Abstract
Objectives
To characterize the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) lesion dynamics, comorbidities, predictors of relapse, and outcomes in anti‐γ‐aminobutyric acid type A receptor (GABAAR) encephalitis, and assess the utility of LIM‐domain‐only‐protein 5 (LMO5) antibodies as tumor markers.
Methods
GABAAR antibodies were confirmed by 2 techniques in serum or cerebrospinal fluid. Long‐term outcomes were defined as good (modified Rankin scale, mRS = 0–1) or poor (mRS 2–5) at ≥12 months. LMO5 antibodies were assessed by cell‐based assays and Western blot.
Results
Thirty‐three patients were identified (4 children, 29 adults; median age, 5.5 and 60 years; 61% male). Ten patients (10/32, 31%) had concurrent systemic autoimmunity. Adults presented with seizures and cognitive/behavioral symptoms, often with thymoma, gastrointestinal, or other tumors (18/33, 55%), whereas children frequently had seizures and ataxia with cerebellar MRI lesions. Multifocal T2/fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery hyperintensities were present at onset in 23 of 31 (74%) or developed later in those with absent or single lesions. Lesions showed dynamic changes, suggesting ongoing inflammation even without clinical correlate. Relapses occurred in 17 of 31 (55%, all adults) and were associated with older age (p = 0.02) and lack of second‐line immunotherapy (p = 0.02). Four patients (4/33, 12%) died. After a 32.5‐month median follow‐up, 9 of 20 (45%) had persistent cognitive deficits, and 6 of 20 (30%) had a poor outcome, which was associated with relapses (p = 0.04). LMO5 antibodies were absent in patients and controls.
Interpretation
Anti‐GABAAR encephalitis shows age‐dependent presentations, most commonly seizures. MRI reveals dynamic changes consistent with an ongoing “clinically silent” inflammation. Relapses and cognitive sequelae are common and associate with not receiving second‐line immunotherapy. LMO5 antibodies lack tumor‐predictive value. ANN NEUROL 2026;100:139–150
Anti‐γ‐aminobutyric acid type A receptor (anti‐GABAAR) encephalitis is a rare autoimmune disorder caused by autoantibodies against the GABAAR, a heteropentameric ion channel that mediates fast inhibitory synaptic transmission in the central nervous system (CNS). 1 , 2 , 3 It is characterized by prominent seizures, often refractory to antiseizure medications and evolving into status epilepticus, and multifocal cortico‐subcortical cerebral lesions. 1 , 2 , 4 Although acute clinical features have been described in single case reports and few larger cohorts, 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 data on disease evolution over time are limited. Most patients appear to respond initially to immunotherapy, however, relatively short follow‐up periods (median, 9 months in the largest series) 1 make it unclear whether this response is sustained or neurological symptoms persist, resulting in chronic disability. Moreover, although some patients experience symptom recurrence after initial improvement, 6 , 8 , 9 the overall risk of relapse and predictive factors still need to be clarified. MRI abnormalities are also known to change over time, 4 but their dynamics and clinical implications are poorly characterized.
Tumors, such as thymoma and others, 1 , 2 , 10 , 11 are known triggers of anti‐GABAAR encephalitis, occurring in approximately 30% of cases, mainly adults. 1 , 7 In anecdotal cases, antibodies against the oncoprotein LIM domain only protein 5 (LMO5) 12 , 13 have been found to co‐exist in tumor‐associated anti‐GABAAR encephalitis, suggesting they could be used as a biomarker of an underlying tumor. 12 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 However, LMO5 antibodies have not been examined in larger cohorts, and their association with paraneoplastic anti‐GABAAR encephalitis remains unknown.
In this study, we characterized the clinical and radiological evolution of anti‐GABAAR encephalitis in a novel cohort of patients, describing MRI dynamics, occurrence of relapses, long‐term outcomes, and associated predictors. Additionally, we determined whether LMO5 antibodies could be used to predict a paraneoplastic etiology.
Methods
Patients' Identification and Clinical Definitions
Patients with anti‐GABAAR encephalitis were retrospectively identified (January 2016–May 2025) from our institutional review board‐approved database and biorepository (IDIBAPS R091217, collection C.0006522), which includes clinical information and serum/cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from over 20,000 patients with suspected autoimmune neurological disorders referred to our Neuroimmunology Laboratory (FRCB‐IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain) for neural antibody studies. Patients were included if they fulfilled the following criteria: (1) clinical picture consistent with encephalitis, 18 and (2) antibodies to GABAAR in their serum and/or CSF detected by rat brain immunohistochemistry and confirmed by a cell‐based assay (CBA) with live HEK293 cells expressing α1/β3 GABAAR subunits. 2 We excluded patients with incomplete clinical data or who had concurrent well‐characterized antibodies against other neural intracellular or cell‐surface CNS antigens (tested by immunohistochemistry on rat brain or cerebellum, immunodot, and CBA).
Clinical information, provided by referring physicians through a dedicated questionnaire, included demographics, comorbidities, tumor association, prodromal syndrome, neurological symptoms (at onset, during disease course, at relapse, and at last follow‐up), paraclinical findings (CSF analysis, electroencephalography [EEG], brain magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], and other ancillary/complementary studies), immunotherapies (including first‐line, ie, oral steroids, intravenous methylprednisolone [IVMP], intravenous immunoglobulins [IVIg], plasma exchange [PLEX], and second‐line, that is, cyclophosphamide, rituximab, and other immunosuppressants), 19 oncologic treatments, and outcome at last follow‐up (assessed using the modified Rankin scale [mRS]). Brain MRI scans were evaluated as part of routine clinical care by neuroradiologists with expertise in neuroinflammatory disorders at each participating center. Lesion characteristics, including size, anatomical localization, signal abnormalities on T2/fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences, and gadolinium enhancement, were reported by the referring neurologist using a dedicated questionnaire based on the radiology report and review of the MRI images. Tumors were considered as associated with the encephalitis if diagnosed within 2 years (both before and after) from encephalitis onset or at relapse. 20 Relapse was defined as new onset or worsening of neurological symptoms after a period of stabilization or improvement for at least 2 months. 19 Long‐term outcome and identification of prognostic factors for good (mRS, 0–1) versus poor outcome (mRS, 2–5) were assessed in disease survivors with ≥12 months follow‐up from disease onset (and minimum 2 months from last relapse). Predictors of relapse were assessed in all patients alive after the first clinical episode.
LMO5 Antibody Studies
LMO5 antibodies were assessed with 2 techniques; (1) CBA of HEK293 cells transfected with the human Myc‐DDK–tagged LMO5/CSRP2 plasmid (catalog number RC201565, accession number NM_001321, OriGene, Rockville, MD, USA), and (2) Western blot of recombinant LMO5/CSRP2 protein (NBP1‐98997, Novus Biologicals, Centennial, CO, USA), as described in Supplementary Material.
Statistical Analysis
Comparisons between groups (presence vs absence of relapse, good vs poor outcome) were performed using the 2‐tailed Fisher exact test (categorical variables) or Mann–Whitney U test (continuous variables). Paired observations from the same patient (features at initial episode vs first relapse) were compared using the McNemar test (categorical variables). To identify independent predictors of clinical relapses, statistically significant variables in the univariable analysis were used to build a binary logistic regression model with a stepwise method (forward selection Wald). The IBM SPSS Statistics software and GraphPad Prism v8.0 were used for statistical analyses. Results with p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Standard Protocol Approvals, Registrations, and Patient Consents
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of FRCB‐IDIBAPS (HCB/2023/1169). Written informed consent for the use of samples and clinical information was obtained before participation.
Results
Demographics, Tumor Association, and Autoimmune Comorbidities
We identified 33 patients with anti‐GABAAR encephalitis, including 4 (12%) children (median age, 5.5 years; range, 4–12) and 29 adults (median age, 60 years; range, 23–82), and 20 of 33 (61%) were males.
Individual patient's demographics, comorbidities, main clinical features, MRI findings, complementary examinations, GABAAR antibody status at onset and at relapse, and outcomes at last follow‐up are reported in Table S1. GABAAR antibodies were detected in both serum and CSF in 25 of 29 patients (87%) with available paired samples, whereas 3 (10%) were positive only in serum, and 1 (3%) only in CSF. The remaining 4 patients had only serum (2) or CSF (2) available, all positive for GABAAR antibodies (Table S1).
Nineteen tumors were identified in 18 of 33 (55%) patients, all adults; 1 patient had 2 tumors. Thymoma was the most frequent (13/19, 68%), followed by gastrointestinal tumors (3/19, 16%; including 1 colorectal cancer, 1 gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors, 1 esophageal cancer), prostate adenocarcinoma (2/19, 11%), and multiple myeloma (1/19, 5%). Tumors were diagnosed within 2 years of encephalitis onset (18/19) or at relapse (1/19, 3 years after onset): 5 (26%) preceded and 14 (74%) coincided with or followed neurological symptom onset. Three tumors had been previously treated when encephalitis developed. Notably, 1 patient with multiple myeloma had undergone an autologous stem cell transplant 1 year earlier. Among 16 patients with available information, 15 (94%) received oncologic therapy, whereas 1 (1 thymoma) did not.
Of 32 patients with available comorbidity data, 10 (31%, including 6 with associated tumors) had concomitant autoimmune diseases: chronic thyroiditis (n = 5, 2 patients with an additional diagnosis of multiple sclerosis and pernicious anemia, respectively), myasthenia gravis with AChR antibodies (n = 2), pemphigus (n = 1), systemic lupus erythematosus (n = 1), Crohn's disease (n = 1). The patient with multiple sclerosis had received alemtuzumab 20 and 8 months before encephalitis onset, following 13 years of natalizumab therapy. Three additional patients, all with a thymoma, had serum AChR antibodies without clinical or electrophysiological evidence of myasthenia.
Clinical Features at the Initial and Subsequent Episodes, and Predictive Factors for Relapse
Clinical features, disease severity, and response to immunotherapy during the initial episode of anti‐GABAAR encephalitis are summarized in Table 1. Seizures were the main clinical presentation, occurring in 32 of 33 (97%) patients of all ages, of whom 20 of 32 (63%) had status epilepticus. Seizures developed in association with other clinical features in 26 of 33 (79%) patients, mainly cognitive and psycho‐behavioral disturbances in adults (17/29, 59% and 9/29, 31%, respectively) and cerebellar symptoms in children (3/4, 75%).
Table 1.
Summary Data on the Patients’ Clinical and Paraclinical Features at the Initial Episode
| Clinical features, n (%) | |
|---|---|
| Prodromes | 11/33 (33) |
| Seizures | 32/33 (97) |
| Status epilepticus | 20/32 (63) |
| Cognitive disturbances | 20/33 (61) |
| Psycho‐behavioral changes | 10/33 (30) |
| Sensory symptoms | 2/33 (6) |
| Ataxia/gait/cerebellar disturbances | 4/33 (12) |
| Movement disorders | 4/33 (12) |
| Decreased level of consciousness | 5/33 (15) |
| Sleep disturbances | 5/33 (15) |
| Dysautonomia | 4/33 (12) |
| Isolated symptoms | 7/33 (21) |
| Initial brain MRI, n (%) | |
| T2/FLAIR hyperintense lesions | 31/33 (94) |
| Cerebral a | 28/31 (90) |
| Temporal lobe | 24/31 (77) |
| Frontal lobe | 22/31 (71) |
| Parietal lobe | 11/31 (35) |
| Occipital lobe | 8/31 (26) |
| Hippocampus | 5/30 (17) |
| Diffusion restriction | 6/20 (30) |
| Gadolinium enhancement | 6/21 (29) |
| Cerebellar | 3/31 (10) |
| Bilateral | 1/3 (33) |
| Diffusion restriction | 1/3 (33) |
| Gadolinium enhancement | 2/3 (67) |
| Complementary studies, n (%) | |
| EEG abnormalities | 26/29 (90) |
| Epileptiform // Slowing | 23/26 (88)//12/26 (46) |
| CSF abnormalities | 20/31 (65) |
| Pleocytosis (white blood cells>5/ mm3) | 8/18 (44) |
| Cell count, median/mm3 (range) | 12,5 (7‐61) |
| Hyperproteinorrachia (>45 mg/dL) | 12/17 (71) |
| CSF‐specific IgG oligoclonal bands//Increased IgG index | 3/15 (20)//3/14 (21) |
| Treatment, n (%) | |
| Immunotherapy | 28/33 (85) |
| First‐line immunotherapy | 28/33 (85) |
| IVMP | 26/28 (93) |
| Oral steroids | 12/28 (43) |
| PLEX | 7/28 (25) |
| IVIg | 11/28 (39) |
| Response to first‐line immunotherapy | |
| Full | 4/26 (15) |
| Partial | 19/26 (73) |
| None | 3/26 (12) |
| Second‐line immunotherapy | 10/33 (30) |
| RTX | 6/10 (60) |
| Azathioprine | 4/10 (40) |
| Others (cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus, cyclosporine, tocilizumab) | 4/10 (40) |
| Response to second‐line immunotherapy | |
| Full | 4/7 (57) |
| Partial | 3/7 (43) |
| Median time to immunotherapy, days (range) | 21 (2–246) |
| Anti‐seizure medication | 30/30 (100) |
| Multiple anti‐seizure drugs | 22/30 (73) |
| Severity, n (%) | |
| ICU admission | 9/30 (30) |
| Higher mRS score, median (range) | 5 (2–6) |
Abbreviations: ICU = Intensive Care Unit; IVIg = intravenous immunoglobulin; IVMP = intravenous methylprednisolone; mRS = Modified Rankin Scale; PLEX = plasma exchange; RTX = rituximab.
If lesions affected several cerebral lobes, each of the involved lobes was counted separately.
Of the 31 patients who survived the initial episode, clinical relapses occurred in 17 (55%), all adults (Fig 1A). The first relapse occurred at a median of 7 months (range, 3–30) after the initial episode. Most relapsed within 1 year (14/17, 82%) and experienced a single relapse (13/17, 76%), although 3 patients had 2 relapses, and 1 had 3 (see Fig 1A). By the time of relapsing symptoms, most patients (12/16, 75%) were not receiving immunotherapy (4 had never received prior immunotherapy given that the initial episode was not recognized as autoimmune encephalitis). Among the 4 on immunotherapy, 3 were tapering steroids, and 1 had received rituximab 6 months prior, with no data on B‐cell repopulation.
FIGURE 1.

Clinical features of patients with relapses. (A) Swimmer plot showing the disease course of the 17 patients with relapses. Each line on the y‐axis represents the disease course of a relapsing patient (numbered as in Table S1). Time spans from clinical onset (time 0) to the last follow‐up (gray diamond if alive, black if died) along the x‐axis. Three patients (line 4, 5, and 14) had follow‐up periods longer than 62 months (gray arrow, duration of follow‐up not shown in the graph). The pink squares represent the onset of the initial episode of the disease, whereas triangles show the onset of the relapse episodes (dark blue = first relapse; light blue = second relapse; orange = third relapse). The length of each episode until improvement or stabilization (when available) is represented by a thicker line of the corresponding color. The vertical dashed line marks the 12th month from onset, most relapses occurring within this time period. (B) Comparison between initial episode and first relapse in anti‐γ‐aminobutyric acid type A receptor (GABAAR) encephalitis. Bar chart showing the comparison of clinical symptoms, ancillary test results and severity at the initial episode of the disease and at first relapse in the 17 patients who experienced relapses. None of the comparisons was statistically significant (p > 0.05). [Color figure can be viewed at www.annalsofneurology.org]
No significant differences were observed in clinical presentation or ancillary tests between the initial episode and relapse (see Fig 1B). Relapses, however, tended to be more often monosymptomatic (9/17, 53% vs 5/17, 29%; p = 0.29) and less severe (mRS, 4–5 in 5/15; 33% vs 9/15; 60% p = 0.29) than the initial episode.
Compared to non‐relapsing patients, those who relapsed were older (66 vs 55 years, p = 0.02), less likely to exhibit movement disorders (0 vs 4/14, 29%; p = 0.03), and less likely to have received second‐line immunotherapy (2/17, 12% vs 8/14, 57%; p = 0.02) (Table S2). At multivariate analysis, older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.063; confidence interval [CI], 1.001–1.128; p = 0.047) and lack of treatment with second‐line immunotherapy (OR, 9.793; CI, 1.352–70.921; p = 0.024) were independent predictors of relapse. After excluding children (all with a non‐relapsing course), lack of second‐line immunotherapy remained the only independent predictor of relapse (OR, 13.125; CI, 1.924–89.515; p = 0.009).
MRI Features and Changes over the Disease Course
Brain MRI at initial episode was performed a median of 11 days (range, 0–667) after onset and was abnormal in 31 of 33 (94%) patients: 23 (74%, 22 adults, 1 child) had multifocal T2/FLAIR hyperintense cerebral lesions, 5 (16%, all adults) had a single cerebral lesion, and 3 (10%, all children) showed isolated cerebellar inflammatory lesions (Table 1 and Fig 2A–C).
FIGURE 2.

Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features and changes over time in patients with anti‐γ‐aminobutyric acid type A receptor (GABAAR) encephalitis. (A–D) Initial brain MRIs findings showing: (A) multifocal supratentorial cortico‐subcortical T2/fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) hyperintense lesions in the left temporo‐fronto‐parietal lobes (patient 10); (B) upper right cerebellar hemisphere lesions with minor involvement of left cerebellar folia (patient 1), without contrast enhancement or diffusion restriction (not shown); (C) initial single cortico‐subcortical T2/FLAIR hyperintense lesion in the right temporal lobe that evolved at relapse (4 months later) into multiple right frontal lesions with re‐expansion of the prior temporal lesion (D) (patient 17). (E) Dynamic changes of brain lesions overtime during the disease course (patient 23). At disease onset, MRI showed multifocal and bilateral T2/FLAIR hyperintense lesions, which worsened during the initial episode eventually merging into confluent areas after 1.5 months. Four months after onset, most of the previous T2/FLAIR abnormalities resolved, and a diffuse brain atrophy developed, predominantly affecting bilateral fronto‐temporal lobes. Nine months from onset, the previous inflammatory lesion in the left temporal cortex enlarged, along with the appearance of new small lesions in the parietal and frontal cortices, without apparent worsening of neurological symptoms. [Color figure can be viewed at www.annalsofneurology.org]
Follow‐up MRI images were available for 30 of 33 (91%) patients (2 children and 28 adults). One of the 2 children with cerebellar lesions at onset (see Fig 2B) had residual isolated cerebellar T2/FLAIR hyperintensities at 18 months, with associated slight cerebellar atrophy, whereas the other showed normal findings at 6‐months.
In all 28 adults, follow‐up MRI demonstrated dynamic lesion changes, including size variation (enlargement or shrinkage) and shifting location (new or resolving lesions), exemplified by patient 20 (see Fig 2E). All 28 developed multifocal supratentorial cortical and subcortical lesions: 22 had this pattern at onset, 5 initially had a single supratentorial lesion, but evolved to multifocal either during the initial episode (in 3) or at relapse (in 2) (see Fig 2C,D), and 1 with a normal initial MRI developed multifocal lesions 6 weeks later, during the same episode. The remaining patient with a normal initial MRI had no follow‐up imaging.
In 6 of 28 (21%) patients, new or enlarging cerebral lesions appeared on brain MRI (performed as part of routine clinico‐radiological assessment) after a median time of 9.5 months (range, 2–10 months) from the last clinic onset, without new symptoms (“clinically silent lesions”) (see Fig 2E, bottom row). In 2 of 6 patients who were not retreated, these changes preceded neurological relapse by 10 and 30 days, whereas the other 4 of 6 who received immunotherapy based on new MRI findings, remained without new or worsening symptoms.
Among 25 adults with available data, 12 (48%) developed brain atrophy compared to previous scans, sometimes as early as 4 months after onset (see Fig 2E), ranging from focal to diffuse involvement. Demographics, clinical features, tumor presence, and follow‐up duration did not differ between those with or without atrophy (p > 0.05).
Other Complementary Studies
Information about other complementary metabolic brain imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) or pathological studies is shown in Table S1. Brain single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or positron emission tomography (PET) demonstrated hypermetabolism of T2/FLAIR hyperintense lesions in all the 7 evaluated patients (Fig S1A), with additional adjacent hypometabolic areas in 3, likely related to surrounding edema or network‐level functional suppression adjacent to inflamed regions. MRS, performed in 4 patients, revealed increased lactate peak in 1 case 21 and decreased N‐acetylaspartate, inverted choline/N‐acetylaspartate ratio, and moderate increase of lactate peaks in the other 2 (Fig S1B), indicating neuronal dysfunction and anaerobic metabolism, a pattern more commonly observed in active inflammatory lesions. In 1 patient, no lactate peak was detected.
Six patients underwent histological studies of the lesions, all showing predominant gliosis. In 1 case, gliosis was accompanied by perivascular CD3+/CD8+ T‐cell infiltration and a few CD20+ B‐cells (Fig S1C). In another, it was associated with microglial activation, mild perivascular, and parenchymal T‐cell infiltration, and later B‐cell infiltration at relapse. 22
Overall, although some of these metabolic abnormalities suggested by the MRS can also be observed during ictal or post‐ictal states, the combination of persistent NAA reduction, moderate lactate accumulation, and the histopathological findings of gliosis with mild or focal inflammatory infiltrates makes an inflammatory etiology more plausible in the context of this cohort.
Long‐Term Outcomes (Follow‐Up ≥12 Months)
Overall, 4 of 33 (12%) patients died of causes related to encephalitis: 3 from complications of status epilepticus (2 at the initial episode, 1 at relapse), 1 from sepsis 2 months after relapse. Of the 29 surviving patients, information about long‐term outcomes (median follow‐up, 32.5 months; range, 12–131) was available for 20 (18 adults and 2 children). Twelve patients (12/20, 60%) had persistent deficits: 9 (9/20, 45%) had cognitive disturbances, either isolated (5 adults and 1 child) or with psycho‐behavioral alterations, mild parkinsonism, or motor deficits, 1 adult (5%) had focal seizures and hemispatial neglect, 1 sensory disturbance, and 1 sphincteric dysfunction. Ten (10/14, 71%) patients returned to their pre‐morbid occupation (work or school). Outcomes according to mRS scores at last follow‐up are shown in Figure 3. Six (6/20, 30%) patients had poor outcome (mRS, 2–5), which was associated with the occurrence of relapse (6/6, 100% vs 6/14, 43% in those with good outcome; p = 0.04). Clinical features and results of paraclinical tests were otherwise comparable between the 2 outcome groups (Table 2). However, notably, patients with persistent long‐term cognitive deficits tended to be less frequently treated with second‐line immunotherapy at the initial episode compared to cognitively unimpaired patients (1/9, 11% vs 6/11, 55%; p = 0.07).
FIGURE 3.

Long‐term outcomes in patients with anti‐γ‐aminobutyric acid type A receptor (GABAAR) encephalitis. Grouped bar chart showing modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores at disease peak (highest mRS at any episode) and at last evaluation in patients with long‐term follow‐up (n = 20). [Color figure can be viewed at www.annalsofneurology.org]
Table 2.
Comparison of the Clinical and Paraclinical Features Between Patients With Good Versus Poor Outcome at Last Follow‐Up
| Good outcome | Poor outcome | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients (total 20), n (%) | 14 (70) | 6 (30) | |
| Demographics | |||
| Median age at onset, years (range) | 51 (4–72) | 66 (38–78) | 0.09 |
| Females, n (%) | 5 (36) | 4 (67) | 0.34 |
| Children, n (%) | 2 (14) | 0 | 1.00 |
| Comorbidities, n (%) | |||
| Autoimmune diseases | 3 (23, n = 13) | 4 (67) | 0.13 |
| Tumor | 9 (64) | 2 (33) | 0.34 |
| First clinical episode | |||
| Clinical features, n (%) | |||
| Prodromal symptoms | 4 (29) | 1 (17) | 1.00 |
| Seizures | 14 (100) | 5 (83) | 0.30 |
| Status epilepticus | 9 (64) | 2 (33) | 0.34 |
| Cognitive disturbances | 9 (64) | 2 (33) | 0.34 |
| Psycho‐behavioral | 5 (36) | 1 (17) | 0.61 |
| Movement disorders | 1 (7) | 0 | 1.00 |
| Sleep disorder | 3 (21) | 1 (17) | 1.00 |
| Sensory disturbance | 2 (14) | 0 | 1.00 |
| Dysautonomia | 1 (7) | 0 | 1.00 |
| Decreased level of consciousness | 1 (7) | 2 (33) | 0.20 |
| Ataxia/gate/cerebellar disturbances | 2 (14) | 1 (17) | 1.00 |
| Initial brain MRI, n (%) | |||
| T2/FLAIR hyperintense lesions | 14 (100) | 5 (83) | 0.30 |
| Cerebral hemisphere(s) | 12 (86) | 5 (83) | 1.00 |
| Cerebellum | 2 (17, n = 10) | 0 | 0.53 |
| Complementary studies, n (%) | |||
| EEG abnormalities (epileptiform and/or slowing) | 10 (91, n = 11) | 3 (60, n = 5) | 0.21 |
| CSF abnormalities | 7 (54, n = 13) | 1 (20, n = 5) | 0.31 |
| CSF‐specific IgG oligoclonal bands | 2 (18, n = 11) | 0 (n = 4) | 1.00 |
| Treatment | |||
| Immunotherapy, n (%) | 13 (93) | 4 (67) | 0.20 |
| First‐line only, n (%) | 7 (50) | 3 (50) | 1.00 |
| First‐ and second‐line, n (%) | 6 (43) | 1 (17) | 0.35 |
| Median time to treatment, days (range) | 22.5 (9–246) | 40 (3–506) | 0.64 |
| Anti‐seizure medications | 13 (100, n = 13) | 5 (83, n = 6) | 0.32 |
| Clinical severity | |||
| ICU admission, n (%) | 3 (23, n = 13) | 2 (33) | 1.00 |
| Highest mRS score, median (range) | 3 (2–5) | 5 (2–5, n = 5) | 0.89 |
| Relapses | |||
| Relapse, n (%) | 6 (43) | 6 (100) | 0.04 |
| Clinical course and last follow‐up | |||
| Median time from onset to last FU, months | 34.5 (12–87) | 27 (13–131) | 0.78 |
| Cerebral atrophy at last FU MRI, n (%) | 3 (25, n = 12) | 4 (67) | 0.14 |
Abbreviations: CSF = cerebrospinal fluid; EEG = electroencephalogram; FU = follow‐up; ICU = Intensive Care Unit; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; mRS = modified rankin scale.
LMO5 Antibody Studies
LMO5 antibodies were assessed in 47 patients with anti‐GABAAR encephalitis (32 from the present study and 15 from our previous series1), and 22 disease controls (5 multiple sclerosis, 17 with suspected neurological disorder) (Fig S2). No LMO5 antibodies were detected in any of the 47 anti‐GABAAR encephalitis patients (total of 74 samples: 39 sera and 35 CSF, paired in 27 cases), regardless of tumor status, or in the 12 sera and 10 CSF from controls.
Discussion
This study provides new insights into the clinical, radiological features, and prognosis of anti‐GABAAR encephalitis. Children present with prominent seizures that can be accompanied by clinical and radiological cerebellar involvement, whereas in adults seizures are typically associated with evolving multifocal supratentorial lesions, which may appear without corresponding clinical changes (“clinically silent lesions”). We also identify novel tumor associations, particularly with gastrointestinal and genitourinary tract malignancies, and report a higher‐than‐previously recognized relapse rate, affecting over half of patients within the first year, mainly if not treated with second‐line immunotherapy. Notably, 60% of patients remain with long‐term neurological sequelae, mainly cognitive disturbances, which were associated with relapse and lack of second‐line immunotherapy. Finally, LMO5 antibodies appear of limited utility as tumor markers, as none were detected in our cohort.
Seizures are the main clinical manifestations in both children and adults and rarely remain an isolated manifestation. In children, they can frequently associate with cerebellar symptoms and MRI lesions, a radiological pattern unreported in adults in this or prior studies. 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 In contrast, in adults, comprising 88% of our cohort, seizures are often accompanied by cognitive and/or psycho‐behavioral disturbances and multifocal supratentorial MRI lesions. These age‐related differences may reflect greater susceptibility of the cerebellum to inflammatory damage during development, 23 , 24 consistent with more frequent cerebellar involvement in younger patients in other autoimmune encephalitides, such as anti‐alpha‐amino‐3‐hydroxy‐5‐methyl‐4‐isoxazole‐propionic acid receptor (AMPAR) 25 and anti‐N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate receptor (NMDAR). 19
Another notable age‐dependent difference is that associated tumors occurred only in adults, consistent with the low prevalence of paraneoplastic etiology in pediatric autoimmune encephalitides. 1 , 19 , 25 , 26 Overall, 60% of adults had an underlying malignancy. Although thymoma remained the most frequent tumor, as previously reported, 1 a novel finding is that the second most common cancers involved gastrointestinal or genitourinary tract. Whether this association is specific to anti‐GABAAR encephalitis remains unclear, because tumors in these locations are more common in this age group and may be coincidental.
Multifocal supratentorial cortico‐subcortical lesions are a hallmark of anti‐GABAAR encephalitis. Longitudinal MRI analyses revealed 2 key findings: first, lesions evolved dynamically over time in terms of number, size, and location, likely reflecting shifting underlying inflammation; second, although the initial MRI may show a single lesion, or rarely appear normal, all adult patients eventually developed the characteristic multifocal pattern, either during the initial episode or at relapse. In patients with a single brain MRI lesion, MRS can help differentiate inflammatory from neoplastic processes, whereas metabolic imaging generally adds little diagnostic value. These findings highlight the importance of repeated MRI in suspected anti‐GABAAR encephalitis, even if early scans are normal or show a solitary lesion. Because biopsies usually reveal nonspecific gliosis, careful radiological follow‐up, with MRS when appropriate, may reduce unnecessary invasive procedures.
Clinical relapses occurred in 55% of patients, all adults, mostly within the first year, higher than reported for other autoimmune encephalitides, 19 , 27 , 28 suggesting distinct immune mechanisms. Some patients developed new “clinically silent” MRI lesions, occasionally appearing up to 1 month before symptom recurrence, suggesting ongoing inflammation despite apparent clinical stability, similar to early post‐acute anti‐leucine‐rich glioma inactivated 1 (LGI1) encephalitis. 29 In our cohort, relapses generally mirrored initial symptoms, although less severe, and occurred mainly in patients off immunotherapy. These findings highlight the need for close MRI monitoring, even in clinically stable patients, as detecting new or evolving lesions can guide maintenance or intensified immunotherapy. This is especially important given the early cerebral atrophy noted in some patients, likely reflecting irreversible neuronal loss.
In our study, over half of patients, mostly adults, had persistent neurological deficits after a median follow‐up of nearly 3 years. Most involved mild to moderate cognitive impairment, whereas only 1 patient had ongoing seizures, consistent with other autoimmune encephalitides such as anti‐NMDAR and anti‐LGI1, where chronic epilepsy is rare and cognitive sequelae predominate. 27 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35
Lack of second‐line immunotherapy during the initial episode was associated with higher risk of relapse, which correlated with worse functional recovery (mRS, 2–5). Additionally, persistent cognitive deficits were more frequent in patients untreated with second‐line immunotherapy. These findings emphasize the value of early, effective immunotherapy to prevent long‐term sequelae, consistent with anti‐NMDAR and anti‐LGI1 encephalitis, where second‐line immunotherapy reduces relapse rate and improves outcomes. 19 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39
We did not detect LMO5 antibodies in serum or CSF from any patients with anti‐GABAAR encephalitis, regardless of tumor status. Two previous studies reported these antibodies in 4 patients with paraneoplastic anti‐GABAAR encephalitis, suggesting LMO5 release from tumoral cells may trigger cross‐reactive autoimmunity. 12 , 13 Our findings do not support this and argue against LMO5 antibodies as tumor biomarkers of paraneoplastic anti‐GABAAR encephalitis.
This study is limited by its retrospective design, relatively small sample size (particularly for pediatric patients and long‐term outcomes), and the use of routine MRI scans acquired at non‐standardized intervals. In addition, formal neuropsychological tests were not performed in many patients, and the level of recovery was assessed with the mRS scale, which is suboptimal to assess conditions with cognitive sequelae.
Despite these limitations, our findings highlight distinct age‐related patterns: encephalitis with cerebellar lesions in children versus encephalitis with evolving multifocal cerebral lesions in adults. Given the high relapse rate and possible subclinical activity, ongoing clinical and MRI surveillance is recommended, even after apparent recovery, alongside early, appropriately intensive immunotherapy. Future studies using CSF cytokine profiling, metabolic and advanced imaging should explore persistent neuroinflammation and its relation to disease activity and outcomes.
Author Contributions
C.P., J.D. and M.S. contributed to the conception and design of the study. C.P., C.M., L.M., A.B.S., E.A., M.G., M.M.S., R.I., Y.F., M.L.S.F.S., T.M., T.A., Y.U., M.K., S.O., L.V.G.R., K.K., N.S.C.C., A.V., F.L., J.M.V., L.A.D., R.H., M.J.T., J.P., L.S., E.M.H., T.A., F.G., T.I., J.D., and M.S. contributed to the acquisition and analysis of data. C.P., J.P., F.G., T.I., J.D., and M.S. contributed to drafting the text or preparing the figures. Members of the anti‐GABAAR encephalitis study group contributed to the acquisition of data and can be found in Supplemental Material. All authors contributed to intellectual revision of the manuscript in its final version.
Potential Conflicts of Interest
Nothing to report.
Supporting information
Data S1. Supporting Information.
Acknowledgments
We thank the IDIBAPS Medical Statistics platform for advice and support in the statistical analyses. This study received research support from Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain (PI23/01366, C.P.); received support from the European Academy of Neurology Research Training Fellowship 2023 to C.P; received research support from Spanish National Health Institute Carlos III to C.M. and co‐funded by the European Union (Rio‐Hortega grant CM24/00055, C.M); received a grant from Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spain (FI24/00021, L.M.); receives funding from the Commission for Cultural, Educational and Scientific Exchange between Spain and the United States of America to L.M.; received support from Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) (doctoral fellowship grant number 2022.13121. BD and DOI identifier https://doi.org/10.54499/2022.13121.BD, A.B.S.); received grant support from Fleury Laboratory for the Brain and Brain Registry projects to L.A.D.; from FAPESP (NMDACog project, L.A.D), and from the Brazilian Academy of Neurology (Brazilian Consensus on Autoimmune Encephalitis project, L.A.D) and L.A.D. received speaker honoraria from Roche, Kyverna, and Amgen. She is a principal investigator in the CIELO and KYSA‐6 studies. This study was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF), project number I6565‐B (SYNABSII, L.A.D) and the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG), project number FO999920011 to L.A.D.; has received grants from Plan Nacional de I + D + I and co‐financed by the ISCIII – Subdirección General de Evaluación y Formento de la Investigación Sanitaria–and the Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (ISCIII‐FEDER; PI18/00486 and PI24/01679 to T.A.); CaixaResearch Health 2022 (HR22‐00221, T.A.), Pla estratègic de recerca i innovació en salut (PERIS), Departament de Salut, Generalitat de Catalunya (SLT006/17/00362, T.A.); Torrons Vicens Foundation (PFNR0144, T.A.), and Mutua Madrileña Foundation (AP162572016, T.A.); received research support from CaixaResearch Health (HR22‐00221, J.D.), Spanish National Health Institute Carlos III (ISCIII, J.D.) and co‐funded by the European Union (PI23/00858, J.D.), PERIS/Generalitat de Catalunya (SLT028/23/000071, J.D.), Fundació Clínic per a la Recerca Biomèdica (FCRB) Programa Multidisciplinar de Recerca, and the Edmond J. Safra Foundation. J.D. receives royalties from Euroimmun for the use of the NMDA, GABAB, and GABAA receptors and DPPX and IgLON5 as autoantibody tests; and he has a research contract with Sage Therapeutics. This study receives research support from the Spanish National Health Institute Carlos III (ISCIII) to M.S. and co‐funded by the European Union (FIS grant PI23/01366, M.S.) and co‐financed by the European Social Fund Plus (ESF+) under the Miguel Servet Program (Grant CP24/00081, M.S.) pursuant to the Resolution of the Directorate of the Carlos III Health Institute, O.A., M.P., dated December 26, 2024 M.S. has received research support from La Caixa Foundation (Junior Leader). This work and M.S. are supported by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon Europe programme (grant no. 101163724), funded by the European Union. The views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the granting authority. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
- 1. Spatola M, Petit‐Pedrol M, Simabukuro MM, et al. Investigations in GABAA receptor antibody‐associated encephalitis. Neurology 2017;88:1012–1020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Petit‐Pedrol M, Armangue T, Peng X, et al. Encephalitis with refractory seizures, status epilepticus, and antibodies to the GABAA receptor: a case series, characterisation of the antigen, and analysis of the effects of antibodies. Lancet Neurol 2014;13:276–286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Ohkawa T, Satake S, Yokoi N, et al. Identification and characterization of GABA(a) receptor autoantibodies in autoimmune encephalitis. J Neurosci 2014;34:8151–8163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Deng B, Cai M, Qiu Y, et al. MRI characteristics of autoimmune encephalitis with autoantibodies to GABAA receptor: a case series. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2022;9:e1158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Pettingill P, Kramer HB, Coebergh JA, et al. Antibodies to GABAA receptor α1 and γ2 subunits: clinical and serologic characterization. Neurology 2015;84:1233–1241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. O'Connor K, Waters P, Komorowski L, et al. GABA(A) receptor autoimmunity: A multicenter experience. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2019;6:e552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Guo CY, Gelfand JM, Geschwind MD. Anti‐gamma‐aminobutyric acid receptor type a encephalitis: a review. Curr Opin Neurol 2020;33:372–380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Figlerowicz M, Kemnitz P, Mania A, et al. Autoimmune encephalitis with GABA(a) receptor antibodies in a 10‐year‐old girl. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2018;164:160–163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Gagnon MM, Savard M, Mourabit Amari K. Refractory status epilepticus and autoimmune encephalitis with GABAAR and GAD65 antibodies: a case report. Seizure 2016;37:25–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Hoshina Y, Galli J, Wong KH, et al. GABA‐A receptor encephalitis after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant forMultiple myeloma: three cases and literature review. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2022;9:e200024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Guasp M, Landa J, Martinez‐Hernandez E, et al. Thymoma and autoimmune encephalitis: clinical manifestations and antibodies. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2021;8:e1053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Brändle SM, Cerina M, Weber S, et al. Cross‐reactivity of a pathogenic autoantibody to a tumor antigen in GABA(a) receptor encephalitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2021;118:e1916337118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Shu Y, Huang Y, Li Q, et al. Individualized therapy guided by single‐cell sequencing in anti‐GABA(a)R encephalitis. Transl Psychiatry 2025;15:78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Hoffmann C, Mao X, Dieterle M, et al. CRP2, a new invadopodia actin bundling factor critically promotes breast cancer cell invasion and metastasis. Oncotarget 2016;7:13688–13705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Hoffmann C, Mao X, Brown‐Clay J, et al. Hypoxia promotes breast cancer cell invasion through HIF‐1α‐mediated up‐regulation of the invadopodial actin bundling protein CSRP2. Sci Rep 2018;8:10191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Zhang MJ, Liu J, Wan SC, et al. CSRP2 promotes cell stemness in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2023;45:2161–2172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Midorikawa Y, Tsutsumi S, Taniguchi H, et al. Identification of genes associated with dedifferentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma with expression profiling analysis. Jpn J Cancer Res 2002;93:636–643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Graus F, Titulaer MJ, Balu R, et al. A clinical approach to diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis. Lancet Neurol 2016;15:391–404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Titulaer MJ, McCracken L, Gabilondo I, et al. Treatment and prognostic factors for long‐term outcome in patients with anti‐NMDA receptor encephalitis: an observational cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2013;12:157–165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Graus F, Vogrig A, Muniz‐Castrillo S, et al. Updated diagnostic criteria for paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2021;8:e1014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Ueno H, Iizuka T, Tagane Y, et al. Focal hyperperfusion and elevated lactate in the cerebral lesions with anti‐GABAaR encephalitis: a serial MRI study. J Neuroradiol 2020;47:243–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Fukami Y, Okada H, Yoshida M, Yamaguchi K. Successful combination immunotherapy of anti‐gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA)(a) receptor antibody‐positive encephalitis with extensive multifocal brain lesions. Rinsho Shinkeigaku 2017;57:436–440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Silwedel C, Förster C. Differential susceptibility of cerebral and cerebellar murine brain microvascular endothelial cells to loss of barrier properties in response to inflammatory stimuli. J Neuroimmunol 2006;179:37–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Tonra JR. Cerebellar susceptibility to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in SJL/J mice: potential interaction of immunology with vascular anatomy. Cerebellum 2002;1:57–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Milano C, Saylam E, Papi C, et al. Clinical characterization and Long‐term outcome in children and adults with anti‐AMPA receptor encephalitis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2025;12:e200453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Florance NR, Davis RL, Lam C, et al. Anti‐N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis in children and adolescents. Ann Neurol 2009;66:11–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Ariño H, Armangué T, Petit‐Pedrol M, et al. Anti‐LGI1‐associated cognitive impairment: presentation and long‐term outcome. Neurology 2016;87:759–765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Campetella L, Farina A, Villagran‐Garcia M, et al. Predictors and clinical characteristics of relapses in LGI1‐antibody encephalitis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2024;11:e200228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Muñoz‐Lopetegi A, Guasp M, Prades L, et al. Neurological, psychiatric, and sleep investigations after treatment of anti‐leucine‐rich glioma‐inactivated protein 1 (LGI1) encephalitis in Spain: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2024;23:256–266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Liu X, Guo K, Lin J, et al. Long‐term seizure outcomes in patients with autoimmune encephalitis: a prospective observational registry study update. Epilepsia 2022;63:1812–1821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Mazowiecki M, Flet‐Berliac L, Roux J, et al. Long‐term clinical and biological prognostic factors of anti‐NMDA receptor encephalitis in children. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2025;12:e200346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Chen LW, Olivé‐Cirera G, Fonseca EG, et al. Very Long‐term functional outcomes and dependency in children with anti‐NMDA receptor encephalitis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2024;11:e200235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Brenner J, Ruhe CJ, Kulderij I, et al. Long‐term cognitive, functional, and patient‐reported outcomes in patients with anti‐NMDAR encephalitis. Neurology 2024;103:e210109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. van Sonderen A, Thijs RD, Coenders EC, et al. Anti‐LGI1 encephalitis: clinical syndrome and long‐term follow‐up. Neurology 2016;87:1449–1456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Shen CH, Fang GL, Yang F, et al. Seizures and risk of epilepsy in anti‐NMDAR, anti‐LGI1, and anti‐GABA(B) R encephalitis. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2020;7:1392–1399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Thaler FS, Zimmermann L, Kammermeier S, et al. Rituximab treatment and Long‐term outcome of patients with autoimmune encephalitis: real‐world evidence from the GENERATE registry. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2021;8:e1088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Nosadini M, Eyre M, Molteni E, et al. Use and safety of immunotherapeutic management of N‐methyl‐d‐aspartate receptor antibody encephalitis: a meta‐analysis. JAMA Neurol 2021;78:1333–1344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Seery N, Wesselingh R, Beech P, et al. Acute and Long‐term immune‐treatment strategies in anti‐LGI1 antibody‐mediated encephalitis: a multicenter cohort study. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2025;12:e200412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Seery N, Wesselingh R, Beech P, et al. Rituximab use for relapse prevention in anti‐NMDAR antibody‐mediated encephalitis: a multicenter cohort study. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2025;12:e200395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data S1. Supporting Information.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
