Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Sep 19.
Published in final edited form as: Emerg Contam. 2023 Jun;9(2):100225. doi: 10.1016/j.emcon.2023.100225

Chemical Safety and the Exposome

Oskar Karlsson 1,
PMCID: PMC7618147  EMSID: EMS207965  PMID: 40978811

Abstract

Air pollution and rapid chemical intensification are major threats to the environment and human health. Today, we have produced over 350,000 chemicals, and current testing strategies do not meet the demands. Therefore, it is important to develop new approach methodologies (NAMs) that can help fill current information gaps. Toxicology needs to evolve from hazard and risk assessments based on morphological endpoints in animal tests towards a mechanism-driven integrated approach that better includes computational modelling as well as molecular, human, and in vitro data. The application of new science and technology such as different types of imaging and omics methods can allow faster collection of high-quality toxicological data for hazard identification and better prediction of toxicological potential using advanced in silico approaches including machine learning. A shift toward active prevention of pollution through a safe and sustainable-by-design approach based on cutting-edge science could significantly help safeguard the population and planetary health. Moreover, it is necessary to improve the understanding of how interactions among chemical mixtures, climate change, infectious agents, and other stressors that constitute the exposome, may affect biota and human health. Individual responses to current exposures and susceptibility to disease are influenced by factors such as genetics, epigenetics, physiology, and health status, which involve changes in biological pathways caused by previous exposures or even ancestral exposures. It is therefore important to better consider individual exposomes and susceptibility in future risk assessments and precision medicine. This review describes the central role of mechanistic toxicology in chemical safety and in the cross-disciplinary efforts needed to characterize the exposome and its complex interactions in detail.

Keywords: Anthropocene, Biodiversity, Chemicals, Environmental health, Epigenetics, Exposome, Mechanistic toxicology, One Health, Planetary health, Pollution

Introduction

Chemical pollution is one of the largest threats to the environment and human health. A well-known example is the emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases and their adverse impact on the oceans, atmosphere, and climate1. However, greenhouse gas emissions constitute only approximately 20% of the annual anthropogenic chemical release, which is estimated to be 220 billion tonnes2, 3. The societal benefits of manmade chemicals are significant and their release into the environment is a direct consequence of economic development2. The extensive burning of fossil fuels was a driver of the Industrial Revolution, and since then a large variety of chemicals have been released globally. This includes the anthropogenic dispersal of geogenic chemicals and the continuous production of a large variety of manmade chemicals. Over the recent decades, there has been massive chemical intensification in most sectors, including agriculture, pharmaceuticals, health, mining, construction, services, plastic and rubber production, and other industries2. In 2017, approximately 2.3 billion tonnes of manmade chemicals were produced globally, doubling the amount from 20005. Currently, we have produced over 350,000 chemicals, and while the safety of pharmaceutical drugs has been extensively tested before they enter the market, the risk assessment of industrial chemicals is often inadequate, making environmental and human safety uncertain1, 2, 4.

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) were used in industry for over 30 years before Jensen, for the first time in the sixties, discovered that they could accumulate in nature6. This was an eye-opener, as it showed that in addition to chemicals such as pesticides that are directly used in the environment, chemicals are unintentionally released into it, and be a potential threat to biodiversity. Since then numerous reports have confirmed that the relationship between humanity and nature has been damaged1, 2, 710. For example, using monitoring data from over 20,000 populations of more than 4,000 vertebrate species, the Living Planet Report from 2022 revealed an average 69% decrease in population sizes between 1970 and 2018 due to unsustainable human activities such as overexploitation, habitat destruction, environmental pollution, and climate change11. In line with this, there are currently over 150,300 species that have been assessed for the IUCN Red List and more than 42,100 species are threatened with extinction, including 41% amphibians, 37% sharks and rays, 34% conifers, 36% reef building corals, 27% mammals, and 13% birds12.

Furthermore, research shows that only a small proportion of human diseases are solely caused by genetic factors. The disease risk attributable to genetics ranged from 3% to 49%, with a median below 20% when evaluating a large number of chronic diseases in monozygotic twins13. Degenerative disease and cancer risk attributable to genetic factors is approximately 10%1416. It has been estimated that pollution caused nine million premature deaths globally in 2015, which is three times more than the combined mortality from AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria, and corresponds to 16% of all deaths17. Air pollution is estimated to cause 6.5 million of the pollution-related premature deaths, which is in line with the World Health Organization number of 7 million deaths per year caused by ambient (outdoor) and household air pollution17. A recent update of this estimate using data from 2019 found that pollution remains responsible for approximately nine million deaths per year18. However, it is likely that the actual contribution of pollution to the global disease burden is underestimated because the potential adverse effects of many chemical contaminants are unknown, involve complex interactions with genes and other environmental exposures that constitute the exposome, and can potentially be transmitted over generations (Figure 1). This review illustrates the central role of mechanistic toxicology in chemical safety and the cross-disciplinary efforts needed to characterize the exposome and its complex interactions in detail.

Figure 1. Gene-environment interactions underlie the majority of chronic human diseases The exposome can be defined as the cumulative lifetime environmental exposure and related biological responses of an individual.

Figure 1

The individual response to current exposure and susceptibility to disease is influenced by factors such as genetics, epigenetics, physiology, and health status, which involve changes in biological pathways caused by previous exposures, or even ancestral exposures. Currently, there are more than 350,000 manmade chemicals, and the potential adverse effects of most of these are still poorly understood. Mechanistic toxicology will therefore play a fundamental role in the large cross-disciplinary efforts needed to better understand how complex exposome interactions may affect the biota and human health.

Toxicology for Life

Because chemical contaminants can cause adverse effects on humans, biota, and ecosystems, toxicology will play an important role in the local, national, and global transdisciplinary collaborations needed for successful transformation to a safe and sustainable society. Toxicology can be defined as the study of how chemicals interact with living systems and affect biological processes and includes predictions of safe exposure levels. The Stockholm Convention on persistent organic pollutants (POPs) is an international attempt to regulate the release of toxic chemicals globally. To date, only 26 chemicals have been banned and nine more compounds are under review2. At the current progress rates, the Stockholm Convention and other international, national, and regional initiatives will take more than 100,000 years to assess all currently existing manmade chemicals for human and environmental safety37. Moreover, every year an additional 2000 years of assessment needs to be added to this estimate due to the massive annual production of new chemicals37. While the industry is focusing on material properties to provide profitable products, regulatory authorities require reliable toxicological data to ensure safety. With the increasing amount and diversity of chemicals, current testing strategies do not meet the demands and fail to sufficiently protect humans and the environment2, 38. Therefore, it is important to develop new approach methodologies (NAMs) that can help fill current information gaps. Higher throughput methods that allow rapid collection of high-quality toxicological data for hazard identification and prediction of toxicological potential should be implemented. Toxicology needs to develop from hazard and risk assessments based on morphological endpoints in animal tests towards a mechanism-driven integrated approach that also includes computational modelling as well as molecular, human, and in vitro data. The application of new science and technology, such as different types of imaging and omics methods, including epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and metagenomics, that permit the collection of novel high-content data directly from tissues, bulk, or single-cell samples, can accelerate the discovery of specific chemical targets and modes of action in a systems toxicology approach1, 39. The adverse outcome pathway (AOP) framework is gaining popularity as a tool for describing the relationship between mechanistic data and toxicity endpoints required for regulatory assessments40. An AOP can be used to structure current understanding of the chemical mechanism of action. This pathway begins with a molecular initiating event, such as the binding of a receptor, progresses through key events that are critical steps necessary for the toxicity to occur, and culminates in an adverse outcome, like diseases or developmental abnormalities. AOPs are useful for identifying areas where more research is necessary to comprehend the underlying mechanisms, aiding in characterizing chemical hazards, and directing the development of NAMs. Other scientific advances that have the potential to drive the development of toxicology include the generation of human-induced pluripotent stem cells, organoids, organ-on-a-chip, CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing, and artificial intelligence (AI).

Initiatives such as Tox21 and ToxCast have spurred the use of in vitro and computational toxicology models. The application of advanced in silico approaches, including AI, can aid in defining the modes of action and improving the ability to predict whether the effects caused by a chemical in experimental models can also occur in humans and animals. With the increasing amounts and types of data available, and new advanced computing technologies, machine learning will likely play a crucial role in toxicology41, 42. Machine learning (subfield of AI), utilizes data and algorithms to continually improve predictions without being explicitly programmed. Its iterative nature allows the models to adjust on their own when they are exposed to new information. Through learning from past computations, machine learning models can produce consistent and reliable decisions and results. However, good data quality is an essential part of the overall data science and machine learning process. Low quality data can greatly affect the outcome and have negative consequences when decisions are based on those results. Mechanistic in vitro data can also be used to strengthen the links between chemical exposure and health outcomes found in epidemiological studies. For example, human data have revealed an association between per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), such as perfluoroctane sulfonate (PFOS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), and perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHxS), and breast cancer. Our in vitro studies confirmed that these PFAS can transform normal human breast epithelial cells to a malignant phenotype via mechanisms that include epigenetic alterations, providing potential pathways involved in the association with breast cancer4345. Interestingly, very low concentrations (500 pM) of the binary PFOS and PFOA mixture were found to induce synergistic effects on breast cell proliferation46. The same cell model was then used to assess the potential tumorigenic activity of several alternative PFAS, which had no effects and were clearly less harmful in our experimental model47.

In addition to the benefits of improved possibilities to generate and use mechanistic information at higher throughput, which allows screening of more compounds, an increased use of NAMs is important considering the 3R concept. The principles of replacement, reduction, and refinement are vital for safeguarding animal welfare during research. However, the development and validation of NAMs for regulatory testing is a complex process. Before new methods can replace animals, they must be verified to provide equivalent or improved protection as the animal test that they would replace48. Currently, several NAMs have been approved by regulatory authorities; however, most of these methods have not yet been widely implemented48. Although scientifically valid NAMs are necessary to screen the large number of chemicals produced and contribute to improved animal welfare, the complete replacement of animals in toxicological research and testing remains a complex and challenging task. The processes in any organism involve a large number of intricate interactions and are more complicated than the sum of all parts. When a chemical enters the body, it can simultaneously interact with several target tissues, affecting numerous biological processes and physiological functions, which may cause unexpected consequences for other pathways. This complexity can in certain cases be difficult to fully study and predict using test approaches that do not include animal models at all. For example, compound toxicity depends on its kinetics and metabolism (absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion; ADME). This can include site-specific accumulation and/or bioactivation of the compound, which causes unpredicted toxicity in certain tissues or even particular cells. In addition to dose and ADME properties, the adverse effects of a chemical depend on the timing of exposure. During vulnerable periods in utero and in early infancy, exposure to chemical concentrations regarded as safe for adults may impair child development and result in disease later in life49, 50. Epigenetic mechanisms such as histone modifications, DNA methylation, and regulation by non-coding RNAs are central pathways for the long-term effects of developmental exposure49, 51. They may even mediate multi- and transgenerational effects of environmental exposure through epigenetic inheritance5254, which is very challenging to study in detail without any animal model. Our recent study demonstrated that male frogs (F0) exposed to environmental concentrations of the pesticide linuron fathered male offspring (F1) with reduced body size, altered spermatogenesis, decreased fertility, and other signs of endocrine system disruption. The impacts were further propagated to the F2 generation, providing evidence of transgenerational effects in amphibians. F2 males demonstrated a decreased number of germ cell nests, increased weight and fat body palmitoleic-to-palmitic acid ratio, and decreased plasma glucose levels. The findings provide important cross-species evidence of paternal epigenetic inheritance and pollutant-induced transgenerational toxicity, supporting a causal and complex role of environmental contamination in ongoing amphibian extinction. This also exemplifies that animal research not only is important for human safety but also for the benefit of animals55.

Even if animal experiments may be difficult to fully replace in the near future, continued investments in the development of NAMs are essential. The first stage of toxicity testing should be performed in vitro and in silico. Better incorporation of mechanistic knowledge gained from NAMs will be important for chemical safety as well as reduce the number of animals used for toxicological testing and generate biomarkers that contribute to reduced distress in animals. The discovery and application of new science and technology to develop and validate NAMs and earlier humane endpoints will further refine, reduce, and replace animal use while ensuring and advancing the health of people, animals, and the environment.

Combining scientific development and knowledge within toxicology and other related research fields, with far-sighted political leadership and carefully defined environmental policies, will be central to driving the changes needed to better protect environmental and human health. The European Commission’s Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability (CSS), released in 2020, is an ambitious political action plan to restructure the chemical regulatory framework in the EU. Safe and sustainable-by-design is an important concept in this initiative, which could become one of the pillars of chemical regulation in the EU. Based on cutting-edge science, this holistic approach aims to promote the development of chemicals that are safe for humans and the environment from production throughout the lifecycle, offer an improved environmental footprint, and deliver the expected performance and societal value. This requires close collaborations between toxicologists and chemists, and innovative green chemistry approaches.

The Exposome: Multiple Exposures and Individual Susceptibility

Another challenge in toxicology is the interaction of chemicals in mixtures, which can occur via several mechanisms. Chemicals are almost always considered individually in current risk assessments, possibly leading to a systematic underestimation of risks. Toxicological research must begin to fully assess the combinatorial effects of chemicals in mixtures. By examining the toxicological impact of complex real-world chemical mixtures instead of one chemical at a time, it may be possible to more accurately identify harmful combinations and underlying mechanisms. This is critical because the combined effect of chemicals in mixtures may be greater or lesser than the effect of individual chemicals on biological processes46, 56, 57.

Moreover, the adverse effects of chemicals also depend on their complex interactions with genes and other environmental factors. The exposome can be defined as the cumulative lifetime environmental exposure and related biological responses of an individual (Figure 1)27. In the exposome concept, all non-genetic factors contributing to disease are considered environmental, including for example air pollutants, chemicals, drugs, radiation, microbiota, climate, and psychosocial stress2830. It is therefore central to study how interactions among chemical exposures and other environmental factors that make up the exposome, may affect our health. For example, the importance of the gut microbiome in human health has become increasingly evident. Pharmaceuticals and other chemicals have also been shown to affect the gut microbiome and vice versa; however, the complex relationship and its possible role in the etiology of disease and response to medical treatment warrant further research58, 59.

Moreover, closely linked factors, such as diet and environmental contaminant exposure, can strongly influence gut flora60, 61. People immigrating from Thailand to the US demonstrated a clear westernization of their gut microbiome and an increased risk of obesity, illustrating how different parts of the exposome may interact and affect health60. Pathogens and environmental pollution can also interact and worsen adverse health effects. For example, people living in regions with high air pollution are more likely to have compromised respiratory and cardiac systems and may therefore be more vulnerable to infectious agents targeting the respiratory system62,63, 64.

While it is generally accepted that human activities, including chemical pollution, drive the severe ongoing decline of biodiversity, the close link between the health of our planet and human health is less often considered2123. For example, biodiversity loss alters ecosystem functions and reduces the ability to provide society with necessary goods and services, such as food2123. Furthermore, one consequence of climate change that was recently highlighted in a review is its potential to alter the distribution and toxicological effects of environmental pollutants1. Global warming together with eutrophication of aquatic and terrestrial environments by widespread agricultural use of fertilizers and manure, can also contribute to ecosystem dysfunction and an increase in cyanobacterial and algal blooms, which are a threat to human and animal health as they can produce a wide range of potent toxins9, 10, 3336.

Efforts to generate systematic information on the human exposome and its complex interactions would significantly advance our understanding of human diseases1, 75. First, exposure assessments need to be further improved. Traditionally, environmental exposure is measured through questionnaires, geographical information, or targeted analytical methods76. The development of high-resolution mass spectrometry and approaches that combine targeted chemical analysis with suspect screening and nontarget analysis can lead to better characterization of current chemical exposures28, 29, 77. Methods for collecting representative information on air pollution exposure have also been developed. While the nearest air pollution monitor may provide a suboptimal estimate of the actual exposure, portable air pollution sensors, dispersion modelling, and land use regression modelling may offer a better and more personalized estimate78. It is also important to leverage new omics methods and other technological developments to characterize the composition and effects of the exposome. Epidemiologists and biostatisticians will play an important role in this challenging task, as further implementation and development of suitable data analysis methods is necessary79. The increased access to high-throughput technologies has led to a massive growth in omics data, which aim to depict various biological aspects such as genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics and metagenomics. Machine learning techniques have been applied to these data to develop diagnostic and classification biomarkers. However, these biomarkers are often limited as they only utilize data from a single omics measurement, not fully utilizing the comprehensive nature of recent multi-omics studies80. To make the most of these multi-omics experiments, a strategy that integrates data from all omics layers is required8082. The field of environmental epidemiology has also begun to move towards using an exposome approach that include multiple environmental exposures. Various statistical methods have been proposed to evaluate the individual and combined effects of chemical combinations and other environmental factors79, 8387. Studies that have compared various machine learning approaches for examining the impact of the exposome suggest that there is no one-size-fits-all model8890. It is therefore recommended to explore various machine learning techniques, such as and random forest models and artificial neural networks (deep learning), to characterize the impact of the exposome in the best possible way82, 88, 9196.

Mechanistic toxicology will play a central role in the large cross-disciplinary efforts needed to better understand complex exposome interactions and their impact on biota and human health. Human health risk assessment aims to protect broad populations, which may include a wide range of susceptibility to the adverse effects of chemical exposure. The exposome can alter important biological processes through epigenetic mechanisms such as DNA methylation, histone modifications, and regulation by non-coding RNAs that alter the expression of key genes97100. Individual responses to current exposures and susceptibility to disease are influenced by genetics, epigenetics, physiology, and health status, which involve changes in biological pathways caused by previous exposures and potentially parental or even grandparental exposures via epigenetic inheritance (Figure 1). People living in socially or economically disadvantaged areas or in developing countries where pollution is generally high and health status is low may therefore be particularly sensitive to chemical exposure. Life stage is also an important factor; both the elderly and young can be highly vulnerable to chemical exposure. Chemical exposure in utero or in early infancy may adversely affect vital developmental processes at concentrations regarded safe for adults49, 50. Currently, uncertainty regarding human variability and susceptibility is considered by applying the conventional safety assessment factors. However, more research is needed to better understand gene-environment interactions, characterize the exposome and its complex interaction at the individual level, and ultimately include this information in the assessment of population-level variability and susceptibility. NAMs can also provide the possibility to experimentally investigate human population variability and susceptibility factors by, for example, using human cell models derived from diverse populations or in silico approaches integrating information from different sources and subpopulations. Chemical exposures are likely to be underestimated contributors to human disease, yet gene-environment interaction studies rarely assess their modifying effects. We recently published a computational approach to profile the human genome and identify the genetic regions associated with differential population susceptibility to chemical exposures75. By integrating high-throughput screening data from sources such as the ToxCast program, and literature-curated chemical-gene data with gene-disease data, this method predicts high-risk genetic regions for differential population susceptibility to chemical exposures and characterize chemical modifying factors in specific diseases75. Another recent study has used an integrative approach, combining an in vitro CRISPR screen with molecular epidemiology to discover individual susceptibility to adverse effects of environmental contaminants101.

Precision medicine, also called personalized medicine, is an emerging approach for disease prevention and treatment that considers differences in the genes, environments, and lifestyles of people. The role of precision medicine in daily healthcare is still relatively limited and highly focused on genetics. It is important to further expand this approach to more areas of health and healthcare and make efforts to better include individual environments and lifestyles by integrating the exposome concept. For example, although air pollution is a global public health concern, there is a lack of individual-level preventative options. In a controlled human exposure study led by Baccarelli, we demonstrated the epigenetic effects of concentrated ambient PM2.5 (fine particles with a diameter of 2.5 micrometers or less) on peripheral T helper cells, the most prolific cytokine producer mediating PM2.5-induced inflammatory responses. Interestingly, B-vitamin supplementation prevented these changes100. This placebo-controlled intervention trial indicated that individual-level prevention may be used to complement regulations and control potential mechanistic pathways underlying the adverse effects of PM2.5, with possible significant public health benefits in areas with frequent PM2.5 peaks. Because of the central role of epigenetic modifications in mediating environmental effects, these findings may be extended to other toxicants, and illustrate the importance of understanding the adverse effects of environmental exposures on a molecular level.

Concluding Remarks and Recommendations

Scientific evidence shows that we live in a time, often referred to as the Anthropocene, when unsustainable human activity shapes the biosphere. This includes greenhouse gas emissions, which are the main cause of global climate change. In addition, air pollution and the rapid chemical intensification, pose a direct threat to biota and human health. However, risk assessment of industrial chemicals and anthropogenic emissions is often inadequate, and the adverse effects of many environmental contaminants are poorly understood.

Combining scientific knowledge and development within toxicology and other related research fields, with far-sighted political leadership and carefully defined environmental policies that include stricter requirements on the industry to conduct safety evaluations of their products, will be central to driving the changes needed to better protect environmental and human health. This strategy includes taking advantage of modern technology and methods to continue the development of NAMs. Modernizing toxicology towards a mechanism-driven integrated approach will allow faster collection of high-quality toxicological data for hazard identification and better prediction of toxicological potential. To further improve chemical safety, it is also important that we actually include the mechanistic knowledge gained from NAMs into chemical regulation and management work.

Mechanistic toxicology will play a fundamental role in the large cross-disciplinary efforts needed to better understand how complex exposome interactions may affect the biota and human health. Gene-environment interactions underlie the majority of chronic human diseases, and a relatively small proportion of chronic human diseases is caused solely by genetic factors. It is therefore essential to conduct more research and develop better tools to determine environmental contributions to diseases. The individual response to current exposure and susceptibility to disease is influenced by genetics, epigenetics, physiology, and health status, which involve changes in biological pathways caused by previous exposure or even ancestral exposures. In the future, it is therefore important to better consider individual genomes, exposomes, and susceptibility in risk assessment and precision medicine. Improved understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the health effects of contaminants will aid risk assessment as well as help develop individual-level preventative options as a complement to regulations.

To solve the complex challenges of humanity in the Anthropocene, we must understand that global work and commitment are needed. Given the major role of economic activity in ongoing anthropogenic changes, economics must be included in the core of sustainable development and vice versa102104. The concept of a circular economy aims to achieve equilibrium between economic growth, the preservation of resources, and the safeguarding of the environment103. Currently, the economic system largely builds on linear principles focused on throughput, optimization, and cost-benefit analysis. Therefore, global sourcing has been a major industrial practice for multinational companies during the past decades105, 106. This is an established strategy for lowering costs and improving competitiveness by sourcing materials/products from countries with lower labor and production costs107. Companies sourcing globally are also accused of not handling social and environmental concerns sufficiently, including disregard of environmental regulations and working conditions106, 108. This includes industries that do not use any type of wastewater treatment before discharge into rivers or appropriate safety equipment for their employees. However, because of increased consumer pressure, some large multinational companies have started to integrate social and environmental sustainability into their overall strategies106. This reflects a growing perception that a company is not more sustainable than its supply chain105. Hence, increased understanding and awareness of chemical contamination could contribute to enforcement or changes in existing environmental regulations, influence global and national companies to increase their sustainability commitments, and minimize environmental contamination in developing countries. It is necessary to consider environmental aspects and ensure that they remain within defined planetary boundaries for sustainable global economic development. This requires competent political leadership and ambitious environmental policies. The vision that EU policymakers have in the CSS will have significant consequences for the industry. Based on cutting-edge science, the concept of safe and sustainable-by-design aims to promote the development of chemicals that are safe for humans and the environment from production throughout the lifecycle, offer an improved environmental footprint, and deliver the expected performance and value to stakeholders throughout the value chain. If this ambitious political initiative to restructure the chemical regulatory framework in the EU becomes a benchmark worldwide, it will significantly help safeguard the population and planetary health, and modern toxicology will play a key role in this work.

Acknowledgements

The European Research Council (PATER 805057), the Swedish Research Council (Grant 2022-04419), and FORMAS (Grant 2022-01316) are acknowledged for financial support.

Footnotes

Competing Financial Interests

The author declares no actual or potential competing financial interests.

References

  • 1.Karlsson O, Rocklöv J, Lehoux AP, et al. The human exposome and health in the Anthropocene. Int J Epidemiol. 2021;50:378–89. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Naidu R, Biswas B, Willett IR, et al. Chemical pollution: A growing peril and potential catastrophic risk to humanity. Environment international. 2021;156:106616. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cribb J. Surviving the 21st Century: Humanity's Ten Great Challenges and How We Can Overcome Them. Springer; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wang Z, Walker GW, Muir DCG, Nagatani-Yoshida K. Toward a Global Understanding of Chemical Pollution: A First Comprehensive Analysis of National and Regional Chemical Inventories. Environmental science & technology. 2020;54:2575–84. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b06379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Valencia RHC. CHEMICAL INDUSTRY UNDER THE 4TH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION: The Sustainable, Digital & Citizens… One. WILEY-VCH; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jensen S. The PCB Story. Ambio. 1972;1:123–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Inger R, Gregory R, Duffy JP, Stott I, Voříšek P, Gaston KJ. Common European birds are declining rapidly while less abundant species' numbers are rising. 2015;18:28–36. doi: 10.1111/ele.12387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hallmann CA, Sorg M, Jongejans E, et al. More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0185809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Springmann M, Clark M, Mason-D’Croz D, et al. Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature. 2018;562:519–25. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Stiles WAV, Rowe EC, Dennis P. Long-term nitrogen and phosphorus enrichment alters vegetation species composition and reduces carbon storage in upland soil. Science of The Total Environment. 2017;593-594:688–94. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Almond REA, Grooten M, Juffe Bignoli D, Petersen T, editors. Living Planet Report 2022 – Building a naturepositive society. WWF; Gland, Switzerland: 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.IUCN. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species Version 2022-2. 2022. https://www.iucnredlist.org. Downloaded on [22 03 2023]
  • 13.Rappaport SM. Genetic Factors Are Not the Major Causes of Chronic Diseases. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0154387. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lichtenstein P, Holm NV, Verkasalo PK, et al. Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer--analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:78–85. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200007133430201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Manolio TA, Collins FS, Cox NJ, et al. Finding the missing heritability of complex diseases. Nature. 2009;461:747–53. doi: 10.1038/nature08494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rappaport SM. Implications of the exposome for exposure science. Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology. 2011;21:5–9. doi: 10.1038/jes.2010.50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Landrigan PJ, Fuller R, Acosta NJR, et al. The <em>Lancet</em> Commission on pollution and health. The Lancet. 2018;391:462–512. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32345-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fuller R, Landrigan PJ, Balakrishnan K, et al. Pollution and health: a progress update. The Lancet Planetary health. 2022;6:e535–e47. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00090-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sánchez-Bayo F, Wyckhuys KAG. Worldwide decline of the entomofauna: A review of its drivers. Biological Conservation. 2019;232:8–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Powney GD, Carvell C, Edwards M, et al. Widespread losses of pollinating insects in Britain. Nature communications. 2019;10:1018. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08974-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A, et al. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature. 2012;486:59–67. doi: 10.1038/nature11148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Diaz S, Fargione J, Chapin FS, Tilman D. Biodiversity loss threatens human well-being. PLoS biology. 2006;4:e277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Whitmee S, Haines A, Beyrer C, et al. Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: report of The Rockefeller Foundation-Lancet Commission on planetary health. Lancet. 2015;386:1973–2028. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60901-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Poore J, Nemecek T. Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science. 2018;360:987–92. doi: 10.1126/science.aaq0216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Organization WH. Reducing animal-human transmission of emerging pathogens. 2020. https://www.who.int/health-topics/coronavirus/who-recommendations-to-reduce-risk-of-transmission-of-emerging-pathogens-from-animals-to-humans-in-live-animal-markets .
  • 26.Karlsson O, Rocklöv J, Lehoux AP, et al. The human exposome and health in the Anthropocene. Int J Epidemiol. 2020 doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wild CP. Complementing the genome with an "exposome": the outstanding challenge of environmental exposure measurement in molecular epidemiology. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:1847–50. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Niedzwiecki MM, Miller GW. The Exposome Paradigm in Human Health: Lessons from the Emory Exposome Summer Course. Environ Health Perspect. 2017;125:064502. doi: 10.1289/EHP1712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vrijheid M. The exposome: a new paradigm to study the impact of environment on health. Thorax. 2014;69:876–8. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-204949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wild CP. The exposome: from concept to utility. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2012;41:24–32. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Noyes PD, McElwee MK, Miller HD, et al. The toxicology of climate change: Environmental contaminants in a warming world. Environment international. 2009;35:971–86. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2009.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Schartup AT, Thackray CP, Qureshi A, et al. Climate change and overfishing increase neurotoxicant in marine predators. Nature. 2019 doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1468-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lürling M, MMe Mello, van Oosterhout F, de Senerpont Domis L, Marinho MM. Response of Natural Cyanobacteria and Algae Assemblages to a Nutrient Pulse and Elevated Temperature. Frontiers in microbiology. 2018;9 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Paerl HW. Mitigating Toxic Planktonic Cyanobacterial Blooms in Aquatic Ecosystems Facing Increasing Anthropogenic and Climatic Pressures. Toxins (Basel) 2018;10:76. doi: 10.3390/toxins10020076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Paerl HW, Hall NS, Calandrino ES. Controlling harmful cyanobacterial blooms in a world experiencing anthropogenic and climatic-induced change. Sci Total Environ. 2011;409:1739–45. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Karlsson O, Berg AL, Hanrieder J, Arnerup G, Lindstrom AK, Brittebo EB. Intracellular fibril formation, calcification, and enrichment of chaperones, cytoskeletal, and intermediate filament proteins in the adult hippocampus CA1 following neonatal exposure to the nonprotein amino acid BMAA. Archives of toxicology. 2015;89:423–36. doi: 10.1007/s00204-014-1262-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cribb J. Surviving the 21st Century: Humanity's Ten Great Challenges and How We Can Overcome Them. Springer; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Martin OV, Adams J, Beasley A, et al. Improving environmental risk assessments of chemicals: Steps towards evidence-based ecotoxicology. Environment international. 2019;128:210–7. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.04.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Karlsson O, Hanrieder J. Imaging mass spectrometry in drug development and toxicology. Archives of toxicology. 2017;91:2283–94. doi: 10.1007/s00204-016-1905-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.LaLone CA, Ankley GT, Belanger SE, et al. Advancing the adverse outcome pathway framework-An international horizon scanning approach. Environmental toxicology and chemistry. 2017;36:1411–21. doi: 10.1002/etc.3805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Liu A, Seal S, Yang H, Bender A. Using chemical and biological data to predict drug toxicity. SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D. 2023 doi: 10.1016/j.slasd.2022.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Cavasotto CN, Scardino V. Machine Learning Toxicity Prediction: Latest Advances by Toxicity End Point. ACS omega. 2022;7:47536–46. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c05693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Pierozan P, Cattani D, Karlsson O. Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) induce epigenetic alterations and promote human breast cell carcinogenesis in vitro. Archives of toxicology. 2020 doi: 10.1007/s00204-020-02848-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pierozan P, Jerneren F, Karlsson O. Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) exposure promotes proliferation, migration and invasion potential in human breast epithelial cells. Archives of toxicology. 2018 doi: 10.1007/s00204-018-2181-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Pierozan P, Karlsson O. PFOS induces proliferation, cell-cycle progression, and malignant phenotype in human breast epithelial cells. Archives of toxicology. 2018;92:705–16. doi: 10.1007/s00204-017-2077-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Pierozan P, Kosnik M, Karlsson O. High-content analysis shows synergistic effects of low perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOA) mixture concentrations on human breast epithelial cell carcinogenesis. Environment international. 2023;172:107746. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2023.107746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Pierozan P, Cattani D, Karlsson O. Tumorigenic activity of alternative per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): Mechanistic in vitro studies. Sci Total Environ. 2022;808:151945. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Stokes WS. Animals and the 3Rs in toxicology research and testing: The way forward. Human & experimental toxicology. 2015;34:1297–303. doi: 10.1177/0960327115598410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gluckman PD, Hanson MA. Living with the past: evolution, development, and patterns of disease. Science. 2004;305:1733–6. doi: 10.1126/science.1095292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Rice D, Barone S., Jr Critical periods of vulnerability for the developing nervous system: evidence from humans and animal models. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108(Suppl 3):511–33. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108s3511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bianco-Miotto T, Craig JM, Gasser YP, van Dijk SJ, Ozanne SE. Epigenetics and DOHaD: from basics to birth and beyond. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2017;8:513–9. doi: 10.1017/S2040174417000733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Anway MD, Cupp AS, Uzumcu M, Skinner MK. Epigenetic transgenerational actions of endocrine disruptors and male fertility. Science. 2005;308:1466–9. doi: 10.1126/science.1108190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Dolinoy DC, Huang D, Jirtle RL. Maternal nutrient supplementation counteracts bisphenol A-induced DNA hypomethylation in early development. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:13056–61. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703739104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Vågerö D, Pinger PR, Aronsson V, van den Berg GJ. Paternal grandfather’s access to food predicts all-cause and cancer mortality in grandsons. Nature communications. 2018;9:5124. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07617-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Karlsson O, Svanholm S, Eriksson A, et al. Pesticide-induced multigenerational effects on amphibian reproduction and metabolism. Sci Total Environ. 2021;775:145771. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Taylor KW, Joubert BR, Braun JM, et al. Statistical Approaches for Assessing Health Effects of Environmental Chemical Mixtures in Epidemiology: Lessons from an Innovative Workshop. Environ Health Perspect. 2016;124:A227–A9. doi: 10.1289/EHP547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Cassee FR, Groten JP, van Bladeren PJ, Feron VJ. Toxicological evaluation and risk assessment of chemical mixtures. Crit Rev Toxicol. 1998;28:73–101. doi: 10.1080/10408449891344164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Maier L, Pruteanu M, Kuhn M, et al. Extensive impact of non-antibiotic drugs on human gut bacteria. Nature. 2018;555:623–8. doi: 10.1038/nature25979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Zimmermann M, Zimmermann-Kogadeeva M, Wegmann R, Goodman AL. Mapping human microbiome drug metabolism by gut bacteria and their genes. Nature. 2019;570:462–7. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1291-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Vangay P, Johnson AJ, Ward TL, et al. US Immigration Westernizes the Human Gut Microbiome. Cell. 2018;175:962–72.:e10. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Rothschild D, Weissbrod O, Barkan E, et al. Environment dominates over host genetics in shaping human gut microbiota. Nature. 2018;555:210–5. doi: 10.1038/nature25973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Cui Y, Zhang Z-F, Froines J, et al. Air pollution and case fatality of SARS in the People's Republic of China: an ecologic study. Environmental Health. 2003;2:15. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-2-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ogen Y. Assessing nitrogen dioxide (NO2) levels as a contributing factor to coronavirus (COVID-19) fatality. Science of The Total Environment. 2020;726:138605. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Wu X, Nethery RC, Sabath BM, Braun D, Dominici F. Exposure to air pollution and COVID-19 mortality in the United States. medRxiv. 2020:2020.04.05.20054502. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd4049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Setti L, Passarini F, De Gennaro G, et al. The Potential role of Particulate Matter in the Spreading of COVID-19 in Northern Italy: First Evidence-based Research Hypotheses. medRxiv. 2020:2020.04.11.20061713 [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Bell ML, Goldberg R, Hogrefe C, et al. Climate change, ambient ozone, and health in 50 US cities. 2007;82:61–76. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Dominici F, Peng RD, Bell ML, et al. Fine Particulate Air Pollution and Hospital Admission for Cardiovascular and Respiratory Diseases. JAMA. 2006;295:1127–34. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.10.1127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Hong C, Zhang Q, Zhang Y, et al. Impacts of climate change on future air quality and human health in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2019;116:17193–200. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1812881116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Yang J, Yin P, Sun J, et al. Heatwave and mortality in 31 major Chinese cities: Definition, vulnerability and implications. Science of The Total Environment. 2019;649:695–702. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Abadin HG, Chou CHSJ, Llados FT. Health effects classification and its role in the derivation of minimal risk levels: Immunological effects. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2007;47:249–56. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2006.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Haines A, Kovats RS, Campbell-Lendrum D, Corvalan C. Climate change and human health: Impacts, vulnerability and public health. Public Health. 2006;120:585–96. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2006.01.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Nagayama J, Tsuji H, Iida T, et al. Immunologic effects of perinatal exposure to dioxins, PCBs and organochlorine pesticides in Japanese infants. Chemosphere. 2007;67:S393–S8. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.05.134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Jacquin L, Gandar A, Aguirre-Smith M, et al. High temperature aggravates the effects of pesticides in goldfish. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2019;172:255–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.01.085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Lagesson A, Saaristo M, Brodin T, et al. Fish on steroids: Temperature-dependent effects of 17β-trenbolone on predator escape, boldness, and exploratory behaviors. Environ Pollut. 2019;245:243–52. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.10.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kosnik MB, Enroth S, Karlsson O. Distinct genetic regions are associated with differential population susceptibility to chemical exposures. Environment international. 2021;152:106488. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Dennis KK, Marder E, Balshaw DM, et al. Biomonitoring in the Era of the Exposome. Environ Health Perspect. 2017;125:502–10. doi: 10.1289/EHP474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Vineis P, Chadeau-Hyam M, Gmuender H, et al. The exposome in practice: Design of the EXPOsOMICS project. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2017;220:142–51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2016.08.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Gulliver J, Hoogh Kd. In: Oxford Textbook of Global Public Health. Detels R, Gulliford M, Karim QA, Tan CC, editors. Oxford University Press; 2015. Environmental exposure assessment: modelling air pollution concentrations. 0. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Stafoggia M, Breitner S, Hampel R, Basagana X. Statistical Approaches to Address Multi-Pollutant Mixtures and Multiple Exposures: the State of the Science. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2017;4:481–90. doi: 10.1007/s40572-017-0162-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Picard M, Scott-Boyer M-P, Bodein A, Périn O, Droit A. Integration strategies of multi-omics data for machine learning analysis. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal. 2021;19:3735–46. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.06.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Reel PS, Reel S, Pearson E, Trucco E, Jefferson E. Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis: A review. Biotechnol Adv. 2021;49:107739. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Sammut S-J, Crispin-Ortuzar M, Chin S-F, et al. Multi-omic machine learning predictor of breast cancer therapy response. Nature. 2022;601:623–9. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04278-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Bobb JF, Valeri L, Claus Henn B, et al. Bayesian kernel machine regression for estimating the health effects of multi-pollutant mixtures. Biostatistics. 2015;16:493–508. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxu058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Liu SH, Bobb JF, Lee KH, et al. Lagged kernel machine regression for identifying time windows of susceptibility to exposures of complex mixtures. Biostatistics. 2018;19:325–41. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxx036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Dickerson AS, Hansen J, Thompson S, Gredal O, Weisskopf MG. A mixtures approach to solvent exposures and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a population-based study in Denmark. European journal of epidemiology. 2020;35:241–9. doi: 10.1007/s10654-020-00624-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Dickerson AS, Ransome Y, Karlsson O. Human prenatal exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and risk behaviors in adolescence. Environment international. 2019;129:247–55. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.04.051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Dickerson AS, Deng Z, Ransome Y, Factor-Litvak P, Karlsson O. Associations of prenatal exposure to mixtures of organochlorine pesticides and smoking and drinking behaviors in adolescence. Environ Res. 2022;206:112431. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Ohanyan H, Portengen L, Huss A, et al. Machine learning approaches to characterize the obesogenic urban exposome. Environment international. 2022;158:107015. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.107015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Lenters V, Vermeulen R, Portengen L. Performance of variable selection methods for assessing the health effects of correlated exposures in case–control studies. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 2018;75:522. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2016-104231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Barrera-Gómez J, Agier L, Portengen L, et al. A systematic comparison of statistical methods to detect interactions in exposome-health associations. Environmental Health. 2017;16:74. doi: 10.1186/s12940-017-0277-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Cipullo S, Snapir B, Prpich G, Campo P, Coulon F. Prediction of bioavailability and toxicity of complex chemical mixtures through machine learning models. Chemosphere. 2019;215:388–95. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.10.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Kar S, Leszczynski J. Computational approaches in assessments of mixture toxicity. Current Opinion in Toxicology. 2022;29:31–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Reel PS, Reel S, Pearson E, Trucco E, Jefferson E. Using machine learning approaches for multi-omics data analysis: A review. Biotechnology Advances. 2021;49:107739. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Leng D, Zheng L, Wen Y, et al. A benchmark study of deep learning-based multi-omics data fusion methods for cancer. Genome biology. 2022;23:171. doi: 10.1186/s13059-022-02739-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Maitre L, Guimbaud J-B, Warembourg C, et al. State-of-the-art methods for exposure-health studies: Results from the exposome data challenge event. Environment international. 2022;168:107422. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Ohanyan H, Portengen L, Huss A, et al. Machine learning approaches to characterize the obesogenic urban exposome. Environment international. 2022;158:107015. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.107015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Hou L, Barupal J, Zhang W, et al. Particulate Air Pollution Exposure and Expression of Viral and Human MicroRNAs in Blood: The Beijing Truck Driver Air Pollution Study. Environ Health Perspect. 2016;124:344–50. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1408519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Karlsson O, Baccarelli AA. Environmental Health and Long Non-coding RNAs. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2016 doi: 10.1007/s40572-016-0092-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Angrish MM, Allard P, McCullough SD, et al. Epigenetic Applications in Adverse Outcome Pathways and Environmental Risk Evaluation. Environ Health Perspect. 2018;126:045001. doi: 10.1289/EHP2322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Zhong J, Karlsson O, Wang G, et al. B vitamins attenuate the epigenetic effects of ambient fine particles in a pilot human intervention trial. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114:3503–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1618545114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Tian M, Xia P, Yan L, et al. Toxicological Mechanism of Individual Susceptibility to Formaldehyde-Induced Respiratory Effects. Environmental science & technology. 2022;56:6511–24. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c07945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Polasky S, Kling CL, Levin SA, et al. Role of economics in analyzing the environment and sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2019;116:5233–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1901616116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Chen T-L, Kim H, Pan S-Y, Tseng P-C, Lin Y-P, Chiang P-C. Implementation of green chemistry principles in circular economy system towards sustainable development goals: Challenges and perspectives. Science of The Total Environment. 2020;716:136998. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Barbier EB. The Concept of Sustainable Economic Development. Environmental Conservation. 1987;14:101–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Jia F, Jiang Y. Sustainable Global Sourcing: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability. 2018;10:595. [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Thorlakson T, de Zegher JF, Lambin EF. Companies’ contribution to sustainability through global supply chains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2018;115:2072–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1716695115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Maltz A, Carter JR, Maltz E. How managers make sourcing decisions about low cost regions: Insights from perceptual mapping. Industrial Marketing Management. 2011;40:796–804. [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Seuring S, Müller M. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2008;16:1699–710. [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES