Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Jun 12.
Published before final editing as: J Exp Bot. 2026 Apr 16:erag177. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erag177

Root anatomical gradients and cultivar differences underlie variation in root hydraulic properties in German winter wheat

Juan C Baca Cabrera 1,*, Dylan H Jones 2, Jan Vanderborght 1, Dominik Behrend 3, Hannah M Schneider 2,4, Guillaume Lobet 5
PMCID: PMC7619146  EMSID: EMS213953  PMID: 41988757

Abstract

Root hydraulic properties affect water uptake in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and are strongly influenced by root anatomy, yet how they vary along root axes and differ among cultivars remains underexplored. We investigated crown roots of six German winter wheat cultivars spanning one century of release, sampled from a field experiment. Roots were imaged at different positions along their axis using a high-throughput system (Rapid Anatomics Tool), and the resulting anatomical traits were coupled to the GRANAR–MECHA model to estimate radial and axial hydraulic conductance.

Longitudinal anatomical gradients were pronounced: tissue dimensions, metaxylem number, and apoplastic barriers decreased from the base onwards, resulting in radial conductance increasing and axial conductance decreasing with distance from the base. Cultivar differences were also apparent: modern cultivars had smaller tissues and fewer metaxylem vessels, reducing both axial and radial conductance and lowering whole-root water uptake capacity (~20–30%).

By integrating field sampling with high-throughput image analysis and modeling, this study establishes an integrated phenotyping approach linking root anatomy to hydraulic function and uncovering anatomical traits relevant for water uptake. The results show that longitudinal gradients and cultivar-associated anatomical differences contribute to variation in hydraulic properties and persist along fully mature root segments.

Keywords: breeding, cross-section imaging, crown roots, modelling, root hydraulic properties, root anatomy, phenotyping, wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Introduction

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is a major global staple, providing roughly one-fifth of human calories and proteins and playing a central role in global food security (Erenstein et al., 2022). With climate change and declining freshwater availability projected to intensify the frequency and severity of droughts, thereby threatening agricultural production (Madadgar et al., 2017), improving the capacity of crops to access and use water efficiently has become increasingly urgent. Targeting root traits in breeding has been proposed as a promising strategy to develop more resilient and resource-efficient crops (Lynch, 2007). Root systems are essential for water and nutrient uptake and thus for sustaining crop growth and productivity (Torres-Ruiz et al., 2024), yet most breeding programs have historically focused on aboveground traits. This bias largely reflects the technical challenges of root phenotyping under field conditions (Atkinson et al., 2019) and the high plasticity of root traits (Schneider and Lynch, 2020).

Water moves through roots via two complementary pathways: radially, from the soil into the xylem, and axially, along roots toward above-ground tissues. The capacity for water transport varies substantially among plant functional types, species, and even genotypes (Rishmawi et al., 2023; Baca Cabrera et al., 2024). In addition, hydraulic properties change longitudinally along individual roots (Bramley et al., 2007), reflecting developmental gradients and tissue differentiation. These variations are strongly influenced by root anatomy and developmental stage, yet it remains largely unknown whether and how breeding has altered these properties, despite their importance for water use and drought adaptation.

In wheat, as in other cereal crops, root anatomy plays a pivotal role in water and nutrient transport and overall plant function (Steudle, 2000; Lynch et al., 2021). Traits such as cortex thickness, stele diameter, proportion of aerenchyma lacunae in the cortex, and the number and size of metaxylem vessels vary substantially between genotypes and along the root axis. (Yamauchi et al., 2019; Ouyang et al., 2020; Guhr et al., 2025), but these longitudinal patterns and their interaction with cultivar differences have not been quantified in a comprehensive way. Monocot roots grow from the root apex, dynamically producing new transport tissue as the root elongates. However, they lack the capacity for radial secondary growth, so that following differentiation, this initially formed tissue is what persists throughout the life of the root (Wu et al., 2011; Clément et al., 2022; Petrova et al., 2023). Both developmental gradients and local environmental conditions shape variation in cortex expansion, vascular differentiation, and apoplastic barrier formation (Jones et al., 2025)—key determinants of hydraulic function.

Anatomical traits influence both the radial (movement of water into the root) and axial (movement of water along the root axis) components of root water flow (Chimungu et al., 2014; Lynch et al., 2014; Schneider et al., 2017; Cuneo et al., 2021; Yamauchi et al., 2021). In particular, the formation of apoplastic barriers, such as suberization and Casparian strips in the endodermis, strongly increases radial resistance (Geldner, 2013; Song et al., 2023). As these traits change along the root axis, axial conductance (kx), radial conductivity (kr), and radial conductance (Kr) are expected to vary, as has been shown in wheat (Bramley et al., 2009). Yet, experimental studies quantifying these properties remain scarce, largely due to the technical complexity of segment-scale hydraulic measurements (Boursiac et al., 2022b). Recent advances in high-throughput, low-cost anatomical phenotyping (Jones et al., 2026), combined with explicit modelling of water transport at the cell scale (Couvreur et al., 2018), provide new opportunities for more systematic and efficient analysis of root hydraulic properties, beyond what is feasible with purely experimental approaches.

In a previous study on historical German winter wheat cultivars released between 1895 and 2002, we observed a significant decline in root axis number and whole root system conductance (Krs–which reflects the maximum root water uptake capacity under sufficiently wet soil conditions) with cultivar release year (Baca Cabrera et al., 2025). While this study represents a relatively small subset of historical cultivars, the trend suggested that breeding may have inadvertently favored more conservative root water-uptake strategies, i.e., a water-saving behaviour aimed at maintaining plant water status when water availability becomes limiting (Richards and Passioura, 1989; Blessing et al., 2018). Root architectural phenotyping revealed that the decline in Krs was associated with a reduction in root axis number. However, whether anatomical changes also contributed remains unknown, as anatomy was not assessed in that study. Furthermore, it remains unclear whether the effect of breeding on Krs was driven primarily by changes in axial, radial, or both hydraulic properties. Thus, understanding how root hydraulic properties have evolved with breeding is critical for explaining variation in water uptake strategies in modern cultivars.

Building on this, here we investigated longitudinal gradients and cultivar differences in wheat root anatomical and hydraulic traits, using the same six historical German winter wheat cultivars previously analyzed in Baca Cabrera et al. (2025). The selected cultivars represent a historical breeding gradient spanning approximately 100 years and were chosen based on their relevance and prevalence during their respective release periods. Specifically, we focused on crown roots, the dominant axes for water and nutrient uptake in cereals (Steffens and Rasmussen, 2016). Our study addressed three main questions: (i) do root anatomical traits (cortex, stele, and metaxylem dimensions; proportion of aerenchyma lacunae in the cortex; and apoplastic barrier development) vary along the root axis?; (ii) are these traits and their interaction with longitudinal gradients potentially associated with cultivar release year; and (iii) what is the effect of anatomical variation on root hydraulic properties (kx, kr and Kr) and its implications for root water uptake capacity? To answer these questions, we developed an integrated phenotyping approach that combined detailed anatomical measurements using the Rapid Anatomics Tool (RAT) (Jones et al., 2026) with root hydraulic modelling through the GRANAR–MECHA framework (Heymans et al., 2019), enabling us to link root structure and function.

Materials and Methods

Plant material and root sampling

Plant material was obtained from a field experiment that has been previously described in detail in Baca Cabrera et al. (2025) and Behrend et al. (2026). In brief, six German winter wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.) spanning more than 100 years of breeding history were grown under rainfed conditions at the Campus Klein-Altendorf research station near Bonn, Germany (50°37’ N, 6°59’ E) during two consecutive growing seasons (2022–2023 and 2023–2024). The experiment was arranged as a complete randomized block design with four field replicates per cultivar, resulting in a total of 24 plots. The soil at the site is a Haplic Luvisol developed on loess, known to be very homogeneous. Field management followed standard agronomic practices with conventional fertilization and weed control, and there was no sign of water stress during growth, with precipitation above the long-term average in both growing seasons (Supplementary Fig. S1).

The cultivars were selected based on historical relevance, availability, and consistency with previous studies, and their release years were spaced at approximately 20-year intervals: S. Dickkopf (1895), SG v. Stocken (1920), Heines II (1940), Jubilar (1961), Okapi (1978), and Tommi (2002). This selection represents a historical breeding gradient spanning approximately 100 years, with cultivars chosen based on their prevalence during their respective release periods, as indicated by records from the German Federal Plant Variety Office (Bundessortenamt, 1985, 2005). Additionally, the cultivars had been previously grown as part of a long-term fertilization study (Ahrends et al., 2018), ensuring consistency with earlier work and facilitating integration with existing datasets. All cultivars were grown in a randomized block design with four field replicates.

Sampling took place at the end of the tillering stage (BBCH < 30) during both growing seasons (spring 2023 and spring 2024), with all cultivars harvested simultaneously in single-day campaigns. Root samples were collected using a slightly modified “shovelomics” method for wheat (York et al., 2018, Preprint). From each plot, a representative topsoil portion (20–30 cm deep, ~30 cm diameter) was excavated, typically yielding 5–10 plants per sample. Samples were stored at 5 °C until root washing. In the laboratory, roots were soaked in water and carefully washed, and root crowns were separated from the shoots close to the base (leaving ~3 cm of tiller tissue). Samples of 4 plants per plot were preserved in a water (37.5%)–ethanol (37.5%)–glycol (25%) solution for further analyses. From these samples, the longest crown root from each plant (~20–25 cm long) was excised directly at the tiller junction (root base) and stored in vials for subsequent anatomical imaging, resulting in a total of 32 crown roots per cultivar (n = 32) across four field replicates. The sampling design followed a hierarchical structure, with roots obtained from individual plants, plants nested within plots, and plots representing the field replication level. Root samples were collected across field replicates to ensure balanced representation of each cultivar. This design allows robust cultivar-level comparisons while capturing variability within plots.

Root subsampling and anatomical imaging

From each selected crown root, 2–3 cm segments were excised from three positions: basal (the 2.5 cm closest to the tiller junction), mid-segment (approximately 10 cm from the base), and distal (approximately 3 cm from the most distal portion of the root, i.e., ~20 cm from the base). Subsamples were stored in 2 mL Eppendorf microcentrifuge tubes filled with 70% ethanol (v/v) at 4 °C for a minimum of two weeks. It is worth noting that, due to the sampling protocol, the root tip (meristematic and elongation zones) was not included; therefore, all sampled sections represent mature root tissues, including the distal position.

Cross-section imaging of crown roots was performed using the Rapid Anatomics Tool (RAT) method as described in Jones et al. (2026), which has been tested on a range of diverse plant samples, and delivers reliable, high-quality anatomical images (Supplementary Fig. S2). This approach combines blockface-like imaging, where a fresh surface of the root is exposed for imaging, with stain-free near-ultraviolet (nUV) induced autofluorescence to highlight cell walls. In brief, preserved root segments were mounted in a 3D-printed holder to ensure consistent orientation and positioning, then cut to reveal a clean cross-section. Imaging was performed using a USB microscope (Dino-lite Edge AM8517MT-FUW) with nUV illumination at 220x magnification. Minor adjustments in fluorescence contrast were applied when necessary to improve tissue visualization. Images were analyzed in Fiji (ImageJ) (Schindelin et al., 2012) to quantify the metaxylem (number, diameter and area), stele (diameter and area), cortex (cortical cell thickness and file layer number and total cortex area), aerenchyma (proportion of the cortex occupied by aerenchyma lacunae), and whole-root cross-section (diameter and area). Stele and cortex diameters were measured at their narrowest points using the line tool, areas were measured manually using the polygon tool. For metaxylem, images were converted to 8-bit, and a 2-pixel radius Gaussian blur was applied (pixel size: 1.365 μm). The magic wand tool was set to a threshold of 20 (adjusted ad-hoc) to select the area of each metaxylem lumen individually.

To complement the anatomical measurements, several tissue ratios were calculated to capture allometric relationships. Specifically, we computed the cortex-to-stele ratio (CSR, cortex area ÷ stele area), stele-to-root ratio (SRR, stele area ÷ total root area), xylem-to-stele ratio (XSR, total metaxylem area ÷ stele area), xylem-to-root ratio (XRR, total metaxylem area ÷ total root area), and a combined index (XCS), defined as (total metaxylem area × cortex area) ÷ (stele area2). These ratios have previously been used to assess anatomical investment patterns in grasses (Yamauchi et al., 2021) and facilitate the comparison of tissue allocation across cultivars and root positions (Jones et al., 2026).

Additionally, to qualify the presence of apoplastic barriers (specifically hypodermal modifications) in the root anatomical image set, images were individually evaluated and scored. The range of images were initially appraised for presence or absence of hypodermal modifications as described in Cantó-Pastor et al. (2025) and Jones et al. (2025). Lignin distribution could be assessed from images captured using nUV autofluorescence (Schneider et al., 2021; Hazman and Kabil, 2022; Cunha Neto et al., 2023). Three categories of hypodermal modification were observed, presence of multiseriate sclerenchyma, presence of a differentiated exodermis (either polar, Y-shaped, polar, or anticlinal), and a combination thereof. Two other categories were assigned, the absence of hypodermal differentiation (relative to cell walls of the cortical mesodermis), and cortical senescence (Supplementary Table S1). Where there was variation within an image or disruption on the cortex caused by lateral root emergence or damage, values were assigned based on the largest contiguous non-damaged region. In all images a differentiated endodermis with Casparian strip was visible, typically stage III (U-shaped). All anatomical measurements were performed at the Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK). Raw data processing was performed in R to obtain anatomical traits for each image, at each root position.

Modelling of segment-scale root hydraulic properties

Segment-scale axial conductance (kx, m4 MPa−1 s−1) and radial conductivity (kr, m MPa−1 s−1) and conductance (Kr, m3 MPa-1 s-1) were estimated using the GRANAR–MECHA computational framework, which predicts emergent root hydraulic properties from anatomical cross-sections. For each crown root at each sampling position, root anatomies were generated with the GRANAR (v1.1) model (Heymans et al., 2019), based on measured anatomical traits (root and stele diameter, cortical cell file layer number and thickness, and number and diameter of metaxylem vessels). GRANAR builds virtual cross-sections by placing cell layers around the root center according to the input traits, introducing a small random variation in cell positions to create unique anatomies while preserving overall tissue features. The reconstructed anatomies (Supplementary Fig. S3) were then processed with MECHA (Couvreur et al., 2018) to model radial water flow and kr, using default subcellular hydraulic parameters (Supplementary Table S2).

MECHA can simulate alternative apoplastic barrier scenarios, which strongly affect radial water flow and kr (Couvreur et al., 2018). The model includes nine scenarios defined by the presence or absence of a Casparian strip (CS) and/or full suberization (Sub) in the endodermis and exodermis: (0) no barriers, (1) endodermis with CS, (2) partially suberized endodermis with passage cells, (3) fully suberized endodermis, (4) fully suberized endodermis + exodermis with CS, (5) endodermis with CS + exodermis with CS, (6) endodermis with CS + fully suberized exodermis, (7) exodermis with CS only, and (8) fully suberized endodermis + fully suberized exodermis. In this study, the barrier scenario assigned to each cross-section was matched to the observed presence of apoplastic barriers, according to our scoring system.

Radial conductance (Kr) was further calculated as

Kr=πdrootdlkr, (1)

where Kr is the radial conductance of a root segment of infinitesimal length dl (m), droot is the root diameter (m), and kr is the radial conductivity. kx was calculated within MECHA using the Hagen–Poiseuille law, based on the number and diameter of mature metaxylem vessels, while protoxylem elements were not included in the calculation. This value represents a theoretical maximum of axial conductance and does not account for potential hydraulic limitations (Barry et al., 2025).

In total, 573 root cross-sections were processed. Of these, >99% could be successfully reconstructed with GRANAR, and >92% of the reconstructions could be modeled with MECHA, underscoring the robustness of the workflow and the representativeness of the root hydraulic properties obtained across cultivars and root positions. This workflow provides an integrated pipeline for quantifying root anatomical and hydraulic traits from field grown plants (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. Integrated phenotyping approach for the quantification of root hydraulic properties.

Figure 1

Crown roots were sampled from a field experiment (Behrend et al., 2026) and 2–3 cm root segments at the base, mid-root and distal positions were subsampled for cross section imaging using the Rapid Anatomics Tool (RAT) (Jones et al., 2026).

Measured anatomical traits obtained from the images were used as input for modelling of root hydraulic properties using the GRANAR–MECHA framework (Heymans et al., 2019).

ALT TEXT: Schematic diagram showing a six-step workflow for quantifying root hydraulic properties. Crown roots are collected from a field experiment, and segments from basal, middle, and distal positions are sampled for cross-section imaging. Anatomical traits extracted from the images are then used as input for modelling root hydraulic properties using the GRANAR–MECHA framework.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted in R v.4.4.1 (R Core Team, 2024). Effects of cultivar year of release and root position, as well as their interaction, were assessed using two-way ANOVA, with model choice depending on the trait type. Additionally, for selected traits (cortex thickness, stele area, and total metaxylem area), differences among cultivars (treated as categorical variables) were assessed using ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc tests to determine whether observed effects were driven by specific cultivars. A total of 32 root replicates were sampled per cultivar (n = 32), collected across field replicates to ensure balanced representation of each cultivar.

Continuous variables (i.e., tissue diameters, areas, and axial conductance), anatomical ratios (XSR, CSR, XRR, SRR, XCS), and count variables (number of cortical cell file layers and metaxylem vessels) were analyzed with ordinary least-squares linear models. Continuous variables and ratios were log-transformed before model fitting, while count data were analyzed untransformed. Radial conductivity was analyzed using a rank-based linear model (Kloke and McKean, 2012) due to discontinuities caused by large differences in radial water flow associated with the presence of apoplastic barriers. Aerenchyma, being strongly zero-inflated and expressed as a ratio, was analyzed using a generalized linear model with a quasibinomial link. Model validation was performed by visual inspection of residuals (Q–Q plots). For plotting purposes, all transformed traits were back-transformed to their original scale. Additionally, apoplastic barrier presence was analyzed using multinomial regression (nnet package; Venables and Ripley, 2002).

To explore overall patterns of anatomical variation, a principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on directly measured anatomical traits (excluding derived or modelled variables, and apoplastic barrier scoring) with the package FactoMineR (et al., 2008), followed by K-means clustering of trait loadings. The ggplot2 package (Wickham, 2016) was used for data visualization.

Results

Root anatomical traits across root positions and cultivar release year

To quantify anatomical variation along crown roots, cross-sections were imaged at basal, mid, and distal positions (Supplementary Fig. S2). These sections correspond to mature root regions, excluding the root tip and elongation zone (Materials and Methods). Across cultivars, these analyses revealed clear longitudinal gradients in tissue dimensions and metaxylem structure (Fig. 2A–E, Table 1). All measured traits differed significantly among root positions (p < 0.001; Fig. 2A–E, Table 1), with all decreasing from the base toward the tip, except for cortical cell file layer diameter, which showed the opposite trend. Across all cultivars, the largest variation along the root was observed for aerenchyma, with a 59.5% decrease in the proportion of the cortex occupied by aerenchyma lacunae, from the basal to the distal sampling point. The smallest differences were found in cortical tissues, with cortical cell file layer diameter increasing by 7.4%, while cortical cell file layer number and total cortex thickness decreased by 14.9% and 12.5%, respectively. Metaxylem area and stele area decreased by similar magnitudes from the base toward the tip (33.8% and 39.4%, respectively), leading to a corresponding 24.5% decline in total root area along the root axis.

Figure 2. Root anatomical traits measured at three positions along crown roots (base, mid-segment and distal) for 6 different cultivars of winter wheat (T. aestivum L.).

Figure 2

Panels (A) to (E) show traits obtained from cross section images, and panels (F) to (J) derived allometric ratios (cortex-to-stele area, stele-to-root area ratio, metaxylem-to-stele area ratio, metaxylem-to-root area ratio, and composite index XCS).

Data points and error bars represent the mean ± SE (n = 32). Dashed lines represent the linear relationship between cultivar release year and the analyzed traits at each root position (based on ordinary least squares linear regression; only shown if significant, p < 0.05).

ALT TEXT: Root anatomical traits and derived allometric ratios across root positions in winter wheat cultivars along a release year gradient. A–E are scatter plots of anatomical traits measured at base, mid-segment, and distal root positions, with colors indicating root position. Each point represents a cultivar mean, and several traits differ among root positions. Dashed lines show significant positive or negative relationships between trait values and cultivar release year. F–J are scatter plots of derived allometric ratios shown across root positions with the same color coding, with dashed lines indicating significant trends with cultivar release year where present.

Table 1. Root traits of winter wheat (T. aestivum L.), as influenced by cultivar release year, root position and their interaction.

Effect significance (p-value) and trait range (average values) across all combinations of cultivars (six German cultivars) and root positions (basal, mid-root and distal) (n = 32 per group).

p-value
trait range release year root position release year × position
root area (mm2) 0.32 – 0.53 <0.001 <0.001 0.11
metaxylem area (mm2) 0.0011 – 0.0017 0.21 <0.001 0.83
metaxylem number 3.6 – 5.5 <0.01 <0.001 0.13
total metaxylem area (mm2) 0.0044 – 0.0089 <0.001 <0.001 0.57
cortical cell file layer diameter (mm) 0.026 – 0.031 <0.01 <0.001 0.99
cortical cell file layer number 7.2 – 9.2 0.57 <0.001 0.36
total cortex thickness (mm) 0.20 – 0.24 <0.01 <0.001 0.66
stele area (mm2) 0.036 – 0.071 <0.001 <0.001 <0.05
aerenchyma proportion 0.012 – 0.051 0.54 <0.001 0.52
kx (m4 MPa-1 s-1 × 10-9) 0.56 – 1.6 <0.01 <0.001 0.68
kr (m MPa-1 s-1 × 10-7) 0.67 – 1.1 0.47 <0.001 0.78
Kr (m3 MPa-1 s-1 × 10-7) 1.6 – 2.5 <0.05 <0.001 0.91
XSR 0.023 – 0.042 0.06 <0.001 <0.05
CSR 6.0 – 9.0 0.81 <0.001 0.38
XRR 0.0031 – 0.0048 0.13 <0.001 0.17
SRR 0.11 – 0.15 0.83 <0.001 0.36
XCS 0.14 – 0.39 0.13 <0.001 <0.05

Cultivar year of release (YOR) had a significant effect (p < 0.01) on total metaxylem area, stele area, total cortex thickness, and root area, but not on the proportion of the cortex occupied by aerenchyma lacunae (Fig. 2A–E, Table 1). In all significant cases, the effect indicated smaller tissue areas with increasing YOR. Averaged across root sampling positions, stele area decreased from 0.059 mm2 in the oldest cultivar to 0.049 mm2 in the most modern cultivar, and a similar decline was observed for root area (from 0.49 mm2 to 0.40 mm2) (Table S3). The reduction in metaxylem area with YOR was associated with a significant decrease in the number of metaxylem vessels (from ca. 5 to 4 between the oldest and most modern cultivars), while the area of individual metaxylem vessels did not vary significantly with YOR (p = 0.21). By contrast, the decrease in cortex thickness with YOR was associated with a significant reduction in cortical cell layer diameter (from 0.030 mm to 0.027 mm), but not in the number of cortical cell file layers (average of 8 across cultivars) (Table S3). In most cases, no significant interaction was observed between YOR and root position. The only exception was stele area (p < 0.05, Table 1), which did not vary among cultivars at the root base but was significantly smaller in mid-segment and distal positions of modern cultivars compared to older ones (Fig. 2C, Table S3).

Further, anatomical ratios were calculated to evaluate allometric relationships between tissues, including the metaxylem-to-stele area ratio (XSR), cortex-to-stele area ratio (CSR), metaxylem-to-root area ratio (XRR), stele-to-root area ratio (SRR), and the composite index XCS (Materials & Methods). Similarly to the individual traits, all ratios differed significantly among root positions (p < 0.001). However, the direction of change was the opposite: except for SRR, all ratios increased from the base towards the tip (Fig. 2F–J, Table 1). YOR did not have a significant main effect on the ratios, but significant interactions between root position and YOR were detected for XSR and XCS (p < 0.05). In both cases, the interaction reflected a shift at the distal position: while no differences among cultivars were observed at the base and mid-segment, modern cultivars exhibited significantly higher XSR and XCS values than older ones toward the tip, driven by a higher relative area of the stele occupied by metaxylem (Fig. 2).

Principal component analysis of anatomical traits

A PCA was performed to further explore the variation in anatomical traits across root positions and cultivars (excluding allometric ratios, see Materials & Methods). The PCA captured the major structure of trait variation, with the first two axes explaining 69.3% of the total variance (50.3% and 19.0% for PC1 and PC2, respectively; Fig. 3A–B). Root position was the dominant source of variation: base, mid-segment, and distal samples formed three clearly separated groups along PC1 (Fig. 3A). Cultivar differences were less pronounced, although the oldest cultivar (S. Dickkopf) consistently clustered apart from the others towards higher values of both PC1 and PC2, while the remaining cultivars largely overlapped in ordination space (Fig. 3B).

Figure 3. Principal component analysis (PCA) of root anatomical traits measured at three positions along crown roots (base, mid-segment and distal) for 6 different cultivars of winter wheat (T. aestivum L.).

Figure 3

PCA scores, showing separation by root position (A) and by cultivars (B). PCA loadings indicating the contribution of each anatomical trait to the first two principal components (C). Clustering of traits into three groups using k-means, highlighting shared patterns of variation (D). Large symbols in (A) and (B) represent the grouping centroids, and ellipses indicate the 95% confidence intervals. PC1 was mainly associated with variation in tissue areas (stele, root and metaxylem area), whereas PC2 reflected variation in cortical traits and aerenchyma presence.

ALT TEXT: PCA of root anatomical traits showing variation across root positions and winter wheat cultivars. A is a PCA scores plot (PC1 vs PC2) showing separation of samples by root position, with colors indicating base, mid-segment, and distal positions and ellipses representing 95% confidence intervals. B is a PCA scores plot showing cultivar-level variation, with colors indicating different cultivars and one older cultivar separated from the main cluster. C is a loading plot showing contributions of anatomical traits to PC1 and PC2, highlighting strong effects of tissue size traits and weaker contributions from cortex-related traits. D is a k-means clustering plot grouping traits into three clusters corresponding to cortex-related traits, aerenchyma, and tissue size-related traits.

Among all variables, tissue dimensions (stele, total metaxylem and root area and total cortex thickness) contributed most strongly to the ordination, whereas individual metaxylem vessel area and individual cortical cell file layer diameter showed the weakest contributions (Fig. 3C). Trait loading also indicated that PC1 was mainly associated with the tissue areas, while PC2 was influenced by cortical features and aerenchyma presence. Additionally, K-means clustering of trait contributions confirmed three coherent trait groups: (i) cortex-related traits (cell file layer diameter, cortex thickness), (ii) aerenchyma, and (iii) all remaining size-related traits (Fig. 3D). Size-related traits largely drove the separation among root positions, while cultivar differences were less pronounced and reflected both cortical traits and tissue size.

Apoplastic barrier development across root positions and cultivars

Apoplastic barrier development was qualitatively assessed from the same anatomical images by scoring hypodermal modifications, including the presence of multiseriate cortical sclerenchyma (MCS), exodermis, exodermis with MCS, or cortical senescence (Scores 1–5; Materials & Methods; Table S1). In all sampled segments, even at the distal sampling position (~20 cm from the base), the endodermis was already differentiated with a Casparian strip (and in some cases suberization) and thus does not contribute to variation in these scores. Therefore, variation in apoplastic barrier development in this dataset was primarily driven by hypodermal tissues.

The distribution of hypodermal apoplastic barrier states strongly depended on the root position (Fig. 4). At the distal position, the vast majority of samples (>75% across all cultivars) showed no hypodermal modification (Score 1). In mid-segment samples, this state remained dominant (>50%), but exodermis formation (Score 3) also became frequent (15–45%, depending on cultivar). At the base, the distribution was more balanced among categories, with exodermis plus MCS (Score 4, >40% of observations) being most common in the three most modern cultivars, endodermis only (Score 1) prevailing in the two oldest cultivars (>30%), and exodermis (Score 3, 45%) being most frequent in the remaining cultivar. Cortical senescence (Score 5) was rare and never observed at the root base.

Figure 4. Distribution of apoplastic barrier development measured at three positions along crown roots (base, mid-segment and distal) for 6 different cultivars of winter wheat (T. aestivum L.).

Figure 4

Apoplastic barrier development (defined as hypodermal modifications) was scored from anatomical cross-sections as: (1) no modifications, (2) multiseriate cortical sclerenchyma (MCS), (3) exodermis, (4) exodermis and MCS combined, or (5) cortical senescence. Bars show the relative frequency of scores within each cultivar × root position group (n = 32 per group).

ALT TEXT: Distribution of apoplastic barrier development across root positions in winter wheat cultivars. Bar charts show the relative frequency of apoplastic barrier development scores for each cultivar and root position. Bars are grouped by root position on the x-axis and show the proportion of observations on the y-axis, with grey shades representing five developmental stages from no hypodermal modification to cortical senescence. Clear shifts in score distributions occur along the root axis, indicating consistent differences in apoplastic barrier development between basal, mid-segment, and distal positions across cultivars.

Multinomial regression confirmed that apoplastic barrier status varied significantly among root positions (likelihood ratio vs. null model, p < 0.001), whereas cultivar release year and its interaction with root position were not significant (p > 0.05). This indicates that, although some differences among cultivars may appear, no consistent trend in barrier development could be detected with increasing YOR.

Root hydraulic properties development along the root axis

Axial conductance (kx) and radial conductivity (kr) were modelled for each cultivar and root position using the GRANAR–MECHA pipeline (Materials & Methods), based on anatomical cross-sections. Here, kx represents a theoretical maximum derived from metaxylem vessel number and diameter, which does not account for potential hydraulic constraints—thus, comparisons of kx among cultivars should be interpreted as relative differences rather than absolute values—while kr reflects the ease of radial water flow across the root segments. Both traits showed highly significant differences among root positions (p < 0.001; Fig. 5A–B, Table 1). Meanwhile, cultivar release year had a significant effect on kx (p < 0.05), but not on kr, and no interaction between root position and release year was observed.

Figure 5. Modelled root hydraulic properties of winter wheat cultivars (T. aestivum L.).

Figure 5

(AB) Axial conductance (kx) and radial conductivity (kr) at three positions along crown roots (base, mid-segment and distal) for 6 different cultivars. (CD) Spatial dynamics of kx and radial conductance (Kr, i.e. kr scaled by surface area) along the root axis, illustrated by comparing the oldest and most modern cultivars. Data points and error bars represent the mean ± SE (n = 32). Dashed lines in (A) and (B) represent the linear relationship between cultivar release year and root hydraulic properties at each root position (based on ordinary least squares linear regression; only shown if significant, p < 0.05). p-values in (C) and (D) indicate the significance of cultivar effects (S. Dickkopf vs. Tommi) on kx and Kr at each root position, based on a Wilcoxon test.

ALT TEXT: Modelled axial and radial root hydraulic properties of winter wheat cultivars across root positions and along the root axis. A–B are scatter plots of axial and radial hydraulic properties at basal, mid-segment, and distal root positions, with colors indicating root position. Points represent cultivar means and dashed lines indicate significant relationships between hydraulic properties and cultivar release year. Clear differences among root positions are visible. C–D are plots of axial and radial hydraulic properties along the root axis, with distance from the root base on the x-axis. Symbols compare the oldest and most modern cultivars and show differences between cultivars and strong changes in hydraulic properties along the root length.

kx and kr exhibited opposite patterns along the root axis: averaged across all cultivars, kx decreased almost 50% from the root base toward the tip (1.40 to 0.71 m4 MPa-1 s-1 × 10-9), whereas kr increased around 35% (from 0.74 to 1.0 m MPa-1 s-1 × 10-7). Averaged across root positions, kx also declined significantly with release year (1.20 to 0.79 m4 MPa-1 s-1 × 10-9 from the oldest to the most modern cultivar), while kr showed no significant trend. However, when kr was scaled by root diameter to account for surface area differences—yielding radial conductance (Kr; Materials & Methods)—a significant decreasing trend with release year was detected (p < 0.05, Table 1).

To further illustrate the spatial dynamics along the root, we compared kx and Kr between the oldest and most modern cultivars, which were expected to show the strongest contrast according to previous studies (Baca Cabrera et al., 2025). For this, we used the distance from the root base where the different root segments were collected (~0, 10, and 20 cm; Materials & Methods). Along the root, kx was systematically lower in the modern cultivar compared to the oldest (~25–42%), whereas Kr showed the opposite trend, albeit less pronounced (Fig. 4C–D). This opposite behaviour of kx and Kr was consistent with patterns typically assumed in mechanistic models and observed in previous empirical studies (see Discussion).

Discussion

Root position and cultivar release year drive variation in root anatomy

This study analyzed the variation in root anatomy along crown roots of six German wheat cultivars spanning more than 100 years of cultivar release. Across all cultivars, anatomical tissue size decreased from the base toward the tip, consistent with spatial gradients reported for both seminal and crown roots under different cultivars and environmental conditions (Bramley et al., 2009; Hendel et al., 2021; Yang et al., 2024; Guhr et al., 2025).

Aerenchyma was generally scarce in these crown roots. The proportion of cortex occupied by aerenchyma lacunae declined from basal to distal positions, yet absolute values remained low (<6%) and many samples lacked aerenchyma entirely. Although aerenchyma is a typical anatomical feature in seminal and nodal roots of wheat—particularly under hypoxic conditions— it can also occur under non-stress conditions (Thomson et al., 1990).

These spatial gradients were further reflected in the principal component analysis (PCA), with basal, mid, and distal positions clearly separated along PC1, dominated by tissue size. Cultivar clustering was less pronounced, but the oldest cultivar (S. Dickkopf) consistently separated from the others, characterized by larger root area and thicker cortex. Notably, S. Dickkopf also displayed higher root axis number than the modern cultivars (Baca Cabrera et al., 2025), consistent with an overall larger root system. While previous studies reported a breeding-driven reduction of root system size in wheat (Fradgley et al., 2020; Maqbool et al., 2022), its impact on anatomy remained unclear. The reductions in tissue size observed here suggest that cultivar differences associated with release year have influenced root anatomical investment, pointing to a potential linkage between anatomical and morphological adjustments (Guhr et al., 2025). Furthermore, loadings in the PCA revealed three coherent anatomical trait groups: (i) cortex traits (thickness and cell diameter), (ii) tissue size traits and (iii) aerenchyma. This grouping is biologically meaningful: variation in tissue areas reflects normal maturation processes along the root axis (Clément et al., 2022; Petrova et al., 2023), whereas aerenchyma is associated with stress responses in cereals (Yamauchi et al., 2013; Lynch et al., 2021). By contrast, cortex traits varied less strongly across root positions and cultivars, which could explain their distinct clustering.

Among all traits, stele area and total metaxylem area showed particularly pronounced changes. Variation in metaxylem area was primarily driven by differences in vessel number rather than diameter. A similar metaxylem area decrease along seminal roots (Hendel et al., 2021) and reductions in both metaxylem area and number along crown roots (Wu et al., 2011; Kadam et al., 2015) have been reported previously in wheat. Unlike seminal roots, which typically contain a single central metaxylem, crown roots can produce multiple vessels (Watt et al., 2008; Jones et al., 2025). This structural flexibility allows adjustment of total metaxylem area primarily through vessel number rather than excessive diameter increases, possibly balancing transport efficiency and cavitation risk (Harrison Day et al., 2023), and the observed differences among cultivars could reflect subtle variation in root plasticity (Karlova et al., 2021). Interestingly, in all cultivars studied here, a similar spatial pattern in metaxylem number—with a decrease from the root base toward the tip—was observed, which appeared more pronounced in modern cultivars, as metaxylem number and area were significantly affected by both root position and cultivar release year (Fig 2B, Table 1).

To further explore cultivar-specific differences, we examined cortex thickness, stele area, and total metaxylem area—key traits that integrate root structure, influence hydraulic capacity, and are most relevant for capturing breeding-related anatomical differences (Jones et al., 2026). Consistent with the PCA results, the oldest cultivar showed clear differentiation from the remaining cultivars, particularly for cortex thickness and stele area (p < 0.05, Tukey post hoc test, Supplementary Table S4), while variation among cultivars released after 1920 was comparatively small. A similar pattern has previously been reported for root axis number in these cultivars (Baca Cabrera et al., 2025). In contrast, the most modern cultivar showed the strongest differentiation in total metaxylem area (p < 0.05, Supplementary Table S4), whereas intermediate cultivars largely overlapped. Taken together, these results indicate that anatomical differentiation among cultivars was consistent with a gradual shift across cultivar release years, with the strongest contrasts occurring between the oldest and most modern cultivars and comparatively limited variation among intermediate cultivars.

Furthermore, allometric ratio analyses revealed interactions between cultivar release year and root position for XCS and XRR, two established metrics for analyzing anatomical investment in grasses (Yamauchi et al., 2021). Both ratios increased significantly with cultivar release year at the distal position but not at the base or in the mid-root, indicating a shift in anatomical composition along the root axis, driven mainly by changes in vascular tissue areas. These allometric shifts were more pronounced in more recently released cultivars, which could, at least in part, reflect differences among cultivars in maturation rate along the root axis. While distinctions between isometric and allometric scaling in wheat crown roots remain largely unexplored, the phenotyping approach applied here provides a robust framework to investigate how genotypic differences shape these anatomical trade-offs.

Finally, the cultivars showed consistent increases in apoplastic barriers along the root axis. While almost no hypodermal modifications were detected at distal positions, a suberized exodermis became progressively more frequent towards the base. A similar spatial pattern was observed for multilayer cortical sclerenchyma (MCS) and for the combination of MCS and suberized exodermis. Such apoplastic barriers are common in cereal crops (Schneider, 2022; Liu and Kreszies, 2023; Jones et al., 2025) and also occurred in the investigated wheat cultivars, which were grown under non-stress field conditions (Baca Cabrera et al., 2025; Behrend et al., 2026). Furthermore, root cortical senescence (RCS) was practically absent, likely reflecting the non-stress conditions under which the plants were grown, but it may also indicate that the sampled crown roots had not yet reached the developmental stage at which RCS typically occurs (Schneider et al., 2017). Cultivar effects on hypodermal modifications were minor compared with the strong spatial gradients, and no clear patterns were evident regarding the influence of release year. Overall, these spatial gradients reflect typical cortical maturation, including structural and functional modifications mediated by lignin and suberin deposition and programmed cell death in defined spatial and temporal patterns (Jones et al., 2025).

Implications of anatomical variation for root hydraulics and water uptake capacity

The anatomical patterns observed here are expected to have direct consequences for root hydraulic properties, which we modelled using GRANAR–MECHA. Radial conductivity (kr) and axial conductance (kx) displayed opposite spatial trends: kr increased from the base to distal positions, whereas kx declined. These trends are consistent with experimental data on wheat (Bramley et al., 2009) and barley (Knipfer and Fricke, 2011), as well as with common model parameterizations (Doussan et al., 1998; Meunier et al., 2018). Across cultivars, kx decreased by approximately 50% and radial conductance (Kr, i.e. kr scaled by root diameter) increased by about 35% from basal to distal positions. However, kx represents a theoretical maximum derived from metaxylem vessel number and diameter and does not account for possible hydraulic limitations (Barry et al., 2025); thus, comparisons are relative rather than absolute. These gradients, although much smaller than the order-of-magnitude variation often assumed in models (Doussan et al., 1998), provide complementary information, as all sampled sections corresponded to mature root segments with fully developed metaxylem vessels and an endodermis containing a Casparian strip. This highlights variation in more mature portions of the root that is not captured by typical model parameterizations. This is particularly notable, because empirical studies have mostly focused on the pronounced spatial gradients from the root tip (meristematic and elongation zones) toward the base (Bramley et al., 2009; Knipfer and Fricke, 2011), whereas our study indicates that spatial gradients also persist within mature tissues—i.e. regions beyond the elongation zone, where primary growth is complete and the stele and cortex are fully differentiated.

Spatial variation in kr was primarily driven by the development of apoplastic barriers, particularly suberization of the exodermis. The role of the Casparian strip and suberin lamellae in restricting radial transport is well established (Peterson et al., 1993; Steudle et al., 1993; Frensch et al., 1996; Geldner, 2013). Apoplastic barrier formation has been shown to substantially reduce radial water flow in wheat and rice (Lu and Fricke, 2023; Song et al., 2023) and our observations are consistent with these findings. Furthermore, in our dataset aerenchyma formation increased toward the base and may have contributed modestly to reduced kr. However, overall aerenchyma proportions were low, so its impact remained minor relative to apoplastic barriers. Cortical traits such as cell diameter and number also varied only slightly across cultivars and positions, further suggesting that their influence on kr was small compared with apoplastic barrier effects.

The kr values estimated here fell well within the range of experimental measurements for wheat root segments (0.53–1.84 m MPa−1 s−1 × 10−7; Bramley et al., 2009), supporting the robustness of our simulations. In contrast, kx values were more than one order of magnitude higher than those reported for wheat (Bramley et al., 2007, 2009) and other grasses (Baca Cabrera et al., 2024), but they were consistent with typical model parameterization values (Doussan et al., 1998). This discrepancy likely resulted from the use of the Hagen–Poiseuille law, which can overestimate kx by up to one order of magnitude (Boursiac et al., 2022a), as it does not account for limitations due to embolism (Harrison Day et al., 2023) or for the intrinsic properties of the xylem vessel network—such as vessel length, branching, connectivity, and the overall topology of the root system (Barry et al., 2025).

Building on these spatial gradients, we assessed whether cultivar release year influenced root hydraulic properties. No significant effect of release year on kr was detected, consistent with the absence of systematic differences in apoplastic barrier formation. However, when scaling kr by root diameter to obtain radial conductance (Kr), a significant decrease with release year emerged, supporting the view that diameter is a useful proxy for radial transport capacity (Heymans, 2022). In contrast, variation in kx was more strongly associated with cultivar differences, with a decline observed toward more recently released cultivars. Across all cultivars, the spatial decline in kx was linked to reductions in metaxylem number and area from the base toward the tip, as reported previously for wheat (Bramley et al., 2009). Reduced metaxylem area and vessel number have been linked to reduced water uptake in wheat (Richards and Passioura, 1989; Yang et al., 2024) and may be consistent with a shift toward more conservative water-use strategies. However, such patterns may also arise as indirect consequences of selection for aboveground traits and yield—which can inadvertently influence root traits (Waines and Ehdaie, 2007)—rather than reflecting direct selection on root function. Furthermore, the trends in root hydraulic properties with cultivar release year were more pronounced in kx than in kr and Kr. As kx represents a theoretical maximum modelled from metaxylem anatomy, differences among cultivars should be interpreted as relative and may underestimate additional hydraulic limitations not captured by the model.

Despite this potential overestimation, the observed changes in kx are relevant for root water uptake capacity. Recently, the importance of axial conductance for water transport has been highlighted (Bouda et al., 2018; Barry et al., 2025). While kr has historically been considered the main limitation to root water transport (Frensch and Steudle, 1989; Bramley et al., 2009), kx can also critically constrain flow, particularly when metaxylem development or vessel connectivity is limited (Barry et al., 2025). Consistently, Li et al. (2024) found that smaller xylem vessels were associated with higher water-use efficiency, while higher cortical thickness enhanced water storage capacity in dryland wheat cultivars—together indicating that both axial and radial traits can modulate root water uptake.

Moreover, the observed decrease in kr, Kr, and kx with cultivar release year along crown roots suggests a corresponding decline in whole-root system conductance (Krs). This aligns with our previous findings of reduced Krs across the same historical wheat cultivars (Baca Cabrera et al., 2025). In that earlier study, the decline was primarily attributed to a reduced number of root axes—i.e. fewer “pipes” for water transport—but we also hypothesized that anatomical differences could contribute to that decrease. The decrease in root hydraulic properties with cultivar release year observed here supports this interpretation. To test this further, we simulated Krs for the most contrasting cultivars (oldest vs. most modern) with CPlantBox (Giraud et al., 2023), using the kr, and kx values determined here and the root architectures as in Baca Cabrera et al. (2025). The model reproduced the observed differences in Krs between cultivars and closely matched the measured values from the previous study (Figure S4). Notably, these differences emerged even before tillering, indicating that they were driven not only by root axis number but also by segment-scale anatomical properties affecting kr and kx.

The observed cultivar differences in root hydraulic properties should be interpreted considering several methodological aspects. GRANAR–MECHA offers limited flexibility to represent the full diversity of apoplastic barriers, and features such as multiseriate cortical sclerenchyma (MCS) are not explicitly implemented. Since MCS occurred consistently across cultivars, this omission is unlikely to bias comparative trends, although it may affect absolute kr values, as MCS influences radial water fluxes, even though its function as a barrier is not fully understood (Schneider, 2022). Additionally, our scoring of the endodermis required a choice between “Casparian strip only” or “fully suberized” depending on tissue maturity—a necessary simplification that affects kr estimates but best reflects the observed anatomical state. In addition, cultivar differences could partly arise from variation in cell-scale hydraulic properties, such as membrane permeability or aquaporin (AQP) activity, for which data remain limited. Furthermore, kx was modelled as a theoretical maximum using the Hagen–Poiseuille law based on metaxylem vessel number and area, likely overestimating actual axial conductance. Protoxylem elements were not included in the calculation, as they are expected to contribute minimally to water transport once metaxylem elements are functional (Wu et al., 2011). Nevertheless, these modelling assumptions apply equally to all cultivars and should not affect relative comparisons. Finally, we assumed a constant AQP contribution across cultivars and root sections. Although this choice allowed us to determine anatomical effects on kr, it does not fully capture known variation in AQP expression, which in wheat exhibits strong diurnal regulation and declines under stress (Lu and Fricke, 2023). Future experimental and modelling efforts should integrate dynamic AQP regulation to better represent root system responses under fluctuating environmental conditions.

Taken together, our results indicate that cultivar differences along the release-year gradient are associated with coordinated anatomical changes leading to lower axial and radial conductance, potentially resulting in reduced whole-root water uptake capacity. These patterns may be consistent with more conservative water-use behavior in modern cultivars, which could be advantageous under limited water availability. This pattern may also be related to differences in the timing of root tissue maturation, with more recently released cultivars potentially exhibiting earlier development of anatomical barriers and a corresponding reduction in radial conductance. In addition to these physiological insights, the kr, Kr and kx values quantified beyond the maturation zone provide key parameters for modelling efforts that integrate root architecture and hydraulics to predict water uptake across contrasting genotypes and environmental conditions.

Conclusions and future perspectives

This study revealed clear longitudinal and release year gradients in root anatomical and hydraulic traits in German winter wheat cultivars spanning over 100 years of breeding. Across cultivars, anatomical traits varied strongly along the crown root axis, with progressive differentiation of cortical and vascular tissues, increased apoplastic barrier development, and contrasting trends in kr, Kr, and kx. A clear trend with cultivar year of release was also observed, with modern cultivars showing smaller tissue dimensions and fewer metaxylem vessels, together indicating a coordinated shift in anatomical investment that contributed to lower radial and axial conductance. These differences in root water uptake traits along the historical gradient suggest a gradual shift toward more conservative hydraulic properties in recently released cultivars.

Beyond these findings, this study highlights the potential of the presented approach for phenotyping root hydraulic properties. The integration of RAT with the GRANAR–MECHA modelling framework enabled detailed, spatially explicit estimation of segment-scale hydraulic properties from field-grown wheat cultivars, effectively linking anatomical measurements to functional water uptake capacity. Expanding this framework to larger genotype panels and diverse environments could help identify hydraulic traits associated with drought tolerance, resource-use efficiency, and climate resilience. Ultimately, combining anatomical–hydraulic modelling with high-throughput imaging and root architectural simulations could establish a systematic approach for assessing root hydraulics in cereals and translating anatomical and physiological insights into relevant traits for breeding.

Highlight.

High-throughput imaging–modeling shows that longitudinal gradients and cultivar-associated anatomical differences along crown roots shape radial and axial conductance, leading to reduced whole-root water uptake capacity in modern winter wheat

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Valentin Couvreur and Marco D’Agostino (Earth and Life Institute, UC-Louvain) for helpful discussions on the apoplastic barrier parameterization in the MECHA model.

The authors acknowledge the use of ChatGPT (GPT-5.1, OpenAI) for language editing. The tool was not used to generate scientific content or intellectual output. All interpretations, analyses, and conclusions are solely those of the authors, who take full responsibility for this manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation), in the DETECT - Collaborative Research Center (SFB 1502/1-2022 - Projektnummer: 450058266). DHJ is co-funded by the Grains Research and Development Corporation ‘Root structure and function traits: Overcoming the root phenotyping bottleneck in cereals’ project. GL is co-funded by the European Union (ERC grant 101125638). HS is co-funded by the European Union (ERC, 101162856, FATE). Views and opinions are expressed however as those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Research Council. Neither the European Union nor the granting authority can be held responsible for them.

Footnotes

Author contributions

JCBC: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review and editing

DHJ: Data Curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - review and editing

JV: Funding Acquisition, Writing - review and editing

DB: Resources, Writing - review and editing

HS: Funding Acquisition, Resources, Writing - review and editing

GL: Formal Analysis, Funding Acquisition, Writing - review and editing

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest

Contributor Information

Dylan H. Jones, Email: jones@ipk-gatersleben.de.

Jan Vanderborght, Email: j.vanderborght@fz-juelich.de.

Dominik Behrend, Email: dbehrend@uni-bonn.de.

Hannah M. Schneider, Email: schneiderh@ipk-gatersleben.de.

Guillaume Lobet, Email: guillaume.lobet@uclouvain.be.

Data availability

Data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary data (Tables S1–S4, Figures S1–S4), and raw anatomical images are available in the bonndata repository. Additional data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Ahrends HE, Eugster W, Gaiser T, Rueda-Ayala V, Hüging H, Ewert F, Siebert S. Genetic yield gains of winter wheat in Germany over more than 100 years (1895–2007) under contrasting fertilizer applications. Environmental Research Letters. 2018;13:104003 [Google Scholar]
  2. Atkinson JA, Pound MP, Bennett MJ, Wells DM. Uncovering the hidden half of plants using new advances in root phenotyping. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 2019;55:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2018.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baca Cabrera JC, Vanderborght J, Boursiac Y, Behrend D, Gaiser T, Nguyen TH, Lobet G. Decreased root hydraulic traits in German winter wheat cultivars over 100 years of breeding. Plant Physiology. 2025;198:kiaf166. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiaf166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baca Cabrera JC, Vanderborght J, Couvreur V, Behrend D, Gaiser T, Nguyen TH, Lobet G. Root hydraulic properties: An exploration of their variability across scales. Plant Direct. 2024;8:e582. doi: 10.1002/pld3.582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barry L, Baca Cabrera JC, Lucas M, Lobet G, Boursiac Y, Grondin A. Role of xylem in root hydraulics: functionality and implications for drought adaptation. Quantitative Plant Biology. 2025;6:e42. doi: 10.1017/qpb.2025.10026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Behrend D, Nguyen T, Hüging H, et al. Biomass partitioning and canopy architecture of six German winter wheat cultivars released between 1895 and 2002. Crop Science. 2026;66:e70263 [Google Scholar]
  7. Blessing CH, Mariette A, Kaloki P, Bramley H. Profligate and conservative: water use strategies in grain legumes. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2018;69:349–369. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bouda M, Brodersen C, Saiers J. Whole root system water conductance responds to both axial and radial traits and network topology over natural range of trait variation. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2018;456:49–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.07.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Boursiac Y, Pradal C, Bauget F, Lucas M, Delivorias S, Godin C, Maurel C. Phenotyping and modeling of root hydraulic architecture reveal critical determinants of axial water transport. Plant Physiology. 2022a;190:1289–1306. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Boursiac Y, Protto V, Rishmawi L, Maurel C. Experimental and conceptual approaches to root water transport. Plant and Soil. 2022b;478:349–370. doi: 10.1007/s11104-022-05427-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bramley H, Turner NC, Turner DW, Tyerman SD. Comparison between gradient-dependent hydraulic conductivities of roots using the root pressure probe: the role of pressure propagations and implications for the relative roles of parallel radial pathways. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2007;30:861–874. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01678.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bramley H, Turner NC, Turner DW, Tyerman SD. Roles of morphology, anatomy, and aquaporins in determining contrasting hydraulic behavior of roots. Plant Physiology. 2009;150:348–364. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.134098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cantó-Pastor A, Manzano C, Brady SM. A way to interact with the world: complex and diverse spatiotemporal cell wall thickenings in plant roots. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2025;76:433–466. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-102820-112451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chimungu JG, Brown KM, Lynch JP. Reduced root cortical cell file number improves drought tolerance in maize. Plant Physiology. 2014;166:1943–1955. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.249037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Clément C, Schneider HM, Dresbøll DB, Lynch JP, Thorup-Kristensen K. Root and xylem anatomy varies with root length, root order, soil depth and environment in intermediate wheatgrass (Kernza®) and alfalfa. Annals of Botany. 2022;130:367–382. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcac058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Couvreur V, Faget M, Lobet G, Javaux M, Chaumont F, Draye X. Going with the flow: multiscale insights into the composite nature of water transport in roots. Plant Physiology. 2018;178:1689–1703. doi: 10.1104/pp.18.01006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cuneo IF, Barrios-Masias F, Knipfer T, Uretsky J, Reyes C, Lenain P, Brodersen CR, Walker MA, McElrone AJ. Differences in grapevine rootstock sensitivity and recovery from drought are linked to fine root cortical lacunae and root tip function. New Phytologist. 2021;229:272–283. doi: 10.1111/nph.16542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cunha Neto IL, Hall BT, Lanba AR, Blosenski JD, Onyenedum JG. Laser ablation tomography (LATscan) as a new tool for anatomical studies of woody plants. New Phytologist. 2023;239:429–444. doi: 10.1111/nph.18831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Doussan C, Vercambre G, Pagè L. Modelling of the hydraulic architecture of root systems: an integrated approach to water absorption—distribution of axial and radial conductances in maize. Annals of Botany. 1998;81:225–232. [Google Scholar]
  20. Erenstein O, Jaleta M, Mottaleb KA, Sonder K, Donovan J, Braun H-J. In: Wheat improvement: food security in a changing climate. Reynolds MP, Braun H-J, editors. Springer International Publishing; Cham: 2022. Global trends in wheat production, consumption and trade; pp. 47–66. [Google Scholar]
  21. Fradgley N, Evans G, Biernaskie JM, Cockram J, Marr EC, Oliver AG, Ober E, Jones H. Effects of breeding history and crop management on the root architecture of wheat. Plant and Soil. 2020;452:587–600. doi: 10.1007/s11104-020-04585-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Frensch J, Hsiao TC, Steudle E. Water and solute transport along developing maize roots. Planta. 1996;198:348–355. [Google Scholar]
  23. Frensch J, Steudle E. Axial and radial hydraulic resistance to roots of maize (Zea mays L.) 1. Plant Physiology. 1989;91:719–726. doi: 10.1104/pp.91.2.719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Geldner N. The endodermis. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2013;64:531–558. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Giraud M, Gall SL, Harings M, et al. CPlantBox: a fully coupled modelling platform for the water and carbon fluxes in the soil–plant–atmosphere continuum. in silico. Plants. 2023;5:diad009 [Google Scholar]
  26. Guhr T, Song Z, Andersen AG, de la Cruz Jiménez J, Pedersen O. Root morphology and anatomy respond similarly to drought and flooding in two wheat cultivars. Annals of Botany. 2025:mcaf152. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcaf152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Harrison Day BL, Johnson KM, Tonet V, Bourbia I, Blackman C, Brodribb TJ. The root of the problem: diverse vulnerability to xylem cavitation found within the root system of wheat plants. New Phytologist. 2023;239:1239–1252. doi: 10.1111/nph.19017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hazman MY, Kabil FF. Maize root responses to drought stress depend on root class and axial position. Journal of Plant Research. 2022;135:105–120. doi: 10.1007/s10265-021-01348-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hendel E, Bacher H, Oksenberg A, Walia H, Schwartz N, Peleg Z. Deciphering the genetic basis of wheat seminal root anatomy uncovers ancestral axial conductance alleles. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2021;44:1921–1934. doi: 10.1111/pce.14035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Heymans A. In silico analysis of the influence of root hydraulic anatomy on maize (Zea mays) water uptake. PhD thesis, Université Catholique de Louvain; 2022. [Google Scholar]
  31. Heymans A, Couvreur V, LaRue T, Paez-Garcia A, Lobet G. GRANAR, a computational tool to better understand the functional importance of monocotyledon root anatomy. Plant Physiology. 2019;182:707–720. doi: 10.1104/pp.19.00617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jones DH, Baca Cabrera JC, Behrend D, Wells DM, Swift JF, Atkinson JA, Schön M, Lobet G, Hanlon MT, Schneider HM. The Rapid Anatomics Tool (RAT): A low-cost root anatomical phenotyping platform reveals changes in root anatomy along the root axis. Plant Phenomics. 2026;8:100150. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphe.2025.100150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jones DH, Kajala K, Kawa D, Lopez-Valdivia I, Kreszies T, Schneider HM. The root cortex of the Poaceae: a diverse, dynamic, and dispensable tissue. Plant and Soil. 2025;514:1627–1662. doi: 10.1007/s11104-025-07498-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kadam NN, Yin X, Bindraban PS, Struik PC, Jagadish KSV. Does morphological and anatomical plasticity during the vegetative stage make wheat more tolerant of water deficit stress than rice? Plant Physiology. 2015;167:1389–1401. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.253328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Karlova R, Boer D, Hayes S, Testerink C. Root plasticity under abiotic stress. Plant Physiology. 2021;187:1057–1070. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kloke JD, McKean JW. Rfit: Rank-based Estimation for Linear Models. The R Journal. 2012;4:57–64. [Google Scholar]
  37. Knipfer T, Fricke W. Water uptake by seminal and adventitious roots in relation to whole-plant water flow in barley (Hordeum vulgare L) Journal of Experimental Botany. 2011;62:717–733. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lê S, Josse J, Husson F. FactoMineR: A package for multivariate analysis. Journal of Statistical Software. 2008;25:1–18. [Google Scholar]
  39. Li P-F, Ma B-L, Wei X-F, Guo S, Ma Y-Q. Deeper root distribution and optimized root anatomy help improve dryland wheat yield and water use efficiency under low water conditions. Plant and Soil. 2024;501:437–454. [Google Scholar]
  40. Liu T, Kreszies T. The exodermis: A forgotten but promising apoplastic barrier. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2023;290:154118. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2023.154118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Lu Y, Fricke W. Changes in root hydraulic conductivity in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in response to salt stress and day/night can best be explained through altered activity of aquaporins. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2023;46:747–763. doi: 10.1111/pce.14535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lynch JP. Roots of the second green revolution. Australian Journal of Botany. 2007;55:493–512. [Google Scholar]
  43. Lynch JP, Chimungu JG, Brown KM. Root anatomical phenes associated with water acquisition from drying soil: targets for crop improvement. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2014;65:6155–6166. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lynch JP, Strock CF, Schneider HM, Sidhu JS, Ajmera I, Galindo-Castañeda T, Klein SP, Hanlon MT. Root anatomy and soil resource capture. Plant and Soil. 2021;466:21–63. [Google Scholar]
  45. Madadgar S, AghaKouchak A, Farahmand A, Davis SJ. Probabilistic estimates of drought impacts on agricultural production. Geophysical Research Letters. 2017;44:7799–7807. [Google Scholar]
  46. Maqbool S, Ahmad S, Kainat Z, Khan MI, Maqbool A, Hassan MA, Rasheed A, He Z. Root system architecture of historical spring wheat cultivars is associated with alleles and transcripts of major functional genes. BMC Plant Biology. 2022;22:590. doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03937-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Meunier F, Zarebanadkouki M, Ahmed MA, Carminati A, Couvreur V, Javaux M. Hydraulic conductivity of soil-grown lupine and maize unbranched roots and maize root-shoot junctions. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2018;227:31–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2017.12.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Ouyang W, Yin X, Yang J, Struik PC. Comparisons with wheat reveal root anatomical and histochemical constraints of rice under water-deficit stress. Plant and Soil. 2020;452:547–568. [Google Scholar]
  49. Peterson CA, Murrmann M, Steudle E. Location of the major barriers to water and ion movement in young roots of Zea mays L. Planta. 1993;190:127–136. [Google Scholar]
  50. Petrova A, Ageeva M, Kozlova L. Root growth of monocotyledons and dicotyledons is limited by different tissues. The Plant Journal. 2023;116:1462–1476. doi: 10.1111/tpj.16440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for statistical Computing; 2024. https://www.R-project.org/ [Google Scholar]
  52. Richards RA, Passioura JB. A breeding program to reduce the diameter of the major xylem vessel in the seminal roots of wheat and its effect on grain yield in rain-fed environments. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 1989;40:943–950. [Google Scholar]
  53. Rishmawi L, Bauget F, Protto V, Bauland C, Nacry P, Maurel C. Natural variation of maize root hydraulic architecture underlies highly diverse water uptake capacities. Plant Physiology. 2023;192:2404–2418. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiad213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nature Methods. 2012;9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Schneider HM. Functional implications of multiseriate cortical sclerenchyma for soil resource capture and crop improvement. AoB PLANTS. 2022;14:plac050. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plac050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Schneider HM, Lynch JP. Should root plasticity be a crop breeding target? Frontiers in Plant Science. 2020;11 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Schneider HM, Strock CF, Hanlon MT, Vanhees DJ, Perkins AC, Ajmera IB, Sidhu JS, Mooney SJ, Brown KM, Lynch JP. Multiseriate cortical sclerenchyma enhance root penetration in compacted soils. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2021;118:e2012087118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2012087118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Schneider HM, Wojciechowski T, Postma JA, Brown KM, Lücke A, Zeisler V, Schreiber L, Lynch JP. Root cortical senescence decreases root respiration, nutrient content and radial water and nutrient transport in barley. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2017;40:1392–1408. doi: 10.1111/pce.12933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Song Z, Zonta F, Ogorek LLP, Bastegaard VK, Herzog M, Pellegrini E, Pedersen O. The quantitative importance of key root traits for radial water loss under low water potential. Plant and Soil. 2023;482:567–584. [Google Scholar]
  60. Steffens B, Rasmussen A. The physiology of adventitious roots. Plant Physiology. 2016;170:603–617. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.01360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Steudle E. Water uptake by plant roots: an integration of views. Plant and Soil. 2000;226:45–56. [Google Scholar]
  62. Steudle E, Murrmann M, Peterson CA. Transport of water and solutes across maize roots modified by puncturing the endodermis (further evidence for the composite transport model of the root) Plant Physiology. 1993;103:335–349. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.2.335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Thomson CJ, Armstrong W, Waters I, Greenway H. Aerenchyma formation and associated oxygen movement in seminal and nodal roots of wheat. Plant, Cell & Environment. 1990;13:395–403. [Google Scholar]
  64. Torres-Ruiz JM, Cochard H, Delzon S, et al. Plant hydraulics at the heart of plant, crops and ecosystem functions in the face of climate change. New Phytologist. 2024;241:984–999. doi: 10.1111/nph.19463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Venables WN, Ripley BD. Modern applied statistics with S. Springer; New York: 2002. [Google Scholar]
  66. Waines JG, Ehdaie B. Domestication and crop physiology: roots of green-revolution wheat. Annals of Botany. 2007;100:991–998. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Watt M, Magee LJ, McCully ME. Types, structure and potential for axial water flow in the deepest roots of field-grown cereals. New Phytologist. 2008;178:135–146. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02358.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Wickham H. Elegant graphics for data analysis. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  69. Wu H, Jaeger M, Wang M, Li B, Zhang BG. Three-dimensional distribution of vessels, passage cells and lateral roots along the root axis of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) Annals of Botany. 2011;107:843–853. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcr005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Yamauchi T, Abe F, Tsutsumi N, Nakazono M. Root cortex provides a venue for gas-space formation and is essential for plant adaptation to waterlogging. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2019;10 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Yamauchi T, Pedersen O, Nakazono M, Tsutsumi N. Key root traits of Poaceae for adaptation to soil water gradients. New Phytologist. 2021;229:3133–3140. doi: 10.1111/nph.17093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Yamauchi T, Shimamura S, Nakazono M, Mochizuki T. Aerenchyma formation in crop species: A review. Field Crops Research. 2013;152:8–16. [Google Scholar]
  73. Yang Y, Ma X, Yan L, Li Y, Wei S, Teng Z, Zhang H, Tang W, Peng S, Li Y. Soil–root interface hydraulic conductance determines responses of photosynthesis to drought in rice and wheat. Plant Physiology. 2024;194:376–390. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiad498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. York LM, Slack S, Bennett MJ, Foulkes MJ. Wheat shovelomics I: A field phenotyping approach for characterising the structure and function of root systems in tillering species. bioRxiv. 2018 doi: 10.1101/280875. [Preprint] [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary data (Tables S1–S4, Figures S1–S4), and raw anatomical images are available in the bonndata repository. Additional data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

RESOURCES