Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Mar 4.
Published in final edited form as: Travel Med Infect Dis. 2025 Aug 25;67:102897. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2025.102897

A decade of dengue disease burden in Africa (2013–2023): a systematic review

Gaspary O Mwanyika a,b, Monika Moir a, Abdualmoniem O Musa c, Jenicca Poongavanan a, Graeme Dor a, Eduan Wilkinson a, Cheryl Baxter a, Tulio de Oliveira a,d, Houriiyah Tegally a,
PMCID: PMC7618809  EMSID: EMS212607  PMID: 40865891

Abstract

Background

Dengue is a major mosquito-borne disease worldwide. The epidemiological trends of the disease in Africa over the past decade remain unclear. This review aims to provide insight into the epidemiological trends of dengue in Africa from 2013–2023.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus for studies published between January 2013 and December 2023. Additionally, we collected official records from the World Health Organization for Africa and African Centre for Disease Control. We included studies that reported dengue cases in humans in Africa and excluded publications prior to 2013, review articles and non-human studies. For specific countries, the suspected cases per 100,000 population and fatality rates were estimated and the trend predicted using a negative binomial model. The statistical analyses and visualisations were performed using R programming.

Results

Of the 453 reports screened, 87 from 25 African countries were selected for systematic review. Of which 55.2% (48/87) were indicator-based, 40.2% (35/87) were research and 4.6% (4/87) were event-based reports. Between 2013 and 2023, approximately 200,000 suspected dengue cases, 90,000 confirmed cases and 900 deaths were reported in Africa. Over 80% of confirmed cases originated from West Africa, with Burkina Faso reporting over 500 cases per 100,000 population. DENV1 and DENV2 predominating at different times with transmission closely linked to rainy seasons.

Conclusions

The rising dengue cases across Africa, highlight the need to strengthen surveillance and implement effective regional-specific interventions against future dengue outbreaks. Further research is necessary to improve our understanding on dengue transmission dynamics and suitability of regions in Africa.

Keywords: dengue, disease burden, Africa, systematic review

1. Introduction

Dengue is a major mosquito-borne viral disease transmitted by infected female mosquitoes of the Aedes genus [1]. The disease is caused by dengue virus (DENV) of the Flaviviridae family in the genus Orthoflavivirus. The virus consists of four antigenically distinct serotypes: DENV1, DENV2, DENV3 and DENV4, which are capable of inducing mild to severe illnesses in humans [2]. Globally, approximately 390 million dengue infections, 500,000 hospitalizations and more than 20,000 deaths are estimated annually [3]. In recent decades, the virus has transcended its traditional boundaries, extending into temperate regions including Europe and North America [4,5]. The disease has been reported in Africa since the late 19th and early 20th centuries, with reported cases in Zanzibar (1870), Burkina Faso (1925), Egypt (1887), South Africa (1926–1927), and Senegal (1927–1928). From the 1960s to 2010, laboratory confirmed cases were reported in 15 African countries, with recent endemicity established in more than 34 countries [6]. Although the prevalence of dengue virus across Africa has been previously documented [7,8], epidemiological trends in the context of morbidity and mortality, geographical distribution, seasonality and transmission suitability remain unclear. In this systematic review, we collate a decade of dengue epidemiological data from the African continent to synthesise and analyse epidemiological trends between 2013 and 2023. We highlight regional and country-specific epidemiological trends to inform public health response against future dengue outbreaks in Africa.

2. Methods

2.1. Search strategy and selection criteria

This review analysed studies and reports describing dengue cases in African countries and territories. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms such as: dengue virus, prevalence in conjunction with a compilation of specific African countries or territories were used in the search. We searched PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus databases for relevant English articles using an advanced search strategy (Appendix S1). Additional epidemiological reports were obtained from the World Health Organization for Africa (WHO AFRO) and the African Centre for Disease Control (AFRICA CDC) between January 2013 and December 2023. We included free full text articles that reported dengue cases in human studies in Africa and official records from the WHO AFRO and AFRICA CDC surveillance reports. We excluded publications prior to 2013, review articles, and non-human studies.

2.2. Screening and quality assessment

Two reviewers (GOM and AM) conducted an initial screening of the titles and abstracts from the search results using Rayyan application software accessible at https://rayyan.ai/ to identify relevant articles. Reasons for exclusion of irrelevant articles were documented. Three reviewers (GOM, AM and HT) evaluated the quality of included reports. The selection of reports for inclusion in the systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines (PRISMA) [9].

2.3. Key definitions

The following terms have been used in the analysis to signify different metrics used to describe dengue burden in Africa.

  1. A suspected case was defined as any individual residing in or having travelled to areas with dengue transmission within the past 14 days and presents with acute fever, typically lasting from two to seven days’ duration with two or more of the following symptoms: nausea/vomiting, abdominal pain, chills, rash, headache/retro-orbital pain, myalgia and arthralgia; may exhibit petechial or positive tourniquet test (+ >10 pinpoint-sized spots of bleeding under the skin (petechiae) per square inch, low platelet and white blood cell counts even without any warning sign.

  2. A confirmed case was defined as a suspected dengue case with laboratory confirmation of infection which may include polymerase chain reaction (PCR), virus culture, IgM seroconversion in paired sera (acute and convalescent samples), IgG seroconversion in paired sera or fourfold IgG titre in paired sera.

  3. A severe case was defined as a suspected/probable/confirmed dengue case presenting with one or more of the following symptoms: severe plasma leakage leading to dengue shock syndrome fluid accumulation with respiratory distress, severe bleeding, severe damage of organs such as liver (aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation ≥ 1000) and central nervous system.

  4. Case fatality rate was defined as the proportion of deaths within a specified population that are attributable to the total number of suspected dengue cases over a specific period.

  5. Transmission potential (index P) was defined as a measure that quantifies the risk of dengue virus transmission in a specific region, taking into account climate-based factors such as temperature and humidity, which directly influence the breeding, survival, and biting behaviour of the mosquito vectors responsible for spreading the virus. This index provides insight into how favourable environmental conditions are for dengue circulation in a given area. The index was developed by Nakase et. al (2023) [10]. The spatio-temporal estimates of transmission potential were then compiled for African countries and territories. A threshold of 1.0 was selected to compare with the basic reproductive rate. A value of 1.0 indicates that in a population where the average number of adult female mosquitoes per host is 1.0 corresponds to a reproduction number of 1. The period of transmission suitability is defined as a month in which the transmission potential is greater than 1.0 [10].

2.4. Data synthesis and analysis

Data on the year of outbreak, country of origin assigned to each region were Chad, Cameroon, Guinea, Sao Tome and Principe Central (Central Africa); Comoros, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Kenya, Mauritius, Reunion, Seychelles, Sudan and Tanzania (Eastern Africa); Cape Verde, Egypt, Mauritania (Northern Africa), Angola (Southern Africa) and Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Mali, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal (Western Africa), number of suspected and confirmed cases, deaths and serotype counts were extracted from included reports and compiled into an Excel spreadsheet (Miscrosoft Corp., 2016 Redmond, WA, USA). The estimation of dengue burden was based on the number of suspected cases per country’s population during the respective years. The population data for the respective years were obtained from the Worldometer web-source, accessible at https://www.worldometers.info/population/africa/. Case fatality rate (CFR) was computed based on the number of reported deaths per total number of suspected dengue cases in the specific country. A negative binomial model was used to predict the growth of suspected cases using the year as a predictor variable. The model was selected to suit count data, such as dengue case numbers and accounts for overdispersion. The model was presented by the following equation;

log(y)=β0+β1Yeart

Where;

y = Expected number of suspected dengue cases

β0 = Intercept of the model

β1 = Coefficient for the year t

Yeart = The year variable for which the number of dengue cases was predicted eβ1 = A multiplicative factor for the growth in dengue cases. The best fit was compared with the Poisson regression model using likelihood ratio test. Statistical analysis and visualizations were conducted using R version 4.3.2 with primary packages ggplot2, dplyr and MASS.

3. Results

3.1. Literature search

The review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO International prospective register for systematic reviews of human studies under CRD42023480486. The search yielded a total of 453 results, including 297 from academic databases and 156 official sources. After removing 151 duplicates, 302 unique records were screened by titles and abstracts. 173 reports were excluded from the screening process, and 129 were evaluation for eligibility. Finally, 42 records were excluded for specific reasons (Appendix S2), and 87 included in the systematic review (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Selection process of included reports according to PRISMA guideline.

Figure 1

3.2. An overview of included reports

Table 1 presents the epidemiological data extracted from 48 indicator-based surveillance reports from the WHO AFRO and AFRICA CDC, 35 published research and 4 event-based surveillance reports. Between January 2013 and December 2023, data on dengue were available from 25 African countries. Seven countries, including, Burkina Faso (7 records, n = 147286), Cameroon (6, n = 2513), Cote d’Ivoire (5, n = 8250), Kenya (8, n = 7828), Senegal (8, n = 4606), Sudan (7, n = 2696) and Tanzania (6, n = 10369) accounted for more than 50% of all records (46/87) and 80% of cumulative suspected cases (197707/245143). A comparison year-on-year reveals that the highest number of reports (21.8%, 19/87) and suspected cases (60.3%, 174888/245143) were documented in 2023. In this year, Burkina Faso reported the deadliest outbreak accounting for 14286 out of 174888 (84.2%) cumulative suspected cases, 68402 out of 72677 (94.1%) confirmed cases, and 688 out of 765 (89.9%) deaths.

Table 1. Epidemiological trends of dengue cases and deaths in Africa over the last decade (2013−2023, n= 87).

Ref Country Population Year of outbreak Suspected cases Confirmed cases Deaths Data source Serotype
DENV 1 DENV 2 DENV3 DENV4
[11] Tanzania 49253643 2013 431 431 2 Research 0 431 0 0
[12] Kenya 44790000 2013 267 101 1 Research 51 48 0 0
[13] Tanzania 50814552 2014 2121 1017 4 Research 0 0 0 0
[14] South Sudan 37003245 2014 155 35 8 Event-based surveillance 35 0 0 0
[15] Tanzania 50814552 2014 483 101 0 Research 0 101 0 0
[16] Kenya 45831863 2014 1022 361 0 Research 36 105 10 11
[17] Nigeria 179E+08 2014 526 24 0 Research 0 0 0 0
[18] Kenya 45831863 2014 489 43 0 Research 0 0 0 0
[19] Burkina Faso 18106000 2015 399 21 0 Research 0 0 0 0
[20] Cameroon 23012646 2015 349 21 0 Research 0 0 0 0
[21] Egypt 97720000 2015 253 28 0 Event-based surveillance 28 0 0 0
[22] Senegal 14360000 2015 104 3 0 Research 3 0 0 0
[23] Burkina Faso 19280000 2016 1327 19 0 Research 0 11 6 0
[24] Democratic
Republic of Congo
81430000 2016 253 14 0 Indicator-based
surveillance
12 2 0 0
[25] Sudan 39380000 2016 106 4 0 Research 0 4 0 0
[26] Seychelles 94677 2016 1062 422 0 Event-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[27] Burkina Faso 19280000 2016 2929 317 0 Indicator-based surveillance 6 191 104 0
[28] Kenya 47894670 2016 560 5 0 Research 0 4 0 0
[29] Angola 21000000 2017 401 66 0 Indicator-based surveillance 1 62 0 0
[30] Burkina Faso 19280000 2017 9029 141 18 Indicator-based surveillance 2 58 12 0
[31] Cote d’Ivoire 24213622 2017 1421 322 2 Indicator-based surveillance 13 181 78 0
[32] Egypt 101800000 2017 144 97 0 Indicator-based surveillance 0 97 0 0
[33] Kenya 48950000 2017 1537 806 1 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[34] Sudan 40680000 2017 90 90 2 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[35] Cameroon 24390000 2017 114 8 0 Indicator-based surveillance 5 0 0 0
[36] Ethiopia 108E+08 2017 101 101 1 Indicator-based
surveillance
0 15 0 0
[37] Cameroon 24390000 2017 791 86 0 Indicator-based surveillance 5 16 8
[38] Mali 19310000 2017 429 33 0 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[39] Cameroon 24390000 2017 629 2 0 Indicator-based surveillance 2 0 0 0
[40] Mauritania 4160000 2017 307 165 0 Indicator-based surveillance 0 104 0 0
[41] Seychelles 95843 2017 4068 1429 0 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[42] Senegal 15570000 2018 2981 342 0 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[43] Mauritania 42710000 2018 322 28 0 Indicator-based surveillance 0 28 0 0
[44] Tanzania 58090000 2018 226 37 0 Indicator-based surveillance 0 27 0 0
[45] Ghana 30637585 2018 150 4 0 Indicator-based surveillance 1 0 3 0
[46] Nigeria 198E+08 2018 130 11 0 Research 5 0 6 0
[47] Reunion 856942 2018 6770 951 6 Research 0 951 0 0
[48] Senegal 15570000 2018 198 17 0 Research 0 4 11 0
[49] Senegal 15570000 2018 832 224 0 Indicator-based surveillance 6 35 103 0
[50] Seychelles 96762 2018 6120 1511 0 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[51] Kenya 48950000 2019 660 286 0 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[52] Benin 12290444 2019 26 14 2 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[53] Côte d’Ivoire 26150000 2019 2919 302 2 Indicator-based surveillance 95 28 0 0
[54] Tanzania 59870000 2019 6917 5286 13 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[52] Ethiopia 114E+08 2019 1251 6 0 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[52] Mali 20570000 2019 20 9 0 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[55] Senegal 16000000 2019 6 1 0 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[56] Sudan 43230000 2019 265 145 0 Research 0 35 100 10
[57] Sudan 43230000 2019 100 23 0 Research 0 0 23 0
[58] Reunion 861200 2019 30 16 0 Research 16 0 0 0
[59] Sudan 43230000 2019 76 17 2 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[60] Tanzania 59870000 2019 191 20 0 Indicator-based surveillance 20 0 0 0
[61] Mauritius 1296279 2019 265 141 0 Indicator-based surveillance 136 5 0 0
[62] Cameroon 25780000 2019 310 14 0 Research 0 0 0 0
[63] Sudan 43230000 2019 395 67 0 Research 0 0 0 0
[64] Comoros 806166 2020 696 4 0 Indicator-based surveillance 4 0 0 0
[65] Mauritania 4615000 2020 7 2 0 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[66] Cameroon 27200000 2020 320 41 0 Research 2 8 28 0
[67] Nigeria 213996181 2020 82 11 0 Indicator-based surveillance 11 0 0 0
[68] Senegal 17763163 2021 86 27 0 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[69] Kenya 53542175 2021 867 36 2 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[70] Angola 34500000 2021 86 38 0 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[71] Côte d’Ivoire 27480000 2021 4 4 0 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[72] Côte d’Ivoire 28200000 2022 11 11 1 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[73] Kenya 54027487 2022 2426 68 2 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[74] Sao Tome and Principe 227380 2022 1150 1150 8 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[75] Niger 26207977 2022 1 1 0 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[74] Senegal 17763163 2022 196 169 0 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[76] Chad 18278568 2023 1581 41 1 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[77] Côte d’Ivoire 28873034 2023 3895 321 27 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[78] Burkina Faso 23251485 2023 146878 68346 688 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[78] Senegal 17763163 2023 203 203 0 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[78] Mali 23293698 2023 4427 629 29 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[78] Cape Verde 573007 2023 410 193 0 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[76] Angola 37174067 2023 3 3 0 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[76] Sudan 48667653 2023 1664 1664 7 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[78] Ethiopia 127E+08 2023 14249 127 7 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[76] Sao Tome and Principe 233931 2023 69 69 3 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
Indicator-based surveillance
[79] Togo 9053799 2023 8 2 1 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[76] Egypt 113E+08 2023 578 578 0 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[78] Mauritius 1300557 2023 265 265 0 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[79] Guinea 14190612 2023 6 6 1 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[78] Niger 27202843 2023 148 148 0 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[78] Nigeria 224E+08 2023 72 14 0 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[78] Ghana 34121985 2023 18 9 0 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[78] Benin 13712828 2023 6 3 1 Indicator-based surveillance 0 0 0 0
[80] Burkina Faso 23251485 2023 408 56 0 Research 18 0 38 0
Total 245143 90053 857 542 2580 530 21

3.3. The spatial distribution of suspected dengue cases in Africa

Spatial distribution analysis indicates differences in number and distribution of suspected dengue cases across African countries and territories. From 2013-2023, Burkina Faso, Ethiopia and Tanzania reported the highest number of cases, surpassing 10,000. Reunion and Seychelles reported the highest number of cases (5,001––10,000) among territories (Figure 2).

Figure 2. A map of Africa illustrating the geographical distribution of suspected dengue cases in various African countries and territories based on data reported from 2013-2023.

Figure 2

The map was developed using QGIS open-source software version 3.38 accessed at https://qgis.org/download/

3.4. A rise in the number of confirmed dengue cases in West Africa

Over the past decade, dengue disease burden has increased in Africa, with a 5-fold increase in West Africa, from approximately 14,000 in 2014 to 70,000 cumulative confirmed cases in 2023. The region was responsible for approximately 80% of the confirmed cases (71, 793/89,967) (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

A. The magnitude and trend of cumulative confirmed dengue cases across Africa. B. The number of suspected dengue cases per 100,000 population and fatality rates (%) for specific countries based on data reported from 2013 to 2023.

3.5. The occurrence of multiple DENV serotypes and severe dengue

Since 2013, all four serotypes of DENV (DENV1, DENV2, DENV3, and DENV4) have been reported in Africa. Continentally, DENV1 and DENV2 dominated at different time (Figure 4). From 2019 to 2020, DENV1 was predominate serotype in both Eastern and Western Africa. In 2023, DENV3 dominated Western Africa whereas DENV2 prevailed in Eastern Africa.

Figure 4. Spatiotemporal distribution of DENV serotypes in Africa based on the data available from 2013 to 2023.

Figure 4

Since 2013, a limited number of severe dengue cases have been reported in Africa. Twenty cases were reported in the United Republic of Tanzania (2014), nine in Burkina Faso (2015), five in Ethiopia (2017), two in Benin (2019) and 40 in Sudan (2019). Severe outcomes were associated with diabetes in Tanzania [11], pregnant women in Burkina Faso [19], male gender in Ethiopia [36] and malaria-dengue co-infection in Sudan [81].

3.6. Regional differences in transmission seasonality and suitability

Central (Figure 5A) and Eastern (Figure 5B) Africa experienced prolonged dengue transmission seasons from April to November. In Central Africa, high peaks were observed in June (> 400 cases), September (> 1,000) and November (> 700) with a monthly median of 90 cases. Eastern Africa exhibited a dynamic transmission pattern with the highest peaks in May and June (> 4,000), September, November and December (> 5,000, respectively) with a monthly median of 218 cases. Northern Africa (Figure 5C exhibited sporadic transmission patterns with high peaks in February, July, August and November (>200, respectively) with a monthly median of 93 cases. Western Africa (Figure 5D) had distinct high transmission seasons with high peaks in October (> 17,000), November (> 50,000) and December (30,000) and a monthly median of 98 cases while Southern Africa reported less than 100 cases. Western Africa reported the highest number of deaths (> 500), followed by Eastern Africa (> 40). The regional variation in the number of suspected dengue cases indicates consistent transmission seasonality patterns from year to year (Figure 6A, 6B, 6C and 6D).

Figure 5. The seasonality of dengue transmission across regions based on data available from 2017–2023.

Figure 5

A. Central Africa, B. Eastern Africa, C. Northern Africa and D. Western Africa.

Figure 6. Regional dengue transmission seasonality variation from year to year based on data available from 2017–2023.

Figure 6

A. Central Africa, B. Eastern Africa, C. Northern Africa and D. Western Africa.

Central and Western Africa experience persistent suitability (index P > 1) for dengue transmission between April and November. Eastern Africa exhibits two phases of transmission suitability (Figure 7B), that coincide with short and long rainy seasons from October to December and March to May, respectively, whereas Northern Africa exhibits transmission suitability between August to November (Figure 7C).

Figure 7. Dengue transmission potential (TP) across regions based on data available from 2017–2023.

Figure 7

A. Central Africa B. Eastern Africa C. Northern Africa and D. Western Africa.

3.7. Increasing trend in the number of predicted dengue cases across Africa

The negative binomial model predicted a rising trend in the number of dengue cases in all African regions for each passing year (Figure 8) with the growth rate exceeding 50% in West Africa (Table 2). There were limited cases from Southern Africa that could be included in the model.

Figure 8. Predicted dengue cases across regions based on a negative binomial model using data reported from 2013–2023.

Figure 8

A. Central Africa B. Eastern Africa, C. Northern Africa and D. Western Africa.

Table 2. Growth of predicted dengue cases in Africa regions according to negative binomial model using data available from 2013–2023.

Region Year coefficient (β1) Multiplicative factor (eβ1) Growth rate (%)/year
  Western Africa 0.44 1.55 55
  Central Africa 0.16 1.17 17
  Northern Africa 0.16 1.17 17
  Eastern Africa 0.13 1.14 14

4. Discussion

Dengue represents a significant public health threat in Africa. However, the non-specific clinical presentation of the disease, which resembles malaria and other febrile illnesses such as yellow fever and chikungunya, limits better detection, reporting and understanding of the disease burden. Additionally, there are limited health resources for surveillance and timely detection [82]. This review presents the first systematic analysis to define the epidemiological trends of dengue disease burden in Africa and associated territories from 2013 to 2023. The findings of this review can inform the strengthening of intervention strategies to reduce morbidity and mortality of dengue in Africa.

The spatial analysis reveals disparities in the quantity and distribution of suspected dengue cases across Africa (Figure 2). This observation may indicate gaps in epidemiological surveillance and case reporting, given that tropical regions in Africa shares similar vector ecologies and transmission indices. Overall, West Africa was responsible for more than two-thirds of confirmed dengue cases and one-third of surveillance reports, indicating increasing transmission activities and improved case reporting in this region.

Burkina Faso recorded the highest burden of cases per 100,000 population (Figure 3). In 2023, the country accounted for more than 80% of confirmed cases and deaths. These estimates are consistent with the World Health Organization’s surveillance report on health emergency situations [83]. The impact of climate hazards on the distribution of vectors and extensive international travels of infected individuals from endemic countries are likely to exacerbate dengue transmission through spillover events and introductions [84,85].

There are several probable factors that may have contributed to dengue transmission in Western Africa over the past decade. Several studies have demonstrated that the abundance of Aedes aegypti breeding habitats, particularly waste tyres, was a significant factor for transmission, particularly in peri urban centres [86,87]. Other studies have revealed that dengue outbreaks in Western Africa are driven by the presence of abundant infected Aedes vectors [88]. In 2023, Ouédraogo and others reported the presence of a high number of immature Aedes aegypti vectors in the handwashing stations that were constructed in public areas during the COVID-19 pandemic in Burkina Faso [89].

Despite a significant increase in the number of dengue cases, case fatality rate remains below 1% in Africa (Figure 3), compared to 3%–10% in Asia [90]. Given the continuous circulation of multiple DENV serotypes within the same region (Figure 4), more cases of severe dengue were expected due to lack of cross immunity. However, it is possible that limited diagnostic capabilities, and under-reporting due to misdiagnosis with other febrile illnesses, such as malaria are contributing to low prevalence [91]. Further, genetic evidence from global ancestral analysis suggests that African descendants may be protective against dengue haemorrhagic phenotype [92].

The seasonality of dengue transmission in Africa shows regional differences (Figure 5), with Central and Eastern Africa experiencing long transmission seasons that coinciding with rainy seasons from May to November in Central Africa (Figure 5A) and from April to May and November to December in Eastern Africa (Figure 5B). The erratic transmission pattern observed in Northern Africa (Figure 5C), may be attributed to various factors including the storage of water in open containers [93,94] and heavy rainfall [95], that attract Aedes mosquitoes. Moreover, there are inter-regional migrations of people from endemic countries and extensive intra-regional trade activities that play a significant role in the transmission of dengue [93]. Western Africa exhibits a distinct high transmission season between October and December. These findings are agree with results from previous studies conducted in this region [96,97]. The observed regional differences in the number of suspected dengue cases shows consistent transmission seasonality patterns from year to year (Figure 6A, 6B, 6C and 6D). These patterns suggest that climatic factors influencing mosquito vector distribution and dengue virus transmission are regional-specific. These observations highlight the predictive nature of dengue seasonality in Africa to guide targeted public health interventions during peak transmission periods.

From April to November, Central and Western Africa (Figure 7A and 7D), exhibit long transmission suitability periods (Index P > 1.0) that correlate with the annual rainfall seasons [98,99]. In contrast, high transmission potential in Eastern Africa (Figure 7B), correlates with two rainy seasons from September to December and from March to May [100]. The low number of dengue cases reported in Northern Africa could be due to a short transmission suitability period between August to October. In general, West Africa experiences the highest transmission suitability (Index P > 2.0) between July and November in comparison to other regions. The prolonged period of transmission suitability may have contributed to the rise of Western Africa as a hotspot of dengue transmission.

The negative binomial model predicted an increasing trend of suspected dengue cases across Central, Eastern and Western Africa (Figure 8), with a growth rate per annum exceeding 50% in West Africa (Table 2). Results from previously described climate suitability models indicate that these regions will experience significant growth in dengue incidences over the coming decades [101]. These findings will aid to inform healthcare policy and practices in Africa to enhance surveillance and implement effective interventions to prevent ongoing dengue transmission.

Limitations

The results of this review are subject to several limitations. First, confirmed case counts may be underestimated due to the application of different case definitions. Second, limited dengue surveillance and case reporting between 2020–2022 period due to COVID-19 pandemic introduces bias in estimating dengue burden. Third, dengue is a notifiable disease, but routine surveillance and case reporting are limited in Africa due to resource constrains and health system capacities. Therefore, the epidemiological trends analysis was limited to available research and national surveillance data reported from different geographic areas within the respective years, which served as country-level data. Fourth, confirmed cases among travellers returning from African countries and territories were not included. Therefore, dengue burden estimates reported in this report should be interpreted with caution.

5. Conclusions

Over the past decade, there has been a rise in the number of confirmed dengue cases, particularly in West Africa. The persistent presence of multiple DENV serotypes within the same region increases the likelihood of severe dengue due to the lack of cross-immunity. It is important to strengthen surveillance and implement region-specific interventions to prevent future dengue outbreaks. We advocate further research for understanding the evolution and transmission dynamics of the specific dengue virus lineages in Africa.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary materials

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the World Health Organization for Africa (#WHOAfro) and Africa Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (#AfricaCDC) that made epidemiological surveillance reports for different countries accessible. We also express our gratitude to all the members of the Climate Amplified Disease Epidemics (#CLIMADE) consortium for their valuable contributions in this review.

Funding

Research activities at KRISP and CERI are supported in part by grants from the Rockefeller Foundation (HTH 017), the Abbott Pandemic Defense Coalition (APDC), the National Institute of Health USA (U01 AI151698) for the United World Antivirus Research Network (UWARN), the SAMRC South African mRNA Vaccine Consortium (SAMVAC), Global Health EDCTP3 Joint Undertaking and its members as well as Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (101103171), the Health Emergency Preparedness and Response Umbrella Program (HEPR Program), managed by the World Bank Group (TF0B8412), the UK’s Medical Research Foundation (MRF-RG-ICCH-2022-100069), and the Wellcome Trust for the Global health project (228186/Z/23/Z). The content and findings reported herein are the sole deduction, view and responsibility of the researcher/s and do not reflect the official position and sentiments of the funding agencies.

Footnotes

Authors’ contributions

Gaspary O. Mwanyika: Conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, validation, writing-original draft, writing-reviewing & editing. Abdualmoniem O. Musa: Data curation and writing-reviewing & editing. Jenicca Poongavanan: Methodology, writing-reviewing & editing. Monika Moir: Methodology, Writing-reviewing & editing. Graeme Dor: Writing-review & editing. Eduan Wilkinson: Writing-reviewing & editing. Cheryl Baxter: Methodology, project administration, writing-original draft, writing-reviewing & editing. Tulio de Oliveira: Resources, funding acquisition, project administration, validation, writing-reviewing & editing. Houriiyah Tegally: Methodology, data curation, validation, writing-original draft and writing-reviewing & editing.

Competing interest

The authors declare no competing interest in this work.

Institutional review board statement

No ethical clearance because this is a review of published research.

Informed consent statement

Not applicable

Data availability statement

All the relevant data are contained within the manuscript. Any additional data is made available through Mendeley data repository accessible at https://data.mendeley.com/my-data/.

References

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials

Data Availability Statement

All the relevant data are contained within the manuscript. Any additional data is made available through Mendeley data repository accessible at https://data.mendeley.com/my-data/.

RESOURCES