Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Nov 21.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Rep. 2024 Apr 1;43(4):114025. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114025

BAI1 localizes AMPA receptors at the cochlear afferent post-synaptic density and is essential for hearing

Adam J Carlton 1,#, Jing-Yi Jeng 1,#, Fiorella C Grandi 2, Francesca De Faveri 1, Ana E Amariutei 1, Lara De Tomasi 1, Andrew O’Connor 1, Stuart L Johnson 1,3, David N Furness 4, Steve DM Brown 5, Federico Ceriani 1, Michael R Bowl 5,6, Mirna Mustapha 1,3, Walter Marcotti 1,3,8,*
PMCID: PMC7618386  EMSID: EMS210735  PMID: 38564333

Summary

Type I spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) convey sound information to the central auditory pathway by forming synapses with inner hair cells (IHCs) in the mammalian cochlea. The molecular mechanisms regulating the formation of the post-synaptic density (PSD) in the SGN afferent terminals are still unclear. Here, we demonstrate that brain-specific angiogenesis inhibitor 1 (BAI1) is required for the clustering of AMPA receptors GluR2–4 (glutamate receptors 2–4) at the PSD. Adult Bai1-deficient mice have functional IHCs but fail to transmit information to the SGNs, leading to highly raised hearing thresholds. Despite the almost complete absence of AMPA receptor subunits, the SGN fibers innervating the IHCs do not degenerate. Furthermore, we show that AMPA receptors are still expressed in the cochlea of Bai1-deficient mice, highlighting a role for BAI1 in trafficking or anchoring GluR2–4 to the PSDs. These findings identify molecular and functional mechanisms required for sound encoding at cochlear ribbon synapses.


Graphic abstract.

Graphic abstract

Introduction

In mammals, a precise representation of the auditory landscape requires the processing of acoustic stimuli with unparalleled temporal precision (in the range of μs) over a wide range of sound intensity and frequency.1,2 While sound frequency is mainly encoded by the tonotopic organization of the sensory hair cells along the length of the cochlea,3 the intensity and timing of the sound waveform are largely defined by the firing characteristics of the auditory afferent fibers.4 Type I spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) represent the majority of the afferent fibers that innervate the cochlea (~95%),5 the role of which is to relay sound information toward the brain. Each type I afferent fiber makes a single bouton-like synapse with an inner hair cell (IHC), which are the primary auditory receptors of the mammalian cochlea. In mice, each IHC is normally contacted by up to 20 SGN afferent boutons that are paired with a pre-synaptic ribbon,6,7 the role of which is to tether vesicles to facilitate high rates of sustained synaptic transmission.8,9 The physiological characteristics of SGN afferent fibers are very heterogeneous, showing a wide range of thresholds and spontaneous firing rates,1012 which allow them to convey the wide dynamic range of sound intensity encoded by the IHCs.2

Recent studies using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) on the mammalian cochlea have identified several genes that are expressed in SGNs,1315 including the brain-specific angiogenesis inhibitor Bai1. The BAI family, a subclass of adhesion G-protein-coupled receptors, consists of three members.16 BAI1, which is encoded by the ADGRB1 (adhesion G-protein-coupled receptor B1) gene,17 was initially identified as a target of the tumor suppressor p53.18,19 BAI1 has also been shown to play crucial roles in diverse cellular processes such as suppressing angiogenesis,20 promoting myogenesis,21 and the internalization of apoptotic cells.22 Knockdown of BAI1 has been shown to affect synaptogenesis in hippocampal and cortical neurons.23 Furthermore, mice lacking Bai1 have been shown to display reduced expression of PSD-95 and a thinning of the post-synaptic density (PSD) in hippocampal neurons24 leading to deficits in spatial learning and memory24 and brain development and an increased susceptibility to seizures.25 Moreover, a rare BAI1 variant has been identified in patients affected with autism spectrum disorders,26 and Bai1 has been suggested to be linked to hearing loss in mice.27 Despite the important role of BAI1 in the CNS, the mechanism(s) by which it mediates afferent synaptogenesis is still poorly understood.

In this study, we investigated the role of Bai1 (Adgrb1) in the auditory system using Bai1-deficient (Bai1tm2b) mice generated by the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium. We found that BAI1 is expressed in cochlear afferent SGNs. Using a combination of functional, morphological, and molecular approaches, we found that BAI1 is required for the correct localization of AMPA receptors (GluR2–4 [glutamate receptors 2–4]) to the PSD. Transcriptomic analysis also reveals that the absence of functional Bai1 leads to many gene expression changes that are also found in VGlut3 knockout mice and highlights a role for BAI1 in trafficking or anchoring GluR2–4 to the PSDs.

Results

Bai1-deficient (Bai1tm2b) mice of both sexes were produced through Cre-mediated conversion of the “knockout-first” tm2a allele, which was achieved by treating in-vitro-fertilization-derived embryos with a cell-permeable Cre enzyme (Figure 1). In the converted tm2b allele (Bai1tm2b), exons 3 and 4 (ENSMUSE00001058436 and ENSMUSE00000963718) of the Adgrb1 gene (ENSMUSG00000034730; MGI: 1933736), located on chromosome 15, are deleted, leaving a lacZ reporter cassette containing a splice acceptor that subsumes normal splicing (Figure 1A). X-gal staining of the cochlea from postnatal day 6 and 7 (P6–P7) mice showed that LacZ is expressed in the cell body of the SGNs (Figures 1B and 1C). scRNA-seq data have also shown that Bai1 is expressed in all subtypes of SGNs from P25–P27 mice with no change along the cochlear tonotopic axis (Figure S1).14 qPCR analysis from P6 and P22 cochlear tissue revealed that Bai1 is significantly downregulated in Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice compared to controls (Bai1tm2b/+) only at the older age tested (Figure 1D). Bai1 has at least two isoforms: a long form, which contains the extracellular thrombospondin repeats (TSRs), and a short form, which contains the intracellular domains only16 (Figures 1E and 1F). To determine which, if any, of the Bai1 isoforms are affected by the tm2b allele, we performed RNA-seq of bulk cochlear tissues and visualized the mapped reads on the Bai1 gene. As expected, in the heterozygous animals, we could observe reads mapping to both the long isoform as well as shared regions of the short isoform. However, splicing analysis of the RNA-seq data in homozygous Bai1tm2b mice at both P7 and P22 showed a loss of reads mapping between exon 3, where the lacZ cassette inserted, and exon 18, where the short isoform(s) begins (Figure 1F), leaving an intact short isoform with no observed differences in expression levels (Figure S2). Therefore, we concluded that the Bai1tm2b mice represent a knockout model for the long isoform of Bai1.

Figure 1. Generation of Adgrb1-deficient mice (Bai1tm2b/tm2b) and Adgrb1 expression in the mouse cochlea.

Figure 1

(A) Schematic representation of the genomic structure of the mouse adhesion G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) B1 (Adgrb1) gene (ENSMUSG00000034730; MGI: 1933736). The gene comprises 31 exons spanning ~73 Kb of genomic DNA on chromosome 15. Adgrb1 is a 1,582-amino-acid 7-transmembrane protein with an extended extracellular region. The ATG (translation start) and the TGA (stop) sites are in exons 2 and 31, respectively, and the untranslated regions are shown in black. The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium (IMPC) uses different targeting strategies to produce knockout alleles, which rely on the identification of critical exons common to all transcript variants that, when deleted, disrupt gene function.28 For the Adgrb1 gene, a promoter-driven targeting cassette was used to generate a knockout-first allele (tm2a) in C57BL/6N embryonic stem cells. Insertion of the lacZ trapping cassette and a floxed promoter-driven neo cassette inserted into intron 2 of the gene is expected to disrupt gene function. Cre-mediated deletion of the selection cassette and floxed exons 3 and 4 of the tm1a allele generates a lacZ-tagged allele (tm2b), which was used for the present study. FRT, flippase recognition target; neo, neomycin resistance gene; pA, polyadenylation site; SA, splice acceptor.

(B and C) X-gal staining of the cochlear apical-coil region from P6 control and heterozygous littermate mice showing strong Adgrb1 expression (blue) in the cell body of spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs). Images are examples from eight control and eleven Bai1tm2b/+ mice. Note that we cannot exclude the possible presence of X-gal staining in the satellite glial cells. However, inner and outer hair cells (IHCs and OHCs, respectively) were not stained with X-gal.

(D) qPCR showing the expression of Bai1 in the apical coil of the Bai1tm2b/+ and littermate Bai1tm2b/tm2b mouse cochlea. Number of replicas is shown above the data, and each replica contains cochleae from 3–4 mice (mean ± SD).

(E) Diagram of protein domains of mouse BAI1 protein. The lacZ cassette removes the thrombospondin type-1 repeats (TSRs) but leaves intact the GPCR-autoproteolysis inducing (GAIN), GPCR proteolytic site (GPS), and transmembrane domains.

(F) Normalized reads from P7 and P22 control (Bai1tm2b/+) and knockout (Bai1tm2b/tm2b) mice. Three out of seven representative animals from 2 batches were chosen for each genotype. Top trace shows the Genecode annotations for the Bai1 (Adgrb1) isoforms. The lacZ cassette removes reads from exons 3–18 but leaves the short isoform intact.

See also Figures S1 and S2.

Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice exhibit early-onset hearing loss

Auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) were used to test the hearing sensitivity of Bai1tm2b mice (Figure 2A). ABR thresholds were defined as the lowest sound level where any recognizable wave was visible. Control mice (Bai1tm2b/+) showed normal thresholds to click stimuli at all ages tested, as previously shown in wild-type mice,29 with a characteristic improvement in sound pressure threshold between early post-hearing ages (P15) and older mice (P76–P88; p = 0.0002, Tukey’s post-test from one-way ANOVA, Figure 2B). The thresholds remained relatively stable up to at least 212–288 days of age (p = 0.0517, Tukey’s post-test). Thresholds for clicks recorded from the long-isoform Bai1 knockout mice (Bai1tm2b/tm2b) did not change significantly between P15 and P212–P288 (p = 0.2846, one-way ANOVA), although they were raised at all three ages tested (p < 0.0001, two-way ANOVA) compared to control mice (Figure 2B). Pure-tone-evoked ABRs were also found to be significantly elevated in all age groups tested in Bai1tm2b/tm2b compared to littermate controls (p < 0.0001 for all ages: two-way ANOVA, Figure 2C). These results also show that Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice do not exhibit any progressive worsening of hearing with age. The hearing loss occurring at high frequencies (>12 kHz) is due to the C57BL/6 mouse strain harboring a hypomorphic allele in Cadherin 23 (Cdh23ahl), which is also present in control mice.30

Figure 2. Auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds, but not distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), are elevated in Bai1 mice.

Figure 2

(A) Schematic representation showing the ABR waveform and the corresponding neuronal component along the ascending auditory pathway. Wave 1 represents the cochlear output and is generated by the auditory afferent fibers (AFs), wave 2 by the cochlear nucleus (CN), wave 3 by the superior olivary complex (SOC), and wave 4 by the lateral lemniscus and inferior colliculus (IC).

(B) Average ABR thresholds elicited by click stimuli applied to control (Bai1tm2b/+) and knockout littermate mice (Bai1tm2b/tm2b) at three age ranges: P15, P76–P88, and P212–P288. Data are plotted as mean values ± SD. Number of mice (biological replica) used is shown above the averages, and single data points are plotted as open circles. Each mouse was only tested once (technical replica). Both biological and technical replicates apply to (B)–(H). Statistical values: Tukey’s post-test, one-way ANOVA.

(C) ABR thresholds for frequency-specific pure-tone stimulations ranging from 3 to 36 kHz recorded from Bai1tm2b/+ and Bai1tm2b/tm2b littermate mice (age as in B). Data are plotted as mean values ± SD. Numbers of mice tested are shown next to the traces. Statistical test: two-way ANOVA.

(D and E) Average ABR waveform responses at 12 kHz at increasing stimulus intensity (dB sound pressure level: dB SPL) at P76–P88 (D) and P212–P288

(E) obtained from the same mice listed above. Continuous lines represent the average values and the shaded areas represent the SD. P1 and N1 indicate the positive and negative peaks of wave 1, respectively.

(F) Expanded view of the average ABR waveform responses at 12 kHz and the highest sound intensity (95 dB) in Bai1tm2b/tm2b (from C) at P76–P88 (left) and P212–P288 (right).

(G and H) Average amplitude (G: from P1 to N1: see D–G) and latency of wave 1 (H: time between the onset of the stimulus and P1) as a function to the actual dB SPL sound intensity recorded from adult Bai1tm2b/+ and Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice at the two age ranges (P76–P88 and P212–P288). Data are plotted as mean values ± SD. Note that most of the wave 1 amplitude data in Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice (G) are near zero, as indicated by the dashed gray line.

(I and J) ABR (I) and DPOAE (J) thresholds measured from the same Bai1tm2b/+and Bai1tm2b/tm2b adult mice at P75–. Data are plotted as mean values ± SD. P95. The frequency range tested: 6, 12, 18, and 24 kHz. The dashed line represents the upper threshold limit used for ABRs (95 dB) and DPOAEs (80 dB). Note the normal DPOAE thresholds in Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice despite the highly elevated ABR thresholds. Five mice per genotype were used for both ABRs and DPOAEs (I and J).

See also Figure S3.

To better assess the sound-induced output of the cochlea, we analyzed ABR wave 1 that is generated by the summed response to the sound of all afferent nerve fibers innervating the IHCs.31,32 ABR wave 1 was analyzed for 12 kHz responses (Figures 2D–2F), as this closely matches the cochlear region used for the following ex vivo experiments (9–12 kHz). We also found that wave 1 amplitude in Bai1tm2b/tm2b was close to zero across the wide range of sound intensities tested and at both ages (p < 0.0001 compared to control mice, Tukey’s post-test, two-way ANOVA, Figures 2D, 2E, and S3A). Despite the almost complete loss of cochlear output, the subsequent waves of the ABR recordings were more easily detected due to auditory central gain.33,34 The latency of the residual wave 1 in Bai1tm2b/tm2b was, however, not significantly different between the two genotypes at both ages (p > 0.9999, two-way ANOVA, Figure 2H). We then recorded distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), which are a product of cochlear amplification caused by sound-induced outer hair cell (OHC) electromotility and therefore provide a specific readout of OHC function. For this experiment, the same adult mice were tested for both ABRs and DPOAEs. We found that despite the largely elevated ABR thresholds, DPOAE thresholds over the same age range were indistinguishable from those recorded from littermate controls (p = 0.8659, two-way ANOVA, Figures 2J and S3B), indicating that OHCs are fully functional. These results suggested that the loss of the long isoform of Bai1 (Adgrb1) is likely to cause auditory neuropathy by affecting the activity of either the IHCs and/or that of the auditory afferent fibers.

Bai1 is not required for hair cell function

Although our X-gal staining revealed that Bai1 is only present in SGNs (Figure 1C), scRNA-seq gene expression profiling (gEAR: https://umgear.org/) has indicated its presence in both IHCs and OHCs. We focused our investigation on IHCs because the function of OHCs was normal in Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice (Figure 2J). The mechanoelectrical transducer (MET) current from P8 apicalcoil IHCs was elicited by displacing their stereociliary bundles using a 50 Hz sinusoidal force stimulus from a piezo-driven fluid jet.35 IHCs from both control and Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice showed a MET current with biophysical characteristics indistinguishable between the two genotypes (Figures 3A–3C and S4). This finding was also supported by the normal staircase morphology of the hair bundles in adult IHCs from both genotypes (Figures 3D, 3E, and S5).

Figure 3. IHC function is normal in Bai1 mice.

Figure 3

(A and B) Saturating mechanoelectrical transducer (MET) current in apical IHCs from Bai1tm2b/+ (A) and Bai1tm2b/tm2b (B) P8 mice in response to 50 Hz sinusoidal force stimuli to the hair bundles at two membrane potentials. DV: driver voltage applied to the fluid. Arrows and arrowheads: closure of the MET channel at –124 and +96 mV, respectively.

(C) Average peak-to-peak MET current-voltage curves recorded by displacing the hair bundles of IHCs from both genotypes while stepping their membrane potential from –124 to +96 mV in 20-mV increments (p = 0.8842, two-way ANOVA). Data are plotted as mean values ± SD.

(D and E) Scanning electron micrographs (SEMs) showing the typical hair bundle staircase structure with 3 rows of stereocilia in IHCs from Bai1tm2b/+ (D) and Bai1tm2b/tm2b (E) P80 mice (examples from 3 mice per genotype).

(F and G) Current responses from IHCs of Bai1tm2b/+ and Bai1tm2b/tm2b adult mice elicited by applying depolarizing voltage steps (10 mV nominal increments) from –84 mV to the various test potentials shown next to some of the traces.

(H) Steady-state current-voltage (I-Vm) curves obtained from IHCs of both genotypes at P87–P114 (p = 0.3094, two-way ANOVA). Data are plotted as mean values ± SD.

(I) Resting membrane potential (Vm) measured from P87–P114 IHCs of both genotypes (statistical comparisons: t test). Data are plotted as mean values ± SD.

(J and K) Calcium current (ICa) and corresponding changes in membrane capacitance (ΔCm) recorded from IHCs of both genotypes (P87–P114) in response to 50 ms voltage steps (10 mV increments) from -81 mV. In (J), only maximal responses at –11 mV are shown. (K) shows average peak ICa (bottom) and ΔCm (top) curves from both genotypes. Data are plotted as mean values ± SD.

(L) Average ΔCm from IHCs of both genotypes (P87–P114) in response to voltage steps from 2 ms to 1 s showing the RRP and SRP. Data are plotted as mean values ± SD.

(M) RRP (expanded from L). Data are plotted as mean values ± SD.

(N) Maximum intensity projections of confocal z stacks of the fibers innervating the IHCs from 7- to 8-month-old Bai1tm2b/+ and Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice. The cochlea was immunolabeled using antibodies against β-tubulin (afferent and efferent fiber marker) and ChAT (efferent fiber marker). Myosin 7a (Myo7a) was used as the IHC marker.

(O) Number of AFs from Bai1tm2b/+ and Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice, which were those β-tubulin positive and ChAT negative (statistical comparisons: t test). Numbers above the mean data indicate the mice used for each genotype. Data are plotted as mean values ± SD.

Data in (A)–(C): control, 6 IHCs from 2 mice; Bai1tm2b/tm2b, 3 IHCs from 1 mouse. Data in (F)–(I): control, 7 IHCs from 4 mice; Bai1tm2b/tm2b, 7 IHCs from 3 mice. Data in (J) and (K): control, 5 IHCs from 3 mice; Bai1tm2b/tm2b, 6 IHCs from 3 mice. Data in (L) and (M): control, 6 IHCs from 3 mice; Bai1tm2b/tm2b, 7 IHCs from 3 mice. Data in (N) and (O): control, 89 afferent bundles from 7 mice; Bai1tm2b/tm2b, 60 afferent bundles from 5 mice).

See also Figures S4–S8.

In mature IHCs, the size of the basolateral membrane K+ currents and resting membrane potential were indistinguishable between Bai1tm2b/+ and Bai1tm2b/tm2b littermate P87–P114 mice (Figures 3F–3I and S6). Pre-synaptic activity or exocytosis in adult IHCs was estimated by measuring the size of the Ca2+ current (ICa) and the induced increase in cell membrane capacitance (ΔCm) following depolarizing voltage steps (Figures 3J and 3K). The sizes of ICa and ΔCm were not significantly different between the two genotypes (p = 0.0658 and 0.4257, respectively, two-way ANOVA, Figure 3K). The rate of neurotransmitter release in adult IHCs was investigated by measuring ΔCm in response to depolarizing voltage steps to –11 mV of varying duration between 2 ms and 1 s (interstep interval was at least 11 s) (Figures 3L and 3M). Under our experimental conditions (1.3 mM extracellular Ca2+ and body temperature), stimuli up to about 50 ms reveal the readily releasable pool (RRP) of the vesicle, while longer steps induce the release of vesicles from a secondarily releasable pool (SRP) that is located farther away from the Ca2+ channels.36 We found that both the RRP (Figure 3M) and the SRP (Figure 3L) recorded from the IHCs of Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice were not significantly different from those obtained in control Bai1tm2b/+ mice (p = 0.5899 and 0.1757, respectively, two-way ANOVA). Overall, the above findings show that the long isoform of Bai1 is not required for the development and function of IHCs.

Afferent fibers and terminals are present in Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice

The almost complete absence of wave 1 in the ABR waveforms recorded from Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice (Figures 2D–2G) could be explained by the loss of the SGNs and their afferent fibers and/or their synapses. Since the SGN marker β-tubulin also labels the efferent fibers, the afferent fibers were identified as β-tubulin positive but negative to an antibody targeting choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) that specifically labels the efferent system (Figure 3N). Using a 3D reconstruction of the SGN bundles, we found that the number of afferent fibers in the apical region of the cochlea from adult Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice was not significantly different from that measured in littermate Bai1tm2b/+ mice at least up to 8 months of age (Figure 3O). In line with these findings, the SGN somata were also present in adult Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice (Figure S7). The ChAT-positive efferent fibers and the synaptic vesicle protein 2 at the efferent endings were also present in both genotypes (Figure S8). These results indicate that the absence of long isoform of Bai1 does not affect the survival of the SGNs.

Mice lacking Bai1 (full knockout) have been shown to have reduced expression of the PSD component PSD-95 at hippocampal synapses.24 Therefore, we investigated whether the localization of PSD-95 and SHANK-1, which is another key protein expressed in the PSD of glutamatergic synapses in the CNS and cochlea,37,38 was affected in Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice. Immunofluorescence labeling also showed that PSD-95 was normally distributed at the IHC ribbon synapses, being juxtaposed to the pre-synaptic marker CtBP2 in both control and Bai1tm2b/tm2b P11 mice (Figures 4A and 4B). The post-synaptic protein SHANK-1 was also expressed in the basal pole of the IHCs from both genotypes (Figure S9). transmission electron microscopy experiments on P22 mice (3 mice per genotype) indicated no obvious structural differences in the pre-synaptic ribbons and the PSD between Bai1tm2b/+ and Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice (Figures 4C–4H). The length of the PSDs was similar between Bai1tm2b/+ (298 ± 83 nm, n = 10) and Bai1tm2b/tm2b (319 ± 70 nm, n = 11, p = 0.5182, t test) mice. These results demonstrate that afferent fibers and PSD are preserved in adult Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice.

Figure 4. Post-synaptic densities at the afferent terminals are not affected in Bai1-deficient mice.

Figure 4

(A and B) Maximum intensity projections of confocal z stacks of IHCs taken from the apical cochlear region of Bai1tm2b/+ (A) and Bai1tm2b/tm2b (B) mice using antibodies against the post-synaptic density protein PSD-95 and the ribbon marker CtBP2. Myo7a: IHC marker. Enlarged views (right) show the colocalization of PSD-95 and CtBP2.

(C–H) Transmission electron microscopy of synaptic structures in the Bai1tm2b/+ and Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice. Low-power image (C) shows the typical ribbon synaptic structure with the terminal (t) of the afferent nerve containing light cytoplasm compared with that of the IHC (left of image). Note the dark synaptic bar adjacent to the apposed membranes on the IHC side. (D) shows a similar view of the synaptic region for the Bai1tm2b/tm2b: terminal with synaptic bar in the IHC adjacent to the apposed synaptic membranes. The higher-magnification images (E–H) show two afferent terminals from Bai1tm2b/+ (E and G) and two from Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice (F and H). The bar and synaptic cleft are visible in each image with post-synaptic density (arrowheads) and synaptic vesicles around the bar (arrows).

Images in (A) and (B) are examples from 3 mice per genotype. Data in (C)–(H) were obtained from 10 post-synaptic bars from 3 mice (control) and 11 afferent bundles from 3 mice (Bai1tm2b/tm2b).

See also Figure S9.

The SGN PSD of adult Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice is almost completely devoid of AMPA GluRs

Cochlear IHCs transmit sound-induced information to the SGNs via the release of glutamate, which primarily activates AMPA-type glutamatergic receptors at the post-synaptic afferent terminals.9,39Therefore, we assessed whether the strongly reduced wave 1 in the ABR recordings (Figure 2) was due to defects in the number and/or localization of GluRs at the PSDs. In the adult cochlea, afferent neurons appear to express only three of the four AMPA-type pore-forming subunits GluR2–4.4042 We found that, in contrast to control mice, SGNs from both pre- and post-hearing Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice showed very few or no GluR2 puncta (Figures 5A–5G). The few remaining GluR2 puncta at the afferent terminals of Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice showed a very poor colocalization with CtBP2 (Figure 5H).

Figure 5. Expression of AMPA-type GluR2 receptors in the IHCs of Bai1 mice.

Figure 5

(A–F) Maximum intensity projections of confocal z stacks of apical-coil IHCs of Bai1tm2b/+ and Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice at pre-hearing (P7, A and B; P11, C and D) and adult ages (P218–P245, E and F) using antibodies against CtBP2 (ribbon synaptic marker) and GluR2 (post-synaptic marker). Myo7a: IHC marker. Right columns are enlarged views of the IHC synaptic region showing the level of colocalization between CtBP2 and GluR2 puncta. Scale bars shown in (F) also apply to (A)–(E).

(G) Number of GluR2 puncta present at the IHC synaptic region at two age ranges in control and Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice. Data are plotted as mean values ± SD. Note that P17 is not shown in images listed in (A)–(F).

(H) Percentage of CtBP2 and GluR2 colocalization at P11–P17 and P218–P245 from both genotypes (number of mice as in G). Data are plotted as mean values ± SD and individual GluR2 counts (smaller open symbols). Numbers above the mean data indicate the IHCs used from P11–P17 and P218–P245: Bai1tm2b/+ (7 and 4 mice, respectively); Bai1tm2b/tm2b (6 and 3 mice).

Statistical values shown in (G) and (H) were obtained using a Mann-Whitney U test.

GluR3 and GluR4 were still expressed in the cochlea of P7 Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice, albeit to a lesser extent compared to littermate controls (Figures S10A–S10D). However, compared to control mice, the number of GluR3 (Figures 6A–6D and 6I) and GluR4 puncta (Figures 6E–6H and 6J) at the IHC synapses of Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice was already reduced by 50%–70% at P10 and P17 and almost completely absent by 3 months of age. The remaining GluR3 and GluR4 puncta were largely not colocalized with the pre-synaptic ribbons at both P17 (Figures S10E–S10H) and adult mice (Figures 6I and 6J). Despite the very significant reduction of GluR4 puncta at the SGN afferent terminals of P10 Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice (p < 0.0001, Tukey’s post-test, one-way ANOVA, Figure 6J), the protein level assessed with western blot was not significantly different between the two genotypes at P9–P11 (Figure S11). This indicates that although the proteins are produced, they are not localized correctly at the post-synaptic afferent terminals.

Figure 6. Expression of AMPA-type GluR2/3 and GluR4 receptors in the IHCs of Bai1 mice.

Figure 6

(A–D) Maximum intensity projections of confocal z stacks of the synaptic region of the IHCs taken from the apical cochlear coil of Bai1tm2b/+ (A and C) and littermate Bai1tm2b/tm2b (B and D) mice at P17 (A and B) and 3 months of age (C and D). IHCs were labeled with antibodies against CtBP2 (ribbon synaptic marker) and both GluR2 and GluR2/3 (post-synaptic markers). Because the only available antibody against GluR3 is also detecting GluR2 (GluR2/3), the expression of GluR3 can be identified in the IHCs from Bai1tm2b/tm2b, as they do not express GluR2. Arrows indicate the IHC synaptic region. The arrowheads show that GluR3 puncta are not colocalized with the CtBP2 puncta.

(E–H) Images of the IHC synaptic region obtained as described above from Bai1tm2b/+ (E and G) and Bai1tm2b/tm2b (F and H) mice at P17 and 3 months of age using antibodies against CtBP2 and GluR4 (post-synaptic marker). Arrows and arrowheads have the same meaning as described above.

(I and J) Left images show enlarged synaptic areas of the IHCs highlighting the degree of colocalization between GluR2/3 (I) and GluR4 (J) and the pre-synaptic ribbon CtBP2 punctate from both genotypes. Right images show the number of GluR2/3 (I) and GluR4 (J) puncta present at the synaptic region of the IHCs from different ages. GluR2/3 (I): P17 and 3-month-old mice (3 and 2 mice, respectively, for both genotypes). GluR4 (J): P10, P17, and 3-month-old mice (Bai1tm2b/+: 3, 4, and 2 mice; Bai1tm2b/tm2b: 3, 3, and 2 mice, respectively). Numbers above the mean (±SD) data indicate the IHCs used for each genotype.

Statistical values shown in (I) and (J) were obtained using Kruskal Wallis, followed by Dunn test.

See also Figures S10 and S11.

The tetrameric AMPA receptors are non-selective cation channels known to be permeable to sodium, potassium, and calcium,43 but any subunit combination that includes GluR2 makes them largely impermeable to calcium.44 Although GluR2 is ubiquitously expressed at the SGN terminals, recent evidence has indicated the presence of Ca2+-permeable, GluR2-lacking AMPA receptors.45,46 We therefore investigated whether spontaneous Ca2+ signals in the SGN terminals of P7–P9 Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice, which represent the activation of post-synaptic receptors via the spontaneous release of glutamate from the IHCs, were affected, as they are almost completely devoid of GluR2 (Figure 5). The lack of GluR2 would increase the potential number of Ca2+-permeable, GluR2-lacking AMPA receptors in the SGNs of Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice, thus affecting their spontaneous Ca2+ signals. To address this question, acutely dissected cochleae from Bai1tm2b/+ and Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice transduced with AAV9-syn-GCaMP8m and -GCaMP8f at P1, a green Ca2+ indicator targeting SGNs, were incubated for 5 min with the red Ca2+ dye Rhod-2 AM that labels the IHCs. We found that spontaneous IHC depolarization elicited Ca2+ transients in the SGN afferent terminals of Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice that were indistinguishable from littermate controls (Figure S12). These Ca2+ transients in SGNs were directly linked to IHC exocytosis since they were absent in mice lacking the CaV1.3 Ca2+ channels (CaV1.3-/-)47 (Figure S12).

Transcriptional changes in the Bai1tm2b/tm2b mouse

To understand the molecular pathways underpinning the changes in the IHC synaptic machinery, we performed RNA-seq on the cochlear apical coil of P7 and P22 Bai1tm2b/+ and littermate Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice. Surprisingly, despite observing a clear loss of the targeted exons (Figure 1F), the transcriptomes at P7 could not be clearly separated using principal-component analysis of the most variable genes. Moreover, differential gene expression analysis using DeSEQ2 did not identify any expression differences between Bai1tm2b/+ and Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice. To determine if this was a technical issue, we repeated the P7 time point (3 replica for each time point) and again observed no change between genotypes. When both sets of data were analyzed together, principal component 1 (PC1) now captured dissection batch and experimental run (Figure 7A). Therefore, we concluded that at P7, the transcriptome of the Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice was not altered.

Figure 7. RNA sequencing analysis in Bai1 mice.

Figure 7

(A and B) Principal-component analysis (PCA) plot of each RNA library from P7 (A) and P22 (B) control (Bai1tm2b/+) and Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice. For P7 data, two separated batches were run from 4 (batch 1) and 3 (batch 2) samples per genotype. For P22 data, one batch was run from 3 samples per genotype. At both ages, each point represents one pool of 4 mice (8 cochleae) for both control and littermate knockout mice. Note that at P7 (A), no PC could capture genotype, consistent with the finding that no genes are differentially expressed at pre-hearing stages between control and Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice.

(C) Normalized counts (transcripts per million) of Bai1 gene at P7 (left) and P22 (right) control (Bai1tm2b/+) and Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice. Adjusted p values are based on DESEq2 analysis with a log2 fold change of 0.5 (see STAR Methods). Data are shown as mean ± SD.

(D) Normalized counts (transcripts per million) of the GluR1–4 genes (Gria1–4). DESEq2 analysis with a log2 fold change of 0.5 (see STAR Methods) show no significant difference for any of the four Gria genes.

(E) Heatmap of the counts (normalized, z-scale) of the genes found to be differentially expressed in Bai1 knockout animals versus the single-cell RNA sequencing of VGlut3 knockout SGNs.14 Genes that are differentially expressed in the P22 data are marked in red.

Data in (C) and (D) are shown as mean ± SD.

See also Figure S12.

To determine how the cochlea continues to develop postnatally in Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice, we also performed RNA-seq on adult mice at P22. In contrast to P7, principal-component analysis showed a clear separation between the genotypes with PC1 explaining 51% of the observed variance (Figure 7B). By mapping reads to all isoforms of Bai1 at P22, we found a decrease in Bai1 expression (Figure 7C). Using splicing analysis (Figure 1F), we determined that while the short isoform was still expressed at the same level, exons from the long isoform were lost. The Bai1 upregulation between P7 and P22 (Figure 7C) may explain the increased sensitivity of RNA-seq to detect the change.

Differential gene expression analysis from the P22 data (adjusted p value < 0.05, log2 standard deviation < 0.5, and log2 fold change > 0.5) yielded 163 upregulated genes and 241 downregulated genes (Table S1). Among the 241 downregulated genes, we observed an enrichment for genes annotated to GO processes related to potassium channels, microfilament assembly, the synaptic vesicle membrane, and the glutamate neurotransmitter release cycle (Table S2). We found that the SGN-specific GluRs GluR2–4, and GluR1, were not significantly downregulated in the Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice (Figure 7D). This further supports the western blotting data showing that the level of GluR4 was not significantly different between Bai1tm2b/+ and Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice at P9–P11 (Figure S11), despite observing a strong reduction in the number of GluR4 puncta (>50%) in the afferent terminals (Figure 6J). RNA-seq has also highlighted that NMDA receptors were not differentially expressed between the two genotypes.

Among the 163 upregulated genes, we did not observe a clear enrichment of Gene Ontology processes but did obtain significant enrichment of genes associated with hearing loss, including the upregulation of Otof, Tectb, Cldn11, Sall1, Cldn14, Chrna10, Esprn, and Fgfr3 (Table S1). This upregulation suggests some compensatory mechanisms by other parts of the adult cochlea, including the hair cells. We next compared these data to the genes found to be differentially regulated in adult type I SGNs in mice lacking the vesicular glutamate transporter (VGLUT3) at the IHC synapses (VGlut3 knockout mice).14 Similar to Bai1-deficient mice, SGN terminals are not activated in VGlut3 knockout mice, but in this case, it is caused by the IHC’s failure to release glutamate.48 Of the 11 genes downregulated in the VGlut3 knockout mice, 5 were also significantly reduced in the Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice (45%), although all 11 genes showed the same overall trend (Figure 7E). Of the 12 upregulated genes, 4 were significantly changed in the Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice (33%). Of note, the original VGLUT3 differentially expressed genes were determined by pseudobulked analysis of single-cell SGNs, while our analysis is based on bulk RNA extracted from cochlear tissue. Collectively, these data suggest that the compensatory changes in the adult Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice phenocopy transcriptionally at least certain aspects of the VGlut3 loss of function.

Discussion

Here, we show that Bai1 is expressed in the mammalian cochlea and is crucial for normal hearing. The absence of the long isoform of BAI1, which caused a failure of AMPA GluR2–4 clustering at the IHC post-synaptic afferent terminals, led to highly elevated hearing thresholds in Bai1-deficient mice. Cochlear RNA-seq analysis indicated that the absence of Bai1’s long isoform did not significantly change the gene expression profile in pre-hearing mice (P7–P10), a time when post-synaptic defects in AMPA receptor localization are already evident. However, compensatory changes of the transcriptome were present in young adult mice (P22), including gene expression changes similar to those observed in Vglut3 loss-of-function mice.14 Considering that AMPA receptors are expressed at normal levels in the cochlea of Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice (GluR2–4: RNA-seq) and appear to be translated into proteins (GluR4: western blotting), we propose that BAI1 is required for the correct trafficking or anchoring of GluR2–4 subunits to the PSDs. We have also found that the SGNs and their afferent fibers were still present in 7- to 8-month-old Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice despite being almost completely devoid of all three GluRs, suggesting that another signal is required for the long-term survival of SGNs.

The role of BAI1 in the mammalian cochlea

IHCs in the post-hearing mammalian cochlea have about 20 pre-synaptic ribbons7 that are contacted by unbranched type I SGN afferent terminals forming a large PSD.49 The glutamatergic PSDs at IHC ribbon synapses have a comparable morphology to those present in the CNS5053 but are generally much larger.54 In the CNS, these PSD regions include several proteins involved in signaling, cell adhesion, cell scaffolding, the cytoskeleton, and membrane trafficking50,55(see also: Genes to Cognition: https://genes2cognition.org/). Although the full molecular composition of the SGN PSD is still unclear, it shares key proteins with CNS synapses such as AMPA receptors containing GluR2–4 subunits,14,40,41 scaffold proteins such as PSD-95, SHANK-1, and HOMER38,5658 and neuroligins.59 BAI1 is another protein enriched in the PSD region of excitatory brain synapses23 and cochlear SGNs (Figure 1).

The BAI family is a subclass of adhesion G-protein-coupled receptors, and each member has seven transmembrane domains.16 BAI proteins possess a large and highly glycosylated N-terminal extracellular domain containing multiple thrombospondin type-1 repeats (TSRs), which have been implicated in neuronal development, including synaptogenesis, in the CNS6062 and the cochlea.63,64 Studies in knockout mice have shown that loss of BAI1 results in hippocampal learning and memory deficits associated with abnormal synaptic plasticity and PSD thinning.24 BAI1, via a C-terminal PDZ binding motif, can interact directly with the PSD scaffold protein PSD-95,65 contributing not only to its anchoring to the post-synaptic membrane66 but also to its recruitment of several regulators of the actin cytoskeleton. As such, BAI1 is able to regulate dendritic spine morphogenesis and morphology.23,67

We have shown that cochlear SGNs express both a long and a short isoform of BAI1, but only the N terminal of the long isoform is affected in the loss-of-function Bai1 mice (Bai1tm2b/tm2b). Despite the presence of the short isoform, Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice exhibit almost no sound-evoked activity in the SGNs and largely reduced hearing sensitivity over the entire frequency range investigated (3–42 kHz), indicating its lack of functional compensation. This also implies that the extracellular TSR region of the long BAI1 isoform is crucial for normal hearing. The finding that ABR thresholds in Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice were significantly elevated at P15, which is just a few days after the onset of hearing (P12–P13), and that the hearing phenotype does not deteriorate further with age indicate that defects have already occurred in the developing cochlea. While the morphology and function of the IHCs were unaffected in Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice, the SGN afferent terminals in adult mice were almost completely devoid of all three AMPA GluRs (GluR2–4). This phenotype fully explains the greatly reduced wave 1 in the pure-tone ABR responses, which are generated by the summed response to sound of the afferent nerve fibers innervating the IHCs.31,32

Despite observing a clear loss of the TSRs in the long BAI1 isoform and the failed accumulation of AMPA receptors in the SGN terminals at P7 (mainly GluR2 and to a lesser extent GluR3 and GluR4), two independent RNA-seq experiments could not identify any differentially expressed genes between Bai1tm2b/+ and Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice. These findings, together with the fact that AMPA receptors appear to be produced in Bai1tm2b/tm2b co-chlea and that BAI1 is known to interact with other PSD scaffold proteins, indicate that BAI1 is most likely involved in trafficking or anchoring GluRs to the SGN post-synaptic membrane.

Absence of functional BAI1 causes gene expression changes only in the adult cochlea

Previous findings have shown that the molecular identity of the SGN subtypes is primarily defined early on in development, most likely during embryonic stages.13,15,68 However, the transcriptomic specification of SGNs has been shown to undergo further refinement postnatally14,69,70 and depends on the spontaneous release of glutamate by the IHCs primarily during the first postnatal week.14 In P7 Bai1-deficient mice, we found that gene expression in the cochlea was indistinguishable from that of littermate control mice in two separate runs of bulk RNA-seq even though GluR2 was nearly absent and GluR3 and GluR4 somewhat reduced in the SGN afferent terminals. These findings suggest that SGN refinement in the pre-hearing cochlea could be less dependent on AMPA receptors and more reliant on other mechanisms such as, for example, the activity of NMDA receptors (see below). Despite the lack of transcriptomic variance at P7, several genes were downregulated between Bai1tm2b/+ and Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice at P22, some of which were associated with all three subtypes of type I SGNs identified from single-cell transcriptomic analysis, including Tnt, Rxrg, Trim54, Calb2, Obscn, and Cpne6.1315 These gene expression changes are likely due to downstream consequences of the lack of GluR2–4 receptors in the SGN afferent terminals of adult Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice. Interestingly, several of the affected SGN genes in Bai1-deficient mice are also targeted in VGlut3 knockout mice, in which IHCs can no longer release glutamate to activate the post-synaptic GluRs,48 suggesting that, different from pre-hearing stages, the activation of the AMPA receptors is required for the long-term maintenance of the molecular identity of the SGNs.

Mechanism of SGN activation in the cochlea

The biophysical properties of the IHC exocytotic machines and the colocalization between PSD-95 and CtBP2 in adult Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice were indistinguishable from those of control mice up to at least 8 months of age. Despite this, sound-evoked activity in Bai1-deficient mice devoid of AMPA receptors was near absent, as is evident from the near-zero ABR wave 1 amplitudes. These findings suggest that although GluR2–4 are crucial for sound transmission at ribbon synapses, they appear not to be required for the survival of the SGNs. However, glutamate release from the hair cells has been shown to be key not only for the function8 but also the survival71 of SGNs in the developing cochlea. For example, IHCs unable to release glutamate due to the knockdown of VGLUT3 or otoferlin, the Ca2+ sensor for exocytosis, lose pre-synaptic ribbons and post-synaptic afferent terminals.48,72 In addition to the well-defined role of AMPA-type receptors in the generation of fast excitatory post-synaptic currents in cochlear afferent terminals,8,9,39,45 SGNs also express NMDA receptors7375 that have been shown to play a crucial neurotrophic role in their survival.71,76 As such, we propose that glutamate released by the IHC ribbon synapses serves to not only encode sound-induced signals via AMPA receptors but also promote the survival of SGN afferents, possibly through NMDA receptors.

Limitations of the study

In summary, we have demonstrated that the long isoform of Bai1 is required for establishing the functional connectivity of IHC ribbon synapses by localizing or clustering the GluRs at the post-synaptic SGN afferent terminals. The inability to determine the location of BAI1 in the cochlea (i.e., SGNs or afferent terminals) using commercially available antibodies (see STAR Methods) prevented us from determining whether BAI1 is involved in the trafficking or clustering of GluRs in the SGN afferent endings. Additionally, RNA-seq and western blot experiments indicated that AMPA receptors were most likely present in the cochlea of Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice, albeit no longer clustered in the afferent terminals. The absence of GluR clustering made it extremely difficult to identify their location in the SGNs of Bai1tm2b/tm2b mice.

Star⋆Methods

Key Resources Table

REAGENT or RESOURCE SOURCE IDENTIFIER
Antibodies
Anti-EPS8 Mouse-IgG1 (610143) BD Bioscience RRID:AB_397544
anti-Bail Rabbit-IgG (135907) abcam N/A
anti-Bai1 Rabbit-IgG (SAB4502506) Sigma RRID:AB_10747699
anti-Bai1 Rabbit-IgG (PA8-102069) Invitrogen N/A
Anti-Bai1 Rabbit-IgG (AP8170a) ABCEPTA RRID:AB_354108
Anti-ChAT Goat-IgG (AB144P) Millipore RRID:AB_2079751
Anti-Myo7a Rabbit-IgG (25-6790) Proteus Biosciences RRID:AB_10015251
Anti-Tubulin Beta 3 Mouse-IgG2a (#801201) BioLegend RRID:AB_2313773
Anti-Histone H3 (#9715) Cell Signaling RRID:AB_331563
Anti-Calretinin Rabbit-IgG (NBP1-32244) Novus Biologicals RRID:AB_10003923
Anti-CtBP2 Mouse-IgG1 (#612044) Biosciences RRID:AB_399431
Anti-PSD95 Mouse-IgG2a (MABN68) Millipore RRID:AB_10807979
Anti-GluR2 Mouse-IgG2a (MAB397) Millipore RRID:AB_2113875
Anti-GluR2/3 Rabbit-IgG (AB1506) Millipore RRID:AB_90710
Anti-GluR4 Rabbit-IgG (#8070) Cell Signaling RRID:AB_10829469
Anti-Shank1a Rabbit-IgG (RA19016) Neuromics RRID:AB_1622814
Donkey Anti-Goat-IgG NL556 (NL001) RNDSystems RRID:AB_663766
Goat Anti-Rabbit-IgG Alexa Fluor 405 (A31556) ThermoFisher RRID:AB_221605
Goat Anti-Mouse-IgG1 Alexa Fluor 647 (A21240) ThermoFisher RRID:AB_2535809
Goat Anti-Mouse-IgG2a Alexa Fluor 488 (A21131) ThermoFisher RRID:AB_2535771
Goat Anti-Rabbit-IgG Alexa Fluor 647 (A21245) ThermoFisher RRID:AB_2535813
Goat Anti-Rabbit-IgG Alexa Fluor 488 (A11034) ThermoFisher RRID:AB_2758380
Anti-GAPDH Mouse-IgG HRP (#9484) Abcam RRID:AB_307274
Goat Anti-Mouse-IgG2a HRP (#A-10685) ThermoFisher RRID:AB_2534065
Sheep Anti-Mouse-IgG HRP (#NA931) Cytiva RRID:AB_772210
Donkey Anti-Rabbit-IgG HRP (#NA934) Cytiva RRID:AB_772206
Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG HRP (#31460) Invitrogen RRID:AB_228341
Bacterial and virus strains
pGP-AAV-syn-jGCaMP8m-WPRE Addgene Addgene viral prep_162375-AAVrg
pGP-AAV-syn-jGCaMP8f-WPRE Addgene Addgene viral prep_162376-AAVrg
Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins
Texas Red-X Phalloidin ThermoFisher T7471
VectaShield Vector Laboratories H1000
ECL Prime Western Blotting Reagent Cytiva #RPN2232
Pierce™ RIPA Buffer Thermo Scientific 89901
Critical commercial assays
RNeasy Plus Micro Kit Qiagen 74034
Deposited data
RNA-sequencing data Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) GSE254269
Experimental models: Organisms/strains
Adgrbtm2a allele MRC Harwell Institute EM:08738
Oligonucleotides
genotyping primer forward WT: 5′ CCAGTTGGTCTGGTGTCA 3′ ThermoFisher Customize
genotyping primer forward LacZ: 5′ CAGACCCAGACCTTG
AGGAG 3′
ThermoFisher Customize
genotyping primer reverse WT: 5′ CGCAGGTACTGGAGCA
TACA 3′
ThermoFisher Customize
qPCR primer forward mm_Hsp90b1: 5′ GAGTCTCCCTG
TGCTCTTGT 3′
ThermoFisher Customize
qPCR primer reverse mm_Hsp90b1: 5′ CATCTTCCTTAA
TCCGCCGC 3′
ThermoFisher Customize
qPCR primer forward mm_Aco1: 5′ CCGGGATGTTTAAG
GAGGT3′
ThermoFisher Customize
qPCR primer reverse mm_Aco1: 5′ GGCTGGAGATCTAAA
GTCAAGC 3′
ThermoFisher Customize
qPCR primer forward mm_Adgrb1: 5′ CATGCGGCTGAGA
AGGAGAA 3′
ThermoFisher Customize
qPCR primer reverse 5′ CCTCTTGTTGGGAGTCTGCT 3′ ThermoFisher Customize
Software and algorithms
Origin Microcal OriginLab RRID:SCR_002815
GraphPad Prism GraphPad RRID:SCR_002798
ImageJ Fiji ImageJ RRID:SCR_002285
BioSigRZ Tucker-Davis Technologies RRID:SCR_014820
pClamp Molecular Devices RRID:SCR_011323
ImageLab Bio-Rad RRID:SCR_014210
Python 3.7 Python RRID:SCR_008394
R Project The R Foundation RRID:SCR_001905
nf-core: https://github.com/nf-core/rnaseq N/A
Other
Agilent Tapestation 4200 Agilent RRID:SCR_019394
Reichert Jung Ultracut E Ultramicrotome Reichert Jung RRID:SCR_022980
Transmission Electron Microscope JEOL JEOL 100S
35mm Acros Neopan Film Fujifilm ACROS 100 II
Canonscan Negative Scanner Canon Canonscan 9000F
Cryostat ThermoFisher CryoStar NX70

Resource Availability

Lead contact

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Walter Marcotti (w.marcotti@sheffield.ac.uk).

Materials availability

No reagents or materials were generated from this study.

Experimental Model and Study Participant Details

Animal model

The Adgrb1tm2a allele (EM:08738) was imported from the EMMA repository at the University of Veterinary Medicine, Austria, to the MRC Harwell Institute (UK) and licensed by the Home Office under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 (PPL_PBF9BD884) and approved by the local Ethical Review Board (AWERB). To obtain Adgrb1tm2b knockout mice, cre-mediated conversion of the ‘knockout-first’ tm1a allele was achieved by treating IVF derived embryos with a cell permeable cre-enzyme (Excellgen). Because Adgrb1tm2b mice encode for the protein Brain-Specific Angiogenesis Inhibitor 1 (Bai1), we named the mice Bai1tm2b. These mice were generated and maintained on the C57BL/6N background strain. The Bai1tm2b mice are viable and fertile, and the frequency of homozygous and heterozygous offspring follow the expected Mendelian ratio. Mice used for this study and had free access to food and water and a 12 h light/dark cycle.

Both male and female mice ranging from postnatal day 6 (P6) and P288 were used for this study.

Mice were genotyped by extracting their DNA from the tissue of ear- or tail-clips, which was used as the template for PCR using the following primers: forward WT: 5′ CCA GTT GGT CTG GTG TCA 3; forward LacZ:5′ CAG ACC CAG ACC TTG AGG AG 3’; reverse WT: 5′ CGC AGG TAC TGG AGC ATA CA 3’.

Method Details

Ethics statement

The animal work was licensed by the UK Home Office under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 (PPL_PCC8E5E93) and was approved by the University of Sheffield Ethical Review Committee (180626_Mar). For in vitro experiments mice were killed by cervical dislocation followed by decapitation. For in vivo auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) mice were anesthetized using intraperitoneal injection of ketamine (100 mg/kg body weight, Fort Dodge Animal Health, Fort Dodge, USA) and xylazine (10 mg/kg, Rompun 2%, Bayer HealthCare LLC, NY, USA). Following the onset of anesthesia and the loss of the retraction reflex with a toe pinch, mice were placed in a soundproof chamber for in vivo experiments. At the end of the in vivo recordings, mice were either culled by cervical dislocation or recovered from anesthesia with intraperitoneal injection of atipamezole (1 mg/kg). For in vivo gene-delivery, mice were anesthetized with isoflurane (2.5%) under oxygenation (0.8%). Mice under recovery from anesthesia were returned to their cage, placed on a thermal mat and monitored over the following 2–5 h.

Tissue preparation

The cochlea was dissected out from both male and female mice in an extracellular solution composed of (in mM): 135 NaCl, 5.8 KCl, 1.3 CaCl2, 0.9 MgCl2, 0.7 NaH2PO4, 5.6 D-glucose, 10 HEPES-NaOH. Amino acids, vitamins and sodium pyruvate (2 mM) were added from concentrates (Thermo Fisher Scientific, UK). The pH was adjusted to 7.48 with 1M NaOH (osmolality ~308 mOsm kg–1). The dissected cochleae were transferred to a microscope chamber and immobilised via a nylon mesh attached to a stainless-steel ring. The microscope chamber, which was continuously perfused with the above extracellular solution using a peristaltic pump (Cole-Palmer, UK), was then mounted on the stage of an upright microscopes (Olympus BX51, Japan; Leica DMLFS, Germany) with Nomarski Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) optics (60x or 64x water immersion objective) and a 15× eyepiece.

Auditory brainstem responses

Anesthetized mice were placed in a soundproof chamber (MAC-3 acoustic chamber, IAC Acoustic, UK). Male and female mice were placed on a heated mat (37°C) with the animal’s pinna positioned at 10 cm from the loudspeaker (MF1-S, Multi Field Speaker, Tucker-Davis Technologies, USA), which was calibrated with a low-noise microphone probe system (ER10B+, Etymotic, USA). Two subdermal electrodes were placed under the skin behind the pinna of each ear (reference and ground electrode), and one electrode half-way between the two pinna on the vertex of the cranium (active electrode). Experiments were performed using a customized software77,78 driving an RZ6 auditory processor (Tucker-Davis Technologies). ABR responses were measured for white noise clicks and pure tone stimuli of frequencies at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 kHz. ABR thresholds were defined as the lowest sound level where any recognisable feature of the waveform was visible. Stimulus sound pressure levels were up to 95 dB SPL, presented in steps of 5 dB SPL (average of 256 repetitions). Tone bursts were 5 ms in duration with a 1 ms on/off ramp time presented at a rate of 42.6/s.

Wave 1 amplitude and latency were measured from ABR recordings obtained by stimulating mice with a pure tone (12 kHz). We selected the 12 kHz value as it is close to the frequency range used for the in vitro work. An initial automatic identification of Wave 1 was carried out using a custom software routine based on the find_peaks function of the scipy.signal Python module (Python 3.7, Python software foundation).79 Results were manually reviewed and, if required, adjusted to the correct peak. The Wave 1 amplitude was calculated as the difference between the amplitude of the first peak and the first trough of the ABR waveform; the latency was calculated as the delay of the Wave 1 peak from the beginning of the recording. Since the distance of the speaker from the animal is 10 cm (see above), this leads to a delay in the signal of ~0.3 ms.

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were used to assess the function of OHCs by the synchronous presentation of two stimulus tones (primaries f1 and f2). DPOAEs were recorded at 2f1-f2 in response to primary tones f1 and f2, where f2/f1 = 1.2. The f2 level (L2) was set from 20 to 80 dB (maximum level set for our system) in 10 dB increments, and the f1 level (L1) was set equal to L2. Frequency pairs of tones between f2 = 6.5 kHz and f2 = 26.3 kHz were presented directly into the left ear canal of mice by means of a coupler, which was connected to two calibrated loudspeakers using 3 cm plastic tubes (MF1-S, Multi Field Speaker, Tucker-Davis Technologies, USA).

Recordings were performed in a soundproof chamber (MAC-3 Acoustic Chamber, IAC Acoustic, UK) and the emission signals were recorded by a low-noise microphone (ER10B+: Etymotic Research Inc, USA) connected to the coupler mentioned above. Experiments were performed using BioSigRZ software driving an RZ6 auditory processor (Tucker-Davis Technologies). The DPOAE thresholds were defined by the minimal sound level where the DPOAEs were above the standard deviation of the noise. The determined DPOAE thresholds were plotted against the geometric mean frequency of f1 and f2. Stimulus sound pressure levels were up to 80 dB SPL, presented in steps of 10 dB. The response signal was averaged over 500 repetitions.

Whole-cell electrophysiology

Patch clamp recordings were performed from hair cells positioned at the apical coil region (9–12 kHz) of the cochlea. Recordings were performed at room temperature (20°C–24°C) using an Optopatch amplifier (Cairn Research Ltd, UK). Patch pipettes were pulled from soda glass capillaries, which had a typical resistance in extracellular solution of 2–3 MΩ. The intracellular solution used for the patch pipette contained (in mM): 131 KCl, 3 MgCl2, 1 EGTA-KOH, 5 Na2ATP, 5 HEPES-KOH, 10 Na-phosphocreatine (pH was adjusted with 1M KOH to 7.28; 294 mOsm kg–1). Data acquisition was controlled by pClamp software using a Digidata 1440A (Molecular Devices, USA). In order to reduce the electrode capacitance, patch electrodes were coated with surf wax (Mr Zoggs SexWax, USA). Recordings were low-pass filtered at 2.5 kHz (8-pole Bessel), sampled at 5 kHz and stored on a computer for offline analysis (Clampfit, Molecular Devices; Origin 2021: OriginLab, USA). Membrane potentials under voltage-clamp conditions were corrected offline for the residual series resistance Rs, which was normally compensated by 80%, and the liquid junction potential (LJP) of –4 mV, which was measured between electrode and bath solutions.

To investigate the biophysical characteristics of the mechanoelectrical transducer (MET) current, we displaced the hair bundles using a fluid-jet system from a pipette driven by a 25 mm diameter piezoelectric disc.80,81 The pipette was pulled from borosilicate glass to a final overall length of 5.5 cm. The fluid jet pipette tip had a diameter of 8–10 μm and was positioned near the hair bundles to elicit a maximal MET current (typically 10 μm). Patch pipettes contained (in mM): 135 CsCl, 2.5 MgCl2, 1 EGTA-CsOH, 2.5 Na2ATP, 10 sodium phosphocreatine, 5 Hepes-CsOH (pH 7.3). Membrane potentials were corrected offline for the LJP of –4 mV. Mechanical stimuli were applied as 50 Hz sinusoids (filtered at 1 kHz, 8-pole Bessel). Prior to the positioning of the fluid jet by the hair bundles, any steady-state pressure was removed by monitoring the movement of debris in front of the pipette.

Real-time changes in membrane capacitance (ΔCm) were measured using the track-in circuitry of the Optopatch amplifier.36 A4 kHz sine wave of 13 mV RMS was applied to IHCs from –81 m and was interrupted for the duration of the voltage step. The capacitance signal from the Optopatch was amplified (×50), filtered at 250 Hz and sampled at 5 kHz ΔCm was measured by averaging the Cm trace over a 200 ms period following the voltage step and subtracting the pre-pulse baseline. Data were acquired using pClamp software and a Digidata 1440A (Molecular Devices) and analyzed with Origin (OriginLab). The intracellular solution used for the patch pipette contained (in mM): 106 Cs-glutamate, 20 CsCl, 3 MgCl2, 1 EGTA-CsOH, 5 Na2ATP, 0.3 Na2GTP, 5 HEPES-CsOH, 10 Na2-phosphocreatine (pH 7.3, 294 mOsm kg–1). ΔCm was recorded in the presence of K+ channel blockers TEA (30 mM), 4-AP (15mM) and linopirdine (80 μM) in the extracellular solution. Membrane potentials were corrected for the voltage drop across the series resistance and an LJP of –11 mV.

Two-photon confocal Ca2+ imaging

Acutely dissected cochleae from Bai1 mice transduced with AAV9-GCaMP8m (see below) were incubated for 5 min at RT in extra-cellular solution supplemented with Rhod-2 a.m. at a final concentration of 10 μM (#R1244, ThermoFisher Scientific, UK). The incubation medium contained also pluronic F-127 (0.1%, w/v) and sulfinpyrazone (250 lM) to prevent dye sequestration and secretion. Imaging was performed using a two-photon laser-scanning microscope80,82(Bergamo II System B232, Thorlabs Inc., USA) based on a mode-locked laser system operating at 800 nm, 80-MHz pulse repetition rate, <100-fs pulse width (Mai Tai HP DeepSee, Spectra-Physics, USA). Images were captured with a 60x objective (LUMFLN60XW, Olympus, Japan) using a GaAsp PMT (Hamamatsu) coupled with a 525/40 band-pass filter (FF02-525/40-25, Semrock). Images were analyzed offline using custom built software routines written in Python (Python 3.10, Python Software Foundation) and ImageJ (NIH). Calcium signals were measured as relative changes of fluorescence emission intensity (ΔF/F0). The correlation coefficient was calculated in a time window of 10 s centered on the maximal response of the fibers. The traces have been corrected with a rolling average filter of 500 frames before calculation of correlations. To perform the statistical test (see below), we have converted the coefficients using Fisher’s transformation.

AAV gene delivery in mice

The surgical protocol used for AAV injection into the cochlea of P1-P3 Bai1 mice was performed under anesthesia. The right ear was accessed via an incision just below the pinna. After the gentle separation of the cervical muscles with forceps, the otic bulla was exposed and opened to visualize the stapedial artery and the round window membrane (RWM).83 When the RWM was identified, it was gently punctured with a borosilicate pipette. This was followed by the injection of the AAV into the cochlea (pressure controlled by mouth) of 1 μL of AAV9-jGCaMP8m (pGP-AAV-syn-jGCaMP8m-WPRE, #162375, Addgene, USA) and AAV9-jGCaMP8f (pGP-AAV-syn-jGCaMP8f-WPRE, #162376, Addgene, USA) at 2 × 1013 vg/ml. Following the injection, the pipette was retracted from the RWM and the wound was closed with veterinarian glue.

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

After dissecting out the inner ear from the mouse, the cochlea was gently perfused with fixative for 1–2 min through the round window using a 10 μL pipette tip. A small hole in the apical portion of cochlear bone was made prior to perfusion to allow the fixative to flow out from the cochlea. The fixative contained 2.5% v/v glutaraldehyde in 0.1M sodium cacodylate buffer plus 2 mM CaCl2 (pH 7.4). The inner ears were then immersed in the above fixative and placed on rotating shaker for 2 h at room temperature. After the fixation, the organ of Corti was exposed by removing the bone from the apical coil of the cochlea and then immersed in 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer for 1 h. For osmium impregnation, which avoids gold coating, cochleae were incubated in solutions of saturated aqueous thiocarbohydrazide (20 min) alternating with 1% osmium tetroxide in buffer (2 h) twice (the OTOTO technique).84 The cochleae were then dehydrated through an ethanol series and critical point dried using CO2 as the transitional fluid (Leica EM CPD300) and mounted on specimen stubs using conductive silver paint (Agar Scientific, Stansted, UK). The apical coil of the organ of Corti was examined at 10 kV using a Tescan Vega3 LMU scanning electron microscope. For SEM, 3 mice were processed for each genotype. Images were taken from the same region (around 12 kHz) used for the electrophysiological recordings.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

For TEM cochleae were fixed as for SEM but postfixed by immersion for 1 h in 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1M cacodylate buffer, dehydrated and embedded in Spurr resin.85 Ultrathin sections (70–100 nm) were cut in radial planes from the apical coil using a Reichert ultracut E ultramicrotome, mounted on 200 mesh thin bar copper grids (Agar Scientific, Stansted, UK) and stained with 2% uranyl acetate in 70% ethanol for 20 min, followed by 2% lead citrate dissolved at high pH in distilled water for 5 min. Samples were examined in a JEOL 100S electron microscope operated at 100 kV accelerating voltage. Digital images were acquired in using a 35 mm Acros Neopan film which, once developed, was digitised using a Canonscan 9000F negative scanner. For TEM, 3 mice were processed for each genotype. Images were taken from the same region (around 12 kHz) used for the electrophysiological recordings.

Immunofluorescence microscopy

For pre-hearing mice, the inner ear was dissected out and immersed for 20 min at room temperature in a solution containing 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4). For adult mice, the inner ear was initially gently perfused with the above solution for 1–2 min through the round window. Following this initial brief fixation, the inner ear was fixed for a further 20 min at room temperature. Fixed inner ears were then washed three times in PBS for 10 min and the cochleae dissected out using fine forceps and incubated in PBS supplemented with 5% normal goat or horse serum and 0.5% Triton X-100 for 1 h at room temperature. The samples were immunolabelled with primary antibodies overnight at 37°C, washed three times with PBS and incubated with the secondary antibodies for 1 h at 37°C. Antibodies were prepared in 1% serum and 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS. Primary antibodies were: mouse-IgG1 anti-Eps8 (1:1000, BD Biosciences, 610143), goat-IgG anti-ChAT (1:500, Millipore, AB144P), rabbit-IgG anti-MYO7a (1:500, Proteus Biosciences, 25–6790), mouse IgG2a anti-β-tubulin (1:400, BioLegend, #801201), mouse IgG1anti-CtBP2 (1:200, Biosciences, #612044), mouse-IgG2a anti-PSD95 (1:1000, Millipore, MABN68), mouse IgG2a anti-GluR2 (1:200, Millipore, MAB397), rabbit-IgG anti-GluR2/3 (1:200, Millipore, AB1506), rabbit-IgG anti-GluR4 (1:500, Cell Signaling, #8070) and rabbit-IgG anti-Shank1a (1:1000, Neuromics, RA19016). F-actin was stained with Texas Red-X phalloidin (1:400, ThermoFisher, T7471) within the secondary antibody solution. Secondary antibodies were species appropriate Alexa Fluor or Northern Lights secondary antibodies. Samples were mounted in VECTASHIELD (H-1000). The images from the apical cochlear region (around 12 kHz) were captured with Nikon A1 confocal microscope equipped with Nikon CFI Plan Apo 60x Oil objective or a Zeiss LSM 880 AiryScan equipped with Plan-Apochromat 63x Oil DIC M27 objective for super-resolution images of hair bundles. Both microscopes are part of the Wolfson Light Microscope Facility at the University of Sheffield. Image stacks were processed with Fiji ImageJ software. At least 3 mice for each genotype were used for each experiment.

X-gal staining

In the conditional-ready design used to generate the Adgrb1 mutant allele, a LacZ trapping cassette gene was inserted into intron 2 placing it under the control of the Adgrb1 promoter, allowing the visualisation of Adgrb1 expression using X-gal. The cochlea from 6 wild-type and 6 heterozygous littermates at P6-P7 were dissected out from the inner ear and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 45 min at 4°C, followed by three 10 min PBS washes with rocking. The apical spiral of the cochlea was then dissected carefully to preserve the spiral ganglion neuronal cell bodies within the modiolus before being washed for 30 min with detergent solution containing 2 mM MgCl2, 0.02% NP-40 substitute (Roche #11754599001) and 0.1% sodium deoxycholate in PBS (Oxoid #BR0014G). To produce staining solution, X-gal (Promega #V3941) was added 1:50 to 100 μL/cochlea of pre-warmed staining solution containing 5 mM K3Fe(CN)6(III) and 5mM K4Fe(CN)6(II) in detergent solution. Immediately after X-gal dilution, cochleae were incubated in darkness in staining solution overnight at 37°C, followed by two 5 min washes in PBS with rocking. Cochleae were mounted on slides and imaged using the Leica M16 microscope equipped with a 2.0x Apocromatic Corr objective and a color camera (DFC295). Images were taken using LAS-X software (Leica).

Western blot

To obtain protein lysates for SDS-PAGE, both cochleae from one or two animals were dissected in sterile PBS to remove the vestibular system, the bone surrounding the cochlea and the stria vascularis before being flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, Cochleae were then crushed with a sterilised plastic pestle in 100 μL of RIPA buffer (Pierce) with 1x protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche #11836153001). Samples were vortexed every 10 min and incubated on ice for a total of 30 min followed by centrifugation at 12000 x g for 30 min at 4°C. Supernatants were then collected and stored at –20°C until being run on a 4–15% SDS-PAGE gel (Bio-Rad #4561083). Following 30V overnight transfer onto a PVDF membrane at 4°C, blots were blocked with 5% low fat skimmed milk powder in TBST (20 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20, pH 7.4) for 1 h at room temperature. The blot was then incubated with primary antibodies (anti-GluR2 1:1000, Millipore, MAB397; anti-GluR4 1:400, Cell Signaling, #8070; anti-GAPDH 1:1000, Proteintech, #9484; anti-class III beta-Tubulin 1:1000, BioLegend, 801201; anti-Histone H3 1:1000, CellSignalling, #9715) diluted in blocking buffer overnight at 4°C, rinsed three times and washed three times with TBST for 10 min, and then incubated with secondary antibodies (anti-mouse IgG2a 1:1000, Invitrogen, #A-10685; anti-mouse IgG 1:6000, Cytiva, #NA931; anti-rabbit IgG 1:3000, Cytiva, #NA934; anti-rabbit IgG 1:5000, Invitrogen, #31460) for 2 h at room temperature. Following three rinses and three 10 min washes with TBST, blots were developed with ECL primer western blotting reagent (Cytiva #RPN2232) and imaged on a Gel-Doc XR + system. Images were captured and analyzed using ImageLab software.

qPCR gene expression analysis

The apical coil of the cochlea was snap frozen after dissection and then thawed on ice in preparation for RNA extraction. Both cochleae from 3 to 4 mice were combined in one tube. Tissues were homogenized in 350ul of RLT buffer + DTT using a pestle until the tissue was no longer visible. The homogenized lysate was mixed with 350 μl of 70% ethanol and then applied directly to the Qiagen RNeasy Micro Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions and RNA was eluted into 15 μl of dH20. ~200 ng was used for reverse transcription after nanodrop quantification using the Applied Biosystems High-Capacity RNA-to-cDNA kit. Primers were designed targeting different Bai1 isoforms (Adgrb) with Hsp90b1 and Aco1 as housekeeping controls. Real Time-quantitative PCR was performed using the Applied Biosystems PowerUp SYBR Green Master Mix, according to the manufacturer’s instructions using the Applied Biosystems QuantStudio 12k Flex machine. Relative gene expression was calculated using the delta-delta Ct method using Hsp90b1 as the reference and confirmed with Aco1. Only Hsp90b1 is plotted the graphs that were presented. The qPCR primer sequences are the following: forward mm_Hsp90b1: 5′ GAGTCTCCCTGTGCTCTTGT 3; reverse mm_Hsp90b1: 5′ CATCTTCCTTAATCCGCCGC 3; forward mm_Aco1: 5′ CCCGGGATGTTTAAGGAGGT 3; reverse mm_Aco1: 5′ GGCTGGAGATCTAAAGTCAAGC 3; 3; forward mm_Adgrb1: 5′ CATGCGGCTGAGAAGGAGAA 3; reverse mm_Adgrb1: 5′ CCTCTTGTTGGGAGTCTGCT 3.

RNA isolation and library preparation for RNA-sequencing

The sensory epithelium and spiral ganglion neurons from 4 mice were micro dissected in DNase free ice-cold PBS 1X and immediately snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. Two batches of 3 and 4 replicates (P7) and one batch of 3 replicates (P22) from each genotype. RNA was extracted using RNeasy Plus Micro Kit (Qiagen) according to manufacturer’s instructions. RNA quantity was established using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer and RNA integrity number (RIN) was calculating using a BioAnalyzer (Agilent Tapestation 4200). All samples had RIN score greater than 9.1. mRNA library preparation was performed using poly A enrichment and sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq sequencer using paired-end 150bp reads.

RNA-sequencing analysis and differential gene expression

The sequencing libraries were processed using the nf-core RNA pipeline86 (https://nf-co.re/rnaseq/usage) using the standard parameters. Reads were mapped to the mouse genome (mm10). The resulting gene counts were determined using Salmon87 and used for downstream analysis with DeSeq2.88 Metascape89 and Reactome90 were used to query for enriched GO and pathways in the list of differentially expressed genes. RPM (reads per million) bigwig files were created using R using the packages Rsamtools,91 rtracklayer,92 and Genomic Ranges93 and were visualized using the Washington University Genome browser (http://epigenomegateway.wustl.edu/).

Quantification and Statistical Analysis

Statistical comparisons of means were made by Student’s two-tailed t test or Mann–Whitney U test (when normal distribution could not be assumed), for multiple comparisons, analysis of variance (one- or two-way or two-way ANOVA followed by a suitable post-test) or Kruskal Wallis, followed by Dunn test. p < 0.05 was selected as the criterion for statistical significance. Only mean values with a similar variance between groups were compared. Average values are quoted in text and figures as means ± S.D. Animals of either sex were randomly assigned to the different experimental groups. No statistical methods were used to define sample size, which was defined based on previous published similar work from our laboratory. Animals were taken from several cages and breeding pairs over a period of several months. Most of the electrophysiological and morphological (but not imaging) experiments were performed blind to animal genotyping and in most cases, experiments were replicated at least 3 times.

Supplementary Material

Differential gene expression analysis from the P22 RNA sequencing data
Figures S1–S12 and Table S2

Highlights.

  • In the mouse cochlea, BAI1 is expressed in the afferent spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs)

  • AMPA receptors are absent in the SGN afferent terminals of adult Bai1-deficient mice

  • Functional IHC ribbon synapses fail to relay sound information to SGNs in mice lacking BAI1

  • Bai1-deficient mice have highly elevated hearing thresholds

In brief.

Carlton et al. show that BAI1 is essential for activating SGN afferent terminals at cochlear IHC ribbon synapses. In Bai1-deficient mice, IHC-SGN synapses are formed but AMPA receptors that are normally in the post-synaptic density are either missing or uncoupled from the pre-synaptic ribbons, leading to highly raised hearing thresholds.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Steven Barnes and Matthew Loczki at Sheffield for their assistance with the mouse husbandry, Catherine Gennery for the genotyping, and Niovi Voulgary for helping with the western blotting. The frozen Adgrb1tm2a sperm (EM: 08738) was imported from the EMMA. This work was supported by the BBSRC (BB/S006257/1 to S.L.J., S.D.M.B., M.R.B., and W.M. and BB/T004991/1 to W.M.), the Wellcome Trust (224326/Z/21/Z to W.M.), and the MRC (MR/S002510/1 to M.M.). A.O’C. was supported by a PhD studentship from the RNID (S56) to W.M. A.E.A. was supported by a PhD studentship from the Sheffield Neuroscience Institute to W.M. J.-Y.J. was supported by the RNID-Dunhill Medical Trust Fellowship (PA28).

Footnotes

Author Contributions

All authors helped with the collection and analysis of the data and approved the final version of the manuscript. W.M. conceived and coordinated the study. All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work to ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All persons designated as authors qualify for authorship, and all those who qualify for authorship are listed.

Declaration of Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Data and code availability

  • Raw RNA-sequencing files are deposited on GEO under accession number: GSE254269.

  • This paper does not report original code.

  • Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this work paper is available from the lead contact upon request.

References

  • 1.Hudspeth AJ. Integrating the active process of hair cells with cochlear function. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014;15:600–614. doi: 10.1038/nrn3786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Winter IM, Robertson D, Yates GK. Diversity of characteristic frequency rate-intensity functions in guinea pig auditory nerve fibres. Hear Res. 1990;45:191–202. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(90)90120-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ashmore J. Cochlear outer hair cell motility. Physiol Rev. 2008;88:173–210. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00044.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fuchs PA. Time and intensity coding at the hair cell’s ribbon synapse. J Physiol. 2005;566:7–12. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.082214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ryugo DK. In: The Mammalian Auditory Pathway: Neuroanatomy. Webster DB, Popper AN, Fay RR, editors. Springer; New York: 1992. The auditory nerve: peripheral innervation, cell body morphology, and central projections; pp. 23–65. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kujawa SG, Liberman MC. Adding insult to injury: Cochlear nerve degeneration after “;temporary” noise-induced hearing loss. J Neurosci. 2009;29:14077–14085. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2845-09.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Meyer AC, Frank T, Khimich D, Hoch G, Riedel D, Chapochnikov NM, Yarin YM, Harke B, Hell SW, Egner A, Moser T. Tuning of synapse number, structure and function in the cochlea. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12:444–453. doi: 10.1038/nn.2293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Glowatzki E, Fuchs PA. Transmitter release at the hair cell ribbon synapse. Nat Neurosci. 2002;5:147–154. doi: 10.1038/nn796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Goutman JD, Glowatzki E. Time course and calcium dependence of transmitter release at a single ribbon synapse. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007;104:16341–16346. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705756104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Liberman MC. The cochlear frequency map for the cat: labeling auditory-nerve fibers of known characteristic frequency. J Acoust Soc Am. 1982;72:1441–1449. doi: 10.1121/1.388677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Liberman MC, Dodds LW, Pierce S. Afferent and efferent innervation of the cat cochlea: quantitative analysis with light and electron microscopy. J Comp Neurol. 1990;301:443–460. doi: 10.1002/cne.903010309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Taberner AM, Liberman MC. Response properties of single auditory nerve fibers in the mouse. J Neurophysiol. 2005;93:557–569. doi: 10.1152/jn.00574.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Petitpré C, Wu H, Sharma A, Tokarska A, Fontanet P, Wang Y, Helmbacher F, Yackle K, Silberberg G, Hadjab S, Lallemend F. Neuronal heterogeneity and stereotyped connectivity in the auditory afferent system. Nat Commun. 2018;9:3691. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06033-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Shrestha BR, Chia C, Wu L, Kujawa SG, Liberman MC, Goodrich LV. Sensory Neuron Diversity in the Inner Ear Is Shaped by Activity. Cell. 2018;174:1229–1246.:e17. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sun Y, Wang L, Zhu T, Wu B, Wang G, Luo Z, Li C, Wei W, Liu Z. Single-cell transcriptomic landscapes of the otic neuronal lineage at multiple early embryonic ages. Cell Rep. 2022;38:110542. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Stephenson JR, Purcell RH, Hall RA. The BAI subfamily of adhesion GPCRs: synaptic regulation and beyond. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2014;35:208–215. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2014.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Paavola KJ, Hall RA. Adhesion G protein-coupled receptors: signaling, pharmacology, and mechanisms of activation. Mol Pharmacol. 2012;82:777–783. doi: 10.1124/mol.112.080309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhu D, Osuka S, Zhang Z, Reichert ZR, Yang L, Kanemura Y, Jiang Y, You S, Zhang H, Devi NS, et al. BAI1 Suppresses Medulloblastoma Formation by Protecting p53 from Mdm2-Mediated Degradation. Cancer Cell. 2018;33:1004–1016.:e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nishimori H, Shiratsuchi T, Urano T, Kimura Y, Kiyono K, Tatsumi K, Yoshida S, Ono M, Kuwano M, Nakamura Y, Tokino T. A novel brain-specific p53-target gene, BAI1, containing thrombospondin type 1 repeats inhibits experimental angiogenesis. Oncogene. 1997;15:2145–2150. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1201542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kaur B, Brat DJ, Devi NS, Van Meir EG. Vasculostatin, a proteolytic fragment of brain angiogenesis inhibitor 1, is an antiangiogenic and antitumorigenic factor. Oncogene. 2005;24:3632–3642. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hochreiter-Hufford AE, Lee CS, Kinchen JM, Sokolowski JD, Arandjelovic S, Call JA, Klibanov AL, Yan Z, Mandell JW, Ravichandran KS. Phosphatidylserine receptor BAI1 and apoptotic cells as new promoters of myoblast fusion. Nature. 2013;497:263–267. doi: 10.1038/nature12135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Park D, Tosello-Trampont AC, Elliott MR, Lu M, Haney LB, Ma Z, Klibanov AL, Mandell JW, Ravichandran KS. BAI1 is an engulfment receptor for apoptotic cells upstream of the ELMO/Dock180/Rac module. Nature. 2007;450:430–434. doi: 10.1038/nature06329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Duman JG, Tzeng CP, Tu YK, Munjal T, Schwechter B, Ho TSY, Tolias KF. The adhesion-GPCR BAI1 regulates synaptogenesis by controlling the recruitment of the Par3/Tiam1 polarity complex to synaptic sites. J Neurosci. 2013;33:6964–6978. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3978-12.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhu D, Li C, Swanson AM, Villalba RM, Guo J, Zhang Z, Matheny S, Murakami T, Stephenson JR, Daniel S, et al. BAI1 regulates spatial learning and synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus. J Clin Invest. 2015;125:1497–1508. doi: 10.1172/JCI74603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shiu FH, Wong JC, Yamamoto T, Lala T, Purcell RH, Owino S, Zhu D, Van Meir EG, Hall RA, Escayg A. Mice lacking full length Adgrb1 (Bai1) exhibit social deficits, increased seizure susceptibility, and altered brain development. Exp Neurol. 2022;351:113994. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2022.113994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Satterstrom FK, Kosmicki JA, Wang J, Breen MS, De Rubeis S, An JY, Peng M, Collins R, Grove J, Klei L, et al. Large-Scale Exome Sequencing Study Implicates Both Developmental and Functional Changes in the Neurobiology of Autism. Cell. 2020;180:568–584.:e23. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.12.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bowl MR, Simon MM, Ingham NJ, Greenaway S, Santos L, Cater H, Taylor S, Mason J, Kurbatova N, Pearson S, et al. A large scale hearing loss screen reveals an extensive unexplored genetic landscape for auditory dysfunction. Nat Commun. 2017;8:886. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00595-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Skarnes WC, Rosen B, West AP, Koutsourakis M, Bushell W, Iyer V, Mujica AO, Thomas M, Harrow J, Cox T, et al. A conditional knockout resource for the genome-wide study of mouse gene function. Nature. 2011;474:337–342. doi: 10.1038/nature10163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Song L, McGee J, Walsh EJ. Frequency- and level-dependent changes in auditory brainstem responses (ABRS) in developing mice. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006;119:2242–2257. doi: 10.1121/1.2180533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Noben-Trauth K, Zheng QY, Johnson KR. Association of cadherin 23 with polygenic inheritance andgenetic modification of sensorineural hearing loss. Nat Genet. 2003;35:21–23. doi: 10.1038/ng1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Moller A, Jannetta P. Evoked potentials from the inferior colliculus in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1982;53:612–620. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(82)90137-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Schaette R, McAlpine D. Tinnitus with a normal audiogram: physiological evidence for hidden hearing loss and computational model. J Neurosci. 2011;31:13452–13457. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2156-11.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Auerbach BD, Rodrigues PV, Salvi RJ. Central gain control in tinnitus and hyperacusis. Front Neurol. 2014;5:206. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chambers AR, Resnik J, Yuan Y, Whitton JP, Edge AS, Liberman MC, Polley DB. Central gain restores auditory processing following near-complete cochlear denervation. Neuron. 2016;89:867–879. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.12.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Corns LF, Johnson SL, Roberts T, Ranatunga KM, Hendry A, Ceriani F, Safieddine S, Steel KP, Forge A, Petit C, et al. Mechanotransduction is required for establishing and maintaining mature inner hair cells and regulating efferent innervation. Nat Commun. 2018;9:4015. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06307-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Johnson SL, Olt J, Cho S, von Gersdorff H, Marcotti W. The coupling between Ca2+ channels and the exocytotic Ca2+ sensor at hair cell ribbon synapses varies tonotopically along the mature cochlea. J Neurosci. 2017;37:2471–2484. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2867-16.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sheng M, Kim E. The postsynaptic organization of synapses. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011;3:a005678. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a005678. 3: a005678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Braude JP, Vijayakumar S, Baumgarner K, Laurine R, Jones TA, Jones SM, Pyott SJ. Deletion of Shank1 has minimal effects on the molecular composition and function of glutamatergic afferent post-synapses in the mouse inner ear. Hear Res. 2015;321:52–64. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ruel J, Chen C, Pujol R, Bobbin RP, Puel JL. AMPA-preferring glutamate receptors in cochlear physiology of adult guineapig. J Physiol. 1999;518:667–680. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0667p.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Matsubara A, Laake JH, Davanger S, Usami S, Ottersen OP. Organization of AMPA receptor subunits at a glutamate synapse: a quantitative immunogold analysis of hair cell synapses in the rat organ of Corti. J Neurosci. 1996;16:4457–4467. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-14-04457.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Parks TN. The AMPA receptors of auditory neurons. Hear Res. 2000;147:77–91. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5955(00)00122-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Rutherford MA, Bhattacharyya A, Xiao M, Cai HM, Pal I, Rubio ME. GluA3 subunits are required for appropriate assembly of AMPAR GluA2 and GluA4 subunits on cochlear afferent synapses and for presynaptic ribbon modiolar-pillar morphology. Elife. 2023;12:e80950. doi: 10.7554/eLife.80950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Traynelis SF, Wollmuth LP, McBain CJ, Menniti FS, Vance KM, Ogden KK, Hansen KB, Yuan H, Myers SJ, Dingledine R. Glutamate receptor ion channels: structure, regulation, and function. Pharmacol Rev. 2010;62:405–496. doi: 10.1124/pr.109.002451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jonas P, Burnashev N. Molecular mechanisms controlling calcium entry through AMPA-type glutamate receptor channels. Neuron. 1995;15:987–990. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90087-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sebe JY, Cho S, Sheets L, Rutherford MA, von Gersdorff H, Raible DW. Ca2+-Permeable AMPARs Mediate Glutamatergic Transmission and Excitotoxic Damage at the Hair Cell Ribbon Synapse. J Neurosci. 2017;37:6162–6175. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3644-16.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hu N, Rutherford MA, Green SH. Protection of cochlear synapses from noise-induced excitotoxic trauma by blockade of Ca2+--permeable AMPA receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117:3828–3838. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1914247117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Brandt A, Khimich D, Moser T. Few CaV1.3 channels regulate the exocytosis of a synaptic vesicle at the hair cell ribbon synapse. J Neurosci. 2005;25:11577–11585. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3411-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Seal RP, Akil O, Yi E, Weber CM, Grant L, Yoo J, Clause A, Kandler K, Noebels JL, Glowatzki E, et al. Sensorineural deafness and seizures in mice lacking vesicular glutamate transporter 3. Neuron. 2008;57:263–275. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.11.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Moser T, Grabner CP, Schmitz F. Sensory Processing at Ribbon Synapses in the Retina and the Cochlea. Physiol Rev. 2020;100:103–144. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00026.2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sheng M, Hoogenraad CC. The postsynaptic architecture of excitatory synapses: a more quantitative view. Annu Rev Biochem. 2007;76:823–847. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.060805.160029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Cheng D, Hoogenraad CC, Rush J, Ramm E, Schlager MA, Duong DM, Xu P, Wijayawardana SR, Hanfelt J, Nakagawa T, et al. Relative and absolute quantification of postsynaptic density proteome isolated from ray forebrain and cerebellum. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2006;5:1158–1170. doi: 10.1074/mcp.D500009-MCP200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sager C, Tapken D, Kott S, Hollmann M. Functional modulation of AMPA receptors by transmembrane AMPA receptor regulatory proteins. Neurosci. 2009;158:45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.12.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Levy AM, Gomez-Puertas P, Tümer Z. Neurodevelopmental Disorders Associated with PSD-95 and Its Interaction Partners. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:4390. doi: 10.3390/ijms23084390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Payne SA, Joens MS, Chung H, Skigen N, Frank A, Gattani S, Vaughn K, Schwed A, Nester M, Bhattacharyya A, et al. Maturation of Heterogeneity in Afferent Synapse Ultrastructure in the Mouse Cochlea. Front Synaptic Neurosci. 2021;13:678575. doi: 10.3389/fnsyn.2021.678575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wichmann C, Kuner T. Heterogeneity of glutamatergic synapses: cellular mechanisms and network consequences. Physiol Rev. 2022;102:269–318. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00039.2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Davies C, Tingley D, Kachar B, Wenthold RJ, Petralia RS. Distribution of members of the PSD-95 family of MAGUK proteins at the synaptic region of inner and outer hair cells of the guinea pig cochlea. Synapse. 2001;40:258–268. doi: 10.1002/syn.1048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Huang LC, Barclay M, Lee K, Peter S, Housley GD, Thorne PR, Montgomery JM. Synaptic profiles during neurite extension, refinement and retraction in the developing cochlea. Neural Dev. 2012;7:38. doi: 10.1186/1749-8104-7-38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Martinez-Monedero R, Liu C, Weisz C, Vyas P, Fuchs PA, Glowatzki E. GluA2-Containing AMPA Receptors Distinguish Ribbon-Associated from Ribbonless Afferent Contacts on Rat Cochlear Hair Cells. eNeuro. 2016;3:0078–16. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0078-16.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ramirez MA, Ninoyu Y, Miller C, Andrade LR, Edassery S, Bomba-Warczak E, Ortega B, Manor U, Rutherford MA, Friedman RA, Savas JN. Cochlear ribbon synapse maturation requires Nlgn1 and Nlgn3. iScience. 2022;25:104803. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Risher WC, Eroglu C. Thrombospondins as key regulators of synaptogenesis in the central nervous system. Matrix Biol. 2012;31:170–177. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2012.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Adams JC, Tucker RP. The thrombospondin type 1 repeat (TSR) superfamily: diverse proteins with related roles in neuronal development. Dev Dyn. 2000;218:280–299. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0177(200006)218:2<280::AID-DVDY4>3.0.CO;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Wang J, Miao Y, Wicklein R, Sun Z, Wang J, Jude KM, Fernandes RA, Merrill SA, Wernig M, Garcia KC, Südhof TC. RTN4/NoGo-receptor binding to BAI adhesion-GPCRs regulates neuronal development. Cell. 2021;184:5869–5885.:e25. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.10.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Mendus D, Sundaresan S, Grillet N, Wangsawihardja F, Leu R, Müller U, Jones SM, Mustapha M. Thrombospondins 1 and 2 are important for afferent synapse formation and function in the inner ear. Eur J Neurosci. 2014;39:1256–1267. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Smeriglio P, Wangsawihardja FV, Leu R, Mustapha M. TSP1 and TSP2 Have Unique and Overlapping Roles in Protecting against Noise-Induced Auditory Synaptopathy. Neuroscience. 2019;408:68–80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.03.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Stephenson JR, Paavola KJ, Schaefer SA, Kaur B, Van Meir EG, Hall RA. Brain-specific angiogenesis inhibitor-1 signaling, regulation, and enrichment in the postsynaptic density. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:22248–22256. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.489757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Laursen L, Inturi R, Østergaard S, Jemth P. Determinants of affinity, specificity, and phase separation in a supramodule from Post-synaptic density protein 95. iScience. 2022;25:105069. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Duman JG, Mulherkar S, Tu YK, Erikson KC, Tzeng CP, Mavratsas VC, Ho TSY, Tolias KF. The adhesion-GPCR BAI1 shapes dendritic arbors via Bcr-mediated RhoA activation causing late growth arrest. Elife. 2019;8:e47566. doi: 10.7554/eLife.47566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Sanders TR, Kelley MW. Specification of neuronal subtypes in the spiral ganglion begins prior to birth in the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2022;119:e2203935119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2203935119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Grandi FC, De Tomasi L, Mustapha M. Single-Cell RNA Analysis of Type I Spiral Ganglion Neurons Reveals a Lmx1a Population in the Cochlea. Front Mol Neurosci. 2020;13:83. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2020.00083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Siebald C, Vincent PFY, Bottom RT, Sun S, Reijntjes DOJ, Manca M, Glowatzki E, Müller U. Molecular signatures define subtypes of auditory afferents with distinct peripheral projection patterns and physiological properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2023;120:e2217033120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2217033120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Zhang-Hooks Y, Agarwal A, Mishina M, Bergles DE. NMDA Receptors Enhance Spontaneous Activity and Promote Neuronal Survival in the Developing Cochlea. Neuron. 2016;89:337–350. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.12.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Roux I, Safieddine S, Nouvian R, Grati M, Simmler MC, Bahloul A, Perfettini I, Le Gall M, Rostaing P, Hamard G, et al. Otoferlin, defective in a human deafness form, is essential for exocytosis at the auditory ribbon synapse. Cell. 2006;127:277–289. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.08.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Safieddine S, Eybalin M. Co-expression of NMDA and AMPA/kainate receptor mRNAs in cochlear neurones. Neuroreport. 1992;3:1145–1148. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199212000-00029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Usami S, Matsubara A, Fujita S, Shinkawa H, Hayashi M. NMDA (NMDAR1) and AMPA-type (GluR2/3) receptor subunits are expressed in the inner ear. Neuroreport. 1995;6:1161–1164. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199505300-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Sanchez JT, Ghelani S, Otto-Meyer S. From development to disease: diverse functions of NMDA-type glutamate receptors in the lower auditory pathway. Neurosci. 2015;285:248–259. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.11.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Pujol R, Puel JL. Excitotoxicity, synaptic repair, and functional recovery in the mammalian cochlea: a review of recent findings. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;884:249–254. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08646.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Jeng JY, Carlton AJ, Johnson SL, Brown SDM, Holley MC, Bowl MR, Marcotti W. Biophysical and morphological changes in inner hair cells and their efferent innervation in the ageing mouse cochlea. J Physiol. 2021;599:269–287. doi: 10.1113/JP280256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Ingham NJ, Pearson S, Steel KP. Using the auditory brainstem response (ABR) to determine sensitivity of hearing in mutant mice. Curr Protoc Mouse Biol. 2011;1:279–287. doi: 10.1002/9780470942390.mo110059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Virtanen P, Gommers R, Oliphant TE, Haberland M, Reddy T, Cournapeau D, Burovski E, Peterson P, Weckesser W, Bright J, et al. SciPy 1.0 Contributors. Nat Methods. 2020;17:261–272. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Carlton AJ, Jeng JY, Grandi FC, De Faveri F, Ceriani F, De Tomasi L, Underhill A, Johnson SL, Legan KP, Kros CJ, et al. A critical period of prehearing spontaneous Ca2+ spiking is required for hair-bundle maintenance in inner hair cells. EMBO J. 2023;42:e112118. doi: 10.15252/embj.2022112118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Carlton AJ, Halford J, Underhill A, Jeng JY, Avenarius MR, Gilbert ML, Ceriani F, Ebisine K, Brown SDM, Bowl MR, et al. Loss of Baiap2l2 destabilizes the transducing stereocilia of cochlear hair cells and leads to deafness. J Physiol. 2021;599:1173–1198. doi: 10.1113/JP280670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Ceriani F, Hendry A, Jeng JY, Johnson SL, Stephani F, Olt J, Holley MC, Mammano F, Engel J, Kros CJ, et al. Coordinated calcium signalling in cochlear sensory and non-sensory cells refines afferent innervation of outer hair cells. EMBO J. 2019;38:e99839. doi: 10.15252/embj.201899839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Jeng JY, Carlton AJ, Goodyear RJ, Chinowsky C, Ceriani F, Johnson SL, Sung TC, Dayn Y, Richardson GP, Bowl MR, et al. AAV-mediated rescue of Eps8 expression in vivo restores hair-cell function in a mouse model of recessive deafness. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2022;26:355–370. doi: 10.1016/j.omtm.2022.07.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Furness DN, Hackney CM. High-resolution scanning-electron microscopy of stereocilia using the osmium-thiocarbohydrazide coating technique. Hear Res. 1986;21:243–249. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(86)90222-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Furness DN, Hackney CM. Cross-links between stereocilia in the guinea pig cochlea. Hear Res. 1985;18:177–188. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(85)90010-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Ewels PA, Peltzer A, Fillinger S, Patel H, Alneberg J, Wilm A, Garcia MU, Di Tommaso P, Nahnsen S. The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38:276–278. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0439-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Patro R, Duggal G, Love MI, Irizarry RA, Kingsford C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat Methods. 2017;14:417–419. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Zhou Y, Zhou B, Pache L, Chang M, Khodabakhshi AH, Tanaseichuk O, Benner C, Chanda SK. Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systems-level datasets. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1523. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09234-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Gillespie M, Jassal B, Stephan R, Milacic M, Rothfels K, Senff-Ribeiro A, Griss J, Sevilla C, Matthews L, Gong C, et al. The reactome pathway knowledgebase 2022. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:D687–D692. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Morgan M, Pagès H, Obenchain V, Hayden N. Rsamtools: Binary alignment (BAM), FASTA, variant call (BCF), and tabix file import. R package version 2160. 2023. https://bioconductor.org/packages/Rsamtools .
  • 92.Lawrence M, Gentleman R, Carey V. rtracklayer: an R package for interfacing with genome browsers. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1841–1842. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Lawrence M, Huber W, Pagès H, Aboyoun P, Carlson M, Gentleman R, Morgan MT, Carey VJ. Software for Computing and Annotating Genomic Ranges. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9:e1003118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Differential gene expression analysis from the P22 RNA sequencing data
Figures S1–S12 and Table S2

Data Availability Statement

  • Raw RNA-sequencing files are deposited on GEO under accession number: GSE254269.

  • This paper does not report original code.

  • Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this work paper is available from the lead contact upon request.

RESOURCES