Abstract
Background
As the world becomes increasingly urbanised, there is recognition that public and planetary health relies upon a ubiquitous transition to sustainable cities. Disentanglement of the complex pathways of urban design, environmental exposures, and health, and the magnitude of these associations, remains a challenge. A state-of-the-art account of large-scale urban health studies is required to shape future research priorities and equity- and evidence-informed policies.
Objectives
The purpose of this review was to synthesise evidence from large-scale urban studies focused on the interaction between urban form, transport, environmental exposures, and health. This review sought to determine common methodologies applied, limitations, and future opportunities for improved research practice.
Methods
Based on a literature search, 2958 articles were reviewed that covered three themes of: urban form; urban environmental health; and urban indicators. Studies were prioritised for inclusion that analysed at least 90 cities to ensure broad geographic representation and generalisability. Of the initially identified studies, following expert consultation and exclusion criteria, 66 were included.
Results
The complexity of the urban ecosystem on health was evidenced from the context dependent effects of urban form variables on environmental exposures and health. Compact city designs were generally advantageous for reducing harmful environmental exposure and promoting health, with some exceptions. Methodological heterogeneity was indicative of key urban research challenges; notable limitations included exposure and health data at varied spatial scales and resolutions, limited availability of local-level sociodemographic data, and lack of consensus on robust methodologies that encompass best research practice.
Conclusion
Future urban environmental health research for evidence-informed urban planning and policies requires a multi-faceted approach. Advances in geospatial and AI-driven techniques and urban indicators offer promising developments; however, there remains a wider call for increased data availability at local-levels, transparent and robust methodologies of large-scale urban studies, and greater exploration of urban health vulnerabilities and inequities.
1. Introduction
Currently, almost 60% of the global population (∼4.8 billion people) live in the urban environment and by 2050 nearly seven out of ten people will inhabit cities1,2. There are a host of reasons attributed to the rising trend of migration and urbanisation; mainly, cities provide rich opportunities for education, employment, wealth, and innovation3,4. Yet cities can also be a concentrated source of environmental exposure stressors (e.g., air pollution, noise, and heat)5,6,7, perpetuate unhealthy lifestyles8, and exacerbate health inequities9. Concurrent with rapid urbanisation, climate change poses an additional threat to urban health and sustainability challenges10,11. Cities account for 75% of the world’s energy-related greenhouse gas emissions12 and can be a major contributor to biodiversity loss13. Although viewed as the principal drivers of climate change, cities also offer a large part of the solution14,15. In Europe, initiatives that aim to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and achieve carbon neutrality include the EU’s Green Deal16 and the Paris Climate Agreement17. These initiatives recognise the pivotal role of sustainable and liveable cities for achieving these objectives, which in turn will protect public and planetary health.
The pathways of urban form, environmental exposures, and health are intricate, and the magnitude of these associations have not been widely substantiated18. Although cities are a complex system, a conceptual framework developed by Nieuwenhuijsen & Khreis19 (Figure 1) illustrates the multitude of urban and transport planning pathways that contributes toward the health of urban populations. Urban form denotes the structure, design, and physical features of an urban environment20, captured by the urban design pillar in Figure 1. There are two dominant urban forms; the first, known as compact cities, is characterised by dense housing and road infrastructure, and the second by dispersed low density infrastructure with high sprawl8,21. Both are notionally inconducive to health and sustainability, as the first lends itself to increased pollutant emissions and noise levels, accentuated hot temperatures, and reduced green space8; whilst the second favours motorised traffic and motor vehicle dependency, poorer public transportation infrastructure, lower social cohesion, and reduced physical activity levels4,22. However, the compact city model has the conceptual benefits of shorter commuting distances that promote active mobility and increase social cohesion, which highlights the potential trade-offs and complexity of urban design23. Naturally, cities can be a combination of these forms.
Figure 1. Conceptual framework of the links and pathways between urban design, environmental exposures and health19.
The health burden attributable to environmental exposures in urban settings is well documented7,8,24. In 2019, particulate matter diameter 2.5μm (PM2.5) and ozone air pollution were estimated to cause 4.51 million premature deaths worldwide25, and road traffic injuries were ranked the leading cause of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for ages 10-49 years, ranking 10th for ages 50-74 years26. Trends of increasing heat-related morbidity and mortality are largely ascribed to climate change27 and are exacerbated in urban environments due to the urban heat island (UHI) effect, an occurrence wherein urban areas exhibit elevated temperatures compared to their rural surroundings28. In addition to premature mortality, heat-related impacts include increased mental health distress29, cardiorespiratory-mortality30, and hospital admissions31. Although a lesser studied environmental risk factor, chronic exposure to noise pollution can also have adverse health effects; at least 20% of the European urban population is likely to be exposed to noise levels harmful to health32. In 2017, 18 million people in Europe were estimated to experience high annoyance from noise and 5 million sleep disturbance. Sedentary behaviour and reduced physical activity are well established risk factors of health burden and are often more prevalent in urban environments owing to lifestyles and built environment characteristics22. Perhaps the starkest of adverse impacts from sedentary behaviour33, sitting for 10 hours a day is associated with 48% increased risk of all-cause mortality compared to 7.5 hours a day34.
Translating health burden statistics into actionable recommendations for policy requires research to effectively discern the intricate relation between urban form, environmental stressors, and health. However, uncovering causal inferences is complex due to the multiple pathways, long causal chains, and dynamic nature of contextual factors (e.g., neighbourhood attributes) and compositional (e.g., demographic characteristics)35, alongside the multidisciplinary nature of urban and transport planning related impacts. Health impact assessment (HIA) is a widely adopted decision support tool that aids evidence-informed policies. HIAs are valuable within urban health research as the impacts of urban planning on health determinants and scenarios can be modelled and estimated impacts often have high comprehensibility to decision-makers, which helps generate awareness36,37. Temporal HIAs offer the additional advantage that predicted impacts reflect the historical trajectory of exposures and health burden, and thus, changes in exposure, impacts, and policies can be tracked over time38. To effectively interpret the accuracy of forecasted impacts and the existing evidence base necessitates understanding the uncertainties inherent in model assumptions and how these vary across studies38. Moreover, qualitative data, such as societal preferences, are integral in elucidating the constituents of an urban ecosystem. The Neighbourhood Environment Walkability Scale (NEWS) is one such tool designed to gather perceptions of neighbourhood attributes linked to physical activity (e.g., street connectivity)39. The widespread adoption of NEWS underscores the need for comprehensive, proxy tools that assess city liveability40. However there exists a plethora of different, context-specific walkability indices41,42,43,44; this underscores the resultant limitations in comparing studies that employ diverse methodologies, and the challenge in obtaining universally applicable insights into urban environmental health pathways and attributable impacts.
Large-scale urban studies offer generalisable and robust evidence for elucidating the nexus among city form, climate, transport, and environmental and health impacts. However, to the best of knowledge, there is no scoping review that synthesises evidence from large-scale urban studies that investigate these interconnections. Exploration of commonly employed methodologies, associated limitations, and key research gaps can highlight future research opportunities.
As such, the purpose of this scoping review was two-fold:
-
1)
Synthesise evidence from large-scale urban studies that focused on the relation between urban structures, transport, environmental exposures, and health.
-
2)
Advanced understanding of current knowledge and gaps, methodologies applied, limitations, and opportunities for the improvement of current research practice.
The research questions we sought to address were:
-
1)
What methodologies were applied in urban form, transport and mobility, and urban environmental health studies from 2003 to 2023?
-
2)
What are novel methods and indicators within urban environmental health research?
-
3)
What knowledge gaps necessitate further exploration?
2. Methods
This review was conducted as part of The Urban Burden of Disease Estimation for Policy Making project (UBDPolicy). UBDPolicy aims to improve the estimation of health impacts and socio-economic costs, or benefits, of environmental determinants in almost 1000 European cities in 31 countries45. Through provision of estimates of health impacts from air pollution5, noise6, heat46, and green space47 in regular three-yearly reporting intervals, UBDPolicy aims to advance understanding of wider impacts and trends from urban planning across Europe and build healthy and sustainable urban scenarios for specific case studies. Therefore, the conclusions drawn from this review and their applicability for UBDPolicy shaped the reasoning behind the methods employed. Given the exploratory nature required to meet the review’s objectives, we conducted a scoping review suited to identifying knowledge gaps and emerging methods within a broad topic area48. The anticipated heterogeneity of study designs of reviewed articles and practical and resource constraints rendered a systematic review or meta-analysis less suitable. Further, a UBDPolicy workshop held in Sitges, Spain, in October 2023 allowed expert consultation for identification of additional applicable studies. A literature search was performed using the bibliographical database PubMed. Figure 2 provides a visual representation of the process of article inclusion and exclusion.
Figure 2. Flowchart of the literature search inclusion and exclusion process.
2.1. Keywords search process
Seven independent searches using PubMed were carried out (Table 1). The same search terms to describe urban form were included in the seven searches. The first search focused on urban form and health, the second on urban environmental health, and the third on urban indicators. The distinction between urban form and urban environmental health pertains to the former investigating the direct link between urban form and health whereas for the latter, studies consider the exposure pathway either by assessment of urban form to environmental exposures or exposures to health.
Table 1. Summary of search terms and results for review.
| Search terms | Theme | PubMeda | Includedb | Total includedc |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Search 1 | ||||||
| Urbanisation Urban typology Urban type Urban studies Urban environment Built environment Urban morphology Urban configuration Urban form Urban areas Cities Sprawl Urban planning Urban development Urban design Urban factors Urban features Urban characteristics Urban density Urban land use Urban land cover |
Health Health impacts Health effects Health impact assessment Mortality Morbidity Disease |
Urban form and health | 2513 | 7 | 9 | |
| Search 2 | ||||||
| Health Health impacts Health effects Health impact assessment Mortality Morbidity Disease |
Air pollution Particulate matter Nitrogen Dioxide PM2.5 NO2 |
Air pollution and health impacts |
201 | 9 | 29 | |
| Health Health impacts Health effects Health impact assessment Mortality Morbidity Disease |
Urban heat island Temperature Heat |
Temperature and health impacts |
124 | 7 | 8 | |
| Health Health impacts Health effects Health impact assessment Mortality Morbidity Disease |
Green space Greenness Tree canopy Tree cover Park Urban green infrastructure Nature-based solutions Green infrastructure Green interventions Urban forests NDVI |
Green space and health impacts |
18 | 3 | 5 | |
| Health Health impacts Health effects Health impact assessment Mortality Morbidity Disease Annoyance Sleep disturbance |
Noise Road traffic noise Environmental noise |
Noise and health impacts |
16 | 1 | 1 | |
| Health Health impacts Health effects Health impact assessment Mortality Morbidity Disease Injury Accidents Physical activity |
Urban mobility Urban transport Road transport Urban travel Travel patterns |
Transport and mobility | 2 | 1 | 2 | |
| Search 3 | ||||||
| Indicator Indicators |
Indicators | 84 | 2 | 12 | ||
The same search terms relating to “urban form” were included in all searches.
Values denote the total number of articles obtained from the respective search terms, for each search performed.
Values denote the number of relevant articles included from PubMed search, following exclusion. Exclusion was based upon studies analysing < 90 cities, or not specifically assessing health impacts. The exclusion criteria did not apply to articles focused on indicators.
Values denote the total number of included articles, by theme, after a supplementary search using included article reference lists and from expert consultation.
For the second category of urban environmental health studies, five searches encompassed the following key themes: air pollution and health impacts; temperature and health impacts; green space and health impacts; noise and health impacts; and transport and mobility. The searches returned 2958 unique articles (Figure 2). Article abstracts were screened for relevance based on the inclusion criteria and objectives of UBDPolicy, which resulted in 40 papers for inclusion. An additional 26 papers were obtained from a manual search conducted by scanning reference lists for relevant studies and from expert consultation. This resulted in nine urban form and health studies 45 urban environmental health studies, and 12 urban indicator papers. A total of 66 studies were included. Table 1 provides a summary of the search terms used and results of each search. Figure 3 categorises articles by theme and year of publication.
Figure 3. Number of articles by published year and theme.
2.2. Inclusion criteria
Article inclusion criteria and conducted searches were divided into three search categories; urban form and health, urban environmental health (subdivided into HIA studies and other research methodologies), and urban indicators. For the second search category, a distinction of HIA methodologies was made to allow for effective exploration of methodologies and affiliated challenges within the broader urban environmental health field. The inclusion criteria for search categories one and two (urban form and health and urban environmental health studies) constituted studies were required to have analysed at least 90 cities, be written in English, and published in peer-reviewed journals from January 2003 to December 2023. The inclusion criterion was set at 90 or more cities as this number was considered appropriate to standardise data collection across different environmental and climatic gradients and to be representative of studies with less than 90 cities. Studies published from January 2003 to December 2023 were included to ensure methodologies and findings were reflective of current levels of urbanisation and health impacts. For the second search category of urban environmental health studies, the environmental exposures included were: air pollution; temperature; green space; road traffic noise; and transport and mobility.
The third search category focused on urban indicators. Indicators and frameworks considered relevant were those that focused on urban design and environmental health. The inclusion criteria specified studies should be written in English and published in peer-reviewed journals from January 2003 to December 2023.
2.3. Exclusion criteria
The exclusion criteria applied to both searches encompassed environmental exposures not relevant to UBDPolicy (such as infectious diseases), studies that did not evaluate health impacts, health outcomes considered less attributable to city design and planning, and studies published before January 2003. For the second search category of urban indicators, the exclusion criterion of studies analysing less than 90 cities did not apply, as indicators can be scaled and applied to different contexts.
3. Results
Of the 66 studies included in this review, the geographical regions covered were: Global (24), China (14), Europe (13), Latin America (9), the United States (3), and Africa (3) (Figure 4 and Table 2). While studies specific to South-Asia, South-East Asia, and the Middle East were not considered in this review, a number of cities from these regions featured in the global studies. A total of 45 studies examined urban environmental exposures and health, with the majority (29, ∼64%) assessing air pollution health impacts. The least studied exposure was road traffic noise (1, ∼1.5%). The number of cities analysed spanned a wide range (93 - 13,189 cities), with variation in city definitions employed (Tables 3 and 4). All studies conducted in China examined the health effects from air pollution exposure, whereas less studied regions, such as Africa were amongst the largest in scale in terms of the number of cities analysed (Figure 4). Examination of findings is in accordance with the thematic order outlined in Table 2, and constitutes four sections: urban form and health, urban environmental health, HIAs, and urban indicators.
Figure 4. Number of cities analysed in each study, categorised by region and environmental exposure.
Table 2. Summary of 66 included studies, by theme, geographic scope, and number of cities analysed.
| Theme | Theme subcategory | Environmental Exposures |
Number of studies |
Geographical regions covered (Number of studies) |
No. of cities Mean / Median (range) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urban form and health |
- | - | 9 | Global (2) Africa (2) Latin America (4) United States (1) |
1046 / 363 (110-5625) |
| Urban environmental health |
Air pollution | 8 | Global (4) China (1) Latin America (3) |
312 / 346 (117-462) |
|
| Temperature | 6 | Global (1) Europe (2) Latin America (2) United States (1) |
447 / 500 (209-601) |
||
| Green space | 4 | Africa (1) Europe (2) United States (1) |
2118 / 496 (233-5625) |
||
| Noise | - | - | - | ||
| Urban environmental health |
Transport and mobility | 2 | Global (2) | 997 (301-1692) |
|
| Health Impact Assessment |
Air pollution | 21 | Global (6) China (13) Europe (2) | 2048 / 335 (95-13189) |
|
| Temperature | 2 | Europe (2) | 474 / 474 (93-854) |
||
| Green space | 1 | Europe (1) | 978 | ||
| Noise | 1 | Europe (1) | 724 | ||
| Transport and mobility | - | - | - | ||
| Indicators | - | - | 12 | Global (9) Europe (3) |
288 / 27 (14-1038) |
Table 3. Summary of urban form, environment, and health studies that analysed at least 90 cities (cities analysed ranged from 110 – 5,625).
| Theme | Reference | Location (number of cities) | Study design | City definition | City database | Health outcome | Health data source | Environmental Exposure | Exposure data source | Urban form metric | Data source | Statistical methoda |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urban form and health | Prieto-Curiel et al., 201751 | Africa (1939) |
Modelling | Continuously built-up area with <200m between two buildings and ≥10,000 inhabitants | Africapolis75 | - | - | - | - | City size Market potential Urbanisation level Local dominance |
Africapolis76 | - |
| Main findings | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| Prieto-Curiel et al., 201752 | Africa (5625) |
Modelling | Continuously built-up area with <200m between two buildings and ≥10,000 inhabitants | Africapolis75 | - | - | - | - | Building height Street network metrics Terrain metrics |
Google AI Africa Open Buildings dataset |
BASE modelb | |
| Main findings | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| Bilal et al., 202150 | Latin America (363) |
Ecological | Agglomerations of administrative units with ≥100,000 residents | SALURBAL study77 | Cancer-related mortality CVD and other NCD-related mortality Unintentional injury-related mortality Violence-related mortality |
Vital registration systems | - | - | City size City growth Population density Fragmentation Street connectivity Social environment index |
SALURBAL study77 | Nonparametric approach Three-level negative binomial multilevel model |
|
| Main findings | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| Mullachery et al., 202256 | Latin America (363) |
Cross-sectional | Agglomerations of administrative units with ≥100,000 residents | SALURBAL study77 | Healthcare-amenable mortality | SALURBAL study77 | City population Fragmentation Patch density Population growth |
SALURBAL study77 | Log regression model | |||
| Main findings | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| Nguyen et al., 201955 | United States (500) |
Cross-sectional | Categorised into tertiles | United States Census Bureau78 | Obesity Diabetes Self-rated health Mental distress Physical distress Physical inactivity Teen births |
BRFSS Survey Data79 | - | - | Highway Rurality Grassland |
Google Street View | Linear regression models | |
| Main findings | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| Ortigoza et al., 202149 | Latin America (286) | Cross-sectional | Agglomerations of administrative units with ≥100,000 residents | SALURBAL study77 | Infant mortality rate | Vital registration systems | - | - | Population size Population growth rate Living conditions score Services provision score Mass transit availability |
SALURBAL study77 | Poisson multilevel model | |
| Main findings | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| Taubenböck et al., 202080 | Global (110) |
Modelling | Morphological urban areas | United Nations81 | - | - | Local Climate Zones | ESA82 | - | - | - | |
| Main findings | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| Avila-Palencia et al., 202253 | Latin America (230) |
Cross-sectional | Agglomerations of administrative units with ≥100,000 residents | SALURBAL study77 | NCD-specific mortality Unintentional injury-specific mortality |
Vital registration systems | NDVI PM2.5 NO2 Carbon footprint |
SALURBAL study77 | Fragmentation Urban isolation Shape of patches |
SALURBAL study77 | Linear regression models | |
| Main findings | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| Air pollution and impacts | Meng et al., 202163 | Global (398) |
Ecological | - | MCC83 | All-cause mortality CVD mortality Respiratory mortality |
Local authorities | NO2 | MCC83 | - | - | Time series quasi-Poisson generalised linear regression model Multi-level meta-analytical approach |
| Main findings | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| Ye et al., 202164 | China (367) |
Ecological | Boundaries defined in the Population Census | China Health Statistical Yearbook84 | All-cause mortality | China Health Statistical Yearbook76 | PM2.5 PM10 CO2 NO2 SO2 TSP |
China’s National Urban Air Quality Real-time Publishing Platform85 | - | - | Random Forests model | |
| Main findings | ||||||||||||
| - Compared air quality during the COVID lockdown period in early 2020 with a business-as-usual scenario and found: 1239 (844 - 1578) PM2.5 related avoidable deaths; economic savings 1.22 billion USD. 2777 (1565 - 3995) PM10 related avoidable deaths; economic savings 2.60 billion USD. 1587 (98 - 3104) CO related avoidable deaths; economic savings 1.36 billion USD. 4711 (3649 - 5781) NO2 related avoidable deaths; economic savings 4.05 billion USD. 213 (116 - 314) O3 related avoidable deaths; economic savings 0.20 billion USD. 1088 (774 - 1421) SO2 related avoidable deaths; economic savings 0.95 billion USD. | ||||||||||||
| Kephart et al., 202360 | Latin America (326) |
Cross-sectional | Clusters of administrative units encompassing an urban built-up area a | SALURBAL study77 | - | - | NO2 NDVI |
SALURBAL study77 US Geological Survey (MODIS MOD13Q1)86 |
Population density Intersection density GDP per capita Traffic congestion |
SALURBAL study77 Kummu et al., 201787 Delclòs-Alió et al., 201988 |
Multilevel models | |
| Main findings | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| Heydari et al., 202265 | Global (117) |
Meta-analysis | - | - | COPD Diabetes IHD Lower respiratory disease Lung cancer Stroke |
GBD 201789 | PM2.5 | WHO90 | - | - | Non-linear Integrated Exposure Response function | |
| Main findings | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| Gouveia et al., 202159 | Latin America (366) | Cross-sectional | Urban clusters with ≥100,000 inhabitants | Global Urban Footprint Dataset91 | - | - | PM2.5 NDVI |
Atmospheric Composition Analysis Group92 US Geological Survey (MODIS MOD13Q1)86 |
Population density Fragmentation Mass transit Infrastructure City size City growth Intersection density |
SALURBAL study77 |
Linear mixed models |
|
| Main findings | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| Rezaei & Millard-Ball 202362 | Global (462) |
Cross-sectional | Urban Centres with ≥1,500 inhabitants per km2 | GHSL93 | - | - | PM2.5 NDVI |
GHSL93 Landsat annual Top-of-Atmosphere (TOA) reflectance composite |
Weighted population density Compactness Street connectivity 2016 GNI per capita |
Global Human Settlement Layer93 OpenStreet Map Network94 World Bank95 |
Random Forest regression | |
| Main findings | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| Avila-Palencia et al., 202269 | Latin America (208) |
Ecological | Agglomerations of administrative units with ≥100,000 residents | SALURBAL study77 | NCD-specific mortality Unintentional injury-related mortality HTN Diabetes Obesity |
Vital registration systems National surveys WHO 201696 |
PM2.5 NO2 Carbon footprint NDVI |
Atmospheric Composition Analysis Group92 Moran at al., 201897 |
Fragmentation Isolation Shape of urban patches |
SALURBAL study98 | Spearman correlations Linear regression models |
|
| Main findings | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| Temperature and impacts | Kephart et al., 202267 | Latin America (326) |
Ecological | Agglomerations of administrative units with ≥100,000 residents | SALURBAL project77 | All-cause mortality CVD-related mortality Respiratory disease-related mortality Respiratory infection-related mortality |
Vital registration systems | Ambient air temperature | ERA5-Land99 | - | - | Distributed lag nonlinear conditional Poisson model Random effects meta-regression model |
| Main findings | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| Wang et al., 2016100 | United States (209) | Ecological | - | - | Mortality | National Centre for Health Statistics | Cold wavesc | CMIP Phase 5101 | - | - | Over-dispersed Poisson regression | |
| Main findings | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| Krummenauer et al., 201961 | Europe (599) |
Ecological | ≥1,500 inhabitants per km2 | Gridded population of the world102 | Life expectancy Health expenditure |
WBOD95 World Income Inequality Database103 MDGLR104 |
Minimum mortality temperature | Global Summary of the Day105 | Topography Population density GDP per capita GINI coefficient Improved water source |
CIESIN102 | Non-linear sigmoid model | |
| Main findings | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| Alahmad et al., 202366 | Global (567) |
Ecological | - | MCC83 | CVD-specific mortality data | MCC83 | Ambient temperature | MCC83 | - | - | Case-crossover models Mixed-effects meta-analytic framework |
|
| Main findings | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| Bakhtsiyarava et al., 202358 | Latin America (325) |
Ecological | Agglomerations of administrative units with ≥100,000 residents | SALURBAL study77 | All-cause mortality CVD-specific mortality |
Vital registration systems SALURBAL study77 |
Temperature | ERA5-Land99 | - | - | Distributed lag nonlinear conditional Poisson model Random effects meta-regression model |
|
| Main findings | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| Zhou et al., 201768 | Europe (5000) |
Ecological | Urban agglomerations | CORINE land cover106 | - | - | Surface UHI intensity | CMIP Phase 5101 | City size Urban fractality Urban anisometry |
CORINE morphological zones107 | Multi-linear regression model | |
| Main findings | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| Green space | Marando et al., 202272 | Europe (601) |
Modelling | Functional Urban Areas | GHSL93 | - | - | Land surface temperature | Google Earth Engine108 | Cooling indexd | Copernicus109 MODIS86 |
Bivariate linear regression model Univariate model |
| Main findings | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| Browning et al., 201857 | United States (496) |
Cross-sectional | - | 500 Cities project110 | Obesity Mental health |
500 Cities project110 | NDVI Tree cover |
MODIS111 Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium112 |
Spatial moving average models | |||
| Main findings | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| Anderson et al., 202210 | Africa (5625) | Modelling | Continuously built-up area with <200m between two buildings and ≥10,000 inhabitants | Africapolis75 | - | - | Urban green space fraction Proximity to green space PM2.5 |
WorldClim113 GHSL114 |
Urban form metricse | European Space Agency’s World Cover Map115 | Linear econometric models | |
| Main findings | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| Olsen et al., 201970 | Europe (233) |
Cross-sectional | Large Urban Zones of ≥100,000 inhabitants | Urban Atlas 2018116 | All-cause mortality (SMR) | Richardson et al., 2017117 | - | - | Land cover usesf | See supplementary70 | Linear regression models | |
| Main findings | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| Transport and mobility | Thompson et al., 202074 | Global (1692) |
Cross-sectional | 1) Minimum radius of 1.5km 2) Selected images of 400m2 |
United Nations73 Google Static Maps |
Road traffic injuries (DALYs, YLLs, YLDs) | GBD 2016110 | Fossil fuel emissions | FFDAS111 | 2 × 3 multivariate analysis of variance | ||
| Main findings | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| Bassolas et al., 201973 | Global (301) |
Ecological | Metropolitan areas | U.S. Census | Stroke (incidence) Stroke-related mortality Transport-related mortality |
CDC118 US Department of Transportation119 |
Trip flow data | Mobility Map project120 | Multivariate analysis | |||
| Main findings | ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
Abbreviations: Cardiovascular disease (CVD); Non-communicable disease (NCD); Social economic status (SES); Behavioural Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS); Infant mortality rate (IMR); Normalised differential vegetation index (NDVI); Multi-City Multi-Country (MCC); Terra Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Vegetation Indices (MOD13Q1); Chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD); Ischaemic heart disease (IHD); Global Human Settlement Layer (GHSL); Hypertension (HTN); Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5); World Bank Open Data (WBOD); Millennium Development Goals Lebanon Report (MDGLR); Centre for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN); Urban Heat Island (UHI); Standardised mortality rate (SMR); Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs); Years of life lost (YLLs); Years lived with disability (YLDs); Fossil Fuel Data Assimilation System (FFDAS).
Statistical method for estimation of association between urban form, exposures, and health.
BASE model: mean distance between buildings is a functional relation to the number of Buildings and their average Area and the Sprawl and the Elongation of its spatial arrangement. Allows relation of city morphology to distance indicators (e.g., sprawl, elongation, and polycentricity) and the energy demand from transport.
Cold waves defined as two, three, or at least four consecutive days with daily temperature lower than the 5th percentile of temperatures recorded in each city.
Variables included in cooling index: tree cover density, water evaporation from tree canopies, vaporisation of intercepted rainfall from vegetation.
Urban form metrics include sprawl, city elongation, built-up intensity, intersection density, average node degree, city centre building density, types of green cover, total footprint centre 1km, is pyramid, urban green space fraction.
Land covers/uses include agriculture, semi-natural areas, wetlands, green urban areas, industrial, commercial, public, military, discontinuous low density urban fabric, residential, isolated structures.
Table 4. Summary of health impact assessments that analysed at least 90 cities (cities analysed ranged from 93 – 13,189).
| Reference | Location (number of cities) | City definition | City population database | Outcome | Outcome data source a |
Temporal resolution | Environmental exposure (Resolution Scale) b | Environmental exposure data source | Relative Risk | ERF data Source c | Models to estimate exposure | Counterfactual Scenario |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Khomenko et al., 20215 | Europe (1016) |
Local administrative boundaries, with ≥50,000 inhabitants93 | Urban Audit143 | Natural cause mortality (rate per 100 000 and YLL) |
Eurostat144 (City-level) |
2015 |
(100m2) |
ELAPSE145 | PM2.5-1.07 (1.04-1.09) per 10μg/m3 increase NO2-1.02 (0.99-1.06) per 10μg/m3 increase |
WHO 2014146 Atkinson et al., 2018147 |
LUR model (100m2) Ensemble model (10km2) Global LUR model (100m2) |
PM2.5-10μg/m3 NO2- 40μg/m3 |
| Khomenko et al., 2023124 | Europe (857) | Local administrative boundaries, with ≥50,000 inhabitants93 | Urban Audit143 | Natural cause mortality | Eurostat139 (City-level) |
2015 | PM2.5 NO2 (0.1°×0.05° /∼6km2) |
Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service regional inventory148 | PM2.5-1.08 (1.06-1.09) per 10μg/m3 increase NO2-1.02 (1.01-1.04) per 10μg/m3 increase |
Chen et al., 2020149 Huangfu & Atkinson 2020150 |
SHERPA tool151 EMEP MSC-W chemical transport model152,153 |
Pollutant concentrations related to each emission source eliminated |
| Anenberg et al., 2019126 | Global (250) |
Population census tables and corresponding geographic boundaries | CIESIN102 | All-cause mortality IHD Stroke COPD Lung cancer Lower respiratory infections Diabetes |
GHDx148 (0.1°×0.1° grid cell level) |
2010 and 2015 | PM2.5 Ozone (0.1°×0.1° /∼10km2) |
ECLIPSE154,155 | See references156,89 | Shaddick et al., 2018156 GBD 201789 |
GEOS-Chem global chemical transport model (2° x 2.5°) | PM2.5-2.4–5.9μg/m3 Ozone- 32.4 ppb (∼63.5μg/m3) |
| Zhang et al., 2022140 | China (331) |
Defined by the Population Census | China Health Statistical Yearbook157 | Premature mortality CVD mortality Respiratory mortality |
China Health Statistical Yearbook157 | 2015-2020 | PM2.5 Ozone |
China National Environmental Monitoring Centre116 | ERF reported140 | Kan et al., 2002158 | Univariate linear regression model | PM2.5- 10μg/m3 Ozone- 26.7 ppb (∼54μg/m3) |
| Guan et al., 2021139 | China (338) |
Defined by the Population Census | National Bureau of Statistics of China159 | All-cause mortality (DALY) Respiratory disease (DALY) |
GBD Study 2016160 (Provincial level) |
2015-2020 | PM2.5 Ozone |
China National Environmental Monitoring Centre135 | All-cause ozone – 1.01 per 10μg/m3 increase Respiratory disease ozone – 1.02 per 10μg/m3 increase |
Burnett et al., 2014161 Maji et al., 2018138 Wang et al., 2021162 |
- | PM2.5 – 10, 15, 25, 35μg/m3 Ozone– 100, 160μg/m3 (∼196, 313.6 ppb) |
| Guan et al., 2021b125 | China (101) |
City seasonal population | Baidu population migration index163 | CVD (DALYs) Respiratory disease (DALYs) |
GBD Study 2017164 (Provincial level) |
Fourteen seasons from 2017, 2018, 2019 and first half of 2020 | PM2.5 Ozone |
Ministry of Environmental Protection165 | See Table 1 of Appendix125 | - | - | PM2.5- 25μg/m3 Ozone- 100μg/m3 (∼196 ppb) |
| Guan et al., 2022166 | China (335) |
Defined by the Population Census | National Bureau of Statistics of China159 | All-cause (DALY) CVD (DALY) Respiratory disease (DALY) |
GBD Study 2017164 (Provincial level) |
2021 | PM2.5 Ozone |
China National Environmental Monitoring Centre135 | - | Orellano et al., 2020167 | - | PM2.5- 15μg/m3 Ozone- 70μg/m3 (∼137.2 ppb) |
| Anenberg et al., 2019131 | Global (250) |
≥1,500 inhabitants per km2 | CIESIN102 | Mortality | GBD 201689 | 2016 | PM2.5 ((∼0·0083°)2 /1km2) CO2 (1km2) |
Shaddick et al., 2018156 Oda & Maksyutov, 2011168 |
Age-specific RRc | Cohen et al., 2017169 | Chemical transport model (Calibrated to 6003 measurements for 117 countries) |
2.4–5.9μg/m3 |
| Maji et al., 2017132 | China (190) |
Defined by the Population Census | National Bureau of Statistics of China170,171 | All-cause mortality 5 causes premature mortality 18 causes morbidity |
GBD Study 2010160 (Provincial level) |
2014-2015 | PM2.5 PM10 |
GBD 2010172 | See table 1133 | GBD 2010160 | - | PM2.5– 20μg/m3 PM10 – 5.8μg/m3 |
| Maji et al., 2018138 | China (338) |
Defined by the Population Census | National Bureau of Statistics of China170 | Stroke IHD COPD Lung cancer Cause-related hospital admission |
GBD Study 2016160 (Provincial level) |
2016 | PM2.5 | China National Environmental Monitoring Centre135 | - | - | - | PM2.5 – 5.9μg/m3 |
| Guan et al., 2019173 | China (328) |
Defined by the Population Census | National Bureau of Statistics of China170 | CVD mortality Respiratory disease mortality Lung cancer mortality |
Zhou et al., 2016174 (Provincial level) |
2015-2017 | PM2.5 | China National Environmental Monitoring Centre135 | - | - | - | PM2.5 - 10μg/m3 |
| Diao et al., 2020127 | China (338) |
Defined by the Population Census170 | China Health Statistical Yearbook157 | All-cause mortality Respiratory mortality CVD hospitalisation Chronic bronchitis hospitalisation Asthma diagnosis Acute bronchitis diagnosis |
- | 2015 | PM2.5 | LandScan175 | All-cause mortality PM2.5- 1.019 (1.003-1.081) per 10μg/m3 increase See Table 1 for full list127 |
Wang et al., 2017176 | - | PM2.5- 10μg/m3 |
| Han et al., 2022128 | China (296) |
Population census tables and corresponding geographic boundaries | CIESIN102 | All-cause mortality | China Health Statistical Yearbook157 (City-level) |
2015-2019 | PM2.5 (0.1°×0.1° /∼10km2) |
Satellite sources177 Emission-inventories178 Model simulation179 Ground-based sources180 |
All-cause mortality PM2.5-1.055 (1.022–1.088) 139 per 10μg/m3 increase |
Zhang 2021181 | Artificial intelligence combined data from satellite-, emission inventories-, model simulation- and ground-based sources. |
PM2.5 - 5μg/m3 |
| Southerland et al., 2022129 | Global (13,160) |
Defined by Global Human Settlement Model grid182 | European Commission’s Joint Research Centre183 | Attributable cause-specific mortality of: Ischaemic heart disease Intracerebral haemorrhagic stroke Lower-respiratory infections Lung cancer Type 2 diabetes COPD |
GBD 201926 (National level) |
2000-2019 | PM2.5 ((∼0·0083°)2 /1km2) |
PM2.5 concentration database184 | Produced RR estimates for 385 integer exposure levels ranging from 0-2500 μg/m3 |
Zheng et al., 2021185 | Integrated data from satellite-retrieved aerosol optical depth, chemical transport modelling, and ground monitor data. |
PM2.5 - 2.4-5.9μg/m3 |
| Zhang et al., 2008130 | China (111) |
Defined by the Population Census | China Health Statistical Yearbook | All-cause mortality CVD hospitalisation Chronic bronchitis Acute bronchitis Respiratory hospitalisation Asthma attack Outpatient visits (internal medicine) Outpatient visits (paediatric) |
China Health Statistical Yearbook157 (Provincial level) |
2004 | PM10 | SEPAC186 | ERF reported130 | - | - | PM10 - 40μg/m3 |
| Malashock et al., 2022133 | Global (12,946) |
Population of ≥0.05 million and ≥ 1500 inhabitants per km2, or built up area of at least 50% and town population between 20000-50000183 | European Commission’s Joint Research Centre183 | Attributable cause-specific mortality | GBD 201926 (National level) |
2000-2019 | Ozone ((∼0·0083°)2 /1km2) |
OSDMA8187 | Respiratory mortality- 1.06 per 10 ppb ozone |
Turner et al., 2016188 | - | Ozone- 32.4 ppb188 (∼63.5μg/m3) |
| Guan et al., 2022189 | China (338) |
Defined by the Population Census | China Health Statistical Yearbook | All-cause mortality Respiratory mortality COPD mortality |
GBD Study 2017164 (Provincial level) |
2015-2020 | Ozone NO2 (0.25°×0.25°) |
China National Environmental Monitoring Centre135 | - | Anenberg et al., 2018190 Huangfu and Atkinson 2020150 |
- | WHO 2021 guidelines191 |
| Maji et al., 2019192 | China (338) |
Defined by the Population Census | China Health Statistical Yearbook157 | CVD mortality Respiratory mortality |
GBD Study 2016160 (Provincial level) |
2016 | Ozone | China National Environmental Monitoring Centre135 | Respiratory mortality- 1.04 (1.013 - 1.067) per 20mg/m3 increase CV mortality- 1.01 (1 - 1.2) per 20mg/m3increase |
Jerrett et al., 2009193 | - | Ozone- 75.2μg/m3 (∼38.34 ppb) |
| Mead et al., 2006134 | China (95) |
Defined by the Population Census | China Environmental Yearbook | Non-accident mortality | Author derived (City-level) |
2001 | NO2 SO2 TSP |
China Environmental Yearbook | NO2- 1.012 and 1.008 SO2- 1.0188 TSP- 1.013 |
- | - | NO2-80 and 40μg/m3 SO2- 60 and 50μg/m3 TSP- 200 and 90μg/m3 |
| Anenberg et al., 2022123 | Global (13,189) |
Defined by Global Human Settlement Model grid | European Commission’s Joint Research Centre183 | Paediatric asthma incidence | GBD 2019 study26 (National level) |
1990-2019 | NO2 ((∼0·0083°)2 /1km2) |
Adjusted existing model (Larkin et al., 2017194) | 1.26 (1.1-1.37) per 10 ppb annual average increase |
Achakulwisut et al., 2019195 | LUR model (100m2) | NO2 - < 2 ppb (∼3.78μg/m3) |
| Song et al., 2023142 | Global (13,189) |
Defined by Global Human Settlement Model grid | European Commission’s Joint Research Centre183 | All-cause mortality | GBD 2019 study26 (City-level) |
2019 | NO2 (1km2) |
Dataset from Anenberg et al., 2022123 | 1.047 (1.023-1.072) per 10 ppb increase |
Stieb et al., 2021196 | LUR model123 | 10μg/m3 (∼5.32 ppb) |
| Barboza et al., 202147 | Europe (978) |
Local administrative boundaries, with ≥50,000 inhabitants85 | Urban Audit137 | Natural-cause mortality (rate per 100 000 and YLL) |
Eurostat192 (City-level) |
2015 | NDVI %GA (250m2) |
US Geological Survey (MODIS MOD13Q1)78 European Urban Atlas129 |
%GA–0.99 (0.98-1.01) for every 10% increase in GA NDVI–0.96 (0.94-0.97) for every 0.1 unit increase in green exposure |
Gascon et al., 2016193 Rojas-Rueda et al., 2019194 |
- | %GA– 25% GA within 300m of residence Target NDVI estimated per city40 |
| Iungman et al., 202339 | Europe (93) |
Local administrative boundaries, with ≥50,000 inhabitants93 | Urban Audit143 | All-cause mortality (rate per 100 000 and YLL) |
Eurostat197 (City-level) |
2015 | Heat (UHI) (100m2) Tree cover density (250m2) |
Copernicus Urban Climate dataset198 Copernicus tree coverage199 |
City and age-specific ERFs; supplementary46 | Masselot et al., 2023121 | - | Day-time UHI-0.6ºC Night-time UHI- 1.9ºC Tree coverage: 25%, 30%, 40% |
| Masselot et al., 2023121 | Europe (854) |
Local administrative boundaries, with ≥50,000 inhabitants93 | Urban Audit143 | All-cause mortality Non-accidental causes of mortality |
Eurostat144 MCC Collaborative Research Network83 (City-level) |
2000-2020d | Extreme heat Extreme cold (9km2) |
ERA5-Land dataset99 | City and age-specific ERFs; see supplementary121 | Masselot et al., 2023121 | - | - |
| Khomenko et al., 20226 | Europe (724) | Local administrative boundaries, with ≥50,000 inhabitants93 | Urban Audit143 | High noise annoyance IHD (rate per 100 000 and YLL) |
Guski et al., 2017200 Eurostat144 (City-level) |
2015 | Road traffic noise (250m) |
Environmental Noise Directive201 | IHD-1.05 (0.97-1.13) per 10dB increase |
Van Kempen et al., 2018202 | Country-specific prediction models (250m2) using ordered logistic regression for aggregated data. | 53dB |
Abbreviations: Years of life lost (YLL); Effects of low-level air pollution: a study in Europe (ELAPSE); Land Use Regression (LUR); Screening for High Emission Reduction Potentials for Air Quality (SHERPA); European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme for Transboundary Long-Range Transported Air Pollutants Meteorological Synthesizing Centre-West (EMEP MSC-W); Ischaemic heart disease (IHD); Chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (COPD); Global Health Data Exchange (GHDx); Cardiovascular disease (CVD); Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs); Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD); State Environmental Protection Administration of China (SEPAC); Total suspended particles (TSP); Normalised differential vegetation index (NDVI); Terra Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Vegetation Indices (MOD13Q1); Urban heat island (UHI).
Spatial scale denotes the finest level of analysed health data. Resolution scale denotes the grid-cell level the exposures were estimated at, when reported.
ERF source used to calculate relative risk.
Age-specific RR calculated for each grid cell PM2.5 concentration not reported, available from the authors upon request.
Average taken from 20-year time series and therefore was not a trend analysis.
3.1. Urban form and health
Many studies that assessed urban form employed urban form metrics at city-level, namely: population density49,50,51,52, fragmentation53,50, sprawl21, built-up area53,21, compact development54, intersection density53, and mass transit infrastructure49,53. Fewer studies explored spatial observations and patterns within-city level52,54,55.
Health outcomes included long-term and short-term outcomes; long-term outcomes encompassed non-communicable diseases, cancer-related mortality, infant mortality, and mental distress, whilst short-term outcomes were violence-related and unintentional injury-related mortality (Table 3). The only urban form studies to include social and demographic variables in analyses were conducted in Latin America and employed the social environment index, which comprises area-level measures of education attainment, access to water and sewage facilities, and overcrowding50,53. Higher values indicate more favourable social conditions and a higher quality of life.
Findings suggest that lower city fragmentation, high population density, high connectivity, and higher rates of public transportation have positive impacts on health and reducing premature mortality49,53,55,56. Car-centric urban planning55 was reported to have adverse effects on health, whilst in Africa greater sprawling cities were shown to have higher energy demands52. City size was identified as the most critical variable for influencing urban sprawl with round and compact city designs generally more advantageous52. Another African-based study conducted spatial analysis of four urban form variables in an effort to classify cities based on urbanisation dynamics51. Prieto-Curiel et al. developed a systematic approach to capture and delineate the spatial interactions between variables of city size, market potential, level of urbanisation, and local dominance; the latter indicates city size in relation to adjacent agglomerations51. Results showed diverse and distinct interactions of spatial variables, finding this to impact the rate of urban growth, the emergence of new agglomerations, and the clustering of cities. In another classification study, Taubenböck et al. utilised remote sensing and cluster analysis to classify 1500 cities worldwide into seven distinct types54. Findings highlighted the issue of spatial-morphological inequality, where the shape of cities was shown to be critical in shaping functional and social aspects of urban living, and 30% of sparsely built areas were found to accommodate 10% of the total population. Illustrating the complexity of urban form, a global study spanning 24 years found sprawl to strongly correlate with human development index (HDI), which comprises life expectancy, educational attainment, and standard of living (measured by gross national income (GNI) per capita); cities characterised by extensive urban sprawl exhibited high values of HDI21. Between 1990 and 2014, Europe was identified as the continent with the highest degree of urban sprawl and had the highest sprawl rate, increasing by 51% since 199021.
3.2. Urban environmental health
Urban studies that investigated the exposure pathway to health in general followed an ecological (10, ∼15%) or cross-sectional study design (6, ∼9%), with a minority encompassing modelling studies (2, ∼3%), or meta-analysis (1, ∼1.5%) (Table 3). Certain studies adjusted for population demographic characteristics in their analyses, such as household income57, income inequality58, self-rated health55, educational attainment49, and race and ethnicity57. Seven studies (∼11%) directly examined the modification effect of socioeconomic status (SES) on the association between the urban environment and health, applying gross-domestic product (GDP) per capita59,60,61, GINI coefficient58,61, or GNI per capita62. In all studies that performed stratified analyses of socioeconomic (SE) and demographics variables, aggregate data were applied at city-level.
3.2.1. Urban form and air pollution
Studies consistently reported significant proportions of urban populations to be exposed to ambient pollution that exceeded WHO 200510,59,63,64 and 202160,65 guidelines. Findings from Latin America showed 85% of the study population exposed to ambient nitrogen dioxide (NO2) concentrations and 58% exposed to PM2.5 levels that exceeded WHO guidelines59,60,. Whilst Anderson et al. reported all the 5625 African cities under study failed to meet WHO 2005 clean air guidelines10.
The relation between city size, higher population density, and pollutant concentrations was somewhat inconsistent. A Latin American study reported larger population size was associated with higher annual mean PM2.5, whilst higher population density was positively associated with lower levels of PM2.5 in a separate univariate model59. Another Latin American study reported denser and more congested cities to have higher NO2 and PM2.5 concentrations, owing to higher motorisation rates and congestion60. The same study reported highest variability in NO2 population exposure was within cities and an increase in green space at neighbourhood level, rather than city-level, was associated with lower local levels of NO260. Interestingly, Rezaei & Millard-Ball observed cities with greater density exhibited reduced per capita PM2.5 transportation emissions; however, increased exposure was noted due to the population residing in closer proximity to emission sources62. Authors noted greater variation in emission exposure between income groups, as opposed to urban form metrics and income where no significant correlations were found. Another study found higher city GDP per capita and higher intersection density correlated with elevated levels of PM2.559. The only study to include educational attainment in analyses found population groups of higher educational attainment were exposed to higher NO2 concentrations60.
3.2.2. Urban form and temperature
Studies that assessed the relationship between urban form, temperature, and health mainly focused on the impact of non-optimal temperatures on premature and cardiovascular-related mortality58,66,67. In Europe, lower minimum mortality temperature (MMT) positively correlated with lower GDP per capita; for example, spatially close cities of Austria (Vienna) and Slovakia (Bratislava) exhibited MMTs of 20.5°C and 18.4°C and GDP per capita of 29,301 and 11,348, respectively61. A Latin American study found the GINI coefficient, indicative of income inequality, was the sole modifier that showed a statistically significant association with all-age MMT58. Cities exhibiting the highest income inequality experienced a mortality rate 3.45% higher than those in the lowest tertile of income inequality58. For ages 65 years and older, increased levels of poverty and residential segregation were linked to higher cold MMT58. Of note, there were higher deaths associated with cold, 5.09% out of 5.75% non-optimal temperature attributable deaths at all ages, compared to 0.67% deaths associated with heat58. Zhou et al. found city size and compactness to have the strongest influence on UHI intensities, concluding small to medium sized cities were most effective in alleviating UHI68.
3.2.3. Urban form and green space
Generally, studies found the health benefits of urban green space to depend upon the distribution within a city57,62,69. Reported health benefits included lower levels of obesity57,69, mental health disorders57, and lower pollutant levels10,67. Across African cities, linear econometric models predicted the impact of increasing green space cover by at least 25% and found this would reduce PM2.5 to moderately safe levels (12 - 35.4μg/m3)10. Evidence varied on whether the type of green space had an effect on benefits. Olsen et al. explored a range of land uses and the impacts at individual and aggregate city-level across European cities and found relatively wild green space (constituting agricultural, wetlands, and semi-natural areas) was associated with lower standardised mortality rate70. Another study found a significant correlation between poor mental health and greenness and between obesity and tree cover, reporting no significant relationships between greenness and obesity, or between tree cover and mental health57. A notable strength of Browning et al.’s study was the inclusion of moderation tests for exploring effect modification, analysing sociodemographic variables and urban sprawl (defined by population density, the percentage who drive to work, and residential density). When adjusting for spatial and confounding variables, population density (-0.15, -0.17), physical inactivity (0.65, 0.67), median age (-0.11, -0.11), and income (-0.98, -0.95) were significantly associated with obesity (reported β coefficients are for greenness and tree cover, respectively). Whilst median income (-0.85, -0.86) and physical inactivity (0.21, 0.2) were significantly associated with poor mental health57.
Although evidence was mixed, urban form characteristics of denser housing70, higher population density71, and more compact cities10 generally showed a negative association with green space availability. Aiming to advance predictions of the benefits of increasing green space, Marando et al. developed a model that simulated the microclimate regulation of urban green infrastructure across European cities72. To lower temperatures by 1°C in urban areas, a minimum tree cover of 16% was required. Of the Functional Urban Areas (FUAs) studied in Europe, 32% (192 FUAs) had tree cover below 16%. A global review by McDonald et al. explored how urban areas can achieve both population density and green space and found a 10% increase in density was associated with 2.9% decline in tree cover72. Interestingly, the reported negative correlation was weakest when explored at neighbourhood level compared to city-level, suggesting some neighbourhoods achieved more tree canopy than was expected based on population density. Supportive findings by Anderson et al. observed variation between cities in the magnitude of cooling benefits from green space and attributed this to different distributions of green space within cities10. Cities with the same availability of green space (20%) but different levels of proximity experienced varying cooling effects during a heat wave, 55% of one city’s population was estimated to benefit in contrast to 16% of another city’s population10.
3.2.4. Urban form and transport and mobility
Bassolas et al. developed a metric that quantifies the hierarchical organisation of urban mobility, considered a proxy for urban inhabitants’ needs being met73 (Table A1 in Appendix). Weekly trip flow information of 300 million people in 301 global cities was aggregated into weighted networks to identify hotspots of activity at spatial resolution of ∼1.27km2 and city-level. The varied spatial distribution patterns of hotspots captured differences in city organisation, permitting inferences of the effects of urban structure on transportation (mode share), pollutant emissions, and health outcomes (ischaemic stroke mortality and fatal traffic injuries). Greater urban mobility was attributed to more population mixing (Pearson’s coefficient (R2P) = 0.21, Spearman’s coefficient (R2S) = 0.24), extensive use of public transportation (R2P = 0.45, R2S = 0.39), higher levels of walkability (R2P = 0.47, R2S = 0.58), and better health outcomes (ischaemic stroke mortality rate per 100,000 inhabitants: R2P = 0.31, R2S = 0.26, fatal traffic injuries: R2P = 0.34 and R2S = 0.33). Another study that applied advanced techniques of remote sensing and global geospatial data identified nine global city types by modularity analysis74. The poorest performing cities for road traffic injuries were characterised by sparse and irregular shapes with large blocks, whereas the best performing city types were characterised by high rates of public transportation. Road traffic injury burden of 9.6 million DALYs were attributed to suboptimal urban design74.
3.3. Health impact assessment
Of the 45 urban environmental health studies, 25 applied a HIA methodology. All the HIAs followed a comparative risk assessment (CRA) approach, with all but one HIA121 assessing the potential health impacts under an alternative scenario (i.e., counterfactual)38. To effectively examine the different HIA methodologies employed, this section is structured as follows: environmental exposures, population and health data, exposure response functions (ERFs) and counterfactual scenarios, and summary of findings.
3.3.1. Environmental exposures
Almost 85% of the HIAs (21) analysed the health impacts from air pollution. Of these HIAs, eight obtained pollution exposure data from the common data repository of China National Environmental Monitoring Centre122, two utilised a dataset produced by Anenberg et al.123, and the remainder obtained estimates from emission inventories124,125,126,127,128,129,130 or from air pollution models (e.g., land use regression models, EMEP MSC-W chemical transport model, and SHERPA tool)5,131,132,133 (Table 4). The majority of HIAs that focused on air pollution analysed PM2.5 as the environmental exposure (14, ∼56%), followed by ozone (8, ∼32%), NO2 (7, 28%) and particulate matter diameter 10μm (PM10) (2, 8%) with one study assessing carbon dioxide (CO2)131 and one sulphur dioxide (SO2) and total suspended particles (TSP)134. Of the 25 HIAs, eight (32%) assessed temporal trends in air pollution, the longest trend assessed global NO2-attributable paediatric asthma incidence across 29 years123.
Of the four HIAs that analysed alternative environmental exposures, two assessed temperature health impacts48,135, obtaining temperature records from ERA5-Land dataset (100m2)48 and Copernicus UrbClim model application (100m2)135; one assessed green space49 by normalised differential vegetation index (NDVI) and percentage of green area (%GA), obtained from the US Geological Survey89 and European Urban Atlas136 (250m2); and one estimated the impact of road traffic noise6. Of the strategic noise maps acquired from the Environmental Noise Directive and local sources ∼83% were considered low or moderate quality. Masselot et al. was the only HIA to analyse both extreme heat and extreme cold115.
3.3.2. Population and health data
Similar city population data sources were applied based on the country HIAs were conducted in. For HIAs conducted in China, the National Bureau of Statistics of China was a common population data depository; all HIAs conducted in Europe (6, 24%) utilised the Urban Audit, whilst Global HIAs obtained population estimates from European Commission’s Joint Research Centre or the Centre for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN) (Table 4). Health data were generally obtained at national or provincial-level and applied to city-level; two HIAs in China128,134 and all HIAs conducted in Europe utilised city-level health data.
A diverse range of health outcomes were analysed, with each HIA examining between one and 24 health outcomes (Table 4). Mortality outcomes were a key focus, encompassing categories of all-cause mortality (14, 56%), cause-specific mortality (8, 32%), natural-cause mortality (3, 12%), and specific morbidity-related mortality (6, 24%). Mortality estimates mostly obtained from the Global Burden of Disease study137. Units ranged from total death counts, mortality rate per 100,000, DALYs and Years of Life Lost. Beyond morbidity and mortality, additional health outcomes included attributable hospital admissions, symptom onset, and high noise annoyance130,6. Notably, the majority of HIAs assessed health impacts in adults. Only two HIAs (8%) assessed health outcomes in children, focusing on premature paediatric mortality123 and asthma attack, respiratory symptoms, and bronchodilator usage132.
3.3.3. Exposure response functions and counterfactual scenarios
The most common sources of ERF were from epidemiological literature. Two HIAs obtained ERF estimates from local cohort studies, whilst one HIA estimated ERFs by atmospheric modelling with integrated risk function based on six meta-analyses129. Only one HIA developed their own ERFs121, and these were applied in another HIA to estimate UHI impacts46. Masselot et al. employed a three-stage modelling framework that applied daily time series temperature and mortality data, age-specific mortality, and composite indices of vulnerability to produce age- and city-specific ERFs121. The composite index of vulnerability was developed from distributed lag non-linear and meta-regression models and incorporated city size, proximity to green and blue space, and SE inequalities121. In general, ERFs were applied homogeneously to the adult study population. Exceptions included acute lower respiratory infection-specific ERF to infants under five years132, city-specific and age group-specific ERFs for temperature46,121, and morbidity- and health endpoint-specific ERFs132,138,127,130. There was variation in counterfactuals applied. Of the 13 HIAs (25%) that analysed health risk of PM2.5 exposure, five applied the same counterfactual 10μg/m3 based on the 2005 WHO guideline, whilst three applied the 2021 guideline of 5μg/m3126,128,129. For air pollution, counterfactuals ranged: for PM2.5 2.4 - 35μg/m3 126,139; ozone 54 - 160μg/m3 139,140; NO2 ∼3.78 - 80μg/m3 and PM10 5.8 - 40μg/m3130,132. Two studies applied Chinese ambient air quality standards (CAAQS) as counterfactual scenarios130,134, whereas Khomenko et al.’s study was the only one to apply the lowest measured concentration in the dataset as an additional counterfactual concentration5. Barboza et al. based counterfactuals on the WHO recommendation of universal access to green space (i.e., equal opportunity to access) within 300 m of residence, applying counterfactuals of 25% GA within 300m of residence and a target NDVI modelled for each city47. Another HIA based in Europe estimated the mortality burden attributable to UHI by applying city-specific counterfactuals of exposure level scenarios without an UHI effect and estimated the impact on mortality by increasing tree coverage to 25%, 30%, and 40%131. The only study to focus on road traffic noise health impacts applied WHO recommendation of 53dB, which remains the current guideline6.
3.3.4. Summary of findings
Global HIAs consistently reported cities in southeast Asian countries to experience the greatest pollutant concentrations and attributable health impacts worldwide129,131,141,142. Inconsistent findings from HIAs conducted across the same years 2015 and 2020 in China reported ozone-related impacts increased by ∼95% (5.05 x106 DALYs) and 96% (7.64 x105 DALYs) for all-cause and respiratory mortality139, respectively, in contrast to ozone-attributable impacts reported to increase by 17% for all-cause mortality (133,415 deaths in 2015 to 156,173 deaths in 2020) and 17% for respiratory mortality (28,614 deaths in 2015 to 33,456 deaths in 2020). For NO2, a global HIA reported highest NO2-attributable deaths in South Asia (75,397 deaths) and Eastern Europe (46,840 deaths)142. Whereas within Europe, Khomenko et al. reported the highest NO2 mortality burden was in Western and Southern European capital cities and applied local-level mortality rates; highest burden cities were Madrid (Spain), Antwerp (Belgium), and Turin (Italy)5.
Temporal trend HIAs revealed declining trends in PM2.5 concentrations and attributable mortality in China and globally126,128. Southerland et al. reported the largest absolute decrease in mean urban population-weighted PM2.5 concentration between 2000 and 2019 was in Africa, decreasing by 18%129. However, in certain regions, such as Luanda (Angola), there was an increase in PM2.5 concentrations and directional trends did not consistently align with trends in attributable mortality rates (an observation potentially explained by reported population growth). Another global temporal HIA covering 2000-2019 reported South and East Asia accounted for the highest proportion of global population ozone-attributable mortality in 2019, followed by Eastern Europe. However, this HIA reported divergent trends within South and East Asia; population-weighted ozone concentrations and mortality rates increased across all cities in South Asia, and decreased across all cities in East Asia141.
Additional insights from temporal trend analyses were the contribution of HIA parameters to health impact estimates. For ozone-attributed mortality, key global drivers were ozone concentrations and population, and for a few regions changes in baseline disease rates141. For PM2.5-attributed mortality, changes in population growth and population ageing were the primary drivers in all regions129. For specific cities across Africa, the Eastern Mediterranean, and Southeast Asia, changes in baseline disease rates had the largest impact. Conversely, in the Western Pacific, the Americas, and Europe, reductions in PM2.5 concentrations outweighed the influence of baseline disease rates129.
In addition to regional variation in exposure attributable health burden, there was heterogeneity among cities and age groups. In Europe, cities in Northern Italy were amongst cities with the highest mortality burden despite Italy not placing highest for PM2.5-attributed mortality burden in country-level estimates5. Similarly in Europe, Barboza et al. reported 42,698 and 17,947 annual deaths could be prevented by increasing NDVI and %GA, respectively, and found unequal distribution of NDVI and %GA among and within cities47. The only HIA to assess the impacts of non-optimal temperatures reported large variability in vulnerability across Europe121. The highest vulnerability was found in eastern European cities during extreme cold and heat and in age groups of over 85 years, which contributed over 60% to the total mortality burden. Annual excess deaths of 203,620 deaths (129 per 100,000 person years) were attributed to cold temperatures and 20,173 annual excess deaths (13 per 100,000 person years) attributed to heat. Iungman et al. found that increasing tree coverage to 30% can reduce city temperatures by 0.4°C and prevent almost 40% (2644 premature deaths) of 6700 premature UHI-attributable deaths46. The only study to examine the effects of noise on health reported 11 million adults, of the estimated 60 million exposed to road traffic noise, to experience significant annoyance and 3608 IHD-deaths could have been prevented if compliance with WHO recommendations were achieved6. City comparative analysis was not possible due to inconsistencies in noise mapping methods.
3.4. Indicators
Identified indicators covered the key themes of this review: urban form, air pollution, temperature, green space, noise, and transport and mobility; in addition to climate change mitigation, which encompassed indicators of greenhouse gas emissions and climate change impact on trees. The indicators identified and methods employed, in addition to geographical coverage, spatial resolution, and data sources, are detailed in Table A1 of the Appendix. There was heterogeneity in spatial resolution of indicators; the greatest variation was amongst air pollution indicators, which ranged from 0.01° resolution to the coarsest resolution of NUTS3 level, a territorial unit defined by the European Commission Urban Audit that typically encompasses districts or boroughs203 (Table A1).
As part of a Lancet series on urban design, transport and health204, Boeing et al. developed an open-source framework with urban spatial indicators for measuring walkability and public transport access205. A total of 25 global cities were compared to elucidate the optimal urban design for promoting active travel35. Applying the developed walkability index, Boeing et al. found compact cities had better walkability, whereas the worst performing cities for active travel were concentrated in more sprawled cities in high-income countries (HIC), such as Australia and the United States, consistent with previous findings21,206. To add to the utility of these indicators, Cerin et al. sought to provide evidence-informed thresholds207. To meet the physical activity criteria of urban inhabitants having at least 80% probability of engaging in walking for transport, and WHO’s target of at least 15% relative reduction in insufficient physical activity through walking208, neighbourhood targets associated with meeting one or both criteria were identified as: 5700 people per km2, 100 intersections per km2, and 25 public transport stops per km2. Curvilinear associations of population, street intersection, and public transport densities with walking revealed less than a quarter of the studied population lived in neighbourhoods that reached these thresholds, with observed between-city differences; cities in Latin American upper-middle-income countries performed better than those in HIC. Another transport and mobility indicator that aimed to measure how conducive the urban environment is to active transport was the extent of bicycle network in a city209. Akande et al. utilised the UNECE-ITU Smart Sustainable Cities Framework to rank 28 European capital cities based on 32 sustainability indicators covering the thematic areas of economy, environment, and society and culture210. Berlin (Germany) was ranked the most smart and sustainable city; indicators of bicycle network, wastewater treatment, and e-commerce had the greatest impact on ranking. Conversely, Sofia (Bulgaria) and Bucharest (Romania) were the lowest ranked cities, rankings were most influenced by indicators PM10 emissions and protected terrestrial area (Table A1). Other novel indicators of urban form included access to urban services and amenities, considered proxies for opportunities and living standards within cities211,205.
Climate change mitigation indicators have the potential to advance understanding of how cities contribute to climate change, forecast impacts, and potential mitigation strategies. One indicator depicted the percentage change in greenhouse gas emissions between 2000 and 2020 at city-level, disaggregated by pollutant and sector (e.g., agriculture from livestock, soils, and waste burning, industry, residential, commercial, and off- and on-road transportation)211; in addition to a 20-year global warming potential and total emission summaries for 2000 and 2020 (Table A1). Pertinent to climate change urban mitigation strategies, the average annual greenhouse gas net flux from trees (per hectare of city area) was provided for a 21-year period, 2000 to 2021 (Table A1). This is complimented by an indicator of the same global coverage, which estimated the percentage of urban built-up land absent of tree cover211. Related temperature indicators included the percentage of built-up land with low surface reflectivity211. This enables identification of areas within a city that exhibit low solar reflectivity and thereby could derive significant benefit from the implementation of tree planting and green spaces.
Departing from commonly applied green space indicators that measure NDVI and %GA, novel methods for analysing green space included accessibility, quality, level of urban biodiversity, and the relation between green space and inequality (Table A1). Battiston & Schifanella developed a composite index for green space accessibility and exposed variation between-city levels; cities in Europe and Australia-Oceania had higher green space accessibility compared to regions in low- and middle-income countries and North America212. The index’ sensitivity to parameterisation was evident from adjustment of metrics, such as level of inequality (defined by the GINI coefficient), resulting in different area rankings of green space accessibility. Complimentary work has aimed to quantify green space accessibility based on quality, defined as “high-amenity nature”213. Ranking cities by amenity of accessible nature revealed higher population densities, although living generally further from nature, live closer to high-amenity nature compared to residents of lower urban population densities. Further advances for analysing green space were illustrated by Stowell et al. who applied cloud computing technology and analysis of remote sensing data to produce an urban greenness indicator dataset (measured by population-weighted peak and annual mean NDVI). Although an NDVI metric is not novel, 1000 global cities were classified based on level of greenness, climate zone, and HDI for the years of 2010, 2015, and 2020, which allows for temporal tracking of urban greenness– an attribute not available in other reviewed indicators214 (Table A1).
4. Discussion
The purpose of this review was to synthesise evidence from large-scale urban studies that focused on the relation between urban structures, environmental exposures, and health and to identify future opportunities for urban health research. To achieve this, the research questions we sought to address were: what methodologies were applied in urban form, transport and mobility, and urban environmental health studies from 2003 to 2023? What are novel methods and indicators within urban environmental health research? What knowledge gaps necessitate further exploration?
Key findings from this review confirm the complex, intricate relation between the urban environment and health. This is evidenced from the discordant impacts from urban form variables on exposures and health. For example, compactness52,54, high population density49,50,51,52, green space57,62,69,47, and extensive public transportation and active travel infrastructure49,53,73,207 were found to have a multitude of benefits, which promote health and well-being73,205,207. Conversely, increasing density and compactness were associated with the trade-offs of reduced green space10,71, accentuated UHI46,68, and higher pollutant concentrations and exposure from congestion59,60. Urban sprawl and fragmented city shapes were generally reported to have negative implications for city liveability54 and health50,53. This pertains to the ‘15-minute city’ model, wherein all essential amenities for the urban residents’ needs, such as health, socialisation and culture, are accessible by walking or cycling within a 15-minute radius215. The strong correlation between urban sprawl and HDI could indicate sprawl has positive ramifications, owed to HDI incorporating life expectancy, educational attainment, and gross national income per capita21. Urban scaling laws offer a partial explanation, as linear urban scaling delineates that larger cities generate higher wages216, consistent with findings of city size being the most influencing factor for urban sprawl52. Spatial analysis of urban form characteristics by Prieto-Curiel et al. demonstrated concomitant analysis is critical for understanding how urban shape and structures affect the functional and social aspects of urban living51.
An important inference from reviewed literature is the distinction between exposure and vulnerability, as certain less-exposed groups may have heightened vulnerability to the exposure under study. For example, sophisticated methods employed by Masselot et al. found the highest vulnerability to extreme cold and heat was in age groups of over 85 years121. Differential risk levels from extreme temperatures based on gender have been illustrated elsewhere, women aged 65 years and above and men below 65 years showed the highest vulnerability to hot temperatures217. In Europe, groups of lower SES had lower MMT61, whilst in Latin America higher levels of poverty and income inequality were associated with all-age MMT and higher cold MMT58. Inequality-driven variation in exposure levels was also present; reduced access to green space and therefore increased PM2.5-exposure was reported in lower income groups62.
4.1. What methodologies were applied in urban form, transport and mobility, and urban environmental health studies from 2003 to 2023?
There was heterogeneity across studies in methodologies, indicators, and city boundaries (Table 3 and 4). Sub-city units can vary in size and composition, and therefore, the boundaries of urban agglomerations can have a considerable effect on results, creating a potential bias towards larger cities10. Harmonised city definitions are a key challenge and may have contributed to contrasting results. To achieve cooling effects of urban green in Europe, tree cover of at least 16% was estimated to achieve a reduction of 1°C72, whilst an HIA study estimated 30% tree cover would be required to reduce temperatures by 0.4°C46. Iungman et al. employed a city-level model46, whilst Marando et al. utilised FUAs72, which encompass the surrounding community zone and suburban areas218. Approaches to defining cities of the reviewed studies were based upon administrative boundaries5, functional definitions that rely on travel patterns and economic connections72, or morphological approaches that create shapes based on the extent of built-up or urbanised areas62; the choice of definition typically depends upon research objectives. An operational city definition independent of context specificity would improve meaningful comparisons and transparency among studies.
The prevailing study design applied was cross-sectional or ecological (Table 3), which reflects a wider challenge in the field of requiring longitudinal studies and thus more robust causal inferences of the relation between urban design and health219. This has further implications that the exposure-response relationships may be limited and therefore captured in analyses. For example, the link between urban land use, transport and mortality, and health is conceptually well understood; however, it lacks comprehensive quantitative evidence15.
In addition, the exposures under study may not fully capture population exposure. In urban environmental health studies focused on green space, proximity was the primary exposure variable analysed. Exploration of the frequency220 that urban residents visit green space, potential variation in access between demographic subgroups220, and the quality and amenity can augment the understanding of population exposure and attributable health impacts. Research examining spatial inequalities in quality and accessibility of green space consistently report residents of more deprived neighbourhoods experience longer travel time to access green areas221,222. In Brussels (Belgium), area-based deprivation levels were associated with reduced satisfaction and authors identified factors that influence the use of green space, such as positive attributes of tranquillity and cleanliness and negative attributes of noise and lack of facilities221. Further, none of the reviewed air pollutant studies explored indoor air pollution. Although often present at low concentrations, long-term exposure to indoor air pollutants can pose significant risk to human health223. Given that people spend the majority of their time indoors, incorporation of indoor pollutant exposure estimates would ensure predicted health impacts are comprehensive and effectively advance the understanding of the magnitude of this exposure pathway. Novel materials for sensors, indoor air pollution-monitoring systems, and smart homes show promise for advancing exposure and impact estimations of indoor air quality223.
In comparison to the other study designs employed, the HIA methodology can present distinct advantages; however, equally have distinct challenges. Within China, divergent estimates of ozone-attributable impacts for all-cause and respiratory mortality highlight the sensitivity of methodological choices139,140. These respective studies applied the largest difference in counterfactuals of pollutant HIAs reviewed; Guan et al.139 estimated impacts relative to 160μg/m3 whereas Zhang et al.140 applied counterfactual of 54μg/m3. This may partially explain varied findings and highlights the significance of counterfactual scenario choices, in addition to the difficulty in study comparisons when different health outcomes are assessed (e.g., DALYs vs. deaths). Further, models used to calculate pollutant exposure levels are generally built using data representative of the average exposure and thus extremes in concentration response relationships are poorly understood. Investigation on the significance and choice of counterfactual scenarios was beyond the scope of this review; however, it highlights an important conjecture when conducting HIAs and interpreting results.
Additional insights from temporal trend HIAs were the ability to track impact over time and identify impact drivers of policies and exposure level changes. This can introduce the methodological challenge of the sensitivity ascribed to chosen years. Of the eight temporal studies, three included the year 2020 and thus the COVID-19 pandemic is likely to have influenced exposure levels and impact estimates139,140,189. Whilst estimates of temperature-attributed health impact will be largely affected by a particularly hot year being included in analyses. Advances in available indicators that permit temporal tracking will improve the accuracy of temporal estimates and help mitigate this constraint. The only identified indicator that included temporal tracking was for green space availability, which may be particularly useful in understanding climate change resilience of different urban green types214.
4.2. What are novel methods and indicators within urban environmental health research?
The importance of studying local variance of environmental exposures and health impacts was illustrated and new methods and indicators show promise to this advancement. African cities with the same availability of green space were found to experience varying cooling effects during heat waves10. This was ascribed to varied distributions of green space within cities, suggesting availability is not the same as proximity and quality. This inference was corroborated by Barboza et al. whose sensitivity analyses suggested population distribution within cities influenced local differences of green space-attributable health impacts47. To achieve a balance of dense and green cities, future research analysing the cooling effects of urban tree cover should consider the effects of climate change and urban green resilience224. The greatest environmental benefits are considered to be provided by long-stature, mature trees and thus this is an important consideration for the time required and potential impact of climate change and UHI mitigation strategies224. Novel green space indicators of green space quality213, level of amenity209, and urban biodiversity211 offer to advance this understanding. The latter may improve understanding of the ecological quality and species-richness; greater biodiversity closer to residence requires large urban connected patches and offers positive benefits on mental health and well-being10.
The emergence of cutting-edge technologies225,226 and advances in remote sensing and geospatial data sources present significant opportunities to enhance the comprehension of intricate urban health phenomena and the identification of key elements for sustainable urban design47,219. These advancements hold the potential to address challenges related to diverse urban form metrics and definitions by leveraging geospatial data sources. These sources can improve the accuracy of population-weighted averages for obtaining overall urban metrics or enable the disaggregation of cities into neighbourhoods, thus facilitating better harmonisation. A key challenge will be effective translation of vast quantities of remote sensing and other spatial data sources into interpretable evidence of the complex spatial interactions219; however, deep learning algorithms offer a promising solution to this challenge, through techniques such as semantic segmentation227.
Further applications of spatial data science and artificial-intelligent (AI)-driven tools for supporting sustainable urban development include agent-based modelling (ABM)228 and machine learning algorithms225. Motieyan et al. utilised an ABM to simulate the implementation of superblocks, an urban model that prioritises public space for active transport and leisure and minimises motorised traffic229. By incorporating individual “agents” diverse behavioural patterns of local citizens were simulated which enabled anticipation of public opinion and acceptance of superblock implementation. Machine learning algorithms are enhancing predictions of environmental exposures, through methods such as integration of urban morphology data (e.g., topography and building height) into air quality forecasts230. Woo Oh et al. trained deep learning models using meteorological data and urban texture factors (e.g., surface albedo) to develop temporal- and spatial-UHI models231. The temporal UHI model that quantified the number of UHI hours rather than intensity, was found to be a better predictor of seasonal UHI predictions and therefore improved estimations of attributable heat-related mortality231. Future urban research is likely to combine and harmonise data from various scales and sources, and leverage Spatial Data Science and AI-driven technologies to gain a more comprehensive understanding of urban dynamics, challenges and solutions.
4.3. What knowledge gaps necessitate further exploration?
A minority of studies included SE and demographic variables in analyses; however, observations from those that did confirm social determinants are an important avenue of future urban environmental health research. This would advance understanding of whether distinct urban form types can mitigate inequalities. Further, investigating inequalities within cities is particularly important in light of the limited knowledge of vulnerability drivers responsible for across city variation. These differences can be important; for example, differences in air pollution-attributable health burden are mostly due to differential levels of pollutants and can partly be explained by the pollutant chemical compositions232, whereas for other drivers, such as temperature, differences can be due to the level of vulnerability and resilience of the population233.
The paucity of demographic and SE data available at local-level was a commonly cited reason for not examining between population-group differences. This dearth of data both impedes the identification of health disparities and undermines the formulation of targeted and effective public health strategies for vulnerable populations. This is reflected in the literature from the limited evidence on gender-specific outcomes from urban adaptation intervention234. Females have been shown to experience multiple barriers to public transportation accessibility and thus this may influence female commuting choices and in turn exposure levels235. For HIAs, a methodological challenge central to the tendency of not stratifying estimates by gender and age is the lack of available sub-group ERFs. This reflects a gap in the underlying epidemiological evidence236. The lack of age-specific ERFs, particularly for populations under 20 years, may also be a by-product of the overemphasis on PM2.5 and O3 pollutants in the literature. PM2.5- and O3-realated mortality impacts generally focus on the over 25-year-old population; however, in recent years more research has emerged for NO2-related health outcomes in paediatric populations123,195.
4.4. Limitations of urban environmental health studies
The pathways covered in this review are not an exhaustive list and do not cover all pathways to health. Additional pathways that hold relevance include social exclusion237, community severance237, stress237, and proximity to blue space238. There was an evident paucity of research investigating health burden attributed to noise pollution. The only noise study analysed impacts from road traffic noise; however, aircraft, rail and construction noise also have considerable health impacts239,240. The household noise annoyance indicator may capture some of this exposure; however, the finest spatial resolution of NUTS3 restricts inferences for within city variability (Table A1). No studies incorporated climate change risk, which is a notable limitation for the HIAs that projected extreme heat and UHI.
The majority of studies applied regional-level estimates at city-level and assumed uniform distribution across cities, which discounts variability within and between cities. Commonly cited reasons for applying regional estimates were inconsistent data quality and availability at local-level and finer spatial resolutions123,125,130; however, this can introduce the risk of uncertainty in local impact predictions. Approaches to mitigate this included extrapolating metrics from geographies with greater data coverage121,142 or excluding geographies from analyses46. The latter pertains to the significant challenge of conducting HIAs in low- and middle-income countries241. Few studies investigated within-city variation47,52,54,55,60; the extent of which was also subject to data availability and quality47. Ensuring fairness in data exploration and identification of local inequities necessitates robust and comprehensive datasets with uniform data collection at local-level. Central to this is collaboration across sectors, levels of government, and for researchers and practitioners to leverage open-data platforms205.
Applicable to all HIAs was the uncertainty attributed to ERFs and RRs. There was high variation in ERF data sources, which points to the general uncertainty surrounding the selection of the most accurate ERFs to apply (Table 4). For the majority of HIAs, the same ERFs were applied to the general population, which assumes equivalent risk. The paucity of sub-group ERFs that capture susceptibility merits that recommendations cannot be made for susceptible subpopulations.
4.5. Strengths and caveats of review
This was a scoping and not a formal systematic review, and therefore, aimed to provide a holistic overview of evidence from large-scale urban studies, rather than assess all evidence concerning a single relationship (e.g., air pollution and birth weight). Inclusion of additional health outcomes (e.g., mental health) in search terms may have identified further large-scale urban studies of relevance. Investigation of the interplay between urban environments and both established and emerging infectious diseases was beyond the scope of this review; however, these pathways have high relevance to the complex urban health ecosystem. Changes to land use, demographic shift patterns, and globalisation infrastructures have been identified as pivotal factors that influence infectious disease incidence and outbreak242. The COVID-19 pandemic illustrates the crucial role of governments and policies in managing infectious disease outbreaks, and highlights the inevitable trade-offs and conflicts encountered in planning strategies243. Enhancing understanding of the interconnection between urban form and infectious diseases holds significant prominence in both research and governmental priorities for urban and transport planning. The scope of exposures included in this review aligned with those of the UBDPolicy project45; however, the caveat of additional pathways being excluded pertains to the broader challenge of prioritisation and resource constraints. Initiatives such as Urbanisation and Health Initiative244 led by the WHO, and the Urban Health Collaborative245 led by Drexel University, recognise the significance of investigating non-communicable and infectious diseases in tandem.
Strengths of this review include the expert consultation of relevant literature, which extended the scope of reviewed studies, and inclusion criterion of large-scale urban studies, which serves to increase the reliability and generalisability of results. Equally, this may have been a limitation as potential insights may have been missed from the 90-city inclusion criterion. Studies of fewer cities may have covered understudied regions and vulnerable populations. Not all geographical regions were covered (for example Australia and South Asia) and only English search terms were included in the literature search, exclusion of studies conducted in other languages may have contributed to the geographic distribution of studies and introduced bias in reported results. However, 22 studies were global in geographic coverage, this is considered a strength and may have mitigated potential exclusion bias. Further, PubMed was the sole electronic database articles were obtained from. This was due to PubMed’s comprehensive coverage of health and biomedical research. Finally, examination of urban policies and affiliated impacts was beyond the scope of this review.
5. Conclusion and Future Perspectives
This scoping review aimed to synthesise evidence from large-scale urban studies to provide a state-of-the-art overview of the relation between urban structures, transport, environmental exposures, and health. The complexity of the urban ecosystem was evidenced and emphasises the need for a multi-faceted approach for elucidating the intricate urban environmental health pathways. Researchers should prioritise exploring associations at multiple spatial scales and resolutions, both within and between population groups. Identifying local disparities in exposure, vulnerability, and adaptation will require enhanced local-level data, open-source indicators, and shared consensus of best research practices. Advances in techniques, temporal trend analysis, and urban health and sustainability indicators show promising developments. To fully harness the potential of cities as key drivers of sustainable and healthy living, robust evidence should spearhead this change. Only then can policies and interventions realise the impact they set out to achieve.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through the “Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa 2019-2023” Program (CEX2018-000806-S); support from the Generalitat de Catalunya through the CERCA Program; support from Centro de Investigación Biomédica en red (CIBER) Epidemiología y Salud Pública and support from the Urban Burden of Disease Estimation for Policy Making 2023–202645 Horizon Europe project (grant number 101094639). Professor Richard Mitchell is funded by the Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00022/4 and CSO SPHSU19).
References
- 1.The World Bank. United Nations Population Division. World Urbanization Prospects: 2018 Revision. [cited 2023 Sep 20]. [Internet] Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZS.
- 2.The World Bank. Urban Development. [cited 2023 Sep 20]. [Internet] Available from: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/urbandevelopment/overview.
- 3.Lenzi A. Why urbanisation and health? Acta Biomed. 2019;90(2):181–3. doi: 10.23750/abm.v90i2.8354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sarkar C, Webster C. Healthy Cities of Tomorrow: the Case for Large Scale Built Environment–Health Studies. J Urban Heal. 2017;94(1):4–19. doi: 10.1007/s11524-016-0122-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Khomenko S, Cirach M, Pereira-Barboza E, Mueller N, Barrera-Gómez J, Rojas-Rueda D, et al. Premature mortality due to air pollution in European cities: a health impact assessment. Lancet Planet Heal. 2021;5(3):e121–34. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30272-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Khomenko S, Cirach M, Barrera-Gómez J, Pereira-Barboza E, Iungman T, Mueller N, et al. Impact of road traffic noise on annoyance and preventable mortality in European cities: A health impact assessment. Environ Int. 2022;162 doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107160. December 2021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Glazener A, Sanchez K, Ramani T, Zietsman J, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Mindell JS, et al. Fourteen pathways between urban transportation and health: A conceptual model and literature review. J Transp Heal. 2021 February;21:101070. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2021.101070. [Internet] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nieuwenhuijsen MJ. Urban and transport planning pathways to carbon neutral, liveable and healthy cities; A review of the current evidence. Environ Int. 2020 April;140:105661. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105661. [Internet] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Giles-Corti B, Moudon AV, Lowe M, Cerin E, Boeing G, Frumkin H, et al. What next? Expanding our view of city planning and global health, and implementing and monitoring evidence-informed policy. Lancet Glob Heal. 2022;10(6):e919–26. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00066-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Anderson B, Patiño Quinchia JE, Prieto Curiel R. Boosting African cities’ resilience to climate change : The role of green spaces. 2022;(37) [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fagliano JA, Roux AVD. Climate change, urban health, and the promotion of health equity. PLOS Med. 2018:8–11. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ritchie H. Global inequalities in CO2 emissions. OurWorldInData.org; 2023. [Internet] Available from: https://ourworldindata.org/inequality-co2. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Oke C, Bekessy SA, Frantzeskaki N, Bush J, Fitzsimons JA, Garrard GE, et al. Cities should respond to the biodiversity extinction crisis. npj Urban Sustain. 2021;1(1):9–12. doi: 10.1038/s42949-020-00010-w. [Internet] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.UN General Assembly. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly: transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Transform our world 2030 Agenda Sustain Dev. 2015 October;16301:259–73. [Internet] Available from: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_70_1_E.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tonne C, Adair L, Adlakha D, Anguelovski I, Belesova K, Berger M, et al. Defining pathways to healthy sustainable urban development. Environ Int. 2021;146 doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.European Commission. Un Pacto Verde Europeo. [cited 2023 Sep 29]. [Internet] Available from: https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_es.
- 17.United Nations. The Paris Agreement. [cited 2023 Sep 29]. [Internet] Available from: https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement.
- 18.Nieuwenhuijsen MJ. Urban and transport planning, environmental exposures and health-new concepts, methods and tools to improve health in cities. Environ Heal A Glob Access Sci Source. 2016;15(Suppl 1) doi: 10.1186/s12940-016-0108-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Khreis H. Car free cities: Pathway to healthy urban living. Environ Int. 2016;94:251–62. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.05.032. [Internet] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Eldesoky AH, Abdeldayem WS. Disentangling the Relationship between Urban Form and Urban Resilience: A Systematic Literature Review. Urban Sci. 2023;7(3):93. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Behnisch M, Krüger T, Jaeger JAG. Rapid rise in urban sprawl: Global hotspots and trends since 1990. PLOS Sustain Transform. 2022;1(11):e0000034 [Google Scholar]
- 22.Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants. Lancet Glob Heal. 2018;6(10):e1077–86. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30357-7. [Internet] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bibri SE, Krogstie J, Kärrholm M. Compact city planning and development: Emerging practices and strategies for achieving the goals of sustainability. Dev Built Environ. 2020;4 [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mueller N, Rojas-Rueda D, Khreis H, Cirach M, Milà C, Espinosa A, et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in urban and transport planning related exposures and mortality: A health impact assessment study for Bradford, UK. Environ Int. 2018;121:931–41. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation’s Global Burden of Disease, Institute HE. State of Global Air Report 2020. 2020. [Internet] Available from: https://www.stateofglobalair.org/resources/report/state-global-air-report-2020.
- 26.Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abbasi-Kangevari M, Abd-Allah F, Abdelalim A, Abdollahi M, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204–22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.World Health Organisation. Climate Change. 2023 [Internet] Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/climate-change-and-health. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Deilami K, Kamruzzaman M, Liu Y. Urban heat island effect: A systematic review of spatio-temporal factors, data, methods, and mitigation measures. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf. 2018;67:30–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2017.12.009. [Internet] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Thompson R, Hornigold R, Page L, Waite T. Associations between high ambient temperatures and heat waves with mental health outcomes: a systematic review. Public Health. 2018;161:171–91. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.06.008. [Internet] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cheng J, Xu Z, Bambrick H, Prescott V, Wang N, Zhang Y, et al. Cardiorespiratory effects of heatwaves: A systematic review and meta-analysis of global epidemiological evidence. Environ Res. 2019;177 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wondmagegn BY, Xiang J, Dear K, Williams S, Hansen A, Pisaniello D, et al. Increasing impacts of temperature on hospital admissions, length of stay, and related healthcare costs in the context of climate change in Adelaide, South Australia. Sci Total Environ. 2021;773:145656. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145656. [Internet] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.European Environment Agency. Noise. 2023. [Internet] Available from: https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/topics/in-depth/noise?activeTab=fa515f0c-9ab0-493c-b4cd-58a32dfaae0a.
- 33.Park JH, Moon JH, Kim HJ, Kong MH, Oh YH. Sedentary Lifestyle: Overview of Updated Evidence of Potential Health Risks. Korean J Fam Med. 2020;41(6):365–73. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.20.0165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Henson J, De Craemer M, Yates T. Sedentary behaviour and disease risk. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):23–5. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16867-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Giles-Corti B, Vernez-Moudon A, Reis R, Turrell G, Dannenberg AL, Badland H, et al. City planning and population health: a global challenge. Lancet. 2016;388(10062):2912–24. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30066-6. [Internet] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Joffe M, Mindell J. Health impact assessment. Occup Environ Med. 2005;62(12):907–12. doi: 10.1136/oem.2004.014969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wismar M, Blau J, Ernst KFJ. The Effectiveness of Health Impact Assessment: Scope and Limitations of Supporting Decision- Making in Europe. WHO Regional Office for Europe; Copenhagen: 2007. [Internet] Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/data/assets/pdf_file/0003/98283/E90794.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mueller N, Anderle R, Brachowicz N, Graziadei H, Lloyd SJ, Morais DS, et al. Model Choice for Quantitative Health Impact Assessment and Modelling : An Expert Consultation and Narrative Literature Review. Kerman Univ Med Sci. 2023;12:7103. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7103. [Internet] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Almeida DP, Alberto KC, Mendes LL. Neighborhood environment walkability scale: A scoping review. J Transp Heal. 2021;23:101261. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2021.101261. August 2020. [Internet] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cerin E, Conway TL, Cain KL, Kerr J, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Owen N, et al. Sharing good NEWS across the world: Developing comparable scores across 12 countries for the neighborhood environment walkability scale (NEWS. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1) doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Shashank A, Schuurman N. Unpacking walkability indices and their inherent assumptions. Heal Place. 2019;55:145–54. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.12.005. June 2018 [Internet] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Stockton JC, Duke-Williams O, Stamatakis E, Mindell JS, Brunner EJ, Shelton NJ. Development of a novel walkability index for London, United Kingdom: Cross-sectional application to the Whitehall II Study. BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3012-2. [Internet] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Puttaswamy D, Ghosh S, Kuriyan R. Neighborhood Walkability Index and Its Association With Indices of Childhood Obesity in Bengaluru, Karnataka. Indian Pediatr. 2023;60(2):113–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Carson JR, Conway TL, Perez LG, Frank LD, Saelens BE, Cain KL, et al. Neighborhood walkability, neighborhood social health, and self-selection among U.S. adults. Heal Place. 2023;82:103036. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2023.103036. [Internet] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.The Urban Burden of Disease Estimation for Policy Making. UBDPolicy: Assessing the burden of disease of urban life in 1000 European cities. [Internet] Available from: https://ubdpolicy.eu/
- 46.Iungman T, Cirach M, Marando F, Pereira Barboza E, Khomenko S, Masselot P, et al. Cooling cities through urban green infrastructure: a health impact assessment of European cities. Lancet. 2023;401(10376):577–89. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02585-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Barboza EP, Cirach M, Khomenko S, Iungman T, Mueller N, Barrera-Gómez J, et al. Green space and mortality in European cities: a health impact assessment study. Lancet Planet Heal. 2021;5(10):e718–30. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00229-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Colquhoun H, Garritty CM, Hempel S, Horsley T, et al. Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application. Syst Rev. 2021;10(1):1–6. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01821-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ortigoza AF, Tapia Granados JA, Miranda JJ, Alazraqui M, Higuera D, Villamonte G, et al. Characterising variability and predictors of infant mortality in urban settings: findings from 286 Latin American cities. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2021;75(3):264–70. doi: 10.1136/jech-2020-215137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bilal U, Hessel P, Perez-Ferrer C, Michael YL, Alfaro T, Tenorio-Mucha J, et al. Life expectancy and mortality in 363 cities of Latin America. Nat Med. 2021;27(3):463–70. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-01214-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Prieto-Curiel R, Heinrighs P, Heo I. Cities and spatial interactions in West Africa: A clustering analysis of the local interactions of urban agglomerations. OECD Publ. 2017;(05) [Google Scholar]
- 52.Prieto-Curiel R, Patino JE, Anderson B. Scaling of the morphology of African cities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023;120(9):1–9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2214254120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Avila-Palencia I, Rodríguez DA, Miranda JJ, Moore K, Gouveia N, Moran MR, et al. Associations of Urban Environment Features with Hypertension and Blood Pressure across 230 Latin American Cities. Environ Health Perspect. 2022;130(2):1–10. doi: 10.1289/EHP7870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Taubenböck H, Debray H, Qiu C, Schmitt M, Wang Y, Zhu XX. Seven city types representing morphologic configurations of cities across the globe. Cities. 2020 April;105:102814. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2020.102814. [Internet] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Nguyen QC, Khanna S, Dwivedi P, Huang D, Huang Y, Tasdizen T, et al. Using Google Street View to examine associations between built environment characteristics and U.S. health outcomes Prev Med Reports. 2019 April;14:100859. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100859. [Internet] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Mullachery PH, Rodriguez DA, Miranda JJ, López-Olmedo N, Martinez-Folgar K, Barreto ML, et al. Mortality amenable to healthcare in Latin American cities: A cross-sectional study examining between-country variation in amenable mortality and the role of urban metrics. Int J Epidemiol. 2022;51(1):303–13. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyab137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Browning MHEM, Rigolon A. Do income, race and ethnicity, and sprawl influence the greenspace-human health link in city-level analyses? Findings from 496 cities in the United States. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(7) doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Bakhtsiyarava M, Schinasi LH, Sánchez BN, Dronova I, Kephart JL, Ju Y, et al. Modification of temperature-related human mortality by area-level socioeconomic and demographic characteristics in Latin American cities. Soc Sci Med. 2023;317 doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115526. August 2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Gouveia N, Kephart JL, Dronova I, McClure L, Granados JT, Betancourt RM, et al. Ambient fine particulate matter in Latin American cities: Levels, population exposure, and associated urban factors. Sci Total Environ. 2021;772:145035. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145035. [Internet] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kephart JL, Gouveia N, Rodriguez DA, Indvik K, Alfaro T, Texcalac JL, Miranda JJBURA. Ambient nitrogen dioxide in 47,187 neighborhoods across 1 326 cities in eight Latin 2 American countries: population exposures and associations with urban features. medrxiv. 2023:1–21. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00237-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Krummenauer L, Prahl BF, Costa L, Holsten A, Walther C, Kropp JP. Global drivers of minimum mortality temperatures in cities. Sci Total Environ. 2019;695:133560. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.366. [Internet] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Rezaei N, Millard-Ball A. Urban form and its impacts on air pollution and access to green space: A global analysis of 462 cities. PLoS One. 2023;18:1–26. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278265. [Internet] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Meng X, Liu C, Chen R, Sera F, Vicedo-Cabrera AM, Milojevic A, et al. Short term associations of ambient nitrogen dioxide with daily total, cardiovascular, and respiratory mortality: Multilocation analysis in 398 cities. BMJ. 2021;372(2) doi: 10.1136/bmj.n534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Ye T, Guo S, Xie Y, Chen Z, Abramson MJ. Health and related economic benefits associated with reduction in air pollution during COVID-19 outbreak in 367 cities in China. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Heydari S, Asgharian M, Kelly FJ, Goel R. Potential health benefits of eliminating traffic emissions in urban areas. PLoS One. 2022;17(3 March):1–14. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264803. [Internet] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Alahmad B, Khraishah H, Royé D, Vicedo-Cabrera AM, Guo Y, Papatheodorou SI, et al. Associations Between Extreme Temperatures and Cardiovascular Cause-Specific Mortality: Results From 27 Countries. Circulation. 2023;147(1):35–46. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.061832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Kephart JL, Sánchez BN, Moore J, Schinasi LH, Bakhtsiyarava M, Ju Y, et al. City-level impact of extreme temperatures and mortality in Latin America. Nat Med. 2022;28(8):1700–5. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01872-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Zhou B, Rybski D, Kropp JP. The role of city size and urban form in the surface urban heat island. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04242-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Avila-Palencia I, Sánchez BN, Rodríguez DA, Perez-Ferrer C, Miranda JJ, Gouveia N, et al. Health and Environmental Co-Benefits of City Urban Form in Latin America: An Ecological Study. Sustain. 2022;14(22):1–14. doi: 10.3390/su142214715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Olsen JR, Nicholls N, Moon G, Pearce J, Shortt N, Mitchell R. Which urban land covers/uses are associated with residents’ mortality? A cross-sectional, ecological, pan-European study of 233 cities. BMJ Open. 2019;9(11) doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.McDonald RI, Aronson MFJ, Beatley T, Beller E, Bazo M, Grossinger R, et al. Denser and greener cities: Green interventions to achieve both urban density and nature. People Nat. 2023;5(1):84–102. [Google Scholar]
- 72.Marando F, Heris MP, Zulian G, Udías A, Mentaschi L, Chrysoulakis N, et al. Urban heat island mitigation by green infrastructure in European Functional Urban Areas. Sustain Cities Soc. 2022;77(November 2021):103564. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103564. [Internet] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Bassolas A, Barbosa-Filho H, Dickinson B, Dotiwalla X, Eastham P, Gallotti R, et al. Hierarchical organization of urban mobility and its connection with city livability. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12809-y. [Internet] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Thompson J, Stevenson M, Wijnands JS, Nice KA, Aschwanden GD, Silver J, et al. A global analysis of urban design types and road transport injury: an image processing study. Lancet Planet Heal. 2020;4(1):e32–42. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30263-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.OECD/SWAC. OECD and Sahel and West Africa Club. OECD Publishing; Paris: 2018. Africapolis (database) [Internet] Available from: https://africapolis.org. [Google Scholar]
- 76.Moriconi-Ebrardi Francis, Harre Dominique, Heinrigs P. Urbanisation Dynamics in West Africa 1950–2010: Africapolis I. OECD Publishing; Paris: 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 77.Quistberg DA, Roux AVD, Bilal U, Moore K, Ortigoza A, Rodriguez DA, et al. Building a Data Platform for Cross-Country Urban Health Studies : the SALURBAL Study. 2019:311–37. doi: 10.1007/s11524-018-00326-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.United States Census Bureau. TIGER/Line Shapefiles. 2016. [Internet] Available from: https://www.census.gov/geographies/mapping-files/time-series/geo/tiger-line-file.html.
- 79.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2014 (BRFSS) 2014. [Internet] Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/
- 80.Zhu XX, Qiu C, Hu J, Shi Y, Wang Y, Schmitt MTH. The global urban morphology on our planet - perspectives from space. Remote Sens Environ. 2022;269(112794) doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Department. World urbanization prospects: The 2014 revision, CD-ROM edition. Data publication; 2014. [Internet] Available from: https://population.un.org/wup/ [Google Scholar]
- 82.Agency TES. Sentinel 2. 2012. [Internet] Available from: https://www.esa.int/Space_in_Member_States/Spain/SENTINEL_2.
- 83.London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. MCC Collaborative Research Network. [Internet] Available from: https://mccstudy.lshtm.ac.uk/
- 84.Chinese Statistical Yearbook. Statistical Yearbook of China. 2020. [Internet] Available from: https://www.chinayearbooks.com/
- 85.China’s National Urban Air Quality Real-time Publishing Platform. 2020. Available from: https://aqicn.org/city/beijing/
- 86.Didan K. MOD13Q1 MODIS/Terra Vegetation Indices 16-Day L3 Global 250m SIN Grid. NASA LP DAAC niversity of Arizona, Alfredo Huete - University of Technology Sydney and MODAPS SIPS - NASA; 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 87.Kummu M, Taka M, Guillaume JHA. Gridded global datasets for Gross Domestic Product and Human Development Index over 1990-2015. Sci Data. 2018;5:1–15. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Delclòs-Alió X, Rodríguez DA, Olmedo NL, Ferrer CP, Moore K, Stern D, et al. Is city-level travel time by car associated with individual obesity or diabetes in Latin American cities? Evidence from 178 cities in the SALURBAL project. Cities. 2022;131:1–21. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Stanaway JD, Afshin A, Gakidou E, Lim SS, Abate D, Abate KH, et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Stu. Lancet. 2017;392(10159):1923–94. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32225-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.World Health Organisation. WHO’s Source Apportionment Database for PM10 and PM2.5. 2015 [Internet] Available from: http://www.who.int/quantifying_ehimpacts/global/source_apport/ [Google Scholar]
- 91.Esch T, Heldens W, Hirner A, Keil M, Marconcini M, Roth A, et al. Breaking new ground in mapping human settlements from space – The Global Urban Footprint. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2017;134:30–42. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.10.012. [Internet] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Louis WU in St. Atmospheric Composition Analysis Group. [Internet] Available from: https://sites.wustl.edu/acag/
- 93.European Commission’s Joint Research Centre. GHSL - Global Human Settlement Layer. [Internet] Available from: https://ghsl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/
- 94.Barrington-Leigh C, Millard-Ball A. Global trends toward urban street-network sprawl. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(4):1941–50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1905232116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.The World Bank. The World Bank Open Data. 2016. [Internet] Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/
- 96.World Health Organisation. World Health Organisation Global Health Estimates 2016: Deaths by Cause, Age, Sex, by Country and by Region, 2000-2016. [Internet] Available from: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/mortality-and-global-health-estimates/ghe-leading-causes-of-death.
- 97.Moran D, Kanemoto K, Jiborn M, Wood R, Többen J, Seto KC. Carbon footprints of 13 000 cities. Environ Res Lett. 2018;13(6) [Google Scholar]
- 98.Sarmiento OL, Useche AF, Rodriguez DA, Dronova I, Guaje O, Montes F, et al. Built environment profiles for Latin American urban settings: The SALURBAL study. PLoS One. 2021;16:1–25. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Muñoz-Sabater J, Dutra E, Agustí-Panareda A, Albergel C, Arduini G, Balsamo G, et al. ERA5-Land: A state-of-the-art global reanalysis dataset for land applications. Earth Syst Sci Data. 2021;13(9):4349–83. [Google Scholar]
- 100.Wang Y, Shi L, Zanobetti A, Schwartz JD. Estimating and projecting the effect of cold waves on mortality in 209 US cities. Environ Int. 2016;94:141–9. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.05.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.World Climate Research Programme. Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5.
- 102.Centre for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN) Gridded population of the world, version 4 (GPWv4) NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC); 2016. [cited 2023 Sep 15]. [Internet] Available from: https://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/data/collection/gpw-v4. [Google Scholar]
- 103.World Income Inequality Database. [Internet] Available from: https://wid.world/
- 104.United Nations Development Programme. Millennium Development Goals. Lebanon Report. 2008;2 [Google Scholar]
- 105.NOAA National Climatic Data Center. Global Summary of the Day (GSOD) 2018.
- 106.Copernicus. Corine Land Cover 2012. 2012.
- 107.European Environment Agency. CORINE Urban Morphological Zones 2006. 2006. [Internet] Available from: https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/datahub/datahubitem-view/6e5d9b0d-a448-4c73-b008-bdd98a3cf214.
- 108.Parastatidis D, Mitraka Z, Chrysoulakis N, Abrams M. Online global land surface temperature estimation from landsat. Remote Sens. 2017;9(12):1–16. [Google Scholar]
- 109.Copernicus. High Resolution Layers. 2018. [Internet] Available from: https://land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/high-resolution-layers.
- 110.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 500 Cities: Local Data for Better Health. [Internet] Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/500cities.
- 111.Wickham J, Homer C, Vogelmann J, McKerrow A, Mueller R, Herold N, et al. The multi-resolution land characteristics (MRLC) consortium - 20 years of development and integration of USA national land cover data. Remote Sens. 2014;6(8):7424–41. [Google Scholar]
- 112.Consortium MRLC. National Land Cover Database. 2011. [Internet] Available from: https://www.mrlc.gov/
- 113.WorldClim. WorldClim Historical Climate Data. 2020. [Internet] Available from: https://www.worldclim.org/data/worldclim21.html.
- 114.Schiavina MSFKM. GHS-POP R2019A - GHS population grid multitemporal (1975-1990-2000-2015) - OBSOLETE RELEASE. European Commission. 2019 [Internet] Available from: https://data.jrc.ec.europa.eu/dataset/0c6b9751-a71f-4062-830b-43c9f432370f. [Google Scholar]
- 115.Zanaga D, Van De Kerchove R, De Keersmaecker W, Souverijns N, Brockmann C, Quast R, et al. ESA WorldCover 10m 2020 v 100. 2021. [Internet] Available from: https://zenodo.org/record/5571936.
- 116.Copernicus. Urban Atlas 2018. 2018 [Google Scholar]
- 117.Richardson EA, Moon G, Pearce J, Shortt NKMR. Multi-scalar influences on mortality change over time in 274 European cities. Soc Sci Med. 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.02.034. [Internet] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Interactive Atlas of Heart Disease and Stroke. [Internet] Available from: https://nccd.cdc.gov/dhdspatlas/reports.aspx.
- 119.U.S. Department of Transportation. Transportation health tool indicators. [Internet] Available from: https://www.transportation.gov/
- 120.Kirmse A, Udeshi T, Bellver P, Shuma J. Extracting patterns from location history; GIS Proc ACM Int Symp Adv Geogr Inf Syst; 2011. pp. 397–400. [Google Scholar]
- 121.Masselot P, Mistry M, Vanoli J, Schneider R, Iungman T, Garcia-Leon D, et al. Excess mortality attributed to heat and cold: a health impact assessment study in 854 cities in Europe. Lancet Planet Heal. 2023;7(4):e271–81. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(23)00023-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.CNEMC. China National Environmental Monitoring Centre. [Internet] Available from: https://www.cnemc.cn/en/
- 123.Anenberg SC, Mohegh A, Goldberg DL, Kerr GH, Brauer M, Burkart K, et al. Long-term trends in urban NO2 concentrations and associated paediatric asthma incidence: estimates from global datasets. Lancet Planet Heal. 2022;6(1):e49–58. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00255-2. [Internet] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Khomenko S, Pisoni E, Thunis P, Bessagnet B, Cirach M, Iungman T, et al. Spatial and sector-specific contributions of emissions to ambient air pollution and mortality in European cities: a health impact assessment. Lancet Public Heal. 2023;8(7):e546–58. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00106-8. [Internet] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Guan Y, Xiao Y, Wang F, Qiu X, Zhang N. Health impacts attributable to ambient PM2.5 and ozone pollution in major Chinese cities at seasonal-level. J Clean Prod. 2021;311 [Google Scholar]
- 126.Anenberg SC, Miller J, Henze DK, Minjares R, Achakulwisut P. The global burden of transportation tailpipe emissions on air pollution-related mortality in 2010 and 2015. Environ Res Lett. 2019;14(9) [Google Scholar]
- 127.Diao B, Ding L, Zhang Q, Na J, Cheng J. Impact of urbanization on PM2.5-related health and economic loss in China 338 cities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(3) doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Han C, Xu R, Ye T, Xie Y, Zhao Y, Liu H, et al. Mortality burden due to long-term exposure to ambient PM2.5 above the new WHO air quality guideline based on 296 cities in China. Environ Int. 2022 May;166:107331. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107331. [Internet] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Southerland VA, Brauer M, Mohegh A, Hammer MS, van Donkelaar A, Martin RV, et al. Global urban temporal trends in fine particulate matter (PM2·5) and attributable health burdens: estimates from global datasets. Lancet Planet Heal. 2022;6(2):e139–46. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00350-8. [Internet] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Zhang M, Song Y, Cai X, Zhou J. Economic assessment of the health effects related to particulate matter pollution in 111 Chinese cities by using economic burden of disease analysis. J Environ Manage. 2008;88(4):947–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Anenberg SC, Achakulwisut P, Brauer M, Moran D, Apte JS, Henze DK. Particulate matter-attributable mortality and relationships with carbon dioxide in 250 urban areas worldwide. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–6. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48057-9. [Internet] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Maji KJ, Arora M, Dikshit AK. Burden of disease attributed to ambient PM2.5 and PM10 exposure in 190 cities in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2017;24(12):11559–72. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-8575-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Malashock DA, Delang MN, Becker JS, Serre ML, West JJ, Chang KL, et al. Global trends in ozone concentration and attributable mortality for urban, peri-urban, and rural areas between 2000 and 2019: a modelling study. Lancet Planet Heal. 2022;6(12):e958–67. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00260-1. [Internet] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Mead RW, Brajer V. Valuing the adult health effects of air pollution in Chinese cities. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1076:882–92. doi: 10.1196/annals.1371.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.China National Environmental Monitoring Centre. National Air Quality Forecast Information Dissemination System [Dataset] Monitoring Data. 2020 [Internet] Available from: https://quotsoft.net/air/ [Google Scholar]
- 136.Copernicus. Urban Atlas 2012. 2012 [Google Scholar]
- 137.Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Global Burden of Disease (GBD) [Internet] Available from: https://www.healthdata.org/research-analysis/gbd.
- 138.Maji KJ, Ye WF, Arora M, Shiva Nagendra SM. PM2.5-related health and economic loss assessment for 338 Chinese cities. Environ Int. 2018;121(April):392–403. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.09.024. [Internet] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Guan Y, Xiao Y, Wang Y, Zhang N, Chu C. Assessing the health impacts attributable to PM2.5 and ozone pollution in 338 Chinese cities from 2015 to 2020. Environ Pollut. 2021 February;287:117623. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117623. [Internet] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Zhang X, Cheng C, Zhao H. A Health Impact and Economic Loss Assessment of O3 and PM2.5 Exposure in China From 2015 to 2020. GeoHealth. 2022;6(3):1–15. doi: 10.1029/2021GH000531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Malashock DA, Delang MN, Becker JS, Serre ML, West JJ, Chang KL, et al. Estimates of ozone concentrations and attributable mortality in urban, peri-urban and rural areas worldwide in 2019. Environ Res Lett. 2022;17(5) doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00260-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Song J, Wang Y, Zhang Q, Qin W, Pan R, Yi W, et al. Premature mortality attributable to NO2 exposure in cities and the role of built environment: A global analysis. Sci Total Environ. 2023;866(2):161395. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161395. [Internet] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Eurostat. Urban Audit. [Internet] Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/gisco/geodata/reference-data/administrative-units-statistical-units/urban-audit.
- 144.European Commission. City statistics. [cited 2023 Sep 15];Eurostat. 2019 [Internet] Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/main/home. [Google Scholar]
- 145.de Hoogh K, Chen J, Gulliver J, Hoffmann B, Hertel O, Ketzel M, et al. Spatial PM2.5, NO2, O3 and BC models for Western Europe – Evaluation of spatiotemporal stability. Environ Int. 2018;120(2):81–92. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.07.036. [Internet] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.World Health Organization. WHO Expert Meeting: Methods and tools for assessing the health risks of air pollution at local, national and international level. Meeting report. 2014 May;:1–112. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/data/assets/pdf_file/0010/263629/WHO-Expert-Meeting-Methods-and-tools-for-assessing-the-health-risks-of-air-pollution-at-local,-national-and-international-level.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- 147.Atkinson RW, Butland BK, Anderson HR, Maynard RL. Long-term concentrations of nitrogen dioxide and mortality. Epidemiology. 2018;29(4):460–72. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Kuenen J, Dellaert S, Visschedijk A, Jalkanen JP, Super I, Denier Van Der Gon H. CAMS-REG-v4: a state-of-the-art high-resolution European emission inventory for air quality modelling. Earth Syst Sci Data. 2022;14(2):491–515. [Google Scholar]
- 149.Chen J, Hoek G. Long-term exposure to PM and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Int. 2020;143:105974. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105974. [Internet] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Huangfu P, Atkinson R. Long-term exposure to NO2 and O3 and all-cause and respiratory mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Int. 2020 July;144:105998. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105998. [Internet] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.European Commission. SHERPA. [Internet] Available from: https://aqm.jrc.ec.europa.eu/Section/Sherpa/Document.
- 152.Simpson D, Benedictow A, Berge H, Bergström R, Emberson LD, Fagerli H, et al. The EMEP MSC-W chemical transport model – Technical description. Atmos Chem Phys. 2012;12(16):7825–65. [Google Scholar]
- 153.Pisoni E, Thunis P, Clappier A. Application of the SHERPA source-receptor relationships, based on the EMEP MSC-W model, for the assessment of air quality policy scenarios. Atmos Environ X. 2019 April;4:100047. doi: 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100047. [Internet] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Klimont Z, Kupiainen K, Heyes C, Purohit P, Cofala J, Rafaj P, et al. Global anthropogenic emissions of particulate matter including black carbon. Atmos Chem Phys. 2017;17(14):8681–723. [Google Scholar]
- 155.Stohl A, Aamaas B, Amann M, Baker LH, Bellouin N, Berntsen TK, et al. Evaluating the climate and air quality impacts of short-lived pollutants. Atmos Chem Phys. 2015;15(18):10529–66. [Google Scholar]
- 156.Shaddick G, Thomas ML, Amini H, Broday D, Cohen A, Frostad J, et al. Data Integration for the Assessment of Population Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution for Global Burden of Disease Assessment. Environ Sci Technol. 2018;52(16):9069–78. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b02864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.China’s economic and social big data research platform. The 6th Population Census [Dataset] 2020. [Internet] Available from: https://data.cnki.net/%0Ayearbook/Single/N2021050059.
- 158.Kan HD, Chen BH. Analysis of exposure response relationships of air particulate matter and adverse health outcomes in China. J Environ Heal. 2002;19:422–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.National Bureau of Statistics of China. Main Data of the Seventh National Population Census. 2021. [Internet] Available from: http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/PressRelease/202105/t20210510_1817185.html.
- 160.Naghavi M, Abajobir AA, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abd-Allah F, Abera SF, et al. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980-2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390(10100):1151–210. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32152-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Burnett RT, Arden Pope C, Ezzati M, Olives C, Lim SS, Mehta S, et al. An integrated risk function for estimating the global burden of disease attributable to ambient fine particulate matter exposure. Environ Health Perspect. 2014;122(4):397–403. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1307049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Wang F, Qiu X, Cao J, Peng L, Zhang N, Yan Y, et al. Policy-driven changes in the health risk of PM2.5 and O3 exposure in China during 2013–2018. Sci Total Environ. 2020;757:143775. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143775. [Internet] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Baidu Map. China urban vitality research report.
- 164.Zhou M, Wang H, Zeng X, Yin P, Zhu J, Chen W, et al. Mortality, morbidity, and risk factors in China and its provinces, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2019;394(10204):1145–58. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30427-1. [Internet] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Ministry of Environmental Protection. Technical Regulation for Ambient Air Quality Assessment. Available from: https://www.gov.il/en/departments/ministry_of_environmental_protection/govil-landing-page.
- 166.Guan Y, Xiao Y, Zhang N, Chu C. Tracking short-term health impacts attributed to ambient PM2.5 and ozone pollution in Chinese cities: an assessment integrates daily population. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022;29(60):91176–89. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22067-z. [Internet] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Orellano P, Reynoso J, Quaranta N, Bardach A, Ciapponi A. Short-term exposure to particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and ozone (O3) and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Int. 2020;142:105876. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105876. December 2019 [Internet] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Oda T, Maksyutov S. A very high-resolution (1 km×1 km) global fossil fuel CO2 emission inventory derived using a point source database and satellite observations of nighttime lights. Atmos Chem Phys. 2011;11:543–56. [Google Scholar]
- 169.Cohen AJ, Brauer M, Burnett R, Anderson HR, Frostad J, Estep K, et al. Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015. Lancet. 2017;389(10082):1907–18. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30505-6. [Internet] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.National Bureau of Statistical of China. China statistical yearbook 2014. 2016. [Internet] Available from: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/%0A2014/indexeh.htm.
- 171.Zhang YL, Cao F. Fine particulate matter (PM 2.5) in China at a city level. Sci Rep. 2015;5(2014):1–12. doi: 10.1038/srep14884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation GHDx. Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 (GBD 2010) - Ambient Air Pollution Risk Model 1990 - 2010. 2010. [Internet] Available from: https://ghdx.healthdata.org/record/ihme-data/gbd-2010-ambient-air-pollution-risk-model-1990-2010.
- 173.Guan Y, Kang L, Wang Y, Zhang NN, Ju MT. Health loss attributed to PM 2.5 pollution in China’s cities: Economic impact, annual change and reduction potential. J Clean Prod. 2019;217:284–94. [Google Scholar]
- 174.Zhou M, Wang H, Zhu J, Chen W, Wang L, Liu S, et al. Cause-specific mortality for 240 causes in China during 1990-2013: A systematic subnational analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2016;387(10015):251–72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00551-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Dobson JE, Bright EA, Coleman PR, Durfee RC, Worley BA. LandScan: A global population database for estimating populations at risk. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing. 2000;66(7):849–57. [Google Scholar]
- 176.Wang GZ, Wu LY, Chen JB, Song YX, Chen RR. ACGE-based analysis onPM2.5-induced health-related economic e ect in Beijing. China Environ Sci. 2017;37:2779–85. [Google Scholar]
- 177.Geng G, Xiao Q, Liu S, Liu X, Cheng J, Zheng Y, et al. Tracking Air Pollution in China: Near Real-Time PM2.5Retrievals from Multisource Data Fusion. Environ Sci Technol. 2021;55(17):12106–15. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c01863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.TAP. [Internet] Available from: http://tapdata.org.cn.
- 179.Xiao Q, Geng G, Cheng J, Liang F, Li R, Meng X, et al. Evaluation of gap-filling approaches in satellite-based daily PM2.5 prediction models. Atmos Environ. 2021;244:117921. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117921. June 2020 [Internet] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Xiao Q, Zheng Y, Geng G, Chen C, Huang X, Che H, et al. Separating emission and meteorological contributions to long-term PM2.5trends over eastern China during 2000-2018. Atmos Chem Phys. 2021;21(12):9475–96. [Google Scholar]
- 181.Zhang Y. All-Cause Mortality Risk and Attributable Deaths Associated with Long-Term Exposure to Ambient PM2.5in Chinese Adults. Environ Sci Technol. 2021;55(9):6116–27. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c08527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Dijkstra L, Florczyk AJ, Freire S, Kemper T, Melchiorri M, Pesaresi M, et al. Applying the Degree of Urbanisation to the globe: A new harmonised definition reveals a different picture of global urbanisation. J Urban Econ. 2021;125:103312. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2020.103312. November 2020 [Internet] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Pesaresi M, Florczyk A, Schiavina M, Melchiorri M ML. GHS-SMOD R2019A - GHS settlement layers, updated and refined REGIO model 2014 in application to GHS-BUILT R2018A and GHS-POP R2019A, multitemporal (1975-1990-2000-2015) 2019. [Internet] Available from: https://data.jrc.ec.europa.eu/dataset/42e8be89-54ff-464e-be7b-bf9e64da5218.
- 184.Hammer MS, Van Donkelaar A, Li C, Lyapustin A, Sayer AM, Hsu NC, et al. Global Estimates and Long-Term Trends of Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations (1998-2018) Environ Sci Technol. 2020;54(13):7879–90. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c01764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Zheng P, Barber R, Sorensen RJD, Murray CJL, Aravkin AY. Trimmed Constrained Mixed Effects Models: Formulations and Algorithms. J Comput Graph Stat. 2021;30(3):544–56. [Google Scholar]
- 186.State Environmental Protection Administration of China (SEPAC) Annual report of national urban environmental management and integrated management in 2004. 2005.
- 187.Delang MN, Becker JS, Chang KL, Serre ML, Cooper OR, Schultz MG, et al. Mapping Yearly Fine Resolution Global Surface Ozone through the Bayesian Maximum Entropy Data Fusion of Observations and Model Output for 1990-2017. Environ Sci Technol. 2021;55(8):4389–98. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c07742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Turner MC, Jerrett M, Pope CA, Krewski D, Gapstur SM, Diver WR, et al. Long-Term Ozone Exposure and Mortality in a Large Prospective Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;193(10):1134–42. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201508-1633OC. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Guan Y, Xiao Y, Chu C, Zhang N, Yu L. Trends and characteristics of ozone and nitrogen dioxide related health impacts in Chinese cities. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2022 June;241:0–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Anenberg SC, Henze DK, Tinney V, Kinney PL, Raich W, Fann N, et al. Estimates of the Global Burden of Ambient PM 2 : 5, Ozone, and NO 2 on Asthma Incidence and Emergency Room Visits. Environmental. 2018;126(2):1–14. doi: 10.1289/EHP3766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.WHO. World Health Organization; Geneva: 2021. WHO global air quality guidelines: Particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Maji KJ, Ye WF, Arora M, Nagendra SMS. Ozone pollution in Chinese cities: Assessment of seasonal variation, health effects and economic burden. Environ Pollut. 2019;247(x):792–801. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.01.049. [Internet] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Jerrett M, Burnett RT, Pope CA, Ito K, Thurston G, Krewski D, et al. Long-Term Ozone Exposure and Mortality. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(11):1085–95. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0803894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Larkin A, Geddes JA, Randall VM, Xiao Q, Yang L, Marshall JD BMHP. A Global Land Use Regression Model for Nitrogen Dioxide Air Pollution. Physiol Behav. 2017;176(5):139–48. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b01148. [Internet] Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5958625/pdf/nihms960157.pdf. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Achakulwisut P, Brauer M, Hystad P, Anenberg SC. Global, national, and urban burdens of paediatric asthma incidence attributable to ambient NO 2 pollution: estimates from global datasets. Lancet Planet Heal. 2019;3(4):e166–78. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30046-4. [Internet] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Stieb DM, Berjawi R, Emode M, Zheng C, Salama D, Hocking R, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies of long term outdoor nitrogen dioxide exposure and mortality. PLoS One. 2021;16:1–20. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246451. 2 February [Internet] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Eurostat. City statistics. 2015.
- 198.Copernicus. Climate variables for cities in Europe from 2008 to 2017. 2018. [Internet] Available from: https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/#!/home.
- 199.Copernicus. Land Monitoring Service. Tree cover density. [Internet] Available from: https://land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/high-resolution-layers/forests/tree-cover-density. [Google Scholar]
- 200.Guski R, Schreckenberg D, Schuemer R. WHO environmental noise guidelines for the European region: A systematic review on environmental noise and annoyance. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(12):1–39. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.European Commission. Environmental Noise Directive. 2002. [Internet] Available from: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/noise/environmental-noise-directive_en.
- 202.van Kempen E, Casas M, Pershagen G, Foraster M. WHO environmental noise guidelines for the European region: A systematic review on environmental noise and cardiovascular and metabolic effects: A summary. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(2):1–59. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Eurostat. Archive: Urban-rural typology. [Internet] Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Archive:Urban-rural_typology.
- 204.The Lancet. Urban design, transport and health. 2022. [cited 2023 Sep 28]. [Internet] Available from: https://www.thelancet.com/series/urban-design-2022.
- 205.Boeing G, Higgs C, Liu S, Giles-Corti B, Sallis JF, Cerin E, et al. Using open data and open-source software to develop spatial indicators of urban design and transport features for achieving healthy and sustainable cities. Lancet Glob Heal. 2022;10(6):e907–18. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00072-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Lowe M, Adlakha D, Sallis JF, Salvo D, Cerin E, Moudon AV, et al. City planning policies to support health and sustainability: an international comparison of policy indicators for 25 cities. Lancet Glob Heal. 2022;10(6):e882–94. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00069-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Cerin E, Sallis JF, Salvo D, Hinckson E, Conway TL, Owen N, et al. Determining thresholds for spatial urban design and transport features that support walking to create healthy and sustainable cities: findings from the IPEN Adult study. Lancet Glob Heal. 2022;10(6):e895–906. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00068-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.World Health Organisation. WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. World Health Organization; Geneva: 2020. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Akande A, Cabral P, Gomes P, Casteleyn S. The Lisbon ranking for smart sustainable cities in Europe. Sustain Cities Soc. 2019;44:475–87. April 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 210.UNECE. Smart Sustainable Cities. 2017. [cited 2023 Sep 28]. [Internet] Available from: https://unece.org/housing/smart-sustainable-cities.
- 211.Mackres E, Shabou S, Wong T. Calculating Indicators From Global Geospatial Data Sets for Benchmarking and Tracking Change in the Urban Environment. World Resour Inst. 2023:1–36. [Google Scholar]
- 212.Battiston A, Schifanella R. On the need to move from a single indicator to a multi-dimensional framework to measure accessibility to urban green. 2023:1–23. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.05538. [Google Scholar]
- 213.Daams MN, Veneri P. Living Near to Attractive Nature? A Well-Being Indicator for Ranking Dutch, Danish, and German Functional Urban Areas. Soc Indic Res. 2017;133(2):501–26. doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1375-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Stowell JD, Ngo C, Jimenez MP, Kinney PL, James P. Development of a global urban greenness indicator dataset for 1,000+ cities. Data Br. 2023;48:109140. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2023.109140. [Internet] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Allam Z, Bibri SE, Chabaud D, Moreno C. The ‘15-Minute City’ concept can shape a net-zero urban future. Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2022;9(1):1–5. [Google Scholar]
- 216.Rybski D, Arcaute E, Batty M. Urban scaling laws. Environ Plan B Urban Anal City Sci. 2019;46(9):1605–10. [Google Scholar]
- 217.Ballester J, Quijal-Zamorano M, Méndez Turrubiates RF, Pegenaute F, Herrmann FR, Robine JM, et al. Heat-related mortality in Europe during the summer of 2022. Nat Med. 2023;29(7):1857–66. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02419-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Eurostat. What is a city? - Spatial units. [Internet] Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/cities/spatial-units.
- 219.Fazeli Dehkordi ZS, Khatami SM, Ranjbar E. The Associations Between Urban Form and Major Non-communicable Diseases: a Systematic Review. Journal of Urban Health. 2022;99:941–58. doi: 10.1007/s11524-022-00652-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Bao Z, Bai Y, Geng T. Examining Spatial Inequalities in Public Green Space Accessibility: A Focus on Disadvantaged Groups in England. Sustain. 2023;15(18) [Google Scholar]
- 221.Phillips A, Canters F, Khan AZ. Analyzing spatial inequalities in use and experience of urban green spaces. Urban For Urban Green. 2022 January;74:127674. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127674. [Internet] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Hoffimann E, Barros H, Ribeiro AI. Socioeconomic inequalities in green space quality and Accessibility—Evidence from a Southern European city. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(8) doi: 10.3390/ijerph14080916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Van Tran V, Park D, Lee YC. Indoor air pollution, related human diseases, and recent trends in the control and improvement of indoor air quality. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(8) doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Esperon-Rodriguez M, Rymer PD, Power SA, Barton DN, Cariñanos P, Dobbs C, et al. Assessing climate risk to support urban forests in a changing climate. Plants People Planet. 2022;4(3):201–13. [Google Scholar]
- 225.Son TH, Weedon Z, Yigitcanlar T, Sanchez T, Corchado JM, Mehmood R. Algorithmic urban planning for smart and sustainable development: Systematic review of the literature. Sustain Cities Soc. 2023 March;94:104562. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104562. [Internet] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Essamlali I, Nhaila H, El Khaili M. Supervised Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Key Pollutants and for the Sustainable Enhancement of Urban Air Quality: A Systematic Review. Sustain. 2024;16(3) [Google Scholar]
- 227.Jia P, Chen C, Zhang D, Sang Y, Zhang L. Semantic segmentation of deep learning remote sensing images based on band combination principle: Application in urban planning and land use. Comput Commun. 2024;217:97–106. [Google Scholar]
- 228.Motieyan H, Mesgari MS. An Agent-Based Modeling approach for sustainable urban planning from land use and public transit perspectives. Cities. 2018 March;81:91–100. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2018.03.018. [Internet] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 229.Nieuwenhuijsen M, de Nazelle A, Pradas MC, Daher C, Dzhambov AM, Echave C, et al. The Superblock model: A review of an innovative urban model for sustainability, liveability, health and well-being. Environ Res. 2024;251 doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.118550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230.Wang S, McGibbon J, Zhang Y. Predicting high-resolution air quality using machine learning: Integration of large eddy simulation and urban morphology data. Environ Pollut. 2024;344:123371. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123371. November 2023 [Internet] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Oh JW, Ngarambe J, Duhirwe PN, Yun GY, Santamouris M. Using deep-learning to forecast the magnitude and characteristics of urban heat island in Seoul Korea. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1–13. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60632-z. [Internet] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Stafoggia M, Tobias A, Chen H, Burnett RT. Differential mortality risks associated with PM2.5 components: a multi-country, multicity study. Epidemiology. 2022;33(2):167–75. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.Romero-Lankao P, Qin H, Dickinson K. Urban vulnerability to temperature-related hazards: A meta-analysis and meta-knowledge approach. Glob Environ Chang. 2012;22(3):670–83. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.04.002. [Internet] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 234.Solomon DS, Singh C, Islam F. Examining the outcomes of urban adaptation interventions on gender equality using SDG 5. Clim Dev. 2021;13(9):830–41. doi: 10.1080/17565529.2021.1939643. [Internet] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 235.Mejía-Dorantes L, Soto Villagrán P. A review on the influence of barriers on gender equality to access the city: A synthesis approach of Mexico City and its Metropolitan Area. Cities. 2020;96 [Google Scholar]
- 236.Cohen Hubal EA, Sheldon LS, Burke JM, McCurdy TR, Berry MR, Rigas ML, et al. Children’s exposure assessment: A review of factors influencing children’s exposure, and the data available to characterize and assess that exposure. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108(6):475–86. doi: 10.1289/ehp.108-1638158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237.Glazener A, Sanchez K, Ramani T, Zietsman J, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Mindell JS, et al. Fourteen pathways between urban transportation and health: A conceptual model and literature review. J Transp Heal. 2021 April;21:101070. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2021.101070. [Internet] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 238.Smith N, Georgiou M, King AC, Tieges Z, Webb S, Chastin S. Urban blue spaces and human health: A systematic review and meta-analysis of quantitative studies. Cities. 2021;119 [Google Scholar]
- 239.Agencia Ambiental Europea. Environmental noise in Europe - 2020. European Environment Agency; 2020. p. 104. [Google Scholar]
- 240.Mir M, Nasirzadeh F, Bereznicki H, Enticott P, Lee SH, Mills A. Construction noise effects on human health: Evidence from physiological measures. Sustain Cities Soc. 2023;91:104470. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104470. [Internet] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 241.Thondoo M, Rojas-Rueda D, Gupta J, De Vries DH, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ. Systematic literature review of health impact assessments in low and middle-income countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(11) doi: 10.3390/ijerph16112018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242.Connolly C, Keil R, Ali SH. Extended urbanisation and the spatialities of infectious disease: Demographic change, infrastructure and governance. Urban Stud. 2021;58(2):245–63. [Google Scholar]
- 243.Agyapon-Ntra K, McSharry PE. A global analysis of the effectiveness of policy responses to COVID-19. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):1–15. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31709-2. [Internet] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244.World Health Organisation. Urban Health Initiative. [Internet] Available from: https://www.who.int/initiatives/urban-health-initiative.
- 245.University D. Urban Health Collaborative. [Internet] Available from: https://drexel.edu/uhc/
- 246.Earth Engine Data Catalog. WorldPop Global Project Population Data: Estimated Residential Population per 100x100m Grid Square. 2020. [Internet] Available from: https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/WorldPop_GP_100m_pop.
- 247.OpenStreetMap. 2022. [Internet] Available from: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=6/40.011/-2.483.
- 248.Earth Engine Data Catalog. ESA WorldCover 10m v100. 2020. [Internet] Available from: https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/ESA_WorldCover_v100.
- 249.Resource Watch. Trees in Mosaic Landscapes. [Internet] Available from: https://resourcewatch.org/data/explore/Trees-in-Mosaic-Landscapes.
- 250.Open Street Map. OpenStreetMap contributors. 2017. [Internet] Available from: https://www.openstreetmap.org.
- 251.World Health Organization. WHO Global Air Quality Guidelines: Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM10), Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide, Sulfur Dioxide and Carbon Monoxide. 2021. [Internet] Available from: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/9789240034228. [PubMed]
- 252.Inness A, Ades M, Agustí-Panaredaz A, Barré J, Benedictow A, Blechschmidt A, Dominguez J, et al. CAMS Global Reanalysis (EAC4) Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service. 2019 [Internet] Available from: https://ads.atmosphere.copernicus.eu/cdsapp%23!/dataset/cams-global-reanalysis-eac4?tab=overview. [Google Scholar]
- 253.Hersbach H, Bell B, Berrisford P, Hirahara S, Horányi A, Muñoz-Sabater J, et al. The ERA5 global reanalysis. Q J R Meteorol Soc. 2020;146(730):1999–2049. [Google Scholar]
- 254.Thrasher B, Maurer EP, McKellar C, Duffy PB. Technical Note: Bias correcting climate model simulated daily temperature extremes with quantile mapping. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 2012;16(9):3309–14. [Google Scholar]
- 255.Ermida SL, Soares P, Mantas V, Göttsche FM, Trigo IF. Google earth engine open-source code for land surface temperature estimation from the landsat series. Remote Sens. 2020;12(9):1–21. [Google Scholar]
- 256.Bonafoni S, Sekertekin A. Albedo Retrieval From Sentinel-2 by New Narrow-to-Broadband Conversion Coefficients. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett. 2020;17(9):1618–22. [Google Scholar]
- 257.United States Geological Survey. Landsat. [Internet] Available from: https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/
- 258.Köppen-Geiger climate classification system. Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps and bioclimatic variables. [Internet] Available from: http://glass.umd.edu/KGClim/
- 259.United Nations Development Program. Human Development Report. 2022. [cited 2023 Sep 28]. [Internet] Available from: https://hdr.undp.org/
- 260.Luxen D, Vetter C. Real-time routing with OpenStreetMap data; GIS Proc ACM Int Symp Adv Geogr Inf Syst; 2011. pp. 513–6. [Google Scholar]
- 261.Brown G, Kyttä M. Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research. Appl Geogr. 2014;46:122–36. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.11.004. [Internet] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 262.Global Biodiversity Information Faculty. Occurrence Download-Birds. 2022. [Internet] Available from: https://www.gbif.org/occurrence/download/0197178-210914110416597.
- 263.BirdLife International. World Database of Key Biodiversity Areas. 2022. [Internet] Available from: https://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/
- 264.United States Census Bureau. Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics. [Internet] Available from: https://lehd.ces.census.gov/data/
- 265.Google. Location history. [Internet] Available from: https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/3118687.
- 266.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Prevalence Data (2011 to present) [Internet] Available from: https://chronicdata.cdc.gov/Behavioral-Risk-Factors/Behavioral-Risk-Factor-Surveillance-System-BRFSS-P/dttw-5yxu.
- 267.World Bank. List of economies. 2020. [Internet] Available from: https://databankfiles.worldbank.org/public/ddpext_download/site-content/CLASS.xls.
- 268.Granier C, Darras S, van der Gon HD, Doubalova J, Elguindi N, Galle B, et al. The Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service global and regional emissions. Copernicus Atmos Monit Serv. 2019 April;:54. [Google Scholar]
- 269.Harris NL, Gibbs DA, Baccini A, Birdsey RA, de Bruin S, Farina M, et al. Global maps of twenty-first century forest carbon fluxes. Nat Clim Chang. 2021;11(3):234–40. doi: 10.1038/s41558-020-00976-6. [Internet] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




