–235. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zhang W, He H, Zang M, Wu Q, Zhao H, Lu LL, et al. Genetic features of aflatoxin-associated hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2017;153:249–262.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.03.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Chaisaingmongkol J, Budhu A, Dang H, Rabibhadana S, Pupacdi B, Kwon SM, et al. Common molecular subtypes among Asian hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2017;32:57–70.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Candia J, Bayarsaikhan E, Tandon M, Budhu A, Forgues M, Tovuu LO, et al. The genomic landscape of Mongolian hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Commun. 2020;11:4383. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18186-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Boyault S, Rickman DS, de Reyniès A, Balabaud C, Rebouissou S, Jeannot E, et al. Transcriptome classification of HCC is related to gene alterations and to new therapeutic targets. Hepatology. 2007;45:42–52. doi: 10.1002/hep.21467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Désert R, Rohart F, Canal F, Sicard M, Desille M, Renaud S, et al. Human hepatocellular carcinomas with a periportal phenotype have the lowest potential for early recurrence after curative resection. Hepatology. 2017;66:1502–1518. doi: 10.1002/hep.29254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kancherla V, Abdullazade S, Matter MS, Lanzafame M, Quagliata L, Roma G, et al. Genomic analysis revealed new oncogenic signatures in TP53-mutant hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Genet. 2018;9:2. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Yang T, Choi Y, Joh JW, Cho SK, Kim DS, Park SG. Phosphorylation of p53 serine 15 is a predictor of survival for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;2019:9015453. doi: 10.1155/2019/9015453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ma Z, Guo D, Wang Q, Liu P, Xiao Y, Wu P, et al. Lgr5-mediated p53 Repression through PDCD5 leads to doxorubicin resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma. Theranostics. 2019;9:2967–2983. doi: 10.7150/thno.30562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kopanja D, Huang S, Al Raheed MRH, Guzman G, Raychaudhuri P. p19Arf inhibits aggressive progression of H-ras-driven hepatocellular carcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 2018;39:318–326. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgx140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zhu ZZ, Bao LL, Zhao K, Xu Q, Zhu JY, Zhu KX, et al. Copy number aberrations of multiple genes identified as prognostic markers for extrahepatic metastasis-free survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Curr Med Sci. 2019;39:759–765. doi: 10.1007/s11596-019-2103-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Dhar D, Antonucci L, Nakagawa H, Kim JY, Glitzner E, Caruso S, et al. Liver cancer initiation requires p53 inhibition by CD44-enhanced growth factor signaling. Cancer Cell. 2018;33:1061–1077.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zhou Y, Cui G, Xu H, Chun J, Yang D, Zhang Z, et al. Loss of TP53 cooperates with c-MET overexpression to drive hepatocarcinogenesis. Cell Death Dis. 2023;14:476. doi: 10.1038/s41419-023-05958-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Duffy MJ, Tang M, Rajaram S, O’Grady S, Crown J. Targeting mutant p53 for cancer treatment: moving closer to clinical use? Cancers (Basel) 2022;14:4499. doi: 10.3390/cancers14184499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Zhou X, Singh M, Santos GS, Guerlavais V, Carvajal LA, Aivado M, et al. Pharmacologic activation of p53 triggers viral mimicry response thereby abolishing tumor immune evasion and promoting antitumor immunity. Cancer Discov. 2021;11:3090–3105. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-1741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Lu Y, Lin B, Li M. The role of alpha-fetoprotein in the tumor microenvironment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2024;14:1363695. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1363695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hussein MS, Li Q, Mao R, Peng Y, He Y. TCR T cells overexpressing c-Jun have better functionality with improved tumor infiltration and persistence in hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1114770. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1114770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Charneau J, Suzuki T, Shimomura M, Fujinami N, Nakatsura T. Peptide-based vaccines for hepatocellular carcinoma: a review of recent advances. J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2021;8:1035–1054. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S291558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Zheng X, Liu X, Lei Y, Wang G, Liu M. Glypican-3: a novel and promising target for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2022;12:824208. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.824208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Terris B, Cavard C, Perret C. EpCAM, a new marker for cancer stem cells in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2010;52:280–281. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.10.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Yamashita T, Ji J, Budhu A, Forgues M, Yang W, Wang HY, et al. EpCAM-positive hepatocellular carcinoma cells are tumor-initiating cells with stem/progenitor cell features. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:1012–1024. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Tremosini S, Forner A, Boix L, Vilana R, Bianchi L, Reig M, et al. Prospective validation of an immunohistochemical panel (glypican 3, heat shock protein 70 and glutamine synthetase) in liver biopsies for diagnosis of very early hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut. 2012;61:1481–1487. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Abou-Alfa GK, Puig O, Daniele B, Kudo M, Merle P, Park JW, et al. Randomized phase II placebo controlled study of codrituzumab in previously treated patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2016;65:289–295. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Carrasquillo JA, O’Donoghue JA, Beylergil V, Ruan S, Pandit-Taskar N, Larson SM, et al. I-124 codrituzumab imaging and biodistribution in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. EJNMMI Res. 2018;8:20. doi: 10.1186/s13550-018-0374-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Komatsu SI, Kayukawa Y, Miyazaki Y, Kaneko A, Ikegami H, Ishiguro T, et al. Determination of starting dose of the T cell-redirecting bispecific antibody ERY974 targeting glypican-3 in first-in-human clinical trial. Sci Rep. 2022;12:12312. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16564-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Yamaguchi H, Hsu JM, Sun L, Wang SC, Hung MC. Advances and prospects of biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cell Rep Med. 2024;5:101621. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Sangro B, Melero I, Wadhawan S, Finn RS, Abou-Alfa GK, Cheng AL, et al. Association of inflammatory biomarkers with clinical outcomes in nivolumab-treated patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2020;73:1460–1469. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.07.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Yau T, Park JW, Finn RS, Cheng AL, Mathurin P, Edeline J, et al. Nivolumab versus sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 459): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23:77–90. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00604-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Finn RS, Ryoo BY, Merle P, Kudo M, Bouattour M, Lim HY, et al. Pembrolizumab as second-line therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma in KEYNOTE-240: a randomized, double-blind, phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:193–202. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Han JW, Kang MW, Lee SK, Yang H, Kim JH, Yoo JS, et al. Dynamic peripheral T-cell analysis identifies on-treatment prognostic biomarkers of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Cancer. 2024 Sep 2; doi: 10.1159/000541181. doi: 10.1159/000541181. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Renne SL, Woo HY, Allegra S, Rudini N, Yano H, Donadon M, et al. Vessels encapsulating tumor clusters (VETC) is a powerful predictor of aggressive hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2020;71:183–195. doi: 10.1002/hep.30814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Liu K, Dennis C, Prince DS, Marsh-Wakefield F, Santhakumar C, Gamble JR, et al. Vessels that encapsulate tumour clusters vascular pattern in hepatocellular carcinoma. JHEP Rep. 2023;5:100792. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Fang JH, Xu L, Shang LR, Pan CZ, Ding J, Tang YQ, et al. Vessels that encapsulate tumor clusters (VETC) pattern is a predictor of sorafenib benefit in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2019;70:824–839. doi: 10.1002/hep.30366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Vogel A, Meyer T, Sapisochin G, Salem R, Saborowski A. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2022;400:1345–1362. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01200-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Pallmann P, Bedding AW, Choodari-Oskooei B, Dimairo M, Flight L, Hampson LV, et al. Adaptive designs in clinical trials: why use them, and how to run and report them. BMC Med. 2018;16:29. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1017-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Subbiah V. The next generation of evidence-based medicine. Nat Med. 2023;29:49–58. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02160-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Campani C, Imbeaud S, Couchy G, Ziol M, Hirsch TZ, Rebouissou S, et al. Circulating tumour DNA in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma across tumour stages and treatments. Gut. 2024;73:1870–1882. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2024-331956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Chen VL, Xu D, Wicha MS, Lok AS, Parikh ND. Utility of liquid biopsy analysis in detection of hepatocellular carcinoma, determination of prognosis, and disease monitoring: a systematic review. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;18:2879–2902.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.04.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


