Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2026 Sep 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Cell Sci. 2026 Apr 1;139(6):jcs263933. doi: 10.1242/jcs.263933

Microscopy in Mitochondrial Research: A Comprehensive Review

Prasanna Katti 1,#, Prasanna Venkhatesh 1, C Nivedya 1, Andrea Marshall 2, Amber Crabtree 2,12,13, Zahra Elly Soltani 10, Olga Korolkova 3, Vineeta Sharma 3, Suraj Thapliyal 1, Karthik Naik 1, Kit Neikirk 2, Rodolpho Ornitz Oliveira Souza 11, Sepiso K Masenga 2,4, Nelson Wandira 5, Magdalene Ameka 6, Okwute M Ochayi 7, Christian A Combs 8, Lucy Collinson 9, Nalan Liv 10, Antentor Hinton Jr 2,#
PMCID: PMC7619493  EMSID: EMS218256  PMID: 41919488

Abstract

Mitochondria are highly dynamic, double-membrane organelles that play integral roles beyond energy production. Mitochondria adapt their morphology to meet diverse cellular demands, and highly plastic mitochondrial networks interact and communicate with various cellular components to maintain cellular health. Advances in both light and electron microscopy have greatly enhanced our understanding of mitochondrial structure and function. However, the small diameter of mitochondrial tubules, often near the diffraction limit of light, poses challenges for visualizing submitochondrial structures and protein distributions with conventional microscopy. Recently, super-resolution microscopy has offered unprecedented insights into mitochondrial dynamics, interactions, and architecture. In this Review, we discuss how imaging techniques have advanced our understanding of mitochondrial biology. We critically assess the contributions of 2D electron microscopy to elucidating the native architecture of cristae and respiratory chain complexes. Additionally, we explore how 3D electron microscopy and super-resolution methods have reshaped our comprehension of mitochondrial network dynamics, heterogeneity, and interactions with other cellular components. Finally, we discuss the strengths and limitations of various approaches, considering their potential to overcome current challenges and open new avenues in mitochondrial research, and illuminate how advanced microscopy continues to drive discoveries in mitochondrial biology with implications for metabolic diseases and aging.

Keywords: Mitochondria, Confocal, Super-Resolution Microscopy, EM, CLEM, Volume EM

Introduction

Since mitochondria were first characterized by Richard Altmann in 1890, and later named by Carl Benda in 1898 (Ernster and Schatz, 1981), they have remained a focal point in biological research due to their central role in metabolism. However, mitochondria are submicron organelles with highly organized internal structure (typically 0.5–1 µm in diameter and 1-10 µm in length, with inner-membrane cristae and cristae junctions on the order of 10-40 nm). C onventional light microscopy, limited by the physics of light diffraction, cannot resolve structures smaller than ∼200 nm, rendering it insufficient for detailed studies of mitochondrial structure and function (Schermelleh et al., 2010). Early electron microscopy (EM) studies in the 1950s and 1960s provided the first detailed views of mitochondrial ultrastructure, revealing the distinctive outer and inner mitochondrial membranes (OMM and IMM, respectively) and the intricate folds of the IMMs known as cristae (Palade, 1952; Sjostrand, 1953). Although traditional EM offers high resolution, it provides only static, two-dimensional images of fixed samples, unable to capture mitochondrial dynamics in living cells (Frey and Mannella, 2000). Live-cell imaging techniques developed in the 1980s and 1990s revolutionized mitochondrial research by revealing their highly dynamic (Bereiter-Hahn and Voth, 1994). The development of fluorescent probes, genetic labeling techniques, and confocal microscopy allowed researchers to observe mitochondrial movement, fusion, and fission in living cells (Chen et al., 2003), revealing that mitochondria form complex, interconnected networks that continuously remodel in response to cellular demands and stress (Westermann, 2010). The ability to visualize these dynamics has been instrumental in elucidating the molecular mechanisms governing mitochondrial behavior and their implications for cellular health and disease (Chan, 2012).

In recent years, super-resolution light microscopy methods, such as stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy, photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM) and stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM), have overcome the diffraction limit, enabling visualization of mitochondrial substructures and protein distributions in living cells (Jakobs and Wurm, 2014; Jans et al., 2013; Palmer et al., 2021; Rust et al., 2006). Concurrently, advances in EM, particularly three-dimensional EM (3D-EM) techniques like electron tomography (ET) and focused ion beam-scanning EM (FIB-SEM), have enabled high-resolution 3D reconstructions of mitochondrial ultrastructure (Perkins et al., 1997). These methods have been crucial in elucidating the complex architecture of cristae and their dynamic remodeling in response to cellular signals (Mannella, 2006). Integration of different microscopy techniques has proven particularly powerful; for example, correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM) combines the labeling specificity and live-cell imaging capabilities of fluorescence microscopy with the ultrastructural detail provided by EM, offering a more comprehensive view of mitochondrial structure and function (de Boer et al., 2015).

This Review explores how these recent advances in microscopy techniques have transformed our understanding of mitochondrial biology. We focus on their impact on the study of mitochondrial network dynamics, cristae ultrastructure, mitochondria–ER contact sites, and the structural basis of mitochondrial function. Furthermore, we evaluate the strengths and limitations of different microscopy modalities used in mitochondrial research (Box 1). We conclude by examining future directions and highlighting how emerging imaging innovations may redefine the frontiers of mitochondrial investigation.

Fluorescence microscopy techniques in mitochondrial research

Confocal and multiphoton microscopy

Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), which employs a focused laser beam together with a pinhole to eliminate out-of-focus light, resulting in sharper images with better contrast, offers several advantages over conventional widefield fluorescence microscopy, including improved resolution, optical sectioning capability and three-dimensional imaging of living cells (Fig. 1 A-C) (Conchello and Lichtman, 2005; Elliott, 2020 ; Schatten and Pawley, 1988). Decades of key studies of mitochondrial function have used CLSM, for example, to reveal the dynamic nature of mitochondrial Ca2+ signaling, demonstrating rapid and localized Ca2+ uptake by mitochondria in response to cellular stimuli (Rizzuto et al., 1998), and to visualize mitochondrial membrane potential fluctuations in cardiomyocytes, revealing spontaneous depolarization events that were previously unobservable (Eisner et al., 2017). Spinning disk confocal systems, which employ a rotating disk containing thousands of precisely arranged pinholes and microlenses to enable parallel illumination and detection, have further improved the temporal resolution of confocal microscopy for mitochondrial imaging. Unlike conventional point-scanning confocal systems that sequentially sample individual locations, the parallel architecture of spinning disk systems achieves 10-100× faster acquisition rates while maintaining optical sectioning, making it valuable for capturing rapid mitochondrial dynamics or assessing mitochondrial quantity, morphology, and membrane potential (Ahmadian et al., 2024).

Fig. 1. Multi-scale microscopy of mitochondria.

Fig. 1

(A) Schematic overview showing the range of resolution and visible mitochondrial features across different imaging modalities. (B-D) Mitochondrial imaging in live HeLa cells using MitoTracker™ Red FM across three modalities: (B) wide-field fluorescence, (C) confocal, and (D) super-resolution microscopy. Scale bar: 5 μm. (E-F) Super-resolution STED microscopy of cardiomyocytes showing defined localization of two inner mitochondrial membrane proteins. (E) Cells were immunostained with primary antibodies against ATPβ (ThermoFisher A-21351, 1:200) and (F) CHCHD3 (Millipore Sigma HPA042935, 1:200). Images were acquired using a Leica SP8 STED microscope with XY and Z depletion, then deconvolved using Huygens software. Scale bar: 2 μm. Created in BioRender. Katti, P. (2026) https://BioRender.com/hitcuun

Multiphoton microscopy is a powerful tool for studying mitochondria in intact tissues and organisms. Multiphoton microscopy uses near-infrared (IR) pulsed lasers to excite fluorophores by simultaneously absorbing multiple lower-energy photons. This approach reduces phototoxicity by confining excitation exclusively to the focal plane, employing longer wavelengths that minimize endogenous absorption, and providing recovery intervals between high-intensity pulses that enable prolonged imaging of mitochondria in intact tissues (Zipfel et al., 2003) Although more expensive than single-photon systems, by using long-wavelength IR excitation light, multiphoton systems enable deeper tissue penetration and reduced autofluorescence, light scattering, photodamage and phototoxicity compared to conventional confocal microscopy (Helmchen and Denk, 2005). Multiphoton microscopy is also superior to single-photon microscopy for imaging endogenous fluorescence of mitochondrial metabolites like NAD(P)H and FAD, because it shifts the stimulation of NAD(P)H autofluorescence from ultraviolet (UV) to IR wavelengths (∼720-800 nm), which also minimizes phototoxicity-associated DNA damage in the nucleus and mitochondria (Youn et al., 2007). A key example of the utility of multiphoton microscopy for imaging mitochondria in intact tissues utilized intravital two-photon microscopy to visualize mitochondrial transport and membrane potential in individual axons of living mice (Breckwoldt et al., 2014). These findings challenged the prevailing view that mitochondrial depolarization invariably triggers mitophagy (mitochondrial degradation via autophagy) by revealing spontaneous mitochondrial depolarization and repolarization events, demonstrating how advanced imaging techniques can uncover previously unobserved phenomena and reshape our understanding of mitochondrial biology.

However, both confocal and multiphoton microscopy are limited by light diffraction, restricting their lateral (x-y) resolution to ∼200-300 nm and axial (z) resolution to ∼500-700 nm (Box 1). This limitation has driven the development of super-resolution microscopy techniques, further expanding our ability to visualize mitochondrial structures and processes.

Super-Resolution Microscopy

Super-resolution microscopy techniques have bridged the gap between conventional light microscopy and EM, offering nanoscale resolution while retaining the advantages of being compatible with fluorescence labeling (Fig. 1D-F) and live-cell imaging capabilities (Thapilyal et al., 2026).

Stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy

STED microscopy builds upon confocal microscopy hardware by incorporating an additional depletion light source alongside the excitation light source. The first laser excites fluorophores within the focal region, while the depletion laser selectively suppresses fluorescence in the periphery via stimulated emission (Klar et al., 2000). The depletion laser forms a doughnut-shaped pattern around the excitation center, suppressing spontaneous emission and collecting only the central fluorescence signal. This technique provides direct, high-resolution imaging without requiring algorithmic processing (Fig. 1 E-F). Initially, STED was limited to use in fixed samples due to a lack of fluorescent probes suitable for live imaging. Liu et al., developed a photostable, low-phototoxicity fluorescent stain for the mitochondrial inner membrane that enables extended multicolor live-cell STED nanoscopy of mitochondrial structure and dynamics with sub-100 nm resolution (Liu et al., 2022).

In fixed cells dual-colour STED microscopy has revealed that mitochondrial nucleoids are significantly smaller than previously thought (∼100 nm in diameter) (Kukat et al., 2011). STED and immunogold EM were also employed to investigate the mitochondrial inner membrane organizing system (MINOS) in fixed cells (Neikirk et al., 2023; Jans et al., 2013). (an example of which can be found in Fig. 1E). A recent study that combined STED nanoscopy with dual-color imaging and HB Mito crimson, an exceptionally photostable, deep-red fluorescent probe well-suited for STED that specifically labels the IMM (Ge et al., 2025), demonstrated that extensive functional and structural interactions exist between mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and mitochondria. Dual-color imaging of the IMM and mtDNA, which enabled precise mapping of nucleoid position relative to mitochondrial architecture, revealed that mtDNA preferentially localizes to mitochondrial tips or branch points while maintaining an overall regular spatial distribution within the mitochondrial network (Ren et al., 2024). This study changed our understanding of mtDNA organization, in which nucleoids had previously been suggested to be relatively stationary and uniformly distributed, by showing that mtDNA does not distribute randomly within the mitochondrial network but has a positional preference for dynamically active regions like tips and branch points, and additionally demonstrated that membrane curvature and network remodeling contribute to nucleoid localization. Recently, live-cell STED imaging was also used to investigate the nanoscale organization and dynamics of the mitochondrial calcium uniporter (MCU) complex (Hirtl et al., 2025). Interestingly, this study observed that MCU forms distinct clusters along the IMM, with cluster size and distribution changing in response to cellular Ca2+ levels.

Improved fluorescent probes and image processing techniques have also expanded the application of STED in mitochondrial research. MitoTrackerTM dyes are widely used for mitochondrial labeling but have limitations, particularly for long-term or high-intensity imaging (Buckman et al., 2001). To address some of these limitations, gentler fluorophores, such as photostable and keto-epoxide-based MitoOrange (PKMO), have been developed (Chen et al., 2024). These fluorophores exhibit lower phototoxicity and less photobleaching under repeated or high-power illumination, making them more suitable for extended live-cell STED imaging. For example, using several mitochondrial membrane potential-dependent probes to distinguish the cristae from the inner boundary membrane (IBM), a recent study used both Airyscan imaging (see Box 1) and STED microscopy to image the IMM with high spatial and temporal resolution in living cells (Wolf et al., 2019). Further improvements in STED technology include precise localization techniques like minimal stimulated emission depletion (MINSTED, discussed further below) (Weber et al., 2021) and deep learning-based image restoration (Ebrahimi et al., 2023). Live-cell STED nanoscopy has revealed the nanoscale architecture and dynamic organization of mitochondrial cristae ridges in living cells (Stephan et al., 2019).

Summary.

In this Review, the authors provide an overview of how advanced microscopy techniques reveal the intricate ultra structure, dynamics, and interactions of mitochondria, enhancing our understanding of their essential roles in cellular metabolism, aging, and disease.

Combined, these advances in STED microscopy have helped to significantly enhance our understanding of mitochondrial–ER contact sites (MERCs). Because STED’s high-resolution multicolor imaging enables the concurrent visualization of multiple mitochondrial components and their interactions with surrounding organelles, it can offer a more integrated perspective on mitochondrial function within the cellular environment (Bottanelli et al., 2016). For example, multi-color STED was combined with parallelized reversible saturable or switchable optical fluorescence transitions (RESOLFT) nanoscopy – a method that uses photo-switchable fluorescent proteins – to study MERC organization and dynamics in neuronal cells (Damenti et al., 2021). Using this approach, which enabled prolonged time-lapse imaging of multiple contact sites, Damenti and colleagues visualized mitochondrial constriction by fine transverse ER tubules throughout the dendrites and axons of the same neuron (Damenti et al., 2021). -Live-cell STED nanoscopy has also been used to visualize ER architecture, revealing an interconnected and highly dynamic network of membrane sheets and tubules, and demonstrating that structures appearing as ER sheets by conventional microscopy often correspond to densely packed regions of rapidly moving ER tubules (Schroeder et al., 2019). Together, these studies illustrate how live-cell super-resolution imaging can resolve dynamic membrane architectures in intact cells, providing a conceptual framework for investigating the nanoscale organization and transient behavior of mitochondria–ER contact sites.

Despite its advantages, STED microscopy still presents notable challenges for mitochondrial imaging, as the high-intensity laser exposure can cause photodamage and artificially alter mitochondrial morphology and function (Wäldchen et al., 2015). These challenges necessitate careful optimization of imaging parameters and the use of specialized fluorophores to mitigate damage while maintaining resolution. In this context, advanced approaches such as Tau-STED (Alvarez et al., 2021) and fluorescence lifetime-encoding strategies have been shown to substantially reduce the required STED depletion power while preserving STED-level resolution. Tau-STED uses fluorescence lifetime information to temporally distinguish between undepleted and depleted emission, enabling effective resolution enhancement at a fraction of the depletion power required in conventional STED (Alvarez et al., 2021). Similarly, lifetime-based encoding and detection schemes such as gated STED, SPLIT, and phasor-based lifetime filtering improve signal separation and contrast, thereby minimizing photobleaching and phototoxicity during high-resolution imaging (Alvarez et al., 2021; Vicidomini et al., 2011; Moffitt et al., 2011; Lanzanò et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2018)

Single-Molecule Localization Microscopy (SMLM)

SMLM enables the tracking of fluorescent molecules and their trajectories over time by sequentially imaging multiple on/off cycles (“blinking”) of sparsely activated, non-overlapping fluorophores (Lelek et al., 2021). Stochastic blinking isolates single emitters in time, enabling precise localization of each emitter. SMLM techniques, including photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM) and stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM), achieve super-resolution by precisely localizing individual fluorescent molecules over numerous activation-deactivation cycles (Betzig et al., 2006; Rust et al., 2006). These ingenious techniques have provided unprecedented insights into the nanoscale organization of mitochondrial proteins.

Several SMLM strategies, along with specialized fluorescent probes and antibodies, have enabled detailed study of mitochondrial components, including the IMM, outer OMM, and mitochondria-associated membranes (MAM) (Jolivet and Bertolin, 2025; Landoni et al., 2024). For example, STORM was used to reveal distinct cluster arrangements of IMM proteins and to detect changes in the organization of complex IV subunits in cells lacking specific mitochondrial chaperones (Palmer et al., 2021). Similarly, direct STORM (dSTORM) imaging was used to visualize the spatial organization of F0F1-ATP synthase and uncoupling protein 4 (UCP4), which regulates mitochondrial membrane potential (Klotzsch et al., 2015). This study found that UCP4 and F0F1-ATP synthase are spatially separated within the IMM, thereby eliminating proton competition between them.

Although PALM and STORM offer exceptional spatial resolution, live-cell mitochondrial imaging using these techniques remains challenging due to long acquisition times and high-intensity illumination, which can perturb mitochondrial function (Jakobs et al., 2020). Thus, the utility of PALM and STORM for visualizing mitochondrial dynamics was initially limited. H owever, 0.8-1 second temporal resolution has now been achieved using compressed sensing STORM with noise-correction methods, which allows for a fluorophore density that is ten times higher than that allowed in conventional methods. In compressed sensing, a mathematical approach that allows reconstruction of a super-resolution image from a few data points using smart algorithms to fill in the missing information, a sparse signal can be recovered from highly noisy or incomplete data (Zhu et al., 2012). This approach allows for the capture of rapid events, such as mitochondrial tubulation (Chen et al, 2020). In addition, the use of novel probes, such as vicinal dithiol protein (VDP)-targeting fluorophores, which exhibit spontaneous, reversible blinking under red excitation without requiring specialized imaging buffers or thiol additives, enables “buffer-free” STORM imaging (Zhang et al., 2023; Samanta, 2019). Although these probes and buffer-free STORM workflows have not yet been broadly applied to mitochondrial imaging, their properties make them well-suited for future studies. Buffer-free STORM reduces toxicity and simplifies imaging conditions, which would be advantageous for examining dynamic mitochondrial behaviors in live cells. Some fluorescent arsenical dyes show high specificity toward VDPs, which contain two adjacent cysteine residues that form a specific chemical handle for selective labeling, through covalent arsenic–thiol linkages, enabling selective in situ labeling and high-resolution STORM imaging (Griffin et al., 1998; Hoffmann et al., 2010; Shen et al., 2013). These developments offer advantages over STED microscopy, including easier multicolor imaging, reduced phototoxicity, and quantitative analysis of protein numbers and clustering (Chen et al., 2020; Nicovich et al., 2017).

Structured illumination microscopy (SIM)

SIM enhances resolution through patterned illumination and computational reconstruction, offering a two-fold improvement over conventional microscopy. Structured illumination refines resolution by transforming unresolvable fine details into visible, low-resolution patterns called moiré fringes, making it easier to detect tiny, hard-to-see structures. In SIM, resolution is improved by illuminating the sample with fine patterns of light that generate detectable interference patterns, allowing spatial information beyond the diffraction limit to be computationally recovered (Gustafsson, 2005). In 3D SIM, the incorporation of a transmission phase grating (an optical element with fine, evenly spaced lines that splits incoming light into several beams) into the illumination pathway diffracts a collimated beam (in which light rays travel in parallel, maintaining a narrow focused path) into three distinct illumination beams directed at one sample, where their interference generates a 3D structured illumination pattern essential for achieving enhanced spatial resolution (Shao et al., 2011).

SIM offers a balance between resolution enhancement and live-cell compatibility and supports multicolor imaging, making it a valuable tool for studying dynamic mitochondrial processes (Chen et al., 2023). It provides more modest resolution than other super-resolution methods, achieving ∼100 nm lateral resolution compared to the 20-50 nm resolution possible with STED, STORM, or PALM. However, unlike STED, which requires high-intensity laser illumination, and STORM and PALM, which rely on photo-switchable fluorophores and long acquisition times, SIM is compatible with conventional fluorophores and offers faster imaging. Opstad et al., 2018; Markwirth et al., 2012; Schermelleh et al., 2017

Two functionally and mechanistically distinct types of mitochondrial fission were recently discovered using SIM (Kleele et al., 2021). Live-cell 3D-SIM was used to investigate the dynamics of mitochondrial DNA nucleoids during cell division, revealing that they undergo coordinated movements and segregation to ensure equal distribution between daughter cells – providing new insights into mitochondrial genome inheritance (Lewis et al., 2016). 3D SIM has also been used to visualize the formation under metabolic stress of mitochondrial-derived vesicles (MDVs) (Opstad et al., 2022; Opstad et al., 2022), which are dynamic small (50-100 nm) vesicles that support mitochondrial quality control, immune signaling and communication by delivering selective mitochondrial cargo to peroxisomes, late endosomes, lysosomes and phagosomes, with roles in aging, heart disease and neurodegeneration (König and McBride, 2024).

Overall, these applications demonstrate that SIM provides a powerful combination of enhanced resolution, low phototoxicity, and rapid imaging, well-suited for capturing fast, transient mitochondrial events. As the need for super-resolution tools continues to grow, SIM’s unique balance of performance and compatibility makes it an indispensable tool for dissecting mitochondrial structure, dynamics, and function in living cells.

Minimal Emission Fluxes (MINFLUX)

MINFLUX (Balzarotti et al., 2017) is a single-molecule localization technique that localizes individual fluorescent molecules with nanometer precision by stochastically activating and imaging sparse subsets of fluorophores over time. Like STED, MINFLUX employs a ring-shaped light; however, MINFLUX excites fluorophores within the ring region while leaving the center unaffected, determining the position of emitters by locating where fluorescence emission is minimized and mitigating photobleaching and phototoxicity. Significant advantages of MINFLUX include its ability to operate with brief exposure times, thereby collecting fewer photons and enabling sub-millisecond temporal resolution, as well as achieving sub-5 nm spatial resolution by analyzing the position of minimal emission flux. DNA-PAINT MINFLUX nanoscopy was recently employed to precisely localize three mitochondrial target proteins across three color channels, achieving 3D localization precision of approximately 5.4 nm laterally and 3.1 nm axially (Ostersehlt et al., 2022)

Minimal Stimulated Emission Depletion (MINSTED)

MINSTED, like MINFLUX, iteratively localizes molecules by collecting photon information from each imaged position (Weber et al., 2021b). This technique leverages STED’s laser illumination, shifting the ring-shaped suppression light and central excitation light in tandem. As the ring’s center approaches a fluorescent molecule, STED suppression weakens, increasing fluorescence emission and pinpointing the molecule’s location at the position with the highest photon count. MINSTED demonstrates exceptional precision, achieving resolutions as low as 4.7 Å while measuring individual molecule positions. Notably, 2D MINSTED data revealed the nanoscale distribution of MIC60, a core component of the mitochondrial contact site and cristae-organizing system (MICOS) complex (Weber et al., 2021b). An integral membrane protein located in the inner mitochondrial membrane, MIC60 plays a crucial role in organizing cristae architecture and maintaining the structure of crista junctions (Van Laar et al., 2019), narrow tubular openings (typically 28-30 nm in diameter) that connect cristae to the IBM.

EM in Mitochondrial Research

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)

TEM has served as a foundational tool in mitochondrial ultrastructural analysis since the 1950s (Palade 1952). TEM transmits a focused electron beam through ultrathin sections of fixed and stained biological specimens, producing high-resolution images by differentially scattering electrons within cellular components. This allows detailed visualization of mitochondrial architecture at the nanoscale (Palade 1952). Advancements in sample preparation techniques, including high-pressure freezing and freeze-substitution, have markedly improved preservation of mitochondrial ultrastructure for TEM analysis (McDonald and Auer, 2006). These cryo-fixation methods minimize artifacts typically introduced by chemical fixation and dehydration, enabling more faithful representations of mitochondrial morphology (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. TEM and vEM reveal mitochondrial ultrastructure and organelle interactions.

Fig. 2

(A) Representative 2D transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of mitochondria–endoplasmic reticulum contact sites (MERCS) in primary myoblasts shown across increasing magnifications (1K, 2.5K, 5K, 8K, 15K, and 20K). The top row displays raw, unaltered TEM images. The bottom row shows the same images with superimposed segmentations highlighting mitochondria (dark blue), cristae (light blue), and endoplasmic reticulum (green), illustrating the progressive resolution of cristae architecture and MERCS with increasing magnification.

(B) Representative 2D TEM images of MERCS in primary myoblasts following MFN2 deletion, displayed at identical magnifications (1K–20K). Loss of MFN2 is associated with altered mitochondrial morphology, disrupted cristae organization, and changes in mitochondria–ER juxtaposition compared with control cells.

(C–E) 2D TEM images of wild-type Drosophila melanogaster skeletal muscle (mito-GFP, WT118) illustrating overall muscle ultrastructure, mitochondrial organization, cristae morphology, and MERCS at progressively higher magnifications.

(F–H) Corresponding 2D TEM images from Marf (Drosophila MFN homolog) knockdown (KD) skeletal muscle. Marf depletion results in pronounced alterations in mitochondrial size and shape, disrupted cristae architecture, abnormal mitochondria–ER contacts, and accumulation of additional organelles, including lysosomes and glycogen deposits (arrowheads), indicative of altered metabolic and quality-control states. Scale bars: 10 μm (C, F); 2 μm (D, G); 0.5 μm (E, H).

(I) 3D electron microscopy reconstruction of mitochondrial inner membrane architecture, highlighting cristae organization. Individual mitochondria are rendered to visualize cristae morphology and spatial complexity at submicron resolution (scale ∼0.5–1 μm). This panel illustrates cristae form derived from high-resolution volumetric EM datasets.

(J) Serial block-face scanning electron microscopy (SBF-SEM; vEM) of mouse hypothalamic tissue. Top: Representative serial EM sections from 3-month-old (left) and 2-year-old (right) mice. Bottom: Corresponding 3D reconstructions of mitochondria (pink) and endoplasmic reticulum (green) within axons (axon interior, red), revealing age-dependent remodeling of mitochondrial morphology, ER distribution, and mitochondria–ER interactions within neuronal processes.

The power of high-resolution TEM for revealing structure-function relationships in mitochondria is exemplified by the work of Cogliati and colleagues, who used TEM to demonstrate that OPA1-dependent cristae remodeling influences the assembly and stability of respiratory super complexes, providing a mechanistic link between mitochondrial ultrastructure and bioenergetic efficiency (Cogliati et al., 2013). TEM has also produced insights into how MERCs are organized and physically interact with the endoplasmic reticulum via known tethering proteins (Fig. 2A-H). For example, TEM was used in conjunction with the manipulation of the MERC-associated protein mitofusin-2 (MFN2), which is affected in several neurological diseases, to investigate how the structural and functional organization of MERCs is altered under pathophysiological conditions (Han et al., 2021). TEM has also provided detailed ultrastructural views of MDVs, particularly in models of mitochondrial damage (Cadete et al., 2016). Furthermore, immunogold labelling in TEM allows precise localization of specific proteins within mitochondrial sub-compartments (Vogel et al., 2006). Using antibody-conjugated gold particles, proteins such as mitofusin-1 (MFN1) (Fig. 3A–B) and the mitochondrial import receptor subunit TOM20 (Fig. 3C) can be clearly identified on the outer mitochondrial membrane.

Fig. 3. Immunogold EM and CLEM for precise localization of mitochondrial proteins.

Fig. 3

(A-B) Representative electron micrographs of mitochondria showing MFN-1 immunogold labeling from mouse myotubes. MFN-1 is detected as electron-dense black gold particles (MFN-1–positive puncta). MFN-1 labeling is not uniformly distributed across all mitochondrial profiles but is detectable in the majority of mitochondria, particularly at lower magnifications. Mitochondria undergoing fusion, or having recently undergone fusion, display an increased density of MFN-1–positive puncta. Arrows highlight concentrated gold particle clusters, indicating regions of high MFN-1 protein density. Scale bars A: 0.2 μm; B: 200 nm. (C) Immunogold labelling of TOM20 showing its localization in HeLa cells using Tokuyasu cryo-sectioning. Gold particles (10 nm) specifically mark the mitochondrial outer membrane (arrows). Scale bar: 5μm. (D) Correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM) analysis of the cellular distribution of CDK1 in HeLa cells. Red fluorescence signals indicate regions of elevated CDK1 concentration at mitochondria (arrows indicate sites of correlation between fluorescent signals and corresponding ultrastructural features). Blue nuclear staining provides cellular context. Scale bar: 5 μm.

Despite these strengths, TEM has several key limitations. Sample preparation can introduce artifacts, particularly in membrane structures (Winey et al., 2014b). Furthermore, TEM images are inherently two-dimensional, making it challenging to interpret complex three-dimensional structures such as mitochondrial networks using this method (Holcomb et al., 2013; Neikirk et al., 2023). To mitigate these issues and ensure reliable quantification, standardized protocols for sample preparation, image acquisition, and analysis are crucial. Stereological methods that provide unbiased 3D estimates from 2D TEM images (Fig. 2), although more time-consuming, offer advantages over simple 2D analysis (Duranova et al., 2020). Additionally, complementary 3D EM techniques (e.g., serial block-face scanning EM, discussed further below) can provide a more comprehensive view of cellular ultrastructure (Fig.2I) (Marshall et al., 2023c).

Electron Tomography (ET)

ET extends TEM’s capabilities by reconstructing 3D volumes from a series of tilted 2D projections. In ET, TEM images are collected as the sample is tilted through a range of angles (typically ± 60-70 °); these images are then aligned and computationally reconstructed to create a 3D volume (tomogram) that can achieve resolutions of 4-6 nm. (Beck and Baumeister, 2016). ET has been used to study mitochondrial ultrastructure since the late 1990s and produced significant advancements in understanding mitochondrial structure and function in the 2000s (Frey and Mannella, 2000; Mannella, 2006).

ET has provided crucial insights into mitochondrial architecture. For example, it helped show that cristae are not simple invaginations of the IMM but rather complex, interconnected structures with diverse morphologies (Mannella et al., 1994; Perkins et al., 1997). Additionally, ET enabled visualization of cristae junctions and demonstrated how these structures change under different physiological conditions (Perkins et al., 1997). The improved spatial resolution of ET also allowed for MDV formation to be clearly distinguished from mitochondrial fusion/fission events (Cadete et al., 2016).

More recently, cryoelectron tomography (also called electron cryotomography; cryo-ET) has become a powerful tool for studying mitochondrial ultrastructure in a near-native state. Cryo-ET, which flash-freezes samples to preserve their native structure without chemical fixation or staining, has provided unprecedented views of mitochondrial protein complexes in situ, including the organization of ATP synthase dimers along cristae edges (Davies et al., 2012). With a resolution of 1–2 nm, cryo-ET has been instrumental in defining the organization of the cristae membrane and mapping the localization of respiratory chain complexes (Dudkina et al., 2011). Cryo-ET employed in the ciliate Paramecium tatraurelia, revealed the assembly of ATP synthase dimers into helical structures around the outer perimeter of twisted tubular cristae, demonstrating that ATP synthase dimer assemblies shape cristae morphology (Mühleip et al., 2016; Blum et al., 2019). Furthermore, cryo-ET combined with focused ion beam milling (discussed further below) has enabled imaging of mitochondria in their cellular context, providing insights into their interactions with other cellular structures (Wagner et al., 2020).

These evolving ET techniques continue to push the boundaries of our understanding of mitochondrial structure and function. However, ET is also not without limitations as its limited tilt range can cause an artifact called the ‘missing wedge’ that leads to the artificial elongation of structures and uneven or anisotropic resolution in the reconstructed volume (Zhai et al., 2020). For mitochondria, this artifact can obscure small features such as crista junctions or membrane contact sites and can artificially elongate tubular structures, potentially leading to misinterpretation of their true morphology. Additionally, the sample thickness in ET is typically restricted to less than 500 nm, which can make studying entire mitochondria or mitochondrial networks in situ challenging (Rigort et al., 2012). Nonetheless, ET remains a prominent tool in mitochondrial research, providing crucial 3D insights into mitochondrial ultrastructure and function.

Volume EM (vEM) in Mitochondria Research

Three-dimensional (3D) EM techniques, often collectively referred to as vEM, have greatly expanded mitochondrial research by enabling the reconstruction of organellar networks and spatial relationships within cells (Baena et al., 2021; Hinton et al., 2023; Katti et al., 2022a). Two key methods – focused ion beam scanning EM (FIB-SEM) and serial block-face scanning EM (SBF-SEM) – are particularly notable for generating high-resolution volumetric data on mitochondrial ultrastructure (Fig. 2I) (Marshall et al., 2023a; Faitg et al., 2025), providing even deeper insights into mitochondrial dynamics, morphology, and interactions with other cellular structures.

FIB-SEM

FIB-SEM combines the high-resolution imaging capabilities of scanning EM with precision milling using a focused ion beam, enabling the sequential removal of thin layers (typically 5-10 nm) from a sample. The exposed surfaces are imaged in detail, and the resulting images can be computationally reconstructed into a 3D volume. With resolutions comparable to TEM (5-10 nm), FIB-SEM enables visualization of larger volumes, typically up to several hundred cubic micrometers (Baena et al., 2021; Knott et al., 2008).

FIB-SEM’s ability to mill samples in situ eliminates the need for ultrathin sectioning, reducing artifacts associated with mechanical sectioning. This capability has provided insights into the spatial relationships between mitochondria and other structures within their native cellular context, such as between mitochondria and myofilaments in striated muscle cells (Katti et al., 2022b). FIB-SEM was used to create a 3D reconstruction of neural tissue, revealing the heterogeneity of mitochondrial morphology and distribution in different neuronal compartments (Kasthuri et al., 2015). Additionally, FIB-SEM has been instrumental in mitochondrial disease research. In an analysis of skeletal muscle fibers from individuals with mitochondrial DNA mutations associated with mitochondrial myopathy, 3D FIB-SEM reconstructions revealed extensive mitochondrial network remodeling, including the formation of elongated mitochondrial nanotunnels, suggesting potential compensatory mechanisms in response to stress caused by mitochondrial diseases (Vincent et al., 2016).

FIB-SEM has limitations: f or example, the process of sequentially removing sample material is destructive, meaning that once imaged, samples cannot be revisited. The technique is also time-consuming and computationally intensive, especially for imaging large volumes. Moreover, ion beam damage can introduce artifacts, particularly in beam-sensitive biological specimens, such as resin-embedded or cryo-preserved samples, lipid-rich membranes, and protein-dense organelles, where ion milling can cause local heating, mass loss, amorphization, and membrane thinning (Hoffman et al., 2020). Advancements in cryo-FIB-SEM, which enable imaging of samples in a near-native, hydrated state, aim to mitigate some of these issues (Schertel et al., 2013).

SBF-SEM

SBF-SEM is another EM technique that generates high-resolution 3D reconstructions of cellular structures, similar to FIB-SEM, but with a different sample sectioning approach (Crabtree et al., 2024; Marshall et al., 2023c). In SBF-SEM, a resin-embedded sample is imaged in an SEM chamber, and after each imaging cycle, an ultramicrotome slices thin layers (typically 25-100 nm thick) from the sample surface (Marshall et al., 2023c). These successive layers are imaged and then reconstructed into a 3D volume. SBF-SEM achieves lateral resolutions of 10-20 nm and can image volumes up to several hundred cubic micrometers.

SBF-SEM is particularly useful for studying mitochondrial morphology and distribution across different cell types and tissues (Fig. 2 I, J). For example, SBF-SEM was used to investigate changes in mitochondrial morphology and function associated with aging or loss of the MICOS complex in muscles and cardiac tissues (Vue et al., 2023). SBF-SEM has been used to generate detailed 3D reconstructions of mitochondrial networks in muscle, revealing intricate connections between mitochondria and the sarcoplasmic reticulum in human skeletal muscle fibers (Hinton et al., 2024) and highlighting an intricate mitochondrial network with extensive inter-mitochondrial junctions in cardiac muscle (Pinali et al., 2013). These findings suggest that the spatial organization of mitochondria underpins functional coupling in muscle energy metabolism by supporting efficient energy transfer within muscle cells, allowing ATP production to match local metabolic demand.

Combining SBF-SEM with genetic and biochemical analyses has also proven beneficial in studying mitochondrial behavior in disease states. For instance, as discussed above, Vincent and colleagues employed both FIB-SEM and SBF-SEM to reveal previously unrecognized patterns of mitochondrial network remodeling in individuals with mitochondrial DNA disorders (Vincent et al., 2016), demonstrating the potential of these techniques to advance our understanding of mitochondrial diseases.

Despite its advantages, SBF-SEM also has limitations. Compared to FIB-SEM, its z-axis resolution is lower because comparatively thicker sections are removed during imaging. Additionally, like FIB-SEM, it is a destructive technique, and the time required for large-volume acquisitions can be substantial. Furthermore, aspects of sample preparation, particularly heavy metal staining and resin embedding, can introduce artifacts that must be considered during data interpretation (Titze and Genoud, 2016).

Correlative light and EM (CLEM) in Mitochondrial Research

CLEM combines the strengths of fluorescence microscopy with the ultrastructural resolution of EM, enabling the correlation of fluorescently labeled cellular processes captured either in live cells or after fixation with high-resolution EM imaging of the same structures (Marshall et al., 2023c). An important advantage of CLEM is its compatibility with advanced imaging modalities, including FIB-SEM, TEM, total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy (see Box 1), cryo-EM, SBF-SEM, STED, and SIM (Marshall et al., 2023b). Additionally, CLEM can be combined with software that localizes and correlates ultrastructural components with specific proteins or structures (Fig. 3D), providing detailed insights into their interactions (Kobayashi et al., 2016; Schellenberger et al., 2014).

A major challenge in CLEM is precisely correlating light and EM data. This challenge was addressed by using fluorescent fiducial markers visible under both light microscopy and EM, which provide a reliable coordinate system that allows accurate mapping of positions from fluorescence microscopy images to EM images with a correlation precision of tens of nanometers (Kukulski et al., 2011). This approach has opened new possibilities for studying ultrastructures associated with dynamic cellular processes. However, fiducial markers can interfere with cellular processes, necessitating careful control experiments. The remaining challenge for the application of CLEM in mitochondrial research lies in maintaining sample integrity during the transition from live-cell imaging to EM preparation, underscoring the need for rapid, gentle fixation protocols (Karreman et al., 2016; Kolotuev et al., 2009). As in TEM, chemical fixation methods can introduce artifacts (Winey et al., 2014a); however, improvements in freeze-substitution and embedding protocols that work well for both fluorescence microscopy and TEM, in turn benefiting correlative imaging techniques, have been developed (Karreman et al., 2012). This method significantly improved preservation of mitochondrial ultrastructure while maintaining fluorescence signals, although some unavoidable structural alterations, such as subtle membrane shrinkage, cristae distortion, and partial lipid extraction, remained. Such effects can alter the apparent shape or spacing of mitochondrial membranes, complicating quantitative ultrastructural analysis.

Despite these challenges, CLEM has emerged as a powerful tool, particularly for studying dynamic processes such as mitochondrial fission, fusion, and mitophagy (Cornelissen et al., 2018; Godtliebsen et al., 2023; Jung et al., 2020; Li et al., 2021; Munson et al., 2021; Zhen et al., 2020). For example, CLEM was recently employed to investigate ultrastructural changes associated with mitochondrial fission, which were shown to be coordinated by the combined roles of Mitofusin/Atg44 and dynamin-related protein/Dnm1 (Furukawa et al., 2024). Similarly, CLEM was used in SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells to track mitophagy induced by the mitophagy modulator propionic acid to study its potential mechanisms in neurodegenerative diseases (Jung et al., 2020). However, it should be noted that the delay between live-cell imaging and sample fixation (approximately 5-10 seconds) can still miss rapid structural changes (Fermie et al., 2018; Kukulski et al., 2011) such as those that might occur during fission, fusion, and mitophagy.

Cryo-CLEM

Compared with CLEM, cryo-CLEM minimizes chemical fixation and dehydration artifacts, providing a more accurate representation of cellular structures. Schellenberger and colleagues pioneered cryo-CLEM by developing a workflow to study the trafficking of fluorescent particles within cells (Schellenberger et al., 2014). This technique was applied to correlate super-resolution fluorescence microscopy of mtDNA with cryo-ET, revealing the native organization of nucleoids within mitochondrial ultrastructure and demonstrating the potential of cryo-CLEM to provide molecular-resolution insights into mitochondrial biology (Kukat et al., 2011; Jakobs & Wurm, 2014; Stephan et al., 2019). However, technical challenges remain, such as maintaining vitreous ice during fluorescence imaging and the limited penetration depth of cryo-ET. (Last et al., 2023; Lucić et al., 2005)

A cryo-CLEM approach compatible with focused ion beam milling that allows targeted imaging of specific cellular regions identified by fluorescence microscopy was recently developed, thereby making cryo-CLEM applicable to thicker cellular specimens (DAM et al., 2021; Hsieh et al., 2014). Using this approach, a study of MERCs in yeast (referred to as ER-mitochondria encounter structures, ERMES) resolved the internal supramolecular architecture of the lipid transfer machinery at ERMES, unveiling lipid flux mechanisms in eukaryotic cells (Wozny et al., 2023). The further integration of CLEM with other advanced imaging techniques holds promise for future mitochondrial research. For instance, cryo-CLEM was combined with cryo-focused ion beam milling and cryo-ET to study mitochondrial cristae remodeling during apoptosis (Ader et al., 2019). Despite these advancements, the complexity of this technique limits its throughput and constrains its application to specialized research facilities, underscoring the need for further methodological refinement and technological developments to improve accessibility.

Volume Correlated Light and EM (vCLEM) in mitochondrial research

Volume-CLEM or vCLEM integrates the strengths of CLEM with vEM techniques to investigate cellular physiology at high-resolution ultrastructural detail throughout entire cell volumes (Peddie et al., 2017). This approach enables 3D visualization of protein–ultrastructure relationships and cellular connectomics, allowing researchers to identify complex architectures and interactions within the densely packed intracellular environment (Peddie et al. 2017; Hoffman et al. 2020). This makes vCLEM especially valuable for assessing rare and transient contacts between the mitochondrial membrane and the ER (Jung and Mun, 2019), lysosomes, and possibly other organelles. Additionally, vCLEM has been used to visualize transient changes in mitochondrial morphology due to loss of mitochondrial membrane potential and serves as an important tool for directly correlating these changes with cellular dysfunction (Miyazono et al., 2018). The minutiae of methodology for vCLEM vary depending on imaging goals, but it is applicable across different formats and customizable. Current literature suggests that the use of vCLEM would be ideal for visualizing fine details of transient but integral cell-cell connections and for understanding the correlative value and consequences of changes to a capricious mitochondrial environment.

Expansion Microscopy i n Mitochondrial Research

Expansion microscopy (ExM) has rapidly become a transformative technique for investigating mitochondrial ultrastructure and protein organization at nanoscale resolution. By physically expanding biological specimens while preserving their relative spatial organization, ExM enables imaging nanoscale structures with conventional microscopes, overcoming the diffraction limit of light without the need for advanced super-resolution systems (Chen et al., 2015; Humpfer et al., 2024; Wassie et al., 2019). ExM is thus particularly relevant for mitochondrial research, where understanding the intricate details of cristae and protein distributions is crucial for comprehending mitochondrial function and dysfunction (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4. Nanoscale organization of TOM20 clusters revealed by TR-Expansion Microscopy.

Fig. 4

Maximum-intensity projection of TOM20 (red) across the mitochondrial network visualized by expansion microscopy. Physical expansion of the specimen (8.5×) enhances spatial resolution, revealing the detailed organization and clustering of TOM20 along individual mitochondria. The nucleus is labeled with Hoechst (cyan). Dashed boxes indicate regions shown as higher-magnification inset images on the right. Images were acquired using a THUNDER imager with a 40× objective. Scale bar, 5 µm (colored overview image); 1 µm (inset images), adjusted for the 8.5× expansion factor.

ExM works by embedding samples in a swellable polymer, digesting cellular components to facilitate expansion, and then imaging the expanded samples at higher resolution using standard microscopes. Expansion factors typically range from 4x to 10x (Chen et al., 2015; Chozinski et al., 2016; Humpfer et al., 2024; Wassie et al., 2019). Methodological variants, such as protein retention ExM (proExM), in which proteins are anchored to the swellable gel, allow for higher-fidelity imaging of mitochondrial structures (Tillberg et al., 2016). Furthermore, ultrastructure ExM (U-ExM), developed by Gambarotto and colleagues, further refined this approach, achieving improved protein retention and uniform isotropic expansion, making it an ideal tool for mitochondrial studies (Gambarotto et al., 2019a). A key consideration when evaluating ExM approaches is the choice of anchoring chemistry. For example, proExM primarily relies on pre-expansion labelling, in which proteins are anchored to the polymer using Acryloyl-X (AcX), although post-expansion antibody labeling is possible under modified homogenization conditions. In contrast, techniques such as fluorescent labeling assisted by stimulated hydrolysis (FLASH) enable systematic post-expansion labeling of mitochondrial proteins, broadening the scope of ExM applications. (Tillberg et al., 2016; Di Gallo et al., 2025)

ExM and its variations have provided exciting insights into mitochondrial ultrastructure. Combining ExM with STED microscopy (ExSTED) achieved an effective resolution of ∼15 nm, revealing fine-scale variations in cristae morphology that correspond to distinct mitochondrial metabolic states (Gao M et al., 2021). Similarly, ExM was used to visualize the mitochondrial internal structure and characterize mitochondrial cristae morphology by labelling the intermembrane space (Kunz et al., 2020). The same approach also enables nanoscale mapping of multiple mitochondrial proteins relative to cristae organization in fixed cells (Kunz et al., 2020). Furthermore, a novel ExM protocol, termed Ten-fold Robust Expansion Microscopy (TREx), which enables a ten-fold expansion of both thick tissues and cultured cells, allows ultrastructural detailing of subcellular protein localization by combining antibody labelling with small-molecule stains to label total protein and membranes (Damstra et al., 2023). The integration of ExM with other advanced microscopy techniques, such as single-molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) (Zwettler et al., 2020), continues to push the boundaries of mitochondrial research, making ExM a powerful tool for both structural and functional investigations. Recently, an iterative ultrastructure expansion microscopy (U-ExM) protocol that enables expansion up to 26X was developed. U-ExM coupled with cryofixation was able to resolve individual cristae and observe a crista spacing of about 85 nm (Gambarotto et al., 2019; Louvel et al., 202 3).

Conclusions

Microscopy continues to drive advances in mitochondrial research, revealing intricate structural details and critical functional roles of these organelles within cellular systems. Technological innovations, from initial EM observations to contemporary breakthroughs in super-resolution imaging, ET, and ExM, have fundamentally transformed our understanding of mitochondrial dynamics, mitochondria-organelle interactions, and bioenergetic processes. Today, integrating advanced techniques, including cryo-FIB-SEM and in situ cryo-ET, enables structural analysis of mitochondria within near-native cellular environments, and live-cell super-resolution microscopy facilitates real-time visualization of mitochondrial processes at molecular resolution, effectively bridging structure-function relationships. Looking ahead, machine learning approaches are expected to accelerate discovery by supporting automated analysis of complex imaging datasets. Such methods may enable robust segmentation of mitochondrial networks in challenging imaging conditions and provide new avenues for classifying dynamic fusion and fission events alongside morphology changes linked to mitochondrial function.

Despite these remarkable achievements, advanced mitochondrial imaging still faces critical constraints, including the complexity of multidimensional data arising from fusion-fission dynamics, phototoxicity-induced effects on membrane potential that impact measurements using fluorescent dyes, and systematic imaging artifacts that affect network topology analysis. Infrastructure requirements, the need for access to specialized facilities, and substantial costs limit the widespread adoption of these techniques across research institutions. Addressing these methodological limitations requires systematic interdisciplinary collaboration: physicists to optimize adaptive optics for mitochondrial morphologies, computer scientists to develop automated segmentation algorithms for organelle networks, and chemists to engineer photostable mitochondria-targeted probes with reduced cellular toxicity. By integrating strategic expertise, researchers can achieve greater resolution in the study of mitochondrial structure-function relationships, facilitating transformative discoveries in cellular bioenergetics and mechanisms of metabolic disorders that will advance our fundamental understanding of organelle biology and disease pathogenesis.

Box 1. Fluorescence microscopy methods for assessing mitochondrial structure-function: advantages and disadvantages.

Conventional Fluorescence Techniques

Widefield Fluorescence Microscopy (∼200 nm lateral/∼600 nm axial) utilizes uniform specimen illumination with broad emission collection and enables rapid acquisition with minimal photodamage, facilitating long-term monitoring of mitochondrial morphology, membrane potential, and distribution, although it is limited by out-of-focus signal in thick samples (Jakobs et al., 2020; Loew et al., 1993)

Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) (∼180 nm lateral/∼500 nm axial) employs point-scanning with pinhole apertures to reject out-of-focus light, providing superior optical sectioning for reconstruction of three-dimensional mitochondrial networks (Collins, 2002; Katti et al., 2022a). CLSM offers enhanced contrast but introduces increased photodamage and reduced temporal resolution.

Spinning Disk Confocal Microscopy (∼200 nm lateral/∼500 nm axial) uses parallel scanning through multiple pinholes on a rapidly rotating disk, enabling simultaneous multi-point illumination and detection (Nakano et al., 2002). A nipkow spinning-disk confocal system was employed to visualize mitochondrial dynamics in real time, which enabled the high-speed imaging of fluorescent proteins in individual mitochondria (Liu et al., 2009).

Multiphoton Microscopy (∼300 nm lateral/∼800 nm axial) excites via simultaneous absorption of multiple lower-energy photons, confining excitation to the focal plane. It provides superior tissue penetration (up to 1 mm) with reduced phototoxicity, enabling visualization of mitochondria in intact tissues and assessment of metabolic activity through endogenous fluorophores. (Helmchen and Denk, 2005; Zipfel et al., 2003).

Super-Resolution Techniques

Stimulated Emission Depletion (STED) Microscopy (∼30-80 nm lateral/∼500 nm axial) employs a donut-shaped depletion beam to selectively deactivate fluorophores at the periphery of the excitation focus, enabling direct optical super-resolution visualization of nanoscale protein distributions, cristae structure, and nucleoid organization, although it requires specialized fluorophores and higher illumination intensities. (Jakobs et al., 2020; Stephan et al., 2019a)

Single-Molecule Localization Microscopy (PALM/STORM) (∼10-30 nm lateral/∼50 nm axial) achieves super-resolution by sequentially activating, localizing, and bleaching sparse subsets of fluorophores. These methods provide the highest resolution among fluorescence microscopy techniques with quantitative capabilities for precise protein mapping and nucleoid structure analysis, but require specialized probes and extended acquisition times. (Appelhans et al., 2012; Betzig et al., 2006; Huang et al., 2008; Rust et al., 2006)

Structured Illumination Microscopy (SIM) (∼100 nm lateral, ∼300 nm axial) uses patterned illumination and computational reconstruction to extract high-frequency spatial information. SIM offers an optimal balance between spatial and temporal resolution for visualizing cristae dynamics and fusion-fission events in living mitochondria. (Huang et al.,2018)

Image Scanning Microscopy (Airyscan) (∼140 nm lateral/∼400 nm axial) captures the complete Airy disk pattern using a detector array with computational reassignment of pixels, providing moderate resolution enhancement with significantly improved signal-to-noise ratio and reduced illumination requirements for extended imaging of mitochondria (Kolossov et al., 2018).

Functional Techniques

Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence (TIRF) Microscopy (∼200 nm lateral/∼50-100 nm axial) selectively excites a thin (∼100 nm) region adjacent to the coverslip using an evanescent wave. TIRF offers a superior signal-to-noise ratio for visualization of mitochondria-membrane interactions and early mitophagy events, although its range limits imaging to mitochondria at the cell periphery (Axelrod, 2001; Kudalkar., et al 2016)

Light Sheet Fluorescence Microscopy (∼300-500 nm lateral/∼1 μm axial) uses orthogonal illumination with a thin sheet of light and wide-field detection, dramatically reducing phototoxicity while enabling rapid volumetric acquisition, enabling extended imaging of mitochondrial dynamics in developing embryos and large specimens. (Power and Huisken, 2017)

Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) Microscopy (∼200-250 nm lateral/∼500-700 nm axial) detects energy transfer between donor and acceptor fluorophores in close proximity (1-10 nm). FRET can reveal molecular interactions and conformational changes within mitochondrial proteins, providing functional information beyond structural data. (Sun et al., 2013; Wallrabe and Periasamy, 2005)

Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Microscopy (FLIM) (∼200-250 nm lateral/∼500-700 nm axial) measures the lifetime of excited fluorophore states rather than intensity, allowing concentration-independent assessment of mitochondrial metabolic state, pH, and membrane properties through environment-sensitive lifetime measurements. (Skala et al., 2007; Van Munster & Gadella, 2005)

Photobleaching Techniques (Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching, FRAP; Fluorescence Loss In Photobleaching, FLIP) (∼200-250 nm lateral) analyze fluorescence recovery (FRAP) or loss (FLIP) patterns following controlled photobleaching. These methods enable quantitative assessment of protein diffusion rates, membrane fluidity and matrix connectivity within mitochondria (Lippincott-Schwartz et al., 2001; Reits and Neefjes, 2001; Simula & Campello, 2018; Jakobs S. 2006 and Partikian et al., 1998).

Acknowledgements

We extend our sincere gratitude to Dr. Ganesh Kadasoor, Senior Manager (Applications) at Evident Scientific India Ltd., Bangalore, for his generous contribution of wide-field and super-resolution microscopy images that significantly enhanced the visual documentation presented in this review. We acknowledge all contributing authors and laboratory members for their valuable scientific discussions, critical insights, and constructive feedback throughout the manuscript development process. We particularly thank Dr. Madhangi Mani for her comprehensive review of this article. We thank Dr. Junhui Sun and Dr. Randi Parks from Dr. Elizabeth Murphy’s laboratory for their scientific contributions and methodological expertise, which substantially informed our understanding of advanced mitochondrial imaging approaches. Software: Schematic illustrations and conceptual diagrams were created using BioRender software (BioRender.com).

Funding

This work was funded by a Core Research Grant from the Indian Institute of Science Education and Research (IISER)Tirupati, Tirupati, India. Funding support Anusandhan National Research Foundation from the Government of India (Grants: ANRF/IRG/2024/001777/LS/ANRF, ANRF/ECRG/2024/001042/LS/ANRF), India. Fogarty International Center, and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health grants 2D43TW009744, R21TW012635, and the American Heart Association Award Number 24IVPHA1297559. The UNCF/Bristol-Myers Squibb E.E. Just Faculty Fund, Career Award at the Scientific Interface (CASI Award) from Burroughs Welcome Fund (BWF) ID # 1021868.01, BWF Ad-hoc Award, NIH Small Research Pilot Subaward to 5R25HL106365-12 from the National Institutes of Health PRIDE Program, DK020593, Vanderbilt Diabetes and Research Training Center for DRTC Alzheimer’s Disease Pilot & Feasibility Program. CZI Science Diversity Leadership grant number 2022-253529 from the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative DAF, an advised fund of Silicon Valley Community Foundation to A.H.J. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of the NIH. This work was accomplished in part through the use of the Meharry Medical College Core Facilities, which are supported by NIH Grants MD007586, CA163069, and S10RR025497. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Footnotes

Author Contributions

All authors drafted and edited the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted without commercial or financial relationships that could create a conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ader NR, Hoffmann PC, Ganeva I, Borgeaud AC, Wang C, Youle RJ, Kukulski W. Molecular and topological reorganizations in mitochondrial architecture interplay during Bax-mediated steps of apoptosis. eLife. 2019;8:e40712. doi: 10.7554/eLife.40712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmadian S, Lindsey PJ, Smeets HJM, Van Tienen FHJ, Van Zandvoort MAMJ. Spinning Disk Confocal Microscopy for Optimized and Quantified Live Imaging of 3D Mitochondrial Network. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:4819. doi: 10.3390/ijms25094819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alvarez LAJ, Schwarz U, Friedrich L, Foelling J, Hecht F, Roberti MJ. Application Note: Pushing STED beyond its limits with TauSTED. Nat Methods. 2021 Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/d42473-021-00241-0. [Google Scholar]
  4. Appelhans T, Richter CP, Wilkens V, Hess ST, Piehler J, Busch KB. Nanoscale Organization of Mitochondrial Microcompartments Revealed by Combining Tracking and Localization Microscopy. Nano Lett. 2012;12:610–616. doi: 10.1021/nl203343a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Axelrod D. Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Microscopy in Cell Biology. Traffic. 2001;2:764–774. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2001.21104.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Baena V, Conrad R, Friday P, Fitzgerald E, Kim T, Bernbaum J, Berensmann H, Harned A, Nagashima K, Narayan K. FIB-SEM as a Volume Electron Microscopy Approach to Study Cellular Architectures in SARS-CoV-2 and Other Viral Infections: A Practical Primer for a Virologist. Viruses. 2021;13 doi: 10.3390/v13040611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Balzarotti F, Eilers Y, Gwosch KC, Gynnå AH, Westphal V, Stefani FD, Elf J, Hell SW. Nanometer resolution imaging and tracking of fluorescent molecules with minimal photon fluxes. Science. 2017;355:606–612. doi: 10.1126/science.aak9913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Beck M, Baumeister W. Cryo-Electron Tomography: Can it Reveal the Molecular Sociology of Cells in Atomic Detail? Trends Cell Biol. 2016;26:825–837. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2016.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bereiter-Hahn J, Voth M. Dynamics of mitochondria in living cells: shape changes, dislocations, fusion, and fission of mitochondria. Microsc Res Tech. 1994;27:198–219. doi: 10.1002/jemt.1070270303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Betzig E, Patterson GH, Sougrat R, Lindwasser OW, Olenych S, Bonifacino JS, Davidson MW, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Hess HF. Imaging intracellular fluorescent proteins at nanometer resolution. Science. 2006;313:1642–1645. doi: 10.1126/science.1127344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Blum TB, Hahn A, Meier T, Davies KM, Kuhlbrandt W. Dimers of mitochondrial ATP synthase induce membrane curvature and self-assemble into rows. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116:4250–4255. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1816556116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bottanelli F, Kromann EB, Allgeyer ES, Erdmann RS, Baguley Wood, Sirinakis G, Schepartz A, Baddeley D, Toomre DK, Rothman JE, Bewersdorf J. Two-colour live-cell nanoscale imaging of intracellular targets. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10778. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Breckwoldt MO, Pfister FM, Bradley PM, Marinkovic P, Williams PR, Brill MS, Plomer B, Schmalz A, Clair DK, Naumann R, Griesbeck O, et al. Multiparametric optical analysis of mitochondrial redox signals during neuronal physiology and pathology in vivo. Nat Med. 2014;20:555–560. doi: 10.1038/nm.3520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Buckman JF, Hernandez H, Kress GJ, Votyakova TV, Pal S, Reynolds IJ. MitoTracker labeling in primary neuronal and astrocytic cultures: influence of mitochondrial membrane potential and oxidants. J Neurosci Methods. 2001;104:165–176. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0270(00)00340-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cadete VJ, Deschênes S, Cuillerier A, Brisebois F, Sugiura A, Vincent A, Turnbull D, Picard M, McBride HM, Burelle Y. Formation of mitochondrial-derived vesicles is an active and physiologically relevant mitochondrial quality control process in the cardiac system. The Journal of physiology. 2016;594:5343–5362. doi: 10.1113/JP272703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chan DC. Fusion and fission: interlinked processes critical for mitochondrial health. Annu Rev Genet. 2012;46:265–287. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-110410-132529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen B, Gong W, Yang Z, Pan W, Verwilst P, Shin J, Yan W, Liu L, Qu J, Kim JS. STORM imaging of mitochondrial dynamics using a vicinal-dithiol-proteins-targeted probe. Biomaterials. 2020;243:119938. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.119938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chen F, Tillberg PW, Boyden ES. Optical imaging. Expansion microscopy. Science. 2015;347:543–548. doi: 10.1126/science.1260088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen H, Detmer SA, Ewald AJ, Griffin EE, Fraser SE, Chan DC. Mitofusins Mfn1 and Mfn2 coordinately regulate mitochondrial fusion and are essential for embryonic development. J Cell Biol. 2003;160:189–200. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200211046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen JT, Stephan T, Gaedke F, Liu TY, Li YY, Schauss A, Chen P, Wulff V, Jakobs S, Jüngst C, Chen ZX. An aldehyde-crosslinking mitochondrial probe for STED imaging in fixed cells. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2024;121 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2317703121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Chozinski TJ, Halpern AR, Okawa H, Kim HJ, Tremel GJ, Wong RO, Vaughan JC. Expansion microscopy with conventional antibodies and fluorescent proteins. Nat Methods. 2016;13:485–488. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Cogliati S, Frezza C, Soriano ME, Varanita T, Quintana-Cabrera R, Corrado M, Cipolat S, Costa V, Casarin A, Gomes LC, Perales-Clemente E, et al. Mitochondrial cristae shape determines respiratory chain supercomplexes assembly and respiratory efficiency. Cell. 2013;155:160–171. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Collins TJ. Mitochondria are morphologically and functionally heterogeneous within cells. EMBO J. 2002;21:1616–1627. doi: 10.1093/emboj/21.7.1616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Conchello JA, Lichtman JW. Optical sectioning microscopy. Nat Methods. 2005;2:920–931. doi: 10.1038/nmeth815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Cornelissen Tom, Vilain Sven, Vints Katlijn, Gounko Natalia, Verstreken Patrik, Vandenberghe Wim. Deficiency of Parkin and PINK1 Impairs Age-Dependent Mitophagy in Drosophila. eLife. 2018 May;7:e35878. doi: 10.7554/eLife.35878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Crabtree A, Neikirk K, Marshall AG, Vang L, Whiteside AJ, Williams Q, Altamura CT, Owens TC, Stephens D, Shao B, Koh A, et al. Defining Mitochondrial Cristae Morphology Changes Induced by Aging in Brown Adipose Tissue. Adv Biol (Weinh) 2024;8:e2300186. doi: 10.1002/adbi.202300186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Damenti M, Coceano G, Pennacchietti F, Bodén A, Testa I. STED and parallelized RESOLFT optical nanoscopy of the tubular endoplasmic reticulum and its mitochondrial contacts in neuronal cells. Neurobiol Dis. 2021;155:105361. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2021.105361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. DEW DAM, Hsieh C, Marko M, Hayles MF. Cryo-FIB preparation of whole cells and tissue for cryo-TEM: use of high-pressure frozen specimens in tubes and planchets. J Microsc. 2021;281:125–137. doi: 10.1111/jmi.12943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Damstra H, Mohar B, Eddison M, Akhmanova A, Kapitein L, Tillberg P. Ten-fold Robust Expansion Microscopy. BIO-Protoc. 2023;13 doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.4698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Davies KM, Anselmi C, Wittig I, Faraldo-Gómez JD, Kühlbrandt W. Structure of the yeast F-ATP synthase dimer and its role in shaping the mitochondrial cristae. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:13602–13607. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1204593109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. de Boer P, Hoogenboom JP, Giepmans BN. Correlated light and electron microscopy: ultrastructure lights up! Nat Methods. 2015;12:503–513. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Di Gallo M, Guilbert T, Pereira D, Cepella Z, Braud-Mussi R, Jauliac E, Macaux G, Britto FA, Launay T. FLASH: innovative integrated enzymatic-fluorescent labeling for automated muscle fiber typing, metabolic and morphometric analysis. Skelet Muscle. 2025;15:32. doi: 10.1186/s13395-025-00401-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Dudkina NV, Kudryashev M, Stahlberg H, Boekema EJ. Interaction of complexes I, III, and IV within the bovine respirasome by single particle cryoelectron tomography. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108:15196–15200. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107819108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Duranova H, Valkova V, Knazicka Z, Olexikova L, Vasicek J. Mitochondria: A worthwhile object for ultrastructural qualitative characterization and quantification of cells at physiological and pathophysiological states using conventional transmission electron microscopy. Acta Histochem. 2020;122:151646. doi: 10.1016/j.acthis.2020.151646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ebrahimi V, Stephan T, Kim J, et al. Deep learning enables fast, gentle STED microscopy. Commun Biol. 2023;6:674. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-05054-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Eisner V, Cupo RR, Gao E, Csordas G, Slovinsky WS, Paillard M, Cheng L, Ibetti J, Chen SR, Chuprun JK, Hoek JB, et al. Mitochondrial fusion dynamics is robust in the heart and depends on calcium oscillations and contractile activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114:E859–E868. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1617288114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Elliott AD. Confocal Microscopy: Principles and Modern Practices. Curr Protoc Cytom. 2020;92:e68. doi: 10.1002/cpcy.68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ernster L, Schatz G. Mitochondria: a historical review. J Cell Biol. 1981;91:227s–255s. doi: 10.1083/jcb.91.3.227s. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Faitg J, Davey T, Laws R, Lawless C, Tuppen H, Fitton E, Turnbull D, Vincent AE. Mapping mitochondrial morphology and function: COX-SBFSEM reveals patterns in mitochondrial disease. Commun Biol. 2025;8:24. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-07389-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Fermie J, Liv N, Ten Brink C, van Donselaar EG, Muller WH, Schieber NL, Schwab Y, Gerritsen HC, Klumperman J. Single organelle dynamics linked to 3D structure by correlative live-cell imaging and 3D electron microscopy. Traffic. 2018;19:354–369. doi: 10.1111/tra.12557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Frey TG, Mannella CA. The internal structure of mitochondria. Trends Biochem Sci. 2000;25:319–324. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(00)01609-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Furukawa K, Hayatsu M, Okuyama K, Fukuda T, Yamashita S-I, Inoue K, Shibata S, Kanki T. Atg44/Mdi1/mitofissin facilitates Dnm1-mediated mitochondrial fission. Autophagy. 2024;20:2314–2322. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2024.2360345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Gambarotto D, Zwettler FU, Le Guennec M, Schmidt-Cernohorska M, Fortun D, Borgers S, Heine J, Schloetel JG, Reuss M, Unser M, Boyden ES, et al. Imaging cellular ultrastructures using expansion microscopy (U-ExM) Nat Methods. 2019a;16:71–74. doi: 10.1038/s41592-018-0238-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Gao M, Thielhorn R, Rentsch J, Honigmann A, Ewers H. Expansion STED microscopy (ExSTED) Methods Cell Biol. 2021;161:15–31. doi: 10.1016/bs.mcb.2020.06.001. Epub 2020 Jun 29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ge X, Ren W, Shan C, Xi P, Gao B. Using HBmito Crimson to Observe Mitochondrial Cristae Through STED Microscopy. BIO-Protoc. 2025;15 doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.5150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Godtliebsen Gustav, Larsen Kenneth Bowitz, Bhujabal Zambarlal, et al. High-Resolution Visualization and Assessment of Basal and OXPHOS-Induced Mitophagy in H9c2 Cardiomyoblasts. Autophagy. 2023;19(10):2769–88. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2023.2230837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Griffin BA, Adams SR, Tsien RY. Specific covalent labeling of recombinant protein molecules inside live cells. Science. 1998 Jul 10;281(5374):269–72. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5374.269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Gustafsson MG. Nonlinear structured-illumination microscopy: wide-field fluorescence imaging with theoretically unlimited resolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2005;102:13081–13086. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0406877102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Han S, Zhao F, Hsia J, Ma X, Liu Y, Torres S, Fujioka H, Zhu X. The role of Mfn2 in the structure and function of endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondrial tethering in vivo. J Cell Sci. 2021;134:jcs253443. doi: 10.1242/jcs.253443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Helmchen F, Denk W. Deep tissue two-photon microscopy. Nat Methods. 2005;2:932–940. doi: 10.1038/nmeth818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Hinton A, Katti P, Christensen TA, Mungai M, Shao J, Zhang L, Trushin S, Alghanem A, Jaspersen A, Geroux RE, Neikirk K, et al. A Comprehensive Approach to Sample Preparation for Electron Microscopy and the Assessment of Mitochondrial Morphology in Tissue and Cultured Cells. Adv Biol (Weinh) 2023;7:e2200202. doi: 10.1002/adbi.202200202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Hinton A, Katti P, Mungai M, Hall DD, Koval O, Shao J, Vue Z, Lopez EG, Rostami R, Neikirk K, Ponce J, et al. ATF4-dependent increase in mitochondrial-endoplasmic reticulum tethering following OPA1 deletion in skeletal muscle. J Cell Physiol. 2024;239:e31204. doi: 10.1002/jcp.31204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Hirtl M, Gottschalk B, Bachkoenig OA, Oflaz FE, Madreiter-Sokolowski C, Hoydal MA, Graier WF. A novel super-resolution STED microscopy analysis approach to observe spatial MCU and MICU1 distribution dynamics in cells. Bba-Mol Cell Res. 2025;1872 doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2025.119900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Hoffman DP, Shtengel G, Xu CS, Campbell KR, Freeman M, Wang L, Milkie DE, Pasolli HA, Iyer N, Bogovic JA, Stabley DR, et al. Correlative three-dimensional super-resolution and block-face electron microscopy of whole vitreously frozen cells. Science. 2020;367 doi: 10.1126/science.aaz5357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Hoffmann C, Gaietta G, Zürn A, Adams SR, Terrillon S, Ellisman MH, Tsien RY, Lohse MJ. Fluorescent labeling of tetracysteine-tagged proteins in intact cells. Nat Protoc. 2010 Sep;5(10):1666–77. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2010.129. Epub 2010 Sep 23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Holcomb PS, Hoffpauir BK, Hoyson MC, Jackson DR, Deerinck TJ, Marrs GS, Dehoff M, Wu J, Ellisman MH, Spirou GA. Synaptic inputs compete during rapid formation of the calyx of Held: a new model system for neural development. J Neurosci. 2013;33:12954–12969. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1087-13.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Hsieh C, Schmelzer T, Kishchenko G, Wagenknecht T, Marko M. Practical workflow for cryo focused-ion-beam milling of tissues and cells for cryo-TEM tomography. J Struct Biol. 2014;185:32–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2013.10.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Huang B, Wang W, Bates M, Zhuang X. Three-dimensional super-resolution imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy. Science. 2008;319:810–813. doi: 10.1126/science.1153529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Humpfer N, Thielhorn R, Ewers H. Expanding boundaries - a cell biologist’s guide to expansion microscopy. J Cell Sci. 2024;137 doi: 10.1242/jcs.260765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Jakobs S, Stephan T, Ilgen P, Bruser C. Light Microscopy of Mitochondria at the Nanoscale. Annu Rev Biophys. 2020;49:289–308. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-121219-081550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Jakobs S, Wurm CA. Super-resolution microscopy of mitochondria. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2014;20:9–15. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2014.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Jans DC, Wurm CA, Riedel D, Wenzel D, Stagge F, Deckers M, Rehling P, Jakobs S. STED super-resolution microscopy reveals an array of MINOS clusters along human mitochondria. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110:8936–8941. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1301820110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Jolivet N, Bertolin G. Revealing mitochondrial architecture and functions with single molecule localization microscopy. Biol Cell. 2025;117:e2400082. doi: 10.1111/boc.202400082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Jung M, Choi H, Kim J, Mun JY. Correlative Light and Transmission Electron Microscopy Showed Details of Mitophagy by Mitochondria Quality Control in Propionic Acid Treated SH-SY5Y Cell. Materials. 2020;13:4336. doi: 10.3390/ma13194336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Jung M, Mun JY. Mitochondria and Endoplasmic Reticulum Imaging by Correlative Light and Volume Electron Microscopy. J Vis Exp. 2019:59750. doi: 10.3791/59750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Karreman MA, Mercier L, Schieber NL, Solecki G, Allio G, Winkler F, Ruthensteiner B, Goetz JG, Schwab Y. Fast and precise targeting of single tumor cells in vivo by multimodal correlative microscopy. J Cell Sci. 2016;129:444–456. doi: 10.1242/jcs.181842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Karreman MA, Agronskaia AV, Van Donselaar EG, Vocking K, Fereidouni F, Humbel BM, Verrips CT, Verkleij AJ, Gerritsen HC. Optimizing immuno-labeling for correlative fluorescence and electron microscopy on a single specimen. J Struct Biol. 2012;180:382–386. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2012.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Kasthuri N, Hayworth KJ, Berger DR, Schalek RL, Conchello JA, Knowles-Barley S, Lee D, Vazquez-Reina A, Kaynig V, Jones TR, Roberts M, et al. Saturated Reconstruction of a Volume of Neocortex. Cell. 2015;162:648–661. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.06.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Katti P, Ajayi PT, Aponte A, Bleck CKE, Glancy B. Identification of evolutionarily conserved regulators of muscle mitochondrial network organization. Nat Commun. 2022a;13:6622. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34445-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Katti P, Hall AS, Parry HA, Ajayi PT, Kim Y, Willingham TB, Bleck CKE, Wen H, Glancy B. Mitochondrial network configuration influences sarcomere and myosin filament structure in striated muscles. Nat Commun. 2022b;13:6058. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33678-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Klar TA, Jakobs S, Dyba M, Egner A, Hell SW. Fluorescence microscopy with diffraction resolution barrier broken by stimulated emission. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2000;97:8206–8210. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.15.8206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Kleele T, Rey T, Winter J, et al. Distinct fission signatures predict mitochondrial degradation or biogenesis. Nature. 2021;593:435–439. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03510-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Klotzsch E, Smorodchenko A, Löfler L, Moldzio R, Parkinson E, Schütz GJ, Pohl EE. Superresolution microscopy reveals spatial separation of UCP4 and F0 F1-ATP synthase in neuronal mitochondria. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015;112:130–135. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1415261112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Kolotuev I, Schwab Y, Labouesse M. A precise and rapid mapping protocol for correlative light and electron microscopy of small invertebrate organisms. Biol Cell. 2009;102:121–132. doi: 10.1042/BC20090096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Kolossov VL, Sivaguru M, Huff J, Luby K, Kanakaraju K, Gaskins HR. Airyscan super-resolution microscopy of mitochondrial morphology and dynamics in living tumor cells. Microsc Res Tech. 2018;81:115–128. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Knott G, Marchman H, Wall D, Lich B. Serial section scanning electron microscopy of adult brain tissue using focused ion beam milling. J Neurosci. 2008;28:2959–2964. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3189-07.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Kobayashi S, Iwamoto M, Haraguchi T. Live correlative light-electron microscopy to observe molecular dynamics in high resolution. Microscopy (Oxf) 2016;65:296–308. doi: 10.1093/jmicro/dfw024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. König T, McBride HM. Mitochondrial-derived vesicles in metabolism, disease, and aging. Cell metabolism. 2024;36:21–35. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2023.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Kukat C, Wurm CA, Spåhr H, Falkenberg M, Larsson N-G, Jakobs S. Super-resolution microscopy reveals that mammalian mitochondrial nucleoids have a uniform size and frequently contain a single copy of mtDNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108:13534–13539. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109263108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Kukulski W, Schorb M, Welsch S, Picco A, Kaksonen M, Briggs JA. Correlated fluorescence and 3D electron microscopy with high sensitivity and spatial precision. J Cell Biol. 2011;192:111–119. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201009037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Kunz TC, Götz R, Gao S, Sauer M, Kozjak-Pavlovic V. Using Expansion Microscopy to Visualize and Characterize the Morphology of Mitochondrial Cristae. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:617. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Landoni JC, Kleele T, Winter J, Stepp W, Manley S. Mitochondrial Structure, Dynamics, and Physiology: Light Microscopy to Disentangle the Network. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2024;40:219–240. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-111822-114733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Laporte MH, Klena N, Hamel V, Guichard P. Visualizing the native cellular organization by coupling cryofixation with expansion microscopy (Cryo-ExM) Nat Methods. 2022;19:216. doi: 10.1038/s41592-021-01356-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Last MGF, Tuijtel MW, Voortman LM, et al. Selecting optimal support grids for super-resolution cryogenic correlated light and electron microscopy. Sci Rep. 2023;13:8270. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-35590-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Lelek M, Gyparaki MT, Beliu G, Schueder F, Manley S, Jungmann R, Sauer M, Lakadamyali M, Zimmer C. Single-molecule localization microscopy. Nature reviews methods primers. 2021;1:39. doi: 10.1038/s43586-021-00038-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Lewis Samantha C, Uchiyama Lauren F, Nunnari Jodi. ER-mitochondria contacts couple mtDNA synthesis with mitochondrial division in human cells. Science. 2016;353(6296):aaf5549. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf5549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Li Huihui, Doric Zak, Berthet Amandine, et al. Longitudinal Tracking of Neuronal Mitochondria Delineates PINK1/Parkin-Dependent Mechanisms of Mitochondrial Recycling and Degradation. Science Advances. 2021;7(32):eabf6580. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf6580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Lippincott-Schwartz J, Snapp E, Kenworthy A. Studying protein dynamics in living cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001;2:444–456. doi: 10.1038/35073068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Liu T, Stephan T, Chen P, Keller-Findeisen J, Chen J, Riedel D, Yang Z, Jakobs S, Chen Z. Multi-color live-cell STED nanoscopy of mitochondria with a gentle inner membrane stain. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2022;119:e2215799119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2215799119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Liu X, Weaver D, Shirihai O, Hajnóczky G. Mitochondrial ‘kiss-and-run’: interplay between mitochondrial motility and fusion–fission dynamics. EMBO J. 2009;28:3074–3089. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2009.255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Loew LM, Tuft RA, Carrington W, Fay FS. Imaging in five dimensions: time-dependent membrane potentials in individual mitochondria. Biophys J. 1993;65:2396–24007. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(93)81318-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Lucić V, Förster F, Baumeister W. Structural studies by electron tomography: from cells to molecules. Annu Rev Biochem. 2005;74:833–65. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.074112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Mannella CA. Structure and dynamics of the mitochondrial inner membrane cristae. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1763:542–548. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Mannella CA, Marko M, Penczek P, Barnard D, Frank J. The internal compartmentation of rat-liver mitochondria: tomographic study using the high-voltage transmission electron microscope. Microsc Res Tech. 1994;27:278–283. doi: 10.1002/jemt.1070270403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Marshall AG, Damo SM, Hinton A., Jr Revisiting focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy. Trends Biochem Sci. 2023a;48:585–586. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2023.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Marshall AG, Krystofiak E, Damo SM, Hinton A., Jr Correlative light-electron microscopy: integrating dynamics to structure. Trends Biochem Sci. 2023b;48:826–827. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2023.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Marshall AG, Neikirk K, Stephens DC, Vang L, Vue Z, Beasley HK, Crabtree A, Scudese E, Lopez EG, Shao B, Krystofiak E, et al. Serial Block Face-Scanning Electron Microscopy as a Burgeoning Technology. Adv Biol (Weinh) 2023c;7:e2300139. doi: 10.1002/adbi.202300139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. McDonald KL, Auer M. High-Pressure Freezing, Cellular Tomography, and Structural Cell Biology. BioTechniques. 2006;41:137–143. doi: 10.2144/000112226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Miyazono Y, Hirashima S, Ishihara N, Kusukawa J, Nakamura KI, Ohta K. Uncoupled mitochondria quickly shorten along their long axis to form indented spheroids, instead of rings, in a fission-independent manner. Sci Rep. 2018;8:350. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18582-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Munson Michael J, Mathai Benan J, Ng Matthew Yoke Wui, et al. GAK and PRKCD Are Positive Regulators of PRKN-Independent Mitophagy. Nature Communications. 2021;12(1):6101. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26331-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Mühleip AW, Joos F, Wigge C, Frangakis AS, Kühlbrandt W, Davies KM. Helical arrays of U-shaped ATP synthase dimers form tubular cristae in ciliate mitochondria. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113:8442–8447. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1525430113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Neikirk K, Lopez EG, Marshall AG, Alghanem A, Krystofiak E, Kula B, Smith N, Shao J, Katti P, Hinton A., Jr Call to action to properly utilize electron microscopy to measure organelles to monitor disease. Eur J Cell Biol. 2023;102:151365. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2023.151365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Nicovich PR, Owen DM, Gaus K. Turning single-molecule localization microscopy into a quantitative bioanalytical tool. Nat Protoc. 2017;12:453–460. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Ostersehlt LM, Jans DC, Wittek A, Keller-Findeisen J, Inamdar K, Sahl SJ, Hell SW, Jakobs S. Dna-paint minflux nanoscopy. Nature Methods. 2022;19:1072–1075. doi: 10.1038/s41592-022-01577-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Opstad IS, Godtliebsen G, Ahluwalia BS, Myrmel T, Agarwal K, Birgisdottir ÅB. Mitochondrial dynamics and quantification of mitochondria-derived vesicles in cardiomyoblasts using structured illumination microscopy. Journal of Biophotonics. 2022;15:e202100305. doi: 10.1002/jbio.202100305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Opstad IS, Godtliebsen G, Ströhl F, Myrmel T, Ahluwalia BS, Agarwal K, Birgisdottir ÅB. Three-dimensional structured illumination microscopy data of mitochondria and lysosomes in cardiomyoblasts under normal and galactose-adapted conditions. Sci Data. 2022;9:98. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01207-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Palade GE. The fine structure of mitochondria. Anat Rec. 1952;114:427–451. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091140304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Palmer CS, Lou J, Kouskousis B, Pandzic E, Anderson AJ, Kang Y, Hinde E, Stojanovski D. Super-resolution microscopy reveals the arrangement of inner membrane protein complexes in mammalian mitochondria. J Cell Sci. 2021;134:jcs252197. doi: 10.1242/jcs.252197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Peddie CJ, Domart M-C, Snetkov X, O’Toole P, Larijani B, Way M, Cox S, Collinson LM. Correlative super-resolution fluorescence and electron microscopy using conventional fluorescent proteins in vacuo. J Struct Biol. 2017;199:120–131. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2017.05.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Perkins G, Renken C, Martone ME, Young SJ, Ellisman M, Frey T. Electron tomography of neuronal mitochondria: three-dimensional structure and organization of cristae and membrane contacts. J Struct Biol. 1997;119:260–272. doi: 10.1006/jsbi.1997.3885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Pinali C, Bennett H, Davenport JB, Trafford AW, Kitmitto A. Three-dimensional reconstruction of cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum reveals a continuous network linking transverse-tubules: this organization is perturbed in heart failure. Circ Res. 2013;113:1219–1230. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.301348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Power RM, Huisken J. A guide to light-sheet fluorescence microscopy for multiscale imaging. Nat Methods. 2017;14:360–372. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Ren W, Ge X, Li M, Sun J, Li S, Gao S, Shan C, Gao B, Xi P. Visualization of cristae and mtDNA interactions via STED nanoscopy using a low saturation power probe. Light: Science & Applications. 2024;13:116. doi: 10.1038/s41377-024-01463-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Reits EAJ, Neefjes JJ. From fixed to FRAP: measuring protein mobility and activity in living cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3:E145–E147. doi: 10.1038/35078615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Rigort A, Bauerlein FJ, Villa E, Eibauer M, Laugks T, Baumeister W, Plitzko JM. Focused ion beam micromachining of eukaryotic cells for cryoelectron tomography. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:4449–4454. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1201333109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Rizzuto R, Pinton P, Carrington W, Fay FS, Fogarty KE, Lifshitz LM, Tuft RA, Pozzan T. Close contacts with the endoplasmic reticulum as determinants of mitochondrial Ca2+ responses. Science. 1998;280:1763–1766. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5370.1763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Rust MJ, Bates M, Zhuang X. Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) Nat Methods. 2006;3:793–795. doi: 10.1038/nmeth929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Samanta Soham, He Ying, Sharma Amit, Kim Jiseon, Pan Wenhui, Yang Zhigang, Li Jia, Yan Wei, Liu Liwei, Qu Junle, Kim Jong Seung. Fluorescent Probes for Nanoscopic Imaging of Mitochondria. Chem. 2019;5(7):1697–1726. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2019.03.011. ISSN 2451-9294. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  119. Schermelleh L, Heintzmann R, Leonhardt H. A guide to super-resolution fluorescence microscopy. J Cell Biol. 2010;190:165–175. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201002018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Schatten G, Pawley JB. Advances in optical, confocal, and electron microscopic imaging for biomedical researchers. Science. 1988;239 G164, G148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Schellenberger P, Kaufmann R, Siebert CA, Hagen C, Wodrich H, Grunewald K. High-precision correlative fluorescence and electron cryo microscopy using two independent alignment markers. Ultramicroscopy. 2014;143:41–51. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2013.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Schertel A, Snaidero N, Han HM, Ruhwedel T, Laue M, Grabenbauer M, Mobius W. Cryo FIB-SEM: volume imaging of cellular ultrastructure in native frozen specimens. J Struct Biol. 2013;184:355–360. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2013.09.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Schroeder LK, Barentine AES, Merta H, Schweighofer S, Zhang Y, Baddeley D, Bewersdorf J, Bahmanyar S. Dynamic nanoscale morphology of the ER surveyed by STED microscopy. J Cell Biol. 2019;218:83–96. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201809107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Shen Shengwen, Li Xing-Fang, Cullen William R, Weinfeld Michael, Chris Le X. Arsenic Binding to Proteins. Chemical Reviews. 2013;113(10):7769–92. doi: 10.1021/cr300015c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Shao L, Kner P, Rego EH, Gustafsson MG. Super-resolution 3D microscopy of live whole cells using structured illumination. Nat Methods. 2011;8:1044–1046. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Schatten G, Pawley JB. Advances in optical, confocal, and electron microscopic imaging for biomedical researchers. Science. 1988;239 G164, G148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Sjostrand FS. Electron microscopy of mitochondria and cytoplasmic double membranes. Nature. 1953;171:30–32. doi: 10.1038/171030a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Skala MC, Riching KM, Gendron-Fitzpatrick A, Eickhoff J, Eliceiri KW, White JG, Ramanujam N. In vivo multiphoton microscopy of NADH and FAD redox states, fluorescence lifetimes, and cellular morphology in precancerous epithelia. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007;104:19494–19499. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708425104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Stephan T, Roesch A, Riedel D, Jakobs S. Live-cell STED nanoscopy of mitochondrial cristae. Scientific reports. 2019;9:12419. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48838-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Sun Y, Rombola C, Jyothikumar V, Periasamy A. Förster resonance energy transfer microscopy and spectroscopy for localizing protein–protein interactions in living cells. Cytometry A. 2013;83:780–793. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.22321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Titze B, Genoud C. Volume scanning electron microscopy for imaging biological ultrastructure. Biol Cell. 2016;108:307–323. doi: 10.1111/boc.201600024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Tillberg PW, Chen F, Piatkevich KD, Zhao Y, Yu CC, English BP, Gao L, Martorell A, Suk HJ, Yoshida F, DeGennaro EM, et al. Protein-retention expansion microscopy of cells and tissues labeled using standard fluorescent proteins and antibodies. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34:987–992. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Van Laar VS, Otero PA, Hastings TG, Berman SB. Potential Role of Mic60/Mitofilin in Parkinson’s Disease. Front Neurosci. 2019;12:898. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Vincent AE, Ng YS, White K, Davey T, Mannella C, Falkous G, Feeney C, Schaefer AM, McFarland R, Gorman GS, Taylor RW, et al. The Spectrum of Mitochondrial Ultrastructural Defects in Mitochondrial Myopathy. Sci Rep. 2016;6:30610. doi: 10.1038/srep30610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Vogel F, Bornhövd C, Neupert W, Reichert AS. Dynamic subcompartmentalization of the mitochondrial inner membrane. J Cell Biol. 2006;175:237–247. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200605138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Vue Z, Neikirk K, Vang L, Garza-Lopez E, Christensen TA, Shao J, Lam J, Beasley HK, Marshall AG, Crabtree A, Anudokem J, et al. Three-dimensional mitochondria reconstructions of murine cardiac muscle changes in size across aging. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2023;325:H965–H982. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00202.2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Wagner FR, Watanabe R, Schampers R, Singh D, Persoon H, Schaffer M, Fruhstorfer P, Plitzko J, Villa E. Preparing samples from whole cells using focused-ion-beam milling for cryo-electron tomography. Nat Protoc. 2020;15:2041–2070. doi: 10.1038/s41596-020-0320-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Wallrabe H, Periasamy A. Imaging protein molecules using FRET and FLIM microscopy. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2005;16:19–27. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2004.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Wäldchen S, Lehmann J, Klein T, Van De Linde S, Sauer M. Light-induced cell damage in live-cell super-resolution microscopy. Sci Rep. 2015;5:15348. doi: 10.1038/srep15348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Wang J, Zhang J, Wang L, Gao X, Shao Y, Liu L, Yang Z, Yan W, Qu J. Dual-color STED super-resolution microscope using a single laser source. Journal of Biophotonics. 2020;13:e202000057. doi: 10.1002/jbio.202000057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Wassie AT, Zhao Y, Boyden ES. Expansion microscopy: principles and uses in biological research. Nat Methods. 2019;16:33–41. doi: 10.1038/s41592-018-0219-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Weber M, Leutenegger M, Stoldt S, Jakobs S, Mihaila TS, Butkevich AN, Hell SW. MINSTED fluorescence localization and nanoscopy. Nat Photonics. 2021a;15:361–366. doi: 10.1038/s41566-021-00774-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Westermann B. Mitochondrial fusion and fission in cell life and death. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11:872–884. doi: 10.1038/nrm3013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Winey M, Meehl JB, Giddings TH., Jr Conventional transmission electron microscopy. Molecular biology of the cell. 2014a;25:319–323. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E12-12-0863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Wolf DM, Segawa M, Kondadi AK, Anand R, Bailey ST, Reichert AS, van der Bliek AM, Shackelford DB, Liesa M, Shirihai OS. Individual cristae within the same mitochondrion display different membrane potentials and are functionally independent. EMBO J. 2019;38:e101056. doi: 10.15252/embj.2018101056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Wozny MR, Di Luca A, Morado DR, Picco A, Khaddaj R, Campomanes P, Ivanović L, Hoffmann PC, Miller EA, Vanni S, Kukulski W. In situ architecture of the ER–mitochondria encounter structure. Nature. 2023;618:188–192. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06050-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Youn H-Y, Bantseev V, Bols NC, Cullen AP, Sivak JG. In vitro assays for evaluating the ultraviolet B-induced damage in cultured human retinal pigment epithelial cells. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2007;88:21–28. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2007.04.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Zhai X, Lei D, Zhang M, Liu J, Wu H, Yu Y, Zhang L, Ren G. LoTToR: an algorithm for missing-wedge correction of the low-tilt tomographic 3D reconstruction of a single-molecule structure. Scientific reports. 2020;10:10489. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66793-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Zhang P, Wang X, Wang X, Huang C, James TD, Sun X, Qian X. Chemoselective Fluorogenic Bioconjugation of Vicinal Dithiol-Containing Proteins for Live Cellular Imaging via Small Molecular Conjugate Acceptors. Anal Chem. 2023 Aug 15;95(32):11953–11959. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.3c01518. Epub 2023 Jul 25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Zhen Yan, Spangenberg Hélène, Munson Michael J, et al. ESCRT-Mediated Phagophore Sealing during Mitophagy. Autophagy. 2020;16(5):826–41. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2019.1639301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Zhu L, Zhang W, Elnatan D, Huang B. Faster STORM using compressed sensing. Nature methods. 2012;9:721–723. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Zipfel WR, Williams RM, Webb WW. Nonlinear magic: multiphoton microscopy in the biosciences. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21:1369–1377. doi: 10.1038/nbt899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Zwettler FU, Reinhard S, Gambarotto D, Bell TDM, Hamel V, Guichard P, Sauer M. Molecular resolution imaging by post-labeling expansion single-molecule localization microscopy (Ex-SMLM) Nat Commun. 2020;11:3388. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17086-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

References

  1. Vicidomini G, Moneron G, Han KY, Westphal V, Ta H, Reuss M, Engelhardt J, Eggeling C, Hell SW. Sharper low-power STED nanoscopy by time gating. Nature methods. 2011;8(7):571–573. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Lanzanò L, Coto Hernández, Castello M, Gratton E, Diaspro A, Vicidomini G. Encoding and decoding spatio-temporal information for super-resolution microscopy. Nature communications. 2015;6:6701. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Wang L, Chen B, Yan W, Yang Z, Peng X, Lin D, Weng X, Ye T, Qu J. Resolution improvement in STED super-resolution microscopy at low power using a phasor plot approach. Nanoscale. 2018;10(34):16252–16260. doi: 10.1039/c8nr03584a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Moffitt J, Osseforth C, Michaelis J. Time-gating improves the spatial resolution of STED microscopy. Opt Express. 2011;19:4242–4254. doi: 10.1364/OE.19.004242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen X, Zhong S, Hou Y, et al. Superresolution structured illumination microscopy reconstruction algorithms: a review. Light Sci Appl. 2023;12:172. doi: 10.1038/s41377-023-01204-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Louvel V, Haase R, Mercey O, et al. iU-ExM: nanoscopy of organelles and tissues with iterative ultrastructure expansion microscopy. Nat Commun. 2023;14:7893. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43582-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Nakano A. Spinning-disk confocal microscopy -- a cutting-edge tool for imaging of membrane traffic. Cell structure and function. 2002;27(5):349–355. doi: 10.1247/csf.27.349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Huang X, Fan J, Li L, et al. Fast, long-term, super-resolution imaging with Hessian structured illumination microscopy. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36:451–459. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Simula L, Campello S. Monitoring the Mitochondrial Dynamics in Mammalian Cells. Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, NJ) 2018;1782:267–285. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7831-1_15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jakobs S. High resolution imaging of live mitochondria. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2006;1763(5-6):561–575. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Partikian A, Olveczky B, Swaminathan R, Li Y, Verkman AS. Rapid diffusion of green fluorescent protein in the mitochondrial matrix. The Journal of cell biology. 1998;140(4):821–829. doi: 10.1083/jcb.140.4.821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kudalkar EM, Davis TN, Asbury CL. Single-Molecule Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Microscopy. Cold Spring Harbor protocols. 2016;2016(5):pdb.top077800. doi: 10.1101/pdb.top077800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. van Munster EB, Gadella TW. Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology. 2005;95:143–175. doi: 10.1007/b102213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Neikirk K, Vue Z, Katti P, Rodriguez BI, Omer S, Shao J, Christensen T, Garza Lopez E, Marshall A, Palavicino-Maggio CB, Ponce J, et al. Systematic Transmission Electron Microscopy-Based Identification and 3D Reconstruction of Cellular Degradation Machinery. Adv Biol (Weinh) 2023 Jun;7(6):e2200221. doi: 10.1002/adbi.202200221. Epub 2023 Mar 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Thapilyal Suraj, Kalpana Namdar Hari, Ronald McMillan, et al. Light Microscopy-Based Organelle Quantification: A Comprehensive Protocol. Current Protocols bioRxiv. 2026:2026.01.19.700276. doi: 10.1002/cpz1.70324. (Accepted) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES