Abstract
Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment by prolonging overall survival of cancer patients. Despite advances in the clinical setting, the immune cellular network in the tumor microenvironment (TME) that mediates such therapy is not well understood. Interleukin 33 (IL33) is highly expressed in normal epithelial cells but downregulated in tumor cells in advanced carcinoma. Here, we showed that IL33 was induced in tumor cells after treatment with ICB such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). ST2 signaling in non-tumor cells, particularly CD8+ T cells, was critical for the antitumor efficacy of ICB immunotherapy. We demonstrated that tumor-derived IL33 was crucial for the antitumor efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors. Mechanistically, IL33 increased the accumulation and effector function of tumor resident CD103+CD8+ T cells and CD103 expression on CD8+ T cells was required for the antitumor efficacy of IL33. In addition, IL33 also increased the numbers of CD103+ dendritic cells (DC) in the TME and CD103+ DC were required for the antitumor effect of IL33 and accumulation of tumor infiltrating CD8+ T cells. Combination of IL33 with CTLA-4 and PD-1 ICB further prolonged survival of tumor-bearing mice. Our study established that the “danger signal” IL33 was crucial for mediating ICB cancer therapy by promoting tumor resident adaptive immune responses.
Introduction
Immune-checkpoint-blockade (ICB) therapy has produced unprecedented survival benefits for cancer patients. The efficacy of ICB depends on adaptive antitumor immune responses, which are activated by a combination of tumor antigens and tumor-derived damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) molecules (1). High tumor mutation load increases the chance of generating immunogenic non-self neoantigens, which can be recognized by the adaptive immune system (2). Increased tumor mutation load is associated with the improved survival provided by ICB therapy in multiple cancer types (3,4). The “danger hypothesis” predicts that antitumor immune responses depend on immunostimulatory DAMP molecules, also called alarmins or danger signals, in addition to neoantigens (5). Alarmins stimulate dendritic cells (DCs) and T cells and are involved in initiating antitumor immune responses. Yet the role of DAMP molecules in ICB tumor therapy is not well understood.
Tumor resident T cells have been implicated in mediating tumor immune surveillance and immunotherapy (6). Ample studies have established that the number of resident CD8+ T cells in the tumor tissue correlates with better prognosis (7,8). Tissue resident T cells can be generated in the draining lymph node (LN) and migrate to the tissue. Although sharing similar TCR repertoires with effector and central memory T cells, tissue resident T cells reside in the tissue and do not circulate into the blood. Resident T cells also express characteristic markers such as CD103, CD69, and CD49a (9,10). In tumor tissues, it is thought that they interact intimately with epithelial tumor cells and can initiate various effector functions against target tumor cells. The tissue signals crucial for tissue residence of T cells are not well understood.
IL33 is a member of the IL1 gene family. IL33 protein is detected in the nuclei of epithelial cells in barrier tissues such as the skin, gastrointestinal tract, lungs, and endothelial cells of blood vessels (11). The nuclear localization of IL33 suggests that it has a role as an alarmin or danger signal upon damage of endothelial or epithelial cells (11). IL33 performs diverse biological functions by targeting various immune cells. The role of IL33 in type 2 immunity is established (12). IL33 enhances the function of Th1 and CD8+ T cells in vitro and mediates types 1 immunity during viral infection and chronic immune pathology (13–15). Strong antitumor effects can be produced when the active isoform of IL33 is expressed in tumor cells or the recombinant IL33 is administered exogenously (16,17). The biological function of endogenous IL33 in tumorigenesis is quite complex because it can promote immune tolerance by activating Tregs and M2 while being a positive regulator of adaptive immune responses (18–21). However, the role of IL33 in ICB tumor immunotherapy has not been defined.
In this study, we set out to determine the role of IL33 in responsiveness to ICB tumor therapy. We examined IL33 expression in mouse tumor tissues after treatment with checkpoint inhibitors such as CTLA-4 and PD-1 monoclonal antibodies. We also determined the significance of IL33 signaling in mediating ICB efficacy in murine tumor models. We clarified the role of tumor-derived IL33 in ICB tumor therapy by dissecting the underlying cellular mechanisms and IL33-driving immune responses, particularly involvement of the tissue adaptive immune system. Finally, we explored the feasibility of combination therapy with IL33 and ICB for the treatment of tumors.
Materials and Methods
Animals
C57BL/6J, BALB/cJ, B6.129S2(C)-Itgaetm1Cmp/J (CD103-deficient), RAG1 KO and B6.129S(C)-Batf3tm1Kmm/J (Batf3-deficient) mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. The ST2−/− mice were provided by Dr. Andrew McKenzie (MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology). Il33−/− mice have been previously described (22) and were obtained from RIKEN. All “knockout” mice were on the C57BL/6 background. Mice were housed in the specific-pathogen-free facility of the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine or Soochow University. Experiments were done in accordance with a protocol approved by the institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and in accordance with NIH guidelines.
Tumor tissue processing and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes analysis
Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes were harvested from freshly resected tumor tissues according to the method we have previously described (23). In brief, the tumor tissues were dissected and transferred into RPMI culture medium. Tumor tissues were then mechanically disrupted and digested with a mixture of 0.3 mg/ml DNase I (Sigma-Aldrich) and 0.25 mg/ml Liberase TL (Roche) in the serum-free RPMI medium in a CO2 culture incubator at 37°C for 30min. The tissues were then dispersed through a 40-mm cell strainer (BD Biosciences) to remove tissue clumps. The single cells were washed and suspended in Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS) with 1% FCS for staining and flow cytometry analysis.
Cell lines
MC-38 cells and Panc02 cells were kindly provided by Dr. Zongsheng Guo (University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine) in 2017. 4T1.2 mouse breast tumor cells were provided by Dr. Zhaoyang You (University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine) in 2017. The cell lines were cultured in RPMI-1640 (B16F0) or DMEM (MC-38 and 4T1.2) media supplemented with 10% FBS in the presence of benzylpenicillin (100 U/mL), streptomycin (100 μg/mL), and 2 mM L-glutamine. Construction of the B16-IL33 cell line has been reported previously (16). Cells were cultured for less than 2 weeks before injection into mice.
IL33−/− MC38 cells were generated using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Briefly, single guide RNA (sgRNA) was designed using online CRISPR Design Tool (https://crispr.cos.uni-heidelberg.de) and cloned into plasmid lentiCRISPRv2GFP (Addgene, catalog 82416). The sgRNA sequences were designed to delete exon2 and exon3 of mouse IL33. They were 5’-CATTCTAGGTCTCATTTTTC-3’ for sgRNA1, and 5’-TACTGCATGAGACTCCGTTC-3’ for sgRNA2. The plasmids were transfected into MC38 cell line using Lipofectamine 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, catalogue number 11668030). Transfected cells were sorted and single cell-cloned, and mutant cells were identified using PCR and confirmed by Western blot (Supplementary Fig. S4B-D). The genomic target sequences used for targeting screening were 5’-AGCCAAGGTTGCTTCTGATGA-3’ and 5’-TAGATGCCCATCAGTCTTTC-3’. IL33 expression by Western blot used an IL33 antibody (R&D Systems, catalogue number AF3626).
Preparation of IL33 plasmid/POEG-st-Pmor nanoparticles
The construction of IL33 expression plasmid has been described before (16). Briefly, the IL33 expression construct was generated by fusing the nucleotide sequence encoding the human CD8α signal sequence to the 5’ end of IL33 (S109 to I266) sequence downstream the elongation factor alpha promoter. The detailed procedure of synthesis of POEG-st-Pmor polymer was described previously (24). For plasmid DNA complexation, POEG-st-Pmor was diluted to different concentrations in water and mixed with plasmid DNA solution to obtain the desired N/P ratios. Mice were treated intravenously with IL33 plasmid/POEG-st-Pmor nanoparticles at a dose of 30 μg DNA/mouse in 200 μl 5% dextrose.
Tumor model
For the MC-38 tumor model, MC-38 cells (1×106) were injected intradermally (i.d.) into the right flank of C57BL/6 mice. CTLA-4 mAbs (clone 9D9, catalogue number BE0164, BioXcell) and PD-1 mAbs(clone j43, catalogue number BP0033–2, BioXcell)-based ICB therapies were administered on the 4th day after the tumor inoculation, when tumor diameters had reached approximately 4-mm). 200μg antibodies were intraperitoneally (i.p.) injected four times with 4-day intervals. Hamster IgG (catalogue number BE0091) and mouse IgG2b (catalogue number BE0086, BioXcell) were used as controls. Tumor size was monitored by a caliber and recorded every 2 days after tumor inoculation.
For the B16 tumor model, the B16-Vec and B16-IL33 cells (1×105 in 100 μl PBS) were injected i.d. into the right flank of C57BL/6j mice. CTLA-4 mAbs (200 μg) and IgG2b control (200 μg) were i.p. injected starting on the 4th day after tumor inoculation for a total of four injections separated by 4-day intervals. Tumor size was recorded every 2 days.
For the 4T1.2 tumor model, 4T1.2 cells (2×105 in 100 μl PBS) were intravenously (i.v.) injected via the tail vein of BALB/c mice. The CTLA-4 mAbs (200 μg) in combination with the IL33 plasmid-nanoparticles were injected i.v. on the 5th day after tumor inoculation. These injections were repeated three times at intervals of 4 days. Mouse IgG2b (200 μg) and control plasmid-nanoparticles were used as controls.
Adoptive CD8+ T-cell transfer
B16-IL33 cells were injected i.d. into the right flank of RAG1−/− mice to establish the B16-IL33 tumor model. The CD8+ T cells from ST2−/−, CD103−/−, and wild-type CD57BL/6 mice were purified using magnetic bead-based methods (catalogue number 130–116-478, Miltenyi Biotec). The purified CD8+ T cells (around 10 million in 100 μl PBS) were i.v. injected into the retro-orbital venous sinus of RAG1−/− mice. Tumor cells were inoculated on the same day. Tumor size was monitored and recorded every 2 days.
Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
Expression of the IL33 mRNA in MC-38 cells under different stimulation conditions were assessed using RT-PCR. The total RNA was extracted from MC-38 cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and reverse-transcribed using Superscript II (Invitrogen). RT-PCR reactions were done using the StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Primers were synthesized as follows: GAPDH 5’-CCTGCACCACCAACTGCTT-3’ and 5’-ATGACCTTGCCCACAGCCT-3’; IL33 5’-TATCCACGGGATTCTAGGAAGAG-3’ and 5’-CTCATAGTAGCGTAGTAGCACCT-3’. Relative amounts of mRNA were calculated using the 2–ΔΔCT method.
Histopathology and immunofluorescence staining
Tumor samples were resected and embedded in disposable vinyl specimen molds (Tissue-Tek Cryomold, Sakura) with Optimal Cutting Temperature (O.C.T.) compound (catalogue number 23730571, Tissue-Tek, Sakura) on dry ice. For immunofluorescence staining of CD8 and CD103, 7-μm cryostat sections were prepared using a microtome (Leica CM1950), then air-dried for 10 min and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde fix solution for 10 min at room temperature. The sections were incubated in PBS with 3%FBS, then stained with Alexa Fluor 647 anti-mouse CD8α (Clone 53–6.7, Biolegend)) and Alexa Fluor 594 anti-mouse CD103 (Clone 2E7, Biolegend)) for 1 hour at room temperature. The sections were then washed twice with PBS and counterstained with 4’,6-Diamidino-2-Phenylindole (DAPI) for 30 sec. For immunofluorescence staining of IL33, the 7-μm cryostat sections were air-dried for 10 min, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature, permeabilized using 0.5%Triton for 10 min at room temperature, washed twice with PBS. They were then stained with goat anti-mouse IL33 (R&D, AF3626), washed twice with PBS, and stained with Alexa Fluor 594 donkey anti-goat secondary ( Catalogue number A32758, Invitrogen). For the multicolor staining assay, APC-CD45(Clone 30-F11, BD Pharmingen), FITC-CD11b(Clone M1/70, BD Pharmingen), FITC-B220(Clone RA3–6B2, BD Pharmingen), FITC-CD3 (Clone 145–2C11, BD Pharmingen), CD31 (EPR17260–263, Catalogue number ab222783, Abcam), fibroblast specific protein 1(FSP1) (Rabbit Polyclonal IgG, Clone S100A4, Catalogue number 810101, Biolegend), and Alexa Fluor 647 donkey anti-rabbit secondaries (Catalogue number A-31573, Invitrogen) were used.
Evaluation of immunofluorescence staining
The densities of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells and CD103+CD8+ T cells in tumor tissues were evaluated as we have previously described (24). In brief, pictures of five randomly chosen high-power fields (x200) were captured and collected using an OX83 Olympus microscope, after which the numbers of tumor infiltrating CD8+ T cells and CD103+CD8+ T cells in each picture were calculated and recorded. For the assessment of IL33+MC-38 tumor cells in tumor sections, pictures of five random high-power fields (x100) were captured and collected using the OX83 Olympus microscope. The numbers of IL33+MC-38 cells were then calculated, recorded, and statistically analyzed.
Flow analysis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes
Flow cytometry analysis was performed using a FACS flow cytometer Fortessa (BD Biosciences). The data were analyzed using Flowjo software. CD45 (Clone 30-F11), CD4 (Clone GK1.5), CD8 (Clone 53–6.7), CD103 (Clone M290) and CD69 (Clone H1.2F3) were purchased from BD Bioscience. PD-1 (Clone 29F.1A12), Granzyme B (Clone GB11) and Foxp3 (Clone MF-14) were purchased from BioLegend. Ki-67 (Clone SolA15) and IFN-γ (Clone XMG1.2) were purchased from eBioscience (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For intracellular cytokine staining, harvested cells were stimulated with PMA (10 ng/ml) (catalogue number p1585–1G, Sigma) and ionomycin (1 μg/ml) (I9657–1G, Sigma) for 4h and incubated for the last 3h with brefeldin A (10 μg/ml) (catalogue number 00–4506-51, Thermo Fisher). The cells were transferred to a V-bottom plate, stained with surface marker antibodies in HBSS containing 1% FCS, fixed with 2% formaldehyde, and permeabilized with 0.5% saponin. The cells were stained with anti-IFN-γ and examined by flow cytometry.
Immunohistochemistry
Immunohistochemical staining was performed as described in our previous studies (25). Briefly, the paraffin-embedded tissue-array blocks were cut into 3-mm-thick consecutive sections, and were dewaxed in xylene, rehydrated and graded ethanol solutions. Antigen retrieval was performed by heating the tissue sections at 100°C for 30 min in EDTA solution (pH 9.0). The sections were incubated with mouse IL33 antibody (Abcam, ab229698) at 4°C overnight, followed by incubation with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody. Diaminobenzene was used as the chromogen, and hematoxylin was used as the nuclear counterstained. Finally, the sections were dehydrated, cleared and mounted.
Statistical analyses
GraphPad Prism 6.0 software package (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, USA) was used for the analysis. Statistical analysis was done using the Student’s t-test (two-tailed), two-way ANOVA, or the Log-rank survival analysis. A p-value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. No statistical correction was used.
Results
ICB efficacy is dependent on IL33R1/ST2 signaling
The role of IL33 in tumorigenesis and antitumor immunotherapy is complex. We determined whether IL33 signaling in recipient mice was important for mediating the antitumor effect during ICB tumor therapy. The MC-38 tumor model was chosen due to responsiveness to ICB therapy (26). To this end, we inoculated WT and ST2−/− mice with MC-38 colon tumor cells. Upon tumor formation, we started treatment with CTLA-4 mAbs. MC-38 cells formed tumors, which, given treatment with control IgG, grew at similar rates in WT and ST2−/− mice. Administration of CTLA-4 mAbs inhibited tumor growth in WT mice (Fig. 1A; Supplementary Fig. S1A). In contrast, administration of CTLA-4 mAbs did not inhibit tumor growth in ST2−/− mice (Fig. 1A; Supplementary Fig. S1A). This indicated that ST2 signaling in host cells was critical for the antitumor effect of CTLA-4 mAbs.
Figure 1: The antitumor effect of ICB immunotherapy was dependent on ST2.
The MC-38 cells (1×10^6) were injected i.d. into the right flank of ST2+/+ or ST2−/−B6 mice. CTLA-4 mAbs (A) and PD-1 mAbs (B) were injected i.p. on day 4 after tumor inoculation and again every 4 days for a total of 4 injections. Tumor sizes were monitored every two days. Average sizes of tumors are shown. In a separate cohort of experiment, the tumors were resected around 10 days after tumor cell inoculation and TIL were analyzed by the multi-color flow cytometry and immunofluorescence (C to J). C, CD45+ Immune cells were first gated following FSC/SSC, single cells, Ghost dye negative, and then CD45high. Percentages of CD45+ TIL are shown. D, Representative flow cytometric plots showing the expression of CD103 and IFN-γ in CD4+ and CD8+ TIL. E, Percentages of IFN-γ producing CD4+ TIL. F, Percentages of IFN-γ producing CD8+ TIL. G, The percentage of resident CD103+CD8+ TIL. H, The percentage of IFN-γ-producing CD103+CD8+ TIL among CD103+CD8+ TIL. I, Immunofluorescence staining of CD8 and CD103 in MC38 tumor from different groups. J, Statistical analysis of immunofluorescence images for the intensity of CD8+ and CD103+CD8+ TIL. SEM error bars were shown. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 and ****P<0.0001 by Student’s t-test or two-way ANOVA analysis. Data are representative of three independent experiments. At least 5 mice were used in each experimental group.
We also determined if the IL33/ST2 axis was important for the therapeutic efficacy of the PD-1 blockade. Administration of PD-1 mAbs inhibited tumor growth in WT mice (Fig. 1B; Supplementary Fig. S1B). In contrast, PD-1 mAbs did not inhibit tumor growth in ST2−/− mice (Fig. 1B; Supplementary Fig. S1B). Besides MC-38, we showed that IL33 signaling was required for the ICB treatment in a murine pancreatic cancer model Panc02 (Supplementary Fig. S1C) and a murine ovarian tumor model ID8 (Supplementary Fig. S1D). Consistently, ST2 was also specifically up-regulated in tumor tissues from melanoma patients who responded to PD-1 mAbs ICB therapy (Supplementary Fig. S1E)(27). These results indicated that ST2 signaling in host cells was critical for responsiveness to ICB therapy.
To further investigate the underlying cellular immune mechanisms, we performed multi-color flow cytometry and immunofluorescence analysis, finding that treatment with CTLA-4 mAbs resulted in increases in CD45+ immune cells in tumors from both WT and ST2−/− mice (Fig. 1C; Supplementary Fig. S2A). However, the increases were much higher in WT than ST2−/− mice. Within the immune cell compartment, we detected no differences between the experimental groups with regard to the percentages of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells (Supplementary Fig. S2A-C). However, we observed substantial decreases in tumoral Tregs after CTLA-4 mAbs treatment of WT mice (Supplementary Fig. S2D-E). This is consistent with a plethora of studies demonstrating the Treg-depleting activities of CTLA-4 mAbs in both mice and humans (28,29). It is worth noting that the percentage of tumoral Tregs was much less in ST2−/− mice and that CTLA-4 mAbs treatment did not further reduce tumoral Tregs in ST2−/− mice (Supplementary Fig. S2D-E). These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that the IL33/ST2 axis also promotes Tregs in tumors. Therefore, a main effect of CTLA-4 mAbs was the elimination of IL33-induced Tregs in the tumor microenvironment (TME). As a result, the full brunt of antitumor effect of IL33 was unleashed.
We next examined IFN-γ production by tumoral CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. The frequency of IFN-γ+CD4+ and IFN-γ+CD8+ tumoral T cells was similar in WT and ST2−/− mice in the control IgG treatment groups, suggesting similar spontaneous antitumor immune responses in WT and ST2−/− mice. We observed an increase in IFN-γ+CD4+ and IFN-γ+CD8+ tumoral T cells upon CTLA-4 mAbs treatment of WT mice (Fig.1 D, E, and F). In contrast, CTLA-4 mAbs treatment did not result in any increase of IFN-γ+CD4+ and IFN-γ+CD8+ TIL in ST2−/− mice (Fig.1 D, E, and F).
CD103 is the best characterized marker for intraepithelial lymphocytes (IEL) and tissue-resident T cells (30). CD103 expressed on CD8+ T cells is important during immune responses against cancer, particularly cancers of epithelial origin (31). Because IL33 is a tissue alarmin, we decided to examine whether the CD103+ subset of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) is regulated by IL33/ST2 signaling. Flow cytometric analysis demonstrated that treatment of tumor-bearing mice with CTLA-4 mAbs increased the percentage of CD103+CD8+ TIL in WT mice, but not in ST2−/− mice (Fig.1 D and G). This was confirmed by immunofluorescent analysis of tumor sections (Fig.1 I and J). In addition, IFN-γ+CD103+CD8+ TIL in WT mice, but not ST2−/− mice, were increased by CTLA-4 mAbs treatment (Fig.1 D and H). This indicated that IL33, which enhances the number and function Th1, CD8+, and CD103+CD8+ TIL, was required for the antitumor effect of CTLA-4 mAbs treatment.
We next characterized TIL in the PD-1 mAbs treated mice by multicolor flow cytometric analysis and immunofluorescence microscopy. Using flow cytometry, we showed that administration of PD-1 mAbs led to an increase in the percentage of CD45+ immune cells in both WT and ST2−/− mice (Supplementary Fig. S2F). There was no difference in the frequencies of CD4+ and CD8+ TIL in various experimental groups (Supplementary Fig. S2G and H). In contrast, we observed a considerable decrease in tumoral Tregs in WT mice after PD-1 mAbs treatment (Supplementary Fig. S2I and J). This was consistent with previous findings that PD-1 is involved in the generation and maintenance of induced Tregs, as well as in homeostasis of natural Tregs (32).
We then examined IFN-γ production by CD4+ and CD8+ TIL. Administration of PD-1 mAbs led to large increases in the frequency of IFN-γ+CD4+ TIL in WT mice but not ST2−/− mice (Supplementary Fig. S2K and I). Treatment with PD-1 mAbs also resulted in large increases in the frequency of IFN-γ+CD8+ TIL in WT but not ST2−/− mice (Supplementary Fig.S2K and M). PD-1 mAbs treatment led to an increase in the percentage of CD103+CD8+ TIL in WT mice but not ST2−/− mice (Supplementary Fig. S2K and N). These findings were confirmed by immunofluorescent microscopic analysis of tumor sections (Supplementary Fig. S2P and Q). IFN-γ+CD103+CD8+ TIL were increased following PD-1 mAbs treatment of WT mice, but not ST2−/− mice (Supplementary Fig. S2K and O). These results indicated that IL33 mediates PD-1 immunotherapy by increasing the number and function of Th1 and CD103+CD8+ TIL.
ICB therapy increases IL33 expression in tumor cells
Since IL33 signaling is required for ICB tumor therapy, we determined the cellular source of IL33. IL33 is expressed in normal epithelial cells and tumor cells but its amount is reduced in tumor cells at the most advanced stage of cancer (25,33). These clinical findings suggest that cancer cell-derived IL33 may be involved in antitumor immune responses. We examined the expression of IL33 protein in tumor tissues in the MC-38 model during CTLA-4 or PD-1 ICB treatment. Using immunofluorescence microscopy, we found that IL33 protein was expressed in small numbers of tumor cells in mice treated with control IgG (Fig. 2A to D). Upon treatment with CTLA-4 or PD-1 mAbs, the numbers of IL33+ cells were greatly increased in tumor tissues (Fig. 2A to D). The morphology of these cells suggested that IL33 was expressed mainly in tumor cells (Fig. 2A to D; Supplementary Fig. S3A). Additional immunostaining with CD45, CD11b, CD3, CD31, and FSP1 confirmed that the dominant population of IL33+ cells within tumor tissues was not immune cells or stromal cells (Supplementary Fig. S3B). Tumor cells located in the invasion border, as well as those deep inside tumor nests, expressed IL33. In contrast to these findings in tumors isolated from WT mice, IL33 protein was not induced in tumor tissues from ST2−/− mice regardless of which checkpoint inhibitors were used (Fig. 2A to D). This suggests that IL33 induced its own expression in vivo, possibly through host immune and stromal cells. These results indicated that IL33 could be induced in mice after ICB therapy.
Figure 2: Tumor-derived IL33 was required for the antitumor efficacy of CTLA-4 and PD-1 mAbs.
The MC-38 cells (1×10^6) were injected i.d. into the right flank of B6 mice. CTLA-4 mAbs and PD-1 mAbs were injected i.p. on day 4 after tumor inoculation and again every 4 days for a total of 4 injections. Immunofluorescence staining was done to examine IL33 expression in tumor tissues from different treatment groups of ST2+/+ or ST2−/− B6 mice. A and B, Immunofluorescence staining (left) and quantification (right) of tumor tissues from IgG control and CTLA-4 mAbs-treated mice. C and D, Immunofluorescence staining (left) and quantification (right) of tumor tissues from IgG control and PD-1 mAbs-treated mice. E, The MC-38WT cells or MC-38IL33−/− (denoted MC-38IL33KO) (1×10^6) were injected i.d. into the right flank of wide type B6 mice. Then PD-1 mAbs and IgG control were injected i.p. on day 4 after tumor inoculation and every 4 days thereafter for 3 more times. Tumor sizes were monitored every two to three days. Average sizes of tumors are shown. F, In a separate experiment, tumors were isolated 10 days after tumor cell inoculation and TIL were analyzed by the multi-color flow cytometry. The percentages of CD45+ immune cells in MC-38WT and MC-38IL33−/− tumors. G, The MC-38 cells (1×10^6) were i.d. injected into the right flank of IL33+/+ or IL33−/− B6 mice, and the PD-1 mAbs and IgG control were injected i.p. on day 4 after tumor inoculation and thereafter every 4 days for 3 more times. (H to K) In a separate experiment, tumors were isolated 10 days after tumor cell inoculation and TIL were analyzed by the multi-color flow cytometry. H, Representative flow cytometric plots showing expression of CD103 and IFN-γ in CD4+ and CD8+ TIL from MC-38WT and MC-38IL33−/− tumors. I, Percentages of IFN-γ producing CD4+ TIL. J, Percentages of IFN-γ producing CD8+ TIL. K, Percentages of resident CD103+CD8+ TIL. L, Percentages of IFN-γ-producing CD103+CD8+ TIL. SEM error bars were shown. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 by Student’s t-test or two-way ANOVA analysis. Data are representative of three independent experiments. At least 5 mice were used in each experimental group.
Tumor-derived IL33 is required for ICB efficacy
In order to substantiate the cellular sources of IL33 that mediates ICB therapy, we generated IL33 deficient cell lines MC38IL33−/− using the Crispr/Cas9 technology and showed IL33 protein is not expressed in MC38IL33−/− cells (Supplementary Fig. S4B-D). Neither PD-1 nor CTLA-4 mAbs administration inhibited the growth MC38IL33−/− tumors (Fig. 2E; Supplementary Fig. S4E). We examined whether IL33 produced by host mice was responsible for mediating the antitumor effect of PD-1 and CTLA-4 mAbs. We carried out PD-1 and CTLA-4 mAbs treatment of MC-38 tumors in IL33−/− and WT control mice. We found that administration of PD-1 or CTLA-4 mAbs inhibited tumor growth in both WT and IL33−/− mice with equivalent efficacies (Fig. 2G; Supplementary Fig. S4F). This again confirmed that tumor-derived IL33 and ST2 signaling in host cells were critical for the antitumor effect of ICB tumor therapy.
Tumor-derived IL33 increases the number and function of CD103+CD8+ TIL
We dissected the cellular basis of the reduced antitumor efficacy in MC38IL33−/− tumors. We found that the percentage of tumor infiltrating immune cells (CD45+) was drastically reduced in MC38IL33−/− tumors compared to control tumors (Fig. 2F). In addition, we found that the percentage of IFN-γ+ CD4+ and CD8+ TIL was also reduced in MC38IL33−/− (Fig. 2H to J). We also found the percentage of tissue resident CD103+CD8+ TIL and IFN-γ+CD103+CD8+ TIL was reduced in MC38IL33−/− tumors (Fig. 2H, K and L). These data suggested that tumor-derived IL33 is crucial for the tumor resident antitumor immune responses.
Onto dissecting the cellular immune mechanism underlying the antitumor function of tumor-derived IL33, we characterized TIL in B16 tumors, which do not express IL33, and B16-IL33 tumors (16), which express and secrete an active form of IL33 (Fig. 3A and Fig. S4A). The percentage of CD45+ immune cells was increased in B16-IL33 tumors as compared to B16 tumors (Fig. 3B). In addition, we observed considerable increases in CD4+ TIL (Fig. 3C), Tregs, and CD103+ Tregs (Fig. 3D) in B16-IL33 compared to B16 tumors. Despite increases in Tregs, the percentage of tumoral Th1 cells was increased in B16-IL33 compared to B16 tumors (Fig. 3H; Supplementary Fig. S5A). Flow cytometric analysis showed no differences in the percentages of CD8+ TIL (Fig. 3E). In contrast, the percentages of CD103+CD8+ TIL were greatly increased in B16-IL33 tumors as compared to B16 tumors (Fig. 3F and G). In addition, we found increases in proliferation (Ki67), activation (CD69), and IFN-γ production in total CD8+ TIL as well as CD103+CD8+ TIL in B16-IL33 tumors (Fig. 3G to K; Supplementary Fig. S5B to D). The increases in the numbers of CD103+CD8+ TIL were confirmed using immunofluorescent microscopy (Fig. 3L to O). Our findings indicated that tumor-derived active IL33 increased the number and function of tumoral Th1 cells, CD8+ T cells, and CD103+CD8+ T cells.
Figure 3: Overexpression of secreted IL33 in B16 tumors increased resident CD103+CD8+ T cells.
A, Growth curves of B16 and B16-IL33 tumors. Average sizes of tumors are shown. Tumors of both types were harvested about 10 days after inoculation. TIL were analyzed by the multi-color flow cytometry. B, Percentages of CD45+ TIL. C, Percentages of CD4+ TIL. D, Representative plots of Foxp3 and CD103 staining in CD4+ TIL and percentages of Foxp3+CD4+ TIL. E, Percentages of CD8+ TIL. F, Percentages of CD103+CD8+ TIL among CD8+ TIL. G, Representative plots of CD69, Ki67, and CD103 staining of CD8+ TIL, and percentages of CD69+ or Ki67+ among CD103+CD8+ TIL. H, Representative plots of IFN-γ and CD103 staining in CD4+ and CD8+ TIL. I, Percentages of CD103+IFN-γ+ among CD4+ TIL. J, Percentages of CD103+IFN-γ+ among CD8+ TIL. K, Percentages of IFN-γ+ among CD103+CD8+ TIL. L, Immunofluorescence staining of CD8 and CD103 in both types of tumor tissues. M, N and O, Quantification of immunofluorescence images. SEM error bars were shown. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001 by Student’s t-test analysis. Data are representative of three independent experiments. At least 5 mice were used in each experimental group.
ST2 expression on CD8+ T cells is required for the antitumor effect of IL33
ST2 can be induced on CD8+ T cells (14), we set out to determine whether ST2 expression on CD8+ T cells was required for the antitumor effect of IL33 in vivo. CD8+ T cells were isolated from WT and ST2−/− mice and adoptively transferred to Rag1−/− mice. B16-IL33 cells were then inoculated i.d. into the recipient Rag1−/− mice. Rag1−/− infused with ST2-deficient CD8+ T cells had increased tumor growth (Fig. 4A), confirming that ST2 signaling on CD8+ T cells was required for the antitumor effect of IL33. Flow cytometric analysis showed a decrease in CD45+ TIL in mice infused with ST2−/− CD8+ T cells (Fig. 4B). ST2 deficiency in CD8+ T cells resulted in a pronounced decrease in the percentage of CD103+CD8+, but not total CD8+ TIL (Fig. 4C to E), and the production of IFN γ was reduced in both CD103+ and CD103-CD8+ TIL as the result of ST2 deficiency in CD8+ T cells (Supplementary Fig. S6A to C). Using immunofluorescent microscopy, we confirmed that the densities of both CD103+CD8+ TIL and total CD8+ TIL in tumor tissues were much lower in mice infused with ST2−/− CD8+ T cells than in those with WT CD8+ T cells (Fig. 4F to I). These findings indicated that ST2 expression on CD8+ T cells was required for the IL33-mediated antitumor effect, as well as the accumulation of CD103+CD8+ T cells in tumor tissues.
Figure 4: The IL33-induced antitumor effect and increases of CD103+CD8+ TIL were dependent on ST2 expression by CD8+ T cells.
A, CD8+ T cells from ST2+/+ or ST2−/− B6 mice were purified and infused into RAG1−/− mice (i.v.), and the B16-IL33 cells were inoculated i.d. on the same day. Average sizes of tumors are shown. Tumors were resected on about day 10 and TIL were analyzed by the multi-color flow cytometry. B, Percentages of CD45+ TIL. C, Percentages of CD8+ TIL. D, Percentages of CD103+ among CD8+ TIL. E, Representative flow cytometric plots showing staining of CD69, Ki67, and CD103 in CD8+ TIL. F, Immunofluorescence staining of CD8 and CD103. G, H and I, Quantification of immunofluorescence images. SEM error bars were shown. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 by Student’s t-test analysis. Data are representative of three independent experiments. 3 to 5 mice were used in each experimental group.
The antitumor activities of IL33 are dependent on CD103 expression on CD8+ T cells
The ligand for CD103 is the epithelial cell surface molecule E-cadherin (34). Specific interactions between CD103 and E-cadherin are responsible for retention of antigen-specific lymphocytes within epithelial tissues (35). Since we showed that IL33 increased the function and number of CD103+CD8+ TIL, we determined if CD103 expression on CD8+ T cells was required for the antitumor effect of IL33. CD8+ T cells were isolated from WT and CD103−/− mice and adoptively transferred to Rag1−/−mice. B16-IL33 cells were then inoculated i.d. CD103 deficiency in CD8+ T cells led to an increased rate of tumor growth (Fig. 5A), indicating that CD103 was required for the antitumor effect of IL33. Flow cytometric analysis showed a decrease in CD45+ TIL in mice infused with CD103−/−CD8+ T cells as compared to those infused with the WT control (Fig. 5B). Although the percentage of CD8+ TIL was not changed, CD103 deficiency resulted in decreased proliferation (by Ki67 staining), activation (CD69), and IFN-γ production in CD8+ TIL (Fig. 5C and D; Supplementary Fig. S6D to F). Using immunofluorescence microscopy, the density of CD103+CD8+ and total CD8+ TIL was lower in mice infused with CD103−/−CD8+ T cells than it was in controls (Fig. 5E to H). These results indicated that CD103 expression on CD8+ T cells was required for the IL33-driven antitumor effect and tumoral accumulation of CD8+ TIL.
Figure 5: The antitumor effect of IL33 was dependent on CD103 expression by CD8+ T cells.
A, CD8+ T cells from CD103+/+ or CD103−/− B6 mice were purified and infused into RAG1−/− mice (i.v.), and the B16-IL33 cells were inoculated i.d. on the same day. Average sizes of tumors are shown. Tumors were resected on about day 10 and TIL were analyzed by the multi-color flow cytometry. B, Percentages of CD45+ TIL. C, Percentages of CD8+ TIL. D, Representative flow cytometric plots showing staining of CD69, Ki67, IFNγ and CD103 in CD8+ TIL. E, Immunofluorescence staining of CD8 and CD103. F, G and H, Quantification of immunofluorescence images. SEM error bars were shown. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 by Student’s t-test analysis. Data are representative of three independent experiments. 4 to 6 mice were used in each experimental group.
CD103+ DC are required for the IL33 tumor immunotherapy
CD103 is also a marker for the type-1 dendritic cell (DC1), which can cross present antigens to CD8+ T cells in the TME (36). The percentage of CD103+ DC was increased in B16-IL33 tumors compared to B16 tumors and decreased in MC38IL33−/− compared to MC38 tumors (Fig. 6A and B; Supplementary Fig. S7A to C). In order to determine the role of CD103+ DC in mediating the antitumor function of IL33, we used Batf3−/− mice, which had a selected deficiency in generating CD103+ DC (36,37). Our data showed that the antitumor effect of IL33 was abrogated in Batf3−/− mice (Fig. 6C). At the cellular level, the immune infiltration was severely reduced in B16-IL33 tumor from Batf3−/− mice compared to control mice (Fig. 6D). Consistent with the role of CD103+ DC in driving CD8+ T cell immune responses, the percentage of CD8+ TIL and IFN-γ+CD8+ TIL was also reduced in B16-IL33 tumors from Batf3−/− mice (Fig. 6E and F; Supplementary Fig. S7D). Although there was an increase in the percentage of CD4+ TIL, a profound decrease in Th1 cells was found in B16-IL33 tumors from Batf3−/− mice when compared to WT control mice (Fig. 6G and H; Supplementary Fig. S7D). These data demonstrated that CD103+ DC were crucial for mediating the antitumor effect of IL33.
Figure 6: CD103+ DC were required for the IL33-tumor immunotherapy.
A, Percentages of CD103+ DC in B16-IL33 and B16 tumors. B, Percentages of CD103+ DCs in MC38 and MC38IL33−/− tumors. C, B16-IL33 cells (1×10^5) were injected i.d. into the right flank of Batf3+/+ or Batf3−/− B6 mice, tumor sizes were monitored every two or three days. Average sizes of tumors are shown. With a separate cohort of mice, the tumors were resected 10 days after tumor cell inoculation and TIL were analyzed by the multi-color flow cytometry (D to H). D, Percentages of CD45+ TIL. E, Percentages of CD8+ TIL. F, Percentages of IFN-γ producing CD8+ TIL. G, Percentages of CD4+ TIL. H, Percentages of IFNγ producing CD4+ TIL. SEM error bars were shown. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001 by Student’s t-test or two-way ANOVA analysis. Data are representative of three independent experiments. At least 5 mice were used in each experimental group.
ICB and IL33 synergistically prolong survival of tumor-bearing mice
Although potent antitumor efficacy can be achieved by tumoral expression of the secretory IL33, the number of tumor infiltrating Foxp3+Treg cells was also increased. Since one main mechanism of action for CTLA-4 mAbs is deletion of tumoral Tregs (28,29), we set out to determine whether IL33 combined with CTLA-4 mAbs can act as a novel tumor immunotherapy. Mice were inoculated with B16 or B16-IL33 cells, then treated with control IgG or CTLA-4 mAbs (Fig. 7A). As expected, B16-IL33 tumors grew much more slowly than control B16 tumors. Administration of CTLA-4 mAbs did not affect the progression of B16 tumors, but greatly inhibited the growth rate of B16-IL33 tumors and prolonged survival of B16-IL33 tumor-bearing mice (Fig. 7B and C). Thus, IL33 and CTLA-4 mAbs have synergistic antitumor effects.
Figure 7: Combination of IL33 and CTLA-4 or PD-1 mAbs synergistically improved the therapeutic effect against tumors.
A, B and C, The B16-Vec and B16-IL33 tumor models were established in C57BL/6 mice by i.d. injection (1×10^5). CTLA-4 mAbs and control IgG were administered, then the tumor sizes were measured and the overall survival was monitored (n=7 for B16-Vec+IgG and B16-Vec+αCTLA-4 groups respectively, and n=10 for B16-IL33+IgG and B16-IL33+αCTLA-4 groups respectively). Average sizes of tumors are shown. D and E, The 4T1.2 tumor lung metastasis model was established in Balb/c mice by i.v. injection (2×10^5). Tumor-bearing mice were treated with nanoparticles loaded with IL33 expression plasmid and/or CTLA-4 mAbs, and the overall survival was monitored (n=5 for each group). F, G and H, The B16-Vec and B16-IL33 tumor models were established in C57BL/6 mice by i.d. injection (1×10^5). PD-1 mAbs and control IgG were administered, then the tumor sizes were measured and the overall survival was monitored (n=6 for each group). Average sizes of tumors are shown. SEM error bars were shown. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001 and ****P<0.0001 by two-way ANOVA or Log-rank survival analysis.
Based on the rationale that there was synergy between depletion of Treg cells and IL33, we further investigate the antitumor effect of combination of CTLA-4 mAbs and IL33 in a therapeutic setting. To this end, we delivered the IL33-expressing plasmid using a nanoparticle-based approach. Plasmid-loaded POEG-st-Pmor nanoparticles are stable in the blood and are highly effective in selective delivery of gene expressing constructs to the lung tumor tissues (38). Mice were inoculated i.v. with 4T1.2 tumor cells, then treated with control IgG, the IL33 nanoparticle, CTLA-4 mAbs, and the IL33 nanoparticle plus CTLA-4 mAbs (Fig. 7D). All mice treated with the control plasmid nanoparticles plus control IgG died within 22 days after tumor cell injection (Fig. 7E). Mice treated with CTLA-4 mAbs alone or the IL33 nanoparticle alone did not show improvement in survival compared to the control group. However, the long-term survival rate of mice treated with IL33 nanoparticles plus CTLA-4 mAbs was significantly higher than that of the control group or mice treated with either IL33 nanoparticles or CTLA-4 mAbs (Fig. 7E). Together, these results demonstrated that a combination of targeted expression of IL33 protein in the tumor site and CTLA-4 mAbs was an effective immunotherapy for tumors. The underlying mechanism is likely due to depletion of Treg cells by CTLA-4 mAbs (28,29).
As many T cells in B16-IL33 tumors expressed PD-1 (Supplementary Fig. S8), we then tried to determine whether combining IL33 and PD-1 blockade could further increase antitumor efficacy (Fig. 7F). Indeed, administration of PD-1 mAbs significantly inhibited growth of B16-IL33 tumors (Fig. 7G). Accordingly, PD-1 mAbs also prolonged the survival of B16-IL33 tumor bearing mice (Fig. 7H). These data indicated that IL33 and PD-1 blockade could be combined to synergistically enhance antitumor efficacy.
Discussion
Although ICB has improved the survival of countless cancer patients, the majority of cancer patients do not respond to this therapy. Identification of the specific molecular mechanisms that mediate responsiveness to ICB treatment will help improve responses to ICB therapies and facilitate the development of new cancer therapies. In this study, we demonstrated that IL33 was expressed in immunogenic murine tumor cells and could be further induced during immune checkpoint tumor therapy. ST2 signaling was required for both CTLA-4 and/or PD-1-based tumor immunotherapy and the tumor, but not host, cell-derived IL33 was responsible for the antitumor effect. Mechanistically, IL33 induced IFN-γ production by Th1, CD8+, CD103+CD8+ TIL, and CD103+ DC in the TME. Tumor resident CD103+CD8+ T cells and CD103+ DC were critical for the antitumor efficacy of IL33 and demonstrated that IL33 synergized with CTLA-4 or PD-1 mAbs to increase antitumor efficacy. Our study establishes a critical role of the “danger signal” IL33 in mediating responsiveness to ICB therapy through promoting tumor resident T cells, thus shedding light on how to harness IL33 to improve ICB tumor immunotherapy. IL33 promotes tissue resident T cells in vitro (39), and our study confirms this in vivo.
There is an antitumor role of IL33 (33). IL33 potently increases the effector function of CD8+ T cells (14). Including IL33 in a cancer vaccine regimen boosts its potency (40,41). The tumoral expression of an active form of IL33 leads to striking tumor inhibition in multiple murine tumor models (16). Administration of a recombinant IL33 protein inhibits the growth of large, established tumors (17). The antitumor function of IL33 in these models is dependent on CD8+ T cells. In addition to CD8+ T cells, the antitumor function of IL33 can also be mediated by eosinophils (42). Silencing ST2 in CT26, a colon cancer cell line, results in increased tumor growth in vivo, implying that IL33 signaling has an inhibitory role in tumor cells (43). In one colorectal cancer model, IL33 was shown to decrease dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colon tumors. The antitumor function of IL33 was attributed to its ability to restrain IL-1α–dependent colitis (44).This study not only reinforces the idea that the IL33/ST2/CD8+ T cell axis mediates antitumor immune responses, but also further illustrates the significance of this pathway in ICB therapy.
In addition to its antitumor activity, IL33 promotes oncogenesis in some experimental systems. Administration of low amounts of IL33 promotes the accumulation of immune suppressive cells such as MDSC and Tregs, thereby suppressing active antitumor immune responses (33). In the APC Min/+ mouse intestine tumor model, a modest but statistically significant reduction in the number and size of polyps in small intestines was observed in IL33−/− APC Min/+ mice as compared to WT APC Min/+ mice (45–50). The protumor effect of IL33 can be attributed to several mechanisms, as follows. First, the APC mutation leads to activation of the WNT pathway, which inhibits CD8+ T cell recruitment into the TME (51). Thus, the APC mutation inhibits the antitumor function of IL33 and tips the balance toward a protumor function. Second, IL33 promotes the function of mast cells, which are crucial for polyp formation in this model. Third, IL33 can also promote Tregs and M2 in the APC Min/+ model, thereby promoting tumorigenesis (50). Fourth, full-length IL33, which is expressed in cell nuclei, has potential oncogenic functions, as has been demonstrated with transplant tumor models (33). Collectively, in the absence of tumor antigen-specific type 1 T cells, the protumor role of IL33 becomes predominant and is mediated by Tregs, M2, mast cells, MDSC, and nuclear IL33.
Tumor resident CD103+CD8+ T cells might play an important role in antitumor immunity, in particular against cancers of epithelial origin (31,52–55). Local signals that favor the recruitment and activation of resident T cells are important. This concept has been proven in vivo by the “prime and pull” strategy (56). Nonetheless, understanding of tissue “pull” signals is lacking. Although IL33 promotes tissue resident T cells in vitro (39), it has not been demonstrated in vivo. In this study, we demonstrated that IL33 can serve as this local signal. The effect of IL33 is two fold. First, IL33 can directly activate CD103+CD8+ T cells. This idea is consistent with our data and other published studies (14). Second, IL33 can enhance the accumulation of tumoral CD103+ DC. Our data showed that IL33 increased the number of tumor associated CD103+ DC. The generation of tissue resident CD8+ T cells is dependent on CD103+ DC in non-lymphoid tissues and CD8α+ DC in lymphoid organs (57). Here, CD103+ DCs were crucial to the antitumor efficacy of IL33. Our study indicates that IL33 is alocal signal for the establishment of resident CD8+ T cell immune responses against tumor.
IL33 is a potent cytokine that induces both strong CD8+ T cell immune responses and self-limiting Treg-mediated immune regulation. Based on IL33 biology, an effective immune therapy will entail tumoral delivery of an active form of IL33 and simultaneous depletion of protumor cells. We have demonstrated that such a strategy is clinically feasible by combining CTLA-4 mAbs, which eliminate tumoral Tregs, and gene delivery of IL33 by nanoparticles. These studies warrant clinical trials of this novel combination therapy for cancer treatment.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by R21CA2165743 to BL and R01CA239716 to BL and SL. LC was supported by AAI (American Association of Immunologists) Careers in Immunology Fellowship.
Footnotes
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
B. Lu serves as a scientific adviser and owns stocks of Anwita Biosciences Inc. Other authors declare no competing interests.
Reference:
- 1.Matzinger P. The danger model: a renewed sense of self. Science 2002;296(5566):301–5 doi 10.1126/science.1071059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Schumacher TN, Schreiber RD. Neoantigens in cancer immunotherapy. Science 2015;348(6230):69–74 doi 10.1126/science.aaa4971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hellmann MD, Ciuleanu TE, Pluzanski A, Lee JS, Otterson GA, Audigier-Valette C, et al. Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Lung Cancer with a High Tumor Mutational Burden. The New England journal of medicine 2018. doi 10.1056/NEJMoa1801946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hugo W, Zaretsky JM, Sun L, Song C, Moreno BH, Hu-Lieskovan S, et al. Genomic and Transcriptomic Features of Response to Anti-PD-1 Therapy in Metastatic Melanoma. Cell 2016;165(1):35–44 doi 10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tolerance Matzinger P., danger, and the extended family. Annu Rev Immunol 1994;12:991–1045 doi 10.1146/annurev.iy.12.040194.005015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Blanc C, Hans S, Tran T, Granier C, Saldman A, Anson M, et al. Targeting Resident Memory T Cells for Cancer Immunotherapy. Front Immunol 2018;9:1722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Djenidi F, Adam J, Goubar A, Durgeau A, Meurice G, de Montpreville V, et al. CD8+CD103+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes are tumor-specific tissue-resident memory T cells and a prognostic factor for survival in lung cancer patients. Journal of immunology 2015;194(7):3475–86 doi 10.4049/jimmunol.1402711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Webb JR, Milne K, Nelson BH. PD-1 and CD103 Are Widely Coexpressed on Prognostically Favorable Intraepithelial CD8 T Cells in Human Ovarian Cancer. Cancer immunology research 2015;3(8):926–35 doi 10.1158/2326-6066.Cir-14-0239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ho AW, Kupper TS. T cells and the skin: from protective immunity to inflammatory skin disorders. Nature reviews Immunology 2019;19(8):490–502 doi 10.1038/s41577-019-0162-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Masopust D, Soerens AG. Tissue-Resident T Cells and Other Resident Leukocytes. Annu Rev Immunol 2019;37:521–46 doi 10.1146/annurev-immunol-042617-053214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Moussion C, Ortega N, Girard JP. The IL-1-like cytokine IL-33 is constitutively expressed in the nucleus of endothelial cells and epithelial cells in vivo: a novel ‘alarmin’? PLoS One 2008;3(10):e3331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Innate Kubo M. and adaptive type 2 immunity in lung allergic inflammation. Immunol Rev 2017;278(1):162–72 doi 10.1111/imr.12557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Smithgall MD, Comeau MR, Yoon BR, Kaufman D, Armitage R, Smith DE. IL-33 amplifies both Th1- and Th2-type responses through its activity on human basophils, allergen-reactive Th2 cells, iNKT and NK cells. Int Immunol 2008;20(8):1019–30 doi 10.1093/intimm/dxn060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yang Q, Li G, Zhu Y, Liu L, Chen E, Turnquist H, et al. IL-33 synergizes with TCR and IL-12 signaling to promote the effector function of CD8(+) T cells. Eur J Immunol 2011;2(10):201141629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bonilla WV, Frohlich A, Senn K, Kallert S, Fernandez M, Johnson S, et al. The alarmin interleukin-33 drives protective antiviral CD8(+) T cell responses. Science 2012;335(6071):984–9 doi 10.1126/science.1215418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gao X, Wang X, Yang Q, Zhao X, Wen W, Li G, et al. Tumoral expression of IL-33 inhibits tumor growth and modifies the tumor microenvironment through CD8+ T and NK cells. Journal of immunology 2015;194(1):438–45 doi 10.4049/jimmunol.1401344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Dominguez D, Ye C, Geng Z, Chen S, Fan J, Qin L, et al. Exogenous IL-33 Restores Dendritic Cell Activation and Maturation in Established Cancer. Journal of immunology 2017;198(3):1365–75 doi 10.4049/jimmunol.1501399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Matta BM, Lott JM, Mathews LR, Liu Q, Rosborough BR, Blazar BR, et al. IL-33 is an unconventional Alarmin that stimulates IL-2 secretion by dendritic cells to selectively expand IL-33R/ST2+ regulatory T cells. Journal of immunology 2014;193(8):4010–20 doi 10.4049/jimmunol.1400481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schiering C, Krausgruber T, Chomka A, Frohlich A, Adelmann K, Wohlfert EA, et al. The alarmin IL-33 promotes regulatory T-cell function in the intestine. Nature 2014;513(7519):564–8 doi 10.1038/nature13577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Arpaia N, Green JA, Moltedo B, Arvey A, Hemmers S, Yuan S, et al. A Distinct Function of Regulatory T Cells in Tissue Protection. Cell 2015;162(5):1078–89 doi 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Jiang HR, Milovanovic M, Allan D, Niedbala W, Besnard AG, Fukada SY, et al. IL-33 attenuates EAE by suppressing IL-17 and IFN-gamma production and inducing alternatively activated macrophages. Eur J Immunol 2012;42(7):1804–14 doi 10.1002/eji.201141947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Oboki K, Ohno T, Kajiwara N, Arae K, Morita H, Ishii A, et al. IL-33 is a crucial amplifier of innate rather than acquired immunity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2010;107(43):18581–6 doi 10.1073/pnas.1003059107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wang X, Zhao X, Feng C, Weinstein A, Xia R, Wen W, et al. IL-36gamma Transforms the Tumor Microenvironment and Promotes Type 1 Lymphocyte-Mediated Antitumor Immune Responses. Cancer cell 2015;28(3):296–306 doi 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.07.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhu Y, Ju S, Chen E, Dai S, Li C, Morel P, et al. T-bet and eomesodermin are required for T cell-mediated antitumor immune responses. Journal of immunology 2010;185(6):3174–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yang M, Feng Y, Yue C, Xu B, Chen L, Jiang J, et al. Lower expression level of IL-33 is associated with poor prognosis of pulmonary adenocarcinoma. PLoS One 2018;13(3):e0193428 doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0193428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Robbins PF, Kantor JA, Salgaller M, Hand PH, Fernsten PD, Schlom J. Transduction and expression of the human carcinoembryonic antigen gene in a murine colon carcinoma cell line. Cancer research 1991;51(14):3657–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Riaz N, Havel JJ, Makarov V, Desrichard A, Urba WJ, Sims JS, et al. Tumor and Microenvironment Evolution during Immunotherapy with Nivolumab. Cell 2017;171(4):934–49 e15 doi 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Selby MJ, Engelhardt JJ, Quigley M, Henning KA, Chen T, Srinivasan M, et al. Anti-CTLA-4 antibodies of IgG2a isotype enhance antitumor activity through reduction of intratumoral regulatory T cells. Cancer immunology research 2013;1(1):32–42 doi 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-13-0013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Simpson TR, Li F, Montalvo-Ortiz W, Sepulveda MA, Bergerhoff K, Arce F, et al. Fc-dependent depletion of tumor-infiltrating regulatory T cells co-defines the efficacy of anti-CTLA-4 therapy against melanoma. J Exp Med 2013;210(9):1695–710 doi 10.1084/jem.20130579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cerf-Bensussan N, Jarry A, Brousse N, Lisowska-Grospierre B, Guy-Grand D, Griscelli C. A monoclonal antibody (HML-1) defining a novel membrane molecule present on human intestinal lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol 1987;17(9):1279–85 doi 10.1002/eji.1830170910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cresswell J, Robertson H, Neal DE, Griffiths TR, Kirby JA. Distribution of lymphocytes of the alpha(E)beta(7) phenotype and E-cadherin in normal human urothelium and bladder carcinomas. Clinical and experimental immunology 2001;126(3):397–402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wang L, Pino-Lagos K, de Vries VC, Guleria I, Sayegh MH, Noelle RJ. Programmed death 1 ligand signaling regulates the generation of adaptive Foxp3+CD4+ regulatory T cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2008;105(27):9331–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lu B, Yang M, Wang Q. Interleukin-33 in tumorigenesis, tumor immune evasion, and cancer immunotherapy. J Mol Med (Berl) 2016;94(5):535–43 doi 10.1007/s00109-016-1397-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cepek KL, Shaw SK, Parker CM, Russell GJ, Morrow JS, Rimm DL, et al. Adhesion between epithelial cells and T lymphocytes mediated by E-cadherin and the alpha E beta 7 integrin. Nature 1994;372(6502):190–3 doi 10.1038/372190a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gorfu G, Rivera-Nieves J, Ley K. Role of beta7 integrins in intestinal lymphocyte homing and retention. Curr Mol Med 2009;9(7):836–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Broz ML, Binnewies M, Boldajipour B, Nelson AE, Pollack JL, Erle DJ, et al. Dissecting the tumor myeloid compartment reveals rare activating antigen-presenting cells critical for T cell immunity. Cancer cell 2014;26(5):638–52 doi 10.1016/j.ccell.2014.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hildner K, Edelson BT, Purtha WE, Diamond M, Matsushita H, Kohyama M, et al. Batf3 deficiency reveals a critical role for CD8alpha+ dendritic cells in cytotoxic T cell immunity. Science 2008;322(5904):1097–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chen Y, Sun J, Huang Y, Liu Y, Liang L, Yang D, et al. Targeted codelivery of doxorubicin and IL-36gamma expression plasmid for an optimal chemo-gene combination therapy against cancer lung metastasis. Nanomedicine 2019;15(1):129–41 doi 10.1016/j.nano.2018.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Casey KA, Fraser KA, Schenkel JM, Moran A, Abt MC, Beura LK, et al. Antigen-independent differentiation and maintenance of effector-like resident memory T cells in tissues. Journal of immunology 2012;188(10):4866–75 doi 10.4049/jimmunol.1200402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kallert SM, Darbre S, Bonilla WV, Kreutzfeldt M, Page N, Muller P, et al. Replicating viral vector platform exploits alarmin signals for potent CD8(+) T cell-mediated tumour immunotherapy. Nature communications 2017;8:15327 doi 10.1038/ncomms15327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Villarreal DO, Svoronos N, Wise MC, Shedlock DJ, Morrow MP, Conejo-Garcia JR, et al. Molecular adjuvant IL-33 enhances the potency of a DNA vaccine in a lethal challenge model. Vaccine 2015;33(35):4313–20 doi 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.03.086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lucarini V, Ziccheddu G, Macchia I, La Sorsa V, Peschiaroli F, Buccione C, et al. IL-33 restricts tumor growth and inhibits pulmonary metastasis in melanoma-bearing mice through eosinophils. Oncoimmunology 2017;6(6):e1317420 doi 10.1080/2162402X.2017.1317420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.O’Donnell C, Mahmoud A, Keane J, Murphy C, White D, Carey S, et al. An antitumorigenic role for the IL-33 receptor, ST2L, in colon cancer. British journal of cancer 2016;114(1):37–43 doi 10.1038/bjc.2015.433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Malik A, Sharma D, Zhu Q, Karki R, Guy CS, Vogel P, et al. IL-33 regulates the IgA-microbiota axis to restrain IL-1alpha-dependent colitis and tumorigenesis. The Journal of clinical investigation 2016;126(12):4469–81 doi 10.1172/JCI88625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Maywald RL, Doerner SK, Pastorelli L, De Salvo C, Benton SM, Dawson EP, et al. IL-33 activates tumor stroma to promote intestinal polyposis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2015;112(19):E2487–96 doi 10.1073/pnas.1422445112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Gounaris E, Erdman SE, Restaino C, Gurish MF, Friend DS, Gounari F, et al. Mast cells are an essential hematopoietic component for polyp development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2007;104(50):19977–82 doi 10.1073/pnas.0704620104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Blatner NR, Bonertz A, Beckhove P, Cheon EC, Krantz SB, Strouch M, et al. In colorectal cancer mast cells contribute to systemic regulatory T-cell dysfunction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2010;107(14):6430–5 doi 10.1073/pnas.0913683107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Cheon EC, Khazaie K, Khan MW, Strouch MJ, Krantz SB, Phillips J, et al. Mast cell 5-lipoxygenase activity promotes intestinal polyposis in APCDelta468 mice. Cancer research 2011;71(5):1627–36 doi 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Rigoni A, Bongiovanni L, Burocchi A, Sangaletti S, Danelli L, Guarnotta C, et al. Mast Cells Infiltrating Inflamed or Transformed Gut Alternatively Sustain Mucosal Healing or Tumor Growth. Cancer research 2015;75(18):3760–70 doi 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.He Z, Chen L, Souto FO, Canasto-Chibuque C, Bongers G, Deshpande M, et al. Epithelial-derived IL-33 promotes intestinal tumorigenesis in Apc (Min/+) mice. Sci Rep 2017;7(1):5520 doi 10.1038/s41598-017-05716-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Spranger S, Bao R, Gajewski TF. Melanoma-intrinsic beta-catenin signalling prevents anti-tumour immunity. Nature 2015;523(7559):231–5 doi 10.1038/nature14404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ling KL, Dulphy N, Bahl P, Salio M, Maskell K, Piris J, et al. Modulation of CD103 expression on human colon carcinoma-specific CTL. Journal of immunology 2007;178(5):2908–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Le Floc’h A, Jalil A, Vergnon I, Le Maux Chansac B, Lazar V, Bismuth G, et al. Alpha E beta 7 integrin interaction with E-cadherin promotes antitumor CTL activity by triggering lytic granule polarization and exocytosis. J Exp Med 2007;204(3):559–70 doi 10.1084/jem.20061524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.French JJ, Cresswell J, Wong WK, Seymour K, Charnley RM, Kirby JA. T cell adhesion and cytolysis of pancreatic cancer cells: a role for E-cadherin in immunotherapy? British journal of cancer 2002;87(9):1034–41 doi 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Quinn E, Hawkins N, Yip YL, Suter C, Ward R. CD103+ intraepithelial lymphocytes--a unique population in microsatellite unstable sporadic colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 2003;39(4):469–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Shin H, Iwasaki A. A vaccine strategy that protects against genital herpes by establishing local memory T cells. Nature 2012;491(7424):463–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Iborra S, Martinez-Lopez M, Khouili SC, Enamorado M, Cueto FJ, Conde-Garrosa R, et al. Optimal Generation of Tissue-Resident but Not Circulating Memory T Cells during Viral Infection Requires Crosspriming by DNGR-1(+) Dendritic Cells. Immunity 2016;45(4):847–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.







