Skip to main content
Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation logoLink to Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation
. 2020 Summer;26(3):209–219. doi: 10.46292/sci2603-209

A Primary Care Provider’s Guide to Preventive Health After Spinal Cord Injury

James Milligan 1,, Stephen Burns 2,3, Suzanne Groah 4, Jeremy Howcroft 5
PMCID: PMC7640905  PMID: 33192049

Abstract

Objective: Provide guidance for preventive health and health maintenance after spinal cord injury (SCI) for primary care providers (PCPs). Main message: Individuals with SCI may not receive the same preventive health care as the general population. Additionally, SCI-related secondary conditions may put their health at risk. SCI is considered a complex condition associated with many barriers to receiving quality primary care. Attention to routine preventive care and the unique health considerations of persons with SCI can improve health and quality of life and may prevent unnecessary health care utilization. Conclusion: PCPs are experts in preventive care and continuity of care, however individuals with SCI may not receive the same preventive care due to numerous barriers. This article serves as a quick reference for PCPs.

Keywords: accessibility, preventive health, primary care, screening


Health Maintenance Checklist

  1. Provide evidence-based general preventive care:

    • Immunization

    • Cancer screening

    • Cardiovascular and metabolic health

  2. Review and provide preventive care for common secondary health issues after SCI: urohealth, bowel, autonomic dysfunction, respiratory health, sexual and reproductive health, bone health, skin integrity, mental health, pain, spasticity, musculoskeletal conditions

Case Report

Jennifer is a 45-year-old female who comes to your family practice asking about general health and screening tests, particularly whether she should receive a Papanicolaou (Pap) test. She sustained a spinal cord injury (SCI) at T5 4 years ago that resulted in paraplegia. A review of her history indicates that her last Pap test was 5 years ago. She has concerns that she will not be able to transfer to the height of the exam table, and she has spasticity of the legs. What would you do?

Introduction

Individuals with SCI are living longer and are affected by the same health issues as able-bodied individuals, but they also have secondary health issues unique to SCI.1,2 Furthermore, they are known to have challenges accessing the same level of primary care as able-bodied individuals, and they have unmet health needs.35 The barriers to care are well described: inaccessibility (e.g., inaccessible office, lack of accessible equipment), lack of primary care physician (PCP) knowledge and confidence in managing SCI, systematic issues (e.g., cost, geographical discrepancies, fragmented care systems), and attitudinal issues (e.g., misconceptions that people with disabilities do not develop the same diseases or cannot undergo the investigations).4,68

McColl and colleagues suggest that ideal primary care for individuals with SCI involves having an accessible premise and an awareness of unmet needs (e.g., sexual health) and performing an annual comprehensive evaluation.3,9,10 PCPs have an important role in facilitating specialist involvement for secondary conditions and multidisciplinary follow-up for disability-related issues.1,10

Preventive care for individuals with SCI often requires a greater time commitment per visit or more frequent visits.1 Effective management needs to be patient-centered and deliberately planned, and it requires collaboration and coordination of all health care providers. Many barriers to delivering optimal primary care are not immediately surmountable. This article provides guidance for preventive health and health maintenance measures for PCPs managing individuals with SCI. In the absence of specialist involvement, the PCP may have greater responsibility (e.g., urohealth surveillance). Alternatively, specialist involvement warrants vigilance to avoid unnecessary duplication in ordering investigations (e.g., lab and diagnostic imaging). We recommend SCI specialist involvement for any patient with SCI-related comorbidities (e.g., neurogenic bladder and/or bowel, mobility issues, or spasticity) or for cases that the PCP is not comfortable managing.

It is important to note that there is often limited evidence for specific recommendations, and many are based on expert opinion. Therefore, this article is intended as a guide and not a complete list. Please refer to the other articles in this issue for more detailed information.

General Preventive Care

Even though evidence-based preventive care recommendations vary between jurisdictions, individuals with SCI should receive the same preventive care (e.g., immunization, cancer screening, etc.) as the general population. The following discussion summarizes preventive health care needs, including the differences specific to the management of individuals with SCI and special considerations when performing investigations (e.g., accessibility, physical considerations, planning).2

Immunizations

Vaccines have contributed significantly to preventive health and control of infections and are particularly important in people with underlying chronic medical conditions, especially in those with SCI.1113 Ensure routine immunizations are up to date; individualized risk factors and local guidelines should inform further immunizations.

Suggestions for people with SCI:

  • Annual influenza vaccination is highly recommended for adults and children (6 months old and older).1115 Refer to local evidence-based guidelines as to type and number of doses of influenza vaccine.

  • Pneumococcal vaccination is not a routine recommendation in adults under 65 years old, but it may be an important additional vaccination in SCI, particularly in patients with lesions at T8 or higher due to impaired respiratory function (refer to local evidence-based guidelines as to type of pneumococcal vaccines for patients under age 65 with chronic medical conditions and for children age 2 years or less).1113,15

  • Note: Individuals with SCI who have other comorbid conditions (e.g., asplenia) may require additional vaccines.11

Cancer Screening

Population cancer screening is an important component of preventive care, and recommendations will vary depending on geographical evidence-based guidelines.16 The literature does not show an increased risk of these cancers among people with SCI versus the general population but does suggest screening does not occur at the same rates.6,10,14,17,18 This section will discuss SCI-specific considerations to facilitate screening.

Breast cancer screening

Women with SCI and other disabilities are less likely to receive a mammogram.6,19 Barriers to obtaining a mammogram include lack of health insurance, factors related to skills/attitudes of health care workers, and physical barriers (inaccessible facilities and equipment).6,18,20

Suggestions:

  • Adhere to evidence-based guidelines.

  • Be knowledgeable of accessible facilities, and coordinate with the facility and staff to ensure they can accommodate individual patient needs.

Cervical cancer screening

Women with SCI often encounter barriers to Pap testing. Physical barriers are the most obvious (e.g., inaccessible premises, inaccessible examination tables). A less obvious barrier is the possibility that the clinician lacks expertise with managing unique conditions such as spasticity, bladder issues, and autonomic dysreflexia (AD).6,20 (A description of AD can be found in the section, Preventive Care for Common Secondary Health Issues After SCI.)

Suggestions:

  • Adhere to evidence-based guidelines.

  • If the exam table is not accessible, a home visit may be an alternative strategy.

  • Have patient empty bowel and bladder prior to exam.

  • Spasticity in the lower extremities may decrease flexibility, and additional assistance may be required for positioning the patient.

  • If a patient has a history of AD:

    • Monitor blood pressure and have anesthetic gel (lidocaine) to coat the speculum or administer nifedipine 30 minutes prior to procedure if required.2123

  • Referral to a gynecologist may be necessary.

  • Consultation with a rehabilitation specialist may be necessary (especially in patients with AD).

Colorectal cancer screening

With SCI, fecal screening tests may be falsely positive due to hemorrhoids or from regular digital extraction as part of the bowel program.7 Colonoscopy has been determined to be safe and effective but requires planning and coordination.7,24 Colonoscopy diagnostic yield may be low due to poor preparation and may require a modified or extended preparation that may be difficult for patients. The clinician should be aware of individuals at risk of AD and understand management of AD. The bowel preparation and resultant increased stooling can cause skin problems. Patients may be wary of having a colonoscopy performed due to their fear of disrupting their established bowel program.

Suggestions:

  • Adhere to evidence-based guidelines.

  • Understand the patient’s current bowel program and associated issues (e.g., AD, spasticity).

  • An extended preparation may be required for colonoscopy. Some studies show success with a multiday inpatient bowel preparation regime.24

  • Communicate to the specialist and facility performing a colonoscopy the unique needs of the patient. This may include the potential need for extended bowel preparation, extra time needed for the procedure, assistance or equipment for patient transfers, or risk of AD.

Prostate cancer screening

The United States Preventive Services Task Force recommends that periodic PSA screening in men between 55 and 69 years should be an individual decision.25 Several studies have found the PSA level and cancer risk between men with SCI and non-SCI age-matched controls did not have any significant differences or increased risk.2629

Suggestion:

  • Adhere to evidence-based guidelines.

Cardiovascular and metabolic health

As individuals with chronic SCI are predisposed to accelerated atherogenesis, dyslipidemia, and glycemic dysregulation, it is not surprising that cardiovascular disease has emerged as a leading cause of mortality among people with SCI.1012,30 Neurogenic obesity frequently occurs in persons with chronic SCI, resulting in the cardiometabolic syndrome of insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and ultimately accelerated arteriosclerosis.30 The primary intervention required for long-term management includes behavior modification such as diet and exercise.

It is important to note that cardiovascular disease symptoms can present atypically in patients with cervical and upper thoracic SCI.15,30 Chest pain may be absent, and other symptoms such as AD, spasticity, syncope, and dyspnea may be present.

Suggestions:

  • Encourage cessation of tobacco use.14,21,22,30

  • Recommend adoption of a heart-healthy diet with focus on fruits, vegetables, lowfat dairy, poultry, fish, legumes and nuts to achieve neutral or negative (fat loss) energy balance.22

  • Encourage exercise ≥150 minutes per week to increase energy expenditure sufficiently to achieve neutral or negative (fat loss) energy balance.22

  • Measure lipids in asymptomatic adults with SCI, with fasting LDL (estimated using the Friedewald equation when fasting TG levels are TG levels are <200 mg/dL or by direct measurement when higher), TC, TG, and HDL-C. Repeat at least every 3 years if levels are normal.22

  • Screen lipids annually if there are multiple risk factors, confirmed dyslipidemia, or initiation of treatment.22

  • Use cardiovascular disease risk calculators with caution as they are not specific to SCI population and may underestimate risk.22,23

    • Initiation of pharmacotherapy may be guided by other indicators such as low HDL-C, high C-reactive protein.22

    • At least moderate intensity statin therapy should be used.22

  • Screen adults with SCI for diabetes/prediabetes. Repeat every 3 years if normal.22

    • Use American Diabetes Association guidelines for diagnosis and treatment.22

    • Medication selection should incorporate patient characteristics; be aware of side effects that may be greater in individuals with SCI (e.g., hypotension, urinary tract infection).22

  • Assess weight annually with an obesity surrogate of BMI ≥ 22 kg/m2, unless more accurate body composition testing is available.22,23

  • Obtain involvement of a specialist to help manage cardiometabolic issues.

Hypertension

Diagnosis of hypertension can be challenging in patients with SCI due to autonomic instability and postural influences.22 Blood pressure is commonly lower in individuals with tetraplegia and lesions above T7 (e.g., 100/60 mm Hg).

Suggestions:

  • Measure blood pressure at every routine visit and at least annually.14,22,23,31

  • Apply evidence-based guidelines for treating hypertension as per general population; for most, the threshold for initiating pharmacotherapy is >140/90 mm Hg.22

  • Consider patient characteristics when selecting an antihypertensive agent (e.g., diuretic and bladder management).22

Preventive Care for Common Secondary Health Issues After SCI

Urohealth

Neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) and urinary tract infection (UTI) are common secondary complications that result in significant morbidity and can greatly affect quality of life.32,33 The vast majority of individuals with SCI experience bladder dysfunction.3436

Suggestions:

  • Regularly review patient’s bladder care/program (at least annually).32,33

  • Annually evaluate serum creatinine and calculated creatinine clearance to assess renal function.32,33

  • Perform renal ultrasound to assess upper tracts annually (or at least every 2 years).32,33

  • Perform urodynamic studies at baseline and if there is a change in function (UTIs, incontinence, difficulty catheterizing, autonomic dysreflexia, urolithiasis).32,33,37

  • Consider cystoscopy in individuals with long-term indwelling catheters due to an increased prevalence of bladder cancer several years post injury.38,39

  • Avoid testing and treating asymptomatic bacteriuria.33,35,39

Bowel health

Neurogenic bowel dysfunction (NBD) can greatly affect quality of life; some effects include incontinence, skin breakdown, lengthy bowel programs, social isolation, intimacy issues, and employment issues.4044

Suggestions:

  • Assess bowel program regularly

    • Method (upper motor neuron vs. lower motor neuron), length, timing, diet, laxatives, complications (e.g., blood, incontinence), patient satisfaction.45,46

    • Stool consistency (e.g., Bristol Stool Chart).47

  • Recommend adequate fiber and fluids.2,48

  • Be aware that many individuals require suppositories, laxatives, or manual assistance.2,45,46

Autonomic dysfunction

AD is a potentially life-threatening emergency that can occur with SCI at T6 or above (it has been reported in patients with SCI as low as T8–12).42,43,47,4951 The chief finding of AD is an increase in systolic blood pressure of 20 mm Hg or more above baseline (baseline systolic blood pressure with high level SCI often 80–100 mm Hg).48 AD may also include profound headache, sweating above the level of SCI, blurred vision, piloerection, and anxiety. It is caused by noxious stimuli below the level of the lesion and is often triggered by bladder or bowel irritation.4951

Suggestions:

  • Educate patients about AD and ask them about their risks for or instances of AD (especially with SCI at T6 and above).49

  • Regularly review triggers, severity, plan of action, and changes.49

  • Have an AD management protocol and kit in the office and consider a home kit for patients.49

  • Document AD clearly in patient medical records and when referring to other health care providers.4951

  • Advise patients to carry an AD wallet card or mobile alert.49,51

  • Refer patients to a specialist if AD is severe or worsening.49,51

Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is common in cervical and high thoracic SCI when an individual assumes an upright position.52 Symptoms can include fatigue, dizziness, blurred vision, light-headedness, dyspnea, and perhaps cognitive impairment.5356

Suggestions:

  • Document baseline blood pressure.

  • Ask about symptoms of OH in appropriate patients.

  • Consider nonpharmacological and pharmacological treatments.

Respiratory health

Respiratory diseases, particularly pneumonia, remain the leading cause of mortality and a frequent reason for hospitalization.5761 Respiratory complications are greater with higher levels of injury and severity of SCI.2,62 Permanent ventilator assistance via tracheostomy is usually required with injury at C3 and above. Injuries at C5 or above often require some level of ventilator support.63 Many patients with injuries below this level will have respiratory compromise.

Suggestions:

  • Ensure that immunizations are up to date.

  • Monitor for signs and symptoms of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB).

    • If feasible, polysomnography is recommended if SDB is suspected, particularly in complete tetraplegia.2

  • Encourage regular respiratory muscle training.

  • Consider pulmonary function tests (spirometry).2

  • Encourage weight management.

  • Encourage tobacco cessation.2

  • Refer to specialist:

    • Individuals with higher level injuries requiring respiratory support.

    • Individuals with deterioration in respiratory function, frequent infections, and SDB.

Sexual and Reproductive Health

For individuals with SCI, sexuality and sexual health are important topics that medical providers often do not address adequately.64,65

Suggestions:

  • Ask, listen, and follow-up:

    • How is your sexual health?

    • Have you experienced any difficulty in the areas of sexual health?

    • Do you or your partner have any concerns or questions that have not been addressed?

  • Explore multiple etiologies and factors related to the identified issue:

    • Consider pharmacological (e.g., antispasmodics, pain medications) and psychosocial factors (e.g., depression) as potential causes of sexual dysfunction.

    • Make referrals as clinically indicated.

    • There are pharmacological (e.g., phos phodiesterase inhibitors) and nonpharmaco logical interventions (e.g., sex devices, positi oning) that can be implemented by the PCP.

Bone health

Patients with SCI are at high risk for developing sublesional osteoporosis. Most bone loss occurs in the first year after complete motor paralysis, and fractures occur most commonly in the distal femur and proximal tibia.66,67

Inability to access investigations and limitations of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) are barriers to diagnosis. Ideally DXA should be performed at the distal femur and proximal tibia, but this protocol is not universally available. There is currently lack of evidence and clear guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in SCI.68

Suggestions:

  • Have a high index of suspicion for fragility fracture when there is an observable change in a limb (e.g., edema, redness, deformity, increased spasticity, AD).

  • Consider referral to a specialist for management of fractures and sublesional osteoporosis.

  • Consider assessing bone mass with DXA at baseline and perhaps periodically (every 1–2 years thereafter).

  • Consider optimizing metabolic parameters through calcium and vitamin D supplementation.

  • Consider excluding secondary causes of osteoporosis in individuals with fractures and sublesional osteoporosis (e.g., thyroid stimulating hormone, complete blood count, alkaline phosphatase, vitamin D, calcium, creatinine).

  • Consider recommending physical modalities to maintain bone density (e.g., ambulation, functional electrical stimulation).

Pressure injury

Skin breakdown from pressure injury is common after SCI and leads to poor outcomes such as significant disability, loss of quality of life and independence, social and occupational impacts, and tremendous use of health care resources.31 Common sites are over bony prominences such as the ischial tuberosity, calcaneus, malleoli, and sacrum.31

Suggestions31:

  • Educate patient and caregiver (e.g., daily inspection, good hygiene, and early signs).

  • Recommend frequent pressure relief.

  • Provide early identification and assessment.

  • Refer to appropriate resources (specialty clinic, community wound nursing, occupational therapy).

Mental health

Major depression is more common in individuals with SCI and is underrecognized and undertreated.69 Risk factors include prior mental health issues, unstable work, history of substance abuse, lower education, and chronic pain.70 Depression after SCI is associated with worse medical and functional outcomes.71,72 Specific SCI barriers to management include limited access to care (e.g., accessibility, financial limitations), nonadherence, and multiple medical and psychosocial comorbidities.

Suggestions:

  • Screen for depression routinely using the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 or Patient Health Questionnaire-9.73

  • Recommend cognitive behavioral therapy and pharmacology (e.g., venlafaxine XR) as effective treatments for major depression after SCI.74,75

  • Recognize that management of risk factors (e.g., pain) and other modalities (e.g., exercise) are important.73,76,77

Pain after SCI

Pain is a common secondary complication of SCI and is associated with interference in daily activities and poorer quality of life.

Suggestions:

  • Assess pain regularly (suggest at minimum annually) and differentiate between the different types of pain (nociceptive, neuropathic).

  • Advocate and explore nonpharmacological interventions (e.g., exercise, therapies) along with medications to optimize chronic pain management.

Spasticity

Spasticity is a common condition in SCI and has been reported as a clinical impairment in 40% to 60% of individuals.78,79 Spasticity can be exacerbated by a number of factors, but a significant worsening of spasticity along with other symptoms might give a clue to a potentially reversible condition (e.g., UTI) or perhaps serious complication (e.g., syringomyelia). Be sure to assess for reversible causes of spasticity.31

Suggestions:

  • Regularly assess spasticity80:

    • Bothersome vs. beneficial (e.g., help with transfers and mobility), severity, complications (e.g., fractures), triggers, worsening or change

  • Consider nonpharmacological (exercise, seating, physiotherapy) and pharmacological treatments.31

  • Refer to specialists as needed.

Neurological/functional status

Deterioration in neurological function or general function may indicate a new issue or a need to focus on an identified need (e.g., syringomyelia is a fluid-filled cyst that can occur at the site of the SCI that can develop months to years after injury and cause worsening neurological function).1,31

Suggestions:

  • Regularly, at least annually, ask about changes in neurological signs and symptoms (sensory/motor change) and change in functional ability from baseline.

    • If changes are present, assess and consider investigations or referral to specialist.

Musculoskeletal health

Overuse injuries are common in individuals with SCI due to repetitive stress (e.g., transfers, wheelchair propulsion) on normal or abnormal tissues (e.g., weakened arm muscles in C5 tetraplegia).14 Shoulder injuries are most common, but elbow and wrist injuries are also common.14,31

Suggestions:

  • Regularly inquire about overuse injuries.

  • Early identification and management is important, consider1,31:

    • Activity modification

    • Physiotherapy, exercise

    • Occupational therapy, seating/positioning adjustments

Case Resolution

You arrange a home visit to perform the Pap test. Jennifer has an attendant to help with her lower extremity spasticity and as chaperone. She does not have a history of AD to worry about. She agrees to receive influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations. You give her a requisition to do some screening bloodwork including fasting blood sugar, A1C, and lipid panel. You do a more comprehensive assessment and discuss preventive health and SCI secondary complications more thoroughly while there. This encounter has you thinking about the accessibility of your office and what accommodations you might make.

Conclusion

Primary care is essential to providing preventive care and health maintenance in individuals with SCI. In order to achieve this, primary care must not only be accessible but also be knowledgeable in the unique issues associated with SCI, flexible in the approach, and instrumental in coordinating and communicating with the patient’s entire health care team.

Acknowledgments

Mr. Howcroft reports personal fees from eHealth Centre of Excellence during the conduct of the study. Mr. Howcroft is living with a spinal cord injury and is a patient of the Centre For Family Medicine Family Health Team’s Mobility Clinic. Suzanne Groah is an Editor of Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Withers H, Higgins K, Ramakrishnan K, Middleton J, Cameron I. Ageing with Spinal Cord Injury. https://www.aci.health.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/224679/ACI-Ageing-with-SCI-FINAL.pdf Published May 2014. Accessed August 1, 2019.
  • 2.Mishori R, Groah SL, Otubu O, Raffoul M, Stolarz K. Improving your care of patients with spinal cord injury/disease. J Fam Pract. 2016;65(5):302–309. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27275933. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.McColl MA, Aiken A, McColl A, Sakakibara B, Smith K. Primary care of people with spinal cord injury: Scoping review. Can Fam Physician. 2012;58(11):1207–1216. e626–35. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23152456. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kroll T, Jones GC, Kehn M, Neri MT. Barriers and strategies affecting the utilisation of primary preventive services for people with physical disabilities: A qualitative inquiry. Health Soc Care Community. 2006;14(4):284–293. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2006.00613.x. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Middleton JW, Leong G, Mann L. Management of spinal cord injury in general practice - part 1. Aust Fam Physician. 2008;37(4):229–233. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Xu X, Mann JR, Hardin JW, Gustafson E, McDermott SW, Deroche CB. Adherence to US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations for breast and cervical cancer screening for women who have a spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2017;40(1):76–84. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2016.1153293. doi. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hayman A V, Guihan M, Fisher MJ, et al. Colonoscopy is high yield in spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2013;36(5):436–442. doi: 10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000091. doi. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.O’Day B, Dautel P, Scheer J. Barriers to healthcare for people with mobility impairments. Manag Care Q. 2002;10(3):41–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Groah SL, Charlifue S, Tate D, et al. Spinal cord injury and aging: Challenges and recommendations for future research. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;91(1):80–93. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31821f70bc. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Smith K, McColl MA, Aiken A, McColl A. Spinal Cord Injury Research Evidence: Primary Care. https://scireproject.com/evidence/rehabilitation-evidence/primary-care/ Published 2014. Accessed August 1, 2019.
  • 11.Public Health Agency of Canada. Canadian Immunization Guide. https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/canadian-immunization-guide.html Updated January 24, 2018. Accessed August 1, 2019.
  • 12.Mahoney MC. Adult immunization--pneumococcal vaccine. Am Fam Physician. 2000;61(7):2239–2240. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10779259. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mahoney MC. Adult immunization--influenza vaccine. Am Fam Physician. 2000;61(9):2901–2902. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10821162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Middleton J, Ramakrishnan K, Cameron I. Health Maintenance for Adults with Spinal Cord Injuries. https://www.aci.health.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/155167/Health-Maintenance.pdf Published 2014. Accessed August 1, 2019.
  • 15.Department of Veterans Affairs. Veterans Health Administration Handbook. Washington, DC: Author; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Selby K, Bartlett-Esquilant G, Cornuz J. Personalized cancer screening: Helping primary care rise to the challenge. Public Health Rev. 2018;39:4. doi: 10.1186/s40985-018-0083-x. doi. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kao C-H, Sun L-M, Chen Y-S, et al. Risk of nongenitourinary cancers in patients with spinal cord injury: A population-based cohort study. Medicine (Balt) 2016;95(2):e2462. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002462. doi. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Iezzoni LI, McCarthy EP, Davis RB, Siebens H. Mobility impairments and use of screening and preventive services. Am J Publi Health. 2000;90(6):955–961. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.6.955. doi. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Courtney-Long E, Armour B, Frammartino B, Miller J. Factors associated with self-reported mammography use for women with and women without a disability. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2011;20(9):1279–1286. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2609. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Schopp LH, Sanford TC, Hagglund KJ, Gay JW, Coatney MA. Removing service barriers for women with physical disabilities: Promoting accessibility in the gynecologic care setting. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2002;47(2):74–79. doi: 10.1016/s1526-9523(02)00216-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12019989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chiodo AE, Scelza WM, Kirshblum SC, Wuermser L-A, Ho CH, Priebe MM. Spinal cord injury medicine. 5. Long-term medical issues and health maintenance. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(3 Suppl 1):S76–83. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.12.015. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nash MS, Groah SL, Gater DR, et al. Identification and management of cardiometabolic risk after spinal cord injury: Clinical practice guideline for health care providers. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2018;24(4):379–423. doi: 10.1310/sci2404-379. doi. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.McColl MA, Gupta S, Smith K, McColl A. Promoting long-term health among people with spinal cord injury: What’s new? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(12) doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121520. doi. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Song SH, Svircev JN, Teng BJ, Dominitz JA, Burns SP. A safe and effective multi-day colonoscopy bowel preparation for individuals with spinal cord injuries. J Spinal Cord Med. 2018;41(2):149–156. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2016.1258968. doi. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wolff T, Jadotte YJ. Screening for prostate cancer. Am Fam Physician. 2018;98(8):537–538. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30277736. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pramudji CK, Mutchnik SE, DeConcini D, Boone TB. Prostate cancer screening with prostate specific antigen in spinal cord injured men. J Urol. 2002;167(3):1303–1305. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11832718. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pannek J, Berges RR, Cubick G, Meindl R, Senge T. Prostate size and PSA serum levels in male patients with spinal cord injury. Urology. 2003;62(5):845–848. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00654-x. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Konety BR, Nguyen TT, Brenes G, et al. Evaluation of the effect of spinal cord injury on serum PSA levels. Urology. 2000;56(1):82–86. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00548-3. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Atalay AC, Karaman MI, Güney S, Dalkiliç A, Müslümanoğlu AY, Ergenekon E. Age-specific PSA reference ranges in a group of non-urologic patients. Int Urol Nephrol. 1998;30(5):587–591. doi: 10.1007/BF02550550. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9934802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Yarar-Fisher C, Heyn P, Zanca JM, Charlifue S, Hsieh J, Brienza DM. Early identification of cardiovascular diseases in people with spinal cord injury: Key information for primary care providers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(6):1277–1279. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.10.001. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Middleton JW, Leong G, Mann L. Management of spinal cord injury in general practice - part 2. Aust Fam Physician. 2008;37(5):331–332. 335–338. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18464962. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kreydin E, Welk B, Chung D, et al. Surveillance and management of urologic complications after spinal cord injury. World J Urol. 2018;36(10):1545–1553. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2345-0. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Blok B. EAU guidelines on neurourology. https://uroweb.org/guideline/neuro-urology/ Published 2018. Accessed August 1, 2019.
  • 34.McKinley WO, Jackson AB, Cardenas DD, DeVivo MJ. Long-term medical complications after traumatic spinal cord injury: A regional model systems analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(11):1402–1410. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90251-4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10569434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Middleton J, Ramakrishnan K, Cameron I. Management of the Neurogenic Bladder for Adults with Spinal Cord Injuries. 2013 https://www.aci.health.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/155179/Management-Neurogenic-Bladder.pdf Accessed August 1, 2019.
  • 36.Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. Bladder management for adults with spinal cord injury: A clinical practice guideline for health-care providers. J Spinal Cord Med. 2006;29(5):527–573. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17274492. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Goetz LL, Klausner AP. Strategies for prevention of urinary tract infections in neurogenic bladder dysfunction. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2014;25(3):605–618. viii. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2014.04.002. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ismail S, Karsenty G, Chartier-Kastler E, et al. Prevalence, management, and prognosis of bladder cancer in patients with neurogenic bladder: A systematic review. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(4):1386–1395. doi: 10.1002/nau.23457. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Przydacz M, Chlosta P, Corcos J. Recommendations for urological follow-up of patients with neurogenic bladder secondary to spinal cord injury. Int Urol Nephrol. 2018;50(6):1005–1016. doi: 10.1007/s11255-018-1852-7. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Levi R, Hultling C, Nash MS, Seiger A. The Stockholm spinal cord injury study: 1. Medical problems in a regional SCI population. Paraplegia. 1995;33(6):308–315. doi: 10.1038/sc.1995.70. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lynch AC, Antony A, Dobbs BR, Frizelle FA. Bowel dysfunction following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2001;39(4):193–203. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101119. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Vallès M, Mearin F. Pathophysiology of bowel dysfunction in patients with motor incomplete spinal cord injury: Comparison with patients with motor complete spinal cord injury. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(9):1589–1597. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181a873f3. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Glickman S, Kamm MA. Bowel dysfunction in spinal-cord-injury patients. Lancet (Lond) 1996;347(9016):1651–1653. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91487-7. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Groah SL, Stiens SA, Gittler MS, Kirshblum SC, McKinley WO. Spinal cord injury medicine. 5. Preserving wellness and independence of the aging patient with spinal cord injury: A primary care approach for the rehabilitation medicine specialist. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(3 Suppl 1):S82–9. S90–8. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.32182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Faaborg PM, Christensen P, Finnerup N, Laurberg S, Krogh K. The pattern of colorectal dysfunction changes with time since spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2008;46(3):234–238. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102121. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Finnerup NB, Faaborg P, Krogh K, Jensen TS. Abdominal pain in long-term spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2008;46(3):198–203. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102097. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lewis SJ, Heaton KW. Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1997;32(9):920–924. doi: 10.3109/00365529709011203. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Clinical practice guidelines: Neurogenic bowel management in adults with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord Medicine Consortium. J Spinal Cord Med. 1998;21(3):248–293. doi: 10.1080/10790268.1998.11719536. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Milligan J, Lee J, McMillan C, Klassen H. Autonomic dysreflexia: Recognizing a common serious condition in patients with spinal cord injury. Can Fam Physician. 2012;58(8):831–835. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22893332. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Cragg J, Krassioukov A. Autonomic dysreflexia. CMAJ. 2012;184(1):66. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.110859. doi. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Krassioukov A, Blackmer J, Teasell RW, Eng JJ. Autonomic dysreflexia following spinal cord injury. In: Eng JJ, Teasell RW, Miller WC, et al., editors. Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence. Version 6.0. Vancouver: 2018. pp. 1–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Claydon VE, Krassioukov AV. Orthostatic hypotension and autonomic pathways after spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2006;23(12):1713–1725. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.23.1713. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Sclater A, Alagiakrishnan K. Orthostatic hypotension. A primary care primer for assessment and treatment. Geriatrics. 2004;59(8):22–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Frisbie JH, Steele DJ. Postural hypotension and abnormalities of salt and water metabolism in myelopathy patients. Spinal Cord. 1997;35(5):303–307. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sachdeva R, Gao F, Chan CCH, Krassioukov AV. Cognitive function after spinal cord injury: A systematic review. Neurology. 2018;91(13):611–621. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006244. doi. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Phillips AA, Warburton DER, Ainslie PN, Krassioukov A V. Regional neurovascular coupling and cognitive performance in those with low blood pressure secondary to high-level spinal cord injury: Improved by alpha-1 agonist midodrine hydrochloride. J Cerebr Blood Flow Metabol. 2014;34(5):794–801. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2014.3. doi. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Cardenas DD, Hoffman JM, Kirshblum S, McKinley W. Etiology and incidence of rehospitalization after traumatic spinal cord injury: A multicenter analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(11):1757–1763. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.03.016. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15520970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. 2018 Annual Report - Complete Public Version. https://www.nscisc.uab.edu/ Updated 2018. Accessed August 1, 2019.
  • 59.Skelton F, Hoffman JM, Reyes M, Burns SP. Examining health-care utilization in the first year following spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2015;38(6):690–695. doi: 10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000269. doi. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Winslow C, Bode RK, Felton D, Chen D, Meyer PR. Impact of respiratory complications on length of stay and hospital costs in acute cervical spine injury. Chest. 2002;121(5):1548–1554. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.5.1548. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Garshick E, Kelley A, Cohen SA, et al. A prospective assessment of mortality in chronic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2005;43(7):408–416. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101729. doi. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Berlowitz DJ, Wadsworth B, Ross J. Respiratory problems and management in people with spinal cord injury. Breathe (Sheffield, England) 2016;12(4):328–340. doi: 10.1183/20734735.012616. doi. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Schilero GJ, Bauman WA, Radulovic M. Traumatic spinal cord injury: Pulmonary physiologic principles and management. Clin Chest Med. 2018;39(2):411–425. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2018.02.002. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Pieters R, Kedde H, Bender J. Training rehabilitation teams in sexual health care: A description and evaluation of a multidisciplinary intervention. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(6):732–739. doi: 10.1080/09638.288.2016.1271026. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Eisenberg NW, Andreski S-R, Mona LR. Sexuality and physical disability: A disability-affirmative approach to assessment and intervention within health care. Curr Sex Health Rep. 2015;7(1):19–29. doi: 10.1007/s11930-014-0037-3. doi. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Garland DE, Adkins RH, Kushwaha V, Stewart C. Risk factors for osteoporosis at the knee in the spinal cord injury population. J Spinal Cord Med. 2004;27(3):202–206. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2004.11753748. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Frotzler A, Cheikh-Sarraf B, Pourtehrani M, Krebs J, Lippuner K. Long-bone fractures in persons with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2015;53(9):701–704. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.74. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Troy KL, Morse LR. Measurement of bone: Diagnosis of SCI-induced osteoporosis and fracture risk prediction. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015;21(4):267–274. doi: 10.1310/sci2104-267. doi. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Williams R, Murray A. Prevalence of depression after spinal cord injury: A meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(1):133–140. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.08.016. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Craig A, Rodrigues D, Tran Y, Guest R, Bartrop R, Middleton J. Developing an algorithm capable of discriminating depressed mood in people with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2014;52(5):413–416. doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.25. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Krueger H, Noonan VK, Williams D, Trenaman LM, Rivers CS. The influence of depression on physical complications in spinal cord injury: Behavioral mechanisms and health-care implications. Spinal Cord. 2013;51(4):260–266. doi: 10.1038/sc.2013.3. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Krause JS, Saunders LL. Health, secondary conditions, and life expectancy after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(11):1770–1775. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.05.024. doi. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Bombardier CH, Kalpakjian CZ, Graves DE, Dyer JR, Tate DG, Fann JR. Validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 in assessing major depressive disorder during inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(10):1838–1845. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.04.019. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Perkes SJ, Bowman J, Penkala S. Psychological therapies for the management of co-morbid depression following a spinal cord injury: A systematic review. J Health Psychol. 2014;19(12):1597–1612. doi: 10.1177/1359105313496445. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Fann JR, Bombardier CH, Richards JS, et al. Venlafaxine extended-release for depression following spinal cord injury: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72(3):247–258. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.2482. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Cardenas DD, Nieshoff EC, Suda K, et al. A randomized trial of pregabalin in patients with neuropathic pain due to spinal cord injury. Neurology. 2013;80(6):533–539. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318281546b. doi. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Hicks AL, Martin KA, Ditor DS, et al. Long-term exercise training in persons with spinal cord injury: effects on strength, arm ergometry performance and psychological well-being. Spinal Cord. 2003;41(1):34–43. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101389. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Adams MM, Hicks AL. Spasticity after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2005;43(10):577–586. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101757. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Pandyan AD, Gregoric M, Barnes MP, et al. Spasticity: Clinical perceptions, neurological realities and meaningful measurement. Disabil Rehabil. 27(1–2):2–6. doi: 10.1080/09638280400014576. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15799140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Lin J, Chay W. Special considerations in assessing and treating spasticity in spinal cord injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2018;29(3):445–453. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2018.03.001. doi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation are provided here courtesy of American Spinal Injury Association

RESOURCES