Abstract
Aquaporins are natural proteins that rapidly transport water across cell membranes, maintaining homeostasis, whilst strictly excluding salt. This has inspired their use in water purification and desalination, a critical emerging need. However, stability, scalability, and cost have prevented their widespread adoption in water purification membrane technologies. As such, attention has turned to the use of artificial water channels, with pore functionalized polymers and macrocycles providing a powerful alternative. Whilst impressive rates of transport have been achieved, the combination of a scalable, high-yielding synthesis and efficient transport has not yet been reported. Herein, we report such a system, with densely functionalized channel interiors, synthesized by high-yielding living polymerization with low polydispersities, showing high salt exclusion, and excellent water transport rates. Our aramid foldamers create artificial water channels with hydrophobic interiors, and single-channel water permeability rates of up to 108 water molecules per second per channel, approaching the range of natural Aquaporins (c. 109). We show that water transport rates closely correspond to the helical length, with the polymer which most closely matches bilayer thickness showing optimal efficacy, as supported by molecular dynamics simulations. Our work provides a basis for the scalable synthesis of next-generation artificial water channels.
Keywords: helical polymers, macrocycles, aramids, polymerization, foldamers, water transport, synthetic aquaporins, supramolecular, ion selectivity
Graphical Abstract.
We compare the water permeability of stacked macrocycles and synthetic helical nanotubes of three different lengths across phospholipid bilayers. Our results demonstrate that covalent nanotubes with a length matching the bilayer width exhibit high water permeability, excellent salt and proton rejection, and performance comparable to natural aquaporins.
Introduction
Biological water channels, such as the aquaporins, efficiently transport water across cell membranes while excluding ions.1 The Percec group was among the pioneers synthesizing aquaporin mimics based on dendritic dipeptides that allowed robust self-assembly into helical porous nanotubes in solution and in bulk.2–5 Inspired by aquaporin’s performance, researchers have developed a range of aquaporin- based biomimetic membranes for water purification and desalination.6,7 However, protein-based membranes have several limitations, including high production costs, challenges with scalability, and low stability.8 To overcome these limitations, the field has turned to artificial water channels.9–27
Artificial water channels are synthetic analogs of aquaporins with simpler structures, but which retain water transport and ion exclusion capabilities.9 Inspired by synthetic successes in mimicking biological ion channels28–32 first-generation artificial water channels, such as imidazole-quartets,33 and hydrazide pillars,34 with pore sizes ranging from 3 to 5 Å, focused on mimicking the one-dimensional water permeation route of aquaporins by constructing tubular transmembrane nanostructures. However, these channels have extensive hydrogen bond interactions between the pore walls and diffusing water wires, resulting in lower permeabilities.34
The idea of minimizing pore-wall/water interactions inspired the next generation of channels, with researchers incorporating hydrophobic pore-lining groups.35,36 This approach effectively minimizes water- pore wall interactions, leading to high water permeability.37 Several approaches have been successful, with carbon nanotubes showing high rates of water transport, but poor ion selectivity due to cation- π interactions promoting ion passage, resulting in a loss of salt exclusion.36,37
To achieve both high ion selectivity and ultrafast water permeation, Zeng and coworkers developed foldamers and helical polymers with inner pores decorated with aliphatic hydrocarbons (i.e. methyl), creating a slightly positive electrostatic surface that excludes cations.36,38 Recently, Aida and co-workers demonstrated that incorporating hydrophobic and non-polarizable fluorine atoms in the pore enables ultrafast water permeation, with rates surpassing those of natural aquaporins.36,39,40 The key weakness of these approaches lies in the difficulty of synthesizing suitable molecules in sufficient yields (for example, the fluorinated macrocycles were recovered in <0.1% yield).39
Whilst polymers can be synthesized in higher yields, control over size distribution and reproducibility remain significant challenges, with existing examples synthesized via step-growth polymerization.38
This will make application of these breakthroughs challenging. Further, as water transport properties are highly dependent on average molecular weight and dispersity, gaining control of polymerization with a high yielding reaction is essential.35
Inspired by this previous work, we now report a new class of helical polymers and macrocycles which show high water permeability and salt rejection, with both fluorine and hydrocarbons on the interior surface (Figure 1). The polymers are stabilized by H---F---O three center hydrogen bonds, promoting helical folding and rigidifying the structures. The polymers were synthesized by living chain polymerization, formed quantitatively with narrow polydispersities, and were characterized by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H NMR), 19F nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (19F NMR), matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-ToF), and size exclusion chromatoagphy (SEC) analysis.
Figure 1.
(A) Schematic representation of aquaporis and (B) water channel formation by macrocycle and helical polymers embedded in a vesicular phospholipid bilayer membrane, illustrating salt exclusion and water transport.
We used chiral hydrocarbon side chains, which enabled the characterization of polymers and assessment of the stability of their helical folding via circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy. Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) analysis further supported the folded structure of the polymers in solution. Macrocycles formed from the same building blocks were characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Lipid vesicle studies showed high water channel activities by an osmotic shock assay, and effective salt exclusion by fluorescence measurements. Our systems are highly effective artificial water channels, formed in high yields from simple building blocks, and provide a route to scalable and effective water purification and desalination.
Results and Discussion
Our system is based on the use of condensation agent 1 and monomer 2, whose synthesis was achieved in six steps (54% overall yield, gram scale, SI Section 3). Key design principles were the incorporation of chiral hydrophobic alkyl chains, fluorine atoms to promote water transport and facilitate analysis, and the incorporation of a turn motif with a three-center H---F---H hydrogen bond.
We performed a living polymerization using a procedure we recently reported (Scheme 2).41,42 2 was added slowly (0.1 mL/h) to a solution containing an initiator (aniline) and the condensation agent, chloro-tri-o-tolylphosphonium iodide (1) (see Scheme S2, SI) at 55 °C. The crude mixture was concentrated and precipitated in cold methanol to obtain Poly-10mer in quantitative yield, which showed a narrow dispersity (Đ =1.14) and a number average molecular weight (Mn.sEc = 4.3 kDa) close to that expected from the [2]:[aniline] ratio of 10:1 (Mn-theo = 3.8 kDa). 1H NMR end-group analysis of Poly-10mer gave a molecular weight of 3.5 kDa, in good agreement with the theoretical target value and the data obtained by SEC. The identity of the end groups of Poly-10mer was further supported by an isotopically resolved MALDI-ToF mass spectrum (Figure 3A, B & Figure S36), with the major distribution consistent with aniline and amine end groups (SI Section 5, Figure S36).
Scheme 2.
(A) (i) Slow addition of monomer 2 to a solution of 1 and initiator (aniline) at 55 °C yielding polymers Poly-10mer − Poly-30mer quantitatively (with respect to 2). (ii) Reaction of monomer 2 with 1 at rt without an initiator yielding macrocycles 4 (5%) and 3 (1%) Conditions: 1 (3 eq.), Aniline (1 eq.), 2 (10 - 30 eq.), Pyridine, CHCl3, 55 °C. (B) X-ray single crystal structure of 4. (C) Space filling model of the X-ray single crystal structure of 4 top view and (D) side view. (E) 2D molecular packing along axis b (top view) showing accessible voids.
Figure 3.
(A) Isotopically resolved MALDI-ToF mass spectrum (DCTB, NaTFA) of Poly-10mer. (B) Zoomed view of MALDI-ToF mass spectrum. (C) CD spectrum of Poly-10mer in toluene at different temperatures. (D) Kratky plot of the SAXS data of Poly-10mer in toluene/DMSO 9:1 v/v (and SAXS intensity vs q inset).
To confirm the generality and robustness of the method, Poly-20mer and Poly-30mer, were synthesized, employing a 20:1 and 30:1 monomer-to-initiator ratio respectively. SEC analysis of Poly-20mer (Mn-SEC = 8.73 kDa, Đ =1.21, SI, Figure S39) and Poly-30mer (Mn-SEC = 11.14 kDa, Đ =1.13, SI, Figure S40) were in good agreement with the theoretical target values (Poly-20mer: Mn-theo = 7.5 kDa, and Poly-30mer: Mn-theo= 11.2 kDa) (Scheme 2). A linear relationship between the monomer-to-initiator ratio and size of polymer formed was observed, confirming a living polymerization mechanism (SI Section 5, Figure S30 + Table Sl).
Synthesis of macrocycles
To gain insight into the folded conformation of the polymer backbone, and to estimate the number of monomer residues likely in a single helical turn, we synthesized macrocyclic model compounds. Monomer 2 was reacted with 1 by slow addition (0.1 mL/h) in chloroform at room temperature, without an initiator (Scheme 2 & SI Section 3). After completion of the monomer addition, the crude product was concentrated and precipitated in methanol, and the resulting precipitate was subjected to silica gel flash chromatography using 20% diethyl ether in DCM to remove polymeric side products. The MALDI-ToF mass spectrum of the macrocycles revealed a major signal [m/z = 1884.10] corresponding to macrocycle 4 (as a sodium ion adduct), consisting of five units of monomer 2 and a minor signal [m/z = 1511.50] corresponding to macrocycle 3 (as a sodium ion adduct, Figure S34).
The reaction mixture was purified by preparative HPLC (10–20% diethyl ether in DCM), yielding pure 4 (5%) and 3 (1%) as colorless solids. Due to the unoptimized macrocyclization conditions, significant polymeric byproducts were formed. The higher yield of 4 suggested that it may be the less strained of the two macrocycles and that a polymeric helical turn is likely close to five residues.
X-Ray crystallographic analysis of oligomers and macrocycle
The single crystal x-ray structure of the dimer of monomer 2, 11 (SI Section 6),43 showed that the oligomers are rigidified by an inner rim of continuous three-centered hydrogen bonds (Figures S46 + S49). These three-centered hydrogen bonds should force polymers to fold into a helical conformation. The folded structure was confirmed by the X-ray crystal structure of the macrocycle 4,43 obtained by slow methanol diffusion into a chloroform solution. Single crystal diffraction data confirmed successful macrocyclization, with the top view of the structure (Scheme 2, B and C) showing a regular pentagonal shape with a defined, rigid, cavity of ca. 0.7 nm.
The chiral, hydrophobic alkoxy substituents and fluorine atoms must point inward in a macrocycle that forms all possible three-centered F--H--O- hydrogen bonds. However, a deviation from perfect planarity was observed (Figure 2, D), with the chiral, hydrophobic groups protruding above and below the macrocyclic plane due to their steric demands. Based on these observations, we assume a helical structure for the linear polymer in which all F--H--O hydrogen-bonds are formed.
It is, therefore, reasonable to assume that longer linear oligomers should adopt a similar rigidified folded structure, i.e. a helical conformation. Moreover, the packing pattern of macrocycle 4 along axis b showed the formation of nanochannels, stabilized by π-π stacking interactions (Figure 2, E). This strongly supports our ap plication of this system in lipid membranes to act as water channels, vide infra. We confirmed the solid-state assembly of macrocycle 4 by atomic force microscopy (AFM). A solution (4 mg/L) of 4 drop cast from CHCl3 solution onto a mica surface revealed linear fiber-like aggregates (SI Section 7, Figure S51).
Conformational analysis of polymers in solution
The chiral side chains within the helical cavity induce a helical bias in the polymeric structure, allowing characterization by CD spectroscopy. At room temperature, we observed a strong signal from Poly-10mer in both toluene (Figure 3b & Figures S41 + S42) and CC14(Figure S43). To evaluate the thermostability of the helical conformation of Poly-10mer in solution, temperature-dependent CD spectra were recorded. The CD signal remained nearly unchanged from +25 °C to +80 °C, indicating that the folded structure remains stable even at elevated temperatures, with a slight enhancement observed at -10 °C (Figure 3C, Figure S42). These results confirm the helical conformation of Poly-10mer in solution and highlight its exceptional thermal stability.
To further validate the folded structure of Poly-10mer in solution we conducted SAXS analysis. The SAXS data (Figure 3D) reveals an upturn at very low q values (< 0.07 nm−1), likely corresponding to large aggregates, confirmed by DLS (Figures S44 & S45). At higher q values, the data probes the subunits of these aggregates.
The intermediate flat region provides information about the size of the subunits. A Guinier analysis at the intermediate q values (from 0.3 nm−1 to 1.1 nm−1) yields an estimated radius of gyration of 1.1 nm for the overall size of the subunits (see Figure S56, SI) in hydrophobic solvent conditions (toluene/DMSO 9:1 v/v). Furthermore, the Kratky plot (q2 × intensity vs q) of Poly-10mer shown in Figure 3C exhibits a parabolic shape, with the curve converging to the baseline at high q values. Such a shape is characteristic of compacted or folded macromolecules.1 Therefore, this further confirms the folded structure of the Poly-10mer in solution.
Water permeability across lipid bilayer membranes
The formation of nanochannels by macrocycle 4 in the solid state, and the folded structures of the polymers in hydrophobic solvents, encouraged us to investigate their water permeability and salt exclusion (ion permeation rates) across lipid membranes. We used a stopped-flow light scattering instrument to measure the light scattering intensity of vesicle suspensions on a millisecond scale. We prepared vesicles by mixing 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DOPC) with channel-forming compounds at a molar channel-to-lipid ratio (mCLR) of 0.004. We then extruded in 100 mM NaCl solution, buffered to pH 7.0 with HEPES (Figure 4A), forming vesicles with an average diameter of ~ 156 nm.2 Upon exposing these vesicles to a hypertonic solution (300 mM sucrose in pH 7.0 HEPES buffer), water efflux caused vesicle shrinkage, increasing light scattering intensity. Notably, we observed a significant rise in light scattering for both the macrocycles (3 and 4) and polymers (Poly-10mer, Poly-20mer and Poly-30mer) compared to controls, suggesting that all these molecules are able to facilitate water transport across lipid membranes (Figure 4A, B, & Figure S55, SI Section 9). Assuming 100% membrane insertion efficiency for all channels at mCLR = 0.004, the rate constants from scattering plots were used to calculate the permeability values for 3, 4, Poly-10mer, Poly-20mer, and Poly-30mer using a previously published model (Figure 4C, SI Section 9).13,39,3
Figure 4.
(A) Representation of water leakage assay. (B) Light scattering intensity vs. time plot of blank DOPC vesicles (blank) and DOPC vesicles with Poly-20mer with mCLR 0.004. (C) Comparison of corrected water permeability (corrected from blank) of all channels. (D) Molecular dynamics simulations of polymers with varying chain lengths, Poly-10mer (on left, L =18.7 Å), Poly-20mer (on middle, L = 33.1 Å), and Poly-30mer (on right L = 49.3Å) in octanol, showing size matching of Poly-20mer with DOPC bilayer (L = 36.7 Å) which shows the highest water flux.
We then converted these values to estimate the single-channel water permeability, expressed as water molecules per second per channel. The resulting values were 7.6 × 107, 8.02 × 107, 1.0 × 108, 1.3 × 108, and 3.5 × 107 for 3, 4 Poly-10mer, Poly-20mer, and Poly-30mer, respectively. Poly-20mer is the most efficient water channel examined in this study, approaching the performance of biological aquaporins within an order of magnitude. To better understand the channel formation of Poly-10mer − Poly-30mer we reconsidered the X-ray single crystal structure of macrocycle 4. The 2-methylbutoxy and methoxy side chains connected to the inside of macrocycle 4 prevent their close stacking in the solid state, with interplanar distances of c. 6.8 Å. This indicates that the space available on the inside of the macrocycle is insufficient to accommodate the total volume of all attached side chains. This in turn, suggests that polymers Poly-10mer − Poly-30mer may not form a tightly packed helix due to steric interactions of the interior chains. Estimating the tubular length of these helices is, therefore, difficult. For this reason, we employed molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to obtain a better estimate for the dimensions of the polymeric helical tubes in solution. MD simulations of individual polymer chains corresponding to Poly-10mer − Poly-30mer show that the number of repeat units per helical turn changes with the length of the modelled polymer. Poly-10mer has 4.5 repeat units per turn, but Poly-30mer requires 5 units per turn on average. This also affects the average length of the helical tube, with Poly-10mer exhibiting an average length of 18.7 Å, Poly-20mer 33.1 Å and Poly-30mer 49.3 Å.
Representative snapshots of the MD trajectory for each of the polymers are shown in Figure 4D. These show how the interior substitution of the helical tube prevents a tight helical fold, with substituents forcing openings in the helix. Considering that the hydrophobic thickness of a DOPC bilayer is 36.7 Å,4 and that Poly-20mer matches this length most closely, these results are in agreement with the observed water transport efficiency (Figure 4D). A good correspondence of the helical length with lipid bilayer thickness seems to be crucial for efficient water transport.
Ion transport studies across lipid bilayer membrane
A key requirement for artificial water channels is effective salt exclusion. To verify the salt (Na+ and K+) rejection ability of our most effective channel, Poly-20mer, we conducted an ion transport experiment using LUVs prepared from egg yolk phosphatidylcholine (EYPC) lipids with the pH-sensitive fluorescent dye HPTS (8-hydroxypyrene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid trisodium salt, 1 mM) encapsulated in a pH 7, 10 mM HEPES buffer.18, 34 Vesicles, containing pre-incorporated channel Poly-20mer (0.4mol% with respect to lipid), were then exposed to 200 mM M2 SO4 (M = Na+ or K+, (Figure 5A-D and Figure S56). The change in fluorescence intensity over time was monitored after adding NaOH to establish a pH gradient (ΔpH = 0.8) across the membrane. Poly-20mer showed minimal response to the Na+ (Figure 5B) and K+ (Figure 5D) gradients, confirming its impermeability to these cations. In contrast, gramicidin (a peptide cation channel) showed significant activity (~65 % for both Na+ and K+). These findings clearly demonstrate that our channels do not transport Na+ or K+ across the bilayer membrane at appreciable rates.
Figure 5.
(A-B). Representation of vesicles and sodium ion transport by gA (0.1 µM) and Poly-20mer by HPTS assay. (C-D). Representation of vesicles and potassium ion transport by gA (0.1 µM) and Poly-20mer by HPTS assay. (E-F) Vesicular representations and assay details of anion and proton transport. The H+ transport activities of FCCP (0.2 µM) and Poly-20mer in HPTS assay (G-H). Representations of assay details and chloride anion transport of Poly-20mer across the EYPC-LUVs⊃Lucigenin (Poly-20mer =0.4 mol% with respect to lipid in all assays).
Furthermore, proton and anion translocation were assessed using a HPTS assay (Figure 5E + F). In an iso-osmolar environment, a pH gradient (ΔpH = 0.8) should drive a proton transporter to export protons, increasing HPTS fluorescence intensity. Similarly, an anion transporter would bring hydroxyl ions into the vesicles, increasing HPTS fluorescence intensity. Poly-20mer exhibited no significant transport activity, whereas carbonyl cyanide-4-(trifluoromethoxy)phenylhydrazone (FCCP, a proton carrier) demonstrated substantial transport activity (~70 %). These observations confirm that Poly-20mer does not transport protons or anions at appreciable rates.
Finally, we examined the chloride transport capabilities of Poly-20mer using the fluorescent dye lucigenin, which is quenched in the presence of chloride. Under intravesicular and extravesicular conditions of NaNO3 (225 mM) and NaCl (33.3 mM) (Figure 5 G + H), no lucigenin quenching occurred in the presence of Poly-20mer. This result confirms that water channel Poly-20mer effectively excludes anions, whilst retaining high levels of water transport activity.
Conclusion
We have successfully demonstrated the synthetic design and characterization of functional polymers (Poly-10mer, Poly-20mer, Poly-30mer) and macrocycles (3 and 4) as high-performance artificial water channels. These structures were designed with inner cavities functionalized by fluorine and chiral alkyl substituents, imparting hydrophobicity and ion selectivity. The foldamers were synthesized via a living polymerization approach, yielding polymers with narrow dispersities and a simple, high yielding, purification by precipitation. The polymers were characterized using SEC, MALDI-ToF, and NMR (1H and 1ÅF). Circular Dichroism (CD) spectroscopy confirmed that the polymers fold to form helices, while SAXS analysis further supported their folded structure. Additionally, X-ray single-crystal structures of oligomers and macrocycles confirmed the presence of a key turn-inducing three-center hydrogen bond in the solid state and revealed the formation of nanochannels. We used this structural information to demonstrate the functional utility of these polymers and macrocycles in transporting water molecules across bilipid membranes with high efficiency and selectivity. Poly-20mer acted as the most efficient channel, with high water permeability, excellent salt and proton rejection, and performance similar to the evolutionarily optimized aquaporins, but showing vastly superior stability. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations aligned closely with experimental data, with the high-water transport rate of Poly-20mer relating to its length, and optimal balance of flexibility and structural rigidity.
This work represents a significant advance in developing scalable and efficient artificial water channels, providing a robust platform for next-generation water purification and desalination technologies. Further optimization of these water channels is underway, seeking to achieve water transport rates beyond those of biological aquaporins.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
A.F.M.K., S.F., J.A.M., C.T.M., R.V.M.F., S.S., I.M., M.N., A.C., and M.L thank Md A. Rahman for the crystallization of compound 11, J. Adamcik for AFM analysis of 4, and the Swiss National Science Foundation and the NCCR Bio-Inspired Materials for financial support. J.A.M., C.T.M thank the Francis Crick Institute which receives its core funding from Cancer Research UK (CC2213), the UK Medical Research Council (CC2213), and the Wellcome Trust (CC2213) and the UKRI under Future Leaders Fellowship MR/W00657X/1. We thank Dr Simone Kunzelmann from Structural biology (Francis Crick Institute) for help with stopped flow measurements.
Footnotes
Author Contributions
S.F. and A.F.M.K. designed the project. S.F. synthesized all monomers, macrocycles, and polymers, conducted molecular and polymer analyses, and crystallized all the macrocycles, J.A.M. and C.T.M. carried out water and ion transport analysis, R.V.M.F and S.S. carried out DLS and SAXS analysis, M.N. and M.L. carried out the MD calculations, A.C. measured some crystal structures, the manuscript was drafted by S.F., A.F.M.K., J.A.M. and C.T.M.. I. M. assisted in drafting the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
References
- 1.Murata K, Mitsuoka K, Hirai T, Walz T, Agre P, Bernard Heymann J, Engel A, Fujiyoshi Y, Mu ME. Nature. 2000;407:599–605. doi: 10.1038/35036519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Percec V, Dulcey AE, Balagurusamy VSK, Miura Y, Smidrkal J, Peterca M, Hummelin S, Edlund U, Hudson SD, Heiney PA, Duan H, et al. Nature. 2004;430:764–768. doi: 10.1038/nature02770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kaucher MS, Peterca M, Dulcey AE, Kim AJ, Vinogradov SA, Hammer DA, Heiney PA, Percec V. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:11698–11699. doi: 10.1021/ja076066c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sahoo D, Peterca M, Imam MR, Maurya DS, Percec V. J Mater Chem B. 2024;12:12265–12281. doi: 10.1039/d4tb01951b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rosen BM, Wilson CJ, Wilson DA, Peterca M, Imam MR, Percec V. Chem Rev. 2009;109:6275–6540. doi: 10.1021/cr900157q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shen YX, Saboe PO, Sines IT, Erbakan M, Kumar M. J Memb Sci. 2014;454:359–381. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kumar M, Grzelakowski M, Zilles J, Clark M, Meier W. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:20719–20724. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708762104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hélix-Nielsen C. Membranes. 2018;8:44. doi: 10.3390/membranes8030044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Barboiu M. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2012;51:11674–11676. doi: 10.1002/anie.201205819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gong B. Faraday Discuss. 2018;209:415–427. doi: 10.1039/c8fd00132d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Huang LB, Di Vincenzo M, Li Y, Barboiu M. Chem Eur J. 2021;27:2224–2239. doi: 10.1002/chem.202003470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Shen Y, Fei F, Zhong Y, Fan C, Sun J, Hu J, Gong B, Czajkowsky DM, Shao Z. ACS Cent Sci. 2021;7:2092–2098. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.1c01218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Shen J, Ye R, Romanies A, Roy A, Chen F, Ren C, Liu Z, Zeng H. J Am Chem Soc. 2020;142:10050–10058. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c02013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li Y, Li Z, Aydin F, Quan J, Chen X, Yao YC, Zhan C, Chen Y, Pham TA, Noy A. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eaba9966. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba9966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yan ZJ, Wang D, Ye Z, Fan T, Wu G, Deng L, Yang L, Li B, Liu J, Ma T, Dong C, et al. J Am Chem Soc. 2020;142:15638–15643. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c00601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Strilets D, Fa S, Hardiagon A, Baaden M, Ogoshi T, Barboiu M. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2020;59:23213–23219. doi: 10.1002/anie.202009219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Di Yuan Y, Dong J, Liu J, Zhao D, Wu H, Zhou W, Gan HX, Tong YW, Jiang J, Zhao D. Nat Commun. 2020;11:4927. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18639-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Shen YX, Si W, Erbakan M, Decker K, De Zorzi R, Saboe PO, Kang YJ, Majd S, Butler PJ, Walz T, Aksimentiev A, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:9810–9815. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1508575112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Huang LB, Hardiagon A, Kocsis I, Jegu CA, Deleanu M, Gilles A, Van Der Lee A, Sterpone F, Baaden M, Barboiu M. J Am Chem Soc. 2021;143:4224–4233. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c11952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Andrei IM, Chen W, Baaden M, Vincent SP, Barboiu M. J Am Chem Soc. 2023;145:21904–21914. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c06335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kaucher MS, Peterca M, Dulcey AE, Kim AJ, Vinogradov SA, Hammer DA, Heiney PA, Percec V. J Am Chem Soc. 2007;129:11698–11699. doi: 10.1021/ja076066c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mondal A, Mondal D, Sarkar S, Shivpuje U, Mondal J, Talukdar P. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2025;64:e202415510. doi: 10.1002/anie.202415510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lim YJ, Goh K, Wang R. Chem Soc Rev. 2022;51:4537–4582. doi: 10.1039/d1cs01061a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chang HY, Wu KY, Chen WC, Weng JT, Chen CY, Raj A, Hamaguchi HO, Chuang WT, Wang X, Wang CL. ACS Nano. 2021;15:14885–14890. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c04994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Huang LB, Su DD, Hardiagon A, Kocsis I, van der Lee A, Sterpone F, Baaden M, Barboiu M. J Am Chem Soc. 2025;147:678–686. doi: 10.1021/jacs.4c13072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hu XB, Chen Z, Tang G, Hou JL, Li ZT. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:8384–8387. doi: 10.1021/ja302292c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Licsandru E, Kocsis I, Shen YX, Murail S, Legrand YM, Van Der Lee A, Tsai D, Baaden M, Kumar M, Barboiu M. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138:5403–5409. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b01811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Li H, Valkenier H, Judd LW, Brotherhood PR, Hussain S, Cooper JA, Jurček O, Sparkes HA, Sheppard DN, Davis AP. Nat Chem. 2016;8:24–32. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yang K, Boles JE, White LJ, Hilton KLF, Lai HY, Long Y, Hiscock JR, Haynes CJE. RSC Adv. 2022;12:27877–27880. doi: 10.1039/d2ra05314d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Howe ENW, Gale PA. J Am Chem Soc. 2019;141:10654–10660. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b02116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.De Jong J, Bos JE, Wezenberg SJ. Chem Rev. 2023;123:8530–8574. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Johnson GT, Sadeghi-Kelishadi A, Langton MJ. A Photo-Responsive Transmembrane Anion Transporter Relay. J Am Chem Soc. 2022;144:10455–10461. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c02612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Leduc Y, Michau M, Gilles A, Gence V, Legrand YM, Vanderlee A, Tingry S, Barboiu M. Angew Chem, Int Ed. 2011;50:11366–11372. doi: 10.1002/anie.201103312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hu XB, Chen Z, Tang G, Hou JL, Li ZT. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:8384–8387. doi: 10.1021/ja302292c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Song W, Lang C, Shen Y-X, Kumar M. Annu Rev Mater Res. 2018;48:57–82. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Song W, Kumar M. Langmuir. 2022;38:9085–9091. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c01605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Tunuguntla RH, Henley RY, Yao Y-C, Pham TA, Wanunu M, Noy A. Science. 2017;357:792–796. doi: 10.1126/science.aan2438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Roy A, Shen J, Joshi H, Song W, Tu YM, Chowdhury R, Ye R, Li N, Ren C, Kumar M, Aksimentiev A, et al. Nat Nanotechnol. 2021;16:911–917. doi: 10.1038/s41565-021-00915-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Itoh Y, Chen S, Konda T, Aoki T, Ueda T, Shimada I, Cannon JJ, Shao C, Shiomi J, Tabata KV, Noji H, et al. Science. 2022;376:738–743. doi: 10.1126/science.abd0966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sato K. Langmuir. 2024;40:2809–2814. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c03665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Pal S, Hong L, Freire RVM, Farooq S, Salentinig S, Kilbinger AFM. Macromolecules. 2023;56:7984–7992. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pal S, Nguyen DPT, Molliet A, Alizadeh M, Crochet A, Ortuso RD, Petri-Fink A, Kilbinger AFM. Nature Chemistry. 2021;13:705–713. doi: 10.1038/s41557-021-00712-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Deposition numbers 2423513 (for 2), 2423514 (for 4) and 2423515 (for 11), contain the supplementary crystallo-graphic data for this paper. These data are provided free of charge by the joint Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre and Fachin-formationszentrum Karlsruhe Access Structures service
- 44.Brosey CA, Tainer JA. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2019;58:197–213. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2019.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Shen J, Ye R, Romanies A, Roy A, Chen F, Ren C, Liu Z, Zeng H. J Am Chem Soc. 2020;142:10050–10058. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c02013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hannesschläger C, Barta T, Siligan C, Horner A. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1–8. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26946-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Marquardt D, Heberle FA, Greathouse DV, Koeppe RE, Standaert RF, Van Oosten BJ, Harroun TA, Kinnun JJ, Williams JA, Wassall SR, Katsaras J. Soft Matter. 2016;12:9417–9428. doi: 10.1039/c6sm01777k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






